Progress in Resource Mobilization and Creating an Enabling
Environment
Elizabeth LulePopulation and Reproductive Health
Advisor, The World Bank
The Changing Donor Environment
Donor fatigue for population assistance Economic recession Global conflict - Iraq Bilateral and multilateral donors changing
priorities Focus on communicable diseases (STI/HIV,TB &
Malaria) From ICPD to MDGs Shift from project to direct budgetary support,
PRSPs, SWAps, GFATM etc. Worsening political economy for RH
ODA Breakdown
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
mil
lio
n U
SD
s
Bilateral grants Bilateral loans Contributions to multilateral institutions
Net ODA in 2003 as a Percentage of GNI
0.00%
0.10%
0.20%
0.30%
0.40%
0.50%
0.60%
0.70%
0.80%
0.90%
1.00%
Norway
Denm
ark
Nether
land
s
Luxe
mbo
urg
Sweden
UN Tar
get
Belgiu
m
Franc
e
Irelan
d
Switzer
land
Finlan
d
United
Kin
gdom
Ger
man
y
Canada
Austra
lia
Spain
New Z
ealand
Gre
ece
Portu
gal
Japa
n
Austri
aIta
ly
United
Sta
tes
Total D
AC
Post Monterrey Commitments….
EU members to reach 0.33% ODA/GNI by 2006
US to increase aid by 50% (US$5 billion) by 2006
Canada to increase ODA budget by 8% annually to double aid by 2010
Japan to reduce its ODA budget for fiscal consolidation 2002/3
Norway to increase aid to 1% of GNI by 2005
Switzerland to increase aid to 0.4% of GNI by 2010
Australia to increase its ODA by 3% in real terms in 2002/3
Of all the money developed countries give for ODA, what percentage goes towards population assistance?
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
80000
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
mill
ion
US
Ds
0.00%
0.50%
1.00%
1.50%
2.00%
2.50%
3.00%
3.50%
4.00%
% o
f d
evel
op
men
t as
sist
ance
fro
m d
evel
op
ed
cou
ntr
ies
that
go
es t
ow
ard
s p
op
ula
tio
n
Total ODA Population Assistance from Developed Countries as % of total ODA
What percentage of a countries ODA goes toward population assistance?
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
Per
cen
t o
f O
DA
Germany France United Kingdom Denmark United States
Share of Official Development Assistance to Population Assistance, By Country, 2002
7.30%5.30%
5.10%4.90%
4.80%4.50%
4.50%4.10%
4.10%3.40%
3.10%
3.00%2.70%
2.20%2.00%
1.90%1.50%
1.00%0.30%
0.20%0.20%
0.02%
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8%
United StatesFinland
LuxembourgNetherlands
Norway
DenmarkSwitzerland
CanadaBelgium
United KingdomSweden
IrelandNew Zealand
AustraliaGermany
Japan
France
Italy
AustriaSpain
PortugalGreece
Percent of ODA
Population Assistance Expenditures by Type of Activity, 1995-2002
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
$US
Bill
ion
s
Basic Research, data and population and development policy analysisSexually transmitted diseases and HIV/AIDS activitiesBasic Reproductive Health servicesFamily Planning
Where is Total Population Assistance Coming From?
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
mill
ion
s U
SD
s
World Bank IDA/IBRD loans United Nations SystemFoundations/NGOs Developed Countries
Allocation of Population Assistance Funds by Donor Country and Channel, 2002
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
AustraliaAustria
BelgiumCanada
DenmarkEuropean Union
FinlandFrance
GermanyGreeceIreland
ItalyJapan
LuxembourgNetherlands
New ZealandNorway
PortugalSpain
SwedenSwitzerland
United KingdomUnited States
Percent of total Population Assistance
Bilateral MultiBi Multilateral NGO
The Bottom Line
Net ODA declined from $59 billion in 1995 to $52 billion in 2001 and rose again in 2002 to $58 billion
ODA/GNI increased from 0.22 in 2001 to 0.25 in 2003
Total population assistance increased from nearly $2.5 billion in 2001 to $3.2 billion in 2002
Developed countries and Foundations contributions increased while funding from the UN and development banks declined
Funding for STI/HIV/AIDS increased from 9% in 1995 to 43% in 2002. FP declined from 55% to 23% in the same period.
Creating an Enabling Environment
Mutual accountability and Governance Political Commitment complemented by
adequate resources Strategies for attaining results Donor harmonization and coordination Public expenditure management?? Sound macroeconomic environments