zbornik

2. 2009 : , 52 : : .

: 2. 2009 . : , . . , . . , . . , . . :. () . () . () . () . () . () . () . () . () . () . () . () . () . () . ( ) . () . () . a () . () . ()

:. , Mp , . , , , . . , . . . , . . . ,

: "Copy Centar", : 100

CIP , 656.1(082) 2009 (2 ; 2009 ; ) = Proceedings / II 2009, 20. 21. 2009. ; [ ] - : , 2009. - 411 . : . ; 25 - 100 ISBN 978-99955-36-18-3 COBISS.BH-ID 1276952

......................................................................................................................................................... - 8 ............... - 10 - ...................................................................................................................................... - 16 ............. - 24 -

........................................................................................................................................................ - 32 .............................................................................................. - 35 ROAD WEATHER INFORMATION SYSTEM -''RWIS'' ..................................................................................................................................... - 40 ESP ..................................................................................................................................... - 49 ......................................................................................................... - 54 ........................................................................................................ - 59 ........................... - 68 ................. - 72 .................................................................................................................... - 76 .................................................. - 82 ........................................................................................................... - 88 .............................................................................................................. - 95 ......................................................................................... - 100 ........................................................................... - 107 ................................ - 113 ........................................................................................................................... - 120 ............................................................................................................. - 124 ...................................................................... - 133 ...................................... - 143 ............................................................................................................................................... - 148 ............................................................................................................................. - 152 -

.................................................................................... - 159 2008. ............................................. - 163 -

............................................................................................................................................ - 170 ......... - 171 .................................................. - 175 ...... - 179 .................................................................................................................................................... - 183 ................................................................................................... - 189 ............ - 194 ............................................. - 201 .............................................. - 209 PRIJEDLOG METODOLOGIJE ODVAJAWA RA^UNA NA @EQEZNICAMA REPUBLIKE SRPSKE ............. - 215 PREDVI\AWE ORGANIZACIONIH PROMJENA NA @EQEZNICI ................................................................ - 220 ................. - 226 ............................................................................................. - 230 ..................................... - 234 ........................................................................ - 240 ....................................... - 245 -

.............................................................................................................................................. - 251 ................ - 253 ............................................................................................................................................. - 262 - ................................................................................................................................................................. - 268 ................................... - 273 ........................ - 280 CITY ................................................................................................................. - 282 -

................................................................................................................................... - 289 ............................................................................................................... - 285 .... - 288 .................................................................................................................................................................... - 293 -

............................................................................................................................... - 300 -

.............................................................................................. - 303 ..................................................................................................................... - 305 .......................................................................................................................... - 311 THE TRANSPORTATION PROBLEM IN RELATION TO THE TIME CRITERION WITH ADDITIONAL CONSTRAINTS ................................................................................................................................................................ - 316 -

...................................................................................................................... - 319 ...................................................................... - 321 .................................................. - 325 OPTOELEKTRONSKI TEMPERATURNO KOMPENZOVANI SENZORI U AUTOMOBILIMA ............................. - 329 ......................................... - 333 - ...... - 339 ............................................................................................................................................. - 346 W .................................................... - 352 ..................................................................................................................................................... - 357 PROBLEMS OF PACKAGES LOSS IN WIRELESSHART NETWORK ...................................................................... - 362 ........................... - 367 GSM-R ................................. - 372 -

.............................................................................................................................................. - 377 1998-2008. E ................................................................................................................... - 379 -..................................................................................................... - 384 - .................................. - 389 01.01. - 01.07.2008. 01.01 - 01.07.2009. .................................................................. - 395 ........................................................................................................................................- 403 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

TRAFFIC SAFETY SITUATION AND TENDENCIES IN SERBIA AND SELECTED COUNTRIES , , , - , , SEETO , . 1975. 2007. . . , , . bstract In the paper realize situation and tendencies of the public risk, traffic risk and dynamic traffic risk. Investigation is taken period of 32 years (1975-2007) with cosideration on comparative analyze of trends. All countries are classificated according to traffic safety situation and traffic safety trends. We are noticed directly relations between traffic safety sitution, especially traffic safety tendencies, and strength, stability i efficiency of the traffic safety system in some countries. , , : ( 100.000.000 . -), ( 100.000 ) ( 10.000 )

1. , . . , . . . , .

. , - , , , . . 1975. 2007. . 1975. 1995. 1995. 2007. . , .

2. , . . , . , .

- 10 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

3. 3.1. 3.1.1. 4,3 (, 2007.) 14,9 (, 2006.) ( 1.). : ( 5). , . , , , , . ( 9). , , , , . ( 14). , , , .

: (1) , (2) (3) . 3.2.1. . 1975. 1990. ( 1. )) ( 1. )), 1990. . 1975. ( 2.). , .

3.1.2. 0,6 (, 2007.) 3,5 (, 2007.) ( 2.). : ( 0,8). , , . , , , , . ( 1,4). , , , , . ( 2,0). , , , , .

1.

3.1.3. 0,5 (, 2007.) 2,1 (, 2006.) ( 3.). 0,6 0,9. 3.2. . . . - 11 -

1:

2:

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

. ( ) , ( ) ( ) . ( ) ( 3.).

5: . ( ) 1975. 1985 . ( ) 1985. 2007. ( 6.). 3: 3.2.2. . 1975. 2007. . (, .) 1990. , ( 4). 6: 3.2.3. . ( 7. 7.). . 4:. ( 5.).

) - 12 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

. , . . . (1975.) (2007.) . . , . . () , . , . . ( ) , . ( 1990. ) , . . . , , , .

) 7: () () 3.3. , , . 2007. 12,8., 5,7. . . . , (, ) . ( , ).

8: , 1980-2007.

5. . . ,

4. , , , , , , . .

- 13 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

. , . , .

6. [1] Benchmarking Road Safety, THE 1999 REPORT The Australian Transport Safety Bureau Commonwealth of Australia, 2002. [2] International Road Safety Comparisons: The 2007 Report Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Local Government, July 2009.1998 9,4 12,1 14,7 9,7 13,2 9,4 7,8 15,2 9,5 6 20,7 13,5 9,9 12,4 11,9 8,5 13,4 6,8 13,2 9,5 8 18,3 22,4 15,2 15,6 22,5 15,1 6 8,4 15,4 1999 9,3 13,5 13,7 9,7 14,1 9,7 8,4 14,4 9,5 6 20,1 12,9 7,6 11 11,6 8,2 13,5 6,9 13,4 8,3 6,8 17,4 21 12 16,9 23,1 14,5 6,6 8,2 15,3 2000 9,5 12,2 14,4 9,5 14,5 9,3 7,7 13,6 9,1 6 18,7 11,9 11,5 11 12,2 8,2 17,5 6,8 12,1 10,2 7,6 16,3 18,1 11,6 15,8 21,8 14,5 6,7 8,3 15,2 2001 8,9 11,9 14,5 8,9 13 8,1 8,4 13,8 8,5 6 17,2 12,1 8,5 10,7 12,3 7,9 15,9 6,2 11,8 8,8 6,1 14,3 16,2 11,4 13,9 17,1 13,8 6,2 7,6 14,8 2002 8,7 11,8 13,1 9,3 14 8,6 8 12,9 8,3 6 14,9 14 10,1 9,6 12,2 7,5 14 6,1 10,3 8,8 6,9 15,2 16,1 11,3 13,5 15,2 12,9 6 7,1 14,9 2003 8,1 11,5 11,7 8,7 14,2 8 7,3 10,2 8 6,1 14,6 13,1 8 8,4 11,4 7 11,8 6,3 11,5 8,8 6,2 14,8 14,8 12 12,1 15,1 12,8 5,9 7,5 14,7 2004 7,9 10,7 11,2 8,5 13,5 6,8 7,2 9,3 7,1 5,5 15,1 12,8 7,9 8,8 10,6 6,7 11 4,9 10,7 8,6 5,6 15 12,3 11,2 13,7 13,7 11 5,3 6,9 14,6 2005 8 9,3 10,4 9,1 12,6 6,1 7,2 8,8 6,5 5,5 15 12,7 6,5 9,7 10 6,2 10,2 4,6 9,9 7,8 4,8 14,3 11,8 10,4 12,9 13,2 10,2 4,9 5,5 14,7 2006 7,7 8,8 10,2 9,1 10,4 5,6 6,4 7,7 6,2 5,4 14,9 12,9 10,3 8,6 9,6 5,7 7,7 4,5 9,5 7,2 5,2 13,8 9,2 10,7 13,1 13,1 9,3 4,9 5 14,2 2007 7,6 8,3 10,1 11,9 7,4 7,2 7,5 6 5 12,2 4,9 7,8 8,7 5,2 9 4,3 10 6,4 5 14,6 9,2 11,6 14,6 12,7 8,6 5,2 5,1 13,6

. .

1975 26,6 33,4 24,0 26,7 16,3 16,4 19,4 27,3 22,0 11,9 13,8 16,0 18,4 18,6 12,5 17,1 20,3 13,5 16,5 39,5

1980 22,3 26,5 24,3 22,7 12,2 13,5 11,5 25,4 19,3 11,1 15,0 15,2 11,0 16,6 16,4 9,7 27,0 14,2 18,9 8,9 16,8 31,5

1985 18,6 20,1 18,3 17,3 9,6 15,1 11,1 20,7 13,0 9,4 20,2 16,5 10,0 11,6 13,5 9,9 21,6 9,9 22,7 9,7 12,6 25,2

12,6 16,6 14,3 19,0 20,7

17,2 17,6 10,2 19,2 22,5

21,4 16,6 9,7 13,6 18,4

1990 13,7 20,3 19,9 14,9 12,5 12,3 13 19,8 14 9,4 20,2 23,4 9,4 13,6 12,4 11,8 18,8 9,2 21,4 11,6 7,8 19,2 28,2 25,9 33,1 23,2 9,1 13,9 17,9

1995 11,2 15,2 14,3 11,4 15,4 11,2 8,6 15,3 11,6 6,4 23,1 15,5 9 12,1 12,3 10,1 17 8,6 15,9 8,7 7 17,9 25,2 12,3 20,9 26,3 14,7 6,5 9,9 15,9

1996 10,8 12,9 13,4 10,4 15,2 9,8 7,9 14,7 10,7 6,4 20,6 13,4 3,7 12,5 11,7 9,3 17,2 7,6 13,8 8,5 5,8 16,5 25,4 11,5 19,5 32 14 6,1 8,7 15,9

1997 9,5 13,9 13,4 10,2 15,5 9,3 8,5 14,4 10,4 6,4 20 13,7 5,6 12,9 11,7 8,9 14,4 7,5 14,4 8,6 6,9 18,9 23,4 14,6 18 29 14,3 6,1 8,3 15,7

1. ( 100.000 ), 1975-2007.

- 14 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

. .

1975 5,8 11,6 7,5 5,3 5,0 7,2 8,1 7,2 3,9 17,0 12,6 8,6 6,0 4,3 11,7 6,3 4,3 14,4 26,1 238,8 9,0 3,8 5,8 3,2

1980 4,3 7,2 6,4 4,0 4,8 3,7 4,0 6,3 4,9 3,4 10,6 9,0 2,8 6,2 4,7 2,7 6,4 4,3 3,5 2,4 10,9 15,2 95,4 6,4 2,5 4,5 3,2

1985 3,2 4,8 4,5 3,0 3,4 4,1 3,1 4,6 2,9 2,5 9,9 9,0 2,1 4,5 3,1 2,4 4,0 2,8 3,9 2,2 6,6 9,2 54,5 5,4 2,2 2,7 2,6

1990 2,3 4,2 4,3 2,3 4 3,1 2,9 4,2 2,6 2,1 7,4 11,2 1,7 4,5 2,3 2,4 3,3 2,3 3,3 3,6 1,5 8,1 12,1 6,9 28,9 5,8 1,8 2,4 2,4

1995 1,8 2,7 2,8 2 4,2 2,7 2 3,1 2 1,4 6,7 6 1,8 3,5 1,9 1,8 2,5 2 2,5 2,4 1,3 6,2 6,9 4,5 5,1 10,8 3,1 1,3 1,7 2,1

1996 1,7 2,3 2,6 1,8 4 2,3 1,8 3 1,8 1,4 5,7 5 0,7 3,4 1,8 1,6 2,5 1,7 2,2 2,2 1,1 5,4 6,5 4 4,6 11,8 2,8 1,2 1,5 2,1

1997 1,5 2,4 2,6 1,7 3,9 2,2 1,9 2,9 1,7 1,3 5,2 5 1,1 3,3 1,8 1,5 2,1 1,7 2,3 2,1 1,3 5,9 5,6 5,1 4 9,9 2,8 1,2 1,4 2,1

1998 1,5 2 2,8 1,6 3,1 2,1 1,7 2,7 1,6 1,2 5 4,9 1,8 3 1,8 1,4 1,9 1,5 2,1 2,3 1,4 5,6 5,1 5,2 3,3 7,1 2,8 1,2 1,4 2

1999 1,4 2,2 2,5 1,7 3,3 2,2 1,8 2,5 1,5 1,2 4,5 4,9 1,3 2,6 1,7 1,3 1,9 1,5 2 2 1,2 5,1 4,4 4,2 3,4 7,2 2,6 1,3 1,3 2

2000 1,4 1,9 2,6 1,6 3,4 2,1 1,6 2,4 1,5 1,2 4 4,4 1,8 2,5 1,8 1,3 2,4 1,4 1,8 2,3 1,3 4,5 3,9 4,1 3,1 6,9 2,5 1,2 1,3 1,9

2001 1,4 1,8 2,5 1,5 3,1 1,8 1,7 2,3 1,3 1,2 3,5 4,4 1,3 2,3 1,7 1,3 2,1 1,2 1,7 1,9 1 3,8 3,4 3,9 2,7 5,1 2,3 1,1 1,2 1,9

2002 1,3 1,8 2,3 1,6 3,3 1,9 1,6 2,1 1,3 1,1 2,9 4,8 1,5 2 1,7 1,2 1,8 1,2 1,5 1,9 1,1 3,8 3,3 3,3 2,6 4,4 2,1 1,1 1,1 1,9

2003 1,2 1,8 2 1,5 3,2 1,7 1,4 1,7 1,2 1,1 2,7 4,2 1,1 1,7 1,5 1,1 1,5 1,2 1,6 1,8 1 3,5 3 2,3 4,1 2,1 1,1 1,1 1,9

2004 1,2 1,7 1,9 1,4 3 1,5 1,4 1,5 1,1 1 2,6 3,9 1,1 1,8 1,4 1 1,4 0,9 1,5 1,7 0,9 3,4 2,4 2,5 3,6 1,8 0,9 1 1,8

2005 1,2 1,5 1,8 1,5 2,7 1,3 1,3 1,4 1 1 2,5 3,8 0,9 1,9 1 1,3 0,9 1,3 1,5 0,8 3,2 2,3 2,2 3,4 1,6 0,9 0,8 1,8

2006 1,1 1,4 1,7 1,5 2,1 1,2 1,1 1,3 0,9 1 2,4 3,8 1,3 1,6 0,9 1 0,8 1,3 1,3 0,8 2,9 2,3 3,3 1,4 0,9 0,7 1,7

2007 1,1 1,3 1,7 2,3 1,5 1,2 1,2 0,9 0,9 3,5 0,6 1,4 0,8 1,1 0,8 1,3 1,1 0,7 2,9 3,2 0,9 0,7 -

2. ( 10.000 ), 1975-2007.1975 3,6 8,3 6,2 3,1 3,7 5,9 4,9 3,5 2,7 3,6 2,1 1980 3,2 5,6 5,0 5,9 2,5 2,1 4,4 3,7 2,1 2,8 2,9 2,7 1,9 1,6 3,1 2,1 1985 2,1 3,8 3,4 4,5 2,6 1,7 3,3 2,4 1,8 2,8 1,8 1,7 1,5 2,0 1990 2,8 2,8 4,8 1,7 1,6 2,6 2 1,3 1,4 1,9 2,3 1,4 1,2 6,6 6,5 1,2 1,9 1,3 1995 1,2 1,9 1,8 4,7 1,4 1 1,9 1,5 0,8 3,5 1,3 1,4 1,8 1,2 1 1 6,1 4,4 0,9 1,3 1,1 1996 1,5 1,7 4,5 1,2 1 1,8 1,4 0,8 3 0,5 1,3 1,6 1,1 0,8 1 3,8 0,8 1,2 1,1 1997 1,6 1,6 4,4 1,1 1 1,7 1,3 0,8 2,7 0,8 1,5 1 1 1 3,3 0,8 1,1 1 1998 1 1,4 1,7 3,5 1,1 0,9 1,8 1,2 0,7 2,7 1,4 1,4 0,9 1,1 1 2,8 0,8 1,1 1 1999 1 1,5 1,6 3,6 1,1 0,9 1,6 1,2 0,7 1 1,4 0,9 1 2,9 0,8 1 1 2000 1 1,3 1,6 0,9 3,7 1,1 0,8 1,5 1,1 0,7 1,6 1,3 0,9 1,2 1 4,7 2,7 4,9 0,8 1 0,9 2001 0,9 1,3 1,6 0,9 3,2 0,9 0,9 1,5 1 0,7 1,1 1,3 0,8 1,3 0,8 2,3 3,3 0,8 0,9 0,9 2002 0,9 1,2 1,5 0,9 3,3 1 0,9 1,4 1 0,7 1,2 0,8 1,1 0,9 2,2 2,8 0,7 0,9 0,9 2003 0,8 1,2 1,3 0,9 3,2 0,8 1,1 1 0,7 1,1 0,8 1,2 0,8 1,7 2,6 0,7 0,9 0,9 2004 0,8 1,1 1,2 0,9 2,9 0,8 0,7 1 0,8 0,6 1,1 1,1 0,7 1,8 2,3 0,6 0,8 0,9 2005 0,8 0,9 1,1 0,9 2,6 0,7 1 0,8 0,6 1 1 0,6 1,7 1,8 0,6 0,7 0,9 2006 0,8 0,9 1,1 0,9 2,1 0,6 0,6 0,8 0,7 0,6 1,1 1 1 0,7 1,6 1,9 0,6 0,6 0,9 2007 0,7 1,1 0,8 0,7 0,8 0,7 0,6 0,5 0,9 1 0,6 0,6 0,6 0,8

. .

3. ( 100.000 . -), 1975-2007.- 15 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

- ADVANTAGES OF APPLICATION COMBINED TRAM-TROLLEY VEHICLE FOR PUBLIC TRANSPORT , , , , . , , . . . , . bstract Public group transportation of passengers is certainly the future of transportation. Not only because the car will be less and less space, but also because the modern public transport already planning, designing and organizing according to the future expected quality of transport services by the user. One of the examples of such a subsystem of public transport is using of combined tram-trolley vehicles. This vehicle is the sum of the benefits of a successful tram and trolley vehicles on today's level of technique. Application of this subsystem contributes to better quality services and secure transport and increased safety of passengers during their transport in these vehicles. . , , , , , , , . . - , . . . , , , . : ( , )

1. , , , , , , , . , , , , . .

2. , , , , . . , . ,

- 16 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

1 . , : ( , ); ( , ); , ;

4. 5.

(. / ); .

2 , . . . . , . : ; ; ; ;

, , , . , , : , . , . ( ), ( ) -. , : 1.

, . . , - - ( , , ). , , . - , - .

(. ); (. ); (. );

3. 270 , . 1. .

2. 3.

1

.

2

, .

- 17 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

? ( 2.). ? , , . , , , , 3 .

, , , , , , , , . , .

3. , 2009 1. ,

4. , 2009 . , - .

2.

3.1 ( 3. 4.) . .3

4. - ( 5.),

, .

- 18 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

, :

, ( 8.).

5. 2,2 [m] , R = 10 [m] R = 11,92 [m], , R = 8,62 [m]. , 2,2 , 3,3 . , 20 , , , , 6.

7.

8. , 3-5 [cm]. , , . . 9. . 75 [kg]. 900 , ( 10.). ,

6. . 25 [cm] 2,89 [m], 2,2 [m] ( 7.) . , . , ,

- 19 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

, . , , , .

11. , , ( 12.). .

9. .

10. ( 11.). . , .

12. . , , . , ( 13.). 46 [m] 255 ( ) 358 ( ) , . 25 [cm].

- 20 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

13. 13% , ( 14.). .

14. 25cm , , , - ( 15.).

15. . . ( 16.). , , , . , . 16. - 21 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

5. . , 30- , . , , , . , . .

, . , - , , . , , , 30.000 . ( 17.) , , . ( ) .

17. . - 22 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

6. , , , . , , v = 70 [km/h] . 3 , .

, 1990, , . [3] 2009 : , , http://ec.europa.eu [4] UNECE , WP.29 , http://www.unece.org [5] . . : - , 2005, , . [6] .: , 2008, , . [7] .: , 1995, , . [8] .: , 1989, , . [9] http://www.gsp.rs/ ,

7. [1] Company Translohr : Section 1. L-autre tramway dossier technique, Section 2. The other tramway wipost Translohr with out catenary, Section 3. The other tramway, Section 4. Clermont-Ferrand: UN + tram nouvelle generation, Section 5. The other tramway Technical file, 2007, Clermont-Ferrand. [2] . : , , ,

- 23 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

MODERN METHODS FOR CAPACITY AND LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS ON TWOLANE ROADS. . , , , , . . , , , , , . , . . . : HCM 2000., HBS 2001. , . , , . HCM- 2000., HBS 2001. , 1-20 . . bstract The main goal, of this paper is to show methods for capacity and level of service analysis on two lane roads and find the most appropriate method for our road conditions. The first chapter presents a brief description of the road network in Serbia, and road conditions that affects capacity and level of service. Methods for analysis that were used in this paper are: HCM 2001, HBS 2000. and Novoklasican method. The second chapter presents the basic definitions, steps and algorithms for each of the above methods. Third chapter presents the results of the analysis of specific examples, using all of the above methods. There are 20 groups of specific examples, and every group has one or more factors that represent specific road and traffic conditions. . F. : , s () , ( ).

1. , , , . , . , . , , . . .

: HCM 2000., HBS 2001. , .

- 24 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

, , , , .

, , , , , Vsl, , , FVS ( ), , ,

2. 2.1. HCM 20001

, HCM 1994, , : I , . . , , . II , ( ). , , , .

NU HCM 2000. 1.

: . . , 3(s) . : . I , , . II , , , . , : ,

1. HCM 2000. I II , 1. 2., , mer , , .% 35 > 35-50 > 50-65 > 65-80 > 80 (/) > 90 > 80-90 > 70-80 > 60-70 60

NU B C D

1

Highway Capacity Manual , Transportation Research Board, National - 25 -

Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000

1. NU I

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

NU B C D

% 40 > 40 - 55 > 55 - 70 > 70 - 85 > 85

, . (/), . [/] 5 12 20 30 40

NU B C D F

2. NU II HCM-2000 1700 PA/h . , , 3200 PA/h . 3200 3400 PA/h .

> 40

3. (q V ) . . q V . q V , : .

2.2. HBS 2001

2

mer qmer. mer . - . , , , , . . . 300 m. : , (UN > 2%) , , , , , q-V , , RQ 10.5 RQ 9.5, RAS-Q, 1996, AI, AII AIII, . ,

, .

2.3. . , , , /. 2.

2

Handbuch fur die Bemessung von Straenverkehrsanlagen HBS 2001", Forschungsgeselshaft fur Straen und Verkehrswesen, Koln, 2001 - 26 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

HCM 2000. - -

HBS 2001.

-

4. NU 2. . , . 2 . : , , .

3. HCM- 2000., HBS 2001. 1-20 (>10) ). . , , . : , mer mer . , . . / , . , , . ( ). ( 3. 4.)

( ).

2.4. 4. , . .

- 27 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009. 2500

2500

2000

2000

Kapacitet (voz/h)

1500

Kapacitet (voz/h) Grupa III Grupa IVHBS 2001.

1500

1000

1000

500

500

0

0

Grupa VI

Grupa VIII

Grupa X

Grupa XI

Grupa XIIIHBS 2001

Grupa XIV

Grupa XV

Novoklasini postupak


3. , HBS 2001. 2500

5. , HBS 2001. 2500

2000

2000

Kapacitet (voz/h)

Kapacitet (voz/h) Grupa I Grupa IIHBS 2001

1500

1500

1000

1000

500

500

0

0

Grupa V

Grupa VII

Grupa IX

Grupa XII

Grupa XVI

Grupa XVII Grupa XVIII Grupa XIX Novoklasini postupak

Grupa XX


HBS 2001

4. , HBS 2001. I II , 5. NU HCM 2000. . I . II . III . IV . V . VI . VII . VIII . IX . X B B I HBS 2001. B B B B B B C C D C B B B B B C B C C C HCM 2000. C C XX HBS 2001. C C C D D D F F

6. HBS 2001. I II , 6. NU I HBS HCM 2001. 2000. B B B B B B C D D D B B B B D D D D F F F F F F XX HBS 2001.

HCM 2000. . XI . XII . XIII . XIV . XV . XVI . XVII . XVIII . XIX . XX

FF F

C CD D D D F F F F

D F F F F F F

D D D

D D D

FD F

5. XX HCM 2000, HBS 2001. . : , , . ( 5. 6.).

6. I XX HCM 2000, HBS 2001. ( mer , ) (711).

- 28 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

.HBS 2001.

4. . 86.82% , . : HCM 2000, HBS 2001. . . , , . HCM 2000. , . . s . HBS 2001. , , . . , HBS . , . . HBS . HCM-2000 () . HBS 2001. 24% . 57% ( 7% - 47%), 40% . . .

110.0% Kapacite (%) 100.0% 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Procenat komercijalnih vozila Ravniarski Brdovit Planinski

7. HBS 2001. mer Novoklasini postupak102.0% Kapacitet (%) 100.0% 98.0% 96.0% 94.0% 92.0% 90.0% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Procenat komercijalnih vozila Ravniarski Brdovit Planinski

8. mer HCM 2000.110.0% Prosena brzina putovanja (%) 100.0% 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% 3 6 9 12 18 24 Gustina pristupnih taaka (taaka/km) Ravniarski Brdovit Planinski

9. HBS 2001.110.0% Kapacite (%) 100.0% 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% 50.0% 20% 40% 60% Procenat zona bez preticanja Ravniarski Brdovit Planinski 80% 100%

10. HBS 2001. HCM 2000.130.0% 120.0% 110.0% 100.0% 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Procenat zona bez preticanja Ravniarski Brdovit Planinski Procenat vremenskih zastoja (%)

11.

- 29 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

/ , . , .

[5] , ., , ., " ", 2006. [6] , ., , ., "General analysis of transportation demand and supply on primary state rural roads network in th Republic of Serbia", International Journal Transport&Logistics, Number 9, December 2005., BERG Faculty TU Koice, Slovakia. page 36-51. [7] ., , ., ., . TES-2008, 2008., , , 2008.. [8] , ., " (HCM 2000 HBS 2001) ", 2006, ,11-13.05.2006. [9] , ., " (HCM 2000) ", 2004, , [10] , ., , ., , . Contribution to Basic Parameters of the Traffic Flow on Two-lane Highways in the Function of Directional Split of Traffic Flow of Passenger Cars, Third International Symposium on Highway Capacity, TRB and the Road Directorate of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark, June 22-27,1998., Procedings page. 661-670,

5. [1] " ", : 15015., , , , 2008- 2010. [2] "Highway Capacity Manual" HCM 2000, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000. [3] FGSV "Handbuch fur die Bemessung von Straenverkehrsanlagen HBS 2001", Forschungsgeselshaft fur Straen und Verkehrswesen, Koln, 2001. [4] , ., " ", , , 2000.

- 30 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

VEHICLE DYNAMICS CONTROL. , . , , . . . . . bstract Automobiles have played a dominant role in transportation since the onset of their mass production. Everywhere on earth, people come into contact with these vehicles, often on a daily basis. Typically, a car or a truck is one of the most complex and sophisticated products of the Industrial revolution that individuals encounter and with which they must interact. Although many people have an intuitive understanding of automobile dynamics, relatively few are able to describe, in any quantitative way. The goal of this paper is describe how vehicle dynamic control work and describe some technical solution.

1. , . . [6]. . . . . () . . . 1 [2]. 1. . 1. , , . . , . 2. . , . . .

- 35 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

3. . 2. . Gxy . . . [4, 5]. Ek = 1 1 2 2 m(vx + v y ) + J z z2 2 2

2. : . ; XY.

(3)

. . XY 3 : X Y . mX = FX mY = FY J z = M z ,

m , vx i v y Gx Gy Gxy, , z . .

d E k E k = Qi , dt q i q i

(4)

(1)

FX i FY X i Y M Z . XY xy FX cos ( ) sin ( ) Fx = FY sin ( ) cos ( ) Fy

qi , qi Qi . q = [X Y ] i q = X Y T T

(5) (6)

= vx v y z

T

(2)

, , .

, (4) .

- 36 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

T T A Ek Ek T + A A A q t Ek T T A = A F, q

(7)

cos ( ) sin ( ) A= sin ( ) cos ( ) T

,

F = [ FX FY M z ] .

. : , ( ), , .

(7) m ( vx z v y ) = Fx J z z = M z , m ( v y + z vx ) = Fy

(8)

(8) , . (8) . m ( v y + z v ) = Fy J z z = M z ,

(9)

4. . . . . . .

z

mV + z + m V = Fy J z z = M z .

(

)

(10)

3. (SBC Cencotronic Brake Control) -. (CPU)

5. . - 37 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

:

- 90 km h .

; ; 6 /; (ACC Adaptive Cruise Control).

. . 5. . . 1. . y1 y2. 3. 3 1 2. 150 . 3 ( 150 ) 1 . : y6, y8, y10 y12 : y7, y9, y11 y13 . 3, 4, 5 6 . y3 y4 . (ESP). . . y1 y2 6. y1 y2 . . , . 6. .

4. . . . , , . .

5. [1] Schiehlen W.., Dynamical Analysis of Vehicle Systems, 2008, Springer, New York. [2] D Karnopp D., Vehicle Stability, 2004, Marcel Dekker Inc, Davis. [3] Reza N. Jazar. Vehicle Dynamics: Theory and Application, 2008, Springer, New York. [4] Meirovitch L., Methods of Analytical Dynamics, 1970., Mc Graw-Hill, New York. [5] Genta G., Morello M., The Automotive chassis, 2008, , Springer, New York. [6] ., ., A., , 2000, , .

- 38 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

[7] Hac A., Simpson M., Estimation of vehicle side slip angle and yaw rate, 2000, SAE 2000 World Congr., Detroit, Paper SAE 2000010696.

[8] Internet sources: http://www.mercedestechstore.com/pdfs/327_traction_a nd_braking/327%20HO%2009%20SBC%20(WJB)%20 03-05-04.pdf and its domain: www.mercedestechstore.com

- 39 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

ROAD WEATHER INFORMATION SYSTEM -''RWIS'' ROAD WEATHER INFORMATION SYSTEM -''RWIS'' AND ITS ROLE IN TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT , , , , , . . Inteligent Transport System- (IT ) Road Weather Information System (RWI ). Road Weather Information System, - , . Abstract Modern traffic management systems are composed of series of information which are linked to the transport and management components, thus making the system in whole more efficient, safer, and ecologically acceptable. The characteristics of successful traffic management system are comprehensive, adequate and real time information linked to the road infrastructure. One of those subsystems of Inteligent Transport System (IT system) is Road Weather Information System (RWI system). This paper presents Road Weather Information System in general, as innovation in the traffic and civil engineering practice in the Republic of Srpska, and elaborates the possibilities and expences of introduction of such system on the Republic of Srpska's roads. . RWI , , . (PC), - , - , . RWI , . . , , RWI IT . , RWI , ,

1. , , . . Inteligent Transport System- (IT ) Road Weather Information System (RWI ). RWI IT . . , . Road Weather Information System (RWI ) , RWI , , , - ,

- 40 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

.

2. ROAD WEATHER INFORMATION SYSTEM RWI 1997. (IT ) . , RWI .

2: . , , p - , .

1: RWI . RWI , , , . , , . , ( 1).

A) RWI , , . , RWI - , - -, . 3: / . , , , - . . , , , . , ,

I)

- , , ( 2).

- 41 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

. , - , . 3 - .

, , . , , UMTS (3G), , WLAN, 5.9 GHz DSRC (Dedicated Short Range Communications).

II) - - IT , , RWI . - (, , , .) , ( ) , RWI , .

IV) - - . , , , . . - . , . - . , - . . , - , , ,

III) RWI . , , , . . , - . , RWI . . , , . , , , . .

- 42 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

. , - . , . , , - ''real-time'' . - , , . - , , , 30 50 . . , , , ( ). - - . , , . , .

.

, . , - . . - . (www) , . (Variable Message Sign - VMS), (Radio Data System Traffic Message Channel), GSM/GPS - ( 4).

4: .

) . , - , , . , - , .

V) ROAD WEATHER INFORMATION SYSTEM ''RWIS'' , RWI , , . . , ,

- 43 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

, , .

- , .

) (VARIABLE MESSAGE SIGN) (Variable Message Sign) , , . 60. . , , . , . , , , . . , . (Fiber Optics), , (LED) (LCD). , , - , , . , , ( -10), . , , . , , , ,

) RADIO DATA SYSTEM TRAFFIC MESSAGE CHANNELRadio Data System Traffic Message Channel . . Radio Data System Traffic Message Channel , . RDS TMC . . Radio Data System Traffic Message Channel , , . Traffic Message Channel , , . Traffic Message Channel , . , , .

) GSM/GPS '''' . . , . , ,

- 44 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

, '''' , RWI . - GSM GPS .

3. ROAD WEATHER INFORMATION SYSTEM , , , IT , RWI IT . , , , IT RWI . , IT RWI , , .

). - . 12 19 . (), 21 23 . (), 0.2 -0.9 . 41, -30 , 71 . 1.050 /2 750 /2 . 1.900 . , . , , . (. , , . ). , , , , . 5 7 , - 2.5 -3 . -30 , 35 . - , . 1.200 /2. 1.850 . . - 10 , 700 1.000 /2. , , . . . 2.400 . 14 14.7 . 41 , -8 . 1.500 2.000 /, , , . . , , . , ,

) , , , , . 328 , 1.764,358 2.094,826 .

) RWIS RWI , .

I)

, . , - , - , - . (. , ,

- 45 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

, . . , -30 , , . , , . , , , , , ( ).

, - , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 12.000 . - , - , , PGDS- 500 7.000 . , , PGDS- 2.000 . , , , 70% 90%. , . RWI , , , .

II) , , . 15. 15. , , , . , , 16.000 60.000 . , ( 130 , 90 , 130 , 40 80 ). (, , , .) .

) RWIS - , , , , IT , .

III) (PGDS), -2005. , , , . , . , ( , , , , ), .

I)

RWI

- 5.

- 46 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

II) W , RWI . RWI , , - , - ( ), - - , - , - , - , , , , RDS - TMC , GMS/GPS . , 50 , RWI 3.0 .

5: RWIS . RWI , , . 10 - 10 - . , RWI , , . 15 10 - . , , - , . 1 - 3 .

4. RWI . , , . , , , , . - RWI . , (ESA) , , 600.000

- 47 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

RWI . , , 75% , , 45%. RWI .

[3] Mills B., Audrey J.; Driving under the influence of weather-a Canadian case study of relative risk; Fifth international Conference on urban climate; 2003, Lodz, Poland. [4] Mills B., Audrey J., Vandermolen J.; Weather information and road safety; The Institute for catastrophic loss reduction; 2001, Toronto, Canada. [5] Lhesmaa J., Schirokoff A., Pilli Sihvola Y.; Transport telematics-E18 Test area; Finnish National Road Administration Reports 40/1999; 1999, Helsinki, Finland. [6] Federal Ministry of Transport, Building and Housing; Transport telematics-Development and success stories in Germany; 2004, Berlin, Germany. [7] Elvik R, Vaa T.; The Handbook of road safety measures, Elsevier; 2004, Oxford, United Kingdom. [8] JP ''Putevi RS'', Brojanje vozila na mrei puteva u Republici Srpskoj-2005. godina; 2006; Banja Luka, Republika Srpska, Bosna i Hercegovina. [9] www.meteo-rs.com. [10] www.putevirs.com

5. [1] Lo A., Peters B.; Alberta RWIS deployment-an innovative way to outsource RWIS contract; Annual conference of the Transportation Association of Canada; 2005, Calgary, Canada. [2] Axelson L.; Development and use of Swedish road weather information system; Swedish Road Administration Reports; 2003, Borlnge, Sweden.

- 48 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

ESP INTELLIGENT TRANSPORT SYSTEM ESP AND ITS ROLE IN TRAFFIC SAFETY , , , . , , , , , , . (ITS). ITS- , , (Electronic Stability Control- ESP), . ESP- , , , : ITS, ESP, , , bstract In the last twenty years traffic density and number of vehicles on roads in general, has drastically increased. However, number of accidents is decreasing. Usage of intelligent transport systems (ITS) is very important factor that contributes such fact. This paper shows chronological overview of certain ITSs, their role in traffic safety with the emphasis on electronic stability application (Electronic Stability Program - ESP) i.e. its elementary parts, way of functioning, implementation, efficiency Key words: ITS, ESP,handling vehicles, stability, safety (ATIS) (ABCS) (CVO) (APTS) (ARTS)

1. , , . , :

1.

. . ITS (Intelligent Transportation System) , , . , ITS . ITS , : (ATMS)

1. ITS - (ESP),

- 49 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

. ESP , , .

ESP- .

2. j "" . , , . , , . , -. . , , "" , , , . , , . (ESP, VSA, DSC, VDC..., ), .

ESP a ( )

2. ESP . . , , , . ( 3)

3. ESP ESP- ( ) , , , - - (Understeer Oversteer), ABS TCS (Traction Control System) . ESP , . ABS, TCS, ECU ESP , BA (Brake Assist) EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution) . ECU (Electronic Control Unit) , /. ESP ,

3. ESP . , , ECU , , . ECU-, . , , ! ECU- , ABS-.

- 50 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

. , , !

4. ESP- ESP . ( 4.), , .

( 5.), , "" . ESP , , . , . , .

5. ESP- . 4. ESP- . . , , , . , , . S . 6. ESP . ESP , .

6. S- ESP- ESP- .

- 51 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

ESP , . , .

Mercedes Benz-, ESP- 42%, , Toyota ESP- 50%. ESP 2008. -. . . , ESP 34%, 71%. ABS , - . 40% ESP . , 71% ESP-, , 2012. ESP , 2014. .

5. ESP- ESP- . ( 1997. 2007). , 35% ESP-. ( 7.) (Insurance Institute for Highway Safety), SUV- (Sport Utility Vehicle) ESP- ESP- , . 7 , FARS (Fatality Analysis Reporting System).

6. . , . , , , . , - . , , . ITS- . , , , . ITS- , , . ITS- , , ESP .

7. SUV ESP- ESP- .

- 52 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

7. [1] Linder, A., Kircher, A. i A. Vadeby: Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) in passenger cars and methods for assessment of traffic safety impact, , (Linkping), 2007. [2] ., , , , 2008. [3] ., , , , 2007. [4] http://www.automobilizam.net [5] http://www.mojauto.rs [4] http://www.safercar.com

- 53 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

TRAINING DRIVERS IN TRAFFIC , ... . : , . , : (), , , -, . , , , , , . bstract In the work discussed the issue of training and training of drivers and given the proposed model of training that should help all participants in traffic. Each participant traffic should included dude this program in the first phase consists of three basic components: theoretical training, ethical conduct and practical training. In the second phase of training the participants in traffic would be required to attend meetings where they predicted the participants were representatives of various institutions: the Ministry of Interior (MoI), Ministry of Infrastructure, Transport and Traffic School representatives, auto-schools, schools for elementary and secondary education. Because the bus drivers, as proposed by this model, should be thoroughly familiar with the peculiarities of each kategrije participants in traffic - would have to know how to drive a bicycle, to acquire the part of theoretical and practical training for drivers of bicycles, and such training and any other transportation in the traffic, because Savak of funds in traffic has its own special characteristics and derive from it and various ways of behavior in traffic. . , . : . , , , . . , . , , , , , , .

1. . . . ( ) . , . . , . , , . . .

- 54 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

2. , (, , , ). , , , . . (, , ...). ( ) , . ( ), . . , , . . , . , . , . . ( , ) , . , . , , , , , . , . .

, .

3. . .

4. . [1] , , , , , . - ? . , . , , . [4] . , , - . . , . . - , , . . - [5] - . - ( ), .

- 55 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

, . . - - . . : , , , , , . [6] 5 60.000 . 882 (900 ) [2], 16.708 . 2 100.000 , 5 10.000 , . , , , . 2007. - ( 2-3 *): : 7 498 001 : 2 235 389 : 16 585

. , , , , , , . [7] 370 , 48 2008. [8], , . , , , , . , " , ", , " ", " " . . [9] . . [10] , . : ? [3] , . ,

: 22 201 : 962 (* - ). , . , . 2007. . . 2007. 2010.,

5. , . . . , .

- 56 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

, . - , . - , . . , -, . . - , , . . , , . , . , .Javnost Sud-

, , , . , . , . . , , . . . , . . . . - .

Zdravstvo

Saobraajni fakultet Osnovna i srednja skola

Peak

Teorijska obuka

Lepo ponaanje

Praktina obuka

MUP i Ministarstvo za infrastrukturuVoza bicikla Teorijska obuka Lepo ponaanje Praktina obuka

DISKUSIJE-SKUPOVI

Voza motocikla

Teorijska obuka

Lepo ponaanje

Praktina obuka

Vozai koji su ranije stekli vozaku dozvolu

Auto-kole

Voza autobusa

Teorijska obuka

Lepo ponaanje

Praktina obuka

Preduzee za puteve

ELEKTRONSKA BAZA PODATAKA

1: . [1] - 57 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

. . , . , , . - , . .

-.

7. [1] ., , , , 2004. [2] ., , , 2008.,

[3] . ., , , .46, 2009. [4] www.informator.co.rs [5] www.bihamk.ba [6] www.putevi-srbije.rs [7] www.sah.nadlanu.com [8] www.naslovi.net [9] www.durmitorcg.com [10] www.borba.rs

6. , , . , . , , .

- 58 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

, - , , , , - , . () . : , , , , , . : , ( ) , , , ( , , , ), ( ) . , ( ), ( , , , ), ( , , , ), (, , ), . : , , , , , , , . -. - . . 20% 40%2, . . , , . . , : (, ), (2 1

1. -. , : ( ), ( , , , , ) ( , .). - , 1. , .: , , , 2008.

Legal measures and enforcement. Gadget, WP 5, Project funded by EC under the transport, RTD programme of 4th framework programme, 1999.

- 59 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

) ( - ). . , , . - ( , 53/82 ...) (IX 3) 3

(X 4). , , , . '' , , ''5, . , , . , . ( ) , . - . 174. . 175. , . .4

171.

, ( : ), . 1. , . 172. ; ; ; (- , , - , ); ; ; , , , , , , ; , ; . 173. . : , , , , - , .

176.

- . . 2. 50% , , 50% . 3. : 1. , 2. , 3. 4. ( , " " .). 3. , - . 5. . 177. 176. 4. , .

( , 53/82 ...), . 171, 2.

5

- 60 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

- ( 50% 6), '''' . . , , , , ( ) . , 3. : 7 ( ), , . . , , -, , .

, . . , , . : , , , , , , , . , . . , , . , , , . , , , . , . . , , . , , . , , . 8 : '' , , , , (, .), , .'') , , .''. (. 8, )

2. 8, 1, -, ( ). , : , , , , , 8. ( , 53/82 ...), . 176, 3. 7 ( ) . 8 ' , , ( : ), , , , , , , . , , , , (, .), , . , 6

- 61 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

. , . . , , , . , , , (. ) . (, , , , , , .). , , / . / , , , . / , , - , , , . , -, ( ) , ( ). ( ) . . , . , , . , . , .

. ( ), ( ) , , , ( ). . , . ( , ) . 11, -9 ( ), (), ( , , , ), ( 5 ) ( ). , . . . . , , , , . , 1 10. ( ), ( 9 '' ( : ). , , , . , .'' (. 11, -) 10 '' , , ( : ), . : , , , .'' (. 12, -)

3. , . , , ,

- 62 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

), (), ( 1 ) (, , , ). , . . , , . , , . , ( ) , . , , . , . . , , . , , 11. , . , . , ( ). , . , , .

, , , , , , . . - 12 . - , , 13. . , , . , , , , . . , . , , . ( ) . , . , ( ) , , . , . 4. (4. ) III (III ) 14, 15 16. 13 '' , . , , , , .'' (. 14, -)12

4. , , . , , . , , 11 '' , , , .'' (. 13, -)

- 63 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

. , . - () , 14. : , , , . , , ( - ), , . , . , , : , , , , , , , , . . . , , . . , , , , . 14 '' , . .'' (. 15, -)

15. , , . , , . , , , . - , , . , .

5. '' '' . , , . , , '''' . '''' '''': , , , , , , , , , . -. , '' '' . , , , . , 15 ' Error! Reference source not found.. 2. 1) , .'' (. 16, -)

- 64 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

, . , . . 16. , ( ). , '' ''. , , . . , . , , , . . . , . , , , , ( /), , . . , , ', , , . : , , , , , .'' (. 17, -)16

, ( ) . , , . , , , , 17. , 70% , 30% . , 70% , 75% . , . ( 52,5 % ) , ( , , , '' '' .), . , - . , (, , , , .), ( -, 17 '' 17. 2. 2) , 70% , 30% . 70 % , 75 % . 30% , 50% . 1. .'' (. 18, -)

- 65 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

). -, , . 25% ( 17,5% ) , , - . , , . (): 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. , , - , - ,

, : , , - , , . , , (. - ). , '' ''. . . 19, '' , , , ''. . , . , , !

.

, , , . , , . , . . , 50% ( 30% ) , . , . 19, 18. 18 ' 17. : , , - , - ,

6. . : ( , , , , , .), ( ), ( , , ''30'', , .), , , , , . 17. , , , .'' (. 19, -)

-

- 66 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

( ), , , , ( , , , .), ( , .) . .

, ( ), .

8. [1] , ., , . . : , III , , . 5-16, , , 2008. [2] , : A - , I , , , , 2007. [3] Elvik, R. Vaa, T.: THE HANDBOOK OF ROAD SAFETY MEASURES, Elsevier, 2004. [4] , . . : , II , , , , 2007. [5] , .: , , , 2008. [6] ., . , . . : , , 4. : , , , 2009. [7] , ", . 50/88, 63/88, 80/89, 29/90 11/91, ", . 34/92, 13/93, 24/94, 41/94, 28/96 3/02, '' 101/05. [8] , '' 41-09, , 2009. [9] Legal measures and enforcement. Gadget, WP 5, Project funded by EC under the transport, RTD programme of 4th framework programme, 1999.

7. . . , , . , . ( ), , , , , . . , , . ( , , , ), , ( , ), ( ), ( ),

- 67 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

INFLUENCE OF THE CANDIDATES APPROACH TO DRIVER TRAINING ON TRAFFIC SAFETY. , , j , 2007. 2009. - . , . : , , , bstract The paper specifies and presents information and statistical data that reffer to the field of passing driving tests in the Republic of Srpska in the period from the year 2007 to 2009, with the overview of stage when Ministry of Education and Culture of Republic of Srpska - Traffic Department became in charge to organise such tests. At the end, the importance of the problem and improvement measures are given. Key words: driving test, driver training, safety, traffic , , , ( ) -. , - , , ( , , ). : -; ( ); ; .

1. , , . () , , , . 1. 2007. ( ), . , , . , 1. 2007. .

2. 2007. 1. 2007. , ()

. .

- 68 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

1. 2006. 2007. 2006. 1.1 - 31.3. 1.4 - 30.6. 1.7 - 30.9. 1.10- 31.12. 408 438 641 482 327 339 459 328 % 79 77 71,5 68 73,79 655 700 871 832 354 375 496 460 % 54 53,5 57 55 55,10

: 2007. 1.1 - 31.3. 1.4 - 30.6. 1.7 - 30.9. 546 708 358 268 534 422

:

77 75,5 75

748 872 849

445 519 473

59 59,5 55,7

:

75,99%

:

55,10

: , , , , 2006. 2007. 2006 2007. , 75,9 , . 55,10 . 3. :

. : (.177); , , (.179).

: , - ( . 15. 6.3.2007); - ( . 15. 6.3.2007); , - ( . 25 3.4.2007); , , -

, . , , , - 69

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

( - .12 16.2.2007); , - - ( . 15 6.3.2007).

. , . , , - ( ) . , , . , . , , . - . 1. -: , ( ) , - ,

, , , , . ? - , . - , ( ) . , . . , : , , -, (), .

, . : , , , , , -.

2.

.

1.11.2007. 31.8.2009. .

- 70 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

2008. 1.11. 2007- 31.12. 2009. 1.1-31.8. 2364 1708

1407 992 % 60 58 4073 1436

2113 773 % 52,4 53,8

2. 1.11. 2007. 31.8.2009. . [4] 59, 53,1 . (75,9% 59%) . 5,9% (59%53,1%), . - .

5. , . , . ( ) . ( ) ( ). , , . , .

4. , - , . , . - - , . , . : , , , , ,

6. [1] , . 15. 2007. [2] , . 15. 2007. [3] , . 12. 2007. [4] , , , , 2006. 2007. [5] , , , 2008. 2009.

- 71 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

IMPACT OF MOTOR VEHICLES ON THE ENVIRONMENT DURING THE EXPLOITATION , ... . , , . , . . . . : , , , . bstract Motor vehicle is a complex product and its impact on the environment cannot simply to appraise. In addition to the impact during the construction of vehicles and the harmful impact of after use, the most important are ecological impacts on the environment during the exploitation of motor vehicles. During the use, a vehicle emits toxic exhaust gases and creates noise. Legal regulations, which restrict the levels of these parameters, become stronger from year to year. Manufacturers of motor vehicles discover new techniques of combustion to reduce the quantity and types of pollution components in the exhaust gases. Key words: motor vehicle, the environment, exhaust gases, legal regulations.

1. . , . . . . . . 1998, -, Euro on Board- (EUBD). .

CO ( ) HC ( ) 2 ( )

NOh ( )

, . , . , . , .

1: . 1. .

2. :

- 72 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

1: . EURO . EURO1 EC93 1993. . 1996. EURO2 , 2000. EURO3 . , . EURO5 EURO3. CEMT . 3,5 Euro 1 (1993) Euro 2 (1996) Euro 3 (2000) Euro 4 (2005) Euro 5 (2008) 1,5 0,55 2 0,02 . . .1

3. , , . , . , , , , . . .

(g/kWh) (g/kWh) (g/kWh) (g/m3)

4,9 1,23 9 0,4

4,0 1,1 7 0,4

2,1 0,66 5 0,1

1,5 0,46 3,5 0,02

2: . , .

1 . , , , 2009.

- 73 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

4. SCR EURO1 EURO2. EURO5. () . .2 . 2 .

. MIL (Malfunction Indicator Light), . . . () . , . , , . EU3 EU4 (NEF3) EOBD- , EOBD- NEF3.

2: SCR EGR . EURO5. Scania Man.3 3 EGR . 4: 4 : : 11,007 [km] : 33,6 [km/h] :120 [km/h]

6. . 2,0l Volkswagen.

3: EGR

5. Euro on Board- : () , , , ,

5: 5 1. 2. 285

EURO-4 i EURO-5 standardi, sa ili bez aditiva, dilema: SCR EGR www.scania.ba 3 EURO-4 EURO-5 , , : SCR EGR www.scania.ba

2

3.45

EOBD - EOBD -

- 74 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9.

G504 V135 G507

. , . , , , .

10. 11. G39 12. 13. G506 14. 15. G505 16.

8. [1] ., , 2009, [2] www.scania.ba (EURO-4 EURO-5 , , : SCR EGR) [3] wrww.spediter.com ( SAT plus, , 2009) [4] EOBD - , 2009, VOLKSWAGEN AG, Wolfsburg, VK-36 Service Training Alle Rechte sowie technische nderungen vorbehalten.

7. .

- 75 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

VEGETABLE OIL AS PETROL , , (HVC- huile vgtale carburant), (HVP- huile vgtale pure) (HVB- huile vgtale brute) ( 100%) ( ), , (30% , 50% ). , . : , , , Kyota, 2003/30/ EZ bstract Vegetable oil used a a fuel (HVC-huile vgetal carburant), better known under the name pure plant oil (HVP- huile vgetal pure) or vegetable oil as a gross product (HVB- huile vgetal brute) can be used (to 100%) as a fuel for all diesel motor (which original inovation was for that type of fuel), considering small modification in order to that type of the fuel to be warmed, or without modification mixing the vegetable oil with standard diesel (30% for all vehicles, and to 50 % according to the need). That is also a raw material for biodiesel production, which is alcoholic ether, nowadays used as a biofuel, incorporated directly to the diesel Key words: White book, Green book, Biofuel, Kyoto Protocol, Directive 2003/30/EC. , 2.

1. 36% ( 46%, 1973. ), 24% , 24% (15%, 1973. ), 13% 3% 84% . , ( 30 % ) 98%. . - (GHG). 2010 1990. 2010. 50% 1113 . 84% CO21. . , 10% . 1

2. 1891. Rudolph Diesel . (HVB- huile vgetal brute). Rudolph Diesel . ( ). OTTO 1900-. , . 1939. 1945. . . 21. 2

EZ 2003/30/EZ, . 1

Direktiva EZ 2003/30/EZ, str. 2

- 76 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

CO2 ( Kyota) . 18. 19983. 2% .

. 25 45 . ( ). . 25 45 . - , . , .

3. () . . , , . ( 8 ), ( ). . 100, - 0-(). . , . . . 90% 10% , 90. , . , . , . ( 16 ), ( ). . 170 C 360 C, . : ( ), ( ), ( ). . (C16H34) --, . , 100. -- 0. .

4. 2003/30/Z . . . . . , ( ). 189 , , . 2003/30/Z 31. 2010. 5,75%. 2020 20% . 2003/30/Z4: : ; : , ; : , ; : , ;

3

EZ JO C 210 6.7.1998, . 215.

4

2003/30/EZ, 2, 2, 3.

- 77 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

: , ; -BE (Etil-Tertio-Butil-Eter): BE . -BE 47 % ; -MTBE (Metil-Tertio-Butil-Eter): . -MTBE 36% ; ; : ; , .

6.

5. . 50% . (, CO2, .) . 30 . : Pongamia pinnata: , , 1800 //. Jatropha curcas: , 1892 // . , . : , 662 //. : , 572 //. : . . , , . .

( ) . . . . Mc Donalds 6500 . y Roule ma frite Lyon ( ) 0,65 0,40 /l . , . 1 . . ( ) .

1. GF . , , . , , , , , ( ).

2. .

- 78 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

. . .

7. . . , ( 450C -) , -5C -15C . . ( ), . . . (-5C 10C ) ( ). 600 1000 , .

3. / . (HVP-huile vgtale pure) (www.oliomobile.org) 1127 . 497 ( 3.13 )(*) 7.96 ( 50.1 ) (**) CO2 1.45 (*) 23.2 (**)

km 9.05 km (*) 145 km (**)

(*) 937 (**) 15 . (www.oliomobile.org/documents/rezultat.gif) CO 0,07, 163,25 165,50 ( CO2 ). : . ( ).

- 79 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

. .

, Gusto e sapore5 , (GIPS) . 72000 72000 . - 155 . GISP , 20 . , .

8. (, , .) 30% 40% 7. . . 100% . . - (ADIT Agence pour la Diffusion de l`Information Technologique en Allemagne ) 11.07.2004. . 110 2002. 8 , 71 31 . . 30 % . . (Villeneuve-sur-lot) 10 . 21400 km ( 3500 28000 km ). .

9. 2003/30/Z , . 5% - . prEN 14214 (CEN- comit europen de normalisation). ( ). 100% . 1. Z- . , 2003/30/Z. . (TUV) 5

24.04.2009. , . 22

- 80 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

100% . , . 2006. ACC4 198,3188 / 1000 03.04.2006. .

CO2 .

11. [1] 2003/30/Z [2] , , : , (EkoIst08, / Ecological Truth, 01 - 04. 2008. ) [3] , ., , .: , 32. , , , 2005. [4] , .: , , , 1994. [5] , .: ( ) , , , , 1998. [6] www.oliomobile.org

10. 65 85 /. 1990. 2004. 20 30 / 2004. 2008. 150 /. ( 15 km/h 251 CO2 75 km/h 158 CO2) .

- 81 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

TRANSPORT STRATEGIC PLANNING DOCUMENTS REVIEW , , . . , , , . . bstract National strategic documents dealing with development of transport represent a precondition for coordinated investment actions, and coordinated development of particular transport modes toward an integrated and efficient transport system. In practice they are characterized by different document titles and diverse contents even if they have similar titles. The reasons for those differences are studied in the paper. The paper starts by defining basic terms, followed by the review of strategic transport documents titles and contents for several European countries. The relations between documents and their contents are discussed, as well as chronological process of policy formulation. Finally, some recommendations are given regarding strategic documents concepts and contents in the circumstances specific for countries in transition with a particular attention to countries of the former Yugoslavia and CEE countries. , , , / . ( ), / . / , . , , . , , . , , . ( ) , , . ,

1. . , : () , , , , ., . () . . , , , , . , , , , , .

- 82 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

. ; " " ; . , : , , . , . .

, . Klbl et al. (2008) 2 " , , , ". " " ( , 2007), " " (ITS Leeds, 2006). , , . , . , , , , . Klbl et al. (2008) 3 " ; , ". , " " (Shires, 2003), " " (ITS Leeds, 2006). , , . , , /. , , "" "" ( ), ( ) () , ( ) () . , , (, , ) . , , , . , " " , , , , ( ). , 2 3

2. (, ) ( ), ( ) , . , , () . "" Klbl et al. (2008): " ".

2.1. " " , (ITS Leeds, 2006) . : , , , . Klbl et al. (2008) 1 " , , ". "" . () . , , (ITS Leeds, 2006). . Oxford English dictionary, Oxford University Press, 2006. (http://www.oed.com/).1

Ibid. Ibid.

- 83 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

" " ( " "), "" , , , . " " (Marsden and Bonsall, 2006) " " (ITS Leeds, 2006). , ( ) (, ), (TRANSFORUM, 2007). . (Marsden and Bonsall, 2006). , : (1) ( ), ; (2) ( , ); (3) () () .

2.

- ( 1). , -. : (MdF, 2005). . / // ( 1). - , . : (V&W and VROM, 2006).

3.

. ( ) . (Atkins and Mclean Hazel, 2006): 1. . , ( 1). , / . : 2030: , (MoTC, 2007).

, , , . . . (, , ) 1.

- 84 -

( )

2.2.

1: .

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

. . () , . , , , (Gratwick, 2001). , . (, , ) . , (1) RUS (2) 2030 (, 2008) (DOT, 2008) (MSPT, 2008) . (3) (4) 20092030 20082010 263

. , , . , , 20 . , , 9: , , , , , , , , , , . , , 5 . , , : (5) (6) - , . - , , , . 2013-2014, 2014-2015

IR CG UK FI SRB

75 , , 40 . 90 44

. : 2009 2019 (DfT, 2007) 2030: , 2007 (MoTC, 2007) 2030 , , , 2008 ( 2015 , 2008) (MdF, 2005) 2015 (MTPT, 2005) (V&W and VROM, 2006) 20032015 (MEAT, 2004) -, (Pacific Consultants International, 2001) (Hrvatski sabor, 1999) 20052020 20052015 20052020 20032015 20012020 20002010

47 , . 179 , - 42 , , - , , , - , , , 161 , / , 46 47 , , + 140

E SK NL H BiH HR

1: .

- 85 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

( . ), , (. ) (. ) ( 1, 5); . ( .) ! !? , , , ( 1, 6); , , , , ; , ( , , ).

, , . , [/10002], 2, , . . () . , . ( ) , (. ). , . , . (NL, FI) (). , , (, ...). , , ( , , ), ( ). . ( /) . . ( .) '''' () . , , .

1 , , . (). () . . . . , .

3. , , . , ( )

- 86 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

. '''' .

[5] Hrvatski sabor (1999), Strategija prometnog razvitka Republike Hrvatske, "Narodne novine" br. 139/99. [6] . . (2007), , , . [7] Klbl R, Niegl M. and Knoflacher H. (2008), "A strategic planning methodology", Transport Policy, Volume 15, Issue 5, September 2008, pp.273-282. [8] ITS Leeds (2006), KonSULT Knowledge base on sustainable urban land use and transport, Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK, [9] Marsden G. and Bonsall P. (2006), "Performance targets in transport policy", Transport Policy, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp.191-203. [10] MdF (2005), Plan Estratgico de Infraestructuras y Transporte (PEIT) 2005 2020, Ministerio de Fomento, Espaa, http://www.fomento.es/ [11] MEAT (2004), Hungarian Transport Policy 2003-2015, Ministry of Economic Affairs and Transport, Hungary, http://en.gkm.gov.hu/ [12] MIEC (2003), A summary of the Swedish Governments transport policy objectives, Ministry of Industry, Employment and Communications, Sweden, http://www.industry.ministry.se/ [13] (2008), 2030 , , [14] MoTC (2007), Transport 2030: Major challenges, new directions, Ministry of Transport and Communications, Finland, http://www.mintc.fi/ [15] MSPT (2008), Strategija razvoja saobraaja Crne Gore, Ministarstvo saobraaja, pomorstva i telekomunikacija, http://www.gov.me/minsaob/ [16] MTPT (2005), Transport policy of the Slovak republic until 2015, Ministry of Transport, Posts and Telecommunications, http://www.telecom.gov.sk/ [17] Pacific Consultants International (2001), (), [18] Shires J. (2003), The impact of policy drivers on the logistics supply chain, Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, http://www.itels.org.uk/ [19] TRANSFORUM (2007), Indicators for European Transport Policy Impact Assessment - Fitness for purpose, TRANSFORUM Deliverable D3.4, http://www.transforum-eu.net [20] V&W and VROM (2006), Mobility Policy Document: Towards reliable and predictable accessibility: Part III Government Position, Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management, Netherlands, http://www.verkeerenwaterstaat.nl/ [21] (2008), , , , 2008. 2015. , " " . 4/2008.

4. . . . ( , , .). , . , , . , . , , , ( ), ( ).

5. [1] Atkins and Mclean Hazel (2006), A Review of National Transport Strategies Across Developed Countries in Europe and Elsewhere, Scottish Executive Social Research, http://openscotland.gov.uk/ [2] DfT (2007), Towards a Sustainable Transport System: Supporting Economic Growth in a Low Carbon World, Department for Transport, TSO, Norwich, UK. [3] DOT (2008), Department of Transport: Statement of Strategy 20082011, Department of Transport, Ireland, http://www.transport.ie/ [4] Gratwick J. (2001), The Evolution of Canadian Transportation Policy, Report for the Canada Transportation Act Review Panel, Canada Transportation Act Review, http://www.reviewcta-examenltc.gc.ca/

- 87 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

THE INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS , , , . . , . , . , . . : , , . bstract In the society nowadays, traffic represents a significant activity. It is involved into all aspects of human life and surrounding. The increasing need for safety of all participants is essential aspect of the traffic, demanding a new approach to its planning and organizing. Taking into account a constant increase of vehicles at city roadways and consequently, traffic jams, currently, the automatic managing of traffic has been implemented. Through adequate software solution, from one centre the intelligent managing of traffic is performed. In such a way the creation of proper systems is enabled so called green waves along with remarkable decrease of traffic jams at city roadways. Key words: traffic, safety, the automatic managing of traffic. . () , . , . , on-line . . , .

1. , . . , , . , . , . , . 30 . .

2. , , . , , . , , . , ,

- 88 -

II 2009 , 20. 21. 2009.

. , , , , . . , ICT (Information and Communication), . , , , , , . , . ICT, , . . . , ICT . , , ICT , , . , . . , . , . ICT . ,

Documents

zbornik