NFPA Technical Committee on Special Operations …...NFPA Technical Committee on Special Operations Protective Clothing and Equipment Savannah, GA January 23-27, 2017 Agenda 1.Call

NFPA Technical Committee on Special Operations Protective Clothing and

Equipment Savannah, GA January 23-27, 2017

Agenda

1.Call to order at 1:00 pm

2.Introductions

3.Opening remarks - Chair, Jeremy Metz

4.Review and approval of minutes from previous meeting

5.NFPA Staff Liaison report - Chris Farrell

6.NFPA 1855 Second Draft- act on public comments

7.NFPA 1858 Second Draft- act on public comments

8.NFPA 1975 First Draft- act on public inputs

9. Discuss NFPA 1951

10.New business

11. Other items

12. Next meeting

13. Adjourn, NLT 1:00 pm local time

NFPA TECHNICAL COMMITTEE FOR

Special Operations Clothing and Equipment NFPA Headquarters, Quincy, MA

July 19-20, 2016 1. Call to order at 8:00am July 19th 2016 2. Introductions/Attendance Members Metz, Jeremy (Chairman) Lehtonen, Karen (Secretary) Brads, Jeremy Broccolo, Richard Dacey, Paul Dempsey, Keith Dunn, Charlie Geraghty, Steve Hess, Diane Hock, Tricia Hudson, Dan Klaren, Kim Legros, Stephen McCurley, Loui Mignogno, Craig Reall, Jack Stephenson, Doug Stutts, Beverly Winer, Harry Farrell, Chris (NFPA Staff)

Guests Barton, Brian (StedFast) Cosgrove, Ellen (NFPA) Newsome, Amanda (UL) Salvato, Mike (StedFast) Smith, Yvonne (NFPA)

3. Opening remarks were provided by the technical committee Chair, Jeremy Metz.

a. Several Correlating committee calls since our last meeting. NFPA 1983 went through with no CC modifications NFPA 1855 and NFPA 1858 went through with no CC notes b. This meeting will cover the Second Revision for NFPA 1951.

4. The minutes from the previous meeting were reviewed and approved 5. NFPA Staff Liaison report was provided by Staff Liaison Chris Farrell. 6. NFPA 1951 Second Revision

a. 53 Public comments were acted on, 81 Second Revisions were created. 7. New Business

a. Short Cycle of NFPA 1951 to Fall 2020 due to project reorganization. 8. Old Business a. Upcoming Revision Cycles

NFPA 1855 Fall 2017 PC Close 11/17/16 SD Mtg By 2/9/17 NFPA 1858 Fall 2017 PC Close 11/17/16 SD Mtg By 2/9/17 NFPA 1975 Fall 2018 PI Close 1/5/2017 FD Mtg By 3/16/17 9. Other Items

a. None 10. Next meeting a. NFPA 1855 and NFPA 1858 Second Draft Meeting and NFPA 1975 1st Draft Meeting January 21-24, 2016; Location TBD

12. Adjourn, 10:45 am July 20th, 2016

Public Comment No. 1-NFPA 1855-2016 [ Section No. 1.1.1 ]

1.1.1

This standard shall specify the minimum selection, care, and maintenance requirements for utility technicalrescue protective, and rescue and recovery technical rescue protective , and chemicals, biological agents,and radiological particulate [also known as chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) technicalrescue] ensembles and the individual ensemble elements, including garments, helmets, gloves, footwear,and interface components, that are compliant with NFPA 1951.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

Removing CBRN references as those ensembles are being removed from NFPA 1951 in the next edition.

Related Item

First Revision No. 1-NFPA 1855-2016 [Chapter 2]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Karen Lehtonen

Organization: Lion Group, Inc.

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Sun Nov 13 18:47:02 EST 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

1 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM

Public Comment No. 2-NFPA 1855-2016 [ Sections 1.2.1, 1.2.2 ]

Sections 1.2.1, 1.2.2

1.2.1

The purpose of this standard shall be to establish a program for utility technical rescue, rescue and rescueand recovery technical rescue , and CBRN technical rescue protective ensembles and ensemble elementsto reduce the safety risks and potential health risks associated with poorly maintained, contaminated, ordamaged protective ensembles and ensemble elements.

1.2.2

The purpose of this standard shall also be to establish basic criteria for selection, inspection, cleaning,decontamination, repair, storage, and retirement of utility technical rescue, rescue and rescue andrecovery technical rescue , and CBRN technical rescue protective ensembles and ensemble elements.



Related Item

Public Input No. 1-NFPA 1855-2015 [Chapter 2]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



2 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM


1.3.4

This standard shall not apply to respiratory protective equipment other than where such equipmentinterfaces with CBRN technical rescue protective ensembles .



Related Item

Public Input No. 1-NFPA 1855-2015 [Chapter 2]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



3 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM

Public Comment No. 4-NFPA 1855-2016 [ Section No. 2.2 ]

2.2 NFPA Publications.

National Fire Protection Association, 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA 02169-7471.

NFPA 70E® , Standard for Electrical Safety in the Workplace®, 2018 edition.

NFPA 1500, Standard on Fire Department Occupational Safety and Health Program, 2018 edition.

NFPA 1670, Standard on Operations and Training for Technical Search and Rescue Incidents, 2017edition.

NFPA 1951, Standard on Protective Ensembles for Technical Rescue Incidents,2018 2013 edition.

NFPA 1971, Standard on Protective Ensembles for Structural Fire Fighting and Proximity Fire Fighting,2018 edition.

NFPA 1977, Standard on Protective Clothing and Equipment for Wildland Fire Fighting, 2016 edition.

NFPA 1981, Standard on Open-Circuit Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) for EmergencyServices, 2018 edition.

NFPA 1991, Standard on Vapor-Protective Ensembles for Hazardous Materials Emergencies, 2016edition.

NFPA 1992, Standard on Liquid Splash-Protective Ensembles and Clothing for Hazardous MaterialsEmergencies,2017 2018 edition.

NFPA 1994, Standard on Protective Ensembles for First Responders to CBRN TerrorismIncidents,2017 2018 edition.

NFPA 1999, Standard on Protective Clothing for Emergency Medical Operations, 2018 edition.


Updating editions of various NFPA standards based on current revision cycles.

Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



4 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM


3.3.3 Biological Terrorism Agents.

Liquid or particulate agents that consist of a biologically derived toxin or pathogen to inflict lethal orincapacitating casualties.



Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



5 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM

Public Comment No. 6-NFPA 1855-2016 [ Sections 3.3.7, 3.3.8, 3.3.9, 3.3.10, 3.3.11,

3.3.12, 3.3.1... ]

Sections 3.3.7, 3.3.8, 3.3.9, 3.3.10, 3.3.11, 3.3.12, 3.3.13, 3.3.14, 3.3.15, 3.3.16

3.3.7 CBRN.

An abbreviation for chemicals, biological agents, and radiological particulate hazards.

3.3.8 * CBRN Barrier Layer.

The part of the composite that is intended to provide protection against CBRN terrorism agents.

3.3.9 CBRN Technical Rescue Protective Ensemble.

Multiple elements of compliant protective clothing and protective equipment designed and configured as anensemble to provide limited protection in operational settings where exposure to physical, thermal, liquid,and body fluid–borne pathogen hazards and to CBRN agents in vapor, liquid-splash, and particulate formsare expected.

3.3.10 CBRN Technical Rescue Protective Ensemble Elements.

The parts that comprise the CBRN technical rescue protective ensemble, that include coats, trousers,coveralls, helmets, hoods, gloves, footwear, respirator, and interface components.

3.3.11 CBRN Technical Rescue Protective Footwear Element.

The element of the certified CBRN technical rescue protective ensemble element that provides protectionto the foot, ankle, and leg.

3.3.12 CBRN Technical Rescue Protective Garment Element.

The coat, trouser, or coverall of the certified CBRN technical rescue protective ensemble that providesprotection to the upper and lower torso, arms, and legs.

3.3.13 CBRN Technical Rescue Protective Glove Element.

The element of the certified CBRN technical rescue protective ensemble that provides protection to thehand and wrist.

3.3.14 CBRN Technical Rescue Protective Helmet Element.

The element of the certified CBRN technical rescue protective ensemble that provides protection to thehead.

3.3.15 CBRN Technical Rescue Protective Hood Element.

An interface element of the certified CBRN technical rescue protective ensemble that provides protection tothe coat/helmet/respirator facepiece area.

3.3.16 * CBRN Terrorism Agents.

Chemicals, biological agents, and radiological particulates that could be released as the result of a terroristattack. (See also 3.3.3 , Biological Terrorism Agents; 3.3.19 , Chemical Terrorism Agents; 3.3.87 ,Radiological Particulate Terrorism Agents; and 3.3.119 , Toxic Industrial Chemicals.)



Related Item





6 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM


Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



7 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM


3.3.19 Chemical Terrorism Agents.

Liquid, solid, gaseous, and vapor chemical warfare agents and toxic industrial chemicals used to inflictlethal or incapacitating casualties, generally on a civilian population as a result of a terrorist attack.



Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



8 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM


3.3.21 Coat.

See 3.3.12 , CBRN Technical Rescue Protective Garment Element; 3.3. 92, Rescue and RecoveryTechnical Rescue Protective Garment Element; and 3.3.126, Utility Technical Rescue Protective GarmentElement.



Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



9 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM


Sections 3.3.28, 3.3.29

3.3.28 Contamination/Contaminated.

The process by which ensembles and ensemble elements are exposed to hazardous materials , bodyfluids, or CBRN terrorism agents or body fluids .

3.3.29 Coverall.

See3.3.12 , CBRN Technical Rescue Protective Garment Element; 3.3. 92, Rescue and RecoveryTechnical Rescue Protective Garment Element; and 3.3.126, Utility Technical Rescue Protective GarmentElement.



Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



10 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM


3.3.41 Ensemble.

See3.3.9 , CBRN Technical Rescue Protective Ensemble, 3.3. 89, Rescue and Recovery TechnicalRescue Protective Ensemble, and 3.3.123, Utility Technical Rescue Protective Ensemble.



Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



11 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM


3.3.48 Footwear.

See 3.3.11 , CBRN Technical Rescue Protective Footwear Element, 3.3. 91, Rescue and RecoveryTechnical Rescue Protective Footwear Element, and 3.3.125, Utility Technical Rescue Protective FootwearElement.



Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



12 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM


3.3.51 Garment.




Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



13 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM


3.3.53 Glove.

See 3.3.13 , CBRN Technical Rescue Protective Glove Element; 3.3. 111, Technical Rescue ProtectiveGloves; and 3.3.127, Utility Technical Rescue Protective Glove Element.



Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



14 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM


Sections 3.3.61, 3.3.62

3.3.61 Helmet.

See 3.3.14 , CBRN Technical Rescue Protective Helmet Element; 3.3. 94, Rescue and RecoveryTechnical Rescue Protective Helmet Element; and 3.3.129, Utility Technical Rescue Protective HelmetElement.

3.3.62 Hood.

See 3.3.15 , CBRN Technical Rescue Protective Hood Element.



Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



15 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM


3.3.73 Outer Glove.

A secondary glove worn over the glove ensemble element for the purpose of providing CBRN protection.



Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



16 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM

Public Comment No. 15-NFPA 1855-2016 [ Sections 3.3.75, 3.3.76, 3.3.77, 3.3.78, 3.3.79,

3.3.80, 3.... ]

Sections 3.3.75, 3.3.76, 3.3.77, 3.3.78, 3.3.79, 3.3.80, 3.3.81, 3.3.82, 3.3.83, 3.3.84

3.3.75 Protective Clothing.

See 3.3.9 , CBRN Technical Rescue Protective Ensemble; 3.3. 89, Rescue and Recovery TechnicalRescue Protective Ensemble; and 3.3.123, Utility Technical Rescue Protective Ensemble.

3.3.76 Protective Coat.

See 3.3.10 , CBRN Technical Rescue Protective Ensemble Elements; 3.3. 90, Rescue and RecoveryTechnical Rescue Protective Ensemble Elements; and 3.3.124, Utility Technical Rescue ProtectiveEnsemble Elements.

3.3.77 Protective Coverall.

See 3.3.10 , CBRN Technical Rescue Protective Ensemble Elements; 3.3. 90, Rescue and RecoveryTechnical Rescue Protective Ensemble Elements; and 3.3.124, Utility Technical Rescue ProtectiveEnsemble Elements.

3.3.78 Protective Ensemble.


3.3.79 Protective Footwear.

See 3.3.11 , CBRN Technical Rescue Protective Footwear Element; 3.3. 91, Rescue and RecoveryTechnical Rescue Protective Footwear Element; and 3.3.125, Utility Technical Rescue Protective FootwearElement.

3.3.80 Protective Garment.


3.3.81 Protective Glove.

See 3.3.13 , CBRN Technical Rescue Protective Glove Element; 3.3. 111, Technical Rescue ProtectiveGloves; and 3.3.127, Utility Technical Rescue Protective Glove Element.

3.3.82 Protective Goggle.

See 3.3.93, Rescue and Recovery Technical Rescue Protective Goggle Element, and 3.3.128, UtilityTechnical Rescue Protective Goggle Element.

3.3.83 Protective Helmet.


3.3.84 Protective Hood.




Related Item



17 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



18 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM


3.3.85 Protective Trouser.




Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



19 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM


3.3.87 * Radiological Particulate Terrorism Agents.

Particles that emit ionizing radiation in excess of normal background levels, used to inflict lethal orincapacitating casualties, generally on a civilian population as a result of terrorist attack.



Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



20 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM


3.3.102 Soiled/Soiling.

The accumulation of materials that are not considered hazardous materials, or body fluids , or CBRNterrorism agents but that could degrade the performance of the ensemble or ensemble element.



Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



21 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM

Public Comment No. 19-NFPA 1855-2016 [ Sections 3.3.108, 3.3.109, 3.3.110, 3.3.111,

3.3.112, 3.3.1... ]

Sections 3.3.108, 3.3.109, 3.3.110, 3.3.111, 3.3.112, 3.3.113, 3.3.114

3.3.108 Technical Rescue Protective Ensembles.


3.3.109 Technical Rescue Protective Footwear.

See 3.3.11 , CBRN Technical Rescue Protective Footwear Elements; 3.3. 91, Rescue and RecoveryTechnical Rescue Protective Footwear Element; and 3.3.125, Utility Technical Rescue Protective FootwearElement.

3.3.110 Technical Rescue Protective Garments.


3.3.111 Technical Rescue Protective Gloves.

See 3.3.13 , CBRN Technical Rescue Protective Glove Element; and 3.3. 127, Utility Technical RescueProtective Glove Element.

3.3.112 Technical Rescue Protective Goggles.

See 3.3.93, Rescue and Recovery Technical Rescue Protective Goggle Element, and 3.3.128, UtilityTechnical Rescue Protective Goggle Element.

3.3.113 Technical Rescue Protective Helmets.


3.3.114 Technical Rescue Protective Hood.




Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



22 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM


3.3.119 Toxic Industrial Chemicals.

Highly toxic solid, liquid, or gaseous chemicals that have been identified as mass casualty threats thatcould be used to inflict casualties, generally on a civilian population, during a terrorist attack.



Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



23 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM


3.3.120 Trouser.




Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



24 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM


4.1.1*

The organization shall develop and implement a program for the selection, care, and maintenance of utilitytechnical rescue , rescue and rescue and recovery technical rescue, and CBRN technical rescueensembles and rescueensembles and ensemble elements used by the members of the organization in theperformance of their assigned functions.



Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



25 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM


4.3.4

The organization shall compile and maintain records as required by 4.3.3 on CBRN technical rescueprotective ensembles. The records shall include a list of specific required elements and interfacecomponents necessary for CBRN technical rescue protective ensembles.



Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



26 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM



27 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM

5.2.2


28 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM

The risk assessment shall include, but not be limited to, the hazards that can be encountered by technicalrescue personnel based on the following items and as detailed in Table 5.2.2, which represents potentialhazards identified in the USFA report, Protective Clothing and Equipment Need of Emergency Respondersto US & R Missions:

(1) Type of duties performed

(2) Frequency of use of ensemble elements

(3) Organization’s experiences

(4) Incident operations

(5) Geographic location and climate

(6)

Table 5.2.2 Risk Assessment

Hazards Utility Rescue/Recovery

CBRN

Falling objects Helmet Helmet

Helmet

Shrapnel from small tool usage X X

X

Projectiles or ballistic objects — —

—

Abrasive or rough surfaces X X

X

Sharp edges X X

X

Pointed objects X X

X

Slippery surfaces Boots Boots

Boots

Excessive vibration — —

—

High heat and humidity (heat stress) Garment/best Garment/better

Garment/good

Ambient cold — —

—

Wetness from tool work — X

X

Rain (inclement weather) — X

X

High wind — X

X

Insufficient or bright light — —

—

Excessive noise — —

—

Chemical inhalation — —

See NFPA 1981

* Likelihood of or response to CBRN terrorism incident


29 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM

Chemical skin absorption — Selected liquids

Selected vapors

Chemical ingestion or injection — —

X

Liquefied gas contact — —

—

Chemical flash fire Good Better

Good

Chemical explosions — —

—

High voltage Boots Boots

Boots

Electrical arc flash X (see NFPA 70E ) X (see NFPA 70E )

X (see NFPA 70E )

Static charge buildup Boots Boots

Boots

Ionization radiation

Alpha X X

X

Beta Attenuates Attenuates

Attenuates

Gamma — —

—

X-ray — —

—

Radiological particulates — —

X

Daytime visibility X X

X

Nighttime visibility X X

X

High convective heat Garment/low Garment/low

Garment/low

Low radiant heat Garment/low Garment/low

Garment/low

High radiant heat — —

—

Flame impingement X X

X

High pressure steam — —

—

Hot liquids — Selected

Selected

Molten metals — —

—


30 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM

Hot solids — —

—

Hot surfaces — —

—

Bloodborne pathogens — X

X Airborne pathogens — — X (see NFPA 1981) Biological particles

(toxins and allergens) — — X (see NFPA 1981)

Falling — —

—

Drowning — —

—

Material incompatibility — —

—

Ease of contamination X —

—

Thermal comfort Garment/best Garment/better

Garment/good

Range of motion — —

—

Hand function Gloves Gloves

Gloves

Ankle support Boots Boots

Boots

Back support — —

—

Vision protection Goggles Goggles

See NFPA 1981

Communications ease — —

—

Fit (poor) X X

X

Ease of donning and doffing Gloves Gloves

Gloves

Note: An “X” indicates that the ensemble element provides a level of protection from that hazard. Anelement name indicates that only that element provides a level of protection from that hazard. The terms“good, better, and best” indicate the level of performance in providing protection from that hazard. A “—”indicates the ensemble does not provide protection from that hazard based on the requirements in NFPA1951.

Additional Proposed Changes

File Name Description Approved

PI_1855-2013_Table_5.2.2.docx Word version of proposed changes to 5.2.2



Related Item


31 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Nov 16 20:10:03 EST 2016


32 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM

Public Comment No. 40-NFPA 1855-2016 [ Sections 5.2.5, 5.2.6, 5.2.7 ]

Sections 5.2.5, 5.2.6, 5.2.7

5.2.5

Utility technical rescue ensembles shall be selected where there is no expectation of encountering liquid,body fluid , bloodborne pathogens, or CBRN hazard or bloodborne pathogens .

5.2.6

Rescue/recovery ensembles shall be selected where there is an expectation of liquid, body fluid, orbloodborne pathogen hazard but not CBRN hazard pathogens .

5.2.7

As part of the risk assessment, the organization shall determine which type of technical rescue protection isneeded: utility technical rescue protective ensembles and ensemble elements , rescue or rescue andrecovery technical rescue protective ensembles and ensemble elements, or CBRN technical rescueprotective ensembles . The organization shall also determine in the risk assessment if consideration isrequired for NFPA 1999 is also needed.



Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



33 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM


5.3.1*

Where the organization develops purchase specifications, at least the following criteria shall be included:

(1) Purchase specifications shall require that the ensemble or ensemble element(s) to be purchased shallbe compliant with the current edition of NFPA 1951. Purchasers shall consider that certified CBRNtechnical rescue protective ensembles shall be worn as an ensemble with all elements and interfacecomponents present as stated on the element label.

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)



Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


* Where the organization selects criteria that exceed the minimum requirements of the current editionof NFPA 1951, such criteria shall be stipulated in the purchase specifications.

* Purchase specifications shall require that manufacturer’s bids include substantiation of certificationfor each element and model stated in the bid.

* Where applicable, the purchase specifications shall define the process for determining proper fit.

* The organization shall compare each bid submittal against purchase specifications.


34 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM


6.1.2*

Any ensemble elements that are found to be soiled or contaminated shall be cleaned or decontaminatedbefore any additional inspection is initiated. Where ensemble elements are found to be contaminated byCBRN agents, the ensemble shall be retired.



Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



35 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM

Public Comment No. 48-NFPA 1855-2016 [ Section No. 6.2.2.6 ]

6.2.2.6

Hood elements shall be inspected for the following:

(1) Soiling

(2) Contamination

(3) Physical damage such as the following:

(4) Rips, tears, and cuts

(5) Thermal damage (charring, burn holes, melting, discoloration of any layer)

(6) Loss of face opening adjustment

(7) Loss of seam integrity and broken or missing stitches



Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



36 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM


6.3.5.6

Hood elements shall be inspected for the following:

(1) Soiling

(2) Contamination

(3) Physical damage such as the following:

(4) Rips, tears, and cuts

(5) Thermal damage (charring, burn holes, melting, discoloration of any layer)

(6) Shrinkage

(7) Loss of material elasticity or stretching out of shape

(8) Loss of seam integrity or broken or missing stitches

(9) Loss of face-opening adjustment

(10) Label integrity and legibility



Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



37 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM


6.3.6 Additional Advanced Inspection Criteria for CBRN Technical Rescue Protective Ensembles.

6.3.6.1 *

CBRN protective ensembles shall be inspected according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

6.3.6.2

Complete barrier inspection of all garment elements shall be conducted at a minimum after 2 years inservice and annually thereafter or whenever advance inspections indicate that a problem might exist.

6.3.6.3 *

CBRN protective ensembles shall be inspected for loss of integrity, including, but not limited, to thefollowing:

(1) Loss of interface functionality

(2) Excessive material or component shrinkage or stretching



Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



38 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM


6.4.1

Complete barrier inspection of all rescue and recovery technical rescue garments and CBRN technicalrescue garment elements shall be performed by the garment manufacturer, a manufacturer trainedorganization, a verified organization, or a verified ISP.



Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



39 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM


7.1.3

Ensembles and ensemble elements contaminated by CBRN terrorism agents shall be immediately retiredafter confirmed exposure and shall not be subjected to cleaning or decontamination.



Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



40 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM


7.3.8*

The following procedures shall be used for machine washing:

(1)

(2)

(3) All closures, including pocket closures, hooks and loops, snaps, zippers, and hooks and dees shall befastened.

(4) All garments and separable barriers shall be placed into a mesh laundry bag for machine cleaning.

(5)

(6) A mild detergent with a pH range of not less than 6.0 pH and not greater than 10.5 pH as indicated onthe product MSDS or original product container shall be used.

(7) All tools and accessories shall be removed and not machine washed.

(8)

(9)

(10)

(11) The element shall be inspected and rewashed if necessary.

(12) All tools and accessories shall be removed and not machine dried.

(13)

(14) Cleaning and soaking agents shall not leave any residue or cause any degrading of the ensemble orensemble elements.


Additional clarification about the machine type to be used for laundering to specify that a machine with a center agitator like those used in home laundering machines should not be used due to the damage that can be inflicted to PPE by these agitators.

Related Public Comments for This Document

Related Comment Relationship

Public Comment No. 53-NFPA 1855-2016 [Section No. A.7.3.7]

Related Item

First Revision No. 3-NFPA 1855-2016 [Section No. 7.3.8]




Street Address:

City:

* The machine shall not be overloaded.

* Heavily soiled or spotted areas shall be pretreated. Chlorine bleach, chlorinated solvents, active-ingredient cleaning agents, or solvents shall not be used without the ensemble or ensemble elementmanufacturer’s approval.

* Water temperature shall not exceed 40°C (105°F).

* Washing machines shall be adjusted so the g-force does not exceed 100 g for all elements

Machines with a center post agitator shall not be used .

* Machine manufacturer’s instructions shall be followed for proper setting or program selection for thespecific element being washed.

* Where the machine is also used to wash items other than protective ensemble elements, it shall berinsed out by running the machine without a laundry load through a complete cycle with detergent andfilled to the maximum level with water at a temperature of 49°C to 52°C (120°F to 125°F).


41 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu Nov 17 11:02:27 EST 2016


42 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM


Sections 7.3.14, 7.3.15

7.3.14 Additional Requirements for Advanced Cleaning of Hood Elements.

Hoods shall be permitted to be machine washed and machine dried with garment barriers.

7.3.15 Additional Requirements for Advanced Cleaning of CBRN Technical Rescue ProtectiveEnsembles.

The manufacturer shall be consulted to determine if any special handling procedures or the removal ofinterface components or other components must be undertaken prior to advanced cleaning.



Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



43 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM


8.1.3.1

Ensembles contaminated by CBRN terrorism agents shall be immediately retired after CBRN exposure isconfirmed and shall not be reused.



Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



44 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM

Public Comment No. 35-NFPA 1855-2016 [ Sections 8.9, 8.10 ]

Sections 8.9, 8.10

8.9 Hood Interface Component Repair.

In addition to the requirements in Section 8.1 , all repairs to hoods shall be performed in accordance withthe element manufacturer’s instructions.

8.10 Additional Requirements for CBRN Technical Rescue Protective Ensembles.

All repairs to CBRN technical rescue protective ensembles shall be referred to the ensemble manufacturerfor repair.



Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



45 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM


10.1.2*

Technical rescue protective ensembles and ensemble elements shall be retired in accordance with 10.2.1,no later than the number of years after date of manufacture indicated in Table 10.1.2.

Table 10.1.2 Mandatory Retirement

Number of Years After Date of Manufacture

Type Garment Gloves Helmet Boots

Utility 15 5 15 15

Rescue/Recovery 10 10 15 15

CBRN 10 10 15 15



Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



46 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM


10.1.6

Technical rescue protective ensembles and ensemble elements that are contaminated by CBRN terrorismagents shall be immediately retired as specified in 10.2.1 after confirmed exposure and shall not bereused.



Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



47 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM


11.1.1.1

Verification of the organization or ISP shall include advanced inspection, advanced cleaning, and advancedrepairs of garment elements only. Verification of the organization or ISP shall not apply to helmet elements,glove elements , or footwear elements, hood elements, or optional CBRN ensembles .



Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



48 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM


11.2.3

The certification organization shall be accredited for personal protective equipment in accordance with ISOGuide 65, General requirements for bodies operating product certification systems /IEC 17065, Conformityassessment - Requirements for bodies certifying products, processes and services . The accreditation shallbe issued by an accreditation body operating in accordance with ISO 17011, Conformity assessment —General requirements for accreditation bodies accrediting conformity assessment bodies.


Update to ISO/IEC 17065 which has replaced ISO Guide 65.

Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



49 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM


12.1.1 Application.

This evaluation method shall apply to barrier materials and barrier seams found in rescue and recoverytechnical rescue and CBRN technical rescue protective garment elements that are in service.



Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



50 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM

Public Comment No. 25-NFPA 1855-2016 [ Sections A.3.3.8, A.3.3.16 ]

Sections A.3.3.8, A.3.3.16

A.3.3.8 CBRN Barrier Layer.

While it is recognized that the entire composite will affect the performance of the ensemble in preventingthe penetration of CBRN agents, the identification of the CBRN barrier layer is intended to assistapplication of specific ensemble and element tests.

A.3.3.16 CBRN Terrorism Agents.

Chemical terrorism agents include solid, liquid, and gaseous chemical warfare agents and toxic industrialchemicals. Chemical warfare agents include, but are not limited, to GB (Sarin), GD (Soman), HD (sulfurmustard), VX, and specific toxic industrial chemicals. Many toxic industrial chemicals (e.g., chlorine andammonia) are identified as potential chemical terrorism agents because of their availability and the degreeof injury they could inflict.

Biological terrorism agents are bacteria, viruses, or toxins derived from biological material. The CBRNensemble protects against biological particles dispersed as aerosols and liquid-borne pathogens. Airbornebiological terrorism agents could be dispersed in the form of liquid aerosols or solid aerosols (e.g., apowder of bacterial spores). Liquid-borne pathogens could be encountered during a terrorism incident as aresult of deliberate disposal or from body fluids released by victims of other weapons (e.g., explosives,firearms).

CBRN ensembles protect from radiological particulates dispersed as aerosols. The protection is defined forblocking or filtering airborne particulate matter and liquid and solid aerosols but not for radiological gasesor vapors. Airborne particulates have the ability to emit alpha and beta particles and ionizing radiation fromthe decay of unstable isotopes.



Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



51 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM

Public Comment No. 26-NFPA 1855-2016 [ Section No. A.3.3.42 ]

A.3.3.42 Ensemble Elements.

The CBRN technical rescue protective ensemble includes, but is not limited to, garments, helmets, hoods,gloves, footwear, and interface components. The rescue and recovery technical rescue protectiveensemble includes, but is not limited to, garments, helmets, goggles, gloves, and footwear. The utilitytechnical rescue protective ensemble includes, but is not limited to, garments, helmets, goggles, gloves,and footwear. The utility and rescue and recovery elements are certified individually, whereas CBRNelements must at least be certified as part of an ensemble . However, CBRN elements can be certifiedindividually to be used as replacement elements for the CBRN ensemble with which they were originallycertified.



Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



52 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM


A.3.3.87 Radiological Particulate Terrorism Agents.

This standard addresses protective ensembles that provide only partial protection from certain radiationsources. By their nature, these ensembles provide protection from alpha particles; the element materialsand distance will significantly attenuate beta particles. These ensembles do not provide any protection fromionizing radiation such as gamma- and X-rays other than to keep the actual radiological particulates fromdirect skin contact.



Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



53 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM

Public Comment No. 46-NFPA 1855-2016 [ Section No. A.4.2.3.2 ]

A.4.2.3.2

Organizations should consider evaluating the ensemble or ensemble element with tests provided inNFPA 1951 in which the accessory could negatively affect the performance of the ensemble or ensembleelement, depending on how the element might be affected by the attachment of the accessory. (See TableA.4.2.3.2.)

Another test that can be used to evaluate the performance of an externally placed accessory is ASTMF1930, Standard Test Method for Evaluation of Flame Resistant Clothing for Protection Against Flash FireSimulations Using an Instrumented Manikin. This test simulates a flash fire exposure using a static manikin.The effects of the flash fire on an ensemble or ensemble element with the accessory can be determinedand compared to the effects on an ensemble or ensemble element that does not have the accessory inplace. A minimum exposure time of 10 seconds is recommended when evaluating technical rescueprotective ensembles. While this test demonstrates ensemble/accessory performance under emergencyconditions, it does not simulate all fire ground hazards, and other evaluations should be considered.

Table A

replace table A .4.2.3.

2 Evaluating Possible Negative Effects of Accessory Attachments on Ensemble Ensemble and EnsembleElement Properties Applicable Section of NFPA 1951 Garments Flame resistance 8.4 Heatresistance 8.5 Whole-garment liquid integrity 8.3 (rescue and recovery; CBRN only) Helmets Flameresistanc 8.18 Heat resistance 8.5 Top-impact resistance 8.19 Electrical insulation 8.51 Gloves Flameresistance 8.24 Heat resistance 8.5 Overall liquid integrity 8.31 (rescue and recovery; CBRNonly) Glove–hand function 8.28 Grip 8.29 Footwear Flame resistance 8.32 Heat resistance 8.5 Electricalinsulation 8.38 Slip resistance 8.37 Hoods (CBRN only) Flame resistance 8.4 Heat resistance 8.5 CBRNprotective ensembles Man-in-simulant test (MIST) 8.442 with the attached table



PI_1855-2013_Annex_A.4.2.3.2.docx Revised table A.4.2.3.2



Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



54 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM

Public Comment No. 39-NFPA 1855-2016 [ Section No. A.5.2.2(6) ]

A.5.2.2(6)

In determining the need for CBRN protection, the organization should determine homeland securitypriorities for their jurisdiction, including, but not limited to, whether the organization would be responding toa CBRN terrorism incident, the specific roles and missions to be undertaken in response to a CBRNterrorism incident, the expected types of hazards that might be encountered for its members during aCBRN terrorism incident, and the capabilities of the organization to provide sufficient training and supportfor the use of CBRN protective ensembles (e.g., decontamination for safe doffing of ensemble elements). Ifit is determined that CBRN protection is needed, the organization should review the CBRN protectiveensemble requirements in NFPA 1951, CBRN terrorism agent protection option in NFPA 1971, the differentclasses of ensembles addressed in NFPA 1994, and the protective ensemble defined in NFPA 1991,together with its intended CBRN terrorism agent response or action plan to determine the suitability ofrequiring protective ensembles meeting the CBRN terrorism agent protection option of NFPA 1951 versusobtaining separate ensembles that comply with specific classes of ensembles for NFPA 1994 or ensemblesmeeting NFPA 1991 or NFPA 1971.



Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



55 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM

Public Comment No. 42-NFPA 1855-2016 [ Sections A.5.2.4, A.5.3.1, A.5.3.1(2) ]

Sections A.5.2.4, A.5.3.1, A.5.3.1(2)


56 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM

A.5.2.4


57 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM

The majority of tests in NFPA 1951 provide quantitative results; however, some tests are established on thebasis of pass or fail results and cannot be readily compared. Specific tests that offer comparativeperformance results include, but are not limited to, the following:

(1) Protective garment elements

(2) Total heat loss of the material composite

(3) Tear resistance of the material layers (outer shell and lining fabrics)

(4) Breaking strength of the outer shell

(5) Abrasion resistance of the outer shell

(6) Cleaning shrinkage of the material layers (outer shell and lining fabrics)

(7) Seam strength of outer shell and lining layers

(8) Flame resistance of material layers and other components (outer shell, lining fabrics, othermaterial layers and components)

(9) Thermal shrinkage of the material layers (outer shell and lining fabrics)

(10) Thermal protective performance of the material composite

(11) Water absorption resistance of the outer shell

(12) Protective helmet elements

(13) Flame resistance

(14) Heat resistance (level of sagging)

(15) Impact resistance (top) after selected preconditions

(16) Protective glove elements

(17) Cut resistance of the glove composite

(18) Puncture resistance of the glove composite

(19) Abrasion resistance of the glove composite

(20) Dexterity of whole gloves

(21) Grip of whole gloves

(22) Flame resistance of the glove composite

(23) Conductive heat resistance of the glove composite

(24) Burst strength of wristlet material

(25) Thermal protective performance of the glove composite

(26) Protective footwear elements

(27) Abrasion resistance of the footwear sole and upper

(28) Cut resistance of the footwear upper

(29) Puncture resistance of the footwear sole and upper

(30) Slip resistance of the footwear sole

(31) Flame resistance of whole footwear

(32) Thermal protective performance of the footwear upper

(33) Conductive heat resistance of the footwear upper

(34) Protective hood interface elements


58 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM

(35) Thermal protective performance of the hood material

(36) Flame resistance of the hood material

(37) Thermal shrinkage of the hood material

(38) Burst strength of the hood material

(39) Cleaning shrinkage of the hood material

(40) CBRN protective ensemble: Man-in-simulant test (MIST) of overall ensemble

(41)

(42)

Additional testing can also be specified for performance properties not addressed in NFPA 1951 based onthe organization's hazard and risk assessment. When additional testing is specified, standard test methodsshould be used when available, and testing should be conducted at accredited, independent laboratories.

Organizations should consider the use of a request for information (RFI) or a request for proposal (RFP)format when soliciting quotations for technical rescue protective ensemble elements. The advantage of anRFI or an RFP proposal is that it allows manufacturers the option of providing all of the most currenttechnologies for organization review (the offering is then not limited to the requirements of thespecification). The organization can then choose among proposals for offered items finally accepted.Typically an RFI and an RFP have the following characteristics:

(1) Minimum requirements, such as NFPA product certification, required materials, or available options

(2) Inclusion of current specifications and a requirement that each manufacturer explain how its offeringdiffers from the currently specified product

(3) Background on the offering firm's finances, capabilities, and references

(4) Field test procedures and results (see 5.1.6) of offered products

Using this approach, the organization can then employ a rating system that assigns values and weights toseveral factors, including but not limited to product design, manufacturer references, and field test results.

In this approach, a separately sealed cost proposal is opened only after the point ratings have beenassigned to each offering. The organization can then apply separate criteria considering both technicalmerits and cost. This approach allows organizations to compare prices and product acceptability.

Organizations should also consider integrated personal protective equipment programs that addressvarious levels of care and maintenance as provided by or coordinated by the manufacturer of theemergency response personal protective equipment. These programs can address many of the aspects ofcare and maintenance that are addressed in this standard, including, but not limited to, cleaning, inspection,and repairs, in addition to the offer of program guidance and reporting and documentation of procedures.


59 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM

A.5.3.1


60 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM

Specifications translate the organization’s needs into performance or design requirements that can be metby manufacturers of protective equipment. Specifications should clearly address every aspect of thedepartment’s needs and expectations in regard to both the performance and the delivery of the ensemblesor ensemble elements.

Organizations should specify delivery time requirements and, if appropriate, penalty assessments for notmeeting delivery dates. Warehousing requirements, if desired, should also be established in theprocurement specification.

Organizations should be careful not to write specifications that are redundant or contradictory or that cannotbe met by manufacturers of ensembles or ensemble elements. For example, the organization should besure the thermal protection performance (TPP) specified can be achieved with the materials specified. Apre-bid meeting with participation by potential bidders or manufacturers is useful in eliminatinginconsistencies and explaining requirements that might be unclear in the specifications.

Organizations should continuously review and document how their specifications and ensembles andensemble elements meet their needs and applicable standards. There are many ways to improve thequantity and quality of information received from prospective bidders. Additionally, increased purchasingpower potential can be gained by forming collective buys with other organizations for possible volumediscounts.

Purchase specifications should indicate the organization’s selection of choice for the following NFPA 1951ensemble element components:

(1) Garments

(2) Outer shell material: fabric, weight, and color

(3) Barrier material (rescue and recovery

or CBRN

(a) ): base fabric, film, or coating

(b) Visibility markings (if present): configuration, material, and color

(c) Closure system

(d) Wristlets: material, design, if present

(4) Helmets

(5) Material

(6) Color

(7) Retention system

(8) Visibility markings (if present): configuration, material, and color

(9) Gloves

(10) Composite materials

Wristlet or gauntlet

(a) Gauntlet ; type of material

(11) Wristlet material

(12) Boots: composite materials

(13) Eye protection (goggles)

(14) Type, ventilated, not ventilated, indirect ventilation

(15) Type of band

(16) Hoods (CBRN only)


61 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM

(17) Material

(18) Face opening design to accommodate respirator

(19) CBRN protective ensemble

(20) Types of interfaces between elements

(21) Respirators accommodated by design and certification

(22)

(a)


62 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM

A.5.3.1(2)


63 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM

An organization should consider its needs for performance or features in excess of the minimumrequirements of NFPA 1951, such as the following:

(1) Garment elements

(2) Any styling issues

(3) Any specific range-of-motion requirements

(4) Any sleeve retraction requirements

(5) Any garment rise with overhead reach requirements

(6) Any additional barrier material requirements

(7) Any additional reinforcement needs (recognizing that multiple layering can modify protectiveperformance in several areas, especially breathability)

(8) Any specific additional thread requirements

(9) Any specific additional requirements for stitch characteristics

(10) Any customized sizing requirements

(11) Any attachment requirements for barriers and outer shells

(12) Any specific requirements for placement of visibility marking, visibility marking materials, andreflective lettering

(13) Any specific material choices

(14) Any requirements for weight reduction

(15) Any specific details of required suspender construction or suspender/garment interface

(16) Any requirements for field interchangeability or replacement of reinforcement pieces

(17) Any requirements for enhanced flexibility at movement-sensitive areas

(18) Any requirements for notification systems to indicate barrier absence

(19) Any requirements for barrier material substrate accessibility to allow field inspection

(20) Any requirements for lumbar support systems

(21) Any customization requirements

(22) Any passport or accountability system requirements

(23) Any specialized or additional pocketing requirements

(24) Any flashlight clips required

(25) Any PASS (personal alert safety system) interface features required

(26) Any requirements for personal escape or rescue features

(27) Any requirements for sizing adjustment

(28) Any requirements for temperature-sensing features

(29) Any requirements for interface area compatibilities

(30) Helmet elements

(31) Any styling requirements

(32) Any customization requirements

(33) Any reflective marking requirements

(34) Any customized sizing requirements


(36) Any specific requirements for earflaps (design, materials, dimensions, attachment to shellspecifics), if the organization determines ear flaps are required as they are not required inNFPA 1951


64 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM

(37) Any specific requirements for suspension construction

(38) Any requirements for weight reduction

(39) Glove elements


(41) Any overall styling requirements

(42) Any details of cuff styling (

wristlet or

(a) gauntlet)

(43) Boot elements


(45) Any overall styling requirements

(46) Any trouser interface requirements

(47) Goggles elements

(48) Any specific lens types and size

(49) Any type of ventilation

(50) Any type of strap material

(51) Overall styling requirements

(52) Hood interface elements(CBRN only)


(54) Any styling requirements

(55) Any coverage requirements

(56)

(a)

(57) All ensemble elements

(58) Any additional certification requirements (e.g., state OSHA, federal OSHA)

(59) Any requirements for interface with existing elements of the protective ensemble

(60) Any warranty requirements

(61) Any requirements for cleaning and repair support

(62) Any requirements for manufacturer or dealer references

(63) CBRN ensembles

(64) Method of deploying the CBRN protection

(65) Position of CBRN barrier layer in the material systems of each element and its ease of itsinspection

(66) Manner in which ensemble interfaces are designed to prevent inward leakage

(67) Specialized donning or doffing procedures in the wearing of the ensemble


65 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM

(68) Ensemble resistance to contamination and ease of ensemble doffing for safe exit of wearerfrom ensemble

(69) Specific types of respirator for which ensemble is certified

(70)



Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



66 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM


A.6.3.5

Revise Table A.6.3.5

provides a quick reference guide to advanced inspection criteria.

Table A.6.3.5 Advanced Inspection Criteria

Criteria Garments Barrier Helmets Gloves Footwear Goggles Hoods InterfaceDevices Soiling X X X X X X X X Contamination X X X X X X Tears and cuts X X X X X X Damaged or missinghardware or closure system X X X X X X Charring, burn holes, melting X X X X X X Shrinkage X Materialdegradation (UV or chemical damage) X X X X X X Material discoloration X X X X X X Visibility markingintegrity, attachment to garment, reflectivity damage X X Loss of face opening elasticity oradjustability X Cracks, dents X X X Abrasions X X X X Bubbling, soft spots, warping X X Damaged or missingcomponents of the suspension and retention systems X X Damaged or missing components includingdiscoloration and scratched lenses X X Inverted glove barrier X Exposed or deformed protective toe,protective midsole, or shank X Loss of water resistance X X X Evaluation of system fit and coat/trouseroverlap X Loss of seam integrity X X Broken or missing stitches X X X Loss or shifting of barriermaterial X Loss of wristlet elasticity, stretching of wristlet X Label integrity and legibility X X X X X Hook andloop functionality X X X Barrier attachment system X X Material elasticity, stretching out of shape X Damageto the impact cap X Loss of flexibility X Punctures, cracking, or splitting X X X Excessive treadwear X Condition of barrier: tears, excessive wear, separation from outer layer X Delamination,separation X X X Size compatibility X

per the attached



PI_1855-2013_Annex_A.6.3.5.docx Revised Table A.6.3.5



Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



67 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM


A.6.3.6.1

Organizations should consult with the manufacturer of the CBRN technical rescue protective ensemble forany additional or specific advanced inspection requirements for this type of ensemble.



Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



68 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM



69 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM

A.6.3.6.3


70 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM

Loss of integrity can be determined by evaluating the inward leakage for representative CBRN technicalrescue protective ensembles. One evaluation method that could be used is the CBRN Ensemble InwardLeakage Resistance Evaluation. The procedure in this section is based on procedures established by theOccupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) for the evaluation of totally encapsulated suits, asfound in Appendix A of OSHA 29 CFR 1910.120, “Hazardous Waste Operations and EmergencyResponse.” Modifications to the procedures have been made to evaluate CBRN technical rescueprotective ensembles that do not encapsulate both the wearer and the breathing apparatus.

For this testing, the entire CBRN technical rescue protective ensemble should be evaluated, includingprotective garments, gloves, footwear, and hood. The protective helmet should be included, if it is part ofthe CBRN technical rescue protective ensemble. The appropriate CBRN respirator should be included asspecified as part of the CBRN technical rescue protective ensemble.

The suggested test procedure involves placement of commercially available colorimetric dosimeters(sensors) on the ensemble wearer’s body at different locations at or near interface areas of the ensemble.An ammonia challenge atmosphere is then created by the placement of a volume of household ammonia(aqueous ammonium hydroxide, approximately 58 percent by weight) in a shallow pan in a closed room,such as a large closet. The procedure generates an ammonia atmosphere of approximately 500 to 1500ppm; the test concentration can be assessed using length of stain detection tubes specific for ammonia.After the placement of the colorimetric dosimeters, the ensemble wearer dons the ensemble and respiratorwell away from the test area, enters the test area, and goes through a series of exercises to stress variousparts of the ensemble. Following the exercises, the ensemble wearer goes to an area well away from thetest area, the ensemble is removed, and the colorimetric dosimeters are examined for color changes.Indications of color change for any of the colorimetric dosimeters that cannot be rationalized from crosscontamination or error in procedure are then deemed as requiring the ensemble to be removed forreevaluation, inspected, and repaired, if necessary.

The CBRN technical rescue ensemble should be evaluated as specified in Test B, Totally EncapsulatingChemical Protective Suit Qualitative Leak Test in Appendix A of 29 CFR 1910.120, with the followingmodifications:


71 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM

(1) All safety precautions must be followed.

(2) The CBRN technical rescue protective ensemble should be substituted for the totally encapsulatingchemical protective suit.

(3) Specific colorimetric dosimeters should be used in lieu of bromophenol blue–indicating paper thathave a specific range of sensitivity of at least 1 ppm when exposed to ammonia for a period of2 minutes.

(4) Eight colorimetric dosimeters should be placed on the test subject at the following locations underthe CBRN technical rescue protective ensemble:

(5) Neck area

(6) Center lower front chest near waist

(7) Center lower back near waist

(8) Each wrist

(9) Front of each leg above the ankle

(10) Forehead above where the respirator facepiece (if used) and the test subject’s face form theseal; these placements are intended to evaluate possible inward leakage in interface areas.Additional colorimetric dosimeters can be added at other locations where inward leakage issuspected to occur. Colorimetric indicators that have been found suitable are the Permea-Tec™aliphatic amine sensors, part no. 3005, available from CLI Laboratories, 1261A Rand Road, DesPlaines, Illinois 60016-3402, 847-803-3737, www.clilabs.com. These adhesive bandage–likesensors are placed on the skin at the recommended locations. The sensors turn a reddish-purple if ammonia at concentrations over 1 ppm is detected.

(11) Performance is deemed as passing if no color changes are noted for any of the colorimetricdosimeters. If color changes are found, a determination should be made that the procedures weredone correctly and that no cross contamination of the colorimetric dosimeters occurred. If the resultsare determined to be valid, the ensemble should be removed from service, repaired, or replaced.



Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



72 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM


A.7.3.7

Machine cleaning is the most effective method for cleaning ensemble elements such as coats, trousers,coveralls, and hoods. It is the most effective means of loosening and removing dirt, soot, and other debris.Presently there are two basic types of automatic washing machines commonly available for use by endusers: top-loading agitator style machines and front-loading washer/extractors. New technologies areemerging every day in the cleaning industry that will affect the options available to both the end user as wellas the ISP for all ensemble elements. At this time, it is generally accepted that front-loading machines aremore appropriate for protective ensembles and ensemble elements, where allowed by the elementmanufacturer. It is very important for machine operators to ensure correct water temperatures and properdetergent and additive selection and to carefully monitor and adjust the g-forces of the spinning/extractioncycle for each element type being laundered. Careful adherence to manufacturers' recommendations ofcleaning processes has a significant impact on cleaning thoroughness and maintenance of protectionfactors inherent in each element, as well as extending the life expectancy of elements. Some of theadvantages and disadvantages of each type of machine follow.

Top-Loading Washers. Top-loading machines are similar to those used in most homes. They use a centerpost agitator to whisk water through the fibers of garments. They are designed to clean multiple garmentsof minimum bulk. As a result of the center post agitation, it is generally accepted that top-loading machinesare more damaging to ensembles and ensemble elements than front-loading machines. Top-loading,agitating machines have the potential to reduce the longevity of garments due to mechanical damage. Iftop-loading machines without center post agitators are used, stainless steel wash tubs free of rough spots,burrs, or sharp edges are recommended to protect against rusting, chipping, and the associated wear onand damage of garments.

Front-Loading Washers. Front-loading washers have a door on the front of the machine through whichgarments are loaded. They clean by lifting garments out of the water and gently dropping them back intothe water. These units provide better mechanical action because of the size and type of rotation, as well asthe degree of extraction. They have various capacities and are designed to handle heavy loads of bulkyitems and also to save water and energy. For these reasons, it is generally accepted that front-loadingmachines are more appropriate for protective clothing. If front-loading machines are used, stainless steelwash tubs free of rough spots, burrs, or sharp edges are recommended to protect against rusting, chipping,snags, and the associated wear on and damage of garments.


Additional information about the use of top loading wash machines without a center post agitator.

Related Public Comments for This Document

Related Comment Relationship

Public Comment No. 52-NFPA 1855-2016 [Section No. 7.3.8]

Related Item

First Revision No. 3-NFPA 1855-2016 [Section No. 7.3.8]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


73 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM

Submittal Date: Thu Nov 17 11:07:03 EST 2016


74 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM

Public Comment No. 28-NFPA 1855-2016 [ Section No. B.1.1 ]

B.1.1 NFPA Publications.


NFPA 1500, Standard on Fire Department Occupational Safety and Health Program, 2018 edition.

NFPA 1521, Standard for Fire Department Safety Officer, 2015 edition.

NFPA 1581, Standard on Fire Department Infection Control Program, 2015 edition.

NFPA 1951, Standard on Protective Ensembles for Technical Rescue Incidents, 2018 2013 edition.

NFPA 1971, Standard on Protective Ensembles for Structural Fire Fighting and Proximity Fire Fighting,2018 edition.

NFPA 1991, Standard on Vapor-Protective Ensembles for Hazardous Materials Emergencies, 2016 edition.

NFPA 1994, Standard on Protective Ensembles for First Responders to CBRN Terrorism Incidents, 20172018 edition.



Updates to editions of referenced publications.

Related Item

First Revision No. 2-NFPA 1855-2016 [Chapter B]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



75 of 75 12/6/2016 1:45 PM

NFPA 1858

NO PUBLIC COMMENTS RECEIVED

Public Input No. 28-NFPA 1975-2017 [ Global Input ]

Clarification is needed to determine if the intended optional insect repellency requirements can beachieved by the end user applying the insect repellent on the product. If this is the case, thendetailed provisions must be provided in the test procedures to better define the procedures (i.e., inaccordance with garment manufacturer or insect repellent vendor instructions). Moreover,additional details are needed to clarify if the insect protection on the fabric is evaluated for flameresistance before and after washing.

It is further unclear on how the longevity of the insect repellency is evaluated as the given reference, GL/PD07-013C, is ambiguous as to the number of launderings to be carried out for this testing.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Additional clarification is needed for indicating how to evaluate garments materials for flame resistance and insect repellency when the optional insect repellency option is chosen.

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 27-NFPA 1975-2017 [New Section after 7.5.3]


Submitter Full Name: Jeffrey Stull

Organization: International Personnel Protection, Inc.

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu Jan 05 16:53:19 EST 2017


1 of 28 1/6/2017 1:10 PM

Public Input No. 17-NFPA 1975-2017 [ Section No. 1.1.2 ]

1.1.2 *

Work apparel garments shall not include socks , or dress uniforms, and specific types of undergarmentsincluding briefs, boxer shorts, boxer briefs, and bras .


NFPA PPE standards are product standards that test the individual PPE product without regard, in many cases, to the compatibility or impact to other complaint products or to the fire fighter. The military has moved onto the process of the “Solder as a System”, more thought is not only put into the overall design, but to the Solder to be managed as a complete system to make them safer, more effective and efficient. Technology is moving the standards to this capability. Fire Fighters must be put at the center of the Personal Protective Equipment process and the standards should be designed for these products Fire Fighters use, in the as worn condition. All layers of clothing add and subtract to the performance of the Fire Fighter and should be accounted for in the standards.



Public Input No. 18-NFPA 1975-2017 [Section No. 3.3.18]


Submitter Full Name: Rick Swan

Organization: IAFF

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Jan 04 14:30:43 EST 2017


2 of 28 1/6/2017 1:10 PM

Public Input No. 11-NFPA 1975-2017 [ Chapter 2 ]

Chapter 2 Referenced Publications

2.1 General.

The documents or portions thereof listed in this chapter are referenced within this standard and shall beconsidered part of the requirements of this document.


3 of 28 1/6/2017 1:10 PM

2.2 NFPA Publications. (Reserved)

2.3 Other Publications.

2.3.1 AATCC Publications.

American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists, P.O. Box 12215, Research Triangle Park, NC27709.

AATCC 42, Water Resistance: Impact Penetration Test, 2007 2013 .

AATCC 100, Antibacterial Finishes on Textile Materials, Assessment of , 2004 2012 .

AATCC 135, Dimensional Changes of Fabrics After Automatic Home Laundering, 2010 2004 .

AATCC 158, Dimensional Changes on Dry-Cleaning in Perchloroethylene: Machine Method, 2011 2016 .

2.3.2 ASTM Publications.

ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959.

ASTM D 751 D751 , Standard Test Methods for Coated Fabrics, 2006 2011 .

ASTM D 1683 D1683 /D 1683M D1683M , Standard Test Method for Failure in Sewn Seams of WovenApparel Fabrics, 2011a 2016 .

ASTM D 6413 D6413/D6413M , Standard Test Method for Flame Resistance of Textiles (Vertical Test),2011a 2015 .

ASTM D 6797 D6797 , Standard Test Method for Bursting Strength of Fabrics Constant Rate of Extension(CRE) Ball Burst Test, 2007 (2011) 2015 .

ASTM E 2149 E2149 , Standard Test Method for Determining the Antimicrobial Activity of ImmobilizedAntimicrobial Agents Under Dynamic Contact Conditions, 2010 2013a .

ASTM F 2894 F2894 , Standard Test Method for Evaluation of Materials, Protective Clothing andEquipment for Heat Resistance Using a Hot Air Circulating Oven, 2012 2014 .

2.3.3 GSA Publications.

U.S. General Services Administration, 1800 F Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20405.

Single copies of GSA publications generally are available at the General Services Administration BusinessCenters in cities throughout the United States. They also are available from the U.S. Government PrintingOffice.

Federal Test Method Standard 191A, Textile Test Methods, 1978.

2.3.4 ISO Publications.

International Organization for Standardization, 1, rue de Varembé, Case postale 56, CH-1211 Geneve 20,ISO Central Secretariat, BIBC II, Chemin de Blandonnet 8, CP 401, 1214 Vernier, Geneva, Switzerland.

ISO 27, Guidelines for corrective action to be taken by a certification body in the event of misuse of itsmark of conformity, 1983.

ISO/IEC 65, General requirements for bodies operating product certification systems ,1996 17065, Conformtiy assessment - Requirements for bodies certifying products, processes andservices, 2012 .

ISO 9001, Quality management systems — requirements, 2000 2008 .

ISO 9001, Quality management systems - requirements, 2015

ISO 17011, General requirements for accreditation bodies accrediting conformity assessment bodies,2004.

ISO/IEC 17021, Conformity assessment — Requirements for bodies providing audit and certification ofmanagement systems - Part 1: Requirements ,2006 2015 .

ISO/IEC 17025, General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories, 2005.


4 of 28 1/6/2017 1:10 PM

2.3.5 Other Publications.

U.S. Department of Defense GL/PD 07-13C, Purchase Description Coat, Army Combat Uniform, U.S. ArmyNatick Research, Development and Engineering Center, Attn: RDNS-WPW-C, Kansas Street, Natick, MA01760-5019, 2011.

Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, 11th edition, Merriam-Webster, Inc., Springfield, MA, 2003.

2.4 References for Extracts in Mandatory Sections. (Reserved)


Update of standards editions, titles and addresses.Note the change of edition of AATCC 135 to 2004 edition. This is correct despite newer editions being available as newer editions changed the type of washer used and the impact of this washer change has not yet been evaluated for Fire Service protective clothing.Additional updates to NFPA standards will be required in second revision.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



5 of 28 1/6/2017 1:10 PM


2.3.2 ASTM Publications.

ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959.

ASTM D 751 D751 , Standard Test Methods for Coated Fabrics, 2006 (2011) .


ASTM D 6413 D6413/D6413M , Standard Test Method for Flame Resistance of Textiles (Vertical Test),2011a 2015 .



ASTM F 2894 F2894 , Standard Test Method for Evaluation of Materials, Protective Clothing and Equipmentfor Heat Resistance Using a Hot Air Circulating Oven, 2012 2014 .


updates - note that ASTM standards no longer have a space between the letter and the number.


Submitter Full Name: Marcelo Hirschler

Organization: GBH International

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



6 of 28 1/6/2017 1:10 PM


3.3.12 * Inherent Flame Resistance.

Flame resistance that is derived from the essential characteristics of the fiber or polymer.


add annex note referencing the annex note to flame resistance.



Public Input No. 23-NFPA 1975-2017 [Section No. A.3.3.9]

Public Input No. 26-NFPA 1975-2017 [New Section after A.3.3.9]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



7 of 28 1/6/2017 1:10 PM


3.3.18 Nonprimary Protective Garment.

A garment or , undergarment or clothing that is not designed nor intended to be the barrier of protectionfrom a specific hazard exposure.


NFPA PPE standards are product standards that test the individual PPE product without regard, in many cases, to the compatibility or impact to other complaint products or to the fire fighter. The military has moved onto the process of the “Solder as a System”, more thought is not only put into the overall design but to the Solder to be managed as a complete system to make them safer, more effective and efficient. Technology is moving the standards to this capability. Fire Fighters must be put at the center of the Personal Protective Equipment process and the standards should be designed for the products Fire Fighters use, in the as worn condition. All layer of clothing add and subtract to the performance of the Fire Fighter and should be accounted for in the standards.





Submitter Full Name: Rick Swan

Organization: IAFF

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



8 of 28 1/6/2017 1:10 PM


4.1.4

All certification shall be performed by a certification organization that meets at least the requirementsspecified in Section 4.2, Certification Program, and that is accredited for personal protective equipment inaccordance with ISO 65, General requirements for bodies operating product certification systems /IEC17065, Conformity assessment - Requirements for bodies certifying products, processes and services .The accreditation shall be issued by an accreditation organization operating in accordance with ISO 17011,General requirements for accreditation bodies accrediting conformity assessment bodies.


ISO Guide 65 has been replaced by ISO/IEC 17065.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



9 of 28 1/6/2017 1:10 PM

Public Input No. 13-NFPA 1975-2017 [ Sections 4.1.9, 4.1.10, 4.1.11 ]

Sections 4.1.9, 4.1.10, 4.1.11

4.1.9

The certification organization shall not issue any new certifications to the 2009 the 2014 edition of NFPA1975 on or after the NFPA effective date for the 2014 the 2019 edition of NFPA 1975, which is November12, 2013 .

4.1.10

The certification organization shall not permit any manufacturer to continue to label any products that arecertified as compliant with the 2009 the 2014 edition of NFPA 1975, on or after November 12, 2013, theeffective date, plus 12 months.

4.1.11

The certification organization shall require manufacturers to remove all certification labels and productlabels indicating compliance with the 2009 the 2014 edition of NFPA 1975, from all products that are underthe control of the manufacturer on November 12, 2013, the effective date, plus 12 months, and thecertification organization shall verify that this action is taken.


Placeholder to update the effective date and certification date requirements. Review again in second revision for accuracy.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



10 of 28 1/6/2017 1:10 PM

Public Input No. 15-NFPA 1975-2017 [ Sections 4.5.3.1, 4.5.3.2 ]

Sections 4.5.3.1, 4.5.3.2

4.5.3.1

Registration to the requirements of ISO 9001, Quality management systems — Requirements, shall beconducted by a registrar that is accredited for personal protective equipment in accordance with ISO/IEC17065 Conformity assessment - Requirements for bodies certifying products, processes and services . The registrar shall affix the accreditation mark on the ISO registration certificate.

4.5.3.2

Registrars specified in 4.5.3.1 shall be accredited for personal protective equipment in accordance withthe 2006 edition of ISO/IEC 17021, Conformity assessment — Requirements for bodies providing auditand certification of management systems The scope of the ISO registration shall include at least the designand manufacturing systems management for the type of personal protective equipment being certified .


Updates these sections to the current boilerplate language being used by other standards in this project.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



11 of 28 1/6/2017 1:10 PM


6.2.1

Work apparel designed for the upper torso shall be permitted to be configured as follows:

(1) Shirt, with collar, full-length front opening, either long sleeve or short sleeve

(2) Polo or golf-style shirt, with collar, pullover with partial front opening, either long sleeve or short sleeve

(3) Tee shirt, pullover without front opening, without collar, either long sleeve or short sleeve (SeeA.1.1.2.)

(4) Sweatshirt, pullover, with or without collar, either long sleeve or short sleeve

(5) Jacket, with or without collar, with full front opening and long sleeves

(6) For visibility All work apparel should at less have 50 % bright colours and minimumreflective.


First responders need to be more visible for optimum safety.


Submitter Full Name: Francois Doucet

Organization: Joliette FD

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Apr 19 01:07:10 EDT 2016


12 of 28 1/6/2017 1:10 PM

Public Input No. 5-NFPA 1975-2015 [ New Section after 7.5.2 ]

New 7.5.2.2

Where emblems or other small textile items are applied or affixed to exterior uniform layers and have an

overall area that is larger than 22500 mm 2 (36in 2 ), those emblem or small textile items shall be tested forflame resistance in accordance with 8.6, Flame Resistance Test, using the small small specimen testprocedures provided in 8.6.11.



1975_F2013_FAE-SCE_SD_PCResponses_6.pdf 1975 PC # 6


NOTE: This Public Input appeared as "Reject but Hold" in Public Comment No. 6 of the F2013 Second Draft Report for NFPA 1975 and per the Regs. at 4.4.8.3.1.

In the exclusion of emblems from being subjected to flame resistance testing, the assumption is made that these items are relatively small and do not present a significant hazard. However, it is possible and has been observed that very large emblems can be used on station/work uniforms. A requirement has been proposed to provide a means for making a determination that the emblem is not small and could be a hazard based on the respective total area of a normal flame resistance specimen 22500 mm2 or 36 in2.


Submitter FullName:

TC ON FAE-SPF

Organization:NFPA TC on Structural and Proximity Fire Fighting ProtectiveClothing and Equipment

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Sep 30 09:56:23 EDT 2015


13 of 28 1/6/2017 1:10 PM

Public Comment No. 6-NFPA 1975-2012 [ New Section after 7.5.2 ]

NEW 7.5.2.2Where emblems or other small textile items are applied or affixed to exterior uniform layers and have an overall area that is larger than 22500 mm2 (36 in2), those emblem or small textile items shall be tested for flame resistance in accordance with 8.6, Flame Resistance Test, using the small small specimen test procedures provided in 8.6.11.


In the exclusion of emblems from being subjected to flame resistance testing, the assumption is made that these items are relatively small and do not present a significant hazard. However, it is possible and has been observed that very large emblems can be used on station/work uniforms. A requirement has been proposed to provide a means for making a determination that the emblem is not small and could be a hazard based on the respective total area of a normal flame resistance specimen 22500 mm2 or 36 in2.


Submitter Full Name: Jeffrey StullOrganization: International Personnel Protection, Inc.Submittal Date: Tue Nov 13 22:59:40 EST 2012

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but held

Resolution: The technical committee decided to hold this comment because of the lack of public review for the requirement of emblems to be flame resistant. The committee will continue to review this issue for the next edition.

Copyright Assignment

I, Jeffrey Stull, hereby irrevocably grant and assign to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) all and full rights in copyright in this Public Comment (including both the Proposed Change and the Statement ofProblem and Substantiation). I understand and intend that I acquire no rights, including rights as a joint author, in any publication of the NFPA in which this Public Comment in this or another similar or derivative form is used. I hereby warrant that I am the author of this Public Comment and that I have full power and authority to enter into this copyright assignment.

By checking this box I affirm that I am Jeffrey Stull, and I agree to be legally bound by the above Copyright Assignment and the terms and conditions contained therein. I understand and intend that, by checking this box, I am creating an electronic signature that will, upon my submission of this form, have the same legal force and effect as a handwritten signature

Page 67 of 148National Fire Protection Association Report

3/15/2013http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentParams=%28Comment...


7.7 Optional Requirements for Moisture-Wicking Station/Work Uniforms

Where station/work uniforms are represented as being moisture-wicking, textiles, excluding interlinings andreinforcements, shall be tested for the liquid wicking rate, as specified in Section 8.8, Liquid Wicking RateTest, and shall have a minimum water rise rate of X inches 30 seconds.





Note: This Public Input appeared as "Reject but Hold" in Public Comment No. 117 of the F2013 Second Draft Report for NFPA 1975 and per the Regs. at 4.4.8.3.1

Since this test measures the wicking rate of the fabrics, a minimum length in 30 seconds has to be included.


Submitter FullName:

TC ON FAE-SPF


Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Sep 29 15:11:22 EDT 2015


14 of 28 1/6/2017 1:10 PM


7.7 Optional Requirements for Moisture-Wicking Station/Work Uniforms. Where station/work uniforms are represented as being moisture-wicking, textiles, excluding interlinings and reinforcements, shall be tested for the liquid wicking rate, as specified in Section 8.8, Liquid Wicking Rate Test, and shall have a minimum water rise time rate of 30 X inches 30 seconds.


Since this test measures the wicking rate of the fabrics, a minimum length in 30 seconds has to be included.


Submitter Full Name: Kimberly HenryOrganization: PBI Performance Products, Inc.Submittal Date: Fri Nov 16 15:15:15 EST 2012

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but held

Resolution: The technical committee believes that moisture management needs to be addressed in the next edition of the standard.


I, Kimberly Henry, hereby irrevocably grant and assign to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) all and full rights in copyright in this Public Comment (including both the Proposed Change and the Statement ofProblem and Substantiation). I understand and intend that I acquire no rights, including rights as a joint author, in any publication of the NFPA in which this Public Comment in this or another similar or derivative form is used. I hereby warrant that I am the author of this Public Comment and that I have full power and authority to enter into this copyright assignment.

By checking this box I affirm that I am Kimberly Henry, and I agree to be legally bound by the above Copyright Assignment and the terms and conditions contained therein. I understand and intend that, by checking this box, I am creating an electronic signature that will, upon my submission of this form, have the same legal force and effect as a handwritten signature




7.5.4

These optional requirements shall not apply to insect repellents that are applied by the end user to attainthe necessary performance.


It is unclear if external insect repellent treatments can be applied by the end user as a means for achieving this optional performance. If such a practice was permitted, there would be no means for the manufacturer to control the claim of insect repellency given the reliance on the end user properly applying the treatment.



Public Input No. 28-NFPA 1975-2017 [Global Input]


Submitter Full Name: Jeffrey Stull

Organization: International Personnel Protection, Inc.

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



15 of 28 1/6/2017 1:10 PM


7.8 Optional Requirements for Odor Resistant Station/Work Uniforms

7.8.1 Where station/work uniforms are represented as having odor resistance properties, textile fabrics shallbe tested for the microbial resistance, as specified in Section 8.9, Odor Resistance Effectiveness Test, andshall have a 99.9% reduction of bacteria.

7.8.2 Where station/work uniforms are represented as having odor resistance properties, textile fabrics shallbe tested for water absorption resistance, as specified in 8.13, Water Absorption Test, and shall have awater absorption of 15% or less.

7.8.3 Where station/work uniforms are represented as having odor resistance properties, textile fabrics shallbe tested for water repellency, as spedified in 8.16, Water Repellency Test, and shall have a spray rating of80 or better.





Note: This Public Input appeared as "Reject but Hold" in Public Comment No. 72 of the F2013 Second Draft Report for NFPA 1975 and per the Regs. at 4.4.8.3.1

The effectiveness of antimicrobial finishes on fabrics is partly dependent on the bioburden present in the fabric, Fabrics that absorb large quantities or liquid or those that do not repel liquids are far more likely not to prevent the the growth of microorganisms that lead to odor and other problems. The need to maintain a low bioburden has been demonstration in research by Margaret P. Cotton, Thomas J. Walsh, and Matthew J. Hardwick, Fabric Challenge Assays: new standards for the evaluation of the performance of textiles treated with antimicrobial agents, at MedStar Health Research Institute and the Weill Cornell University Medical Center.


Submitter FullName:

TC ON FAE-SPF


Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Sep 29 15:20:15 EDT 2015


16 of 28 1/6/2017 1:10 PM


7.8 Optional Requirements for Odor Resistant Station/Work Uniforms. 7.8.1 Where station/work uniforms are represented as having odor resistant resistance properties, textiles textile fabrics shall be tested for the microbial resistance, as specified in Section 8.9, Odor Resistance Effectiveness Test, and shall have a 99.9% reduction of bacteria.

7.8.2 Where station/work uniforms are represented as having odor resistance properties, textile fabrics shall be tested for water absorption resistance, as specified in 8.13, Water Absorption Test, and shall have a water absorption of 15% or less.

7.8.3 Where station/work uniforms are represented as having odor resistance properties, textile fabrics shall be tested for water repellency, as specfied in 8.16, Water Repellency Test, and shall have a spray rating of 80 or better.


File Name Description Approved1975_Supplement_to_Stull_Public_Comment_72.docx


The effectiveness of antimicrobial finishes on fabrics is partly dependent on the bioburden present in the fabric, Fabrics that absorb large quantities or liquid or those that do not repel liquids are far more likely not to prevent the the growth of microorganisms that lead to odor and other problems. The need to maintain a low bioburden has been demonstration in research by Margaret P. Cotton, Thomas J. Walsh, and Matthew J. Hardwick, Fabric Challenge Assays: new standards for the evaluation of the performance of textiles treated with antimicrobial agents, at MedStar Health Research Institute and the Weill Cornell University Medical Center.


Submitter Full Name: Jeffrey StullOrganization: International Personnel Protection, Inc.Submittal Date: Wed Nov 14 22:03:19 EST 2012

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but held

Resolution: The technical committee decided to hold this comment because further research in water absorption for odor resistant garments is needed. The technical committee will continue to review this issue for the next edition.





New Section after 7.11

Where station/work uniforms are represented as having water resistance, textile fabrics, excludingemblems, labels, interlinigs, hook and pile fasteners, and closure tape, shall be tested as specified in 8.16,Water Repellency Test, and shall have a spray rating of 80 or better.





NOTE: This Public Input appeared as "Reject but Hold" in Public Comment No. 69 of the F2013 Second Draft Report for NFPA 1975 and per the Regs. at 4.4.8.3.1.

The use of a water absorption test alone is insufficient for characterizing a station/work uniform as water resistance. An industry standard test method has been proposed in a separate comment to address the demonstration of water repellency as part of the proposed optional water resistance requirement.


Submitter FullName:

TC ON FAE-SPF

Organization:NFPA TC on Structural and Prosimity Fire Fighting ProtectiveCothing and Equipment

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Sep 30 09:46:50 EDT 2015


17 of 28 1/6/2017 1:10 PM

Public Comment No. 69-NFPA 1975-2012 [ New Section after 7.11 ]

NEW 7.11.2Where station/work uniforms are represented as having water resistance, textile fabrics, excluding emblems, labels, interlinings, hook and pile fasteners, and closure tape, shall be tested as specified in 8.16, Water Repellency Test, and shall have a spray rating of 80 or better.


The use of a water absorption test alone is insufficient for characterizing a station/work uniform as water resistance. An industry standard test method has been proposed in a separate comment to address the demonstration of water repellency as part of the proposed optional water resistance requirement.


Submitter Full Name: Jeffrey StullOrganization: International Personnel Protection, IncSubmittal Date: Wed Nov 14 21:50:20 EST 2012

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but held

Resolution: The technical committee decided to hold this comment because further research in water absorption and water resistance requirements is needed. The technical committee will continue to review this issue for the nextedition.


I, Jeffrey Stull, hereby irrevocably grant and assign to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) all and full rights in copyright in this Public Comment (including both the Proposed Change and the Statement of Problem and Substantiation). I understand and intend that I acquire no rights, including rights as a joint author, in any publication of the NFPA in which this Public Comment in this or another similar or derivative form is used. I hereby warrant that I am the author of this Public Comment and that I have full power and authority to enter into this copyright assignment.

By checking this box I affirm that I am Jeffrey Stull, and I agree to be legally bound by the above Copyright Assignment and the terms and conditions contained therein. I understand and intend that, by checking this box, I am creating an electronic signature that will, upon my submission of this form, have the same legal force and effect as a handwritten signature



Public Input No. 19-NFPA 1975-2017 [ Section No. 8.1.2.1 ]

8.1.2.1

Specimens shall be conditioned at a temperature of 21°C, ±3°C (70°F, ±5°F) and a relative humidity of 65percent, ±5 percent, until equilibrium is reached, as determined in accordance with Section 4 of FederalTest Method 191A, Textile Test Methods , or ASTM D1776, Standard Practice for Conditioning Textiles forTesting, or for at least 24 hours, whichever is shortest.


This revision updates the conditioning procedure to match the procedure that is used throughout the rest of the project. Actual conditioning temperature and time remains unchanged.


Submitter Full Name: Amanda Newsom

Organization: UL LLC

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



18 of 28 1/6/2017 1:10 PM


8.3.1 Application.

This test method shall apply to textiles excluding knits intended for base layer garments .



1975_F2013_FAE-SCE_SD_PCResponses_120.pdf NFPA 1975, Public Comment No. 120


NOTE: This Public Input appeared as "Rejected but Held" in Public Comment No. 120 of the F2013 Second Draft Report for NFPA 1975 and per the Regs. at 4.4.8.3.1.

Base layer requirements should be do no harm. The oven temperature is 265 ?C or 510 ?F for a 6 hour exposure. This test exceeds the oven test requirements for even primary protective clothing


Submitter FullName:

TC ON FAE-SPF


Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon Sep 28 15:29:53 EDT 2015


19 of 28 1/6/2017 1:10 PM


8.3.1 Application. This test method shall apply to textiles excluding knits intended for base layergarments .


Base layer requirements should be do no harm. The oven temperature is 265 ?C or 510 ?F for a 6 hour exposure. This test exceeds the oven test requirements for even primary protective clothing.


Submitter Full Name: Kathleen McNuttOrganization: Globe Manufacturing CoSubmittal Date: Tue Nov 20 10:13:23 EST 2012

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but held

Resolution: The technical committee is not addressing the concept of layering in this revision, but will consider this issue for future revisions of the standard when further data is available.


I, Kathleen McNutt, hereby irrevocably grant and assign to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) all and full rights in copyright in this Public Comment (including both the Proposed Change and the Statement of Problem and Substantiation). I understand and intend that I acquire no rights, including rights as a joint author, in any publication of the NFPA in which this Public Comment in this or another similar or derivative form is used. I hereby warrant that I am the author of this Public Comment and that I have full power and authority to enter into this copyright assignment.

By checking this box I affirm that I am Kathleen McNutt, and I agree to be legally bound by the above Copyright Assignment and the terms and conditions contained therein. I understand and intend that, by checking this box, I am creating an electronic signature that will, upon my submission of this form, have the same legal force and effect as a handwritten signature



Public Input No. 24-NFPA 1975-2017 [ Section No. 8.6.1.1 ]

8.6.1.1 *

This test method shall apply to flame resistant textiles and visibility markings.


add pointer to annex material




Public Input No. 25-NFPA 1975-2017 [New Section after A.8.4.1.2]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



20 of 28 1/6/2017 1:10 PM

Public Input No. 26-NFPA 1975-2017 [ New Section after A.3.3.9 ]

A.3.3.12 See also A.3.3.9.


add pointer








Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



21 of 28 1/6/2017 1:10 PM

Public Input No. 23-NFPA 1975-2017 [ Section No. A.3.3.9 ]

A.3.3.9 Flame Resistance.

Flame resistance can be an inherent property of the textile material, or it can be imparted by specifictreatment. Flame resistance is a relative concept because it depends on the source of heat or flame thatthe textile material is supposed to withstand. A textile material can be deemed flame resistant if it complieswith one specific required test method (as would be ASTM D6413 in this case) but might still be unable toresist ignition from an alternate source or an alternate test method.


It is important to note that flame resistance is not an absolute concept.




Public Input No. 24-NFPA 1975-2017 [Section No. 8.6.1.1]

Public Input No. 25-NFPA 1975-2017 [New Section after A.8.4.1.2]

Public Input No. 26-NFPA 1975-2017 [New Section after A.3.3.9]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



22 of 28 1/6/2017 1:10 PM

Public Input No. 14-NFPA 1975-2017 [ New Section after A.4.2.9 ]

A.4.5.3

In September of 2015, a revised edition of ISO 9001 Quality management systems – Requirements wasissued. Both the 2008 and 2015 editions of the standard are being referenced in this revision of thestandard to allow manufacturer’s sufficient amount of time to transition their quality management systemsregistration to this new edition.


Addition of clarification language as to registration by manufacturer's to ISO 9001 2015 edition. This language was provided by the Correlating Committee to all TC's in the current revision cycles related to timing of the ISO standard and the NFPA standard publication.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



23 of 28 1/6/2017 1:10 PM

Public Input No. 25-NFPA 1975-2017 [ New Section after A.8.4.1.2 ]

A.8.6.1 See also A.3.3.9


pointer to information on flame resistance



Public Input No. 24-NFPA 1975-2017 [Section No. 8.6.1.1]





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



24 of 28 1/6/2017 1:10 PM

Public Input No. 16-NFPA 1975-2017 [ Chapter C ]

Annex C Informational References


25 of 28 1/6/2017 1:10 PM

C.1 Referenced Publications.

The documents or portions thereof listed in this annex are referenced within the informational sections ofthis standard and are not part of the requirements of this document unless also listed in Chapter 2 for otherreasons.

C.1.1 NFPA Publications.


NFPA 1581, Standard on Fire Department Infection Control Program, 2010 2016 edition.

NFPA 1951, Standard on Protective Ensembles for Technical Rescue Incidents, 2013 edition.

NFPA 1977, Standard on Protective Clothing and Equipment for Wildland Fire Fighting, 2011 2016edition.

NFPA 1994, Standard on Protective Ensembles for First Responders to CBRN Terrorism Incidents, 2012edition.


C.1.2 Other Publications.

C.1.2.1 AATCC Publications.

American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists, P.O. Box 12215, Research Triangle Park, NC27709.

AATCC 42, Water Resistance: Impact Penetration Test, 2007 2013 .

AATCC 100, Antibacterial Finishes on Textile Materials: Assessment of, 2004 2012 .

AATCC 135, Dimensional Changes of Fabrics After Automatic Home Laundering, 2004.

AATCC 158, Dimensional Changes on Dry-Cleaning in Perchloroethylene: Machine Method, 2005 2016 .

C.1.2.2 ASTM Publications.

ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959.

ASTM D 751 D751 , Standard Test Methods for Coated Fabrics, 2006 2011 .


ASTM D 6413 D6413/D6413M , Flame Resistance of Textiles (Vertical Test), 2011a 2015 .


ASTM F 1731 F1731 , Standard Practice for Body Measurement and Sizing of Fire and Rescue ServicesUniforms and Other Thermal Hazard Protective Clothing, 1996 (2008) 2013 .

ASTM E 2149, F2894 Standard Test Method for Evaluation of Materials, Protective Clothing andEquipment for Heat Resistance Using a Hot Air Circulating Oven, 2014.

ASTM E2149, Standard Test Method for Determining the Antimicrobial Activity of ImmobilizedAntimicrobial Agents Under Dynamic Contact Conditions, 2010 2013a .

C.1.2.3 ISEA Publications.

International Safety Equipment Association, 1901 North Moore Street, Arlington, VA 22209-1762.

ANSI/ISEA 107, High-Visibility Safety Apparel and Headwear Accessories , 2004 2015 .

ANSI/ISEA 207, High-Visibility Public Safety Vests, 2011.


26 of 28 1/6/2017 1:10 PM

C.1.2.4 ISO Publications.

International Organization for Standardization, 1, rue de Varembé, Case postale 56, CH-1211 Geneve 20,ISO Central Secretariat, BIBC II, Chemin de Blandonnet 8, CP 401, 1214 Vernier, Geneva, Switzerland.

ISO 27, Guidelines for corrective action to be taken by a certification body in the event of misuse of itsmark of conformity, 1983.

ISO/IEC 65, General requirements for bodies operating product certification systems , 1996.ISO 17493,Clothing and equipment for protection against heat — Test method for convective heat resistance using ahot air circulating oven , 2000 17065, Conformity assessment - Requirements for bodies certifyingproducts, processes and services, 2012 .

C.1.2.5 U.S. Government Publications.

U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402.

Title 21, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 7, Subpart C.

Title 29, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 1910.1030, 6 March 1992.

Title 42, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 84, Subpart E.

FHA Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, 2012

C.2 Informational References. (Reserved)

C.3 References for Extracts in Informational Sections. (Reserved)


Updates to standards, editions and addresses referenced in the document.Will need to update some NFPA references in second revision.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



27 of 28 1/6/2017 1:10 PM

Public Input No. 21-NFPA 1975-2017 [ Section No. C.1.2.2 ]

C.1.2.2 ASTM Publications.

ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959.

ASTM D 751 D751 , Standard Test Methods for Coated Fabrics, 2006 (2011) .


ASTM D 6413 D6413/D6431M , Flame Resistance of Textiles (Vertical Test), 2011a 2015 .


ASTM F 1731 F1731 , Standard Practice for Body Measurement and Sizing of Fire and Rescue ServicesUniforms and Other Thermal Hazard Protective Clothing, 1996 (2008 2013 ).



updates




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



28 of 28 1/6/2017 1:10 PM

Documents

NFPA Technical Committee on Special Operations …...NFPA Technical Committee on Special Operations Protective Clothing and Equipment Savannah, GA January 23-27, 2017 Agenda 1.Call