1
More women with the pelvic girdle syndrome than with other pelvic pain during pregnancy had pelvic pain 2 years after delivery Albert H, Godskesen M, Westergaard J. Prognosis in four syndromes of pregnancy-related pelvic pain. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2001 Jun;80:505–10. QUESTION: In women with pregnancy-related pelvic joint pain, what are the predictors and prevalence of long term symptoms? Design Inception cohort followed for 2 years after delivery. Setting A university hospital in Denmark. Patients 405 women at 33 weeks of gestation were classified into 5 subgroups on the basis of their history and objective pelvic joint pain (> 1 positive test from a joint): the pel- vic girdle syndrome (n=118; daily pain in all 3 pelvic joints); symphysiolysis (n=38; daily pain in pubic symphysis only); the 1-sided sacroiliac syndrome (n=98; daily pain from 1 sacroiliac joint alone); the double- sided sacroiliac syndrome (n=120; daily pain from both sacroiliac joints); or miscellaneous (n=31; daily pain in > 1 pelvic joint, but inconsistent findings from the history). Patients with no objective evidence of pelvic joint pain or those with the same or lower intensity of pelvic joint or low back pain as before the pregnancy were excluded (n=1384). Follow up was 84%. Assessment of prognostic factors Epidemiological and obstetric background data and pain history obtained from a questionnaire and physical examination (pain tests and index of mobility). Demo- graphic data (age, education, and employment history) were also assessed. Main outcome measures Pelvic pain (> 1 positive pain test result for > 1 pelvic joint). Women were examined at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after delivery or until symptoms disappeared whichever occurred first. All women seen at 6 months of follow up were examined 6 months later. Main results Continued pelvic joint pain at 2 years occurred in 21 of the 100 women (21%) with the pelvic girdle syndrome who were followed; 0 of 33 (0%) with symphysiolysis; 1 of 82 (1.2%) with the 1-sided sacroiliac syndrome; 5 of 99 (5.1%) with the double-sided sacroiliac syndrome; and 2 of 27 (7.4%) with miscellaneous joint pain at base- line. No women with symphysiolysis had joint pain at 6 months after delivery. Prognostic factors associated with pelvic joint pain 2 years after delivery in women with the pelvic girdle syndrome were > 16 positive responses on objective pain tests (relative risk [RR] 10.7); low index of mobility (< 320; RR 3.9); no education (RR 2.3); multiparity (RR 2.0); older age (> 29 y; RR 1.9); and high intensity of pain (> 6 on a visual analog scale; RR 1.6). No prognostic indicators existed for the other groups. Conclusions Among women with pregnancy-related joint pain, more women with the pelvic girdle syndrome had pelvic pain at 2 years after delivery than did women with other pel- vic pain. Women with symphysiolysis had no joint pain 6 months after delivery. COMMENTARY Back pain and pelvic pain affect almost 50% of pregnant women. 1 The study by Albert et al followed women with pelvic pain for longer than any previous study. The study did not compare lumbar back pain with pelvic pain, which is a pity because we lack good prognostic information on such women. The study distinguishes pelvic pain from lum- bar back pain and describes tests that may help to differentiate sites of pelvic pain. The authors describe these as “objective” tests. I am unhappy about this term because the tests rely on a subjective response about pain. Nonetheless, the study was able to distin- guish different sites of pain, which is important because it allows better prognostic information. In the future, healthcare workers caring for pregnant women should examine those with back and pelvic pain more carefully. The good news is that we can tell women with pubic symphysis pain that they are almost certain to be free of pain 6 months after delivery. I share the authors’ unease about using the term symphysiolysis, which implies that the joint is dissolving a distressing image to conjure up. Symphy- sial pain would be a better term. This study showed that for the 6.6% of pregnant women (of the 1789 women who were booked for delivery at the study site) who had symphysial and sacroiliac joint pains (pelvic girdle pain) at baseline, 21% will still have pain 2 years after giving birth. Deter- mining how to treat women with such pain is not straightforward because we lack good evidence about treatments. Trochanteric belts 2 and acupuncture may help. 3 A Cochrane review on preventing and treating backache in pregnancy will be updated next year. 4 Gavin Young, MA, MB, BS The Surgery Penrith, Cumbria, UK 1 Mantle MJ, Greenwood RM, Currey HL. Backache in pregnancy. Rheumatol Rehabil 1977;16:95–101. 2 Berg G, Hammar M, Moller-Nielsen J, et al. Low back pain during pregnancy. Obstet Gyne- col 1988;71:71–5. 3 Wedenberg K, Moen B, Norling A. A prospective randomized study comparing acupunc- ture with physiotherapy for low-back and pelvic pain in pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2000;79:331–5. 4 Young G, Jewell D. Interventions for preventing and treating backache in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001;(3):CD001139. Sources of funding: Health Insurance Foundation; Funen County Board of Prevention; Danish Physiotherapist Research Foundation; Danish Manual Therapy Group. For correspondence: Ms H Albert, Department of Physiotherapy, Odense University Hospital, Sdr. Boulevard, 5000 Odense C., Denmark. Fax + 45 6613 2854. 28 Volume 7 January/February 2002 EBM Prognosis www.evidence-basedmedicine.com

Simpisiolisis Post Partum

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

pdf

Citation preview

  • More women with the pelvic girdle syndrome than withother pelvic pain during pregnancy had pelvic pain 2years after deliveryAlbert H,Godskesen M,Westergaard J.Prognosis in four syndromes of pregnancyrelated pelvic pain. Acta Obstet GynecolScand 2001 Jun;80:50510.

    QUESTION: In women with pregnancy-related pelvic joint pain, what are the predictorsand prevalence of long term symptoms?

    DesignInception cohort followed for 2 years after delivery.

    SettingA university hospital in Denmark.

    Patients405 women at 33 weeks of gestation were classified into5 subgroups on the basis of their history and objectivepelvic joint pain (> 1 positive test from a joint): the pelvic girdle syndrome (n=118; daily pain in all 3 pelvicjoints); symphysiolysis (n=38; daily pain in pubicsymphysis only); the 1sided sacroiliac syndrome (n=98;daily pain from 1 sacroiliac joint alone); the double

    sided sacroiliac syndrome (n=120; daily pain from bothsacroiliac joints); or miscellaneous (n=31; daily pain in>1 pelvic joint, but inconsistent findings from the history).Patients with no objective evidence of pelvic joint painor those with the same or lower intensity of pelvic jointor low back pain as before the pregnancy were excluded(n=1384). Follow up was 84%.

    Assessment of prognostic factorsEpidemiological and obstetric background data andpain history obtained from a questionnaire and physicalexamination (pain tests and index of mobility). Demographic data (age, education, and employment history)were also assessed.

    Main outcome measuresPelvic pain (> 1 positive pain test result for > 1 pelvicjoint). Women were examined at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24months after delivery or until symptoms disappeared whichever occurred first. All women seen at 6 months offollow up were examined 6 months later.

    Main resultsContinued pelvic joint pain at 2 years occurred in 21 ofthe 100 women (21%) with the pelvic girdle syndromewho were followed; 0 of 33 (0%) with symphysiolysis; 1of 82 (1.2%) with the 1sided sacroiliac syndrome; 5 of99 (5.1%) with the doublesided sacroiliac syndrome;and 2 of 27 (7.4%) with miscellaneous joint pain at baseline. No women with symphysiolysis had joint pain at 6months after delivery. Prognostic factors associated withpelvic joint pain 2 years after delivery in women with thepelvic girdle syndrome were > 16 positive responses onobjective pain tests (relative risk [RR] 10.7); low index ofmobility (< 320; RR 3.9); no education (RR 2.3);multiparity (RR 2.0); older age (> 29 y; RR 1.9); andhigh intensity of pain (> 6 on a visual analog scale; RR1.6). No prognostic indicators existed for the othergroups.

    ConclusionsAmong women with pregnancyrelated joint pain, morewomen with the pelvic girdle syndrome had pelvic painat 2 years after delivery than did women with other pelvic pain. Women with symphysiolysis had no joint pain 6months after delivery.

    COMMENTARYBack pain and pelvic pain affect almost 50% of pregnant women.1 The study by Albertet al followed women with pelvic pain for longer than any previous study. The study didnot compare lumbar back pain with pelvic pain, which is a pity because we lack goodprognostic information on such women. The study distinguishes pelvic pain from lumbar back pain and describes tests that may help to differentiate sites of pelvic pain. Theauthors describe these as objective tests. I am unhappy about this term because thetests rely on a subjective response about pain. Nonetheless, the study was able to distinguish different sites of pain, which is important because it allows better prognosticinformation. In the future, healthcare workers caring for pregnant women shouldexamine those with back and pelvic pain more carefully. The good news is that we cantell women with pubic symphysis pain that they are almost certain to be free of pain 6months after delivery. I share the authors unease about using the term symphysiolysis,which implies that the joint is dissolving a distressing image to conjure up. Symphysial pain would be a better term.

    This study showed that for the 6.6% of pregnant women (of the 1789 women whowere booked for delivery at the study site) who had symphysial and sacroiliac joint pains(pelvic girdle pain) at baseline, 21% will still have pain 2 years after giving birth. Determining how to treat women with such pain is not straightforward because we lack goodevidence about treatments. Trochanteric belts2 and acupuncture may help.3 A Cochranereview on preventing and treating backache in pregnancy will be updated next year.4

    Gavin Young, MA, MB, BSThe Surgery

    Penrith, Cumbria, UK

    1 Mantle MJ, Greenwood RM, Currey HL. Backache in pregnancy. Rheumatol Rehabil1977;16:95101.

    2 Berg G, Hammar M, MollerNielsen J, et al. Low back pain during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1988;71:715.

    3 Wedenberg K, Moen B, Norling A. A prospective randomized study comparing acupuncture with physiotherapy for lowback and pelvic pain in pregnancy. Acta Obstet GynecolScand 2000;79:3315.

    4 Young G, Jewell D. Interventions for preventing and treating backache in pregnancy.Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001;(3):CD001139.

    Sources of funding:Health InsuranceFoundation; FunenCounty Board ofPrevention; DanishPhysiotherapistResearch Foundation;Danish ManualTherapy Group.

    For correspondence:Ms H Albert,Department ofPhysiotherapy, OdenseUniversity Hospital,Sdr. Boulevard, 5000Odense C., Denmark.Fax +45 6613 2854.

    28 Volume 7 January/February 2002 EBM Prognosiswww.evidencebasedmedicine.com