PM11 Moses

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/4/2019 PM11 Moses

    1/36

    Sustainability

    National Press Foundation

    February 16, 2011

    Marina Moses, DirectorScience and Technology for Sustainability Program

    Policy and Global Affairs DivisionThe National Academies

    [email protected] 202-334-2143

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 8/4/2019 PM11 Moses

    2/36

    Historical Perspective*

    Post WW II Development - US led an international system based oneconomic development, human rights, and peace and security

    Development intended to promote human opportunity, quality of lifeand freedom --- Progress

    Whats missing??

    * Dernbach, Editor Agenda for a Sustainable America

  • 8/4/2019 PM11 Moses

    3/36

    Historical Perspective, cont.*

    In the 70s and 80s

    Problems: Widespread poverty

    Growing environmental degradation

    Systematic causes:

    Increasing consumption

    of resources

    Population growth

  • 8/4/2019 PM11 Moses

    4/36

    4

    World Commission on Environment and

    Development (1987)

    Created by 1983 U.N. General Assembly resolution Definition of sustainable development: development

    that meets the needs of the present withoutcompromising the ability of future generations tomeet their own needs.

    Described a threatened future

    Called on U.N. General Assembly to

    transform this report into a global plan

    of action for sustainable

    development

  • 8/4/2019 PM11 Moses

    5/36

    5

    United Nations Conference on Environment andDevelopment--1992

    At Rio de Janeiro Earth Summit, nations of the world endorsedsustainable development

    Agenda 21comprehensive action plan

    Rio Declarationstatement of principles

    Forest Action Plan

    United States participated

    actively and agreed

  • 8/4/2019 PM11 Moses

    6/36

    Rio Declaration Principles

    27 principles for sustainable development, including:

    - Integrated decision-making

    - Precautionary approach

    - Intergenerational equity

    - Necessity of reducing and eliminating unsustainable patterns ofproduction and consumption and adopting appropriate demographicpolicies

  • 8/4/2019 PM11 Moses

    7/36

    Additional Principles

    - Public participation, public information, and access to justice

    - Internalization of environmental costs

    - Environmental issues best handled at the relevant level ofgovernment

    - Peace, development and environmental protection are

    interdependent and indivisible

  • 8/4/2019 PM11 Moses

    8/36

    Our Common Journey: A Transition towardSustainability(NRC, 1999) described the goals ofsustainability as:

    The primary goals of a transition to sustainability over

    the next two generations should be to meet the needs

    of a much larger but stabilizing human population, to

    sustain the life support systems of the planet, and to

    substantially reduce hunger and poverty.

  • 8/4/2019 PM11 Moses

    9/36

    Additional Milestones

    Millennium Declaration (U.N. General Assembly, 2000)

    Johannesburg Plan of Implementation (World Summit onSustainable Development, 2002)

    U.N. Conference on Sustainable Development, Rio deJaneiro, May 2012

  • 8/4/2019 PM11 Moses

    10/36

    Size: 738 593

    Type: 74KB PNG

    This image may be subject to copyright.

    Accessed fromGoogle Images

  • 8/4/2019 PM11 Moses

    11/36

    Accessed from

    Google Images

  • 8/4/2019 PM11 Moses

    12/36

    Sustainability

    A different way of thinking

    Paradigm shift

    Organizing Principle

    Unique characteristics: grass-roots, transdisciplinary

    How does it work?

  • 8/4/2019 PM11 Moses

    13/36

    Encourage the use of science and technology to achieve long-term

    sustainable development.

    Goal: to contribute to sustainable improvements in human well-beingby creating and strengthening the strategic connections betweenscientific research, technological development, and decision-making.

    The program concentrates on activities with the following attributes: Cross-cutting in nature, requiring expertise from multiple

    disciplines; Important both in the United States and internationally; Effectively addressed via cooperation among multiples sectors,

    including academia, government, industry, and NGOs.

    Science and Technology for Sustainability ProgramPolicy and Global Affairs Division

  • 8/4/2019 PM11 Moses

    14/36

    Roundtable on Science and Technology for Sustainability Network for Emerging Leaders in Sustainability

    Sustainability at the Academies Newsletter Sponsor-Requested Workshops and Studies

    Approach Applied Cases Framework Studies

    Science and Technology for Sustainability ProgramProgrammatic Elements

  • 8/4/2019 PM11 Moses

    15/36

    Examples of the Applied Cases

  • 8/4/2019 PM11 Moses

    16/36

    A Sustainability Challenge: Food Security for All

    Objectives Help establish the dimensions of the food security challenge Explore how to sustainably meet growing food demands during the

    coming decades

    Convene Two Public Workshops in 2011 Measuring Food Insecurity and Assessing the Sustainability of

    Global Food Systems (February 2011) Examine the empirical basis for past trends, the current situation and

    projections for the future. Exploring Sustainable Solutions for Increasing Global Food

    Supplies (May 2011) Examine a set of issues fundamental to assuring that food supplies

    can be increased to meet the needs of the worlds growing populationnow expected to grow to 9 billion by the year 2050.

  • 8/4/2019 PM11 Moses

    17/36

    Regional Approaches to Urban Sustainability

    Organize a series of workshops beginning in Fall 2010 to foster discussion ofregional approaches to making U.S. metropolitan areas more sustainable, withan emphasis on building the evidence base upon which policies and programsmight be developed.

    Three Major Themes Relevant to Metro Atlanta Transportation & land use Public health & the built environment Water resources conservation

    Objectives Discuss the ways that regional actors are approaching sustainability Examine the role that science, technology, and research can play in

    supporting efforts to make the region more sustainable Explore how federal agency efforts, particularly interagency partnerships,

    can complement/leverage the efforts of other key stakeholders

  • 8/4/2019 PM11 Moses

    18/36

    Linkage Example

    Water and Energy

    Thomas Graedel

  • 8/4/2019 PM11 Moses

    19/36

  • 8/4/2019 PM11 Moses

    20/36

  • 8/4/2019 PM11 Moses

    21/36

  • 8/4/2019 PM11 Moses

    22/36

    Large-scale Desalination

  • 8/4/2019 PM11 Moses

    23/36

    Large-scale Desalination

    Power Distribution Station

  • 8/4/2019 PM11 Moses

    24/36

  • 8/4/2019 PM11 Moses

    25/36

    The Issue:

    Do we anticipate having enough energy to acquire

    the water we need?

  • 8/4/2019 PM11 Moses

    26/36

    Rationale

    Understanding the linkages between domains (energy,water, land, non-renewable resources) is essential for thedevelopment of policies and programs supporting long termsustainability.

    These linkages are not always recognized or accounted forby federal policies and programs and, in fact, often trigger

    unintended consequences.

    Sustainability Linkages in the Federal Government

  • 8/4/2019 PM11 Moses

    27/36

    The Sustainability Silos of the U.S. Government

    Health (DHHS)

    Land (DoI)

    Environmentalquality (EPA)

    Minerals(USGS)

    Energy (DoE)

    Water(NOAA)

    Food (DoA)

  • 8/4/2019 PM11 Moses

    28/36

    The Sustainability Silos of the Experts

    Health(medicalresearchers)

    Land use(geographers)

    Environmentalquality(ecologists)

    Minerals(geologists)

    Energy (powerengrs., matl. sci.)

    Water(hydrolo-gists)

    Food (cropresearchers)

  • 8/4/2019 PM11 Moses

    29/36

    Objectives

    To identify and describe the most critical linkages betweendomains, with potential sustainability impacts highlightingtemporal, geographic, and spatial differences.

    To develop a decision framework which could be used toanalyze or assess consequences, tradeoffs, and synergiesof policy choices among linked domains.

    Sustainability Linkages in the Federal Government

  • 8/4/2019 PM11 Moses

    30/36

    LANDSCAPES

    Urban

    Mineral Rich

    Coastal

    Agriculture/Forest

    Coastal

  • 8/4/2019 PM11 Moses

    31/36

    After a series of briefings, information-gathering meetings,field visits, and a literature review, the committee will be

    able to:o Describe the major linkages inherent in each case study within thedefined landscape

    o Determine the government policies and programs influencing themanagement and use of critical resources within each landscape

    o Identify sustainability consequences (positive and negative)resulting from existing stove piped policies and programs

    o With input from local and federal stakeholders, the committee willexplore options for assuring that key linkages identified in casestudies are recognized and addressed as part of future policydecisions

    Sustainability Linkages in the Federal Government

  • 8/4/2019 PM11 Moses

    32/36

    Incorporating Sustainability in

    the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

    A committee under the STS Program will conduct a

    study at the request of the U.S. Environmental ProtectionAgency (EPA)s Office of Research and Development tohelp define efforts to incorporate sustainability conceptsinto Agency programs.

    This study will build on existing sustainability efforts inEPA by strengthening the analytic and scientific basis forsustainability as it applies to human health andenvironmental protection within the Agency's decision-making process.

  • 8/4/2019 PM11 Moses

    33/36

    Incorporating Sustainability inthe U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

    The consensus report will answer the following questions:

    What should be the operational framework for sustainability for EPA?

    How can the EPA decision making process rooted in the riskassessment/risk management (RA/RM) paradigm be integrated into this

    new sustainability framework?

    What scientific and analytical tools are needed to support theframework?

    What expertise is needed to support the framework?

  • 8/4/2019 PM11 Moses

    34/36

    Science and Technology for Sustainability ProgramSpecial Event

    Celebrate EPA at 40 and Help Address Environmental Issues for the Future

    Launch of a National Research Council StudyIncorporating Sustainability in the U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyTuesday, November 30, 2010

    4:005:00 pm

    Marian Koshland Science Museum

    Corner of 6th and E Street NW Washington DC

    Metro: Judiciary Square (Red Line) or Gallery Place (Yellow/Green Line)

    A committee under the Science and Technology for Sustainability Program (STS) will conduct a study at the request of the U.S.

    Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)s Office of Research and Development to help define their efforts to incorporate

    sustainability concepts into agency programs.

    This study will build on existing sustainability efforts in EPA by strengthening the analytic and scientific basis for sustainability as it

    applies to human health and environmental protection within the Agency's decision-making process.

    Program

    Remarks:

    Ralph J. Cicerone, President, National Academy of Sciences

    Lisa P. Jackson, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyBernard D. Goldstein, University of Pittsburgh, Chair, Ad hoc Committee, Incorporating Sustainability in

    the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

    Question and Answer Session and Reception to follow.

    If you plan to attend this event, please register by Monday, November 29th at 5:00 pm at http://www8.nationalacademies.org/isc-

    registration/public/default.asp?event=A0ABFE48or call 202-334-2047. Please note space is limited and registration will be closed

    once capacity has been met.

    For more information on the STS Program, please visit our website at: www.nas.edu/sustainability.

    http://www8.nationalacademies.org/isc-registration/public/default.asp?event=A0ABFE48http://www8.nationalacademies.org/isc-registration/public/default.asp?event=A0ABFE48http://www.nas.edu/sustainabilityhttp://www.nas.edu/sustainabilityhttp://www8.nationalacademies.org/isc-registration/public/default.asp?event=A0ABFE48http://www8.nationalacademies.org/isc-registration/public/default.asp?event=A0ABFE48http://www8.nationalacademies.org/isc-registration/public/default.asp?event=A0ABFE48
  • 8/4/2019 PM11 Moses

    35/36

    Moving forward..

    Account for tradeoffs/synergies in the decisions we make

    Factor the future into current decisions Be transparent in the decision process

    Frame questions differently ask about social, economicand environmental impacts

    Think systematically

  • 8/4/2019 PM11 Moses

    36/36

    Additional Information

    Websitewww.nas.edu/sustainability

    Monthly newsletter

    To subscribe, send email to: [email protected]

    http://www.nas.edu/sustainabilitymailto:[email protected]:[email protected]://www.nas.edu/sustainability