Crim Pro Review

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    1/67

    Remedial Law Review Notes under Atty Ferdinand TanCRIMINAL PROCEDURE

    Notes by Paul Lemuel E! C"ave#

    Criminal Procedure Notes

    Criminal Procedure

    $ Pro%eedin& in w"i%" t"e state

    'rose%utes a 'erson (or an a%t or

    omission in violation o( 'enal laws) andin %ase o( %onvi%tion) t"e %ourt im'oses

    t"e 'ro'er 'unis"ment 'rovided (or by

    'enal laws

    Criminal jurisdiction

    $ Aut"ority o( t"e %ourt to "ear and try

    %riminal o((enses and to im'ose 'ro'er

    'unis"ment as 'rovided (or by 'enal

    laws

    SpecialProceedings

    CriminalProcedure OrdinaryCivil Action

    A remedy byw"i%" a'arty see*sto establis"a status) ari&"t) or a'arti%ular(a%t

    T"e +tate'rose%utes a'erson (oran a%t oromission'unis"ableby law

    A'ro%eedin&

    w"erein a'erson is'rose%utedby t"e +tate(or a%ts oromissions%ommitted inviolation o('enal laws)and toim'ose t"e%orres'ondin& 'enalty'rovided (or

    by 'enallaws

    A 'arty suesanot"er (ort"een(or%ementor 'rote%tiono( a ri&"t) ort"e'revention orredress o( a

    wron&

    ,overned bys'e%ial rules)and in t"eabsen%e o(s'e%ial'rovisions)t"e rules

    ,overned byt"e RevisedRules o(CriminalPro%edure

    ,overned byt"e rules (orordinary %ivila%tions

    'rovided (orin ordinarya%tions s"allbe) as (ar as'ra%ti%able)a''ly

    su''letoryMay involveonly one'arty

    Involves t"e+tate a&ainstt"e a%%used

    Involves - ormore 'arties

    Initiated by'etition

    Initiated by%om'laint.but (iled in%ourt byIn(ormation/

    Initiated by%om'laint

    E0%e't"abeas%or'us) notbased on a%ause o(a%tion

    1ased on ana%t oromission'unis"ableby law

    1ased on a%ause o(a%tion

    Sources of criminal procedure

    2! A3 o( Constitution

    -! 224$2-5) Rules o( Court

    3! Administrative %ir%ulars

    6! 1'2-7

    8! RA5972

    9! RA5294

    5! RA7-9-

    :! DO; Cir%ular 54 and 92 .on in

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    2/67

    Remedial Law Review Notes under Atty Ferdinand TanCRIMINAL PROCEDURE

    Notes by Paul Lemuel E! C"ave#

    Constitutional Provisions of Criminal

    Procedure:

    A3 +2

    No 'erson s"all be de'rived o( li(e) liberty or

    'ro'erty wit"out due 'ro%ess o( law) nor s"allany 'erson be denied e

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    3/67

    Remedial Law Review Notes under Atty Ferdinand TanCRIMINAL PROCEDURE

    Notes by Paul Lemuel E! C"ave#

    -! In all %riminal 'ro%eedin&s) a%%used

    s"all be 'resumed inno%ent unless t"e

    %ontrary is 'roved .on t"e 'rose%ution to

    'rove/) and s"all en>oy t"e ri&"t to

    a! be "eard by "imsel( or "is

    %ounsel)

    b! be in(ormed o( t"e nature and

    %ause o( t"e a%%usation a&ainst

    "im

    %! "ave s'eedy) im'artial) 'ubli%

    trial

    d! meet wit" witnesses (a%e to (a%e

    e! "ave %om'ulsory 'ro%ess to

    se%ure attendan%e o( witness

    and 'rodu%tion o( eviden%e in

    "is be"al(

    ?owever) a(ter arrai&nment) trial may 'ro%eed

    notwit"standin& t"e absen%e o( t"e a%%used)

    'rovided "e "as been duly noti(ied and "is

    (ailure to a''ear is un>usti(iable!

    A3 +29

    All 'ersons s"all "ave t"e ri&"t to s'eedy

    dis'osition o( %ases be(ore all >udi%ial) udi%ial) administrative bodies

    A3 +25

    No 'erson s"all be %om'elled to be a witness

    a&ainst "imsel( .NOTE a''lies only to

    testimonial eviden%e/

    A3 +2:

    2! no 'erson s"all be detained solely

    be%ause o( "is 'oliti%al belie(s and

    as'irations

    -! no involuntary servitude in any (orms"all e0ist e0%e't as 'unis"ment (or t"e

    %rime w"ereo() t"e 'arty s"all "ave

    been duly served

    A3 +-4

    No 'erson s"all be im'risoned (or non 'ayment

    o( debt or (or 'oll ta0

    A3 +-2

    No 'erson s"all be twi%e 'ut in >eo'ardy (or

    'unis"ment (or t"e same o((ense! I( an a%t is

    'enali#ed by law and an ordinan%e) %onvi%tion or

    a%

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    4/67

    Remedial Law Review Notes under Atty Ferdinand TanCRIMINAL PROCEDURE

    Notes by Paul Lemuel E! C"ave#

    E0%usive a''ellate .:$8$-/$ on a''eal .R68/ or

    on %ertiorari .R98/ w"en >urisdi%tion o( lower

    %ourt is in issue

    2! all %ases in w"i%" >urisdi%tion o( lower

    %ourt is at issue

    -! all %riminal %ases w"ere 'enalty

    im'osed is RP or "i&"er

    3! all %ases w"ere only error or

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    5/67

    Remedial Law Review Notes under Atty Ferdinand TanCRIMINAL PROCEDURE

    Notes by Paul Lemuel E! C"ave#

    3! M) M) +an&&unian& 'an&lun&sod)

    treasurer) assessors) en&ineers) ot"er

    %ity de'artment "eads

    6! O((i%ers o( di'lomati% servi%e) %onsul

    &eneral or "i&"er

    8! P"il Army and Air For%e Cols) Naval

    Ca't) O((i%ers o( ?i&"er Ran*

    9! O((i%ers o( PNP w"ile o%%u'yin& 'osition

    o( 'rovin%ial dire%tor) senior

    su'erintendent) or "i&"er

    5! City or 'rovin%ial 'rose%utors and t"eir

    assistants) o((i%ers and 'rose%utors in

    O((i%e o( t"e Ombudsman and +'e%ial

    Prose%utors

    :! President) Dire%tor) Trustee) Mana&er o(

    ,OCCs) +tate Universities) Edu%ational

    Institutions and Foundations

    7! Members o( ;udi%iary wit"out 're>udi%e

    to Constitutional Provisions

    24! Members o( Con&ress) O((i%ials +alary

    ,rade -5 or ?i&"er

    22! C"airmen and Members o(

    Constitutional Commissions wit"out

    're>udi%e to %onstitutional 'rovisions

    +o) i( lower t"an salary &r -5) %onsider t"e

    'enalty

    Penalty 9 y$ RTC

    Penalty 9 y$ MTC

    Provision o( Rule 62$6-) i( %ase involves +, -5

    or "i&"er) a''eal'etition (or review to

    +andi&anbayan

    Can the Sandiganbayan try civil cases

    GE+) in %ase o( ill &otten wealt") re%overy o(

    w"i%" would be %ivil liability arisin& (rom t"e

    %riminal a%t

    Con%urrent Ori&inal

    Certiorari) Mandamus) Pro"ibition wit" +C) RTC)

    CA

    A''ellate ;urisdi%tion

    2! 1y ordinary a''eal$ de%isions o( RTC in

    e0er%ise o( ori&inal >urisdi%tion) w"en

    +, -9 or lower) 'enalty 9y

    -! 1y 'etition (or review$ de%isions o( RTC

    in e0er%ise o( a''ellate >urisdi%tion)

    w"en +, -9 or lower) 'enalty 9y

    !"C

    E0%lusive Ori&inal

    2! All %rimes) 'enalty o( w"i%" is "i&"er

    t"an 9 years im'risonment

    -! All %ases not wit"in e0%lusive >urisdi%tion

    o( any %ourt) tribunal) body

    3! ;urisdi%tion over %om'le0 %rime) over

    t"e w"ole) lod&ed wit" RTC "avin&

    >urisdi%tion to im'ose ma0imum and

    most severe 'enalty im'osable on an

    o((ense (ormin& %om'le0 %rime

    6! Libel %ases

    8! iolation o( CDDA -44-

    9! O((enses under +andi&anbayan

    >urisdi%tion but %ommitted by 'ubli%

    o((i%er) +, -9 and lower) 'rivate

    individuals as %o 'rin%i'als)

    a%%om'li%es) a%%essories) im'risonment

    is "i&"er t"an 9 years

    Family Court ;urisdi%tion

    2! A%%used lower t"an 2: not under 28

    .;uvenile ;usti%e A%t/ or w"ere one or

    more o( t"e vi%tims is a minor at t"e time

    o( %ommission o( t"e %rime

    8

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    6/67

    Remedial Law Review Notes under Atty Ferdinand TanCRIMINAL PROCEDURE

    Notes by Paul Lemuel E! C"ave#

    -! Minor is a%%used in violation o( CDDA

    -44-

    3! iolation o( Anti C"ild Abuse Law

    6! Cases o( violation o( RA7-9-

    A''ellate >urisdi%tion

    2! All %ases de%ided by lower %ourts in

    e0er%ise o( res'e%tive territorial

    >urisdi%tion

    #"C

    E0%lusive Ori&inal ;urisdi%tion) Ordinary Criminal

    Cases

    2! O((enses 'unis"able by im'risonment o(

    not more t"an 9 years) irres'e%tive o(

    amount o( (ine) re&ardless o( ot"er

    im'osable a%%essory or ot"er 'enalties

    in%ludin& %ivil liability arisin& (rom su%"

    o((enses or 'redi%ated t"ereon

    -! O((enses involvin& dama&e to 'ro'erty

    t"rou&" %riminal ne&li&en%e) value

    e0%eedin& 24*

    3! All o((enses under +andi&anbayan;urisdi%tion %ommitted by 'ubli% o((i%er

    and em'loyees) and by 'rivate indivs

    %"ar&ed as %o 'rin%i'als) a%%om'li%es)

    a%%essories) im'risonment 9y) +, -9

    and lower

    6! Crimes 'unis"able by destierro

    +ummary Pro%edure

    2! Tra((i% violations

    -! iolations o( rental law

    3! iolation o( %ity or muni%i'al ordinan%es

    6! All ot"er o((enses 'unis"able by

    im'risonment not e0%eedin& 9 mont"s

    and or (ine not e0%eedin& 2* irres'e%tive

    o( ot"er 'enalties or %ivil liabilities

    arisin& t"ere(rom

    8! O((enses involvin& dama&e to 'ro'erty

    t"rou&" %riminal ne&li&en%e) not

    e0%eedin& 24*

    9! Cases o( 1P--

    Note in summary 'ro%eedin&s) su%" as in %aseo( 1P--) no warrant o( arrest s"all be issued

    EHCEPT in %ase t"e a%%used was duly noti(ied)

    but (ailed to a''ear in t"e summary 'ro%eedin&s

    1P--$ usually 'unis"ed by FINE .0- t"e amount

    in t"e %"e%*) or t"e >ud&e may im'ose t"e

    'ro'er 'enalty

    $atarungang Pambarangay

    ,eneral rule No %om'laint) 'etition) a%tion

    involvin& any matter wit"in aut"ority o( Lu'on

    s"all be (iled or instituted dire%tly in any %ourt or

    in ot"er &overnment o((i%e (or ad>udi%ation

    unless t"ere is %on(rontation between t"e 'arties

    be(ore t"e Lu'on C"airman or Pan&*at) and t"at

    no %on%iliation or settlement "as been rea%"ed

    as %erti(ied by Lu'on or Pan&*at C"air

    E0%e'tions

    2! O((enses 'unis"able by im'risonment"i&"er t"an 2 year) (ine "i&"er t"an 8*

    -! O((enses w"ere t"ere is no 'rivate

    o((ended 'arty

    3! Dis'ute involves real 'ro'erties lo%ated

    in di((erent %ities or muni%i'alities unless

    'arties t"ereto a&ree to submit t"eir

    di((eren%es be(ore a''ro'riate Lu'on

    6! Dis'ute involvin& 'arties w"o a%tually

    reside in baran&ays o( di((erent %ities ormuni%i'alities e0%e't w"ere su%"

    baran&ay units ad>oin ea%" ot"er and

    'arties a&ree to submit di((eren%es to

    ami%able settlement be(ore a''ro'riate

    Lu'on

    8! Ot"er %lasses o( dis'utes w"i%"

    President may determine in t"e interest

    9

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    7/67

    Remedial Law Review Notes under Atty Ferdinand TanCRIMINAL PROCEDURE

    Notes by Paul Lemuel E! C"ave#

    o( >usti%e or u'on re%ommendation o(

    DO; +e%

    9! "en a%%used is under detention

    5! Person de'rived o( liberty %allin& (or ?C

    'ro%eedin&s

    :! "en a%tion already 'res%ribed

    7! Dis'utes involvin& traditions o(

    indi&enous %ultural %ommunities

    %#PO!"ANC& O' $NO(%N) J*!%S+%C"%ON:

    "en %om'laint or in(ormation is (iled wit" t"e

    wron& %ourt) remedy

    File MOTION TO @UA+? .Rule 225/ on t"e

    &round t"at T?E COURT TRGIN, T?E CA+E

    ?A+ NO ;URI+DICTION OER T?E OFFEN+E

    C?AR,ED .+3/

    ,ranted) remedy

    $ File new %om'laint or in(ormation)

    be%ause an order sustainin& a motion to

    e%t to e0istin& laws) t"e %riminal

    a%tion s"all be instituted and tried in t"e

    %ourt o( t"e muni%i'ality or territory

    a! w"ere t"e o((ense was%ommitted or w"ere any o( its

    essential in&redients o%%urred

    -! "ere an o((ense is %ommitted in a

    train) air%ra(t) or ot"er 'ubli% or 'rivate

    ve"i%le in t"e %ourse o( its tri') t"e

    %riminal a%tion s"all be instituted and

    tried in

    a! t"e %ourt o( t"e muni%i'ality or

    territory w"ere said train)

    air%ra(t) or ot"er ve"i%le 'assed

    durin& its tri' in%ludin& t"e 'la%e

    o( de'arture and arrival

    5

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    8/67

    Remedial Law Review Notes under Atty Ferdinand TanCRIMINAL PROCEDURE

    Notes by Paul Lemuel E! C"ave#

    3! "ere an o((ense is %ommitted on

    board a vessel in t"e %ourse o( its

    voya&e) t"e %riminal a%tion s"all be

    instituted and tried in

    a! t"e %ourt o( t"e (irst 'ort o( entry

    or

    b! at any muni%i'ality or territory

    w"ere t"e vessel 'assed durin&

    su%" voya&e) sub>e%t to

    &enerally a%%e'ted 'rin%i'les o(

    international law

    6! Crimes %ommitted outside o( t"e P"ils

    but 'unis"able under A- o( RPC s"all

    be %o&ni#able by t"e %ourt

    a! w"ere t"e %riminal a%tion is (irst

    (iled

    +tate t"ose 'unis"able under A- o( RPC

    2! %ommission o( o((ense w"ile on

    P"ili''ine s"i' or airs"i'

    -! (or&in& or %ounter(eitin& any %oin or

    %urren%y note o( t"e P"ili''ines or

    obli&ations and se%urities issued by

    ,overnment o( t"e P"ils

    3! w"ile bein& 'ubli% o((i%ers or em'loyees)

    s"all %ommit an o((ense in t"e e0er%ise

    o( t"eir (un%tions

    6! %ommit any o( t"e %rimes a&ainst

    national se%urity and t"e law o( nations

    Crime %ommitted in t"e "i&" seas) w"ere t"e

    vessel is re&istered

    8! In %ase o( %ontinuin& %rimes) su%" as

    Ille&al Re%ruitment

    $ "ere t"e ille&al re%ruitment was

    %ommitted

    $ "ere t"e 'rivate o((ended 'arty is

    residin& at t"e time o( t"e ille&al

    re%ruitment

    o At ele%tion o(

    %om'lainant'rivate o((ended

    'arty

    Libel

    $ "ere t"e arti%le was (irst 'ublis"ed

    $ In %ase o( 'ubli% o((i%ers) w"ere "oldin&

    o((i%e

    $ In %ase o( 'rivate individual) w"ere

    'rivate o((ended 'arty resides

    PRELIMINARG MATTER+ TO REMEM1ER

    (ho may institute-commence criminal

    action

    R224 +8

    All %riminal a%tions %ommen%ed by %om'laint or

    in(ormation s"all be 'rose%uted

    $ under t"e dire%tion and %ontrol o( t"e

    'ubli% 'rose%utor

    2! In %ase o( "eavy wor* s%"edule o( t"e

    'ubli% 'rose%utor or

    -! in t"e event o( la%* o( 'ubli%

    'rose%utors)

    t"e 'rivate 'rose%utor may be aut"ori#ed in

    writin& by t"e C"ie( o( t"e Prose%ution O((i%e or

    t"e Re&ional +tate Prose%utor to 'rose%ute t"e

    %ase sub>e%t to t"e a''roval o( t"e %ourt

    On%e so aut"ori#ed to 'rose%ute t"e %riminal

    a%tion) t"e 'rivate 'rose%utor s"all %ontinue to

    'rose%ute t"e %ase u' to t"e end o( t"e trial

    even in t"e absen%e o( a 'ubli% 'rose%utor)

    $ unless t"e aut"ority is revo*ed or

    ot"erwise wit"drawn

    :

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    9/67

    Remedial Law Review Notes under Atty Ferdinand TanCRIMINAL PROCEDURE

    Notes by Paul Lemuel E! C"ave#

    P*./%C C!%#& P!%,A"& C!%#&

    In>ured 'arty wit"out%ontrol over %riminalliability) res'onsibilityo( o((endin& 'erson

    In>ured 'arty wit"%ontrol over %riminalliability) res'onsibility o(o((endin& 'erson

    Crimes %overed

    2! sedu%tion-! abdu%tion3! a%ts o(

    las%iviousness6! adultery8! %on%ubina&e

    PRO+ECUTION OF PRIATE CRIME+ .R224

    +8/

    Prosecution of crimes of adultery orconcubinage:

    T"e %rimes o( adultery or %on%ubina&e s"all not

    be 'rose%uted e0%e't

    $ u'on a %om'laint (iled by the offended

    spouse

    T"e o((ender 'arty %annot institute %riminal

    'rose%ution wit"out including the guilty

    parties) i( bot" are alive) nor in any %ase) i( t"e

    o((ended 'arty "as %onsented to t"e o((ense or

    "as 'ardoned t"e o((enders!

    Prosecution of seduction0 abduction0 acts of

    lasciviousness:

    T"e o((enses o( sedu%tion) abdu%tion) a%ts o(

    las%iviousness s"all not be 'rose%uted e0%e't

    u'on a %om'laint (iled by t"e

    12 offended party

    -! her parents) grandparents) or

    guardian

    nor in any %ase) i( t"e o((ender "as been

    e0'ressly 'ardoned by any o( t"em!

    I( o((ended 'arty dies or be%omes in%a'a%itated

    be(ore s"e %an (ile t"e %om'laint) and s"e "as

    no *nown 'arents)

    3! t"e states"all initiate t"e %riminal a%tion

    in "er be"al(

    T"e offended party) even i( a minor) "as t"e

    ri&"t to institute t"e 'rose%ution o( t"e o((enses

    o( abdu%tion) sedu%tion) a%ts o( las%iviousness

    inde'endently o( "er 'arents) &rand'arents or

    &uardian unless s"e is in%a'able o( doin& so!

    "ere t"e offended partyw"o is a minor (ails

    to (ile t"e %om'laint) "er parents)

    grandparents) guardian may (ile t"e same!

    T"e ri&"t to (ile t"e a%tion &ranted to 'arents)

    &rand'arents) or &uardian s"all be e3clusive of

    all other persons and s"all be e3ercisedsuccessively in the order herein provided)

    e3cept as stated in the preceding paragraph2

    No %riminal a%tion (or de(amation w"i%" %onsists

    in t"e im'utation o( any o( t"e o((enses

    mentioned above s"all be brou&"t e0%e't at t"e

    instan%e o( and u'on %om'laint (iled by t"e

    o((ended 'arty!

    Complaint .Criminal Complaint) NOT a((idavito( %om'laint/

    R224 +3

    A sworn written statement

    $ %"ar&in& a 'erson wit" an o((ense)

    $ subs%ribed by

    o o((ended 'arty

    o any 'ea%e o((i%er

    o ot"er 'ubli% o((i%er %"ar&ed wit"

    en(or%ement o( t"e law violated

    Criminal %nformation

    R224 +6

    7

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    10/67

    Remedial Law Review Notes under Atty Ferdinand TanCRIMINAL PROCEDURE

    Notes by Paul Lemuel E! C"ave#

    An a%%usation in writin& %"ar&in& a 'erson wit"

    an o((ense) subs%ribed by t"e 'rose%utor) and

    (iled wit" t"e %ourt!

    P!O.A./& CA*S&

    $ (a%ts and %ir%umstan%es w"i%" would

    lead a reasonably dis%reet and 'rudent

    man to believe t"at an o((ense "as been

    %ommitted and t"at t"e ob>e%ts sou&"t in

    %onne%tion wit" t"e o((ense are in t"e

    'la%e sou&"t to be sear%"ed

    CO##&NC&N" O' C!%#%NA/ AC"%ON

    %2 (%"4 "4& .A!AN)A5

    Penalty is 2 year) (ine is 2J .i( e0%eedin&) t"en

    not sub>e%t to 1aran&ay Con%iliation/

    $ I( no ami%able settlement) (ile

    AFFIDAIT OF COMPLAINT

    .sinum'aan& salaysay/ wit" t"e

    1aran&ay) alle&in& a%ts or omissions

    'unis"able under 'enal laws

    $ T"e baran&ay will dismiss i( t"ere is no

    'robable %ause)

    $ 1UT i( wit" 'robable %ause) 1aran&ay

    will issue sub'oena

    $ it"in 24 days a(ter issuan%e o(

    sub'oena) res'ondent will be re

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    11/67

    Remedial Law Review Notes under Atty Ferdinand TanCRIMINAL PROCEDURE

    Notes by Paul Lemuel E! C"ave#

    %%2 (%"4 "4& C%"5 P!OS&C*"O!

    O! O#.*+S#AN

    RULE+

    !! For o((enses w"ere a 'reliminary investi&ation

    is re

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    12/67

    Remedial Law Review Notes under Atty Ferdinand TanCRIMINAL PROCEDURE

    Notes by Paul Lemuel E! C"ave#

    $ COMELEC .in %ase o( ele%tion$related

    %rimes/

    $ PC,,

    NOTE t"at AM 8$:$-9 Removed t"e 'rovision

    >ud&es o( MTCs) "en%e) >ud&es o( MTCs %an no

    lon&er %ondu%t 'reliminary investi&ation!

    Procedure before the City Prosecutor same

    process if before the Ombudsman; -

    Preliminary %nvestigation Proper:

    .R22- in relation to R224/

    +3 R22-

    2! A''%+A,%" O' CO#P/A%N"$

    Com'lainant s"all state address o(

    res'ondent and s"all be a%%om'anied

    by a((idavits o( %om'lainant and "is

    witnesses as well as ot"er su''ortin&

    do%uments to establis" 'robable %ause

    -! it"in 24 days a(ter (ilin& o( t"e

    %om'laint) t"e investi&atin& o((i%er s"all

    EIT?ER

    $ Dismiss it i( "e (inds no &round to

    %ontinue wit" t"e investi&ation OR

    $ Issue S*.PO&NA to t"e res'ondent

    atta%"in& to it a %o'y o( t"e %om'laintand its su''ortin& a((idavits

    3! it"in 24 days (rom re%ei't o( sub'oena

    wit" t"e %om'laint) su''ortin& a((idavits

    and do%uments) res'ondent s"all submit

    "is CO*N"&! A''%+A,%"and t"at o(

    t"e witnesses and ot"er su''ortin&

    do%ument

    6! IF res'ondent %annot be sub'oenaed or

    i( sub'oenaed) does not submit %ounter

    a((idavits wit"in t"e 24 day 'eriod) t"e

    investi&atin& o((i%er s"all resolve the

    complaint based on the evidence

    presented by the complainant

    8! it"in 24 days (rom submission o( t"e

    %ounter a((idavit by res'ondent)

    %om'lainant s"all submit a !&P/5A''%+A,%"

    9! .o'tional/$ !&JO%N+&! A''%+A,%"

    5! Investi&atin& o((i%er may set a hearingi(

    t"ere are (a%ts and issues to be %lari(ied

    (rom a 'arty or witness! T"e 'arties %an

    be 'resent at a "earin& but wit"out ri&"t

    to e0amine or to %ross e0amine) but

    may) "owever) submit to t"e

    investi&atin& o((i%er

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    13/67

    Remedial Law Review Notes under Atty Ferdinand TanCRIMINAL PROCEDURE

    Notes by Paul Lemuel E! C"ave#

    %orres'ondin& remedies in %ase o( adverse

    resolutionB

    2! MOTION FOR RECON+IDERATION

    be(ore t"e INE+TI,ATIN,

    PRO+ECUTOR .DO; AM 683/ wit"in 24

    days (rom re%ei't o( adverse de%ision

    +enied0

    -! PETITION FOR REIE be(ore t"e

    DO; +ECRETARG .DO; Cir%ular 54/

    wit"in 28 days (rom re%ei't o( noti%e o(

    denial

    +enied0

    3! MOTION FOR RECON+IDERATION

    be(ore t"e DO; +ECRETARG wit"in 28days (rom re%ei't o( noti%e o( denial

    +enied0

    7 scenarios:

    +tate Prose%utor rendered De%ision on t"e

    Preliminary Investi&ation

    +enied0

    A''eal to DO; +e%retary

    .T"en (ollow 're%edin& remedies/

    Re&ional +tate Prose%utor rendered de%ision)

    +enied0

    A''eal to Provin%ial Prose%utor

    +enied0

    A''eal to DO; +e%retary

    .t"en (ollow 're%edin& remedies/

    NOTE Even i( 'endin& 'etition (or review be(ore

    t"e DO; +e%retary) t"e %riminal in(ormation %an

    still be (iled

    DO; Cir%ular 54) in relation to Rule 229 +e%tion

    6) t"e latter 'rovidin& t"at w"en a%%used 'leads

    &uilty to a non %a'ital eviden%e) t"e %ourt may

    re%eive eviden%e (rom t"e 'arties to determine

    t"e 'enalty to be im'osed) it 'rovides (or t"e

    remedy o(

    $ Filin& a motion to sus'end 'ro%eedin&s

    ?GB 1e%ause on%e t"e a%%used is arrai&ned)

    t"e %ourt a%urisdi%tion over t"e %ase) and

    all remedies would be%ome moot and a%ademi%

    .+O) wa& *a na 'a'aabot sa arrai&nment!!

    tira"in mo na a&ad *a"it may in(ormation na

    a&ad sayo) *esa umabot *a sa arrai&nment/

    23

    %'0 NON .A%/A./&

    O''&NS&

    Petition for review to Office

    of President IT?IN 28

    DAG+ (rom re%ei't o( denial

    .AM 8:/

    Denied)

    #otion for reconsideration

    be(ore t"e Office of the

    President wit"in 28 days

    (rom re%ei't o( t"e adverse

    de%ision

    Denied)

    Petition for review be(ore

    t"e CA wit"in 28 days (rom

    noti%e o( t"e >ud&ment .Rule

    63/

    Denied)

    #otion for reconsideration

    be(ore t"e CAwit"in 28 days

    .Rule 8-/

    Denied)

    Petition for review on

    certiorari be(ore t "e SC

    .Rule 68/

    %'0 .A%/A./& O''&NS&

    Certiorari be(ore CA wit"in

    94 days (rom re%ei't o( noti%e

    o( denial o( t"e motion (or

    re%onsideration .Rule 98/

    ?GB 1e%ause no a''eal

    nor 'lain) s'eedy) ade

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    14/67

    Remedial Law Review Notes under Atty Ferdinand TanCRIMINAL PROCEDURE

    Notes by Paul Lemuel E! C"ave#

    .1e%ause on%e t"e motion to sus'end is (iled)

    t"e matter is dis%retionary u'on t"e %ourt/

    %' the prosecutorudi%ial to t"e ri&"ts o( t"e

    a%%used

    -! "en t"ere is need (or 'rote%tin& t"e

    Constitutional ri&"ts o( t"e a%%used

    3! To Prevent t"e lon& arm o( t"e law (rom

    bein& vindi%tive

    6! "en 're>udi%ial

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    15/67

    Remedial Law Review Notes under Atty Ferdinand TanCRIMINAL PROCEDURE

    Notes by Paul Lemuel E! C"ave#

    8! In %ase o( %riminal 'rose%ution under an

    invalid law

    (hen person is deprived of his right to

    preliminary investigation0 what are his

    remedies

    12 4e can refuse to enter his plea upon

    arraignment0 or object to such further

    proceedings

    -! 4e can file a motion to conduct

    preliminary investigation .'reliminary

    investi&ation as a matter o( ri&"t) 'enalty

    is "i&"er t"an 6 y - mos 2 day/

    IF - DENIED) %ertiorari under Rule 98 is t"e

    'ro'er remedy) on t"e &round o( violation o(

    ri&"t to due 'ro%ess

    3! 'ro%eed wit" trial) and in %ase o(

    adverse de%ision) raise la%* o(

    'reliminary investi&ation as error on

    a''eal

    6! "e %an (ile (or 'ro"ibition under Rule 98

    NOTE T?AT de'rival o( t"e ri&"t to 'reliminary

    investi&ation is NOT A ,ROUND FOR MOTION

    TO @UA+?

    %%%2 +%!&C" '%/%N) O' "4&

    CO#P/A%N" O! %N'O!#A"%ON

    (%"4 "4& #"C

    $ "en t"e 'enalty is less t"an 6 years -

    mont"s and 2 day) not in Metro Manila

    or ot"er %"artered %ities .Rule 224 +2/

    Di((erentiate Com'laint (rom In(ormation

    CO#P/A%N" %N'O!#A"%ON

    +worn writtenstatement %"ar&in& a'erson wit" an o((ense

    A%%usation in writin&%"ar&in& a 'erson wit"an o((ense

    +ubs%ribed byo((ended 'arty) any'ea%e o((i%er) ot"er'ubli% o((i%er %"ar&ed

    wit" en(or%ement o(t"e law violated

    +ubs%ribed by'rose%utor

    Filed wit" t"e %ourt orwit" t"e 'rose%utorKso((i%e

    Filed wit" t"e %ourt

    must be made underoat"

    Need not be underoat"

    Usually re(ers to'rivate %rimes

    Usually re(erred to'ubli% %rimes

    Di((erentiate A((idavit o( Com'laint (rom

    Criminal Com'laint

    A''%+A,%" O'CO#P/A%N"

    C!%#%NA/CO#P/A%N"

    Filed by o((ended 'arty Filed by o((ended'arty) 'ea%e o((i%er) or'rose%utor

    Title Com'lainant vsRes'ondent

    Title Peo'le vsA%%used

    .!!Im not sure i( Criminal Com'laint and Criminal

    In(ormation are one and t"e same!!/

    .As to su%%ession o( t"e 'ro%edure under III) it

    will be dis%ussed later on a(ter QI and )

    Commen%ement o( Criminal a%tion/

    %,2 (A!!AN"/&SS A!!&S"

    Note Rule 223 +e%tion 8 in relation to RA 563:

    .ri&"t o( 'ersons arrested or detained/

    R223 +8

    A 'ea%e o((i%er or a 'rivate 'erson may) wit"out

    warrant) arrest a 'erson

    28

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    16/67

    Remedial Law Review Notes under Atty Ferdinand TanCRIMINAL PROCEDURE

    Notes by Paul Lemuel E! C"ave#

    $ "en in "is 'resen%e) t"e 'erson to be

    arrested "as %ommitted) is a%tually

    %ommittin&) or is attem'tin& to %ommit

    an o((ense

    $ "en an o((ense "as >ust been

    %ommitted and "e "as 'robable %ause

    to believe based on 'ersonal *nowled&e

    o( (a%ts or %ir%umstan%es t"at t"e

    'erson to be arrested "as %ommitted it

    $ "en t"e 'erson to be arrested is a

    'risoner w"o "as es%a'ed (rom a 'enal

    establis"ment or 'la%e w"ere "e is

    servin& (inal >ud&ment) or is tem'orarily%on(ined w"ile "is %ase is 'endin&) or

    "as es%a'ed w"ile bein& trans(erred

    (rom one %on(inement to anot"er

    In t"e (irst - %ases) t"e 'erson arrested wit"out

    a warrant s"all be (ort"wit" delivered to t"e

    nearest 'oli%e station or >ail and s"all be

    'ro%eeded a&ainst in a%%ordan%e wit" +5 o(

    Rule 22-

    Note (urt"er) t"e ri&"ts o( a 'erson arrested or

    detained .Miranda Ri&"ts/) A3 +2-) a''lies

    w"ile bein& arrested wit"out warrant

    Any 'erson under investi&ation (or %ommission

    o( an o((ense s"all "ave t"e ri&"t

    2! to be in(ormed o( t"e ri&"t to remain

    silent and

    -! "ave %om'etent and inde'endent%ounsel 're(erably o( "is own %"oi%e

    3! I( t"e 'erson %annot a((ord t"e servi%es

    o( %ounsel) "e must be 'rovided wit"

    one! T"ese ri&"ts %annot be waived

    wit"out writin& and wit"out 'resen%e o(

    %ounsel

    NOTE T"e 'ro%edures involved "ere may also

    a''ly to search incidental to a lawful arrest.R2-9 +23/) w"i%" is de(ined as (ollows

    $ A 'erson law(ully arrested may be

    sear%"ed (or dan&erous wea'ons or

    anyt"in& w"i%" may "ave been used or

    %onstitute 'roo( in t"e %ommission o( an

    o((ense wit"out a sear%" warrant

    Te%"ni%ally) warrantless arrest din an& involved)

    ?OEER) in (la&rante deli%to "inuli) e 'ano

    *un& may 'ana*sa* 'ala) tira"in an& arrestin&

    o((i%er ?en%e) >usti(ied!!

    ONCE ARRE+TED) +EARC?ED) AND

    INCRIMINATIN, EIDENCE A+ +EISED)

    T"e arti%le sei#ed would be %on(is%ated

    ?OEER)

    I( t"ere was no law(ul or valid arrest) it (ollows

    t"ere t"e in%idental sear%" was also invalid)

    "en%e) w"atever was sei#ed (rom t"e 'erson

    would be QFRUIT OF T?E POI+ONOU+ TREE)

    "en%e) inadmissible as eviden%eob>e%tionable

    as eviden%e) and e0%luded by Rules o( Court

    and t"e Constitution

    A(ter t"e warrantless arrest) t"e ne0t ste' is

    C*S"O+%A/ %N,&S"%)A"%ON !A=68>;

    $ It is an in

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    17/67

    Remedial Law Review Notes under Atty Ferdinand TanCRIMINAL PROCEDURE

    Notes by Paul Lemuel E! C"ave#

    w"et"er or not ano((ense is %ommittedand t"e 'ersonarrested "as%ommitted t"e saido((ense

    &round to en&ender awell (ounded belie( t"ata %rime "as been%ommitted) t"atres'ondent is 'robably&uilty t"ereo() and

    s"ould be "eld (or trialCondu%ted byarrestin& o((i%er

    Condu%ted byProse%utor Ombudsman as t"e%ase may be

    Determine w"et"er ornot t"ere is 'robable%ause t"at a %rime was%ommitted) and t"e'erson arrested%ommitted t"e o((ense

    Determine w"et"er ornot a %rime "as been%ommitted) res'ondentis 'robably &uiltyt"ereo() and s"ould be"eld (or trial

    Condu%ted in %ase o(warrantless arrestsunder +8 R223

    Condu%ted 'rior to(ilin& o( a %om'laint orin(ormation i( t"eo((ense is at least 6years) - mont"s) 2day) no warrantlessarrest

    Notes on Custodial Investi&ation

    $ +tarts w"en investi&ation is dire%ted to

    t"e 'erson arrested and %urrently bein&

    investi&ated

    $ Person arrested "as t"e ri&"t to be

    re'resented by %ounsel 're(erably at "is

    own %"oi%e

    o IF t"e ri&"ts are not observed)

    t"e 'ro%eedin&s %ould be

    nulli(ied) and t"e a%%used is to

    be a%

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    18/67

    Remedial Law Review Notes under Atty Ferdinand TanCRIMINAL PROCEDURE

    Notes by Paul Lemuel E! C"ave#

    3! I

    6! A

    1e(ore inudi%ial aut"orities .ille&al detention='ero

    arbitrary detention daw sabi ni boss!!! %&e!!!

    arbitrary) 'ara walan& talo talo/)

    2- "ours$ %rimes 'unis"able by li&"t 'enalties

    2: "ours$ %rimes 'unis"able by %orre%tional

    'enalties

    39 "ours$ %rimes 'unis"able by a((li%tive or

    %a'ital 'enalties

    EHCEPT i( in a remote 'la%e) "ard (or

    trans'ortation to t"e %ity'la#amuni%i'ality in

    order to %"ar&e t"e 'erson be(ore t"e %ourt

    Re

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    19/67

    Remedial Law Review Notes under Atty Ferdinand TanCRIMINAL PROCEDURE

    Notes by Paul Lemuel E! C"ave#

    In absen%e or unavailability o( in

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    20/67

    Remedial Law Review Notes under Atty Ferdinand TanCRIMINAL PROCEDURE

    Notes by Paul Lemuel E! C"ave#

    t"e o((i%ers)and %"ar&edin %ourt

    %rime was%ommitted)and t"e'ersonarrested%ommitted t"e

    o((ense

    res'ondent is'robably &uiltyt"ereo() ands"ould be"eld (or trial

    Condu%ted byin

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    21/67

    Remedial Law Review Notes under Atty Ferdinand TanCRIMINAL PROCEDURE

    Notes by Paul Lemuel E! C"ave#

    Issued by a J*+)&.note +ala#ar v A%"a%oso/

    $ not by De'artment +e%retary) not by

    Cler* o( Court

    72 After e3amination under oath or

    affirmation of the complainant and

    the witnesses he may produce

    Da'at totoo an& statements) or else) mala$liable

    (or 'er>ury

    $ Proven by

    o T+N .trans%ri't o( steno&ra'"i%

    notes/

    Not by mere @ and A

    82 Particularly describing the place to

    be searched and things to be sei9ed

    which is anywhere in the Philippines

    NOTE 'a& wala isan& ree%ts o( sear%" and sei#ure .2-9 +3/

    P&!SONA/ P!OP&!"5 .+i&e n&a) *aya mo

    bu"atin an& ba"ayB real 'ro'erty/ wit" t"e

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    22/67

    Remedial Law Review Notes under Atty Ferdinand TanCRIMINAL PROCEDURE

    Notes by Paul Lemuel E! C"ave#

    NOT/ sign *y #r issu *y S/ARCIN2

    OFFIC/R

    IF si&ned by o%%u'ant) and no %ounsel) t"en

    tantamount to EHTRA;UDICIAL CONFE++ION

    E((e%t

    $ Inadmissible as eviden%e an&

    PER+ONAL PROPERTIE+ +EISED

    durin& t"e sear%"

    "yB T"ere is no 'roo( by 'rose%ution t"at t"e

    arti%les were sei#ed (rom t"e owner) *asi walan&

    list o( inventory and walan& re%ei't in t"e (irst

    'la%e da"il n&a "indi sinunod an& re%ei't$

    si&ned$by$im'lementin& o((i%er$reud&e

    A violation o( t"is se%tion s"all %onstitute

    %ontem't o( %ourt!

    R2-9 +26$ Motion to

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    23/67

    Remedial Law Review Notes under Atty Ferdinand TanCRIMINAL PROCEDURE

    Notes by Paul Lemuel E! C"ave#

    would li*ewise be DENIED .Reason motion to

    su''ress eviden%e is de'endent u'on t"e

    motion to

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    24/67

    Remedial Law Review Notes under Atty Ferdinand TanCRIMINAL PROCEDURE

    Notes by Paul Lemuel E! C"ave#

    For t"e %ourt to

    'ronoun%e >ud&ment

    6! NAME OF T?E OFFENDED PARTG

    +2-

    $ +tate name and surname o( 'erson

    o a&ainst w"om or a&ainst w"ose

    'ro'erty t"e o((ense was

    %ommitted) or

    o any a''ellation or ni%*name by

    w"i%" su%" 'erson is or "as

    been *nown

    $ I( t"ere is no better way o( identi(yin&

    "im)

    o "e must be des%ribed under a

    (i%titious name

    $ In o((enses a&ainst 'ro'erty) i( name o(

    o((ended 'arty is un*nown)

    o t"e 'ro'erty must be des%ribed

    wit" su%" 'arti%ularity as to

    'ro'erly identi(y t"e o((ense

    %"ar&ed

    $ I( t"e true name o( t"e 'erson a&ainst

    w"om or a&ainst w"ose 'ro'erty t"e

    o((ense was %ommitted is t"erea(ter

    dis%losed or as%ertained)

    o t"e %ourt must %ause su%" true

    name to be inserted in t"e

    %om'laint or in(ormation and t"e

    re%ord

    $ i( t"e o((ended 'arty is a >uridi%al 'erson)it is su((i%ient to

    o state its name) or

    o any name or desi&nation by

    w"i%" it is *nown or by w"i%" it

    may be identi(ied)

    wit"out need o( averrin&

    it is a >uridi%al 'erson or

    t"at it is or&ani#ed in

    a%%ordan%e wit" law

    8! APPROHIMATE DATE o( %ommission o(

    t"e o((ense

    +22

    Not ne%essarily to state t"e 're%ise date t"e

    o((ense was %ommitted e0%e't w"en it is

    material in&redient o( t"e o((ense

    T"e o((ense may be alle&ed to "ave been

    %ommitted on a date as near as 'ossible to t"e

    a%tual date o( its %ommission

    EHCEPTION "en date %onstitutes essential

    element o( o((ense .in(anti%ide) abortion)

    bi&amy/

    9! PLACE w"ere o((ense was %ommitted

    +24

    +u((i%ient i( understood (rom its alle&ations t"att"e o((ense was %ommitted or some o( its

    essential elements too* 'la%e wit"in t"e

    >urisdi%tion o( t"e %ourt)

    UNLE++ t"e 'arti%ular 'la%e w"ere it was

    %ommitted %onstitutes an essential element o(

    t"e o((ense %"ar&ed or i( ne%essary (or its

    identi(i%ation

    .E0am'les violation o( domi%ile) tres'ass to

    dwellin&/

    Rule 222 .salient 'rovisions/

    Prose%ution o( Civil A%tion

    OCCUR+ AFTER T?E INFORMATION I+

    FILED IT? T?E COURT

    -6

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    25/67

    Remedial Law Review Notes under Atty Ferdinand TanCRIMINAL PROCEDURE

    Notes by Paul Lemuel E! C"ave#

    Note Arti%les -7) 34) 32) 3-) 33) 36) 38) 39)

    -259 o( NCC A244 o( RPC

    +2

    "en %riminal a%tion is instituted) %ivil a%tion (or

    t"e re%overy o( %ivil liability (or t"e o((ense%"ar&ed s"all be deemed instituted in t"e

    %riminal a%tion

    UNLE++

    2! O((ended 'arty waives t"e %ivil a%tion

    -! Reserves t"e ri&"t to institute it

    se'arately

    3! Institutes ri&"t to institute it se'arately

    3 s"all be made

    2! be(ore t"e 'rose%ution starts 'resentin&

    its eviden%e) and

    -! under %ir%umstan%es a((ordin& t"e

    o((ended 'arty a reasonable o''ortunity

    to ma*e su%" reservation

    "en o((ended 'arty see*s to en(or%e %ivil

    liability a&ainst t"e a%%used by way o( MNTE

    dama&es wit"out s'e%i(yin& amount t"ereo( in

    %om'laint or in(ormation)

    $ (ilin& (ees t"ere(or s"all %onstitute a (irst

    lien on t"e >ud&ment awardin& su%"

    dama&es

    "en amount o( dama&es ot"er t"an a%tual is

    s'e%i(ied in t"e %om'laint or in(ormation)

    $ %orres'ondin& (ilin& (ees s"all be 'aid

    by t"e o((ended 'arty u'on t"e (ilin&

    t"ereo( in %ourt

    E0%e't as ot"erwise 'rovided in t"ese Rules) no

    (ilin& (ees s"all be awarded (or a%tual dama&es

    No CC) CrC) 3PC may be (iled by a%%used in t"e

    %riminal %ase) but any %ause o( a%tion w"i%"

    %ould "ave been t"e sub>e%t t"ereo( may be

    liti&ated in a se'arate %ivil a%tion

    Deat" o( t"e a%%used .R222 +6/

    2! A(ter arrai&nment) durin& 'enden%y o(

    %riminal a%tion

    $ E0tin&uis" %ivil liability arisin& (rom

    a%tion

    $ 1UT) ICA under +3 or instituted to

    en(or%e liability arisin& (rom ot"er

    sour%es o( obli&ation may be %ontinued

    a&ainst estate or le&al re'resentatives

    o( a%%used)

    o A(ter 'ro'er substitution) or

    o A&ainst said estate) as t"e %ase

    may be

    ?eirs o( a%%used may be substituted (or

    de%eased wit"out reud&ment entered in (avour o( o((ended

    'arty s"all be en(or%ed in t"e manner es'e%ially

    'rovided (or in t"ese Rules (or 'rose%utin&

    %laims a&ainst estate o( de%eased .RELATE TO

    R:9 and :5/

    -! A%%used dies be(ore arrai&nment)

    $ Criminal %ase s"all be dismissed)

    $ it"out 're>udi%e to any %ivil a%tion

    o((ended 'arty may (ile a&ainst estate o(de%eased 'erson

    1P -- %ases .-*2 bar R222 +2b/

    -8

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    26/67

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    27/67

    Remedial Law Review Notes under Atty Ferdinand TanCRIMINAL PROCEDURE

    Notes by Paul Lemuel E! C"ave#

    I( %riminal a%tion is (iled a(ter said %ivil a%tion "as

    already been instituted) latter s"all be

    sus'ended in w"atever sta&e it may be (ound

    be(ore >ud&ment on t"e merits!

    +us'ension s"all last until (inal >ud&ment is

    entered in t"e %riminal a%tion! Nonet"eless)be(ore >ud&ment on t"e merits is rendered in t"e

    %ivil a%tion) t"e same may) u'on motion o(

    o((ended 'arty) be %onsolidated wit" t"e %riminal

    a%tion in t"e %ourt tryin& t"e %riminal a%tion!

    In %ase o( %onsolidation) eviden%e already

    addu%ed in t"e %ivil a%tion s"all be deemed

    automati%ally re'rodu%ed in t"e %riminal a%tion)

    wit"out 're>udi%e to t"e ri&"t o( t"e 'rose%ution

    to %ross e0amine t"e witnesses 'resented by

    t"e o((ended 'arty in t"e %riminal %ase and o(

    t"e 'arties to 'resent additional eviden%e! T"e

    %onsolidated %riminal and %ivil a%tions s"all be

    tried and de%ided >ointly!

    Durin& 'enden%y o( t"e %riminal a%tion) runnin&

    o( t"e 'eriod o( 'res%ri'tion o( t"e %ivil a%tion

    w"i%" %annot be instituted se'arately or w"ose

    'ro%eedin&s "as been sus'ended s"all be

    tolled!

    E0tin%tion o( t"e 'enal a%tion does not %arry wit"

    it t"e e0tin%tion o( t"e %ivil a%tion! ?owever) t"e

    %ivil a%tion based on deli%t may be deemed

    e0tin&uis"ed i( t"ere is a (indin& in a (inal

    >ud&ment in t"e %riminal a%tion t"at t"e a%t or

    omission (rom w"i%" t"e %ivil liability may arise

    did not e0ist!

    R222 +3$ ICA

    In %ases 'rovided (or in A3-) 33) 36) -259 o( t"e

    NCC) t"e ICA may be brou&"t by t"e o((ended

    'arty! It s"all 'ro%eed inde'endently o( t"e%riminal a%tion) and s"all reust %om'ensation w"en 'rivate

    'ro'erty is ta*en (or 'ubli% use:! T"e ri&"t to e

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    28/67

    Remedial Law Review Notes under Atty Ferdinand TanCRIMINAL PROCEDURE

    Notes by Paul Lemuel E! C"ave#

    Art! 33! In %ases o( de(amation) (raud) and '"ysi%alin>uries) a %ivil a%tion (or dama&es) entirely se'arateand distin%t (rom t"e %riminal a%tion) may be brou&"tby t"e in>ured 'arty! +u%" %ivil a%tion s"all 'ro%eedinde'endently o( t"e %riminal 'rose%ution) and s"allre

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    29/67

    Remedial Law Review Notes under Atty Ferdinand TanCRIMINAL PROCEDURE

    Notes by Paul Lemuel E! C"ave#

    o .RELATE to DO; Cir 54/

    IF not (iled t"is remedy) t"en PROCEED

    ACCORDIN,LG

    %%2 #O"%ON "O CON+*C"

    P!&/%#%NA!5 %N,&S"%)A"%ON

    .efore Arraignment;

    Rule 224 +2

    2! For o((enses w"ere PI is re

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    30/67

    Remedial Law Review Notes under Atty Ferdinand TanCRIMINAL PROCEDURE

    Notes by Paul Lemuel E! C"ave#

    T"e re&istry return %ard s"all be (iled

    immediately u'on its re%ei't by t"e sender) or in

    lieu t"ereo() t"e un%laimed letter to&et"er wit"

    t"e %erti(ied or sworn %o'y o( t"e noti%e &iven by

    t"e 'ostmaster to t"e addressee!

    :! I( t"e motion is not served to t"e ot"er'arty by 'ersonal servi%e) su%" mode

    resorted to must be a%%om'anied by a

    written e0'lanation w"y t"e servi%e or

    (ilin& was not done 'ersonally! A

    violation o( t"is Rule may be %ause to

    %onsider t"e 'a'er as not (iled .R23

    +22/

    &ffect of failure to comply with Sections0 60 0

    D of !ule 1

    2! t"e motion s"all be treated as a

    wort"less 'ie%e o( 'a'er w"i%" t"e %ler*

    o( %ourt "as no ri&"t to re%eive and t"e

    %ourt "as no aut"ority to a%t u'on .mere

    s%ra' o( 'a'er/

    -! It does not interru't t"e runnin& o( t"e

    'res%ri'tivere&lementary 'eriod (or t"e

    (ilin& o( t"e re

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    31/67

    Remedial Law Review Notes under Atty Ferdinand TanCRIMINAL PROCEDURE

    Notes by Paul Lemuel E! C"ave#

    A%%used may move to

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    32/67

    Remedial Law Review Notes under Atty Ferdinand TanCRIMINAL PROCEDURE

    Notes by Paul Lemuel E! C"ave#

    $ File amended in(ormation or %om'laint

    DENIED

    $ Pro%eed wit" arrai&nment and trial) and

    in %ase o( adverse de%ision) (ile an

    a''eal assi&nin& as error t"e denial o(t"e motion to e%t it be(ore trial) t"e %ourt s"all

    %onvi%t "im o( as many o((enses as are %"ar&edand 'roved) and im'ose on "im t"e 'enalty (or

    ea%" o((ense) settin& out se'arately t"e (indin&s

    o( (a%t and law in ea%" o((ense

    ,RANTED

    $ File amended %om'laint or in(ormation

    DENIED

    $ Pro%eed wit" arrai&nment and trial) andin %ase o( adverse de%ision) (ile an

    a''eal assi&nin& as error t"e denial o(

    t"e motion to

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    33/67

    Remedial Law Review Notes under Atty Ferdinand TanCRIMINAL PROCEDURE

    Notes by Paul Lemuel E! C"ave#

    %ertiorari wit" tem'orary restrainin&

    order .+2 R62 in relation to +6 R98/

    %2 "4A" "4& ACC*S&+ 4A+ .&&N

    P!&,%O*S/5 CON,%C"&+ O!AC?*%""&+ O' "4& O''&NS&

    C4A!)&+0 O! "4& CAS& A)A%NS"

    4%# (AS +%S#%SS&+ O!

    O"4&!(%S& "&!#%NA"&+ (%"4O*"

    4%S 'A*/"

    A*a DOU1LE ;EOPARDG

    Constitutional reurisdi%tion)

    o u'on a valid %om'laint or

    in(ormation or

    o ot"er (ormal %"ar&e su((i%ient in

    (orm and substan%e to sustain a

    %onvi%tion and

    o a(ter t"e a%%used "as 'leaded

    to t"e %"ar&e)

    t"e %onvi%tion or a%

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    34/67

    Remedial Law Review Notes under Atty Ferdinand TanCRIMINAL PROCEDURE

    Notes by Paul Lemuel E! C"ave#

    (ormer %om'laint or in(ormation under any o( t"e

    (( instan%es

    $ &raver o((ense develo'ed due to

    su'ervenin& (a%ts arisin& (rom same a%t

    or omission %onstitutin& t"e (ormer

    %"ar&e

    $ (a%ts %onstitutin& t"e &raver %"ar&e

    be%ame *nown or were dis%overed only

    a(ter a 'lea was entered in t"e (ormer

    %om'laint or in(ormation

    $ t"e 'lea o( &uilty to t"e lesser o((ense

    was made wit"out %onsent o( t"e'rose%utor and o( t"e o((ended 'arty)

    e0%e't as 'rovided in 2( o( Rule 229

    R229 2( .EHCEPTION/

    Private o((ended 'arty s"all be re

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    35/67

    Remedial Law Review Notes under Atty Ferdinand TanCRIMINAL PROCEDURE

    Notes by Paul Lemuel E! C"ave#

    EHCEPTION la%* o( >urisdi%tion over t"e

    o((ense %"ar&ed

    Motion to Quash Demurrer to evidence

    (Criminal Cases)Rule 117 Rule 119 S23

    Before arraignment After the prosecution

    rested its case

    9 grounds under S3 R117

    Not goes into merits of

    the case but anchored on

    matters not directly

    related to question of

    guilt or innocence of

    accused

    nsufficiency of

    e!idence"inadequacy ofe!idence adduced by

    prosecution in support of

    accusation

    Motion to Quash Motion to Dismiss

    Rule 117 Rule 1#

    $riminal %rocedure $i!il %rocedure

    Before arraignment &ithin the t ime for but

    before filing ans'er to

    the complaint or pleading

    asserting a claim

    1( grounds )R117 S3* 9 grounds )R1# S1*

    f denied+ proceed 'ith

    arraignment and trial+

    'hen decision is ad!erse+

    file an appeal assigning

    as error the denial of themotion to quash, f the

    denial is tainted 'ith

    -A."!iolati!e of due

    process+ $ertiorari under

    Rule #/ 0 R

    f denied+ file ans'er

    'ithin balance of the

    period 'hich shall not be

    less than / days in any

    e!ent+ counted fromnotice of denial+ proceed

    'ith trial+ and 'hen

    decision is ad!erse+ file

    an appeal assigning as

    error the denial of the

    motion to dismiss, f the

    denial is tainted 'ith

    -A.+ $ertiorari under

    Rule #/

    f granted+ on ground is

    etinguishment )3g* or.4 )3i*+ accused is

    acquitted

    f granted+ ground is .4+

    appeal may still be filed+

    but only 'ith respect to

    the ci!il aspect+ no

    longer the criminalaspect

    f on other grounds not

    f granted on ground of

    litis pendencia+ res5udicata+ paid 'ai!ed

    abandoned other'iseetinguished+ or

    prescription+ dismissal is

    'ith pre5udice+ hence+

    appeal is proper remedy

    f granted on othergrounds aside from

    abo!e stated+ re filing isthe proper remedy

    3g or 3i+ and granted+remedy is to file

    amended complaint or

    information+ because not

    a bar to another

    prosecution for the same

    offense

    )ecept in case of 'ilfuland deliberate forum

    shopping+ 'hich operates

    as dismissal 'ith

    pre5udice*

    %,2 #O"%ON 'O! A#&N+#&N" O'

    "4& %N'O!#A"%ON-C!%#%NA/

    CO#P/A%N" .efore Plea;

    R224 +26

    A %riminal %om'laint or in(ormation may be

    amended) in (orm or in substan%e)

    $ wit"out leave o( %ourt)

    o at any time be(ore a%%used

    enters "is 'lea

    A(ter t"e 'lea and durin& t"e trial) a (ormal

    amendment may only be made

    $ wit" leave o( %ourt

    $ and w"en it %an be done wit"out

    %ausin& 're>udi%e to t"e ri&"ts o( t"e

    a%%used

    ?owever) any amendment be(ore 'lea) w"i%"

    $ down&rades nature o( t"e o((ense

    %"ar&ed in or

    $ e0%ludes any a%%used (rom t"e

    %om'laint or in(ormation)

    o Can be done only u'on motion

    by 'rose%utor)

    o it" noti%e to o((ended 'arty)

    o it" leave o( %ourt

    T"e %ourt s"all state its reasons in resolvin& t"e

    motion and %o'ies o( its order s"all be (urnis"ed

    all 'arties) es'e%ially t"e o((ended 'arty!

    38

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    36/67

    Remedial Law Review Notes under Atty Ferdinand TanCRIMINAL PROCEDURE

    Notes by Paul Lemuel E! C"ave#

    I( it a''ears at any time be(ore >ud&ment t"at a

    mista*e "as been made in %"ar&in& t"e 'ro'er

    o((ense)

    $ T"e %ourt s"all dismiss t"e ori&inal

    %om'laint or in(ormation u'on (ilin& o( a

    new one %"ar&in& t"e 'ro'er o((ense ina%%ordan%e wit" R227 +2) 'rovided t"e

    a%%used would not be 'la%ed in double

    >eo'ardy

    T"e %ourt may re

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    37/67

    Remedial Law Review Notes under Atty Ferdinand TanCRIMINAL PROCEDURE

    Notes by Paul Lemuel E! C"ave#

    the original charge

    Accused could in!oe

    double 5eopardy

    Accused cannot claim

    double 5eopardy

    TE+T TO DETERMINE w"et"er Amendment or

    +ubstitution

    I( de(ense o( t"e a%%used would be rendered

    null) not serve its 'ur'ose)

    $ +U1+TITUTION

    I( not)

    $ AMENDMENT

    Can t"ere be amendment to %on(orm toeviden%e in %riminal 'ro%edureB

    GE+) w"en (a%ts 'roved are di((erent (rom t"e

    (a%ts %"ar&ed

    In %ase o( mista*e in %"ar&in& t"e 'ro'er

    o((ense)

    $ Amendment (ollows

    o T"e ori&inal %om'laint orin(ormation s"all be dismissed

    In %ase o( de(e%t in matters o( (orm or %leri%al

    errors)

    $ Amendment is allowed

    +ubstantial amendments) su%" as in motion to

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    38/67

    Remedial Law Review Notes under Atty Ferdinand TanCRIMINAL PROCEDURE

    Notes by Paul Lemuel E! C"ave#

    $ A((idavit o( t"e 'arty servin& %ontainin&

    a (ull statement o( t"e date) 'la%e) and

    manner o( servi%e

    I( by servi%e is by ordinary mail) 'roo( t"ereo(

    s"all %onsist o( an a((idavit o( t"e 'erson mailin&

    o( (a%ts s"owin& %om'lian%e wit" +5 o( t"isRule!

    I( servi%e is by re&istered mail) 'roo( s"all be

    made by su%" a((idavit and re&istry re%ei't

    issued by t"e mailin& o((i%e

    T"e re&istry return %ard s"all be (iled

    immediately u'on its re%ei't by t"e sender) or in

    lieu t"ereo() t"e un%laimed letter to&et"er wit"

    t"e %erti(ied or sworn %o'y o( t"e noti%e &iven by

    t"e 'ostmaster to t"e addressee!

    29! I( t"e motion is not served to t"e ot"er

    'arty by 'ersonal servi%e) su%" mode

    resorted to must be a%%om'anied by a

    written e0'lanation w"y t"e servi%e or

    (ilin& was not done 'ersonally! A

    violation o( t"is Rule may be %ause to

    %onsider t"e 'a'er as not (iled .R23

    +22/

    &ffect of failure to comply with Sections0 60 0D of !ule 1

    8! t"e motion s"all be treated as a

    wort"less 'ie%e o( 'a'er w"i%" t"e %ler*

    o( %ourt "as no ri&"t to re%eive and t"e

    %ourt "as no aut"ority to a%t u'on .mere

    s%ra' o( 'a'er/

    9! It does not interru't t"e runnin& o( t"e

    'res%ri'tivere&lementary 'eriod (or t"e

    (ilin& o( t"e re

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    39/67

    Remedial Law Review Notes under Atty Ferdinand TanCRIMINAL PROCEDURE

    Notes by Paul Lemuel E! C"ave#

    -! 'ro'erty bond)

    3! %as" de'osit) or

    6! re%o&ni#an%e

    Conditions (or bail .R226 +-/

    $ underta*in& s"all be e((e%tive u'on

    a''roval) and unless %an%elled) s"all

    remain in (or%e at all sta&es o( t"e %ase

    until 'romul&ation o( t"e >ud&ment o( t"e

    RTC) irres'e%tive o( w"et"er t"e %ase

    was ori&inally (iled in or a''ealed to it

    $ a%%used s"all a''ear be(ore t"e 'ro'er%ourt w"enever reusti(i%ation and de'ite due

    noti%e s"all be deemed a waiver o( "is

    ri&"t to be 'resent t"ereat! In su%"

    %ase) trial may 'ro%eed in absentia) and

    $ bondsman s"all surrender t"e a%%used

    to t"e %ourt (or e0e%ution o( t"e (inal

    >ud&ment

    T"e ori&inal 'a'ers s"all state

    2! (ull name and address o( a%%used)

    -! amount o( underta*in&

    3! %onditions re

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    40/67

    Remedial Law Review Notes under Atty Ferdinand TanCRIMINAL PROCEDURE

    Notes by Paul Lemuel E! C"ave#

    o u'on s"owin& by 'rose%ution)

    wit" noti%e to t"e a%%used) o(

    t"e (ollowin& or ot"er similar

    %ir%umstan%es

    a! t"at "e is a re%idivist)

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    41/67

    Remedial Law Review Notes under Atty Ferdinand TanCRIMINAL PROCEDURE

    Notes by Paul Lemuel E! C"ave#

    strong) re&ardless o( t"e sta&e o( t"e %riminal

    'rose%ution!

    Ma""r #$ is!r"i#n "# "rmin &%"%r

    +in! #$ guil" is s"r#ng, *!aus i$ n#", "%n*ail s%#ul * gran"

    +:$ 1urden o( 'roo( in a''li%ation (or bail

    At a "earin& o( an a''li%ation (or bail (iled by a

    'erson in %ustody (or %ommission o( o((ense

    'unis"able by deat") RP) LI)

    $ 'rose%ution "as t"e burden o( s"owin&

    t"at t"e eviden%e o( &uilt is stron&

    T"e eviden%e 'resented durin& t"e bail "earin&

    s"all be %onsidered automati%ally re'rodu%ed at

    t"e trial but) u'on motion o( eit"er 'arty) t"e

    %ourt may re%all any witness (or additional

    e0amination unless t"e latter is dead) outside

    t"e P"ils) or ot"erwise unable to testi(y

    +7$ Fa%ts to %onsider amount o( bail

    a! (inan%ial ability o( a%%used to&ive bail

    b! nature and %ir%umstan%es o( t"e

    o((ense

    %! 'enalty (or o((ense %"ar&ed

    d! %"ara%ter and re'utation o(

    a%%used

    e! a&e and "ealt" o( a%%used

    (! wei&"t o( eviden%e a&ainst

    a%%used

    &! 'robability o( a%%used a''earin&

    at trial

    "! (or(eiture o( ot"er bail

    i! (a%t t"at a%%used was (u&itive

    (rom >usti%e w"en arrested

    >! 'enden%y o( ot"er %ases w"ena%%used is on bail

    E0%essive bail s"all not be re

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    42/67

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    43/67

    Remedial Law Review Notes under Atty Ferdinand TanCRIMINAL PROCEDURE

    Notes by Paul Lemuel E! C"ave#

    +28$ Re%o&ni#an%e

    "enever allowed by law or t"ese Rules) t"e

    %ourt may release a 'erson in %ustody or "is

    own re%o&ni#an%e or t"at o( a res'onsible

    'erson!

    +-9$ 1ail not a bar to ob>e%tions on ille&al

    arrest) la%* o( or irre&ular 'reliminary

    investi&ation

    An a''li%ation (or or admission to bail s"all not

    bar t"e a%%used (rom %"allen&in& validity o( "is

    arrest or t"e le&ality o( t"e warrant issued

    t"ere(or) or (rom assailin& t"e re&ularity or

    usti%e) or %"ar&ed

    wit" '"ysi%al in>uries

    %! "en a%%used does not reside

    in t"e 'la%e w"ere t"e violation

    o( law or ordinan%e is %ommitted

    d! ?as no *nown residen%e

    9! "en a%%used started to serve "is

    senten%e

    "en bail is e0%essive) (ile a motion (or

    redu%tion o( bail .R226 +-4/

    ,%2 #O"%ON 'O! .%// O'

    PA!"%C*/A!S before

    arraignment;

    R229 +7

    Accusedmay) before arraignment) move (or a

    bill o( a 'arti%ulars to enable "im to 'ro'erly

    'lead and 're'are (or trial! T"e motion s"all

    s'e%i(y t"e alle&ed de(e%ts o( t"e %om'laint or

    in(ormation and t"e details desired!

    Pur'ose to %lari(y ambi&uities in t"e in(ormation

    Sa*i ni A""y Tan ia& ang a!!us, any #u*"

    !ra" *y pr#s!u"i#n sr+s in $a+#r #$

    a!!us, %n!, in !as #$ #u*", a!!us

    s%#ul * a!4ui""5 /NC/, M#"i#n $#r 6ill #$

    Par"i!ulars is n#" pra!"i!al $#r "% a!!us5

    6ai" m# lilina&in7 2A2O 8A 6A7 / i

    63

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    44/67

    Remedial Law Review Notes under Atty Ferdinand TanCRIMINAL PROCEDURE

    Notes by Paul Lemuel E! C"ave#

    pinayagan m# lang silang lina&in yung !%args

    say# a" sigurau%in pagaaul#ng m#555

    Motion for Bill of

    Particulars in Civ Pro

    Motion for Bill of

    Particulars in Crim ProRule 12 R11# S9

    8ay be filed before

    responding to a pleading

    8ay be filed before

    arraignment

    Address any matter in

    the pleading not a!erred'ith sufficient

    definiteness or

    particularity

    Address alleged defects

    in the criminal complaintor information

    %urpose is to prepare

    responsi!e pleading

    %urpose is to enable

    properly to plead and

    prepare for trial

    Are there #odes of +iscoveries in Criminal

    Procedure

    GE+) relate to R-3 and R-6 .instan%esmodes/

    $ Conditional e0amination o( a witness on

    t"e 'art o( a%%used) w"ere witness "as

    no intention o( returnin&

    $ "en witness is dead or i( not) is

    residin& more t"an 244*m (rom 'la%e o(

    trial or "earin&) or out o( P"ils) unless

    absen%e was 'ro%ured by 'arty o((erin&

    t"e de'osition

    $ itness is unable to attend or testi(y

    due to a&e) si%*ness) in(irmity)

    im'risonment

    $ Party o((erin& t"e de'osition "as been

    unable to 'ro%ure attendan%e o( witness

    by sub'oena

    $ E0%e'tional %ir%umstan%es in interest o(

    >usti%e

    $ In %ase o( 'rodu%tion or ins'e%tion o(

    do%uments

    $ Produ%tion or ins'e%tion o( material

    eviden%e in 'ossession o( 'rose%ution

    .R229 +24/

    NOTE 1y #O"%ON

    !e@uisites of a valid motion:

    25! In writin&) e0%e't t"ose made u'on in

    o'en %ourt or in t"e %ourse o( a "earin&

    or trial .R28 +-/

    2:! Must be veri(ied and a%%om'anied by an

    a((idavit o( merit i( t"e &round (or t"e

    motion is FAME

    27! +"all state t"e (ollowin& .R28 +3/

    a! Relie( sou&"t to be obtained

    b! ,rounds u'on w"i%" it is based

    and

    %! I( re

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    45/67

    Remedial Law Review Notes under Atty Ferdinand TanCRIMINAL PROCEDURE

    Notes by Paul Lemuel E! C"ave#

    R23 +23

    Proo( o( 'ersonal servi%e s"all %onsist o(

    $ ritten admission o( 'arty served or

    $ O((i%ial return o( t"e server or

    $ A((idavit o( t"e 'arty servin& %ontainin&

    a (ull statement o( t"e date) 'la%e) and

    manner o( servi%e

    I( by servi%e is by ordinary mail) 'roo( t"ereo(

    s"all %onsist o( an a((idavit o( t"e 'erson mailin&

    o( (a%ts s"owin& %om'lian%e wit" +5 o( t"is

    Rule!

    I( servi%e is by re&istered mail) 'roo( s"all be

    made by su%" a((idavit and re&istry re%ei't

    issued by t"e mailin& o((i%e

    T"e re&istry return %ard s"all be (iled

    immediately u'on its re%ei't by t"e sender) or in

    lieu t"ereo() t"e un%laimed letter to&et"er wit"

    t"e %erti(ied or sworn %o'y o( t"e noti%e &iven by

    t"e 'ostmaster to t"e addressee!

    -6! I( t"e motion is not served to t"e ot"er

    'arty by 'ersonal servi%e) su%" mode

    resorted to must be a%%om'anied by a

    written e0'lanation w"y t"e servi%e or

    (ilin& was not done 'ersonally! A

    violation o( t"is Rule may be %ause to

    %onsider t"e 'a'er as not (iled .R23

    +22/

    &ffect of failure to comply with Sections0 60 0

    D of !ule 1

    7! t"e motion s"all be treated as a

    wort"less 'ie%e o( 'a'er w"i%" t"e %ler*

    o( %ourt "as no ri&"t to re%eive and t"e%ourt "as no aut"ority to a%t u'on .mere

    s%ra' o( 'a'er/

    24! It does not interru't t"e runnin& o( t"e

    'res%ri'tivere&lementary 'eriod (or t"e

    (ilin& o( t"e re

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    46/67

    Remedial Law Review Notes under Atty Ferdinand TanCRIMINAL PROCEDURE

    Notes by Paul Lemuel E! C"ave#

    (arrant of arrest was issued:

    File motion to

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    47/67

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    48/67

    Remedial Law Review Notes under Atty Ferdinand TanCRIMINAL PROCEDURE

    Notes by Paul Lemuel E! C"ave#

    d! meet wit" witnesses (a%e to (a%e

    e! "ave %om'ulsory 'ro%ess tose%ure attendan%e o( witness

    and 'rodu%tion o( eviden%e in

    "is be"al(

    ?owever) a(ter arrai&nment) trial may 'ro%eed

    notwit"standin& t"e absen%e o( t"e a%%used)

    'rovided "e "as been duly noti(ied and "is

    (ailure to a''ear is un>usti(iable!

    Co'y o( t"e %riminal %om'laintin(ormation s"all

    be &iven to a%%used and %ounsel .(( AM -$2$2:$

    +C a*a ;uveniles in Con(li%t wit" t"e Law/

    "ere arrai&nment is made"ow madeB

    2! In o'en %ourt w"ere %om'laint or

    in(ormation "as been (iled or assi&ned

    (or trial

    -! 1y t"e >ud&e or %ler* o( %ourt

    3! 1y (urnis"in& a%%used wit" a %o'y o(

    %om'laint or in(ormation

    6! Readin& it in a lan&ua&e or diale%t

    *nown to a%%used

    8! As*in& a%%used w"et"er "e 'leads

    &uilty or not &uilty

    9! +"all be made o( re%ord) but (ailure to

    enter o( re%ord s"all not a((e%t validity o(

    'ro%eedin&s

    "en arrai&nment is "eld wit"in a s"orter

    'eriod

    2! "en a%%used is under 'reventive

    sus'ension) "is %ase s"ould be ra((led

    wit"in 3 days (rom (ilin& and a%%used

    s"all be arrai&ned wit"in 24 days (rom

    re%ei't by t"e >ud&e o( t"e re%ords o( t"e

    %ase .RA:673 a*a +'eedy Trial A%t/

    -! "ere %om'lainant is about to de'art(rom t"e P"ils wit" no de(inite date o(

    return) a%%used s"ould be arrai&ned

    wit"out delay .RA674:/

    3! Cases under RA5924 .C"ild Abuse A%t/)

    t"e trial s"all be %ommen%ed wit"in 3

    days (rom arrai&nment

    6! Cases under +C AO 246$79 ."einous

    %rimes) violations o( Intelle%tual Pro'erty

    Ri&"ts Law) t"ese %ases must be tried

    %ontinuously until terminated wit"in 94

    days (rom %ommen%ement o( t"e trial

    and to be de%ided wit"in 34 days (rom

    t"e submission o( t"e %ase

    Rules on arrai&nment

    2! Trial in absentia may be %ondu%ted onlya(ter valid arrai&nment

    -! A%%used must 'ersonally a''ear durin&

    arrai&nment and enter "is 'lea .%ounsel

    %annot enter 'lea (or a%%used/

    3! A%%used is 'resumed to "ave been

    validly arrai&ned in t"e absen%e o( 'roo(

    to t"e %ontrary

    6! ,enerally) >ud&ment is void i( a%%used

    "ad not validly arrai&ned

    6:

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    49/67

    Remedial Law Review Notes under Atty Ferdinand TanCRIMINAL PROCEDURE

    Notes by Paul Lemuel E! C"ave#

    8! I( a%%used went into trial wit"out bein&

    arrai&ned) subseusti(yin&

    sus'ension o( t"e arrai&nment)

    s"all be e0%luded in %om'utin&

    t"e 'eriod

    "en s"ould 'lea o( not &uilty be entered

    2! "en a%%used so 'leaded

    -! "en "e re(uses to 'lead

    3! "ere in admittin& t"e a%t %"ar&ed) "e

    sets u' matters o( de(ense or wit" law(ul

    >usti(i%ation

    6! "en "e enters a %onditional 'lea o(

    &uilty

    8! "ere) a(ter a 'lea o( &uilty) "e

    introdu%es eviden%e o( sel( de(ense or

    ot"er e0%ul'atory %ir%umstan%es

    9! "en t"e 'lea is inde(inite or

    ambi&uous

    A%%used to 'ersonally enter "is 'lea

    No 'lea$ not &uilty

    Conditional 'lea$ not &uilty

    E0%ul'atory$ not &uilty

    67

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    50/67

    Remedial Law Review Notes under Atty Ferdinand TanCRIMINAL PROCEDURE

    Notes by Paul Lemuel E! C"ave#

    Im'rovident 'lea later wit"drawn$ allowed) not

    admissible a&ainst admitter

    $ I( %a'ital o((ense at t"e time o( t"e

    a''li%ation (or bail) 'unis"able by RP)

    o ;ud&e may as* (or voluntarinesso( said 'lea

    Un%onditional 'lea o( &uilt admits o( t"e %rime

    and all t"e attendant %ir%umstan%es alle&ed in

    t"e in(ormation in%ludin& t"e alle&ations o(

    %ons'ira%y and warrants o( >ud&ment o(

    %onvi%tion wit"out need o( (urt"er eviden%e)

    EHCEPT

    2! "ere t"e 'lea o( &uilty was %om'elledby violen%e or intimidation

    -! "en a%%used did not (ully understand

    t"e meanin& and %onseurisdi%tion

    In %ase o( 'lea to lesser o((ense) t"e ;ud&e may

    allow t"e 'rose%ution to 'rovide eviden%e to

    determine t"e 'ro'er 'enalty!

    Rule 229 +2(

    T"e 'rivate o((ended 'arty s"all be re

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    51/67

    Remedial Law Review Notes under Atty Ferdinand TanCRIMINAL PROCEDURE

    Notes by Paul Lemuel E! C"ave#

    %om'laint or in(ormation is

    ne%essary

    $ I( a%%used entered 'lea to a lesser

    o((ense wit"out %onsent o( o((ended'arty and t"e 'rose%utor and t"e

    %onvi%ted)

    o ?is subseud&e between t"e 'arties and t"eir

    res'e%tive %ounsels

    Im'ortan%e o( Pre$Trial

    2! It %overs not only t"e 'eriod te%"ni%ally

    de(ined in Rule 22: but also t"at 'eriod

    (rom (ilin& o( t"e in(ormation u' to t"e

    a%tual %ondu%t o( trial

    -! En%om'asses many le&al remedies

    su%" as (ilin& o( motion to

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    52/67

    Remedial Law Review Notes under Atty Ferdinand TanCRIMINAL PROCEDURE

    Notes by Paul Lemuel E! C"ave#

    $ Mar*in& (or identi(i%ation o( eviden%e o(

    t"e 'arties

    $ aiver o( ob>e%tions to admissibility o(

    eviden%e

    $ Modi(i%ation o( t"e order o( trial i( t"e

    a%%used admits t"e %"ar&e but

    inter'oses a law(ul de(ense

    $ +u%" matters as will 'romote a (air and

    e0'editious trial o( t"e %ivil and %riminal

    as'e%ts o( t"e %ase

    +-$ Pre Trial a&reement

    All a&reements or admissions made or entered

    durin& t"e 're trial %on(eren%e s"all be redu%ed

    in writin& and si&ned by t"e a%%used and

    %ounsel) ot"erwise) t"ey %annot be used a&ainst

    t"e a%%used! T"e a&reements %overin& t"e

    matters re(erred to in +2 o( t"is Rule s"all bea''lied

    +3$ Non a''earan%e at t"e 're trial %on(eren%e

    I( %ounsel (or a%%used or 'rose%utor does not

    a''ear at t"e 're trial %on(eren%e and does not

    o((er an a%%e'table e0%use (or "is la%* o(

    %oo'eration) t"e %ourt may im'ose t"e 'ro'er

    san%tions and 'enalties

    +6$ Pre Trial Order

    A(ter t"e 're trial %on(eren%e) t"e %ourt s"all

    ma*e an order re%itin&

    2! A%tions ta*en

    -! Fa%ts sti'ulated

    3! Eviden%e mar*ed

    +u%" order s"all)

    2! 1ind t"e 'arties

    -! Limit t"e trial to matters not dis'osed o(

    3! Control %ourse o( a%tion durin& t"e trial

    a! Unless modi(ied by t"e %ourt to

    'revent mani(est >usti%e

    .as amended) -446/

    Pre rial in CriminalCases Pre rial in Civil Cases

    $ 8andatory requirement

    After arraignment+

    'ithin 3( days from the

    date the court acquires

    5urisdiction o!er the

    accused

    After the last pleading

    asserting a claim has been

    ser!ed and filed

    Rule 11: Rule 1:

    No pre trial brief %re trial brief is required

    to be filed and ser!ed

    $ounsel of accused and

    prosecutor are required

    to appear

    %arties and counsel are

    required to appear

    Non appearance may be

    ecused only if !alid

    cause is sho'n+ or

    representati!e shall

    appear in behalf duly

    authori;ed in 'riting toenter into amicable

    settlement+ submit to

    A.R+ enter into

    stipulations of facts and

    of document

    ailure of counsel of

    accused or prosecutor to

    appear+ and 'ithout

    acceptable ecuse for

    lac of cooperation+court may impose

    proper sanctions or

    penalties

    %resence of pri!ate

    offended party is not

    ailure of plaintiff to

    appear+ dismissal of the

    case 'ith pre5udice+

    unless other'ise ordered

    by the court

    ailure of defendant to

    appear+ plaintiff to

    present e!idence e parte

    8-

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    53/67

    Remedial Law Review Notes under Atty Ferdinand TanCRIMINAL PROCEDURE

    Notes by Paul Lemuel E! C"ave#

    required )as onlyrequired to appear at

    arraignment*

    %r< trial agreement is in

    'riting+ signed by

    accused and counsel+ orelse+ cannot be used

    against accused

    Signed by parties and

    counsel )=*

    $onsiderations in pre

    trial conference>

    $ %lea bargaining$ Stipulation of

    facts

    $ 8aring ofidentification of

    e!idence of the

    parties

    $ &ai!er ofob5ections to

    admissibility of

    e!idence

    $ 8odification oforder of trial if

    accused admits

    the charge but

    interposes a

    la'ful defense

    $ Such matters as'ill promote a

    fair and

    epeditious

    trial of the

    criminal andci!il aspects of

    the case

    $onsiderations in pre

    trial>

    $ %ossibility ofamicable

    settlement or

    submission to

    alternati!e

    modes of dispute

    resolution

    $ Simplification ofthe issues

    $ Necessity ordesirability of

    amendments to

    the pleadings

    $ %ossibility ofobtaining

    stipulations or

    admissions of

    facts and of

    documents toa!oid

    unnecessary

    proof

    $ ?imitation on thenumber of

    'itnesses

    $ Ad!isability ofpreliminary

    conference of

    issues to

    commissioner

    $ %ropriety ofrendering

    5udgment on the

    pleadings+summary

    5udgment+

    dismissing the

    action should a!alid ground

    therefor be found

    to eist

    $ Ad!isability or

    necessity ofsuspending the

    proceedings

    $ Such othermatters as may

    aid in the prompt

    disposition of the

    action

    Criminal Cases are not subject of amicable

    settlement-mediation0 &EC&P":

    2! 1P--

    -! Civil liability arisin& (rom %rime

    3! Esta(a

    6! T"e(t

    8! @uasi o((enses

    9! Mediatable o((enses

    Motion to amend 're trial order

    $ Allowed i( &ranted) 're trial may be

    modi(ied a%%ordin&ly

    A$"r Pr Trial,

    TRIAL

    83

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    54/67

    Remedial Law Review Notes under Atty Ferdinand TanCRIMINAL PROCEDURE

    Notes by Paul Lemuel E! C"ave#

    Rule 227 in relation to Rule 23-

    R227 +2

    A(ter 'lea o( not &uilty is entered) a%%used s"all

    "ave at least 28 days to 're'are (or trial! T"e

    trial s"all %ommen%e wit"in 34 days (rom re%ei'to( t"e 're trial order!

    +-

    Trial on%e %ommen%ed s"all %ontinue

    @ (rom day to day as (ar as 'ra%ti%ableuntil terminated

    o It may be 'ost'oned (or a

    reasonable 'eriod o( time

    (or &ood %ause

    T"e %ourt s"all) a(ter %onsultation wit" t"e

    'rose%utor and de(ense %ounsel)

    $ set t"e %ause (or %ontinuous trial on

    $ a wee*ly or

    $ ot"er s"ort term trial %alendar at t"e

    earliest 'ossible time

    so as to ensure s'eedy trial

    In no %ase s"all t"e entire trial 'eriod e0%eed2:4 days (rom t"e (irst day o( trial) e0%e't as

    ot"erwise aut"ori#ed by t"e +u'reme Court!

    T"e time limitations 'rovided under t"is +e%tion

    and t"e 're%edin& se%tion s"all not a''ly

    @ w"ere s'e%ial laws or %ir%ulars o( t"e+u'reme Court 'rovide (or a s"orter'eriod o( trial

    +22$ Order o( Trial

    T"e trial s"all 'ro%eed in t"e (ollowin& order

    a! T"e 'rose%ution s"all 'resent

    @ eviden%e to 'rove t"e %"ar&e) and)

    @ in t"e 'ro'er %ase) t"e %ivil liability

    b! T"e a%%used may 'resent

    eviden%e

    @ to 'rove "is de(ense and@ dama&es) i( any)

    o arisin& (rom t"e issuan%e o(

    a 'rovisional remedy in t"e%ase

    %! T"e 'rose%ution and t"ede(ense may) in t"at order)'resent

    @ rebuttal and@ sur$rebuttal eviden%e unless

    o t"e %ourt) in (urt"eran%e o(

    >usti%e) 'ermits t"em to'resent additional eviden%ebearin& u'on t"e main issue

    d! U'on admission o( t"e eviden%eo( t"e 'arties) t"e

    @ %ase s"all be deemed submitted (orde%ision

    o unless t"e %ourt dire%ts

    t"em to ar&ue orally or tosubmit written 'ro'a&anda

    e! "en t"e a%%used admits t"ea%t or omission %"ar&ed in t"e%om'laint or in(ormation butinter'oses a law(ul de(ense)

    @ t"e order o( trial may be modi(ied

    86

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    55/67

    Remedial Law Review Notes under Atty Ferdinand TanCRIMINAL PROCEDURE

    Notes by Paul Lemuel E! C"ave#

    RULE 222 +2 in Relation to RULE 23-$ ORDER

    OF TRIAL

    T"is order is to be (ollowed) e0%e't in %ase o(

    @ inverted or reverse trial) in %ase o(

    law(ul de(ense) w"ere a%%used'resents (irst

    @ %ourtKs own dis%retion

    12 Prosecutionud&ment on t"e basis o( eviden%e

    (or t"e 'rose%ution

    T"e motion (or leave o( %ourt to (ile demurrer to

    eviden%e s"all s'e%i(i%ally state its &rounds and

    s"all be (iled wit"in a non e0tendible 'eriod o( 8

    days a(ter t"e 'rose%ution rests its %ase! T"e

    'rose%ution may o''ose t"e motion wit"in a

    non$e0tendible 'eriod o( 8 days (rom its re%ei't!

    T"e order denyin& t"e motion (or leave o( %ourt

    to (ile demurrer to eviden%e or t"e demurrer

    itsel( s"all not be reviewable by a''eal or

    %ertiorari be(ore >ud&ment

    .emurrer to e!idence in

    $i!il %rocedure

    .emurrer to e!idence in

    $riminal %rocedure

    Rule 33 Rule 119 S23

    No lea!e of court

    required

    &ith or 'ithout lea!e of

    court

    f 'ith lea!e of court+

    accused could present

    e!idence if demurrer is

    denied

    f 'ithout lea!e of court+

    accused could not present

    e!idence if demurrer is

    denied

    f court finds that

    e!idence is insufficient

    )plaintiff has sho'n no

    right to relief*+ complaint

    f court finds that

    prosecutions e!idence is

    insufficient+ demurrer

    granted+ accused is

    88

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    56/67

    Remedial Law Review Notes under Atty Ferdinand TanCRIMINAL PROCEDURE

    Notes by Paul Lemuel E! C"ave#

    dismissed as demurrer isgranted

    acquitted

    4udgment of acquittal not

    appealable+ hence+ .4

    sets in

    4udgment of dismissal is

    appealable

    f demurrer is granted

    but on appeal+ order of

    dismissal is re!ersed+defendant is deemed to

    ha!e 'ai!ed the right to

    present e!idence

    )N res 5udicata in

    dismissal due to

    demurrer*

    4udgment of acquittal is

    not appealable .4 sets in

    %laintiff files motion to

    deny motion due to

    demurrer to e!idence

    $ourt may motu proprio

    deny motion

    f court denies demurrer+

    defendant 'ill present

    e!idence

    f court denies demurrer+

    &ith ?o$@ accused may

    present e!idence

    &" ?o$@ accused can

    no longer present

    e!idence and submits

    case for decision based

    on prosecutions

    e!idence

    In order to (ile demurrer to eviden%e) (ile motion

    (or leave o( %ourt to (ile demurrer to eviden%e)

    and atta%" t"e demurrer to eviden%e

    @ i( t"e demurrer to eviden%e is not

    atta%"ed) it would be %onsidered as

    demurrer wit"out leave o( %ourt)

    "en%e) waiver o( 'resentation o(

    eviden%e by a%%used i( demurrer is

    denied) and %ase submitted (or

    >ud&ment on basis o( eviden%e o(

    t"e 'rose%ution

    #otion for leave of court to file demurrer to

    evidence:

    @ to be (iled wit"in a NON

    EHTENDI1LE PERIOD o( +A5S

    a(ter t"e 'rose%ution rests its %ase

    o .Prose%ution may o''ose

    t"e motion wit"in a 'eriod o(

    8 DAG+ non e0tendible

    'eriod) (rom its re%ei't/

    +*!!&! "O &,%+&NC&:

    @ I( leave o( %ourt is &ranted) demurrer

    to be (iled wit"in a NON

    EHTENDI1LE PERIOD o( 1B +A5S

    (rom noti%e

    o

    .Prose%ution may o''osewit"in a similar 'eriod (rom

    re%ei't/

    "he order denying motion for leave of court

    to file demurrer to evidence or demurrer

    itself0

    @ +"all not be reviewable by a''eal or

    by %ertiorari be(ore >ud&ment

    4&NC&0 in such a case0 what will be your

    remedy

    @ Pro%eed wit" t"e trial) in %ase o(

    adverse de%ision) (ile an a''eal)

    assi&nin& as error t"e order denyin&

    t"e motion (or leave o( %ourt to (ile

    demurrer to eviden%e or t"e

    demurrer itsel(

    Can "here be demurrer to evidence insummary procedure

    GE+! It is not a 'ro"ibited 'leadin&

    I( demurrer is denied)

    A%%used must 'resent eviden%e in %"ie(

    89

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    57/67

    Remedial Law Review Notes under Atty Ferdinand TanCRIMINAL PROCEDURE

    Notes by Paul Lemuel E! C"ave#

    IF DEMURRER TO EIDENCE is IT? LEAE

    OF COURT)

    @ Case is already (or >ud&ment

    72 Accused2 J*+)#&N"

    %&DGMENT

    Rule 2-4

    Judgment

    R2-4 +2

    ;ud&ment is t"e Ad>udi%ation o( t"e %ourt t"at

    t"e a%%used is &uilty or not &uilty o( t"e o((ense

    %"ar&ed and t"e im'osition on "im o( t"e 'ro'er

    'enalty and %ivil liability i( any!

    It must be

    @ written in t"e o((i%ial lan&ua&e)

    @ 'ersonally and dire%tly 're'ared by

    t"e >ud&e and

    @ si&ned by "im

    @ s"all %ontain %learly and distin%tly a

    statement o( t"e (a%ts and t"e law

    u'on w"i%" it is based

    J*+)#&N" CAN &%"4&! .&:

    Conviction or [email protected] 2-4 +-$ %ontents

    o( >ud&ment/

    +TATE T?E FOLLOIN,

    For CONICTION .a%%used still "as remedies/

    @ le&al

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    58/67

    Remedial Law Review Notes under Atty Ferdinand TanCRIMINAL PROCEDURE

    Notes by Paul Lemuel E! C"ave#

    o UNLE++) t"e en(or%ement

    o( %ivil liability by a se'arate

    %ivil a%tion "as been

    reserved or waived

    For AC@UITTAL .no more remedy (or

    'rose%ution %ant a''eal t"e %riminal as'e%t

    anymore/

    @ "et"er t"e eviden%e o( t"e

    'rose%ution

    o Absolutely (ailed to 'rove

    &uilt o( t"e a%%used or

    o Merely (ailed to 'rove "is

    &uilt beyond reasonable

    doubt

    In eit"er %ase) >ud&ment s"all determine i( t"e

    a%t or omission (rom w"i%" t"e %ivil liability mi&"t

    arise did not e0ist!

    Promulgation of Judgment !17B SD;:

    IMPORTANT Par 2

    T"e >ud&ment is 'romul&ated by readin& it in t"e

    'resen%e o( t"e a%%used and any >ud&e o( t"e

    %ourt in w"i%" it was rendered!

    ?owever) i( t"e %onvi%tion is (or a li&"t o((ense)

    t"e >ud&ment may be 'ronoun%ed in t"e

    'resen%e o( "is %ounsel o( re'resentative!

    "en t"e >ud&e is absent or outside t"e

    'rovin%e or %ity) t"e >ud&ment may be

    'romul&ated by t"e %ler* o( %ourt!

    O"4&! PA!S:

    I( t"e a%%used is %on(ined or detained in anot"er

    'rovin%e or %ity) t"e >ud&ment may be

    'romul&ated

    @ by t"e e0e%utive >ud&e o( t"e Re&ional

    Trial Court "avin& >urisdi%tion over t"e

    'la%e o( %on(inement or detention

    o u'on t"e reud&ment

    T"e %ourt 'romul&atin& t"e >ud&ment s"all "ave

    aut"ority to

    @ a%%e't t"e noti%e o( a''eal and

    @ to a''rove t"e bail bond 'endin& a''eal

    Provided) t"at i( t"e de%ision o( t"e trial %ourt

    %onvi%tin& t"e a%%used

    @ %"an&ed t"e nature o( t"e o((ense (rom

    non$bailable to bailable)

    o t"e a''li%ation (or bail %an only

    be (iled and resolved by t"e

    a''ellate %ourt

    T"e 'ro'er %ler* o( %ourt s"all &ive noti%e to t"e

    a%%used

    @ 'ersonally or

    @ t"rou&" "is bondsman or

    @ warden and %ounsel)

    re

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    59/67

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    60/67

    Remedial Law Review Notes under Atty Ferdinand TanCRIMINAL PROCEDURE

    Notes by Paul Lemuel E! C"ave#

    Note t"e (ollowin& rules

    C?ILD ITNE++ EHAMINATION RULE

    @ Leadin& ud&ment be%omes (inal

    .%ounted (rom 'romul&ation B o( >ud&ment/

    NOTE (res" 'eriod rule a''lies in %ase o( M6R

    or MNT) %ounted (rom denial o( M6R or MNT

    +2$ at any time be(ore >ud&ment or %onvi%tion

    be%omes (inal) t"e %ourt may) on motion o(

    a%%used or at its own instan%e but wit" %onsent

    o( a%%used) &rant re%onsideration or new trial

    #otion for reconsideration !171;

    ,rounds .+3/

    @ Errors o( law OR

    @ Errors o( (a%t

    o In t"e >ud&ment

    re

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    61/67

    Remedial Law Review Notes under Atty Ferdinand TanCRIMINAL PROCEDURE

    Notes by Paul Lemuel E! C"ave#

    @ T"at new and material eviden%e "as

    been dis%overed w"i%" a%%used %ould

    not "ave wit" reasonable dili&en%e "ave

    dis%overed and 'rodu%ed at t"e trial and

    w"i%" i( introdu%ted and admitted would'robable %"an&e t"e result

    Motion for $e% rial

    in Criminal Cases

    Motion for $e% rial in

    Civil Cases

    Rule 121 Rule 37

    1/ days before 5udgment

    becomes final

    &ithin the period for

    taing an appeal )1/ or3( depending*

    -rounds>

    @ 6rrors of la' orirregularities

    pre5udicial to

    the substantial

    rights of the

    accused ha!e

    been con!icted

    during the trial

    @ hat ne' and

    material

    e!idence has

    been disco!ered

    'hich accusedcould not ha!e

    'ith reasonable

    diligence ha!edisco!ered and

    produced at the

    trial and 'hich

    if introducted

    and admitted

    'ould probable

    change the

    result

    -rounds>

    @ A86 'hichordinary

    prudence could

    not ha!e

    guarded against

    and by reason of

    'hich such

    aggrie!ed party

    has probablybeen impaired

    in his rights+ or

    @ Ne'ly

    disco!erede!idence+'hich

    he could not+

    'ith reasonablediligence+ ha!e

    disco!ered and

    produced at the

    trial+ and 'hich

    if presented

    'ould probably

    alter the result

    Ot"er 'rovisions

    +6$ Form o( motion and noti%e to t"e 'rose%utor

    T"e motion (or new trial or re%onsideration s"all

    be in writin& and s"all state t"e &rounds on

    w"i%" it is based! I( based on newly dis%overed

    eviden%e) t"e motions must be su''orted by

    a((idavits o( witnesses by w"om su%" eviden%e

    is e0'e%ted to be &iven or by duly aut"enti%ated

    %o'ies o( do%uments w"i%" are 'ro'osed to be

    introdu%ed in eviden%e! Noti%e o( t"e motion (or

    new trial or re%onsideration s"all be &iven to t"e

    'rose%utor

    +8$ ?earin& on motion

    "ere a motion (or new trial %alls (or resolution

    o( any

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    62/67

    Remedial Law Review Notes under Atty Ferdinand TanCRIMINAL PROCEDURE

    Notes by Paul Lemuel E! C"ave#

    and a new >ud&ment rendered

    a%%ordin&ly!

    !&OP&N%N) O' "!%A/ !ule 11G S76;

    R227 +-6

    At any time be(ore (inality o( t"e >ud&ment o(

    %onvi%tion) t"e >ud&e may) motu 'ro'rio or u'on

    motion) wit" "earin& in eit"er %ase) reo'en t"e

    'ro%eedin&s to avoid mis%arria&e o( >usti%e! T"e

    'ro%eedin&s s"all be terminated wit"in 34 days

    (rom t"e order &rantin& it!

    .T"e se%ond time t"is %on%e't is mentioned) is

    as a 'ro"ibited 'leadin& under t"e Rules on

    +ummary Pro%edure!/

    Com'are t"e (ollowin& remedies in %riminal

    %ases

    Motion for $e%

    rial

    Motion for

    "econsideration

    Motion for

    "eo&ening of

    rial

    -RCN.S>

    6rrors of la' or

    irregularitiespre5udicial to thesubstantial rightsof the accused

    ha!e beencon!icted duringthe trial

    hat ne' andmaterial e!idencehas beendisco!ered 'hich

    accused could notha!e 'ith

    reasonable

    diligence ha!edisco!ered and

    produced at the

    trial and 'hich ifintroducted andadmitted 'ould

    probable change

    the result

    6rrors of la' or

    facts in the5udgment

    Admission of

    additionale!idence

    8ade at any time before 5udgment of At any time

    con!iction becomes final before finality of

    5udgment ofcon!iction

    nly after eitheror both the partiesha!e formally

    offered andclosed theire!idence before

    5udgment

    Based on specific grounds $ontrolled by norules pro!ided

    for+ but byparamount

    interests of5ustice restingentirely of sounddiscretion of trial

    court+ theeercise of 'hichdiscretion 'ill

    not be re!ie'edon appealCN?6SS clearabuse thereof issho'n

    I( 'enalty is not 9 years) PRO1ATION LA

    APPLIE+ .+ee Criminal Law/

    Note t"at a(ter t"e (ilin& o( in(ormation u' to

    be(ore >ud&ment) PROI+IONAL REMEDIE+CAN 1E AAILED .Rule 2-5 in relation to Rules

    85$92/

    Rule 2-5

    +2$ Availability o( 'rovisional remedies

    T"e 'rovisional remedies in %ivil a%tions) inso(ar

    as t"ey are a''li%able) may be availed o( in

    %onne%tion wit" t"e %ivil a%tion deemed

    instituted wit" t"e %riminal a%tion!

    LIJE

    @ Preliminary atta%"ment

    @ Preliminary in>un%tion .and TRO/

    @ Re%eivers"i'

    @ Re'levin

    9-

  • 8/12/2019 Crim Pro Review

    63/67

    Remedial Law