1. Science in the YouTube Age: How web based tools are enabling Open Research Cameron Neylon STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory http://openwetware.org/wiki/User:Cameron_Neylon http://friendfeed.com/cameronneylon

2. 3. 4. If I have seen further, it is by standing on the shoulders of giants Isaac Newton 5. I never had an idea that couldnt be improved by sharing it with as many people as possible Bill Hooker 3 Quarks Daily (2006) http://3quarksdaily.blogs.com/3quarksdaily/2006/10/the_future_of_s_1.html 6. Science is social Web 2.0 is social Science needs Web 2.0 7. 8. What am I thinking? 9. How do I justify this? 10. How do Ido this? 11. What amI doing? 12. What does it mean? 13. What amI reading? 14. Who canhelp me? 15. 16. Lets goout! 17. Best place to go? 18. How do I justify this? 19. Extract cashfrom parents 20. Coordination 21. Take photos/ video/audio 22. Uploadingphotos/video 23. Commenting on photos 24. What didthe others do? 25. What was I thinking? 26. 27. 28. What am I thinking? 29. http:// www.zoology.ubc.ca/~redfieldindex.html What am I thinking? What does the data mean? 30. What amI reading? 31. What am I reading? 32. http:// openwetware.org/wiki/Nxsib:community/papers What am I reading? 33. What amI doing? 34. http:// usefulchem.wikispaces.com What am I doing? 35. http:// chemtools.chem.soton.ac.uk/projects/blogs/blogs.php/blog_id/10 What am I doing? 36. Science is social Web 2.0 is social Science needs Web 2.0 37. Science is social Web 2.0 is social Science needs Web 2.0 like a hole in the head 38. David Crotty (2008) Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press,Why Web2.0 is failing in Biology http://www.cshblogs.org/cshprotocols/2008/02/14/why-web-20-is-failing-in-biology/ 39.

Network size issues

Barriers to entry

No immediate benefit

Too many me too sites

Fear of being scooped

40. Rich Apodaca (2007) Depth-First,Scientific Publication and the Seven Deadly Sins http://depth-first.com/articles/2007/05/14/scientific-publication-and-the-seven-deadly-sins 41. How do I justify this? 42.

Open call for participants on Blog

Collaborative writing on GoogleDocs.

Concept to submitted proposal in five days

http://blog.openwetware.org/scienceintheopen/2007/12/12/the-open-research-network-proposal-update-and-reflections/ 43. Lab notebook Blog Lab notebook Lab notebook 44. Science is social Scientists are not (necessarily) social Web 2.0 fundamentally relies on openness Without a change in culture and rewards the benefits of Web 2.0 will not be realised 45. Jean-Claude Bradley, Jeremiah Faith, Jeremy Frey, Michael Barton, Deepak Singh, Bill Hooker, Pedro Beltrao, Shirley Wu, Pawel Szczesny, Ricardo Vidal, Mat Todd, Antony Williams, Peter Murray-Rust, Bill Flanagan, Julius Lucks, John Cumbers, Liz Lyon, John Wilbanks, Simon Coles, Andy Powell, Timo Hannay, Dave de Roure The Open Science Collective Acknowledgements 46.