Upload
cairo
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Butt.Fae. o6 Ag~e., Univ.o6 C~o, Vol . 43, No. 3(July 1992 ; 1055-1012.
MICROBIOLOGICAL INTERACTION IN DAMPING-OFF DISEASE OF CASUARINA
(received: 18.04.1992) By -
(1). • (1) M.S.M1khail ; K.K. Sabet
M.E. Abd El- Massih( 2 ) and Fatma M. Radwan( 2 )
1) Plant Pathologhy Dept., Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
2) Plant Pathology Institute, Agriculture Research Research Center, Giza, Egypt.
ABSTRACT
Fu-6a!vW.m OX!f6poltum and Rhi.zoc-tonia 60lani were found--- to. be the rrain caus~ of pre- and post-emergence darning-off of casuarina in four nursery locations. Inter-action between these two fungi increased the severity of the disease specially when R. 60lani was added to the soi 1 one week before SOl'ling. The presence of root-knot nematode increased the disease severity • R/S ratio in the case of the less susceptible causarina species was higher than that of the highly susceptible species.
INTRODUCTION
Casuarina species are known as the most extensively grown woody trees in Egypt. Their seedl ings are seriously affecteri by damping-off and root-rot caused by several fungi. The presenc e of root-knot nematode in combination with these fungi may cause greater decay and losses. In addition, infected seedlings could be an imRortant source of contamination when transplanted to the newly reclaimed lands (Farahat, 1976). The present investigation was carried out to study the causal agents of Casuarina damping-off and root-rot and the _interaction between the fungal pathogens . and root-knot nematode.
-1055--
-105 6-
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Diseased casuarina seedlings were collected from four nurseries, Bragil (Giza), Kom Oshim (Fayoum), Qanater (Qalubia) and Qorashia (Gharbia).
Infected roots were cut into small pieces, washed and surface sterilized with 4% Sodium hypochlorite solution for two minutes, rinsed in s teri 1 e water and plated on potato dextrose agar (PDA) . Pure cultures of isolated fungi were obtained by single spore or hyphal tip techniques.
Identification of the isolated fungi was made according to Barnett (1960) and Domsch et ~., (1980) .
Inoucla of fungi tested for pathogenicity were grown in sand-barley medium (1:3 w/w), in glass bottles ( 500 ml) and incubated at 28 °C for two weeks. Soil infestation was achieved by mixing the inoculum of each fungus with sterile soil at the rate of 5'/o (W/H). One week later, surface sterilized seeds of Ca6ua~na giauca were planted. Fu6aJUum oxy6poltum and RIUzoc.-ton..i .. a 6oian--i .. were selected for the other experiments by virtue of their wide spread and high virulence.
Susceptibility of C. giauca, C. cunninghamiana and the natural hybrid (c. giauce. c. cumunghamiana) as we 11 as some other woody trees s ho,.,n in Tab le (2,and 3) to the isolated pathogens was studied. All tree seedlings were ob La ined from Agriculture Research Center
Individual egg-masses of Meio~ogyne. ~ncognita isolated from infected casuarina roots by Radwan (1992) were used to i noculate " Pritchard" tomato seedlings previously planted in 15 cm pots filled with sterile sand Infected tomato roots were used as a source of inoculum .
-1057-
To study the interaction between nematode and the fungal pathogens, 20 casuarina seedlings were transplanted to soi 1. Nematode sus pens ion was added at of 6000 larvae/pot. After 60 days, preand emergence darning-off were determined
root-knot week-old infested the rate post-
Total microbial flora in the rhizosphere of C. giauca and the hybrid were determined in different nursery soils. Ninety days old seedlings were uprooted and one gram of rhizosphere (R) soil as well as non-rhizosphere soil (S) each was transferred to a flask with 99 ml steril water, Barakat et al-., (1986).
Dilution plate method was used to determi~g. (i) total bacterial count at the dilution of 10 on soil extract yeast agar medium (Skinner et ~· · . 1952); (ii) actinomycetes at the dilutionof 10-~ on Jensen 's agar medium ( Jens_~, 1930) and ( iii) fungi at the dilution of 10 on peptone dextrose agar medium (Martin, 1950). One ml of the above dilutions . was plated on each medium. All plates were incubated at 28°C • Total bacterial count was determined after 4 days, actinomycetes after 7 days and fungi after 5 days. Ratio of rhizosphere/soil counts (R/S) was also calculated for each group.
RESULTS
Fu6alt.ium ·axy6pcJJwm and RfUzoc.:torU.a 6oiarU. were the most frequently isolated fungi from diseased casuarina seedlings in the four nursery locations followed by F. mon)ti6okme, F. eq~~ and Phoma sp. ~~en these fungi were tested for their pathogenicity to ~C.giauca, they caused damping-off and decreased emergence in different degrees.F. oxy6pokun and R. 6oia~ caused the highest percentage of pre- and post-emergence darning-off (Table 1) and were considered the main cause of the disease. C. gtauc.a and C. cwtrU.nghamiana were more susceptible
-10
58
-
Tsb
l e ( 1
) :
Av
erage
perc
en
tat:e
of p
re-,
po
st-em
....... .:·~enee
dam
pin
g
oft an
d h
eal tt:y
surv
ival·· p
l8n
ta o
n C
esual·in
_!! e
leuc~
wi.t h
i so
l s t ed !u
ng
i •
?u
r.gi
% D
amp
ing-
off
Pre-
Po
et-ece.:-ge!lce
e::Ierger.ce
Fu
sarium
eg
uie
eti
J.4
51
.6
!• mo
nilifo
r:ne
6.9
4
4.8
P.
0X
Y9
C0
l"u::1
o.o
69
.0
Pb.oma
sp.
lJ .a
24
.1
Rh
! zo
cto
nia
so
lan
i J7
.9
24
.2
Co
ntro
l 0
.0
0.0.
~
Su
rviv
als
44
.8
4S
.3
31
.0
62
.l .
37
.9
10
0.0
----------~-~-------~------------------------------------------
L.S
.D.
at 5 ~
1
0.4
9
.8
15
.2
-1059-
than t he natural hybrid (Table 2 ) . Infection was man ifested as basal fjtell rot, and reduction of root system with dark brown lesions. Other tested tree species were infected with t he two pathogens. LPu~ae.na tcu~o~e.pha.ea gave the highest percentage of preand postemergencc damping-off , A~eia 6atigna showad res i r.tance to both. Other trees varied in their s usceptibility to both fungi (Table 3).
Combined inocula of the two pathogens increassed disease incider.ce and signHicantly decreased t he percentage of sur~i val plants than e:ither pathogen o l~ne. Pre-cmergence damping- off was very severe .in soil infested with F. oxy6po!Lwn plus R. -6o.f.ani nt inoculum ·levels 1. 75i'.: ·2.25%, respectively, and vice versa. Also, addition of R. 6otani to the soil, one week before sowing reduced plant s urvival significantly (Table 4).
Presence of M. ·..t.n~ognLta in combinction with e i t her F • (l>:y6pO!tu.m or R. 60tani has incre:e·scd the perccnt3~c of infected plants, when compared with the pethogen :;lone in the case of C. gta!..l.~a and C. c.untU.ngltan'..iana,~hile no significant diff<.>rencc was found in the case of _ the hybrid (Table 5 ) .
E&ch fungus c9mbined with t he nematode reduced plant height, more than each fungus alone. The ~ame trend was observed in shoot weight. All treatment including r oot knot nematode increased r oot weight of C. giau~a and C. cunnlnghamiana secdlingo (Table 6) .
R/S ratio in the case of the hybrid "less susceptible" was higher than thst of C. gtauc.a "highly susceptible" (Table 7) .
DISCUSSION
Isolation from diseased seed~ings and pa t hogenicity tests proved that Fuoaaltium oxy6poltum and
-1060-
·rable
(1.) Pcrcentae~ ot
p~e-
, poet-cmcrr.en~c dam
pins-ot! ond
o~1~ival
pla
nts of
three
casuar1
na
ape~ico
f~Own ir.
uo
il ln
feQtcd
with~~ oY
.yooorum
and Rh1~octonia aol~ni.
Sp
ed
eo
CaaugrinQ
~leucs
Sle
b e~.
Sp
ring
~u a
rt na c u nn1 n:3 h8:!1i ur.t\
!Hq
.
The hybrid (2_.
sla~e
l! 1 £·
cu
nn
it\.'lht.:h.n!>)
L.~.D.
ui
5 ~
t'or
:. Sp.s
.:1~~
¥u
r.;i S
ped
a11
x :!'u
t~i
:G inl~cti
on in
aoil 1.n!en
tcd w
1 th :
---------------------------------------------------------· !llB
t\1•:!.. 1101 ~Xy~ p
Ol"U
t'J R
hh:o
cton
ia
oo
lani -
r~.-o-
Poot-·
Su!'vivblo
?re
-?
-:at-
e~~rgcn:o cce~s~r.ec
c::tergenec:! e::.erp:en
ce
--------·--------------------------- -o.o
o.o
o.c
fi4.)
·lG .2
l7.G
~
S:.\r'ti V
flht
~4. 7
::o .. 2 )
5.0
J5. 7
28.6 28
.6
sJ.e )0.~
2).0
fl2.-l·
17
.6 1
0.')
Su
l·vl vales
4<.3
46.2
i'1.5
J.ll v
aluell 'A'uru
ca!c~l&ted
ao p
crcentu
ec o! ::cnni::!lt1
on ot th
o co
ntr
ol
t1·catmen
t a
lOO
-1061-
Table
(3} :.
Su
sceptib
ility o
t five tree seedlings to pathogenic fungi.
%in
fection
in so
il infested with
:
'l'ree epecie!e
Fusarium ox~s2orum
Rhi zoctonie eoleni
Pre-P
oet-S
urvival a Pre-
Poet-
Survivalo
emergence
emergence
eme~gence
emergence
Ace cl e ael1:,K!!,!! o.o
o.o 100.0
o.o o.o
100.0
Cuoreesue
~npervirena
s.J o.o
94.7 52.6
·0.0
47.4
Eucelyotu
·~ c
i triodora 10·. 7
)2. 7
57.1 28.6
21.4 50.0
Leucaena
~ueoeephele
44.4 22.)
JJ,J 90.6
0.0
9.4
Pi nu e pi nes1:!! o.o
0.0
100.0
42.9 22.8
34 .)
All values w
e.re calculated as percentage of germ
ination of the control treatment =
100.
-10
62
-
Teb
1e (~)
Ef'.f"e
et
o£
tb
e in
te1
·actio
n b
etw
een
th
e
pa
tho
gen
:ie
.f"un
ei
on
th
e
percen
tag
e o
r ceo
pin
g-o
f'f' o
f £
· eleu~e
eeec
l.in
ge.
Fu
ng
i %
In
ocu
l.uc
% D
am
pin
g-o
ff
l. ev
el.
("ti/'11
) P
re-
Po
et-
Su
rv
i vale
e~e~~ence e~er~~nce
Pu
eeriu
m
o:x
:t..soo
rum
5
22
.5
47
-5
30
.0
Rh
!. z.octo
n.i a
sol. a
ni
5 55
.0
7.5
3
7.5
~-
o:x
yso
or=
+
~-sol. a
ni
2. 5
0~
-2. 5
0
70
.0
1.2
.5
17
.5
~.o:xysoor~
+ ~.solar~
1..7
5+
3.2
5
95
.0
o.o
5
.0
~.o:x:t..eoo~~
+ ~-sol.en.i
3-2
5+
1..7
5
1.0
0.0
o
.o
0.0
~-o~veoor~
+ g~~~·
2.5
0+
2.5
0
52
-5
l. 5 .o
32
.5
~.o:xvsnorum
+ ~.eol.er~~
2.5
0+
2.5
0
92
-5
o.o
7
.5
No
n-in
feste
d
so:1
l. (co
ntr
ol.)
0
1.7
.5
o.o
7
2.5
L.S
.D.
et
5 %
fo
r
eu:x·v:i vale
1
7.6
~ In
ocu
l.uc o~ ~-
ox
yeo
oru
m wo~
ed
ded
to
~be ooi~
on
e
week
b
efo
re
so
win
g
an
d
ino
cu
lum
o
f' ~-
eo1ar~
was
ad
de
d et tb~ t~me
of'
so
win
g.
~ Inocul.~ of'~-
so
l.an
i w
as
ad
ded
to
tb
e so
il.
on
e w
eek
b
efo
re
so
win
g an
d.in
ocu
lum
of'~-
o:x:t..aoor~
wes acd
ed
at
tbe
time o
f
so
win
g.
-10
63
-
Tab
le ( 5
) :
Effe
ct
of M
eloid
og
yn
e _!.r:cop;ni ta,
Puaa::-lt!n
o:x:veoorum
end
Rh
i zo
eto
nie
eo
l an
i
sing
ly o
r·ln
eo
mb
lnetlo
ne o
n th
e
percen
taGe
of w
ilted
p
lan
ts o
n th
ree
eao
uerin
a sp
ecie
s.
Treatm
ent
Helo
ido
gy
ne in
co
gn
ite
Pu
serium
ox
veo
oru
m
Rh
izo
eto
nie
eo
len
i
H.
1n
co
gn
ita +
!• o:x:yeoorum
M.
inco
snite
+
R· so
len
i
Un
ino
eu
late
d
(co
ntro
l)
L.S
.D.
et 5 ~
fo
r :
Tre
atm
en
ts
Sp
ecie
s
Treatm
ent x
Sp
ecie
s
c. g
leu
ce
-o.o )).)
25
.)
91
.6
83
.3
o.o
17
.9
12
.7
Jl.O
Percen
taGe
of w
ilted
p
lan
ts
:
C. cunni~hruniene
The
hy
brid
0.0
0
.0
25
.0
16
.6
16
.6
8.)
83
.3
)).)
75
.0
25
.0
o.o 0
.0
-106~-
~~h
( ~ )
E.t!e
et Clr
!_e_!oi·dogovne l_nC'.-:w
!\1 ta,
.Fu.enriu.o
o~y
tlnO-:otl.t!l
e:ld Rhixoe~~ 3t:ll!.~
alr.g
l·y Q
T lll -c:.om
.Oinat.!ona
~
pl.u
tt 'lfeg
ets..t1 v
e g
rol'rtb
o
r· t·hre
e .ca3
Wlt·1
na
ap
.c!••·
-~eet~r.t
!lfelot~or;vne
incc.:rni ta
~1
1:21a .O
XJ!!O
Ol"U
a
Rb
! ::.oc't-ort! a ·a
ol9
n1
!·1nco~nl ta
+ !·~c--oram
~.1nco~~1ta +
R,a
ole
ni
Uninocu
late
d
(co
ntro
l)
L.S
.D,
at 5 ~
!o
r :
'1':-eat:~ent S
ped
c:a
'h
e:2
t.:1ent x S
pecie
s
Ple
nt
hei ~
!"'~t {=:!1
)
19
1
:?21
Z·40
'2CS
215
253
C.
1~!8UC~
R.::.ot
nt<-L::t.t
(=-.e)
-es 1 ·
~
~-
1!3
'lOB
279
147
~ i:o
ot
Wt•i. ~
~';':
(::t:)
::u 2
€-t.
.2el
~
205
27
)
Pla
nt h
eig
ht
17
.8
12
.6
)0.8
Caa~eT\na apec!e~
C.
l'll!'U'I1 m
r hcm1.oH
l!! '!h
e ~d
-rln
nt
Ro
ot
!;hoo
t P
l.ar.t k~c
-= :>
nm
rt he-!.~ht
w .. 1
.:ht
wei~=;ht he!.f :-::
.. ..,.: .-:-~ .,.,t': ;.:~t
(.:.:~) (:::,~,
(:::g") ( ::.
( ·~~
)
170
J.86
)0
1
?' ·•
~----·.:. ~"' ~
JCO
16
6
150 )5
6
219 ::! c;o
J?~
2CO
l4
j Joo
262 11:-7
2E2
1..91 .2
EO
)2
2
2)8
2
00
)2
4
17
) )0
0
)00
2
40 249
360
20
2
15
6
)61
269
lE9
)eo
Ro
ot
weie
ht
Sho
ot
weilh
t
12
.0
1).1
8
.5
9 . .) 2
0.8
2
2.7
Tab
le
("fJ
Sourc
e o
!
soil
!lrag
il (~.1 zo
) l<om
-Cehim
(P
ayoum)
Qan
ester (Q
alu
b1
a)
Qo
rauh
ie (G
harb
h)
-10
65
-
Miero
!lora o
! soil and
rhizo~phere o
! hi~hly sua~eptible ~pecies (£.
clAu~e)
end
leee eue~e~tib1e
(the h
yb
rid).
Count x
10
6/c
oo11
To
tal ~cteriel !lo
re
Ar.tinom
yceteo Punei
S~
R1E
K
R1 /S R2~
R2 /S
S
R1
R1/S
R
2 lt2
/S
S R
1 F.1/S
R2
P.2/S
JO.O
2JJ,J 737
254.6 8
.50
0
.61
2.4
2 ).9
6 J,J5
5
.5
0.01C 0
.02
0
2.0
0.0
JS ).~
2J.o
aa:s 3
.84
12
0.9
5
.25
0
.22
o.eo
J.6J 1
.62
7
.4
o.o
oJ o
.oJo
1c.0
o.o
24 e
.o
18
.J 24
J.s lJ.J
29
).2 1
6.2
0
0.4
2 2
.04
4.9
0 4
.85
11
.5
o.o
oe 0.~25
J,1 o
.o4o 5.0
77.7 13&.9 1
.7a 314.2
4.04 0.26 1
.12
4.30 1.26 4.8
0.015 o.c37 2
.5 o
.o2e 1.~
s S
: S
oil a
part
u R
1 :
Rh
izoep
here s
oil
o! £•
glau
ce
u~ R
2 :
Rh
izoep
here so
il o! th
e h
yb
rid (£.
Gleu
ce x £• cu
nn
ing
hem
ion
e)
-1066-
(a961). Similar results were reported Khan ( 1969 , a) and Sa bet and Khan Sabet ~ ~., (1966).
by Sabet and (1969,b) and
Radwan (1992) reported that Metoidogyn~ ~ncognita was the most common root-knot nemato de on collected samples on C. gtauea, C.eun~nghamiana and the hybrid, and that C. gtauea showed more root gal ling a nd egg-masses t han the others.
Interaction between M. ~neognlta and either F. oxy~pokum or R. ~ota~ increased fungal root infection more than each fungus alone, thus the· n ema tode predisposed causarina seedlings to be attacked by the tested fungi. Powe ll (1971) reporte d that root-kont infections induced morphologica l and physiol ogical changes which render the host more s usceptibl e to fungus invasion.
Plant hight as well as shoot weight were v ery much affected and r educe d, when the fu ngi were combined with nematode more than the fungi ~lone. These changes were also observed b~
. Pow.,ll (1963) and Ibrahim et al. , ( 1982). On the other hand' root weight was increased in combined trea tment . This cG uld be attributed to the presence of root galls.
The rh i zosphere of the hybrid (Less s u sceptibl e) gave higher densties of total bacteria and actinomyce fe s than tllat of C, gtcuca ( s usceptible ) when grown in the same soi 1 type. However, there was n o significant differen ce in the fungal density. This d i fference in rhizo ,.; pher e microflora is attributable to the dif ference in root exudates (Schro t h and lliidebrand 1964, Neal et al., (1973) were t h e first to sh0\-1 that the g;notype of t he host gov e rns the magni tude and composi tion of bac terial populations in the rhizosphere with high spec ificity. Benson and Baker (1970) advoca ted that specific nutrients in the rhizos phere become limiting to microbial growth and crucial for
-1067-
RfUzoc;torU.a &otarU. we:re tJU! .mo.st dominant and the main cause of casuarina damping-off in four nurseries. Rkizoc;torU.a &oiarU. only was previous ly isolated from casuarina roots in Egypt by Abdallah (1985) • The frequency of these fungi varied from nursery to another, evidently due to differences in environmental conditions .
It was found that C. gfruca was the rrost . susceptible followed by C. cunrU.nghamiana, while the hybrid was the least.
Other than casuarina, Leucaena teucocephatal!as the most -susceptible species. This result confirms the orndings of Hsieh (1982) and perez-Guerrero (1982) who reported that R. ~otarU. and F. oxy&pOII.um cause damping-off of L. ~ in Taiwan. Acac-ia 6aUgna was found to be resistant to the disease caused by the two fungi, but P~nu6 plna&teA~was res~stant to F. oxy6pO~only. Other reports indicated that both species \'lere susceptible to R. 6·otarU. (Darvas !! al., 1978 and Saxena and Saksena, 1981).
Mixing the two pathogens in equal amounts increased the percentage of pre-emcrgence dampingoff. This reveals a synergistic effect between the tested fl!ngi on disease severity. When they were added to the soil in unequal rates, the severity of the disease increased more than the previous case. This may be du~ to the combined effect of the predisposition brought about by the low rate pathogen and the hightened pathoginici ty due to the increased inoculum potential of the other.
The disease rate was higher when R. 60iarU. was added to the soil one week before sowing and F. oxy-6pOkum at the time of sowing than when the opposite was done. This may be due to the tendency of F.oxy6pokum to act £s an active saprophyte competing with other pathogens in the absence of a s uitable host, as mentioned by Garrett (1956) and wastie
-1068-
prepentration growth.
llir results may explain the relative resistance of the hybrid. Similar results were obtained by Barakat et al., (1986). and Saied (1986). - -
REFERENCES
Abdallah, M.A. (1985): The rhizosphere fungi of some Egyptian desert plants. Ph.D. Thesis, Fac. of Sci., Tanta Univ., 209 PP.
Barakat, F.M.: , ·sabet K.A. and Halib W.F. (1986): Varietal r~action of faba bean and lentil to specific strain of ru6a~m 60iani in relation to anatagonistic rhizosphere microflora. Agric. Res. Rev., 64; 245-256.
Barnett, H.L. (1960): Illustrated Genera of Imperfect Fungi Butgess publishing ComFany, 218 PP.
Benson, D.M., and Bakey R. (1970): Rhizosphere corr.p1tion in model soil systems. Phytopathology 60: 1058- 1061.
Darvas, J.M.; ~cott D.B. and Kotze J.M. ' ' (1978): Fungi associated with damping-off in coniferous seedlings in South African nurseries. S. Afr. Forestery J._, 104: 15-19. (C. F. For. Abs., 41: 1540, 1920)-. -
Domsch, K.H.; ·corns W.and . A nderson T. (1980): Compendium of Soil Fungi, Vol. 1 and 2. Academic Press, London, New York, Toronto, Sydney, and San Francisco, 859 and 405 PP.
Farahat, A.A. (1976): Source of nematode infestations in newly reclaimed irrigated lands. M.Sc. Thesis, Fac. of Agric., Cairo Univ., 67 PP.
-1069-
Garrett, S.D.(l956): Biology of Root-infecting Fungi. Camb. Univ. Press. London.
Hsieh, H.J. (1982): Disease of Leucaena in Taiwan. Leucaena Res. Reptr. 3: 58. (C.V. For. Abs., 47: 4791, 1986).
lbrahim. I.K.A.; Rezk, M.A. and Khalil H • . A~ (1982): Effects of Metoidogyne incognita and Fu6a~m oxy6po~um f,Va6in6ectum on plant growth and mineral content of cotton,G066ypium b~baden6e L. Nematologies, 28: 298-302.
Jensen, H.L. (1930) : Actinomycetes in Danish Soil. Soil Sci., 30: 59-77.
11artin, J.P. (1950): Use of acid, rose bengal and streptomycin in the plate method for estimating soil fungi. Soil Sci., 69: 215-233.
Neal, J.L., Larson, R.I.and Atkinson, I.G.(1973): Changes in rhizosphere populations of selected physiological groups of bacteria related to substitution of specific pairs of chromosomes in spring wheat. Plant Soil 39: 209-212.
Perez-Guerrero, A.J. (1982): Disease of Leucaena observed i n humid tropics of Costa Rica. Leucaena Res. Reptr. 3: 10 (C. F. For. Abs., 47: 4790, 1986).
Powell, N.T. (1963): The role of plant parasitic nematodes in fungus diseases. Phytopathology, 53: 28-35.
Powell, N.T. (1971): Interactions between nematodes and fungi in disease complex. Ann • Rev. Phytopathol., 9: 253-274.
-1070-
Radwan, Fatma, M. (1992): Studies on root diseases of woody tree seedlings in Egypt. Ph.D. Thesis, Fac. of Agric., Cairo Univ., 134. PP.
Sabet, K.A. and Khan, I.P. (1969,a): Competitives saprophytic ability and inoculum potential of cotton root-infecting fungi in five soil s. Cott. Gr. Rev., 46t: 119-133.
Sabet, K.A. and Khan. I.D.(l969,b): Interaction of cotton root-infecting fungi. Cott. Gr. Rev., 46: 210-222.
Sabet , K.A.; Sumra , A.S.and Mansour I. S. · (1966): Interaction betNeen Fu6a!Uum oxy6pOI!.Um f.Va6in6e.c.-tum and Ce.phato6poltium mayc:U.6 on cooton and maize. Ann. appl. Biol., 58: 93-101.
Saied, K. S. (1986): Studies on olive seed ling rot in the A.R.E. Ph.D. Thesis. Fac. of Agric., Zagazia Univ., 189 PP.
Saxena, A.K. and , Saksena , S.B.(1981): A new funga l disorder of Australian acacia Curr. Sci., 50 862. (C.F. Rev. P1, Path.,.§.!_: 2452, 1982).-
Schroth, M.N. and Hildbrand, D.C. (1964). Influence of plant exudates in root infecting fungi. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol., ~: 101-132.
Skinner , F.A.; Jones, D.G. and molisom J.E. (1952): A comparison of a direct and a plate counting technique for quantitative counts of soil microbial.,~: 261: 271.
Wast ie , R.L. (1961): Factors affecting competitive saprophytt~ colonization of the agar plate by various rootinfecting. Fungi. Trans. Brit. My col. Soc., 44, 146.
-1071-
~J~}JI .::.IJ,~ J ~.JI ..:.~KII .::.~lA:. .::.lJ,L:Jl .1~ ~Wl
l ~b Jt.S J.tS -\ ~~ tS,r.ro O""tH
T u l,.o; tS .1.r- 6&1li _ T ~ l ~ J;_,b.
' 0 1,1> :U.. ~ _ ~I;) I i::J5 .::. W I J> I_J41 ~ _ \
. ~I;) I ..::..~1 }.r _ .::.WI ~l.rl ..\~ -T
.l.u.ll ( o·) ~I_ i_rb\iJI u...4 _ ~1;)1 ~ ~I i¥1
• \ . y T - \ • o o : ( \ , , T ~~ ) ..::.J W I