Upload
ct-llc
View
99
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
NAVIGATING ASYMMETRICAL BUSINESS TERRAIN WITH OPEN SOURCE INTELLIGENCE + NETWORKS + MACHINES
CHANDLER T WILSON DIRECTOR OF INSIGHTS/ANALYTICS WALMART
THIS IS ABOUT MAKING SENSE OF AND CONNECTING THE HUMAN CONDITION, COLLECTIVE KNOWLEDGE, EVENTS, ACTIONS AND INTERNAL DATA. THE NEW WORLD OF BUSINESS BELONGS TO COMPANIES WHO CAN NAVIGATE ASYMMETRICAL TERRAIN, TEST ASSUMPTIONS AND CREATE INTELLECTUAL, AS WELL AS HARD VALUE.
Technology has made the world more similar and faster, yet business strategies are not typically scalable from one market to the next.
The Paradox
Inherently intelligence and insights is about decisions. The value of information that leads to a “roughly right” decision ishighest in the beginning – and often more valuable than a perfect decision. To address this bias, organizations need to focus on developing process and internal communication that foster faster “information-to-action” transaction times, much like how traders look at financial markets.
Time
Benefit of Decision
Cost of Decision/IndecisionCompetitive advantage
Many variables + little time = rapidly diminishing information value.
Studies show experts consistently fail at forecasting and traditionally perform worse than random guessing in businesses as diverse as medicine, real-estate valuation and political elections. This is because traditionally people weight experiences and information in very biased ways.
Combining open source web intelligence + internal data (product or operations) can help organizations make contextually cognizant decisions while acknowledging the level granularity needed to be competitive in todays globalized market place.
Key Themes:
• Network Analysis: Find how people, events, things and places are connected to find unforeseen risk and nonobvious opportunities. Offers more potential for higher resolution & descriptive KPI’s.
• Open Source:Anything data that is online - structure or unstructured.Given the amount of descriptive events now reported online, the results describe reality.
• Machines: Weight thousands of variables at once in an unbiased way.
• Operations focused: It's not the companies that adopt new technologies that are going to win, it’s the ones that mandate processes and operation that leverage them who will. Legacy business processes & thinking need to be assessed with the utmost scrutiny.
Machines + Networks + Open Source Intelligence
Traditional BI, Strategy and Insights • Linear & disparate isolated trends lead to biased decisions – humans are bad at weighting information• Doesn’t isolate influencing variables that can (actually) be controlled for quickly • Predetermined questions to derive importance or meaning
• All business environments are multidimensional, asymmetrical and granular.• Linear or rules-based analysis not only has dangerous consequences in terms of biased decision making, but it’s also time consuming and not contextual.
Typically business strives to be linear and simple when it’s not.
Open SourceMost of the world’s collective knowledge and descriptions of events are online. Applying Machines to these data sets can upscale the quality of intelligence in ways not possible just a few years ago. Much like how Google sped up information discovery, tools with sophisticated graphing capabilities are allowing people “up skill” their intelligence.
Entities
Emotions
Location
Event Actions
• Machines analyze and weight vast amounts of information in ways humans cannot.• Understanding these dynamics allows for higher resolution forecasts. • No need to make variables into a binary KPI like positive/negative sentiment – go with context.
How machines extract meaning from open source text.
Dynamics: 2015 MN Vikings Draft Online News • How legacy BI tends to look at trends• Time lines are great but show little in the name of context• Descriptive, not prescriptive • People weight information in inconsistent ways which doesn’t enable them to see certain connections that matter do to experience, insider knowledge, personal connection/interest.
The obvious isn’t a competitive advantage. In an era when the obvious leads to little or no wins, finding novel connections can generally offer more return on investment than legacy strategies. Industry disruption is often times led by outsiders.
Entity extraction from specific “expert” commentary on the draft. • Top people extracted from open source content related to the 20015 NFL Draft and Minnesota Vikings
Leveraging the machine• Zooming out with a few filters enable the machines to build connections in less obvious areas through interpolating entities and key concepts.
• All nodes could be zoomed in on and have vast amounts of meta data for further analyses.
Using machines to extract entities can help predict outcomes (less specific).• The broad domain which leaned in on machine hypothesis – hit’s on our 2nd round draft pick Eric Kendricks. • This enables us to go into this ideation phase where machines define the framework with plenty of room left for creative thinking.
Humans, when looking for more specificity, added more noise opposed to exploring vast data sets with machines driving the connections = less potential insights.
Machine and network driven frameworks allow us to have both more meaningful and creative strategies by cutting through noise and finding what we can actually control.
And further weight, non-superficially, variables that influence those outcomes.
VAR
AC
E
D
F
B
Be cautious of “common sense”. • The best operations and information that need the level of speed and quality are often times abstract and uncongenial to standard processes or thinking when in most cases they are the only things that drives a competitive advantage
• The more we know the less clear things become often times, this is why priming an organization is vital. As is reframing the idea of what is means to have expertise.
• Under the majority of daily business circumstance niche’ domain expertise isn’t readily available. Organizations need to be cognizant that the level of expertise needed to beat a machine is constantly swinging in favor of machines.
• Lean in on building automated hypothesis systems that isolate key problems and variable thereafter using humans ability to understand context humans and organization structure – something machines are not able to do (currently).
• Build decision, not insight systems that push decisions, not insights. Only look to apply information where it can be effected – there are drastic biased consequences to people looking at too much information (most of which is irrelevant) with out context (emails, twitter, insider information).
What’s next?
HitchBot