AGENDA NFPA Technical Committee on Assembly Occupancies NFPA 101 … · 2018-07-20 · AGENDA NFPA Technical Committee on Assembly Occupancies NFPA 101 and NFPA 5000 First Draft Meeting

AGENDA NFPA Technical Committee on Assembly Occupancies

NFPA 101 and NFPA 5000 First Draft Meeting Monday, August 20, 2018

Minneapolis Marriott City Center Minneapolis, Minnesota

1. Call to order. Call meeting to order by Chair Josh Lambert at 8:00 a.m. on August 20, 2018 at the Minneapolis Marriott City Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

2. Introduction of committee members and guests. For a current committee roster, see page 2.

3. Approval of July 18, 2016 second draft meeting minutes. See page 6.

4. The process – staff PowerPoint presentation. See page 9.

5. Correlating committee minutes with direction for 2018 editions. See page 26.

a. Item 4.e: Mass notification system task group – M. Herrera b. Item 5.a: Held items – J. Lambert c. Items 7.a.i: Means of egress provision organization (related PI 101-157) d. Item 7.a.iii: Sprinkler requirement “pointers”

6. Core chapter first revisions of interest – staff review.

7. Aisle terminations task group report – E. Roether, TG Chair.

8. “Escape room” task group report – J. Washburn, TG Chair.

9. NFPA 101 First Draft preparation. For Public Input, see page 34.

10. NFPA 5000 First Draft preparation. For Public Input, see page 86.

11. Other business.

12. Future meetings.

13. Adjournment.

Enclosures

Page 1 of 101

Address List No PhoneAssembly Occupancies SAF-AXM

Safety to Life

Gregory E. Harrington07/11/2018

SAF-AXM

Josh Lambert

ChairUniversity of Texas at Austin304 East 24th Street, Suite 202ADMail Code C2600Austin, TX 78712

U 07/29/2013SAF-AXM

Gregory E. Harrington

Secretary (Staff-Nonvoting)National Fire Protection AssociationOne Batterymarch ParkQuincy, MA 02169-7471

2/3/2016

SAF-AXM

George D. Bushey

PrincipalRosser International1550 Peachtree Street, Suite 800Atlanta, GA 30309

SE 4/5/2001SAF-AXM

Eric Center

PrincipalCedar Hammock Fire RescueFire Marshal5200 26th Street WestBradenton, FL 34207Florida Fire Marshals & Inspectors AssociationAlternate: Shawn M. Hanson

E 08/09/2012

SAF-AXM

William Conner

PrincipalBill Conner Associates LLC637 North Marion StreetOak Park, IL 60302American Society of Theater Consultants

SE 1/1/1987SAF-AXM

Nils Deacon

PrincipalMutual Service Office, Inc.1108 Morris AvenuePoint Pleasant, NJ 08742

I 11/30/2016

SAF-AXM

Daniel P. Finnegan

PrincipalSiemens Industry, Inc.Building Technologies DivisionFire & Security2953 Exeter CourtWest Dundee, IL 60118-1724National Electrical Manufacturers AssociationAlternate: Jason A. Lupa

M 3/2/2010SAF-AXM

Max L. Gandy

PrincipalChurch of Jesus Christ of Latter-day SaintsAEC Division50 East North Temple Street12th Floor West WingSalt Lake City, UT 84150-0012Alternate: Christopher M. Jenkins

U 10/29/2012

SAF-AXM

Donald G. Goosman

PrincipalWiss Janney Elstner Associates, Inc.10 South Lasalle Street, Suite 2600Chicago, IL 60603-1017

SE 12/08/2015SAF-AXM

Harold C. Hansen

PrincipalVenue Management Consultants Group, LLC7414 North Sheridan RoadChicago, IL 60626-2012

SE 10/28/2008

SAF-AXM

Mark A. Herrera

PrincipalInternational Association of Venue Managers635 Fritz Drive, Suite 100Coppell, TX 75019-4462

U 04/08/2015SAF-AXM

David W. Hollinger

PrincipalDrexel University3201 Arch Street, Suite 350Philadelphia, PA 19104-2756

U 03/03/2014

1Page 2 of 101


Safety to Life


SAF-AXM

Jonathan Humble

PrincipalAmerican Iron and Steel Institute45 South Main Street, Suite 312West Hartford, CT 06107-2402Alternate: Farid Alfawakhiri

M 7/20/2000SAF-AXM

Kenneth F. Keberle

PrincipalArena Americas2537 East Huntington DriveTempe, AZ 85282-4161

U 10/18/2011

SAF-AXM

John Lake

PrincipalCity of Gainesville306 NE 6th Avenue, Building BP.O. Box 490, Station 9Gainesville, FL 32627-0490Northeast Florida Fire Prevention AssociationAlternate: Van Hoover Patterson

E 4/3/2003SAF-AXM

Jake Pauls

PrincipalJake Pauls Consulting Services255 Glenlake Avenue, Suite 2207Toronto, ON M6P 1G2 Canada

SE 4/1/1993

SAF-AXM

Ryan Peterson

PrincipalWayne Auto Fire Sprinklers4683 Laredo AvenueFort Myers, FL 33905National Fire Sprinkler AssociationAlternate: David Kurasz

M 08/17/2017SAF-AXM

Vincent Quinterno

PrincipalRhode Island State Fire Marshal’s Office560 Jefferson BoulevardWarwick, RI 02886

E 8/5/2009

SAF-AXM

Ed Roether

PrincipalEd Roether Consulting LLC25950 Mission BelleviewLouisburg, KS 66053

SE 7/20/2000SAF-AXM

Karl G. Ruling

PrincipalEntertainment Services & Technology Association630 Ninth Avenue, Suite 609New York, NY 10036US Institute for Theatre Technology, Inc.Alternate: Jerrold S. Gorrell

U 4/5/2001

SAF-AXM

Steven J. Scandaliato

PrincipalSDG, LLC15123 Harness LaneWebster, TX 77598American Fire Sprinkler Association

IM 1/15/2004SAF-AXM

Charles J. Schweitzer

PrincipalCity of LincolnBureau of Fire Prevention555 South 10th StreetLincoln, NE 68508Alternate: Robert D. Fiedler

E 03/05/2012

SAF-AXM

Philip R. Sherman

PrincipalPhilip R. Sherman, PE444 Wilmot Center RoadPO Box 216Elkins, NH 03233-0216

SE 1/1/1989SAF-AXM

Jeffrey Shirey

PrincipalUniversity of Maryland - Office of the Fire MarshalOffice of Environmental Safety2880 Chance CourtHuntingtown, MD 20639

E 08/03/2016

2Page 3 of 101


Safety to Life


SAF-AXM

Elbert R. Thomas, Jr.

PrincipalNew Orleans Fire Department317 Decatur StreetNew Orleans, LA 70130-1023Alternate: Julie A. Little

E 03/05/2012SAF-AXM

Jeffrey S. Tubbs

PrincipalArup60 State StreetBoston, MA 02109Alternate: Toby J. White

SE 7/20/2000

SAF-AXM

Janet A. Washburn

PrincipalCity of Hollywood Fire DepartmentDivision Chief/Fire Marshal2741 Stirling RoadHollywood, FL 33312International Fire Marshals AssociationLocal

E 04/08/2015SAF-AXM

Gene Boecker

Voting AlternateCode Consultants, Inc.2043 Woodland Parkway, Suite 300St. Louis, MO 63146-4235National Association of Theatre Owners

U 1/12/2000

SAF-AXM

David Cook

Voting AlternateRalph Gerdes Consultants, LLC5510 South East Street, Suite EIndianapolis, IN 46227

SE 1/17/1997SAF-AXM

Farid Alfawakhiri

AlternateAmerican Iron and Steel Institute380 Cottonwood LaneNaperville, IL 60540-5020Principal: Jonathan Humble

M 7/23/2008

SAF-AXM

Robert D. Fiedler

AlternateCity of LincolnBureau of Fire Prevention555 South 10th StreetLincoln, NE 68508Principal: Charles J. Schweitzer

E 1/1/1991SAF-AXM

Jerrold S. Gorrell

AlternateTheatre Safety Programs15514 East Bumblebee LaneFountain Hills, AZ 85268US Institute for Theatre Technology, Inc.Principal: Karl G. Ruling

U 4/3/2003

SAF-AXM

Shawn M. Hanson

AlternateGreater Naples Fire Rescue District2700 Horseshoe Drive NorthNaples, FL 34104Florida Fire Marshals & Inspectors AssociationPrincipal: Eric Center

E 08/03/2016SAF-AXM

Christopher M. Jenkins

AlternateChurch of Jesus Christ of Latter-day SaintsChurch Office Building50 East North TempleSalt Lake City, UT 84150-9001Principal: Max L. Gandy

U 03/03/2014

SAF-AXM

David Kurasz

AlternateNew Jersey Fire Sprinkler Advisory Board2 King Arthur Court, Suite #1North Brunswick, NJ 08902-3381National Fire Sprinkler AssociationPrincipal: Ryan Peterson

M 08/11/2014SAF-AXM

Julie A. Little

AlternateOffice of State Fire Marshal1450 Poydras Street, Suite 1500New Orleans, LA 70112-1526Principal: Elbert R. Thomas, Jr.

E 08/11/2014

3Page 4 of 101


Safety to Life


SAF-AXM

Jason A. Lupa

AlternateSiemens Industry, Inc.2000 Crawford Place, Suite 300Mrt. Laurel, NJ 08054-3920National Electrical Manufacturers AssociationPrincipal: Daniel P. Finnegan

M 04/08/2015SAF-AXM

Van Hoover Patterson

AlternateState Of Florida NE Region Jacksonville Office921 North Davis, Building B, Suite # 270Jacksonville, FL 32209Principal: John Lake

E 08/17/2017

SAF-AXM

Toby J. White

AlternateArup955 Massachusetts AvenueSuite 402Cambridge, MA 02139-3180Principal: Jeffrey S. Tubbs

SE 08/09/2012SAF-AXM

Gregory E. Harrington

Staff LiaisonNational Fire Protection AssociationOne Batterymarch ParkQuincy, MA 02169-7471

2/3/2016

4Page 5 of 101

MINUTES NFPA Technical Committee on Assembly Occupancies

NFPA 101 and NFPA 5000 Second Draft Meeting Monday, July 18, 2016

Hilton Fort Lauderdale Marina Fort Lauderdale, Florida

1. Call to order. The meeting was called to order by Chair Jeffrey Tubbs at 8:00 a.m. on July 18, 2016, at the Hilton Fort Lauderdale Marina, Fort Lauderdale, Florida.

2. Self-introductions.

TECHNICAL COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT

NAME COMPANY Jeffrey Tubbs, Chair Arup Raymond Battalora, Principal JENSEN HUGHES Lorrell Bush, Principal National Fire Sprinkler Association

Rep. National Fire Sprinkler Association George Bushey, Principal Rosser International Eric Center, Principal Cedar Hammock Fire Rescue

Rep. Florida Fire Marshals & Inspectors Association

William Conner, Principal Bill Conner Associates LLC Rep. American Society of Theater Consultants

Daniel Finnegan, Principal Siemens Industry, Inc. Rep. National Electrical Manufacturers Association

Max Gandy, Principal Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Harold Hansen, Principal Venue Management Consultants Group, LLC David Hollinger, Principal Drexel University Jonathan Humble, Principal American Iron and Steel Institute Josh Lambert, Principal University of Texas at Austin Gregory Miller, Principal Code Consultants, Inc. Jake Pauls, Principal Jake Pauls Consulting Services Vincent Quinterno, Principal Steven Scandaliato, Principal American Fire Sprinkler Association Charles Schweitzer, Principal City of Lincoln

Page 6 of 101

Philip Sherman, Principal Philip R. Sherman, PE Janet Washburn, Principal City of Hollywood Fire Department

Rep. International Fire Marshals Association Local

Jerrold Gorrell, Alt. to K. Ruling Theatre Safety Programs Rep. US Institute for Theatre Technology, Inc.

Julie Little, Alt. to E. Thomas, Jr. Louisiana State Fire Marshal Gregory Harrington, Secretary, Staff Liaison

NFPA

TECHNICAL COMMITTEE MEMBERS NOT PRESENT (NOT LISTED WHERE ALTERNATE ATTENDED)

NAME COMPANY Ralph Gerdes, Principal Ralph Gerdes Consultants, LLC Donald Goosman, Principal Wiss Janney Elstner Associates Inc. Mark Herrera, Principal International Association of Venue Managers Kenneth Keberle, Principal Arena Americas John Lake, Principal City of Gainesville Ed Roether, Principal Ed Roether Consulting LLC

GUESTS

NAME COMPANY

David Tabar Northern Risk LLC Richard Roberts Honeywell/NEMA

3. Previous minutes. The August 24, 2015 first draft meeting minutes were approved as

submitted.

4. Process. Staff provided an overview of the second draft meeting procedures. See the meeting agenda for the PowerPoint slides.

5. Aisle terminations task group report Ed Roether, TG Chair. No report. The subject might be considered for submittal as an NFPA Research Fund project and was retained on the agenda.

6. Evaluation of smoke-protected assembly seating capacity factors. The subject was

retained from the previous meeting. Discussion centered on the interpolation of capacity factors in NFPA 101, Tables 12.4.2.3 and 13.4.2.3 (see 12.4.2.5 and 13.4.2.5). It is unknown whether the interpolation of values has been validated. The committee supports requesting a Fire Protection Research Foundation project to validate the interpolation of the values. Staff will coordinate with the chair on the submittal of a project request.

7. Sightline-constrained railing height Harold Hansen. The subject of falls over railings in

assembly venues is complicated. Accidents can be caused by reaching over railings (e.g., to catch a ball), negligence (e.g., standing on railings), and other factors. The scope of the problem is not well known; is it a handful of incidents or do accidents happen routinely?

Page 7 of 101

A solution that will not adversely impact the quality of the event or performance is not readily obvious. This might be a subject for consideration by the Fire Protection Research Foundation for an NFPA Research Fund project. The scope of any such project should focus on items that the committee can address in the codes (i.e., the codes are unable to regulate human behavior).

8. Life safety evaluation threshold of occupant load >6,000. No action, subject is closed.

9. NFPA 101 Second Draft preparation. The TC reviewed the Public Comments and

developed Second Revisions as applicable see the NFPA 101 second draft report.

10. NFPA 5000 Second Draft preparation. The TC reviewed the Public Comments and developed Second Revisions as applicable see the NFPA 101 second draft report.

11. Other business. A task group was report to the committee at the next meeting with any needed recommendations for revisions to the codes. The task members are: Janet Washburn (TG Chair), Lorrell Bush, Eric Center, and Vinny Quinterno.

12. Future meetings. The committee will next meet to prepare the first drafts of the 2021 editions of NFPA 101 and 5000 in 2018.

13. Adjournment. The meeting adjourned at 1:15 p.m.

Page 8 of 101

NFPA 101‐5000 First Draft MeetingsJuly 23‐27 & August 20‐23, 2018

1

NFPA.ORG | © National Fire Protection Association. All rights reserved.

IT’S A BIG WORLD. LET’S PROTECT IT TOGETHER.TM

NFPA 101 & NFPA 5000First Draft Meetings

Minneapolis Marriott City Center

Minneapolis, Minnesota

July 23-27, 2018 & August 20-23, 2018


NFPA First Draft Meeting

2

At this and all NFPA committee meetings, we are concerned with your safety.

If the fire alarm sounds, please egress the building.

Page 9 of 101


2



• Please verify/update your contact information on roster attached to sign-in list.

• Members categorized in any interest category who have been retained to represent the interests of ANOTHER interest category (with respect to issues addressed by the TC) shall declare those interests to the committee and refrain from voting on those issues throughout the process.

3

Members:



• All guests are required to sign in and identify their affiliations.

• Participation is limited to TC members or those individuals who have previously requested time to address the committee.

• Participation by other guests is permitted at the Chair’s discretion.

4

Guests:

Page 10 of 101


3



• Use of audio recorders or other means capable of reproducing verbatim transcriptions of this meeting is not permitted.

5

Members and Guests:


Annual 2020 Revision Cycle – Key Dates• Public Input Stage (First Draft):

First Draft Meeting: July 23-27 and August 20-23, 2018 Posting of First Draft for Balloting Date: before October 17, 2018 Posting of First Draft for Public Comment: February 27, 2019

• Comment Stage (Second Draft): Public Comment Closing Date: May 8, 2019 Second Draft Meeting Period: TBD - June 1 to July 31, 2019 Posting of Second Draft for Balloting Date: September 11, 2019 Posting of Second Draft for NITMAM: January 22, 2020

• Tech Session Preparation: NITMAM Closing Date: February 19, 2020 NITMAM / CAM Posting Date: April 1, 2020 NFPA Technical Meeting: June 17, 2020 (Orlando)

• Standards Council Issuance: Issuance of Documents with CAM: August 14, 2020

6

Page 11 of 101


4



• Either Principal or Alternate can vote, not both.

• All Principals are encouraged to have an Alternate.

• Voting (simple majority) during meeting is used to establish a base position on First Revisions.

• Voting (simple majority) during meeting is also used to establish Public Input resolution responses and to create Committee Inputs.

7

Voting During the First Draft Meeting:



• Follow Robert’s Rules of Order

• Discussion requires a motion

8

General Procedures:

Page 12 of 101


5



• Member addresses the chair.

• Receives recognition from the chair.

• Member introduces the motion.

• Another member seconds the motion.

9

Committee Member Actions:



• Restates the motion

• Calls for discussion

• Ensures all issues have been heard

• Calls for a vote

• Announces the vote result

10

Committee Chair Actions:

Page 13 of 101


6



• Not in order when another member has the floor

• Requires a second

• Not debatable and DOES NOT automatically stop debate

• 2/3 affirmative vote immediately closes debate, returns to the original motion

• Less than 2/3 allows debate to continue

11

Motion to End Debate, Previous Question, or to “Call the Question”

12nfpa.org

Page 14 of 101


7



• Resolve Public Input (PI)

• Create a First Revision (FR)

• Create a Committee Input (CI) – a placeholder used to solicit Public Comments and permit further work at Second Draft stage

13

Committee Actions and Motions:



• Committee develops a committee statement to respond to (i.e., resolve) a Public Input.

• Committee indicates in statement its reasons for not accepting the recommendation and/or points to a relevant First Revision.

• PI response does not get balloted.

14

Resolve a Public Input (PI):

Page 15 of 101


8



• FR is created to change current text or add new text.

• Committee statement is developed to substantiate the change.

• Associated PIs get a committee response, often simply referring to the relevant FR.

• Each FR gets balloted.

15

Create a First Revision (FR):



• Committee is not ready to incorporate a change into the First Draft but wants to receive Public Comment on a topic that can be revisited at Second Draft stage.

• Committee statement is developed to explain committee’s intent.

• CI is not balloted.

16

Create a Committee Input (CI):

Page 16 of 101


9



• All Public Input must receive a Committee Statement.

• A valid technical reason must be provided.

• Vague references to “intent” should not be used.

• Reasons for why the submitter’s substantiation is inadequate should be provided.

• A First Revision should be referenced if it addresses the intent of the submitter’s Public Input

17

Committee Statements:



• In-meeting votes establish a base committee position on the development of First Revisions (FRs).

• FRs are secured by electronic balloting (≥2/3 of completed ballots affirmative, and affirmative by ≥1/2 voting members).

• Only the results of the electronic ballot determine the official position of the committee on the First Draft.

18

Formal Voting on First Revisions

Page 17 of 101


10



• Only First Revisions (FR) are balloted

Public Inputs and Committee Statements not balloted

Reference materials are available

• First Draft, PI, CI, and CS

• Voting options:

Affirmative on all FRs

Affirmative on all FRs with exceptions specifically noted

• Ballot provides option to vote affirmative with comment

• Vote to reject or abstain requires a reason

19

Ballots:



• Ballot system is web-based.

• Alternates are encouraged to complete ballots.

• Ballot session will time out after 90 minutes.

• Use “submit” to save your work – ballots can be revised until the balloting period is closed.

20

Electronic Balloting:

Page 18 of 101


11



21

• Click link provided in ballot email.

• Sign in with NFPA.org username and password.



22

• Select either ‘Affirmative All’ or ‘Affirmative with Exception(s)’.

Page 19 of 101


12



23

• Use “See FR- #” link to review all First Revisions.

• Use “edit election” to change individual votes or to modify vote after submitting ballot.



24

• Make selection: Affirmative with Comment, Negative, or Abstain

• No selection defaults to affirmative

• Must include comment (reason) on each vote other than Affirmative

Page 20 of 101


13



25

• To complete ballot, click ‘Participant Consent and Submit’.

• Return to edit any votes by ballot due date.



• Initial ballot

• Circulation of negatives and comments – electronic balloting re-opened to permit members to change votes

• Any First Revision that fails ballot becomes a Committee Input (CI)

26

Balloting:

Page 21 of 101


14


Legal

• Must comply with state and federal antitrust laws

• Participants are to conduct themselves in strict accordance with these laws

• Read and understand NFPA’s Antitrust Policy which can be accessed at nfpa.org/regs

27

Antitrust Matters:


Legal

• Participants must avoid any conduct, conversation or agreement that would constitute an unreasonable restraint of trade

• Conversation topics that are off limits include:

Profit, margin, or cost data

Prices, rates, or fees

Selection, division or allocation of sales territories, markets or customers

Refusal to deal with a specific business entity

28

Antitrust Matters (cont’d):

Page 22 of 101


15


Legal

• NFPA’s standards development activities are based on openness, honesty, fairness and balance

• Participants must adhere to the Regulations Governing the Development of NFPA Standards and the Guide for the Conduct of Participants in the NFPA Standards Development Processwhich can accessed at nfpa.org/regs

• Follow guidance and direction from your employer or other organization you may represent

29



Legal

• Manner is which standards development activity is conducted can be important

• The Guide of Conduct requires standards development activity to be conducted with openness, honesty and in good faith

• Participants are not entitled to speak on behalf of NFPA

• Participants must take appropriate steps to ensure their statements whether written or oral and regardless of the setting, are portrayed as personal opinions, not the position of NFPA

• Be sure to ask questions if you have them

30


Page 23 of 101


16


Legal

• Disclosures of essential patent claims should be made by the patent holder

• Patent disclosures should be made early in the process

• Others may also notify NFPA if they believe that a proposed or existing NFPA standard includes an essential patent claim

• NFPA has adopted and follows ANSI’s Patent Policy

• It is the obligation of each participant to read and understand NFPA’s Patent Policy which can accessed at nfpa.org/regs

31

Patents:


TC Struggles with an Issue

•TC needs data on a new technology or emerging issue

•Two opposing views on an issue with no real data

•Data presented is not trusted by committee

Code Fund Lends a Hand

•TC rep and/or staff liaison submits a Code Fund Request

•Requests are reviewed by a Panel and chosen based on need / feasibility

Research Project Carried Out

•Funding for project is provided by the Code Fund and/or industry sponsors

•Project is completed and data is available to TC

www.nfpa.org/research

Page 24 of 101


17


Document Information Pages

About

• Document scope• Table of contents• Articles• Research and statistical reports

• Latest codes and standards news on NFPA Today blog feed

• Free access

Current and Previous Editions

• Issued TIAs, FIs, Errata• Archived revision information such as meeting and ballot information, First Draft Reports (previously ROPs), Second Draft Reports (previously ROCs), and Standards Council and NITMAM information

Next Edition

• Revision cycle schedule• Posting & closing dates• Submit public input/comments via electronic submission system.

• Meeting and ballot information

• First Draft Report and Second Draft Report

• NITMAM information• Standard Council Decisions

• Private TC info (*red asterisk)• Ballot circulations, informational ballots and other committee info

Technical Committee

• Committee name and staff liaison

• Committee scope and responsibility

• Committee list with private information

• Committee documents (codes & standards) in PDF format

• Committees seeking members

• Online committee membership application


Questions?

• www.nfpa.org/101

• www.nfpa.org/5000

34

NFPA 101 & NFPA 5000 Document Information Pages

Page 25 of 101

Page 26 of 101

Page 27 of 101

Page 28 of 101

Page 29 of 101

Page 30 of 101

Page 31 of 101

Page 32 of 101

Standard on Community Risk

Assessment and Community Risk Reduction Plan Development

Page 33 of 101

Public Input No. 43-NFPA 101-2018 [ Global Input ]

1. Revise 12.7.14 to read as follows:

12.7.14 Integrated Fire Protection and Life Safety Systems. Integrated fire protection and life

safety systems shall be tested in accordance with 9.11.4.1.

2. Revise 13.7.14, 13.7.14.1 and 13.7.14.2(new) to read as follows:

13.7.14 Integrated Fire Protection and Life Safety Systems.13.7.14.1Integrated fire protection and life safety systems shall be tested in accordance with9.11.4.1.

13.7.14.2 Integrated fire protection and life safety systems in high-rise buildings shall betested in accordance with 9.11.4.2.

Additional Proposed Changes

File Name Description Approved

Issued_TIA_101-18-4_Final_-_TIA_101_18_4.pdf NFPA 101 TIA 101-18-4 (Log No. 1318)

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

NOTE: This public input originates from Tentative Interim Amendment No. 101-18-4 (Log. 1318) issued by the Standards Council on December 6, 2017 and per the NFPA Regs., needs to be reconsidered by the Technical Committee for the next edition of the Document.

Substantiation. Often, in order for fire and life safety objectives to be met, interdependence on two or more fire protection and life safety systems is required. When that occurs, there is a fundamental expectation for integrated features to remain functional. Common sense has always dictated a need to verify the response of integrated features when individual systems are tested, but standards historically lacked guidance for such testing.

To fill that gap, NFPA 4 Standard for Integrated Fire Protection and Life Safety Systems Testing was developed and published in 2015 as an outgrowth of recommended practices that were previously established by NFPA 3. As a new standard that was derived from a recommended practice, the requirements of NFPA 4 have not yet been widely adopted and remain somewhat untested.

Nevertheless, in the just-completed cycle for the 2018 editions of NFPA 101 and NFPA 5000, NFPA 4 was proposed for adoption by reference in nearly all occupancy chapters with inconsistent results that can be attributed to at least two factors:1. The content of NFPA 4 was not consistently and adequately explained to all of the NFPA 101 and NFPA 5000 technical committees that were asked to review these proposals and comments.2. The “one size fits all” approach to integrated testing currently used by NFPA 4 is well suited for complex systems, but it is unnecessarily burdensome for testing of simple integrations, such as a sprinkler waterflow switch connecting to a fire alarm system for alarm initiation and monitoring. For example, NFPA 4 always requires an integrated test team and development of an integrated test plan that is carried out by an integrated test team, unless waived by the AHJ. It is understandable that some technical committees viewed mandatory references to NFPA 4 as excessive and rejected proposals that would have mandated compliance.

As the 2018 editions of NFPA 101 and NFPA 5000 currently stand, some occupancy chapters broadly reference NFPA 4 for all integrated systems. Others contain no reference to NFPA 4 at all, and still others reference NFPA 4

National Fire Protection Association Report https://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPar...

1 of 41 7/11/2018, 12:58 PM

Page 34 of 101

but modify how it is to be applied. These inconsistencies will lead to confusion among code users and code enforcers and could result in unsafe conditions. For example, omission of requirements for integrated testing in some 2018 edition chapters will essentially convey that it is unnecessary to test ANY integrated functions in new or existing occupancies regulated by chapters that do not contain such a requirement. This undermines the traditional common-sense minimum of making sure that even simple integrations must be tested to verify cause-effect functionality.

To deal with this issue, multiple NITMAMs to delete all references to integrated testing requirements and NFPA 4 were submitted and certified for consideration at the annual conference in Boston. However, rather than advancing these motions, the proponents agreed to support an alternate path of using TIAs to repair issues with the code text instead of deleting it.

The TIAs are the result of a collaborative effort that included fire alarm and fire sprinkler industry participation, among others. The approach can be summarized as follows:

1. Because of the complex interaction of systems needed to accomplish smoke control, new and existing buildings with smoke control systems will be required to comply with NFPA 4. This is entirely handled in Chapter 9.2. Because of the complex interaction of systems needed to accomplish safety objectives in high-rise buildings, new and existing high-rise buildings will be required to comply with NFPA 4. Note that new high-rise buildings are handled by Chapter 11. However, existing high-rise buildings had to be individually addressed in existing occupancy chapters since there is no central location in the codes where regulations are established for existing high-rise buildings.3. All other buildings and occupancies WILL NOT be required to follow NFPA 4.However, such other buildings and occupancies WILL be required to comply with a simple, prescriptive requirement ensuring that cause-effect relationships of integrated systems are verified when testing is conducted.

It is important to note that the approach suggested by this TIA correlates with code provisions that were adopted in the 2018 edition of the International Fire Code. Therefore, acceptance of this TIA will ensure that provisions in the 2018 editions of NFPA and ICC codes will be consistent with respect to integrated test requirements.

Emergency Nature. The standard contains an error or an omission that was overlooked during the regular revision process. The proposed TIA intends to offer to the public a benefit that would lessen a recognized (known) hazard or ameliorate a continuing dangerous condition or situation.

Although it is only necessary to satisfy one of the six possible TIA emergency nature criteria, this TIA satisfies two… 1. The standard contains an error or an omission that was overlooked during the regular revision process. Because some occupancy chapters in the 2018 (Chapters 15, 17, 29, 31, 32, 33, 38 and 39) omitted references to Chapter 9 for integrated testing and others did not, NFPA 101 and 5000 will essentially be conveying that it is unnecessary to test ANY integrated functions in new or existing occupancies regulated by the chapters that do not contain such a requirement. This undermines the traditional common-sense minimum of ensuring that simple integrations must be tested to verify cause-effect functionality. Although each technical committee is certainly authorized to oversee requirements for occupancies under its authority, it was probably unrecognized or overlooked that omitting a reference to Chapter 9 in some chapters, when such references appear in other chapters, conveys a message that testing of integrated features can be entirely ignored in some cases. Rather, it is believed that committees that chose to reject inclusion of a Chapter 9 reference for integrated testing did so for the purpose of rejecting NFPA 4, not basic common-sense tests to verify functionality of connected systems.2. The proposed TIA intends to offer to the public a benefit that would lessen a recognized (known) hazard or ameliorate a continuing dangerous condition or situation. It is essential to safety for fire protection and life safety systems, including integrated features, to function as designed. Should system interactions fail, dangerous conditions can certainly result. As indicated in Item 1 above, the inclusion of integrated test requirements for some occupancies but not others conveys that integrated testing is NEVER required in occupancies that don’t include a reference to Chapter 9. However, some technical committees reportedly rejected referencing Chapter 9 for integrated testing because of the connection to NFPA 4, not because they opposed the concept of verifying basic functionality of integrated features. The proposed TIA resolves this issue by establishing a minimum requirement for ensuring basic functionality of integrated features and only referencing NFPA 4 for complex systems associated with high-rise buildings and buildings with smoke-control systems.


2 of 41 7/11/2018, 12:58 PM

Page 35 of 101

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Tc On Saf-Axm

Organization: NFPA 101 TC on Assembly Occupancies

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon Mar 05 14:49:19 EST 2018

Committee: SAF-AXM


3 of 41 7/11/2018, 12:58 PM

Page 36 of 101

Life Safety Code

(SC 17-12-12 / TIA Log #1318)

Regulations Governing the Development of NFPA StandardsLife Safety Code


2. Revise 13.7.14, 13.7.14.1 and 13.7.14.2(new) to read as follows:

Page 37 of 101

Public Input No. 393-NFPA 101-2018 [ Section No. 3.3.37.9 ]

3.3.37.9 Special Amusement Building.

A building or portion thereof that is temporary, permanent, or mobile and contains a device or ride systemthat conveys passengers or provides a walkway along, around, or over a course in any direction as a formof amusement, entertainment, or education and arranged so that the egress path is not readily apparentdue to visual or audio distractions or an intentionally confounded egress path, or is not readily available dueto the mode of conveyance through the building or structure. (SAF-AXM)


The revision addresses the use of portions of a building not being used a special amusement occupancy. This is typical when a attraction exits through a gift shop (mercantile). This would clarify that the mercantile area would not be required to meet the sections of 12.4.8. This is also supported by the existing code language contained in A.12.4.8 for special amusements contained in a exhibit hall.

The revision includes industry standard verbiage of "ride systems" and extends the use of special amusement to include entertainment or educational purposes.


Submitter Full Name: Joel Edwards

Organization: Reedy Creek Improvement District

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Jun 26 19:15:21 EDT 2018

Committee: SAF-AXM


4 of 41 7/11/2018, 12:58 PM

Page 38 of 101

Public Input No. 183-NFPA 101-2018 [ New Section after 3.3.166 ]

TITLE OF NEW CONTENT

Type your content here ...

3.3.166 Life Safety Floor Plan. A drawing or set of drawings that depict the floor plan(s), fire-resistivefeatures, occupant load, flow lines of accumulated occupant load routed to exits, and numerical comparisonof occupant load (in units of people) and exit capacity (in units of people) at each major egress feature andexit.


The term LIFE SAFETY FLOOR PLAN currently exists in 2018 NFPA 101 Sections 12.4.1.4.3 and 13.4.1.4.3 relative to assembly occupancy life safety evaluations. However, LIFE SAFETY FLOOR PLANS are needed for virtually all plans for construction (new work, additions, and renovations). A LIFE SAFETY FLOOR PLAN is usually one of the first types of drawings that an AHJ will review to gain understanding of the building. LIFE SAFETY FLOOR PLANS should be used for all occupancy classifications. If a designer cannot, or will not prepare a LIFE SAFETY FLOOR PLAN, then he/she has not demonstrated his/her understanding of the building and of the means of egress system. This defined term can later be referenced by other occupancy chapters if the quality of building plans will be specified. An article in the NFPA Journal describes preparation of LIFE SAFETY FLOOR PLANS. Refer to "Exit Strategy" by Battalora and Sawyer, in NFPA Journal, July/August 2015.


Submitter Full Name: Raymond Battalora

Organization: The University of Texas at Austin - Fire Prevention Services

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Jun 13 10:33:27 EDT 2018

Committee: SAF-AXM


5 of 41 7/11/2018, 12:58 PM

Page 39 of 101

Public Input No. 231-NFPA 101-2018 [ New Section after 12.2.2.2.10 ]

12.2.2.2.11 Emergency locking systems complying with 7.2.1.6.4 shall be permitted.


This proposal is based on acceptance of new Section 7.2.6.1.4 Emergency Locking Systems.

Chapters 14, 15, 16, 17, 38, and 39 have requirements for locking doors under lockdown conditions. Doors in auditoriums, cafeterias, and gymnasiums (and other spaces) are likely candidates for some form of emergency door locking functions. The proposed new section 7.2.1.6.4 Emergency Locking Systems could be applied safely to doors in assembly occupancies.

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 216-NFPA 101-2018 [New Section after 7.2.1.6.3]


Submitter Full Name: Keith Pardoe

Organization: Pardoe Consulting LLC

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon Jun 18 14:36:58 EDT 2018

Committee: SAF-AXM


6 of 41 7/11/2018, 12:58 PM

Page 40 of 101

Public Input No. 347-NFPA 101-2018 [ Section No. 12.2.5.5.1 ]

12.2.5.5.1*

The required clear width of aisle accessways shall be determined by provisions of 12.2.5.5.1.1 betweenrows of seating

shall be determined as follows:and by 12.2.5.5.1.2 where the aisle accessway is between seats, either in a row or grouped otherwise, anda railing:

12.2.5.5.1.1

(1) Horizontal measurements shall be made, between vertical planes, from the back of one seat to thefront of the most forward projection of the seat immediately behind it.

(2) Where the entire row consists of automatic- or self-rising seats that comply with ASTM F851, StandardTest Method for Self-Rising Seat Mechanisms, the measurement shall be permitted to be made withthe seats in the up position.

12.2.5.5.1.2*

(1) Horizontal measurements shall be made between the vertical planes of the front of the seat, in thedown position if self rising, and any railing in front of the seating where the aisle accessway is in front of theseat.

(2) Horizontal measurements shall be made between the vertical plane of the rear of the seat back and therailing or seating deck riser, whichever is closer to the back of the seat, where the aisle accessway isbehind the seat.


This addresses the aisle accessway width applicable to the front row of conventional row seating and to other configurations of seating where the aisle accessway is behind seating, not arranged in conventional rows. The latter could occur in lecture halls where a continuous, narrow table is provided in front of individual seats which are approached from an aisle accessway behind the seats. The same configuration, without the continuous table, could occur especially in the front of a balcony or elevated grandstand where seats are placed immediately behind the guard railing at the front of the balcony or grandstand and such seats, for example arranged in groups of two, are accessed from the rear so that other people do not walk in front of these seats (which could rotate for convenient access and egress) nor does anyone have to walk immediately adjacent to the railing at the front of the balcony or grandstand. This creates both a safer situation relative to falls over sightline-constrained railings and a better viewing experience for those in the seats located immediately adjacent to the sightline constrained railing. Such a railing, being closer (horizontally) to such people can be at regular guard height (42 inches or 1067 mm) with no disruption to their sightline due to their eye height being about 46 inches (1170 mm) above the seating deck surface where they are seated.



Public Input No. 351-NFPA 101-2018 [Section No. A.12.2.5.5.1]

Public Input No. 417-NFPA 101-2018 [Section No. 12.2.11.1.1]


Submitter Full Name: Jake Pauls

Organization: Jake Pauls Consulting Services

Affiliation: Self


7 of 41 7/11/2018, 12:58 PM

Page 41 of 101

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee: SAF-AXM


8 of 41 7/11/2018, 12:58 PM

Page 42 of 101


12.2.11.1.1* Sight Line–Constrained Rail Heights.

Unless subject to the requirements of 12.2.11.1.2, a fasciae or railing system complying with the guardrequirements of 7.2.2.4, and having a height of not less than 26 in. (660 mm), shall be provided where thefloor or footboard elevation is more than 30 in. (760 mm) above the floor or the finished ground level below,and where the fasciae or railing system would otherwise interfere with the sight lines of immediatelyadjacent seating. Provision of a fasciae or railing system shall not be construed as satisfying the need for aguard as required where there is more than a 30-inch (760 mm) drop below the foor or footboardellevation; other measures shall be taken to prevent injurious falls at such locations that are equivalent inperformance to providing a 42-inch (1065 mm) guard.


26-inch high railings are not functional guards, especially in occupancy settings such as some sport events and certain concerts, both characterized by exuberance of one or more of the occupants in the vicinity of the balcony or elevated grandstand front, including those in rows behind the first row of seating.

A separate proposal provides an alternative method of designing seating and aisle accessways at the front of seating areas that obviates the need for lower railings. This is one solution to the problem of inadequate rail heights in assembly facilities that does not require reduction of the guard height below the minimum 42 inches otherwise required. it is Public Input 347.



Public Input No. 347-NFPA 101-2018 [Section No. 12.2.5.5.1]




Affiliation: Self

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee: SAF-AXM


9 of 41 7/11/2018, 12:58 PM

Page 43 of 101

Public Input No. 77-NFPA 101-2018 [ Section No. 12.3.5.1 ]

12.3.5.1

The following assembly occupancies shall be protected throughout by an approved, supervised automaticsprinkler system in accordance with 9.7.1.1(1):

(1) Dance halls

(2) Discotheques

(3) Nightclubs

(4) Bars

(5) Restaurants

(6) Assembly occupancies with festival seating


NFPA 101 Chapter 12 thresholds for fire sprinkler protection in assembly occupancies is inconsistent with the IFC and the IBC. Both the IBC/IFC require fire sprinkler protection of A-2 occupancies and A-2 occupancies include restaurants and bars. While there is no mandate or intent for correlation with IBC/IFC, the reality is that 101 is adopted in most jurisdictions with the IBC and/or IFC. When the IFC/IBC and 101 do not come close to matching on such an important issue, it creates conflicts and it is a poor reflections on model codes as design professionals, contractors and owners then question the credibility of the both codes.

In addition, the current language in 101 is highly problematic for AHJ's to enforce. We sprinkler nightclubs, but now not bars, and never restaurants. The transition line from a bar, to a nightclub, to a restaurant is highly questionable. Even applying the current language to a "Station Nightclub" type environment, I could see an owner fighting the AHJ saying we are not a true "nightclub." "Nightclub" implies a dancing disco type environment that could potentially not include "Station Nightclub" type environment.

With the risk factors in assembly occupancies, even restaurants and bars, why do we not want to error on the side of fire sprinkler protection in new construction in these assembly occupancies, especially when the IFC and IBC already requires fire sprinkler protection?


Submitter Full Name: Anthony Apfelbeck

Organization: Altamonte Springs Building/Fire Safety Division

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Fri Mar 30 14:06:56 EDT 2018

Committee: SAF-AXM


10 of 41 7/11/2018, 12:58 PM

Page 44 of 101


12.4.6.11.3

Scenery and stage properties not separated from the audience by proscenium opening protection shall beof noncombustible materials, limited-combustible materials, or fire-retardant–treated wood or fire-retardantcoated wood .


Fire-Retardant Coatings have the ability to comply with this code and should not be excluded for stage installations.


Submitter Full Name: Kathleen Newman

Organization: Firetect

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee: SAF-AXM


11 of 41 7/11/2018, 12:58 PM

Page 45 of 101


12.4.6.11.4

In theaters, motion picture theaters, and television stage settings, performance halls and music clubvenues, with or without horizontal projections, and in simulated caves and caverns of foamed plastic, anysingle fuel package shall have a heat release rate not to exceed 100 kW where tested in accordance withone of the following:

(1) ANSI/UL 1975, Standard for Fire Tests for Foamed Plastics Used for Decorative Purposes

(2) NFPA 289 using the 20 kW ignition source



101_A2017_PC217.pdf NFPA 101 Public Comment No. 217


NOTE: This Public Input appeared as "Reject but Hold" in Public Comment No. 217 of the A2017 Second Draft Report for NFPA 101 and per the Regs. at 4.4.8.3.1.

This provision should not be limited to theater and television hall exposures for obvious reasons.


Submitter Full Name: TC ON SAF-AXM

Organization: NFPA TC on Assembly Occupancies

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Feb 06 15:49:50 EST 2018

Committee: SAF-AXM


12 of 41 7/11/2018, 12:58 PM

Page 46 of 101

Public Comment No. 217-NFPA 101-2016 [ Section No. 12.4.6.11.4 ]

12.4.6.11.4

Standard for Fire Tests for Foamed Plastics Used for Decorative Purposes

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

Related Item


Submitter Full Name:

Organization:

Affilliation:

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date:

Committee Statement

Committee

Action:

Resolution:

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

116 of 287 8/15/2016 8:48 AM

Page 47 of 101


Taskgroup

I am requesting the creation of a taskgroup to review the provisions for new and existing assembly chapterson special amusement buildings.


The provisions for new and existing special amusement building have not changed significantly since the New Jersey Haunted Castle fire. New technologies in themed entertainment, fire suppression, detection, and building automation have significantly enhanced the offerings for both entertainment companies and code professionals to provide a very unique experience and while also enforcing stringent life safety requirements. I have submitted several public inputs to this code cycle to begin a review of this section. I ask technical committee to explore a performance based option specific to special amusement buildings when the prescriptive requirements of the life safety code are not able to be met. I would also ask the technical committee to consider if special amusements should be moved to Chapter 11, Special Structures and reorganize the chapter to a format similar to other occupancy chapters. For example:

12.4.8.1 General Requirements12.4.8.2 Means of Egress Requirements12.4.8.3 Protection ...

For the reasons noted here, I respectfully request a task group be developed to look into these issues and consider all public inputs related to special amusements buildings. I would volunteer my time to serve as a task group member and will help seek out other professionals in the entertainment industry familiar with these buildings to provide input.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee: SAF-AXM


13 of 41 7/11/2018, 12:58 PM

Page 48 of 101

Public Input No. 78-NFPA 101-2018 [ Section No. 12.4.8 ]

12.4.8* Special Amusement Buildings.

12.4.8.1* General.

Special amusement buildings, regardless of occupant load, shall meet the requirements for assemblyoccupancies in addition to the requirements of 12.4.8, unless the special amusement building is amultilevel play structure that is not more than 10 ft (3050 mm) in height and has aggregate horizontal

projections not exceeding 160 ft2 (15 m2).

12.4.8.2* Automatic Sprinklers.

Every special amusement building, other than buildings or structures not exceeding 10 ft (3050 mm) in

height and not exceeding 160 ft2 (15 m2) in aggregate horizontal projection, shall be protected throughoutby an approved, supervised automatic sprinkler system installed and maintained in accordance withSection 9.7.

12.4.8.3 Temporary Water Supply.

Where the special amusement building required to be sprinklered by 12.4.8.2 is movable or portable, thesprinkler water supply shall be permitted to be provided by an approved temporary means.

12.4.8.4 Smoke Detection.

Where the nature of the special amusement building is such that it operates in reduced lighting levels, thebuilding shall be protected throughout by an approved automatic smoke detection system in accordancewith Section 9.6.

12.4.8.5 Alarm Initiation.

Actuation of any smoke detection system device shall sound an alarm at a constantly attended location onthe premises.

12.4.8.6 Illumination.

Actuation of the automatic sprinkler system, or any other suppression system, or actuation of a smokedetection system having an approved verification or cross-zoning operation capability shall provide for bothof the following:

(1) Increase in illumination in the means of egress to that required by Section 7.8

(2) Termination of any conflicting or confusing sounds and visuals

12.4.8.7 Exit Marking.

12.4.8.7.1

Exit marking shall be in accordance with Section 7.10.

12.4.8.7.2

Floor proximity exit signs shall be provided in accordance with 7.10.1.6.

12.4.8.7.3*

In special amusement buildings where mazes, mirrors, or other designs are used to confound the egresspath, approved directional exit marking that becomes apparent in an emergency shall be provided.

12.4.8.8 Interior Finish.

Interior wall and ceiling finish materials complying with Section 10.2 shall be Class A throughout.


Suggest the TC establish a Task Group to look at the Special Amusement provisions. These code provisions have not been modified much since they were first included. The environment for these rides in many parks has


14 of 41 7/11/2018, 12:58 PM

Page 49 of 101

dramatically changed since these provisions went into NFPA 101. Riders are now mostly restrained, they are unable to egress even if the ride stops, smoke control is not considered but might be appropriate, specific training and tasks might need to be evaluated and assigned to the ride staff, in some cases, a mandate to utilize a performance based design might be appropriate.

This PI does not suggest specific code language as the proponent of this PI does not have the specific expertise to suggest such language in special amusement buildings. However, this proponent is of the opinion, and has had first hand experience with some of these new rides, to realize that the current code provisions of NFPA 101 for special amusement do need to be reviewed and modified to meet the demands of a new risk environment.


Submitter Full Name: Anthony Apfelbeck

Organization: Altamonte Springs Building/Fire Safety Division

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Fri Mar 30 14:39:38 EDT 2018

Committee: SAF-AXM


15 of 41 7/11/2018, 12:58 PM

Page 50 of 101

Public Input No. 350-NFPA 101-2018 [ New Section after 12.4.8.3 ]

Detection, Alarm, and Communication Requirements

X.1 General. Special amusement buildings shall be provided with an approved fire alarm system inaccordance with Section 9.6 and this section.

X.2 Initiation . Initiation of the required fire alarm system shall be by manual means in accordance with9.6.2, by detection devices or detection systems as required by 12.4.8.4, and by means of water flow alarmfrom the sprinkler system required by 12.4.8.2

X2.1 Notification.

A.X2.1 Notification in special amusement buildings should be considered carefully depending on theoperation of the special amusement. Voice announcements in accordance with Section 12.3.4.3.3 are therequired method. However, automatically transmitted evacuation instructions may not be appropriate insome rides when occupants are confined to a ride vehicle and unable to self-evacuate. In order to avoidconfusion, manual voice announcements from the ride operator may be preferable to pre-recordedevacuation instructions for some rides. See [New Section on Emergency Action Plans] and A.4.2.3.

X2.1 An automatic means for sounding the general evacuation alarm shall be provided for when theconstantly attended location is not staffed.

A.X2.1 Special amusement buildings that contain rides tend be occupied after operating hours bymaintenance staff. Afterhours maintenance work may talk place along the ride track or in an attachedmaintenance bay where ride vehicles are moved on/off spur tracks. When no ride operator is located at theconstantly attended location to receive alarm signals, a means of automatically sounding the generalevacuation signal should be provided for afterhours occupants. This can be accomplished by requiring theride operator to acknowledge a fire alarm signal on the remote annunciator within a pre-determined time (forexample, 15 seconds). Afterhours, where no ride operator is present, the general evacuation alarm willsound when the alarm is not acknowledged at the remote annunciator.

X2.2 Positive alarm sequence in accordance with 9.6.3.4 shall be permitted where approved by theauthority having jurisdiction.


The provisions for smoke detection in special amusement buildings were added to NFPA 101 in 1997. Changes were made in 2000 and the current requirements went into effect in 2003. This proposed addition clarifies that a fire alarm system is required. The requirements found in section 12.4.8.4 Smoke Detection and 12.4.8.2 Automatic Sprinklers support this inclusion.

Since the addition of the special amusement chapters in 1997 there have been no major updates to this section of the code. However there have been substantial changes to fire alarm and building technologies. Similarly, special amusement buildings and the entertainment industry have embraced many new technologies such as digital projection and smoke control in ride spaces where guests are confined to vehicles and unable to self-evacuate. The fire alarm system acts as the central control point for all of the input/output for these emergency control functions. The proposed fire alarm initiation language further clarifies the requirements already found in sections 12.4.8.4 and 12.4.8.2.

A new proposal is added to allow an operator acknowledgement feature. This will allow the operator, during use of the special amusement, to provide manual voice announcements while the fire alarm operates in private mode. However, without the operator acknowledgment, the fire alarm would enter public mode notification when the constantly attended location is not attended, a common condition at night where maintenance personnel may work on the attraction or custodial personnel clean.

Due to the use of alarm verification or smoke detector cross zoning, the use of positive alarm sequence should not normally be allowed as this may create a further delay in evacuation time. Currently a conflict exists between Section 12.3.4.3.1 which allows positive alarm sequence in assembly occupancies and Section 12.4.8.6 which requires alarm verification or cross-zoning. The proposed addition allows the authority having jurisdiction to asses


16 of 41 7/11/2018, 12:58 PM

Page 51 of 101

and approve the use of positive alarm sequence.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee: SAF-AXM


17 of 41 7/11/2018, 12:58 PM

Page 52 of 101


Furnishings, Decoration, and Scenery

X.1 The authority having jurisdiction shall impose controls on the quantity and arrangement of combustiblecontents in special amusement buildings to provide an adequate level of safety to life from fire.

A.X.1 Special amusement buildings may simulate different structures such as an outdoor scene where falsewalls and ceilings, commonly known as sets, are recreated indoors with various fabrics and materials usedto simulate trees, leaves, or other items. Sets in special amusement facilities are often designed byentertainment companies familiar with Broadway style stage productions. However unlike stages andtheaters there is no requirements for smoke control or proscenium protection. The AHJ should consider andevaluate the total quantity of material introduced into the space, including materials that because of theirnature, such as plastics, that cannot meet Class A requirements.


Section 12.7.4 and specifically section 12.7.4.2 do not provide sufficient guidance on the materials used within special amusements buildings, particularly for show sets. This proposed addition and annex material is similar in nature to section 12.4.6.11 Flame Retardant Requirements for Stages and platforms, however within the special amusement section there is no requirements for smoke control or proscenium protection. This section provides clarity to specific to special amusement show decorations/sets.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee: SAF-AXM


18 of 41 7/11/2018, 12:58 PM

Page 53 of 101


Emergency Action Plans

X.1 Where special amusements contain a ride system, the Emergency Action Plan shall be reviewed andapproved by the authority having jurisdiction.

A.X.1 The evacuation plan for special amusement attractions should consider the fastest way to removeoccupants from the structure. When a ride stops within the special amusement building, removingoccupants from the ride system may present an extended evacuation. Additionally, hazards associated withthe ride and show system may present electrical and entanglement challenges to occupants unfamiliar withthe building.

For special amusement buildings which contain ride systems, the fastest way to evacuate may be to:

(1) Upon receipt of the alarm signal, discontinue loading occupants onto the ride

(2) Evacuate the loading platform and any queue via the provided egress routes

(3) Cycle-out occupants already on the ride system via the unload platform

Evacuation of special amusement buildings can also pose challenges to the local fire department if they arenot familiar with the nature of the building or ride system. Additionally, specialized equipment for rescue, ridevehicle specific tools for releasing doors, and high-energy ride vehicle hazard awareness may all berequired when evacuating from a location other than a load/unload station. The authority having jurisdictionshould work with the ride operator from an early stage to develop a pre-incident plan in accordance withNFPA 1620: Standard for Pre-Incident Planning. See also A.4.8.2.1(3)


The substation for this addition is documented well in the proposed annex material. The key addition here is the requirement of the AHJ to approve the plan and not just perform a review. As the authority have jurisdiction may be tasked to provide evacuation and medical services, they must be prepared with the proper knowledge, equipment, and tools. This is similar to the fire department concurrency evaluation required in Chapter 15 of the life safety code.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee: SAF-AXM


19 of 41 7/11/2018, 12:58 PM

Page 54 of 101


12.7.5.3.4

Exhibit booth construction materials shall be limited to the following:

(1) Noncombustible or limited-combustible materials

(2) Wood exceeding 1⁄4 in. (6.3 mm) nominal thickness

(3) Wood that is pressure-treated, fire-retardant wood and fire-retardant coated wood meeting therequirements of NFPA 703

(4) Flame-retardant materials complying with one of the following:

(5) They shall meet the flame propagation performance criteria contained in Test Method 1 or TestMethod 2, as appropriate, of NFPA 701.

(6) They shall exhibit a heat release rate not exceeding 100 kW when tested in accordance withNFPA 289 using the 20 kW ignition source.

(7) Textile wall coverings, such as carpeting and similar products used as wall or ceiling finishes,complying with the provisions of 10.2.2 and 10.2.4.4

(8) Plastics limited to those that comply with 12.3.3 and Section 10.2

(9) Foamed plastics and materials containing foamed plastics having a heat release rate for any single fuelpackage that does not exceed 100 kW where tested in accordance with one of the following:



(12) Cardboard, honeycombed paper, and other combustible materials having a heat release rate for anysingle fuel package that does not exceed 150 kW where tested in accordance with one of the following:




To stay consistent with NFPA 703, Standard for Fire Retardant-Treated Wood and Fire-Retardant Coatings for Building Materials, Fire Retardant Coatings needs to be added. Processes should not be excluded when tests are performed to comply with testing requirements for the intended use.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee: SAF-AXM


20 of 41 7/11/2018, 12:58 PM

Page 55 of 101


13.2.2.2.11 Emergency locking systems complying with Section 7.2.1.6.4 shall be permitted.


This proposal is based on acceptance of new Section 7.2.6.1.4 Emergency Locking Systems.

Chapters 14, 15, 16, 17, 38, and 39 have requirements for locking doors under lockdown conditions. Doors in auditoriums, cafeterias, and gymnasiums (and other spaces) are likely candidates for some form of emergency door locking functions. The proposed new section 7.2.1.6.4 Emergency Locking Systems could be applied safely to doors in assembly occupancies.



Public Input No. 216-NFPA 101-2018 [New Section after 7.2.1.6.3]


Submitter Full Name: Keith Pardoe

Organization: Pardoe Consulting LLC

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee: SAF-AXM


21 of 41 7/11/2018, 12:58 PM

Page 56 of 101


TITLE OF NEW CONTENT

Type your content here ...

Insert a new section after 2018 NFPA 101 Section 13.2.5.6.3 (6):

13.2.5.6.3 (7) Previously approved aisles designed using a version of NFPA 101 that permitted aislewidths ranging from 36 inches up to 42 inches shall be permitted to remain in use provided that theyprovide compliant egress capacity, and a center handrail shall be permitted to be installed in existingaisles having a width of 36 inches and greater. The center handrails shall be noncontinuous withgaps or breaks at intervals not exceeding three rows to facilitate access to seating and to allowcrossing from one side of the aisle to the other.



SCAN_-_1967_NFPA_101_1967_NFPA_102_-_Assembly_36-inch_Wide_Aisles_in_Outdoor_Stadiums.pdf

PDF file of Selected Sections from 1967 NFPA 101 & 1967 NFPA 102


Many grandstands built in the early- to mid-20th century (e.g., 1900’s, 1910’s, 1920’s, etc.) have narrow 36-inch wide aisles that are still in use. Some owners would like to install intermediate handrails for occupant safety, but the current Chapter 13 Existing Assembly Occupancies requires a minimum of 42 inches of aisle width for intermediate handrails to be installed. In my opinion, installation of intermediate handrails in legacy grandstands having 36-inch wide aisles and greater should be permitted. Refer to 1967 NFPA 101 and 1967 NFPA 102 which permit 36-inch wide aisles in large, outdoor, noncombustible grandstands. The code citations are in series:

1967 NFPA 101 Section 8-2 – Outdoor Assembly, 1967 NFPA 101 Section 8-2111,1967 NFPA 101 Appendix B (reference to 1967 NFPA 102),1967 NFPA 102 Section 36 – Aisles, 1967 NFPA 102 Section 362.

A pdf file of these selected code sections is attached.


Submitter Full Name: Raymond Battalora

Organization: The Univ of Texas at Austin Fire Prevention Services

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee: SAF-AXM


22 of 41 7/11/2018, 12:58 PM

Page 57 of 101

Page 58 of 101

Page 59 of 101

Page 60 of 101

Page 61 of 101

Page 62 of 101

Page 63 of 101


13.4.6.11.3

Scenery and stage properties not separated from the audience by proscenium opening protection shall beof noncombustible materials, limited-combustible materials, or fire-retardant-treated wood or fire-retardantcoated wood .


Fire-Retardant Coatings have the ability to comply with this code and should not be excluded for stage installations.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee: SAF-AXM


23 of 41 7/11/2018, 12:58 PM

Page 64 of 101


Detection, Alarm, and Communication Requirements

X.1 General. Special amusement buildings shall be provided with an approved fire alarm system inaccordance with Section 9.6 and this section.

X.2 Initiation . Initiation of the required fire alarm system shall be by manual means in accordance with9.6.2, by detection devices or detection systems as required by 13.4.8.4, and by means of water flow alarmfrom the sprinkler system required by 13.4.8.2

X2.1 Notification.

A.X2.1 Notification in special amusement buildings should be considered carefully depending on theoperation of the special amusement. Voice announcements in accordance with Section 13.3.4.3.3 are therequired method. However, automatically transmitted evacuation instructions may not be appropriate insome rides when occupants are confined to a ride vehicle and unable to self-evacuate. In order to avoidconfusion, manual voice announcements from the ride operator may be preferable to pre-recordedevacuation instructions for some rides. See [New Section on Emergency Action Plans] and A.4.2.3.

X2.1 An automatic means for sounding the general evacuation alarm shall be provided for when theconstantly attended location is not staffed.

A.X2.1 Special amusement buildings that contain rides tend be occupied after operating hours bymaintenance staff. Afterhours maintenance work may talk place along the ride track or in an attachedmaintenance bay where ride vehicles are moved on/off spur tracks. When no ride operator is located at theconstantly attended location to receive alarm signals, a means of automatically sounding the generalevacuation signal should be provided for afterhours occupants. This can be accomplished by requiring theride operator to acknowledge a fire alarm signal on the remote annunciator within a pre-determined time(for example, 15 seconds). Afterhours, where no ride operator is present, the general evacuation alarm willsound when the alarm is not acknowledged at the remote annunciator.

X2.2 Positive alarm sequence in accordance with 9.6.3.4 shall be permitted where approved by theauthority having jurisdiction.


The provisions for smoke detection in special amusement buildings were added to NFPA 101 in 1997. Changes were made in 2000 and the current requirements went into effect in 2003. This proposed addition clarifies that a fire alarm system is required. The requirements found in section 13.4.8.4 Smoke Detection and 13.4.8.2 Automatic Sprinklers support this inclusion.

Since the addition of the special amusement chapters in 1997 there have been no major updates to this section of the code. However there have been substantial changes to fire alarm and building technologies. Similarly, special amusement buildings and the entertainment industry have embraced many new technologies such as digital projection and smoke control in ride spaces where guests are confined to vehicles and unable to self-evacuate. The fire alarm system acts as the central control point for all of the input/output for these emergency control functions. The proposed fire alarm initiation language further clarifies the requirements already found in sections 13.4.8.4 and 13.4.8.2.

A new proposal is added to allow an operator acknowledgement feature. This will allow the operator, during use of the special amusement, to provide manual voice announcements while the fire alarm operates in private mode. However, without the operator acknowledgment, the fire alarm would enter public mode notification when the constantly attended location is not attended, a common condition at night where maintenance personnel may work on the attraction or custodial personnel clean.

Due to the use of alarm verification or smoke detector cross zoning, the use of positive alarm sequence should not normally be allowed as this may create a further delay in evacuation time. Currently a conflict exists between Section 13.3.4.3.1 which allows positive alarm sequence in assembly occupancies and Section 13.4.8.6 which requires alarm verification or cross-zoning. The proposed addition allows the authority having jurisdiction to asses


24 of 41 7/11/2018, 12:58 PM

Page 65 of 101

and approve the use of positive alarm sequence




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee: SAF-AXM


25 of 41 7/11/2018, 12:58 PM

Page 66 of 101


Furnishings, Decoration, and Scenery

X.1 The authority having jurisdiction shall impose controls on the quantity and arrangement of combustiblecontents in special amusement buildings to provide an adequate level of safety to life from fire.

A.X.1 Special amusement buildings may simulate different structures such as an outdoor scene wherefalse walls and ceilings, commonly known as sets, are recreated indoors with various fabrics and materialsused to simulate trees, leaves, or other items. Sets in special amusement facilities are often designed byentertainment companies familiar with Broadway style stage productions. However unlike stages andtheaters there is no requirements for smoke control or proscenium protection. The AHJ should considerand evaluate the total quantity of material introduced into the space, including materials that because oftheir nature, such as plastics, that cannot meet Class A requirements.


Section 12.7.4 and specifically section 12.7.4.2 do not provide sufficient guidance on the materials used within special amusements buildings, particularly for show sets. This proposed addition and annex material is similar in nature to section 12.4.6.11 Flame Retardant Requirements for Stages and platforms, however within the special amusement section there is no requirements for smoke control or proscenium protection. This section provides clarity to specific to special amusement show decorations/sets.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee: SAF-AXM


26 of 41 7/11/2018, 12:58 PM

Page 67 of 101


Emergency Action Plans

X.1 Where special amusements contain a ride system, the Emergency Action Plan shall be reviewed andapproved by the authority having jurisdiction.

A.X.1 The evacuation plan for special amusement attractions should consider the fastest way to removeoccupants from the structure. When a ride stops within the special amusement building, removingoccupants from the ride system may present an extended evacuation. Additionally, hazards associatedwith the ride and show system may present electrical and entanglement challenges to occupants unfamiliarwith the building.

For special amusement buildings which contain ride systems, the fastest way to evacuate may be to:

(1) Upon receipt of the alarm signal, discontinue loading occupants onto the ride

(2) Evacuate the loading platform and any queue via the provided egress routes

(3) Cycle-out occupants already on the ride system via the unload platform

Evacuation of special amusement buildings can also pose challenges to the local fire department if theyare not familiar with the nature of the building or ride system. Additionally, specialized equipment forrescue, ride vehicle specific tools for releasing doors, and high-energy ride vehicle hazard awareness mayall be required when evacuating from a location other than a load/unload station. The authority havingjurisdiction should work with the ride operator from an early stage to develop a pre-incident plan inaccordance with NFPA 1620: Standard for Pre-Incident Planning. See also A.4.8.2.1(3)


The substation for this addition is documented well in the proposed annex material. The key addition here is the requirement of the AHJ to approve the plan and not just perform a review. As the authority have jurisdiction may be tasked to provide evacuation and medical services, they must be prepared with the proper knowledge, equipment, and tools. This is similar to the fire department concurrency evaluation required in Chapter 15 of the life safety code.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee: SAF-AXM


27 of 41 7/11/2018, 12:58 PM

Page 68 of 101

Public Input No. 394-NFPA 101-2018 [ Section No. A.3.3.37.9 ]

A.3.3.37.9 Special Amusement Building.

Special amusement buildings include amusements typically found in theme parks such as a hauntedhouse, a roller coaster–type ride within a building, a multilevel play structure within a building, a submarineride, and similar amusements where the occupants are not in the open air. airand may, or may not be,confined to a ride vehicle and/or unable to self-evacuate. Examples of a temporary special amusementbuilding include mobile fun-houses typically found in carnivals or a gymnasium converted to a hauntedhouse for Halloween..


This revision to the existing annex material provides additional examples and considerations to help the user of the code determine applicability of the special amusement definition.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee: SAF-AXM


28 of 41 7/11/2018, 12:58 PM

Page 69 of 101

Public Input No. 351-NFPA 101-2018 [ Section No. A.12.2.5.5.1 ]

A.12.2.5.5.1

Seats having reclining backs are assumed to be in their most upright position when unoccupied.

A.12.2.5.5.1.2

This addresses the aisle accessway width applicable to the front row of conventional row seating and toother configurations of seating where the aisle accessway is behind seating, not arranged in conventionalrows. The latter could occur in lecture halls where a continuous, narrow table is provided in front ofindividual seats which are approached from an aisle accessway behind the seats.

The same configuration, without the continuous table, could occur especially in the front of a balcony orelevated grandstand where seats are placed immediately behind the guard railing at the front of thebalcony or grandstand and such seats, for example arranged in groups of two, are accessed from the rearso that other people do not walk in front of these seats (which could rotate for convenient access andegress) nor does anyone have to walk immediately adjacent to the railing at the front of the balcony orgrandstand. This creates both a safer situation relative to falls over sightline-constrained railings and abetter viewing experience for those in the seats located immediately adjacent to the sightline constrainedrailing. Such a railing, being closer (horizontally) to such people can be at regular guard height (42 inchesor 1067 mm) with no disruption to their sightline due to their eye height being about 46 inches (1170 mm)above the seating deck surface where they are seated.


The substantiation is incorporated in the proposed Annex Note plus the following. Having the aisle accessway in front of seating is the norm with a few exceptions one of which is noted in the proposed Annex Note — lecture hall seating at a continuous table (as needed for computers, tablets, etc.) — and in some theatre seating layouts where seating is right at a balcony front with access to and egress from the seating being behind the seating.

Such seating could also be used in grandstands and might alleviate some dangers of people falling over sightline-constrained railings at the front of such grandstand balconies while providing superior (first-class) seating at the front of the balconies.

The proposed new text and Annex note provide the needed flexibility in how the Code addresses minimum width requirements for aisle accessways so there are no enforcement issues over these unusual designs.



Public Input No. 347-NFPA 101-2018 [Section No. 12.2.5.5.1] New Requirement to go with Annex Note




Affiliation: Self

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee: SAF-AXM


29 of 41 7/11/2018, 12:58 PM

Page 70 of 101


A.12.4.1.1

Life safety evaluations are examples of performance-based approaches to life safety. In this respect,significant guidance in the form and process of life safety evaluations is provided by Chapter 5, keeping inmind the fire safety emphasis in Chapter 5. Performance criteria, scenarios, evaluation, safety factors,documentation, maintenance, and periodic assessment (including a warrant of fitness) all apply to thebroader considerations in a life safety evaluation. A life safety evaluation deals not only with fire but alsowith storms, collapse, crowd behavior, and other related safety considerations for which a checklist isprovided in A.12.4.1.3. Chapter 5 provides guidance, based on fire safety requirements, for establishing adocumented case showing that products of combustion in all conceivable fire scenarios will not significantlyendanger occupants using means of egress in the facility (e.g., due to fire detection, automaticsuppression, smoke control, large-volume space, or management procedures). Moreover, means of egressfacilities plus facility management capabilities should be adequate to cope with scenarios where certainegress routes are blocked for some reason.

In addition to making realistic assumptions about the capabilities of persons in the facility (e.g., anassembled crowd including many disabled persons or persons unfamiliar with the facility), the life safetyevaluation should include a factor of safety of not less than 2.0 in all calculations relating to hazarddevelopment time and required egress time (the combination of flow time and other time needed to detectand assess an emergency condition, initiate egress, and move along the egress routes). The factor ofsafety takes into account the possibility that half of the egress routes might not be used (or be usable) incertain situations.

Regarding crowd behavior, the potential hazards created by larger masses of people and greater crowddensities (which can be problematic during ingress, occupancy, and egress) demand that technology beused by designers, managers, and authorities responsible for buildings to compensate for the relaxedegress capacity provisions of Table 12.4.2.3. In very large buildings for assembly use, the hazard of crowdcrushes can exceed that of fire or structural failure. Therefore, the building designers, managers, eventplanners, security personnel, police authorities, and fire authorities, as well as the building constructionauthorities, should understand the potential problems and solutions, including coordination of theiractivities. For crowd behavior, this understanding includes factors of space, energy, time, and information,as well as specific crowd management techniques, such as metering. Published guidance on these factorsand techniques is found in the SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering , Section 3, Chapter 13, pp.3-342–3-366 (Proulx, G., “Movement of People”), Chapter 56 (Egress Concepts and Design Approaches),Chapter 58 (Human Behavior in Fire), and 59 (Employing the Hydraulic Model in Assessing EmergencyMovement) , SFPE Guide to Human Behavior in Fire and the publications referenced therein.

Table 12.2.3.2 and Table 12.4.2.3 are based on a linear relationship between number of seats and nominalflow time, with not less than 200 seconds (3.3 minutes) for 2000 seats plus 1 second for every additional 50seats up to 25,000. Beyond 25,000 total seats, the nominal flow time is limited to 660 seconds (11 minutes).Nominal flow time refers to the flow time for the most able group of patrons; some groups less familiar withthe premises or less able groups might take longer to pass a point in the egress system. Although three ormore digits are noted in the tables, the resulting calculations should be assumed to provide only twosignificant figures of precision.


The edits reflect the changes made to the current edition of the SFPE Handbook of fire Protection Engineering. Also, the revised version of the SFPE Guide to Human Behavior in Fire provides additional guidance on the information referenced in Section 12.4.1.1.


Submitter Full Name: Chris Jelenewicz

Organization: Society of Fire Protection Eng


30 of 41 7/11/2018, 12:58 PM

Page 71 of 101

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee: SAF-AXM


31 of 41 7/11/2018, 12:58 PM

Page 72 of 101

Public Input No. 395-NFPA 101-2018 [ Section No. A.12.4.8 ]

A.12.4.8

Special amusement buildings are unique structures that can present challenges not common in assemblyor other occupancies. Hazards in Special Amusement Buildings include industrial, electrical, pneumatic,stored energy systems or other systems and equipment associated with the ride and/or show systems.Occupants are typically not familiar with their surroundings and the provided egress access may not beapparent while the building is operating in show conditions.

Additionally, special amusement buildings may present design challenges which the authority havingjurisdiction may need to consider. For example, a ride building containing a roller-coaster may meet theheight requirements for a high-rise structure, but only contain one story of height and mezzanines orcatwalks at upper levels for evacuation. Portions of a ride may exit and return into the building, traverse toan open structure, be located surrounded by water, or contain an atrium. Each of these conditions presentchallenges to the design of fire protection, fire alarm and life safety systems as well as the emergencyaction plan required in Sections 12.7.13.

Where a special amusement building is installed inside another building on a temporary basis , such aswithin an exhibit hall, the special amusement building requirements apply only to the portions of thebuilding used as a special amusement building . For example, the smoke detectors required by 12.4.8.4are not required to be connected to the building’s fire alarm system. Where installed in an exhibit hall, suchsmoke detectors are also required to comply with the provisions applicable to an exhibit.


This revision to the existing annex material provides new and updated information to help the user of the code identify the different hazards typically found in a special amusement structure. As new technologies for special amusement attractions have been implemented, this section of the annex has become outdated as it fails to mention these complex systems. This annex material will help users of the code identify other sections of the code that require consideration for these unique circumstances.

The section on Special Amusements installed in other buildings is updated to reflect the temporary natures of these installations and not to provide a permanent solution in lieu of the code requirements contained in Chapter 12.4.8.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee: SAF-AXM


32 of 41 7/11/2018, 12:58 PM

Page 73 of 101

Public Input No. 380-NFPA 101-2018 [ New Section after A.12.4.8.2 ]

A.12.4.8.6

Lighting levels within special amusement buildings are typically reduced to levels less than required bySection 7.8 for show purposes. In addition, projections, special effects, haze, and other theatrical elementsmay be combined which can disorient occupants who are already unfamiliar with the egress route. Section12.4.8.6 requires that activation of the automatic sprinkler system or smoke detection system to immediatelyincrease illumination to required levels and stop all show elements that would continue to disorient orconfuse occupants.

Because of the delay in verification or cross-zoning of smoke detectors, positive alarm sequence should notbe utilized when alarm-verification or cross-zoned smoke detectors is selected.


This addition to the annex provides up-to-date information on the environment common to today’s special amusement structures.

Due to the use of alarm verification or smoke detector cross zoning, the use of positive alarm sequence should not normally be allowed as this may create a further delay in evacuation time. Currently a conflict exists between Section 12.3.4.3.1 which allows positive alarm sequence in assembly occupancies and Section 12.4.8.6 which requires alarm verification or cross-zoning. The proposed addition allows the authority having jurisdiction to asses and approve the use of positive alarm sequence.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee: SAF-AXM


33 of 41 7/11/2018, 12:58 PM

Page 74 of 101


A.12.4.8.5

Most special amusements attractions contain an operator console or “tower” which may also service as aconstantly attended location when the ride is operational. A remote fire alarm annunciator capable oftransmitting voice announcements or a PA system that complies with 9.6.3.9.2 should be provided andaccessible to the ride operator. The operator should have a means of acknowledging receipt of alarmsignals and be trained on the evacuation plan required in Sections 12.7.13 and 4.8.


This addition to the annex identifies an arrangement standard to special amusement facilities and guides the user to consider the training and operational procedure necessary of the ride operator when a fire alarm is initiated and evacuation is necessary.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee: SAF-AXM


34 of 41 7/11/2018, 12:58 PM

Page 75 of 101


A.12.4.8.7.3

Special amusement buildings contain highly themed environments where it may be desirable to dim exitmarkings. Consideration should be given to the provision of directional exit marking on or adjacent to thefloor. See Proposed A.12.4.8.6


This addition to the annex provides up-to-date information on the environment common to today’s special amusement buildings. This addition to the annex identifies a manual means of illumination which is standard to special amusement facilities and should be provided at the operator console.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee: SAF-AXM


35 of 41 7/11/2018, 12:58 PM

Page 76 of 101


A.13.4.1.1

Life safety evaluations are examples of performance-based approaches to life safety. In this respect,significant guidance in the form and process of life safety evaluations is provided by Chapter 5, keeping inmind the fire safety emphasis in Chapter 5. Performance criteria, scenarios, evaluation, safety factors,documentation, maintenance, and periodic assessment (including a warrant of fitness) all apply to thebroader considerations in a life safety evaluation. A life safety evaluation deals not only with fire but alsowith storms, collapse, crowd behavior, and other related safety considerations for which a checklist isprovided in A.13.4.1.3. Chapter 5 provides guidance, based on fire safety requirements, for establishing adocumented case showing that products of combustion in all conceivable fire scenarios will not significantlyendanger occupants using means of egress in the facility (e.g., due to fire detection, automaticsuppression, smoke control, large-volume space, or management procedures). Moreover, means of egressfacilities plus facility management capabilities should be adequate to cope with scenarios where certainegress routes are blocked for some reason.

In addition to making realistic assumptions about the capabilities of persons in the facility (e.g., anassembled crowd including many disabled persons or persons unfamiliar with the facility), the life safetyevaluation should include a factor of safety of not less than 2.0 in all calculations relating to hazarddevelopment time and required egress time (the combination of flow time and other time needed to detectand assess an emergency condition, initiate egress, and move along the egress routes). This factor ofsafety takes into account the possibility that half of the egress routes might not be used (or usable) incertain situations.

Regarding crowd behavior, the potential hazards created by larger masses of people and greater crowddensities (which can be problematic during ingress, occupancy, and egress) demand that technology beused by designers, managers, and authorities responsible for buildings to compensate for the relaxedegress capacity provisions of Table 13.4.2.3. In very large buildings for assembly use, the hazard of crowdcrushes can exceed that of fire or structural failure. Therefore, the building designers, managers, eventplanners, security personnel, police authorities, and fire authorities, as well as the building constructionauthorities, should understand the potential problems and solutions, including coordination of theiractivities. For crowd behavior, this understanding includes factors of space, energy, time, and information,as well as specific crowd management techniques, such as metering. Published guidance on these factorsand techniques is found in the SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, Section 3 , Chapter 13 ,pp. 3-342–3-366 (Proulx, G., “Movement of People”), Chapter 56 (Egress Concepts and DesignApproaches), and Chapter 58 (Human Behavior in Fire), and 59 (Employing the Hydraulic Model inAssessing Emergency Movement), SFPE Guide to Human Behavior in Fire and the publicationsreferenced therein.

Table 13.2.3.2 and Table 13.4.2.3 are based on a linear relationship between number of seats and nominalflow time, with not less than 200 seconds (3.3 minutes) for 2000 seats plus 1 second for every additional 50seats up to 25,000. Beyond 25,000 total seats, the nominal flow time is limited to 660 seconds (11 minutes).Nominal flow time refers to the flow time for the most able group of patrons; some groups less familiar withthe premises or less able groups might take longer to pass a point in the egress system. Although three ormore digits are noted in the tables, the resulting calculations should be assumed to provide only twosignificant figures of precision.


Edits needed to reflect current edition of the SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering. Also, the SFPE Guide to Human Behavior in Fire provides information relevant to content in Section 13.4.1.1.





36 of 41 7/11/2018, 12:58 PM

Page 77 of 101

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee: SAF-AXM


37 of 41 7/11/2018, 12:58 PM

Page 78 of 101

Public Input No. 385-NFPA 101-2018 [ Section No. A.13.4.8 ]

A.13.4.8

Special amusement buildings are unique structures that can present challenges not common in assemblyor other occupancies. Hazards in Special Amusement Buildings include industrial, electrical, pneumatic,stored energy systems or other systems and equipment associated with the ride and/or show systems.Occupants are typically not familiar with their surroundings and the provided egress access may not beapparent while the building is operating in show conditions.

Additionally, special amusement buildings may present design challenges which the authority havingjurisdiction may need to consider. For example, a ride building containing a roller-coaster may meet theheight requirements for a high-rise structure, but only contain one story of height and mezzanines orcatwalks at upper levels for evacuation. Portions of a ride may exit and return into the building, traverse toan open structure, be located surrounded by water, or contain an atrium. Each of these conditions presentchallenges to the design of fire protection, fire alarm and life safety systems as well as the emergencyaction plan required in Sections 13.7.13.

Where a special amusement building is installed inside another building on a temporary basis , such aswithin an exhibit hall, the special amusement building requirements apply only to the the portions of thebuilding used as a special amusement building special amusement . For example, the smoke detectorsrequired by 13.4.8.4 are not required to be connected to the building’s fire alarm system. Where installed inan exhibit hall, such smoke detectors are also required to comply with the provisions applicable to anexhibit.


This revision to the existing annex material provides new and updated information to help the user of the code identify the different hazards typically found in a special amusement structure. As new technologies for special amusement attractions have been implemented, this section of the annex has become outdated as it fails to mention these complex systems. This annex material will help users of the code identify other sections of the code that require consideration for these unique circumstances.

The section on Special Amusements installed in other buildings is updated to reflect the temporary natures of these installations and not to provide a permanent solution in lieu of the code requirements contained in Chapter 12.4.8.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee: SAF-AXM


38 of 41 7/11/2018, 12:58 PM

Page 79 of 101


A.13.4.8.5

Most special amusements attractions contain an operator console or “tower” which may also service as aconstantly attended location when the ride is operational. A remote fire alarm annunciator capable oftransmitting voice announcements or a PA system that complies with 9.6.3.9.2 should be provided andaccessible to the ride operator. The operator should have a means of acknowledging receipt of alarmsignals and be trained on the evacuation plan required in Sections 12.7.13 and 4.8.


This addition to the annex identifies an arrangement standard to special amusement facilities and guides the user to consider the training and operational procedure necessary of the ride operator when a fire alarm is initiated and evacuation is necessary.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee: SAF-AXM


39 of 41 7/11/2018, 12:58 PM

Page 80 of 101


A.13.4.8.6

Lighting levels within special amusement buildings are typically reduced to levels less than required bySection 7.8 for show purposes. In addition, projections, special effects, haze, and other theatrical elementsmay be combined which can disorient occupants who are already unfamiliar with the egress route. Section13.4.8.6 requires that activation of the automatic sprinkler system or smoke detection system to immediatelyincrease illumination to required levels and stop all show elements that would continue to disorient orconfuse occupants.

Because of the delay in verification or cross-zoning of smoke detectors, positive alarm sequence should notbe utilized when alarm-verification or cross-zoned smoke detectors is selected.


This addition to the annex provides up-to-date information on the environment common to today’s special amusement structures.

Due to the use of alarm verification or smoke detector cross zoning, the use of positive alarm sequence should not normally be allowed as this may create a further delay in evacuation time. Currently a conflict exists between Section 12.3.4.3.1 which allows positive alarm sequence in assembly occupancies and Section 12.4.8.6 which requires alarm verification or cross-zoning. The proposed addition allows the authority having jurisdiction to asses and approve the use of positive alarm sequence.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee: SAF-AXM


40 of 41 7/11/2018, 12:58 PM

Page 81 of 101


A.13.4.8.7.3

Special amusement buildings contain highly themed environments where it may be desirable to dim exitmarkings. Consideration should be given to the provision of directional exit marking on or adjacent to thefloor. See Proposed A.13.4.8.6


This addition to the annex provides up-to-date information on the environment common to today’s special amusement buildings. This addition to the annex identifies a manual means of illumination which is standard to special amusement facilities and should be provided at the operator console.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee: SAF-AXM


41 of 41 7/11/2018, 12:58 PM

Page 82 of 101

Public Input No. 157-NFPA 101-2018 [ Global Input ]

Throughout all the occupancy chapters revise Section 2.5 Arrangement of Means of Egress so thatcommon path of travel and dead-end corridors come first and are in the same order, common path oftravel followed by dead-end corridors. Example:

XX.2.5 Arrangement of Means of Egress

XX.2.5.1 Means of egress shall be arranged in accorance wit Section 7.5

XX.2.5.2 Common path of travel (after this insert what is currenlty in the occuancy chapter for common path oftravel as 2.5.2.1, 2.5.2.2, etc.

XX 2.5.3 Dead-end corridors (after this insert what is currently in the occuancy chapter for dead-end corridorsas 2.5.3.1, 2.5.3.2, etc.

XX.2.5.4 etc continue with any other requirements the occupancy chapter has with regard to arrangement ofmeans of egress.


Currently there is close to a 50/50 split in which is handled first, CPT or Dead-ends. This can make it confusing to the new Code user and clearly makes it tougher to teach. Since Chapter 7 handles CPT first, to me that made the reason for my recommendation that the occupancy chapters handle CPT first. There is NO INTENT AT ALL to change any of the requirements technically, only to handle them in the same order and in the same format. Concurrent with this there is a proposal to move the Dead-end corridor requirements in Chapter 7 up, closer to the CPT requirements. All editorial for user friendliness.


Submitter Full Name: James Lathrop

Organization: Koffel Associates, Inc.

Affiliation: None

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee: SAF-MEA

Copyright Assignment

I, James Lathrop, hereby irrevocably grant and assign to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) all and full rights in copyright in thisPublic Input (including both the Proposed Change and the Statement of Problem and Substantiation). I understand and intend that I acquire norights, including rights as a joint author, in any publication of the NFPA in which this Public Input in this or another similar or derivative form isused. I hereby warrant that I am the author of this Public Input and that I have full power and authority to enter into this copyright assignment.

By checking this box I affirm that I am James Lathrop, and I agree to be legally bound by the above Copyright Assignment and the terms andconditions contained therein. I understand and intend that, by checking this box, I am creating an electronic signature that will, upon mysubmission of this form, have the same legal force and effect as a handwritten signature

National Fire Protection Association Report https://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/FormLaunch?id=/TerraView/...

1 of 1 7/6/2018, 9:40 AM

Page 83 of 101


3.4 General Acronyms

AHJ = Authority Having Jurisdiction

HRR = Heat Release Rate

LP-Gas = Liquefied Petroleum Gas

MCM = Metal Composite Panel

RDP = Registered Design Professional


Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input:New Section 3.4:We have become liberal over the years as TC members in the application of terms versus acronyms. When examining the publication the use of the full text of the term and its associated acronym are inconsistent throughout. In addition, while we have generated acronyms nowhere is there a listing where a user can easily refer to said acronym for reference.

We are proposing that a new Section 3.4 be added to Chapter 3. This will be a section dedicated for acronyms which are used in the document. While the current document illustrates the acronym following the term, most users of the document have trouble finding same since they view the acronym first and then must hint for the association with the actual term. By creating this list in a separate section will make the document more user friendly.

Assignment for Technical Committees:We are asking each of the technical committees to perform an assessment of their respective chapters and proposed modifications to follow the NFPA manual of style (Shown below) by replacing the text version of a definition which has been assigned an acronym with the appropriate acronym.

“3.2.5.1 Acronyms and Uncommon Abbreviations.3.2.5.1.1 All acronyms and any abbreviations that are not in common use shall be spelled out with the acronym or abbreviation following in parentheses for the first use of the term in the document.3.2.5.1.2 Each subsequent use shall be the acronym or abbreviation only.”

(Source: “NFPA Manual of Style for NFPA Technical Committee Documents”, July 2004 Edition)


Submitter Full Name: Jonathan Humble

Organization: American Iron and Steel Institute

Affiliation: American Iron and Steel Institute

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee: SAF-FUN


1 of 2 7/6/2018, 9:56 AM

Page 84 of 101


I, Jonathan Humble, hereby irrevocably grant and assign to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) all and full rights in copyright in thisPublic Input (including both the Proposed Change and the Statement of Problem and Substantiation). I understand and intend that I acquire norights, including rights as a joint author, in any publication of the NFPA in which this Public Input in this or another similar or derivative form isused. I hereby warrant that I am the author of this Public Input and that I have full power and authority to enter into this copyright assignment.

By checking this box I affirm that I am Jonathan Humble, and I agree to be legally bound by the above Copyright Assignment and the termsand conditions contained therein. I understand and intend that, by checking this box, I am creating an electronic signature that will, upon mysubmission of this form, have the same legal force and effect as a handwritten signature


2 of 2 7/6/2018, 9:56 AM

Page 85 of 101


16.2.5.5.1*

The required clear width of aisle accessways shall be determined by provisions of 16.2.5.5.1.1 betweenrows of seating

shall be determined as follows:and by 16.2.5.5.1.2 where the aisle accessway is btween seats, either in a row or grouped otherwise, anda railing:

16.2.5.5.1.1

(1) Horizontal measurements shall be made, between vertical planes, from the back of one seat to thefront of the most forward projection of the seat immediately behind it.

(2) Where the entire row consists of automatic-rising or self-rising seats that comply with ASTM F851, TestMethod for Self-Rising Seat Mechanisms, the measurement shall be permitted to be made with theseats in the up position.

12.2.5.5..1.2*

(1) Horizontal measurements shall be made between the vertical planes of the front of the seat, in the downposition if self rising, and any railing in front of the seating where the aisle accessway is in front of the seat.

(2) Horizontal measurements shall be made between the vertical planes of the rear of the seat back and therailing or seating deck riser, whichever is closer to the back of the seat, where the aisle accessway is behidthe seat.


This addresses the aisle accessway width applicable to the front row of conventional row seating and to other configurations of seating where the aisle accessway is behind seating, not arranged in conventional rows. The latter could occur in lecture halls where a continuous, narrow table is provided in front of individual seats which are approached from an aisle accessway behind the seats.

The same configuration, without the continuous table, could occur especially in the front of a balcony or elevated grandstand where seats are placed immediately behind the guard railing at the front of the balcony or grandstand and such seats, for example arranged in groups of two, are accessed from the rear so that other people do not walk in front of these seats (which could rotate for convenient access and egress) nor does anyone have to walk immediately adjacent to the railing at the front of the balcony or grandstand. This creates both a safer situation relative to falls over sightline-constrained railings and a better viewing experience for those in the seats located immediately adjacent to thesightline constrained railing. Such a railing, being closer (horizontally) to such people can be at regular guard height(42 inches or 1067 mm) with no disruption to their sightline due to their eye height being about 46 inches (1170 mm)above the seating deck surface where they are seated.




Affiliation: Self

Street Address:

City:

State:


1 of 13 7/11/2018, 1:11 PM

Page 86 of 101

Zip:


Committee: BLD-AXM


2 of 13 7/11/2018, 1:11 PM

Page 87 of 101


16.2.11.1.1* Sight Line-Constrained Rail Heights.

Unless subject to the requirements of 16.2.11.1.2, a fasciae or railing system complying with the guardrequirements of 11.2.2.4, and having a minimum height of 26 in. (660 mm), shall be provided where thefloor or footboard elevation is more than 30 in. (760 mm) above the floor or the finished ground level belowand the fasciae or railing system would otherwise interfere with sight lines of immediately adjacent seating.Provision of a fasciae or railing system shall not be construed as satisfying the need for a guard asrequired where there is more than a 30-inch (760 mm) drop below the foor or footboard ellevation; othermeasures shall be taken to prevent injurious falls at such locations that are equivalent in performance toproviding a 42-inch (1065 mm) guard.


26-inch high railings are not functional guards, especially in occupancy settings such as some sport events and certain concerts, both characterized by exuberance of one or more of the occupants in the vicinity of the balcony or elevated grandstand front, including those in rows behind the first row of seating.A separate proposal provides an alternative method of designing seating and aisle accessways at the front of seating areas that obviates the need for lower railings. This is one solution to the problem of inadequate rail heights in assembly facilities that does not require reduction of the guard height below the minimum 42 inches otherwise required. it is Public Input 347 for NFPA 101




Affiliation: Self

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee: BLD-AXM


3 of 13 7/11/2018, 1:11 PM

Page 88 of 101

Public Input No. 4-NFPA 5000-2018 [ Section No. 16.3.7 ]

16.3.7 Integrated Fire Protection and Life Safety Systems.

Integrated fire protection and life safety systems shall be tested in accordance with 55.1.4.2.1.



Issued_TIA_5000-18-2_Final_-_TIA_5000_18_2.pdf

NFPA 5000 TIA 18-2 (Log No. 1319) BLD-AXM


NOTE: This public input originates from Tentative Interim Amendment No. 18-2 (Log No. 1319) issued by the Standards Council on December 6, 2017 and per the NFPA Regs., needs to be reconsidered by the Technical Committee for the next edition of the Document.

Substantiation. Often, for fire and life safety objectives to be met, interdependence on two or more fire protection and life safety systems is required. When that occurs, there is a fundamental expectation for integrated features to remain functional. Common sense has always dictated a need to verify the response of integrated features when individual systems are tested, but standards historically lacked guidance for such testing.

To fill that gap, NFPA 4 Standard for Integrated Fire Protection and Life Safety Systems Testing was developed and published in 2015 as an outgrowth of recommended practices that were previously established by NFPA 3. As a new standard that was derived from a recommended practice, the requirements of NFPA 4 have not yet been widely adopted and remain somewhat untested.

Nevertheless, in the just-completed cycle for the 2018 editions of NFPA 101 and NFPA 5000, NFPA 4 was proposed for adoption by reference in nearly all occupancy chapters with inconsistent results that can be attributed to at least two factors:1. The content of NFPA 4 was not consistently and adequately explained to all the NFPA101 and NFPA 5000 technical committees that were asked to review these proposals and comments.2. The “one size fits all” approach to integrated testing currently used by NFPA 4 is well suited for complex systems, but it is unnecessarily burdensome for testing of simple integrations, such as a sprinkler waterflow switch connecting to a fire alarm system for alarm initiation and monitoring. For example, NFPA 4 always requires an integrated test team and development of an integrated test plan that is carried out by an integrated test team, unless waived by the AHJ. It is understandable that some technical committees viewed mandatory references to NFPA 4 as excessive and rejected proposals that would have mandated compliance.

As the 2018 editions of NFPA 101 and NFPA 5000 currently stand, some occupancy chapters broadly reference NFPA 4 for all integrated systems. Others contain no reference to NFPA 4 at all, and still others reference NFPA 4 but modify how it is to be applied. These inconsistencies will lead to confusion among code users and code enforcers and could result in unsafe conditions. For example, omission of requirements for integrated testing in some 2018 edition chapters will essentially convey that it is unnecessary to test ANY integrated functions in new or existing occupancies regulated by chapters that do not contain such a requirement. This undermines the traditional common-sense minimum of making sure that even simple integrations must be tested to verify cause-effect functionality.

To deal with this issue, multiple NITMAMs to delete all references to integrated testing requirements and NFPA 4 were submitted and certified for consideration at the annual conference in Boston. However, rather than advancing these motions, the proponents agreed to support an alternate path of using TIAs to repair issues with the code text instead of deleting it.

The TIAs are the result of a collaborative effort that included fire alarm and fire sprinkler industry participation,


4 of 13 7/11/2018, 1:11 PM

Page 89 of 101

among others. The approach in NFPA 5000 can be summarized as follows:

1. Because of the complex interaction of systems needed to accomplish smoke control, new buildings with smoke control systems will be required to comply with NFPA 4. This is entirely handled in Chapter 55.2. Because of the complex interaction of systems needed to accomplish safety objectives in high-rise buildings, new high-rise buildings will be required to comply with NFPA 4. Note that new high-rise buildings are handled by Chapter 33.3. All other buildings and occupancies WILL NOT be required to follow NFPA 4.

It is important to note that the approach suggested by this TIA correlates with code provisions that were adopted in the 2018 edition of the International Fire Code. Therefore, acceptance of this TIA will ensure that provisions in the 2018 editions of NFPA and ICC codes will be consistent with respect to integrated test requirements.

Emergency Nature. The standard contains an error or an omission that was overlooked during the regular revision process. The proposed TIA intends to offer to the public a benefit that would lessen a recognized (known) hazard or ameliorate a continuing dangerous condition or situation.

Although it is only necessary to satisfy one of the six possible TIA emergency nature criteria, this TIA satisfies two.

1. The standard contains an error or an omission that was overlooked during the regular revision process. Because some occupancy chapters in the 2018 omitted references to Chapter 55 for integrated testing and others did not, NFPA 5000 will essentially be conveying that it is unnecessary to test ANY integrated functions in new or existing occupancies regulated by the chapters that do not contain such a requirement. This undermines the traditional common-sense minimum of ensuring that simple integrations must be tested to verify cause-effect functionality. Although each technical committee is certainly authorized to oversee requirements for occupancies under its authority, it was probably unrecognized or overlooked that omitting a reference to Chapter 55 in some chapters, when such references appear in other chapters, conveys a message that testing of integrated features can be entirely ignored in some cases. Rather, it is believed that committees that chose to reject inclusion of a Chapter 55 reference for integrated testing did so for rejecting NFPA 4, not basic common-sense tests to verify functionality of connected systems. 2. The proposed TIA intends to offer to the public a benefit that would lessen a recognized (known) hazard or ameliorate a continuing dangerous condition or situation. It is essential to safety for fire protection and life safety systems, including integrated features, to function as designed. Should system interactions fail, dangerous conditions can certainly result. As indicated in Item 1 above, the inclusion of integrated test requirements for some occupancies but not others convey that integrated testing is NEVER required in occupancies that don’t include a reference to Chapter 55. However, some technical committees reportedly rejected referencing Chapter 55 for integrated testing because of the connection to NFPA 4, not because they opposed the concept of verifying basic functionality of integrated features. The proposed TIA resolves this issue by establishing a minimum requirement for ensuring basic functionality of integrated features and only referencing NFPA 4 for complex systems associated with high-rise buildings and buildings with smoke-control systems.


Submitter Full Name: Tc On Bld-Axm

Organization: NFPA 5000 TC on Assembly Occupancies

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Mar 06 13:17:24 EST 2018

Committee: BLD-AXM


5 of 13 7/11/2018, 1:11 PM

Page 90 of 101

Building Construction and Safety Code

(SC 17-12-26 / TIA Log #1319)

Regulations Governing the Development of NFPA StandardsBuilding

Construction and Safety Code


Page 91 of 101


16.4.6.2.1

Permanent platforms shall be constructed of materials as follows:

(1) Materials as required for the type of construction of the building in which the permanent platform islocated shall be permitted.

(2) Materials of fire-retardant-treated wood or fire-retardant coated wood for platforms in accordance with7.2.3.2.7 and 7.2.3.2.8 shall be permitted.

(3) The finished floor shall be permitted to be of wood in all types of construction.


Fire-retardant coatings should not be excluded. There are currently approved flame-retardant coatings on the market today that comply with building codes. New products including flame-retardant coatings may be developed to comply with these requirements. Excluding flame-retardant coatings or any other product is limiting opportunities for fair trade and the consumer.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee: BLD-AXM


6 of 13 7/11/2018, 1:11 PM

Page 92 of 101


16.4.6.7.2

Fire-retardant-treated wood or fire-retardant coatings shall be permitted for fly galleries and pinrails of alltypes of construction.


Fire-retardant coatings should not be excluded. There are currently approved flame-retardant coatings on the market today that comply with building codes. New products including flame-retardant coatings may be developed to comply with these requirements. Excluding flame-retardant coatings or any other product is limiting opportunities for fair trade and the consumer.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee: BLD-AXM


7 of 13 7/11/2018, 1:11 PM

Page 93 of 101


16.4.9.3.3

The finished ground level area or length required by 16.4.9.3.2 shall be permitted to be doubled where oneof the following criteria is met:

(1) Where the grandstand is constructed entirely of labeled fire-retardant-treated wood or fire-retardantcoated wood that has passed the standard rain test of ASTM D2898, Standard Test Methods forAccelerated Weathering of Fire-Retardant-Treated Wood for Fire Testing

(2) Where the grandstand is constructed of members conforming to dimensions for heavy timberconstruction [Type IV (2HH)]


There are approved Fire-retardant Coatings that meet or could potentially meet the requirements of this section. Fire-retardant coatings are held to the same standard as stated in ASTM D2898 “Standard Rain Test”, Standard Test Methods for Accelerated Weathering of Fire-Retardant Treated Wood for Fire Testing, (Method A) [703: 5.3.2]. By only referencing Fire-Retardant Treated Wood you are limiting the consumers options in achieving this code.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee: BLD-AXM


8 of 13 7/11/2018, 1:11 PM

Page 94 of 101


16.4.9.3.6

The height requirements specified in 16.4.9.3.4 and 16.4.9.3.5 shall be permitted to be doubled where oneof the following criteria is met:

(1) Where the grandstand is constructed entirely of labeled fire-retardant-treated wood or fire-retardantcoated wood that has passed the standard rain test of ASTM D2898

(2) Where the grandstand is constructed of members conforming to dimensions for heavy timberconstruction [Type IV (2HH)]


There are approved Fire-retardant coatings that meet or will potentially meet the requirements of this section. Fire-retardant coatings are held to the same standard as stated in ASTM D2898 “Standard Rain Test” described in ASTM D2898, Standard Test Methods for Accelerated Weathering of Fire-Retardant Treated Wood for Fire Testing, (Method A) [703: 5.3.2] By only referencing fire-retardant treated wood, NFPA is limiting the consumers options in achieving this code.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee: BLD-AXM


9 of 13 7/11/2018, 1:11 PM

Page 95 of 101


A.16.2.5.5.1

Seats having reclining backs are assumed to be in their most upright position when unoccupied.

A.12.2.5.5.1.2

This addresses the aisle accessway width applicable to the front row of conventional row seating and toother

configurations of seating where the aisle accessway is behind seating, not arranged in conventional rows.The

latter could occur in lecture halls where a continuous, narrow table is provided in front of individual seatswhich

are approached from an aisle accessway behind the seats.

The same configuration, without the continuous table, could occur especially in the front of a balcony or

elevated grandstand where seats are placed immediately behind the guard railing at the front of thebalcony or

grandstand and such seats, for example arranged in groups of two, are accessed from the rear so thatother

people do not walk in front of these seats (which could rotate for convenient access and egress) nor does

anyone have to walk immediately adjacent to the railing at the front of the balcony or grandstand. Thiscreates

both a safer situation relative to falls over sightline-constrained railings and a better viewing experiencefor

those in the seats located immediately adjacent to the sightline constrained railing. Such a railing, beingcloser

(horizontally) to such people can be at regular guard height (42 inches or 1067 mm) with no disruptionto their

sightline due to their eye height being about 46 inches (1170 mm) above the seating deck surfacewhere they

are seated.


The substantiation is incorporated in the proposed Annex Note plus the following. Having the aisle accessway in front of seating is the norm with a few exceptions one of which is noted in the proposed Annex Note — lecture hall seating at a continuous table (as needed for computers, tablets, etc.) — and in some theatre seating layouts where seating is right at a balcony front with access to and egress from the seating being behind the seating.

Such seating could also be used in grandstands and might alleviate some dangers of people falling over sightline constrained railings at the front of such grandstand balconies while providing superior (first-class) seating at the front of the balconies.


10 of 13 7/11/2018, 1:11 PM

Page 96 of 101

The proposed new text and Annex note provide the needed flexibility in how the Code addresses minimum width requirements for aisle accessways so there are no enforcement issues over these unusual designs.



Public Input No. 257-NFPA 5000-2018 [Section No. 16.2.5.5.1] Annex Note & related new code text




Affiliation: Self

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee: BLD-AXM


11 of 13 7/11/2018, 1:11 PM

Page 97 of 101


A.16.4.1.1

Life safety evaluations are examples of performance-based approaches to life safety. In this respect,significant guidance in the form and process of life safety evaluations is provided by Chapter 5, keeping inmind the fire safety emphasis in Chapter 5. The general approach to performance criteria, scenarios,evaluation, safety factors, documentation, maintenance, and periodic assessment (including a warrant offitness) applies to the broader considerations in a life safety evaluation. A life safety evaluation deals notonly with fire but also with fire, storm, collapse, crowd behavior, and other related safety considerations forwhich a checklist is provided in A.16.4.1.3. Chapter 5 provides guidance, based on fire safety requirements,for establishing a documented case showing that products of combustion in all conceivable fire scenarioswill not significantly endanger occupants using means of egress in the facility (e.g., safety factors such asfire detection, automatic suppression, smoke control, large-volume space, or management procedures).Moreover, means of egress facilities plus facility management capabilities should be adequate to cope withscenarios where certain egress routes are blocked for some reason.

In addition to making realistic assumptions about the capabilities of persons in the facility (e.g., anassembled crowd including many disabled persons or persons unfamiliar with the facility), the life safetyevaluation should include a factor of safety of not less than 2.0 in all calculations relating to hazarddevelopment time and required egress time (the combination of flow time and other time needed to detectand assess an emergency condition, initiate egress, and move along the egress routes). The factor ofsafety takes into account the possibility that half of the egress routes might not be used (or be usable) incertain situations.

Regarding crowd behavior, the potential hazards created by larger masses of people and greater crowddensities (which can be problematic during ingress, occupancy, and egress) demand that technology beused by designers, managers, and authorities responsible for buildings to compensate for the relaxedegress capacity provisions of . In very large buildings for assembly use, the hazard of crowd crushes canexceed that of fire or structural failure. Therefore, the building designers, managers, event planners,security personnel, police authorities, and fire authorities, as well as the building construction authorities,should understand the potential problems and solutions, including coordination of their activities. For crowdbehavior, this understanding includes factors of space, energy, time, and information, as well as specificcrowd management techniques such as metering. Published guidance on these factors and techniques isfound in the the SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering , Section 3 Chapter 59 , Chapter 13,pp. 3 2115 - 263–3-285 2151 ( Pauls Gwynne , J., “Movement of People”), S. M. V. and Rosenbaum, E.R., "Employing the Hydraulic Model in Assessing Emergency Movement") , the SFPE Engineering Guide toHuman Behavior in Fire and the publications referenced therein.

Table 16.2.3.2.1 and Table 16.4.2.3 are based on a linear relationship between number of seats andnominal flow time, with not less than 200 seconds (3.3 minutes) for 2000 seats plus 1 second for everyadditional 50 seats up to 25,000. Beyond 25,000 total seats, the nominal flow time is limited to 660 seconds(11 minutes). Nominal flow time refers to the flow time for the most able group of patrons; some groups lessfamiliar with the premises or less able groups might take longer to pass a point in the egress system.


Edit needed to identify the correct chapter that is in the current edition of the SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering. Also, the SFPE Guide to Human Behavior in Fire provides the type of guidance that is referenced.




Street Address:

City:


12 of 13 7/11/2018, 1:11 PM

Page 98 of 101

State:

Zip:


Committee: BLD-AXM


13 of 13 7/11/2018, 1:11 PM

Page 99 of 101


3.4 General Acronyms

ACM = Aluminum Composite Panel

AHJ = Authority Having Jurisdiction

ALS = Assistive Listening System

BFE = Base Flood Elevation

DFE = Design Flood Elevation

FBFM = Flood Boundary and Floodway Mapf

FHBM = Flood Hazard Boundary Map

FIRM = Flood Insurance Rate Map

HPM = Hazardous Production Material

HRR = Heat Release Rate

I = Importance Factor

LFL = Lower Flammable Limit

LP-Gas = Liquefied Petroleum Gas

MCM = Metal Composite Panel

OSB = Oriented Strand Board

p = Design Pressure

PEL = Permissible Exposure Limit

RDP = Registered Design Professional

SIED = Special Industrial Explosive Device

V = Wind Speed


Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input:New Section 3.4:We have become liberal over the years as TC members in the application of terms versus acronyms. When examining the publication the use of the full text of the term and its associated acronym are inconsistent throughout. In addition, while we have generated acronyms nowhere is there a listing where a user can easily refer to said acronym for reference.

We are proposing that a new Section 3.4 be added to Chapter 3. This will be a section dedicated for acronyms which are used in the document. While the current document illustrates the acronym following the term, most users of the document have trouble finding same since they view the acronym first and then must hint for the association with the actual term. By creating this list in a separate section will make the document more user friendly.

Assignment for Technical Committees:We are asking each of the technical committees to perform an assessment of their respective chapters and proposed modifications to follow the NFPA manual of style (Shown below) by replacing the text version of a definition which has been assigned an acronym with the appropriate acronym.

“3.2.5.1 Acronyms and Uncommon Abbreviations.3.2.5.1.1 All acronyms and any abbreviations that are not in common use shall be spelled out with the acronym or abbreviation following in parentheses for the first use of the term in the document.3.2.5.1.2 Each subsequent use shall be the acronym or abbreviation only.”


1 of 2 7/6/2018, 10:37 AM

Page 100 of 101

(Source: “NFPA Manual of Style for NFPA Technical Committee Documents”, July 2004 Edition)


Submitter Full Name: Jonathan Humble

Organization: American Iron and Steel Institute

Affiliation: American Iron and Steel Instittute

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee: BLD-FUN


I, Jonathan Humble, hereby irrevocably grant and assign to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) all and full rights in copyright in thisPublic Input (including both the Proposed Change and the Statement of Problem and Substantiation). I understand and intend that I acquire norights, including rights as a joint author, in any publication of the NFPA in which this Public Input in this or another similar or derivative form isused. I hereby warrant that I am the author of this Public Input and that I have full power and authority to enter into this copyright assignment.

By checking this box I affirm that I am Jonathan Humble, and I agree to be legally bound by the above Copyright Assignment and the termsand conditions contained therein. I understand and intend that, by checking this box, I am creating an electronic signature that will, upon mysubmission of this form, have the same legal force and effect as a handwritten signature


2 of 2 7/6/2018, 10:37 AM

Page 101 of 101