Upload
samson-thick
View
218
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
What characterises a good specialisation
process?A qualitative inquiry among 17 Danish elite athletes
Louise Kamuk Storm & Mette Krogh ChristensenInstitute of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics
Storm & Christensen, ECSS 2010
AIM 1) to describe how 17 Danish elite
athletes specialises 2) to explore what characterises a
good specialisation process to these athletes
A new understanding of specialisation
processes
Traditional understandingsEarly or late specialisation?
Storm &Christensen , ECSS 2010
Sampling years – diversification (6-12 years)•Focus on several sports•DELIBERATE PLAY
Sampling years – diversification (6-12 years)•Focus on several sports•DELIBERATE PLAY
Early specialisation(6 years→)
•Focus on one sport
•DELIBERATE PRACTICE
Early specialisation(6 years→)
•Focus on one sport
•DELIBERATE PRACTICE
Specialising years (12-15 years)•Reduce number of sports•DELIBERATE PLAY AND DELIBERATE PRACTICE
Specialising years (12-15 years)•Reduce number of sports•DELIBERATE PLAY AND DELIBERATE PRACTICE
Investment years(15-19 years)•Focus in one sportInvestment years(15-19 years)•Focus in one sport
Expert performanceReduced health and enjoyment
Expert performanceEnhanced health and enjoyment
Introduction to sport
Inspired by: Developmental Model of Sport Participation Côté et al 2007
Storm & Christensen, ECSS 2010
Diversity among sports and biographical data
SPORTS10 different sportsindividual, pair and team sport
BIOGRAPHICAL DATAnational and international elite male and female average age 25 years national team
Questionnaire 720
athletes
217 athletes accept
Selection of 30 athletesContact via
12 interviews
Re-contact and new
contact 12 athletes
5 interviews
17 interviews
Storm & Christensen, ECSS 2010
Qualitative inquiry
In-depth biographical interviews
Kvale (2008)
Case study analysis Flyvbjerg (2006)
Interpretation
Gadamer (1975)
Storm & Christensen, ECSS 2010
Pathways of Danish elite athletes
Early focus on one sport via deliberate practice (n=1)
Late entry to primary sport (n=2)
Sampling and late specialisation (n=8)
Early focus on one sport via ‘fun and being together’ and late investment (n=6)
A third pathway
Storm & Christensen, ECSS 2010
Sampling years – diversification (6-12 år)•Focus on several sports•DELIBERATE PLAY
Sampling years – diversification (6-12 år)•Focus on several sports•DELIBERATE PLAY
Early specialisation(6 years+)
•Focus on one sport
•DELIBERATE PRACTICE
Early specialisation(6 years+)
•Focus on one sport
•DELIBERATE PRACTICE
Specialising years (12-15 years)•Reduce number of sports•DELIBERATE PLAY AND DELIBERATE PRACTICE
Specialising years (12-15 years)•Reduce number of sports•DELIBERATE PLAY AND DELIBERATE PRACTICE
Investment years (15-19 years)•Focus in one sport
Investment years (15-19 years)•Focus in one sport
Expert performanceReduced health and enjoyments
Expert performanceEnhanced health and enjoyment
Introduction to sport
Notice: This is a way of illustrating the empirical data of the present study in the light of the two well-known traditional understandings of specialisation. This is not a new model, to that the foundation is way to limited.
Early focus on one sport
FunNon-serious
‘Being-together’
Late investment
SeriousCompetitiveIndividual
Expert performance
Storm Christensen, ECSS 2010
Common features regarding experiences of sports
participation
14-16 years of age
age
FunEnjoyableBeing-together
SeriousCompetitiveIndividual
1) Transition to another club
2) Selected for National Team3)Transition within the club
Storm & Christensen, ECSS 2010
A cultural fingerprint
Danish sports originated from popular movements in different social milieus. These milieus and social movements gave different and rivalling impulses to the Danish practice and understanding of sports
Eichberg & Loland (2010) “Sport for all - regardless of level, age and gender”
Sports confederation of Denmark
Storm & Christensen, ECSS 2010
Conclusions
Specialisation processes are unique trajectories Research has tended to focus on two common
trajectories leading to excellence in sport. This study outlines a third pathway - maybe more??
There is a cohesion between cultural aspects and specialisation – we must look at the environments in talent development
We need a more detailed discussion of specialisation processes
Storm & Christensen, ECSS 2010
REFERENCESCôté J, Baker, J., Abernethy, B. (2007): Practice and Play in the Development of Sport Expertise. In Eklund R, Tenenbaum G (eds.) Handbook of Sport Psychology 3rd ed. pp. 184-202 New York WileyEricsson KA et al (1993): The Role of Deliberate Practice in the Acquisition of Expert Performance. In Psychological Review 100 pp. 363-406
Eichberg, H, Loland, S (2010): “Nordic sports - from social movements via emotional to bodily movement - and back again?” In: Sport in Society, 13: 4, 676 — 690Flyvbjerg, B. (2006): “Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research “ In:Qualitative Inquiry.;12:219-245Gadamer, HG. (1975): Truth and Method, Seabury Press, NYKvale, S. (1996): Interviews: an introduction to qualitative research interviewing, Sage, LondonHenriksen K et al (2009): “Holistic approach to athletic talent development environments: A successful sailing milieu” In: Psychology of Sport and Exercise (in press)
Thank you for your attention!Thanks to The Danish Council for Independent Research | Humanities who allocated research grant to the research project and thereby made it possible to realiseContact: [email protected]