Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
www.danskeresearch.com
Investment Research
March 2013
Nordic OutlookEconomic and financial trends
� Denmark: Growth – but no jobs - the downturn is behind us, we expect Denmark to recover slowly
� Sweden: Dancing to a different tune - the economic key is set to change from minor to major
� Norway: Slower growth - but growth still solid
� Finland: Recovery drifting further - weak export performance is holding back Finnish economy
2 | March 2013 www.danskeresearch.com
No
rdic O
utlo
ok
Nordic Outlook
Markets Research
Editorial deadline 15 March 2013 Investment Research
Editor-in-Chief:
Steen Bocian
Chief Economist
+ 45 45 12 85 31
Macro economics:
Jens Nærvig Pedersen Denmark +45 45 12 80 61 [email protected]
Las Olsen Denmark +45 45 12 85 36 [email protected]
Roger Josefsson Sweden +46 (0)8-568 805 58 [email protected]
Frank Jullum Norway +47 85 40 65 40 [email protected]
Pasi Petteri Kuoppamäki Finland +358(0)105467715 [email protected]
Sales contacts:
Thomas Thøgersen Grønkjær Head of Markets Research +45 45 12 85 02 [email protected]
Rolf Kofoed Head of Sales Copenhagen +45 45 12 69 92 [email protected]
Henrik Voetmann Mikkelsen Global Head of Equities +45 45 14 73 05 [email protected]
Anders Damgaard Derivatives Sales and
Structuring
+45 45 12 85 50 [email protected]
Jesper Ronald Petersen FX Sales and Structuring +44 (0)20 7410 8149 [email protected]
Bo Wetterstein Debt Capital Markets +45 45 14 72 83 [email protected]
Lars Worsøe Andersen Fixed Income +45 45 14 69 97 [email protected]
Torben Frederiksen Head of Sales and Sales
Trading, US
+1 212 293 0340 [email protected]
This publication can be viewed at www.danskebank.com/danskeresearch
Statistical sources: Datastream, Ecowin, OECD, IMF, National Institute of Social and Economic Research, Statistics
Denmark and other national statistical institutes as well as proprietary calculations.
Important disclosures and certifications are contained from page 37 of this report.
3 | March 2013 www.danskeresearch.com
No
rdic O
utlo
ok
Nordic Outlook
Contents
Denmark Growth – but no jobs 4
Forecast at a glance 10
Sweden Dancing to a different tune 11
Forecast at a glance 19
Norway Slower growth 20
Forecast at a glance 24
Finland Recovery drifting further 25
Forecast at a glance 30
Global overview US take-off to drive global recovery 31
Economic forecast 35
Financial forecast 36
The Nordic Outlook is a quarterly publication that presents Danske Bank’s view on the economic outlook for
the Nordic countries. The quarterly publication the Global Scenarios sets out our global economic outlook.
Updated economic forecasts for the following countries and regions are available at
www.danskebank.com/danskeresearch:
Denmark
Sweden
Norway
Finland
US
UK
Eurozone
Switzerland
Central and Eastern Europe
Asia
4 | March 2013 www.danskeresearch.com
No
rdic O
utlo
ok
Nordic Outlook
Denmark
Growth – but no jobs
2012 was a year of economic decline. Exports were hit particularly
hard, with the European economy generally stuck in reverse gear.
This fed through to the labour market, with falling employment.
However, we believe the economic downturn is behind us and the
coming years will bring growth in the Danish economy.
The brighter outlook for the global economy is particularly good
news for the Danish economy in its current predicament, where scope
for expansionary economic policy is limited.
We expect healthy growth in domestic demand this year, with
increases in private consumption, public consumption and business
investment. Exports will be boosted by the global recovery.
We believe that the labour market hit bottom last year. Employment
will be largely unchanged this year, while next year economic growth
will be strong enough for a slight increase.
Return to growth
Although the Danish economy took a surprisingly steep dive at the end of
2012, we remain cautiously optimistic and forecast weak positive growth in
the coming years. However, the big dip in economic activity at the end of last
year does mean that we do not expect growth to be any higher than 0.4% this
year. Not until 2014 are we likely to see a more normal rate of growth.
Growth is expected to be fuelled by gently rising private consumption,
growing investment activity until the government’s investment window
closes and a slow improvement in exports driven by recovery in the global
economy.
Our expectation of slight growth in private consumption is based on
disposable income, which fell in both 2011 and 2012 and was the main
reason for the very weak consumption growth in those years. In 2013 and
2014 we anticipate a gradual increase in disposable income thanks to lower
inflation, interest rates and tax cuts. Also, we do not expect consumption to
face the same headwinds from the housing market.
There has been much talk about growth and even more about job creation in
the economic debate. Fiscal stimuli will only have a very limited impact on
growth in the coming years. The government has extremely little fiscal
leeway, making it difficult for us to turn the economy around under our own
steam. Despite these limitations, economic policy will still have a slight
expansionary impact. Things are also very tight when it comes to job
creation. Although there were signs of improvement in Q4 12, it is hard to
find indications of any real turnaround in the job market. We anticipate
largely unchanged employment in 2013.
Changes relative to previous forecast
Source: Statistics Denmark, Danske Bank
Downturn is behind us
Source: Statistics Denmark, Danske Bank
Growth dependent on global recovery
Source: Macrobond
2013 2014 2011 2012
GDP 0.4 1.5 0.7 1.6
Private consumption 0.4 1.1 1.3 1.2
Public consumption 1.2 0.2 0.6 0.8
Gross fixed investment 0.3 -0.5 2.1 -1.5
Exports 0.1 3.2 1.6 3.6
Imports 0.0 1.6 2.9 2.0
Gross unemployment (thousands) 160 159 170.1 170.8
Inflation 1.3 1.9 1.5 1.7
Government balance, % of GDP -1.4 -0.3 0.3 -1.8
Current account, % of GDP 4.1 4.7 4.8 4.9
Current forecast Previous forecast
-6.0
-4.0
-2.0
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
% growth in GDP
5 | March 2013 www.danskeresearch.com
No
rdic O
utlo
ok
Nordic Outlook
Only in 2014 will there be a slight rise in the number of jobs. The
government’s ‘growth plan’ will not have any great impact on the outlook for
job creation, but in the slightly longer term it may boost output in the Danish
economy and so have a positive effect on our overall prosperity.
While growth has been less than impressive, the Danish economy is strong in
other areas. We predict solid current account surpluses throughout the
forecast period, and the budget deficit is likely to be moderate. When it
comes to public finances, there is now reason to expect the extraordinary
income from the early taxation of capital pensions to be spread across both
2013 and 2014. We still expect this tax rescheduling to give public finances
an artificial boost of DKK40bn.
We have not radically altered our expectations for the Danish economy since
our previous forecast in December. The weak Q4 last year is the main reason
why we have revised down our growth expectations. On the other hand, the
labour market has surprised on the upside, which means that we no longer
anticipate a slight decline in employment.
Consumption treading water
There are currently no signs of any real upswing in private consumption on
the back of the crisis. Somewhat surprisingly, consumption fell in H2 12, and
growth over the year as a whole was just 0.5%, following on from a similarly
sized decrease in 2011. The higher level of consumption in 2012 is, of
course, due to the repayment of early retirement contributions, as real
disposable income fell. In terms of consumer confidence, there has not been
any fundamental change in households’ spending plans and indeed it is
difficult to see why there should have been – neither the housing market nor
the job market has taken a turn for the better.
Consumption indicators do not point to any notable increase in the current
quarter either, rather the reverse. That said, it should be noted that normally
reliable indicators such as Dankort debit card transactions have become
harder to interpret since the abolition of shopping hours legislation, which
has changed shopping patterns. We expect the rise in real incomes in 2012 to
be reflected in an increase in spending later in the year, leaving the
propensity to consume largely unchanged. In 2014 a general improvement in
the economic climate and higher employment in particular will probably
bring consumption growth that is not fuelled solely by income growth.
Private consumption decreased by 2.2% from 2007 to 2012, but retail sales
fell far further. Housing consumption, as calculated in the national accounts,
boosted overall private consumption by almost 1% during the same period.
At the onset of the crisis it was mainly car sales that were pulling down
consumption, but this effect has now reversed. Today almost all the
components of the consumption of goods are appreciably down on 2007 –
including food, where there has been a marked shift towards discount lines.
We expect employment to pick up in 2014
Source: Statistics Denmark, Danske Bank
Prospect of growth in private consumption
Source: Statistics Denmark, Danske Bank Markets
Housing consumption has boosted private
consumption
Source: Statistics Denmark, Danske Bank Markets
NB: The chart shows the cumulative contribution to growth in
private consumption calculated in chained prices from its various
subcomponents.
2730
2740
2750
2760
2770
2780
2790
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Employment, incl. forecast
(thousands)
9293949596979899
100101102103
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Private consumption, incl. forecast, chained
prices (2007=100)
-5.00
-4.00
-3.00
-2.00
-1.00
0.00
1.00
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Other
Housing
Leisure
Transport and communicationAcquisition of vehiclesFurnishing
Electricity and heatingBeverages and tobaccoFood
Pct. point
6 | March 2013 www.danskeresearch.com
No
rdic O
utlo
ok
Nordic Outlook
Sharp fall in inflation
The annual rate of inflation fell by 1.1pp in just four months and is now down
at 1.2%. The abolition of the fat tax and the absence of last year’s surge in
energy prices are among the main reasons for this, but 0.3pp of the drop is
due to a surprisingly steep fall in transport insurance premiums. Private-
sector wage growth is still around 1.5%, which means that 2013 could bring a
marginal increase in real wages after two years of decline. Add in lower taxes
and interest rates, and real household disposable income could rise by around
1% this year. 2014 will probably bring flat real wage growth, much smaller
tax savings and no further decrease in interest rates, but households will
benefit from rising employment.
Fragile housing market
The housing market continues to flounder. Although the decline in property
prices slowed in 2012, it is still too early to talk about a turnaround.
According to Statistics Denmark’s property price index, prices for houses
were exactly the same at the end of 2012 as they were a year earlier. Given
that prices of other goods and services climbed around 2% during the same
period, it is clear that the market is still under pressure. Prices for holiday
homes fell by 2.6% over the same period, and only owner-occupied
apartments showed signs of a turnaround, gaining 7.9% in 2012. However,
apartments make up only a very small part of the overall housing market, and
it is not a given that higher apartment prices will lead to higher house prices,
so to claim that the housing market as a whole has turned the corner would be
going too far.
The housing market will continue to benefit from extremely low interest rates
in the coming years, which is why we expect a slight rise in house prices –
but the rate of increase will probably be below general inflation, which goes
to show that the market is in far from good shape, so it is debatable whether
this really is a turnaround. And while we expect property prices to rise
slightly, we cannot rule out a further fall. This remains a risk, but with the
prospect of continued low interest rates, only gently falling employment and
rising disposable income, we are fairly confident that prices will rise.
There has been some talk recently about the expiry of the repayment-free
period on interest-only mortgages issued in 2003. However, we do not expect
this to send shockwaves through the housing market within our forecast
horizon. House prices are still above the levels of 2003 and 2004, which will
make it possible for most homeowners to remortgage in a way that makes the
increase in payments manageable. However, we cannot rule out some
homeowners feeling the squeeze in 2015-17. This could potentially lead to
more homes on the market and so put downward pressure on prices, but this
is unlikely to have any major impact on the housing market over the next two
years. We expect a stable to gently falling number of repossessions over the
next two years.
Tax cuts pull down inflation
Source: Statistics Denmark
Housing market yet to turn around
Source: Statistics Denmark
Repossessions have peaked
Source: Statistics Denmark
7 | March 2013 www.danskeresearch.com
No
rdic O
utlo
ok
Nordic Outlook
Days of negative interest rates coming to an end
Money market rates in the euro area pushed up at the beginning of the year,
putting a slight pressure on the krone and forcing the Danish central bank,
Danmarks Nationalbank (DN), to intervene and then raise its lending and CD
rates by 10bp in January to support the currency. This can be put down to a
general improvement in the global economy, and in particular the decreasing
risk of euro collapse, rather than dwindling confidence in the Danish
economy. There are no signs that investors have seriously begun to abandon
Denmark as a safe haven.
We expect the ECB to leave interest rates alone in the coming years, but it is
not inconceivable that Danmarks Nationalbank will raise its rates again. If the
global economy continues to recover and the economic situation in the euro
area continues to settle, the period of negative interest rates in Denmark
could soon be over. Everything points to a modest increase in the DN’s rates.
This could lead to small rises in mortgage rates, but they will still be very
low.
Higher employment on the horizon
The number of people in work fell by 8,000 during the course of 2012. This
breaks down into a decrease of 5,000 in the private sector and a slightly
smaller drop of 3,000 in the public sector. Given the relatively severe
economic downturn, it was surprising that employment did not fall further.
Growth in the Danish economy is likely to be on trend during the forecast
period. We expect this to keep employment at a stable level this year and
bring a small increase next year. We have already seen slight positive signs
from the job market. Employment rose at the end of last year, and
unemployment has fallen at the beginning of this year. The number of
vacancies has also increased over the past year. The employment growth we
predict for 2014 will be mainly in the private sector, as more subdued growth
in public expenditure will limit the scope for growth in public-sector
employment.
The labour force has shrunk by almost 100,000 since 2008 but has grown
again slightly in recent quarters. The big decrease in the labour force means
that the rise in employment will not necessarily lead to lower unemployment.
There is a reserve of labour in the student population and it is not
inconceivable that greater demand for labour will be met to some extent by
imported labour, for example in the construction industry. Thus, despite
slight growth in employment during the forecast period, we do not expect any
decrease in unemployment.
Productivity gap widened in 2012
Labour productivity was unchanged in 2012. The reason may be that the
sharp downturn in the economy took employers by surprise – certainly the
year’s business confidence data did not indicate that they anticipated
contracting activity.
It may also be because there was an expectation among employers that the
downturn was only temporary and growth would return this year. Both
The central bank raised its rates in January
Source: Statistics Denmark
Decline in the labour force means an increase in
the labour reserve
Source: Statistics Denmark, Danske Bank
NB: The labour force is defined as the number of people in
employment plus the number of unemployed people excluding job
creation schemes.
Employment up at the end of the year
Source: Statistics Denmark, Danske Bank
8 | March 2013 www.danskeresearch.com
No
rdic O
utlo
ok
Nordic Outlook
factors could explain why employment did not fall further than it did last year
given the steep drop in GDP.
Last year’s weak productivity growth can presumably also be put down to the
usual rigidities in the Danish labour market and the Danish economy, and we
do not consider it a reflection of any structural shift in the economy.
Companies have, however, been compensated to some extent via weak wage
growth. Whatever the case, the lack of productivity growth means that the
productivity gap widened last year. In the short term, this gap will limit the
scope for recovery in the labour market even if demand starts to pick up.
Public consumption growing again
Public consumption got back up to speed in 2012, with quarterly growth
roughly around the average seen in the years before the crisis. The
government’s ‘growth plan’ assumes slow growth in expenditure in the
coming years. We therefore expect public consumption to climb at more or
less the same rate this year as in 2012 and somewhat more slowly next year.
The government deficit probably exceeded the EMU limit of 3% of GDP last
year, but is likely to fall back in line this year. The early taxation of capital
pensions will give public finances a temporary boost. Originally the plan was
to offer a discounted rate of tax in 2013, but the ‘growth plan’ has extended
this into 2014. We reckon that the scheme will bring in non-recurring
revenue in the region of DKK 40bn, with the bulk of this now coming in
2014.
Global recovery to boost exports
Exports had a horrendous end to 2012, falling in both Q3 and Q4, the latter
quarter being particularly difficult for the global economy, with some of
Denmark’s biggest trading partners seeing a fall in activity. This is probably
the reason for the downturn in Danish exports.
The effective krone exchange rate has weakened somewhat over the past
month but is still some 3% stronger than when it bottomed out last summer.
This has made Danish goods more expensive abroad. However, the reasons
for this movement are actually good news for Danish exports, namely the
marked easing of monetary policy in the US and Japan over the past six
months and the latest improvements in Europe, which have reduced the risk
of euro collapse. Both effects have boosted the euro and therefore also the
krone, and both will help stimulate growth in the global economy. This
means higher export market growth and so stronger demand for Danish
goods.
We expect healthy growth in exports in the coming years. The monetary
easing in the US and Japan is expected to have a positive knock-on effect on
demand in Europe, home to our most important export markets. There is also
the prospect of growing domestic demand, fuelled by growth in private
consumption, public consumption and business investment.
We expect some of the increase in domestic demand to be met by rising
imports. Growth in domestic demand will reduce the current account surplus
Unchanged labour productivity in 2012
Source: Statistics Denmark, Danske Bank
NB: Labour productivity is defined as gross value added in chained
prices per employee.
Public consumption grew in 2012
Source: Statistics Denmark
Exports struggled last year
Source: Statistics Denmark
9 | March 2013 www.danskeresearch.com
No
rdic O
utlo
ok
Nordic Outlook
slightly, but there is still the prospect of further strong surpluses in the
coming years.
Investment Window to lift business investment
There was moderate growth in investment as a whole in 2012. The bringing
forward of public investments as part of the government’s Kick Start
programme made a healthy contribution to investment growth, while the
biggest positive contribution came from an increase in business investment.
Pulling the other way was a sharp decrease in housing investment. We expect
further moderate growth in the overall level of investment this year. On the
one hand, the normalisation of public investment will pull down investment
activity somewhat. On the other, we expect the government’s Investment
Window, which closes at the end of 2013, to result in business investments
being brought forward from 2014. This will mean markedly increased
business investment towards the end of this year and then reduced levels in
early 2014. Investment activity next year will probably be bolstered by a
generally slightly brighter economic outlook.
Moderate investment plans
Source: Statistics Denmark
10 | March 2013 www.danskeresearch.com
No
rdic O
utlo
ok
Nordic Outlook
Denmark: Forecast at a glance
Source: Statistics Denmark, Danmarks Nationalbank, Reuters EcoWin, Danske Bank
National account 2011 2011 2012 2013 2014
DKK bn (current prices)
Private consumption 874.5 -0.5 0.5 0.4 1.1
Government consumption 508.1 -1.5 0.5 1.2 0.2
Gross fixed investment 311.7 2.8 1.2 0.3 -0.5
- Business investment -1.8 4.1 3.6 0.2
- Housing investment 14.6 -9.8 -2.0 1.6
- Government investment 4.2 10.6 -10.3 -7.7
Growth contribution from inventories 3.6 0.5 -0.5 0.0 0.0
Exports 956.8 6.5 1.1 0.1 3.2
- Goods exports 593.4 5.9 -0.4 0.7 3.0
- Service exports 363.4 7.6 3.6 -0.8 3.7
Imports 863.3 5.6 2.7 0.0 1.6
- Goods imports 552.7 5.4 3.1 0.9 0.8
- Service imports 310.6 5.9 1.8 -1.7 3.0
Gross domestic product 1791.5 1.1 -0.6 0.4 1.5
Economic indicators 2011 2012 2013 2014
Current account, DKK bn 101.2 107.0 75.0 90.0
- % of GDP 5.6 5.9 4.1 4.7
General government balance, DKK bn -32.0 -72.0 -25.0 -5.0
- % of GDP -1.8 -4.0 -1.4 -0.3
General government debt, DKK bn 835.0 763.0 753.0 743.0
- % of GDP 46.6 42.0 40.7 38.9
Employment, ex. leave (thousands) 2767.0 2754.0 2755.0 2764.8
Gross unemployment (thousands) 159.8 162.0 159.6 159.1
- % of total work force (DST definition) 6.0 6.1 6.0 6.0
Oil price - USD/barrel 111.0 112.0 115.0 107.0
House prices, % y/y -2.8 -3.4 1.0 0.6
Private sector wage level, % y/y 1.8 1.6 1.5 1.9
Consumer prices, % y/y 2.8 2.4 1.3 1.9
Financial figures 20/03/13 +3 mths +6 mths +12 mths
Repo rate, % p.a. 0.30 0.30 0.40 0.50
2-yr swap yield, % p.a. 0.66 0.80 0.90 1.05
10-yr swap yield, % p.a. 1.85 1.95 2.25 2.50
EUR/DKK 745.5 746 746 746
USD/DKK 573.3 549 541 557
11 | March 2013 www.danskeresearch.com
Nordic Outlook
Sweden Dancing to a different tune
The Swedish economy has encountered multifaceted risks over the past few years, all with international origin.
The fundamental strengths of the Swedish economy, pared with extraordinary measures from economic policy makers both at home and abroad, have nonetheless made the Swedish economy able to withstand most adversities.
With prospects of a gradual global recovery led by economies in the Americas and Asia, moderating near-term downside risks in euroland, and a possible reawakening of the Japanese manufacturing machine, we feel that the economic key should be set to change from minor to major.
And being an archetypical ‘small open economy’, Sweden is likely to benefit, despite a somewhat stronger SEK (in real terms), which is why we have lifted our forecast a couple of notches for both 2013 and 2014.
GDP-growth is now expected to reach 1.7% (1.3%) y/y in 2013 and 2.2% (2.0%) y/y in 2014. We expect the unemployment rate to slowly recede from 8% (8.5%) this year to 7.8% (8.0%) next year. Inflation is expected to reach 0.3% (0.4%) y/y and 1.7% (1.5%) y/y for 2013 and 2014, respectively. Nota Bene, the changes to our inflation forecast are mainly due to a different monetary policy outlook (see below).
The Riksbank majority should be able to take some comfort in the stabilising, even improving, global outlook and as domestic risk management apparently warrants higher rates, we expect the Riksbank to tentatively start normalising rates at the monetary policy meeting in December 2013. The prolonged hiking cycle foreseen should, however, keep the monetary policy stance expansionary throughout the forecast horizon
Our more optimistic, or perhaps less pessimistic, forecasts have not altered our views on the long-term impact of the global debt crisis on the Swedish economy. Large and important parts of our export markets are mired in recession and deleveraging is continuing to take place on a global scale. And though perhaps petering out, risks remain. The economic and political turmoil in euroland continues and domestic risks such as a deflating housing market bubble or a chokingly fast strengthening of the SEK are still very much present.
That said, one strong argument for changing our views in a more positive direction is that for the first time in many years we also see some upside risks. These pertain mainly to the combination of a stronger US housing market, a more positive financial market sentiment and an extremely lax monetary policy.
Loosing market shares, the new normal
Sources: National Institute for Economic and Social Research
(NIESR), National Institute for Economic Research (KI) and
Statistics Sweden (SCB). Danske Bank calculations.
12 | March 2013 www.danskeresearch.com
No
rdic O
utlo
ok
Nordic Outlook
International demand through the cold spell
Economic and financial decision makers focused squarely on the incoming
event risks during autumn and winter, leaving activity and asset prices in a
state of contraction. However, of the main risks associated with the US fiscal
cliff we are now left with a “fiscal hump” of considerably less real effects and
despite a European political situation still in flux, we have gained a central
bank that has pledged to: “[...] do whatever it takes to preserve the euro”. In a
nutshell, it seems the old market adage “Don’t fight the FED” is applicable
also in a European setting where the above ECB wording skilfully succeeded
in veering market sentiment and sovereign risk premia to levels deemed, at
least temporarily, sustainable – without having to show neither real money
nor a detailed explanation on how the ECB would or could render the euro
irreversible.
In addition, we continue to receive good news from the US housing market,
where new houses are again being erected as household formation has finally
depleted inventories of unsold houses and outpaced the historically low
housing completions by some margin (not to mention for some time). Hence,
and to no little extent thanks to apt monetary policy measures directed on
financing of house mortgages, house prices have posted consecutive growth
for almost a year, with an apparent chance of positive dynamics through both
wealth effects and a relaxation of credit conditions. A long sought after
recovery in activity in large developing economies (the BRIC-countries by a
popular acronym) also seems to be underway, despite perhaps being
inadequate for those expecting a new world order within a year or two (at
most). Even the manufacturing giant Japan seems ready for a bold step into
the unknown with an(-other) enormous fiscal stimulus package and a new,
foolproof, resolve by the Bank of Japan to escape the liquidity trap once and
for all (herein lies also massive risks to confidence as it could be seen as
fiscal domination of the central bank, but we hope for the best).
In spite of what seems a shift in tactics from unrelenting and unpopular
austerity measures to longer-term growth-enhancing reforms (privatisation,
deregulation, etc) southern Europe, incl France, is mired in recession and we
expect little positive news from these economies near term. Luckily, the
south of Europe is a miniscule part of Swedish export markets, which is why
growth in international import demand for Swedish exports – world market
growth – is expected to hold up relatively well during the forecast horizon. In
addition, from what we can gather, many of the measures taken to stimulate
demand in growing economies are directly aimed at increasing investments,
which is an extra boon for the investment goods laden Swedish exports
industry.
In short, we expect Swedish world market growth to surpass 3% y/y in 2013
and be in line with historical averages, at around 6½% y/y in 2014.
Notwithstanding the emergence of a more positive financial market
sentiment, and stabilising real developments, downside risks are still
predominant and the dispersion and development of risks will take close
scrutiny going forward. Among these risks are possible confidence effects
from the rather mild fiscal contraction in the US, a more assertive stance
from the ECB or creditor nations on fiscal slippage in southern Europe and,
13 | March 2013 www.danskeresearch.com
No
rdic O
utlo
ok
Nordic Outlook
of course, political upheaval in conjunction with elections or critical fiscal
policy decisions in both creditor and debtor nations.
Economic policy mix and asset prices
Since December, the SEK has strengthened against most currencies, and the
broad trade weighted currency index KIX has even – admittedly only in
nominal terms – touched the 100-level, something which has not been seen
since 18 November 1992, the day before the Riksbank let the SEK float
freely. In real terms, the picture is drastically different with the real SEK
being more or less in line with the average since 1992. This seemingly
distorted picture is due to differences in price developments over the years,
with lower cost increases in Sweden vis-à-vis our main competitors. The
lower relative cost developments in Sweden probably goes some way in
explaining the rising profit share of GDP and suggests that companies – in
aggregate – are more able to withstand a stronger SEK than the nominal
level of the krona suggests. It will, however, eat away at profit margins in the
exports industry, something that might put a damper on Swedish stock
markets going forward, especially since we foresee further strengthening in a
medium-term perspective.
Interest rates have risen over the past few months, on almost all maturities,
counteracting some of the additional monetary policy stimuli released over
the past few months. However, (credit) risk premia have simultaneously
decreased, leaving corporate and housing financing rates at historically low
levels on most horizons. As in most other countries, short-term interest rates
are firmly repressed by the central bank, whereas the improved market
sentiment and economic outlook have started to slowly push longer interest
rates upwards. Since the tentative rise in longer-term rates represents a
positive change in market sentiment and the economic outlook, and the
absolute levels are still close to historical lows, we do not believe that current
interest rate levels constitute any threat to the economic recovery. Any
renewed weakness in the outlook should thus be accompanied, rather than
led-on, by changes in market interest rates. This proposition is further
underlined since the Riksbank still enjoys a very high inflation fighting
credibility, further negating the risk of a stifling rise in market interest rates.
Believing that a tepid economic recovery is about to unfold, it should come
as no surprise that we expect the Riksbank to eventually initiate a hiking
cycle. However, such actions should only take place against the background
of a Swedish economy on much firmer footing, which we believe will push
the first hike deep into winter 2013/14 and thenceforth continue at a very
slow pace for the remainder of the forecast horizon (and beyond). Under any
circumstances, the foreseen hikes will keep monetary policy in expansionary
territory for a very long time, even when taking account of various structural
issues such as lower potential growth and higher structural unemployment.
The other, often overlooked, pillar of stabilisation policy is the economic
policy mix in general and fiscal policies in particular. For even in a perfect
world, where fiscal policy is concentrated on structural issues, any decision is
likely to have cyclical consequences when being promulgated through the
economy. And according to Finance Minister Anders Borg, there is room for
additional structural measures – mainly tax cuts for low and middle-income
earners – but his calculations are based on an optimistic 2.7% y/y potential
The SEK really shouldn’t pose much of a problem
Note: The real KIX index has been estimated through using
Swedish relative ULC:s
Sources: Macrobond, KI, NIESR and Organisation for Economic
Cooperation and Development (OECD). Danske Bank calculations.
We are the Anders Borg, resistance is futile
Sources: KI and SCB. Danske Bank calculations
14 | March 2013 www.danskeresearch.com
No
rdic O
utlo
ok
Nordic Outlook
growth rate, which is rather far from our own 1½% y/y. We can understand
the political rationale behind such arguments, but given the strong legal
framework surrounding the sustainability of fiscal policy, the government is
likely in time (pass the forecast horizon) to be forced to cut back on some of
its promises or even reduce spending (or hike taxes). In our forecast,
nonetheless, government expenditures are set to expand by circa 1% y/y in
both 2013 and 2014, pushing central government net lending to -1% of GDP
this year, and -¾% of GDP next year.
To conclude our discussion on the economic policy mix, our estimates
indicate that while monetary policy is suitably expansionary throughout the
forecast horizon, we see a risk of overly expansionary fiscal policy
necessitating future austerity, perhaps at a more sensitive stage of the
business cycle.
The expansionary stance of domestic monetary policy is augmented by
abundant liquidity on a global scale on the back of massive quantitative
measures from all central banks in major currency areas. As can be seen from
statistics on, inter alia, portfolio investments, this liquidity has to some extent
benefitted Sweden, where foreign demand for Swedish assets has been rising
on trend for almost two years. Sovereign, corporate and housing financing
have therefore remained cheap or have become even cheaper over the last
couple of years. Despite the effect of the stronger SEK, Swedish stock
markets have thus developed on a strong note, even compared to doped stock
markets like the US, UK et al. Going forward, we expect Swedish stock
markets to develop in line with (long term) nominal GDP, id est, rise by 3 to
5 per cent a year.
Swedish housing markets have remained afloat despite a public discourse on
increased regulations of lending standards and a generally sour sentiment
during autumn last year. In some areas, a small decrease in housing prices is
visible but on a national level prices are more or less unchanged. We
continue to foresee a limited drop in house prices, amounting to 5% y/y this
year and a somewhat less pronounced drop next year, when prices are
expected to decrease by 2½% y/y. From a longer term perspective, our view
is that Swedish house prices are above their fundamental value by more than
20%, underlining that something will probably have to change; either prices
demonstrate a more abrupt correction or – in a more benign scenario –
household incomes rise while house prices remain stable.
Summing up economic and financial conditions, we believe that cheap
liquidity is no longer a restriction in the Swedish economy, it is rather a lack
of demand for credits – viable investment projects – that is lacking. This
probably has more to do with depressing expectations of future incomes than
anything else. A sustainable shift in the income outlook– in line with what we
are expecting – will nonetheless benefit from credits freely available. There is
even a non-negligible risk that this process will pick up steam much faster
than we expect due to the extremely loose global monetary conditions,
creating a not so clear cut policy dilemma for many central banks.
A stronger krona leaving its mark on growth
The global outlook is slowly becoming more positive and demand for
typically Swedish export products is on the rise. At the same time, economic
Monetary Conditions seem balanced
Note: MCI is calculated as the deviation from a filtered trend of
different interest rates and an exchange rate index (all variables
are normalised).
Source: Macrobond. Danske Bank calculations
15 | March 2013 www.danskeresearch.com
No
rdic O
utlo
ok
Nordic Outlook
conditions are mostly benign, lending support to the recovery. However, the
stronger krona – though not yet at levels where it wreaks havoc on the export
industry – is likely to restrain international demand growth for Swedish
exports during the entire forecast horizon, which is why our forecast for
exports is quite subdued from a historical perspective. In 2013 export growth
is expected to be a meagre 1.5% y/y, which is largely due to a very weak
starting point to 2013, whereas Q4 over Q4 comparisons demonstrate export
growth close to 4% y/y. In 2014, we forecast export growth to improve
further at 5.1% y/y.
If Swedish exports posted a weak end to 2012, import growth was worse still.
Weak demand for industrial goods and a need to control inventories pushed
consecutive import growth into the red during H2 12. However, looking at
demand and inventory indicators, there is evidence that this inventory cycle
has run its course and Q1 should see some recoil in imports. In addition, the
stronger krona is beneficial for importers and consumers, lifting import
growth throughout the forecast horizon. All in all, we expect import growth
just shy of 2% y/y and 4% y/y in 2013 and 2014, respectively.
Taken together, and under the influence of a structurally stronger krona, this
means that net exports should start to retract growth over the coming years,
partly explaining why the net export contribution is calculated to be -0.4 p.p.
y/y this year and -0.9 p.p. y/y in 2014. Underneath these dismal figures we
nonetheless see signs of a gradual restructuring of the export sector towards
services, a product group less sensitive to currency changes.
Investments picking up steam towards the end of the
forecast horizon
The currently low growth in exports and consumption demand together with
production in the manufacturing industry running low has produced
considerable slack in the economy, which is expected to keep a lid on
investment growth during the first few phases of this year. However, our long
held view is that the slack in the economy is considerably lower than
generally perceived as a lot of the capital stock has become obsolete due to
large shifts in relative costs and exchange rates, etc, in the wake of the great
recession. These shifts necessitate investments in productive capacity in new
and growing industries. In addition, there is an excess demand for housing
and in areas where market prices exceed production costs (Tobin’s Q),
typically high population density areas, there should be room for additional
investments, even when taking our sombre outlook on house prices into
account.
Public investments are another area where we expect to see positive growth
going forward. The government has previously announced large investments
in infrastructure, etc, and there is evidence of another “shameless” election
year increase in public investments.
To sum up, we expect investment growth in 2013 to be subdued, growing by
2.5% y/y. In 2014, the above-mentioned factors are expected to come more
clearly into play and will, together with a higher overall level of demand,
produce investment growth of close to 8% y/y, on our forecasts.
SEK making imports cheaper, and the inventory
cycle stabilises again
Sources: KI and SCB. Danske Bank calculations.
Net Exports contributing negatively, the new
normal
Sources: KI and SCB. Danske Bank calculations.
Investment demand to pick up again
Sources: KI and SCB. Danske Bank calculations.
16 | March 2013 www.danskeresearch.com
No
rdic O
utlo
ok
Nordic Outlook
Labour market developments should follow suit
Despite a visible weakening of Swedish labour markets in H2, the lingering
impression is one of relative stability. The newfound flexibility among both
employers and unions has let hours worked (and thus by and large also the
monthly pay check) become a buffer instead of large lay-offs at the first sign
of a deceleration. This pattern has been discernible ever since the onset of the
great recession and seems to have worked well, even though we initially
considered this merely to be traditional labour hoarding, albeit a somewhat
more sophisticated version.
Despite the labour market normally lagging growth by a couple of quarters,
we can already see some green shoots in labour market indicators. Not only
have notices of lay-offs come down close to “normal” levels, employment
plans and other survey data on the labour market have clearly turned a corner
and are for some business sectors even in expansionary territory again.
Nonetheless, investment growth has historically proven to be the perhaps
most reliable indicator for employment since investments not only demand
people to construct and install, but also to operate, new equipment. We do not
think this time around will be much different, but the large pool of people
outside the labour force might keep unemployment rates higher for longer
even with pronounced improvements in employment.
The good news is thus that labour markets seem to be through the worst, with
most indicators pointing in the right direction. Therefore, we expect
employment to at least remain stable in the near term. However, growth in
average hours worked has been depressed, which is why a more pronounced
upturn could take some time. As investment growth picks up steam and
developments in more labour-intensive industries such as construction and
retail also progress, we should nonetheless see a more substantial
improvement in both employment and the unemployment rate but we expect
that to take place mainly during next year. To conclude, we estimate that
employment will grow by less than 1% y/y in 2013 and by more than 1% y/y
in 2014. This should be enough to keep the unemployment rate stable at 8%
during the better part of this year, only to recede towards 7.6% during the
course of 2014. The large number of unemployed and people currently
outside the labour force will probably keep unemployment rates at elevated
levels for a long period of time, far beyond the forecast horizon.
Krona putting a golden touch to consumption
Household confidence is on the rise again, after facing a number of
headwinds during the latter part of 2012. Not only was the general risk
sentiment very low in the run-up to a number of decisive international events,
but notices of lay-offs shot up and the Riksbank seemed intent on driving
down the housing markets. In response, households increased their savings
further, from already very high levels, due to which 2012 consumption
growth stopped at a bleak 1.7% y/y, saved only by strong growth in the first
quarter of 2012.
Now, as these downward forces recede, we expect less weak household
consumption growth near term, but the lack of swift progress in employment
will probably keep any pent-up demand at bay for some time more.
Nonetheless, the stronger SEK is already proving to have an impact as travel
and consumption abroad have picked up and there is anecdotal evidence of
Stubbornly high unemployment rates…
Source: Reuters Ecowin
…but a strong currency makes consuming easier
Source: Reuters Ecowin
17 | March 2013 www.danskeresearch.com
No
rdic O
utlo
ok
Nordic Outlook
improved pricing in – exempli gratia – clothing and shoes producing stronger
volume growth.
Next year we see a more solid improvement of household consumption, since
increased employment and a tad higher wages lift disposable incomes. In
addition, we foresee some decrease in precautionary savings. However, wise
from experiences of recent years, we have chosen not to revise this variable
to any larger extent. All in all, household consumption growth is expected to
surpass the historical average of 2% y/y in 2013 and even push close to 3%
y/y in 2014.
Resource utilisation and inflation
In the preceding sections we have touched on the main components when
looking at GDP-growth. And the lingering impression is one of an improving
economic environment, but it is a recovery that is bleak by any historical
comparison and one that is still laden with large risks to the downside, ready
to push the world economy and the export dependent Swedish economy into
the doldrums without much notice. Nevertheless, and despite apparent
downside risks, for the first time in many years, we are also able to identify
upside risks in the nexus of very strong liquidity, rising asset prices and a
more pronounced shift in sentiment.
To sum up, GDP-growth is expected to accelerate in 2013 and 2014 and we
have revised our forecasts in a more positive direction for both years. In 2013
GDP is estimated to grow by 1.7% y/y, compared to 1.3% y/y in our previous
forecast. For 2014, we have made a smaller change and now expect GDP-
growth of 2.2% y/y versus 2.0% y/y in our previous forecast.
From a historical perspective this is a meagre outcome for a recovery phase.
However, we believe that the great recession has altered the structures of the
world economy and, hence, also of the Swedish economy. The most obvious
change is an ongoing, fundamentally warranted, strengthening of the Swedish
krona that still has some way to go. The stronger SEK pushes low-value
added export companies into dire straits and some of them will probably be
put out of business or be forced to relocate production to other economies.
Still having a rather rigid labour market, the effects on the Swedish economy
are already visible – stubbornly high unemployment rates. Eventually, we
might see more decisive political measures to address this problem, but given
the highly sensitive ideological nature of the resolutions on offer, we suspect
this will take a long time. In the meantime, estimates on potential growth
should recede, and we have “guesstimated” – with the use of mainly
demographical projections –long-term GDP-growth at no higher than 1.5%
y/y. Beware, though, that given the very limited time series on hand effects
on potential estimates are difficult to assess quantitatively and are also very
sensitive to specifications.
This means that even the feeble growth rates foreseen over the next couple of
years should be able to reduce slack – increase resource utilisation – and give
way to increasing inflationary pressures. Make no mistake about it though,
current levels of resource utilisation are very low, and will be a restraining
factor in the upcoming wage negotiations during spring. The deflationary
impact of low wage growth will to some extent be balanced by low
productivity growth keeping cost pressures – measured in terms of Unit
Steady as she hopefully goes
Sources: KI and SCB. Danske Bank calculations.
Not as much slack as could be expected
Sources: KI and SCB. Danske Bank calculations.
18 | March 2013 www.danskeresearch.com
Nordic Outlook
Labour Costs (ULC) – between 1½ and 2% y/y for the forecast horizon, levels deemed sufficient to pull inflation from current deflationary territory and towards the inflation target (2%). However, the structural strengthening of the SEK works in the other direction, which is why we will probably need to move beyond 2014 to see the operational inflation target, CPIF (CPI excluding the impact of interest costs), being attained.
Riksbank in a policy dilemma of its own
From our perspective, it should all be so simple. Contrary to many of its peers, the Riksbank has successfully managed to exit all non-standard measures during the height of the financial crisis and there is no need to support fiscal policy, which is why the discussion on fiscal dominance heard elsewhere has not even started in Sweden. This should make it possible for the Riksbank to focus more squarely on the inflation target.
This situation should be the envy of most central banks, who have rather increased non-standard measures and runs the risk of losing confidence, letting the inflation genie out of its bottle again, should they be found financing massive fiscal deficits.
However, the Riksbank has chosen to create its own, unique, policy dilemma in adding financial stability considerations into their discussions on monetary policy. According to the Riksbank, the lack of adequate instruments to control high and rising household indebtedness might to no little extent be balanced by a higher policy rate. This thinking has led to one of the most public and heated debates on the current stabilisation policy regime Sweden has seen in a very long time, since it is seen as expanding the Riksbank’s powers and obfuscating any evaluation of the Riksbank’s performance.
We will not enter that debate here, suffice to say that it has altered the monetary policy reaction function and is one of the main reasons why we believe that the Riksbank will hike as soon as December this year, even though our forecast for inflation does not by itself warrant such an early reaction. The projected hiking cycle is nonetheless cautious, with hikes at every other meeting, meaning that by end-2014 the repo rate is still at a low 2%.
Inflation is not much of an issue these days
Sources: Macrobond and SCB. Danske Bank calculations.
Riksbank hiking, but only very slowly
Sources Macrobond and Riksbank. Danske Bank calculations.
19 | March 2013 www.danskeresearch.com
No
rdic O
utlo
ok
Nordic Outlook
Sweden: Forecast at a glance
Source: Danske Bank
National Accounts 2011 2011 2012 2013 2014
SEK bn
Private consumption 1672,9 2,1 1,5 2,4 2,6Government consumption 926,0 1,1 0,8 0,8 0,6Fixed gross cap formation 646,0 6,4 3,4 2,5 7,7Stocks* 40,5 0,5 -1,1 0,2 0,0Domestic demand 3245,0 2,7 1,7 1,9 3,1Exports 1748,8 7,1 0,7 1,5 4,9Aggregate demand 3285,2 3,2 0,5 2,1 3,1Imports 1531,5 6,3 -0,1 2,5 7,6Net exports* 217,0 0,7 0,4 -0,3 -0,9GDP 3502,5 3,7 0,8 1,7 2,0 - GDP, Calendar adjusted 3,7 1,2 1,7 2,2* contribution to GDP growth
Economic indicators 2011 2012 2013 2014
Trade balance, SEK bn 91,1 90,4 96,1 79,2in % of GDP 2,6 2,5 2,7 2,1Current Account, SEK bn 256,7 250,6 249,5 228,0in % of GDP 7,3 7,0 6,9 6,1
Public sector savings, SEK bn -3,5 -21,3 -36,0 -29,9in % of GDP -0,1 -0,6 -1,0 -0,8Public debt ratio, % of GDP* 38,4 37,7 37,6 37,5
Unemployment, % of labour force 7,8 8,0 8,0 7,8Hourly wages, % y/y 3,2 2,7 2,8 3,2Consumer prices, % y/y 3,0 0,9 0,3 1,7House prices, % y/y 0,8 -2,0 -5,0 -2,5* Maastricht definitionFinancial figures 19.03.13 + 3 mths + 6 mths + 12 mths
Repo-rate 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,252-yr swap yield 1,40 1,70 1,80 1,9010-yr swap yield 2,36 2,50 2,60 2,65SEK/EUR 833 830 830 820SEK/USD 643 610 601 612
Vol growth in %
20 | March 2013 www.danskeresearch.com
No
rdic O
utlo
ok
Nordic Outlook
Norway
Slower growth
More subdued growth in oil investments and tighter credit policies
have resulted in slower growth in the Norwegian economy.
Household savings rate is up despite low interest rates, high house
prices and low unemployment. This, together with tighter capital
requirements on banks, should reduce the risk of a housing bubble.
Low inflation and low interest rates in other countries have kept
Norwegian rates down. We see only modest downside risk to
Norwegian interest rates going forward.
Return to trend growth
The Norwegian economy has come through the European debt crisis
relatively unscathed. Oil investment has increased considerably and made a
big contribution to Norway’s economic growth – both directly through
increased activity and indirectly through strong income growth. Now,
however, there are signs that these growth impulses are beginning to wane.
Oil companies have revised down their investment estimates for this year,
which is likely to reduce the growth impulses for the supply industry. At the
same time, the announced tightening of capital adequacy rules has caused
Norwegian banks to turn off the taps. Higher interest rate margins and stricter
lending practices have had an effect, especially on the potential for
businesses to expand. On the other hand, despite still weak growth in Europe,
there are signs of exports beginning to pick up, and we therefore expect a less
negative contribution to growth from net imports this year compared to 2012.
Still strong real wage growth should secure buoyant consumption growth.
Developments in the housing market are less certain than earlier due to
stricter bank regulations. Our main scenario remains that these measures will
contribute to a needed slowing of house price growth but that home building
will not be choked by a dearth of capital. Hence, employment growth should
remain buoyant, unemployment should remain low and wage growth should
be similar to last year. We expect the increase in bank lending rates to grant
Norges Bank (central bank) the leeway to keep policy rates low for the rest of
the year. NOK is likely to remain strong but the risk of significant
strengthening from here has declined.
Weaker growth – temporarily
Source: Reuters EcoWin, Danske Bank Markets
08 09 10 11 12 13 14
-1,5
-0,5
0,5
1,5
2,5
3,5
-1,5
-0,5
0,5
1,5
2,5
3,5% y/y % y/y
<< Mainland-GDP
21 | March 2013 www.danskeresearch.com
No
rdic O
utlo
ok
Nordic Outlook
Growth slows due to oil investments and banks
Strong growth impulses from the oil sector have helped prevent any serious
impact on the Norwegian economy from the weakness in global activity.
Norwegian activity levels are more or less normal and growth has been above
trend despite capacity utilisation having increased. However, clear signs are
emerging of growth impulses beginning to wane. The reason appears to be a
mixture of weaker growth in the oil-related industry and the impact of stricter
credit policies on Norwegian banks. Hence, uncertainty on the economic
outlook for 2013 has increased somewhat, though our main scenario is still
for growth to remain around trend.
Norges Bank’s regional network is now indicating growth of around 0.5%
q/q in Q1 and around 0.7% q/q over the next two quarters. This is down
somewhat on 2012 growth rates but nevertheless indicates growth of around
trend. The survey showed the slowdown to be broadly based but a drop in the
activity of oil-related businesses and business service companies has had a
particularly negative effect on the main index.
Oil investments should also make a substantial contribution to growth in
2013, though it will probably be somewhat lower than in 2012. Moreover, the
latest investment figures show that growth could be rather lower than what
we had previously expected. According to Statistics Norway’s figures, oil
investments should grow by just over 10% in current prices in 2013, while
the November figures indicated almost 15% growth.
There is little evidence to suggest that price or demand forecasts for the
global oil market have changed significantly since the previous survey in
November. On the other hand, we know that several major contracts have
been awarded to foreign suppliers, which could suggest capacity limitations
in the Norwegian supply industry. But unless the ‘reflagging’ is due to long-
term cost disadvantages for the Norwegian supply industry, this should
simply mean a postponement of growth impulses from the oil business to the
mainland economy.
The second important drag on growth is the tighter credit policies of
Norwegian banks. The announced tightening of bank capital requirements
has prompted both a re-pricing of loans and, not least, a reduced appetite for
new projects among the banks. This appears to have hit the property market
in particular, where the financing of both commercial and residential property
projects has become considerably more difficult.
As a result, corporate investment activity has slowed. New commercial
property starts, for example, have fallen sharply since last summer.
That said, we believe the worst will soon be behind us, both in terms of the
slowdown in the oil supply industry and bank credit policies. As global
growth, despite everything, appears to be picking up, we also expect the drag
from net imports to be somewhat less than last year.
Income-driven consumption growth
Norwegian households continue to express optimism. While we saw a
slowdown in consumption that lasted until October 2012, this year has got off
A soft spot
Source: Norges Bank, ReutersEcoWin, Danske Bank Markets
Credit tightening hurting corporates
Source: ReutersEcoWin
02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
-3
-1
1
3
5
7
-1,5
-0,5
0,5
1,5
2,5
3,5index % y/y
<< Regional survey
Mainland-GDP >>
02 04 06 08 10 12
-2,5
2,5
7,5
12,5
17,5
22,5
200000
250000
300000
350000
400000
450000 m2% y/y
<< Non-residential buildings
Credit, corporates >>
22 | March 2013 www.danskeresearch.com
No
rdic O
utlo
ok
Nordic Outlook
to a fine start. Retail sales grew 1.2% m/m in January, while car sales grew
more than 10% y/y in February. We estimate that household disposable real
income will grow by around 4% again in 2013. Real wage growth should be
around 2.5% and employment growth approximately 1.5%. The big question
for consumption growth is therefore whether the savings rate will continue to
climb. Last year the savings rate increased from 8.7% to 9.4%, which
dragged consumption growth down by 0.7 percentage points (pp).
The increase in the savings rate occurred despite low unemployment, low
interest rates, high house prices and an expansive fiscal policy. It may have
been partly due to the increased uncertainty surrounding economic growth
among Norway’s neighbours, while greater focus on the need to increase
pension savings in connection with the pension reform probably also played a
part. Regardless of the reason for the increase in the savings rate, the result is
that the financial situation of households is substantially more solid than was
the case in the years leading up to the financial crisis. In fact, the savings rate
is increasing even though debt growth is high.
The solidity of household finances is also having an effect on the housing
market. Prices continue to rise, sales times are shrinking and the inventory to
sales ratio continues to fall. House prices rose 7.7% overall in 2012.
Housing market developments have forced the authorities to propose
tightening bank capital adequacy rules to slow growth. The changes to the
rules have not yet been finalised but just the fact that they have been
proposed will increase the banks’ financing costs on home loans. This has
already pushed Norwegian mortgage rates roughly 0.3pp higher. Depending
on the final text of the rule changes, mortgage rates could well rise further.
We expect that higher mortgage rates could help slow house price growth,
especially as this comes in the wake of a tighter credit policies at the banks.
However, we do not believe these changes will cause the housing market to
collapse. Wage growth appears set to be around 4% this year too, while
mortgage rates will likely settle at 4-4.25%, i.e. still very low real rates.
High house prices will probably also mean housing investment growth
remaining strong. Housing investment surged more than 7% in 2012 and new
home start figures suggest that growth could be just as high in 2013. Hence,
the growth contribution from housing investment should also be similar to
last year.
After 10 years of continuously rising house prices and debt burdens, the
financial position of households has to be considered a risk factor. Norway is
one of the few Western countries where households are more indebted (in
terms of debt relative to disposable income) than they were prior to the
financial crisis of 2007-08. Nominal house prices have also risen strongly and
are now more than 25% above the previous peak in 2007. However, as
mentioned, household savings rates have continued to climb in recent years.
Moreover, the hope is that the tighter capital adequacy rules will help
dampen growth in house prices and household debt, meaning a housing and
debt bubble can be avoided.
Return of the consumers
Source: Reuters EcoWin
Housing: stable price growth
Source: Reuters EcoWin
09 10 11 12
118
120
122
124
126
128
130
118
120
122
124
126
128
130 2005=100 2005=100
<< Retail sales ex. gas stations
05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20% y/y % y/y
Housing prices >>
23 | March 2013 www.danskeresearch.com
No
rdic O
utlo
ok
Nordic Outlook
Can the inflation target be reached?
Despite high capacity utilisation, low unemployment and high wage growth,
there is no sign of inflation increasing. Underlying inflation has remained
largely unchanged over the past year. Moreover, the strong NOK exchange
rate combined with low global price growth will probably ensure negative
price impulses on imported goods in 2013 too. More surprising perhaps is
that domestic price impulses are so modest when activity levels are so high.
This may be due to a number of factors, including that the high level of prices
in Norway means a great deal of trade is ‘lost’ to cross-border and internet
shopping and trips abroad.
Nevertheless, it will soon be time to ask when, and not least how, the inflation
target can be reached. With the exception of the period following the
weakening of NOK in autumn 2008, imported price growth has been around -
0.5% y/y since the inflation target was introduced. As around a third of core
inflation is imported inflation, that means domestic inflation has to be 4% to
reach the inflation target of 2.5%. Productivity growth in the consumption
sectors of 1-1.5% means wage growth of 5-5.5% is needed to reach the
inflation target. The question then is whether this is possible or indeed
desirable. Alternatively, Norway could wish for a pronounced weakening of the
NOK exchange rate, without worrying about what it should be due to.
Strong NOK and low rates
The strength of Norway’s government finances, combined with much higher
capacity utilisation than in other Western countries, probably means that the
NOK exchange rate will remain relatively strong until the problems in
Europe diminish significantly. On the other hand, we can see that some of the
capital that flowed into Norway when the situation looked bleakest is now
beginning to return to its homeland. This is probably due to a brighter global
outlook and thus a greater appetite for risk. Nevertheless, there is reason to
underline that the relative economic situation suggests that NOK will remain
comparatively strong.
The tightening of regulations governing the capital adequacy of the banks has
prompted higher lending rates from Norwegian banks. This should help ease
the pressure on Norges Bank to hike interest rates. As the proposal on the
table looks now, mortgage rates could increase by 0.5pp as a result. This
would help postpone the need to hike interest rates by a similar amount but
still means that policy rates should increase in 2014 and 2015. A gradual
hiking of interest rates by Norway’s trading partners should also make it
easier to raise rates in Norway without the exchange rate firming excessively.
In its Monetary Policy Report from March, Norges Bank indicated that the
policy rate will remain unchanged until ‘spring’ 2014 and then be raised
gradually to between 2.5% and 3% by the end of 2015. The published rate
projection also opens the door to rates being cut this year if economic growth
comes out weaker than expected. However, we expect interest rates to remain
unchanged until the first hike in March 2014.
Negative imported inflation
Source: Reuters EcoWin, Danske Bank Markets
The market disagrees with the central bank
Source: Reuters EcoWin
03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
-4-3-2-1012345
-4-3-2-1012345
% y/y % y/y
<< Domestic inflation
Imported inflation >>
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
1,50
1,75
2,00
2,25
2,50
2,75
3,00
3,25
1,50
1,75
2,00
2,25
2,50
2,75
3,00
3,25% %
<< NOKFRA
Norges Bank: MPR 1/13 >>
24 | March 2013 www.danskeresearch.com
No
rdic O
utlo
ok
Nordic Outlook
Norway: Forecast at a glance
Source: Danske Bank
National accounts 2011(2010-prices) 2011 2012 2013 2014
NOK bn
Private consumption 1149,8 2,5 2,9 3,0 3,6Public consumption 580,7 1,8 2,1 1,6 2,0Gross fixed investment 560,7 7,6 8,1 5,5 4,6 Petroleum activities 162,0 14,1 14,4 8,4 8,2 Mainland Norway 383,0 8,5 3,9 4,2 2,9 Dwellings 128,2 21,9 7,4 6,5 2,1 Enterprises 170,3 3,5 2,7 1,9 2,5 General government 84,5 2,2 1,4 5,5 4,9Mainland demand 2113,6 3,3 2,9 2,8 3,2Growth contribution from stockbuilding 0,1 0,0Exports 1033,6 -1,8 2,2 -1,6 1,4 Crude oil and natural gas 446,0 -6,2 0,9 -6,8 -3,5 Traditional goods 307,1 0,0 2,6 1,0 4,0Total demand 3435,8 1,8 3,2 1,7 2,9Imports 779,0 3,8 3,3 4,2 3,8 Traditional goods 460,5 3,6 2,1 2,3 3,9Growth contribution from net exports -2,1 0,0 -1,8 -0,6
GDP 2656,8 1,2 3,2 2,2 2,7 GDP Mainland Norway 2108,1 2,5 3,5 2,8 3,5
Other posts 2011 2012 2013 2014
Employment, % y/y 1,3 2,2 1,6 1,8Labour force, % y/y 1,1 1,8 1,5 1,6Unemployment (LFS), % 3,3 3,2 3,1 3,0Annual wages, % y/y 4,2 4,0 4,0 4,2Consumer prices, % y/y 1,2 0,8 1,6 2,0Core inflation 0,9 1,2 1,3 1,7
Financial figures 19/03/2013 + 3 mths + 6 mths + 12 mths
Deposit rate 1,50 1,50 1,50 1,752y swap rate. % 1,96 2,00 2,00 2,1010y swap rate, % 3,17 3,25 3,30 3,40EUR/NOK 7,50 7,25 7,20 7,15USD/NOK 7,79 5,33 5,22 5,34
Vol growth in %
25 | March 2013 www.danskeresearch.com
No
rdic O
utlo
ok
Nordic Outlook
Finland
Recovery drifting further
GDP contracted 0.2% in 2012. Domestic demand slipped, especially
construction, and exports suffered from the euro crisis. Consumption
brought some growth and jobs to services.
We have revised down our 2013 outlook for Finland to take into
account the weak Q4 12 figures and business surveys. GDP is now
forecast to grow 0.3% in 2013.
Finnish exports have underperformed the growth in export markets,
due to the high weight in investment goods, poor competitiveness and
Nokia downscaling. Emerging markets, especially Russia, offer
growth possibilities.
New normal in private consumption means modest growth figures in
the future. Real wages are increasing only slightly and the relatively
low savings ratio does not provide much additional room for
spending.
Housing market looks relatively stable. Prices are expected to remain
at current levels despite low interest rates and shortage of housing
construction. Tax hikes and higher loan margins dampen the near-
term outlook.
Unemployment rate is expected to rise above 8% in 2013 before
economic growth and shrinking labour supply decrease
unemployment in 2014. Inflation and wage growth decline.
Bouncing around zero growth
Gross domestic product fell by 0.2% in 2012. Technically speaking Finland
avoided a recession, because third quarter GDP was revised up to a meagre
growth of 0.1% q/q. GDP fell more than expected during the last quarter,
which gave a poor start for 2013. For most practical purposes Finland is in a
recession and conditions for a strong recovery look weak. We expect net
exports to bring GDP back to positive trend later this year, while domestic
demand continues to crawl slowly at best both in 2013 and 2014.
The fall was broad based. Exports fell towards the end of the year and were
1.4% lower than in 2011. Investments turned weaker, especially construction
activity decreased. Private consumption regained some strength during H2
from the slump in Q2, although the numbers were far weaker than during Q1,
when private consumption was supported by wage increases and an
anticipated motor vehicle tax hike.
Manufacturing output fell towards the end of the year and recorded a total
decline of 2.2% in 2012. According to monthly statistics, industrial output
was 4.8 % down y/y in January 2013, giving a weak starting point for current
year.
Changes relative to previous forecast
Source: Danske Bank
OECD leading indicator implies recovery in Q2
00 02 04 06 08 10 1294
96
98
100
102
104
-15.0
-10.0
-5.0
0.0
5.0
10.0 GDP monthly indicator, y/y
3 month moving average
OECD leading indicator,
6 month lead
Source: Reuters EcoWin
FINLAND
2013 2014 2013 2014
GDP, % 0.3 2.0 0.5 2.2
Unemployment 8.3 8.0 8.2 7.9
rate, %
Inflation, % 2.0 2.0 2.5 2.0
Earnings, % 2.6 2.2 2.7 2.5
Housing prices, % 0.5 2.5 1.5 2.5
Current account, -1.0 -0.7 -1.0 -0.5
% of GDP
Public debt, 56.0 57.0 54.5 55.0
% of GDP
Current forecast Previous forecast
26 | March 2013 www.danskeresearch.com
No
rdic O
utlo
ok
Nordic Outlook
Reflecting the closure of Nokia manufacturing in Finland and weak demand
for investment goods, output fell most in the electrical and electronics
industry, by 14.8%, and in the metal industry by 11.8%.
Leading indicators are mixed in the sense that consumer confidence has
slightly improved but construction confidence is very weak. The OECD
leading indicator, which has been a fairly robust indicator in recent years,
supports our view that Finland could pull out of the recession after the weak
Q1.
We have revised our estimate for 2013 downward to GDP growth of 0.3%
(previously 0.5%) as we see no fast solutions being implemented to bring
significant growth to the euro area. Assuming that China and the US lead the
global recovery, we expect Finland to reach 2.0% growth in 2014. Obviously,
a full-blown political crisis in the euro area or other major economic events
would not leave the Finnish economy untouched.
Leaner years for consumers ahead
Consumer buying power was exhausted during 2012, while consumption
grew substantially in 2010 and 2011 on the back of low interest rates and
rising real wages. In Q1 12 one-off salary payments and tax changes
supported private consumption growth to 2.4% q/q but in Q2 we saw the
biggest decline in private consumption in the history of the quarterly statistics
(started in 1975) with a dive of 2.3% q/q. Consumer spending normalised in
H2 as private consumption rose 0.8% y/y.
The short-term outlook is weak as consumer confidence remains at low
levels. Although retail sales rose slightly in January 2013, car registrations
remained very weak. The full-year outlook is challenging for retail sales,
because the increase in purchasing power is expected to halt. In the
forecasting period wage growth will be marginally higher than inflation at a
time when tax increases will take their share as well. We also expect
consumer confidence to remain at low levels as employment figures continue
to weaken in H1 13. Low interest rates and a reasonably steady (relatively
speaking) employment level will help sustain private activity but past growth
figures are not realistic nor are they sustainable. The outlook further into
2014 is also restrained with only modest wage growth and an already low
savings rate with little additional room to boost spending. We expect private
consumption to grow 0.8% in 2013 and 1.2% in 2014.
Inflationary pressures are modest because of the recession. Largely due to
global energy prices and tax hikes inflation was 2.8% in 2012. Despite a full
percentage point hike in VAT, inflation was below 2% in January-February
2013. The surprisingly low number could have been caused by a prolonged
discount sale period and some of the tax changes will feed through slowly.
We expect an annual average inflation of 2.0% both in 2013 and 2014.
Exports fall before global recovery comes to the rescue
The volume of exports fell 1.4% in 2012 and the final quarter was weakest.
Finnish exports have been lagging behind the growth in international trade,
which could emanate from the low diversification in key export products as
well as from the large share of metal engineering, paper and other cyclical
industries. Capex is still weak in several export markets in Europe. Nokia has
Confidence indicators remain at low levels
06 07 08 09 10 11 12-40-30-20
-100
1020
30
4050
-40-30-20
-100
1020
30
4050
Consumers
Services
Manufacturing
Net Bal.Net Bal.
Source: Reuters EcoWin
Inflation and wage growth expected to decline
00 02 04 06 08 10 12
-2-101234567
-2-101234567
Wages and salaries
Consumer prices
%, 12 month changes%, 12 month changes
Source: Reuters EcoWin
27 | March 2013 www.danskeresearch.com
No
rdic O
utlo
ok
Nordic Outlook
shut down telephone manufacturing production in Finland, which has had a
sizable impact on Finnish exports.
The outlook for Finland’s main export markets, Germany, Russia and
Sweden, is relatively stable. Exports to Russia have risen somewhat less than
expected but Russia might retake its position as the largest export destination
in 2013. Finnish competitiveness may have eroded compared to Germany or
some other countries but generally the Finnish export industries should still
be able to compete at reasonable terms. The strong SEK exchange rate has
helped Finnish companies compared to Sweden. Nevertheless, the fairly
widespread drive to preserve the strong manufacturing base in Finland calls
for low wage rises in the medium run. Given the large weight of cyclical
forest and metal industries and the poor manufacturing confidence, exports
are likely to perform poorly in Q1. Assuming a mild recovery in the euro area
in late 2013 and better global outlook next year, we expect exports to recover
by 1.2% in 2013 and rise further by 4.0% in 2014.
Finland had a current account surplus from 1994 to 2010 but fell into a small
deficit in 2011. The current account deficit deepened to 1.7% of GDP in
2012. We expect a current account deficit also in 2013-2014, driven by weak
exports and large net transfers. As a one-off item, Nokia’s decision not to pay
dividends improves the current account by nearly EUR600m in 2013
compared to 2012. The deficit is forecast to be around 1% of GDP, which
does not pose a major threat in the near future. An improvement in the global
business cycle could reverse the deficit back into a surplus fairly swiftly.
Investments continue to decline in 2013
Last year investments fell by 3%. The main factor behind the decline was
construction, which diminished by over 4%. The volume of investments in
machinery, equipment and transport equipment was nearly flat from the
previous year. Investments in the public sector held up at similar levels as in
2011 but private investments shrunk by 3.4%.
Weak business confidence, a persistent decline in building permits and
building starts as well as low manufacturing capex reported by business
surveys point to a continued fall in investments in the first half of 2013. We
forecast the decline for 2013 to be around 2%. After two poor years it is
expected that postponed investment needs will pick up, while low interest
rates still support construction and capex. Thus we expect investments to turn
to a healthy 3% growth in 2014.
Cooling-off period before new rise in housing market
The housing market was fairly stable in 2012. The number of sales of old
dwellings in blocks of flats and terraced houses fell by 3% according to the
preliminary information from the Central Federation of Finnish Real Estate
Agencies. Although the sales numbers fell marginally during the year, prices
held up and even increased by 1.7% compared to the previous year. The split
between Helsinki Metropolitan Area and the rest of the country continued as
prices in the capital rose by 2.4% and in the rest of the country only by 1.1%.
Preliminary figures from January tell that prices fell by 0.6% m/m. This was
somewhat surprising as our and the consensus expectation was for prices to
rise before a new tax hike on housing purchases that took effect in March.
Sales contracts made after February have to pay 2% transfer tax for the gross
Exports behind potential in global trade
99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 1190
110
130
150
170
190
90
110
130
150
170
190
Finish exports
Global imports
1999 = 100, volume, s.a.
Source: Reuters EcoWin
Manufacturing industries invest cautiously
76 80 84 88 92 96 00 04 08 1245
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
45
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13Machinery and equipment investment per GDP, %
Source: Reuters EcoWin
28 | March 2013 www.danskeresearch.com
No
rdic O
utlo
ok
Nordic Outlook
price of the house; previously the tax was 1.6% and only for the selling price
excluding debts owned through the housing company. The absolute tax
increase can be nearly EUR1,000 in a typical housing purchase transaction,
which can calm the market for a while after the tax hike.
Also housing loan growth nearly halted in January, which points to a sluggish
development in 2013. The reasons for this development can be found on the
demand side, as consumers’ intentions to purchase houses declined, as well
as on the supply side, as banks have started to change lending procedures to
meet new regulations that are expected to be implemented later in 2013.
These regulations include the Finnish FSA’s objective to bring loan-to-value
ratios down, even with a cap on loan ratios, similar to Sweden. As housing
loan stock growth has declined, banks have increased margins on typical
variable Euribor rate loans from 87bp at the end of 2011 to 136bp at the end
of 2012 according to the Bank of Finland.
Despite the abovementioned headwinds, there are also factors working in the
opposite direction. The debt-to-income ratio of Finnish households, albeit on
the rise, is still below that of other Nordic countries. Finnish households are
still able to amortise debt as the exceptionally low interest rate transmits
effectively in the Finnish housing market due to the high percentage of
variable rate loans. The supervisor’s vigilance should be seen as a
precautionary measure, which can be viewed as a stabilising factor in the
long term.
The volume of construction excluding renovations went down in 2012. The
decline was over 13% y/y in December. This limits the supply, which is
expected to continue as the permits granted for residential buildings went
down by 39.4% y/y in December. Construction confidence indicators remain
below normal levels and we expect caution to weigh on housing construction
well into 2013.
We expect nominal prices to rise only 0.5% in 2013, which would mean a
consecutive year when real prices in the housing market decline. Next year
we forecast housing prices to increase but only by 2.5%. Despite the past
year’s rise in prices we do not see a major risk of a bubble, because prices
have generally risen in line with earnings. A major decline in housing prices
could be initiated only by much higher long-term unemployment or surging
interest rates, which both look unlikely.
Debt level rising modestly despite austerity
The six-party coalition government increased taxes on alcohol, tobacco,
sugar, gasoline and motor vehicles last year. Some savings were also
implemented, ranging from forestation subsidies to defence expenditure. In
the beginning of 2013 the VAT increased by 1 percentage point. Initially the
new government aimed at EUR2.5bn in new annual tax revenue and savings.
In spring 2012 the coalition government agreed to additional net savings of
EUR2.7bn between 2013-2015 bringing the total to EUR5.2bn.
Approximately half of this is achieved by increasing the VAT, consumption
taxes and taxes on income. The other half comes from spending cuts from all
areas of the government. These measures will narrow the budget deficit
considerably and the main focus should now be the long-term solutions, such
as increasing the labour force participation rate via the increased retirement
age that takes into account future liability of the ageing population. There is,
Real prices do not signal a major housing bubble
78 81 84 87 90 93 96 99 02 05 08 117589
104118132147161175189204
7589
104118132147161175189204
Relative to average
household disposable income
Relative to rents
1978 = 100, blocks of flats and terraced
houses prices
Source: Reuters EcoWin
29 | March 2013 www.danskeresearch.com
No
rdic O
utlo
ok
Nordic Outlook
however, a possibility of added austerity in 2014-2015 as the government has
committed to decrease the national debt level and to keep Finland’s triple-A
rating. These measures might be necessary if the coalition government cannot
agree on structural changes, especially on retirement age.
Finnish participation in the European bailouts shows in the national debt.
Last year the capital need for the ESM added EUR1.44bn to the general
government debt as Finland agreed to pay the whole amount in a lump sum in
exchange for the collateral agreements from Greece and Spain. The general
government debt reached 53% per GDP by the end of 2012. We forecast the
ratio to hover around 56% next year and by the end of 2014 to stabilise at
57% per GDP.
Public consumption increased by 0.8% in 2012. Tight budgets are likely to
keep growth in public spending in the coming years well below 1%. Room
for expansionary fiscal policy is tight, even if Finland is one of the least
indebted euro area countries. The remaining space for fiscal expansion is
reserved as a buffer against major shocks and future demographic changes.
Within the euro area, the Republic of Finland continues to enjoy one of the
lowest risk premiums compared to Germany. The triple-A rating might come
under review but the effects from a possible downgrade are likely to be
limited. We expect the fairly low level of public debt, the excellent track
record and policy decisions to continue to keep Finnish risk premium low,
interest rates low and credit ratings high.
Employment decent, outlook wary
Until now the labour market has remained surprisingly strong despite the
weak growth figures. Unemployment rate has stayed around 8%. Youth
unemployment rate has declined but is still high at 20%. Layoffs have
increased and according to surveys firms’ intentions of hiring new workers
are low in almost all industries. In January the number of unemployed was
228,000, which was 25,000 more than a year earlier. The seasonally adjusted
unemployment rate rose to 8.0%. The labour force participation rate was
66.9%, which was unchanged from a year ago. New vacancies at
employment offices stood at 55,000 in October, which is 5,000 positions less
than January 2012. The ageing trend will limit the supply of labour in the
coming years.
We forecast the unemployment rate to increase until the end of 2013 as the
economic downturn weighs on the labour market. The average
unemployment rate is expected to rise to 8.3% in 2013 before economic
growth and the ageing trend bring it back to 8% in 2014. The number of
employed persons is likely to continue to fall slightly in early 2013, while the
labour supply stops growing, thus keeping the unemployment rate in control.
Lost manufacturing jobs are largely replaced by jobs in services sectors. The
natural rate of unemployment is likely to be around 6-7% given that
unemployment rates are stubbornly high in some rural parts of eastern
Finland and Lapland.
Budget balance and current account negative
99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11-8-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
-8-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
Central gov. revenue balance
Current account
% of GDP, mov. ann. totals
Source: Reuters EcoWin
Unemployment rate to rise above 8%
90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 120
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Finland
Euro zone
%%
Source: Reuters EcoWin
30 | March 2013 www.danskeresearch.com
No
rdic O
utlo
ok
Nordic Outlook
Finland: Forecast at a glance
Source: Danske Bank * Forecasts: Sampo Bank/Economists
National accounts 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
GDP 3.3 2.8 -0.2 0.3 2.0Imports 6.9 6.1 -3.7 0.8 2.5Exports 7.5 2.9 -1.4 1.2 4.0Consumption 2.1 1.8 1.4 0.8 0.9- Private 3.3 2.3 1.6 0.8 1.2- Public -0.3 0.4 0.8 0.5 0.2Investments 1.9 7.1 -2.9 -2.0 3.0
Key Performance Indicators 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Unemployment rate, % 8.4 7.8 7.7 8.3 8.0Earnings, % 2.6 2.7 3.5 2.6 2.2Inflation, % 1.2 3.4 2.8 2.0 2.0Current account, Bn, EUR 2.7 -3.1 -3.3 -2.0 -1.5Current account/GDP, % 1.5 -1.6 -1.7 -1.0 -0.7Public deficit/GDP, % -2.5 -0.8 -1.9 -1.5 -1.0Public debt/GDP, % 48.6 49.0 53.0 56.0 57.0
Financial figures + 3 mths + 6 mths + 12 mths
Repo rate, % 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.752 year swap rate 0.46 0.60 0.70 0.8510 year swap rate 1.68 1.80 2.10 2.35EUR/USD 1.30 1.36 1.38 1.34
19/03/2013
Volume, y-o-y %
31 | March 2013 www.danskeresearch.com
No
rdic O
utlo
ok
Nordic Outlook
Global overview
US take-off to drive global recovery
We are gaining confidence that the global economy is now on a
path to a sustainable recovery that will gain pace in coming years.
A turn in US housing, an easing of the euro crisis and looser policy
in China are among the main forces behind the improvement we
see in the global economy.
We expect 2013 to be the year in which the US economy really
takes off.
The euro area will be in dire straits for some time but should see a
return to slow - but positive - growth soon.
In China a two-year slowdown has come to an end. However, the
economy is recovering to a lower potential growth rate than
before the slowdown. Japan will see a strong rebound in 2013 on
the back of ‘Abenomics’ but risks loom again in 2014.
Monetary policy is expected to stay loose for a very long time. The
Fed is not expected to scale back asset purchases until Q4 13. And
both Bank of Japan and Bank of England are seen stepping up
asset purchases this year. We look for the ECB to keep rates
unchanged for a very long time but not cut rates further.
Global economy on path to sustainable recovery? Yes!
The global economy has been in a slowdown for two and a half years now
but there are finally signs that a path towards a sustainable recovery has
started.
The very slow global growth in recent years can be mainly attributed to three
factors:
1. A severe hangover following the Great Housing Bubble;
2. Periods of intense financial stress due to the euro crisis; and
3. Chinese policy tightening to stem a housing bubble and fight inflation.
The recipe for a sustainable global recovery is to be found in improvement on
these three fronts – and we are indeed seeing this now.
First, we see many signs that the world’s largest economy has progressed
significantly from the hangover following the Great Housing Bubble and we
believe this will be an important driver of a global recovery in the years
ahead.
Second, there are clear indications that the periods of intense financial stress
due to the euro crisis could be behind us. The stress has given significant
uncertainty for consumers and companies globally and restrained private
spending. This has added to the significant drag already coming from a
decline in public spending in many countries. The back-stop from the ECB
has so far worked to significantly improve sentiment in financial markets and
Global GDP forecasts
Source: Danske Bank Markets, Bloomberg, OECD, IMF
China’s slowdown has come to an end – but
potential growth is lower now
Source: Reuters EcoWin, Danske Bank Markets
G3 on path to recovery
Source: Reuters EcoWin, Danske Bank Markets
% y/yD anske
B ank
C o nsen
sus OEC D IM F
D anske
B ank
C o ns
ensus OEC D IM F
USA 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.8 2.7 2.8 3.0
Euro area -0.4 -0.2 -0.1 -0.2 1.2 1.1 1.3 1.0
Japan 1.6 1.2 0.7 1.2 1.1 1.3 0.8 0.7
China 8.4 8.1 8.5 8.2 8.2 8.0 8.9 8.5
Global 3.6 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.9 4.1
2013 2014
10 11 12 13 14
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
% y/y
%%GDP
% q/q SAForecast
04 06 08 10 12 14
5
15
25
35
45
55
65
75
-8
-6
-4
-2
1
3
5% y/y Index
<< G3 GDP growth
G3 PMI new orders >>
Note: G3 is US, Euro area and Japan
32 | March 2013 www.danskeresearch.com
No
rdic O
utlo
ok
Nordic Outlook
to avoid the euro crisis from flaring up again. The fairly calm effect (at least
so far) following the Italian election is an indication of this.
Finally, China is seeing an end to a two-year slowdown which has worked as
a major drag on the global economy. China is the second-largest economy in
the world but number one when it comes to the contribution to global growth.
In addition to the above factors, global central banks are stepping quite hard
on the accelerator – and some are expected to step even harder this year
(Bank of Japan and Bank of England).
Overall, we are gaining confidence that the global economy is now on a path
to a sustainable recovery that will gain pace in coming years as more of the
hangover from the financial crisis will ease.
US ahead in the healing after the Great Housing Bubble
The US is clearly ahead in the healing process while there is still more pain
left in the euro area. US housing has turned a corner whereas the euro area
has further adjustments left before a recovery can take place. French house
prices, for example, have yet to correct from overvalued levels. Banks are
also in much better shape in the US which stands in sharp contrast to the euro
area where lending standards continue to be tightened every quarter. The US
is also ahead when it comes to household deleveraging giving a stronger base
for improvement in household spending.
The healing that is needed in the public sector still has some way to go in
both the US and the euro area. The euro area on average has reduced the
budget deficit to a lower level than the US and thus could be said to be ahead
on this point. But as the US has much higher nominal growth in the economy
it is able to stabilise the debt level with a higher budget deficit – all else
equal.
In 2014 we expect the headwind from tighter fiscal policy in both the US and
the euro area to ease as the pace of reducing the public budget deficits can be
allowed to slow down.
Although the US is leading the way out of the crisis, the hangover will also
come to an end in Europe at some point. This will pave way for ‘a new
beginning’ with growth rates recovering from the current very low levels.
Pent-up demand from investment and consumption at that point will be
released and structural reforms will have a positive effect on growth.
However, history suggests it can take quite some time yet before the euro
area reaches that point as the need for further adjustments is still big.
Germany in the 1990’s and 2000’s is an example of how long it can take to
rise from the ashes. Until then we are likely to see very slow growth and a
further rise in unemployment.
During the period of further domestic adjustment any growth in the euro area
will mostly stem from exports to the rest of the world. The take-off in the US
and higher growth in Emerging Markets will lift export growth and to some
extent also investment spending.
China recovering – but potential growth is lower
The picture in China is one of recovery from a two-year slowdown. Although
uneven, data is generally supporting a gradual improvement in growth. The
Status on healing after the Great Housing Bubble –
US ahead, euro is not there yet
Source: Danske Bank Markets
US house price adjustment has come far
Source: MacroBond
Credit flowing in US, still weak in Europe
Source: Reuters EcoWin, Danske Bank Markets
Housing recovery
Flow of credit
Household deleveraging
Fiscal adjustment
US -
Euro area - - - -
06 07 08 09 10 11 12
-15.0
-10.0
-5.0
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
-15.0
-10.0
-5.0
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0% y/y % y/y
UK credit to
private sector
US credit to consumers and businesses
Euro credit to private sector
Data break
33 | March 2013 www.danskeresearch.com
No
rdic O
utlo
ok
Nordic Outlook
slowdown in China was triggered by fading stimulus after the boost in 2009
and policy tightening in response to an overheating housing market and high
inflation. The weak Chinese economy also suffered from a sharp decline in
exports to Europe which accounts for 20% of total Chinese exports.
However, renewed policy stimulus in 2012 has given a lift to the domestic
economy. Housing has recovered and infrastructure investment has also seen
a lift. Exports are also doing better.
A challenge for China continues to be a rebalancing of the economy away
from investments and exports towards more consumer-driven growth. The
recent pick-up in growth is again investment and credit driven while private
consumption has yet to show clear signs of recovery.
We expect the Chinese economy to improve further in coming quarters with
growth reaching just above 9% in mid-2013. During the second half of the
year activity is likely to taper off again, though, as policy stimulus fades and
tighter regulation in the housing market will keep a lid on activity in this
sector.
Next year the Chinese economy is expected to grow 8.2% which we see as
close to China’s potential growth rate. This rate has come down from the
10% level prior to the financial crisis as the rebalancing of the economy
means more weight to the service sector where productivity growth is lower
than in the industrial sector. The early low-hanging fruits from new
technology have also been taken. Gains in productivity from new investments
are therefore also going down.
Japan makes a difference in 2013 – risks in 2014
For once Japan is expected to make a difference for the global economy in
2013. After the economy shrank by more than 2% annualised in the second
half of last year it is expected to rise by 3.5% annualised in the first half of
this year. This will give a direct lift to global growth of 0.4 percentage points.
Japan is recovering in response to a massive stimulus programme – popularly
called ‘Abenomics’ after the new prime minister, Shinzo Abe – involving a
significant easing of both fiscal and monetary policy as well as an increase of
the inflation target to 2% from 1%.
The Japanese experiment is a very new way for Japan. And it will be
interesting to see if it succeeds. If the global economy continues to recover
there is a good chance that Japan can succeed with its kick-start and get a
pick-up in private spending strong enough to compensate for the subsequent
decline in public spending once the stimulus measures fade again in 2014.
Not least because it is expected to take place in a more positive global
environment with the US recovering and Europe getting further in healing
process next year. There is a clear risk, though, that the Japanese economy
will tumble again in 2014 if the fiscal contraction becomes too big and the
global economy loses steam.
Euro crisis still the main risk to the global economy
The main risk is still a renewed flare-up of the euro crisis which could be
triggered by a severe slowdown in France or chaos in Italy or Spain. But the
probability of such a development has been reduced by the ECB’s back-stop
Signs of pick-up in Chinese imports after two years
of stagnation
Source: Reuters EcoWin, Danske Bank Markets
Strong turn in Japanese economy in 2013
Source: Reuters EcoWin, Danske Bank Markets
Severe recession in euro area domestic economy
Source: Reuters EcoWin, Danske Bank Markets
07 08 09 10 11 12
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.1
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.1Bn CNY
China imports, smoothed
12 13
-0.20
-0.15
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6 % q/q AR% q/q, % points
ForecastDirect contr. to
global growth >>
<< Japan GDP growth
96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12
-7.5
-5.0
-2.5
0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
-7.5
-5.0
-2.5
0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5% y/y
Euro private domestic demand
US private domestic demand% y/y
34 | March 2013 www.danskeresearch.com
No
rdic O
utlo
ok
Nordic Outlook
and also the fact that the fiscal situation has improved in the euro area
following years of consolidation.
Central banks keeping foot on the accelerator
The outlook for monetary policy is one of continued very easy policy among
the developed economies. We expect the Fed to continue asset purchases of
USD85bn until Q4 13. After that we expect asset purchases to be scaled
down until a complete end in early 2015. Further stimulus is expected from
Bank of Japan and Bank of England where incoming new governors are
signalling a more aggressive approach to spurring growth. For the ECB, the
bar for further easing seems quite high and we do not expect any further
stimulus from this side. However, rate hikes are not on the horizon for a very
long time. We do not expect the first hike until the first half of 2015.
In China a renewed rise in property prices is being watched closely by the
People’s Bank of China. We now expect a first rate hike to come already in
Q4 13 to stem the pick-up in house prices.
35 | March 2013 www.danskeresearch.com
No
rdic O
utlo
ok
Nordic Outlook
Economic forecast
Source: OECD and Danske Bank. 1) % y/y. 2) % contribution to GDP growth. 3) % of labour force. 4) % of GDP.
Macro forecast, Scandinavia
Denmark 2012 -0,6 0,5 0,5 1,2 -0,5 1,1 2,7 2,4 6,1 -4,0 42,0 5,92013 0,4 0,4 1,2 0,3 0,0 0,1 0,0 1,3 6,0 -1,4 40,7 4,12014 1,5 1,1 0,2 -0,5 0,0 3,2 1,6 1,9 6,0 -0,3 38,9 4,7
Sweden 2012 0,8 1,5 0,8 3,4 -1,1 0,7 -0,1 0,9 8,0 -0,6 37,7 7,02013 1,7 2,4 0,8 2,5 0,2 1,5 2,5 0,3 8,0 -1,0 37,6 6,92014 2,0 2,6 0,6 7,7 0,0 4,9 7,6 1,7 7,8 -0,8 37,5 6,1
Norway 2012 3,5 2,9 2,1 8,1 2,2 3,3 0,8 3,2 - - -2013 2,8 3,0 1,6 5,5 0,1 -1,6 4,2 1,6 3,1 - - -2014 3,5 3,6 2,0 4,6 0,0 1,4 3,8 2,0 3,0 - - -
Macro forecast, Euroland
Euroland 2012 -0,5 -1,2 -0,1 -3,9 -0,7 2,9 -0,9 2,5 11,4 -3,5 93,1 1,42013 -0,4 -0,7 -0,4 -4,5 -0,1 2,0 -0,2 1,7 12,1 -3,1 95,5 2,42014 1,2 0,1 -0,2 1,0 0,1 4,4 2,8 1,6 12,2 -2,9 95,8 2,5
Germany 2012 0,9 0,6 1,4 -4,9 0,0 4,3 2,2 2,0 6,9 0,1 82,4 6,32013 0,5 0,5 0,8 -1,2 0,0 2,6 2,5 1,8 6,7 -0,2 81,1 6,02014 2,3 1,4 0,9 4,9 0,0 4,8 4,5 2,0 6,5 0,0 79,0 5,6
France 2012 0,0 0,0 1,4 0,0 1,4 2,3 -0,3 2,1 10,2 -4,7 90,8 -1,92013 -0,1 0,2 0,6 -1,0 -0,4 1,8 1,1 1,7 10,4 -4,0 92,8 -1,62014 0,8 1,1 0,0 1,4 0,0 4,4 4,3 1,5 10,6 -4,2 94,2 -1,8
Italy 2012 -2,2 -4,2 -1,0 -9,2 -0,4 1,9 -7,4 3,0 10,6 -2,4 124,2 -0,72013 -1,5 -1,9 -0,5 -4,7 0,0 3,0 1,6 2,0 11,8 -2,4 128,6 0,62014 1,0 1,1 -0,4 2,0 0,0 4,0 4,1 1,7 11,5 -2,3 128,1 0,8
Spain 2012 -1,4 -2,2 -3,7 -8,7 0,5 3,1 -5,0 1,9 24,9 -6,7 88,4 -1,92013 -1,4 -2,8 -3,6 -7,8 0,0 5,8 -0,8 1,7 26,4 -5,5 96,0 1,02014 -0,6 -0,7 -2,0 -2,0 0,0 4,8 3,5 1,0 26,8 -5,2 102,0 2,5
Finland 2012 -0,2 1,6 0,8 -2,9 - -1,4 -3,7 2,8 7,7 -1,9 53,0 -1,72013 0,3 0,8 0,5 -2,0 - 1,2 0,8 2,0 8,3 -1,5 56,0 -1,02014 2,0 1,2 0,2 3,0 - 4,0 2,5 2,0 8,0 -1,0 57,0 -0,7
Macro forecast, Global
USA 2012 2,2 1,9 -1,7 8,5 0,1 3,3 2,4 2,1 8,1 -7,0 100,0 -3,02013 1,9 1,7 -1,5 8,4 0,0 2,7 3,2 1,6 7,6 -5,3 101,8 -3,12014 2,8 2,4 -0,9 9,6 0,1 7,4 7,5 1,7 6,8 -3,7 100,9 -3,2
Japan 2012 2,0 2,3 2,7 4,2 0,0 -0,2 5,3 -0,1 4,4 -7,9 229,7 1,92013 1,6 1,0 1,6 4,1 0,0 -1,7 0,7 0,2 4,2 9,3 238,6 1,52014 1,1 0,1 1,0 0,7 0,0 7,6 3,2 2,1 4,1 -8,4 245,0 2,0
China 2012 7,8 - - - - - - 2,7 4,3 -1,3 22,2 2,32013 8,4 - - - - - - 2,7 4,3 -1,9 19,6 2,92014 8,2 - - - - - - 3,1 4,1 -1,7 17,2 3,4
UK 2012 0,0 0,8 2,7 -0,4 -0,3 -0,1 2,3 2,8 8,0 -5,2 90,5 -3,52013 1,1 1,0 -0,1 0,7 0,2 3,5 2,7 2,7 8,1 -6,2 93,5 -2,92014 1,7 1,6 -1,1 4,8 0,0 4,5 3,4 2,6 8,2 -5,2 96,2 -2,9
Current
acc.4
GDP 1
Private
cons.1
Public
cons.1
Fixed
inv.1
Stock
build.2
Ex-
ports1
Im-
ports1
Infla-
tion1
Unem-
ploym.3
Public
budget4
Public
debt4
Year
Year GDP 1
Private
cons.1
Public
cons.1
Fixed
inv.1
Stock
build.2
Ex-
ports1
Im-
ports1
Infla-
tion1
Unem-
ploym.3
Public
budget4
Current
acc.4
Public
debt4
Current
acc.4
Im-
ports1
Public
debt4
Public
budget4
Ex-
ports1
Infla-
tion1
Unem-
ploym.3
Year GDP 1
Private
cons.1
Public
cons.1
Fixed
inv.1
Stock
build.2
36 | March 2013 www.danskeresearch.com
No
rdic O
utlo
ok
Nordic Outlook
Financial forecast
Source: Danske Bank
Bond and money markets
Currencyvs USD
Currencyvs DKK
USD 20-mar - 577,3
+3m - 549
+6m - 541+12m - 557
EUR 20-mar 129,1 745,3
+3m 136 746,0
+6m 138 746,0+12m 134 746,0
JPY 20-mar 95,4 6,05
+3m 95 5,78
+6m 96 5,65+12m 100 5,57
GBP 20-mar 151,2 872,8
+3m 155 848
+6m 153 829+12m 152 848
CHF 20-mar 94,6 610,1
+3m 93 592
+6m 91 592+12m 92 607
DKK 20-mar 577,3 -
+3m 549 -
+6m 541 -+12m 557 -
SEK 20-mar 645,2 89,5
+3m 610 89,9
+6m 601 89,9+12m 612 91,0
NOK 20-mar 583,1 99,0
+3m 533 102,9
+6m 522 103,6+12m 534 104,3
Equity markets
Regional
Price trend12 mth.
Regional recommen-dations
USA Still policy fears but solid private demand 10%-15% Underweight
Emerging markets (USD) Modest growth recovery in China 10%-15% Neutral
Europe (ex. Nordics) (EUR) Euro crisis abates 10%-15% OverweightNordics Strong macro balances 10%-15% Neutral
Commodities
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 2013 2014
NYMEX WTI 96 103 103 102 102 102 101 100 101 101
ICE Brent 116 118 115 112 110 108 106 104 115 107
Copper 8.200 8.400 8.450 8.500 8.525 8.550 8.575 8.600 8.388 8.563
Zinc 2.100 2.125 2.135 2.145 2.150 2.155 2.160 2.165 2.126 2.158
Nickel 18.000 18.500 18.200 17.900 17.700 17.500 17.300 17.100 18.150 17.400
Aluminium 2.100 2.150 2.125 2.100 2.075 2.050 2.025 2.000 2.119 2.038
Gold 1.700 1.750 1.725 1.700 1.675 1.650 1.625 1.600 1.719 1.638
Matif Mill Wheat 250 255 260 255 250 252 254 256 255 253
CBOT Wheat 798 826 833 807 792 798 804 811 816 801
CBOT Corn 725 750 775 765 755 760 765 770 754 763CBOT Soybeans 1.450 1.500 1.525 1.505 1.485 1.500 1.515 1.530 1.495 1.508
Medium 0 to +5%
1.416
730
1,69
2,602,65
3,22
3,25
3,30
2,37
2,50
1,86
2,60
1,11
1,05
1,201,35
3,40
2,252,50
1,95
0,80
0,901,05
1,97
2,10
2,40
20142013
2,15
2,04
2,352,65
1,80
2,102,35
93
16.535
7.530
1.923
1.610
242
108
1.937
731
20-mar
0 to +5%
0 to +5%
Medium
Medium
2,02
Currencyvs EUR
2-yr swap yield
Risk profile3 mth.
Medium 0 to +5%
Price trend3 mth.
0,42
0,49
0,23
0,60
0,10
0,67
0,60
0,700,85
0,45
85,4
122,2
745,3
88,0
90,088,0
126
126123
833,0
752,8
715
830
830820
725
129,1
-
-
--
123,2
746
746746
0,25
0,250,25
136
138134
129
132134
0,72
0,15
0,150,20
1,43
1,70
0,550,70
0,65
0,700,80
2,10
1,90
0,80
0,901,050,50
1,32
1,27
1,88
720
1,82
1,85
2,00
2,00
1,80
0,05
0,20
0,20
0,20
0,050,05
0,45
0,40
0,28
0,21
0,16
0,51
0,02
0,35
0,400,45
0,28
0,30
1,50
1,00
1,001,25
1,50
1,50
0,000,00
0,75
0,50
1,57
1,00
0,10
0,28
2,05
0,75
0,10
0,50
0,00
0,30
0,35
0,50
0,500,50
0,75
0,100,10
0,50
10-yr swap yield
1,25
0,30
0,400,50
3m interest rate
0,50
Average
Key int.rate
0,25
0,25
0,250,25
1,75
0,00
0,75
37 | March 2013 www.danskeresearch.com
No
rdic O
utlo
ok
Nordic Outlook
Disclosure This research report has been prepared by Danske Bank Markets, a division of Danske Bank. Danske Bank is under supervision by the Danish Financial Supervisory
Authority.
Danske Bank has established procedures to prevent conflicts of interest and to ensure the provision of high quality research based on research objectivity and independence.
These procedures are documented in the Danske Bank Research Policy. Employees within the Danske Bank Research Departments have been instructed that any request that
might impair the objectivity and independence of research shall be referred to Research Management and to the Compliance Officer. Danske Bank Research departments are
organised independently from and do not report to other Danske Bank business areas. Research analysts are remunerated in part based on the over-all profitability of Danske
Bank, which includes investment banking revenues, but do not receive bonuses or other remuneration linked to specific corporate finance or debt capital transactions.
Danske Bank research reports are prepared in accordance with the Danish Society of Investment Professionals’ Ethical rules and the Recommendations of the Danish
Securities Dealers Association.
Financial models and/or methodology used in this research report
Calculations and presentations in this research report are based on standard econometric tools and methodology as well as publicly available statistics for each individual
security, issuer and/or country. Documentation can be obtained from the authors upon request.
Risk warning
Major risks connected with recommendations or opinions in this research report, including as sensitivity analysis of relevant assumptions, are stated throughout the text.
Expected updates
Nordic Outlook is a quarterly forecast, but new statistical data may give rise to changes in our views on individual economies.
First date of publication
Please see the front page of this research report.
General disclaimer This research has been prepared by Danske Bank Markets (a division of Danske Bank A/S). It is provided for informational purposes only. It does not constitute or form part
of, and shall under no circumstances be considered as, an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to purchase or sell any relevant financial instruments (i.e. financial
instruments mentioned herein or other financial instruments of any issuer mentioned herein and/or options, warrants, rights or other interests with respect to any such
financial instruments) ("Relevant Financial Instruments").
The research report has been prepared independently and solely on the basis of publicly available information which Danske Bank considers to be reliable. Whilst reasonable
care has been taken to ensure that its contents are not untrue or misleading, no representation is made as to its accuracy or completeness, and Danske Bank, its affiliates and
subsidiaries accept no liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss, including without limitation any loss of profits, arising from reliance on this research report.
The opinions expressed herein are the opinions of the research analysts responsible for the research report and reflect their judgment as of the date hereof. These opinions are
subject to change, and Danske Bank does not undertake to notify any recipient of this research report of any such change nor of any other changes related to the information
provided in the research report.
This research report is not intended for retail customers in the United Kingdom or the United States.
This research report is protected by copyright and is intended solely for the designated addressee. It may not be reproduced or distributed, in whole or in part, by any recipient
for any purpose without Danske Bank’s prior written consent.
Disclaimer related to distribution in the United States This research report is distributed in the United States by Danske Bank Inc., a U.S. registered broker-dealer and subsidiary of Danske Bank, pursuant to SEC Rule 15a-6 and
related interpretations issued by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The research report is intended for distribution in the United States solely to "U.S.
institutional investors" as defined in SEC Rule 15a-6. Danske Bank Inc. accepts responsibility for this research report in connection with distribution in the United States
solely to “U.S. institutional investors”.
Danske Bank is not subject to U.S. rules with regard to the preparation of research reports and the independence of research analysts. In addition, the research analysts of
Danske Bank who have prepared this research report are not registered or qualified as research analysts with the NYSE or FINRA, but satisfy the applicable requirements of
a non-U.S. jurisdiction.
Any U.S. investor recipient of this research report who wishes to purchase or sell any Relevant Financial Instrument may do so only by contacting Danske Bank Inc. directly
and should be aware that investing in non-U.S. financial instruments may entail certain risks. Financial instruments of non-U.S. issuers may not be registered with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission and may not be subject to the reporting and auditing standards of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
N o r way
F r a n k J u l l u m+ 4 7 8 5 4 0 6 5 4 0f j u @ f o k u s . n o
B e r n t C h r i s t i a n B r u n+ 4 7 2 3 1 3 9 1 9 0b b r u @ d a n s k e b a n k . n o
F i N l a N d
P a s i P e t te r i K u o p p a m ä k i+ 3 5 8 ( 0 ) 1 0 5 4 6 7 7 1 5p a s i . k u o p p a m a k i @ d a n s k e b a n k . co m
i N t e r N at i o N a l M a c r o
C h i e f A n a l y s t & H e a d of A l l a n v o n M e h r e n + 4 5 4 5 1 2 8 0 5 5a l v o @ d a n s k e b a n k . d k
S i g n e P. R o e d - F r e d e r i k s e n+ 4 5 4 5 1 2 8 2 2 9s r o e @ d a n s k e b a n k . d k
F r a n k Ø l a n d H a n s e n+ 4 5 4 5 1 2 8 5 2 6 f r a n h @ d a n s k e b a n k . d k
F l e m m i n g J e g b j æ r g N i e l s e n + 4 5 4 5 1 2 8 5 3 5f l e m m @ d a n s k e b a n k . d k
P e r n i l l e B o m h o l d t N i e l s e n+ 4 5 4 5 1 2 8 4 9 8p e r n i @ d a n s k e b a n k . d k
F i x e d i N c o M e r e s e a r c h
C h i e f A n a l y s t & H e a d of T h o m a s T h ø g e r s e n G r ø n k j æ r + 4 5 4 5 1 2 8 5 0 2th g r @ d a n s k e b a n k . d k
J e n s P e te r S ø r e n s e n+ 4 5 4 5 1 2 8 5 1 7 j e n s s r @ d a n s k e b a n k . d k
C h r i s t i n a E . Fa l c h + 4 5 4 5 1 2 7 1 5 2c h f a @ d a n s k e b a n k . d k
S ø r e n S ko v H a n s e n + 4 5 4 5 1 2 8 4 3 0s r h a @ d a n s k e b a n k . d k
J a n We b e r Ø s te r g a a r d+ 4 5 4 5 1 3 0 7 8 9j a s t @ d a n s k e b a n k . d k
S v e r r e H o l b e k + 4 5 4 5 1 4 8 8 8 2h o l b @ d a n s k e b a n k . d k
A n d e r s Ve s te r g å r d F i s c h e r+ 4 5 4 5 1 3 6 6 4 1a f i s @ d a n s k e b a n k . d k
A n d e r s M ø l l e r L u m h o l t z+ 4 5 4 5 1 2 8 4 9 8a n d j r g @ d a n s k e b a n k . d k
r at e s , F x & c o M M o d i t i e s
s t r at e g y
C h i e f A n a l y s t & H e a d of A r n e L o h m a n n R a s m u s s e n + 4 5 4 5 1 2 8 5 3 2a r r @ d a n s k e b a n k . d k
K a s p e r K i r k e g a a r d + 4 5 4 5 1 3 7 0 1 8k a k i @ d a n s k e b a n k . d k
C h r i s t i n K y r m e Tu x e n + 4 5 4 5 1 3 7 8 6 7tu x @ d a n s k e b a n k . d k
P e te r P o s s i n g A n d e r s e n + 4 5 4 5 1 3 7 0 1 9p a @ d a n s k e b a n k . d k
L a r s Tr a n b e r g R a s m u s s e n+ 4 5 4 5 1 2 8 5 3 4 l a r a s @ d a n s k e b a n k . d k
M o r te n T h r a n e H e l t+ 4 5 4 5 1 4 8 8 8 2m o h e l @ d a n s k e b a n k . d k
c r e d i t r e s e a r c h
C h i e f A n a l y s t & H e a d of T h o m a s M a r t i n H o v a r d+ 4 5 4 5 1 2 8 5 0 5 h o v a @ d a n s k e b a n k . d k
H e n r i k A r n t + 4 5 4 5 1 2 8 5 0 4h e a n d @ d a n s k e b a n k . d k
L o u i s L a n d e m a n+ 4 6 8 5 6 8 8 0 5 2 4l l a n @ d a n s k e b a n k . s e
J a ko b M a g n u s s e n + 4 5 4 5 1 2 8 5 0 3j a k j a @ d a n s k e b a n k . d k
A s b j ø r n P u r u p A n d e r s e n+ 4 5 4 5 1 4 8 8 8 6a p u @ d a n s k e b a n k . d k
M a d s R o s e n d a l+ 4 5 4 5 1 4 8 8 7 9m a d r o @ d a n s k e b a n k . d k
G a b r i e l B e r g i n+ 4 6 ( 0 ) 8 - 5 6 8 8 0 6g a b e @ d a n s k e b a n k . d k
B r i a n B ø r s t i n g+ 4 5 4 5 1 2 8 5 1 9b r b r @ d a n s k e b a n k . d k
Å s e H a a g e n s e n h a @ d a n s k e b a n k . co m + 4 7 2 2 8 6 1 3 2 2
D a n s k e B a n k , D a n s k e R e s e a r c h , H o l m e n s K a n a l 2 - 1 2 , D K - 1 0 9 2 C o p e n h a g e n K . P h o n e + 4 5 4 5 1 2 0 0 0 0 w w w. d a n s k e r e s e a r c h . co m
d e N M a r k
S te e n B o c i a n+ 4 5 4 5 1 2 8 5 3 1s tb o @ d a n s k e b a n k . d k
L a s O l s e n + 4 5 4 5 1 2 8 5 3 6l a s o @ d a n s k e b a n k . d k
J e n s N æ r v i g P e d e r s e n + 4 5 4 5 1 2 8 0 6 1j e n p e @ d a n s k e b a n k . d k
s w e d e N
C h i e f A n a l y s t & H e a d of M i c h a e l B o s tr ö m+ 4 6 8 5 6 8 8 0 5 8 7m b o s @ c o n s e n s u s . s e
R o g e r J o s e f s s o n+ 4 6 8 5 6 8 8 0 5 5 8 r j o s @ c o n s e n s u s . s e
M i c h a e l G r a h n + 4 6 8 5 6 8 8 0 7 0 0m i k a @ c o n s e n s u s . s e
C a r l M i l to n+ 4 6 8 5 6 8 8 0 5 9 8c a r m i @ c o n s e n s u s . s e
M a r c u s S ö d e r b e r g+ 4 6 8 5 6 8 8 0 5 6 4m a r s d @ c o n s e n s u s . s e
S te f a n M e l l i n+ 4 6 8 5 6 8 8 0 5 9 2m e l l @ c o n s e n s u s . s e
Global Danske ReseaRch
H e a d o f G l o b a l d a n s k e R e s e a R c H T h o m a s T h ø g e r s e n G r ø n k j æ r + 4 5 4 5 1 2 8 5 0 2th g r @ d a n s k e b a n k . d k
c H i e f e c o n o m i s t at d a n s k e b a n k
S te e n B o c i a n+ 4 5 4 5 1 2 8 5 3 1s tb o @ d a n s k e b a n k . d k
e M e r g i N g M a r k e t s
C h i e f A n a l y s t & H e a d of L a r s C h r i s te n s e n+ 4 5 4 5 1 2 8 5 3 0l a r c h @ d a n s k e b a n k . d k
S ta n i s l a v a P r a d o v a + 4 5 4 5 1 2 8 0 7 1s p r a @ d a n s k e b a n k . d k
Vi o l e ta K l y v i e n eS e n i o r B a l t i c A n a l y s t+ 3 7 0 6 1 1 2 4 3 5 4v k l y @ d a n s k e b a n k . d k
S e n i o r E co n o m i s tS a n n a K u r r o n e n ( o n l e a v e )+ 3 5 8 1 0 5 4 6 7 5 7 3k u r r @ d a n s k e b a n k . co m
V l a d i m i r M i k l a s h e v s k y + 3 5 8 ( 0 ) 1 0 5 4 6 7 5 2 2v l m i @ d a n s k e b a n k . co m