Upload
dangdung
View
242
Download
4
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
IWMP-2011-12
IWMP-VII (CHIMER)
District Watershed Developing Unit, Tapi
Gujarat State Watershed Management Agency
2
CONTENTS
Chapter 1 - Project Background
1.1 Project Background........................................... ........................................................ ................................................................... ...................................... ..12
Table no.1: Basic project information..................................................... .................................................................................................... ..............14
1.2 Need of Watershed Development Programs....................................................................................... .............................................................. ............15
Table no.2: Weight age of the project ............................................................................................................................................................. ......15
Table no.3: Watershed information............................................................................................ ......................................................................... ......16
1.3 Other development projects/schemes running in the Bhintkhurd Project.........................................................................................................17
Table no.4: Developmental programs running in the project area................. ........................................................................................... ......17
Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmes in the project area................................................................ ............................................ ..............17
Chapter 2 - Project Implementing Agency
2.1 Project Implementing Agency.............................................................................................. ............................ ...........................................................19
2.2 About District Watershed Development Unit (DWDU), Tapi................................................................... ..........................................................19
2.2.1 The Organization & its objectives.............................................................................................. ......................................................................19
2.2.2 Objectives of the Forest Dept……… ................................................................................................................................................. .................19
2.3 SWOT Analysis of the DWDU.................................................................................. ..................................................................................................... 22
Table no. 6: PIA: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................24
Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level: ............................................................................................ .............................................................. .....................24
Chapter 3 - Basic Information of the Project Area
3.1 Basic Information of the Project Area......................................................................................................................................................................26
Table no. 8: Land use pattern................................................................................................ ................................................................................27
3.1.2 Soil & Topography.......................................................................................................................... ......................................................................27
Table no. 9: Soil type and topography.................................................................................................................................................. ...............27
Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition........................................................................ ...............................................................................28
Table no. 11.1: Soil Erosion................................................................................................. ................................................. ..................................28
Table no. 11.2: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress).................................................................. .............................................. .............29
Table no. 11.3: Water logging Conditions..........................................................................................................................................................29
3
3.2 Land & Agriculture.......................................................................................................................... ............................... ..................................... ...........30
Table no. 12: Climatic conditions........................................................................................ ...................................................................... ...........30
Table no. 13: Physiographic and relief....................................................................................... .............................. ..........................................30
Table no. 14: Land ownership details.................................................................................................................................................................30
Table no. 15: Agriculture........................................................................................................................................................................................31
3.3 Irrigation....................................................................................................................................................... ............................... .................................... .31
Table no. 16: Irrigation.................................................................... ....................................................................................................................... .31
Table no. 17: Crop details................................................................................................... ....................................................................................32
3.4 Livestock............................................................................................................................................................ ...............................................................33
Table no. 18: Livestock............................................................................................................................................................................................33
3.5 Infrastructure Facilities................................................................................................................................................................................................33
Table no. 19: Drinking water.................................................................................................................................................................................33
Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources................................................................................................................................... 34
3.6 Socio-Economic Profile................................................................................................................................................................................................. 36
Table no. 21: Demographic information............................................................................................................................................................36
Table no. 22: Literacy rate.....................................................................................................................................................................................36
3.7 Migration Pattern...................................................................................... ..................................................................................................................... 37
Table no. 23: Migration details.............................................................................................................................................. ...............................37
3.8 Poverty...................................................................................... ......................................................................................................... ...............................38
Table no. 24: Poverty................................................................................................ .............................................................................................. .38
3.9 Infrastructure Facilities............................................................................................................................................................................................. ...39
Table no. 25: Village infrastructure.......................................................................................................................................................... ..........39
Table no. 26: Facilities / HH assets......................................................................................................................................................................40
3.10 Livelihood Pattern........................................................................................................................................... .............................................................42
Table no. 27: Per Capita Income................................................................................................................................................................. ..........42
3.11 Dependence on Forest/CPR............................................................................................................................................................................... .......43
Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR..........................................................................................................................................................43
Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution).....................................................................................................................44
4
Chapter 4 - Watershed Activities
4.1 Scientific Planning........................................................................................................................................................................ ..................................52
Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects................................................................................................54
Table no.31: Details of PRA Activities conducted in the project area............................................................................................................................57
4.2 Institution building........................................................................................................................................................................................................ .60
4.2.1 Watershed Committee.................................................................................................... ..................................................... ................................60
Table no. 32: Watershed Committee details......................................................................................................................................................60
4.2.2 Shelf Help Group.......................................................................................................................................................... ......................................... .66
Table no. 33: SHG details......................................................................................................................................................... ................................67
4.2.3 User group....................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................68
Table no. 34: User group detail.............................................................................................................................................................................68
4.3 Physical Activities to be undertaken under IWMP...............................................................................................................................................69
4.3.1 Entry Point Activities (EPA).................................................................................................................................................................... ..........69
Table no.35: Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs.)...........................................................................................69
Table no.36: Details of engineering structures in watershed works………………………………………………………………………………………….71
Table no.37: Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakhs Rs.) .................................74
Table no.38: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) ............75
Table no.39: Details of activities related to livelihood, production system and micro-enterprises………………………………….…….…….76
Table no. 40: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas........................................................................79
Table no. 41: Linkages developed at village level……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..80
Table no.42: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works……………………………………………………………..82
Table no.43: Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas……………………………………………………………………………………..……….83
4.4 Capacity Building........................................................................................................ .........................................................................................................................................84
Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution..............................................................................................................................................................................................85
Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan...........................................................................................................................................................................................................85
Table no.46: Information, education and Communication Activities...........................................................................................................................................86
5
Chapter 5 - Budgeting
Table no. 47: Budget at a glance...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................88
Table no. 48: Village component wise budget available under IWMP.................................................................................................................................................89
Table no. 49: Village wise gap in funds requirements................................................................................................................................................................................90
Table no. 50: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes....................................................................................................................................................91
Table no. 51: Public-Private Partnership in the IWMP projects.............................................................................................................................................................93
Chapter 6 - Expected Outcomes
Table no. 52: Employment in Project area...............................................................................................................................................................................................95
6.1.2 Migration: ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................96
Table no. 53: Details of seasonal migration from Project area.......................................................................................................................................................96
Table no. 54: Details of average ground water table depth in the project areas (in meters)...........................................................................................97
6.1.3 Status of Drinking water.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................97
Table no. 55: Status of Drinking water............................................................................................................................. ........................................................................97
6.1.4 Crops............................................................................................................................. .......................................................................................................................................98
Table no. 56: Details of Kharif crop area and yield in the project areas....................................................................................................................................98
6.1.5 Horticulture............................................................................................................................. ........................................................................................................................100
Table no. 57: Area under horticulture............................................................................................................................. ........................................................................100
6.1.6 Vegetative cover............................................................................................................................. ...............................................................................................................101
Table no. 58: Forest/vegetative cover............................................................................................................................. .......................................................................101
6.1.7 Livestock............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 102
Table no. 59: Details of livestock in the project areas............................................................................................................................. .................................................102
Table no. 60: Backward-Forward linkages............................................................................................................................. ......................................................................104
Chapter 7 - Quality and Sustainability Issues
7.1 Plans for Monitoring and Evaluation...................................................................................... .................................................................................................................106
7.2 Plans for Project Management....................................................................................................................................................................................................................107
7.3 Watershed Development Fund...................................................................................................................................................................................................................107
7.4 User Charges.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................107
6
Chapter 8 – Mapping
1. Cadastral Map……………………………………………………………………………………….……………............................................…………..……….....……… 131
2. Drainage Map………………………………………………………………………………………………………..............…………………................................... ....……132
3. Slop Map…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...................................................…… .133
4. Geomorphology Map…………………………………………………………………………………………………………..............................................……………… 134
5. Soil Map………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….................................................………………. 135
6. Land Use / Land Cover Map……………………………………………………………………………………..........................................…………………........…… 136
7. Ground Water Map..……………………………………………………………………………………………………............................................………………...…… .137
8. Propose Action Plan Map………………………………………….................................................................................. ........................................ .......……138
7
Tapi District
Tapi district is one of the 26 districts of Gujarat state in western India. Vyara town is the district headquarters. The area of the district is
2951.10 km². The district has a population of 719,634 (2001 census).It is Located in the southern part of Gujarat. On 27th September
2007, the district of Surat was bifurcated into two new districts, viz. Surat district with it's headquarter at Surat and Tapi district with its
headquarter at Vyara. The newly constituted Tapi district consists of five talukas viz. Vyara, Songadh, Uchchal, Nizar and Valod. Vyara
and Songadh in Tapi district are known for dense forests with a major production of bamboos
(Source: http://www.vibrantgujarat.com/district-profiles/tapi-district-profile.aspx)
Geographical location : 73.5° to 74.23 ° East (Longitude) 21.0 ° to 21.23 ° North (Latitude)
Temperature : 45 ° Centigrade (Maximum)
Average Rainfall : 1926 mm
Rivers : Tapi, Midoda, Purna and Ambika
Area : 3434.64 Sq Km
District headquarter : Vyara
Population : 7,19,634 (As per 2001 Census)
Population density : 210 persons per Sq Km
Sex ratio : 996 females per 1000 males
Literacy Rate : 57.05 %
Languages : Gujarati and Hindi
Seismic Zone : Zone III (Moderate damage risk zone)
8
District: Tapi
Fig1. Geographical location of Dist Tapi
9
Famous Places in Fort Songadh
1. Ukai Dam,
2. Rokadia Hanuman Mandir,
3. Kalyanraiji Mandir,
4. Fort of Songadh,
5. Gaumukh,
6. Dosvada Dam,
7. Hindustan Bridge,
8. The Central Pulp Mills (CPM) (now part of JK Singhania
Group), The Tps & Hydro power station
9. Bhagwan Parsuramji Mandir and Agni Mandir at CPM,
10. Gayatrimata & Sai baba Mandir,
11. Suryatapeshwar Mandir,
12. Firangi Mataji - Jalaram Mandir,
13. Mari Mata Mandir,
14. Tapi Nadi,
15. V.I.P., Ukai National Gate, Bhurival, chamri guest house, Bhimpura
16. Thermel power stastion Ukai
10
The Fort of Songadh literally means 'Son' stands for Gold & 'Gadh' stands for fort which means that the 'Fort of Gold'. Songadh is
located at 21.17°N73.57°E[1]. It has an average elevation of 112 metres (367 feet). The town is located at the foot of a solitary mountain
which can be seen from miles round, particularly as the surrounding area has been almost completely flattened by almost 30 local stone
quarries. Due to these stone quarries, Songadh has very good road links to the city of Surat to its west and the state of Maharashtra to its
east.
The main town of Songadh is split into two parts; Junagam (old town) and Navagam (new town). Due to rapid expansion of the town in
recent times, Navagam has outgrown the original Junagam and is characterised by the hustle and bustle of the Main Road almost any
time of the day. This is largely due to the Bus Terminal which acts as a hub for cross country buses which are en route to the city of Surat.
This passing traffic has bought much trade into Songadh as it is the first town as you enter Gujarat from the East (or the last before you
leave from the West). To the west of Songadh is the district capital of Vyara which has a slightly smaller population but substantially more
industry. Vyara has grown faster than Songadh due to the higher work ethic of the Vyara population in comparison to the younger
population of Songadh, this is in part due to the practice of intermarrying of cousins in Songadh.
11
Chapter 1
Project Background
12
1.1Project Background
Chimer (IWMP-VII) project is located in Songadh Taluka, Tapi district of Gujarat state. The project is a cluster of four micro-watersheds
with 5B2D8c2e ,5B2D8c1d,5B2D8c1f,5B2D8c2c being their respective codes. The total area of the project is 5333.70 Ha, of which
50000Ha has been proposed to be treated under Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP) starting year 2010-11.
The nearest town is Vyara which is well connected by project area. The project area lies in the edges off forest. The livelihood of
these people is primarily based on rain fed agriculture, animal husbandry, wage labour, cows and buffalos for the milk production. The
project contains three gram panchayat (Chimer, Medha ). In Kaksala there are two project villages and Keshbandh have four villages. The
watershed area of the six villages is taken under the area proposed to be treated for the Kaksala project. The PIA (project implementation
agency) for the IWMP1-Kaksala project is North Dang Division, Forest Department.
Latitude 21.1667 Longitude 73.5667 Altitude (feet) 367
Lat (DMS) 21° 10' 0N Long (DMS) 73° 34' 0E Altitude (meters) 111
13
Fig. 2. Geographical location of Chimer
IWMP-7 Chimer Project
14
Table no.1: Basic project information
Sl
No.
Name of
the
project
Villages Gram
Panchayats Taluka District
Area of
the
project
Area
proposed to
be treated
Total
project
cost
PIA Name
Census
code
1 IWMP 7
Chimer
Chimer
Chimer
Songadh Tapi
1595.90 1448.40 173.808
2 Shravaniya 1695.30 1612.90 193.548
3 Lavchali 424.90 393.20 47.184
4 Nana
Tarpada 702.10 683.60 82.032
Forest Dept,
Vyara
5 Ojhar 642.20 619.20 74.304
6 Hindla 273.30 242.70 29.124
5333.70 5000.00 600.000
15
1.2 Need of Watershed Development Programs Area proposed to be treated
Table no.2: Weightage of the project Project name
Project type
Weightage
IWMP-VII CHIMER PROJECT
i ii iii Iv v vi vii viii ix x xi xii xiii
7.5 10 5 5 3 10 15 5 10 10 5 10 10
Table no: 2.1 Criteria and weightage for selection of watershed
S.
No.
Criteria Maximum
Score
Ranges & scores
I Poverty index (% of poor to population)
10 Above 80 % (10) 80 to 50 %(7.5) 50 to 20%(5) Below 20
ii % of SC/ST population 10 More than 40%(10) 20 to 40%(5) Less than 20%(3)
iii Actual wages 5 Actual wages are significantly lower than
minimum wages (5)
Actual wages are equal to or higher than
minimum wages (0)
iv % of small and marginal farmers
10 More than 80%(10) 50 to 80%(5) Less than 50 %(3)
V Ground water status 5 Over exploited (5) Criteria (3) Sub critical (2) Safe (0) V Moisture index/DPAP
/DDP Block 15 -66.7 & Below (15)
DDP Block -33.3 to -66.6(10)
DPAP block 0 to -33.2 (0)
Non DPAP/DDP Block
vi Area under rain-fed agriculture
15 More than 90% (15) 80 to 90 %(10) 70 to 80% (5) Above 70%(Reject)
vii Drinking water 10 No Source (10) Problematic Village(7.5)
Partially covered(5) Fully Covered(0)
ix Degraded land 15 high-above 20%(15) Medium-10 to 20% (10)
Low-less than 10% of TGA (5)
X Productivity Potential of 15 Land with low production Lands with moderate Lands with high
16
the land &where productivity can be significantly enhanced with
reasonable efforts (15)
production & where productivity can be
enhanced with reasonable efforts (10)
production & where productivity can be
marginally enhanced with reasonable efforts (5)
xi Contiguity to another watershed that has
already been developed/treated
10 Contiguous to previously treated watershed &
contiguity within the micro watersheds in the project
(10)
Contiguity within the micro watersheds in the project but non
contiguous to pre4ously treated
watershed (5)
Neither contiguous to previously treated
watershed nor contiguity within the micro
watersheds in the project (0)
xii Cluster approach in the plains (more than one
contiguous micro-watersheds in the project)
15 Above 6 micro –watersheds in cluster (15)
4 to 6 micro watersheds in cluster
(10)
2 to 4 micro watersheds in cluster (5)
xiii Cluster approach in the hills (more than one contiguous micro-
watersheds in the project)
15 Above 5 micro –watersheds in cluster (15)
3 to 5 micro watersheds in cluster
(10)
2 to 3 micro watersheds in cluster (5)
Total 150 150 90 41 2.5
Project type: Hilly/desert/Other Table no.3: Watershed information
Name of the project
No. of watersheds to be treated
Watershed code Watershed regime/type/order
IWMP-VII CHIMER PROJECT
4 5B2D8c2e,5B2D8c2d,5B2D8c1f,5B2D8c2c
Others
17
1.3 Other development projects/schemes running in the Bhintkhurd Project
Table no.4: Developmental programmes running in the project area:
Sl
no
Name of the
programme/scheme Sponsoring agency
Objectives of the
programme/scheme
Year of
commencement
Villages
covered
Estimated
number of
beneficiaries
MGNREGS Gram Panchayat, Forest
Dept
S.B. ,S.S.B., C.C.T, G.P,
Plantation 2013 6 1250
G.F.D.P Forest Dept Land Lavaling 2013 6 185
Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmes in the project area:
Sl no
Project name
Year started
Name of Villages
No. of micro watershed
Watershed codes
Area under treatment
Funding source
Nodal agency
PIA Total cost
Expenditure incurred up to start of IWMP
% financial completion
% physical completion
IWMP-VII CHIMER PROJECT
18
Chapter 2
Project Implementing Agency
19
2.1 Project Implementing Agency
The Project Implementing Agencies (PIA) is selected by an appropriate mechanism by Gujarat State Watershed Management
Agency (GSWMA), the State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) for Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP) in Gujarat. The
PIAs are responsible for implementation of watershed project. These PIAs may include relevant line departments, autonomous
organizations under State / Central Governments, Government Institutes/Research bodies, Intermediate Panchayats, voluntary
Organization (VOs). The PIA for Malangdev watershed project is the Gujarat Forest Department (Vyara Division)
2.2 About Gujarat Forest Department as a PIA
2.2.1 The organization and its objectives:
Gujarat state was constituted as the Union of India on May1, 1960 after the bifurcation of the State of Bombay. Gujarat Forest
department is entrusted with the prime responsibility of protection, conservation and development of the forests and wildlife of the state.
The total geographical area of the state is 196024 sq. kms out of which 18961.56 sq. kms (9.67%) is the declared forest area with 7.72%
of area as forest cover. Whereas, the unique features of the state are the climatic and geomorphologic conditions, the largest coastline in
the country, the saline deserts of Rann, grasslands, wetlands. These factors have bestowed the state with the diversity of flora and fauna.
The faunal biodiversity consists of 14% fishes, 18 % reptiles, 37% avifauna and 25% of the mammal population of the country.
2.2.2 Objectives of the Forest Dept.:
1. Protection, Conservation and development of forests and wild life, the adoption of measures of soil conservation, moisture
conservation and increasing soil fertility.
2. The utilization of the forest so as to obtain the maximum yield consistent with their permanent maintenance and the supply of the
needs of the people, agriculture, industry and defence.
3. To conduct research into silviculture, utilization and other problems affecting the regeneration and development of the forests.
20
4. To achieve the goals of National Forest policy 1988 and to cover the maximum area under forests.
5. To create awareness among the people about the forests and environment.
6. To increase active participation of local people in protection & conservation of forest with special emphasis on tribal, poor & women.
2.2.3 Status of Working Plans in Gujarat state
Gujarat state is situated along the western coast of the country with a total geographical area of 1,96,024 sq km having only 9.8%
designated forest lands, divided by the Tropic of Cancer. The forests of Gujarat consist of four major types, namely (1) Tropical Moist
Deciduous, (2) Tropical Dry Deciduous, (3) Littoral and Swamp and (4) Northern Tropical Thorny Forests. Most of the forest area is
confined mainly in the districts of The Dangs, Valsad, Tapi, Rajpipla, Chhotaudepur, Baria, Godhra, Sabarkantha, Banaskantha,
Junagadh and Kachchh.
For forestry management purpose, the forests of the State are divided into 20 territorial forest divisions and 2 forest sub-divisions
and these are covered under 14 approved Working Plans. All of these Working Plans have basically been formulated for improving
conservation and development of forest resources of the state. Much higher emphasis has been given to conservation, people’s
involvement for regeneration of forests, increasing the NTFP (non timber forest products) outputs, bio-diversity conservation, and
medicinal plants. (Source: http://gujaratforest.gov.in/forests/work_plan.htm)
The PIA has experienced staff comprising Watershed Development Team of: Civil Engineer, Agriculture Expert and Community
Mobilization and other staff as Data Entry Operator, Surveyor, Accountant and Messenger. This team has a role of planning,
implementing, supervising, documenting and promoting watershed development projects and related developmental activities in the
district as per The New guidelines 2008.
21
2.2.4 Programs/projects of DWDU, Tapi:
The total 4 IWMP projects have been sanctioned by Government of India in the year 2010-11 for Tapi district. The entry point
activities of all the 4 IWMP projects have been identified by the respective PIAs in the district. The DWDU, Tapi implements one project
namely; IWMP-6 IWMP- , Bedchit l while Vyara Forest Division implements three projects namely; IWMP8- Dhanmauli, IWMP7- Chimer
22
2.3 SWOT Analysis of the DWDU, Tapi:
Strength:
(1) Ample forest wealth in the forms of Timber, Minor Forest Produce
(2) Possibilities for taking up horticulture and food processing due to suitable agro-climatic conditions
(3) Independent District Level Nodal Agency.
(4) Linkages with State level institutions, agricultural universities and NGOs for capacity building and technical guidance
(5) Appropriate topographic conditions for water conservation
(6) Scientific planning in watershed projects with help of GSWMA & BISAG
(7) District level monitoring, coordination & co-operation Committee
Weakness:-
(1) The project areas are located at extreme remote places.
(2) Inadequate livelihood opportunities
(3) Heavy rainwater runoff due to hilly terrain
(4) Inadequate secondary and higher level educational infrastructure
(5) Low literacy rate and Seasonal Migration
(6) Limited employment and economic activities due to absence of major industries
(7) Poor connectivity in interior areas
(8) Irregular electric supply
23
(9) Lack of skilled manpower and specialized services
(10) Low production and lack of marketing infrastructure.
Opportunities:
(1) A number of different other development schemes of the government are running; so, there can be horizontal integration and
convergence of programmes
(2) Better financial provision under IWMP
(3) Usage of new ICT tools like GIS,GPS
(4) Sustainable community forest management through Joint Forest Management Committee can be strengthen with diagnostic and
focused intervention
Threats:
(1) Rainfall being unreliable in the project area, the activities planned to be taken up may yield limited impact
(2) Irregularities in fund flow can derail the smooth functioning
(3) Lack of contribution and cooperation from local people
(4) Low literacy rate in the project area
24
Table no. 6: PIA:
Sl. No.
Names of project Details of PIA
1 IWMP-VII
CHIMER PROJECT
(i) Type of organization District Level Nodal Agengy
(ii) Name of organization Vyara Forest Department
(iii) Designation & Address
Deputy Conservator of Forest Office, Near-Sayajirav Statue, Vyara.
(iv) Telephone (02626)-222019
(v) Fax (02626)-222339
(vi) E-mail [email protected]
Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level: Sl no
Name Age Sex Designation Qualification Experie
nce Job assigned
Monthly remuneration
1 B. G. Prajapati
Male District Forest
Officer I.F.S.
Project Management 50400
2 R.K.Chaudhari 57 Male Range Forest
Officer S.Y B.sc. 34 Team leader 37189
3 Chaudhari Niteshbhai S 25 Male Agriculture & Soil Expert
M.R.S. – Agro. 2.5 Field Work 8000
4 Chaudhari
Dharmisthaben K. 27 Female
Community Mobilization
B.R.S. B ed 3.0 Field Work 8000
5 Patel Manishaben 26 Female Civil Diploma in civil 3.5 Field Work 8000
5 Chaudhari Sujataben 29 Male Accountant B.Com, M.Com,
B ed 3.00 Office Work 7000
7 Chaudhari Sangitaben
G. 29 Female
Data Entry Operator
B.A. - Office Work 5000
25
Chapter 3
Basic Information of the Project Area
26
3.1. Geography & Geo-hydrology
3.1.1. Land use pattern:
The Net geographical area of Malangdev project is about 6453.01 ha. The total forest area is about 39.96%. 56.24% land is under
cultivation in Malangdev Project is which is 70% rain-fed and mainly Kharif crop is taken. In Malangdev project, about 14.12% of the total
geographical land is classified under wasteland of which 73.52% is cultivable land & 26.48% is no-cultivable. The land under cultivation in
Malangdev Project is completely rain-fed and mainly Kharif crop is taken.The traditional cropssuch as paddy, figer millet, Bengal gram is
cultivated under maximum area.
27
Table no. 8: Land use pattern:
S. No. Names of Villages Geographical
Area of the Village
Forest Area
Land under agricultural use
Rainfed area
Permanent pastures
Wasteland
Cultivable Non-
cultivable
Chimer 1595.90 1068.70 379.70 373.20 91.50 91.50 56.00
Shravaniya 1695.30 1489.80 166.70 157.50 0.00 0.00 38.80
Lavchali 424.90 288.50 104.70 101.10 12.10 12.10 19.60
Nana Tarpada 702.10 629.40 54.20 50.00 7.60 7.60 10.90
Ojhar 642.20 519.90 99.30 92.30 11.50 11.50 12.50
Hindla 273.30 109.20 133.50 114.90 15.00 15.00 14.70
Total 5333.70 4105.50 938.10 889.00 137.70 137.70 152.50
3.1.2. Soil & Topography : Table no. 9: Soil type and topography:
S. No. Name of the Agro-climatic zone covers project area
Area in ha Names of the
Villages
Major soil types Topography
a)Type b) Area in ha
Agro-climatic sub zones - southern Hills
1595.90 Chimer 1595.90
1695.30 Shravaniya 1695.30
424.90 Lavchali Red, Black
Cotton, Goradu 424.90 Undulating
moderate slope 702.10 Nana Tarpada 702.10
642.20 Ojhar 642.20
273.30 Hindla 273.30
5333.70 5333.70
# Flat, undulating, moderate slope, Steep slope
28
Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition:
Sl no Name of Village Flood (Incidence) Drought (Incidence)
1 Chimer
No No
2 Shravaniya
3 Lavchali
4 Nana Tarpada
5 Ojhar
6 Hindla
11. Edaphic Factors
Table no. 11.1: Soil Erosion
Cause Type of erosion Area affected (ha) Run off
(mm/ year) Average soil loss
(Tonnes/ ha/ year) Water erosion
a Sheet 300
200
4.65%
b Rill 950 14.72%
c Gully 1550 24.02%
d Ravenous 2200
34.09%-
Sub-Total 5000 77.48%
Wind erosion 34.09%
Total 5000 77.48%
29
Table no. 11.2: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress)
Name of the Village Survey Number Soil pH Type of Salinity
(Inherent/Ingress)
Chimer 36 6.5 0.24
Shravaniya 58 6.7 0.24
Lavchali 79 6.8 0.23
Nana Tarpada 46 6.6 0.24
Ojhar 72 6.9 0.31
Hindla 52 6.8 0.28
Table no. 11.3: Waterlogging Conditions
Name of the Village Survey Number Reasons
Chimer
NIL -
Shravaniya
Lavchali
Nana Tarpada
Ojhar
Hindla
30
3.2 Land & Agriculture :- Table no. 12: Climatic conditions:
Name of project Average rainfall- last 5 years
(mm) Average temperature
IWMP-VII
CHIMER PROJECT 89.6 Inch
Summer Winter
Max Min Max Min
38 33 30 25
Table no. 13: Physiography and relief
Project name Elevation Slope range (%) Major streams
IWMP-VII
CHIMER PROJECT 500mt 25-30% Zakari River
Table no. 14: Land ownership details
Sl
no Village
Total owned land HHs giving
land on lease
HHs taking
land on lease Gen OBC SC ST
Chimer 0.00 0.00 0.00 100 0 12
Shravaniya 0.00 0.00 0.00 100 0 5
Lavchali 0.00 0.00 0.00 100 0 0
Nana Tarpada 0.00 0.00 0.00 100 0 0
Ojhar 0.00 0.00 0.00 100 0 6
Hindla 0.00 0.00 0.1 99 0 12
31
Table no. 15: Agriculture
Sl no Name of Village Net sown area
One time Two times Three times
1 Chimer 90.10 22.50 -
2 Shravaniya 248.90 62.20 -
3 Lavchali 362.70 90.70 -
4 Nana Tarpada 227.60 56.90 -
5 Ojhar 237.20 59.30 -
6 Hindla 259.90 65.00 -
Total 2958.9 739.6 -
3.3 Irrigation Table no. 16: Irrigation
Sl
no Village
Source 1 : Canal Source 2 : Check dam / Pond Source 3 : Well
Availability
months Net area
Gross
area
Availability
months Net area
Gross
area
Availability
months Net area
Gross
area
1 Chimer - - - 4 1.4 7 12
2 Shravaniya - - - 4 5.1 7 11
3 Lavchali - - - 4 5.2 9 30
4 Nana Tarpada - - - 4 3.2 9 33
5 Ojhar - - - 4 4.4 10 42
6 Hindla - - - 4 3.8 7 16
32
Table no. 17: Crop details:
Sl
no Name of Village
Kharif (Monsoon)
Crop 1 Crop 2
Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity
1 Chimer 22.5 20970 932.00 4.5 4840 1075.56 29.7 102610 3454.88
2 Shravaniya 62.2 53490 859.97 12.4 11790 950.81 82.1 228970 2788.92
3 Lavchali 90.7 74730 823.93 18.1 16070 887.85 119.7 293980 2455.97
4 Nana Tarpada 56.9 50290 883.83 11.4 11320 992.98 75.1 226120 3010.92
5 Ojhar 59.3 51700 871.84 11.9 11560 971.43 78.3 227070 2900.00
6 Hindla 65 55120 848.00 13 12090 930.00 85.8 229770 2677.97
Total 739.6 636560 895.81 147.9 141800 1015.6 976.3 2689950 3072.06
Sl no
Name of Village Rabi (Winter)
Crop 1 Crop 2 Crop 3 Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity
1 Chimer 9.9 5200 525.25 7.7 3630 471.43 4.4 1870 425.00
2 Shravaniya 27.9 13500 483.87 21.7 9460 435.94 12.4 4840 390.32
3 Lavchali 40.5 18750 462.96 31.5 13160 417.78 18 6710 372.78
4 Nana Tarpada 25.2 12540 497.62 19.6 8780 447.96 11.2 4510 402.68
5 Ojhar 26.5 13010 490.94 20.6 9100 441.75 11.8 4680 396.61
6 Hindla 28.8 13730 476.74 22.4 9630 429.91 12.8 4920 384.38
Total 328.7 159100 504.54 255.6 111430 453.58 146.2 57120 408.22
33
3.4 Livestock :
Table no. 18: Livestock
Sl no
Name of Village Buffalo Cow Total Milk
(Buffalo+Cow)
Goat Sheep Bullock Hen Others
No milk No Milk No Milk
1 Chimer 60 120 80 240 360 30 - - 90 215 - 2 Shravaniya 77 190 100 150 340 152 - - 158 389 - 3 Lavchali 30 65 25 75 140 20 45 50 - 4 Nana Tarpada 45 135 16 20 170 25 - - 45 70 - 5 Ojhar 78 190 11 10 200 46 - - 90 303 - 6 Hindla 57 140 19 20 160 76 - - 123 162 -
Total 347 840 251 515 1355 303 - - 551 1189 -
3.5 Infrastructure Facilities : Table no. 19: Drinking water
Sl no
Name of Village Ground water table
(mt) Source of drinking water Availability in months
Quality Tube well Well Tube well Well
1 Chimer 46 Both use
12 month 12 month Slightly saline
2 Shravaniya 24 Both use
3 Lavchali 40 Both use
4 Nana Tarpada 34 Both use
5 Ojhar 40 Both use
6 Hindla 37 Both use
34
Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources
S. No.
Names of
project
CPR Particulars
Total Area (ha) Area owned/ In possession of
Area available for treatment (ha)
Pvt. persons Govt.
(specify dept.)
PRI Any other
(Pl. Specify)
Pvt. persons
Govt. (specify
dept.) PRI
Any other (Pl.
Specify)
Wasteland/ degraded land 911.32 4.12
Pastures 436.30 30.97
Orchards
Village Woodlot
Forest 2578.45 1956.12
Village Ponds/ Tanks
Community Buildings
Weekly Markets
Permanent markets
Temples/ Places of worship
Others (Pl. specify)
3489.77 436.30 1960.24 30.97
35
Malangdev project has a total population of 7756 out of which 3907 are male and 3849 female. The sex ratio is 985 females to
1000 males. There are 893 BPLs HH for Malangdev project and average family size is 5. There are total 547HH with no land. The literacy
rate is 30.10% (of total male population) and female literacy rate is as low as 21.20% (of total female population). The total population
belongs to ST caste & mainly involved in agriculture and animal husbandry.
36
3.6 Socio-Economic Profile :
Table no. 21: Demographic information
Sl
no
Name of
Village
Population SC ST
Total Male Female Total Male Female % Total Male Female %
1 Chimer 1750 910 840 0 0 0 0.00 1750 910 840 100.00
2 Shravaniya 600 312 288 0 0 0 0.00 600 312 288 100.00
3 Lavchali 454 236 222 5 1 4 0.77 449 235 218 98.77
4 Nana Tarpada 284 147 137 0 0 0 0.00 284 147 137 100.00
5 Ojhar 601 312 289 0 0 0 0.00 601 312 289 100.00
6 Hindla 757 393 364 0 0 0 0.00 757 393 364 100.00
Total 4446 2312 2134 6 1 5 0.07 4446 2312 2134 99.33
Table no. 22: Literacy rate
Sl no Name of Village Literacy Literacy %
above age 14
Literacy %
below age 14 Total % Male % Female %
1 Chimer 750 42.85 475 63.40 275 36.60 35 65
2 Shravaniya 210 35 147 70.40 63 29.60 27.70 72.30
3 Lavchali 146 32.15 93 63.45 53 36.55 29.40 70.60
4 Nana Tarpada 142 50 81 57.16 61 43.84 21.50 78.50
5 Ojhar 232 38 129 55.65 103 44.35 28.60 71.40
6 Hindla 258 34.08 148 57.45 110 42.55 20.80 79.20
Total 1738 39.09 1073 61.73 665 38.56 27.16 72.84
37
3.7 Migration Pattern
Table no. 23: Migration details
Sl no
Village Total
population
Migration Migration by months Main reason
for migration
Income during
migration / month Total Male Female
Up to 3 months
3-6 months
More than 6 months
1 Chimer 252 151 136 15 64 50 37
Lack of Employment
3000 to 5000
2 Shravaniya 533 319 288 32 134 107 80
3 Lavchali 650 390 351 39 163 130 97
4 Nana Tarpada 632 379 341 38 158 127 94
5 Ojhar 708 424 383 43 178 142 106
6 Hindla 608 365 328 37 152 121 92
Total 8391 5033 4530 505 2101 1678 1258
38
3.8 Poverty : Table no. 24: Poverty
Sl no Village Total
Household
BPL
% of BPL HH Total Land less HH % of land less
HH 0-16 16-20 Total
1 Chimer 375 95 142 237 63.20 70 18.66
2 Shravaniya 105 4 16 20 19.04 15 14.28
3 Lavchali 73 0 9 9 12.32 0 0
4 Nana Tarpada 71 0 4 4 5.63 0 0
5 Ojhar 116 7 18 25 21.55 12 10.34
6 Hindla 146 14 62 76 52.05 28 19.17
Total 886 120 251 371 41.87 125 14.10
39
3.9 Infrastructure Facilities :
Table no. 25: Village infrastructure
Sl
no Village
Pucca
road
to the
Village
(Y/N)
Schools
Colleges
(Number)
Post Office
(Distance)
Banks
(Number)
Distance
from
nearest
market
yard
Milk
collection
centre
(Number)
Milk
cooperative
(Number)
Other
cooperative
s / CBIs
(Number)
Any
other
instituti
on
LP UP HS
1 Chimer Y Y Y N N N N N Y N N N
2 Shravaniya Y Y N N N N N N Y N N N
3 Lavchali Y Y N N N N N N Y N N N
4 Nana
Tarpada Y Y N N N N N N Y N N N
5 Ojhar Y Y N N N N N N Y N N N
6 Hindla Y Y Y N N N N Y (every
moday) Y N N N
40
Table no. 26: Facilities / HH assets
Sl
no Village
HHs with
electricity
HHs with
safety
latrines
HHs with phones HHs with vehicle
HHs with
TV set
HHs with
cooking
gas
HHs with
Drinking
water
HHs
with
freedge Land line Mobile 2-wheeler 4-wheeler
1 Chimer 300 170 0 100 30 3 42 10 125 8
2 Shravaniya 113 80 0 45 40 1 25 8 70 3
3 Lavchali 74 20 0 45 12 1 22 3 32 0
4 Nana Tarpada 57 22 0 25 20 0 26 8 25 0
5 Ojhar 98 30 0 69 40 0 29 12 33 2
6 Hindla 135 90 0 96 56 1 40 17 58 2
Total 777 432 0 380 198 6 184 58 383 15
41
3.3 Livelihood pattern: The livelihood of the villagers depends on agriculture and animal husbandry & during lean seasons
they migrate for daily wages to other parts of the state. There are few people who are engaged in
42
3.10 Livelihood Pattern :
Table no. 27: Income
Sl no Name of Village Agriculture Animal husbandry Casual labour Others/ Services
Total
1 Chimer 200500 117500 70500 10000 398500
2 Shravaniya 498800 254000 152400 20000 925200
3 Lavchali 436000 230000 138000 20000 824000
4 Nana Tarpada 368600 197100 118200 15000 698900
5 Ojhar 451800 244000 146400 25000 867200
6 Hindla 342100 189600 113700 18000 663400
Total 2297800 1232200 739200 108000 4377200
43
3.11 Dependence on Common Property Resource :
Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR
Sl no Name of Village
Benefit type 1 Benefit type 2 Benefit type 2
Total income
% sells Income % sells Income % sells Income
1 Chimer - 65000 - 20000 - 10500 95500
2 Shravaniya - 100000 - 35000 - 15000 150000
3 Lavchali - 20000 - 15000 - 5000 40000
4 Nana Tarpada - 15000 - 10000 - 15000 40000
5 Ojhar - 95500 - 40000 - 20000 155500
6 Hindla - 42000 - 35000 - 15000 92000
Total 337500 155000 80500 573000
44
Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution)
Sl
no Name of Village
Total
workforce Agriculture
Animal
husbandry
(AH)
Agriculture +
AH
Casual
labour Ser4ces Handicraft Others
1 Chimer 720 410 108 137 58 7 - -
2 Shravaniya 550 313 82 105 45 5 - -
3 Lavchali 200 114 30 38 16 2 - -
4 Nana Tarpada 125 71 19 24 10 2 - -
5 Ojhar 320 182 48 61 26 3 - -
6 Hindla 475 271 71 90 38 5 - -
Total 2390 1361 358 554 193 24 - -
45
Chart 3.4.1 showing comparative productivity of Finger Millet:
Finger Millet is one of the major crops grown in Tapi district with having the productivity of 1500kg/ha approx. which is higher than the total
productivity of the state and country. Whereas, there is an appreciable productivity of the finger millet in the malangdev project area i.e.
1015.60 kg/ha and even it can be increased with an adequate source of irrigation.
46
Chart 3.4.2 showing comparative productivity of Ground nut:
The Groundnut production has been increased last from 2 years in Tapi district, its productivity is about 1200 kg/ha. The
productivity of project area is 1064.87 kg/ha. The state and country productivity is comparatively less than tapi district.
Chart 3.4.3 showing comparative productivity of Paddy:
Paddy is the major kharif crop which is cultivated in Tapi district. The ekdandi variety of paddy is found to be most
popular recently due to maximum production compared to other indigenous/local varieties, thus there is appreciable
productivity all over the district. The productivity in project area is about 3072.06 kg/ha, whereas, in Tapi it is 4000 kg/ha.
47
But in the other parts of Gujarat, the productivity is less resulting in overall less productivity i.e. 1698.06 kg/ha. The
productivity of paddy in India is 2178 kg/h
Chart 3.4.4 showing comparative productivity of Black gram:
The productivity of black gram in project area is 858.42 kg/ha, which is much higher compared to, state and country. The productivity of
black gram in Tapi district is 800 kg/ha.
48
Chart 3.4.5 showing comparative productivity of Tuwar:
The productivity of the Tuwar is 895.81 kg/ha which is much less as compared to the district (1000 kg/ha). The southern villages in
Tapi has appreciable amount of productivity. Gujarat has low productivity followed by the country.
49
The Malangdev project area has low productivity because of the following reasons:
I. Full dependence on monsoon:
Malangdev village is dependent on monsoon for the cultivation. Water is being essential input in agriculture thus, shortage of water
results in lower productivity. Due to the absence of irrigation facility, 100% of the total cultivated area depends on the uncertain
monsoon. Therefore, the success or failure of the monsoon determines the success or failure of agriculture production.
II. Low use of fertilizer per unit cropped area:
Farmers do not use fertilizer due to insufficient money and poor irrigation facility which result in lower production.
III. Traditional farming methods:
The traditional methods such as monocropping, taking same crop every year results in lower productivity. The ignorance about the use
of new farming methods and technologies such as multiple cropping are not followed.
IV. Lack of adequate farm machinery:
Even today a large number of farmers use wooden ploughs and bullocks. They don't have adequate machinery like tractor for
cultivation.
V. Lack of finances for farmers:
Most of the farmers are marginal and small. They do not have enough money to buy good quality seeds, machinery and other inputs.
VI. Lack of other facilities such as storage and marketing:
50
5-10% of agriculture product damage after harvesting due to scarcity of proper storage and proper market for sale. So he sells to local
traders at the low prices. Farmers mainly face problems in means of transportation due to kachha roads. And other problem of farmers
is the lack of proper storage facilities.
51
Chapter 4
Watershed Activities
52
4.1 Watershed Activities
Watershed management as a strategy has been adopted by Government of India especially in the rain-fed regions of semi-arid
tropics. These regions are characterized by low and undependable rain, low soil fertility, poor infrastructure development, low literacy and
high incidence of migration. Several studies have identified that there is a dire need of a systematic and scientific approach to deal with
watershed development. The common guidelines generate a fresh and flexible framework for the next generation watershed development.
4.1. Scientific Planning:
i) Cluster Approach
This envisages a broader vision of Geo-hydrological unit which involves treating a cluster of micro-watershed. The Malangdev
Project consists of 7 micro- watersheds namely 5B2D8d2l, 5B2D8d1g, 5B2D8d2k, 5B2D8d1h, 5B2D8d1k, 5B2D8d1l, 5B2D8d2j as their
respective codes.
ii) Base line Survey
To access the impact of any watershed development program a detailed baseline survey has to be conducted. This acts a
benchmark for any intervention during and post implementation of any development program. A detailed baseline survey was undertaken
which involved household census survey, Bio-physical survey, Field to field survey and Village level data collection from Talati –cum
mantri. Household census survey includes a detailed questionnaire which was been filled by visiting each and every household in the
village. This gave in the details of the demographic profile of the village, the literacy percentage, SC/ST population, number of BPL
53
household, cattle population, and net consumption rate in the village, average milk production of the cattle and various schemes running
and their benefits. Bio-physical survey was undertaken to identify various natural resources available in the village. It included the soil
typology, wells in the area, crops cultivation, Cropping pattern, fertilizer application and various sources of irrigation in the field.
iii) Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA)
The past experience of watershed has given tremendous input to focus on creating accountability of the stakeholders towards the
program. This has created an emphasis to include all the stakeholder communities and their local and indigenous Technological
Knowledge (ITK) while planning for any activity. Participatory approach provides a new path for planning, implementing, and monitoring
and post- withdrawal activities with a complete accountability of the stakeholders. Various PRA techniques like resource mapping, social
mapping, and season calendars were used to understand the physical and social orientation of the village in general and watershed in
specific. These tools put the villagers in ease than the complicated questionnaires. Various tools like Matrix ranking, Venn diagram were
used to identify various local vegetations, fodders crops and even various institutions to identify their significance in the life of the farmers.
iv) Use of GIS and remote sensing for planning
Use of various high science tools has been promoted at various stages of watershed development which include GPS, satellite
maps through BISAG.
54
a) Prioritization: Geographical Information System (GIS) has been used for prioritization process. Various layer maps were
created like Geo-morphological, Soil, BPL Population, SC/ST population, Ground water Status, Drinking water situation Slope percent.
These were all given proper weight-age according to the DoLR specification. This helped in prioritization of various watershed areas.
b) Planning: A action plan matrix was formulated by State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) taking into account various features like the
slope percent, soil Depth, Soil Texture, Soil erosion in the area for wasteland, forest land and agricultural land. Global positioning System
(GPS) was used to identify each and every water conservation structures available in the project area. This was used to create a map.
Contour Map of vertical interval of 1 meter at a scale of 1:8000 was used for identifying various locations for soil and water conservation
structures.
c) Hydrological modeling: Hydrology modeling technique was used for locating drainage, stream length, flow direction, sink, and
Flow accumulation. This model overlaid over cadastral map to calculate the catchment area of each structures like the check dam etc.
This has helped to remove the human error which generally occurs while calculating the catchment area of a check dam.
Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects
S. No. Scientific criteria/ inputs used Whether scientific
criteria was used
(A) Planning
Cluster approach Yes
55
Whether technical back-stopping for the project has been arranged? If yes, mention the name of the Institute Yes
Baseline survey Yes
Hydro-geological survey Yes
Contour mapping Yes
Participatory Net Planning (PNP) Yes
Remote sensing data-especially soil/ crop/ run-off cover -
Ridge to Valley treatment Yes
Online IT connecti4ty between
(1) Project and DRDA cell/ZP Yes
(2) DRDA and SLNA Yes
(3) SLNA and DoLR Yes
Availability of GIS layers
1. Cadastral map Yes
2. Village boundaries Yes
3. Drainage Yes
4. Soil (Soil nutrient status) Yes
56
5. Land use Yes
6. Ground water status Yes
7. Watershed boundaries Yes
8. Activity Yes
Crop simulation models#
Integrated coupled analyzer/ near infrared visible spectroscopy/ medium spectroscopy for high speed soil
nutrient analysis
Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)#
Weather Station
(B) Inputs
1. Bio-pesticides Yes
2. Organic manures Yes
3. Vermicompost Yes
4. Bio-fertilizer Yes
5. Water saving devices Yes
6. Mechanized tools/ implements Yes
57
7. Bio-fencing Yes
8. Nutrient budgeting Yes
9. Automatic water level recorders & sediment samplers Yes
Any other (please specify)
#NDVI - Ratio of the differences of the response of vegetation in the near infrared & red regions of the electromagnetic spectrum
Table no.31: Details of PRA Activities conducted in the project area
Sr.
No.
Name of the PRA
Activity / FGD Date
Number
of people
present
Lessons learnt / Understanding of the problem/situation
Problem
Identification
Transent Walk
-Chapati Diagram
-Village Mapping
-Seasonal
Calender
-Boundary
Mapping.
20/06/2010
To
9/07/2010
841
Major Problem is Drinking Water facility
Education Problem
Transportation Problem
People migration for income
Note:
1. After this table, add the problem tree analysis
2. Then add the object tree analysis
58
59
60
4.2 Institutional formation in Watershed 4.2.1 Watershed Committee
Table no. 32.:1 Watershed Committee details
Sl. No.
Names of
Village
Date of Registrati
on as a Society
Name of Member Designation M/F
SC ST
SF
MF
LF Landless
UG
SHG
GP Any
other Educational qualification
Function/s
assigned#
1 Chimer under
process
Shri Samaji bhai NathubhaiKokani
President M Y Y 38 B.A Pass
Watershed
Committee
Shri Kantilal Jamshibhai Gamit
Secretary M Y Y Forester 8 Pass
Shri Hadgiyabhai Maharbhai kokani
Member M Y Y 30 B.A.Pass
Shri Maganbhai Chhetriyabhai Gamit
Member M Y Y 36 4 Pass
Shri Soniyabhai balubhai Gamit
Member M Y Y 42 12 Pass
Shri Vaniyabhai Ratnabhai Kokani
Member M Y Y Y 38 4 Pass
Shri Ambubhai Ishariyabhai Kokani
Member M Y Y Y 30 10 Pass
Shri Nitesh.s chaudhri
WDT Member M Y Y B.R.S
Shri Fulajibhai Afakunyabhai Kokani
Member M Y Y Y 39 7. Pass
Smt Taraben Prabhubhai Kokani
Member F Y Y Y 39 S S C
Smt Simaguben Dashrubhai Kokani
Member F Y Y 50 10 Pass
61
Table no. 32.2: Shravaniya Watershed Committee details
Sl. No.
Names of Village
Date of Registra
tion Name of Member
Designation
M/F
SC
ST
SF
MF
LF
Landless
UG
SHG
GP
Any other
Educational
qualification
Function/s
assigned#
2 Shravaniy
a
Shri Mirajibhai
Nuryabhai Gamit President M Y Y 30 10 Pass
Watershe
d
Committe
e
Shri Vasanjibhai
Ratanabhai Gamit Secretary M Y Y Forester 9 Pass
Shri Umedbhai
Manshingbhai
Gamit
Member M Y Y 27 10 Pass
Shri Maganbhai
Micharabhai Gamit Member M Y Y 32 10 Pass
Shri Pantubhai
Bhiliyabhai Gamit Member M Y Y 42 7 Pass
Shri Kunvarjibhai
Maganbhai Gamit Member M Y Y Y 29 9 Pass
Shri Samalabhai
Kuthiyabhai Gamit Member M Y Y Y 30 8 Pass
Manisha m. patel wdt M Y Y 25 D.C.E.
Shri Isapbhai
Paslyabhai Gamit Member M Y Y Y 40 5 Pass
Smt Urmilaben
Shurapshingbhai
Gamit
Member F Y Y 50 4 Pass
Smt Maganiben
Tulajibhai Gamit Member F Y Y 25 9 Pass
62
Table no. 32.3:Lavachali Watershed Committee details
Sl.
No. Village
Date of
Registrati
on
Name of Member Designation M/F S
C ST SF MF LF
Landles
s UG
SH
G GP
Any
other
Educatio
nal
qualificati
on
Function/s
assigned#
3 Lavchali
Shri Santubhai
Babubhai Gamit President M Y Y 42 10 Pass
Watershed
Committee
Shri Nageshbhai
Ratanjibhai Gamit Secretary M Y
Y
Fores
ter 9 Pass
Shri Ilambhai
Fatiyabhai Gamit Member M Y
Y 39 10 Pass
Shri Mirajibhai
Dhedabhai Gamit Member M Y
Y 46 7 Pass
Shri Ranajitbhai
Divanjibhai Gamit Member M Y Y 35 7 Pass
Shri Rameshbhai
Chemabhai Gamit Member M Y Y Y 32 9 Pass
Shri Fatesingbhai
Rameshbha
Gamit
Member M Y Y Y 35 7 Pass
Smt Darmishta
ben k. WDT F Y
Y 27 B.R.S.
Smt Sangatiben
Kantilal Gamit Member F Y
Y Y 52 4 Pass
Smt Paluben
Jayntibhai Gamit Member F Y Y 42 10 Pass
Smt Premilaben
Maganbhai Gamit Member F Y Y 45 4 Pass
63
Table no. 32.4: NanaTarpada Watershed Committee details
Sl. No.
Names of WCs
Date of Registration as a Society
Name of Member
Designation
M/F
SC
ST
SF
MF
LF Landle
ss UG
SHG
GP
Any other
Educational qualification
Function/s
assigned#
4
Nana Tarpad
a
Shri Chhaganbhai Radtiyabhai Gamit
President M Y Y 39 10 Pass
Watershed
Committee
Shri Shaileshbhai Vadiyabhai Gamit
Secretary M
Y Y Foreste
r 9 Pass
Shri Dhnubhai Navgiyabhai Gamit
Member M
Y Y
32 10 Pass
Shri Lajreshbhai Jedadabhai Gamit
Member M
Y Y
45 7 Pass
Shri Rameshbhai Akhatiyabhai Gamit
Member M
Y Y 28 10 Pass
Shri Nitesh s chaudharii
W.D.T M Y Y Y 24 B.R.S
Smt Gitaben jayantilal Gamit
Member F Y Y
Y 35 5 Pass
Smt Vanitaben Rajubhai Gamit
Member F Y Y
31 12 Pass (I T I)
Smt Tesalaben Jivabhai Gamit
Member F
Y Y
Y 42 4 Pass
Smt Ishudiben Rusimbhai Gamit
Member F
Y Y 38 Illiterate
Shri M. N Vanaraj
Member M Y Y 39 4 Pass
64
Table no. 32.5 Ojhar Watershed Committee details
Sl.
No.
Names
of
Village
Date of
Registration
Name of
Member Designation M/F SC ST SF MF LF Landless UG SHG GP
Any
other
Educational
qualification
Function/s
assigned#
5 Ojhar
Shri Anijbhai
Jethiyabhai
Gamit President M Y Y 50 8 Pass
Watershed
Committee
Shri Bhimjibhai
Motiyabhai
Gamit Secretary M Y Y Forester 9 Pass
Shri Jayantilal
Maganbhai
Gamit Member M Y
Y
Y 55 Illiterate
Shri
Dhrmeshbhai
Chhidiyabhai
Gamit
Member M Y
Y 38 10 Pass
Shri Nileshbhai
Babubhai
Gamit Member M Y
Y
33 10 Pass
Shri Nalinbhai
Bhimajibhai
Gamit Member M Y Y Y 30 5 Pass
Shri Revajibhai
Bodliyabhai
Gamit Member M Y Y Y 39 10 Pass
Smt Manisha
ben.m patel WDT F Y Y 25 D.C.E
Smt Ruthaben
Aravindbhai
Gamit Member F Y Y Y 35 9 Pass
Shri Vinodbhai
Kikabhai Gamit Member M Y Y 38 4 Pass
Shri
Maheshbhai
Shukkariyabhai
Gamit
Member M Y Y 42 7 Pass
65
Table no. 32.6: Hindla Watershed Committee details
Sl.
No
.
Names
of
Village
Date of
Registr
ation as
a
Society
Name of Member Designatio
n
M/
F
S
C
S
T
S
F
M
F
L
F
Landles
s
U
G
SH
G
G
P
Any
other
Educational
qualificatio
n
Function/
s
assigned#
6 Hindla
Shri Kanjibhai
Chemabhai Gamit President M Y Y 39 12 Pass
Watershed
Committee
Shri Tulajibhai
Kalidasbhai Gami Secretary M Y Y Foreste
r 9 Pass
Shri Ajitbhai
Ganabhai Gamit Member M Y Y
32 10 Pass
Shri Rameshbhai
Dhanubhai Gamit Member M Y Y
26 10 Pass
Shri
Mahendrabhai
Navagiyabhai
Gamit
Member M Y Y 39 12 Pass
Shri Rogiyabhai
Agariyabhai Gamit Member M Y Y Y 24 10 Pass
Shri Jayantbhai
Ganiyabhai Gamit Member M Y Y Y 26 Illiterate
Darmishta ben k WDT
Member M Y
Y 27 B.R.S
Smt Lalitaben
Surajibhai Gamit Member F Y Y
Y 39 Illiterate
Smt Vingiben
Tulajibhai Gamit Member F Y Y 32 10 Pass
Shri Maganbhai
Javabhai Gamit Member M Y Y 25 10 Pass
66
# Only the letter assigned, as below, needs to be typed, except for `J’, where the type may be specifically mentioned. A. PNP and PRA B. Planning C. Maintenance of Accounts D. Signing of cheques and making payments E. Super4sion of construction acti4ties F. Cost Estimation G. Verification & Measurement H. Record of labour employed I. Social Audit J. Any other (please specify).
i) Self Help Group
Self Help Groups are motivated, small homogenous groups organized together through credit and thrift activities. Self help group
initiative especially for women help uplift their livelihood. Generally self help groups include landless and poor women. Before formation of
the SHGs, during PRA activities, Focused Group Discussions (FGDs) were held with the women, which came up with the following
observations:
a) Lack of proper credit facilities due to low intervention of formal financial credit institution.
b) Excessive exploitation of weaker section by money lenders
c) Lack of knowledge on credit facility and banking.
With a detailed discussion with some of the local NGOs working in the area like BAIF, it was planned to have some capacity
building training regarding SHG activities. It was also proposed to have some livelihood activities which will promote women empowerment
such as Wadi Project.
67
Table no. 33: SHG detail
S. No.
Village
Total no. of registered SHGs No. of members No. of ST in each
category No. of BPL in each category
With only Men
With only Women
With both
Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total
1 Chimer 1 1 0 2
(i) Landless 3 1 4
13 16 29 8 6 14 (ii) SF 3 4 7
(iii) MF 7 10 17
(iv) LF 0 15 15
2 Shravaniya 1 1 0 2
(i) Landless 3 2 5
15 15 30 7 6 13 (ii) SF 8 4 12
(iii) MF 1 9 10
(iv) LF 8 0 8
3 Lavachali 2 0 0 2
(i) Landless 0 0 0
0 22 22 0 10 10 (ii) SF 0 7 7
(iii) MF 0 14 14
(iv) LF 0 1 1
4 Nanatarpada 0 2 1 3
(i) Landless 0 4 4
0 27 27 0 12 12 (ii) SF 0 7 7
(iii) MF 0 14 14
(iv) LF 0 2 2
5 Ojhar 1 0 0 1
(i) Landless 2 0 2
14 0 14 6 0 6 (ii) SF 2 0 2
(iii) MF 8 0 8
(iv) LF 2 0 2
6 Hindala 0 0 1 1
(i) Landless 1 0 1
7 4 11 4 2 6 (ii) SF 3 1 4
(iii) MF 3 3 6
(iv) LF 0 0 0
Total 5 4 2 11 49 84 133 49 84 133 25 36 61
68
iii) User Group: User Groups are normally formed to manage an activity or asset created under the programme on a long term basis. The user
group collect user charges from their members, oversee the works and manage the benefits. It was decided that each group would
formulate certain internal rules and have a feeling of ownership with community spirit.
Table no. 34: UG detail
S. No.
Name of Village
Total no. of registered SHGs No. of members No. of ST in each
category No. of BPL in each
category
With only Men
With only Women
With both
Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total
1 Chimer 2 0 2 4
(i) Landless 0 0 0
14 6 20 12 4 16 (ii) SF 6 2 6
(iii) MF 8 4 12
(iv) LF 6 0 6
2 Shravaniya 3 0 1 4
(i) Landless 0 0 0
20 10 30 12 4 16 (ii) SF 8 2 10
(iii) MF 10 6 16
(iv) LF 2 2 4
3 Lavachali 1 1 0 1
(i) Landless 0 0 0
12 0 12 2 2 4 (ii) SF 3 0 3
(iii) MF 7 0 7
(iv) LF 2 0 2
4 Nanatarpada 3 0 0 3
(i) Landless 0 0 0
20 0 20 6 2 8 (ii) SF 8 0 8
(iii) MF 10 0 10
(iv) LF 2 0 2
5 Ojhar 0 0 1 1
(i) Landless 0 0 0
7 3 10 4 1 5 (ii) SF 7 3 10
(iii) MF 0 0 0
(iv) LF 0 0 0
6 Hindala 0 0 1 1
(i) Landless 0 0 0
7 3 10 3 1 4 (ii) SF 7 3 10
(iii) MF 0 0 0
(iv) LF 0 0 0
Total 9 1 4 14
80 22 102 80 22 102 39 14 53
69
4.3. Physical activities to be undertaken under IWMP, Malangdev Project
4.3.1 Entry Point activity (EPA)
EPA activities are taken up under watershed projects to build a rapport with the village community at the beginning of the project;
generally, certain important works which are in urgent demand of the local community are taken up. A group discussion was conducted
with watershed Development Committee regarding the EPA activity, It was conveyed to the WC that an amount of Rs. 24.00 Lakh was
allotted for EPA activity, which was 4 per cent of total allocated budget. The villagers discussed various activities which they felt is
important but after a brief discussion it was conveyed to them that only those activities can be taken, which revive the common natural
resources. It was also taken into priority that there should be an instrument of convergence which will result in sustainability of activities.
Table no.35: Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs.)
S. No. Names of Villages
Amount earmarked for EPA
Entry Point Activities planned
Estimated cost Expected outcome
1 Chimer 6.95 Underground watertank-2 3.475 *2 no. Drinking water for Villegers
Total 6.95
2 Shravaniya
7.74 Well Repair 3.87 Drinking & irrigation Facilities
Well Repair 3.87 Drinking & irrigation Facilities
Total 7.74
3 Lavchali 1.88 Drinking water faselities 1.88 Drinking water for Villegers
Total 1.88
4 Nana Tarpada 3.28 Drinking water faselities 3.28 Drinking water for Villegers
Total 3.28
5 Ojhar 2.97
Drinking water faselities 2.40 Drinking water for Villegers
Milk shed 0.57 for Villegers
Total 2.97
6 Hindla 1.16 pond 1.16 Water storeg ,
Total 1.16
Total 24.00
24.00
70
4.3.2. Watershed Development Works:
Watershed development works are to be done during second phase of watershed project. A multi-tier ridge to valley sequence approach
should be approached towards implementation of watershed development projects. A net budget of 50 percent is allotted for this work.
Ridge Area Treatment Plans: The main purpose is to harvest the
water at ridge level first as this is where the major water resources
originate. It would allow the water to percolate underground and recharge
the natural aquifers. Other benefits would be the reduction in the velocity
of the water which is flowing with high velocity due to heavy rain and steep
slope. The reduced Kinetic energy would allow the soil particle to
accumulate in the trenches and furrows, minimizing the soil erosion as
well. The Kamad watershed had been identified as one of the most eroded
part of the South Dang. Thus, SMC treatment in that region would benefit
the villagers for drinking purpose and help them to increase the
productivity. The gradual process would also help us to retain GWT of the same region. In order to overcome above hurdles, following
structure had been proposed after interaction between the watershed committee, Range Forest Officer (RFO) and other field staff of
forest.
71
Table no.36.: Details of ridge line treatment / land based activities in watershed works*
S.
No. Village name
Name of
structures
Type of treatment Type of land Executing
agency Target
(i)
Ridge
area
(R)
(ii)
Drainag
e line
(D)
(iii)
Land
dev. (L)
(i)
Private
(ii)
Community
(iii)
Forest
(i) UG
(ii)SHG
(iii) Others
No. of
units
(No./
cu.m./
rmt)
Estimated cost
(Rs. in lakh)
Expected
month &
year of
completion
(mm/yyyy)
M W O T
1 Chimer
Stone Bund D P F 345 cmt 0.43225
S.S.B R F 550 cmt 0.6897
Land levelling L P 56 hac 9.842
C.C.T D P 380 cmt 0.4769
M.F.O 185
sq.m 7.733
GABIUN STCTER
85 cmt 0.14535
GALLY PLUGE
270 cmt 0.3382
Protection wall
132
sq.m 10.68
2
Shravaniya
Stone Bund D P F 945 cmt 1.18465
S.S.B R F 450 cmt 0.5643
Land levelling L P 45 hac. 7.90875
C.C.T D P 390 cmt 0.48925
M.F.O 278 sq.m
11.6204
72
GABIUN STCTER
75 cmt 0.12825
GALLY PLUGE
275 cmt 0.34485
Protection wall
75 sq.m 6.05625
3 Lavchali
Stone Bund D P F 227 cmt 0.285
S.S.B 73 cmt 0.0912
Land levelling R F 30 hac. 5.2725
C.C.T 85 cmt 0.1064
M.F.O L P 30 sq.m 1.254
GABIUN STCTER
25 cmt 0.04275
GALLY PLUGE
55 cmt 0.06935
4
Nana
Tarpada
Stone Bund D P F 425.5 cmt
0.5339
S.S.B R F 44 cmt 0.0551
Land levelling 9.5 hac. 1.6701
C.C.T 470 cmt 0.589
M.F.O 38 sq.m 1.5884
GABIUN STCTER
95 cmt 0.68115
GALLY PLUGE
380 cmt 0.4769
Protection wall
40 sq.m 3.23
5
Ojhar
Stone Bund D P F 490 cmt 0.61465
S.S.B 435 cmt 0.5453
Land levelling 43 hac. 7.55725
73
C.C.T 390 cmt 0.48925
M.F.O 65 sq.m 2.717
GABIUN STCTER
85 cmt 0.14535
GALLY PLUGE
320 cmt 0.4009
6 Hindla
Stone Bund D P F 493 cmt 0.61845
S.S.B 250 cmt 0.3135
Land levelling 34 hac. 5.9755
C.C.T 250 cmt 0.3135
M.F.O 45 sq.m 1.881
GABIUN STCTER
35 cmt 0.05985
GALLY PLUGE
250 cmt 0.3135
Protection wall
15 sq.m 1.21125
Total
Stone Bund D P F 2926 cmt
3.6689
S.S.B R F 1802 cmt
2.26005
Land levelling 217.5 hac.
38.228
C.C.T 1965 cmt
2.46715
M.F.O 641
sq.m 26.7938
GABIUN STCTER
400 cmt 0.684
GALLY PLUGE
1550 cmt
1.9437
Protection wall
262
sq.m 211565
74
5% increase
(Estimated
SOR of the
year 2011-
12)
Stone Bund 3.862
S.S.B 2.379
Land levelling 40.24
C.C.T 2.594
M.F.O 28.204
GABIUN STCTER
0.72
GALLY PLUGE
2.046
Protection wall
22.27
TOTAL 102.315
(M – Materials, W- wages, O- others, T – Total)
Table no.37: Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)
S. No.
Village name
Type of structures
Proposed target
Augmentation/ repair of existing structures
Construction of new structures Total target
NO.
Area to be
irrigated (ha)
Storage capacity
Estimated cost
NO.
Area to be
irrigated (ha)
Storage capacity
m3
Estimated cost
Area to be
irrigated (ha)
Storage capacity
Estimated cost
1
Chimer
CheckWall - - - - 8 16 19200 10.089 16 19200 10.089
Check dam - - - - 7 35 28350 49.14 35 28350 49.14
2 Shravaniya Check wall - - - - 9 18 21600 10.62 18 21600 10.62
Check dam - - - - 9 45 36450 58.59 45 36450 58.59
75
3
Lavchali
Check wall - - - - 2 5 4800 2.97 5 4800 2.97
Check dam - - - - 1 6 4050 8.694 6 4050 8.694
4
Nana
Tarpada
Check wall - - - - 4 9 9600 5.31 9 9600 5.31
Check dam - - - - 4 20 16200 30.24 20 16200 30.24
5
Ojhar
Check wall - - - - 3 7 7200 3.717 7 7200 3.717
Check dam - - - - 4 18 16200 24.57 18 16200 24.57
6 Hindla Check wall
3 7 720 3.717 7 720 3.717
Check dam
2 12 8100 11.34 12 8100 11.34
Total
Check wall - - - - 29 62 69600 36.423 62 69600 36.423
Check
dam - - - - 27 136 109350 182.574 136 109350 182.574
Total 218.997
10% increase (Estimated SOR of the year 2011-12) 240.8967
Table no.38: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)
S. No. Name of Villages Type of
structures
Proposed target
Augmentation/ repair of existing
recharging structures
Construction of new
recharging structures Total target
No. Area to be
irrigated (ha)
Estimated
cost No.
Area to be
irrigated (ha)
Estimated
cost
Area to be
irrigated (ha)
Estimated
cost
1 Chimer Open wells 10 25 10.80 - - - 25 10.80
2 Shravaniya Open wells 8 20 8.64 - - - 20 8.64
76
3 Lavchali Open wells 1 3 1.08 - - - 3 1.08
4 Nana Tarpada Open wells 1 2 1.08 - - - 2 1.08
5 Ojhar Open wells 6 10 6.48 - - - 10 6.48
6 Hindla Open wells 5 9 5.4 - - - 9 5.4
Total
Nana
Tarpada
31 69 33.48 - - - 69 33.48
10% increase (Estimated
SOR of the year 2010-11) 37.2 37.2
Table no.39: Details of activities related to livelihood, production system and micro-enterprises
S. No.
Name of village
Name of activity
Type of land Executing
agency Target
(i) Private (ii)
Community
(iii) Others
(pl. specify)
(i) UG (ii)SHG
(iii) Others (pl. specify)
Estimated cost
(Rs. in lakh)
Expected month & year of
completion (mm/yyyy)
1 Chimer
Agriculture productivity enhancement Crop Demo(Turmeric,Garlic jinjar) P Individual 3.30 Horticulture (Mango Plot) P Individual 2.99 / Seeds of ledy finger fartilizer Individual 1.34 Green house-2 p 1.00
77
Trector UG (10) 7.15 Tresher p UG (10) 1.60 Silvey Pasture/ chap cutter Forest SHG 0.50 Agriculture tools kit Individual 0.50 BIO-gas other 1.80 Fartilazar depo SHG 5.00 Mandap deco. Kit & janreter SHG 3.64 Catet camp, catel food Other 2.10 Narshari kit for vagitabels seed, berol dreep, Honda pupm machine
UG (10) 1.40
Agriculture tools kit Individual 0.50
2 Shravaniya
Agriculture productivity enhancement Crop Demo(Turmeric,Garlic jinjar) Individual 1.32 Horticulture (Mango Plot) Individual 2.14 Honda machine P SHG 1.40 Lifttio Irrigan-2 UG (24) 9.00 Green house-2 1.00 Vegitabel crop -8 Individual 2.80 Seeds of ledy finger fartilizer Individual 2.00 Silvey Pasture/chap cutter Forest UG 1.60 Baj-daliya & FOREST SEED COLLECTION SHG 1.75 Fay-ase plant unite SHG , (20) 5.00 Floor Mill SHG 0.91 Catet camp, catel food other 1.80 BIO-gas Individual 2.80 Mini trector UG(10) 2.80 Agriculture tools kit Individual 1.36
3 Lavchali
Agriculture productivity enhancement
Crop Demo(Turmeric,Garlic jinjar) Individual 0.66 Horticulture (Mango Plot) Individual 1.28 Mini trector UG(10) 2.78 Lift Irrigation UG 3.00
78
cement- poll making unite SHG 2.50 irrigation facilety & Aggri culere seed kit SHG (1) 2.94 catel camp Others 0.80
4 Nana
Tarpada
Agriculture productivity enhancement Crop Demo(Turmeric,Garlic jinjar) Individual 1.32 Lifttio Irrigan- UG 3.80 Honda machine P UG 0.70 Vegitabel crop Individual 1.10 Horticulture (Mango Plot) P Individual 1.28 Fartilazar depo SHG 4.00 Baj-daliya & FOREST SEED COLLECTION SHG 2 Narshari kit for vagitabels seed, berol dreep, Honda pupm machine
UG(10) 1.38
5 Ojhar
Agriculture productivity enhancement Crop Demo(Turmeric,Garlic jinjar) Individual 1.98 Horticulture (Mango Plot) P Individual 1.32 Lift Irrigation UG 2.00 Green house-2 1.00 Agrricaluer tools UG 0.67 Dreep irrigation Individual 0.50 Sound system & janareter SHG 4.10 Catet camp, catel food Others 1.20 Bio- gas Individual 1.00 Silvey Pasture/chap cutter UG (15) 0.39
6 Hindla
Agriculture productivity enhancement Crop Demo(Turmeric,Garlic jinjar) P Individual 1.32 Horticulture (Mango Plot) P Individual 1.07 Green house UG 0.52 Threser SHG 1.75 Tea- sank stoll& sugarcan juse machine with lory
SHG 1.82
catel camp Others 0.80
79
Note: 1. Please provide the list of works and names beneficiaries in the annexure]
Sr. No. Name of Village Name of Activity Name of Beneficiaries
Production System and Microenterprise Development (13%)
1
Livelihood Activities for landless people. (10%)
2. Ensure that 10% of the total project funds go to the assetless give separate list in the annexure
Table no. 40: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas
S. No. Names of
Villages
Major activities of the SHGs
Name of activity No. of SHGs involved Average annual income from
activity per SHG
1 Chimer
Silvey Pasture/ chap cutter 2 1.20
Fartilazar depo
Mandap deco. Kit & janreter
2 Shravaniya Baj-daliya & FOREST SEED COLLECTION 2 2.80
80
Fay-ase plant unite
3 Lavachali
cement- poll making unite 2 2.50
irrigation facilety & Aggri culere seed kit
4 Nanatarpada
Baj-daliya & FOREST SEED COLLECTION 2 1.70
Narshari kit for vagitabels seed, berol dreep, Honda pupm machine
5 Ojhar Sound system & janareter 1 2.10
6 Hindala Threser 1 1.80
Table no. 41: Linkages developed at Village level
Sr.
No. Village Name of activity
Forward/Backward
linkage Linkage with Outcome
1 Chimer
Crop Demo(Turmeric,Garlic jinjar) Krushi University Navshari Vyara & songadh 4.20
Horticulture (Mango Plot) BAIF Trust Vyara & songadh 3.00
/ Seeds of ledy finger fartilizer KVK VYARA Vyara & songadh, 2.70
Green house-2 KVK VYARA Vyara & songadh Local Area 1.10
Fartilazar depo GINC Vyara & songadh Local Area 3.80
Mandap deco. Kit & janreter SURAT Vyara & songadh Local Area 2.00
2 SHRAVNIYA Crop Demo(Turmeric,Garlic jinjar) Krushi University Navshari Vyara & songadh 1.80
Horticulture (Mango Plot) BAIF Trust Vyara & songadh 2.80
81
Green house-2 KVK VYARA Vyara & songadh Local Area 1.10
Vegitabel crop -8 KVK VYARA Vyara & songadh Local Area 2.90
Seeds of ledy finger fartilizer KVK VYARA Vyara & songadh 2.50
Baj-daliya & FOREST SEED
COLLECTION SURAT & FORST AREA Vyara & songadh Local Area 3.00
Fay-ase plant unite SURAT & UKAI THARMAL Vyara & songadh 4.00
Floor Mill SURAT Vyara & songadh 3.00
3 Lavchali
Agriculture productivity enhancement
Crop Demo(Turmeric,Garlic jinjar) Krushi University Navshari Vyara & songadh 0.90
Horticulture (Mango Plot) BAIF Trust Vyara & songadh 1.25
cement- poll making unite SURAT Vyara & songadh Local Area 2.50
4
Nana
Tarpada
Agriculture productivity
enhancement
Crop Demo(Turmeric,Garlic jinjar) Krushi University Navshari Vyara & songadh 1.68
Horticulture (Mango Plot) Vyara & songadh Local Area 1.20
Fartilazar depo Vyara & songadh Local Area 3.80
Baj-daliya & FOREST SEED
COLLECTION Vyara & songadh Local Area 2.10
Narshari kit for vagitabels seed,
berol dreep, Honda pupm machine KVK VYARA Vyara & songadh Local Area
5 Ojhar Agriculture productivity
enhancement
82
Crop Demo(Turmeric,Garlic jinjar) Krushi University Navshari Vyara & songadh 2.50
Horticulture (Mango Plot) BAIF Trust Vyara & songadh 1.68
Green house-2 KVK VYARA Vyara & songadh 1.20
Sound system & janareter SURAT Vyara & songadh 3.00
6 Hindla
Agriculture productivity enhancement
Crop Demo(Turmeric,Garlic jinjar) Krushi University Navshari Vyara & songadh 1.32
Horticulture (Mango Plot) BAIF Trust Vyara & songadh Local Area 1.40
Green house KVK VYARA Vyara & songadh 1.20
Tea- sank stoll& sugarcan juse
machine with lory SURAT Vyara & songadh, Local Area 2.00
Table no.42: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works
S. No.
Name of village
Name of structure/ work
Type of treatment Type of land Executing
agency Target
(i) Ridge area (R)
(ii) Drainage
line (D)
(iii) Land
dev. (L)
(i) Private
(ii) Community
(iii) Forest
(i) UG (ii) SHG (iii) Indi.
Area (ha)
No. of plants
Estimated cost
(Rs. in lakh)
Expected month & year
of completion (mm/
yyyy)
1 Chimer Tree Plantation R P Individual 1100 0.066
Bamboo Plantation R F SHG 5 hac 2000 0.673
2 Shravaniya Tree Plantation R P Individual 2830 0.170
Bamboo Plantation R F SHG 25 hac 10000 3.365
83
TKB Plantation R F SHG 7 hac 12439 2.375
3 Lavchali
Tree Plantation R P Individual 4240 0.254
Bamboo Plantation R F SHG 5 hac 2000 0.673
TKB Plantation R F SHG 1 hac 1777 0.339
4 Nana
Tarpada
Tree Plantation R P Individual 2370 0.142
Bamboo Plantation R F SHG 5 hac 2000 0.673
5 Ozar
Tree Plantation R P Individual 2910 0.349
Bamboo Plantation R F SHG 20 hac 8000 2.692
TKB Plantation R F SHG 6 hac 10662 2.036
6 Hindla Tree Plantation R P Individual 3330 0.400
Total
Tree Plantation R P Individual 35280 3.361
Bamboo Plantation R F SHG 315 hac 12600
0 42.399
Teak Kher Bamboo
Plantation R F SHG 89 hac
15815
3 30.202
Table no.43: Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas
S. No.
Name(s) of the villages
CPR particulars Activity
proposed
Target
Area under the activity (ha)
Estimated expenditure (Rs. in Lakh)
Expected no. of beneficiaries
1 Chimer Pasture / Waste Land Pond 1.00 0.80
2 Hindla Pasture / Waste Land Pond 0.49 0.60
84
4.4 Capacity Building:
Capacity Building is the process of assisting the group or individuals to identify and address issues and gain the insights,
knowledge and experience needed to solve problems and implement change.
There is a realization in the development sector that there is a need to appraise the success of development interventions by going
beyond the conventional development targets and measures of success (e.g. in the form of commodities, goods and services) to take into
account improvements to human potential. Capacity building of stakeholders is also increasingly viewed as an important factor in
developmental projects that involve participation of stakeholders at all levels for effective implementation of projects.
Scope of capacity building at Malangdev Village
Alternative Land Use Plan
Scientific technique of Soil and Moisture conservation
Improved and Scientific agriculture practices
Fodder development and Management
Dairy Development and Management
Rural Craft.
85
Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution:
S. No
.
Name of the
Training Institute
Full Address with contact no., website & e-
Type of Institute#
Area(s) of specialization$
Accreditation details
Trainings
Reference Year
No. of trainings assigned
No. of trainees to be
trained
1 Krishi
Vigyan Kendra
Navsari Agri. University, Vyara, Dist. Tapi.
02626-220212
Research Institute
Agriculture, Horticulture, Animal Husbandry,
Cropping Techniques, Dairy, Nursery
GoI 2012-14 4 100
2 BISAG Gandhinagar Space
Application Remote sensing GoG 2010-15 3 3
3 BAIF Griserve, Vyara NGO Agriculture, Watershed Structures, Accounts
NGO 2010-15 10 200
# Central govt. Dept./ State govt. Dept./ Autonomous Body/ Research Institutes/ Universities/ Others (pl. specify) $ Capacity Building/ Agriculture/ Horticulture/ Animal Husbandry/ Pisciculture/ Remote Sensing/ Water conservation/ Ground water/
Forestry/ livelihoods/ entrepreneurship development/ others (pl. specify)
Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan:
S. No.
State Project
Stakeholders Total no. of
persons No. of persons to be
trained No. of training programmes
Estimated cost
PIA 10 10 5
Under Process
WDTs 28 28 10
UGs 200 200 20
SHGs 1052 1052 20
WCs 165 165 15
GPs 25 25 5
86
Table no.46: Information, Education and Communication Activities:
S. No.
Activity Executing agency Estimated expenditure (Rs.) Outcome (may quantify, wherever
possible)
1 Street Plays Forest Dept, Vyara 0.15
Awareness for the importance of Integrated
Watershed Development Programme (IWMP)
2 Video Shows Forest Dept, Vyara 0.25
3 Pamphlets & Posters Forest Dept, Vyara 1.10
4 Banners & Hoardings Forest Dept, Vyara 1.50
Total 3.00
87
Chapter 5
Budgeting
88
Budgeting
The first step in budgeting is dividing the cost of the project into various components as detailed in the common guidelines and done
accordingly in table No.47. It helps us in further identifying activities under different components and allocate appropriate funds .
Table no. 47: Budget at a glance for the project
Sl no Budget component Cost requirement
1 Administrative costs 10 % 60.00
2 Monitoring 1 % 6.00
3 Evaluation 1 % 6.00
4 Entry Point activity 4 % 24.00
5 Institution and Capacity Building 5 % 30.00
6 Detailed Project Report 1 % 6.00
7 Watershed Development Works 56% 336.00
8 Livelihood acti4ties for asset less 9 % 54.00
9 Production systems and micro-enterprises 10 % 60.00
10 Consolidation phase 3 % 18.00
TOTAL 100 % 600.00
89
Table no. 48: Village wise- component wise budget available under IWMP
Sl
no Village
Activity
EPA Institution
and CB DPR
Watershed
development Work
Livelihood for
asset less
Production
system and
Microenterprises
Consolidation Total
1 Chimer 6.95 8.69 1.73 97.33 15.64 17.38 5.21 152.93
2 Shravaniya 7.74 9.67 1.93 108.38 17.42 19.35 5.80 170.29
3 Lavchali 1.88 2.36 0.47 26.42 4.24 4.71 1.41 41.49
4 Nana Tarpada 3.28 4.10 0.82 45.93 7.38 8.20 2.46 72.17
5 Ojhar 2.97 3.71 0.74 41.61 6.69 7.43 2.23 65.38
6 Hindla 1.16 1.46 0.29 16.30 2.62 2.91 0.87 25.61
Total 24 30 6 336 54 60 18 528
90
Table no. 49: Village wise gap in funds requirement
Sl no Name of Village Total cost requirement Total funds available under IWMP Gap in funds requirement
1 Chimer 187.848 173.808 14.04
2 Shravaniya 203.488 193.548 9.94
3 Lavchali 47.644 47.184 0.46
4 Nana Tarpada 82.602 82.032 0.57
5 Ojhar 88.974 74.304 14.67
6 Hindla 46.974 29.124 17.85
Total 657.53 600.00 57.53
91
Table no.50: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes
S. No. Village Phase/ Type of work* Activity to be
carried out
Fund made available to IWMP due
to convergence (Rs. in lakh)
Scheme with which convergence took
place
Reference no. of
activity/ task/
structure in DPR
Level at which
decision for convergence
was taken
1 Chimer
Vegetative and Engineering Structure
S.B. 0.455 MGNREGS Table no. 36 Under
Process
Plantation 0.33
S.S.B 0.726 MGNREGS
C.C.T 0.502
G.P, 0.356
Land Development (Productive use
Land Lavaling 10.36
2 Shravaniya
Vegetative and Engineering Structure
S.B. 1.247 MGNREGS Table no. 36
Plantation 0.27
S.S.B 0.594 MGNREGS
C.C.T 0.515
G.P, 0.363
Land Development (Productive use
Land Lavaling 8.325
92
3
Lavchali
Vegetative and Engineering Structure
S.B. 0.3 MGNREGS Table no. 36
Plantation 0.21
S.S.B 0.096 MGNREGS
C.C.T 0.112
G.P, 0.073
Land Development
(Productive use Land Lavaling 5.55
4
Nana Tarpada
Vegetative and Engineering Structure
S.B. 0.562 MGNREGS Table no. 36
Plantation 0.15
S.S.B 0.058
C.C.T 0.62
G.P, 0.502
Land Development
(Productive use Land Lavaling 1.758
5
Ojhar
Vegetative and Engineering Structure
S.B. 0.647 MGNREGS Table no. 36 Under
Process
Plantation 0.06
S.S.B 0.574 MGNREGS
93
C.C.T 0.515
G.P, 0.422
Land Development
(Productive use Land Lavaling 7.955
6
Hindla
Vegetative and Engineering Structure
S.B. 0.651 MGNREGS Table no. 36
Plantation 0.18
S.S.B 0.33 MGNREGS
C.C.T 0.33
G.P, 0.33
Land Development
(Productive use Land Lavaling 6.29
Total 57.53
*Phase/Type of work: EPA, Land base, Surface water, Ground water, Livelihood
Table no. 51: Public-Private Partnership in the IWMP projects
S. No.
Name of Private Sector
Partner Agency
Type of agreement signed Financial
contribution Partnership
Interventions Expected Outcomes
Comments a)MoU b)Contract
c) Any other (pl. specify)
IWMP Private sector
- - - - - - -
94
Chapter 6
Expected Outcomes
95
6.1 Expected Outcomes.
6.1.1 Employment
Employment has always been a problem in the village. The principal occupations of the people are dry land agriculture, animal
husbandry and casual labour work. However, rain fall being very limited and erratic, agriculture suffers, i.e. at best they can take only a
single crop, which keeps them partially engaged for about 4 months. Lack of fodder makes animal husbandry very difficult too. So, animal
husbandry does not keep tem engaged full time. Thus the People mainly depend upon casual labour, either in the village itself or outside
it. The project plans for creation of both wage employment and self employment opportunities. Wage employment would be created by
engaging people in watershed physical works like construction of earthen bunds, village pond, plantation, etc. self employment would be
created by providing the people with cash support in the form of direct livelihood like agriculture, animal husbandry and enterprise
development.
Table no. 52: Employment in Project area:
S. NO.
Names of Villages
Wage employment Self employment
No. of mandays No. of beneficiaries No. of beneficiaries
SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total
1 Chimer
0 6733 0 3367 6733 0 673
0 337 673
0 20
0 10 20
2 Shravaniya 0 15133 0 7567 15133 0 1513 0 757 1513 0 45 0 23 45
3 Lavchali 0 18667 0 9334 18667 0 1867
0 933 1867
0 56
0 28 56
4 Nana Tarpada 0 20200 0 10100 20200 0 2020
0 1010 2020
0 61
0 30 61
5 Ojhar 0 19700 0 9850 19700 0 1970
0 985 1970
0 59
0 30 59
6 Hindla 0 16567 0 8284 16567 0 1657
0 828 1657
0 50
0 25 50
Total 0 256434 0 128222 256434 0 25644 0 12821 25644 0 770 0 384 770
96
6.1.2. Migration
Heavy rainfall results in Malangdev and their is fodder availability in monsoon and winter but there is a problem for a summer.
There is a problem of water in summer. On account of agriculture and animal husbandry providing only part time employment for some
part of the year, the people migrate for a better half of the year for wage labour in sugar factory.Employment opportunities in the local area
as mentioned above will ensure lessening seasonal migration from the area.
Table no. 53: Seasonal migration from Project area
Sl. No. Names of villages No. of persons migrating No. of days per year of migration
Pre-project Expected post project Pre-project Expected post project
1 Chimer 121 85
240 120
2 Shravaniya 272 191
3 Lavchali 340 238
4 Nana Tarpada 365 256
5 Ojhar 356 249
6 Hindla 298 209
Total 4652 3258
97
Table no. 54: Average ground water table depth in the project areas (in meters)
S. No. Names of Villages Sources Pre-Project level Expected Increase/decrease
(Post- Project)
Open wells
Bore wells
Others (specify)
1 Chimer 35 27
2 Shravaniya 28 21
3 Lavchali 26 20
4 Nana Tarpada 35 28
5 Ojhar 30 22
6 Hindla 40 33
6.1.3 Status of Drinking Water Table no. 55: Status of Drinking water
Production Productivity Area Production
Productivity Pre-project Expected Post project Pre-project Expected Post-project
98
6.1.4 Crops : Agriculture primarily depends upon water; but this is heavy rain fall in the Malangdev village. The surface water is scanty
due for only 4 months and land with stone which is not preferable for recharging the ground water level. So, there is lacking of water in the
summer which is affect to the crop production. All this can change with the integrated land and water management during the watershed
project. The planned earthen bunds would prevent the saline water from the Hill to river and stop water for increasing the water level for
water underground, and preserve some moisture in the soil. This will help in additional area coming under cultivation and increasing
productivity too. The farmer can take more than one season of crops. Different varieties of crops can be taken.
Table no. 56: Crop area and yield in the project area
Sr.
No. Name of village
Name of
crops
Pre-project Expected Post-project
Area
(ha)
Production in
Qtl
Average Yield (Qtl) per
ha.
Area
(ha)
Production in
Qtl
Average Yield
per ha (qtl)
1 Chimer
Tuwer 22.5 209.70 9.32 22.5 395.70 11.15
Nagali 4.5 48.40 10.75 4.5 90.70 20.15
Paddy 29.7 1026.10 34.54 29.7 2026.5 68.23
Groundnut 20 229.20 11.46 20 420.30 21.01
Black Gram 13.5 75.10 5.56 13.5 150.5 11.14
2 Shravaniya
Tuwer 62.2 534.90 8.59 62.2 980.90 15.77
Nagali 12.4 117.90 9.50 12.4 250.30 20.18
Paddy 82.1 2289.70 27.88 82.1 4479.60 54.56
Groundnut 55 541.20 9.84 55 1000.10 18.18
99
Black Gram 37.3 187.60 5.02 37.3 300.60 8.05
3 Lavchali
Tuwer 90.7 747.30 8.23 90.7 1400.80 15.44
Nagali 18.1 160.70 8.87 18.1 320.80 17.72
Paddy 119.7 2939.80 24.55 119.7 6570.50 54.89
Groundnut 80 722.40 9.03 80 1800.60 22.50
Black Gram 54.4 258.90 4.75 54.4 620.50 11.40
4 Nana tarpada
Tuwer 56.9 502.90 8.83 56.9 900.60 15.82
Nagali 11.4 113.20 9.92 11.4 205.50 18.02
Paddy 75.1 2261.20 30.10 75.1 3500.10 46.60
Groundnut 50 519.00 10.38 50 1000.30 20.00
Black Gram 34.1 177.60 5.20 34.1 360.80 10.58
5 Ozar
Tuwer 59.3 517.00 8.71 59.3 1000.10 16,86
Nagali 11.9 115.60 9.71 11.9 175.40 14.73
Paddy 78.3 2270.70 29.00 78.3 3950.40 50.45
Groundnut 52 525.70 10.10 52 890.80 17.13
Black Gram 35.6 182.20 5.11 35.6 270.40 7.59
6 Hindla
Tuwer 65 551.20 8.48 65 900.10 13.84
Nagali 13 120.90 9.30 13 420.20 32.32
Paddy 85.8 2297.70 26.77 85.8 3325.60 38.75
Groundnut 57 545.40 9.56 57 850.30 14.91
Black Gram 39 192.60 4.93 39 280.60 7.19
100
6.1.5 Horticulture :
Table no. 57: Area under horticulture
S. No. Name of Village Crop Existing area under the crop Area post project
1 Chimer Holticulture (Amba Wadi ) 1.5 2.5
Crop (Turmeric , Yam, Paddy, Wheet, Garlic) 2 4.5
2 Shravaniya Holticulture (Amba Vadi ) 4.5 7.5
Crop (Turmeric , Yam, Paddy, Wheet, Garlic) 2 3.5
3 Lavchali Holticulture (Amba Vadi ) 5.28 10.5
Crop (Turmeric , Yam, Paddy, Wheet, Garlic) 2 3
4 NanaTarpada Holticulture (Amba Vadi ) 3.5 7
Crop (Turmeric , Yam, Paddy, Wheet, Garlic) 2 3
5 Ozar Holticulture (Amba Vadi ) 4 7.5
Crop (Turmeric , Yam, Paddy, Wheet, Garlic) 2 4.5
6 Hindla
Holticulture (Amba Vadi ) 1.5 3
Crop (Turmeric, Garlic) 1.60 5.00
Crop (Turmeric, Garlic) 2 3.5
101
Drinking water
The village has open wells and bore wells which they depend for their drinking water. Many an effort at finding sweet water at
different other places in the same village has failed. A farmer uses an open well in the farm and allows the villages to take water from the
well. There is another well in a common land too; but the water is not as good as the other well. WASMO has constructed a take to store
water brought pipeline from Bore well.As a result of the watershed activities, it is expected that the quality of drinking water would improve.
6.1.6 Vegetative Cover :
Table no. 58: Forest/vegetative cover
S. No. Name of Village Existing area under tree cover (ha) Area under tree cover proposed
1 Chimer 35 5
2 Shravaniya 185 32
3 Lavchali 60 6
4 Nana Tarpada 15 5
5 Ojhar 85 26
6 Hindla 55 10
Total 435 84
102
6.1.7 Livestock
The Village has quite a good of livestock population. These include cows, bullocks, buffaloes, goats and hens. The interventions
like provision of good quality cows and buffaloes, the establishment of a fodder bank and other such related activities would spur up the
dairy development in the village. It is expected that the post project period would see a substantial increase in livestock population and
yield from them.
Table no. 59: Details of livestock in the project areas (for fluids please mention in litres, for solids please mention in kgs. and income in Rs.)
S. No. Name of Village Type of Animal Pre-Project Expected Post-project
Remarks No. Yield Income No. Yield Income
1 Chimer
Milch-animals 60 110 2680 100 220 6600
Draught Purpose animals 89
Animals for other purpose 164 150 3000 210 300 36000
2 Shravniya
Milch-animals 177 340 8020 390 670 21100
Draught Purpose animals 158
Animals for other purpose 389 360 43200 659 760 106400
103
3 Lavchali
Milch-animals 132 260 6480 240 450 13500
Draught Purpose animals 185
Animals for other purpose 266 230 27600 466 470 65800
4 Nana Tarpada
Milch-animals 78 170 4560 145 280 8400
Draught Purpose animals 184
Animals for other purpose 339 310 37200 690 650 91000
5 Ozar
Milch-animals 89 200 5500 170 420 12600
Draught Purpose animals 284
Animals for other purpose 303 280 33600 610 670 93800
6 Hindla
Milch-animals 76 160 4280 180 370 11100
Draught Purpose animals 123
Animals for other purpose 61+162 900+130 162000+1
5600
80+2
30 1200+280
14400+32
200
104
No. 60: Backward-Forward linkages
S. No. Project Type of Marketing Facility Pre-project (no.) During the project (no.) Post-project (no.)
IWMP-VII
Chimer
Backward linkages
Seed certification NIL - -
Seed supply system “ Local Market Local Market
Fertilizer supply system Local Market Local Market Pesticide supply system - -
Credit institutions - - Water supply Village Area Village Area
Extension services - - Nurseries Forest & local area Forest & local area
Tools/machinery suppliers - -
Price Support system - -
Labour Local Village Local Village
Any other (please specify) - -
Forward linkages
Harvesting/threshing machinery Local Local & Near
Villages
Storage (including cold storage) - -
Road network - -
Transport facilities - -
Markets / Mandis Local Local
Agro and other Industries - -
Milk and other collection centres Local Local
Labour Local Local
Any other (please specify) - -
105
Chapter 7
Quality and Sustainability Issues
106
7.1 Plans for Monitoring and Evaluation
A Web-based GIS System is being developed for monitoring and evaluating the project in its planning & implementation phases.
The system would be available on a public domain and can be accessed by all the stakeholders of the project. The system shows the
entire state of Gujarat and all of those areas selected over the next 18 years. Filtering allows the user to zoom on to one particular project.
Details related to soil type, Land-use classification, inhabitation etc., can be obtained village-wise. Furthermore, survey-number wise
details related to ownership, irrigation source, yield etc., can also be accessed by the users of the system. This system is being used for
pooling up the details obtained from the DPR. In other words, the DPR is made available online in the form of a database which will help
the stakeholders know areas of importance viz., already treated areas/historical works in the area, proposed areas for treatment etc., for
the further treatment and planning. The system would also show the satellite imageries of various years from the project inception stage to
the project closing stages. This allows the user to evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment and thereby plan corrective measures for the
project area. The system would serve as and aiding tool to the planners and evaluators for judging the efficacy of the project.
Yet another component of the Web-based GIS system is the Mobile based Monitoring & Evaluation System, which will help the
ground staff alias WDTs (Watershed Development Team) to transmit information from the ground level to the central server. Also, any
higher-up official in charge of the project can obtain information regarding the project area on their mobile phone by means of an SMS.
The system works in the following manner. The WDT equipped with a GPS instrument marks the latitude-longitude information of various
treatment areas during the DPR. The probable sites are then transferred onto the central server. During the works phase, any progress in
107
the treatment areas is reported to the server by means of an SMS by the WDT. Similarly, any nodal officer or higher-up official can view
the progress in a project by means of summarized reports generated over frequent periods of time.
7.2 Plans for Project Management:
The Project management of any Watershed programme is very important; it mainly depends upon the community organization and
the village level institutes. In chimer, watershed committee and various user groups have been formulated for post project operation and
maintenance of assets created during project period. Major emphasis will be on equity and sustainable benefit of the project even after
implementation stage. A proper link-up will be built during project period with various institutes and capacity building organization. They
will act as a major kingpin during post implementation for scaling up the successful experience during project.
7.3 Watershed Development Fund:
The major source of financial assistance after post implementation period is a Watershed Development Fund. The contribution of it
will comes mainly fund the following:
7.4 User Charges:
Various user groups will be formed in village. These user groups will collect user charges according to the designated rules formed
during the formation of user group. These funds will be transferred to the WDF funds as per these formulated rules. There secretary of
watershed committee (WC) shall maintain the records of the following.
108
Chapter 8
Maps
109
1. Cadastral Map
2. Drainage Map
3. Slop Map
4. Geomorphology Map
5. Soil Map
6. Land Use / Land Cover Map
7. Ground Water Map
8. Propose Action Plan Map
9. Contour maps