1
8/7/2019 Laminates Company - Epoxy Spot Defects http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/laminates-company-epoxy-spot-defects 1/1 The Problem A laminates company was experiencing a large increase in the number of epoxy spots left on the finished product after the manufacturing process. This problem had started several months earlier when the company changed its customer requirements. The epoxy spot defects were increasing scrap and manufacturing overhead costs, and reducing on-time delivery rates due to rework, remake and inspection activities. The company assembled a problem-solving team to investigate the situation and launch a proje ct with the goal of reducing the epoxy spot defect rate from 1.5 percent to 0.35 percent. The team estimated this shift would cut material costs by approximately $100,000 annually. The Solution The project team started investigating where the spots were coming from by looking at all the possible reasons for the increase in spots. They quickly ruled out variations in the inspection process as a major cause of the problem since inspectors merely counted and documented the number of epoxy spots. So, instead of focusing on inspector variation with a Gage R&R study, the team used process maps, affinity diagrams and fault tree analysis to determine the greatest sources of the epoxy spots. The team identified two main sources of increased epoxy spots: operator handling of materials and “random factors.” The latter included many variables — trays, conveyors, even the air itself. The team felt that pursuing these “random factors” would require a long, comprehensive investigation that may not lead to the level of change it desired. Therefore, the team chose instead to dig deeper into the operator handling procedures to locate potential areas for improvement. The team’s research suggested that handling prepreg (a raw material used in the laminate process) caused some operators to collect epoxy dust, which was then sometimes accidentally transferred to the finished product. Team members tested this theory by running a two- proportion hypothesis test. The results indicated that operators with clean hands produced 40 to 80 percent better yields than those who touched the prepreg material before handling the laminate. Therefore, the team looked at ways of standardizing the hand-washing process for all operators who came in contact with the prepreg material. Their research showed that in the current state, the operators who handled prepreg were in the habit of cleaning their hands after every instance. However, operators at one location cleaned their hands with alcohol-soaked rags while those at another plant used only tac cloth. The team ran hypothesis tests to compare the two methods. Tests showed that the alcohol- soaked rag cleaning process yielded 40-50 percent better results than the tac cloth method. In addition, the tests found that one pair of operators yielded consistently better results than all the others, regardless of the method of cleaning they used. Digging a little deeper, the research team showed that these two “cleanest” operators always washed their hands thoroughly, wiping two or three times after touching the prepreg. To see if it was the operators or the process that was causing the improvement, the project team conducted a Design of Experiments with a different pair of operators who typically cleaned their hands with only a single wipe (like most operators were doing). Test results showed the triple wipe yielded 40-80 percent fewer epoxy spots than the single wipe. The Results The team proposed that operators standardize on a new hand cleaning method using tac cloth and that they wipe their hands more thoroughly including behind the fingers and inside the thumbs. The team also provided detailed instructions on the new procedures and established methods to track the operators’ CASE STUDY | Reducing Epoxy Spot Defects  A laminates company reduces number of epoxy spots on nal product Global Headquarters ● 1-800-467-4462 ● +1-303-827-0010 ● www.bmgi.com © BMGI Problem Solved. Summary Industry Manufacturing Business Problem High rate of defects due to epoxy spots Methodology Six Sigma - DMAIC Solution Reduce defects by making a change in operator handling procedure Benefits/Results $320,000 in annual savings BMGI BMGI enables companies throughout the world to identify and solve their most important business problems, with a strong emphasis on sustainable results. During its long history, BMGI has developed solutions for a broad spectrum of businesses across many industries, driving the success of  process-improvement, design and innovation initiatives. Just a few of BMGI’s clients are General Dynamics, TNT Express, Avis Budget Group, China Chemical, Graphic Packaging, Siemens, Hitachi and Philips Electronics. For more information,  please visit the BMGI website at www.bmgi.com adherence to this new procedure. Since the implementation of the new cleaning method, the company has experienced a 66 percent reduction in epoxy spot defects resulting in annual savings of more than $320,000 in material and overhead.

Laminates Company - Epoxy Spot Defects

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Laminates Company - Epoxy Spot Defects

8/7/2019 Laminates Company - Epoxy Spot Defects

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/laminates-company-epoxy-spot-defects 1/1

The Problem

A laminates company was experiencing a largeincrease in the number of epoxy spots left onthe finished product after the manufacturingprocess. This problem had started several monthsearlier when the company changed its customerrequirements. The epoxy spot defects wereincreasing scrap and manufacturing overhead

costs, and reducing on-time delivery rates dueto rework, remake and inspection activities.

The company assembled a problem-solvingteam to investigate the situation and launch aproject with the goal of reducing the epoxy spotdefect rate from 1.5 percent to 0.35 percent.The team estimated this shift would cut materialcosts by approximately $100,000 annual ly.

The Solution

The project team started investigating wherethe spots were coming from by looking at all thepossible reasons for the increase in spots. They

quickly ruled out variations in the inspectionprocess as a major cause of the problem sinceinspectors merely counted and documented thenumber of epoxy spots. So, instead of focusingon inspector variation with a Gage R&R study,the team used process maps, affinity diagramsand fault tree analysis to determine the greatestsources of the epoxy spots.

The team identified two main sources ofincreased epoxy spots: operator handling ofmaterials and “random factors.” The latterincluded many variables — trays, conveyors,even the air itself. The team felt that pursuing

these “random factors” would require a long,comprehensive investigation that may not leadto the level of change it desired. Therefore,the team chose instead to dig deeper into theoperator handling procedures to locate potentialareas for improvement.

The team’s research suggested that handlingprepreg (a raw material used in the laminateprocess) caused some operators to collect epoxydust, which was then sometimes accidentallytransferred to the f inished product. Teammembers tested this theory by running a two-

proportion hypothesis test. The results indicatedthat operators with clean hands produced 40to 80 percent better yields than those whotouched the prepreg material before handling thelaminate.

Therefore, the team looked at ways ofstandardizing the hand-washing process forall operators who came in contact with theprepreg material. Their research showed thatin the current state, the operators who handledprepreg were in the habit of cleaning their handsafter every instance. However, operators at onelocation cleaned their hands with alcohol-soakedrags while those at another plant used only taccloth.

The team ran hypothesis tests to compare thetwo methods. Tests showed that the alcohol-soaked rag cleaning process yielded 40-50percent better results than the tac cloth method.

In addition, the tests found that one pair ofoperators yielded consistently better resultsthan all the others, regardless of the method ofcleaning they used.

Digging a little deeper, the research teamshowed that these two “cleanest” operatorsalways washed their hands thoroughly, wiping twoor three times after touching the prepreg.

To see if it was the operators or the processthat was causing the improvement, the projectteam conducted a Design of Experiments with adifferent pair of operators who typically cleanedtheir hands with only a single wipe (like mostoperators were doing). Test results showed thetriple wipe yielded 40-80 percent fewer epoxyspots than the single wipe.

The Results

The team proposed that operators standardizeon a new hand cleaning method using taccloth and that they wipe their hands morethoroughly including behind the fingers andinside the thumbs. The team also provideddetailed instructions on the new proceduresand established methods to track the operators’

CASE STUDY | Reducing Epoxy Spot Defects

 A laminates company reduces number of epoxy spots on nal product

Global Headquarters ● 1-800-467-4462 ● +1-303-827-0010 ● www.bmgi.com © BMGI

Problem Solved.

Summary

Industry

Manufacturing

Business Problem

High rate of defects due to epoxyspots

Methodology

Six Sigma - DMAIC

Solution

Reduce defects by making

a change in operatorhandling procedure

Benefits/Results

$320,000 in annual savings

BMGI

BMGI enables companies throughout

the world to identify and solve their 

most important business problems,

with a strong emphasis on sustainable

results. During its long history, BMGI

has developed solutions for a broad 

spectrum of businesses across many 

industries, driving the success of 

 process-improvement, design and 

innovation initiatives. Just a few of 

BMGI’s clients are General Dynamics,

TNT Express, Avis Budget Group,

China Chemical, Graphic Packaging,

Siemens, Hitachi and Philips

Electronics. For more information,

 please visit the BMGI website at

www.bmgi.com

adherence to this new procedure. Since theimplementation of the new cleaning method,the company has experienced a 66 percentreduction in epoxy spot defects resultingin annual savings of more than $320,000 inmaterial and overhead.