Intergraded Watershed Management Programmegswma.gujarat.gov.in/pfile/DPR/2009-10/Banaskantha/Ban... · 2013-04-18 · Intergraded Watershed Management Programme PIA :- Social Forestry

IWMP-3 IDHATA -CLUSTER _THARAD_BANASKANTHA_(DPR) 2009-10

1

Intergraded Watershed Management Programme

PIA :- Social Forestry Division, Banaskantha, Palanpur

DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (DPR) Idhata Cluster- 3 IWMP : 2009-10


2

Contents

1.1 Project Background .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4

Geographic location of Idhata ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 6

All the parameters taken together give a cumulative score of 36 to the watershed (reference Table 2.1 below). ....................................................................................... 7

Table no. 2.1 Criteria and weightage for selection of watershed .................................................................................................................................................................... 8

Table no.3: Watershed information ................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 8

Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmes in the project area ............................................................................................................................................................... 10

Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 15

Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition: .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 18

Table no. 11.1: Soil Erosion ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 18

Table no. 11.2: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress)................................................................................................................................................................................. 18

Table no. 11.3: Water logging Conditions ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 19

Table no. 13: Physiographic and relief ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 20

Table no. 14: Land ownership details. ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 20

Table no. 15: Agriculture ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 21

Table no. 17: Crop details: ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 22

Table no. 18: Livestock ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 19

Table no. 19: Drinking water (explain this table) ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 24

Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources .................................................................................................................................................................................. 24

Table no. 21: Demographic information ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 27

Table no. 22: Literacy rate ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 28


3

Table no. 24: Poverty ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 30

Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 33

Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution) ........................................................................................................................................................................ 33

Table no. 31: Watershed Committee details ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 39

Table no. 32: SHG detail :- ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 45

Table no. 33: UG detail ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 46

Table no. 38: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas ................................................................................................................... 50

Table no. 39: Other activities of watershed works phase – Proposed target ................................................................................................................................................ 53

Table no. 40: Details of engineering structures in watershed works ............................................................................................................................................................ 42

Table no. 41: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works ............................................................................................................................. 55

Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan: ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 66

Table no. 47: Budget at a glance for the project ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 69

Table no. 51: Public-Private Partnership in the IWMP projects .................................................................................................................................................................... 71

Table no. 52: Employment in Project area: .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 73

Table no. 53: Details of seasonal migration from Project area ...................................................................................................................................................................... 74

Table no. 57: Area under horticulture ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 78

Table no. 58: Forest/vegetative cover .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 79

Table no. 59: Details of livestock in the project areas (for fluids please mention in liters, for solids please mention in kegs. and income in Rs.) ..................................... 79


4

CHAPTER – 1

PROJECT BACKGROUND


5

1.1 Project Background:

Idhata (IWMP-3) project is located in Tharad Taluka, Banaskantha District of Gujarat state. The project is a cluster of Two micro-watersheds with

6A1D3c# & 6A1D3b# being their respective codes. The total project area of the watershed is about 7964.10 Ha, of which 5000 Ha has been undertaken

to be treated under Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP) starting year 2009-10.

The nearest town is Tharad which is about 12 Km from Idhata Cluster and is well connected by paver road. The project area lies in the edges of

salt deserts of Kutch also known as Rann of Kutch. The watershed includes Six Villages of Idhata Cluster. Rajput, Brahman,Thakor, Darbar, Rabari, Patel

and SC & ST communities are the primary inhabitants of the Cluster. The livelihood of these people is primarily based on rain fed agriculture, animal

husbandry, wage labour, goat and sheep rearing.

The Project area falls under the Desert and drought prone area according to DoLR Classification. The Project Area of Idhata Cluster is on the out

skirts Rann of Kuttch. Which Faces the Problem of those Rain fed Area in which three out of every five Years Period Occurs Famine.

Table no.1: Basic project information

Sr. No.

Name of the project

Villages Gram

Panchayats Taluka District

Area of the

project

Area proposed to be treated

Total project

cost (Rs. In Lakh)

PIA Name Census code

1 Idhata IWMP – 3 Jampur 020020011130000 Jampur Tharad Banaskantha 944.60 425 63.750 Forest (Social)B.K

2 Idhata IWMP – 3 Bhorol 020020011190000 Bhorol Tharad Banaskantha 2012.20 1400 210.000 Forest (Social)B.K

3 Idhata IWMP – 3 Ganeshpura 020020011200000 Ganeshpura Tharad Banaskantha 1072.90 500 75.000 Forest (Social)B.K

4 Idhata IWMP – 3 Saba 020020011150000 Gadsisar Tharad Banaskantha 940.70 425 63.750 Forest (Social)B.K

5 Idhata IWMP – 3 Gadsisar 020020011160000 Gadsisar Tharad Banaskantha 1061.90 550 82.500 Forest (Social)B.K

6 Idhata IWMP – 3 Idhata 020020011460000 Idhata Tharad Banaskantha 1931.80 1700 255.000 Forest (Social)B.K

Total for the Project 7964.1 5000 750.000


6

Geographic location of Idhata Cluster

Tharad Taluka


7

2.1 Need of Watershed Development Programme: Watershed Development Programme is prioritised on the basis of thirteen parameters namely Poverty Index, Percentage of SC/ST, Actual wages, Percentage

of small and marginal farmers, Ground water status, Moisture Index, Area under rain fed agriculture, Drinking water situation in the area, Percentage of the degraded

land, Productivity potential of the land, Continuity of another watershed that has already developed/treated, Cluster approach for plain of desert. Based on these six

parameters a composite ranking was given to Idhata Watershed project as given in table no. 2.

The total number of families under BPL is 1097, which is less than 42.60 percent of the total households of the Cluster. Hence a score of 5 is allotted. The

percentage of ST, SC in the Cluster is about 14.25 percent to the total population; hence a score of 3 was allotted. Rain fed, agriculture forms the primary occupation

of the Cluster due to the fact that ground water is saline and hence unfit for usage. More than 90 per cent of the farmers are small and marginal by nature and the

actual wages earned by the labour is less than the minimum wages hence a composite rank of 5, 0 and 3 are allotted respectively.

Since the rainfall received is erratic and irregular, the moisture index is low and the area is classified under DDP block. Drinking water is Major problematic in

the Cluster. Majority of land is degraded due to inherent salinity. The soil is very permeable and production of the land can be significantly enriched with the

availability of timely irrigation. Idhata Cluster watershed falls in continuity with other watersheds namely Idhata Cluster approach was followed taking into

consideration Three micro-watersheds covering a total area of 5000 Ha. Thus a cumulative score of 31

All the parameters taken together give a cumulative score of 31 to the watershed (reference Table 2.1 below).

Table no.2: Weightage of the project

Sr. No.

Project name Project type Villages Name Weightage

I ii iii iv v vi vii viii ix x xi xii xiii Total

1 Idhata IWMP – 3 Desert Jampur 10 3 5 0 0 0 10 7.5 0 0 0 0 0 36

2 Idhata IWMP – 3 Desert Bhorol 7.5 3 5 0 0 0 15 5 0 0 0 0 0 36

3 Idhata IWMP – 3 Desert Ganeshpura 7.5 3 5 0 0 0 10 7.5 0 0 0 0 0 33

4 Idhata IWMP – 3 Desert Saba 7.5 3 5 0 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 26

5 Idhata IWMP – 3 Desert Gadsisar 7.5 3 5 0 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 26

6 Idhata IWMP – 3 Desert Idhata 10 3 5 0 0 0 0 7.5 0 0 0 0 0 26

Average 8 3 5 0 3 0 3 6 0 0 0 0 0 31


8

Table no. 2.1.1 Criteria and weightage for selection of watershed

Sr.No Criteria

Maximum score

Ranges & scores

I Poverty index (% of poor to population) 10 Above 80 % (10) 80 to 50 % (7.5) 50 to 20 % (5) Below 20 % (2.5)

Ii % of SC/ ST population 10 More than 40 % (10) 20 to 40 % (5) Less than 20 % (3)

Iii Actual wages 5 Actual wages are significantly lower than minimum wages (5)

Actual wages are equal to or higher than minimum wages (0)

Iv % of small and marginal farmers 10 More than 80 % (10) 50 to 80 % (5) Less than 50 % (3)

V Ground water status 5 Over exploited (5) Critical (3) Sub critical (2) Safe (0)

Vi Moisture index/ DPAP/ DDP Block

15 -66.7 & below (15) DDP Block

-33.3 to -66.6 (10) DPAP Block

0 to -33.2 (0) Non DPAP/ DDP Block

Vii Area under rain-fed agriculture 15 More than 90 % (15) 80 to 90 % (10) 70 to 80% (5) Above 70 % (Reject)

Viii Drinking water 10 No source (10) Problematic village (7.5) Partially covered (5) Fully covered (0)

Ix Degraded land 15 High – above 20 % (15) Medium – 10 to 20 % (10) Low- less than 10 % of TGA (5)

X Productivity potential of the land 15 Lands with low production & where productivity can be significantly enhanced with reasonable efforts (15)

Lands with moderate production & where productivity can be enhanced with reasonable efforts (10)

Lands with high production & where productivity can be marginally enhanced with reasonable efforts (5)

Xi Contiguity to another watershed that has already been developed/ treated

10 Contiguous to previously treated watershed & contiguity within the micro watersheds in the project (10)

Contiguity within the micro watersheds in the project but non contiguous to previously treated watershed (5)

Neither contiguous to previously treated watershed nor contiguity within the micro watersheds in the project (0)

Xii Cluster approach in the plains (more than one contiguous micro-watersheds in the project)

15 Above 6 micro-watersheds in cluster (15)

4 to 6 micro watersheds in cluster (10)


Xiii Cluster approach in the hills (more than one contiguous micro-watersheds in the project)

15 Above 5 micro-watersheds in cluster (15)



Total for the Project 150 150 90 41 2.5


9

3.1 Other developmental projects/schemes running in the Idhata cluster:

This Cluster being very backward has been on top priority of a number of development projects. These programmes are Mahatma Gandhi

National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS), Total Sanitation Campaign (TSC), Swarnajayanti Gram Swarojgar Yojana (SGSY), Indira Awas

Yojana (IAY) and Sardar Awas Yojana (SAY). Besides, previously, 5 watersheds project of 2500 ha. Have also been completed in Idhata cluster.

i. MGNREGS: Construction of deepening of ponds, bori bunds, earthen bunds and a forestation activity has been taken-up under NREGA.

ii. Total Sanitation Campaign (TSC):individual toilets are constructed under TSC programme. All the remaining house hold will be covered under

the scheme.

iii. Swarnjayanti Gram Swarozgar Yojana (SGSY) – families are linked with bank and given loan of Rs.46000/- with subsidy of Rs 7500/- each for

animal husbandry. All BPL Families have been involved in this scheme each group of this scheme will be given revolving fund of Rs. 10000

Beneficiary in this Scheme in the Idhata cluster.

iv. Indira Awas Yojana: In this scheme government give rupees 46000/- Awas sahay to BPL Familyes which consider score under 0-16,.also give to

which belong SC/ST

v. Sakhi Mandal : Under this scheme state government give financial sashay to SHG member in terms of Revolving Fund and also bank link with

SHG for Economical improvement activity

Table no.3: Watershed information

Sr.No

Name of the project Villages Name No. Of watersheds to

be treated Watershed code

Watershed regime/type/order

1 Idhata IWMP – 3 Jampur 1 6A1D3c# & 6A1D3b# Micro Watershed

2 Idhata IWMP – 3 Bhorol 1 6A1D3c# & 6A1D3b# Micro Watershed

3 Idhata IWMP – 3 Ganeshpura 1 6A1D3c# & 6A1D3b# Micro Watershed

4 Idhata IWMP – 3 Saba 1 6A1D3c# & 6A1D3b# Micro Watershed

5 Idhata IWMP – 3 Gadsisar 1 6A1D3c# & 6A1D3b# Micro Watershed

6 Idhata IWMP – 3 Idhata 0 6A1D3c# & 6A1D3b# Micro Watershed

Total for the Project 5


10

Table no.4: Developmental programmes running in the project area

Sr. no.

Name of the programme/sche

me Sponsoring agency Objectives of the programme/scheme

Year of commenceme

nt

Villages covered

Estimated number of

beneficiaries

1 TSC Rural Development Dept. Sanitation 2006 6 323

2 IAY Rural Development Dept. Housing 2002 6 224

3 MGNREGS Rural Development Dept. Employment 2005 6 8500

4 Watershed Rural Development Dept. Water Conservation & Soil Moisture Development 2002 3 450

5 Swajaldhara WASMO(C.M.S.U.) B.K. Drinking Water Facility 2004 1 430 HH

6 SGSY Rural Development Dept. Employment of SHGs Group 2001 6 25

Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmes in the project area

Sr. no.

Project name

Year started

Name of villages

No. Of micro

watershed

Watershed codes

Area under

treatment (In Ha.)

Funding source

Nodal agency

PIA Total cost

Expenditure incurred up to start of

IWMP

% financial

completion

% physical completion

1 DDP-6 2001 Jampur 1 6A1D3c# & 6A1D3b#

500 Govt. DRDA Bhansali

Trust,Tharad 30.00 30.00 100% 100%

2 DDP-9 2005 Bhorol 1 6A1D3c# & 6A1D3b#

500 Govt. DRDA Taluka

Panchayat, Tharad

30.00 24.00 80% 80%

3 DDP-8 2004 Ganeshpura 1 6A1D3c# & 6A1D3b#

500 Govt. DRDA

Banaskantha

Rachanatmak

Sangh,Palanpur

30.00 30.00 100% 100%

4 DDP-9 2005 Saba 1 6A1D3c# & 6A1D3b#


Panchayat, Tharad

30.00 24.00 80% 80%

5 DDP-9 2005 Gadsisar 1 6A1D3c# & 6A1D3b#


Panchayat, Tharad

30.00 24.00 80% 80%

6 0 - Idhata 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total for the Project 5 2500 150 132 73% 73%


11

Baseline Data Collection and Capacity building in Idhata Watershed


12

CHAPTER – 2

PROJECT IMPLEMENTING AGENC


13

Table no. 6: PIA:

6.1. Project Implementing Agency

The Project Implementing Agencies (PIA) is selected by an appropriate mechanism by Gujarat State Watershed Management Agency (GSWMA), the

State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) for Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP) in Gujarat. The PIAs are responsible for implementation of

watershed project. These PIAs may include relevant line departments, autonomous organizations under State/ Central Governments, Government

Institutes/ Research bodies, Intermediate Panchayats, Voluntary Organizations (VOs).The PIA for Idhata Cluster watershed Project is Social Forestry

Division, Banaskantha, Palanpur.

6.2 About Social Forestry Division, Banaskantha, Palanpur

6.2.1 The organization and its objectives:

The PIA for Idhata Cluster watershed Project is Social Forestry Division, Banaskantha, Palanpur is a district level Forest Department Division

office and was established by Govt. to oversee the smooth implementation of watershed projects in the Cluster Area. The D.F.O. of Social Forestry

Division, Banaskantha, Palanpur is the P.I.A. of the Project. The PIA has dedicated and experienced staff comprising one Project Officer (from Gujarat

Forest Department), WDT (Agri.), WDT (Civil Engineer), WDT (Community Mobi.), WDT (Accountant), WDT (Data Entry Operator).The objectives of the

PIA are Planning, Implementing, Monitoring, Documenting and promoting Integrated watershed development projects and related developmental

activities in the Cluster Area as per guidelines.

Sr. No. Names of project Details of PIA

1 IWMP-3

Idhata Project

(i)Type of organization Govt.

(ii)Name of organization Forest Department, Gujarat State

(iii) Designation & Address DFO, Social Forestry Division, B.K, Palanpur

(iv)Telephone 02742 257056, 02737 223359

(v)Fax 02742 257056, 02737 223359

(vi)E-mail [email protected]

mailto:[email protected]


14

6.2.2 IWMP Programmes /projects of Social Forestry Division, Banaskantha, Palanpur :

At present 3 IWMP (IWMP-2, 3, 4) projects have been sanctioned by Govt. for Banaskantha district. The entry point activities of all the 3 IWMP

projects have been identified by the respective Cluster Team of PIA in the Project Area.

6.2.3 Short Analysis of the PIA:

Strength:

(1) Dedicated and experienced staff comprising Project Officer (from Gujarat Forest Department) and WDT Team.

(2) Planning, Implementing, Monitoring, Documenting and promoting Integrated watershed development projects and related developmental activities

in the Cluster Area as per guidelines.

(3) Strong linkages with national and state level institutions, agricultural universities of Dantiwada, North Gujarat University and NGOs for capacity building and

technical guidance.

(4) Scientific planning in watershed projects with the help of BISAG, Gandhinagar and other Intuitions Decided by Govt.

(5) District level monitoring, coordination & Co-operation Committee.

Weakness:

(1) Project area is total Rain fed Area Five Years in to Three Year is Drought.

Opportunities:

(1) A number of different other development schemes of the government are running; so, there can be horizontal integration and convergence of programmes.

(2) Better financial provision under IWMP.

(3) Usage of Technology in the Project like GIS System.

Threats:

(1) Rainfall being very scarce and unreliable in the project area, the activities planned to be taken up may yield limited impact.

(2) Irregularities in fund flow can derail the smooth functioning.

(3) Lack of contribution and cooperation from local people.

(4) Low literacy rate in the project are.


15

Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level:

Sr.no. Name Age Sex Designation Qualification Experience Job assigned Monthly

remuneration

1 Shri M.A.Chavada 56 M D.F.O. & P.I.A GFS, B.Sc. 34 Years Planning, Implementing and

Monitoring -

2 Shri J.C.Raval 52 M R.F.O. & Project Officer B.Sc. 30 Years Project Officer -

3 Shri B.R.Patel 25 M WDT(Agri.) B.R.S.(Agri.) 5-Years Agriculture Development

works 8000/-

4 Shri J.M.Darji 43 M WDT(Engineer) Diploma(Civil) 10-Years Engineering works 8000/-

5 Shri R.K.Turi 25 F WDT (Commu. Mobi.) B.R.S. 4-Years Community Mobilization 8000/-

6 Shri M.P.Prajapati 35 M WDT (Accountant) B.Com 12-Years Accountant 7000/-

7 Shri S.G.Mevada 26 M WDT (Computer Op. ) B.A. COPA 3-Years Data Entry 5000/-

8.1 Land use pattern:

The net geographical area of Idhata Cluster watershed is Total 7964.10 ha Area. This is devoid of any sort of vegetation. About 87.65% of land is

under agriculture, which is 94.25% rain-fed, mainly a Kharif crop is taken. No Forest area in the Cluster and agriculture area of the 6980.80 ha. use and

Rain fed area is the 6579.30 ha. Wasteland area is the 3.74 % in the Idhata Cluster.


16

CHAPTER – 3

BASIC INFORMATION OF THE PROJECT AREA


17

Table no. 8: Land use pattern:

Sr.no. Names of villages Geographical Area of

the village Forest Area

Land under agricultural use

Rainfed area

Perm-anent pastu-res

Wasteland

Cultivable Non-cultivable

1 Jampur 944.60 0 710.60 710.60 200.00 0.00 34.00

2 Bhorol 2012.20 0 1703.30 1585.10 133.10 0.00 175.80

3 Ganeshpura 1072.90 0 1015.80 914.60 54.20 0.00 2.90

4 Saba 940.70 0 837.90 837.90 85.20 0.00 17.60

5 Gadsisar 1061.90 0 936.60 936.60 108.10 0.00 17.20

6 Idhata 1931.80 0 1776.60 1594.50 104.80 0.00 50.40

Total for the Project 7964.10 0.00 6980.80 6579.30 685.40 0.00 297.90

9.1 Soil and topography:

Idhata Cluster Watershed Project (IWMP-3) falls under North West Gujarat Agro Climatic Zone. The soil is mainly Sandy, Medium Black, poorly

drained and saline soil. The soil is Alluvial to very whites gray in surface colour. The depth of soil is to deep about 35 to75 cm. The predominant texture

of soil is sandy, Medium Black, poorly drained and saline soil. The soil fertility is medium with low phosphorus and potash. Gentle to moderate ( 3-10% )

slope, dissected stream banks single crop cultivation and scrub lands ( 40% ) moderately deep very deep, dark grayish brown, fine surface texture,

severe to very erosion, unmanaged.

Table no. 9: Soil type and topography:

Sr.No. Name of the Agro-climatic zone covers project area

Area in ha

Names of the villages

Major soil types Topo-graphy

a)Type b) Area

in ha

1 North-West Gujarat Zone 944.60 Jampur Sandy , Medium Black, poorly drained and saline soil 944.60 Flat & moderate slope

2 North-West Gujarat Zone 2012.20 Bhorol Sandy , Medium Black, poorly drained and saline soil 2012.20 Flat & moderate slope

3 North-West Gujarat Zone 1072.90 Ganeshpura Sandy , Medium Black, poorly drained and saline soil 1072.90 Flat & moderate slope

4 North-West Gujarat Zone 940.70 Saba Sandy , Medium Black, poorly drained and saline soil 940.70 Flat & moderate slope

5 North-West Gujarat Zone 1061.90 Gadsisar Sandy , Medium Black, poorly drained and saline soil 1061.90 Flat & moderate slope

6 North-West Gujarat Zone 1931.80 Idhata Sandy , Medium Black, poorly drained and saline soil 1931.80 Flat & moderate slope

Total for the Project 7964.10 7964.10


18

Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition:

Sr.No. Village Flood (Incidence) Drought (Incidence)

1 Jampur Nil Average Once in 2 Years

2 Bhorol Nil Average Once in 2 Years

3 Ganeshpura Nil Average Once in 2 Years

4 Saba Nil Average Once in 2 Years

5 Gadsisar Nil Average Once in 2 Years

6 Idhata Nil Average Once in 2 Years

Table no. 11.1: Soil Erosion

Cause Type of erosion Area affected (ha.) Run off (mm/ year)

Average soil loss (Tonnes/ ha/ year) Water erosion

A Sheet 2994 148

B Rill 924 290

C Gully 202 195

D Ravenous 0

Sub-Total 4120

Wind erosion 5740

Table no. 11.2: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress)

Name of the Village Survey Number Soil pH Type of Salinity

(Inherent/Ingress)

Jampur All Village General 7.50 to 8.0 Inherent

Bhorol All Village General 7.50 to 8.0 Inherent

Ganeshpura All Village General 7.50 to 8.0 Inherent

Saba All Village General 7.50 to 8.0 Inherent

Gadsisar All Village General 7.50 to 8.0 Inherent

Idhata All Village General 7.50 to 8.0 Inherent


19

Table no. 11.3: Water logging Conditions

Name of the Village Survey Number Reasons

Jampur Not Applicable Desert Area never water logging

Bhorol Not Applicable Desert Area never water logging

Ganeshpura Not Applicable Desert Area never water logging

Saba Not Applicable Desert Area never water logging

Gadsisar Not Applicable Desert Area never water logging

Idhata Not Applicable Desert Area never water logging

Table no. 12: Climatic conditions:

Sr.No. Year Average rainfall- last 5

years (In mm)

Average temperature

Summer Winter

Max Min Max Min

1 2004 203 43 32 27 10

2 2005 485 42 30 30 12

3 2006 1154 44 33 28 11

4 2007 544 44 33 26 10

5 2008 566 45 34 28 11

6 2009 228 46 33 30 12

Average for the Project 530 44 33 28 11

12.1: Climatic conditions:

The rainfall is scanty which has resulted in recurrent phenomenon of drought in every two to three years. The average rainfall of this area is about 530mm (from last six year data) with a highest intensity of 95mm within span of a day.


20

Table no. 13: Physiographic and relief

Project name Elevation Slope range (%) Major streams

Idhata IWMP-3 42 15 % Not Available

13.1: Physiographic and relief:

There is Sandy Soil in this area. Rain flow in the Monsoon Season but that time Very slow Run off in the Follow in the soil not Major Streams Available.

Table no. 14: Land ownership details.

Sr. no. Village Total owned land HHs giving

land on lease HHs taking

land on lease Total Gen OBC SC ST

1 Jampur 242 8 211 22 1 18 18

2 Bhorol 642 184 346 70 42 42 42

3 Ganeshpura 305 8 254 43 0 36 36

4 Saba 311 54 225 32 0 10 10

5 Gadsisar 329 32 237 60 0 12 12

6 Idhata 567 204 295 48 20 75 75

Total for the Project 2396 490 1568 275 63 193 193

14.1 Land and Agriculture:

Salinity of ground water has limited the sufficient base for irrigation as kachha well as for agriculture purpose. This affects directly the

demographic profile of the Cluster. The major crops cultivated by the farmers are Bajra (bajara millet). Some of the farmers take up rain-fed Bajara crop

if rainfall is good. The land conservation measures such as earthen bunds and farm bunds in the area will help them to take up a rabi crop of mustard or

cumin in the residual moisture.


21

Table no. 15: Agriculture

Sr. no. Village Net sown area Ha.

One time Two times Three times

1 Jampur 685.60 25.00 00

2 Bhorol 1585.10 118.00 00

3 Ganeshpura 914.60 101.00 00

4 Saba 810.90 27.00 00

5 Gadsisar 911.60 25.00 00

6 Idhata 1594.50 182.00 00

Total for the Project 6502.3 478 0

15.1 Agriculture:

Salinity of ground water has limited the sufficient base for irrigation as kachha well as for agriculture purpose. The major crops cultivated by

the farmers are Bajra (bajara millet), Pulse, Fodder(Juvar). Some Area are irrigated by Open Well. The Farmers take crops in Rabi season are Cumin,

Castor and Mustered.

Table no. 16: Irrigation

Sr. no. Village Source 1 : Canal Source 2 : Check dam / Pond Source 3 : Tube/Open Wells

Availability months

Net area Gross area Availability

months Net area Gross area

Availability months

Net area Gross area

1 Jampur 0 0 0 0 0 0 3- Months 25.00 As same

2 Bhorol 0 0 0 0 0 0 3- Months 118.00 As same

3 Ganeshpura 0 0 0 0 0 0 3- Months 101.00 As same

4 Saba 0 0 0 0 0 0 3- Months 27.00 As same

5 Gadsisar 0 0 0 0 0 0 3- Months 25.00 As same

6 Idhata 0 0 0 0 0 0 3- Months 182.00 As same

Total for the Project 0 0 0 0 0 0 478.00


22

Table no. 17: Crop details:

Sr. no. Village

Kharif (Monsoon)

Millet (Bajra) Pulses (Mung / Tal/ Muth/ Gavar) Other ( Juvar Fodder)

Area (In ha.)

Production (000’Kg.)

Productivity (Kg. / Ha.)

Area (In ha.)



Area (In ha.)



1 Jampur 274 123300 450 274 90499 330 137 164400 1200

2 Bhorol 634 329680 520 634 234595 370 317 453310 1430

3 Ganeshpura 365 186150 510 366 131702 360 182 267540 1470

4 Saba 324 142560 440 324 103795 320 162 184680 1140

5 Gadsisar 364 163800 450 365 120331 330 182 214760 1180

6 Idhata 637 337610 530 638 235986 370 318 483360 1520

Total for the Project 2598 1283100 483 2601 916908 347 1298 1768050 1323

Sr. no. Village

Rabi (Winter)

Cumin Castor Other- Mustered

Area (In ha.)



Area (In ha.)



Area (In ha.)



1 Jampur 25 10000 400 0 0 0 0 0 0

2 Bhorol 60 25500 425 45 36000 800 13 9750 750

3 Ganeshpura 53 23320 440 40 32000 800 8 6000 750

4 Saba 27 11880 440 0 0 0 0 0 0

5 Gadsisar 25 11750 470 0 0 0 0 0 0

6 Idhata 102 46920 460 60 49200 820 20 14000 700


Sr. no. Village

Zaid (Summer)

Crop 1 Crop 2 Crop 3

Area (In ha.)



Area (In ha.)



Area (In ha.)



1 Jampur 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2 Bhorol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

3 Ganeshpura 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

4 Saba 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

5 Gadsisar 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

6 Idhata 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0



23

Crop Productivity :-

The Results indicate that Project Area has very low Productivity Compared to India, Gujarat and Banaskantha .

The Reason of low productivity are the land is un productive and the farmers skills to manage their crop as insufficient.

Famine affected area and no sourse of regular irrigation.

The Project area is near to desert of rann of kutch , so The land’s Ph is very high and salty water.

No use high-tech and Technology (High Yield- seed, Fertilizer, Pesticide, Micro irrigation, etc.) in the farming . They Farming old custom.

Most reason of low productivity is depending on monsoon season(Rain fed area) and economically backward community .

Table no. 18: Livestock

Sr. no. Village Buffalo Cow Total Milk

(Buffalo + Cow)

Goat Sheep Bullock Hen

Others (Vachharda) No. Milk (lt.) No. Milk (lt.) No. Milk (lt.)

1 Jampur 196 246700 59 37000 283700 162 18144 102 99 0 101

2 Bhorol 347 419870 133 83790 503660 266 30590 76 108 0 190

3 Ganeshpura 185 228475 95 60325 288800 99 11880 27 32 0 123

4 Saba 163 189080 52 32240 221320 157 18055 115 74 0 112

5 Gadsisar 220 268400 74 45880 314280 114 13680 64 82 0 150

6 Idhata 334 405810 216 142560 548370 237 29625 47 147 0 185

Total for the Project 1445 1758335 629 401795 2160130 1035 121974 431 542 0 861

18.1 Livestock:

The Cluster has 629 cows, 1445 buffaloes, 542 bullocks, 1035 goats and 431 sheep. Majority of Rajput, Prajapati, Harijan, Patel, Rabari

community depends on buffaloes & cows rearing for their livelihood. Cows and buffaloes are of local breed. Lack of rain and surface water has reduced

the fodder and pasture availability for their animals. This leads to migration to other parts of the state with their herds of goats and sheep. Milk

production is so full that there is dairy co-operative and private milk collection in the Cluster.


24

Table no. 19: Drinking water (explain this table)

Sr. no.

Village Ground water table (mt) Source of drinking water Availability in

months Quality

1 Jampur 10 Well / G.W.S.S.B. 8 Unfit in Biological Test

2 Bhorol 12 Well / G.W.S.S.B. 8 Unfit in Biological Test

3 Ganeshpura 12 Well / G.W.S.S.B. 10 Unfit in Biological Test

4 Saba 10 Well / G.W.S.S.B. 8 Unfit in Biological Test

5 Gadsisar 10 Well / G.W.S.S.B. 10 Unfit in Biological Test

6 Idhata 12 Well / G.W.S.S.B. 10 Unfit in Biological Test

19.1: Drinking water:-

Drinking Water Facility available under GWSSB by Regional water scheme for Average Drinking Water Facility available 10 to 12 Months in the

Project Area.

Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources

Sr. No.

Names of project

CPR Particulars

Total Area (ha) Area owned/ In possession of

Area available for treatment (ha)

Pvt. persons Govt.

(specify deptt.)

PRI Any other (Pl.

Specify) Pvt.

persons

Govt. (specify deptt.)

PRI Any other

(Pls. Specify)

1 IWMP-3 Jampur

Wasteland/ degraded land 34.00 10.00

Pastures 200.00 100.00

Orchards

Village Woodlot

Forest 0 0

Village Ponds/ Tanks 4.00 2.00

Community Buildings 2.00 0

Weekly Markets

Permanent markets

Temples/ Places of worship 2.00 1.00

Others (Pl. specify)

Total 242.00 113.00


25

2 IWMP-3 Bhorol


Pastures 133.10 50.00

Orchards

Village Woodlot

Forest 0 0



Weekly Markets

Permanent markets



Total 327.90 107.00

3 IWMP-3

Ganeshpura


Pastures 54.20 20.00

Orchards

Village Woodlot

Forest 0 0



Weekly Markets

Permanent markets



Total 65.10 22.00

4 IWMP-3

Saba


Pastures 85.20 40.00

Orchards

Village Woodlot

Forest 0 0




26

Weekly Markets

Permanent markets



Total 110.80 51.00

5 IWMP-3 Gadsisar


Pastures 108.10 50.00

Orchards

Village Woodlot

Forest 0 0



Weekly Markets

Permanent markets



Total 133.30 61.00

6 IWMP-3 Idhata


Pastures 104.80 55.00

Orchards

Village Woodlot

Forest 0 0



Weekly Markets

Permanent markets



Total 174.20 77.00

Total for the Project 1053.30 431.00


27

Field Activities in Idhata Watershed


28

21.1 Demographic Status:

Idhata Cluster watershed project has a total of 2639 households with a population of 13476 (as per Base Line) out of which 7096 are male and

6380 female. The sex ratio is 899 female to 1000 male. There are 1097 BPL families. The average family size is 4. The total literacy rate is 47.70% male

literacy rate is 73.62% percent and female literacy rate is low 26.38% per cent. The major castes in the Cluster are Rajput, Prajapati, Harijan, Patel,

Rabari, and Schedule Caste. Majority of population is involved in agriculture and animal husbandry.

Table no. 21: Demographic information

Sr. no.

Village Population SC ST

Total Male Female Total Male Female % Total Male Female %

1 Jampur 1299 682 617 160 84 76 12.31 0 0 0 0

2 Bhorol 4016 2092 1924 475 247 228 11.82 356 188 168 8.86

3 Ganeshpura 1758 943 815 251 138 113 14.28 6 3 3 0.34

4 Saba 1566 827 739 146 74 72 9.32 0 0 0 0

5 Gadsisar 1626 847 779 308 159 149 18.94 5 3 2 0.30

6 Idhata 3211 1705 1506 203 109 94 6.32 104 53 51 3.24

Total for the Project 13476 7096 6380 1543 811 732 12.17 471 247 224 2.12

Table no. 22: Literacy rate

Sr. no. Village Literacy Literacy % above

age 14 Literacy % below

age 14 Total % Male % Female %

1 Jampur 595 45.80 469 78.80 126 21.20 58.50 41.50

2 Bhorol 2092 52.10 1510 72.20 582 27.80 66.50 33.50

3 Ganeshpura 832 47.30 611 73.40 221 26.60 67.60 32.40

4 Saba 665 42.50 530 79.70 135 20.30 68.10 31.90

5 Gadsisar 737 45.30 515 69.90 222 30.10 60.90 39.10

6 Idhata 1708 53.20 1156 67.70 552 32.30 63.70 36.30

Total for the Project 6629 47.70 4791 73.62 1838 26.38 64.22 35.78


29

22.1: Literacy rate:-

The literacy rate of total Population is 47.70%, Over all Male is 73.62%, Female is 26.38%, The literacy rate of above age 14years is 64.22% and

literacy rate of below age 14years is 35.78%. It is very low.

Reasons of low literacy rate are high Poorly, More community are SC, ST, Backward community and high Work force of Agriculture labours.

No regularly income sourse and high migration is also reason of low literacy.

Table no. 23: Migration details

Sr. no.

Village Total

population

Migration Migration by months Main reason for

migration

Income during migration /

month Total Male Female

Up to 3 months

3-6 months

More than 6 months

1 Jampur 1299 213 190 23 38 90 85

Very Low Rainfall & No Sources of

Irrigation and No Regularly Income

Average 2000/- Per Month

2 Bhorol 4016 542 345 197 23 214 305 As above As above

3 Ganeshpura 1758 329 192 37 94 104 131 As above As above

4 Saba 1566 313 271 42 90 117 106 As above As above

5 Gadsisar 1626 325 295 30 99 122 104 As above As above

6 Idhata 3211 487 402 85 47 264 176 As above As above

Total for the Project 13476 2209 1695 414 391 911 907 - -

23.1: Migration Details:-

The most Reasons of high migration are No regularly income sourse and Famine affected area. Literacy rate is very low.

Most income Sourse is Agriculture and Animal husbandry but Sourse of irrigation not available and Very Low Rainfall.

People migrate during year to different part of the state like Tharad, Deesa, Palanpur and Surat for Agriculture labours, Construction works and

Diamond works.


30

Table no. 24: Poverty

Sr. no. Village Total Household BPL

% of BPL HH Total Land less HH % of land less HH 0-16 16-20 Total

1 Jampur 260 181 54 235 90.38 18 6.92

2 Bhorol 724 182 249 431 59.53 82 11.32

3 Ganeshpura 351 48 35 83 23.65 46 13.10

4 Saba 321 46 104 150 46.73 10 3.12

5 Gadsisar 341 4 28 32 9.38 12 3.52

6 Idhata 642 73 93 166 25.85 75 11.68

Total for the Project 2639 534 563 1097 42.59 243 8.28

24.1: Poverty Details:-

The Results indicate that Project Area has very high Poverty Compared to India, Gujarat and Banaskantha .

The high migration and No regularly income sourse and Famine affected area. Literacy rate is very low.

More community are SC, ST, Backward community and high Work force of Agriculture labours.

Most income Sourse is Agriculture and Animal husbandry but Sourse of irrigation not available and Very Low Rainfall.

The low productivity and the land are un productive and the farmers skills to manage their crop as insufficient.

The Project area is near to desert of rann of kutch , So The land’s Ph is very high and salty water, No use high-tech and Technology (High Yield-

seed, Fertilizer, Pesticide, Micro irrigation, etc.) in the farming. They Farming old custom.

Most Agriculture area are un irrigated is depending on monsoon season (Rain fed area) and economically backward community.

None Development area for industry and other for regularly employing.


31

25.1 Village Infrastructure facilities:

Idhata Cluster watershed is well connected with Tharad Taluka with Paver roads. The Cluster has electricity connectivity available under

Jyotigram Yojana of the State Government. Nearly 85 percent of households in the Cluster have their personal electric meters. Idhata Cluster has a

primary school with all facilities to all six Villages. For Secondary and higher secondary education, the students have to go to Bhorol, Idhata, Sanval.

Idhata Cluster is about Tharad 22 km away. The some Cluster Villages have not the Primary Health Centre for which villages have go to Bhorol CHC

which is 8 Km. away. The Cluster villages come under a Group Panchayat. All villages have post facility available and also Co-operative milk collection

centre and Seva Sahakari mandali for Agriculture Finance by Co-operative Banks.

Table no. 25: Village infrastructure

Sr. no.

Village

Pucca road

to the village (Y/N)

Schools College

s (Numb

er)

Post Office

(Distance)

Banks (Number)

Distance from

nearest market

yard (K.M.)

Milk collection

centre (Number)

Milk cooperative

(Number)

Other cooperatives / CBIs

(Number)

Any other institution LP UP HS

1 Jampur Yes Yes No No No No No 24 1 1 2 No

2 Bhorol Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No 18 1 1 2 Pani

Samitee

3 Ganeshpura Yes Yes No No No No No 18 1 1 2 No

4 Saba Yes Yes No No No No No 35 1 1 2 No

5 Gadsisar Yes Yes No No No Yes No 32 1 1 2 No

6 Idhata Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No 10 1 2 2 No

Total for the Project 6 6 2 0 0 3 0 - 6 7 12 1


32

Table no. 26 : Facilities / HH assets

Sr.

no. Village

HHs with

electricity

HHs with

safety

latrines

HHs with phones HHs with vehicle HHs with

TV set

HHs with

cooking

gas

HHs with

Drinking

water

HHs with

fridge Land line Mobile 2-wheeler 4-wheeler

1 Jampur 250 25 5 174 4 6 7 2 160 1

2 Bhorol 627 94 74 438 9 14 78 16 215 18

3 Ganeshpura 284 12 3 213 13 5 11 4 0 6

4 Saba 290 10 0 185 8 15 10 2 0 5

5 Gadsisar 275 5 5 223 5 11 13 2 217 5

6 Idhata 522 177 17 534 22 34 103 44 164 22

Total for the Project 2248 323 104 1767 61 85 222 70 756 57

27.1. Livelihood pattern:

The Clusters earn their livelihood from animal husbandry and agriculture and during lean seasons they migrate for daily wage labourers in

agriculture labour in other parts like, diamond, construction and carpeting work. Women are working handicraft in summer season.

Table no. 27: Income

Sr. no. Village Agriculture (In.Rs.) Animal husbandry

(In.Rs.)

Casual labour

(In.Rs.) Others (In.Rs.) Total (In.Rs.)

1 Jampur 2940000 1986000 426000 87500 5439500

2 Bhorol 9240000 3525500 2084000 84000 14933500

3 Ganeshpura 5796000 2021500 658000 45500 8521000

4 Saba 3150000 1549000 626000 63000 5388000

5 Gadsisar 3780000 2195000 650000 10500 6635500

6 Idhata 9975000 3838500 974000 164500 14952000

Total for the Project 34881000 15115500 5418000 455000 55869500


33

Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR

Sr. no. Village Fuel Fodder

Total income (Rs.) % sells Income % sells Income

1 Jampur 0 0 0 0 0

2 Bhorol 0 0 0 0 0

3 Ganeshpura 0 0 0 0 0

4 Saba 0 0 0 0 0

5 Gadsisar 0 0 0 0 0

6 Idhata 0 0 0 0 0

Total for the Project 0 0 0 0 0

There is not available Forest Area, Pastures land in the Project area. Not income of Fuel and Fodder in the Project area.

Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution)

Sr. no. Village Total

workforce Agriculture

Animal

husbandry

(AH)

Agriculture +

AH

Casual

labour Services Handicraft Others

1 Jampur 1019 613 68 92 213 25 4 4

2 Bhorol 3162 2002 222 273 542 24 12 87

3 Ganeshpura 1376 821 91 109 329 13 6 7

4 Saba 1233 714 79 96 313 18 10 3

5 Gadsisar 1274 743 83 101 325 3 8 11

6 Idhata 2539 1624 180 168 487 47 17 16

Total for the Project 10603 6517 723 839 2209 130 57 128


34

CHAPTER – 4

WATERSHED ACTIVITIES


35

Watershed Activities: Watershed management as a strategy has been adopted by Government of India especially in the rain-fed regions of semi-arid

tropics. These regions are characterized by low and undependable rain, low soil fertility, poor infrastructure development, low literacy and

high incidence of migration. Several studies have identified that there is a dire need of a systematic and scientific approach to deal with

watershed development. The common guidelines generate a fresh and flexible framework for the next generation watershed development.

30.1 Scientific Planning:

(1) Cluster Approach

This envisages a broader vision of Geo-hydrological unit which involves treating a cluster of micro-watershed. The Idhata Project consists

of Two micro- watersheds namely 6A1D3c#, 6A1D3b# as their respective codes. Further Idhata watershed project is in continuation with other

watershed projects namely Idhata and Golgam Projects this gives an element of continuation of the programme.

(2) Base line Survey

To access the impact of any watershed development programme a detailed baseline survey has to be conducted. This acts a benchmark

for any intervention during and post implementation of any development programme. A detailed baseline survey was undertaken which

involved household census survey, Bio-physical survey and Village level data collection from Talati –cum mantri. Household census survey

includes a detailed questionnaire which was been filled by visiting each and every household in the village. This gave in the details of the

demographic profile of the village, the literacy percentage, SC/ST population, number of BPL household, cattle population, and net consumption

rate in the village, average milk production of the cattle and various schemes running and their benefits.

Bio-physical survey was undertaken to identify various natural resources available in the village. It included the soil typology, well in the

area, crop taken in the field, Cropping pattern, fertilizer used and various sources of irrigation in the field.


36

(3)Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA)

The past experience of watershed has given tremendous input to focus on creating accountability of the stakeholders towards the

programme. This has created an emphasis to include all the stakeholder communities and their local and indigenous Technological Knowledge

(ITK) while planning for any activity. Participatory approach provides a new path for planning, implementing, and monitoring and post-

withdrawal activities with a complete accountability of the stakeholders. Various PRA techniques like resource mapping, social mapping, and

season calendars were used to understand the physical and social orientation of the village in general and watershed in specific. These tools put

the villagers in ease than the complicated questionnaires. Various tools like Matrix ranking, Venn diagram were used to identify various local

vegetations (A forestation), Fodders crops, various institutions and their significance in the life of the farmers.

(4)Use of GIS and Remote sensing for planning

Use of various high science tools has been promoted at various stages of watershed development.

a)Prioritization

Geographical Information System (GIS) has been used for prioritization process. Various layer maps were created like Geo-morphological,

Soil, BPL Population, SC/ST population, Ground water Status, Drinking water situation Slope percent. These were all given proper weight age

according to the DoLR specification. This helped in prioritization of various watershed areas.

b)Planning

An action plan was formulated by Cluster Team and taking into account various in the area for wasteland and agricultural land. GPS was

used to identify each and every water conservation structures available in the project area. This was used to create a map.

c)Hydrological modelling

Hydrology modelling technique was used for locating drainage, stream length, flow direction, sink and Flow accumulation. This model

overlaid over cadastral map to calculate the catchment area of each structures like the Earthen Band etc. This has helped to remove the human

error which generally occurs while calculating the catchment area of an Earthen Band.


37

Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects

Sr. no.

Scientific criteria/ inputs used Whether scientific criteria was

used

(A)Planning -

Cluster approach YES Whether technical back-stopping for the project has been arranged? If yes, mention the name of the Institute

BISAG

Baseline survey YES Hydro-geological survey YES Contour mapping YES Participatory Net Planning (PNP) YES Remote sensing data-especially soil/ crop/ run-off cover YES Ridge to Valley treatment No Ridge Area Online IT connectivity between YES

(1)Project and DRDA cell/ZP YES

(2)DRDA and SLNA YES

(3)SLNA and DoLR YES

Availability of GIS layers -

1.Cadastral map YES 2.Village boundaries YES 3.Drainage YES 4.Soil (Soil nutrient status) YES 5.Land use YES 6.Ground water status YES 7.Watershed boundaries YES 8.Activity YES Crop simulation models# NO Integrated coupled analyzer/ near infrared visible spectroscopy/ medium spectroscopy for high speed soil nutrient analysis

-


38

Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)# -

Weather Station

YES (B)Inputs - 1.Bio-pesticides YES 2.Organic manures YES 3.Vermi compost YES 4.Bio-fertilizer YES 5.Water saving devices YES 6.Mechanized tools/ implements YES 7.Bio-fencing YES 8.Nutrient budgeting YES 9.Automatic water level recorders & sediment samplers NO

Any other (please specify) -

Institution and Capacity building

31.1 Watershed Committee (WC):

The Watershed committee is constituted by Gram Sabha to Planning; implement and supervising the watershed project with technical

support of WDT in the village. This committee will be under society Registration Act 1860. The Gram Sabha of the village selects the chairman of

the watershed committee with the secretary who will be a paid functionary and manage Account. The watershed Committee was formed

accordingly also sub- watershed committee was formed in the village. Capacity building training to the watershed committee is given by WDT.

The watershed committee has a pivotal role to play during and after the project implementation period.


39

Table no. 31: Watershed Committee details

Sr. no.

Names of WCs

Date of Registration as a Society (dd/mm/yyyy)

Name Designati

on

M/F

SC

ST

SF

MF

LF

Land-less

UG SHG

GP

Any othe

r

Educational

qualification

Function/s assigned#

1 Jampur

Watershed Committee

1 Prajapati Dharmabhai Bhikhabhai

Chairman M A,B,D,E

2 Doshi Vasantlal Amulkhbhai

Secretary M A, B,C, D

3 Katariya Ratnabhai Rupabhai

Member M Y A,B,G,I

4 Rabari (Makvana) Vohatabhai Ratnabhai

Member M A,B,G,I

5 Chauhan Sitaben Harkhabhai

Member F A,B,G,I

6 Dhemecha Vaniben Udabhai

Member F A,B,G,I

7 Sarvaniya Madhabhai Hengolabhai

Member M A,B,G,I

8 Nai Tagabhai Virmabhai Member M A,B,G,I

9 Dodgama Premabhai Kalabhai

Member M A,B,G,I

10 Padhiyar Hemaben Bhurabhai

Member F A,B,G,I

11 Turi(Rathod) Ritaben

Kantibhai W.D.T. F Y - - - - - - - PIA B.R.S.

A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H,I

Total -

2 Bhorol

Watershed Committee

1 Chauhan Jogaji Vanaji Chairman M A,B,D,E

2 Rathod Modabhai

Pitambarbhai Secretary M A, B,C, D


40

3 Vanol Ganeshbhai Amraji Member M A,B,G,I

4 Vanol Ramjibhai Vastaji Member M A,B,G,I

5 Chauhan Devjibhai

Narsengji Member M A,B,G,I

6 Rabari Hirabhai

Karamshibhai Member M A,B,G,I

7 Patel Motibhai Premaji Member M A,B,G,I

8 Patel Mavabhai

Gagdasbhai Member M A,B,G,I

9 Vyas Raniben Ramjibhai Member F A,B,G,I

10 Bhail Jemalbhai Okhaji M A,B,G,I

11 Parmar Lachhiben

Rupshibhai F A,B,G,I

12 Umat Nilaben Vanaji Member F A,B,G,I

13 Turi(Rathod) Ritaben

Kantibhai W.D.T. F - - - - - - - PIA

B.R.S.(Agronomy)

A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H,I

Total -

3 Ganeshpura Watershed Committee

1 Gauswami Devpuri

Bhurpuri Chairman M Y Y 8th pass A,B,D,E

2 Patel Pirabhai Raymalbhai Secretary M Y Y M.A A, B,C, D

3 Patel(Od) Rupabhai

Kanjibhai Member M Y Y

Milk-Dairy

Illiterate A,B,G,I

4 Patel Moghiben

Meghrajbhai Member F Y Illiterate A,B,G,I

5 Thakor(Makvana)

Shankarbhai Hardasbhai Member M Y 5th pass A,B,G,I

6 Brahman(Nanivada)

Hansaben Gordhanbhai Member F Y 4th pass A,B,G,I


41

7 Patel(Fok) Ravjibhai

Vajeshibhai Member M Y 7th pass A,B,G,I

8 Patel (Od) Kalabhai

Nanjibhai Member M Y Y Illiterate A,B,G,I

9 Patel (Od) Vajeshibhai

Narsengabhai Member M Y Illiterate A,B,G,I

10 Bajaniya Sejiben

Ravtabhai Member F Y Y Illiterate A,B,G,I

11 Darji Jayantilal Maftlal W.D.T. M - - - - - - - PIA Diploma-

Civil

A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H,I

Total

4 Saba

Watershed Committee

1 Madhavi Amrutbhai

Devjibhai Chairman M A,B,D,E

2 Bochiya Shantibhai

Raymalbhai Secretary M A, B,C, D

3 Bochiya Paniben

Dhanabhai Member F A,B,G,I

4 Madhavi Putliben Pirabhai Member F A,B,G,I

5 Rajput Shankarbhai

Laxmanbhai Member M A,B,G,I

6 Madhavi Amirambhai

Vajerambhai Member M A,B,G,I

7 Parmar Kalabhai

Okhabhai Member M A,B,G,I

8 Kalar(Rabari) Mafiben

Shankarbhai Member F A,B,G,I

9 Prajapati Manabhai

Rudabhai Member M A,B,G,I


42

10 Kandli Raghnathbhai

Ramengabhai Member M A,B,G,I

11 Moji Lumbabhai Chamnaji Member M A,B,G,I

12 Moji Bhemabhai

Khetabhai Member M A,B,G,I

13 Bhuriya Leraben

Mavjibhai Member F A,B,G,I

14 Patel Nathabhai Motabhai Member M A,B,G,I

15 Patel Bhemabhai

Ramshibhai W.D.T. M - - - - - - - PIA B.R.S.

A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H,I

Total -

5 Gadsisar

Watershed Committee

1 Dighari Modabhai

Prabhuram Chairman M A,B,D,E

2 Hadiyal Shantibhai

Gagabhai Secretary M A, B,C, D

3 Bhunjar Hemrajbhai

Govdabhai Member M A,B,G,I

4 Rabari Harjibhai

Kunpabhai Member M A,B,G,I

5 Doshi Sevantilal Mavjibhai Member M A,B,G,I

6 Makvana Chaganbhai

Velabhai Member M A,B,G,I

7 Hadiyal Shantibhai

Chelabhai Member M A,B,G,I

8 Solanki Mehabhai

Narsengabhai Member M A,B,G,I

9 Makvana Vihabhai

Danabhai Member M A,B,G,I


43

10 Dighari Vasantiben

Rameshbhai Member F A,B,G,I

11 Chaudhri Kasubiben

Nanjibhai Member F A,B,G,I

12 Chaudhri Sitaben Jogabhai Member F A,B,G,I

13 Chaudhri Ranabhai

Vagabhai Member M A,B,G,I

14 Malavi Sendhabhai

Ranchhodbhai Member M A,B,G,I

15 Patel Bhemabhai

Ramshibhai W.D.T. M - - - - - - - PIA

B.R.S.(Agronomy)

A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H,I

Total -

6 Idhata

Watershed Committee

1 Chauhan Umedsinh

Hamirji Chairman M A,B,D,E

2 Chauhan Jevatsinh

Varagsinh Secretary M A, B,C, D

3 Br.(Rajgor) Amirambhai

Magabhai Member M A,B,G,I

4 Galchar(Harijan)

Masrubhai Dhudabhai Member M A,B,G,I

5 Patel Rupabhai

Masengabhai Member M A,B,G,I

6 Bhil Babiben Shankarbhai Member F A,B,G,I

7 Galchar (Rabari)

Karshanbhai Ramjilal Member M A,B,G,I

8 Parmar (Rajput)

Madhabhai Ratabhai Member M A,B,G,I

9 Rajgor(Br) Divaliben Member F A,B,G,I


44

Ramjibhai

10 Vajir Babiben Kanjibhai Member F A,B,G,I

11 Darji Jayantilal Maftlal

W.D.T. M - - - - - - - PIA Diploma-

Civil

A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H,I

Total -

Total for the Project -

# Only the letter assigned, as below, needs to be typed, except for `J’, where the type may be specifically mentioned. A. PNP and PRA B. Planning C. Maintenance of Accounts D. Signing of cheques and making payments E. Supervision of construction activities F. Cost Estimation G. Verification & Measurement H. Record of labour employed I. Social Audit J. Any other (please specify).

32.1 Self Help Group

Self Help Groups are motivated, small homogenous groups organized together through credit and thrift activities. Self help group initiative

especially for women help uplift their livelihood. Generally self help groups include landless and poor women.

Before formation of the SHGs, during PRA activities, Focussed Group Discussions (FGDs) were held with the women, which came up with the

following observations:

a)Lack of proper credit facilities due to low intervention of formal financial credit institution.

b)Excessive exploitation of weaker section by money lenders

c)Lack of attitude for saving among poor people

d)Lack of knowledge on credit and thrift activity and banking.


45

Table no. 32: SHG detail :-

S. No./Village Total no. of registered SHGs No. of members

No. of SC/ST in each category

No. of BPL in each category

With only Men With only Women

With both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total

01 Jampur

1 2 - 3

(i) Landless 2 1 3 - - - - - -

(ii) SF 3 12 15 - - - - 10 10

(iii) MF - - - - - - - - -

(iv) LF 6 7 13 - - - - - -

Total 1 2 - 3 11 20 31 - - - - 10 10

02 Bhorol

- - 2 2

(i) Landless - - - - - - - - -

(ii) SF 3 7 10 - - - - - -

(iii) MF - - - - - - - - -

(iv) LF 4 6 10 - - - - - -

Total - - 2 2 7 13 20 - - - - - -

03 Ganeshpura

1 1 - 2

(i) Landless - - - - - - - - -

(ii) SF - 2 2 - - - - - -

(iii) MF - - - - - - - - -

(iv) LF 10 8 18 - - - - - -

Total 1 1 - 2 10 10 20 - - - - - -

04 Saba

1 - 5 6

(i) Landless 2 - 2 4 - 4 10 - 10

(ii) SF 13 5 18 - - - - - -

(iii) MF 11 10 21 - - - - - -

(iv) LF 13 7 20 - - - - - -

Total 1 - 5 6 39 22 61 4 - 4 10 - 10

05 Gadsisar

2 1 4 7

(i) Landless - 8 8 11 17 28 2 8 10

(ii) SF 17 13 30 - - - - - -

(iii) MF 16 7 23 - - - - - -

(iv) LF 5 4 9 - - - - - -

Total 2 1 4 7 38 32 70 11 17 28 2 8 10


46

06 Idhata

- 2 - 2

(i) Landless - - - - - - - - -

(ii) SF - 15 15 - - - - - -

(iii) MF - - - - - - - - -

(iv) LF - 5 5 - - - - -

Total - 2 - 2 - 20 20 - - - - - -

Total for the Project

33.1 User Group:

User Groups are normally formed to manage an activity or asset created under the programme on a long term basis. The user group

collect user charges from their members, oversee the works and manage the benefits. It was decided that each group would formulate

certain internal rules and have a feeling of ownership with community spirit.

Table no. 33: UG detail

S. No. Total no. of UGs No. of members

No. of SC/ST in each category

No. of BPL in each category

Men Women Both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total

01 36 00 06 42

(i)Landless 35 17 52 17 3 20 17 3 20

(ii) SF 210 8 218 23 2 25 13 2 15

(iii) MF 180 0 180 10 0 10 0 0 0

(iv) LF 50 0 50 5 0 5 0 0 0

Total 36 00 06 42 475 25 500 55 05 60 30 05 35

Total for the Project 36 00 06 42 475 25 500 55 05 60 30 05 35


47

34.1. Physical activities to be undertaken under IWMP, Idhata.

Entry Point activity (EPA):

EPA activities are taken up under watershed projects to build a rapport with the village community at the beginning of the project;

generally, certain important works which are in urgent demand of the local community are taken up. A group Discussion was conducted

with watershed Development Committee regarding the EPA activity, it was conveyed to the WC that an amount of Rs. 30.00 Lakh was

allotted for EPA activity, which was 4 per cent of total allocated budget. The villagers discussed various activities which they felt is important

but after a brief discussion it was conveyed to them that only those activities can be taken, which revive the common natural resources. It

was also taken into priority that there should be an instrument of convergence which will result in sustainability of activities like as the

water tank, havada, new well, Pipeline, Shman Chapri.

Table no.34: Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs.)

S. No. Names of Villages Amount earmarked for EPA Entry Point Activities planned Estimated cost (Rs, In Lakh)

1 Jampur 2.55 lacs Protection Wall 2.24

Pipeline 0.31 Total 2.55 lacs

2 Bhorol 8.40 lacs

Protection Wall 1.14

Pipeline (90mm) 1.53


Verry (well) Construction 1.25

Smashan Chapri 1.05

R.O.Plant in School-2 nos. 1.08

CattleTrough 0.40 Total 8.40 lacs

3 Ganeshpura 3.00 lacs R.C.C. Cistern 1.70

Pipeline 0.90

CattleTrough 0.40 Total 3.00 lacs


48

4 Saba 2.55 lacs CattleTrough 0.76

Pipeline 1.25

R.O.Plant in School 0.54 Total 2.55 lacs

5 Gadsisar 3.00 lacs Protection Wall 1.10

Pipeline 0.50

R.C.C. Cistern 1.70 Total 3.30 lacs

6 Idhata 10.20 lacs

Protection Wall-2 nos. 1.76


Smashan Chapri-2 nos. 2.10

CattleTrough-2 nos. 1.54

R.C.C. Cistern 1.70 Total 10.20 lacs

Total for the Project 30.00 lacs

Table no.35: Details of activities of preparatory phase (All financial figures in lakh Rs.)

S. No .

Name of villages Initiation of village level institution

Capacity building

IEC activities Baseline survey

Hydro-geological survey

Identifying technical support agencies

Any other (please specify)

Estimated Cost (Rs. in

lakh)

1 Jampur 1.00 1.594 0.594 0.319 0.064 0.191 0.064 3.825

2 Bhorol 3.25 5.250 2.00 1.050 0.210 0.630 0.210 12.60

3 Ganeshpura 1.20 1.875 0.675 0.375 0.075 0.225 0.075 4.50

4 Saba 1.00 1.594 0.594 0.319 0.064 0.191 0.064 3.825

5 Gadsisar 1.30 2.063 0.763 0.413 0.083 0.248 0.083 4.95

6 Idhata 4.00 6.375 2.375 1.275 0.255 0.765 0.255 15.30

Total for the Project 11.75 18.75 7.00 3.75 0.75 2.25 0.75 45.00


49

Watershed Development Works:

Table no.36: Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)

S. No.

Village name Type of structures

Proposed target

Augmentation/ repair of existing structures

Construction of new structures Total target

No.

Area to be

irrigated (ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost

No.

Area to be

irrigated (ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost

Area to be

irrigated (ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost

1 Jampur Pond 2 9 90,00000 4.50 9 90,00000 4.50

Farm pond 10 2 40,000 1.00 2 40,000 1.00

Total 2 9 9,000,000 4.50 10 2 40,000 1.00 11 9,040,000 5.50

3 Ganeshpura Pond 2 10 100,00000 5.00 10 100,00000 5.00

Farm pond - - - - 10 2 40,000 1.00 2 40,000 1.00

Total 2 10 10,000,000 5.00 10 2 40000 1.00 12 10,040,000 6.00

4 Saba Pond 2 10 100,00000 5.00 10 100,00000 5.00

Farm pond - - - - 10 2 40,000 1.00 2 40,000 1.00

Total 2 10 10,000,000 5.00 10 2 40000 1.00 12 10,040,000 6.00

5 Gadsisar Pond 2 10 100,00000 5.00 10 100,00000 5.00

Farm pond - - - - 20 4 80,000 2.00 4 80,000 2.00

Total 2 10 10,000,000 5.00 20 4 80000 2.00 14 10,080,000 7.00

6 Idhata Pond 3 31 310,00000 15.50 31 310,00000 15.50

Farm pond - - - - 60 12 240,000 6.00 12 240,000 6.00

Total 3 31 31,000,000 15.5 60 12 240000 6 43 31,240,000 21.5

Total for the Project 14 98 98000000 49 154 31 616000 15.4 129 98616000 64.4

2 Bhorol Pond 3 28 280,00000 14.00 28 280,00000 14.00

Farm pond - - - - 44 9 176,000 4.40 9 176,000 4.40

Total 3 28 28,000,000 14.00 44 9 176000 4.40 37 28,176,000 18.40


50

Table no.37: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)

S. No. Name of Villages Type of structures

Proposed target

Augmentation/ repair of existing recharging structures

Construction of new recharging structures

Total target

No. Area to be

irrigated (ha) Estimated

cost No.

Area to be irrigated (ha)

Estimated cost

Area to be irrigated (ha)

Estimated cost

1 Jampur Well Recharge 6 2 0.30 - - - 2 0.30

2 Bhorol Well Recharge 20 6 1.00 - - - 6 1.00

3 Ganeshpura Well Recharge 5 2 0.25 - - - 2 0.25

4 Saba Well Recharge 5 2 0.25 - - - 2 0.25

5 Gadsisar Well Recharge 5 2 0.25 - - - 2 0.25

6 Idhata Well Recharge 10 5 0.50 - - - 5 0.50

Total for the Project 51 19 2.55 - - 19 2.55

Table no. 38: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas

Sr. No. Names of Villages

Major activities of the SHGs

Name of activity No. of SHGs involved Average annual income from activity per SHG

1 Jampur

Nursery 1

Vegitable Seed Kits 4

Kitchen Garden Kits 1

Masonry Work 1

Shivan Training & Kits 1

Vessel Contract Buisness 1

Ambodary Works 1

Computer Training 1

Animal Husbandary 1 5000

Total 12


51

2 Bhorol

Nursery 3



Masonry Work 2



Ambodary Works 2

Computer Training 2


Milk Collection & Product 2

Handicraft 1

Total 38

3 Ganeshpura

Nursery 2







Total 12

4 Saba

Nursery 1






52

Animal Hasbandary 1 5000

Total 9

5 Gadsisar

Nursery 1







Ambodary Works 1


Total 13

6 Idhata

Nursery 3



Masonry Work 3



Ambodary Works 2

Computer Training 2



Papad & Farsan makaing 1

Fruit plantation 1

Total 43


53

Table no. 39: Other activities of watershed works phase – Proposed target

S.

No.

Name of vill-

ages

Ridge area

treat-

ment

Drainage

line treat-

ment

Nursery

raising Land development

Crop demonstra-

tions

Pasture

develop-

ment

Fishery

develop-

ment

Non-

conventional

energy

Any other

(Development

work for Private &

Community Land)

Total

Estimated

cost (Rs. In

lakhs)

(a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b)

1 Jampur - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

2 Bhorol - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

3 Ganeshpura - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

4 Saba - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

5 Gadsisar - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

6 Idhata - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Total for Project - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


54

Table no. 40: Details of engineering structures in watershed works

Sr.no. Village name Name of structures

Type of treatment Type of land Executing

agency Target

(i) Ridge area (R)

(ii) Drainage

line (D)

(iii) Land

dev. (L)

(i) Pri-vate

(ii) Community

(iii) Others

(pl. specify)

(i) UG (ii)SHG

(iii) Others

No. of units (No./

cum./ rmt)

Estimated cost (Rs. in lakh)

Expected month & year of completion

(mm/yyyy) M W O T

1 Jampur

Farm banding L Private UG 25378 11.42 July/2014

Farm levelling L Private UG 4750 2.375 July/2014

Inlet D Community WC 1 1.86 July/2014

Total 15.655

2 Bhorol




Total 66.28

3 Ganeshpura




Total 19.73

4 Saba




Total 14.305

5 Gadsisar




Total 23.56

6 Idhata




Total 81.66

Total for Project 221.19


55

Table no. 41: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works

Sr. No

Name of village

Name of structure/ work

Type of treatment Type of land Executing

agency Target

(i) Ridge area (R)

(ii) Drainage line

(D)

(iii) Land dev. (L)

(i) Private

(ii) Community

(iii) Others

(pl. specify)

(i) UG (ii)SHG

(iii) Others (pl. specify)

Area (ha)

No. of plants

Estimated cost

(Rs. in lakh)

Expected month & year of

completion (mm/ yyyy)

1

Jampur

Tree Plantation L C UG 2 2222 5.28 Aug/2011

2 Horti. Plantation L C UG 1 400 2.76 Aug/2011

3 Avenue Plantation L C UG 1 100 0.82 Aug/2011

4 Fodder Plot L C UG 1 - 1.20 Aug/2011

5 Live Fencing (Thor) L Private UG 200 10000mtr 1.60 June/2014

6 Tree Plant Distribution L Private UG 305 6100 1.22 Aug/2012

7 Horti. Plant Distribution L Private UG 100 2000 1.00 Aug/2012

Total 13.88

1

Bhorol








Total 24.96

1

Ganeshpura







56



Total 14.24

1

Saba








Total 14.38

1

Gadsisar




4 Fodder Plot L C UG 0 - 0 Aug/2011




Total 13.90

1

Idhata








Total 29.48



57

Table no. 42: Details of allied / other activities (Livelihood Intervention & Production system intervention)

S. No.

Name of village Name of activity No.Unit

Type of land Executing

agency Target

(i) Private

(ii) Community

(iii) Others

(pl. specify)

(i) UG (ii)SHG


Estimated cost

(Rs. in lakh)


completion (mm/yyyy)

1 Jampur

Nursery 5 Community SHG 1.250 Aug/2012

Vegetable Seed Kits 420 Private SHG 0.625 Aug/2012

Kitchen Garden Kits 10 Private SHG 1.000 Aug/2012

Masonry Work 5 Private SHG 0.500 Aug/2012

Vessel Contract Business 1 Private SHG 1.000 Aug/2012

Animal Husbandry 1 Private SHG 2.00 Aug/2012

Total Livelihood Intervention

Floor mill 1.0 Private UG 0.750 Aug/2012

Masala Unit 1.0 Private UG 0.800 Aug/2012

Cement Block Product 1.0 Private UG 1.500 Aug/2012

Carpenter Works 1.0 Private UG 0.500 Aug/2012

Black Smith Works 1.0 Private UG 0.500 Aug/2012

Handicraft Works 1 Private UG 0.500 Aug/2012

Centing Works 1 Private UG 0.500 Aug/2012

Hybrid Seed Distribution 600 Private UG 1.500 Aug/2012

Organic Fertiliser Distribution/Gypsum 375 Private UG 0.938 Aug/2012

Vermi Compost 10.0 Private UG 0.800 Aug/2012

Total of the Production system intervention


58

S. No.

Name of village Name of activity No. Unit


agency Target

(i) Private

(ii) Community

(iii) Others

(pl. specify)

(i) UG (ii)SHG


Estimated cost

(Rs. in lakh)


(mm/yyyy)

2 Bhorol





Shivan Training & Kits 2 Private SHG 1.00 Aug/2012


Ambodary Works 2 Private SHG 1.00 Aug/2012

Computer Training 2 Private SHG 1.00 Aug/2012


Milk Collection & Product 2 Private SHG 1.00 Aug/2012

Handicraft 1.0 Private SHG 1.00 Aug/2012


Floor mill 2 Private UG 1.50 Aug/2012

Masala Unit 1 Private UG 0.80 Aug/2012

Cement Block Product 1 Private UG 1.50 Aug/2012

Carpenter Works 2 Private UG 1.00 Aug/2012

Black Smith Works 2 Private UG 1.00 Aug/2012

Agro & Animal food Centre 1 Private UG 1.00 Aug/2012

Welding Works 1 Private UG 1.50 Aug/2012

Mandap Decoration 1 Private UG 2.00 Aug/2012

Mini Oil Mill 1 Private UG 3.00 Aug/2012

Tyre Puncher Shop 1 Private UG 0.30 Aug/2012


59




Vermi Compost 18 Private UG 1.44 Aug/2012

Horticulture Demonstration plot 1 Private UG 2.76 Aug/2012


S. No.



agency Target

(i) Private

(ii) Community

(iii) Others

(pl. specify)

(i) UG (ii)SHG


Estimated cost

(Rs. in lakh)


(mm/yyyy)

3 Ganeshpura















60

S. No.



agency Target

(i) Private

(ii) Community

(iii) Others

(pl. specify)

(i) UG (ii)SHG

(iii) Others (pl.

specify)

Estimated cost

(Rs. in lakh)


(mm/yyyy)

4 Saba

Nursery 5 Private Community SHG 1.250 Aug/2012











Ice Candy & milk Product Selling 1 Private UG 1.00 Aug/2012






Mandap Decoration 1.0 Private UG 1.00 Aug/2012



61






S. No.



agency Target

(i) Private

(ii) Community

(iii) Others

(pl. specify)

(i) UG (ii)SHG


Estimated cost

(Rs. in lakh)


(mm/yyyy)

5 Gadsisar

Nursery 6 Private Community SHG 1.50 Aug/2012
















62


Agro & Animal Food Centre 1 Private UG 1.000 Aug/2012




Mandap Decoration 1.0 Private UG 1.000 Aug/2012


S. No.



agency Target

(i) Private

(ii) Community

(iii) Others

(pl. specify)

(i) UG (ii)SHG


Estimated cost

(Rs. in lakh)


completion (mm/yyyy)

6 Idhata








Computer Training 2 Private SHG 1.00 Aug/2012



Papad & Farsan making 1.0 Private SHG 2.00 Aug/2012

Fruit plantation 1 Private SHG 2.50 Aug/2012



63

Floor mill 2 Private UG 1.50 Aug/2012

Masala Unit 1 Private UG 0.80 Aug/2012

Cement Block Product 1 Private UG 1.50 Aug/2012

Carpenter Works 2 Private UG 1.00 Aug/2012

Black Smith Works 2 Private UG 1.00 Aug/2012

Animal food Centre 1 Private UG 1.00 Aug/2012

Agro Centre & Agri tools 1 Private UG 1.50 Aug/2012

Welding Works 1 Private UG 1.50 Aug/2012

Mandap Decoration 1 Private UG 2.00 Aug/2012

Mini Oil Mill 1 Private UG 3.00 Aug/2012

Tyre Puncher Shop 1 Private UG 0.30 Aug/2012




Vermi Compost 30 Private UG 2.40 Aug/2012

Horticulture Demonstration Plot (Dadam)

1 Private

UG

3.50 Aug/2012




64

Table no. 43: Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas

Sr. No. Name(s) of the

villages CPR particulars Activity proposed

Target

Target area under the activity (ha)

Estimated expenditure (Rs.)

Expected no. of beneficiaries

1 Jampur

Pond Repairing 1 4.50

Inlet O 1.86

Tree Plantation 2 5.28

Horti. Plantation 1 2.76

Avenue Plantation 1 0.82

Fodder Plot 1 1.20

Total for village -

2 Bhorol


Inlet 0 1.86




Fodder Plot 1 1.20

Total for village -

3 Ganeshpura


Inlet 0 3.36




Fodder Plot 1 1.20

Total for village -


65

4 Saba


Inlet 0 1.86




Fodder Plot 1 1.20

Total for village -

5 Gadsisar


Inlet 0 1.86




Fodder Plot 0 0

Total for village -

6 Idhata


Inlet 0 3.72




Fodder Plot 1 1.20

Total for village -

Total for Project


66

44.1. Capacity Building: Capacity Building is the process of assisting the group or individuals to identify and address issues and gain the insights, knowledge and experience needed to solve problems and implement change. There is a realization in the development sector that there is a need to appraise the success of development interventions by going beyond the conventional development targets and measures of success (e.g. in the form of commodities, goods and services) to take into account improvements to human potential. Capacity building of stakeholders is also increasingly viewed as an important factor in developmental projects that involve participation of stakeholders at all levels for effective implementation of projects.

Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution:

S. No.

Name of the Training Institute

Full Address with contact no., website

& e-mail

Type of Institute# Area(s) of specializations Accreditation

details

Trainings

Reference Year

No. of trainings assigned

No. of trainees to be trained

1 Dantiwada Agri

University Banaskantha University

Agriculture/Horticulture/Animal Husbandry

GOI 2012-2014 8 8

2 KrishiVigyan

Kendra Deesa Research Institutes

Agriculture/Horticulture/Animal Husbandry

GOI 2012-2014 6 90

3 VRTI Kutch NGO Capacity Builing Society Reg

Act 2011-2012 12 600

4 BISAG Gandinagar Space application Remote Sensing GOG 2010-2015 12 600

Total for Project 38 1298

Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan:

S. No. State Project Stakeholders Total no. of

persons No. of persons to be

trained No. of training programmes

Estimated cost

IWMP-3

Gujarat

PIA 3 3 4 1.20

WDTs 5 5 4 2.00

WCs 90 90 6 2.75

SHGs 600 600 12 6.40

UGs 600 600 12 6.40

Total for Project 1298 1298 38 18.75


67

Table no.46: Information, education and Communication Activities:

S. No. Activity Executing agency Estimated expenditure (Rs.) Outcome

(may quantify, wherever possible)

1 Street players Drama Players 1.20

All activities are Created strength Co-operatives with community and

project institutes and its make very high Awareness, knowledge, True and Complete information about Project

Activity, Administrative, Environment, Water, Agriculture etc.

2 Video shows PIA 0.30

3 Pamphlets and Posters Distri. PIA 4.20

4 Banners, Hoardings, Boards PIA 1.80

5 Bhavai Show Drama Players 0.60

6 Exposure tour PIA 3.40

7 Sabha & Shibir PIA 3.45

8 Wall Writting & Painting, Map PIA 3.80

Total for Project 18.75 lacs ● All activities are Created strength Co-operatives with community and project institutes and its make very high Awareness, knowledge,

True and Complete information about Project Activity, Administrative, Environment, Water, Agriculture etc.


68

CHAPTER – 5

BUDEGETING


69

BUDGET Table no. 47: Budget at a glance for the project

Sr. No. Budget component Cost requirement (Cost in lacs)

IWMP-3

Administrative costs 75.00

Monitoring 15.00

Entry Point activity 30.00

Institution and Capacity Building 37.50

Detailed Project Report 7.50

Watershed Development Works 375.00

Livelihood activities for asset less 75.00

Production systems and micro-enterprises 97.50

Consolidation phase 37.50


Table no. 48: Village wise- component wise budget available under IWMP

Sr.no.

Village EPA Institution and CB

DPR Watershed development

Work

Livelihood for asset

less

Production system and

Microenterprises

Consolidation Total

1 Jampur 2.550 3.188 0.638 31.875 6.375 8.288 3.188 63.750

2 Bhorol 8.400 10.500 2.100 105.000 21.000 27.300 10.500 210.000

3 Ganeshpura 3.000 3.750 0.750 37.500 7.500 9.750 3.750 75.000

4 Saba 2.550 3.188 0.638 31.875 6.375 8.288 3.188 63.750

5 Gadsisar 3.300 4.125 0.825 41.250 8.250 10.725 4.125 82.500

6 Idhata 10.200 12.750 2.550 127.500 25.500 33.150 12.750 255.000

Total for Project 3.00 37.50 7.50 375.00 75.00 97.50 37.50 750.00


70

Table no. 49: Village wise gap in funds requirement Sr. No. Village Total cost requirement Total funds available under IWMP Gap in funds requirement

1 Jampur 67.21 63.75 3.46

2 Bhorol 215.64 210.00 5.64

3 Ganeshpura 77.72 75.00 2.72

4 Saba 66.81 63.75 3.06

5 Gadsisar 85.96 82.50 3.46

6 Idhata 260.64 255.00 5.64

Total for Project 773.98 750 23.98

Table no.50: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes

Sr. No

Village Activity to be carried out Fund made available

to IWMP due to convergence ( lakh)

Scheme with which convergence took

place

Reference no. of activity/ task/ structure

in DPR

Level at which decision for convergence was taken

1 Jampur

Pond Repairing 2.00 NREGA Table No. 36/ Item No. 1 District, PIA and Cluster Level

Farm Pond 0.60 NREGA Table No. 36/ Item No. 2 District, PIA and Cluster Level

Tree Plantation 0.44 NREGA Table No. 41/ Item No. 1 District, PIA and Cluster Level

Horti. Plantation 0.30 NREGA Table No. 41/ Item No. 2 District, PIA and Cluster Level

Avenue Plantation 0.12 NREGA Table No. 41/ Item No. 3 District, PIA and Cluster Level

Total 3.46 - - -

2 Bhorol






Total 5.64 - - -

3 Ganeshpura





Total 2.72 - - -


71

4 Saba






Total 3.06 - - -

5 Gadsisar






Total 3.46 - - -

6 Idhata






Total 5.64 - - -

Total for Project 23.98 - - -

Table no. 51: Public-Private Partnership in the IWMP projects

S. No.

Name of Private Sector

Partner Agency

Type of agreement signed Financial contribution Partnership

Interventions Expected Outcomes

Comments a)MoU b)Contract

c) Any other (pl. specify)

IWMP Private sector

1 - - - - - - -

2 - - - - - - -

3 - - - - - - -

4 - - - - - - -

Total for Project - - - - -


72

CHAPTER – 6

EXPECTED OUTCOMES


73

52.1 Employment

Employment has always been a problem in the village. The principal occupations of the people are dry land agriculture, animal

husbandry and casual labour work. However, rain fall being very limited and erratic, agriculture suffers, i.e. at best they can take only a

single crop, which keeps them partially engaged for about 4 months. Lack of fodder makes animal husbandry very difficult too. So, animal

husbandry does not keep them engaged full time. Thus the people mainly depend upon casual labour, either in the village itself or outside it.

The project plans for creation of both wage employment and self employment opportunities. Wage employment would be created by

engaging people in watershed physical works like construction of earthen bunds, farm bunds, village pond, plantation, etc. Self employment

would be created by providing the people with cash support in the form of direct livelihood activities like agriculture, animal husbandry and

enterprise development.

Table no. 52: Employment in Project area:

Sr. NO.

Names of Villages

Wage employment Self employment

No. of mandays No. of beneficiaries No. of beneficiaries

SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total

1 Jampur 1600 0 2600 120 4320 80 0 130 6 210 4 1 7 2 14

2 Bhorol 4760 4980 8040 380 18160 238 249 402 19 889 12 12 20 6 50

3 Ganeshpura 2520 80 3520 160 6280 126 4 176 8 306 6 1 9 3 19

4 Saba 1460 0 3140 140 4740 73 0 157 7 230 4 0 8 3 15

5 Gadsisar 3080 80 3260 160 6580 154 4 163 8 321 8 0 8 2 18

6 Idhata 2040 1460 6420 300 10220 102 73 321 15 496 5 4 16 5 30

Total for Project 15460 6600 26980 1260 50300 773 330 1349 63 2452 39 18 68 21 146


74

53.1. Migration

Low rainfall results in very little fodder availability in the locality. The relatively well off farmers bring fodder from Palanpur, Tharad,

Deesa, Dhanera (approximately 100kms away) collectively; but the resource poor cannot afford it. On account of agriculture and animal

husbandry providing only part time employment for some part of the year, the people migrate for a better half of the year for wage labour.

Employment opportunities in the local area as mentioned above will ensure lessening seasonal migration from the area.

Table no. 53: Details of seasonal migration from Project area

Sr. No. Names of villages No. of persons migrating No. of days per year of migration

Pre-project Expected post project Pre-project Expected post project

1 Jampur 213 64 33360 10008

2 Bhorol 542 163 89760 26928

3 Ganeshpura 329 99 50460 15138

4 Saba 313 94 47430 14229

5 Gadsisar 325 98 48900 14670

6 Idhata 487 146 76920 23076

Total for Project 2209 664 346830 104049

54.1 Ground water table:

Rainfall has been scanty but demand for ground water has been increasing all the time. The ground water table thus has depleted over

the years. Presently it stands at 25 to 30. Proper water harvesting structures and percolation tanks would go a long way in increasing water

table depth from 25 m in the pre-project level to 30 m in the post project period.


75

Table no. 54: Details of average ground water table depth in the project areas (in ft.)

Sr. No.

Names of Villages

Sources Pre-Project level (In ft.) Expected Increase/decrease

(Post- Project) (In ft.)

1 Jampur Well 33 26

2 Bhorol Well 39 30

3 Ganeshpura Well 39 30

4 Saba Well 33 26

5 Gadsisar Well 33 26

6 Idhata Well 39 30

Average for Project 36 28

55.1 Drinking water

The village has two dug wells on which they depend for their drinking water. Many an effort at finding sweet water at different

other places in the same village has failed. A farmer called As a result of the watershed activities, it is expected that the quantity and quality

of drinking water would improve. Member in the Tanker Process two the Water.

Table no. 55: Status of Drinking water

Sr. No.

Names of Villages

Availability of drinking water (no. of months in a year)

Quality of drinking water Comments

Pre-project Expected Post project Pre-project Expected Post-project

1 Jampur 8 12 month Unfit in Biological Test Completely fit for Drinking Water

2 Bhorol 8 12 month Unfit in Biological Test Completely fit for Drinking Water

3 Ganeshpura 10 12 month Unfit in Biological Test Completely fit for Drinking Water

4 Saba 8 12 month Unfit in Biological Test Completely fit for Drinking Water

5 Gadsisar 10 12 month Unfit in Biological Test Completely fit for Drinking Water

6 Idhata 10 12 month Unfit in Biological Test Completely fit for Drinking Water

Average for Project 9 12 - - -


76

56.1 Crops

Agriculture primarily depends upon water; but this is what is lacking in Cluster village. The surface water is scanty due to low rainfall

and ground water is saline, which is unfit for crop production.

All this can change with the integrated land and water management during the watershed project. The planned earthen bunds would

prevent the saline water from the mix with the sweet rain water and also help percolate sweet water underground, and preserve some

moisture in the soil. This will help in additional area coming under cultivation and increasing productivity too. The farmers can take more

than one season of crops. Different varieties of crops can be taken.

Table no. 56: Details of Kharif crop area and yield in the project areas

Name of village

Name of crops Pre-project Expected Post-project

Area (ha) Average Yield (Qtl) per ha. Area (ha) Average Yield per ha (qtl)

Jampur

Kharif

Bajra 274 4.50 274 5.60

Pulse 274 3.30 274 4.60

Other(juvar fodder) 137 12.00 137 16.80

Rabi Cumin 25 4.00 50 6.20

Castor 0 0 50 8.80

Mustard 0 0 25 7.50

Zaid - - -

Village total 710 -

Bhorol

Kharif

Bajra 634 5.20 634 6.20

Pulse 634 3.70 634 4.80



77

Rabi Cumin 60 4.25 160 6.30

Castor 45 8.00 145 8.80

Mustard 13 7.50 115 8.60

Zaid - - -

Village total 1703 -

Ganeshpura

Kharif

Bajra 365 5.10 365 6.90

Pulse 366 3.60 366 4.80


Rabi Cumin 53 4.40 103 6.50

Castor 40 8.00 90 8.80

Mustard 8 7.50 58 8.60

Zaid - - -


Saba

Kharif

Bajra 324 4.40 324 5.50

Pulse 324 3.20 324 4.50


Rabi Cumin 27 4.40 57 6.50

Castor 0 0 50 8.80

Mustard 0 0 20 7.50

Zaid

- - -

Village total 837 -

Gadsisar Kharif

Bajra 364 4.50 364 5.70


78

Pulse 365 3.30 365 4.60


Rabi Cumin 25 4.70 75 6.80

Castor 0 0 50 8.80

Mustard 0 0 30 7.50

Zaid - - -

Village total 936 -

Idhata

Kharif

Bajra 637 5.30 637 7.10

Pulse 638 3.70 638 5.00


Rabi Cumin 102 4.60 202 6.80

Castor 60 8.20 160 8.80

Mustard 20 7.00 120 7.50

Zaid

- - -


Table no. 57: Area under horticulture

S. No. Name of Village Existing area under horticulture (ha) Area under horticulture proposed to be

covered through IWMP

1 Jampur 0 3

2 Bhorol 0 6

3 Ganeshpura 0 3

4 Saba 0 3

5 Gadsisar 0 3

6 Idhata 0 6



79

58.1 Vegetative cover

There is negligible area under tree cover. The village has a forest area of 524ha which consists of only Juliflora, Procopius (ganda

babool). Trees like Neem and Ailanthus are seen just here and there, not concentrated in any area. It is planned that 15 ha land to be

covered under new plantation.

Table no. 58: Forest/vegetative cover

S. No. Name of Village Existing area under tree cover (ha) Area under tree cover proposed

1 Jampur 0 4

2 Bhorol 1 10

3 Ganeshpura 0 4

4 Saba 0 4

5 Gadsisar 1 4

6 Idhata 0 10


59.1 Livestock

The village has quite a good of livestock population. These include cows, bullocks, buffaloes, goats, sheep and camels. The

interventions like provision of good quality cows and buffaloes, the establishment of a fodder bank and other such related activities would

spur up the dairy development in the village. It is expected that the post project period would see a substantial increase in livestock

population and yield from them.


80

Table no. 59: Details of livestock in the project areas (for fluids please mention in liters, for solids please mention in kegs. and income in Rs.)

Sr. No. Name of Village

Type of Animal Pre-Project Expected Post-project

Remarks No. Yield Income No. Yield Income

1 Jampur

Milk-animals

Buffalo 196 246700 1372000 235 370050 2058000 Milk

Cow 59 37000 236000 71 55500 354000 Milk

Draught Purpose animals

Bullock 99 - - 120 - - Use in Agriculture

Camel 2 - - 6 - - -

Animals for other purpose

Goat (Meat, Milk) 162 18144 243000 194 27216 364500 Milk & Meat

Sheep (Wool) 102 - 135000 122 - 202500 Wool

Total 620 301844 1986000 748 452766 2979000

2 Bhorol

Milk-animals

Buffalo 347 419870 2480500 416 629805 3720750 Milk

Cow 133 83790 532000 160 125685 798000 Milk



Camel 2 - - 6 - - -



Sheep (Wool) 76 - 114000 98 - 171000 Wool

Total 932 534250 3525500 1129 801375 5288250

3 Ganeshpura

Milk-animals

Buffalo 185 228475 1395000 222 342713 2092500 Milk

Cow 95 60325 437500 114 90488 656250 Milk



Camel 0 - - 0 - - -



Sheep (Wool) 27 - 40500 38 - 60750 Wool

Total 438 300680 2021500 531 451021 3032250


81

4 Saba

Milk-animals

Buffalo 163 189080 933000 196 283620 1399500 Milk

Cow 52 32240 208000 62 48360 312000 Milk



Camel 4 - - 8 - - -



Sheep (Wool) 115 - 172500 138 - 258750 Wool

Total 565 239375 1549000 681 359063 2323500

5 Gadsisar

Milk-animals

Buffalo 220 268400 246000 264 402600 369000 Milk

Cow 74 45880 296000 89 68820 444000 Milk



Camel 6 - - 10 - - -



Sheep (Wool) 64 - 96000 84 - 144000 Wool

Total 560 327960 809000 691 491940 1213500

6 Idhata

Milk-animals

Buffalo 334 405810 2488000 401 608715 3732000 Milk

Cow 216 142560 203060 259 213840 304590 Milk



Camel 16 - - 19 - - -



Sheep (Wool) 47 - 70500 56 - 105750 Wool

Total 997 577995 3117060 1195 866993 4675590

Total for Project 4112 2282104 13008060 4975 3423158 19512090


82

Table no. 60: Backward-Forward linkages

Sr. No. Project Type of Marketing Facility Pre-project (no.) During the project (no.) Post-project (no.)

1 IWMP-3 IDHATA Cluster

Backward linkages

Seed certification - Seed supply system - 1 1 Fertilizer supply system - 1 1 Pesticide supply system - 1 1 Credit institutions - Water supply 1 1 2 Extension services - 1 1 Nurseries - Tools/machinery suppliers - Price Support system - Labour - Any other (please specify) - Forward linkages

Harvesting/threshing machinery - Storage (including cold storage) - Road network - Transport facilities - Markets / Mandlis - 1 1 Agro and other Industries - 1 1 Milk and other collection centres 1 1 2 Labour - Any other (please specify) - Vermi compost - 1 1


83

Logical Framework Analysis:-

Components Activities Outputs Effect Impact

Village Institution Formation

•Formation of Watershed Committee, User Group

• One Watershed Committee each village

• Project can be implemented and managed in a democratic and participatory way ensuring equity.

• Unity and prosperity in the village management.

• Number of User group depending on the coverage of particular intervention

• People's Participation and positive perception towards the programme

Strengthening Village Institutions

• Organise training and awareness programme for Village institutions

• Awareness camps to be organised.

• Quality of management of common resources improved.

• Capacity building workshops and exposure visits User Group and Watershed Committee

• trainings and exposure visits UGs and WCs to be held

• Quality of distribution of benefits between people improved.

• Facilitating and monitoring the functioning of UGs and WCs

• Capacity building workshops to be organised

• Increased awareness amongst women about village resources.

• Strengthen linkages between UGs and WCs and Panchayat Institutions.

• 1 Federations of UGs and WC to be formed.

• Women participation enhanced in decision-making of GVCs.

• Gender sensitisation of UGs and WCs to increase inclusiveness of samuh decision-making.

• Involvement of youth and children in village development increased.

• Sensitise village communities to involve children and youth in development.


84

Fund Management

• Improve management and utilisation of UGs and WCs.

• UGs and WCs operating bank account and managing resources on their own

• Purpose, frequency and volume of use of the fund enhanced.

• Prepare communities to explore other sources of income for UGs and WCs.

• Volume of funds generated for UGs and WCs from other sources of income increased.

Ecological Restoration

• Protection, treatment and regeneration of common and private lands

• Common and private lands to be brought under new plantations and agro-horti-forestry like Neem, Adusa, prosopis, Banyan and Peepul

• Fodder availability from common and private lands increased.

• Better Ecological order in the area

• Protection, treatment and regeneration of forest lands

• Forest lands to be brought under new plantations and protection

• Accessibility to common and forest lands increased with removal of encroachments and resolution of conflicts.

• Increase in the proportion of households having more security of fodder

• Plantation of fruits and forest species

• Trainings, exposure visits and meetings to be organised for communities, village volunteers and staff

• Reduction in drudgery of fodder and fuel collection, especially women

• Impart trainings, conduct meetings and organise exposure visits for communities, village volunteers and staff to effectively plan, execute and monitor activities

• Income generation intervention promoted

• Identification and promotion of non-timber forest produce based income generation activities


85

Rainfed Area Development

• Treatment of land through improved soil and moisture conservation practices on watershed basis

• Land to be brought under improved soil moisture conservation practices

• Improved productivity of treated land

• Increase in proportion of households having more security of food

• Promotion of good agricultural practices- horticulture, improved crop and vegetable

• Good agricultural practices to be promoted

• Increased availability of water in wells

• Organic farming to be promoted

• Increase in annual agriculture production

• Increase in contribution of agricultural income to the household income

• Fodder backstop be established

• Farmers adopt organic farming practices

• Promotion of organic farming practices

• Agriculture based livelihood income generation activities to be promoted

• Fodder security of farmers enhanced.

• Formation of Fodder banks to increase fodder security and promote dairy development among communities

• Water harvesting structures to be constructed

• Increase availability of water for 9 to 12 months

• Identification and promotion of agri-produce based income generation activities like grading, processing and packaging.

• Drip Irrigation facilities to be distributed among farmers

• Increased availability of water for livestock

• Promotion of better Irrigation practices like drip irrigation

• Approx 15000 person days of employment to be generated

• Availability of irrigation water established


86

• Impart trainings, conduct meetings and organise exposure visits of communities, village volunteers and staff to effectively plan, execute and monitor activities

• Trainings, exposure visits and meetings to be organized for communities, village volunteers and staff

• Farmers take two crops in a year

• Increase in agricultural productivity of land

• Availability of drinking water enhanced

Women’s Socio-political and economic empowerment

• Formation & Strengthening of women’s SHG groups

• Women’s SHG groups to be formed

• Enhanced capacities of leaders of women's group in taking initiatives to solve problems at different levels.

• Position of women in household, community, society (politically, socially and economically) as perceived by women and community at large

• Capacity building of womenfolk • Federation of Women’s SHGs to be formed

• Performance enhancement of SHGs in terms of participation, decision-making, leadership and fund management.

• Capacity building of SHG leaders and accountants

• Trainings to be conducted for preparation of woollen products from sheep and goats.

• Improved access to credit for livelihood purposes.

• Equality & Equity in gender relations at home (decision making, expenditure, children’s education, health)

• Linking SHGs with external financial instit. • Increased household income.


87

CHAPTER – 7

QUALITY AND SUSTAINABILITY ISSUE


88

Quality and Sustainability Issues

Plans for Monitoring and evolution

A Web-based GIS System is being developed for monitoring and evolution the project in its planning & implementation phases. The

system would be available on a public domain and can be accessed by all the stakeholders of the project. The system shows the entire state

of Gujarat and all of those areas selected over the next 18 years. Filtering allows the user to zoom onto one particular project. Details

related to soil type, Land-use classification, inhabitation etc., can be obtained village-wise. Furthermore, survey-number wise details related

to ownership, irrigation source, yield etc., can also be accessed by the users of the system. This system is being used for pooling up the

details obtained from the DPR. In other words, the DPR is made available online in the form of a database which will help the stakeholders

know areas of importance viz., already treated areas/historical works in the area, proposed areas for treatment etc., for further treatment

and planning. The system would also show the satellite imageries of various years from the project inception stage to the project closing

stages. This allows the user to evolution the effectiveness of the treatment and thereby plans corrective measures for the project area. The

system would serve as an aiding tool to the planners and evolution for judging the efficacy of the project.

Yet another component of the Web-based GIS system is the Mobile based Monitoring & evolution System, which will help the ground

staff alias WDTs (Watershed Development Team) to transmit information from the ground level to the central server. Also, any higher-up

official in charge of the project can obtain information regarding the project area on their mobile phone by means of an SMS. The system

works in the following manner. The WDT equipped with a GPS instrument marks the latitude-longitude information of various treatment

areas during the DPR. The probable sites are then transferred onto the central server. During the works phase, any progress in the

treatment areas is reported to the server by means of an SMS by the WDT. Similarly, any nodal officer or higher-up official can view the

progress in a project by means of summarized reports generated over frequent periods of time.


89

Plans For Project management:

The Project management of any watershed programme is very important. It mainly depends upon the community organisation and

the village level institutes. In Idhata watershed committee and various user groups have been formulated for post project operation and

maintenance of assets created during project period. Major emphasis will be on equity and sustainable benefit of the project even after

implementation stage. A proper link-up will be built during project period with various institutes and capacity building organisation. They

will act as a major kingpin during post implementation for scaling up the successful experience during project.

Watershed Development Fund:

The major source of financial assistance after post implementation period is watershed Development Fund. The contribution of it will comes mainly fund the following:

User Charges:

Various user groups will be formed in village. These user groups will collect user charges according to the designated rules formed

during the formation of user group. These funds will be transferred to the WDF funds as per these formulated rules. The secretary of

watershed committee (WC) shall maintain the records of the following.

-------------------------------------------------------------


90

Annexure:-1 EPA Details for Engineering Works IWMP-3 IDHATA CLUSTER (Banaskantha) Sr. No.

Village Name

Activities location (GPS Coordinates /survey no)

User Group Members

length Dia Meter

height Meter

depth / Width/ Meter

slope total cost (Rs)

1 Jampur

Protection Wall Gamtal All Villagers 48.5 5.0 0.55 0 2.24

Pipeline Gamtal All Villagers 300.0 0 0 0 0.31

Total 2.55

2 Bhorol


Pipeline (90mm) Gamtal All Villagers 1047.0 0 0 0 1.53

Pipeline (110mm) Gamtal All Villagers 1000.0 0 0 0 1.95

Verry (well) Construction Gamtal All Villagers 2.80 14.0 0 0 1.25

Smashan Chapri Gamtal All Villagers 0 0 0 0 1.05

R.O.Plant in School-2 nos. School Children 0 0 0 0 1.08

CattleTrough Gamtal All Villagers 4.0 0.5 1.2 0 0.40

Total 8.4

3 Ganeshpura

R.C.C. Cistern Gamtal All Villagers 4.5 4.0 0 0 1.70


Cattle Trough Gamtal All Villagers 4.0 0.5 1.2 0 0.40

Total 3

4 Saba

Cattle Trough Gamtal All Villagers 7.5 0.5 1.5 0 0.76


R.O. Plant in School School Children 0 0 0 0 0.54

Total 2.55

5 Gadsisar




Total 3.30

6 Idhata

Protection Wall Gamtal All Villagers 30 3 0.4 0 0.56


Pipeline (75mm) Gamtal All Villagers 2986 0 0 0 3.10

Smashan Chapri-2 nos. Gamtal All Villagers 0 0 0 0 2.10

CattleTrough-2 nos. Gamtal All Villagers 7.5 0.5 1.5 0 1.54


Total 10.20

Grand Total 30.00


91

Annexure:-2 Engineering Structure Works Details IWMP-3 IDHATA CLUSTER (Banaskantha)

Sr. No.

Village Name

Activities location (survey no) User Group Members

length Dia Meter

height Meter

depth / Width/ Meter

slope total cost (Rs)

1 Jampur

Pond 14 UGS 50.0 40.0 2.00 0 2.00

Pond 2 UGS 50.0 50.00 2.00 0 2.50

Farm Pond-10 As Action Plan UGS 10.0 10.0 2.00 0 1.00

Inlet 2 UGS 20.0 3.00 4.75 0 1.86

2 Bhoral

Pond 535 UGS 50.0 80.0 2.00 0 4.00

Pond 250 UGS 50.0 100.0 2.00 0 5.00

Pond 196 UGS 50.0 100.0 2.00 0 5.00


Inlet 196 UGS 20.0 0.65 2.00 0 1.86

3 Ganeshpura

Pond 313 UGS 50.0 40.0 2.00 0 2.00

Pond 1 UGS 50.0 60.0 2.00 0 3.00


Inlet 1 UGS 20.0 0.65 2.00 0 1.86

Inlet 1 UGS 15.0 0.65 2.00 0 1.50

4 Saba

Pond 257/p UGS 50.0 40.0 2.00 0 2.00

Pond 34/p UGS 50.0 60.0 2.00 0 3.00

Farm Pond-10 As Action Plan UGS 10.0 10.0 2.00 0 s

Inlet 257/p UGS 20.0 0.65 2.00 0 1.86

5 Gadsisar

Pond 70/P UGS 50.0 40.0 2.00 0 2.00

Pond 78 UGS 50.0 60.0 2.00 0 3.00


Inlet 78 UGS 20.0 0.65 2.00 0 1.86

6 Idhata

Pond 35 UGS 50.0 80.0 2.00 0 4.00

Pond 715 UGS 50.0 120.0 2.00 0 6.00

Pond 716 UGS 50.0 110.0 2.00 0 5.50


Inlet 35 UGS 20.0 0.65 2.00 0 1.86

Inlet 715 UGS 20.0 0.65 2.00 0 1.86


92

CHAPTER – 8

MAPS


93


94


95


96


97


98


99


100


101


102


103


104


105


106

………………The End…………..

Thanks,………………………

Documents

Intergraded Watershed Management Programmegswma.gujarat.gov.in/pfile/DPR/2009-10/Banaskantha/Ban... · 2013-04-18 · Intergraded Watershed Management Programme PIA :- Social Forestry