Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Storm Surge Modelling at the JRC
A. Annunziato
Storm Surge Activities
• The following modelling activities are carried out at JRC • Tsunami wave height forecast • Cyclones Storm Surge
• The activities are performed in the frame of the Global Disasters Alerts and Coordination System (GDACS) • An activity performed in collaboration between
UN-OCHA, UNOSAT and the JRC to alert the Humanitarian Community of large disasters
GDACS Architecture & functions
USGS
EMSC
GIS analyses
Geo Layers
Tsunami travel time Tsunami propagation Cyclones analysis
JRC Online Calculation System
Analysis & Alerting
EMAIL SMS FAX Geofon
IM
PDC JTC
http://www.gdacs.org
Tropical Cyclones in GDACS
Winds
Rainfall
STORM SURGE
GIOVANNA 9 -21 Feb 2012 Madagascar Uragano Categoria 4 (SSHS) Vmax = 232 km/h Pc = 932 mbar
Tropical Cyclones: Storm Surge (2/2)
Tropical Cyclon Monitoring Centers IRENE Hurricane
20-28 Aug 2011
TC BULLETINS
Track Maximum wind
Wind radii
Vmax
WIND RADII TREATMENT by a Monte Carlo Method
Wind Radii
HyFlux2
HOLLAND’S MODEL
ASGARD
INUNDATION MAPS
WIND INPACT ASSESMENT
PRESSURE and WIND
FIELDS
GDACS
Tropical Cyclones
• Online cyclones track analysis every 6 h in order to identify when the conditions for wind intensity and precipitation may lead to dangerous situations
• JRC Partners • Pacific Disasters Center (track collection and formatting) • NOAA (Tropical Rainfall Potential)
• JRC contribution • Track Analysis • Storm surge prediction • Users Alerting
Global Flood Detection System
From bulletins to pressure/winds
Vmax
WIND RADII TREATMENT by a Monte Carlo Method
Wind Radii
Bulletins
Holland Model parameters: Central Pressure, Max Radius, k (B=f(Vmax,Pn,Pc)
Input: Vmax, Wind radii Output: Pc, Rmax, B, k
Current Technique: Bulletins (G. Franchello, P. Probst, 2010) • Based on the reconstruction of the pressure and wind field
from the textual bulletins to follow Holland Model WTPN32 PGTW 100900!MSGID/GENADMIN/JOINT TYPHOON WRNCEN PEARL HARBOR HI//!SUBJ/TROPICAL CYCLONE WARNING//!RMKS/!1. TYPHOON 24W (NARI) WARNING NR 007 ! UPGRADED FROM TROPICAL STORM 24W! 01 ACTIVE TROPICAL CYCLONE IN NORTHWESTPAC! MAX SUSTAINED WINDS BASED ON ONE-MINUTE AVERAGE! WIND RADII VALID OVER OPEN WATER ONLY! ---! WARNING POSITION:! 100600Z --- NEAR 15.2N 126.5E! MOVEMENT PAST SIX HOURS - 275 DEGREES AT 13 KTS! POSITION ACCURATE TO WITHIN 045 NM! POSITION BASED ON CENTER LOCATED BY SATELLITE! PRESENT WIND DISTRIBUTION:! MAX SUSTAINED WINDS - 065 KT, GUSTS 080 KT! WIND RADII VALID OVER OPEN WATER ONLY! RADIUS OF 050 KT WINDS - 025 NM NORTHEAST QUADRANT! 025 NM SOUTHEAST QUADRANT! 025 NM SOUTHWEST QUADRANT! 025 NM NORTHWEST QUADRANT! RADIUS OF 034 KT WINDS - 045 NM NORTHEAST QUADRANT! 045 NM SOUTHEAST QUADRANT! 050 NM SOUTHWEST QUADRANT! 055 NM NORTHWEST QUADRANT! REPEAT POSIT: 15.2N 126.5E! ---! FORECASTS:! 12 HRS, VALID AT:! 101800Z --- 15.6N 124.9E! MAX SUSTAINED WINDS - 075 KT, GUSTS 090 KT! WIND RADII VALID OVER OPEN WATER ONLY! RADIUS OF 064 KT WINDS - 020 NM NORTHEAST QUADRANT! 020 NM SOUTHEAST QUADRANT! !
25 NM
50 knots
LOCATION
QUADRANT OF 50,34 KNOTS AND THEIR DISTANCE
34 knots
50 NM
Automatic procedure
Every 6h in the Atlantic or 12h in the Pacific we download the bulletin parameters and initialize HYFLUX2 code
Dp/Dx, Dp/Dy, Ux, Uy
HAIYAN animation
GDACS pages for HAIYAN
Panay Island 1.8 m
Busuanga, Culion And Coron Islands 1.5 m Tacloban
2.8 m
HAIYAN Typhoon Storm Surge SituaDon published 4/11/2013 (-‐4 days before strucking) IdenDficaDon of mostly affected areas
Estimated storm surge
News coverage with JRC data
A new approach based on ECMWF
• As of 2013, the European Center for Medium Weather Forecast is providing estimations with a much finer grid (50 km -> 16 km) • Therefore it is possible to use their pressure and velocity
fields to impose to the hydraulic calculations • Daily Forecasts related to 00:00 and 12:00 available few
hours after the related time (about 6h) for 72h forecast period
• The maps have to be interpolated and used as boundary conditions to the HYFLUX code
• Preliminary tests on the basis of an informal agreement with ECMWF for the download of daily forecast in a “non-operational” mode
• Advantage is that it is possible to analyse also extra tropical cycones (e.g. St. Jude event 2 weeks ago)
Pressure and max wind available
Time & Space raster interpolation
Pilot calculations with ECMWF
Cyclone Year Results SANDY 2010 Good WIPHA 2013 Good PHAILIN 2013 Too low HAIYAN 2013 Too low
Sandy Cyclone October 2012
Bulletins Method ECMWF forcing method
• Very promising results in the first comparisons
Landfall area – Atlantic City
Bulletins Method ECMWF forcing method
Sandy October 2012
930
940
950
960
970
980
990
1000
1010
10/22/2012 0:00
10/23/2012 0:00
10/24/2012 0:00
10/25/2012 0:00
10/26/2012 0:00
10/27/2012 0:00
10/28/2012 0:00
10/29/2012 0:00
10/30/2012 0:00
10/31/2012 0:00
11/1/2012 0:00
Pc (hPa) BT NOAA ECMWF
PHAILIN October 2013
Phailin 2013
• The maximum velocity is strongly underpredicted in ECMWF
• The minimum pressure is not correctly modelled in ECMWF and thus the maximum impact is underpredicted
WIPHA – October 2013
• Very nice results with 2 cyclones at the same time • several tide gauges to compare in Japan • The behavior is strongly dependent on the history of the
cyclone
The first affected location in Japan
The most off-center location
The point of max impact
HAIYNAN Cyclone
• One of the most severe cyclones • Philippines: • Too few measurements in the impact area
• Wind Radii model • Unable to show the extent of the cyclone • Correct estimation of maximum impact in Philippines in the larger
damage area • ECMWF Forcing model
• Correct extent but maximum wind speed too low and minimum pressure too high
• Vietnam • Wind Radii model
• Unable to show the extent of the cyclone • Impact extent not yet available
• ECMWF Forcing model • Correct extent and good prediction of sea level measurements • Impact extent not yet available
Wind Radii vs ECMWF forcing
Wider impact But less intense
Estimation of cyclone extent
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
Hei
gh
t (m
)
Distance (km)
Max Height over line between 130.45/5.65 and 137.15/11.25
ECMWF
Wind Radii
MEAS PALAU
MEAS YAP
Comparison of forcing conditions
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
100
11/2
/201
3 0:
00
11/3
/201
3 0:
00
11/4
/201
3 0:
00
11/5
/201
3 0:
00
11/6
/201
3 0:
00
11/7
/201
3 0:
00
11/8
/201
3 0:
00
11/9
/201
3 0:
00
11/1
0/20
13 0
:00
11/1
1/20
13 0
:00
11/1
2/20
13 0
:00
11/1
3/20
13 0
:00
88000 90000 92000 94000 96000 98000
100000 102000
11/2
/201
3 0:
00
11/3
/201
3 0:
00
11/4
/201
3 0:
00
11/5
/201
3 0:
00
11/6
/201
3 0:
00
11/7
/201
3 0:
00
11/8
/201
3 0:
00
11/9
/201
3 0:
00
11/1
0/20
13 0
:00
11/1
1/20
13 0
:00
11/1
2/20
13 0
:00
11/1
3/20
13 0
:00
Wind Radii
ECMWF
Wind Radii
ECMWF
Wind Speed (m/s)
Minimum Pressure (Pa)
Other topics on Cyclones
eSurge: use of altimetry for the establishment of sea level height Off shore altimetric data could be extremely useful to • Understand well before landfall which model is
better reproducing the current event • To suffice areas where no tidal gauge are
available (i.e. China)
All tracks, w/o considering distance or time (Jason or Cryosat)
Altimetry Tracks Analysis
• However not all the tracks are useful for modelling comparison
• We need to filter the tracks that fits in space and time with the Hurricane Track • DT= 6 h • Min Distance=200 km
t1
t0
Satellite track
Hurricane eye track
t0 t1 t0-DT
T1+DT
Min distance
Track is selected
Jason2: Filtering on space (DeltaX=200 km) and time (deltaT=6h), only 3 Cryosat tracks are useful
8 Nov 4:30 7 Nov 16:11 7 Nov 3:41
NORTH SOUTH
7 Nov 2013 16:11
18:00
12:00 7 Nov 2013 16:11
18:00
12:00
ECWMF Forcing model
Wind Radii model
Sea level behaviour at the eye position along the track
Wind radii
swh x 0.05
Max Height over track
Height at time of track
ECMWF Forcing
swh x 0.05
Max Height over track
Height at time of track
Conclusions
• JRC is providing online storm surge calculations for every Tropical Cyclone occurring worldwide
• During HAIYAN crisis JRC estimation proved to be instrumental in order to identify the most affected areas and task satellite images production
• Our calculations represent an important support for many groups that trust in our estimations but the quality needs to be continuously verified with sea level measurements
• New developments, using ECMWF medium forecast, seem promising for medium and low cyclones (SANDY, WIPHA, FRANCISCO) but some problems were identified for large velocity events (PHAILIN, HAIYAN)
• The use of altimetric data from JASON/CRYOSAT could be quite useful to compare the quality of the model predictions but still work is necessary to have an operational tool
Thanks !