UNITED STIJTES POSTIJL SERVICE

12

NPMHU

To: [xl Pacific Area Local(s) [ ] Western Area [x I Withholding Info ---~"~,

[xJ Staffing [ J Please review. take action and reduce issues to writing [xl Comments: Prepare & Review 12.S.C.S & 12.S.C.6 Omar Coordinator

is to advise you of the intent of the San Diego District to utilize the provisions of Article 12.6.C.5 of the National Agreement to involuntarily reassign three (3) full-time regular mail handlers and four part-time regular mail handlers from the craft and/or installation at the San Bernardino bid cluster (Event 39991). The basis for this event is a staffing & scheduling review based on BPI efficiency improvements.

The impacted employees will be notified of their involuntary reassignments by separate letter.

By copy of this notice, authorization is being given to withhold three (3) full-time residual assignments and four (4) part-time regular mail handler residual assignments in the mail handler and custodial crafts in post offices and plants within a radius of 900 miles of the San Bernardino bid cluster.

Attached you will find copies of the automated impact statement, the operational data supporting the need to excess, the list of sites where withholding is authorized and a list of the junior impacted mail handlers.

I will be contacting you shortly to confirm a meeting date. In the interim, if you have any questions you may contact me at (858) 674-3193 or Linda Shumate, Area Complement Coordinator at (858) 674-3183.

/); I {1/ t~ ~Roberts

Manager, Labor Relations

2

-San

Omar Gonzalez - APWU with attachments

WorkHour Impact Report

Impacted Bid Cluster

Installation Address

Area Name

Impact Type

Date of Impact

Period (Dates) of Review Performed

Report Prepared By

Report Prepared Date

Reviewed By

Phone

SAN BERNARDINO POST OFFICE EVENT 39991

BPI EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENT

PACIFIC

Reduction Other Than Attrition

11/1712012

07/2312011 thru 08/03/2012

Sharon

07/30/2012

Abelardo Munoz

(858) 674-3110

WorkHour Impact Report Craft = MAIL HANDLER

A B C D E F G Current Planned Annual Annual FTE Current

Work Hours FTE Hrs Hr Rate

Total 7574 7268 -306 -1224 -15912 -9 1820

OverTime Impact

Current OT Current Planned OT Additional Percent Planned OT Planned OT OT Rate per Week Planned OT Planned OT Hours per Rate

from changes per Week per Week Week

Total 384 5.1% -67.25 0 317 4.4%

WorkHour Impact Report Casuals

a. Current Number of MAIL HANDLER Casuals on Rolls

b. Current Total Non-OverTime MAIL HANDLER Casuals Hours per tvlonth

c. Planned Reduction in Total Non-OverTime MAIL HANDLER Casuals Hours per Month

d. Number of MAIL HANDLER Casuals that will have Reduced Hours

e. Number of MAIL HANDLER Casuals that will be Terminated

f. Number of MAIL HANDLER Casuals After Impact

g. Provide Narrative need for MAIL HANDLER Casuals

Casual MH hours will be reduced and cannot be combined to make full-time ""c"nc,n"

Part Time Flexible (PTFs)

a. Current Number of MAIL HANDLER PTFs on Rolls

b. Current Total Non-OverTime MAIL HANDLER PTFs Hours per Month

c. Planned Reduction in Total Non-OverTime MAIL HANDLER PTFs Hours per Month

d. Number of MAIL HANDLER PTFs that will have Reduced Hours

e. Will there be any MAIL HANDLER PTFs Excessed from Craft or Installation

If Yes how Many MAIL HANDLER PTFs

f. Provide Narrative Explaining need for Excessing

PTF hours were reduced.

Transitional Employees (TEs)

a. Current Number of MAIL HANDLER TEs on Rolls

b. Current Total Non-OverTime !VlAlL HANDLER TE Hours per iVlonth

c. Planned Reduction in Total Non-OverTime MAIL HANDLER TE Hours per Month

MAIL HANDLER TEs that have Reduced

19

2660

-380

19

o 19

7

896

-28

7

NO

o

o o o o

b. Current Total Non-OverTime MAIL HANDLER PSE Hours per tvlonth

c. Planned Reduction in Total Non-OverTime MAIL HANDLER PSE Hours per Month

d. Number of MAIL HANDLER PSE that have Reduced Hours o e. Number of tvlAIL HANDLER PSE that will be Terminated

f. Number of fvlAIL HANDLER PSE After

g. Provide Narrative need for MAIL HANDLER PSE

PSEs are not authorized per the CBA.

WorkHour Impact Report

Part Time Regular (PTRs)

a, Current Number of MAIL HANDLER PTRs on Rolls

b. Planned Number of MAIL HANDLER PTR Positions after

c. Estimated Number of MAIL HANDLER PTR Attrition

d. Will there be any MAIL HANDLER PTRs Excessed from Craft or Installation

MAIL HANDLER PTRs

e. Provide Narrative Explaining need for

Based upon the review of the Fl Baseline Model to increase BPI F't'tlrit:>I'1/"V for the San Bernardino Bid Installation, there is a need to excess up to 3 Part-Time Mailhandler employees from the installation.

Full Time Regular (FTRs)

a. Current Number of MAIL HANDLER FTRs on Rolls

b. Planned Number of MAIL HANDLER FTR Positions After Impact

c. Estimated Number of MAIL HANDLER FTR Attrition

d. Will there be any MAIL HANDLER FTRs Excessed from Craft or Installation

If Yes how Many MAIL HANDLER FTRs

e. Provide Narrative Explaining need for Excessing

Based upon the review of the Fl Baseline Staffing Model to increase BPI Efficiency for the San Bernardino Bid Installation, there is a need to excess up to 3 Full-Time Mailhandler employees from the craft/bid installation

15

12

o YES

3

179

176

o YES

3

WorkHour Impact Report-MAIL HANDLER

Preliminary Summary

a. Total Planned Non-OT Reduction per Month for and PTRs

b. Planned Reduction in Total OT Hours per Month

c. Planned Reduction in Casual Non-OT Hours per Month

d. Planned Reduction in PTF Non-OT Hours per Month

e. Planned Reduction in TE Non-OT Hours per Month

f. Planned Reduction in PSE Non-OT Hours per Month

g. Total Planned Non-OT Hours per Month

h. Total FTE Savings

-816

-269

-380

-28

o o

29072

-9

Baseline Staffing Model San Bernardino P&DC - Reduce 25 FTEs with BPI Improvement of 5%

File date: July 20, 2012

Tour 1

Tour 2

Tour 3

Total ORNAlNRP-NOT LOC 67

(long-term unavailable only)

Total F1 LOC 67 (Clerk, MH, EAS)

Grand Total

Craft Ratios Clerk

FT NTH

Casual (still in COINS) PSE

Mail Handler H

PTR PTF

Casual

Proposed Staffing

Current Staffing (WebCoins On-Rolls)

+1- Current

BPI Impacts:

Use last four non-holiday weeks data, jf feasible; enter BPI achievement, Work Hr

and # of weeks

Baseline Staffing Model

WebCOINS On-Rolls of

Clerk MH 171 98

2 1

134 113

307 212

16 2

307 212 24 2

331 214

On-Rolls

274 89.3% 8 2.6% 0 0.0% 25 8.1%

307 100.0"/ ..

179 84.4% 15 7.1% 7 3.3%

11 5.2% 212 100.0%

Clerk MH 288 206

307 212

-19 -6

Data Source: Variance WebSite/BPI

I I

Proposed Staffing

Clerk MH 164 87

2 14

122 105

288 206

0 0

288 206

0 2 288 208

Proposed

257 97.0% 8 3.0% 0 23 8.7%

288 108.7%

168 81.6% 12 5.8% 7 3.4%

19 9.2% 206 100.0%

Total Craft 494

519

-25

San Bernardino P&OC -Reduce 25 FTEs with BPI

Improvement of 5%-- File date: July 20, 2012

66.5% 33.5%

48 13.5%

-76

4

!

SOO Ratio MOO Ratio (1 (1:22 -1

Current Earned Current Earned 11 10 2 1

0 1 0 0

10 9 1 1

21 20 3 3

0 0 0 0

21 20 3 3 0 0 0 0

21 20 3 3

01 A 110 - 50% or more of Career CI, Of A 210 - NTE 50% of F1 Career Cle O/A 610 - N/A. O/A 813 - Non Career. NTE 20% of

O/A 120 Of A 320 O/A 420 O/A 620 - NTE 12.5% of Total Mail!-

San Bernardino P&DC • Reduce 2:5 FTEs with spt Improvement of 5%

R"",""",,"","

R.-,. ..

R..-.mont"

R-.... .. ""

R.-...-"

-"

-" Pt..210

R........,...'" ""

P\.2B4

-"

"-"

San Bemardlno J>&OC - Reduee :zs FTEs with BPI'_", of 5%

R_" ""

wtc 225

R_"

._ ..

San Bernardino P&oc - Reduce 2S FTE. with BPI Improvement of So/.

"_ .. "'-362. --~(6) .­~·tftO\I'tIw310

"-"

San Bernardino P&oc . Re-d-uu 25 FT& wtth BPI tmprovemem of 5%

-"

R.--"

R---," '7%

San Bernardino P&DC - Reduce 25 FTEs with Bf'llmprovement of 5%

San Bernardino P&OC • Redo«: 2S FTEs with 8?t Improvement of $% NOTE: Onty m.aU dat:t N1tno

,--------------------==-:--='"-""""1"":""-"'7:::-----.::---:---------------------,(TheOt'llY$hacJ&(j ~ Ilre 10

R.--..."

R~"

san Beman:!lno P&DC - __ 25 FTEs with BP1lmpn>wment of 5% NOTE; Onty mao !Sate «1lt'\I

r-----------------------------------------~~~~~~~~~~~~--------------------------------------------,~~y~~~~~'o

R_"

R_'"

R_"

San Bernardlno P&OC • Reduce 25 FTEs with SPllmprovement of 5%

(PA-IPS)cg f1~13

San Bernardino P&OC • Reduce 25 FTEs with BPI Improvement of 5%

1.2o!13

San Bernardino P&OC - Reduce 25 FTEs with BPI Improvement of 5%

(PA-/PS)Cg

Station/Branch Fin. No.:SAN BERNARDINO P&DC (056745) FROM

Pay Pd 21 FY 2010

Pay Pd 21 FY 2011 I Change

in Months

RESTRICTED INFORMATION Pane 2 of 2

CAP Actual vsCAP

· Station/Branch Fin. No.:SAN BERNARDINO P&DC (056745)

FROM TO Pay Pd 21 FY 2011

PayPd15 Change FY 2012 in Months

RESTRICTED INFORMATION P::ll1R? (jf?

CAP Actual vsCAP

7.17

J1

)3

)8 10

l4 l5 l7 LS 11

)01

J1.1

Weekly Flash Report. Week 41 2012 Finance SAN BERNARDINO P&DC - 056745

ADMIN/VMF /PI,ANTS FLASH Ildays 6 Sply Ddays 6-- -Act Ddaya 10 Sply Ddaya 12- - - Act

07-07""2012 - 07-13-2012 Act/Plan 07-01-2012 - 07-13-2012 Act/Plan 07-09-2011 07-15-2011 SP1.Y 07-01-2011 - 07-15-2011 S.1.Y Current Week **.*.*.* •• *

Plan '\sPlan '\sInN 35 14.3 0.0 o 0.0 -100.0

69 -42.0 -37.5 208

o 312

1 0.32

5,021 372

1,566 2,122

18 6,206 1,113

44 17,438

394

2.26 1

690 3 96 0.00

94 540 634

18 .84

o 29

2,237 540

1,086 236

o 4,307

83 1.93

2 135

Q

15.4 0.0

-17.9 -100.0 -100.0 -100.0

1.4 -9.9 38.8 12.8

-38.9 -10.8 19.2

-45.5 2.0

31.2

28.7 -100.0

9.7 7.6 0.0

95.7 6.9

20.0 44.4 20.3 0.0

-23.0 -28.8

0.0 -9.2

~37.3

-31. 0

-100.0 42.2

-4.3 0.0

-15.S 0.0 0.0

-100.0

-6.1 -26.2 -11.S

22.S -35.3

0.5 -2.2 0.0

-1. B -29.2 -27.8

-100.0 2.6 4.5

-2.0

130.0 -1. 9 13.9

550.0 470.6

-100.0 0.0

1.6 -4.1

-34.6 -79.1 -11.2 57.6 77.5

-100.0 59.7

Actual MTIl 72 o

56 288

o 416

o 0.00

o

679 4,166 4,490

25 9,632 2,271

30 31,872

919 2.88

o 1,270

3.98 14.52

280 1,042 1,322

63 4.77

1 49

3,498 873

1,520 314

92 7,087

101 1. 43

o 334

o

Month to Date ••••••• *** Plan MTIl

60 o

119 359

o 538

1 0.19

2,663 3,609

31 10,555

1,894 75

29,659 74B

2.S2 3

1,151 3.88 0.00

158 921

1,079 . 32

2.97 a

49

3,836 925

1,863 404

o 7,384

14B 2.00

3 225

o

'\sP MTIl 20.0 0.0

52.9 -19.8

0.0 -22.7

-100.0 -100.0 -100.0

5.5 7.3

56.4 24.4

-19.4 -8.7 19.9

-60.0 7.5

22.9 14.3

-100.0 10.3

2.7 0.0

77.2 13 .1 22.5 96.9 60.7

0.0

-8.S -5.6

-18.4 -22.3

0.0 -4.0

-31.8 -28.9 100.0

49.4

'\sS MTD 50.0

-100.0 61.1

-28.0 0.0

-35.0 0.0 0.0

-100.0

-17 . ., -24.4

-17.0 14.0

-21. 9 -12.0 -16.1

0.0 -12.4 -31. 0

-21. 3 -100.0

-22.2 11. 2

3.2

52.2 -13.8 -5.1

687.5 729.8

-25.9 -12.9 -19.3 -35.3 -42.9 -22.4 83.6

136.5 -100.0

30.0

o 0

Actual YTIl 1,517

o 2,040 8,637

33 12,227

••••••••• * Year Plan Yl'D

1,439 o

,aal 8,639

o ,959

0.05 80

96,676 529

221,402 52,905

265 738,520

31,90'1 4.32

as 39,560

5.36 9.99

4,959 23,886 28,745

914 3.18

16

41,205 7,645 4,101

175,210 2,090 1.19

:n

O.

209,666 15, 65,405 a8,603

744 259,141

46,503 1,920

728,114 25,345

3 48 266

28,

3. 0.00

4,273 , B43

27, 921

3 40

9:;,441

21, 875 45,341

9,572

178,670 3,483 1.95

*.,;,***.* .. ***

.4 0.0

.0 o 0

.0 ··78. S

50

.6 13 B

.4

.4

.1

.9

7 4

.0 -O.B

.4 14. S1. 4

-'I.

O.

38.8 .,

YTD lO.tl

100 0 n 5 a.s 0.0 a.s

.0

.2

27.3 ·2.7 1.7

-0.6 -14 9

tJ 42.S

.2 -6.9 1.4

-86.9 1 4

12. l.?

• 4 1.1 a .,

.8

-4 4 30.

.2

3

Weekly Flash Report, Week 41 2012 Finance SAN BERNARDINO P&DC - 056745

ADMIN/VMF/PLANTS FLASH Ddaya 6 Sply Ddays 6- - --Act Ddays 10 Sply Ddays 12-

07-07-2012 07-13--2012 Act/Plan 07-01-2012 07-13-2012 09-2011 - 07-15-2011 SPL'l 07-01-2011 07-15-2011

Current Weak *****.**.*. Plan I\;Plan I\;SPL'l

•••....••. Actual MTD

o

Month to Date .* .. **.* •• Plan MTD 1\;1' MTD I\;S MTD

o 0.0 0.0

34 34

1 94

17.6 17.6

100.0 -100.0

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

69 69

3 4.35

o 0.0 0.0

58 58

3.45

19.0 19 a 50 0 26.1

-4.2 -4.2 o 0 0.0

IIctual 'lTD 6

1, 1,336

78 5.64

SPL'l • .... * ••• *. Year

Plan 'lTD o

,374 1,374

. '11

07

52.

'lTD O.

.4

.4 4

.8

Page 4

~R~m~~~~.m_U~Dm~ __ ~ __ ._ •• o_.~~w~m~~~~~~~~~~~_~W~~~~"_. __ .gQW_~_~"_W~~ __ g=~_R=_._W __ ~_U __ • ___ * __ .~ __ =_Q=~~UQ_g=_A ___ .~~~Q_~ .. _=w~~q==u_~u~~~~ ___ q~_~~~m~~~~~~~~WW~N~~~~~.~~~=~_um~~

WK

40 35 o o

75 :I

2.67 3

22,800 998,668

498 2.18

3

S6B 3.81

o a.oo

o o 00

o 0.00

o 0.00

o

o

-100.0 14 .3

0.0 o 0

-45.3 150.0 357.3

0.3 2.1

20.5 20 1

100.0

13. a 12 'I

o 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

0.0 0.0 0.0

0.0 0.0

100.0 66.7

-91. 7 (l.0

-46.1 0.0 0.0

-3.1 -2.9

-21.8 -19.2

-100.0

9.1 12.7

393.8 409.7 -33.3 -31.2

6.2 11.7

5.4 B.a

-3.5

0.0

o 72

3 o

75 10

13.33

40,943 1,857,550

1,093 2.67

1

1,655 4.04

110 0.27

35 0.09

668 1. 63

4,341 10.60

0.00 o

72 sa o o

130 2

1. 54

5

38,B48 1,765,636

931 2.40

6

1,449 3.73

o 0.00

o 0.00

o 0.00

o 0.00

o

0.00 a

-100.0 24.1

0.0 0.0

-42.3 400.0 766.7

-100.0

5.2

17 4 11.4

-83.3

14.2 8.4

0.0 0.0 o 0

0.0 0.0 0.0

o 0

0.0 0.0

100.0 28.6

-05.0 0.0

-49.3 0.0

-14.3 -15.7

-21. 6 -8.6

-96.7

-16.3 -2.4

214.3 266.6 -39.7 -29.6 -25.7 13.3

-3.8

0.0

1,448 345

o 906

19

959,164 42,292,001

34,935 .64 125

49,B43 .20

,259 0.24

1,290 O.

23,372 2 44

a.34 4

1,504 1,406

o o

2,910

951, 42,406,819

816 l.13

345

37,697

.00 o

.00 o

0.00

o 0.00

o

00

.7

-4-0.0 o 0 O.

.4

17.

.B

o. O.

.0 O.

o O.

o 0.0 0.0

o

-7.

0.0 O.

o .4-

-83.

.4 0.9

7 8 16.

e. 17.

.4

· . Station/Branch Fin. No.:SAN BERNARDINO P&DC (056745)

Pay Pd 21 FY 2011

TO Pay Pd 15 FY 2012 Change

in Months

RESTRICTED INFORMATION

CAP Actual vsCAP

• 'Wi ......... , .... ....,. .."""..., •• at"'" •• ". a. W....,;tl ............. 1"' .......

Station/Branch Fin. No.:SAN BERNARDINO P&DC (056745) FROM TO

Pay Pd 21 FY 2010

Pay Pd 21 FY 2011

Months

RESTRICTED INFORMATION

CAP Actual vsCAP

··':SENi# .'",,,~,

5 -567451 SAN BERNARDINO P&DCIESPARZA TERESA 37491071 704542111 MAIL HANDLER 4 320 1 13 8/4/2007 1 6 567451 SAN BERNARDINO P&DC I DODSON TIANN R 1 37502661 704542121MAIL HANDLER 4 320 1 13 8/18/2007 567451SAN BERNARDINO P&DC!SUKATON IRIANTO R I 37514331 702817661 MAIL HANDLER 4 320 1 17 9/1/2007

..