Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
'.
II
FINITE ELEMENT APPROXIMATIONS IN NONLINEAR TH ERMOVISCOELASTICITY
J. T. Oden
1
FINITE ELEMENT APPROXIMATIONS IN NONLINEAR THERMOVlSCOELASTICITY
J. T. Oden*
Summary. It is the purpose of this lecture to describe the importantfeatures of general theories of thermomechanical behavior of materials, todemonstrate the construction of general finite-element models of thesetheories, to investigate special forms of these models which are appr~priate for the numerical analysis of nonlinear problems in thermovisco-elasticity, thermoelasticity, and heat conduction in solids, and to citenumerical results obtained by applying the finite element equations torepresentative nonlinear problems. The bulk of this lecture deals withso-called simple materials, particularly thermoviscoelastic materials,with consideration of thermomechanical dissipation, heat conduction, andcertain wave phenomena.
1. INTRODUCTION
It is a common subject of elementary physics that various types 9f
energy can be converted from one form to another. Every child is aware of
the fact that if two objects are rubbed together fast enough and long
enough, they get hotter, indicating a conversion of purely mechanical
energy into thermal energy or heat. Sometimes such conversions of energy
are manifested internally in materials; that is, the physical character of
the material is such that a great deal of heat can be generated by mechani-
cal working. Likewise, we may produce changes in mechanical energy (work)
by heating bodies; but if the same amount of heat generated in working a
body is applied to the body, it may not produce the same amount of mechad-
cal work. Then the process is an irreversible one, and energy is dissi-
pated in the system.
In the physical world, all of these phenomena take place over a finite
period of time. The "instant" recovery of an elastic body upon unloading
is a mathematical abstraction; the response of different materials to the
*Professor and Chairman, Department of Engineering Mechanics, The Universityof Alabama in Huntsville
2
same conditions generally takes place over different periods of time. The
physical properties of many materials are time-dependent, as is illustrated
by the continuing deformation of, say, concrete, certain plastics, metals,
and biological tissues under constant load. Moreover, the rate at which
such materials respond to given loads may be very sensitive to changes in
temperature.
While such thermomechanical phenomena are experienced frequently in
everyday life, their complete mathematical description has elluded scien-
tists for centuries. Only in recent times have rather general continuum
theories of thermoviscoelasticity emerged, and, in order to achieve suffi-
, cient generality to account for most of the phenomena mentioned above, these
theories are necessarily nonlinear and highly complicated. While general
theories are valuable in their own right for providing general and quali-
tative information on the character of certain classes of materials, they
are of little use in controlling, predicting, or studying specific thermo-
mechanical phenomena or in the design of specific machines and structures if
quantitative information cannot be extracted from them. It is toward this
goal, that is, the quantitative description of the nonlinear thermomechani-
cal behavior of materials, that the powerful concept of finite elements and
modern high-speed computers may find their most interesting and useful appli-
cations.
It is the purpose of this lecture to describe the important features of
general theories of thermomechanical behavior of materials, to demonstrate
the construction of general finite-element models of these theories, to in-
vestigate special forms of these models which are appropriate for the numeri-
cal analysis of nonlinear problems in thermoviscoelasticity, thermoelast~ty,
and heat conduction in solids, and to cite numerical results obtained by
,.3
applying the finite element equations to representative nonlinear problems.
Portions of this lecture are based on earlier articles and papers; the dis-
cussion of simple materials and the corresponding finite element models
follows closely that in Finite Elements of Nonlinear Continua [1], and some
of the numerical results presented are taken from pertinent papers [2,3].
The bulk of this lecture deals with so-called simple materials, particularly
thermoviscoelastic materials, with ample consideration of thermomechanical
dissipation, heat conduction, and certain wave phenomena.
2. THERMOMECHANICAL PRELIMINARIES
Kinematics. Consider a body B, the elements of which are material particles
X. We associate with each particle an ordered triple of real intrinsic par-
ticle labels Xi, i = 1,2,3, called intrinsic coordinates of X. Since this
association is one-to-one and onto, we use interchangeably X and! = (Xl,~,
~). Let C denote a subregion of three-dimensional Euclidean space, theo
points ~ = (X1,X2,X3) or which are in one-to-one correspondence with the
particles X of B. We regard C as the portion of E3 occupied by B at timeo
t = to (or T = t - to = 0) and we choose a correspondence ~:B ~ Co such that
the numbers Xl coincide with the coordinates xi. The motion of the body is
traced relative to the fixed reference configuration Co by
(2.1)
where ~ is the mapping that carries X in the reference configuration onto
the place ~ at time t. The deformation function X has the property ~(!,to)=
X (through a change of variables we may also write x = X(X,T) such that- - --X(!,O) =~. For each T'X(!,T) may define a different configuration of the
body. The configuration Ct corresponding to ~(!,t) is referred to as the
current configuration. In addition to (2.1), we introduce as the deforma-
tion gradient F of the motion ~ the second-order tensor
• •
F = ~X(X,t) = F(X,t)- ----. - --1 e
where ~ is the material gradient (i.e., ~ = £ ext).
4
(2.2)
If !t denotes a
system of basis vectors tangent to the material lines Xl in Co and ~ de-
notes a system of natural basis vectors tangent to the material lines Xl
of 6 while in C, then it is clear that
(2.3)
where F~I are the components of F. The tensor
G = F'F (2.4)
is called the Green-Saint Venant deformation tensor. Clearly, its com _.
ponents are
G = G • G = g F- Fn = x· X1J _l ~ •n • I •J ,1. ,J (2.5)
wherein commas denote differentiation with respect to the material co-
ordinates (x:1 = Ox-/exJ). The Green-Saint Venant deformation tensor is
positive definite and nonsingular; it relates the differentials dX1 to the
3square of a material line element ds according to
The Green-Saint Venant strain tensor 1is defined by
(2.6)
1Y = -(FTF - I) =2- __12(~ - I) (2.7)
where I is the unit tensor (i.e., ~ has components!t • ~ = g1J' glJ, 6~,
glJ being the material metric coefficients in Co), Thus, if ds is ao
material line element in C and ds is the same line element in C,o
· ". 5
ds~(2.8)
where the superimposed dot indicates B time-rate-of change (i.e. V\ J a
oytJ(!,t)/ot).
The vector
is the displacement vector of the particle X. The deformation gradient
F is given in terms of gradients of ~ by
H(X,t) - I--(2.10)
Consequently,
(2.11)
and
(2.12)
or, in component form,
1YtJ ="2 (ul;J+ uJ;l+ u~lul<;J)
-.!(' . k' k')Yl j - 2 u\;J+ uj,\+ U;lUk;j+ U;tUk;J(2. l3)
Here H denotes the (material) velocity gradients and the semi-colon denotes
covariant differentiation in Co'
Let !(~,t) denote a continuous function of X and a piecewise contin-
uous function of t. The functLon
• •
ft(s) == f(X,t-s)
6
(2.14 )
is called the total history of f at time t. It is often convenient to
represent the total history by the pair (ft,ft(O», where ft, called the.....r _ _
past history, is the restriction of f(!,t-s) to the open interval s€(O,~)
and ft(O) = f(~,t) is the current value of f at time t. The families of
tensors and vectors
(2.15 )
are called the total strain histories and displacement histories at X.
Similarly, yt(s),ut(s) are the past histories of y(X,t) and u(X,t).-:..r -..:r _ --- - -
Physical Laws. In addition to the kinematical relations just described,
we may postulate certain physical laws which govern the behavior of all
cuntinuous media. Let ~(!,t), S(X,t) denote the body force density (i.~,
the body force per unit mass) and S(X,t) the contact force per unit area- -of a material surface 06 in C. Let a = alJG ~ G denote the Piola-
- -\-J
Kirchhoff stress tensor and p~,t) denote the mass density of 6 in C.
Then, under sufficient smoothness conditions, the principles of conserva-
tion of mass, balance of linear momentum, and angular momentum can be
shown to hold at a particle! it and only if
Div (~) + p~ = p~ (2.16)
wherein G = det G and a is the acceleration field. In component form,- -(2.l6)~ appears as
. ,
(1l J + pb J = pa J: J
7
(2.l7a)
in which : denotes covariant differentiation in C. However, if we intro-
duce the stress tensor tlJC (11JJG, and interpret i<!,t) as tre body force
per unit mass in C , then (2.l7a) becomeso
(2. 17b)
which is often more convenient to use in applications. If ~ is a unit
normal to an element of area on the material surface of ~ while in C , ando
n is a unit normal to the same area while in C, we also have
(2.18)
where SJ and SJ are contravariant components of the surface tractiono
per unit initial and current surface area, respectively.
In addition to (2.16), we introduce the principle of conservation of
energy and the Clausius-Duhem inequality. Glooally, these take the forms
~+U=O+Q(2.19)
r 2: 0
where K, U, 0, and Q are the kinetic energy, the internal energy, the
mechanical power, and the heat energy respectively, and r is the total
rate of entropy production:
K =
0=
• vdu
::.du +If!. .A
vdA
•
Q " J Phdv + !L·n dA
u A
ndA
8
(2.20)
Here v is the velocity field, h is the heat supply density from internal
sources, 1is the heat flux vector, ~ is the internal entropy density and
a is the absolute temperature. If (2.16) holds, we may obtain, under
sufficient smoothness conditions, the following local forms of (2.19):
pe = w + ~ . 1+ ph
• 1pa~ - ~ • q - ph + - ~a • q ~ 0- - a--
Here w is the stress power,
Alternately, we may introduce the free energy density
w = € - ~a
and the internal dissipation,
and obtain the alternative equations
.pw z W - ~e - a
.pa~ = ~ • 1+ ph + a
(2.21)
(2.22 )
(2.23)
(2.24 )
(2.25)
In subsequent calculations, two alternate global forms are convenient
to use. Observing that Q = J (~ . 1+ ph)du, we introduce (2.21), into
u
• • 9
(2.19), and obtain
,; + f wdu • 0
u
(2.26)
Likewise, let T be a uniform reference temperature of B while in itso
reference configuration C and denote T(X,t) - 9(X,t) - T. Multiplyingo ~ _ 0
(2.25)~ by T and using some algebraic manipulations, we obtain
f (p9T~ + Y:.r
u
ydu = f (ph
u
+ oldu + f T'l.
A
ndA (2.27)
All of the relations established thusfar are insufficient in number
to solve specific problems in the thermomechanics of continua. We must
supplement these equations with a collection of constitutive equations
that characterize the material under consideration. We shall examine such
constitutive laws appropriate for simple materials in Section 4.
3. THERMOMECHANICS OF A FINITE ELEMENT
We now direct our attention to the problem of constructing general
finite-element models of continuous media. We follow here the gene~al
procedures outlined in previous work [1,4.5,6J.
Following the usual finite-element philosophy, we represent B by a
discrete model B consisting of a finite number E of pieces B , calledII
finite elements, which are connected continuous together at G preselectedE
material points called nodes. Then 6 = U B. Each element may be con-e-I II
sidered to be disjoint for the purpose or describing its local behavior.
Locally, we identify N particles in element a and label them oonsecu-II II
tively 1,2 •..••N ; the particle at node N is then XN, and if X6 is theII -1l
\ . 10
same particle in the connected model B, then the decomposition of the model
is accomplished by the simple Boolean mapping
(3.1)
tel _ leIwhere 06 = 1 if node N of Be is incident on node 6 of a and ~ a 0 if
otherwise. Likewise, for fixed e,
(3.2)
tf1l6 (elAN being the transpose of ~, and we say that (3.2) establishes the con-
nectivity of the model a. Further properties of these mappings can be
found elsewhere [1,7]. What is important in regard to our present study
is that individual elements can be isolated from B and their behavior can
be described independent ot their ultimate location or mode of connection
in B; indeed, once the behavior of a typical element is described, the
discrete model of the behavior of any global collection of such elements
is obtained by using the transformations (3.2) and (3.2).
With this fundamental property in mind, it suffices to confine our
attention to the local behavivr of a typical element, and to take for
granted that equations governing the global behavior of the collection of
elements can be generated by applying the transformations (3.1) and (3.2).
Consider, then, a typical finite element Be' and let ~ and 1~denote the
restrictions of u(X,t) and T(X,t) to B. Let__ - e
~N(t)(3.3)
denote the values of ~_, and T at node XN of B. Then we approximate_ leI - e
UtA and T) locally over B by functions of the form_) (e e
. - 11
(3.4)
where ~~(!)and ~(!)are local interpolation functions wnich have the
properties
1
0, X t Be
(3.5)
with similar properties holding for ~(~. Note that the repeated index
N in (3.4) is summed from 1 to N. Instead of (3.4), we could also repre-e
sent u~land T as linear combinations of the values of various derivatives- ~at the nodes; this is discussed elsewhere [1,7J, and since the procedure
is straightforward, we limit the present discussion to first-order repre-
sentations.
With the local displacement approximation and the local change in
temperature given by (3.4), we can now proceed to compute all of the other
kinematic variables and the absolute temperature:
2~J = u~(f=Jl + f:1J + f~Jrf~;ru~)
f~ J1
cl1j1N= aXJ 5~ - wNfj 1
.2y.el = (fll + fll )tiN + P fll'r (uNuM)
1 J NJ1 N1J II Njr M1 III n
EJeI (3.6)
12
etc., where the element identification label (e) is omitted in some places
for simplicity and the dependence of ~ '~N on X and uN, TN on t 18N,1 __
understood. In (3.6)a' r~1 is the Christoffel symbol of the seconu kind
corresponding to the undeformed material coordinates.
The stress power developed in element 6 ise
'tel = tr[~}
(3.7a)
or, if the Xl are cartesian in C ,o
(3.7b)
The velocity field is
(3.8)
Thus, introducing (3.4), (3.6), (3.7), and (3.8) into (2.26) and (2.27),
we obtain
(3.9)
Ue
and
[f[P{TO + 'P,T')'P.~ +.'!.. Y.'P.1du - q. - o,}T' = 0
U"
(3.10)
where mNM is the consistent mass matrix for the element, ~ is the gen-
eralized force at node N, qN is the generalized normal heat flux at node
N, ON is the generalized dissipation at node N, and u. is the volume of
6:e
13
m" • f pv, V,du, !'" • f p£.V,du + f ~V,dA
u u AII II II
q, " f ph<p,du + J -'l.' ~<p,dA (3.11)
u AII •
",· f "'l',dA
uII
If uN and TN are each linearly independent sets, (3.9) and (3.10)
must hold for arbitrary nodal velocities and temperatures. Consequently,
the quantities in braces in these equations must vanish. This leads to
the general equat~ons of motion of a finite element
and the general equations of heat conduction of a finite element
(3.12)
f [P(To + <PM T" )<p,~ + -'l. • ~<p,JdU
uII
(3.13)
To apply these models to specific problems, we must furnish appropriate
constitutive equations for a, ], and i (and a).
We remark that (3.12) is the finite-element analogue of Cauchy's
first law of motion (2.16)~, while (3.13) is the analogue of (2.25)~.
Equation (3.12) insures that the principle of balance or linear momentum
is satisfied in an average sense over a and (3.13) insures that energy•is conserved in an average sense over a. Notice that (3.12) and (3.13)
II
can also be obtained by multiplying (2.16)a by WN and (2.25)2 by ~N'
14
integrating over the volume of the element, and using the Green-Gauss
theorem. Then the procedure leading to (3.12) ana (3.13) is interpreted
as Galerkin's method.
It is alsu informative to consider the case in which all quantities
are referred to initial material volumes u ) and areas A ) in C and glJo~ o~ 0
61J' Then ue' Ae' a1J, ~, !' and p in (3.12) and (3.13) are replaced,
respectively, by U ....' A I.) , tl J, b, S , and p ; (3.12) then becomesalbl o,e _ -.Jl 0
(3.14 )
and
(3.15)
4, SIMPLE MATERIALS
A detailed discussion of cunstitutive theory is to be covered in
another lecture in this series; summary accounts are also available in a
number of books and monographs [1, 8, 9]. Rather than to consider a
variety of classes of materials, we shall concentrate on one which is
sufficiently broad to include most of the classical theories as special
cases: the theory of thermomechanically simple materials [10]. A material
is said to be simple if its response at particle X at time t is determined
by the history of the local deformation at X and the history of the temp-
erature at X at time t. Mathematically, a simple material is described
by a collection of four constitutive equations which define the free
energy, stress, entropy, and heat flux as functionals of the total histcry
15
of deformation and temperature and generally the current value of the
temperature gradient ~(t) = ~e(t). If we use the strain tensor y(X,t)--as a measure of the deformation, and if we decompose the total histories
yt(s), Qt(s), into past histories yt(s), et(s) and current values vt(O),- .....:..r r ...l-
et(O), then a simple material is described by the four functionals,
co
(] = ~ (~,e; ;'y,e)~Js=O
co
1) = J('(y;, e; ;1.' e,~l8=0
(4.1)
Here the dependence of W, ~, 'Tl~i' y, e, and [ on ! and t is understood.
The functionals in (4.1) must obey the principle of objectivity and they
must be consistent with the Clausius-Duhem inequality (2.21)1' We see that
this inequality can be written in the alternate form
w - Pw- p'Tl~+ l g • q ~ 0e __ (4.2)
Thus, to test if (4.1) satisfies (4.2), we must compute the time-rate-of
change of W. Since W is a functional of y, e, we have
+ a If [- ] • g&~=O
(4.3)
where, for simplicity in notation, we have used [-] = [yt, ~t; v, e] and..;.J' l' -!.
the vertical stroke indicates that the functional is linear in the argument
16
following the stroke. The operators 0 , On' D , De' 0 are Frechet andy 11 Y ~- -
partial differential operators defined by
00
& '1' [-Ih]Ys-o -
o 00
= Urn eo. ( '1' [t + a~, e~;l' e , gJ }a-t() s=o
00
= lim ~ ('1' [yt,et + as ;y,e,gJ}ua .:.J' r r _ _a-t() s=O
00
000 00
D '1' [-] • h = lim -- ( '1' [yt,et;y + ah,e,gJ}YO - -iOeo. O-u'r- --s= a s=
00 000De '1' [-] • S = lim eo. ( '1' [y;,e~;r,e + as,~.J}
s=O ~ s=O
00 000o '1' [-] • f = lim -- ( '1' [yt,et;y,e,g + afJ} (4.4)& - -iO Oa =0 -u' r - - -~=o a s-
Introducing (4.1) and (4.3) into (4.2) and arguing that the result must
hold for arbitrary rates y, ~, gJ we find that
00
o '1' [-1 = 0~=O
00
x [-J =s;;"O
00
pD '1' [- J.Ys=0
00
J('[-Js=O
00
-De '1' [-]
s=O
00 00
cr = -p(& '1' (-Iyt] + 6 '1' [-let])Y ~ e l'~=o s=O
(4.5)
That is, the
functionals
free energy
00
functional '1' [-J is independent of g, and 'the constitutive00 s=O -~~ [-] and ~C-J for stress and entropy are determined by the
s=O s=Ofunctional. Moreover, by Frechet differentiation, we can also deter-
00
mine the internal dissipation cr from '1' [-1.s=O
Special Forms of the Constitutive Equations. In trying to obtain specific
forms of the constitutive functionals for simple materials, it is natural
17
to first consider possible expansions of the free energy functional.(Xl
Let ot(s), ot(s) be the zero histories of yand q, and suppose that ~ [-]- s=o
is Frechet differentiable to admit a Taylor expansion about ~t(8), ot(s)
of the form
(Xl
\II Cot + yt ot + ~t.0 + Y 0 + ~] =1 _~ ...:.J' r r' ,0- - -s=
()) (Xl
(Xl (Xl (Xl
+ 6 e ~ C:~*Ie:] + D Ii' [~*J .i + De ~ [~*]es=o ~=o 8=0
(Xl (Xl
1+ 2~
(4.6)
where 0* = (ot,ot;o,O). Then, by truncating this series at various points,...... r_
we obtain constitutive functions for various simple materials.
For example, Achenbach, Vogel, andHerrmann [llJ proposed the free
energy functional obtained from (4.6) by retaining cubic terms in y, e,and their histories:
(Xl
{> = A + A 1 j Y + A 1 .I Y Tel+ A 1 J Y T + A 1 .I • n y yo 1 iJ 2 1.1 3 1.1 " 1.1.n
S=O
(4.7)
(Xl
Here ~ is the free-energy functional per unit undeformed volume, T =s=O
e - T is the change in temperature from a uniform constant referenceo
temperature T , ando
A =o
ro ro ro
<P [-] +.!. 6:a <P [-ITt Tt] +.!. O~ <P [-Iyt yt]2 T r'r 2 y ~'~S=O 8=0 ~=Oro ro
+ 00 iP (-Iyt Tt] +.!. 63 <P [-ITt Tt Tt]Y r ~'r 6 T r' r' r- s=O s=O
ro ro
+ .!. 020 ~ (-Iyt yt Tt] + 1 0 O~ ~ (-Iyt Tt Tt]2 y T ~'..:.J" r 2 y T -u-' r' r- s=O - s=O
18
(4.8a)
ro ro ro
A~J = 0 (~[-] + 0 iP [-Iy;] + or ~ [-IT~]YiJS=O 16=0 s=O
ro m
+ .!. 02~ [-ITt TtJ + 0 6 iP [-Iyt TtJ'2 T r' r y T -u-' r r
s=O - S=O
ro ro ro
A~J = 0 DT( ~ [-] + 0T ~ [-IT:' + 0 ~ [-IY;JJYlJ s=O s=O 1s=o
ro
= 1D D (iP (-12 Yt J Y. n 8=0
ro
+ Or ~ [-IT~])s=O
(4.8b)
(4.8c)
(4. 8d, e)
(4.8f)
ro
1 ro m+ - OCl ~ [-Iyt yt] + 0 6 ~ [-Iyt Tt]}2 Y _r'r yT _r'r"
-43=0 - s=O
1 ro ro ro
B:a = "2 ~( ~ [-] + 0T ~ (-IT~J + 0 ~ [-Ii])s=O 8=0 1s=0
1B = - 03 ~ [-J
3 6 Ts=O
(4.8g)
(4.8h)
(4.8i)
ro ro
wherein ~ [-I .. J == ~ [ot,o;;o,ol .. ], 0T = 0e- == oS' and DT = De_T == De's=0 s=0 ~ - -T 0
More specifically, we may introduce the strain- and temperature-dependent
integral coefficients
19
A c: a + R *"lry' + R *"*T' + R *T*T' + R *'my'*T'o .:.:.11 r" _l~ ro
~2 .:..:.112 .J."_
+ R *T*T'*T' + R *'mT'*T'3a a .::.l a a .r0
'
B = H + L'*T + LtiJ*y + L' *T*T' + L'iJan*y *y1 1 a 1 J 11 ~~ 1J .1\
+ L 11 J*y *T I1~ t J
1B3 ::0 '3 F1(0)
(4.9a)
(4. 9b)
(4.9c,d)
(4.ge,f)
(4.9g)
(4. 9h, 1)
Here ~1' ~2, •••,GiJ.n, M~J,•••, L1l' L~~·n,•••, F1 are material kernals
and * denotes a generalized convolution operator which, with an appro-
priate change-of-variables, indicates integrals of the form
~l*r-it t
" JlJIRfl··<t-.,.t- ••)Y,,<.,)o 0
(4.l0a)
(4.10b)
t
M~ 1 J*T = JI dMiJ (t-s)
d(t-s)o .
T(s)ds (4.10c)
etc. The lower limit of integration is assumed to be the time at which
the deformation is initiated.
20
For the constitutive equation for heat flux, we might use the law
proposed by Christensen and Naghdi [12]
00.r aT ,(sJQl = x.1 J (t-s) , ds
as
0
where x.1J(t-s) is a thermal conductivity kernal.
use the generalized Fourier law
00
Ql = x.lJ[yt Tt.y T]T...:.r' r' _, Js=O '
00
(4.11)
Alternately, we may
(4.12 )
is a functional of the indicated arguments. If x.1J (-]s-O
by a constant x.1J, (4.12) reduces to the classical Fourier
where x.1J[-]s=O
is replaced
law of heat conduction.
Thermorheologically Simple Materials. Experimental evidence obtained
from tests on a large class of viscoelastic materials has led to the iden-
tification of an important subclass of materials with memory, commonly
referred to as thermorheologically simple materials. This classification
arose from the observation that, among certain amorphous high polymers
which approximately obey established linear and nonlinear viscoelastic
laws at uniform temperature, are a group which exhibit a simple property
with a change of temperature: namely, a translational shift of various
material properties when plotted against the logarithm of time at differ-
ent uniform temperatures. The shift phenomenon is the basic character-
istic of all thermorheologically simple materials and makes it possible
to establish an equivalence relation between temperature and tn t. Now
in the case of a thermorheologically simple material, it is possible to
write the relaxation moduli at uniform temperature e, e.g., J(t-s), as a
function of tn t, denoted Ee(tn t). Then the shift property is apparent
21
if
Ee(.tn t) = Ee (.ent + f(e»o
where f(9) is a shift function relative to e such that df/dt > 0 ando
f(e ) = O. With this property, the relaxation modulus curve will shifto
toward shorter times with an increase in e. By introducing a shift
factor,
b(e) = exp f(e)
Then
Je(t) = Ee(.tn t) = Ee (p,n(tb(A»] = Je (~)o 0
where S is a reduced time given by
s = tb(e)
(4.13)
(4.14)
If it is possible to invert (4.14) so as to obtain t = g(~), then a
constitutive equation for stress can be obtained from the form
s= S J(~-~')
o
1;
1 J EX+ 3 0lJ K(g-g') og'
o
d~' (4.15 )
wherein Y;J and yare the deviatoric and dilitational components of YlJ
and J(t-s) and K(t-s) are relaxation moduli, and we have used the trans-
formations
That is, when transformed to a reduced time, the constitutive equations
for a thermorheologically simple material assume the same form as the
constitutive law for the isothermal case.
While the above development applies to the special case of linear
response of a body at various uniform temperatures, the basic ideas can
22
be extended to finite deformations of bodies subjected to transie'nt,
non-homogeneous temperatures. For example, if it is assumed that the
relaxation properties at a particle ~ depend only on the current tempera-
ture 9(!,t) at ~, it may be postulated that an increment 6~ in reduced
time is related to an increment 6t in real time according to 6~ =
b[S(!,t)]6t. Then, instead of (4.14), we have
t
~ - f b [e (~, ~') Jd ~ '
o
(4.16)
Clearly, (4.16) reduces to (4.15) in the case of uniform, constant tempera-
tures.
As a representative example of a constitutive functional for the
free energy of a thermorheologically simple material, consider the func-
tional proposed by Cost [13J:
S
+f D (~-s')1 .!
o
0"Yqar- d~'
s- f f (~-~') ~~,d~'
o
fsf~ OYt oy+ i 0l.!0an [3K(S-~',S-S") - 2G(~-S"S-~"] O~I.! os~n dS'dS"
o 0
s s "
SSOY1.! 09
- 01.! 3aK(~-S' ,s-s") ~ os"o 0
S S
~ S S m(~-~' .~-n~~,g~"d~'d~"
o 0
d SId S"
(4.17)
23
Here all quantities have been transformed to reduced time; i.e. Y1j(~'~) =
Ylj(!,g(S», ••• etc.(t = g(S». Also ~ = f(t), as given by (3.8), ~I =
f(t') and S" = f(t") are dummy variables in reduced time, qlo is a constant,
D1j ( ), K( , },G( , ), and m( , ) are material kernals, and a is the co-
efficient of thermal expansion.
Integrating (4.19) by parts and introducing the resulting equation
into (4.5) yields the following constitutive equations for stress, entropy,
and internal dissipation:
~
+ ~ 0" f [3K(~-n
os
0" f Q'3K(~-~')
o
(4.18)
~
p~ = f(O) + 3a!(O) + m(O)em f ~~, [3a!(~')]
o~
• YII (~-~')d~' - f ~~.[m(~·)]e(H')d~'
o
(4.19)
a =
0"[a3K(s-s' ,s-~t1)l 0~~1 ~~II d~'dS·
" "[m(~-~I ,~-s")] ~~I ~:" dS'd~"
24
(4.20)
In these equations 3K(S') = 3K(O,g'), m(~') ~ m(O,s') = 3~. 3K(0,S').
The material kernels 3K( ) and 2G( ) are relaxation bulk and shear moduli.
Thermoelastic Materials. If the free energy depends only upon the current
values of y and e, then
(4.21)
and (4.5)a and (4.5)3 reduce to
(1 = PDy'f(y, e) or (1lJ = P o'f(x.,e)°Y1J
T] = -De 'f(Y, 9) or T] == - o'f (~f.'e)(W1 J
(4.22 )
Materials obeying constitutive laws such as these are called thermo-
elastic materials.
5, FINITE ELEMENT MODELS OF SIMPLE MATERIALS
In view of (3.6), the components of the history of the strain tensor,
the temperature histories, and the temperature gradient for a typical
finite element Baree
2yt (s) = g • Ut (s) + g • U t (s) + u t (s) • Ut (s)1 J _1 _ J ~ -' 1 ~ 1 ...., J
(5.1)
25
Here rJ are the Christoffel symbols of the second kind for the system1r
Xl while in C , u~U(s) and T~~(s) are the total histories of the nodalo I
displacement components and temperatures. Thus, the arguments of the
functionals (4.5) can be written in terms of the histories ~~t)(s) and
TN(t)(s):
(Xl co(j = pD If [-] = rs [uN/.t)TN(t).u NTN]Y ....J' ' I' ' ,~=O s=O -
(Xl (Xl
11 = -De If [-J = lJ! [uN(t)TNW'uN TN] (5.2)....J' ' I' ,_ '
s""O s=Oco co
s.= Q [-] = ~ [UN~ TN~'uN TN]....J' ' r' ,
s~O s~O -
Likewise, the internal dissipation for the element is of the form
(j = (5.3)
Thus, the equations of motion and heat conduction for a finite ele-
ment of a thermomechanically simple material are
+ f ~IJ[-Js=O
u•d (Xl co
dt ~l [-] + <PN 1 131[-1}dus=O ' s=O
fcp ~ [-IuN~t)TNttl]duN ....J' ' r
s=OUe
(5.S)
where, for simplicity, we denote by [-] the arguments listed in (5.2).
In order to obtain specific finite-element models, it now becomes a simple
matter of introducing the appropriate constitutive equations into (5.2)
and (5.3) to determine the forms of the integrals in (5.4) and (5.5)
26
Thermorheologically Simple Elements. The reduction of (5.4) and (5.5)
for the case of thermorheologically simple materials requires special
considerations. To outline briefly the procedure, we consider the case
in which g1J = 61J, that is, the material coordinates X1 are assumed to
be initially cartesian. The following discussion is essentially a repro-
duction of that given by Oden and Armstrong [2].
Consider a class of thermorheologically simple materials for which
it is possible to transform all field quantities to corresponding quanti-
ties in reduced time; i.e., if f(X,t) is a function of real time t, a
function g(S) = t exists such that we can write
Then it is easily shown that
A,. ,.where f = df/d~ and b( J is the shift factor at X at reduced time ~ cor-
responding to t.
• •If 2Y1J = u1,J + uJ,1' pe~ ~ PTo~' and the constitutive equations
are of the form (4.18), (4.19), and (4.20), then it can be shown [1,2,14J
that the equations of motion and heat conduction for an element are G£ the
form~
b:.,J [3K(H')
os
c.;, J3K(~-n
o
OT d~' = P~kO~I (5.6)
27
~. J Nbl11 iN + h<,ah~N + H-3\ 2.... [m(~-~')] f, d~''" N "'!II 1 "'!II o~ S
os s S
+k,., J K(~-n ~~:d~'+cIJJ:1 JJ~~[3K(~-~"~-~")-2G(H'.H")l
o 00~ ~
oUL oUL Sl ( oUN oUL
)( os~ a~IJ,d~ld~" + d~~~ J~~[2G(~-~' ,~-~")] o~~ a~IJ,ds'd~"
o 0
JSJ~ aUN "-~)~L ~~ [3K(s-~' ,~_~")] a'~:~r,d~'d~"
o 0~ ~
-d~\" J J ~s [m(s-s' .~-~")l ~: ~~,ds'ds"00
where
~_ = jlPbOV,V.dU ~)- = J Pb~., V,duu u
II II
1r 'a~"'r = '2 b(1/I/04,jOlk + 1/I/04,lOJk] ~NJJdu
UII
1 - 1 .r- e.,. - a JlCb., .• ,dUbN/04k - 3 b~""k~N,ldu
u ue •and
h\\!, ~ Tom(O) JI "'_"',du k_. - J "',. I"'•• IdUu U
II "
'0\ - JI d &>l" =-1 J'" '" <Pt duliMN - 3OToK(0) CP",CPN,l u M NL 6 M N, 1 , j
U Ue II
(5.7)
(5.8a)
(5. 8b)
28
Also
(5.8c)
To further specialize (5.6) snd (5.7), Oden and Armatrong[2]
assumed that each material kernal was representable in the form of a de-
caying Prony series; e.g.
n
K(~) = LKl exp(-~h)t)
i=l
where Kt and vt
are experimentally-determined constants, ~ ~ 0, and
Vt
> O. Kernals of the type G(~,~') Ire assumed to have the property
G(~_~I ,l,;-F")= G(2S-l,;'_~")so that,
n
G(S-~',~-~') = LGtexp
1=1
(-2S+~'+S")/A 1f
(5.9)
etc., A1 being constants> O. Then, using Simpson's rule for approxi-
mating integration between reduced times ~ and S l' we represent certain• m+
integrals according to
SJ 2G(s-n
o
~NJ
oS' dS' (5.10a)
29
o.jN (~+h 12)J II III
4 ~S
~
f8+1 AN ~~NOUJ h OUJ
O~' exp(s' lA, )d~' ~ t 1 os (~8) exp(~m/A,) +
Sm OUN(~ +h ) !x exp [(~.+ha/2)/A,J + o~J 8 • eXP[(~m+h.)/A1~
Finally, incorporating such approximations into (5.6) and (5.7),
(5.l0b)
we obtain
for the equations of motion and heat conduction,
PA = ~u ~M + J:a) ~M + (a 1 _ b 1 )" G IN (u A)NJ NM J loiN J MNJ MNJ:L. k tic '
k
(5.11a)
+ kNMLEkJ~(T,€)k
in which
etc., and
r-l- AN ~ 1 AN AN) (!r 1\) 2 (AN AN )HG(uJ,At)" L.. (12(uJIiI+1)- UJ{m-l) exp ';)m 1\1 + 3' UJ{1lI+1f U.Ka)
m=l
(5.11b)
(5.l2a)
)(exp[ (s.+h./2) I A11 + f2 (3u~~ +1'- 4u~(.t U~III_1)exp[ (~.+h) 1 AlJ}(5 .12b)
CG(u~, \)
30
_ 1 (A AN) (rr I ) 2 (AN AN-12 UJtr+ll- UJ(r-l) exp -'=>1' ~I +"3 UJlr+1f uJll'»,
eXP[-(sr+hr/2)/\ ] + i2(3u~(r+l)-4u~\r)+u~(r_l»exP[-(~I'+hr)/A11
(5.12c)
In (5.12a) we have separated the histories HG(u~'~1) from the current
values CG(U~,Al)' that is, the value of the integral at the current time
~ + h is obtained by adding to the accumulated sum at S the contribution'=>1' r
between sand S +h.r r
uN(s -h), etc.J •
iAN AN AN(~ )By notat on u"."uJl.!I-1)etc. we mean uJ '=>. '
6. TEST CASES - NUMERICAL RESULTS
We now consider several applications of the theory presented
previously to the finite-element analysis of a number of representative
problems.
Torsional Oscillations of a Thermoviscoelastic Cylinder. As a first ex-
ample, we reproduce the results of Cost [13] on the finite-element
analysis of a solid circular cylindrical rod of a thermorheologically
simple material subjected to torsional oscillations about its longitudinal
axis. The free end of the cylinder is subjected to tangential displace-
1ments -u = a sin wt, a being a given amplitude and w a given frequency,r q 0 0
and r being the radial coordinate (x1,x2,x3) a (r,z,e). The only nonzero
strain component is then y~ = a r sin wt/L, L being the length of theOZ 0
cylinder. With the strain so specified as a function of time, we can con-
centrate on the phenomena of heat generation in the solid. The axis and
exterior surface of the rod are insulated, and the temperature at the end
of the rod is set equal to zero. In this case, the internal dissipation
31
(4.20) assumes the form
(6.1)
The kernal G(g,gl) is assumed to be of the form (5.9).
We assume that the material is a polyurethene rubber for which the
shift factor is such that
and
_ 8.89(8 - 89.6°f)- .6 + 183.5 + (B - 89~60F)
8
G ( t) = L G 1 exp ( - t / AI)
i=l
where AI = 1.0 X 10-13+1, i = 1,2, ...,7, As = 00' G = 1653 psi, 1 ' G =a
4747 psi, G3 = 5539 psi, G4 = 4701 psi, Gs = 3527 psi, Gs = 858 psi, G7=257 psi, and Ge = 143 psi. These properties correspond to the Thiokol
Chemical Co. rubber, Solithane 113 [13], for which ~ = 1.46 x 10-%F;
the coefficient of thermal conductivity is 8.56 x 10-3 BTU/in. hr. of, the
specific heat c 0.48 BTU/lb.m.oF, and p = 0.0361 1b.m./in.~.
The cylinder and a finite-element model of it consisting of composite
rectangular finite elements is shown in Fig. 1. In this case,a rectangu-
lar element is generated by connecting four triangles together. Thus,
over each triangle we use local interpolation functions of the form
(6.2)
Introducing (6.1) and (6.2) and the thermal and mechanical properties
mentioned into (3.10) [or an appropriately modified form of (5.11b)] leads
to the system of differential equations governing heat conduction in the
r
-1·5
~~0"0c:30
I" ~"0Q,)-0-~IIIC'-
insulated boundary.. I." N
Figure 1. Torsional oscillations of a thennoviscoelastic cylinder and 8
finite-element model of a quadrant of the cross-section of thecylinder.
32
element. These were integrated numerically, and the reduced time S at
r at time tn+1 was generated using the approximate quadrature formula
s(r,z,tn+1)
n
~L i (b[e(r,z,tt] + b[e(r,z,tt_1)]}(tt-tt_l)
i=l
(6.3)
\
wherein the.same time increment used in integrating the differential
equations governing the finite element model is employed.
In the case of convective heat transfer boundary conditions, the
heat flux ql at boundary is given by
qt a fl (1'* - To*) (6.4)
where T* is the temperature of the media surrounding the body, 1'* is theo
temperature across a surface boundary layer, and fl are film coefficients.
of (3.11)3 is of the form,Then the corresponding generalized heat flux
q = Jrn n f (rn TM*Pol T~ 1 t TM
Ae
- T*)dAo
(6.5)
Considering again the cylinder of Fig. 1, we prescribe convection
boundary conditions at the ends of the cylinder and the exterior of the
cylinder. Cost obtained film coefficients of f = 0.012 BTU/hr.-in.2-oF by
adjusting computed temperature distributions to fit those determined ex-
perimentally for the case in which the cylinder is rotated at 1000 cycles
per minute but under no strain. Computed and experimental results are
reproduced in Figs. 2 and 3. With the film coefficients so determined,
then torsional oscillations of 1000 cycles per minute at 5.34 percent
17'-'"
160
150
140
l.L.0 .4l
130...::7.-0...4l0-E4l 120I-
110
100
------------------ - ----- -4- ......
"'- ...time • 0 "'_..._
time • 30 min
- ...... - ...... "''''G). .. .... ........ ............. ........ .... ....
Finite Elemlnt Solution----(i)-----. Explr Imlntal
... ... ...... ......"', ...
90o 0'2 0'4 0,6 0,8 1·0 1,2 1,4
Radial Coordinate, In.
Figure 2. Temperature distribution in radial direction in a thermoviscoelasticcylinder (after Cost [13]).
Anite EIement Solution
'-0O-g0-8
.......... -.....
0'7
--- -0...
............0...
.... ........."
............. ....
0'6
--- ..... _--
....
0'5
- --- -- --
0-40-30-2
---------------------
0,'
---0---- Experimental.
time = 60 min
---time = 30 min
time =0----------- -------------
-----------
o
120
160
170
110
l1.o
Q)~::l 140-o~Q)
Q.
EQ)
~ 130
Ax ial Coordinate, in_
Figure 3. Temperature distribution in axial direction in a thermoviscoelastic cylinder (after Cost [13J.
33
strain were induced. The computed and measured temperature distributions
are shown in Fig. 4, together with the finite-element solution for the
case of temperature-independent material properties. In the latter case,
the predicted temperature generated is considerably higher than that
measured or computed using the complete thermoviscoelastic model.
Transient, Thermomechanically Coupled Phenomenon. As another test case,
we cite the recent results of Oden and Armstrong [2,14J on the transient,
nonlinear response of a hollow cylinder subjected to axisYmmetric
mechanical and thermal boundary conditions. Again, a thermorheologically
simple material with b(9) = 10~T, ~(T) -9T/IOO + T °C is considered. The
material properties are: p = 10-3in-lb/in °C sec., a = 10-6/0C, K(~) -
0.1 X 106 exp (-f)oo) psi, and, using the here.dity-type heat conduction law,
~(~) = .1 exp (-S/10-6) + 0.01 exp (-~/oo)in-lb./in.oC sec. The outer
radius of the cylinder is 11.0 in., and the inner radius is 10.0 in.
The complete nonlinear system (5.6) and (5.7) [(5.11)J is used in
this case for a system of twenty finite elements, each of 0.05 in. thic~
ness. The variation (in reduced time) of various quantities appearing
in the equations of motion and heat conduction we assumed to vary quad-
ratically in reduced time. For example, if, for an arbitrary function
the reduced time step, then quadratic interpolation in time yields the
difference approximations
(-4fl+ 3f 1+ f 1)/2h1 + \-
(6.6)
f1 - (fl+1- 2f\+ f1-1)/2h
I.L 940
4)~;:,...0~ 924)Q.E~
88
Isothermal Properties (Finite Element Solution)
_____ ~ -_ Experlml'ntal
Thermorheologlcally Simple MaterialFinite Element Solution
o 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Nondimensionallzed Radial Coordinate, rIo
Figure 4. Comparison of compllted and IIlcaslJrcd tplllperatllres in a thermo-rheologically simple cylinder \llIdertorsional oscillations attime t = 30 minutes, 5.34 vercent strain (after Cost (131).
34
Thus, for each h, we encounter a system of nonlinear equations in fl+1'
The Newton-Raphson method was employed for solving these nonlinear equa-
tions, its starting values being obtained from difference approximations
of the initial conditions on uN and T~ All quantities (stresses, dis-\'
placements, temperatures, etc.) are computed as functions of reduced ti~
and then transformed to real time using fit= fi~/b[e(r,s)1; that is, the
reduced time t at step r + 1 is t + h/b[e(r,; ), where h a 6S is the\' I'
reduced time step. In this procedure, we must also account for the fact
that the stress tensor is associated with a shift factor that involves
the entire element temperature and not simply the temperature at a node.
We set the real time increment associated with nodal displacements and
temperatures at a node N in the connected model equal to h/bN, where bN
is the value of the shift factor at node N. In computing stresses, we
set the real time increment in an element e equal to h/b" where b isIe leI
an averaged shift factor for element e.
To initiate the Newton-Raphson iterations, initial conditions (e.g..uN(Sl) = ~N(Sl) = 0, TN(S1) = TN(Sl) = 0) are cast in central difference
approximations. Then, if h = fiSis the time step in reduced time, ~N
GN(;l+ h) = 2u~(;1+h)/h~; similar equationsUN(Sl+ h) = 2uN(Sl+h)/h and. ..hold for iN and TN. Taking
1800 ~N TN(Sl +h)
h[lOO + ~ fM (S1+h)]llOO + ~ fN (Sl+h) J (6.7)
where M, N, R = I, 2 and 7ff!= ae + be ( rl + na ) /2 (here we use the linear'f'M M M
approximations ~M = aN+ bNr, with ~M computed in certain integrations
using the average radius, r =(r1+ r~)/2), then we use as the shift factor
"NI "" 9 (p. T [100 + ~ T M] "" •b = 10 ~ M b = b tn'lO T (6.8)
3S
Equations (6.6), (6.7), and (6.8) are then used in calculations over the
second time step. Adequate data then exists for carrying the solution
forward tn (reduced) time. With these approximations, the mass matrices
of (S.8a) become
" 1.en (10) • T • mM "l (6.9)
Here r1
and r2 are the radial coordinates of nodes land 2 of the element
a ,b are the nodal coefficients appearing in the local interpolationN N
functions (~"l = aN + bNr; N = 1, 2). Specific forms of the remaining
matrices and the equations of motion and heat conduction for a typical
finite element are given in an Appendix.
As a first example, consider the case in which the model subjected
to a step-pressure loading of 10 pounds-per-square-inch (psi) on the
inner boundary. The outer boundary is stress-free, and the problem is
considered to be isothermal. Figure S presents the radi~l displaccments
as a function of real time. The stress components in the radial and
circumferential directions are presented in Figs. 6 and 7. It is seen
that all stresses are initially compressive in nature. This is a signifi-
cant difference from the conventional quasi-static solution which gives
compressive stress only in the radial direction. The quasi-static solu-
tion, obtained from the finite-element program by deleting inertia terms,
is compared with the exact solution of the quasi-static isothermal problem
in Figs. 8 and 9. It is also noted in Figs. 6 and 7 that the dynamic
circumferential and meridional stresses become tensile at later times. The
solution was not carried past 10-3 seconds, but it is expected that these
stress components would eventually reach values equal to the quasi-static
condition.
102 I TIME IN SECONDS
-3l= Ix 10
11.010.810.610.410.2
-.s::.uc:::--~ 164~~ t= Ix 164~u<t...J k ~ ~;r8X/05Cl.(/)
a..JS 105a<ta:
RADIUS (inch
?igure 5. Radial displacement profiles for dynamic isothermal casewith a step load of 10 psi at inner boundary.
-10
-8-II)
Q.-V)en -6UJa:.-en-oJ -41- \t«0ct
00)a:
\I-2
o10.0 10.2 10.4 10.6
RADIUS (inch)
TIME IN SECONDS
10.8 11.0
Figure 6. Radial stress profiles for dynamic isothermal case with a step load of 10 psi at innerboundary.
-8
-6.....-en~-(f) -4(/)
LLJa::I-00
...J -2~
.....zUJa::LLJu..~ 0::> I ~O.2 10.4 10.6ua:: RADIUS (inch)u
2
4
TIME 'N SECONDS
Figure 7. Circumferential stress ~rofl1e8 for dynamic isothermal case w~th a.step load of 10 psi atinner boundary.
FINITE ELEMENT SOLUTION-10
-8
-..a.-(I)(I) -6~Iii..Jctc -4<lQ:
-2
o10.0 10.2 10.4
- - - - EXACT SOLUTION
10.6
RADIUS (inch)
10.8 II. 0
Figure 8. Radial stress profiles for quasi-static isothermal case ,nth a step load of 10 psi at innerboundary.
100
IIIQ.
(I)(I)IJJQ:.....(I)
140
r " ,.." " " ~ ~ ,..
...J<{
.....zWD::
~~::>ua:u
~Ol- 0-0--0-0-0- FINITE ELEMENT SOLUTION
EXACT SCl.UTION
o10.0
I L10.2
J J f L10.4 10.6
RADIUS (inch)
, ..L10.8
1
Figur~. Circucfer·:mtial stress pro':iles ::or :r.:asi-static isother-:.al ::ase ·.:ith a ste'f. loac. 0;:" Ie l-'siat inner boundary.
36
The final example to be considered is a dynamic, coupled nonisothermal
problem with a step loading of 10 psi applied at the inner boundary while
the thermal boundary conditions correspond to convective heat transfer.
Film coefficients of 0.1 and 1.0 in. lb./in~ °C·sec. respectively are as-
sumed for the inner and outer boundaries of the cylinder. The heat supply
from internal sources is assumed to be zero and the initial temperature
of the cylinder and the surrounding medium are taken to be 300oK. Heat
is thus generated through thermomechanical coupling. Since energy is dis-
sipated in the system, the internal temperature increases during the tran-
sient part of the motion while heat is expelled at different rates at
each boundary. The displacements are presented in Fig. 10 and the radial
and circumferential stresses are shown in Figi. 11 and 12 compared with
the isothermal solution. The meridional stress is indicated in Fig. l3.
While stress and displacement profiles are obtained at different times
for the isothermal and nonisothermal cases owing to the necessity of
transforming all computed quantities to real time in the nonisothermal
case, results do indicate a lag in the nonisothermal stress waves and a
noticeable decrease in amplitude. Circumferential stresses are initially
compressive but become tensile almost everYwhere in the cylinder at 10-3
seconds. The circumferential stress wave requires approximately 2.5 x
10-s seconds to traverse the 1.0 inch thickness of the cylinder in the
isothermal case and approximately 4.0 x 10-sseconds in the nonisothermal
case. Displacement profiles are qualitatively the same for the isothermal
and nonisothermal cases. The nonisothermal displacements are higher than
those predicted by the isotlaermal analysis at the outer boundary, but
they are lower on the inner boundary. ThiH is due chiefly to the rclativl'
DYNAMIC ISOTHERMAL CASE
DYNAMIC NONISOTHERMALCASE
TIME IN SECONDS
- -- -0ta8xlO
-.cu
= -6- 10....zUJ~lJ.JU4:...Jn..(/)
a -7, 10...JctCi4:a:
\,. \
-8 t- \\ \ \ \ ~ \10 \01
U\
~I \ \ \~
'. ,m
I
-910 , , ,
10.0 10.2 10.4 10.6 10.8 11.0RADIUS ( Inch)
Figure 10. Radial displacenlfmt profiles isothcnllal and noniaothcrllisl
//.O/0.8
TIME IN SECONDS
10.6
DYNAMIC ISOTHERMAL CASE
---_ DYNAMIC NONISOTHERMAL CASE
10.410.20.0
10.0
ILla:::::>(f)
IDa::0..
...J<t~ -0.6w...~
"!-0+- h ~~~ \;- \("\ \\
~''Oel'
...J I \~, \O~ \-<t \i -0.2\
RADIUS (Inch)
Figure 11. Nondimensional radial stress profiles in a thermorheologically simple cylinder-isothermaland nonisothermal cases.
UJa:~(f)(f)UJcr:Cl.
...J«zcr:UJ....Z
"(/)(f)UJcr:....(f)
...J~....zUJcr:UJ11..~~ua:o
-0.6
-0.4
0.2
DYNAMIC ISOTHERMAL CASE
-- -- DYNAMIC NONISOTHERMAL CASETI ME IN SECONDS
10.6
RADIUS (inch)
Figure 12. Nondimensional circumferential stress profiles in a thermorheologically simple cylinder-isothermalaDd nonisothermal cases
lit0--(f)(f)IJJa::~(f)
-.l~z -40Q
a::UJ~
-2
o10.0 10.2 10.4
TIME IN SECONDS
\0.6 10.8 II. 0
RADIUS (inch)
Figure 13. Meridional stress profiles for dynamic nonisothermal case with a step load of 10 psi at innerboundary.
37
magnitudes of the film coefficients at these boundaries. The results
indicated in all examples were computed using a reduced ti~e increment
of 10-6 seconds; rather rapid convergence of the Newton-Raphson scheme
was observed at each time step.
The temperature distribution is shown in Fig. 14. Note that the
mechanically loaded inner boundary is the first to experience an increase
in temperature. It is seen that the temperature change reaches maximum
values for the material parameters and boundary conditions considered, at
approximately 4 x 10-6 seconds. Values for times greater than 8 x 10-6
were not obtained.
II. 010.810.4 10.6RADIUS (inch)
10.2
0.0 -10.0
1.0
rTIME I N SECONDS
I0.8
u0-wl!)z1 0.6uw0:::J
~ 0.40::wQ..
~.....
0.2
Figure 14. Radial tewperature profiles :or dynamic nonisothermal case \.1th a step load oi 10 psi atinner boundary.
· ..38
7. REFERENCES
1. Oden, J. T., Finite Elements of Nonlinear Continua, McGraw-Htl1,New York, 1971.
2. aden, J. T. and Armstrong, W. H., "Analysis of Nonlinear Dynamic,Coupled Thermoviscoelasticity Problems by the Finite Element Method,"Journal of Computers and Structures, Vol. 1, No.1, 1971.
3. aden, J. T. and Poe, J. W., "On the Numerical Solution of a Class ofProblems in Dynamic Coupled Thermoelasticity," Developments inTheoretical and Applied Mechanics, V,(Proceedings, 5th SECTAM, April1970), Edited by D. Frederick, Pergamon Press, Oxford).
4. Oden, J. T. and Aguirre-Ramirez, G., "Formulation of General DiscreteModels of Thermomechanical Behavior of Materials with Memory,"International Journal of Solids and Structures, Vol. 5, No. 10, pp.1077-1093, 1969.
5. Oden, J. T., "A Generalization of the Finite Element Concept and itsApplication to a Class of Problems in Nonlinear Viscoelasticity,"Developments in Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, IV, Edited byD. Friederick, (Proceedings, '4th SECTAM, March 1968), Pergamon Press,Oxford, pp. 581-593, 1970.
6. aden, J. T., "Finite Element Formulation of Problems of Finite De-formation and Irreversible Thermodynamics of Nonlinear Continua,"Recent Advances in Matrix Methods of Structural Analysis and Desi~,(Proceedings, U.S.-Japan Seminar on Matrix Methods in StructuralAnalysis and Design, Tokyo, 1969), Edited by R. H. Gallagher, Y.Yamada, and J. T. aden, University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, 1970.
7. aden, J. T., "A General Theory of Finite Elements.Considerations," International Journal of NumericalEngineering, Vol. 1, No.2, pp. 205-221, 1969.
I TopologicalMethods in
8. Truesdell, C. and Noll, W., "The Nonlinear Field Theories of Mechan:lc8,"Encyclopedia of Physics, Vol. 111/3, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1965.
9. Eringcn, A. C., Nonlinear Theory of Continuous Media, McGraw-Hill,New York, 1962.
lO. Coleman, B. D., "Thermodynamics of Materials with Memory," Archivesfor Rational Mechanics and Analysis, VoL. l7, pp. 1-46, 1964.
11. Achenbach, J. D., Vogel, S. M., and Herrmann, G•• "On Stress Waves inViscoelastic:Media Conducting Heat," Irreversible Aspects of ContinuumMechanics and Transfer of Physical Characteristics in Moving Fluids,Edited by H. Parkus and L. I. Sedov, Springer-Verlag, New York,pp. 1-15, 1968.
· .' .39
]2. Christensen, R. M. and Naghdi, P. M., Linear Non-IsothermalViscoelastic Solids," Acta Mechanica, Vol. III/I, pp. 1-12, 1967.
13. Cost, T. L., "Thermomechanical Coupling Phenomena in Non-IsothermalViscoelastic Solids," Ph.D. Thesis, University of Alabama, University,1969.
14. Armstrong,W. H., "Analysis of Nonlinear ThermoviscoelasticityProblems by the Finite Element Method," M. S. Thesis, University ofAlabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, 1971.
8. APPENDIX - EQUATIONS OF MOTION ANDHEAT CONDUCTION OF CYLINDRICAL ELEMENTS
We present here explicit forms of the equations of motion and heat
conduction for finite elements of a thermorheologically simple material,
obeying (4.17) - (4.20). These are special cases of (5.6) and (5.7)
for the case in which ~ and T are assumed to vary linearly in the radial
coordinate r and quadratically in time. For an element joining nodes 1
and 2 of a finite element model, let
b = -l/L1
(A. 1)
where L = r2- r1• Then the equations of motion of a finite element are
of the form
M,N = 1,2
(A.2)
,. ". .,40
where MMN is the term in brackets in (6.9a) and
)(~~+h) - a( )(~.)J
)(~.+h) - 4a( )(~.) + 8( )(~.- h)J)
(A.3a)
e -~t/81eC( )a( )Sk) = 12 [a( )(~.e+ h) - a( )(~rh)]
2e - (~t+·6h )Sk+"'3 [a( )(St+ h) - a( )(~J,)]
-(~ +h)/Be t k[ ]+ 12 3a( )(~t+h) - 4a( )(~t)+ a( )(St- h)
(A.3b)
The equations of heat conduction for an element are
S K- ~[~ <e-(~t+h)/\lk'HK<TN,\Jk) + CK('fN,vk»]J
L... \l1ck=;:l
s ~ ~ ~
L 3UN(~J,+ h) - 4uN(~t) + uN(~t- h)+ QI'T 'D2 • [ K· [o M ~ Ie 2h
k=l
S KL:t< . (e-(SJ,+h)/\lkoHK(UN,\lIe) + CK(uN,vlc»l}
k=lr(2: [E~(e-(St+h)/€P.HE<TN'€p) + CE(TN'€p»lJ
p=l
, ..' .,
+ 2e-(~t+h)/AI'HG(UN,Al)'CG(Gl,Al) + CG(UN,At'CG(Gl,At»JJ
s'\:" Kk - (II' +h)/V -,. -,.
D5MNl'(L.,[Vk
.(e a ....t k.HK(TN,vlc)·HK(Tl,vk)
k=l .
+ 2e-(St+h)/Vk.HK('fN,VIc)·CK('fl'VIc) + CK(TL,VIc)'CK(Tl,Vk»)}
S K- D6"'NL'· (~[Vk (e-~(St+h)/Vk'HK(GN'Vk)'HK<Tl ,Vic)Lk
k=l
+ e - ( St+h ) / V1<•HK (GN' Vic) • CK<TL ' Vic)
+ e - (~t+ h) / V~ •HKd N' Vic) • CK(uL ' Vic)
41
K, L, M, N ~ 1, 2 (A. 4)
where HK, CK, HG, CG, HE, and CE are defined by (A.3) and
.. ~ . .42
(A.5)