Progress in Resource Mobilization and Creating an Enabling

Environment

Elizabeth LulePopulation and Reproductive Health

Advisor, The World Bank

The Changing Donor Environment

Donor fatigue for population assistance Economic recession Global conflict - Iraq Bilateral and multilateral donors changing

priorities Focus on communicable diseases (STI/HIV,TB &

Malaria) From ICPD to MDGs Shift from project to direct budgetary support,

PRSPs, SWAps, GFATM etc. Worsening political economy for RH

ODA Breakdown

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

70000

1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002

mil

lio

n U

SD

s

Bilateral grants Bilateral loans Contributions to multilateral institutions

Net ODA in 2003 as a Percentage of GNI

0.00%

0.10%

0.20%

0.30%

0.40%

0.50%

0.60%

0.70%

0.80%

0.90%

1.00%

Norway

Denm

ark

Nether

land

s

Luxe

mbo

urg

Sweden

UN Tar

get

Belgiu

m

Franc

e

Irelan

d

Switzer

land

Finlan

d

United

Kin

gdom

Ger

man

y

Canada

Austra

lia

Spain

New Z

ealand

Gre

ece

Portu

gal

Japa

n

Austri

aIta

ly

United

Sta

tes

Total D

AC

Post Monterrey Commitments….

EU members to reach 0.33% ODA/GNI by 2006

US to increase aid by 50% (US$5 billion) by 2006

Canada to increase ODA budget by 8% annually to double aid by 2010

Japan to reduce its ODA budget for fiscal consolidation 2002/3

Norway to increase aid to 1% of GNI by 2005

Switzerland to increase aid to 0.4% of GNI by 2010

Australia to increase its ODA by 3% in real terms in 2002/3

Of all the money developed countries give for ODA, what percentage goes towards population assistance?

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

70000

80000

1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

mill

ion

US

Ds

0.00%

0.50%

1.00%

1.50%

2.00%

2.50%

3.00%

3.50%

4.00%

% o

f d

evel

op

men

t as

sist

ance

fro

m d

evel

op

ed

cou

ntr

ies

that

go

es t

ow

ard

s p

op

ula

tio

n

Total ODA Population Assistance from Developed Countries as % of total ODA

What percentage of a countries ODA goes toward population assistance?

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002

Per

cen

t o

f O

DA

Germany France United Kingdom Denmark United States

Share of Official Development Assistance to Population Assistance, By Country, 2002

7.30%5.30%

5.10%4.90%

4.80%4.50%

4.50%4.10%

4.10%3.40%

3.10%

3.00%2.70%

2.20%2.00%

1.90%1.50%

1.00%0.30%

0.20%0.20%

0.02%

0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8%

United StatesFinland

LuxembourgNetherlands

Norway

DenmarkSwitzerland

CanadaBelgium

United KingdomSweden

IrelandNew Zealand

AustraliaGermany

Japan

France

Italy

AustriaSpain

PortugalGreece

Percent of ODA

Population Assistance Expenditures by Type of Activity, 1995-2002

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002

$US

Bill

ion

s

Basic Research, data and population and development policy analysisSexually transmitted diseases and HIV/AIDS activitiesBasic Reproductive Health servicesFamily Planning

Where is Total Population Assistance Coming From?

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002

mill

ion

s U

SD

s

World Bank IDA/IBRD loans United Nations SystemFoundations/NGOs Developed Countries

Allocation of Population Assistance Funds by Donor Country and Channel, 2002

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

AustraliaAustria

BelgiumCanada

DenmarkEuropean Union

FinlandFrance

GermanyGreeceIreland

ItalyJapan

LuxembourgNetherlands

New ZealandNorway

PortugalSpain

SwedenSwitzerland

United KingdomUnited States

Percent of total Population Assistance

Bilateral MultiBi Multilateral NGO

The Bottom Line

Net ODA declined from $59 billion in 1995 to $52 billion in 2001 and rose again in 2002 to $58 billion

ODA/GNI increased from 0.22 in 2001 to 0.25 in 2003

Total population assistance increased from nearly $2.5 billion in 2001 to $3.2 billion in 2002

Developed countries and Foundations contributions increased while funding from the UN and development banks declined

Funding for STI/HIV/AIDS increased from 9% in 1995 to 43% in 2002. FP declined from 55% to 23% in the same period.

Creating an Enabling Environment

Mutual accountability and Governance Political Commitment complemented by

adequate resources Strategies for attaining results Donor harmonization and coordination Public expenditure management?? Sound macroeconomic environments