3
This work has been digitalized and published in 2013 by Verlag Zeitschrift für Naturforschung in cooperation with the Max Planck Society for the Advancement of Science under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Dieses Werk wurde im Jahr 2013 vom Verlag Zeitschrift für Naturforschung in Zusammenarbeit mit der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften e.V. digitalisiert und unter folgender Lizenz veröffentlicht: Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 Lizenz. Notizen 699 Solid State Structure of N,N-Dibenzylhydroxylamine Norbert W. Mitzel+, Jürgen Riede, Klaus Angermaier, Hubert Schmidbaur* Anorganisch-chemisches Institut der Technischen Universität München, Lichtenbergstraße 4, D-85747 Garching, Germany Z. Naturforsch. 50b, 699-701 (1995); received October 31, 1994 Solid State Structure, N,N-Dibenzylhydroxylamine The solid-state structure of N,N-dibenzyl- hydroxylamine (1) has been determined by single crystal X-ray diffraction. The compound crys tallizes in the monoclinic space group P2 \ln with four formula units in the unit cell. N,N-dibenzyl- hydroxylamine dimerizes to give N20 2H2 six- membered rings as a result of the formation of two hydrogen bonds O -H —N in the solid state. The preparative chemistry of hydroxylamine and its organic derivatives as discovered by Lossen in 1865 [1] is well established [2], In particular, the use of hydroxylamine in polymer chemistry (poly amide via the caprolactam process [3]) has stimu lated research in this area. Theoretical contri butions have mainly dealt with the conformation of the N -O skeleton in hydroxylamine and its de rivatives [4], but the structural chemistry of simple hydroxylamines has only been sparingly devel oped. The crystal structure of unsubstituted hy droxylamine, H2NOH, was elucidated in an early work of Meyers and Lipscomb [5] in 1955, but the hydrogen positions could not be located at this time. Rankin and Riddel have determined the gas-phase structures of O-methylhydroxylamine, N-methylhydroxylamine, N,0-dimethylhydroxyl- amine and N,N,0-trimethylhydroxylamine [6] by electron diffraction. The molecular geometries ob tained in this way are those of free molecules which are undistorted by intermolecular or pack ing forces. In the condensed states, however, inter molecular interactions are very important for an understanding of any structural details. With NH + Current address: Department of Chemistry, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH 9 3JJ, U.K. * Reprint requests to Prof. Dr. H. Schmidbaur. or OH functions present in the molecules, the for mation of hydrogen bridges is likely to contribute significantly to the molecular and crystal structure. Recently, we have demonstrated that silylated hydroxylamines have unusual molecular geo metries [7], Unlike most other silicon nitrogen compounds [8], the silylhydroxylamines feature a pyramidal configuration at the nitrogen atom. Turning now to simple organic derivatives of hy droxylamine, we report here the solid state struc ture of N,N-dibenzylhydroxylamine (1). OH 1 According to a well established literature pro cedure [2], compound i was prepared by the benzylation of hydroxylamine hydrochloride and identified by its analytical and spectroscopic data. Crystals were grown from diethylether solutions. In the monoclinic crystals, space group P2 xln with Z = 4 formula units in the unit cell, molecules of compound 1 are present as dimers (Fig. 1). Hydro gen bonding between the OH proton of one mol ecule and the nitrogen atom of another leads to the formation of quasi-rectangular N20 2H2 six- membered rings. Hydrogen bonding is often observed for OH- functionalized hydroxylamines: N,N'-dihydroxy - N,N'-dimethylmethanediamine [9] forms dimers with eight-membered CN30 2H2 rings; N-methane- sulfonyl-N-phenylhydroxylamine [10] forms OH —O bridges; l-(3-(N-r-butylhydroxyamino)- Fig. 1. Structure of the dimer of 1. 0932-0776/95/0400-0699 $06.00 © 1995 Verlag der Zeitschrift für Naturforschung. All rights reserved.

T% - zfn.mpdl.mpg.dezfn.mpdl.mpg.de/data/Reihe_B/50/ZNB-1995-50b-0699_n.pdf · This work has been digitalized and published in 2013 by V erlag Zeitschrift für Naturforschung in cooperation

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: T% - zfn.mpdl.mpg.dezfn.mpdl.mpg.de/data/Reihe_B/50/ZNB-1995-50b-0699_n.pdf · This work has been digitalized and published in 2013 by V erlag Zeitschrift für Naturforschung in cooperation

This work has been digitalized and published in 2013 by Verlag Zeitschrift für Naturforschung in cooperation with the Max Planck Society for the Advancement of Science under a Creative Commons Attribution4.0 International License.

Dieses Werk wurde im Jahr 2013 vom Verlag Zeitschrift für Naturforschungin Zusammenarbeit mit der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Förderung derWissenschaften e.V. digitalisiert und unter folgender Lizenz veröffentlicht:Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 Lizenz.

Notizen 699

Solid State Structure of N,N-DibenzylhydroxylamineNorbert W. Mitzel+, Jürgen Riede,Klaus Angermaier, Hubert Schmidbaur*Anorganisch-chemisches Institut der Technischen Universität München, Lichtenbergstraße 4, D-85747 Garching, GermanyZ. Naturforsch. 50b, 699-701 (1995); received October 31, 1994Solid State Structure,N,N-Dibenzylhydroxylamine

The solid-state structure of N,N-dibenzyl- hydroxylamine (1) has been determined by single crystal X-ray diffraction. The compound crys­tallizes in the monoclinic space group P 2 \ln with four formula units in the unit cell. N,N-dibenzyl- hydroxylamine dimerizes to give N20 2H2 six- membered rings as a result of the formation of two hydrogen bonds O -H —N in the solid state.

The preparative chemistry of hydroxylamine and its organic derivatives as discovered by Lossen in 1865 [1] is well established [2], In particular, the use of hydroxylamine in polymer chemistry (poly­amide via the caprolactam process [3]) has stimu­lated research in this area. Theoretical contri­butions have mainly dealt with the conformation of the N -O skeleton in hydroxylamine and its de­rivatives [4], but the structural chemistry of simple hydroxylamines has only been sparingly devel­oped. The crystal structure of unsubstituted hy­droxylamine, H2NOH, was elucidated in an early work of Meyers and Lipscomb [5] in 1955, but the hydrogen positions could not be located at this time. Rankin and Riddel have determined the gas-phase structures of O-methylhydroxylamine, N-methylhydroxylamine, N,0-dimethylhydroxyl- amine and N,N,0-trimethylhydroxylamine [6] by electron diffraction. The molecular geometries ob­tained in this way are those of free molecules which are undistorted by intermolecular or pack­ing forces. In the condensed states, however, inter­molecular interactions are very important for an understanding of any structural details. With NH

+ Current address: Department of Chemistry, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH 9 3JJ, U.K.

* Reprint requests to Prof. Dr. H. Schmidbaur.

or OH functions present in the molecules, the for­mation of hydrogen bridges is likely to contribute significantly to the molecular and crystal structure.

Recently, we have demonstrated that silylated hydroxylamines have unusual molecular geo­metries [7], Unlike most other silicon nitrogen compounds [8], the silylhydroxylamines feature a pyramidal configuration at the nitrogen atom. Turning now to simple organic derivatives of hy­droxylamine, we report here the solid state struc­ture of N,N-dibenzylhydroxylamine (1).

OH 1

According to a well established literature pro­cedure [2], compound i was prepared by the benzylation of hydroxylamine hydrochloride and identified by its analytical and spectroscopic data. Crystals were grown from diethylether solutions. In the monoclinic crystals, space group P 2 xln with Z = 4 formula units in the unit cell, molecules of compound 1 are present as dimers (Fig. 1). Hydro­gen bonding between the OH proton of one mol­ecule and the nitrogen atom of another leads to the formation of quasi-rectangular N20 2H 2 six- membered rings.

Hydrogen bonding is often observed for OH- functionalized hydroxylamines: N,N'-dihydroxy - N,N'-dimethylmethanediamine [9] forms dimers with eight-membered CN30 2H 2 rings; N-methane- sulfonyl-N-phenylhydroxylamine [10] forms OH —O bridges; l-(3-(N-r-butylhydroxyamino)-

Fig. 1. Structure of the dimer of 1.

0932-0776/95/0400-0699 $06.00 © 1995 Verlag der Zeitschrift für Naturforschung. All rights reserved.

Page 2: T% - zfn.mpdl.mpg.dezfn.mpdl.mpg.de/data/Reihe_B/50/ZNB-1995-50b-0699_n.pdf · This work has been digitalized and published in 2013 by V erlag Zeitschrift für Naturforschung in cooperation

700 Notizen

Bz—.

Bz

u\

H/

H

/O\

\//

— O

.Bz

Bz

Bz

Scheme 1. A: Hydrogen bonding as found in 1. B: Pro­posed alternative aggregation type for 1 (not observed experimentally).

4-chlorophenyl)-l,3-butadiyne [11] occurs in N O H - NOH chains.

The formation of N20 2H 2 rings is known for many oximes, but only for a few hydroxylamines such as l,8-dihydroxy-l,8-diazacyclotetradecane (2) [12] and N-hydroxy-3-nitro-4-azahexacyclodo- decane (3) [13]. The surprising feature of this type of aggregation (Scheme 1 A) is the short distance between the centres of electron density ato the positively polarized hydrogen atoms [2.16(6) A] of the dimer, despite of repulsive Coulomb forces. An alternative aggregation not realized in the crystals of 1 is proposed in Scheme 1B. Within this nine-membered N30 3H3 ring, Coulomb repulsion between the positively charged hydrogen atoms would be reduced as compared with the aggre­gation type A, and the O - H -N units could adopt their ideal unstrained linear geometry.

The O -N ' distance in 1 is 2.875(3) Ä which is in the same range as for 2 (2.875 A) and 3 [2.84(1) A].

The nitrogen atom of 1 has a pyramidal con­figuration, with the sum of angles at the N atom at only o 321.5°. The N -O bond length is1.456(2) A, only marginally shorter than that found for 2 (1.469 A) [12], with the same type of hydrogen bonding, and also in good agreement

Table I. Selected geometric parameters for 1.

Bond lengths [A] Bond angles [°]

N -O 1.456(2) O -N - C l 105.5(1)N -C l 1.480(2) 0 - N - C 2 105.2(1)N -C 2 1.472(2) C 1 -N -C 2 110.8(1)C l - C l l 1.499(3) N -C 1-C 11 111.5(1)C2-C21 1.502(3)O - H l 0.88(3) H 1 - O - N 98(2)H l - N 2.02(3) O - H l - N ' 164(3)H 1 -H 1' 2.16(6) O - N - H l ' 97.3(8)O - N ' 2.875(3)sum of angles at N: 321.5°

with the data of crystalline H2NOH (1.476(3) A)[5]. For comparison, the N -O distances inO-methylhydroxylamine, N-methylhydroxylamine. N,0-dimethylhydroxylamine and N,N,0-trimethyl- hydroxylamine, as determined by gas-phase elec­tron diffraction [6], are 1.463(3), 1.477(2), 1.496(9). and 1.513(9) A, respectively.

The molecular structure of an individual mol­ecule of 1 shows trans conformation, i. e. the lone pairs at N and O are located at a maximum dis­tance. Only this trans conformation allows for the observed type of hydrogen bonding. As the con­formation and the type of hydrogen bonding are dependent upon each other, it is not clear whether the trans conformation also corresponds to the po­tential energy minimum for the isolated molecule. Molecular orbital calculations generally predict two minima for the rotation about the N -O bond in hydroxylamines, and favour the trans confor­mation by about 3 kJ/mol in energy [4c, d]. How­ever, in some cases IR studies of H2NOH and its methyl derivatives give contadictary results as far as the conformation is concerned [14].

ExperimentalCompound 1 was prepared by the reaction of

benzyl chloride with hydroxylamine hydrochloride in the presence of potassium carbonate [2]. It was recrystallized from diethylether.

Crystal data for 1: C 14H 15NO; Mr = 213.28; monoclinic; space group P 2 Jn\ a = 9.292(1); b = 10.397(1); c = 12.309(1) Ä; ß = 94.68(1)°; V = 1185.1(2) Ä 3; Z = 4; Dc = 1.20 gem “3, F(000) = 456; /i(M o -K a) = 0.8 cm-1; 2704 reflections meas­ured, 2244 unique, and 1802 observed [F0 > 4cr(F0)]. No absorption correction was applied. Structure solution was by Direct Methods, with all missing atoms located by successive Fourier syntheses.

Refinement of 205 parameters converged at R = 0.0517 and R w = 0.0547; w = [a2(F0) + 0.005 F02]“ '. Maximum and minimum residual electron densi­ties in the difference Fourier map were 0.202 and -0.391 e A -3, respectively. [T = 22 °C; Enraf- Nonius CAD 4 diffractometer; A(M o-Ka) = 0.71069 Ä]*.

Further information on the X-ray structure determi­nation can be obtained from Fachinformationszen- trum Karlsruhe, Gesellschaft für wissenschaftlich- technische Information mbH, D-76344 Eggenstein- Leopoldshafen, on quoting the depository number CSD 58677, the names of the authors, and the jour­nal citation.

Page 3: T% - zfn.mpdl.mpg.dezfn.mpdl.mpg.de/data/Reihe_B/50/ZNB-1995-50b-0699_n.pdf · This work has been digitalized and published in 2013 by V erlag Zeitschrift für Naturforschung in cooperation

Notizen

Acknowledgement

This work has been supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and the Commission of

[1] W. Lossen, Z. Chem. 1865, 551.[2] B. Zeeh, H. Metzger, Hydroxylamine, in: Methoden

der organischen Chemie (Houben-Weyl), Bd. X /l, Thieme-Verlag, Stuttgart (1971).

[3] G. Zinner, Chemiker-Ztg. 114, 197 (1990).[4] a) A. Rastelli, M. Cocchi, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday

Trans. 87, 249 (1991);b) W. A. Latahn, L. A. Curtis, W. J. Hehre, J. B. Lisle, J. A. Pople, Progr. Phys. Org. Chem. 11, 175 (1974);c) W. J. Orville-Thomas, The Structure of Small Molecules, Elsevier, Amsterdam (1966);d) D. M. Gange, E. A. Kellel, J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1992, 824.

[5] E. A. Meyers, W. N. Lipscomb, Acta Crystallogr. 8, 583 (1955).

[6] a) F. G. Riddell, E. S. Turner, D. W. H. Rankin, M. R. Todd, J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1979,72;b) D. W. H. Rankin, M. Todd, F. G. Riddell, E. S. Turner, J. Mol. Struct. 71, 171 (1981);c) L. Pauling, L. O. Brockway, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 57, 2684 (1935).

701

the European Union (NWM). We are grateful to Dr. S. Parsons (Univ. of Edinburgh) for a search of the Cambridge Database.

[7J a) N. W. Mitzel, K. Angermaier, H. Schmidbaur, Organometallics 13, 1762 (1994);b) N. W. Mitzel, H. Schmidbaur, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 620, 1087 (1994);c) N. W. Mitzel, M. Hofmann, E. W aterstradt, P. v. R. Schleyer, H. Schmidbaur, J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 1994, 2503.

[8] E. Lukevics, O. Pudova, R. Strukokovich, Molecular Structure of Organosilicon Compounds, Ellis Hor- wood, Chichester (1989).

[9] W. Kliegel, S. J. Rettig, J. Trotter, Can. J. Chem. 67, 1959 (1989).

[10] C. Rizzoli, P. Sgarabotto, G. Ugozzoli, L. Cardinelli, L. Greci, G. Tosi, Acta Cryst. C 47, 1515 (1991).

[11] K. Inoue, N. Koga, H. Iwamura, J. Am. Chem. Soc.113, 9803 (1991).

[12] C. J. Brown, J. Chem. Soc. C 1966, 1108.[13 W. H. Watson, A. P. Marchand, P. R. Dave, Acta

Cryst. C 43, 1569 (1987).[14] a) P. A. Giguere, I. D. Lin, Can. J. Chem. 30, 984

(1952);b) M. Davies, N. A. Spiers, J. Chem. Soc. 1959, 3971.