Upload
doannhu
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Community Meeting Coming together to discuss use of force
Agenda • How we got here: laws governing police use of force
• Use of force: around the country and in Saint Paul
• Culture shift: a 21st century approach in Saint Paul
• The draft policy: an overview
• Questions, comments and ideas
• RRA - Response to Resistance and Aggression
• UOF - Use of Force
• DT - Defensive Tactics
Please note: These terms will be used interchangeably.
Synonyms
The Chief’s Mandate SPPD officers will only use force that is:
reasonable, necessary and done with respect
State Statutes
Policy
& Training
Federal Case Law
SPPD Use-of-Force Guidelines
What constitutes reasonable force by a police officer?
Graham vs. Connor Landmark U.S. Supreme Court case governing police use of force
The severity of the crime believed to have been committed by the suspect.
Did the suspect present an immediate threat to to the safety of officers or the public?
Was the suspect actively resisting arrest or
attempting to escape ?
Key: totality of the circumstances
No 20/20 hindsight
Determine what a reasonable officer would have done at the time of incident.
Other factors that influence use of force
• Subject size, age and ability vs. officer size, age and ability
• Subjects known history
• Availability of weapons
• Number of suspects vs. number of officers present
• Environmental factors
• Weather conditions
• Officer exhaustion/injury
• Subjects behavior and actions
Levels of subject resistance
Subject’s actions don’t
necessarily intend to
cause harm
Active Resistance
Subject’s actions
intend to cause harm
Aggressive Aggravated Aggressive
Passive Resistance
Training more than tactics • Is the officer’s intervention fully legal?
• Is there an urgent need to resolve the situation?
• Is the use of force proportional to the person’s resistance?
• Does the officer’s conduct precipitate the use of force?
• Is the officer’s behavior appropriate and professional?
• Would an officer with similar training use the same amount
of force?
Use of force: what we know • More than 800,000 police officers in the U.S.
• 10’s of millions of contacts with the public each year
• Nationally, police use force in less than 1% of those
contacts (Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2008)
• In Saint Paul, police use force in only two-tenths of 1%
(.2%) of contacts
• Urgency to resolve every situation quickly • Using repeated loud verbal commands • Focused on single officer techniques opposed to team
control techniques • Pressure points and striking (punches and kicks) to gain
control of subjects resisting arrest • Dependence on intermediate tools (Taser, baton and
pepper spray)
An evolution: traditionally, U.S. police training has focused on …
SPPD evolving tactics • Based on best practices and policy models
from around the country
• Our goals: 1. Increase safety for everyone involved 2. Emphasize de-escalation techniques 3. Reduce the level of force used 4. Increase technique effectiveness 5. Increase officer confidence 6. Enhance community trust
Leverage-based control techniques
vs Striking and pain compliance techniques
• Does not rely on pain compliance
• Leverage-based not strength-based
• Smaller officers can use techniques effectively against larger subjects
• Effectiveness increases when using multiple officers
• Increased the availability of lower level force options
• Requires more training time
The culture shift: beginning with the 2015 SPPD Police Academy
• New RRA curriculum introduced
• Emphasis on de-escalation skills
• Utilize team tactics
• Soft empty hand control techniques
• Included UOF scenario based training to enhance decision
making
• Officers constantly evaluate and de-escalate force when feasible
Changing the culture: department-wide RRA implementation
• In 2016, the SPPD began training all officers during
annual in-service
• In 2017, BWCs showed officers: • Using de-escalation techniques • Slowing down when possible • Getting additional resources • Using good team tactics • Using soft empty hand techniques to gain control
Draft RRA Policy • Reflects SPPD values and training • De-escalation (emphasizes time, distance and teamwork) • Distinguishes between passive and aggressive resistance • Duty to intervene more clearly defined • Medic response • Increased supervisor oversight • New model replaces outdated use-of-force continuum • Promotes critical decision making • Better aligns with shared values of community and the SPPD
SPPD RRA continuum
Draft RRA model
The Saint Paul Police Department protects people, their property, and their rights by providing
trusted service with respect every day without exception - including during encounters that require the use of force to respond to resistance or aggression. Although officers seek to resolve encounters without force whenever possible, as guardians of public safety and welfare, there are times when officers are called upon to use force to keep others, or themselves, safe. In those times, officers are mindful that they derive their authority from the community and that unreasonable force degrades the legitimacy of that authority and the public trust. This policy guides officers to use the least amount of force that is reasonable and necessary to achieve a lawful objective, and to serve all individuals with respect.
Regardless of the circumstances, officers will see the value of every person they serve and honor their human and civil rights.
Questions and Ideas