RPT ON REVERSE CIRCULATION OVERBURDEN DRILLING WEST …

APPENDIX III

Boulder Mining Corporation West Lake Abitibi Property, Ontario

Boulder Mining Corporation West Lake Abitibi Property, Ontario

Reverse Circulation Overburden Drillingand Heavy Mineral Geochemical Sampling

for Gold and Kimberlite

byStuart A. Averill and Donald R. S. HolmesOverburden Drilling Management Limited

Nepean, Ontario, CanadaJune 05, 2002

42A16NE2003 2.24342 GALNA 010

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

1. SUMMARY l2. INTRODUCTION 22.1 Property Location, Access and Ownership 22.2 Project Background and Objectives 23. METHODS AND COSTS 93.1 Contractors 93.2 Field Procedures 93.3 Sample Processing and Indicator Mineral Logging Procedures 103.4 Analytical Procedures 183.5 Drill Performance and Project Costs 184. RESULTS 204.1 Bedrock Geology and Geochemistry 204.2 Overburden Stratigraphy 274.3 Gold Grain Counts 274.4 Kimberlite Indicator Mineral Counts 334.5 Mineralogy and Geochemistry of the Heavy Mineral Fraction of the Till 335. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 386. CERTIFICATE 397. REFERENCES 41

FIGURES

Figure l Location of the West Lake Abitibi Project relative to the Superior Province andAbitibi Subprovince of the Canadian Shield 3

Figure 2 Property size and relationship to historical exploration activity in the LakeAbitibi area 4

Figure 3 Geological compilation of the Lake Abitibi - Lake Timiskaming region showing the major, E-W trending, gold-bearing deformation zones, the NW-SE trending faults of the Lake Timiskaming Structural Zone and the main kimberlite pipes associated with this structural zone 5

Figure 4 Airborne magnetic/electromagnetic map of the main claim block showing thelocations of the reverse circulation drill holes 7

Figure 5 Airborne magnetic/electromagnetic map of the northern satellite claims showing the locations of the reverse circulation drill holes on the two magnetic anomalies that were targeted as kimberlite pipes 8

Figure 6 Schematic diagram of a reverse circulation drilling system 12

Figure 7 Heavy mineral processing flow sheet for the till samples 13

TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont'd)

FIGURES (cont'd) Page

Figure 8 Backscatter electron images of gold grains from till illustrating the relationshipbetween grain wear and distance of glacial transport 17

Figure 9 Jensen cation plot for greywacke, siltstone and chert samples 23

Figure 10 Jensen cation plot for mafic volcanic, gabbro, pyroxenite and diabase samples 25

Figure 11 Reverse circulation drill section A-A' 28

Figure 12 Reverse circulation drill section B-B' 29

Figure 13 Reverse circulation drill section C-C' 30

TABLES

Table l Drill hole statistics 11

Table 2 Laboratory classifications and heavy mineral processing weights for the till andgravel samples 14,15

Table 3 Comparison of budgeted and actual project costs 19

Table 4 Whole rock and rare earth element analyses for the bedrock samples 22

Table 5 Geochemical analyses for the bedrock samples26

Table 6 Gold grain summary for the till and gravel samples with calculated visible goldassay values for the nonferromagnetic heavy mineral fraction 31,32

Table 7 Heavy mineral concentrate weights and KIM abundances for the medium (0.25- 0.5 mm), coarse (0.5-1.0 mm) and very coarse (l .0-2.0 mm) sand fractions of the till and gravel samples from the satellite claims 34

Table 8 Major nonferromagnetic heavy minerals present in the till and gravel samplesfrom the satellite claims 35

Table 9 Geochemical analyses for the -2.0 mm nonferromagnetic heavy mineral fractionof the till samples from the main claim block 36,37

TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont'd)

APPENDICES

Appendix A Reverse Circulation Drill Hole Logs

Appendix B Binocular Microscope Descriptions of the Bedrock Cuttings

Appendix C Till and Gravel Gold Grain Counts with Calculated Visible Gold Assays for the Nonferromagnetic Heavy Mineral Fraction

PLANS

Plan l Locations and Bedrock Geology of the Reverse Circulation Drill Holes Pocket

1. SUMMARY

This report describes a program of reverse circulation drilling that was conducted 80 km north of Kirkland Lake, Ontario, on the West Lake Abitibi Property which is held under option by Boulder Mining Corporation. Sixteen holes were drilled on the main claim block to test the inferred western extension of the thickly overburden-covered, E-W trending, gold-fertile Lake Abitibi Deformation Zone. The locations of the drill holes were based on the assumption that the deformation zone forms the

contact between northern turbidites of the Scapa Assemblage and southern komatiites of the Stoughton - Roquemaure Assemblage and that this contact lies 3 km further north than previously thought. Two additional holes were drilled on kimberlite-suggestive aeromagnetic bullseyes on a satellite claim block further to the north.

The drilling was intended to sample both the glacial till and underlying bedrock. Sixteen holes were completed successfully, and the average depth of these holes, including about 1.5 m of bedrock, was 43.5 m. Ninety-seven till samples and two gravel samples were processed to extract their heavy mineral fraction and visually separate any gold grains and, on the satellite claims, kimberlite indicator minerals. Most of the heavy mineral concentrates and all bedrock samples were also geochemically analyzed. The project was completed on budget with total drilling, geological and laboratory costs of S96,032.67 or S138.047metre.

The contact between the turbidites and komatiites was found to be in the anticipated northerly location but this contact is unsheared, unaltered and unmineralized. Magnetic pyroxenite and nonmagnetic cherry exhalites were intersected on the northerly magnetic anomalies that were targeted as kimberlite. The chert is anomalous in chalcopyrite which could indicate proximity to volcanogenic massive sulphides.

The buried bedrock surface is relatively flat. Consequently any old, unconsolidated sediments deposited by early glaciations were left unprotected during final S SE ice flow and were replaced by younger Matheson Till, esker gravel and varved Lake Ojibway clay, silt and sand. Ice meltdown in the glacial lake led to much interlayering of the till with the other sediments. The till is also molded into large drumlins which locally rise through the clay cover and impart a S SE grain to the surface topography. Its heavy mineral fraction contains only normal background levels of gold grains, reflecting the observed infertility of the underlying bedrock. The till on the satellite claims is devoid of kimberlite indicator minerals; therefore not only the two targeted magnetic bullseyes but also any others to the north are due to lithologies other than kimberlite.

The Lake Abitibi Deformation Zone, if present on the property, must be in the traditionally accepted position on the southern boundary where a formational conductor suggestive of structurally incompetent graphitic mudstone interrupts the magnetic komatiites. All diamond drill records from this area should

be scrutinized for evidence of the deformation zone and signs of gold mineralization before contemplating any further gold exploration. Several short, weak electromagnetic anomalies near the chalcopyrite-bearing exhalites on the satellite claims should be investigated as possible volcanogenic massive sulphide targets but no further kimberlite exploration is warranted.

-2-

2. INTRODUCTION

2.1 Property Location, Access and Ownership

The West Lake Abitibi Property, which was the focus of the reverse circulation drilling program

described in this report, is 80 km north of Kirkland Lake in northeastern Ontario (Fig. 1). Geologically,

it lies in the Abitibi Subprovince (Abitibi Granite-Greenstone Belt) of the Archean-age (~2700 Ma)

Superior Province of the Canadian Shield.

The property consists of one large, 3952 ha claim block and several small satellite blocks (Fig. 2). The

main block extends westward 13 km from Northwest Bay of Lake Abitibi, the largest remnant of glacial

Lake Ojibway. It straddles the boundary between Bowyer and Marathon Townships in the north and

Galna and Moody Townships in the south. The drilling focussed on this claim block and on the nearest

satellite block, 3 km to the north in eastern Marathon Township.

The nearest towns (Fig. 3) are Iroquois Falls, 30 km to the west, and Cochrane, 60 km to the northwest.

Road access is gained from Cochrane by travelling east 54 km on Route 652, then south 17.5 km on

Abitibi Consolidated's Single Lake logging road to the abandoned CN railway line and continuing 8 km

further south to Traill Lake in Moody Township (Plan l, in pocket).

The West Lake Abitibi Property was staked by C. J. Baker, an independent consulting geologist from

Ottawa with historical prospecting experience in the Lake Abitibi area. The property is optioned to

Boulder Mining Corporation ("Boulder") of Vancouver, B. C. Boulder funded the reverse circulation

drilling program.

2.2 Project Background and Objectives

The main claim block of the West Lake Abitibi Property is thought to host the western extension of the

regional-scale, east-west trending Lake Abitibi Deformation Zone (Fig. 2). This deformation zone is

considered attractive for gold exploration because: 1) most of the major gold deposits of the Abitibi

Subprovince are hosted by similar deformation zones, notably the Destor - Porcupine Fault Zone and

Cadillac - Larder Lake Break to the south (Fig. 3) and the Casa Berardi Fault to the northeast (Pattison

-3-

——— Provincial boundary—— International boundary——— Geological subprovince boundary——— Geological province boundary

SugluH .

West Lake Abitibi Property A

K irk laraT Lake P"."''00 S O

SOOkm

Figure l - Location of the West Lake Abitibi Project relative to the Superior Province and Abitibi Subprovince of the Canadian Shield. Source: Thurston, 1991.

Marathon Twp. Bowyer Twp.

Abitiibi Deformation ZcNorthwest

Bay

pitftl-Poitlt

oAbitibi O

QMoodv Twp.

Legend for gold in HMC (RG holes)

O 0-lg/t -- Fault lEsker

CH Non WALP claimsGold in Qtz Boulders

O Cold in Esker

Direction of Ice Flows Mun

Esker

Figure 2 - Property size and relationship to historical exploration activity in the Lake Abitibi area. Courtesy C. J. Baker (after Meyer 2001) 80316=1:2,000,000.

Figure 3 - CeoSogical compilation of the Lake Abitibi - Lake Timiskaming region showing the major, E-W trending, gold-bearing deformation zones, the NW-SE trending faults of the Lake Timiskaming Structural Zone and the main kimberlite pipes associated with this structural zone. Source: OGS Map 2543. 1991. Scale ---- 1:1,000.000.

-6-

et al,3 1986}^ 2) high-grade gold-quartz boulders have been identified along the Munro Esker in

Milligan Township south (glacially down-river) of the inferred fault (Ferguson and Freeman, 1978; Fig.

2), and 3) anomalous concentrations of gold grains have been identified by panning along both the

Munro and Long Point Eskers and the anomalies extend only as far north (glacially up-river) as

Northwest Bay where the deformation zone is located.

While the evidence for significant lode gold mineralization in or near the Lake Abitibi Deformation

Zone is compelling, the actual position of the fault in the area west of the lake is uncertain because the

bedrock surface is covered by glacial till and gravelly to clayey esker and Lake Ojibway sediments up to

80 m thick. Most maps, including the Ontario Geological Survey's 1992 compilation (Fig. 3), place the

fault in north-central Moody and Galna Townships, roughly coincident with the southern boundary of

the main claim block of the West Lake Abitibi Property. This position was first proposed by Pyke et al.

(1972) and follows a linear conductive zone (Fig. 4) interpreted to be the contact between northern

turbidites of the Scapa Assemblage and southern, komatiitic, mafic to ultramafic volcanics of the

Stoughton-Roquemaure Assemblage (Jackson and Fyon, 1992). On the basis of reprocessed

aeromagnetic data, however, Ayer et al. (1999) placed the fault contact 3 km further north in a non-

conductive zone near the centre of the main clam block. The reverse circulation drilling targeted this

inferred northern fault corridor.

The drilling on the satellite claims was targeted not on gold but rather on two small magnetic bullseyes

(Fig. 5) suggestive of serpentinized kimberlite pipes. The potential for kimberlite was considered high

because 1) the property lies on the northwestern extension of the Lake Timiskaming Structural Zone

(Sage, 1996) which hosts numerous kimberlite pipes in the Matheson, Kirkland Lake and New Liskeard

areas (Fig. 3), and 2) the pipes tend to be clustered at the intersections of this NW-SE trending structural

zone with the major E-W trending, gold-bearing deformation zones.

The reverse circulation drilling sampled both the till and the underlying bedrock. The till samples were

processed for gold grains and, on the satellite claims, for kimberlite indicator minerals. The bedrock

samples were used to map various geological relationships including stratigraphy, structure and

alteration as no outcrops are present on the property. This report documents the work performed and the

results obtained.

Figure 4 - Airborne magnetic/electromagnetic map of (he main claim block showing the locations of the reverse circulation drill holes. Source'OGS ]9S9a. Scale = l :-10.0()().

Figure 5 - Airborne magnetic/electromagnetk map of the northern satellite dairns showing the locations of the reverse circulation drill boles on the two magnetic anomalies that were targeted as kimberlite pipes. Source: OGS. 1989b. Scale - 1:20.000.

-9-

3. METHODS AND COSTS

3.1 Contractors

Overburden Drilling Management Limited ("ODM") of Nepean, Ontario chose the locations of the drill

holes and access roads, arranged the drilling contract, oversaw the drilling, logged the holes, processed

the till samples for heavy indicator minerals and interpreted the data. ODM's field geologist was Donald

Holmes. Remy Huneault supervised the sample processing, Stuart Averill logged the bedrock samples,

interpreted the data and prepared the report and Llyle Duchene produced the report and illustrations.

C.J. Baker laid out the drill sites in the field and supervised the road bulldozing work which was

performed by John Wlad St. Sons of Iroquois Falls. Heath Si Sherwood Drilling (1986) Limited of

Kirkland Lake performed the drilling and also supplied meals and accommodations at a temporary trailer

camp erected near Traill Lake. The samples were collected under ODM's direction by R. Mowat, a

resident of Wahgoshig First Nations Reserve on the south shore of Lake Abitibi. Actlabs Limited of

Ancaster, Ontario, analyzed both the bedrock samples and ODM's heavy mineral concentrates from the

till samples.

3.2 Field Procedures

The inferred shear zone that was targeted on the main claim block trends roughly E-W. It was tested

with a single traverse of drill holes but this traverse was broken into shorter, WNW-ESE trending

segments (Fig. 4; Plan 1) in order to repeatedly cross the target and efficiently map the bedrock geology.

These WNW-ESE segments are roughly normal to the final SSE ice flow (Fig. 2) that generated the

main till horizon (Matheson Till) in the area and would also intercept possible remnants of a slightly

older phase of the till that was deposited by WSW to SSW ice flow. Such till remnants could be

preserved in protective E-W trending preglacial valleys along the targeted deformation zone or in

sinkholes over kimberlite pipes (Averill and Mcclenaghan, 1994). On the northern satellite claims, a

single hole was drilled on each of the two kimberlite-suggestive magnetic anomalies.

The routes of the tractor roads to the drill holes were chosen from 1970s stereo air photos of 1:50,000

scale. Wherever possible, historical logging trails and open areas of muskeg were utilized to minimize

- 10-

vegetation damage. Timber cutting was required along only l .5 km of the 12 km long road on the main

claim block. The old railway bed and an off-branching logging trail were used to reach the northern

kimberlite targets. Although the drill holes were accurately sited from the air photos, their geographic

co-ordinates were also measured by GPS (Table l). However, hole elevations determined by OPS were

found to be very inaccurate, requiring estimates to be made from the air photos and topographic maps.

A reverse circulation drill string consists of two coaxial pipes and a tricone bit (Fig. 6). Air and water

are injected between the pipes to the bit and clay to pebble-sized sediment particles and cm-sized

cuttings of boulders and bedrock are flushed instantly through the centre pipe to surface where they are

logged (Appendix A) and bulk samples weighing 8 to 10 kg are collected. Fine silt and clay suspended

in the drill water are settled in a special tank and the water is recirculated down the drill hole. Heath SL

Sherwood's drill was mounted on a Nodwell tracked carrier for off-road mobility and was fully enclosed

for all-weather operation. Water was hauled to the drill with a smaller Go-Track carrier.

The drill holes were prefixed WLAP-02 (for West Lake Abitibi Property, 2002) and were numbered

consecutively in the sequence drilled. The samples from each hole, whether of till or bedrock, were

numbered consecutively (e.g. WLAP-02-05-01 to 22 in Hole 05).

3.3 Sample Processing and Indicator Mineral Logging Procedures

The bedrock samples were sieved to separate coarse (+2.0 mm), clean cuttings suitable for binocular

microscope logging (Appendix B) and geochemical analysis. The till samples were processed using the

procedures shown in Figure 7. All processed samples (Table 1) were tested for gold grains but only the

samples from the two drill holes on the satellite claims were tested for kimberlite indicator minerals

("KIMs").

The flow sheet of Figure 7 utilizes procedures that are designed to progressively reduce the bulk sample,

concentrate all of the heavy minerals, and finally clean and sort these minerals to simplify identification

of any indicator mineral grains. First the sample is wet screened at 2.0 mm and a -2.0 mm table

concentrate is prepared. Geological observations on the character of the sample are made during both

the screening and tabling operations (Table 2). The table concentrate is purposely large (typically 300-

OPS Co-ordinates (NAD 27, Zone 17)

î^/rn A/A HoteNo. Easting

^ XX4* dro/ WLAP02-01 551120^/^4-ero/ WLAP02^2 551873^/,Zx?^7^Z- VVLAP02-03 552064^ /Z'r&'T'-'Z* VVLAP02-04 552800

A/Z^^ÂS" WLAP02-05 553508

tfZ.l'S'? 0 ^ WLAP02-06 554246ZJZ'fSY'^ WLAP02-Q7 554559

t/ 2-3- 8 f&fc WLAP02-06 55597424-&70 3 WLAP02-09 556680

^/Z42*7f)e1 WLAP02-10 556681^ /^ 8 7 ^6 WLAP02-1 1 555451^ x S 7 o^, WLAP02-1 2 555245

^/^ * (O 0! WLAP02-13 557332t- ' 2-3-^7 o7 VVLAP02-14 557909

^ /.Z^ST// WLAP02-15 556829^/Z--f-87^/ WLAP02-16 550976

WLAP02-17 550974WLAP02-18 552177

16

Average

Northing

5413749

541372254141415414020

5414002

54138965414368

54140015413768541412054147585414119

541396354139585413794541375454188945418381

per hole:

SamplesElevation

(masl)

280278276275

280

279277283282282280280

286273269"280

286284

Metres DrilledOverburden Bedrock

41.0

39.036.846.0

52.0

39.619.5

29.855.548.626.851.3

35.625.035.950.553.246.8

672.4

42.0

0.01.31.21.5

1.0

0.90.0

1.72.50.90.81.0

1.41.51.62.01.82.2

23.3

1.5

Hole Depth (m)

41.0

40.338.047.5

53.0

40.519.5

31.558.049.527.652.3

37.026.537.552.555.049.0

695.7

43.5

Sample Interval

36.031.031.525.035.044.34.551.523.0

(m)

to 40.5to 39.0to 36.8to 26.0to 37.2to 46.0to 452to 52.0to 39.6

No Sample14.813.016.525.518.241.7 31.520.026.043.346.525.334.5

to 29.8to 55.5to 48.6to 26.8to 37.5to 51.3 to 35.6to 25.0to 35.9to 50.5to 53.2to 32.0to 40.5

TillCollected

3

4312220

170

82011195 2255143

116

7.3

Processed

0

4312213170

8138155 2255343

97

6.1

SandS Gravel

0

000000000

0000000000200

2

0.1

Bedrock

0

111

1

10

-' ^#\:

t

1

1

1

2

171.1

Table l - Drill hole statistics. Holes not completed to bedrock are grey-toned and excluded from project total and average values.

-12-

Cyclone

Figure 6 - Schematic diagram of a reverse circulation drilling system.

Character Sample, -300 g:STORE Split

^.0 mm:STORE

Light Fraction: STORE

i-iTable Split:

Dissaggregate (if required); Wet Sieve at 2 D mm

^.0 mm:Table Separation;

Count Visible Gold Grains Mf:tble Concentrate: Micropanningand Visible Gold Grain Cuuni

(selected samples)

Table Concentrate:Calculate Assay Value of V.G.

Light Fraction:STORE

Table Concentrate:Heavy Liquid Separation

(SG 3.20)

i Ferromagnetic Fraction:STORE - Heavy Fraction:

Ferromagnetic SeparationNonferromagnetlc Fraction:

Submit for Geochemical Analysis

mw^~^

: Nonfemomagnettc Fraction: Dry Sieve to 0.25 mm

-0.25 mm: Available for Geochemical Analysis

OJ25 to 1.0 mm NonferromagneticFraction: Oxalic Acid Wash

(oxidized samples only)

NonfWTomagmtic Fraction:Dry Sieve at 0.25, 0.5 and 1.0 mm

0.25 to 0.5 mm NonterromagnaticFraction: Paramagnetic Separation

(Drum Carpoo)0.5 to 1.0 mm and 1.0 to 2.0 mm

Nonlerramagnetic friction:Indicator Loggtng/PlcWng

0.25 to 0.5 mm Paramagnetic ind Nonparamagnetlc Fraction*

Indicator Logging/Picking

Resolve Ambiguous Grains by Qualitative SEM Analysis; Organize All Grains m Viate

Figure 7 - Heavy mineral processing flow sheet for the till samples. All samples were processed for gold grains. Only the samples from Holes 17 and ] 8 on the satellite claims were processed for KIMs and the heavy mineral concentrates from these samples were not submitted for geochemical analysis.

-14-

Sample Number

WLAP-02-02-01WLAP-02-02-02WLAP-02-02-03WLAP-02-02-04WLAP-02-03-01WLAP-02-03-02WLAP-02-03-03WLAP-02-04-01WUAP-02-04-02WLAP-02-04-03WLAP-02-04-04WLAP-02-04-05WLAP-02-05-01WLAP-02-05-03WUAP-02-05-05WLAP-02-06-07WLAP-02-05-09WLAP-02-05-11WLAP-02-05-13WLAP-02-05-1SWLAP-02-05-16WLAP-02-05-17WLAP-02-05-18WLAP-02-05-19WLAP-02-06-20WLAP-02-05-21WLAP-02-06-01WLAP-02-06-02WLAP-02-06-03WLAP-02-06-04WLAP-02-06-05WLAP-02-06-06WLAP-02-06-07WLAP-02-OB-01WLAP-02-08-02WLAP-02-08-03WLAP-02-08-04WLAP-02-08-OSWLAP-02-08-06WLAP-02-OB-07WLAP-02-08-08WLAP-02-09-01WLAP-02-09-03WLAP-02-09-05WLAP-02-09-07WLAP-02-09-09WLAP-02-09-11WLAP-02-09-13WLAP-02-09-15WLAP-02-09-16WLAP-02-09-17WLAP-02-09-18•WLAP-02-09-19WLAP-02-09-20

Damp Weight (kg)

Balk Tot* *" Table S.**, SpK ^ Feed

11.1 10.6 2.0 8.610.7 10.2 0.5 9.710.3 9.8 0.6 9.2

9.7 92 0.5 B.79.9 9.4 1.6 7.8

10.5 1 0.0 1.9 8.110.2 9.7 0.9 8.84.1 3.6 0.6 3.0

10.3 9.8 0.7 9.19.7 9.2 0.4 8.8

10.5 9.7 1.7 8.010.5 10.0 1.3 8.710.4 9.9 1.0 8.911.0 10.5 1.2 9.310.3 9.8 0.8 9.010.2 9.7 0.5 9.210.9 10.4 1.1 9.311.0 10.5 1.0 9.510.5 10.0 0.5 9.511.5 11.0 0.4 10.611.3 10.8 1.4 9.412.0 11.5 1.9 9.611.6 11.1 1.2 9.911.4 10.9 1.0 9.911.5 11.0 0.7 10.33.8 3.5 0.5 3.0

11.5 11.0 1.4 9.611.5 11.0 1.7 9.311.9 11.4 0.9 10.611.3 10.8 0.9 9.912.1 11.6 1.5 10.110.8 10.3 0.6 9.711.3 10.8 0.5 10.311.7 115 1.1 10.111.5 11.0 1.1 9.911.0 10.5 0.5 10.011.7 11.2 0.5 10.711.8 11.3 0.6 10.711.3 10.8 0.5 10.311.5 11.0 0.5 10.511.7 11.2 0.6 10.610.8 10.3 1.4 6311.0 10.6 1.0 9.511.6 12.1 1.0 11.110.8 10.3 1.0 9.310.8 10.3 0.8 9.510.1 9.6 0.3 9.310.9 10.6 0.6 9.910.3 9.8 0.8 9.010.9 10.4 1.1 9.311.3 10.8 1.1 9.710.8 10.3 0.8 9.511.5 11.0 1.6 9.411.1 10.6 0.5 10.1

Dry weight (a)

Table Cone.

479.0407.2514.0455.4351.9396.1351.9230.0468.6369.5365.7420.1282.4412.6247.1306.2265.6311.0375.5240.13022380.3483.4305.7372.2323.1484.5328.8359.0299.3243.6411.7409.8440.4418.8300.9366.7412.7332.9362.9405.1309.3303.7365.8343.6338.7355.8406.6399.0380.4335.2401.2340.5366.7

-2.0 mm Heavy Liquid Separation S.G. 33

LJBhtS

314.3338.2487.1427.6315.3358.6316.5214.3447.0331.6333.63835244.5348.9198.1271.0224.3271.0332.71815257.9341.5447.5262.83235308.14325264.5306.9241.81985364.9352.9384.6372.7271.0310.4357.0276.4307.8354.1267.0253.6300.5297.6282.1307.1359.4354.1326.3277.83605233.5220.8

Total

164.769.026.927.836.637.535.415.741.637.932.136.937.963.749.035.241 340.042.858.944.338.835.942.949.015.052.364.352.157.545.446.856.955.846.129.956.355.756.555.151.042.350.165.346.056.648.747.244.954.157.440.3

107.0145.9

HMC

NonMag Mag

145.5 19.257.5 11.520.3 6.618.7 9.124.7 11.924.7 12.823.2 12.211.3 4.429.9 11.728.4 9.520.4 11.723.0 13.924.9 13.047.9 15.836.4 12.623.8 11.4295 12.129.8 10533.0 9.846.3 12.633.6 10.727.2 11.624.8 11.133.0 9.938.1 10.911.2 3.839.5 12*48.9 15.440.0 12.143.7 13.831.0 14.435.0 11.844.8 12.142.7 13.136.0 10.121.8 8.143.3 13.042.8 12.944.0 12.543.2 11.938.8 12.231.4 10.939.0 11.151.3 14.034.6 11.444.3 12.338.8 9.936.1 11.134.1 10.841.9 125455 11.929.9 10.463.6 43.487.2 58.7

Sample Description

sti t

CCpcccccccccppccccccccccccccppppcpcccccpccppppcpcccccc

Claas (* 2.0 mm)Percentage

V/S Gfl LS OT

60 40 0 010 90 0 065 30 5 060 40 Tr 070 30 0 050 50 Tr 060 40 0 060 40 Tr 060 40 0 060 40 0 060 40 0 090 10 0 050 50 0 050 50 0 060 40 0 060 40 0 060 40 0 060 40 0 060 40 0 050 50 0 060 40 0 060 40 0 070 30 0 070 30 0 070 30 0 095 5 0 070 30 Tr 050 50 Tr 060 40 0 060 40 Tr 070 30 0 070 30 Tr 070 30 0 060 40 0 060 40 0 060 40 Tr 060 40 Tr 060 40 0 060 40 0 060 40 0 060 40 0 060 40 0 070 30 Tr 070 30 Tr 065 35 Tr 065 35 Tr 060 40 0 060 40 Tr 070 30 0 070 30 0 070 30 0 070 30 0 080 20 0 070 ' 30 0 0

Matrix 1*2.0 mm)Distribution

S/U SD ST CY

U YUUU YU YU YU YU YUUU YU YU Y YU Y YU Y YU Y YU Y YU Y Y YU Y Y YU - t tU Y Y YU Y Y YU Y Y YU Y Y YU Y Y YU Y Y YU Y YU Y YU Y YU Y YU Y Y YU Y Y YU Y Y YU Y Y YU Y Y YU Y Y YU Y Y YU Y Y YU Y Y YU Y Y YU Y Y YU Y Y YU Y Y YU Y Y YU - * YU Y Y YU - t *U Y Y YU Y Y YU Y Y YU Y Y YU Y Y YU * YU t Y

Colour0

SD CY R G

GB GB6B GB3B GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGG GYGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GB

LOG GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GB

LOC GBGB GB

LOC GBGB GBGB GB

CLASS

TILLTILLTILLTILLTILLTILLTILLTILLTILLTILLTIUTIU.TILLTIUTILLTIUTIU-TILLTILLTILLTILLTILLTILLTILLTILLTILLTILLTILLTILLTILLTILLTILLTILLTILLTILLTILLTILLTILLT1U-TILtTILLTILLTILLTILLTILLTILLTIU-TILLTILLTILLTILLTILLTIU-TILL

Table 2 - Laboratory classifications and heavy mineral processing weights for the till and gravel samples. On samples from Holes 17 and 18, the heavy liquid separation was performed at S.G. 3.2 rather than 3.3. Clast codes: C - cobbles, P = pebbles, V/S = volcanosedimentary, GR granitic, LS = limestone, OT ^ther. Matrix size distribution/ colour codes: S = sorted, U ^ unsorted, SD = sand, ST = silt, CY ^ clay, FMC = fine/medium/coarse sand, Y = present, N ^ absent, + = abundant, - = negligible, B or GB ^ beige or grey-beige (unoxidized), LOC light ochre (oxidized). Page l of 2.

- 15-

Sample Number

WLAP-02-10-01WLAP-02-10-03WLAP-02- 1 0-05WLAP-02-10-07WLAP-Q2-10-08WLAP-02- 10-09WLAP-02-10-10WLAP-02-10-11WLAP-02-11-01WLAP-02-12-01WLAP-02-12-03WLAP-02-12-05WLAP-02-12-07WLAP-02-12-09WLAP-02-12-10WLAP-02-12-11WLAP-02-12-12WLAP-02-12-13WLAP-02-12-14WLAP-02-13-01WLAP-02-13-02WLAP-02-14-01WLAP-02-14-02WLAP-02-15-01WLAP-02-15-02WLAP-02- 15-03WLAP-02- 15-04WLAP -02-15-05WLAP-02-16-01WLAP-02-16-02WLAP-02-16-03WLAP-02-16-04WLAP-02-16-05WLAP-02-17-01WLAP-02-17-02WLAP-02-17-03WLAP-02-18-01WLAP-02-18-02WLAP-02-18-03WLAP-02-18-04WLAP-02-18-05WLAP-02-18-06WLAP-02-18-07

Damp Weigh! (kg)

Bulk Table *" Table Sample Sp*! C™K Feed

10.9 10.4 1.3 9.110.3 9.8 0.6 9.211.3 10.8 0.9 9.910.9 10.4 0.8 9.611.2 10.7 1.0 9.711.7 11.2 0.7 10.510.9 10.4 0.3 10.14.3 4.0 0.3 3.7

11.7 11.2 1.0 10.210.6 10.1 0.9 9.210.5 10.0 1.8 8211.4 10.9 0.8 10.111.6 11.1 1.1 10.011.3 10.8 0.3 10.511.4 10.9 1.3 9.610.1 9.6 1.0 8.611.4 1.9 0.1 1.810.2 9.7 0.7 9.011.2 10.7 0.6 10.110.1 9.6 0.3 9.311.9 11.4 0.5 10.911.9 11.4 1.3 10.111.1 10.6 1.0 9.611.6 11.1 2.0 9.110.8 10.3 1.4 8.911.0 10.5 0.8 9.711.3 10.8 0.8 10.011.3 10.8 1.0 9.810.2 9.7 1.2 8.510.3 9.8 0.5 9.311.3 10.8 1.2 9.612.3 11.8 0.7 11.111.4 10.9 0.8 10.1

9.2 8.7 1.3 7.411 10.5 1.5 9.0

9.7 9.2 1.4 7.812 11.5 1.8 9.7

11.7 11.2 0.9 10.311.1 10.6 0.9 9.710.6 10.1 1.6 8.511.2 10.7 0.5 10.211.1 10.6 1.2 9.410.4 9.9 0.4 9.5

Dry weight (g)

Tat* Cone.

259.5219.7387.6374.1338.8343.7381.5231.4358.7409.3289.0279.3326.4320.4206.8300.0342.0325.0352.9364.2438.0522.4357.6501.0414.0460.8393.6582.0463.1382.2466.4436.2412.9

1,021.21,243.3

617.3494.5690.7484.1426.3799.3760.2419.0

-2.0 mm Heavy Liquid Separation S.G. 3.3

Lights

207.8165.0328.0324.6298.3300.2335.5211.8299.6364.6256.4231.7285.4288.9157.3245.2275.9251.8283.5319.7370.8467.5306.6442.4360.73992

334.5452.7402.3332.8396.4263.0314.3910.5

1,076.6460.1383.6595.6410.9345.6631.3641.1319.7

HMC

Total

51.754.759.649.540.543.546.019.659.144.732.647.641.031.549.554.866.173.269.444.567.254.951.058.653.361.659.1

129.360.849.470.0

173.298.6

110.7166.7157.2110.9

95.173.280.7

168.0119.199.3

NonMag Hag

38.7 13.041.4 13.345.3 14.337.5 12.029.6 10.933.0 10.535.1 10.913.2 6.445.5 13.633.7 11.022.3 10.335.0 12.629.0 12.022.5 9.040.5 9.034.9 19.948.8 17.354.2 19.052.5 16.935.9 8.650.1 17.139.5 15.438.2 12.840.6 18.038.8 14.548.0 13.645.5 13.665.5 63.844.7 16.134.3 15.140.0 30.0

104.3 68.959.4 39.2652 25.5

125.3 41.4103.3 53.995.9 15.0832 11.962.4 10.870.9 9.8

126.0 42.0100.2 18.9

88.1 11.2

Sample DescriptionClass ^ 2.0 mm)

Sie

Cccccccccppccpccpcccpppcccccccccccccccccccc

Percentage

VrS GR LS OT

60 40 0 060 40 0 060 40 0 060 40 0 070 30 0 070 30 0 070 30 0 060 40 0 060 40 0 060 40 Tr 060 40 Tr 060 40 Tr 060 40 Tr 060 40 Tr 060 40 Tr 060 40 Tr 070 30 0 080 20 0 090 10 0 060 40 0 070 30 0 060 40 Tr 060 40 Tr 060 40 0 060 40 0 060 40 0 060 40 0 070 30 0 050 50 0 060 40 0 060 40 Tr 060 40 Tr 070 30 0 050 50 0 050 50 0 070 30 0 050 50 0 060 40 0 060 40 0 060 40 0 065 35 0 060 40 0 060 40 0 0

Malrnt ^2.0 mm)Distribution

SAJ SD ST CY

U t YU t YU 4 YU * YU t YU -r YU + YU + YU * YU 4 YU + YU * YU t YU * YU -i- YU * YU t YU t YU -f YU -f YU -f YU t YU t Y -U t YU + YU -f YU -f YU Y YU * Y ~U * YU t YU t Y -U * YS FMC - NS FMC Y NU -fU -f YU tU * YU -i- YU Y Y YU tU -1- Y

Colour

0 SO CY R

G

GB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GBGB GYGB GYGB GYB BB BB GBB GBB GBB GBB GB

CLASS

TILLTILLTILLTILLTILLTILLTILLTILLTILLTILLT1LLTILLTILLTILLTILLTILLTILLTILLTILLTILLTILLTILLTILLTILLTILLTILLTILLTILLTILLTILLTILLTILLTILL

SAND 8 GFWiVELSAND S GfWiVEL

TILLTILLTILLTILLTILLTILLTILLTILL

Table 2 - Laboratory classifications and heavy mineral processing weights for the till and gravel samples. On samples from Holes 17 and 18, the heavy liquid separation was performed at S.G. 3.2 rather than 3.3. Clast codes: C = cobbles, P = pebbles, V/S = volcanosedimentary, GR = granitic, LS = limestone, OT ^ther. Matrix size distribution/ colour codes: S = sorted, U = unsorted, SD = sand, ST = silt, CY = clay, FMC = fine/medium/coarse sand, Y = present, N = absent, + = abundant, - = negligible, B or GB ^ beige or grey-beige (unoxidized), LOC ^ light ochre (oxidized). Page 2 of 2.

- 16-

500 g) and of low grade (10-30 percent heavy minerals) in order to achieve a high, 80-90 percent

recovery rate for all desired indicator minerals irrespective of their grains size or specific gravity. The

gold grains, which are mostly silt-sized, are observed at this stage with the aid of micropanning and are

counted, measured and classified as to degree of wear (i.e. distance of glacial transport; Fig. 8). Their

gold assay value is also calculated (Appendix C). For samples that are being tested for KIMs, the table

reject is reprocessed to scavenge possible unrecovered KIMs, especially the largest grains which are the

most difficult to recover.

If the heavy mineral fraction is to be geochemically analyzed for gold and base metals, the -2.0 mm table

concentrate is separated in methylene iodide at S.G. 3.32. If KIMs are targeted, the methylene iodide is

diluted with acetone to S.G. 3.20 to ensure recovery of the least dense KIM species. Undesirable

magnetite is then removed from the heavy liquid concentrate using a ferromagnetic separator. If KIMs

are being targeted, the finer, -0.25 mm grains are sieved from the nonferromagnetic heavies and the

retained 0.25-2.0 mm grains are cleansed with oxalic acid to remove limonite stains that would

otherwise impede mineral identification. The clean heavies are then sieved at 0.5 and 1.0 mm. The

0.25-0.5 mm fraction, which contains the most mineral grains, is sorted electromagnetically into strongly

^0.6 amp), moderately (0.6-0.8 amp), weakly (0.8-1.0 amp) and non-paramagnetic (5-1.0 amp) fractions

which are of simpler mineralogy, thereby easing indicator mineral logging. This logging is done by

experienced exploration geologists/mineralogists, not by technicians. These mineralogists are familiar

with all minerals in the concentrate, not just a limited suite of KIMs, and are therefore able to recognize

minerals indicative of any type of deposit and mineral textures and distribution patterns critical to

follow-up exploration. To this end, they also systematically record the major, regional heavy mineral

suite or assemblage of each sample, thereby monitoring any significant changes in the overall

provenance of the till. Any difficult mineral grains are resolved by energy dispersive x-ray spectrometry

("EDS") analysis using a scanning electron microscope ("SEM"). All indicator mineral grains, or

representative examples of larger populations of such indicators, are carefully vialed for future

reference.

Till Gold Grain Morphology

Pristine

100m

Modified

500m

Reshaped

,000 to > 10,000 m

Distance of Transport

Figure 8 - Backscatter electron images of gold grains from till illustrating the relationship between grain wear and distance of glacial transport. The wear processes are compressional (infolding and compaction) and do not reduce the mass of the gold grain. Scale bars ~ 50 microns.

-18-

3.4 Analytical Procedures

The heavy mineral concentrates of the till samples from the satellite claims were not analyzed

geochemically. The concentrates from the main claim block were analyzed for Au, As, Ag, Cu, Pb, Zn,

Ni, Cd, Mo, Mn and S. Both Au and As were determined by instrumental neutron activation (INA)

analysis using up to a 60 g (as available) aliquot with no acid digestion. The other nine elements were

determined by inductively coupled plasma/mass spectrometry (1CP/MS) on a milled 0.5 g aliquot using

aqua regia acid digestion. All bedrock samples were milled, wholly fused or partially digested as

required and analyzed by a similar IN A + ICP/MS combination for whole rock oxides plus 32 elements

including rare earths and the metals that were determined for the till concentrates.

3.5 Drill Performance and Project Costs

The work performed and/or supervised by ODM (i.e. everything except laying out the drill hole sites in

the field and clearing roads to these sites) was budgeted at 5106,615.50 (Table 3). This budget was

based on drilling 20 holes at Heath *fe Sherwood's quoted hourly contract prices assuming an average

hole depth of 40 m for a total of 800 m, a production rate of 6 m per drilling/moving hour (excluding

moving time between the two properties), 10 percent mechanical down-time, changing the tricone bit

every 60 m and processing an average of 6.5 till samples per hole. The expected cost per metre was

therefore S133.27; of this, S86.05 was allocated to Heath A Sherwood's drilling operations and camp

charges.

Eighteen holes were actually drilled. Two, Nos. 01 and 07, did not reach bedrock and were replaced by

Holes 16 and 11, respectively. The average depth of the 16 completed holes was 43.5 m (Table 1), or 11

percent deeper than forecast, for a total of 695.7 m. Twelve tricone bits were used for an average of 58

m/bit, very close to the expected 60 m. An average of 6.2 "till" samples (includes two gravel samples

from Hole 17) was processed from these holes. This is slightly below the budgeted 6.5 samples;

however, an average of 7.4 samples/hole was actually collected but in Holes 05,09,10 and 12, only the

odd-numbered samples from the upper parts of extra-thick till sections were processed. Actual

mechanical down-time was only 0.4 percent but this does not include time spent rectifying a fluid bypass

problem in the drill string that was the main reason for abandoning Holes 01 and 07. If these two

Total CostsBudget Actual

Completed Holes OnlyService

1. Pre-drilling

2. Drilling operations and camp charges

3. Road Clearing

4. Field supervision, logging and sampling

5. Sample shipping

6. Sample processing

7. Analytical

8. Report

TOTALS

GST

GRAND TOTALS

CompanyODM

Heath Z Sherwood

STotal1,000.00

68,841.50

Contracted separately by Boulder Mining

ODM (includes Boulder's sampling assistant) 1 4,01 1 .00

Various

ODM

Actlabs

ODM

360.00

11,503.00

4,900.00

6,000.00

S1 06,61 5.50

S7,463.09

S1 14,078.59

S/Metre1.25

86.05

it/Foot0.38

26.23

STotal934.21

65,279.40

S/Metre1.34

93.83

S/Foot0.41

28.60

Corporation

17.51

0.45

14.38

6.13

7.50

133.27

6.82

140.09

5.34

0.14

4.38

1.87

2.29

40.62

2.84

43.46

11,408.95

881.10

7,198.10

2,762.00

7,568.91

$96,032,67

S6.722.29

S1 02,754.96

16.40

1.27

10.35

3.97

10.88

138.04

9.66

147.70

5.00

0.39

3.15

1.21

3.32

42.07

2.95

45.02

Table 3 - Comparison of budgeted and actual project costs.

-20-

unfinished holes are excluded, average productivity was only 5.1 m per drilling/moving hour, or 15

percent below forecast. The lower productivity is not all due to the two lost holes; it also reflects the

excessive hole depth as the penetration rate of a reverse circulation drill decreases with depth. With

fewer metres drilled per hour, the cost per metre of Heath & Sherwood's drilling operations rose

significantly to S93.83 or 9 percent more than forecast, but the total project cost was kept 10 percent

below budget at S96,032.67 by reducing the number of holes drilled and till samples processed.

4. RESULTS

4.1 Bedrock Geology and Geochemistry

As expected, most of the drill holes that reached bedrock intersected either northern turbidites of the

Scapa Assemblage or southern mafic volcanics of the Stoughton - Roquemaure Assemblage (Plan l, in

pocket). Although the contact between the two assemblages is in the location predicted by Ayer et al.

(1999), it is neither sheared nor hydrothermally altered. The Scapa turbidites and Stoughton -

Roquemaure komatiites both face south (Jackson and Fyon, 1992), and komatiites are typically the

lowermost horizons of volcanic successions deposited in submarine basins. Therefore the contact

between the two assemblages is probably a normal, conformable contact.

Minor intersected lithologies include cherty exhalative sediments in Hole 18, gabbro in Hole 04,

pyroxenite in Hole 17, feldspar porphyry in Hole 08 and a Proterozoic diabase dyke in Hole 14. The

cherry sediments occur within the northern turbidites and coincide with the easternmost magnetic

bullseye that was targeted as kimberlite (Fig. 5) but the drill hole was not centered on the anomaly and

the 2.2 m drill intercept (Table l) does not contain magnetite or pyrrhotite. It does, however, contain a

thin (O.4 m; Appendix A) interval of mafic volcanics. This suggests that the cherty exhalations are

related to a volcanic event that briefly interrupted turbidite sedimentation an event that may have been

a precursor to major Stoughton - Roquemaure volcanism or residual to earlier calc-alkaline volcanism.

The gabbro and pyroxenite also occur within the turbidites and thus may have been feeder intrusions for

Stoughton - Roquemaure volcanism. The pyroxenite is responsible for the second, more westerly

magnetic bullseye that was targeted as kimberlite (Fig 5). The feldspar porphyry occurs within the

southern komatiites and may represent a feeder for younger, more evolved calc-alkaline volcanism

-21 -

higher in the volcanic pile. The porphyry coincides with a magnetic low between two magnetic diabase

dykes (Fig 4) which have the north-south trend typical of the 2454 Ma Matachewan dyke swarm

(Osmani, 1991). The diabase intersection of Hole 14 is on a similar dyke further east.

Most of the turbidite intersections are fine-grained siltstones, with greywacke occurring only in Hole 10

and as minor laminations within the siltstone of Hole 03. The siltstone cuttings vary in colour from grey

to green but their grain size is so uniform typically 0.05 mm that bedding is seldom evident. The

0.05 mm silt particles are too small for mineralogical resolution by binocular microscope but in

aggregate are relatively soft indicating that they consist mainly of saussuritized plagioclase with little

quartz. A finer silt/clay component is represented by 20-50 percent chlorite (variably sericite). Some

samples are spotted with up to 5 percent small (0.1-0.3 mm) biotite metacrysts indicating metamorphism

of the turbidites at mid-greenschist facies. The Hole 10 greywacke is a poorly sorted, fine to medium

(0.1-0.5 mm) sand with 15 percent finer-grained matrix chlorite/biotite. The sand component consists

mainly of saussuritized plagioclase plus visually similar intermediate volcanic lithic grains with only 15

percent quartz grains. Chemically the turbidites are equivalent to calc-alkaline andesite (Table 4; Fig.

9). All are well-foliated to semi-schistose but not sheared. Carbonates are generally either absent or

restricted to minor, fracture-hosted calcite. Primary pyrite (or more rarely pyrrhotite) stringers and

disseminations are often present but their maximum concentration is only l percent.

The chert of Hole 18 is a pale green-white, sugary-textured rock with a grain size of 0.05-0. l mm. It is

an impure, silty chert as it contains 5*M) chlorite/biotite and its SiCh content, although higher than that of

all other intersected lithologies except feldspar prophyry, is only 69 percent (Table 4). The most

noteworthy feature of the chert is the presence of l percent primary, disseminated to stringer pyrite

which is accompanied by 0.1 percent chalcopyrite. Two bedrock samples rather than the usual 1.5 m

sample were collected from Hole 18 (Table 1) and the sulphide mineralization extends through both

samples including the mafic volcanic interval that interrupts the chert. Sphalerite is absent but the

weakly mineralized chert could nevertheless represent an exploration cue because anomalous exhalite

beds occur near many volcanogenic massive sulphide deposits.

The mafic volcanics are dark green, variably foliated rocks with a grain size of 0. l -0.3 mm. They lack

amygdules and have the equigranular, interlocking texture typical of the unquenched central parts of

basalt flows extruded in deep submarine basins. Mineralogically they consist of subequal chlorite and

SAMPLE NO. SIO2 AI2O3 Fe2O3Vo

MnO MgO CaO Na2O K2O TIO2 P2O5 LOI TOTAL Ba Sr Y Se Zr Be V'/e "/o '/e "/o "^ jjpm ppm pom ppm ppm ppm ppm

WLAP 02-05WLAP 03-04WLAP 04-06WLAP 05-22WLAP 06-08WLAP 08-09WLAP 09-21WLAP 10-1 2WLAP 11 -02WLAP 12-1 5WLAP 13-03WLAP 14-03WLAP 15-06WLAP 16-06WLAP 16-06 RerunWLAP 17-04WLAP 18-08WLAP 18-09WLAP 18-09 (Pulp duplicate)

67.1563.8259.7561.4349.7469.9554.6669.9062.2162.2347.0250.8147.2063.3763.2344.3169.2563.4163.49

13.5017.2415.3614.7913.7115.5812.3513.8216.2215.7014.9013.6915.5716.0916.027.51

16.2215.3915.29

7.536.266.55

10.3414.42

1.3314.894.126.967.92

14.9914.3212.586.546.528.252.564.914.94

0.0450.0370.0860.0610.2060.0180.2370.0490.0580.0730.1820.2050.1380.0580.0570.1360.0240.0720.073

2.462.793.912.876.560.546.262.303.263.857.925.515.702.712.69

20.282.404.074.07

1.260.824.361.678.722.451.881.502.181.736.348.677.571.901.894.562.565.555.57

1.903.723.552.562.306.591.134.602.962.942.262.841.852.982.961.362.992.812.79

2.23 0.4851.88 0.5191.24 0.6142.09 0.6380.31 1.6141.16 0.2140.24 1.1291.06 0.4352:75 0.5571.99 0.6180.36 1.6960.80 1.1960.29 1.1892.29 0.4722.29 0.4600.81 0.2621.56 0.2491.22 0.4111.14 0.405

0.160.160,110.160.150.090.120.130.140.170.160.130.150.130.140.130.090.260.26

3.162.913.763.372.441.795.772.042.572.694.301.906.862.892.89

11.052.041.771.80

99.88100.1699.2999.97

100.1799.7198.6899.9499.8799.91

100.13100.0899.0899.4299.1598.6699.9599.8899.83

525442328522

55752

77308877511

55199113601597168353410406

146252253228145841

54282152236148189127245245322391593588

1010111137

2259

131438283412107399

1314241747

333

91619493940131310

31212

9610584

1111019078

12510211510996

10310910647769088

2 952 941 1471 120

-1 3822 22

-1 2771 672 1071 124

-1 378-1 298-1 2782 861 85

-1 391 232 892 89

N)

Table 4 - Whole rock and rare earth element analyses for the bedrock samples. The samples were analysed by Actlabs Limited, Ancaster, Ontario.

FeO * Fe 20g

FeO 4- Fe2O3 + TiO2

AI203

K) OJ

A12O3 MgO

Figure 9 - Jensen cation plot for greywacke, siltstone and chert (No. 18-08) samples.

-24-

saussuritized plagioclase with <l percent visible quartz. They lack the magnetite that is typical of high-

Fe tholeiites and most are relatively enriched in MgO (Table 4, Fig. 10). In most samples, part of the

chlorite has been transformed to actinolite the equivalent of the mid-greenschist facies biotite

observed in the turbidites. Calcite and pyrite levels are even lower than in the turbidites.

The gabbro of Hole 04 has a grain size of 0.7-1.0 mm, nearly five times coarser than the mafic

volcanics. It is also significantly less mafic, containing more (3 percent versus l percent) quartz and

less (30 percent versus 50 percent) chlorite/actinolite and is more carbonatized, with 10 percent calcite.

Chemically it is equivalent to calc-alkalic andesite (Table 4, Fig. 10).

The pyroxenite of Hole 17 is a completely hydrated and carbonatized rock consisting of subequal

proportions of talc, chlorite and Fe-Mg carbonate. Originally it was probably a websterite as talc is

chemically equivalent to hydrated orthopyroxene and chlorite to hydrated clinopyroxene. The rock

contains 20 percent MgO (Table 4; Fig. 10) which is high for pyroxenite; however a peridotite protolith

is improbable because the rock contains 5 percent plagioclase and only 1-2 percent olivine-suggestive

(i.e. patchily disseminated) magnetite. This minor magnetite explains the weak, kimberlite-suggestive

magnetic signature (Fig. 5) of the pyroxenite.

The feldspar porphyry of Hole 08 is a pale grey-white, weakly foliated granitoid rock with 10 percent

coarse, l .5-4 mm plagioclase phenocrysts in a medium-grained, 0.5-1.0 m groundmass. It is a two-mica

porphyry containing 2 percent biotite/chlorite plus 5 percent muscovite and has a rather high quartz (30

percent) and SiO2 (70 percent; Table 4) content. It also contains 0.5 percent coarsely disseminated cubic

pyrite but otherwise is unaltered and unmineralized.

The Matachewan diabase intersected in Hole 14 is a massive, unmetamorphosed, diabasic-textured,

green and white rock. It consists of 60 percent fresh, unsaussuritized plagioclase and 40 percent primary

green to grey-brown clinopyroxene. The diabase also contains l percent interstitial magnetite,

explaining the linear, north-south trending aeromagnetic anomalies that trace the dyke swarm (Fig. 4).

Chemically it is equivalent to tholeiitic basalt (Table 4, Fig. 10).

In keeping with their unsheared and unaltered condition, the bedrock samples yielded only normal

background Au analyses (Table 5). The highest value is 8 ppb in the mafic volcanics of Hole 13; all

other samples yielded ^5 ppb Au. The As, Ag, Cu, Pb, Zn, Ni, Cd and Mo values are similarly low, the

FeO t-

FeO H- Fe2O3 ± TiO2

SYMBOLSk Mafic Volcanics

Gabbro Pyroxenite Diabase

K)

AI203

A12O3 MgO

Figure 10 - Jensen cation plot for mafic volcanic, gabbro, pyroxenite and diabase samples.

SAMPLE NO.

WLAP 024)5WLAP 034)4WLAP 044)6WLAP 05-22WLAP 064)8WLAP 084)9WLAP 09-21WLAP 10-12WLAP 114)2WLAP 12-15WLAP 134)3WLAP 144)3WLAP 154)6

INA Matt Au A*fa) ppm ppm

26.3824.9123.4427.2927.1722.0423.4623.8826.4225.8425.4230.3123.73

-55

-5-5•5-S•S-5-5•58-5•5

173

-27

-2-232

1062

-25

WLAP 154)6 RerunWLAP 164)6WLAP 174)4WLAP 184)8WLAP 184)9WLAP 184)9(Pulp duplicate)

24.0422.7028.0829.9225.47

-5•5•5-5•5

46

-2-2•2

Ag ppm

0.64X2-0.24X2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.243.24X24X24X245.24X24X24X24X2-0.2-0.2

Cd ppm

-0.5•0.5-0.6-0.5-0.541.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-OS4X5-0.5-0.54X5-0.5•0.5•0.5-0.5-0.5

Cu ppm

3124725958-1

1516

284357

16069862110

251217233

Mn ppm t

300279405382658138

1599359364457543375704665392774150236263

Mo *pm

2-2-2-2-29

-22

-2•2•2-2-2-2-2•2•2-2-2

Ni Pb oofii ppm

1059175904996

10454

1071436740

1049670

418142427

32344

•265345

•22

•2545

-2-2-2

ZnOPfll

656456736314

121366281686866635521112022

Alf.

1.631.831.582.152.190.383.991.252.012.242.401.522.612.661.721.110.971.381.53

A* ppm

18•10-10-10•10•10-10-10•10-10-10•10•10-10-10-10-10-10•10

Ba Be ppm ppm

1027596

10251

2304278

269145

1541989893

10063

269295

•1-1-1-1-1-1• 1•1-1-1-1• 1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1

Bt ppm

-10-10•10•10•10-10-10•10•10-10-10-10-10-10•10•10•10•10•10

Cay.

0.930.482.281.042.001.791.080.921.060.821.671.511.601.761.163.440.251.231.40

Co ppm

2422272331

125854172431343236361852

81314

Cr ppm

828566959617

1341101261789713

16716669

1395104752

Fa

4.824.003.376.505.430.87

10.422,644.325.115.705.496.356.244.023.941.411.892.08

K

0.160.090.100.180.070.130.020.090.440.360.010.060.020.020.110.130.090.320.35

Mg

1.261.461.591.501.930.213.771.251.692.112.861.222.252.201.356,011.121.521.66

Na*

0.030.040.060.050.100.100.050.080.060.050.030.120.040.040.040.040.040.090.10

Pt,

0.0510.0490.0340.0510.0450.0250.0380.0400.0460.0550.0480.0420.0440.0430.0420.0460.0260.0800.086

Sb Se ppm ppm

-10-10-10-10-10-10-10-10-10-10-10•10•10-10-10•10•10•10-10

4368

111

2558

1065

121335

•144

Sn ppm

-10-10-10•10-10-1022

-10-10-1014

-10•10•10-1067

-10•10-10

Sr ppm

231316433382272030381523424427

255107082

TlIt

0.030.010.060.060.330.040.270.130.150.120.090.160.360.400.020.050.010.100.11

Vppm

38386376

16910

302516582

16720714014434398

4449

W Y ppm ppm

-to-10-10-10•10701-1018

-10• 10-10•10-10•10-10-10-10-10-10

-1-1-1-1-1-11

-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1

Zr ppm

3322406622

10232486461187137384221232832

S

0.5550.0120.0520.1640.0950.2520.0080.1280.0200,2300.0640.1040.0030.0050.0540.0940.5420.4240.453

Table 5 - Geochemical analyses for the bedrock samples. The samples were analysed by Actlabs Limited, Ancaster, Ontario.

only exceptions being weak, 217-251 ppm Cu anomalies in the two chert samples from Hole 18,

reflecting the 0. l percent chalcopyrite observed in this chert, and 418 ppm Ni in the pyroxenite of Hole

17, reflecting the presence of Ni-scavenging orthopyroxene and olivine in the pyroxenite at the time of

crystallization.

4.2 Overburden Stratigraphy

The glacigenic sediment and surficial peat layers intersected in the drill holes are shown on Sections A-

A' to C-C1 (Figs. 11 to 13) and the section lines are shown on Plan 1.

The bedrock surface is flat to gently undulating and thus, during the final SSE ice flow event, afforded

little protection to unconsolidated sediments generated by earlier, southwesterly ice flow. Consequently

only young Matheson Till and associated esker gravel and varved Lake Ojibway clay, silt and fine sand

are present. The till typically forms a 2-10 m thick blanket over the bedrock but is locally moulded into

thicker drumlinoid ridges that rise through the clay cover and impart a SSE grain to the otherwise flat

surface topography (Plan 1). It is also variably interlayered with the clay, silt, sand and gravel,

reflecting the fact that ice meltdown and till deposition occurred in Lake Ojibway. The deep lake water

added buoyancy to the ice sheet. Instead of melting steadily northward, the ice front became mobile,

repeatedly overriding the initial till and sediment layers on the lake bottom and topping them with new,

similar layers. The texture of the individual till layers oscillates considerably from clayey to sandy

depending on the nature of the overridden sediments.

4.3 Gold Grain Counts

Most of the till samples yielded one to eight gold grains (Table 6, Appendix C). The maximum

concentration is fifteen grains and some samples yielded no gold grains. The gold grain concentration in

thick till sections does not change significantly from top to bottom (Figs. 11 to 13) and more than 90

percent of the grains are reshaped (i.e. far travelled; Fig. 8). Therefore the 0-15 grain level simply

represents the regional gold background, and no anomalies are present.

West

P'j

1o

East

A'

4-. 835-

t""

—— -.- BOULDER MINING CORPORATION l

vm un ama PWOJICT. Oncun it

t otcuunai EMU. SKTKH *-A |

West

7c

East T .

B'

01

tip-- *-

CORPORATKJW

West

7c

East

c'

LSSWD tufanM17 Stntlfreptly

T•••i *B in td*?

CD

n ~

BOULDER MINING CORPORATIONTC9T IUX ABtTTBI PROJWT. ONTABO

cmcuunoM mau. stcncm c-c' oviBBUrow Dmumj muoocmr umrro

-31 -

Sample NumberNumber of Visible Gold Grains

Total Reshaped Modified Pristine

Nonmag HMC

Weight(g)

Calculated PPB Visible Gold in HMC


WLAP-02-02-01WLAP-02-02-02WLAP-02-02-03WLAP-02-02-04WLAP-02-03-01WLAP-02-03-02WLAP-02-03-03WLAP-02-04-01WLAP-02-04-02WLAP-02-04-03WLAP-02-04-04WLAP-02-04-05WLAP-02-05-01WLAP-02-05-03WLAP-02-05-05WLAP-02-05-07WLAP-02-05-09WLAP-02-05-11WLAP-02-05-13WLAP-02-05-15WLAP-02-05-16WLAP-02-05-17WLAP-02-05-18WLAP-02-05-19WLAP-02-05-20WLAP-02-05-21WLAP-02-06-01WLAP-02-06-02WLAP-02-06-03WLAP-02-06-04WLAP-02-06-05WLAP-02-06-06WLAP-02-06-07WLAP-02-08-01WLAP-02-08-02WLAP-02-08-03WLAP-02-08-04WLAP-02-08-05WLAP-02-08-06WLAP-02-08-07WLAP-02-08-08WLAP-02-09-01WLAP-02-09-03WLAP-02-09-05WLAP-02-09-07WLAP-02-09-09WLAP-02-09-11WLAP-02-09-13WLAP-02-09-15

21234121343031444470393674111921112234586812133586

20234121342021344470293663111821112224586812123586

0100000000101100000100011000100000010000000010000

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

145.557.520.318.724.724.723.211.329.928.420.423.024.947.936.423.829.229.833.046.333.627.224.833.038.111.239.548.940.043.731.035.044.842.736.021.843.342.844.043.238.831.439.051.334.644.338.836.134.1

31

1614584115243314345

3410

49265536650

3020

42865881

10154718

1051361258

112839154310948759277141396334118

30

1614584115243314345

3370

48244536650

3020108658818954718

1031361258

112891543109487592.77

131396334118

0100000000401

210000032000

1110002000000

290000000010000

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Table 6 - Gold grain summary for the till and gravel samples with calculated visible gold assay values for the nonferromagnetic heavy mineral fraction. Page l of 2.

-32-

Sample NumberNumber of Visible Gold Grains


Nonmag HMC

Weight(g)

Calculated PPB Visible Gold in HMC


WLAP-02-09-16WLAP-02-09-17WLAP-02-09-18WLAP-02-09-19WLAP-02-09-20WLAP-02-10-01WLAP-02-10-03WLAP-02-10-05WLAP-02-10-07WLAP-02-10-08WLAP-02-10-09WLAP-02-10-10WLAP-02-10-11WLAP-02-11-01WLAP-02-12-01WLAP-02-12-03WLAP-02-12-05WLAP-02-12-07WLAP-02-12-09WLAP-02-12-10WLAP-02-12-11WLAP-02-12-12WLAP-02-12-13WLAP-02-12-14WLAP-02-13-01WLAP-02-13-02WLAP-02-14-01WLAP-02-14-02WLAP-02-15-01WLAP-02-15-02WLAP-02-15-03WLAP-02-15-04WLAP-02-15-05WLAP-02-16-01WLAP-02-16-02WLAP-02-16-03WLAP-02-16-04WLAP-02-16-05WLAP-02-17-01WLAP-02-17-02WLAP-02-17-03WLAP-02-18-01WLAP-02-18-02WLAP-02-18-03WLAP-02-18-04WLAP-02-18-05WLAP-02-18-06WLAP-02-18-07

83135235453300131310218472643315301035873028401242

7313523545330013131021845264331530935853008401242

100000000000000000000000200000000100020020000000

000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

41.945.529.963.687.238.741.445.337.529.633.035.113.245.533.722.335.029.022.540.534.948.854.252.535.950.139.538.240.638.848.045.565.544.734.340.0104.359.485.2125.?103.395.983.262.470.9126.0100.288.1

339615554588890187284002

212

494038394381149

2,738181756410501027545823001

403901

5422212

2896

15554

588890187284002

212

494038394351149

2,738181756410461027545753000

4039'

01

5422212

500000000000000000000000300000000400060010000000

000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Table 6 - Gold grain summary for the till and gravel samples with calculated visible gold assay values for the nonferromagnetic heavy mineral fraction. Page 2 of 2.

-33-

4.4 Kimberlite Indicator Mineral Counts

The glacial sediments in contact with the magnetic kimberlite targets at Holes 17 and 18 on the northern satellite claim block consist of till interdigitated with esker sand/gravel (Fig. 13). Ten samples of these sediments were processed for kimberlite indicator mineral grains (Table 7). No indicator minerals were found.

4.5 Mineralogy and Geochemistry of the Heavy Mineral Fraction of the Till

The regional heavy mineral assemblages of the till/gravel samples from Holes 17 and 18 on the northern satellite claims were recorded (Table 8) while logging the concentrates for kimberlite indicator minerals. The main minerals present are paramagnetic almandine and hornblende and nonparamagnetic diopside and epidote. The unlogged heavy mineral concentrates from the main claim block probably have essentially the same mineralogy because their gold grain content is the same. However, since the latter concentrates were geochemically analyzed and the analytical package included sulphur (Table 9), the pyrite content of the concentrates can be estimated. Most samples yielded ^ percent sulphur but a few yielded 5-30 percent, indicating the presence of 10 to 60 percent pyrite.

To be considered anomalous in gold, a heavy mineral concentrate must yield M 000 ppb Au. Furthermore, the anomaly must be caused by ten or more small, pristine to modified (i.e. little-travelled; Fig. 8) gold grains or by gold hidden in sulphide minerals, not by one or two large, reshaped gold grains. Four Au anomalies MOOO ppb (Table 9) were obtained from the analysed till samples (i.e. samples

collected on the main claim block). These anomalies are in Samples 05 (l 100 ppb) and 07 (l 060 ppb) from Hole 06, Sample 19 from Hole 09 (l 050 ppb) and Sample 02 from Hole 14(1970 ppb). However,

none are genuine anomalies. The strongest anomaly, in Hole 14, had been forecast (Table 6, Appendix C), on the basis of a large gold grain that was observed when the sample was processed. Similar large gold grains were not observed in the other three samples but nevertheless are inferred to have been present because the anomalous samples are bracketed by barren samples (Figs. 11,12) and also yielded low sulphur analyses, indicating that the gold is not hidden in sulphide minerals. Furthermore, the Au is not accompanied by anomalous As, Ag, Cu, Zn or Pb; indeed all analyzed metals occur at low concentrations throughout the till on the main claim block.

Sample Number

WLAP-02-17-01WLAP-02-17-02WLAP-02-17-03WLAP-02-18-01WLAP-02-18-02WLAP-02-18-03WLAP-02-18-04WLAP-02- 18-05WLAP-02-18-06WLAP-02-18-07

<2.0 mm Table Concentrate

Total

1,021.21,243.3

617.3494.5690.7484.1426.3799.3760.2419.0

Heavy Liquid Separation S.G 3.20

Heavy M Liquid ™g U9hls HMC

910.5 25.51,076.6 41.4

460.1 53.9383.6 15.0595.6 11.9410.9 10.8345.6 9.8631.3 42.0641.1 18.9319.7 11.2

Nonferromagnetlc HMC

Total ^.25 mm -0.25 0.25 to 0.510 1.010 (wash) mm 0.5mm 1.0mm 2.0mm

85.2 1.6 38.3 22.7 16.5 6.1125.3 3.3 63.9 29.3 22.3 6.5103.3 1.7 49.3 27.6 18.2 6.595.9 0.9 71.8 14.2 6.7 2.383.2 0.5 66.7 10.4 4.3 1.362.4 0.9 49.6 7.9 3.7 0.370.9 0.5 55.5 9.9 4.0 1.0

126.0 2.6 77.9 26.3 13.9 5.3100.2 1.2 74.5 14.1 8.0 2.4B8.1 0.6 75.1 7,8 3.8 0.8

Selected PseudoKIMs

1.0-2.0 0.5-1.0 0.25-0.5 mm mm mm

Low-Cr Low-Cr Low-Cr diopside diopside diopside

005

002

0020020020 1 30 0 10050 0 1005

KIM Count

1.0 to 2.0 mm

GP GO DC IM CR FO

000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

0.5 to 1.0mm

GP GO DC IM CR FO

000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

0.25 to 0.5 mm

GP GO DC IM en FO

000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Total KIMs

0000000000

U)

Table 7 - Heavy mineral concentrate weights and KIM abundances for the medium (0.25-0.5 mm), coarse (0.5-1.0 mm) and very coarse (1.0-2.0 mm) sand fractions of the till and gravel samples front the satellite claims. GP = purple Cr-pyrope garnet; GO = orange CR-poor pyrope or eclogitic pyrope-almandine garnet; DC - Cr-diopside; IM = Mg-ilmenite; CR zr chromite and FO = forsterite olivine.

-35-

Sample No. Heavy Mineral Assemblage

WLAP-02-17-01 WLAP-02-17-02 WLAP-02- 17-03 WLAP-02-18-01 WLAP-02- 18-02 WLAP-02- 18-03 WLAP-02- 18-04 WLAP-02- 18-05 WLAP-02- 18-06 WLAP-02-18-07

Almandine-hornblende/diopside-epidote assemblage. Almandine-hornblende/diopside-epidote assemblage. Almandine-hornblende/diopside-epidote assemblage. Almandine-hornblende/diopside-epidote assemblage. Almandine-hornblende/diopside-epidote assemblage. Almandine-hornblende/diopside-epidote assemblage. Hornblende-almandine/diopside-epidote assemblage. Augite-hornblende/epidote-diopside assemblage. Almandine-hornblende-augite/epidote-diopside assemblage. Almandine-hornblende-augite/epidote-diopside assemblage.

Table 8 - Major nonferromagnetic heavy minerals present in the till and gravel samples from the satellite claims. The assemblage almandine-homblende/diopside-epidote indicates that only four major minerals are present, with almandine exceeding hornblende in the paramagnetic (O.8 amp) fraction and diopside exceeding epidote in the nonparamagnetic (M.O amp) fraction. Only the pale green, white and orange varieties of epidote are nonparamagnetic; common pistachio-green epidote reports to the neutral (0.8-1.0 amp) fraction and is not included in the mineral assemblage.

-36-

SAMPLE

WLAP-02 02-01WLAP-02 02-02WLAP-02 02-03WLAP-02 02-04WLAP-02 03-01WLAP-02 03-02WLAP-02 03-03WLAP-02 04-01WLAP-02 04-02WLAP-02 04-02WLAP-02 04-03WLAP-02 04-04WLAP-02 04-05WLAP-02 05-01WLAP-02 05-03WLAP-02 05-05WLAP-02 05-07WLAP-02 05-09WLAP-02 05-11WLAP-02 05-1 3WLAP-02 05-1 5WLAP-02 05-1 6WLAP-02 05-1 7WLAP-02 05-1 7WLAP-02 05-1 8WLAP-02 05-1 9WLAP-02 05-20WLAP-02 05-21WLAP-02 06-01WLAP-02 06-02WLAP-02 06-03WLAP-02 06-04WLAP-02 06-05WLAP-02 06-06WLAP-02 06-07WLAP-02 08-01WLAP-02 08-02WLAP-02 08-03WLAP-02 08-03WLAP-02 08-04WLAP-02 08-05WLAP-02 08-06WLAP-02 08-07WLAP-02 08-08WLAP-02 09-01WLAP-02 09-03WLAP-02 09-05WLAP-02 09-07WLAP-02 09-09

INA Mass

(g)62.654.517.315.621.621.720.2

8.326.8

(Rerun)25.317.420.021.844.833.320.726.126.729.943.230.524.1

(Rerun)21.729.935.0

9.636.345.836.840.627.931.941.639.632.918.8

(Rerun)40.339.841.040.235.828.436.048.431.641.3

Au As Ag Cd Cu Mn Mo Nl Pb Zn ppb ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm

-51389

72377

125606

-560

30952

3125

38690

12943

446103649

263

4572-5-5

84430

288252

110030

10601252444

2256487248-5-580-512

795915274243203118

1642302816152514138

102250

8015203913201420179

1822

618

13-29

-1141210111211

-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.20.3

-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.20.7

-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2

-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5

33671041899389

106101115

14664674433751

126343335505150

1054252

123232935196827132921393033201553417640392530

132201267161

81125193189208229258328343268

545784

10212817224224827627826419259987096

140191271341362356284208

6588

114157237347458425404411229

7346-2-2-22

-2245623

-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-22

-2-23

-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2

6234

932

10689526916161661

15336342431422618203144515364388822313028

14824172416181617191622244524251917

187

1512151614161321141721181312251920141716171515121627101113142126212017181010111516191717232414

1323

1823224526

324

2656

61624168857

20172611203937

81323

5117578638

125

1789

12566

S"/o

27.08619.3320.3561.9072.4804.1431.2822.9202.2852.7802.6882.8686.7341.6381.0340.8921.2931.6640.8210.6310.7461.1872.1802.4852.9621.5291.2163.7880.8011.3751.9521.0502.7490.8390.5270.8380.5630.8180.6090.5840.6640.5250.8221.0181.5290.7320.7600.5970.705

Table 9 - Geochemical analyses for the -2.0 mm nonferromagnetic heavy mineral fraction of the till samples from the main claim block. The samples were analyzed by Actlabs Limited, Ancaster, Ontario. Samples from the satellite claims were not analyzed. Page l of 2).

-37-

SAMPLE

WLAP-02 09-11WLAP-0209-13WLAP-02 09-1 5WLAP-02 09-1 6WLAP-02 09-1 7WLAP-02 09-1 8WLAP-02 09-1 9WLAP-02 09-20WLAP-02 10-01WLAP-02 10-03WLAP-02 10-05WLAP-02 10-07WLAP-02 10-08WLAP-02 10-08WLAP-02 10-09WLAP-02 10-10WLAP-02 10-11WLAP-02 11 -01WLAP-02 12-01WLAP-02 12-03WLAP-02 12-05WLAP-02 12-07WLAP-02 12-09WLAP-02 12-10WLAP-02 12-11WLAP-02 12-12WLAP-02 12-13WLAP-02 12-1 4WLAP-02 12-1 4WLAP-02 13-01WLAP-02 13-02WLAP-02 14-01WLAP-02 14-02WLAP-02 15-01WLAP-02 15-02WLAP-02 15-03WLAP-02 15-04WLAP-02 15-05WLAP-02 16-01WLAP-02 16-02WLAP-02 16-03WLAP-02 16-04WLAP-02 16-04WLAP-02 16-05

INA Mass

(g)35.833.131.139.042.426.960.660.235.738.442.334.526.6

(Rerun)30.032.110.242.530.719.332.026.019.537.531.945.851.349.5

(Rerun)33.047.136.535.137.635.945.142.562.641.731.337.062.6

(Rerun)56.5

Au As Ag ppb ppm ppm

41186180118

3039

10507849408079

954

68-564-515-5

40762-58

46325243

10136

141970

1491765-5-550

210858

-5

270

116

199

14128

-22217121316

141416-212-26

12-271

160113050

2624101122161217-217183918

14

-0.25.5

-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2-0.2

Cd ppm

-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.52.0

-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.5

Cu Mn Mo Ni Pb Zn ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm

211828132852591944503927

36879592725

329151325253954

10137454552554921462728

241513459

158304646

264217216182166150114826462

19223828523920921319115596655965

236271305301310317287225196110

81280393398377325374402319329236195

-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-225-282

-24

-2-2-2-2-26

-2-2-2-24

-2-2-2-2

1727181718223918212119193032221839

92322181718356133353629252230274735376031384570474347

1316181616151611109

1821221716162714139

209

13181617171919161513101315211618161923241818

65

1655

1216

4146

121111186

1229-1146

31539

173123241234

91114126864

453

2719

115

S"/o

0.5600.6950.6940.5600.5171.1221.3460.3930.8520.7560.7200.7331.1621.2500.8350.6881.7070.4790.7590.5860.4950.6310.647

16.1041.4511.2601.4381.3861.2731.1161.3100.9590.8661.7751.4790.9971.3290.5671.6792.4097.4491.6591.7761.430

Table 9 - Geochemical analyses for the -2.0 mm nonferromagnetic heavy mineral fraction of the till samples from the main claim block. The samples were analyzed by Actlabs Limited, Ancaster, Ontario. Samples from the satellite claims were not analyzed. Page 2 of 2).

-38-

5. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The reverse circulation drill holes on the main claim block of the West Lake Abitibi Property were targeted on the contact between the Scapa turbidites and Stoughton - Rocquemaure komatiites based on the assumptions that l) this overburden-covered contact is further north than previously thought and thus is virtually unexplored, and 2) the contact represents the western extension of the gold-fertile Lake Abitibi Deformation Zone. The drilling has verified the northerly location of the contact but has also demonstrated that the contact is unsheared, unaltered and unmineralized and therefore is probably a normal, conformable contact. Furthermore, the till overlying the contact contains only background levels of gold grains and its heavy mineral fraction, although locally enriched in pyrite, is not anomalous in gold or any of the usual gold-associated metals. Therefore no further exploration is warranted along or up-ice (north) of the contact. However, the Lake Abitibi Deformation Zone could alternatively follow a formational conductor within the komatiites on the southern edge of the property as originally proposed by Pyke et al. (1972). This regional-scale conductive zone resembles the one associated with the structurally incompetent graphitic mudstones that host the productive Casa Berardi Fault in Quebec (Pattison et al. 1986). The deformation/alteration zone at Casa Berardi is up to l km wide and is flanked by additional, outlying shear zones. Therefore the Lake Abitibi Deformation Zone, if it is indeed present on the West Lake Abitibi Property, should be of a sufficient scale to have been intersected during diamond drilling programs previously conducted in the area. It is recommended that all available diamond drill hole logs be scrutinized for evidence of the deformation zone and associated mineralization before contemplating any further gold exploration on the property.

The two reverse circulation drill holes on the northern satellite claims were targeted on kimberlite- compatible aeromagnetic anomalies. The drilling has shown that the western anomaly is caused by weakly magnetic pyroxenite. Nonmagnetic cherty sediments interleaved with mafic volcanics were intersected at the eastern anomaly but the drill hole was not centered on the anomaly. Therefore the anomaly is unexplained. It could be caused by a magnetite-bearing facies of the chert or mafic volcanics or by a second, smaller pyroxenite intrusion but it is definitely not due to kimberlite as no KIMs were obtained from the till and gravel overlying either magnetic anomaly. Kimberlite pipes normally occur in clusters or "fields" that produce major, regional-scale KIM dispersal plumes in the till. Therefore the total absence of KIMs at the targeted anomalies not only condemns these two anomalies but also all others for many kilometres up-ice. Consequently no kimberlite exploration is warranted on the other, untested satellite claim blocks of the West Lake Abitibi Property.

-39-

The only positive result of the reverse circulation drilling is the discovery of disseminated chalcopyrite mineralization in the cherty exhalites of Hole 18. The mineralization is very weak (only 200-300 ppm Cu) but the ratio of chalcopyrite to pyrite is appealing (1:10) and could signal proximity to economically significant volcanogenic massive sulphide mineralization. Although the area is thought to be underlain by monotonous Scapa turbidites, the overburden cover is so thick that the geology is essentially unknown. Felsic volcanics could be present and short, weak airborne electromagnetic anomalies occur several hundred metres to the north and south (Fig. 5). If found to be undrilled, these anomalies should be ground checked as potential volcanogenic massive sulphide targets.

-40-

6. Certificate - Stuart A. Averill

I, Stuart A. Averill, residing at 192 Powell Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario hereby certify as follows:

That I attended the University of Manitoba at Winnipeg, Manitoba and graduated with a B.Se. (Rons.) in

Geology in 1969;

That I have worked continuously in the field of mining exploration geology since 1971;

That I am President and principal owner of Overburden Drilling Management Limited, 107-15 Capella

Court, Nepean, Ontario, an independent geological consulting company that I founded in 1974;

That I am a Fellow of the Geological Association of Canada and a Member of the Association of

Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of Newfoundland;

That this technical report is based on data gathered on the subject property by Donald Holmes, a

geologist employed for 17 years by Overburden Drilling Management Limited;

That I personally interpreted the data;

That I directly and indirectly hold 110,000 and 70,000 share purchase warrants of Boulder Mining

Corporation.

"Stuart A. Averill"

Stuart A. Averill, B.Sc. (Mons.)

Dated at Ottawa, Ontario this 5 th day of June, 2002

-41 -

7. REFERENCES

Averill, S.A.2001: The Application of Heavy Indicator Mineralogy in Mineral Exploration with

Emphasis on Base Metal Indicators in Glaciated Metamorphic and Plutonic Terrains; in: Drift Exploration in Glaciated Terrain (Mcclenaghan, M. B., Bobrowsky, P. T., Hall, G. E. M. SL Cook, S. J., eds.), Geological Society, London, Special Publication No. 185, pp. 69-81.

Averill, S.A.,Mcclenaghan, M.B. ;1994: Distribution and Character of Kimberlite Indicator Minerals in Glacial Sediments, C14

and Diamond Lake Kimberlite Pipes, Kirkland Lake, Ontario; Geological Survey ofCanada, Open File 2819,48 p.

Ayer, J.A., i Berger, B.R., Trowell, N.F.1999: Geological Compilation of the Lake Abitibi Area, Abitibi Greenstone Belt; Ontario

Geological Survey, Map P.3398, scale 1:100 000.

Ferguson, S.A.,Freeman, E.B.1978: Milligan Township Float Train No. l - Au; in: Ontario Occurrences of Float, Placer Gold

and Other Heavy Minerals; Ontario Geological Survey, Mineral Deposits Circular 17, p.65.

Jackson, S.L.,Fyon, J.A.1991: The Western Abitibi Subprovince in Ontario; in: Geology of Ontario (P.C. Thurston,

H.R. Williams, R.H. Sutcliffe and G.M. Stott, eds.), Ontario Geological Survey, SpecialVolume 4, Part l, p. 405-484.

Ontario Geological Survey1989a: Airborne Electromagnetic and Total Intensity Survey, Detour - Burntbush - Abitibi Area,

Marathon, Bowyer, Moody, Galna, Kerrs Townships, District of Cochrane, Ontario; by Geoterrex Limited for the Ontario Geological Survey, Geophysical/Geochemical Series, Map 81243, scale 1:20,000.

1989b: Airborne Electromagnetic and Total Intensity Survey, Detour - Burntbush - Abitibi Area, Findlay, Henley, Marathon, Bowyer Townships, District of Cochrane, Ontario; by Geoterrex Limited for the Ontario Geological Survey, Geophysical/Geochemical Series, Map 81233, scale 1:20,000.

-42-

Osmani, LA,1991: Proterozoic Mafic Dyke Swarms in the Superior Province of Ontario; in: Geology of

Ontario (P.C. Thurston, H.R. Williams, R.H. Sutcliffe and G.M. Stott, eds.), OntarioGeological Survey, Special Volume 4, Part l, p. 661-681.

Pattison, E.F.,Sauerbrei, J.A.,Hannila, J.J.,Church, J.F.1986: Gold Mineralization in the Casa-Berardi Area, Quebec, Canada; Proceedings of Gold

'86 an International Symposium on the Geology of Gold: Toronto 1986, A.J.MacDonald (ed.), pp. 170-183.

Pyke, D.R., Ayres, L.D., Innes, D.G.1972: Geological Compilation Series: Timmins-Kirkland Lake, Cochrane, Sudbury and

Timiskaming Districts; Ontario Division of Mines, Map 2205, scale 1:253,440.

Sage, R.P.1996: Kimberlites of the Lake Timiskaming Structural Zone; Ontario Geological Survey, Open

File Report 5937, 435 p.

Thurston, P.C.1991: Geology of Ontario: Introduction; in: Geology of Ontario (P.C. Thurston, H.R. Williams,

R.H. Sutcliffe and G.M. Stott, eds.), Ontario Geological Survey, Special Volume 4, Partl, p. 3-25.

Appendix A

Reverse Circulation Drill Hole Logs

n -rp

OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT LIMITED REVERSE CIRCULATION DRILL HOLE LOG

HOLE NO WLAP-oi-ol LOCATION S'TE f L

GEOLOGIST H*L" e * DRILLER G.'WZ**- B | T NO..

SHIFT HOURS______TO -————

TOTAL HOURS

CONTRACT HOURS

MOVE TO HOLE r-V. npni f**-- "

npn i ER o."iys - 8 -— - ' 2 "-f /*

B(T

. 7-

MECHANICAL DOWN TIME .

DRILLING PROBLEMS OTHER"" **~^— e

MOVE TO MCXT HOLE tr*-**f .- ?vio /"r?

B'"TJ

f A G. E i

DEPTH IN

METRES APH LOG DESCRIPTIVE LOG

/\ A

A .

8-

9-

10-

13

14-

15-

w-i

17-

18

lao4

O - I-O

l, o-3i.o

S 'f "f"

c ley "-J Si/*'

.j.^-."^ -~ -

Arx^^KTi'J - oj /S"-*-


DATE 20:25-

SHIFT HOURS _____ TO

HOLE NOGEOLOGIST ——

MOVE TO HOLE .

DRILL ——————

LOCATIONDRILLER . . BIT NO.

.ELEVATION.BIT FOOTAGE .

TOTAL HOURS

CONTRACT HOURS

MECHANICAL DOWN TIME ,

DRILLING PROBLEMS ——

OTHER ———..—————-——

MOVE TO NEXT HOLE .

ZZ< enDESCRIPTIVE LOG

1B-

l 1 -:

3s-

A i

3*-.

39 A. 0

oA

EC. rt

i*1*: 02

:os

HI

s '"fi.

- 7

li."

.rfc/ j*. •5'"LL ? eft* .r-?'

r,y —— t


r , .HATF ' fB***A^y ^T pf) *~

SHIFT HOURSTO

TOTAL HOURS

CONTRACT HOURS

nni F NO UJ L A r- "i -02- mrATinw s.re*-t-RpninRiRT tfix-n#S ^ npru PB *Z~ot*yeA8- BIT Mn V^

Mnup m nni Fnnni Tl-J^'/o-.ô^/*,

DRII 1 INR PRORI FMS

OTHFP 1r*~c* 7;**-7:*.tS\

MflVF TD NEXT HHL.E

FI FVATION•^•i P |T pnnTAfic o-Vo.3

^/iw/W

DEPTH IN

METRESGRAPHIC

LOG MP NO.DESCRIPTIVE LOG

13

15

18-

u*/ ^ *— * ^

5- —— J y ^f.O-

; 7.0 -29. 5 ^rCjt^y

f.ft


DATE Fit HOLE N0 LOCATION .DRILLER , . BIT NO..

.ELEVATION. BIT FOOTAGE .

SHIFT HOURS______TO ———-

MOVE TO HOLE .


TOTAL HOURS

CONTRACT HOURS


DRILLING PROBLEMS ——-

OTHER -——————..———

MOVE TO NEXT HOLE .

DE I MEMP NO.

DESCRIPTIVE LOG

71-

73-

24-

27-

19 ~

94-

A

? 8-

31-0-31.03t*-?2.-

TILL

for, i

f-o — J

""X * 1-to f

•iftt fl""1 ''"* 4 ]i )!-~**t~*-

tr. /.——— ''

37.0 -"/0.3'tt


DATE ~A* 206Z-

SHIFT HOURS______TO ————.

TOTAL HOURS

CONTRACT HOURS

GEOLOGIST ""'

MOVE TO HOLE .

DRILL ———————

DR1LLER


DRILLING PROBLEMS ——.

OTHER ———————-.—

MOVE TO NEXT HOLE .

BIT NOELEVATION —.— BIT FOOTAGE ^ r-

//'jo -

DE I MEAMP NO.

DESCRIPTIVE LOO

A AA 0-/.0

10

13

19

l.o -/•.it," (f*y f -if -t

'"" Vftr


PATF FiVUfAf-^ôfT,

SHIFT HOURS Tn

TOTAL HOURS

CONTRACT HOURS

HOI F Kin wuir-oz-of, LOCATIONrscninRiRT ,, ,, ,, ,, . . nml i fa

MOVF TO HOI F ,

MECHANICAL DOWH TIME ,

nml 1 IIMR PRORI FMB , , ...||| ,. I|

OTHER

El PVATION

BIT wn ... PIT cnnTAnc

MOVE TO NEXT HOLE.

DEPTH IN

METRES GRAPHI LOG MP NO.

DESCRIPTIVE LOG

21-

22-

23

•24-

75-

Zfi-

tJ-

Z.9-

30-

•33- fi 4'r

/A

y-V

31-0-36.8

-l-ZI'-J i*-Wtr-

/.. A-•55.^ tj

•5 f.e" ^

. ff- 3ff".o

If.L

36.0


HOLE NO ^^f'02.' 0H LOCATION 5/T2 oV_______ ELEVATION.—————- GEOLOGIST Hv-ne-5 DRILLER jA***yz*6- BIT Mn lzy/65 BIT FOOTAGE ê- 5 •' 1 'r-^

SHIFT HOURS______TO ————.

MOVE TO HOLE .

DRILL ———————

1VV?5S ^ - H7.5JJ:.~- Fe&t-t

TOTAL HOURS

CONTRACT HOURS

MECHANICAL DOWN TIME

DRILLING PROBLEMS —— OTHER Fe&.Zl

MOVE TO NEXT HOLE .

li DESCRIPTIVE LOG

18

O -l- 0

/.o . 21-0 cji


HATP fowW/Zlftnc.

SHIFT HOURSTO

t MOI F NH ^^^0

RpninniRT

MOVF TO HOI F ..,,...

nnin

^•^7 inCATinN. nnn i PR PIT un ...

EI FVATIONBIT FnnTARC

TOTAL HOURS

CONTRACT HOURS


DRILLING PROBLEMS ———

OTHER .^^————-———

MOVE TO NEXT HOLE .

0 Sli

MPLE NO.

DESCRIPTIVE LOG

21

2*-.

23-

•aH

27-

26-

Z.9

30-

rt"^* 7fa.

LAyztEb

-fJ d*?-

f-'

y,. /^,. Fef—A

3*z-*'-*lne*\-i

y "7


OATF fÂ^^^yô0

SHIFT HOURS tn

HOI F NO W^r-^Z-

r.fnt nrsiRT .,. ,

uni/F m nni F ^

ppn i

"^ LOCATION

. poi| i PP , . ,, PIT un

FI FVATION

PIT conTArsc

TOTAL HOURS

CONTRACT HOURS



OTHER ———^^.—^^—.

MOVE TO NEXT HOLE .

DEPTH IN

METRES GRAPHI LOG DESCRIPTIVE LOG

V4 -A-'.

13-

17—

18-

18 "

20^

~-yx*-aA*y . o.S~ w-r

-V

rv./.- A. fr.f-

W.o-

ftmr

17.5


DATE

SHIFT HOURS______TO —————

TOTAL HOURS

CONTRACT HOURS

HOLE NO LOCATION ELEVATION

MOVE TO HOLE .DRILL ———^——



OTHER _____________i

MOVE TO NEXT HOLE .

iaujUJ ujo z

ia.z\

GRAPHI LOG DESCRIPTIVE LOG

A //l

/\ S

i'!

-A(J

A " 'o^

12-

13-

'-&- 0

•A : 0 7

o A

20^ A

o-l.o

fti"l j

ra L

''~d

VÂ t/-- /-


PlflTF fGifHMflfy

SHIFT HOURSTO

t nni p NO WUtr.r.cninftisT

MOVE TO HOI F ...,ntji(l

07 -f o inr-ATinwnnn i CD BIT wn

EIFVATinivl

RIT FnnTARC

TOTAL HOURS

CONTRACT HOURS



OTHER ——————————.

MOVE TO NEXT HOLE .


riATP kte**f-f i*200

SHIFT HOURS———— TO ____ —

TOTAL HOURS

^ nni F wn UfUtr-oi- "? , nr.ATiowrscninniRT ,, , , , , ... nnii i en

unup TO uni F

nnii i

MECHANICAL DOWN TIME . . ,.

FI F VAT ION

"'T NO , , . PIT Frv-iTirtC

CONTRACT HOURSDRILLING PROBLEMS

OTHER ,^——————

MOVE TO NEXT HOLE.

//K e 3DEPTH

IN METREGRAPHIC

LOG DESCRIPTIVE LOG

r-

/ . /~-

VB-

J3

zi•zz.

y*-JS-

Je-j

P-.

P-.

"j: ' t r' ' -.'ll-/ otc-~l*'~rX T *** '"- '

*y

iljfit iJoLC^tlC

5-3.0 E *

DATE fefl^tfg


HOLE NO MLAP-ot-o6 LOCATION s TE *l_______. ELEVATION.DRILLER . . BIT

SHIFT HOURS______TO ————-

MOVE TO HOLE

TOTAL HOURS

CONTRACT HOURS


DRILLING PROBLEMS

OTHER ____" -7:00- i?'--v

MOVE TO NEXT HOLE

IT f Ac.

UJo

in

li01

DESCRIPTIVE LOG

18

19

20-

•tzr

- 2 J o '^""

c* r-y S


nATF ft.St***1-* 20"

SHIFT HOURSTO

nni F ND wt-W-npni onisT

nRFii

"2 '" fo .oCATinw. nml i en BIT NO ..

ELEVATIONPIT FnnT40F

TOTAL HOURS

CONTRACT HOURS


DRILLING PROBLEMS ——

OTHER -———————^——

MOVE TO NEXT HOLE .


DATE;SHIFT HOURS____TO,———

HOLE. NOGEOLOGIST __Z

MOVE TO HOLE


inCATIONDRILLER BIT NO.

ELEVATIONBIT FOOTAGE

8"o An- t/-. i^

TOTAL HOURS

CONTRACT HOURS


DRILLING PROBLEMS

OTHER —

MOVE TO NEXT HOLE .

DEPTH IN

METRESDESCRIPTIVE LOG

3-

10

16-

17-

18-

19 ~

20^

r ' T

.s- ?

-ê*

— ff


DATP 6*M*V2720 0 *-

SHIFT HOURSTO

TOTAL HOURS

CONTRACT HOURS

nni p NO WLAP- "Z.- OK IDEATION S'T/s Y FI PVATIONrjpninRisT HoL.1t* : npu i CH ôobYK+fi- R1T Mn /W7V PIT cnnrinp ?6.S-lo8-c

Mnyp TO HOI c lT'%0- l2:ff"12-.—— t*** f*

MFCHANICAt DOWN TIME

nnni ING pRnm FMSOTHFR

MOUF TONFXTHOIE,. t) :1O - 5'oofn

DEPTH IN

METRESP O.

DESCRIPTIVE LOG

*A,

10

13

15-

16-

-.07.

20-

T

'.#- -Zt-8 r /^ L


nATP^T'*7 2oO

SHIFT HOURSTO

TOTAL HOURS

, M™ F wn ^^•"-oPmcATinuRcmnrsiRT , nnn i FB

unvp -rn uni P

PIRN r

MFCHANICAL HOWN TIMF ,

FI PVATIONKIT wn PIT FnnTARF

CONTRACT HOURSDRILLING PROBLEMS

OTHER -——.————..

MOVE TO NEXT HOLE .

DESCRIPTIVE LOG

"\

: "7

?1 -

/:

/ :

•?4 -

?8-

cJe-rl-

.,/ A

ji.S


SHIFT HOURS______ TO -———

TOTAL HOURS

CONTRACT HOURS

DRILL


DRILLING PROBLEMS

OTHER - 7.7 tr~^re,*"-7:t*pSi fe^t-H C "3*-

MDUF TO NEKT HDLE

HI UJD 2

GBAPHI LOG DESCRIPTIVE LOG

A. A

10

15-

16-

18-

19-

20-

t

O'fi'/

-

O-O.5 le.*

0.3-13.0

•f. .-H.*

l-S.o-SS.5 TtU-

Y* t f—'ir. *

7*7, 5 aA -r

'


DATE

SHIFT HOURS

HOLE NOGEOLOGIST ———

MOVE TO HOLE .

DRILL —-,—-—



TOTAL HOURS

CONTRACT HOURS


DRILLING PROBLEMS —-—.

OTHER --—.————.-..—

MOVE TO NEXT HOLE .

DE I MEMP NO.

DESCRIPTIVE LOG

a-

2J-

Z4-

26-

•9-j

79-

Xy

f ^ \\X0?

"7

-^7

-.Ay-i07

- lo

)8-

fiS

- Z f- 5 ; ne~~-'f*

•SZ.J.-32-* ô

, / 60 l t,*(c*~"


SHIFT HOURS-————-TO —————

TOTAL HOURS

HOLE NOGEOLOGIST ——-

MOVE TO HOLE .

DRILL ———^——

LOCATIONDRILLER . . BIT NO. .


CONTRACT HOURS


DRILLING PROBLEMS ————

OTHER —————-.———.

MOVE TO NEXT HOLE .

DEPTH IN

METRESDESCRIPTIVE LOG

A -o' Z

i 1/

Y'-jV 6 -:

1*-.

V-.

i A*'

A ;

fO-A •o

P-

6v

o-S

55-5- /w MM

/x; -


HOLE NO tOCATlON .ELEVATION.DA E——————— — fjcninmsT S/vLlfS nan i FB tZw*yE##- n \r un l iV iff g HIT FnnyarsF '

SHIFT HOURS MOVE TO HAI c Feî-S /;3^-Z""XV7_______________________TO

TOTAL HOURS

CONTRACT HOURS

DRILL _


DRILLING PROBLEMS

OTHER .

—^—^——————.——ip ~7:u*- e-y* /f/t

MOVE TO NEXT HOLE

DE I ME

SAMPLE NO.

DESCRIPTIVE LOG

10

13

1S

18-

20-^ '*7

- 15.6if*ry f^ff iw^-'jpfirf' fir* yc^JL (^**

is.i- w-t TtLL


p/vjF """* 'wni F NO ^L/tf-o^- 10 , nr. ATinN

20"^ ricroinnicT noil i CD PIT wn

ELEVAPIT pnr

TIONiTAnp

SHIFT HOURS unuprnunic

TO npin

TDTAI HOURS MFCHANICAL DOWN TIME

—————— nmii iNfi PRORIFMR

CONTRAHT HOURS rvmFR

. . MnVF TO NEXT HOLE

fA&E Z.

W~\u

0 s'.

71-

•22 -j

•23-

•J j ^

-

- 1

7.5-

Z6-

i

^^

j

^"i^2-

v-^4-

7

7e~

? 7-

je-

J9-

^

(J ^

iE m So 5

A"

KSA 'f ^t'A /

4 m- f

** f

o A/

A ' " S

"^

AO ^X

" *b ^

^

^,J' A

*.rc^"" - Â'.' ''o K

A-?'o ^

*VA

UJ.J

<CO

- r

If-^ "

'l1 - >t ,ft -

-

foV

l 05:r^5-r:Lt~-/-t -' -/~ 07

i-^'7

\|

DESCRIPTIVE LOG

yi.o-jf.^^^Mf. c&.t.teit/ *J **@(

cJt&zT f**^^*fr*f' Gfr**.**- 1 ™

bc* t^L^Kt^

-*,z.?-~ "J 1-0 AV/: K^r.'x it cJ+ftftf*"s f. v^ c^--*^ y -^//Tj-*t^C^t^f 6f* ytle^^cs/ô^^

' t-ff'fff 1r"~'

- arc*J**jfy ^"'-ySS' ™*

7*t "A , jj oft ljfr'*~*'

fi


DATE on ,r 20.1J-

SHIFT HOURS

TOTAL HOURS


MOVE TO HOLE .

DRILL———————

LOCATIONDRILLER . . BIT NO..


CONTRACT HOURS



OTHER ————————————

MOVE TO NEXT HOLE .

DE I MEGRAPH LOG SAMP NO.

DESCRIPTIVE LOG

•H

fi f-

16-

6V.

{D

12-

13-

14-

16-

16-^

17-

18-]

19-j

20-^

J**/

ye-0

11: —— *

z-*f?''


r,ATC DATEHOLE N0

-0 2-11

SHIFT HOURS

TOTAL HOURS

TO

DRILLER t""

2--V- t:"^ fi. BIT

ELEVATIONBIT

CONTRACT HOURS

DRILL ——™-—-—————



OTHER —————.——-—. f : o- . 7; J

TO NFXT HOLE

S AC, Z

DE I ME

GRAPHIC LOG DESCRIPTIVE LOG

AA

A *.

13-

14-

15-

16H

Av-

.M

'- /2-?

•try

.-y

"'

2 y- -y


DATE.

SHIFT HOURS______TO _____

HOLE NOGEOLOGIST ,,

MOVE TO HOLE .


- liLOCATION

DRILLER , . BIT NO..


TOTAL HOURS

CONTRACT HOURS



OTHER ———..—.—^——.

MOVE TO NEXT HOLE .


DATEL 20±Z- HOLE N0 t"Lfff"ai ~ L2~ LOCATION Ssre 8

DRILLER

_____ ELEVATION. BIT MO /7V?7 g B | T

SHIFT HOURS______TO ————

TO HOLE .- V.'ou //"l

TOTAL HOURS

CONTRACT HOURS



OTHER ___i

TO NEXT HOLE ,

B t T

x UJ

"•dlzw

DESCRIPTIVE LOG

3-T-

i 'A

17-^

18-H

19 H

2(H

*

e-5

5 .5- 12-So. S -2-

2.0- 12.

•h.

/r. A

•/r- fe f


DATE 200-

SHIFT HOURS———TO ————TOTAL HOURS

HOLE NOGEOLOGIST ——

MOVE TO HOLE .

DRILL ———————

LOCATIONDRILLER . . BIT NO.,


CONTRACT HOURS



OTHER -———-———————

MOVE TO NEXT HOLE .

DE I ME

O

O

DESCRIPTIVE LOG

/**

12-

TA-

2.zs-

2.9-

J2-

33-

^ 07

: fts

7-

je-

39

•H

I'll', a.*,

?. f

39-

A- " ^ -

r"'"^,?Y

DATE


HOLE NO WLAf-oZ- 12- LOCATION _______________ ELEVATION.

GEOLOGIST__________ DRILLER _________BIT NO.——————— BIT FOOTAGE.

SHIFT HOURS______ TO ———

MOVE TO HOLE ,

DRILL ———————

TOTAL HOURS

CONTRACT HOURS



OTHER ——————————

MOVE TO NEXT HOLE .

DE I ME

GRAPHIC LOG

SAMPLE NO.

DESCRIPTIVE LOG

1 7-7- 4Z-1 W/:

jo 30}

t*-.

1S ~.

Y 8 -

rV8 -

i*-

K.o.K-7

Jtf

i'/

41.0.M-7 ^.7-15.0

y s- t r-* i ^.'M//~f

I- 5

ft.j* 511-52:

*7~.}B-

59 ~.

^

sz.i ^"/-'


DATE

SHIFT HOURS______TO.^———

GEOLOGIST .

MOVE TO HOLE .

DRILL ———————

inr.ATinN 5 /^DRILLER B | T NO

ELEVATION.7 B1T FOOTAGE O

O

TOTAL HOURS

CONTRACT HOURS


DRILLING PROBLEMS

OTHER -30-MOVE TO NEXT HOLE .

2

DE I ME

GRAPHIC LOG DESCRIPTIVE LOG

A A

8-

9-

10-]

11 —

12-

13-

18

O - o-S

6.5'H-O ffblSl6*Tf

TILL.

e^t^w^ c*"*fc ' i

r- J \,^-L±A*tt~*-AS So A "al "^' ; /^

fO Jt/

V

v^-;r-7; t/./r-


DATE 20 oZ-

SHIFT HOURS_____TO ————

TOTAL HOURS

HOLE NO r; mi nn 1ST

MOVE TO HOLE .

DRILL —————.

' LOCATIONDRILLER . . BIT NO.


CONTRACT HOURS

MECHANICAL DOWN TIME , DRILLING PROBLEMS ———

OTHER ———^——.———.MOVE TO NEXT HOLE .

/'AC, f- Z

DE I ME

GRAPHIC LOG

SAMPLE NO.

DESCRIPTIVE LOG

1A-

\014-

•u-

of,

3H

..o A A '-PI

V

f:

-A

JS.(,


HOLE NO WLM-*t- i j LOCATION M. **s *f-tftrS-l* F , FVATlnNDA

SH

TF y litLL-K i,i. 20^^ ' -; r . J. . ' ' — ^ . . ..

IFT HOURSTO

TOTAL HOURS

npniOfiiRT /r-'-'/c.-' nnn i PR v.'*J^*'*A BIT kin ' iV'rfcS BIT FOCTTARP ^7-0- tf5--S"

nn,,, /^SU/i^J ^' — -•tio+frt rt~,^* &--ZO. ll-.a.frtl

MECHANICAL DOWN TIME. , .

nan L ING PRORI EMSCONTRACT HOURS OTHER /7-ii/J -/VaW i---f'o'Pn /3~*4f t,'-l* ' 6*J" A^

DEPTH IN

METRES

.

\-

2-

3-

4 -

5-

6-

7 —

8-

9-

10-

11 —

13-

14-

15-

16-

17-

18-

19

20-

o loSg0

/^ ^

y\

A

S\ A

—. — '*

-^ - ~- —. li"- 1 —. — i

j... — ~^. — - — "— —— "

— — — ' ' —

T

— — - —

^- — — ~

- ———

^ — — — — - -— - —— .— — — -^ —— .

^— — - — ' -— —— "

-— — —— ^-— —~

—

* .g' 'O '* * *

L

SAMPLE NO.

|~-

~r

'r

|-

^

UnUF TO NEXT HOLE ,,

DESCRIPTIVE LOG

xi . ? O OK.Ât^lC.%

^.^.o oxMMv&to'VHr*

Zj uL gfffi *-"**

^* * ^?T" " -T-//IfreSe******' /lc**t***~- ' '"'

1 A f. 2.0. t S^y mfJUi~- ^-K/ c-fff*-

s


DATE 2021r

SHIFT HOURS______ TO ,^——-


MOVE TO HOLE ,

DRILL J——————


.ELEVATION. BIT FOOTAGE.

TOTAL HOURS

CONTRACT HOURS



OTHER ————————^^.^—

MOVE TO NEXT HOLE .

DE I ME li DESCRIPTIVE LOG

Z1-

22-

Z3-

i*-

TS-

27-

16-

30-

11-

12-

13-

14-

15-

16-

17-

18-

f'"

.'i

o" h

0}

20. 0-1.5.0 TI Lk

: , —— /r.'

f, t f,


DA

Sh

TP tf/WC-rf V

IFT HOURSTO

TOTAL HOURS

- wniF NO wurr-oe.-i* , nr.ATinN ^/^ 17™ HIT MI-1 J ZVV85

"OVF Tn nn| p . . //-.w M'* *fl1

E LEVABIT FOC

TION

nnn i It -y f- y-"" 1

MECHANICAL OOWN TIME...,,,,

nmi i IMR pnnni FMRCONTRACT HOURS OTHFR ^~V f :}* - C.:*~M

DEPTH IN

METRES

1-

2-

-3-

1 —

6-

7-

8-

9-

10-

11 —

12—

13-

14—

15-

16—

17—

18-

19-

20-

GRAPHIC LOG

— — —— - •— - — —— — i—

f ————

.-a — —

*- —— - — - ^- — —" — '

, — — — ~—

rf —— "

—

—— ———

^ — — '

—— - ——

^^

. — — —— '

— — —— '

. —— — -~-— — —— - — —- —

— - —— —

^

u

SAMPLE NO.

r

'r

~

-

|-

-]-

J-

—

UOVF TO NFXT HDI F j?I w "- S-fOff^

M6.B l

DESCRIPTIVE LOG

o- 2&O oii&ujA/E sebtme-rt'TS

'


DATF HAltcJI 200*-

SHIFT HOURSTO

TOTAL HOURS

CONTRACT HOURS

HOI F NO IVLAr-oi-15 10CATION

unyp rn uni F

nni^ i

MPTHANirAI DOWN TIME

OTHFB

ELFVATION

PIT FnnT4RF

MOVE TO NEXT HOLE .

DE I ME

GRAPHI LOG

SAMPL NO.DESCRIPTIVE LOG

2 e.o- 35.

18^

•H!

A

?H

?H

0Z.

'-03;

,55.?- (L

j, 7.5


DA

SK

T c t]fiK.C*i^

IIFT HOURSTO

TOTAL HOURS

^ HDI F NO Wijf-ol- /b mr,ATinN S' re. J cnpni nnictT . Hoi^rtK-}^ npi| | po ^.f.-fr' 48- BIT Mr, f-'*'***

MOVF TO ""1 F -,..,..,, _ /Z--/V "7

E LEVABIT FO(

TiniM

- nnin /'.-o-' -~ Z-.vtfn

MECHANICAL DOWN TIME . ,,

DRIILIMG PHOBI FMS

CONTRACT HOURS ITTHFR -j-r*~*X 6. -go- r^.jn

DEPTH IN

METRES

1 —

2-

3-

4-

5-

6-

8-

9-

10—

11—.

13-

14-,

18-

16—

17-

18-

19-

20-

GRAPHIC LOG

A 1 1

A /\

l~ -.1 1 1— - — ' —— '

^ —. — 1 —— ™^. II II 1"

^. ' "1 ^-"— —— —— -"

, — - -^ -- — — '""—— - — -

—— — —

—1 ~~

- — n- 1 1"

Jl — —

1— " —

^ — —~

'•. -\

"it- -T

INTERVAL SAMPLE NO.

^

^~

r

.~

-;-

~-

MOVE TO NEXT HOLE -Z : "" ^ oo PH

W*e i

o- 1:2. Of.6*A*4iC.5 Cf**-**?)

^.î nrmuMsxsewetrs

-r**ct~f~~* t b*i'L* J '' **


SHIFT HOURS______TO —-.——.

HOLE NO

GEOLOGIST..——

MOVE TO HOLE .

DRILL ———————

LOCATIONDRILLER , . BIT NO..


TOTAL HOURS

CONTRACT HOURS



OTHER -^^——-—————.

MOVE TO NEXT HOLE .

DE I ME

GRAPHIC LOG SAMP NO.

DESCRIPTIVE LOG

7s-

ZB-

77-

r-

yi;M

-— /


; HOLE NO ^LAf-o2- /i LOCATION _______________ ELEVATION.GEOLOGIST__________ DRILLER__________BIT NO.________ BIT FOOTAGE.

SHIFT HOURS______TO ————

TOTAL HOURS

MOVE TO HOLE .

DRILL —————.

CONTRACT HOURS


DRILLING PROBLEMS ———.

OTHER ————.—-.———.

MOVE TO NEXT HOLE .


HOLE NO tiJAP- 02- i? LOCATION -f'™ /yww/ /H FI FX/ATinMDA

SH

TP 'MKCIfc./D

IFT HOURSTO

TOTAL HOURS

rtfninni^T //oi-^/JJ nni| i PR (Z-aS-y&Afc HIT NO. li'jH ^?, BIT FO(iTAr.P^-J-- /-f-Jc* ~- -^~S"- **

- nflnp rt~r*,{l, re:-' -X Z --•A? /7a/^< 7. 7:3., - //-v-ASJ /l*s*le 1 2'"" - ^-T* f"r\

MFCHANICAI DOWN TIMF .'lotet, i (Z:**-*S*J n~'~t7 ll:o*4n-* E^f r}*~{* C-t* ~ ir-H/ir,

nniniwR pnnniFMR By/fey p r.i^~* /-e^î/ ^r ei— j.--, he+J1,**/ **~tt ~~J*i-sw;v*(CONTRACT HOURS OTHFR 7voW 1~U. i /A,^ /rê//?*/-*^ 7 z/...*'* fs*~*fn~~*ti tt~o**s

DEPTH IN

METRES

2-

3-

4-

5-

6-

8-

9-

;10-

-11-

12—

K-

15—

16-

18-

19-

20-

GRAPHIC LOG

A ^\

A A A

A.*

^-^—^~

—— ——

.

— ——— f

————

— —— .

~

-j <

j

SAMPLE NO.

r

-

'~

~-

—

~

~

;

7

-

MnvF TO NEXT HOLE fft-t.9 -f-.tf - f :*O SK

O -79 O^G/^N '^S C/3*^* X

•7 c; 7 *7 c^TJ^'VAy 7^" ^"^ C^^BlN.'TS

- v&y T'~'^Ltjr^ i "*g* fiF*~y - b&ft^ Scx.*^

r*t*3T*rl*~y*G} Uw,?**) "2^.0 fc**


rmTFfl*"^.7S 200 Z-

SHIFT HOURSTO

HOI F NO W-W-0

Mi-"VF TO HOI f -,,...

nnii i

^1 ' inCATIOM EI FVATION

BIT FnnTar.c

TOTAL HOURS

CONTRACT HOURS



OTHER —————————^—

MOVE TO NEXT HOLE .

DE I ME

GRAPHI LOG DESCRIPTIVE LOG

19-

35-

y-

?9 -

yt. C-

DATE:


HOI F MO WUf-OT- l 7 l DCATIDN _________________ ELEVATION.

GEOLOGIST __________ DRILLER _________ BIT NO. ——————— BIT FOOTAGE .

SHIFT HOURS______TO_____

MOVE TO HOLE .

DRILL ——.——.

TOTAL HOURS

CONTRACT HOURS


DRILLING PROBLEMS ,

OTHER .——————————

MOVE TO NEXT HOLE.

Z O "5

SS-o Z-OH


8.1 20 oi."- —— —— ~

HOLE NO W-Af' OZ ~ ie LOCATION -S/r-g f,

SHIFT HOURS______TO —————

TOTAL HOURS

GEOLOGIST "'

MOVE TO HOLE

DRILL ———^——

DRILLER

g *

B , T BIT FOOTAGE er- "

-j: Jo

CONTRACT HOURS


DRILLING PROBLEMS -—

OTHER

MOVE TO NEXT HOLE

DE I MEAMP NO.

DESCRIPTIVE LOG

o- J.o

9-

ID-

11-

12.

13

14

15-

16~

17-

18-

19

-"

i.o- L.S

af f.'

Tit-L

f D


DATE 6.1 2011

SHIFT HOURS ______ TO -——

TOTAL HOURS

HOLE NO

GEOLOGIST ———

MOVE TO HOLE .

DRILL ———————

LOCATIONDRILLER BIT NO.


CONTRACT HOURS



OTHER ,^^——^———^——

MOVE TO NEXT HOLE .

2.

DEPTH IN METRE DESCRIPTIVE LOG

tz-

2.3-:

y-.

-/A

/A

19-

)4 ~:

7-i r~.

P/A'"Vi

7A

s

07

9—— ,.Z i'tl; C-/.J/ A '——*'0

^^.u

J37^.38 --o^.. #.5. ^~f

;5


DATE

SHIFT HOURS______ TO ^————

TOTAL HOURS

CONTRACT HOURS

HOLE NO GEOLOGIST ——

MOVE TO HOLE ,

DRILL _______

LOCATIONDRILLER , . BIT NO..




OTHER -———.-.-——-——

MOVE TO NEXT HOLE .

DEPTH IN

METRESQRAPHIC

LOG DESCRIPTIVE LOG

0?

Y2 -

Y3 -i

l4 --

^~:

l 8 -:og

os

XA

^^J

13-1

16H

18H

zoq

4o..t-vz.vtJ!:

u — .5,~M

e -W

Appendix B

Binocular Microscope Descriptions of the Bedrock Cuttings

Sample Number

WLAP-0202-05

03-04

04-06

05-22

06-08

Colour Structure Grain Size (mm)

Variable grey to Fine grained Primary: 0.05green with sedimentary with no Metacrysts: 0.1-ochre- visible bedding. 0.2weathered Strongly foliated,metacrysts and semi-schistose. lO'/owhite veinlets. white quartz

veinlets. Unsheared.

a)(80"7oof Fine to coarse- a) 0.05cuttings): grained sedimentary, b) 0.3-1.0Variably grey or Bedded. Stronglygreen. foliated, semi-b) (200Xo of schistose.cuttings): Pale Unsheared.grey-green.

Mottled dark Coarse magmatic. 0.7-1.0green and grey- Strongly foliated andwhite. weakly lineated.

Unsheared.

Variable grey to Fine-grained 0.05green. sedimentary with no

visible bedding.Strongly foliated,semi-schistose.Unsheared. Samplecontains 30'!âssorted pebblecontamination.

Dark green. Unquenched flow. 0.2-0.3Moderately foliated.Unsheared.

TextureSilicates

Silty. Variably spotted Feldspathic siltwith small biotite and/or with 30-50"7o fine-carbonate metacrysts. grained chlorite

(variably biotite)and D.5% biotitemetacrysts.

a) Silty. a) Feldspathic siltb) Medium to coarse with SO-50% greysandy. to green chlorite

and tracetourmaline.b) 10"Xo quartzsand grains, 70'!'oplagioclase +lithic sand grains,20"Xo greenchloritic matrix.

Equigranular 30Va actinoliteinterlocking. (mainly) +

chlorite, 69-700/.saussuritizcdplagioclase,3"Xo quartz.

Silty. Feldspathic siltwith SO-50% fine grained chlorite(variably sericite).

Equigranular 500Xo chloriteinterlocking. (mainly) -t-

actinolite,50"Xo saussuritizedplagioclase,< 1 "/o quartz.

MineralogyCarbonates Sulphides Other

Wa Fe/Mg carbonate, \Vt primary pyrite No FefTi oxides.metacrysts (mostly stringers andweathered to laminations.limonite).

a) Nil. a) Trace finely a) Trace leucoxene.b) Nil. disseminated b) Nil.

pyrite.b) Nil.

lOô evenly Trace finely Trace disseminateddisseminated calcite, disseminated ilmenite.

pyrite.

Nil. Nil. No Fem oxides

D.5% fracture-hosted Q.1% fracture- No FeATi oxides.calcite. hosted pyrite.

Name

Siltstone

a) Siltstoneb) Greywacke

Gabbro

Siltstone

Mafic volcanic

Sample Colour Number

Structure Grain Size (mm)

Texture Mineralogy NameSilicates Carbonates Sulphides Other

WLAP-0208-09 Grey-white, Coarse magmatic. Plagioclase Plagioclase-phyric with 1(W plagioclase 3"Xo disseminated

speckled green-Weakly foliated. phenoerysts: 1.5- equigranular interlocking phenocrysts. calcite.black Unsheared. 4 groundmass.

Groundmass: 0.5- 1

90% groundmass = 60"Xo saussuritized plagioclase, 300Xo quartz, 2"Xo chlorite (variably biotite), 5"Xo muscovite, 0. l Ve titanite.

C.5% coarsely No Fe/Ti oxides.disseminated cubicpyrite.

Feldspar porphyry

09-21 Dark green with All primary structure 0.05 in cross- Acicular, lineated. Subequal chlorite Nil. 15"Xo white masked by strong section but Cherty zones are rodded, and saussuritized quartz zones. foliation 4- lineation elongated 5-10:1 sugary. plagioclase.

and rodding. No visible quartz Cherty zones may be other than in former pillow cherty zones, selvages. Weakly sheared.

Nil. No Fe/Ti oxides. Mafic volcanic

10-12 Medium to pale Medium to fine- 0.1-0.5 grey-green. grained sedimentary

with no visible bedding. Weakly foliated. Unsheared.

Poorly sorted fine to medium sandy.

1 5 0Xo quartz sand grains, 70"Xo undifferentiated feldspar + lithic sand grains, 15"Xo chloritic matrix

2"Xo fracture-hosted calcite.

Trance primary disseminated pyrite.

(variably biotitic).

Trace leucoxene. Greywacke

11-02 Medium grey- Fine-grained Primary O.05. green. sedimentary with no Biotite

visible bedding. metacrysts 0.2- Moderately foliated. 0.3. Unsheared.

Silty; spotted with small Feldspathic silt G.5% fracture-hosted Nil. biotite metacrysts. with 10-200X0 fine- calcite.

grained chlorite(variably sericite)and 5-100Xo biotitemetacrysts.

No resolvable Fe-Ti Siltstone oxides.

12-15 Dark grey. Fine-grained Primary O.05.sedimentary with no Biotitevisible bedding. metacrysts 0.15-Strongly foliated but 0.3.not schistose.Unsheared.

Silty; spotted with small Feldspathic silt Trace fracture-hosted Q.5% finely biotite metacrysts. with 2Wo fine- calcite. disseminated

grained chlorite primary pyrrhotite.(variably sericite)and 3"Xo biotitemetacrysts.

No resolvable Fe-Ti Siltstone oxides.

13-03 Dark green. Unquenched flow. 0.1-0.15 Equigranular Moderately foliated. interlocking. Unsheared.

50"Xo chlorite l "Xo patchily (mainlyj+actinolit disseminated and e, fracture-hosted 50"Xo saussuritized calcite, plagioclase, l/'o quartz.

Trace pyrite. Trace disseminated ilmenite.

Mafic volcanic

Sample Number

WLAP-0214-03

15-06

16-06

17-04

18-08

18-09

Colour Structure Grain Size (mm)

Mottled dark Coarse magmatic. 0.7-2green and pale Massive.green-white. Unmetamorphosed.

Unsheared.

Medium grey. Unquenched flow. 0.1-0.2Moderately foliated.Unsheared.

Dark green with Fine-grained 0.05yellow-ochre sedimentary with noweathering visible bedding.stain. Strongly foliated,

semi-schistose.Unsheared.

Mottled dark Coarse magmatic. 0.5-2green and Strongly foliated.white. Unsheared.

Pale green- Fine-grained 0.05-0. 1white. sedimentary with no

visible bedding.Strongly foliated,semi-schistose.Unsheared.

a) (60"Xo of a) As 1 8-08 a) As 1 8-08cuttings): As 1 8- b) Unquenched flow, b) 0. 1 5-0.308. Moderately foliated.b) (40"Xo of Unsheared.cuttings): Darkgreen-black.

Texture

Diabasic.

Equigranularinterlocking.

Silty.

Equigranularinterlocking with diffusegrain boundaries due tosecondary alteration.

Sugary, cherty.

a) As 18-08b) Equigranularinterlocking.

MineralogySilicates Carbonates

60Va fresh Trace fracture-hostedplagioclase, calcite.40"Xo green to grey-brownclinopyroxene.40"Xo chlorite Nil.(mainly) +actinolite,60"Xo saussuritizcdplagioclase,Wo quartz.

Feldspathic silt 2Vo veinlet andwith 20-30"Xo grey fracture-hostedchlorite (variably calcite.sericite).

30"Xo talc, 300Xo Fe/Mg30% chlorite, carbonate.5% plagioclase,no quartz.

SO-90% cherty Nil.quartz -t-plagioclase.5"Xo chlorite,(variably biotite),ID'% sericite.

a) As 18-08 a) Nil.except biotite > b) Nil.chlorite.b) 300Xohornblende,20Va chlorite(variably biotite),5Wa saussuritizedplagioclase,rXo quartz.

Sulphides Other

0. 1 "Xo interstitial 1 "Xo interstitalpyrite. magnetite.

Trace leucoxene.

Nil. No FeATi oxides.

Trace primary No resolvable Fe-Tistringer pyrite. oxides.

Nil. l-2')ipatcnilydisseminatedsecondary magnetite.

l"Xo primary No Fe/Ti oxides.stringer pyrite,trace chalcopyrite,rare trace bornite.

a) l"Xo primary a) No Fe/Ti oxides.disseminated to b) No Fe/Ti oxides.stringer pyrite,G.1% chalcopyrite.b)0.1 0Xodisseminated cubicpyrite.

Name

Diabase

Mafic volcanic

Siltstone

Pyroxenite

Chert

a) Chertb) Mafic volcanic

Appendix C

Till and Gravel Gold Grain Counts with Calculated Visible Gold Assays for the Nonferromagnetic Heavy Mineral Fraction

Sample NumberPannedYes/No

Dimensions (microns)

Thickness Width Length

Number of Visible Gold Grains

Reshaped Modified Pristine Total

NonmagHMC

Weight(9)

CalculatedV.G. Assay

in HMC(PPb)

Remarks

WLAP-02-02-01 No

WLAP-02-02-02 No

WLAP-02-02-03 No

WLAP-02-02-04 No

WLAP-02-03-01 No

WLAP-02-03-02 No

WLAP-02-03-03 No

WLAP-02-04-01 No

WLAP-02-04-02 No

WLAP-02-04-03 No

WLAP-02-04-04 No

WLAP-02-04-05 No

WLAP-02-05-01 No

WLAP-02-05-03 Yes

8 C13 C

25 5050 75

8 C 25 50

WLAP-02-05-05 No

13 C25 C

20 C22 C29 C

8 C10 C13 C

13 C

10 C13 C

13 C

13 C18 C25 C

8 C10 C13 C15 C

8 C15 C31 C

NO VISIBLE

5 C10 C18 C

5 C8 C10 C13 C18 C50 M

e c10 C15 C18 C

50125

7575100

2550SO

50

5050

50

5075100

25255050

2550125

GOLD

255075

2525505075125

25505075

75125

125150200

505075

75

5075

75

75100150

507575100

50100200

2550100

25505075100175

5050100100

112

11

112

1113

1124

11

112

11

1113

11114

1113

1113

142421

14

11114

145.5

57.5

20.3

18.7

24.7

24.7

23.2

11.3

29.9

28.4

20.4

24.9

47.9

36.4

3

1

161

458

41

15

24

33

143

45

341

49

265

53

No sulphides.






Nonmag HMC

Weight(g)

Calculated V.G. Assay

in HMCftwb)

Remarks

WLAP-02-05-07 No

WLAP-02-05-09 No

WLAP-02-05-11 Yes

WLAP-02-05-13 No

WLAP-02-05-15 No

WLAP-02-05-16 Yes

WLAP-02-05-17 No

WLAP-02-05-18 Yes

WLAP-02-05-19 Yes

WLAP-02-05-20 No

WLAP-02-05-21 No

WLAP-02-06-01 No

WLAP-02-06-02 No

10 C13 C15 C

8 C13 C15 C

4 C8 C13 C15 C18 C31 C

50 5050 7550 100

25 5050 7550 100

15 2525 5050 7550 10075 100125 200

NO VISIBLE GOLD

8 C13 C20 C

4 C5 C8 C10 C13 C15 C18 C

10 C13 C18 C

7 C10 C13 C18 C

4 C8 C10 C13 C15 C18 C

5 C18 C18 C

25 5050 7575 125

15 2525 2525 5050 5050 7575 7575 100

50 5050 7575 100

15 5050 5050 7575 100

15 2525 5050 5050 7550 10075 100

25 2550 12575 100

8 C

7 C

13 C

25 50

15 50

50 75

1214

1214

1112117

1113

11122119

1113

13116

1111127

2114

11

11

11

23.8

29.2

29.8

46.3

33.6

27.2

24.8

33.0

38.1

11.2

39.5

48.9

66

50

1

302

42

1

86

58

1

81

101

54

7

1

8

No sulphides.

No sulphides.

No sulphides.

No sulphides.






Nonmag HMC

Weight(g)


in HMC(PPb)

Remarks

WLAP-02-06-03 No

WLAP-02-06-04 No

WLAP-02-06-05 No

WLAP-02-06-06 No

WLAP-02-06-07 No

WLAP-02-08-01 No

WLAP-02-08-02 No

WLAP-02-08-03 No

WLAP-02-08-04 No

WLAP-02-08-05 No

WLAP-02-08-06 Yes

WLAP-02-08-07 Yes

WLAP-02-08-08 Yes

WLAP-02-09-01 No

WLAP-02-09-03 No

5 C8 C

10 C13 C

25255050

25 C 100

25505075

150

22 C 100 125 27 C 100 175

13 C 50 75

10 C 25 75

13 C 50 75

8 C13 C

13 C15 C

4 C10 C15 C

8 C10 C10 C

4 C8 C

13 C18 C

8 C10 C13 C18 C25 C

5 C10 C13 C15 C

5 C8 C

10 C13 C15 C20 C

25 C

8 C10 C

2550

5050

152550

252550

15255075

25505075100

25505050

252525507575

100

2525

5075

75100

2575100

507550

255075100

505075100150

255075100

2550757575125

150

5075

141219

112

11

11

11

112

112

1113

1124

11215

411118

12126

2211118

11

112

40.0

43.7

31.0

35.0

44.8

42.7

36.0

21.8

43.3

42.8

44.0

43.2

38.8

31.4

39.0

105

136

12

5

8

11

28

39

15

43

109

48

75

92

7

No sulphides.

No sulphides.

No sulphides.






NonmagHMC

Weight(g)


in HMC(PPb)

Remarks

WLAP-02-09-05 No

WLAP-02-09-07 No

WLAP-02-09-09 No

WLAP-02-09-11 No

WLAP-02-09-13 Yes

WLAP-02-09-15 Yes

WLAP-02-09-16 Yes

WLAP-02-09-17 No

WLAP-02-09-18 No

WLAP-02-09-19 No

WLAP-02-09-20 No

WLAP-02-10-01 No

WLAP-02-10-03 No

WLAP-02-10-05 No

13 C

5 C8 C

13 C

5 C 10 C 13 C

8 C 10 C 10 C 13 C 25 C

8 C 13 C 15 C 22 C 34 C

4 C 10 C 15 C 20 C

4 C5 C

10 C 10 C 13 C

5 C 10 C

10 C

10 C 13 C

5 C8 C

10 C15 C27 C

8 C

13 C 18 C

10 C 13 C 50 M

50 75

252550

255050

2525505075

255050

100150

15507575

1525255050

2550

255075

255075

50755075175

5075100125200

255075125

2525755075

2550

50

5050

25255050

125

5075

505075

50

5075

255050

100150

25 50

75100

5075

100

11

1113

1113

111115

222118

12126

122128

123

11

123

111115

22

123

2215

51.3

34.6

44.3

38.8

36.1

34.1

41.9

45.5

29.9

63.6

87.2

38.7

41.4

45.3

7

14

13

96

l

334

1

118

l

33

9

6

15

55

4

58

88

No sulphides.

No sulphides.

No sulphides.

Sample NumberPanned Yes/No





Nonmag HMC

Weight (a)


in HMC (ppb)

Remarks

WLAP-02-10-07 No 10 C 25 75 2 220 C 75 125 2 2

WLAP-02-10-08

WLAP-02-10-09

WLAP-02-10-10

WLAP-02-10-11

WLAP-02-11-01

WLAP-02-12-01

WLAP-02-12-03

WLAP-02-12-05

WLAP-02-12-07

WLAP-02-12-09

WLAP-02-12-10

WLAP-02-12-11

WLAP-02-12-12

WLAP-02-12-13

WLAP-02-12-14

WLAP-02-13-01

No 5 C13 C18 C50 M

No 10 C13 C

No 5 C8 C

25 2550 7575 100

100 100

50 5050 75

25 2525 50

1211

12

21

No NO VISIBLE GOLD

No NO VISIBLE GOLD

No 8 C

No 4 C8 C

13 C

No 8 C

No 5 C13 C18 C

No 8 C

25 50

15 2525 5050 75

25 50

25 2550 7575 100

25 50

1

111

1

111

1

No NO VISIBLE GOLD

No 4 C8 C

No 13 C

No 4 C8 C

10 C13 C15 C

No 4 C5 C8 C

No 5 C8 C

10 C13 C15 C

15 2525 50

50 75

15 2525 5025 7550 7550 100

15 2525 2525 50

25 2525 5025 7550 7575 75

11

1

12131

112

2

111

37.5 90

12115

123

213

11

1113

11

1113

11

112

11

121318

1124

311117

29.6

33.0

35.1

33.7

22.3

35.0

29.0

22.5

34.9

48.8

54.2

52.5

35.9

187

28

4

2

21

2

49

4

3

8

39

4

38






Nonmag HMC

Weight(9)


in HMC(PI*)

Remarks

WLAP-02-13-02 No

WLAP-02-14-01 No

WLAP-02-14-02 No

WLAP-02-15-01 No

WLAP-02-15-02 No

WLAP-02-15-03 Yes

WLAP-02-15-04 No

WLAP-02-15-05 No

WLAP-02-16-01 Yes

WLAP-02-16-02 No

WLAP-02-16-03 No

WLAP-02-16-04 No

WLAP-02-16-05 No

10 C13 C

5 C8 C13 C18 C

5 C8 C

73 C

5 C8 C

15 C

8 C10 C13 C

4 C5 C8 C10 C10 C13 C15 C

10 C15 C18 C

5050

25255075

2525

400

252550

252550

15252525505075

507575

5075

255075100

2550

475

2550100

507575

25255075507575

5075100

NO VISIBLE GOLD

8 C10 C10 C13 C

13 C18 C22 C

5 C8 C

13 C18 C20 C

10 C13 C20 C

3 C8 C10 C13 C27 C

25255050

5075100

25255075100

505075

1525505075

50755075

75100125

255075100100

5075125

15505075200

332

1332321

15

111

2143

10

50.1 11

39.5 49

38.2 2738

40.6 18

38.8 17

No sulphides.

48.0 56

45.5 41

No sulphides.

44.7 50

11 13 34.3

11111

102

40.0 75

8 104.3

1131

J—————. 7 59.4

45

82



Thickness Wkilh Length



NonmagHMC

Weight(a)


in HMCtoPtt

Remarks

WLAP-02-17-01 No

WLAP-02-17-02

WLAP-02-17-03

No

No

WLAP-02-18-01 Yes

WLAP-02-18-02 No

WLAP-02-18-03

WLAP-02-18-04

WLAP-02-18-05 No

WLAP-02-18-06 No

WLAP-02-18-07 No

8 C13 C22 C

25 SO50 75100 125

NO VISIBLE GOLD

7 C8 C

5 C8 C13 C15 C18 C20 C

8 C10 C20 C20 C

15 5025 50

25 2525 5050 7575 7575 10075 125

25 5050 5075 125100 100

No NO VISIBLE GOLD

No 8 C 25 50

5 C 65 C

10 C 13 C 15 C 18 C

8 C18 C

25300

50505075

2575

25450

5075

100100

50100

85.2 30

103.3

95.9 40

83.2 39

70.9

126.0 542

100.2

88.1

22

12

'•' ''- .-.• I-..--if.';-- "" .. - . - --.j i-'...-v/.'•' '-: -.' -: .^* 1.-. 1 '-*i'

;^.--j .,-- ' . ;_____ ' , ' - -i- . . . .1. - ; l l\-f^ -- "' J ' v ' l : -' ' 'K^r:i^^Vr;^^zSl^^:;iH-----'----f^!;

PROTEROZOICmen m m m mCD ;^SU

BOULDER MINING CORPORATIONWnt Like Abitibi Project

Ptat l - UxMiou did Bedrock Ceotouof Ae Revtne Cifmlrijon Drill Hole!

OvntuftM Mnng Memgxmn UmHO

CDNX: YBR CDNX: YBR CDA/X; YBR CDNX: YBR

WAL(Kimberlte)

\ Lake Abitibi DeformationMarathon Twp.

Legend for GOLD in HMC (RC Holes)

H O O -1 g/t - - Fault

O - 3 g/t ^

1 - 3 g/t —H WALP Claims (Gold)

H WALP Claims (Kimberlite)

3 -12 g/t ^ Gold in Quartz Boulders

12-18 g/t O Gold in Esker

BOULDER MINING CORPORATION

ABITIBI LAKE PROJECTLARDER LAKE MINING DIVISION, ONTARIO

Northwest Bav \\

G2. __ __ __ __l_ '\ ___

ONTARIO MINISTRY OF NORTHERN DEVELOPMENT AND MINES

Work Report Summary

Transaction No: W0280.01573

Recording Date: 2002-OCT-10

Approval Date: 2003-FEB-24

Client(s):301275 BAKER, CLEMENT J.

SurveyType(s):ASSAY

Status: APPROVED

Work Done from: 2002-FEB-22

to: 2002-MAR-05

POVERB

Work Report Details:

Claim*L

L

LL

LL

LL

L

L

L

L

L

L

L

L

1242137

1242142

1244752

1248701

1248702

1248703

1248704

1248705

1248706

1248707

1248708

1248709

1248710

1248711

1248712

1248713

Perform

soSO

so526,484

516,924

SO

SO

518,507

525,910

50

SO

533,848

SO

57,423

SO

SO

5129,096

External Credits:

Perform Approve

SO

SO

SO

522,800

514,600

SO

SO

S 15, 950

522,300

SO

50

S29.243

50

S6.400

SO

SO

5111,293

50

Applied

56,400

56,000

S6.400

56,400

56,400

56,400

S6.400

56,400

S6.400

56,400

S6.400

S6.400

54,800

56,400

56,400

54,800

S98.800

Applied Approve

56,400

S6.000

56,400

56,400

56,400

S6.400

56,400

56,400

56,400

56,400

56,400

56,400

S4.800

56,400

S6.400

54,800

S98.800

Assign50SOSO

S15.388

54,124

SO

SO

55,707

513,110

SO

so521,048

SO

31,023

SO

SO

560,400

Assign Approve

0

0

0

15,388

5,147

0

0

5,707

13,110

0

0

21,048

0

0

0

0

560,400

Reserve

SO

SO

so54,696

56,400

SO

SO

56,400

56,400

50

SO

56,400

SO

SO

SO

SO

S30.296

Reserve Approve

SO

SO

SO

51,012

53,053

SO

SO

53,843

52,790

SO

50

51,795

SO

SO

SO

SO

512,493

Due Date

2004-FEB-19

2004-FEB-19

2003-NOV-15

2004-MAR-06

2004-MAR-06

2004-MAR-06

2004-MAR-06

2004-MAR-06

2004-MAR-06

2004-MAR-06

2004-MAR-06

2004-MAR-06

2004-MAR-06

2004-MAR-06

2004-MAR-06

2004-MAR-06

Reserve:51 2,493 Reserve of Work

512,493 Total Remaining

Report*: W0280.01 573

Status of claim is based on information currently on record.

42A16NE2003 2.24342 GALNA 900

2003-Feb-27 11:28 Armstrong^! Page 1 of 1

Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

Date: 2003-FEB-24

Ministere du Developpement du Nord et des Mines Ontario

GEOSCIENCE ASSESSMENT OFFICE 933 RAMSEY LAKE ROAD, 6th FLOOR SUDBURY, ONTARIO P3E 6B5

CLEMENT J. BAKER 147CLOVERBRAEST., NORTH BAY, ONTARIO P1A4J3 CANADA

Tel: (888)415-9845 Fax:(877)670-1555

Dear Sir or Madam

Submission Number: 2.24342 Transaction Number(s): W0280.01573

Subject: Approval of Assessment Work

We have approved your Assessment Work Submission with the above noted Transaction Number(s). The attached Work Report Summary indicates the results of the approval.

At the discretion of the Ministry, the assessment work performed on the mining lands noted in this work report may be subject to inspection and/or investigation at any time.

The total value of work approved for this submission is S111,293.00.

If you have any question regarding this correspondence, please contact LUCILLE JEROME by email at [email protected] or by phone at (705) 670-5858.

Yours Sincerely,

Ron GashinskiSenior Manager, Mining Lands Section

Cc: Resident Geologist

Nelson W Baker (Agent)

Clement J. Baker (Assessment Office)

Assessment File Library

Clement J. Baker (Claim Holder)

Visit our website at http://www.gov.on.ca/MNDM/LANDS/mlsmnpge.htm Page: 1 Correspondence 10:17996

HIMHlirVOF HCflTHEFWDEVfLQPMEHT

PFUVIKMLtWIIM

MINING LAND TENURE

MAP

lnK WTmB Ml KM Him EUUK moral MlmOE M1KOS BSIDDDf~ *

^ thoiiia(iq)w(jtivllh1lv4l^mKM Mining R rîrVDinn alibi HlMBtry irfMinlliBrn.D )Hls(*tnnilit* Mipiiipativ H lin Irfirn

ci bt a In Ml Hiruutfi Ihu Nw d imtt TRIM RI

General Information and Llm l tat Ions

, i* fuMri (iun4ivlM driv **fl*H In fen PrmrvUi MhW| R wo r H r* Offr* hm RomthiB Mntaliy aiMtrhirn .DwMopw*in te\t Wnn wb *Ma

a* M h mi H* turf*"' Ufflu 1 q D Fm CHwHMH L+UlP T.I KKB vnaiy LWl Rairi f** 1 4l^

i NAOB3UTMMIdiw*!)k: D tt* SB w LI:.,.L*'*' ^

fvlitirMl lindlMUra tntt Muni* n.im4 H ik)M vi mt.hoilfll*nyM*.HUHM, K 0i

md InlMHt fm m ttw Crawi..*l*Q CH^kt .kKII* DI puhipir(FM wvrr O D** mining E)MPIinm.

Date l Time of Issue Oct 11 2002

TOWNSHIP/ AREA

GALNA

11: 1th Eastern

PLAN

Q-5601

ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICTS l DIVISIONSMining Division Larder LakeLand Titlei/floglstry D Iw hi ion COCHRANE

Ministry of Nitural Resource* District COCHRANE

TOPOGRAPHIC

Ikjj P.dvlhttlil.lllr*r'f iL'J-j \nmnHmrn

LJ C'll- *l tflPl'li

LAND TENURE

LAND TENURE WITHDRAWALS

IMPORTANT NOTICES

LAND TENURE WITHDRAWAL DESCRIPTIONS

""——————OJO- 0

2134 UMm

vt*.*.-t*ia2 mn Nwsfa

HPFLPCatWNPiMD HO UNDEA.FUILhC LJIMDEACF

ItlFEET lUKfACI K'llHTI HEE&1W1.TIDH JWOUNB ALL L*t(l* * WVEPU

FHOODIH4 14 COM faun Bfl FT * H1 FT.C O^REP IY L-0**?l

VLOQONOILIVATIOh[HI FT Lfl, H74

FlOMMQE^FVATCUlBII tt LO Od rt

'(,oriow(|KLfcV*TBN:Bll H LO.B874

(li fi F t tUht Kc.nntHl I REififlUiriOH.Ai.CNG

nHfHOHIiaP *LLLJWEt*finrt-ftl

HN'm aid tarlKfl HfllrH ^tfmrfPP Sivttar.H of H Mbihf HctflW

l W4.L-JOtiil am, NW^HI.#H Mw.ihH wmwif^ i.B(^.ritrn

liHI h bfetit f rkpnM E) F*r rwykil(JH*iM m* B* WtbhttttbtUftHH ch

MiFinf *d MrTHw r^rvi nldiririinl CHHtafi.M di mi Mifrt| AotRE

t *yj.L-*M1i|1 DHT, N*r. Jl.JOtt Mott: ttita taunt mt cMi* r*"*

IM h fettiipripBM ri l*r HWWHJ1 JiiM n*y t* WiBHIvttOlttaM' *H

v WLL StMH1 OM1, wp/- "i -MH *laW Dili b

tiM If hirlni prip*tt4 Or iiwiWhniMl m^ b

W-U-M1I22 Wlfc HDV2IWI1 MIHH H

* W4.L iM (41 Drit. N*. M.jail Ho t*, l*

Hlilm md ItrfKi tn*i*^*"rtmiSKtoitaioini Ifctap Ad KM KWM4ir

4 WLL ZW1*1 0*11. N*V. 21.BW1 lain (Hi tOUB*BV****^ r*'H*1M *4 VM

INK H kvlrw pippvMd Mr 'WIMUH.IM Ni*i blttWlKIU MrEHrchMf*.

HHIN HID brfm n**-*^r*-**Mt*r w M HMni AH HIP iw OH* t wik.jwi*i MI\ riv, ZI.HHM Ndi* in* houniHvciiiu*.r4f*Hn IM wt*

n in* mw b* n*r

W4i P1V? Mnt Nflvziznm

MMng wd tutfwa rl|hti HHMmMKKton.HDllUHhlii| hd ftIO H" Ordv

l W4.L-2niA1 ONVNaV.ZI.2dD1 HUM Ml DOUHflVltttW^'H****1 ***

in* M tilrti rrof awti fK r*(LWJoi irri irm bi ni^Mlit tvnnt cbMBL

Kninf md Burt** riiktt WMhMiMI CMMhX M WBMi* fm FLEO IBM Ordw

rWJ.L.2W1fl1(JFtl Hou 21.7001 wi* PH pfio** py m*f^ rîpHHhOw MM

inn H Bin HHffHM W r**lfrlan M* m* t* vMwdft flKflw' CNHH.

ifWLL-ZMIfll OHI Nw..?t.K*t M.tatpm bam^Br itovih rK"*MiM*t**i,

IN* H ttftif, |ir*p***i{ ni r*vl*tlaq tiri m* Ml M*KMa tanr*- Hi W tt.,

WnliV M* fKiriHl rt lHi iri*i4Mm SBctan.36 li taNbihi Ad AK IW 6***

P* Wtt JOBtJOI OHT Nw,2l, 2M) Wnte BifctamâT tMdy.rif' H*nU*M vu

Ihrt d 1 9*1 1 PMPBM* mi*** Wu wri mm bo Mbtartlvrhrtfe' ehwt*

Minim na ihirfvci DBM* w*ifln"* s*cwn.?8 o nwnvti An **o iw Onur

.VWl.L2ni.ai DHT, Hi. .31. MI1 Huw

tlllllW Md fell HI liphW HUHMl SKhMi B El In HhibiiAd R*0 l*t* Wcr

JfWLL iDBIJlt DHr.Hw.21. ZOU HolH Llhh tiDimtHy chii^.rB(H**Mi *w am

4hrikihi*ipprap*H^rirr*WWn*.*4ll mnr fat HHItcttQ frith!' cima*.

Mmna MN Tunvwnihn WAMIMMI IWUM.H ci tt* Wflki) Ad "*(* "" W

*W1 1 JMIIfll HIT, Hw. 71. Mtl Hdto thbhaunt^ cbl* r^rwrfi Hw mi

IM H btiriiprapiH*rBr(iqiii*tUB.*w mivii* wHjfcriotnrtht' ohwia

Oo

IS

M

Documents

RPT ON REVERSE CIRCULATION OVERBURDEN DRILLING WEST …