Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Irrigation Rehabilitation Project (RRP KAZ 50387)
Supplementary Document 17:
DUE DILIGENCE REPORT ON SOCIAL SAFEGUARDS
August 2019 Prepared by the Executing Agency, the Republican State Enterprise “Kazvodkhoz” of the Republic of Kazakhstan for Asian Development Bank. This due diligence report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.
ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ADB Asian Development Bank Akimat Local Executive Power in the regions and districts DDR Due Diligence Report DP Displaced Person EA Executing Agency GoK Government of Kazakhstan GRM Grievance Redress Mechanism IA Implementing Agency IP Indigenous People IR Involuntary Resettlement KVK “Kazvodkhoz “Republican State Enterprise responsible for rehabilitation,
operations and maintenance of irrigations and water facilities LARP Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan MOA Ministry of Agriculture MOF Ministry of Finance PIU Project Implementation Unit PMO Project Management Office PMC Project Management Consultant ha hectare CSC Construction Supervision Consultant SPS Safeguard Policy Statement (2009) of ADB km kilometer SNiP Construction Codes and Regulations
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................... I
INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 1
A. BACKGROUND .............................................................................................................................................. 1 B. OBJECTIVE, SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................ 1
PROJECT DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................................................... 2
A. PROJECT IMPACT, OUTCOME AND OUTPUTS ....................................................................................................... 2 B. DESIGN DETAILS INTRODUCED TO AVOID IMPACT IN REHABILITATION OF CANALS AND DITCHES ...................................... 3 C. THE PLANNED REHABILITATION WORKS .............................................................................................................. 4 D. WORK TECHNOLOGY AND MACHINERY SELECTION .............................................................................................. 10 E. THE CURRENT RIGHT OF WAY ......................................................................................................................... 14
DUE DILIGENCE FINDINGS ..................................................................................................................... 15
A. GENERAL ................................................................................................................................................... 15 B. OWNERSHIP OF THE CANALS AND STRUCTURES .................................................................................................. 15 D. SITE VISITS AND SATELLITE MAPS SCREENING ..................................................................................................... 16 E. LOCATIONS WHERE SOME DITCHES ARE NEAR THE HOUSES ................................................................................... 21 E. THE LAND PLOT FOR THE KVK HEADQUARTERS BUILDING .................................................................................... 26 F. PROJECT CATEGORY FOR INVOLUNTARY RESETTLEMENT AND INDIGENOUS PEOPLE IMPACT ....................................... 28
DISCLOSURE, PUBLIC CONSULTATION AND COMMMUNICATION PLAN .................................... 29
A. PROCEEDINGS OF SIX PUBLIC CONSULTATIONS IN ALL FOUR PROVINCES ................................................................... 29 B. SUMMARY OF THE QUESTIONS AND PROPOSALS PER PROVINCES ............................................................................ 30 C. COMMUNICATION PLAN WITH THE PROJECT STAKEHOLDERS ................................................................................. 32
GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM .................................................................................................... 33
A. OBJECTIVE AND RESPONSIBILITY...................................................................................................................... 33 B. THREE LEVELS OF GRIEVANCE RESOLUTION ........................................................................................................ 34 D. GRIEVANCE REDRESS COMMITTEES ................................................................................................................. 35
INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENT AND MONITORING ........................................................................ 36
A. ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK .......................................................................................................................... 36 B. THE EXECUTING AGENCY – KVK ..................................................................................................................... 36 B. CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT NEEDS .................................................................................................................... 37 C. AKIMATS AND OTHER STATE AGENCIES ............................................................................................................. 38 D. SUPERVISION CONSULTANT AND CONTRACTORS ................................................................................................ 38
MONITORING AND REPORTING ............................................................................................................. 38
CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................................................. 38
ATTACHMENT 1. LIST OF THE CANALS AND DITCHES TO BE REHABILITATED ........................................................................ 39 ATTACHMENT 2. DECREE OF THE REGIONAL AKIMAT ABOUT THE CANALS’ OWNERSHIP (SAMPLE) .......................................... 65 ATTACHMENT 3. CANAL VOLUNTARY DONATION SIGNED DOCUMENTS ............................................................................. 70 ATTACHMENT 4. SAMPLE PHOTOS FROM SITE VISITS .................................................................................................... 73 ATTACHMENT 5. INVOLUNTARY RESETTLEMENT IMPACT CHECKLISTS .............................................................................. 87 ATTACHMENT 6. INDIGENOUS PEOPLE IMPACT CHECKLIST ............................................................................................ 89 ATTACHMENT 7. PROCEEDINGS OF THE DISCLOSURE AND PUBLIC CONSULTATIONS IN FOUR PROVINCES ................................ 91 ATTACHMENT 8. ASSIGNMENT OF THE GRM FOCAL PERSONS BY THE KVK .................................................................... 117 ATTACHMENT 9. CONFIRMATION OF STAFF OF REGIONAL AUTHORITIES AND KVK FOR GRM ............................................. 123
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. The report presents the findings of the due diligence for involuntary resettlement (IR) and indigenous people (IP) impact for the project to rehabilitate the existing irrigation network for 171,101 hectares (ha) lands in four provinces of Kazakhstan. Asian Development Bank (ADB) finances the project and the Kazvodkhoz (KVK) is an Executing Agency (EA).
2. The due diligence was conducted from November 2018 to June 2019 as per ADB Safeguard Policy Statement (ADB SPS 2009) to assess if the project design anticipates: (i) any involuntary resettlement, (ii) any adverse impact to indigenous people, and (iii) review project design details and technologies to avoid adverse impact, if any.
3. The due diligence found that all irrigation canals are state- and municipality-owned. A farmer has donated a 2.7 km long irrigation canal covering an area of 8.2 ha (0.87% of his total 939 ha of land). The canal has not been repaired for years and the farmer is interested in irrigation to increase the productivity of his land but cannot afford proper rehabilitation and maintenance of the canal. The donation is verified as per the laws of Kazakhstan and principles of ADB SPS (2009). The farm is well off and owns 16 tractors, 2 combine harvesters, and 150 large livestock. The farmer is a direct project beneficiary of the project and his household is not vulnerable.
4. The project works include rehabilitation and improvement of the existing irrigation canals to their original designs (with and without lining), restoration of the pipeline systems and installation of the new pumping stations without changes in the right-of-way. No changes are planned in the existing routes, layouts, and capacities of the canals. Analysed site specific civil works technologies were incorporated into the project design which allowed avoiding any adverse impact.
5. The land for the Water Centre building in Nursultan (Astana) city is owned by the municipality and located in the suburb of south-east of Nursultan city. The due diligence counted up 30 tracks using the site as temporary and ad-hoc parking place. According to the city regulations, parking of the trucks are not allowed in the Nursultan city. Therefore, there are number of parking lots for trucks and heavy construction vehicles in this suburb area of the city. The drivers consulted expressed that some of them have been using the site from two months to two years. The main reason for parking there included: (i) parking trucks are not allowed inner Nursultan city and/or (ii) the land plot was not fenced and used by anyone, (iii) land plot is located close to the main road to travel to other provinces. They park their trucks in this site until receiving new orders mainly through phones, online, or references. The parking here or somewhere close does not impact their business due to the nature of their business requiring them to travel and sometimes stay and work for weeks or months in different assignments locations. The trucks are parked there on ad-hoc basis just until they receive the next assignment often by phone calls from the clients they already have or client’s references. Besides, they use paper and digital media announcements to offer their services to the clients. Thus the site is used for parking the trucks until they receive a new assignment in different ongoing constructions sites within Nur-Sultan city as well as in other provinces of Kazakhstan such as Karaghandy and Pavlodar provinces, as well as Ekateringburg and other cities of Russia. Change of the location for parking their trucks to two alternative existing parking lots free of charge (150 and 700 meters away along the same street), while waiting for the orders and assignments from the clients, will not anticipate any adverse impact on their business.
6. There are two alternative parking lots located within the same street in distance about 150 and 700 meters from the site which the drivers are offered to use by Nursultan city Akimat. The drivers were consulted and interviewed about moving to two neighbouring parking lots, based on which, nearby alternative parking lots does not have any adverse impact to their
ii
business due to the described nature of their business and communication methods they use to attract new clients. The drivers were informed about the established project specific GRM, and the contact information of Grievance Redress Mechanism (GRM) responsible persons from KVK were provided to the drivers for their references. Further monitoring is envisaged to follow-up and monitor the process.
7. Disclosure and public consultations were held with farmers and communities from all subprojects in four provinces and truck drivers in Nursultan city. The project outputs, IR and environmental safeguards of ADB SPS (2009) and laws of Kazakhstan, as well as the project GRM were discussed. Participants expressed support for the project, made proposals and raised questions about the project design and water tariffs (more details below). Site specific communication plan will be developed prior to the start of the civil works.
8. The project specific GRM is formed as per ADB SPS (2009) and laws of Kazakhstan. GRM is set at the district, regional, and central levels including the staff from the respective district and regional Akimats and KVK branches. KVK shall ensure regular internal monitoring to address any unanticipated resettlement impact during the project implementation. The outcomes of the monitoring shall be reflected in the project progress reports. ADB will arrange capacity building workshop and on-the-job-training to the KVK staff as KVK is new EA to ADB-assisted projects.
9. The project is Category ‘C’ for IR and IP impact as per ADB SPS (2009). Adverse impact was avoided through analysis of civil works technologies incorporated into the project design. Site specific communication plan will be developed by supervision consultant and contractor agreed with water users to align civil works schedule with irrigation schedule. Further monitoring of any unanticipated impact will be carried out and reported throughout the project implementation in semi-annual and annual social safeguards monitoring reports.
INTRODUCTION
A. Background
1. The project will support the rehabilitation of irrigation networks serving about 171,100 hectares (ha) land in the East Kazakhstan, Karaghandy, Kyzlorda, and Zhambyl provinces of the Republic of Kazakhstan. The project will promote diversification from traditional low-yielding and low-value grain crops into high value cash crops and horticulture crops. Asian Development Bank (ADB) will finance the project and the State Republican Enterprise “Kazvodkhoz” (KVK) will be an Executive Agency (EA).
B. Objective, Scope and Methodology
2. The due diligence was conducted from November 2018 to June 2019 as per ADB Safeguard Policy Statement (ADB SPS 2009) to assess if project design anticipates: (i) any involuntary resettlement, (ii) any adverse impact to indigenous people, and (iii) review project design details and technologies to avoid adverse impact, if any.
3. The due diligence covers the outputs (i) rehabilitation and improvement of irrigation network for all 245 irrigation schemes in four provinces, and (ii) the land plot in Nursultan (Astana) city for the KVK Headquarters building. It was conducted from November 2018 to June 2019 and the methodology and approaches included:
(i) Review of the project related documents, available technical parameters, legal acts and maps, including those verifying the owners and the current rights of way of the irrigation canals and ditches;
(ii) Review project outputs as per ADB SPS (2009) requirements, (iii) Consultations with the stakeholders, the KVK management and specialists at
the central, regional and district levels, and local executive power; (iv) Screening the Project areas by satellite data (Geonomic
https://irr.geonomix.kz/ and Google Earth); (v) Site visits to the project canals and the site for construction the KVK
Headquarters building; and (vi) Consultations and interviews with the farmers and residents during the
disclosure and public consultations conducted for all 16 subprojects in all four project provinces and the drivers parking their trucks in the site proposed for construction of the KVK Headquarters in Nursultan city.
4. Site visits, review of satellite data, cadastral maps, canals and ditches title documents and other project related documents were reviewed and used in the screening of the whole project area.
5. A big volume of data and documents were reviewed but not all could be attached to the report. The documents are available in the central and regional offices of the KVK.
2
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
A. Project Impact, Outcome and Outputs
6. The project will rehabilitate and improve the existing irrigation network with length of 3,100.28 km, ameliorative area 171,106 ha in East Kazakhstan, Karaghandy, Kyzylorda and Zhambyl provinces of Kazakhstan (table 1). This includes 245 old irrigation schemes, which lie in one or few hydrologic zones and therefore, they are grouped into 16 subprojects with consideration to their hydrologic boundaries and administrative jurisdictions.
Table 1: Irrigation areas to be rehabilitated by the provinces
Provinces Irrigation area (ha) No of irrigation schemes
Total To be rehabilitated
East Kazakhstan 104,717 79,256 22
Karaghandy 68,786 27,900 10
Kyzlorda 228,394 28,974 11
Zhambyl 63,191 34,977 202
Total 465,088 171,107 245
Map 1. Map of Kazakhstan: project provinces shown in green color
7. The project is aligned with the following impact: the share of agriculture production contribution to gross domestic production increased, as outlined in Strategy Kazakhstan
3
2050.1 The project will have the following outcome: farm productivity increased in the East Kazakhstan, Karaghandy, Kyzylorda, and Zhambyl province of Kazakhstan.2
8. Project outputs. The project outputs largely remain unchanged and will comprise of four outputs: (i) irrigation infrastructure rehabilitated and/or improved; (ii) water management improved and beneficiary’s capacity enhanced; (iii) KVK’s capacity strengthened, including project administration and implementation support.
9. Output 1: Irrigation infrastructure rehabilitated and/or improved. The output will support the rehabilitation and/or improvement of about 245 irrigation schemes in the four provinces. For canals, the works would involve desilting and removal of vegetation in the lined and unlined canals, re-sectioning of the unlined canals, and repair of damaged sections of the lined canals. The total length of new concrete lined canals will be about 1,064 km while the improved earth canals will be about 1,976 km. A total of about 4,185 hydraulic structures including water measuring devices will be constructed or rehabilitated. About 358 km drainage collectors will be rehabilitated and/or improved. A drip irrigation system to cover 9,300 ha will be established in Zhambyl province. In addition, about 24 sets of the supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) system will be installed in the main canals of the four provinces.
10. Output 2: Water management improved and beneficiary capacity enhanced. The project will support (i) pilot-testing a system to monitor water and agricultural productivity using remote sensing technology in selected irrigation schemes; (ii) assisting in organizing the beneficiaries into the agricultural cooperatives established on hydrological boundaries, and develop the capacity of the cooperatives with respect to their functioning as well as with physical inputs like office furniture and equipment; (iii) training farmers on using improved irrigation management and climate change-related aspects; and (iv) providing consulting services for capacity development. This output will help KVK to extend its advice services to farmers on on-farm water management and crop choices.
11. Output 3: KVK’s capacity strengthened. The project will strengthen KVK’s governance and support its internal reforms by providing consulting services for (i) capacity development and training of KVK staff on financial, procurement, and water management aspects; the (ii) formulation and implementation of an asset management plan. The project will also support (i) provision of machinery, equipment, and vehicles for the four KVK branch offices to carry out their O&M function and improve system performance; (ii) rehabilitation and/or construction of repair workshops; (iii) construction of the KVK headquarters building; (iv) construction of an office building for KVK’s East Kazakhstan branch; (v) organization of a study tour for KVK staff and project beneficiaries to learn from advanced irrigation practices; and (vi) the operations of the project management office and project implementation units to ensure smooth implementation.
B. Design details introduced to avoid impact in rehabilitation of canals and ditches
12. In line with the main principle and objective of the ADB SPS (2009), the following design details were introduced into the project to avoid any adverse impact:
(i) Civil works for cleaning the canals’ and ditches’ beds and slopes will be carried out manually near the settlements areas (which are mainly ditches for irrigation and rain
1 Official Site of the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Address by the President of the Republic of
Kazakhstan, Leader of the Nation, N.A. Nazarbayev on Strategy “Kazakhstan-2050”: New Political Course of the Established State. http://www.akorda.kz/en/addresses/addresses_of_president/address-by-the-president-of-the-republic-of-kazakhstan-leader-of-the-nation-nnazarbayev-strategy-kazakhstan-2050-new-political-course-of-the-established-state.
2 The design and monitoring framework is in Appendix 1 of the Report and Recommendation of the President to
the Board of Directors.
4
water drainage); The feasibility study provides manual works in many occasions and types of the project civil works as can be seen in the table 5 and 6 further below;
(ii) There will be no widening of canals and ditches, and no change in the canals capacities, layouts and right-of-way is considered;
(iii) Rehabilitation works should be arranged in the other sides of the canals where needed
to avoid adverse impact; since canals are many and scattered in different locations and directions and in some canals, the works can be carried in “north”, south, rear and front” pertinent for each site during the physical works which will be defined specifically for each canal prior to the civil works. All canals where machines can be used, have service roads and empty areas at least in one side;
(iv) Ensure continuous consultation with residents and farmers, through effective
communication plan to inform and agree about the civil works schedule and nature of civil works;
(v) The schedule of the civil works will be arranged in consultation with the farmers to ensure
the scheduled irrigation supply during the irrigation season.
C. The planned rehabilitation works
13. A total of 614 irrigation canals and ditches will be rehabilitated, of which 548 canals (magistral, inter-farm, on-farm canals and ditches), 23 pipelines and 43 drains belonging to 245 irrigation schemes, which are grouped into 16 subprojects in four provinces as follows.
• East Kazakhstan: 101 canals (main canals, on- and off-farm canals);
• Karaghandy: 8 canals and 23 pipelines;
• Kyzylorda: 267 canals and 43 drains;
• Zhambyl 172 canals; and
14. Below is a summary of the major rehabilitation works:
• 1,976 km of earthen canals;
• 1,064 km of concrete-lined canals, flumes, and pipelines;
• 1,477 km of inspection road along canals;
• 4,185 hydraulic structures which include head regulators, outlets, pipe crossings, bridges, water meters, and underground pipelines;
• 358 km of collector drains in Kyzlorda province;
• 19 wells for irrigation in Zhambyl province;
• 34 mobile diesel pumping stations in Karaghandy province;
• 19 stationary pumping stations in Karaghandy province, with power lines and associated equipment;
• 27 vertical drainage wells in Kyzylorda province;
• 24 units of SCADA systems; and
• drip irrigation systems on vegetable clusters on 9,300 ha area in Zhambyl province.
15. Table 2 in the next page shows the numbers and length of the irrigation network. Attachment 1 provides the list of canals and drains, their length and rehabilitated areas.
16. The project will rehabilitate and improve the existing irrigation canals and drains. The works include cleaning the canals’ slopes from thickets of reeds, wild bushes, canals bottom
5
silt cleaning, restoration of longitudinal and transverse profiles and the working section lining. No widening of any canal or ditches are planned.
17. The canals will be cleaned to the original capacity with or without lining, and the pipeline systems and new pumping stations will be restored without changing the right of way. Changes in the routes and layouts of the canals are not envisaged. The list of the canals included in the project and their capacities is not expected to change. The lengths of the canals may be refined during the detail design but the right of way will not be increased. The bed width of the canals will vary from 0.8 to 6 m depending on each canal’s capacity. The top width of the canals will be defined for each canal during the detail design. The figures 1, 2 and 3 show the typical cross-sections of the canals.
6
Table 2. Length of the network and number of the structures
No. Name of projects
Can
al li
ning
Ear
th c
hann
el
Flum
e
Pip
elin
e
Col
lect
or
Hea
d st
ruct
ure
Cro
ss r
egul
ator
Out
lets
Flow
-mea
suri
ng s
truc
ture
Fish
pro
tect
ion
stru
ctur
es
Wel
ls
Syp
hon
Pip
e cr
ossi
ng o
n ca
nal
Pip
e cr
ossi
ng o
n co
llect
or
Bri
dges
Pum
p st
atio
n (P
ump
Д 6
30-9
0)
Pum
p st
atio
n (P
ump
Д 2
00-2
1)
Pum
ps o
f typ
e С
НП
and
СН
ПЭ
Tran
sfor
mer
sub
stat
ion
and
lines
Bui
ldin
gs o
f pum
p st
atio
ns
Air
rel
ease
val
ve fo
r un
derg
raou
nd n
etw
ork
Dis
trib
utio
n w
ell f
or u
nder
grou
nd n
etw
ork
Hyd
rant
for
unde
rgro
und
netw
ork
Esc
ape
for
und
ergr
ound
net
wor
k
Out
let f
or u
nder
grou
nd n
etw
ork
Pun
ctur
e ho
pes
km km km km km nos. nos. nos. nos. nos. nos. nos. nos. nos. nos. nos. nos. nos. nos. nos. nos. nos. nos. nos. nos. nos.
1Total: East
Kazakhstan oblast441.07 397.42 - - - 101 - 1 132 101 101 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1.1 Kurchum district 86.44 128.99 - - - 22 - 341.00 22 22 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1.2 Tarbagatai district 55.98 57.00 - - - 8 - 129.00 8 8 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1.3 Urdzhar district 118.10 108.65 - - - 12 - 285.00 12 12 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1.4 Zharma district 40.25 13.00 - - - 5 - 84.00 5 5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1.5 Kokpekti district 2.20 0.00 - - - 1 - 3.00 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1.6 Zaisan district 138.10 89.78 - - - 53 - 290.00 53 53 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
2Total: Karaganda
oblast88.78 - 0.81 90.724 - 9 - 33 9 - - 2 - 2 11 8 34 19 19 44 20 43 13 18
2.1 Abai district 29 - - 2.00 - 12 2.00 - - - - - - 1 - 1 1 - - - - 6.00
2.2 Buhar-Zhyrau district 29.8 - 0.81 48.60 - 5.00 - 13 5.00 - - 2 - 2 7 3 18 10 10 22 9 21 6
2.3 Zhanaarka district 14.18 - - 1.00 - - 1.00 - - - - - - - 4 - - 2 2 2 2
2.4 Zheskazgan c 15.8 - - 1.00 - - 1.00 - - - - - - 1 4 1 1 - - - -
2.5 Nura district - 3.17 - - 8 - - - - - - - 2 - - - - - - 12.00
2.6 Osakarov district - 38.95 - - - - - - - - 4 3 6 7 7 20 9 20 5
3Total: Kyzylorda
oblast- 1 117.24 - - 357.73 252 - 1 165 - - 27 5 149 127 11 - - - - - - - - - - -
3.1 Zhanakorgan district - 7.50 - - 0.00 4.00 - - - 3 - 60.00 - - - - - - - - - -
3.2 Shiely district 187.39 - - 59.70 62.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
3.3 Kyzylorda city - 78.38 - - 68.09 34.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
3.4 Syrdarya district - 193.42 - - 150.01 40.00 - - - 18 - 86.00 - - - - - - - - - -
3.5 Zhalagash district - 60.18 - - 0.00 13.00 - - - 6 - 51.00 11.00 - - - - - - - - - -
3.6 Karmakshy district - 122.44 - - 79.93 24.00 - 579.00 - - - - 63.00 16.00 - - - - - - - - - -
3.7 Kazaly district - 440.65 - - 0.00 70.00 - 586.00 - - - 5 - - - - - - - - - -
3.8 Aral district - 27.28 - - - 5.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
4Total: Zhambyl
oblast359.88 493.79 83.52 4.00 - 156 174 149 155 - 19 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
4.1 Sarysu district 46.10 44.46 2.88 0.00 - 16.00 - 10 16 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
4.2 Talas district 78.74 122.14 36.36 0.00 - 42.00 - 117 42 - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
4.3 T.Ryskulov district 64.05 83.55 5.75 4.00 - 18.00 - 16 17 - 19.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
4.4 Shu district 170.99 243.64 38.53 0.00 - 80.00 174 6 80 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
TOTAL
QUANTITIES on 4
OBLASTS
889.73 2 008.45 84.33 94.72 357.73 518 174 2 479 265 101 46 8 149 127 13 11 8 34 19 19 44 20 0 43 13 18
Length of network and number of structures on project "Modernization of irrigation networks for irrigated lands",
of Kyzylorda, Karaganda, Zhambyl and East Kazakhstan oblasts of RK
7
Figure 1. Typical cross section of concrete canals
8
Figure 2. Typical cross-sections of earthen canals
9
Figure 3. Typical cross-sections of earthen canals
10
D. Work technology and machinery selection
18. Work technology on performance and ditch cleaning in earthen canals: The flow scheme of sediment removal operations on canals in the earthen channel with depth up to three meters depend on a type of used unit. In cleaning the canals, the sediments are removed by operating device of excavator or by ditch cleaner as they move along the canal. Alternate working movements of the basic machines are chosen depending on the sedimentation layer thickness, canal width and depth, canal situation and parameters of operating devices. With a single-pass working movement of the basic machine the canal is cleaned from one position and the operating device is able to influence the sedimentation layer throughout its entire cross-section. When it works from one position, it is cleaned in two or more passages of basic machine.
Figure 4. Flow charts of excavation and cleaning in earthen canals
Figure 4: a) a ditch cleaner with double-rotor operating device; в) a backhoe excavator with tilting ladle; г) an excavator with equipment of side dragline; д) a ditch cleaner with auger operating device; е) an in-the canal ditch cleaner based on narrow tractor with cleanup dumps and rotary operating device; ж, и) an excavator or ditch cleaner with multi-bucket or scraping operating device; к) an excavator with dragline equipment.
19. Weed removal process from side slopes and canal banks in the earthen channel includes the work operations presented in the table. Ditch cleaning process in the earthen channel from weeds depends on local conditions and equipment used. Under specific conditions, some technological operations listed in the table may be excluded from the technological process. For example:
11
(i) at regular mowing of herbaceous vegetation on canal banks and side slopes (two to four times during the growing season), the need for specialized cutting of wild bushes and shrubs, removing it from the channel and utilization is dropped out, as wild shrubs do not succeed to develop up to sizes inaccessible for mowing by ameliorative mowing machines;
(ii) in case of massive overgrowing of banks and slopes with wild shrubs and bushes its
subsequent removal the herbaceous vegetation does not remain and it’s mowing doesn’t carried out.
Table 5. Technology of weeds removal from canal side slopes and banks in earth
canal
Ref. no
Working operation Ways and means of performance
1. Removal of foreign objects (stones, scrap metal etc.) from canal banks.
Tractor manipulators, excavators, bulldozers, loaders-buckets and manually.
2. Revelation and marking with a range rod the nearly invisible structures and invincible obstacles on canal side slopes and banks.
Manually.
3. Cut of wild bushes and shrubs on canal banks.
Brush-cutting machines, bulldozers, manually.
4. Gathering of cut shrub on bank and small forest in a pile.
Bulldozers, root extractors-gatherers, tractor rakes, loaders- buckets
5. Removal of foreign objects (stones, scrap metal etc.) from canal beds.
Tractor manipulators, excavators, loaders dozers, loader-buckets and manually.
6. Cut of wild bushes and shrubs on canal side slopes
Brush cutters, manually.
7. Extraction of cut vegetation from canal bed with its subsequent movement into the formed piles.
Loader-buckets, tractor rakes, bulldozers, root extractors-gatherers, gathering- transportation vehicles.
8. Stump pulling on canal bank and bed.
Root extractors-gatherers, single-bucket excavators with special buckets.
9. Hilling and shaking up piled wood and soil mass.
Root extractors-gatherers, loaders-buckets.
10. Processing of wild bushes and shrubs (stocking up firewood, chopping into chips and others).
Manually, choppers.
11. Loading the convertible bushes and shrubs and wood residues into vehicles.
Loaders, loader-buckets.
12. Removal the bushes and shrubs residues to consumers or to storage sites
Tractor trailers, motor transport.
13. Leveling of soil heaps, leveling of banks.
Bulldozers and graders.
14. Mowing of banks. Front mowing machines, and where there is a road any ameliorative or agricultural mowing machines.
15. Mowing of side slopes. Ameliorative mowing-machines and ditch cleaners with mowing operating devices.
16. Mowing of inaccessible places for mowing -machines.
Manually.
12
20. Work technology of cleaning canal bed and drains from sediments: Cleaning the canals side slopes and bottom in the earthen canals from sediments will be carried out according to the technological process given in the table 4. Structure of technological operations depends on local conditions and equipment used during the process of cleaning the canals in the earthen channel from sediments.
21. Under specific conditions, some technological operations indicated in the table (removal of weed vegetation from canal banks and beds, clearing and levelling of banks, levelling of excavated soil) can be excluded from the technological process. For example, generally there is no need to level the excavated soil when using ditch cleaners with an active rotary working device (MP-14, MP-16).
22. Prior to excavation work in the presence of tree and shrubs and herbaceous vegetation in the cleared canal section, it is necessary to perform technological operations to remove weed vegetation from canal banks and side slopes.
23. If technological operations on weed removal from canal banks and side slopes were not performed immediately prior to performance of cleaning the canal bed from sediments, then the preparation of cleaned canal section and the route of unit movement are performed.
24. Preparatory technological operations include the removal of foreign objects from canal beds and banks, revelation and marking with range rod the nearly invisible structures and invincible obstacles on canal side slopes and banks, levelling of spoil bank and heaps of soil and berm levelling.
Table 6. Technological of cleaning canal beds in an earthen channel from sediments
Ref. No
Technological operation Ways and means of performance
1. Removal of weed vegetation from canal banks and side slopes.
In accordance with technological process, fore-quoted.
2. Removal of foreign objects (stones, scrap metal etc.) from canal side slopes and beds.
Tractor manipulators, excavators, dozers, loader-bucket and manually.
3. Revelation and marking with range rod the nearly invisible structures and invincible obstacles on canal side slopes and banks.
Manually.
4. Leveling of spoil banks and soil heaps, leveling of banks.
Bulldozers and graders.
5. Cleaning of canals from sediments. Ditch cleaners, dragline excavators and backhoe with ameliorative buckets.
6. Leveling of excavated soil on bank or loading into the vehicles with subsequent removal for utilization.
Bulldozers and graders.
25. After extraction of sediments from canal beds, they are unloaded onto the bank with subsequent levelling of excavated soil or loaded into the vehicles with subsequent removal for utilization.
26. When making canals with a top width of less than 3 m if it is impossible to complete the design section, after cleaning the canal from silt and vegetation, the canal is filled with a layer-by-layer compaction of 20 cm. Then cut of design section is performed.
27. This technology of excavation applies to all alternates for earthen canals.
13
28. Technology of the concrete works: Complex technological process of concreting structures, according to the general scheme, includes preparing concrete and transporting it to a construction site, supplying, distributing, laying and compacting in the structure, curing of concrete during hardening.
29. Concrete mix will be prepared according to the brand of concrete specified in the project and with the water permeability requirements, frost resistance, preservation of mechanical properties in aggressive media. It must also have certain technical properties that provide its transportation and operational comfort. In this regard, the mixture should not segregate and have a certain consistency, which, depending on the placement conditions of mixture can vary from liquid to thick and hard.
30. Machinery selection: Cut of the aboveground portion of wild bushes and shrubs and growing on the canal banks is carried out using brush-cutting machines with an operating device (rotary saws, saw chains, cutter-type mechanisms, milling cutters, etc.) and machines with a passive operating device (one - and double knife brush cutters, bulldozers, knife rollers).
31. Mounted brush cutters with an active operating device based on a single-bucket excavator or universal telescopic brush cutters with an active device are used for cutting tree and shrubs on canal side slopes and edges, which on the strength of their design features can produce cutting of shrubs and small forest on the side slopes.
32. The canals banks and beds will be cleaned from stumps mechanically by removing the stumps and roots using specialized root extractors and equipment or other way.
33. At the same time the root extractors, root extractors and gatherers, root extractors-loaders, extracting borrows, rotary root extractors, single-bucket excavators with conventional or repair buckets are used on the banks. To remove stumps from canal side slopes, single-bucket excavators and root extractors are used the design of which allows stump extraction on the slopes.
34. Extraction of cut vegetation from the canal bed to the bank, as well as loading of convertibles of tree and shrubs and wood residues into vehicles is carried out by loader-buckets, special grippers based on single-bucket excavators and pick-ups and pick-up transport machines.
35. Hilling and shaking up of the cut and uprooted wood and earth mass is performed by root extractor-gatherers, loaders, buckets, etc.
36. Mowing of herbaceous vegetation on berms is done by front mowing machines and, if local conditions allow (presence of a road along the bank), by ameliorative mowing machines or ditch cleaners with mowing tools.
37. Mowing of herbaceous vegetation on canal side slopes is carried out by ameliorative mowing machines on tractors of various sizes or ditch cleaners with cutting tools. Cutting devices of mowing machines can be backward and forward action and rotating with an axis of rotation in the vertical and horizontal planes.
38. Selection of mechanism type for the work performance is done by comparing the canal parameters and the vegetation to be removed with performance of a machine.
14
E. The current right of way
39. The current right of way for the irrigation canals and schemes vary from 3.5 to 45 meters depending on their individual capacity, width, depth and types, as per the reviewed legal acts and documents of the canals, and confirmation of KVK. Changes in the right of way of canals and schemes are not envisaged. If there will be any minor change, this will be known during the detail design.
40. According to the laws, the right of way for the irrigation canals are set by coordination of relevant authorities (Akimats, environmental protection agency, sanitary epidemic services, emergency services and others) and based on the requirements of the set of laws and regulations, including:
(i) The Water Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated July 9, 2003 No. 481; (ii) Civil Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan; (iii) Land Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated June 20, 2003 No. 442-II ЗРК; (iv) The Forest Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated July 8, 2003 No. 477; (v) Environmental Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated January 9, 2007 No. 212-III; (vi) Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan “On Architectural, Urban Planning and Construction
Activities in the Republic of Kazakhstan” dated July 16, 2001 No. 242-II; (vii) Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated March 1, 2011 No. 413-IV “On State
Property”; (viii) JV RK 3.04-09-2013 "Melioration systems and facilities"; (ix) GOST 26967-86 (STS EV 5183-85) “Hydro melioration. Terms and Definitions"; (x) GOST 7.5.3.06-85 Protection of the nature of the earth. Reclamation of land; (xi) GOST 17.5.03-78 Biological reclamation; and (xii) Set of Rules for Land allocation for amelioration channels, effective 2015-07-1 (3.04-
113-2014). 41. As per the SP RK 3.04-113-2014, the width of the right of way for irrigation canals, depend on their size, depth and widths, capacity and construction type, and vary from 3,5 to 45 meters for permanent use, and from 9 to 100 meters for temporary use3.
42. The service road for canals with discharge rate of up to 1 m3 /sec will be unpaved. The width of the road is taken 5m, according to SNiP 2.05.11-83, as an off-farm road of the lower category. The service road of canals with discharge rate of more than 1 m3/sec are taken as 6.5m wide, including those with a gravel cover 3.5 m with thickness of 20 cm, category III. At the current pre-project conditions, open areas and service roads also exist along the canals within the right of way.
3 Set of Rules of the Republic of Kazakhstan, SP RK 3.04-113-2014, Land allocation for amelioration channels,
effective 2015-07-1 (“Свод правил Республики Казахстан, СП РК 3.04-113-201, Отвод земель для мелиоративных каналов, Дата введения – 2015-07-01”).
15
DUE DILIGENCE FINDINGS
A. General
43. The due diligence of all project canals and structures, including 614 irrigation canals and drains belonging to 245 schemes which are grouped into 16 subprojects in four provinces in respect to the project design has been conducted, where rehabilitating of the canals and ditches to original design conditions without changing the canals right of way, routes and layouts is planned. No adverse impact on people’s land and properties, and livelihoods upon implementation of the provided design and work technologies.
44. The land plot for the Water Centre building is 0.62 ha and located near Koshkarbaeva - Tulebaeva streets’ crossing in the suburbs of Nursultan (Astana) city. It is owned by the city municipality. The due diligence identified up to 30 tracks using the area as an ad-hoc parking. Akimat of Nursultan city provided the drivers two parking lots to use free of charge which are located about 150 and 700 meters from the site in the same street. No adverse impact is anticipated for the drivers for using the two nearby parking lots.
45. More detailed due diligence findings of the project sites are given in the report further below.
B. Ownership of the canals and structures
46. As per the reviewed documents, all the irrigation canals and structures are state- and municipality owned and registered in the balance of the EA and the Communal Services under the regional Akimats (Table 7). The sample documents on ownership are in attachment 2.
Table 7: Ownership status of the irrigation schemes to be rehabilitated Province Irrigation area, ha No of
schemes No of canals/
structures Ownership
Total To be rehabilitated
EA Communal Services
Private
East Kazakhstan
104,717 79,256 22 101 56 45 0
Karaghandy 68,786 27,900 10 31 (8 canals, 23 pipelines)
17 14 0
Kyzylorda 228,394 28,974 11 310 (267 canals, 43 drains)
310 0 0
Zhambyl 63,191 34,977 202 172 154 18 0
Total 465,088 171,107 245 614 537 77 0
47. Voluntary donation: A farming company “Erzhan” donated an irrigation canal of 2.7 km length (8.2 ha) on 1 November 2018, that makes less than 0.87% of 939 ha of lands owned by the farm (including 255 ha arable land, 133 ha hayfields, 551 ha pastures). The voluntary donation is documented as per the laws of Kazakhstan and good practices and principles of ADB SPS (2009)4. The donated canal has not been repaired for years and the farmer is interested in irrigation and increasing the productivity of his farmland but cannot afford the
4 Resettlement Safeguards. A Planning and Implementation Good Practice Sourcebook – Draft Working
Document, ADB. Para 15, and criteria for acceptable donation (Appendix 2, page 85): a)The impacts are marginal (based on percentage of loss and minimum size of remaining assets); (b) Impacts do not result in displacement of households or cause loss of household’s incomes and livelihood; (c) The households making voluntary donations are direct beneficiary of the project; (d) Land thus donated is free from any dispute on ownership or any other encumbrances; (e) Consultations with the affected households is conducted in a free and transparent manner; (f) Land transactions are supported by transfer of titles; and (g) Proper documentation of consultation meetings, grievances and actions taken to address such grievances is maintained.
16
costs rehabilitation and further maintenance costs of the canal. He had voluntarily donated the canal based on his signed agreement.
48. The farm is established in 1997. It owns also 16 tractors, 2 combine machines and 150 large livestock. The voluntary donation does not severely affect the living standards of the farmer, the household is not vulnerable and he is a direct beneficiary of the project. The farmer was interviewed and donation documents and the farmer’s signed agreement are in the attachment 3.
D. Site visits and satellite maps screening
49. It is found that most of the canals in all four provinces are in open steppe and fields with no or minimum settlement or structures nearby. At the same time, in Zhambyl and Kyzylorda provinces, houses and structures are found close to sections of some canals.
50. Review included all 16 subprojects (245 irrigation schemes) of the project in all four provinces and site for the KVK Headquarters in Nursultan city. 160 canals including all the canals close to the villages were visited. The sample photos given below per provinces describe the characteristics in all canals’ areas that have no or minimum settlement or house around (photos 1 to 10). The photos of the sites where houses and structures are found close to the canals follow after (photos 11-15). More photos are provided in attachment 4.
17
East Kazakhstan province
Photo 1: Canal Bogenbay
Photo 2: Canal Goltsovskiy
18
Karaghandy province
Photo 3: Canal Tuzdi
Photo 4: Canal Shartaz
19
Kyzylorda province
Photo 5: Kyzylorda city canal К-1-3
Photo 6: Kyzylorda City canal
20
Zhambyl province
Photo 7: Talas Zhiembet main canal
Photo 8: Oyik main canal
Photo 9: Talas LVMK Oiyk interfarm canal
Photo 10: Talas Zhiembet main canal
21
E. Locations where some ditches are near the houses
51. The project provides cleaning of irrigation ditches as described in the section of the report about the project description. Some ditches found in Zhambyl and Kyzylorda provinces (listed below) close to the houses. The project design technologies include the manual works for cleaning the ditches close to the houses. No widening of ditches are planned. Civil works will include only cleaning the beds and slopes of the ditches from the dirt which will be carried out manually (see tables 5 and 6 above about the types and technology of works in report chapter about the Project Description).
52. In Zhambyl province:
(i) Abay; (ii) MC Noviy Kartogan; (iii) МC Stariy Kartogan; (iv) Interfarm Bayshakhan; (v) Interfarm Kultobe-Sarisu; (vi) Orta Aryk; (vii) Zhanatogan; (viii) Salyamopv; (ix) Saydakas; (x) Turksib; (xi) Pioner; (xii) Bayshakhan; (xiii) Melnichniy; (xiv) Bolnichniy; (xv) Koskuduk; (xvi) Chu; (xvii) Taylak 1; (xviii) Taykak 2; and (xix) Boribay.
53. In Kyzylorda province:
(i) Baygekum canal; and (ii) Mayzhama canal.
Map 2. Orta Aryk interfarm canal and the Zhanatorgan interfarm canal divided by road
22
54. The irrigation network is not efficient because some of the ditches have been partially cleaned by communities while some other sections were not. The project aims to clean the whole irrigation network in the target area at once so the water use will be efficient, and households will be able to benefit from irrigation water to increase agriculture products for livelihoods and sale. No risk of adverse impact is expected in the operation stage. These ditches and irrigation schemes have been in place and used for decades.
55. There are also MC Sultant and MC Orynbasar canals whereas per the feasibility study the physical works for improvement will be carried out only at the beginning of these canals that are far from the settlements. No work will be carried out in other parts of these canals which are in concrete and good conditions.
56. The types of dwellings near those above-stated canals and ditches are residential rural houses built of bricks and mud bricks. The household plots are from 0.10 to 0.25 ha. Average income per work able body family member is 50,000-60,000 tenge per month (about as 131-157 USD as of 30 May 2019) as reported during consultations. The average family members are 5-6 persons (2-3 children). In addition, many households produce crops in their household plots for own consumption and sale. The crops they grow are the household plots (tomato, onions, watermelons, potato, carrots) for own consumption and sale.
57. According to the Operational Manual (Section F1/BP, 2013), para 8, point (i) and (ii), the households survey and census is required for the projects classified as category A or B for involuntary resettlement as part of activities for preparation of Resettlement Plans. Therefore, under this due diligence, the household’s surveys were not conducted. However, the field surveys, public consultations, focus group discussions (FGDs), and Key Informant Interviews (KIIs) that were carried out both in conducting this due diligence as well as in conducting the Poverty, Social and Gender Assessment for the project, vulnerable and/or poor people were not identified. The poverty line in Kazakhstan is low and estimated at 2.6% (ADB. Basic Statistics 2018). The project beneficiaries are farmers and households that expressed their needs for the project and expect reliable irrigation water supply, as result, increased agriculture products for livelihoods and sale.
58. Project design includes (i) training and capacity building for the EA and stakeholders before the project starts as well as ongoing on-job training for EA during the project implementation, (ii) continuous public consultation, and (iii) the project-specific GRM is established with responsible persons assigned by district and regional Akimats, and KVK district, regional and central offices. These responsible persons will be included in the capacity building trainings planned in the start of the project. The contact information and phone numbers of responsible agencies for grievances have been distributed to people during the public consultation under this due diligence activities. The contact information of responsible persons will be disseminated in the project area and more public consultation will be conducted as needed during the canals rehabilitation works to ensure the people have good awareness about the GRM and know where to contact if they have complain or questions.
23
Zhambyl province
Photo 11: Canal Abay, Chuy district. As seen from the photo, this is not a canal but a small ditch for
irrigating the household’s plots and rain water drainage. Very minimal cleaning works may be needed carried out manually and no risk is anticipated (the concrete will not be removed, only cleaning and
weeds removal will be carried out as needed).
Photo 12: Abay Chuy district: As can be seen from the photo, this is not a canal but part of the
settlements ditches network for irrigating the households plots and (rain) drainage. Any minimal work will be carried out manually and no impact is anticipated.
24
Photo 13: Canal Bolnichniy. This is also a part of the settlements ditches network for irrigating the household’s plots and (rain) drainage. Cleaning works weed and bush removal will be carried out
manually with no risk to damage or remove the structures (dirt canal, no concrete).
25
Kyzylorda province
Photo 14: Canal Mayzhama: No risk is anticipated as there is the service road next to the canal (left
side), houses are located about 20 meters away.
Photo 15: Canal Baygekum: no risk is anticipated to the structures on the left sides (about 10 meters away). The works will be carried out in the right side of the canal where the service road and right-of-
way is located.
26
E. The land plot for the KVK Headquarters building
59. The construction of the KVK Headquarters building was added as a new element in the project design. The identified land plot for this building is the state/municipality owned and located. There are no building, structures or shops on it.
60. The land for the KVK Headquarters building in Nursultan (Astana) city is owned by the municipality. It is about 0.62 ha and located near the Koshkarbaeva-Tulebaeva streets’ cross section in the south-east and outside of Nursultan (Astana) city. The due diligence counted up 30 tracks using the site as temporary and ad-hoc parking place. According to the city regulations, parking of the trucks are not allowed inside the Nursultan city. Therefore, there are number of parking lots for trucks and heavy construction vehicles in this suburb area of the city. The drivers consulted expressed that some of they have been using the site from two months to two years. The main reason for parking there included: (i) parking trucks are not allowed to park inside Nursultan city, (ii) the land plot was not fenced and used by anyone, (iii) it is located close to the main road to travel to other provinces. Drivers park their trucks in this site until receiving new orders mainly through phones or references. The parking here or somewhere close does not impact their business due to the nature of their business requiring them to travel and sometimes stay and work for weeks or months in different assignments locations. The trucks are parked here on ad-hoc bases until they receive the next assignment often by phone calls from the clients they already have or clients’ references. Besides, they use newspaper and digital media announcements to offer their services to the clients. Thus, the site is used for parking the trucks temporary until they receive new assignment in different ongoing constructions sites within Nursultan (Astana) city as well as in other provinces of Kazakhstan such as Karaghandy and Pavlodar provinces, as well as Ekateringburg and other areas of Russia near Kazakhstan border. Change of the location for parking their trucks to two nearby parking lots while waiting for the orders and assignments from the clients do not have any adverse impact to their business.
61. There are two alternative parking lots located within the same street in distance about 150 and 700 meters from the site, which the drivers are offered to use by Nursultan city Akimat. The drivers were consulted and interviewed about moving to two neighbouring parking lots, based on which, nearby alternative parking lots does not have any adverse impact to their business due to the described nature of their business and communication methods they use to attract new clients. The drivers were informed about the established project-specific GRM, and the contact information of Grievance Redress Mechanism (GRM) responsible persons from KVK were provided to the drivers for their references. Further monitoring is envisaged to follow-up and monitor the process.
62. Parking lot 1 is located about 150 away from the site. It is about 500 m2. The parking lot 2 is located about 700 meters and the area is about 150000 m2). These two parking lots currently being used by about 65 trucks but they can accommodate up to 400 trucks.
27
Photo 16. Site for construction of the KVK Headquarters building
Photo 17: Parking lot 1.
28
Photo 18: Parking lot 2.
F. Project Category for Involuntary Resettlement and Indigenous People Impact
63. Based on the above-listed due diligence findings no involuntary resettlement impact is anticipated. No Indigenous People or such minority groups live in the project area. The project is Category “C” both for involuntary resettlement and indigenous people impact as per ADB SPS (2009). Attachment 5 and 6 present the Involuntary Resettlement and Indigenous People Impact Checklists.
29
DISCLOSURE, PUBLIC CONSULTATION AND COMMMUNICATION PLAN
A. Proceedings of six public consultations in all four provinces
64. Six project disclosure and public consultations were conducted in all four project provinces covering all the project districts and subprojects:
(i) In East Kazakhstan province – two disclosure and public consultations (15 November 2018, and 26 February 2019);
(ii) In Karaghandy province – two disclosure and public consultations (27 November
2018, and 28 February 2019);
(iii) In Kyzylorda province – one disclosure and public consultations (20 November 2018); and
(iv) In Zhambyl province- one disclosure and public consultations (22 November 2018).
65. The residents and farmers from all the projects districts and subprojects participated in the public consultations, which were chaired by the Heads and Deputy Heads of the respective districts and regional branches of KVK and Akimats. Announcements about the date and time of all the six public consultation were made in the local newspapers at least a week ahead.
66. KVK and Aklimats staff presented the key aspects of the project, the project proposed works. Following this, the social (resettlement) and environmental safeguards requirements of ADB’s SPS (2009) were presented and discussed with the participants including:
(i) The proposed works and outputs of the project; (ii) Environmental, gender policy and social (resettlement) safeguards of ADB’s SPS
(2009) and national laws that will be applied in the project, if there will be such impact;
(iii) GRM developed for the project following the ADB’s SPS (2009) and laws of Kazakhstan to resolve the complaints the affected persons or public may have during the project implementation;
(iv) Questions and suggestions of participants about the project design and implementation; and
(v) The project’s tentative implementation timeline. 67. All presentations and discussions were carried out in Kazakh and Russian languages. The project information brochures including the resettlement safeguards principles of ADB’s SPS (2009) and laws of Kazakhstan in case of unanticipated impact, and GRM were handed out to the participants in two languages. Power point presentation were used in the public consultations.
68. The farmers and residents expressed their need for the project and raised number of questions and proposals about the technical design and implementation of the project. Detail proceedings of all six public consultations in Kazakh and Russian and the list of participants are given in the attachment 7 for all four provinces. Summary of the key questions and proposals are given below for each province.
30
B. Summary of the questions and proposals per provinces
69. East Kazakhstan province: The summary of the questions and proposals the farmers and residents discussed in the first public consultations in the province:
a) Proposal 1: Include in the detailed design the reconstruction of inter-farm distribution canals that go from the main canals during the project implementation;
b) Proposal 2: To finance and introduce new technologies in the irrigation systems; and c) Proposal 3: Include the raising of water level in Aktogan Canal in the detailed design
(geotags) because the water level in Aktogan Canal is below the ground level at this time.
70. The summary of the farmers and residents’ questions and proposals discussed in the second public consultations in the province:
a) Proposal 1: As the project will restore the existing canals which are in poor conditions now as all are aboveground canals, the concrete lining canals are needed in our area.
b) Question 1: What is the ADB gender policy?
Answer: According to the ADB Gender Development Policy, the gender issues shall be mainstreamed in the projects to improve social and economic conditions for women, and their participation in the project implementation. In this project, the activities under the project Gender Actions Plan will be implemented for gender and development.
c) Question 2: Will the losses (if any) compensated as per ADB Policy or laws of
Kazakhstan? Answer: The LARP will be prepared as per the laws of Kazakhstan and ADB ‘s SPS (2009) that provides the principle of compensation at the replacement cost. In case of discrepancies of the Kazakhstan’s laws and ADB ‘s SPS (2009), the later will prevail. Also, on January 21, 2019, the law of Kazakhstan "On State Property" was amended that provides compensations of losses due to land acquisition for the state needs shall be paid at market value.
d) Question 3: If the project envisages the inputs of the marketing consultant, will he/she
promote the products of certain farms in the market? Is this a competitive advantage? Answer: It will not be promotion of products in the market, but training on marketing.
71. Karaghandy province: The summary of the farmers and residents’ questions and proposals discussed in the first public consultations:
a) Question 1: What will be the water tariff after the project implementation? Answer: Currently, there is single water tariff in Kazakhstan: 0.24 tenge per 1m3. Public consultations will be held if there will be any changes in the tariffs, which will be analyzed and approved by the Antimonopoly Agency and other authorities.
b) Question: Does the project include the area of my land plots for irrigation? Answer: As per local executive authorities, the feasibility study includes the lands of your Collective Farm, i.e. modernization of the main canals that will deliver water to your fields.
c) Proposal 1: Include in the project implementation works, the determination of soil
salinity and ameliorative and drainage activities (farmer).
31
d) Proposal 2: As the project will modernize irrigation networks for irrigated lands (13,384 ha in Bukhar-Zhyrau district), it is requested to include additional extension of main canals (farmer).
72. The summary of the farmers and residents’ questions in the second public consultations:
a) Question 1: Does the project provide for the employment of the local population? Answer: During the project implementation, the normally the hiring of the interested local residents may be given preference and the hiring process will be managed by the contractors.
b) Question 2: Does the project envisage implementation in the Turkestan province?
Answer: There is another project in the Turkestan province, that is financed by other sources.
c) Remark: The Environmental Impact Assessment should provide information also about
possible emissions. It should be taken into account also the (a) protected zones and forest belts along the rivers and reservoirs, the presence of rare and endangered plant species listed in the Red Book of Kazakhstan, and (b) the migration routes and habitats of wild animals, prohibit the capture and hunting of wild animals, and (c) regarding the water resources, it is necessary to calculate the water consumption and water balance and possible negative impacts on water bodies (Head of Natural Resources and Regulation).
73. Kyzylorda province: The summary of the farmers and residents’ questions during the public consultations in the province:
a) Question 1: How will payments for environmental issues be handled? Answer: The project provides for a fee for the issue of environmental protection.
b) Question 2: Why a very small land area in Zhanakorgan district included in the project
(441 ha)? Answer: Another project (PUID-3) in the Kyzylorda province envisages rehabilitation of more than 143,000 hectares, including 35,000 ha in the Zhanakorgan district.
c) Question 3: What will be the water tariffs?
Answer: The water tariffs will be set and regulated as per the laws and procedures, and in consultation of the authorities, including the Antimonopoly Agency. There will be more public consultations which will also discuss the water tariffs with the farmers and residents.
d) Question 4: How compensation will be paid in case of acquisition and purchase of land
plots? Answer: Based on the feasibility study, the land acquisition and resettlement are not anticipated as the project will rehabilitate the existing canals that are mostly state-owned and municipality owned (KVK or Communal Services). If the acquisition of land and property will be identified safeguards and mitigation measures and compensations will be paid following the ADB’s SPS (2009) and the laws of Kazakhstan, based on the principle of replacement value. In case of discrepancies in laws and policies, the norms of ADB SPS (2009) will prevail. Sample entitlement matrix is given in the project information brochures distributed to all participants.
e) Question 5: What are the terms and period of the loan repayment to ADB?
Answer: All terms will be known after signing of the loan agreement.
32
f) Question 6: Does the project provide for reconstruction of inter-farm roads?
Answer: The works on the feasibility study are at the completion stage now. Details will be known after the preparation of detail design and estimation documents.
g) Question 6: Will the topsoil be disturbed? Answer: The Environmental Management Plan includes activities to restore the lands.
74. Zhambyl province: The summary of the farmers and residents’ questions discussed in the public consultations:
a) Question 1: How quarries (stope pits) will be used? Answer: This will be defined by the detail design.
b) Question 2: Will the project consider water supply from Zhienbet water reservoir to
other concrete canals as soil canals are not profitable due to water loss? Answer: The feasibility study considers concrete canals from the Zhienbet water reservoir.
c) Question 3: How the loan from ADB will be repaid and what will be the new water tariff?
Answer: The repayment terms will be known after the loan agreement. Any changes in water tariff rates will be analyzed and agreed with the Antimonopoly Agency and authorities, and discussed in public consultations so everybody can express his/her concerns.
d) Question 4: Does the project consider the construction of water reservoirs?
Answer: As per the state program “Agricultural and Industrial Complex”, construction of a new water reservoirs Akmola in Talas river is considered for irrigation of 6,5 ha lands in Talas district.
e) Question 5: Will there be conducted public consultations at the district level too?
Answer: Yes, during the project detail preparation and project implementation, there will be conducted public consultation covering all aspects of the project in the districts.
C. Communication plan with the project stakeholders
75. Key stakeholders: The key project stakeholders identified at this stage are the farmers and residents of the project area communities, the EA/IA, Akimats, ADB, the Committee of Water Resources, PMU, Constructors and Supervision Consultant and NGOs. The detail stakeholders analysis will be undertaken and stakeholders consultation plan and engagement will be prepared at detail design to ensure their engagement and consultation in the project implementation.
76. Communication methods: Variety of communication and consultation methods will be applied depending on types of the information to be provided, subject and cases, including:
a) Public consultations; b) Individual and group meetings; c) Focus group discussion; d) Information boards and leaflets; e) Radio, posters and other media; f) Letters, etc.;
33
77. Information to be disclosed/consulted: The approaches and information for stakeholders consultation and engagement will be updated on an on-going basis subject to the project progress and raised issues, and will include the followings:
a) Project disclosure, b) Regular updates to stakeholders on construction progress, timeline of physical works
and its corresponding with the schedule of the irrigation supply schedule, c) Social safeguards measures, including design alternatives and manual works to avoid
impact, d) The project specific GRM and contact information of the responsible persons, e) Location of the temporary bridges as necessary to allow the farmers to cross the
canals/access their farmlands; and f) Grievances resolution status (if any and with relevant claimants).
78. Documenting the process: Minutes of meetings, lists of participants and key issues discussed and decision taken.
79. Timeframe: Continuously during the project implementation, detail design preparation and implementation of the physical works on periodically bases every two or three months and/or as needed depending on needs and issues raised.
80. Detail communication plan with project stakeholders: The key stakeholders will be consulted during the detail design and the detail stakeholder’s consultation plan will be prepared, implemented and updated as needed during the project implementation.
GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM
A. Objective and responsibility
81. The Project-specific Grievance Redress Mechanism (GRM) is developed following the principles of ADB SPS (2009) and the Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan “On the procedure for considering appeals of individuals and legal entities” (2007 No. 221). GRM is formed to resolve the grievances of the DPs or public related to the project’s involuntary resettlement and environmental safeguards performance, and information disclosure. It will not replace the country’s judicial system, but aims resolve the grievances in effective and fair manner, and will be maintained for the duration of the Project. All grievances and their resolution status will be monitored and reflected in the project’s progress reports.
82. The Grievance Redress Committees (CRCs) are established with responsible staff of the authorities, Akimats and KVK at the district, regional and central levels to take actions and decisions for solving grievances that can be lodged during the project implementation. Awareness about the GRM and people’s access to it is important. Information about the GRM, contact information of the GRM focal persons assigned by KVK, and members of the in the project provinces that includes representatives of relevant authorities and stakeholders should be disseminated to the affected communities and DPs. Different communication means, such as distribution of the project information brochures, posters, local media, public consultations, community and individual meetings, can be used in awareness raising.
83. KVK is responsible for well-functioning of the GRM and should provide the required human and financial resources. KVK will lead the grievances resolution and the work of the GRC for resolving grievances. KVK has assigned 6 of its staff for social safeguards tasks and serve as focal persons for GRM; 1 staff at the central KVK, 2 staff in Karaghandy, 1 staff in Zhambyl, and 1 staff in East Kazakhstan provinces. The local authorities and Akimats have also assigned staff responsible for GRM in the district and regional levels, including their contact information and phone numbers made available for public access (see attachment X
34
copy of the decisions of respective authorities, Akimats and KVK on assigned responsible persons for GRM).
84. The GRM and the GRCs given below were discussed with KVK staff at the central and regional levels as well as during the public consultations in all four provinces. Based on feedback, experience from other ADB-assisted projects in Kazakhstan, the project specifics and geographic scope, the following grievance resolution process is envisaged under the project.
B. Three levels of grievance resolution
85. The stakeholder’s consultation confirmed the current practice that the residents usually approach to the Akimats for complaints and issues they may have. In some cases, the complainants contact directly the Contractors or KVK. Therefore, the project GRM provides the grievances can be accepted at the offices of all these three actors, registered and forward it by email to the assigned focal person at the central KVK/PMO who will have a consolidated database of all grievances and their status. All complaints and resolution status will be recorded and reported at each level of the GRCs. The steps and the GRCs are given in the table 4 below.
86. The summary of key steps at the District level:
(i) The grievance registration: The staff of the district Akimats, the Contractors and the district KVK appointed as focal persons, will receive and register the grievances (they open a Project Grievance Log Book) and provide acknowledgement of receipt to the complainant. They will put efforts to resolve the grievance at the entry, if not possible, it will be reviewed by the GRC at the district level.
(ii) The grievance processing and resolution: The GRC will resolve the grievance within
seven working days. The complainant should be informed about the decision and actions to be taken.
(iii) The feedback and further actions: If the complainant is not agree with the decision, or if
the resolution of the complaint requires further assessment and actions on a higher level, it will be forwarded to the GRC at the regional level. The complainant should be informed in written form.
87. The summary of key steps at the regional level:
(i) Grievance processing and resolution: KVK will convene the meeting of the GRC to discuss the received grievance (s) and make decision, within ten working days. The minutes of GRC meeting and decisions shall be properly documented and forwarded to the concerned parties.
(ii) Feedback and further actions: If grievance was resolved at the regional level, the
complainant will be informed of the outcome in written form. If the complainant is not agreeing with the decision, or if the resolution of the complaint requires further assessment and decision on higher level, it will be forwarded to the GRC at the central level. The complainant should be informed accordingly.
88. The summary of key steps at the central level:
(i) Grievance processing and resolution: KVK will convene the meeting of the GRC at the central level to discuss the grievance(s) and resolve it within twenty working days.
35
The minutes of GRC meeting and decisions shall be documented and forwarded to the concerned parties in written form.
(ii) Feedback and further actions: The decision of the GRC on the grievance will be informed
to the complaining party in written form. If the grievance was not satisfied, information will be provided to the complaining party about why the case was not resolved, and how the complaining party can make appeal to the country’s legal system, if wished so.
D. Grievance Redress Committees
89. GRM can resolve the complaints and issues effectively if the GRCs members have adequate authority to make decisions and take actions. In consultations with KVK, staff of the relevant authorities on the managerial levels are proposed for CRCs. KVK will coordinate with the authorities and the regional and district Akimats to confirm the proposed members of the GRCs at the district, regional and central levels respectively. Efforts should be made to include women staff in the CRCs to ensure women perspectives in resolving grievances.
Table 8. GRM levels and composition of the GRCs
District Review and resolving at the district within 7 working days
The entry points: District Akimat, KVK branch, Contractors The complainant (s) can visit, call or send a letter or e-mail or fax to the assigned staff of the Akimats or the Contractor. This local level will be important to give people easy access to GRM. In addition, minor issues can be solved immediately at this level. If not, the grievance will be forwarded for resolution by the GRC at the district level: The District GRC members: (i) Head or Deputy Head of the District KVK; (ii) Deputy of the District Akimat; (iii) Deputy Head of the District Agriculture Unit; (iv) KVK assigned focal person; (v) Representatives of the affected persons or communities; (vi) Supervision Consultant, Contractors (during the project implementation);
and (vii) Other specialized agencies and experts if required by the case specifics.
Regional Review and resolving at the province level within 10 working days
The regional CRC members: (i) Head or Deputy Head of the regional KVK; (ii) Deputy of the Regional Akimat; (iii) Deputy Head of Agriculture Unit, (iv) Representatives of the affected persons or communities; (v) Supervision Consultant, Contractors (during the project implementation);
and (vi) Other specialized agencies and experts if required by the case.
Central Review and resolving at the KVK Central level within 20 working days
The Central CRC members: (i) Head or Deputy Head of the Central KVK/ PMO; (ii) Representatives of the Committee of Water Resources; (iii) Representatives of the affected persons or communities; and (iv) Other specialized agencies and experts if required by the case.
36
INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENT AND MONITORING
90. Planning, implementing and monitoring social and resettlement safeguard mitigation measures, and when needed LARP(s), will require resources and coordination of all stakeholders in project implementation. Their key roles are summarized below.
A. Asian Development Bank
91. ADB will carry out monitoring and supervision on social and environmental safeguards performance during the project implementation. This will include periodical review and screening the project area and resettlement safeguards compliance and mitigation measures, and clear contract awards signing and initiation of civil works. If KVK fails to comply with the agreement covenants on safeguard requirements, including those described in the ADB’s SPS (2009), ADB will seek corrective measures and work with KVK to bring it back into compliance.
92. ADB will arrange capacity building activities, such as training workshops and on-job trainings to the staff of KVK and stakeholders as necessary.
B. The Executing Agency – KVK
93. KVK as an EA is responsible to ensure the social and resettlement safeguards compliance and timely identify any unanticipated resettlement impact. In case of unanticipated resettlement impact in any sub-project, KVK shall prepare and endorse LARP in compliance with ADB SPS (2009) and implement it before the commencement of physical works. KVK will coordinate with Akimats and other authorities’ preparation and implementation of LARP(s), provide adequate resources according to the impact scope, resolving grievances and conduct regular monitoring on the safeguard compliance.
94. KVK will ensure the Contractors compliance performance with social and environmental safeguards risks mitigation and management plans. KVK shall (i) include in contractors’ contracts relevant provisions on the social and environmental safeguards compliance, (ii) conduct regular monitoring for contractors safeguards performance are satisfactory, and (iii) ensure that no physical or economic displacement takes place until LARP (if needed) is implemented.
95. A project steering committee (PSC) will be established. To be chaired by the Minister of Agriculture, the PSC will comprise representatives from the Ministry of Finance, Ministry of National Economy, CWR, KVK, and other agencies. The PSC will (i) guide policy and strategic direction, (ii) review and evaluate project performance, (iii) resolve issues affecting project implementation as needed, and (v) facilitate inter-agency coordination. The PSC shall meet at least twice a year.
96. A Project Management Office (PMO) will be set up in the central KVK office to manage the project activities including ensuring compliance with ADB and the government’s environment and social safeguards’ requirements. A Project Implementation Unit (PIU) will be set up in KVK branch offices in the East Kazakhstan, Karaghandy, Kyzylorda and Zhambyl provinces.
97. The project manager will be supported by teams of specialists including the environmental and social safeguards, and gender and social development specialists. The PMO and PIUs will be supported by international and national consultants recruited by the project. The PIU will have a full-time designated safeguards specialist who, with support and coordination from other officials and agencies as needed, will oversee the social safeguards compliance in the project implementation.
37
B. Capacity Development Needs
98. KVK is responsible to ensure the social safeguards compliance, identify and mitigate any unanticipated resettlement impact due to the project. Given this is a first ADB-assisted project for KVK, the staff needs capacity building and awareness about the social and involuntary resettlement safeguards concepts and requirements of ADB SPS (2009) to ensure the safeguards compliance and effective implementation of the project.
99. KVK has no designated staff for social and resettlement safeguards. In this project, 6 staff are assigned (1 at the central and 5 at the regional levels) for social safeguards tasks and perform as focal persons for GRM (attachment 8). Such workload cause concerns if these staff will be able to address the safeguards issues and requirements on-time to ensure compliance for a project with such a large scope.
100. To avoid risks of social safeguards incompliance and delays in the project implementation, it is recommended:
(a) KVK will assign designated staff and allocate budget: Given the large scope of the project and lack of institutional capacity and experience of KVK in social and resettlement safeguards, KVK should (i) assign designated staff on social safeguards: at least one staff unit per each project provinces and one at the central KVK, and (ii) allocate budget as required.
(b) ADB will arrange capacity building for KVK and stakeholders: (i) workshops on
social and environmental safeguards and the requirements of the ADB SPS (2009) and its good practices for the KVK and stakeholders (KVK, Akimats, consultants, contractors, valuation companies and others), and (ii) ongoing on-job training and guidance for KVK staff during the project implementation.
38
C. Akimats and other state agencies
101. Akimats have key role to ensure the social safeguards during the project implementation. As per law, they are key agency to address the appeals and complaints of residents. They will provide administrative support to the EA in project implementation, assist in resolving grievances, as well as in conducting disclosure and public consultations with project communities. The representative of respective Akimats are part of the GRM.
D. Supervision Consultant and Contractors
102. The Supervision Consultant (SC) will assist KVK in all task related to resettlement safeguards compliance, including (i) regular monitoring and preparing bi-annual safeguards monitoring reports for ADB review, (ii) in case of unanticipated resettlement impact, assist the KVK to prepare and implement LARP, (iii) monitoring the Contractors safeguards performance and (iv) provide guidance and corrective actions for identified safeguards incompliances.
103. Contractors shall (i) follow the social, resettlement and environmental safeguards in the project sites, (ii) on a day-to-day basis, monitor their own environmental and social safeguards performance and that of all its subcontractors throughout the project duration, and (iii) submit periodic reports to KVK.
104. They shall allocate designated staff and resources to ensure monitoring social and environmental safeguards, consultation with residents resolving grievances of people who believe are adversely affected by the project.
MONITORING AND REPORTING
105. KVK shall conduct a regular internal monitoring for safeguards compliance, resolving of grievances of people who believe are affected by the project, and identify any unanticipated involuntary resettlement impact raised during the project implementation. This will allow to plan and implement timely the resettlement safeguard mitigation measures in compliance with ADB’s SPS (2009) and Kazakhstan laws and avoid project delays. The monitoring outcomes should be reflected in the project progress reports to be submitted to ADB.
106. Bi-annual social and resettlement safeguards monitoring reports shall be submitted to ADB reflecting any changes in the project design and unanticipated impact, grievances and their resolution status and public consultations. In case of any unanticipated land acquisition and resettlement impact, the safeguards monitoring indicators and reporting requirements will be defined according to the significance of impact and ADB SPS (2009).
CONCLUSION
107. According to the due diligence findings no involuntary resettlement impact is anticipated. No Indigenous People or such minority groups live in the project area. The project is Category “C” both for involuntary resettlement and indigenous people impact as per ADB SPS (2009). Any unanticipated resettlement impact will be addressed according to ADB SPS (2009) and laws of Kazakhstan.
39
Attachment 1. List of the canals and ditches to be rehabilitated
2.1. List of projects in East Kazakhstan province
Sl.No.
Name of project Length, km
Carrying capacity m3/sec
Location Area, thous.ha
command rehabilitation
1 MC Altai 11,00 1,06 Kurchum district
2,997 2,997
2 MC Tore-Togam 10,30 2,8 Kurchum district
4,754 4,754
3 MC Zhaugashty 7,73 1,2 Kurchum district
0,900 0,900
4 Canal Kerzhachii 11,32 1,2 Kurchum district
3,183 3,183
5 MC Shukinskii 14,20 1,44 Kurchum district
1,318 1,318
6 MC Cherepanovskii 2,34 0,3 Kurchum district
0,150 0,150
7 MC Srednii 11,43 1 Kurchum district
0,347 0,347
8 MC Karakya 25,00 1,05 Kurchum district
0,785 0,785
9 MC Pobeda 17,88 5,5 Kurchum district
0,600 0,600
10 Canal Derevenskii 10,00 1,55 Kurchum district
0,300 0,300
11 Canal Rovenskii 18,00 4 Kurchum district
0,595 0,595
12 Canal Derevenskii-Zhidely
17,00 0,5 Kurchum district
0,200 0,200
13 Canal Derevenskii-Buran
11,00 0,5 Kurchum district
0,250 0,250
14 MC "Еrezhep" 12,62 1,5 Kurchum district
0,200 0,200
15 MC Bolshoi Nikolaevskii 5,55 0,3 Kurchum district
0,217 0,217
16 MC "Levoshalinskii" 2,59 0,35 Kurchum district
0,100 0,100
17 MC Sandytogan 12,50 0,35 Kurchum district
0,105 0,105
18 MC Popovskii 3,22 0,35 Kurchum district
0,100 0,100
19 MC Lopatinskii 2,58 0,2 Kurchum district
0,100 0,100
20 MC "Ipatyevskii" 2,12 0,35 Kurchum district
0,007 0,007
21 MC "Zhana Togam" 3,49 0,054 Kurchum district
0,045 0,045
22 MC "Tentekskii" 3,56 0,2 Kurchum district
0,005 0,005
Total 215,43
17,258 17,258
23 MC Begetai 12,00 0,60 Tarbagatai district
0,650 0,650
24 MC Kazakbai 18,00 0,80 Tarbagatai district
0,563 0,563
25 MC Karasha 21,00 1,60 Tarbagatai district
0,743 0,743
40
26 MC Bolat 24,00 1,30 Tarbagatai district
0,600 0,600
27 MC Karatogan 23,00 1,50 Tarbagatai district
0,909 0,909
28 Main canal Dauletbai 2,40 0,35 Tarbagatai district
0,640 0,640
29 on-farm canal Zhanbike 4,39 1,10 Tarbagatai district
0,900 0,900
30 MC Ryurikovskii (МC "Burymbet")
8,20 3,00 Tarbagatai district
1,200 1,200
Total 112,99
6,205 6,205
31 MC Otgonnyi 34,0 2,00 Urdzhar district
0,350 0,350
32 MC Nazar-Oral 7 1,50 Urdzhar district
0,700 0,700
33 MC Toktybai 9,1 1,50 Urdzhar district
1,259 1,259
34 MC Soedinitelnyi 25,0 4,00 Urdzhar district
3,800 3,800
35 MC "Amankeldy" 10 2,00 Urdzhar district
0,800 0,800
36 MC "Almaly" 5 0,50 Urdzhar district
0,762 0,762
37 MC "Shoshkaly" 2 0,50 Urdzhar district
0,150 0,150
38 MC "Kyzylshoky" 5,0 0,50 Urdzhar district
0,206 0,206
39 MC "Akbastau" 4 0,50 Urdzhar district
0,300 0,300
40 MC "Zhanai" 4 1,00 Urdzhar district
0,400 0,400
41 MC Koktal* 25 0,50 Urdzhar district
0,084 0,084
42 On-farm canals of river system Eginsu
96,65
Urdzhar district
2,895 2,895
Total 226,75
11,706 11,706
43 MC Goltsovskii 5,50 0,71 Zharma district
0,474 0,474
44 MC Bogenbai* 4,95 1,40 Zharma district
0,650 0,650
45 MC Korykshar 13,50 3,90 Zharma district
3,180 3,180
46 MC Trudovoi* 7,50 2,50 Zharma district
2,260 2,260
47 MC Aktogan 21,80 6,3 Zharma district
14,304 14,304
Total 53,25
20,868 20,868
48 On-farm canals of river system Chigilik
2,20 Kokpekti district
1,719 1,719
Total 2,20
1,719 1,719
On-farm canals of river system Uidene, including
49 ЛХ-4 3,70 Zaisan district
0,376 0,376
50 ЛХ-5 4,60 Zaisan district
0,375 0,375
51 ОХ-2 5,60 Zaisan district
0,423 0,423
41
52 ОХ-2А 1,80 Zaisan district
0,135 0,135
53 ОХ-2Б 3,20 Zaisan district
0,547 0,547
54 ОХ-3 5,40 Zaisan district
0,429 0,429
55 ОХ-4 5,20 Zaisan district
0,528 0,528
56 ОХ-5 5,10 Zaisan district
0,381 0,381
57 ОХ-6 3,10 Zaisan district
0,513 0,513
58 ОХ-7 3,70 Zaisan district
0,449 0,449
59 ОХ-8 4,20 Zaisan district
0,669 0,669
60 ОХ-9 5,30 Zaisan district
0,699 0,699
61 ОХ-10 5,00 Zaisan district
0,469 0,469
62 ЛХ-3 2,90 Zaisan district
0,358 0,358
63 ОХ-1-1 4,10 Zaisan district
0,564 0,564
64 ОХ-1-2 4,30 Zaisan district
0,387 0,387
65 Ох-1-3 3,80 Zaisan district
0,546 0,546
66 Ох-1-4 1,90 Zaisan district
0,449 0,449
67 Ох-1-5 5,80 Zaisan district
0,258 0,258
68 АХ-1 7,90 Zaisan district
0,445 0,445
69 МХ-1 6,50 Zaisan district
0,393 0,393
70 МХ-2 5,00 Zaisan district
0,341 0,341
71 МХ-3 3,80 Zaisan district
0,348 0,348
72 МХ-4 4,20 Zaisan district
0,284 0,284
73 АХ-1-1 4,30 Zaisan district
0,220 0,220
74 ОПХ-1 2,70 Zaisan district
0,186 0,186
75 ОПХ-2 2,20 Zaisan district
0,114 0,114
76 ОПХ-3 1,90 Zaisan district
0,092 0,092
77 ОПХ-4 1,00 Zaisan district
0,083 0,083
78 ОПХ-5 1,60 Zaisan district
0,100 0,100
79 ОПХ-6 1,10 Zaisan district
0,041 0,041
80 ОПХ-7 2,60 Zaisan district
0,248 0,248
42
81 ОПХ-8 2,80 Zaisan district
0,326 0,326
82 ОПХ-9 3,40 Zaisan district
0,228 0,228
83 АХ-2 4,30 Zaisan district
0,532 0,532
84 АХ-3 4,10 Zaisan district
0,464 0,464
On-farm canals of river system Kendirlik, including
85 Ak-Komei 2,70 Zaisan district
1,082 1,082
86 Sotnya-1 1,90 Zaisan district
1,082 1,082
87 Sotnya-1а 2,20 Zaisan district
0,582 0,582
88 Sotnya-2 1,00 Zaisan district
1,382 1,382
89 Sotnya-3 1,60 Zaisan district
0,582 0,582
90 Kok-Koshkar 1,10 Zaisan district
0,882 0,882
91 Konyr Buka 2,60 Zaisan district
0,582 0,582
92 Levyi -1 2,80 Zaisan district
1,582 1,582
93 Levyi -2 3,40 Zaisan district
0,882 0,882
94 Levyi -3 4,30 Zaisan district
0,482 0,482
95 Trudovoi 4,10 Zaisan district
0,682 0,682
96 Saryeshki 14,00 Zaisan district
0,182 0,182
97 Cholak Togam 14,00 Zaisan district
0,182 0,182
98 Zhymsak aral 14,00 Zaisan district
0,282 0,282
99 Kara Kas 7,08 Zaisan district
0,382 0,382
100 Koldenen tal 5,00 Zaisan district
0,382 0,382
101 Torbie 8,00 Zaisan district
0,282 0,282
Total 227,88
24,494 24,494
Total on EKO 838,49 82,250 82,250
* no longer included in the project scope.
43
List of projects on Zhambyl province
No. Name Locations (r/d) Carrying capacity, m3/sec
Length, km
types of works Comm
and area,
ha
including
mechanical cleaning
concrete ЛР100 ЛР-80 ЛР-60 used not used
Sarysu district
1 mc Otvodyyashii-2 Saudakent 1,0 1,0 1,0
2 off-farm canal Balatogan Saudakent 0,5 11,0 11 70 70
3 mc Tasaryk Zhanatalap 4,0 15,0 15 600 358 242
4 off-farm canal Dyuker Zhanatalap 0,5 5,3 2,9 1,62 0,78 0 0 200 200
5 on-farm canal Saryozek Zhanatalap 3,0 5,0 5 256 256
6 mc Karitogan new Zhanatalap 3,0 7,982 7,982
7 mc Karitogan old Zhanatalap 0,5 3,763 3,763
8 off-farm canal Р-1 Zhanatalap 1,0 1,3 1,3
9 on-farm canal Kultobe Saudakent 0,5 2,5 2,5 100 100
10 on-farm canal Utes Igilik 1,0 6,7 6,7 795 795
11 off-farm canal Baishakhan Igilik 1,0 9,3 8,28 1,02 0 0 1021 1021
12 off-farm canal Kedei Zhanatalap 1,0 5,0 4,64 0,36 0 0 759 759
13 mc nizhnii Berkutty Zhaiylma 3,5 8,8 8,8 369 232 137
14 off-farm canal Berkutty Zhaiylma 1,0 8,0 7,28 0,72 0 0 180 0 180
15 off-farm canal Kirov Zhaiylma 0,5 0,9 0,9 387 387
16 off-farm canal Kyzyl Tu Zhaiylma 0,5 1,9 1,9 266 266
16 Total 93,445 44,463 46,10 2,88 0,00 0,00 5003 4374 629
Talas district
1 mc Zhiembet R/d Bostandyk 6,0 4,5 4,5
2 off-farm canal Abish R/d Bostandyk 0,5 6,7 3,196 3,504 267 66 201
3 off-farm canal LBMC Zhiembet
R/d Bostandyk 1,5 10,2 10,2 1039 282 757
4 off-farm canal Uzyn R/d Bostandyk 5,0 7,9 7,9
44
5 off-farm canal PBMC Zhiembet
R/d Akkum 1,4 8,3 8,3 530 362 168
6 on-farm canal Akkum R/d Akkum 1,0 8,2 0 8,2 527 432 95
7 on-farm canal Kokkol R/d Bostandyk 0,4 4,2 0 4,2 210 90 120
8 on-farm canal Zhambas R/d Akkum 0,4 2,0 0 2 120 45 75
9 on-farm canal Zhambyl R/d Bostandyk 0,3 3,0 0 3 80 21 59
10 on-farm canal Lotok R/d Akkum 0,4 5,6 5,36 0,24 227 136 91
11 on-farm canal Sharyashylyk R/d Shakirov 3,0 12,2 12,2 924 21 903
12 mc Kydyr R/d Bostandyk 2,0 7,1 7,1 243 0 243
13 mc Kazakhbai R/d Shakirov 2,0 10,0 10 448 211 237
14 mc Zhumabek R/d Shakirov 5,0 12,9 12,9 925 71 854
15 mc Boribai R/d Uyk 6,0 27,1 27,1 350 197 153
16 off-farm canal Boribai-2 R/d Uyk 3,0 6,5 6,5 206 66 140
17 mc Zhadik R/d Uyk 1,0 3,8 3,8 80 60 20
18 mc Oiyk R/d Uyk 23,0 5,4 5,4
19 off-farm canal LBMC Oiyk R/d Uyk 10,0 27,1 17,1
20 on-farm canal УХ-1 R/d Uyk 1,0 2,8 2,8 586 120 466
21 on-farm canal УХ-2 R/d Uyk 0,5 2,1 2,1 307 160 147
22 on-farm canal КХ-1 R/d Uyk 0,5 2,0 2 355 118 237
23 on-farm canal КХ-2 R/d Uyk 0,5 3,7 3 0,7 1005 0 1005
24 on-farm canal ТХ-1 R/d Ucharal 0,7 2,7 2,7 758 0 758
25 on-farm canal ТХ-2 R/d Ucharal 0,5 5,0 5 921 0 921
26 on-farm canal ВХ-1 R/d Kenes 0,5 0,8 0,8 250 0 250
27 on-farm canal ВХ-2 R/d Kenes 0,5 1,0 1 350 0 350
28 off-farm canal PBMC R/d Uyk 13,0 1,9 1,9 0
29 off-farm canal МLR R/d Uyk 13,0 13,0 13 0
30 mc Bakhtymbet R/d Kenes 3,0 6,9 6,9 118 99 22
31 mc Sultan R/d Akkol 10,0 0,624 0
32 off-farm canal Orta Aryk R/d Akkol 5,0 7,618 7,618 290 290 0
45
33 on-farm canal Orynbasar R/d Akkol 0,5 4,0 4
34 off-farm canal Zhanatogan R/d Akkol 3,0 4,939 2,465 2,474 20 20 0
35 off-farm canal Kyzyl R/d Kyzylaut 25,0 8,2 8,2 220 100 120
36 mc Aktogan R/d Tamdy 6,0 2,6 2,6 0
37 mc Kokoiyk R/d Tamdy 2,5 5,283 5,283 201 61 140
38 reservoir Zhartas R/d Tamdy 309 190 119
39 reservoir Mynchukir R/d Tamdy 260 131 129
40 reservoir Tamdy R/d Tamdy 207 107 100
41 reservoir Kyzylaut R/d Kyzylaut 736 299 437
41 Total 247,864 122,144 78,734 8,2 15,458 12,704 11557 3028 9317
Т. Ryskulov district
1 мк Karakystak Karakystak 6,5 6,4 4
2 on-farm canal ККPТ Zhanatyrmys 2,0 3,3 2,1 1,2 805 622 183
3 off-farm canal Botbai Karakystak 1,8 5,2 3,82 1,38 839 224 615
4 on-farm canal Botbai-Sikhym Karakystak 0,7 5,7 5,388 0,312 524 357 167
5 on-farm canal Karakat Karakat 0,5 12,4 10,672 0,582 1,146 517 270 247
6 on-farm canal Shonger Kulan 0,8 13,5 12,984 0,516 644 344 300
7 on-farm canal Kokdonen Abai 0,8 15,9 15,66 0,24 325 90 235
8 on-farm canal Kogershin Kogershin 0,8 9,8 9,428 0,372 630 466 164
9 on-farm canal Shal-su Kumaryk 0,5 9,5 9,5 537 481 56
10 Taldy-su Zher Aryk 0,5 17,2 17,2 103 103 0
11 on-farm canal Тuyк-тоr Ornek 0,5 10 10 119 29 90
12 on-farm canal Сulu тоr Ornek 0,5 16,8 16,8 151 41 110
13 on-farm canal Маkpal Teren ozek 0,5 10,25 10,25 262 62 200
14 on-farm canal Маmai kaiyndy
Kaiyndy 0,5 13,4 13,4 100 59 41
15 on-farm canal Kaiyndy Kaiyndy 0,5 6,4 6,4 403 179 224
16 Wells 19 nos. 0 0 2038 2038
35 Total 155,750 83,550 64,052 1,2 2,646 1,902 7997 3327 4670
Shu district
46
1 MC "Таsotkel"
Eski-Shu, Zhana-zhol, Berlikustem,
Konayev, Zhanakogam
45,0 39,035 0
2 off-farm canal Р-1 Zhanakogam 5,0 13,7 8,82 1,5 1,38
3 off-farm canal Akshatogan Eski-Shu 1,5 9 9 220 100 120
4 off-farm canal ТБХ-1 Eski-Shu 0,9 6 3,12 1,5 1,38 640 400 240
5 off-farm canal ТБХ-2 Eski-Shu 1,0 5,5 2,08 1,02 2,4 1000 450 550
6 off-farm canal ТБХ-3 Eski-Shu 0,5 2,5 1,6 0,48 0,42 200 200 0
7 off-farm canal ТБХ-4 Eski-Shu 0,05 3 1,56 0 1,44 67 67 0
8 off-farm canal ТБХ-5 Eski-Shu 0,05 3 1,8 0 1,2 74 74 0
9 off-farm canal Yntaly Eski-Shu 0,06 2 0,996 1,004 500 400 100
10 off-farm canal Тнх-1 Zhana-zhol 0,5 8,685 4,545 1,62 2,52 800 690 110
11 off-farm canal ТНХ-1б Zhana-zhol 0,25 7,32 4,32 1,74 1,26 560 470 90
12 off-farm canal ТНХ-2 Zhana-zhol 2 10,5 2,05 5,45 0,84 2,16 771 601 170
13 canal Toganbai Zhana-zhol 0,25 1,5 0,78 0,72 39 39 0
14 off-farm canal Truba-2 Zhana-zhol 0,5 0,017 0 0,017 100 100 0
15 off-farm canal ТЧХ-1 Berlikustem 0,25 6,1 5,2 0,18 0,72 390 390 0
16 off-farm canal ТЧХ-2 Berlikustem 1,4 7,8 7,02 0,24 0,54 800 608 192
17 off-farm canal ТЧХ-3а Berlikustem 0,7 15,1 13,638 0,042 0,42 600 530 70
18 off-farm canal ТЧХ-3б Berlikustem 0,08 0,3 0,3 150 74 76
19 off-farm canal ТЛХ-1-1а Konayev 1,2 8,885 6,385 1,5 350 300 50
20 off-farm canal ТЛХ-1-1б Konayev 0,8 6 4,92 0,72 0,36 330 170 160
21 off-farm canal ТЛХ-1а Konayev 0,8 8,68 5,75 0,72 0,21 500 310 190
22 off-farm canal ТЛХ-1б Konayev 0,8 6 5,19 0,48 0,33 450 200 250
23 off-farm canal ТЛХ-2 Konayev 0,8 5,1 3,84 0,72 0,54 190 150 40
24 off-farm canal ТЛХ-3 Konayev 0,2 5,6 4,22 0,3 1,08 284 45 239
25 off-farm canal ТЛХ-4 Konayev 1,5 8 6,38 0,72 0,9 1073 669 404
26 off-farm canal ТЛХ-5 Konayev 0,7 9,8 5,288 1,02 0,492 700 550 150
27 off-farm canal ТДЖХ-1 Zhanakogam 0,7 15,32 13,32 800 565 235
28 off-farm canal ТДЖХ-2 Zhanakogam 0,6 8 8 700 530 170
47
29 off-farm canal ТДЖХ-3а Zhanakogam 1,3 7 6 360 360 0
30 off-farm canal ТДЖХ-3б Zhanakogam 0,7 7 6 350 120 230
31 off-farm canal ТДЖХ-4а Zhanakogam 0,5 0,05 0,05 180 110 70
32 off-farm canal ТДЖХ-4б Zhanakogam 0,5 5 4,4925 0,375 107 70 37
33 off-farm canal ТДЖХ-5 Zhanakogam 0,5 0,066 0,066 364 274 90
34 off-farm canal ТДЖХ-6 Zhanakogam 0,5 2,1 2,1 1218 838 380
35 off-farm canal К-1 osnovnoi Zhanakogam 0,4 5,6 5,6 302 302 0
36 off-farm canal Р-1 Dalakainar 0,2 2 1,4 0,36 0,24 280 280 0
37 off-farm canal Р-2 Dalakainar 0,2 4 2,98 0,6 0,42 395 180 215
38 off-farm canal Р-3 Dalakainar 0,2 3,8 2,72 0,6 0,48 220 95 125
39 off-farm canal Р-4 Dalakainar 0,2 3 3 202 102 100
40 off-farm canal Dalakainar -2 Dalakainar 0,4 6 6 270 270 0
41 Levoberezhnyi MC Alga, Shu t.,
Tolebi, Koragaty 16,6 38,8 38,8 0
42 canal Lugovoi Alga 0,3 1,72 1,72 178 78 100
43 canal Kuigen Alga 1,5 18,81 18,783 0,027 1089 499 590
44 canal Zhaisan Alga 0,5 1,54 0,085 1,455 65 30 35
45 canal Novotroisk Alga, Shu t.,
Ondiris 1,0 7,743 7,743 600 0 600
46 canal Pioneer Shu t. 0,7 2,65 2,615 0,035 405 390 15
47 canal Salyamov Shu t. 0,5 1,34 1,3 0,04 50 15 35
48 canal Abai Shu t. 0,1 0,75 0,75 60 60 0
49 canal Togai Shu t. 0,5 0,38 0,38 47 47 0
50 canal Koskudyk Shu t. 0,3 3,13 3,13 190 165 25
51 canal Shu Shu t. 0,5 2,24 1,508 0,732 50 35 15
52 canal Aral Truba Tolebi 0,3 2 2 80 50 30
53 canal ЛНХ-2 Tolebi 2,0 5,61 5,61 1550 1050 500
54 canal Old Кarabas Tolebi 0,3 1,4 1,4 60 60 0
55 canal Saduakas Tolebi 0,3 3,07 3,07 48 48 0
56 canal Мelnichnyiй Tolebi 0,2 0,25 0,25 15 15 0
57 canal Bolnichnyi Tolebi 0,5 0,2 0,2 75 75 0
48
58 canal ЛНХ-4 Tolebi 0,5 6,27 6,27 750 560 190
59 canal Тurksib Tolebi 0,4 1,61 1,61 150 100 50
60 canal Tailak-1 Tolebi 0,5 0,92 0,92 250 150 100
61 canal Tailak-2 Tolebi 1,1 1,82 1,82 290 198 92
62 canal Tailak-2-1 Tolebi 0,2 2,42 2,42 75 75 0
63 canal Tailak-2-2 Tolebi 0,2 1,63 1,63 224 125 99
64 canal Kunshygys Tolebi 0,4 1,34 1,34 80 80 0
65 off-farm canal Zhidebai-1 Tolebi 0,05 1,64 1,64 80 65 15
66 canal Zemlyanoi Karabas Ondiris 2,0 8,31 8,31 475 200 275
67 off-farm canal Sary Koragaty 0,6 9,47 9,47 350 230 120
68 off-farm canal Estemes-2 Koragaty 0,7 3,67 3,07 0,6 350 270 80
69 off-farm canal ЛДРХ-2 Koragaty 2,0 6,43 6,28 0,15 810 720 90
70 off-farm canal Bimenbet Koragaty 0,5 4,93 4,93 853 228 625
71 off-farm canal Aimanbet Koragaty 1,5 2,8 2,8 335 195 140
72 off-farm canal Asembai Koragaty 0,4 1,99 1,99 203 153 50
73 off-farm canal ЛДРХ-3 Koragaty 2,0 9,7 4,2 5,398 800 510 290
74 off-farm canal Masak Aktobe Aktobe 0,2 12,81 12,81 233 143 90
75 MC "Pravoberzhnyi"
Berlikustem, Konayev, Berlik, Zhanakogam,
Dulat
11,0 48,8 48,8
76 Canal "Bolnichnyi-1" Konayev 0,6 1,18 1,18 95 0 95
77 Canal "Birlik " Konayev, Berlik 0,2 3,24 3,24 82 0 82
78 Canal "Aktogan" Zhanakogam 0,3 5,49 5,49 313 0 313
79 Canal "Кarauyl-tobe" Zhanakogam 0,8 4,5 4,5 464 0 464
80 Canal "Тоkseit" Dulat, Kenes 3,5 4,77 4,77 1003 1003
Vegetable cluster 9300
80 Total 505,431 243,6425 170,988 16,602 21,929 0 29363 18302 20361
172 Grand total 1002,5 493,7995 359,876 28,882 40,033 14,606 53920 29031 34977
49
List of projects on Karaghandy province
Sl. No.
Name of project Rehabilitated
area, ha
Length, km Carrying capacity, m3/sec
Parameters Type of existing lining Upper
width, m Bed width,
m Construction depth, m
1. Zhartas off-farm main canal, including Irrigation system Koksu
4021,5 18
3,0 from 3 to 4,5
from 1 to 1,5
1,7 reinforced concrete, earthen
2. Samar main canal 697,5 11 1,5 from 3 to 4
from 1 to 1,5
1,5 reinforced concrete, earthen
Total on Abai district: 4719 2 canals-29km
3. Zhazdi main canal 3028 15,812 3,2 from 3 to 4
from 1 to 1,5
1,5 reinforced concrete and flumes, earthen
Total on Zheskazgan с: 3028 1 canal-15,812 km
4. Bidaiik main canal 1117 14,18
1,8 from 3 to 4
1,3-1,5 1,5 reinforced concrete and flumes
Total on Zhanaarka district: 1117 1 canal-14,18 km
5. Shakai main canal r/d Baimyrza
570 8,8 0,83 from 3 to 7
from 0,5 to 0,8
1 reinforced concrete, earthen and steel pipes
6. Karazhar main canal 1156 5,4 1,4 from 3 to 4
from 1 to 2
1,2 Earthen and reinforced flumes
7. Tuzdy main canal 800 13,60 3,0 from 3 to 4
from 1,5-2,0
1,2 Earthen and concrete
8. Zhanatalap v. (r/d Molodetskii) 3496 4 pipelines -15, 8 1,4 1000÷300
9. Samarkandskii r/d 2300 3 pipelines -16,5 2,2 600÷250
50
10. Central r/d 308 2 pipelines -2,59 0,20 200÷200
11. Gagarin r/d 1158 1 canal combined – 6,2 incl.: 4,21 pipeline and 1,99 - canal
1,0 600
12. Kyzylkaiyn r/d 520 3 pipelines- 3,00 0,70 250÷250
13. Sheshenkara r/d 1416 1 pipeline – 3,4 0,60 600÷600
14. Kokpekti r/d 1660 1 pipeline – 3,1 0,85 800÷800
Total on Buhar-Zhyrau district: 13 384
15 pipelines- 48,6 km, 4 canals -29,79km, Total: 78,39 km
15. Ahmet r/d 530 1 pipeline – 1,675
0,35 300
16. Ahmet r/d 321 1 pipeline – 1,360 0,35 300
17. Baitugan r/d 109 1 pipeline – 0,135 0,15 200
Total on Nura district: 960 3 pipeline -3,17km
18. Zvezdnyi r/d 1048 1pipeline-8,109 1,2 850
19. Karatomar r/d 1040 1 pipeline-9,428 1,2 800
20. Mirnyi r/d 900 1pipeline-10,148 1,0 650
21. Trudovoi r/d 1250 1pipeline-7,553 1,2 800
22. Shiderty r/d 454 1pipeline-3,716 0,6 400
Total on Osakarovsk district: 4692 5 pipelines -38,954 km
Grand total on Karaghandy
province:
27 900 23 pipelines 90,724 km, 8 canals- 88,78 km. Total: 179,5 km
A ruined part of canal Shukai from flumes ЛР8 of 810 m length was added to Karaghandy province. Flumes are on legs, which are supported by foundation blocks.
51
List of projects on Kyzylorda province
No. Name Locations (r/d) Length,
km
including
Carrying capacity m3/s
Rehabilitated area, ha
earthen/clay sand
concrete
Zhalagash district.
1 ЛВ-5А, Myrzabai Ahun 11,32 11,32 - 8,20 1071,54
2 ЛВ-5А-2 Myrzabai Ahun 2,11 2,11 - 2,60 180,51
3 ЛВ-5Б Myrzabai Ahun 6,22 6,22 - 3,50 531,35
4 ЛВ-5А-6 Myrzabai Ahun 8,06 8,06 - 1,00 310,6
5 Sabit r/d Zhanatalap 2,12 2,12 - 1,50 357,14
6 ЛВ-10В-1, (Jana Shaihy) r/d Zhanatalap 0,13 0,13 - 2,00 105,25
7 ЛВ-10В-1 (Eski Shaihy) r/d Makpakol 1,64 1,64 - 2,00 371,61
8 Sabit r/d Makpakol 4,80 4,80 - 1,50
9 ЛВ-10В-1, (Jana Shaihy) r/d Makpakol 1,72 1,72 - 2,00
10 ЛВ-10В-1 (Eski Shaihy) r/d Makpakol 2,63 2,63 - 2,00
11 Belsendi r/d Karaketken 12,02 12,02 - 3,00 241
12 Р-1 r/d Aksu 3,65 3,65 - 3,00 736,07
13 Б-1 r/d Aksu 3,76 3,76 - 2,00 315,74
Total: 13 canals 60,17 4221
Zhanakorgan district.
1 Р-6-1 r/d Ekpindi 1,50 1,50 - 2,00 8
2 Р-6-4 r/d Ekpindi 2,00 2,00 - 2,00 161
3 Р-6-6 r/d Sunakata 3,00 3,00 - 2,00 182,29
52
4 Р-6-3 r/d Sunakata 1,00 1,00 - 2,00 90
Total: 4 canals 7,50 441
Kazaly district.
1 Enbek Maidakol 2,67 2,67 - 4,00 97
2 Enbek Maidakol 5,20 5,20 - 4,00
3 Enbek Maidakol 2,73 2,73 - 4,00
4 Zhaikonak Arandy 9,20 9,20 - 2,00 352,5
5 Bozasha Arandy 15,50 15,50 - 3,00 144,9
6 Terikendi Arandy 3,40 3,40 - 2,00 75,6
7 Akaryk No.1 Akzhona 0,09 0,09 - 2,50 10
8 Akaryk No.2 Akzhona 3,81 3,81 - 2,50
9 Akshungil Akzhona 7,43 7,43 - 2,00 514,7
10 Taldy asha No.1 Akzhona 0,07 0,07 - 2,50 44
11 Taldy asha No.2 Akzhona 9,36 9,36 - 2,50
12 Sakybai Maidakol 9,75 9,75 - 6,00 110,7
13 Zhyluan-1 Urkendeu 2,78 2,78 - 2,00
14 Zhyluan-1 Urkendeu 3,37 3,37 - 2,00
15 Zhyluan-1 Urkendeu 2,38 2,38 - 2,00
16 1х-5 Urkendeu 5,33 5,33 - 1,50
17 1х-5 Urkendeu 2,00 2,00 - 1,50
18 1х-5-2-2, 1х-5-2-1 Urkendeu 5,50 5,50 - 1,50
19 1х 5-1-1, lx-5-2, 1х-5-4, 1х-5-6, 1х-5-1, 1х-5-5,1х-5-7 Urkendeu 8,20 8,20 - 1,50
20 Bahy Urkendeu 9,97 9,97 - 5,40 215,6
21 Bahy Urkendeu 0,04 0,04 - 5,40
22 Bahy Urkendeu 2,77 2,77 - 5,40
23 tail Bahy Urkendeu 1,57 1,57 - 2,00
24 tail Bahy Urkendeu 3,55 3,55 - 2,00
53
25 5х-1-3 Karashengel 7,00 7,00 - 1,00
26 5х-1-3, 1х-5-4, 1х-5-5. Urkendeu 11,70 11,70 - 1,50
27 2х-2 G.Muratbayev 0,27 0,27 - 2,50 109,5
28 Р-2-2 G.Muratbayev 10,00 10,00 - 2,00 121
29 Р-2-2 G.Muratbayev 4,80 4,80 - 2,00 30
30 Kirgiz G.Muratbayev 14,69 14,69 - 2,50 1133,9
31 Зх-6 Kolaryk 7,00 7,00 - 4,50
32 1-7-1К Maidakol 7,30 7,30 - 1,50
33 1-7-3-1К, 1-7-3-2К Maidakol 4,30 4,30 - 1,50
34 4х-1-2-1, 4х-1-2-2,4х-1-2-3. Maidakol 11,40 11,40 - 1,00
35 4Х-1-1-1, 4х-1-1-2, 4х-1-1-5 Maidakol 8,10 8,10 - 1,00
36 Уч-2-1 Arandy 1,30 1,30 - 1,50
37 3-3-1К, section-2 Arandy 4,80 4,80 - 1,00
38 6-3-1К, 6-3-2К, 6-3-3К, 6-3-7К, 6-3-5К. Akzhona 8,56 8,56 - 1,00
39 6-1-1-1К, 6-1-2-1К, 6-1-1К Akzhona 7,90 7,90 - 1,50
40 2Х-1-1, 2Х-1, 2Х-1-2, 2Х-1-4 Akzhona 9,60 9,60 - 1,00
41 2Х-1-7, 2х-1-6, 2х-1-8, 2х-2-3, 2х-2-4 Akzhona 11,90 11,90 - 1,00
42 1х-5-1-2, 1х-5-1-3, 1х-5-1-5, 1х-5-1-1-6 Urkendeu 7,00 7,00 - 1,50
43 5х-1-2 Urkendeu 10,80 10,80 - 1,50 413,1
44 5х-1-2 Urkendeu 5,40 5,40 - 1,50
45 5х-4-5 Karashengel 8,00 8,00 - 1,00
46 5х-2-2 Karashengel 4,00 4,00 - 1,00
47 Р-1-3 Karashengel 4,00 4,00 - 1,00
48 6-2-2К Akzhona 3,10 3,10 - 1,00
49 2х-3-1, 2х-3-2 G.Muratbayev 8,30 8,30 - 1,00
50 2х-1-1, 2х-1-1-5, 2х-1-1-3 Akzhona 7,50 7,50 - 1,00
51 3-1-1К, 3-1-2К Arandy 7,08 7,08 - 1,50
54
52
3х-6-2-1-1, 3х-6-2-1, 3х-6-2-1-2, 3х-6-2-1-3, 3х-6-2-1-4, 3х-6-2-2, 3х-6-2-2-1, Kolaryk 18,33 18,33 - 1,00 3х-6-2-2-2, 3х-6-2-2-3, 3х-6-2-2-4, 3х-6-2-2-0.
53 3х-6-4-1-16, 3х-6-4-2-3. Kolaryk 4,10 4,10 - 1,00
54 Зх-6-3-2, Зх-6-З-З. Зх-6-З-2-I, Зх-6-3-2-2. Зх-6-3-2-3.
Kolaryk 14,10 14,10 - 1,50 Зх-6-3-2-4. Зх-6-3-3-2. Зх-6-З-З-З. Зх-6-3-3-4.
55 3х-6-3, 3х-6-3-1-1, 3х-6-3-1-2, 3х-6-3-1-3, 3х6-3-1-4, 3х-6-3-2-3. Kolaryk 10,70 10,70 - 1,00
56 Уч-2, Уч-5 Arandy 5,40 5,40 - 1,00
57 3-2К-1, 3-2К-2 Arandy 11,30 11,30 - 1,50 159
58 6-3К Alga 1,77 1,77 - 4,00 195
59 6-3-1-1К, 6-3-1К, 6-3-1-3К, 6-3-2-1К, Alga 10,18 10,18 - 1,50
60 3-1-2-1К, 3-1-2-2К Arandy 4,20 4,20 - 1,50
61 5х-1 canal Karashengel 9,88 9,88 - 1,50 259,1
62 5х-2 canal Karashengel 11,32 11,32 - 1,50 92
63 5х-2 canal Karashengel 1,48 1,48 - 1,50
64 5х-4 canal Karashengel 4,43 4,43 - 1,50 104
65 Р-1 canal Karashengel 6,19 6,19 - 1,50 97,8
66 Shalabai canal Karashengel 5,00 5,00 - 2,00
67 1-МК canal Sarykol 3,05 3,05 - 1,50 440,88
68 1-МК-З canal Sarykol 1,61 1,61 - 1,50
69 1 -МК-5 canal Sarykol 3,41 3,41 - 1,50
70 1-МК-5/1 canal Sarykol 1,73 1,73 - 1,50
Total: 105 canals (35-canal -227,28km, 70-distributing canal -213,33 km) 440,61
4720
Shiely district.
1 Л-4 Aktogan 5,31 5,31 - 2.5 110
2 Zhylandy Aktogan 3,41 3,41 - 2.2 -
55
3 Р-12-6 Bestam 7,21 7,21 - 8,00 379
4 Р-12-8 Bestam 4,55 4,55 - 6,00 -
5 К-3-8 Bestam 1,40 1,40 - 4,00 -
6 Р-12-8 Bestam 1,69 1,69 - 6,00 -
7 Р-12-6-2-1 Bestam 2,62 2,62 - 3,20 -
8 К-3-8-2 Bestam 2,26 2,26 - 2,20 -
9 К-3-8 Bestam 4,18 4,18 - 4,00 -
10 Р-12-8-3 Bestam 2,91 2,91 - 3,20 -
11 P-12-8-4 Bestam 2,91 2,91 - 3,20 -
12 Р-12-8 Bestam 1,74 1,74 - 6,00 -
13 Р-12-9 Bestam 3,07 3,07 - 5,00 -
14 Р-12-6-4 Bestam 3,25 3,25 - 2,50 -
15 P-12-8-5 Bestam 3,73 3,73 - 2,20 -
16 К-3-11 Bestam 7,18 7,18 - 2,00 -
17 Р-12-6-2 Bestam 2,63 2,63 - 2,00 -
18 P-12-6-2-1 Bestam 1,33 1,33 - 2,00 -
19 Р-12-6-5 Bestam 4,03 4,03 - 2,00 -
20 P-12-8-2 Bestam 1,45 1,45 - 2,00 -
21 P-12-8 Bestam 7,35 7,35 - 6,00 -
22 Р-12-6 Bestam 3,06 3,06 - 8,00 -
23 Р-12-6-2 Bestam 6,36 6,36 - 2,30 -
24 Р-12-8-2 Bestam 2,41 2,41 - 2,00 -
25 Р-5-1 Gigant 1,15 1,15 - 2,50 307,7
26 Р-5-3 Gigant 4,65 4,65 - 2,50 -
27 Р-3-7 Gigant 4,57 4,57 - 2,00 -
28 Р-5-3-1 Gigant 1,26 1,26 - 2,00 -
29 К-4-10-10 Gigant 4,03 4,03 - 2,50 -
56
30 К-4-3 Gigant 4,55 4,55 - 2,50 -
31 К-4-10 Gigant 1,24 1,24 - 2,50 -
32 К-4-6 Gigant 1,07 1,07 - 2,50 -
33 Р-3-8-2 Gigant 1,33 1,33 - 2,50 -
34 Р-5-1-1 Gigant 0,86 0,86 - 2,00 -
35 Р-3-8-1 Gigant 2,29 2,29 - 1,50 -
36 К-4-1 Gigant 0,45 0,45 - 2,00 -
37 Р-3-7-2 Gigant 1,86 1,86 - 2,50 -
38 Р-5-3 Gigant 1,30 1,30 - 2,50 -
39 P-5-3-3 Gigant 1,27 1,27 - 2,50 -
40 Р-5-1 Gigant 2,01 2,01 - 2,50 -
41 Р-3-7-1 Gigant 1,93 1,93 - 1,50 -
42 P-5-3 Gigant 1,51 1,51 - 2,50 -
43 Р-5-4-3 Gigant 1,24 1,24 - 2,00 -
44 P-5-3-3 Gigant 1,65 1,65 - 2,00 -
45 К-4-1 Gigant 2,25 2,25 - 2,00 -
46 К-4-9 Gigant 0,75 0,75 - 2,00 -
47 К-4-10-2 Gigant 0,91 0,91 - 2,00 -
48 Р-3-4 Gigant 1,95 1,95 - 2,50 -
49 Р-5-3 Gigant 1,41 1,41 - 2,50 -
50 Р-3-4 Gigant 1,24 1,24 - 2,50 -
51 P-5-1-2 Gigant 0,83 0,83 - 2,00 -
52 P-7-12 Iirkol 4,95 4,95 - 2,50 47
53 P-7-12-1 Iirkol 1,70 1,70 - 2,50 -
54 К-7 Iirkol 13,40 13,40 - 3,50 -
55 Р-12-1 Kerdeli 8,20 8,20 - 6,00 316,5
56 Р-12-10 Kerdeli 1,97 1,97 - 2,40 -
57
57 Karakum Kerdeli 2,05 2,05 - 4,00 -
58 Р-12-10-1 Kerdeli 1,72 1,72 - 2,00 -
59 К-1-6-1 Kerdeli 3,43 3,43 - 2,00 -
60 К-4-8 Kerdeli 4,56 4,56 - 2,00 -
61 P-12-1-5 Kerdeli 2,25 2,25 - 2,00 -
62 P-12-1-4 Kerdeli 4,94 4,94 - 2,00 -
63 Р-12-1-4-2 Kerdeli 1,48 1,48 - 2,00 -
64 Р-12-10-2 Kerdeli 1,48 1,48 - 0,20 -
65 Р-12-1-3 Kerdeli 4,67 4,67 - 1,20 -
66 К-1-5-7 Kerdeli 1,04 1,04 - 1,50 -
67 Р-12-1-4-2 Kerdeli 2,11 2,11 - 4,00 -
68 Karakum Kerdeli 7,21 7,21 - 3,00 -
69 Beigekum Talaptan 5,90 5,90 - 11,80 294
70 Eski Tekturmys Talaptan 2,40 2,40 - 10,00 -
71 П-0-3 Telikol 2,66 2,66 - 7,00 -
72 Р-12-6 Telikol 8,39 8,39 - 8,00 212
73 П-0-3 Telikol 2,70 2,70 - 7,00 -
74 П-0-3 Telikol 4,05 4,05 - 7,00 -
75 Р-10-1 Tonkeris 2,86 2,86 - 1,80 -
76 Р-10-1 Tonkeris 5,12 5,12 - 1,80 106
77 Р-10-1-1 Tonkeris 1,73 1,73 - 0,40 -
78 К-1-1-2-3 Tonkeris 3,34 3,34 - 0,40 -
79 Р-10-0-6 Tonkeris 1,52 1,52 - 0,25 -
80 К-1-1-2-5 Tonkeris 3,66 3,66 - 0,40 -
Total: 62 canals -187,4 km, 18 drains -59,7 km
247,10 1772
Syrdarya district.
1 Р-1 r/d S.Seifullin 3,21 3,21 - 1,50 522
58
2 Р-2 r/d S.Seifullin 7,00 7,00 - 1,50 -
3 Р-2-5 r/d S.Seifullin 7,85 7,85 - 0,60 -
4 Р-1-2 r/d S.Seifullin 4,50 4,50 - 0,60 -
5 Maizharma r/d S.Seifullin 10,80 10,80 - 3,00 -
6 К-3-5 r/d S.Seifullin 8,00 8,00 - 2,50 -
7 К-3-1-1 r/d S.Seifullin 9,40 9,40 - 1,50 -
8 К-6-3 r/d S.Seifullin 6,55 6,55 - 1,50 -
9 Аizhanketken r/d
A.Tokmagambetov 11,31 11,31 - 8,00 1503
10 Eltai-1 r/d
A.Tokmagambetov 7,85 7,85 - 3,00 -
11 Р-1-1 r/d
A.Tokmagambetov 6,97 6,97 - 3,00 -
12 Р-1-4 r/d
A.Tokmagambetov 3,18 3,18 - 3,00 -
13 К-1 r/d
A.Tokmagambetov 2,48 2,48 - 2,00 -
14 К-1-3 r/d
A.Tokmagambetov 10,58 10,58 - 1,50 -
15 К-11 r/d
A.Tokmagambetov 10,51 10,51 - 2,00 -
16 Orazbsi r/d Terenozek 10,29 10,29 - 3,00 46
17 Р-1-2 r/d Terenozek 4,70 4,70 - 1,50 -
18 К-6-1 r/d Terenozek 8,81 8,81 - 2,00 -
19 К-6-1-1 r/d Terenozek 4,80 4,80 - 1,50 -
20 ЛМК-11В-10 r/d Akzharma 6,00 6,00 - 3,00 636
21 ЛМК-18-3 r/d Akzharma 0,95 0,95 - 1,50 -
22 ЛМК-18В-1 r/d Akzharma 2,65 2,65 - 1,50 -
23 ЛМК-11В-10-2 r/d Akzharma 1,49 1,49 - 0,60 -
24 ЛМК-24А-3 r/d Akzharma 1,33 1,33 - 1,50 -
25 ЛМК-18В-2 r/d Akzharma 3,33 3,33 - 1,50 -
59
26 ЛМК-24А-2 r/d Akzharma 1,04 1,04 - 1,50 -
27 ЛМК-11В-12 r/d Akzharma 4,05 4,05 - 3,00 -
28 ЛМК-9-4 r/d Akzharma 7,15 7,15 - 3,00 -
29 Д-1 r/d Akzharma 4,93 4,93 - 4,00 -
30 Д-1-1 r/d Akzharma 2,29 2,29 - 2,00 -
31 СК-11 r/d Akzharma 3,91 3,91 - 5,00 -
32 Д-1-2 r/d Akzharma 1,41 1,41 - 2,00 -
33 Д-1-3 r/d Akzharma 2,87 2,87 - 2,00 -
34 Д-2 r/d Akzharma 6,71 6,71 - 5,00 -
35 ЮК-12-7-1 r/d Akzharma 4,98 4,98 - 2,50 -
36 Д-1-4-1 r/d Akzharma 2,70 2,70 - 1,50 -
37 ЛМК-9-2 r/d Shagan 3,82 3,82 - 8,00 -
38 ЛМК-12-1 r/d Shagan 0,84 0,84 - 3,00 -
39 ЛМК-16-7-1 r/d Shagan 1,51 1,51 - 1,50 -
40 ЛМК-9-2В r/d Shagan 3,25 3,25 - 6,20 1510
41 ЛМК-11В-3-5 r/d Shagan 1,20 1,20 - 1,50 -
42 ЛМК-9-2А r/d Shagan 2,71 2,71 - 1,50 -
43 СК-11-6-2-4 r/d Shagan 1,38 1,38 - 0,50 -
44 СК-8В r/d Shagan 5,30 5,30 - 2,00 -
45 ЮК-12-16 r/d Shagan 4,71 4,71 - 8,00 -
46 ЛМК-8А-15-1 r/d Ilyasov 0,70 0,70 - 3,00 -
47 ЛМК-8А-15 r/d Ilyasov 3,00 3,00 - 1,50 701
48 ЛМК-8А-7 r/d Ilyasov 1,05 1,05 - 3,00 -
49 ЛМК-8Б-1 r/d Ilyasov 2,63 2,63 - 1,50 -
50 СК-6 r/d Ilyasov 6,98 6,98 - 8,00 -
51 СК-3 r/d Ilyasov 24,83 24,83 - 6,00 -
52 Р-1-1 r/d Kogalykol 3,61 3,61 - 1,50 1090
60
53 Р-1-2 r/d Kogalykol 3,94 3,94 - 1,50 -
54 ЛМК-5 r/d Kogalykol 3,70 3,70 - 10,00 -
55 Zhanaaryk r/d Kogalykol 9,24 9,24 - 15,00 -
56 Р-11 r/d Kogalykol 5,40 5,40 - 3,00 -
57 Р-1-2 r/d Kogalykol 3,57 3,57 - 1,50 -
58 ЮК-4 r/d Kogalykol 3,48 3,48 - 6,00 -
59 ЮК-2-1 r/d Kogalykol 2,64 2,64 - 4,00 -
60 ЮК-1-1 r/d Kogalykol 6,74 6,74 - 3,00 -
61 ЮК-1Г-1 r/d Kogalykol 3,02 3,02 - 2,50 -
62 Kosaryk r/d Besaryk 10,50 10,50 - 6,00 405
63 Turdali r/d Besaryk 7,61 7,61 - 4,00 361
64 tail Zhaskairat r/d Amankeldi 15,58 15,58 - 4,00 346
65 Aktam r/d Aidarly 3,94 3,94 - 5,00 286
Total: 40 canals-193,6 km, 25 drains, -150,01 km 343,47 7 406
Karmakshy district.
1 ПВ-13-3Е Aldashbai Ahun 13,60 13,60 - 2,50 60
2 ПВ-13-3Б-1 Dauylkol 3,60 3,60 - 1,50 324
3 ПВ-11В Dauylkol 1,50 1,50 - 2,00 610
4 ПВ13-1Д Akzhar 5,40 5,40 - 1,00 503
5 ПВ-13-1Ж Akzhar 3,80 3,80 - 1,50 661
6 ПВ-13-2Б Aktobe 3,00 3,00 - 2,00 392
7 ПВ-13-2Г Aktobe 0,50 0,50 - 1,40 228
8 ПВ-15-7 III-international 11,80 11,80 - 1,90 684
9 ПВ-15-9 III-international 0,14 0,14 - 1,10 540
10 Zhosaly zharma Iirkol 11,40 11,40 - 2,00 187
11 Bala-Zharma Iirkol 3,00 3,00 - 2,00 523
12 ПВ-13-3-Е-1 Aldashbai Ahun 6,40 6,40 - 2,00 -
61
13 ПВ-13-3Б-1-1 Dauylkol 7,50 7,50 - 1,00 -
14 ПВ-11В-1 Akzhar 6,20 6,20 - 1,00 -
15 ПВ-13-1Д-1 Akzhar 5,20 5,20 - 1,00 -
16 ПВ-13-1Ж-1 Akzhar 2,20 2,20 - 1,00 -
17 ПВ-13-2Б-1 Aktobe 10,00 10,00 - 1,00 -
18 ПВ-13-2Г-1 Aktobe 2,30 2,30 - 1,00 -
19 ПВ-15-7-1 III-international 6,30 6,30 - 1,00 -
20 ПВ-15-9-1 III-international 6,60 6,60 - 1,00 -
21 Zhosaly zharma-1 Iirkol 2,20 2,20 - 1,00 -
22 Tail Bala-zharma-1 Iirkol 3,10 3,10 - 1,00 -
23 Tail Bala-zharma-3 Iirkol 5,30 5,30 - 1,00 -
24 Tail Bala-zharma-5 Iirkol 1,40 1,40 - 1,00 -
25 К-1-1 Aldashbai Ahun 17,62 17,62 - 1,20 -
26 К-2-1 Dauylkol 10,32 10,32 - 1,20 -
27 ВКК-2А Akzhar 6,63 6,63 - 1,50 -
28 ВКК-5 Akzhar 10,52 10,52 - 3,00 -
29 ВКК-4 Akzhar 8,21 8,21 - 3,00 -
30 ЗК-5-4 Aktobe 10,97 10,97 - 1,50 -
31 ЗК-2-2 Aktobe 15,66 15,66 - 1,50 -
Total: 24 canals-122,44 km, drains -79,93 km 202,37 4712
Aral district.
1 Bekbaul Akbai 4,58 4,58 - 3 100
2 Beknazar Akbai 1,67 1,67 - 3 164
3 Kairolla Akbai 2,33 2,33 - 8 671
4 Kone Mendibai Akbai 14,89 14,89 - 10 1254
5 Priaral Akbai 3,81 3,81 - 5 456
Total: 5 canals 27,28 2645
62
Kyzylorda c.
1 Karataban Aksuat 9,34 9,34 - 2,5 221,3
2 Р-2 Aksuat 2,94 2,94 - 1,5
3 Р-3 Aksuat 1,47 1,47 - 1,5
4 Р-4 Aksuat 1,93 1,93 - 1,5
5 Р-4-1 Aksuat 0,91 0,91 - 1
6 Zhusipbek Karauyltobe 3,40 3,40 - 2,50 351,8
7 Р-1-1 Karauyltobe 1,87 1,87 - 1,50
8 Р-1 Kosshynyrau 7,80 7,80 - 8,00 605,64
9 Р-2 Kosshynyrau 1,05 1,05 - 2,00 124,6
10 Ж-1 Kosshynyrau 2,60 2,60 - 1,50
11 Ж-2 Kosshynyrau 2,11 2,11 - 1,50
12 Ж-3 Kosshynyrau 1,30 1,30 - 1,50 281,8
13 7х-3 Kosshynyrau 2,40 2,40 - 2,00 182,7
14 А-3 Kosshynyrau 2,10 2,10 - 2,00 93,03
15 А-5 Kosshynyrau 2,71 2,71 - 2,00 300
16 Р-2-3 Kosshynyrau 5,97 5,97 - 2,00 345,1
17 Р-3-1-1 Kosshynyrau 4,00 4,00 - 1,00
18 Р-2-1 Kosshynyrau 1,31 1,31 - 1,50
19 Р-2-2 Kosshynyrau 0,80 0,80 - 1,50 94,37
20 Р-2-4 Kosshynyrau 2,22 2,22 - 1,50
21 Р-2-4-1 Kosshynyrau 1,42 1,42 - 1,50 78,47
22 Р-2-2 Kosshynyrau 0,58 0,58 - 1,00
23 Ж-2-1 Kosshynyrau 0,80 0,80 - 1,00
24 Р-2-7 Kosshynyrau 1,50 1,50 - 1,50 188
25 А-4-1 Kosshynyrau 0,71 0,71 - 1,00
26 Л-5-2 Kosshynyrau 1,60 1,60 - 1,00
63
27 Л-5-3 Kosshynyrau 1,16 1,16 - 1,00
28 Л-5-3-1 Kosshynyrau 1,37 1,37 - 0,50
29 Р-2-4 Kosshynyrau 1,11 1,11 - 2,00
30 Р-2-4-2 Kosshynyrau 1,30 1,30 - 1,50
31 Р-2-2-1 Kosshynyrau 0,77 0,77 - 1,50
32 Р-2-2-2 Kosshynyrau 1,45 1,45 - 1,50
33 Р-1-2 Kosshynyrau 3,50 3,50 - 1,00 112,72
34 Р-1-5 Kosshynyrau 2,88 2,88 - 1.5 76,38
35 К-2 Kosshynyrau 3,50 3,70 - 6,00
36 К-3 Kosshynyrau 2,88 2,50 - 6,00
37 К-1-1 Karauyltobe 1,86 1,86 - 4,00
38 К-1-2 Karauyltobe 10,13 10,13 - 3,50
39 К-1-1 Kosshynyrau 12,78 12,78 - 4,00
40 К-5-1 Kosshynyrau 1,95 1,95 - 3,50
41 К-1-2 Kosshynyrau 5,96 5,96 - 4,00
42 К-1-3 Kosshynyrau 2,00 2,00 - 4,00
43 К-5-5-1-1 Kosshynyrau 0,68 0,68 - 2,00
44 К-5-5-1-2 Kosshynyrau 2,86 2,86 - 2,00
45 К-1-2-2 Kosshynyrau 1,50 1,50 - 2,50
46 К-6-1 Kosshynyrau 1,60 1,60 - 3,50
47 К-7 Kosshynyrau 4,77 4,77 - 8,00
48 К-7-1 Kosshynyrau 1,71 1,71 - 3,50
49 К-7-2 Kosshynyrau 1,70 1,70 - 4,00
50 К-7-3 Kosshynyrau 1,10 1,10 - 4,00
51 К-1-2-1-2 Kosshynyrau 1,25 1,25 - 1,50
52 К-1-2-1-3 Kosshynyrau 1,17 1,17 - 1,50
53 К-1-2-1-4 Kosshynyrau 2,60 2,60 - 1,50
64
54 К-1-2-1-5 Kosshynyrau 0,79 0,79 - 1,50
55 К-4-1-3 Kosshynyrau 2,60 2,60 - 3,00
56 К-4-2-2 Kosshynyrau 2,70 2,70 - 2,50
Total: 34 canals -78,38km, 22 drains- 68,07 km 146,45 3056
65
Attachment 2. Decree of the regional Akimat about the canals’ ownership (sample)
66
67
68
69
70
Attachment 3. Canal voluntary donation signed documents
71
72
73
Attachment 4. Sample photos from site visits
East Kazakhstan province
Photo 1: Canal Goltsovskiy
Photo 2: Canal Bogenbai, a single house close to the whole canal length located about 22 meters away from the canal.
74
Photo 3: Canal МК Алтайский
75
Karaghandy province
Photo 5: Canal Tuzdi
Photo 6: Canal Shartaz
76
Photo 7: Canal Samara
Photo 8: Canal Zherdinskiy
77
Kyzylorda province
Photo 9: Canal R-2
Photo 10: Canal Orazbay
78
Photo 11: Canal LMK 9-2
Photo 12: Canal LMK 9-4 (the houses in left side are about 50 meters away and in right side
there is large open area and service road)
79
Photo 13: Canal 3x6 Kazalinskiy (houses in left side are about 50 meters away and in right
side there is a large open area and service road)
Photo 14: Canal Zhiluan the structures are in one side and about 80 meters away)
80
Zhambyl province
Photo 15: Talas LVMK Oiyk interfarm canal
Photo 16: Talas Zhiembet main canal
Photo 17: Talas Uzyn interfarm canal
81
Photo 18: Talas PVMK interfarm canal
Photo 19: Zhanatorgan interfarm canal (a wagon by the tree can be moved inward the house
yard), however, there will not be any work in this part of the canal at it is in concrete and good conditions.
82
Photo 20: Talas Orta Aryk interfarm canal : there will not be any work in this part of the canal
at it is in concrete and good conditions.
83
Locations where some canals or ditches are near the houses
Zhambyl province
Photo 21: Canal Melnichniy; ditch for irrigation of households plots; wild bushes (one-year
plants) and dirt will be removed by manual works and choppers as planned in the feasibility study (table 5 and 6 of this report).
Photo 22: Canal Saduakas; ditch for irrigation of households plots; dirt will be removed by
manual work as planned in the feasibility study (table 5 and 6 of this report).
84
Photo 23: Canal Salyamov; ditch for irrigation of households plots; cleaning will be by
manual work as planned in the feasibility study (table 5 and 6 of this report).
Photo 24: Canal Turksib; dirt will be removed by manual work as planned in the feasibility
study (tables 5 and 6 of this report).
85
Photo 25: Canal Bayshakhan; dirt will be removed by manual work and choppers as planned
in the feasibility study (table 5 and 6 of this report).
Photo 26: Canal Noviy Kartogan; no work will be carried out in this section as this section of
the canal is in cement and in good condition.
86
Photo 27: Canal Kultobe-Sarisu ; dirt will be removed by manual works as planned in the
feasibility study (table 5 and 6 of this report) and from the right side where there is no structure.
Photo 28: Canal Tuksib, Zhambyl province; cleaning and repairing works in this section will
be manually (table 5 and 6 of this report) and in right side of canal.
87
Attachment 5. Involuntary Resettlement Impact Checklists ADB TRTA 9317-KAZ: Irrigation Rehabilitation Sector Project Site: 16 sub-projects for irrigation canals rehabilitation in four provinces of Kazakhstan Involuntary Resettlement Impact Category: C
Probable Involuntary Resettlement Effects
Yes No Not known
Remarks
Involuntary Acquisition of Land
1. Will there be land acquisition?
2. Is the site for land acquisition known? N/A: It is the existing canals.
3. Is the ownership status and current usage of land to be acquired known?
State-owned: 1 private canal donated by a farming company (project direct beneficiary)
4. Will easement be utilized within an existing Right of Way (ROW)?
5. Will there be loss of shelter and residential land use to land acquisition?
6. Will there be loss of agricultural and other productive assets due to land acquisition?
7. Will there be loss of crops, trees, and fixed assets due to land acquisition?
8. Will there be loss of business or enterprises due to land acquisition?
9. Will there be loss of income sources and means of livelihoods due to land acquisition?
Involuntary Restrictions on land use or on access to legally designated parks and protected areas
10. Will people lose access to natural resources, communal facilities and services?
11. If land use is changed, will it have an adverse impact on social and economic activities?
12. Will access to land and resources owned by the communally or by the state be restricted?
Information on Displaced Persons
13. Any estimate of the likely number of persons that will be displaced by the Project? If yes, approximately how many?
No Yes Not applicable
14. Are any of the poor, female-headed households, or vulnerable to poverty risks?
No Yes Not applicable
15. Are any displaced persons from indigenous or ethnic minority groups?
No Yes Not applicable
88
ADB TRTA 9317-KAZ: Irrigation Rehabilitation Sector Project Site: Land plot for building the EA’s headquarters in Nursultan (Astana) city of Kazakhstan Involuntary Resettlement Impact Category: C
Probable Involuntary Resettlement Effects
Yes No Not known
Remarks
Involuntary Acquisition of Land
1. Will there be land acquisition?
2. Is the site for land acquisition known? It is municipality owned land
3. Is the ownership status and current usage of land to be acquired known?
4. Will easement be utilized within an existing Right of Way (ROW)?
5. Will there be loss of shelter and residential land use to land acquisition?
6. Will there be loss of agricultural and other productive assets due to land acquisition?
7. Will there be loss of crops, trees, and fixed assets due to land acquisition?
8. Will there be loss of business or enterprises due to land acquisition?
9. Will there be loss of income sources and means of livelihoods due to land acquisition?
Involuntary Restrictions on land use or on access to legally designated parks and protected areas
10. Will people lose access to natural resources, communal facilities and services?
11. If land use is changed, will it have an adverse impact on social and economic activities?
12. Will access to land and resources owned by the communally or by the state be restricted?
Information on Displaced Persons
13. Any estimate of the likely number of persons that will be displaced by the Project? If yes, approximately how many?
No Yes Not applicable
14. Are any of the poor, female-headed households, or vulnerable to poverty risks?
No Yes Not applicable
15. Are any displaced persons from indigenous or ethnic minority groups?
No Yes Not applicable
89
Attachment 6. Indigenous People Impact Checklist ADB TRTA 9317-KAZ: Irrigation Rehabilitation Sector Project Site: 16 subprojects in four provinces and land plot for the KVK Headquarters building in Nursultan (Astana) city, Kazakhstan Indigenous Peoples Impact Category: C
KEY CONCERNS (Please provide elaborations on the Remarks column)
Yes No Not known
Remarks
A. Indigenous Peoples Identification
1. Are there socio-cultural groups present in or use the project area who may be considered as "tribes" (hill tribes, schedules tribes, tribal peoples), "minorities" (ethnic or national minorities), or "indigenous communities" in the project area?
No Indigenous People are in the project area
2. Are there national or local laws or policies as well as anthropological researches/studies that consider these groups present in or using the project area as belonging to "ethnic minorities", scheduled tribes, tribal peoples, national minorities, or cultural communities?
3. Do such groups self-identify as being part of a distinct social and cultural group?
4. Do such groups maintain collective attachments to distinct habitats or ancestral territories and/or to the natural resources in these habitats and territories?
5. Do such groups maintain cultural, economic, social, and political institutions distinct from the dominant society and culture?
6. Do such groups speak a distinct language or dialect?
7. Has such groups been historically, socially and economically marginalized, disempowered, excluded, and/or discriminated against?
8. Are such groups represented as "Indigenous Peoples" or as "ethnic minorities" or "scheduled tribes" or "tribal populations" in any formal decision-making bodies at the national or local levels?
B. Identification of Potential Impacts
9. Will the project directly or indirectly benefit or target Indigenous Peoples?
10. Will the project directly or indirectly affect Indigenous Peoples' traditional socio-cultural and belief practices? (e.g. child-rearing, health, education, arts, and governance)
11. Will the project affect the livelihood systems of Indigenous Peoples? (e.g., food production system, natural resource management, crafts and trade, employment status)
12. Will the project be in an area (land or territory) occupied, owned, or used by Indigenous Peoples, and/or claimed as ancestral domain?
C. Identification of Special Requirements Will the project activities include?
13. Commercial development of the cultural resources and knowledge of Indigenous Peoples?
14. Physical displacement from traditional or customary lands?
15. Commercial development of natural resources (such as minerals, hydrocarbons, forests, water, hunting or fishing grounds) within customary lands under use that would impact the livelihoods or the cultural, ceremonial, spiritual uses that define the identity and community of Indigenous Peoples?
16. Establishing legal recognition of rights to lands and territories that are traditionally owned or customarily used, occupied or claimed by indigenous peoples?
17. Acquisition of lands that are traditionally owned or customarily used, occupied or claimed by indigenous peoples?
90
D. Anticipated project impacts on Indigenous Peoples (as applicable) – N/A
Project component/ activity/ output Anticipated positive effect Anticipated negative effect
1.
2.
3.
4.
Note: The project team may attach additional information on the project, as necessary.
91
Attachment 7. Proceedings of the Disclosure and Public Consultations in four provinces Proceedings of the 1st public consultation in East Kazakhstan province (16 November 2018)
92
93
94
List of participants in the 1st public consultations (16 November 2018)
95
Proceedings of the 2nd public consultation in the East Kazakhstan province (26 February 2019)
96
97
98
Proceedings of the 1st public consultations in Karaghandy Province (27 November 2018)
99
100
101
102
103
Proceedings of the public consultations in Kyzylorda (20 November 2018)
104
105
List of participants of public consultations in Kyzylorda
106
107
Proceedings of public consultations Zhambyl province (22 November 2018)
108
109
110
Attendance list in Zhambyl province
111
112
Photos from the disclosure and public consultations in four provinces
East Kazakhstan province
Photo 29: The 1st public consultations (16 November 2018)
113
Photo 30: The 2nd public consultation (26 February 2019)
Karaghandy province
Photo 31: The 1st public consultation (27 November 2018)
114
Photo 32: The second public consultation (28 February 2019)
115
Kyzylorda province
Photo 33: Public consultation on 20 November 2018
Zhambyl province
Photo 34: Public consultations in on 22 November 2018.
116
Announcement in the newspapers about the project disclosure and public consultations
117
Attachment 8. Assignment of the GRM Focal Persons by the KVK
118
Assignment of the KVK staff as focal person in Kyzylorda province
119
Assignment of the KVK staff as focal person in Zhambyl province
120
Assignment of the KVK staff as GRM focal person in Karaghandy province
121
122
Order for assignment of one staff as GRM focal person from East Kazakhstan province KVK
123
Attachment 9. Confirmation of staff of regional authorities and KVK for GRM
Zhambyl province: Confirmation of Zhambyl province’s authorities for assigning staff as member of GRC
124
125
Confirmation of Zhambyl regional KVK branch on assigning staff as member of GRC
126
127
128
Confirmation East Kazakhstan province’s authorities for assigning staff as members of GRC
129
130
Confirmation of Karaghandy province's authorities on assigning staff as member of GRC
131
Confirmation of Karaghandy regional KVK branch on assigning staff as member of GRC
132
133
Confirmation of Kyzylorda regional authorities on assigning staff as member of GRC
134
135
136
Confirmation of Kyzylorda regional KVK branch on assigning staff as member of GRC
