71
feature driven development vS user centered design - The history of visma - How different is it? - How is UCD done? - What are the benefits? Fredrik Fernberg Corporate Design & HCI Manager, Visma M.Sc, Cogntive psychology twitter: @FredrikFernberg, [email protected] , blog.visma.com

Visma fernberg helsinki2012

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

How Visma works with UX and how we are working on going from feature driven to user centered design. Created in Keynot and exported to PPT - that's why there are weird typography.

Citation preview

Page 1: Visma fernberg helsinki2012

feature driven development vS user centered design

-The history of visma

- How different is it?

- How is UCD done?

- What are the benefits?

Fredrik Fernberg Corporate Design & HCI Manager, Visma

M.Sc, Cogntive psychology

twitter: @FredrikFernberg, [email protected], blog.visma.com

Page 2: Visma fernberg helsinki2012

Visma ASCorporate

Communication

7

Software

21

Retail

0

Services

0

Commerce

1

Consulting

21

5000 employees.

Very engineering centric.

Legacy accounting software.

In-house UX - 50 persons.

Page 3: Visma fernberg helsinki2012

Feature driven = sell more short term

Page 4: Visma fernberg helsinki2012

User centered = better UX

= long term sales & relations

Page 5: Visma fernberg helsinki2012

How different is it?

Page 6: Visma fernberg helsinki2012

It is very different...

1. UCD is not a feature on the list

2. UCD does not come a the end

3. UCD is nothing decided by top management but supported

4. UCD demands a definition, process and organization

5. UCD is neither waterfall nor agile

...

It is like night and day...which makes it challenging...

Page 7: Visma fernberg helsinki2012

Result from Feature driven

Page 8: Visma fernberg helsinki2012

Result from Feature driven

Page 9: Visma fernberg helsinki2012

Result from Feature driven

Page 10: Visma fernberg helsinki2012

Result from Feature driven

Page 11: Visma fernberg helsinki2012

Result from USER CENTERED DESIGN

Page 12: Visma fernberg helsinki2012

Result from USER CENTERED DESIGN

Page 13: Visma fernberg helsinki2012

Result from USER CENTERED DESIGN

“Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away”(Antoine de Saint

Exupery)

Page 14: Visma fernberg helsinki2012

Result from USER CENTERED DESIGN

1. Efficiency & effectiveness for customers

2. Happier and loyal customers

3. Prouder and loyal employees

4. Faster development and deployment

5. Less support and training

etc...

=

More revenue

Page 15: Visma fernberg helsinki2012

How IS it DOnE?

We need a definition of good UX

We need a process

We need people

Page 16: Visma fernberg helsinki2012

Vismas Definition oF good UX

Page 17: Visma fernberg helsinki2012

why standards?

Page 18: Visma fernberg helsinki2012

why standards?

Page 19: Visma fernberg helsinki2012

Interface standards

Lacks readability amongst many other things...

Page 20: Visma fernberg helsinki2012

Interface standards

Lacks alignment, padding, consistency etc

Page 21: Visma fernberg helsinki2012

Interface standards

Lacks affordance and predictability

Page 22: Visma fernberg helsinki2012

Interface standards

Page 23: Visma fernberg helsinki2012

user centered design process

Page 24: Visma fernberg helsinki2012

interface dynamics

Page 25: Visma fernberg helsinki2012

interface dynamics

Page 26: Visma fernberg helsinki2012

interface dynamics

Page 27: Visma fernberg helsinki2012

interface dynamics

1. It’s captivating.2. It empowers the user.

3. Adaptable to user needs.

4. Used the right way increase efficiency and assist the user understanding the interface better.

Page 28: Visma fernberg helsinki2012

Aesthetics

1. The important first impression

2. The Form should empower the Functionality

3. Design should intrigue and entice

4. Design should be felt not seen

Page 29: Visma fernberg helsinki2012

Aesthetics

Visma Opic login screen before:

Page 30: Visma fernberg helsinki2012

Aesthetics

Visma Opic login screen after:

Page 31: Visma fernberg helsinki2012

Aesthetics

Visma Accountview Go -

before & after...

Page 32: Visma fernberg helsinki2012

Aesthetics

Visma Opic before:

Page 33: Visma fernberg helsinki2012

Aesthetics

Visma Opic before:

Page 34: Visma fernberg helsinki2012

Aesthetics

Visma Mamut Service Suite -

before & after...

Page 35: Visma fernberg helsinki2012

Aesthetics

Visma Mamut Service Suite -

before & after...

Page 36: Visma fernberg helsinki2012
Page 37: Visma fernberg helsinki2012

Vismas Definition of good uX

Page 38: Visma fernberg helsinki2012

interface dynamics

A Visma application following the UX-pyramid

Page 39: Visma fernberg helsinki2012

How IS it DOnE?

The idea is never better

than how it is executed.

To execute

we need people.

Page 40: Visma fernberg helsinki2012

How IS it DOnE?

1. Recruit the right personnel

2. Establish ambassadors

3. Training, training and training

create knowledge & understanding - not information

4. Establish guidelines & standards

5. Success stories (show by example)

6. Perform Reviews

7. Promote performance

Page 41: Visma fernberg helsinki2012

How IS it DOnE?

I hear and I forget.

I see and I remember.

I do and I understand.

(Confucius)

Page 42: Visma fernberg helsinki2012
Page 43: Visma fernberg helsinki2012

what are the benefits?

Two examples:

Visma Avendo - accounting system

Visma Enterprise - accounting platform

Page 44: Visma fernberg helsinki2012

Visma avendo - accounting system

Page 45: Visma fernberg helsinki2012

Visma avendo - accounting system

How much will the product be improved with a new user interface and a new interaction method?Retrieve quantifiable goals for the HCI-work:• How much time will be saved?• How many mouse clicks will be saved?• How many keyboard strokes will be saved?• How much better will the user experience be? • How will the support be affected?

Page 46: Visma fernberg helsinki2012

Screenshots Avendo 4.2 - sales module

Major disadvantage:

6 different windows/lists to search for the information in

Page 47: Visma fernberg helsinki2012
Page 48: Visma fernberg helsinki2012
Page 49: Visma fernberg helsinki2012
Page 50: Visma fernberg helsinki2012
Page 51: Visma fernberg helsinki2012
Page 52: Visma fernberg helsinki2012
Page 53: Visma fernberg helsinki2012
Page 54: Visma fernberg helsinki2012

Screenshots Avendo 5.0 (PROTOTYPE)

Major change:

1 window to search for the information in

Page 55: Visma fernberg helsinki2012
Page 56: Visma fernberg helsinki2012
Page 57: Visma fernberg helsinki2012

Results

Mouse clicks: Users used only 58% mouse clicks with the prototype (5.0) compared to 4.2.

Keyboard strokes: Users used only 68% keyboard strokes with the prototype (5.0) compared to 4.2.

Page 58: Visma fernberg helsinki2012

Results

Time: Users used only 61% of the time with the prototype (5.0) compared to 4.2.

Staggering result: Novice users performed better with the prototype (5.0) than experienced users used with the old application!

Page 59: Visma fernberg helsinki2012

Results

UX: None of the users were negative against the prototype, all users meant it was an improvement. Even the one user who spent more time in 5.0 than in 4.2

Support: We had to help 7 of the 12 users in 4.2, since they got stuck and couldn’t proceed in the scenario. None of the users got stuck in 5.0 – all could complete the scenario without any help. - 4.2 = 7 support errands - 5.0 = 0 support errands

Page 60: Visma fernberg helsinki2012

Visma Unique - Enterprise platform

80%

20%

Page 61: Visma fernberg helsinki2012

Visma Enterprise - accounting platform

Page 62: Visma fernberg helsinki2012

Visma Enterprise - accounting platform

Page 63: Visma fernberg helsinki2012

Visma Enterprise - Re-brand platform

Page 64: Visma fernberg helsinki2012

Visma Enterprise - Re-brand platform

Page 65: Visma fernberg helsinki2012

Visma Enterprise - Re-brand platform

Page 66: Visma fernberg helsinki2012

Visma Enterprise - Re-brand platform

Page 67: Visma fernberg helsinki2012

Results

External effects: Customers saw the obvious improvements. But most importantly affected by the proud Visma personnel.

Internal effects: Personnel became very enthusiastic & expressed pride.

Bottom line: Budgeted sales went from 32 systems to 71 systems (after the change).

This unit has gone from 1 UX-person to 6 UX-persons in two years. Top management has understood that this is where the money is and invest most in this part of the development.

Page 68: Visma fernberg helsinki2012

Vismas Definition of good uX

Page 69: Visma fernberg helsinki2012

Device with low ux

Page 70: Visma fernberg helsinki2012

Engineering

UCD/Usability

Design

Device with high ux

Page 71: Visma fernberg helsinki2012

Kiitos!

Fredrik Fernberg Corporate Design & HCI Manager, Visma

M.Sc, Cogntive psychology

twitter: @FredrikFernberg, [email protected], blog.visma.com