51
Storm Surge Modelling at the JRC A.Annunziato

Storm Surge Modelling at the JRC › sites › storm-surge.info › files › ...carried out at JRC • Tsunami wave height forecast • Cyclones Storm Surge • The activities are

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Storm Surge Modelling at the JRC

    A.  Annunziato

  • Storm Surge Activities

    •  The following modelling activities are carried out at JRC •  Tsunami wave height forecast •  Cyclones Storm Surge

    •  The activities are performed in the frame of the Global Disasters Alerts and Coordination System (GDACS) •  An activity performed in collaboration between

    UN-OCHA, UNOSAT and the JRC to alert the Humanitarian Community of large disasters

  • GDACS Architecture & functions

    USGS

    EMSC

    GIS analyses

    Geo Layers

    Tsunami travel time Tsunami propagation Cyclones analysis

    JRC Online Calculation System

    Analysis & Alerting

    EMAIL SMS FAX Geofon

    IM

    PDC JTC

  • http://www.gdacs.org

  • Tropical Cyclones in GDACS

    Winds

    Rainfall

    STORM SURGE

    GIOVANNA 9 -21 Feb 2012 Madagascar Uragano Categoria 4 (SSHS) Vmax = 232 km/h Pc = 932 mbar

  • Tropical Cyclones: Storm Surge (2/2)

    Tropical Cyclon Monitoring Centers IRENE Hurricane

    20-28 Aug 2011

    TC BULLETINS

    Track Maximum wind

    Wind radii

    Vmax

    WIND RADII TREATMENT by a Monte Carlo Method

    Wind Radii

    HyFlux2

    HOLLAND’S MODEL

    ASGARD

    INUNDATION MAPS

    WIND INPACT ASSESMENT

    PRESSURE and WIND

    FIELDS

    GDACS

  • Tropical Cyclones

    •  Online cyclones track analysis every 6 h in order to identify when the conditions for wind intensity and precipitation may lead to dangerous situations

    •  JRC Partners •  Pacific Disasters Center (track collection and formatting) •  NOAA (Tropical Rainfall Potential)

    •  JRC contribution •  Track Analysis •  Storm surge prediction •  Users Alerting

    Global Flood Detection System

  • From bulletins to pressure/winds

    Vmax

    WIND RADII TREATMENT by a Monte Carlo Method

    Wind Radii

    Bulletins

    Holland Model parameters: Central Pressure, Max Radius, k (B=f(Vmax,Pn,Pc)

    Input: Vmax, Wind radii Output: Pc, Rmax, B, k

  • Current Technique: Bulletins (G. Franchello, P. Probst, 2010) •  Based on the reconstruction of the pressure and wind field

    from the textual bulletins to follow Holland Model WTPN32 PGTW 100900!MSGID/GENADMIN/JOINT TYPHOON WRNCEN PEARL HARBOR HI//!SUBJ/TROPICAL CYCLONE WARNING//!RMKS/!1. TYPHOON 24W (NARI) WARNING NR 007    !   UPGRADED FROM TROPICAL STORM 24W!   01 ACTIVE TROPICAL CYCLONE IN NORTHWESTPAC!   MAX SUSTAINED WINDS BASED ON ONE-MINUTE AVERAGE!   WIND RADII VALID OVER OPEN WATER ONLY!    ---!   WARNING POSITION:!   100600Z --- NEAR 15.2N 126.5E!     MOVEMENT PAST SIX HOURS - 275 DEGREES AT 13 KTS!     POSITION ACCURATE TO WITHIN 045 NM!     POSITION BASED ON CENTER LOCATED BY SATELLITE!   PRESENT WIND DISTRIBUTION:!   MAX SUSTAINED WINDS - 065 KT, GUSTS 080 KT!   WIND RADII VALID OVER OPEN WATER ONLY!   RADIUS OF 050 KT WINDS - 025 NM NORTHEAST QUADRANT!                            025 NM SOUTHEAST QUADRANT!                            025 NM SOUTHWEST QUADRANT!                            025 NM NORTHWEST QUADRANT!   RADIUS OF 034 KT WINDS - 045 NM NORTHEAST QUADRANT!                            045 NM SOUTHEAST QUADRANT!                            050 NM SOUTHWEST QUADRANT!                            055 NM NORTHWEST QUADRANT!   REPEAT POSIT: 15.2N 126.5E!    ---!   FORECASTS:!   12 HRS, VALID AT:!   101800Z --- 15.6N 124.9E!   MAX SUSTAINED WINDS - 075 KT, GUSTS 090 KT!   WIND RADII VALID OVER OPEN WATER ONLY!   RADIUS OF 064 KT WINDS - 020 NM NORTHEAST QUADRANT!                            020 NM SOUTHEAST QUADRANT!   !

    25 NM

    50 knots

    LOCATION

    QUADRANT OF 50,34 KNOTS AND THEIR DISTANCE

    34 knots

    50 NM

  • Automatic procedure

    Every 6h in the Atlantic or 12h in the Pacific we download the bulletin parameters and initialize HYFLUX2 code

  • Dp/Dx, Dp/Dy, Ux, Uy

  • HAIYAN animation

  • GDACS pages for HAIYAN

  • Panay  Island  1.8  m  

    Busuanga,  Culion  And  Coron  Islands  1.5  m   Tacloban  

    2.8  m  

    HAIYAN  Typhoon  Storm  Surge  SituaDon    published  4/11/2013    (-‐4  days  before  strucking)    IdenDficaDon    of  mostly  affected  areas  

    Estimated storm surge

  • News coverage with JRC data

  • A new approach based on ECMWF

    •  As of 2013, the European Center for Medium Weather Forecast is providing estimations with a much finer grid (50 km -> 16 km) •  Therefore it is possible to use their pressure and velocity

    fields to impose to the hydraulic calculations •  Daily Forecasts related to 00:00 and 12:00 available few

    hours after the related time (about 6h) for 72h forecast period

    •  The maps have to be interpolated and used as boundary conditions to the HYFLUX code

    •  Preliminary tests on the basis of an informal agreement with ECMWF for the download of daily forecast in a “non-operational” mode

    •  Advantage is that it is possible to analyse also extra tropical cycones (e.g. St. Jude event 2 weeks ago)

  • Pressure and max wind available

  • Time & Space raster interpolation

  • Pilot calculations with ECMWF

    Cyclone Year Results SANDY 2010 Good WIPHA 2013 Good PHAILIN 2013 Too low HAIYAN 2013 Too low

  • Sandy Cyclone October 2012

    Bulletins Method ECMWF forcing method

    •  Very promising results in the first comparisons

  • Landfall area – Atlantic City

    Bulletins Method ECMWF forcing method

  • Sandy October 2012

  • 930  

    940  

    950  

    960  

    970  

    980  

    990  

    1000  

    1010  

    10/22/2012  0:00  

    10/23/2012  0:00  

    10/24/2012  0:00  

    10/25/2012  0:00  

    10/26/2012  0:00  

    10/27/2012  0:00  

    10/28/2012  0:00  

    10/29/2012  0:00  

    10/30/2012  0:00  

    10/31/2012  0:00  

    11/1/2012  0:00  

    Pc  (hPa)   BT  NOAA   ECMWF  

  • PHAILIN October 2013

  • Phailin 2013

    •  The maximum velocity is strongly underpredicted in ECMWF

    •  The minimum pressure is not correctly modelled in ECMWF and thus the maximum impact is underpredicted

  • WIPHA – October 2013

    •  Very nice results with 2 cyclones at the same time •  several tide gauges to compare in Japan •  The behavior is strongly dependent on the history of the

    cyclone

  • The first affected location in Japan

  • The most off-center location

  • The point of max impact

  • HAIYNAN Cyclone

    •  One of the most severe cyclones •  Philippines: •  Too few measurements in the impact area

    •  Wind Radii model •  Unable to show the extent of the cyclone •  Correct estimation of maximum impact in Philippines in the larger

    damage area •  ECMWF Forcing model

    •  Correct extent but maximum wind speed too low and minimum pressure too high

    •  Vietnam •  Wind Radii model

    •  Unable to show the extent of the cyclone •  Impact extent not yet available

    •  ECMWF Forcing model •  Correct extent and good prediction of sea level measurements •  Impact extent not yet available

  • Wind Radii vs ECMWF forcing

    Wider impact But less intense

  • Estimation of cyclone extent

    0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    0.9

    0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400

    Hei

    gh

    t (m

    )

    Distance (km)

    Max Height over line between 130.45/5.65 and 137.15/11.25

    ECMWF

    Wind Radii

    MEAS PALAU

    MEAS YAP

  • Comparison of forcing conditions

    0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

    100

    11/2

    /201

    3 0:

    00

    11/3

    /201

    3 0:

    00

    11/4

    /201

    3 0:

    00

    11/5

    /201

    3 0:

    00

    11/6

    /201

    3 0:

    00

    11/7

    /201

    3 0:

    00

    11/8

    /201

    3 0:

    00

    11/9

    /201

    3 0:

    00

    11/1

    0/20

    13 0

    :00

    11/1

    1/20

    13 0

    :00

    11/1

    2/20

    13 0

    :00

    11/1

    3/20

    13 0

    :00

    88000 90000 92000 94000 96000 98000

    100000 102000

    11/2

    /201

    3 0:

    00

    11/3

    /201

    3 0:

    00

    11/4

    /201

    3 0:

    00

    11/5

    /201

    3 0:

    00

    11/6

    /201

    3 0:

    00

    11/7

    /201

    3 0:

    00

    11/8

    /201

    3 0:

    00

    11/9

    /201

    3 0:

    00

    11/1

    0/20

    13 0

    :00

    11/1

    1/20

    13 0

    :00

    11/1

    2/20

    13 0

    :00

    11/1

    3/20

    13 0

    :00

    Wind Radii

    ECMWF

    Wind Radii

    ECMWF

    Wind Speed (m/s)

    Minimum Pressure (Pa)

  • Other topics on Cyclones

    eSurge: use of altimetry for the establishment of sea level height Off shore altimetric data could be extremely useful to •  Understand well before landfall which model is

    better reproducing the current event •  To suffice areas where no tidal gauge are

    available (i.e. China)

  • All tracks, w/o considering distance or time (Jason or Cryosat)

  • Altimetry Tracks Analysis

    •  However not all the tracks are useful for modelling comparison

    •  We need to filter the tracks that fits in space and time with the Hurricane Track •  DT= 6 h •  Min Distance=200 km

    t1

    t0

    Satellite track

    Hurricane eye track

    t0 t1 t0-DT

    T1+DT

    Min distance

    Track is selected

  • Jason2: Filtering on space (DeltaX=200 km) and time (deltaT=6h), only 3 Cryosat tracks are useful

    8 Nov 4:30 7 Nov 16:11 7 Nov 3:41

  • NORTH SOUTH

  • 7 Nov 2013 16:11

    18:00

    12:00 7 Nov 2013 16:11

    18:00

    12:00

    ECWMF Forcing model

    Wind Radii model

  • Sea level behaviour at the eye position along the track

  • Wind radii

    swh x 0.05

    Max Height over track

    Height at time of track

  • ECMWF Forcing

    swh x 0.05

    Max Height over track

    Height at time of track

  • Conclusions

    •  JRC is providing online storm surge calculations for every Tropical Cyclone occurring worldwide

    •  During HAIYAN crisis JRC estimation proved to be instrumental in order to identify the most affected areas and task satellite images production

    •  Our calculations represent an important support for many groups that trust in our estimations but the quality needs to be continuously verified with sea level measurements

    •  New developments, using ECMWF medium forecast, seem promising for medium and low cyclones (SANDY, WIPHA, FRANCISCO) but some problems were identified for large velocity events (PHAILIN, HAIYAN)

    •  The use of altimetric data from JASON/CRYOSAT could be quite useful to compare the quality of the model predictions but still work is necessary to have an operational tool

  • Thanks !