Gujarat State Watershed Management Agency Detail …gswma.gujarat.gov.in/pfile/DPR/2010-11/Sabarkantha/IWMP-11... · Detailed Project Report, Netramali (IWMP-11) (8) Project Background

Detailed Project Report, Netramali (IWMP-11) (1)

Gujarat State Watershed Management

Agency

Detail Project Report (DPR)

Project Name-IWMP-11

Project Identity-Netramali Project 2010-11

District Watershed Development Unit-Sabarkantha


TABLE OF CONTENT

Chapter 1 Project Background

1.1 Project Background

Table no.1: Basic Project information…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………09

1.2 Need of Watershed Development Programme……………………………………………………………………………………………………………09

Table no.2: Weight age of the Project ....................................................................................................................................................................... …10

Table no.3: Watershed Information ............................................................................................................................................................................ .11

1.3 Other developmental projects / schemes running in the Kadavada village

Table no.4: Developmental programmes running in the project area: ....................................................................................................................... 11

Table no.5: Previous Watershed programmers in the project are: ............................................................................................................................ 15

Chapter 2 Project implementing Agency

Table no. 6: PIA:.............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 20

Table no.7: Staff at PIA level: ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 21

Chapter 3 Basic Information of Project Area

Table no.8: Land use pattern ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 24

Table no.9: Soil type and topography: .......................................................................................................................................................................... 25


Table no.10 : Food and drought condition .................................................................................................................................................................... 26

Table no.11: Soil Erosion: ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 27

Table no.11.2: Soil Salinity / Alkalinity (Salinity ingress): .................................................................................................................................... 27-28

Table no.12: Climatic condition: .................................................................................................................................................................................... 29

Table no. 13: Physiographic and relief .......................................................................................................................................................................... 30

Table no. 14: Land ownership details ............................................................................................................................................................................ 31

Table no. 15: Agriculture ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 32

Table no. 16: Irrigation ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 33

Table no. 17: Crop details .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 34

Table no. 18: Livestock .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 36

Table no. 19: Drinking water ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 37

Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources ............................................................................................................................................... 38

Table no. 21: Demographic information ...................................................................................................................................................................... 41

Table no. 22: Literacy rate ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 42

Table no. 23: Migration details ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 43

Table no. 24: Poverty ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 44


Table no. 25: Village information ................................................................................................................................................................................. 45

Table no. 26: Facilities / HH assets ................................................................................................................................................................................ 46

Table no. 27: Per capita Income ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 47

Chapter 4 Watershed Activities ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 53

Table no. 28: Dependence on Forest / CPR ................................................................................................................................................................. 48

Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution) ................................................................................................................................. 49

Table no. 30: Details of scientific Planning and Input in IWMP projects ......................................................................................................... 56

Table no. 31: Watershed Committee details ................................................................................................................................................................. 57

Table no. 32: SHG details ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 64

Table no. 33: User Group details ................................................................................................................................................................................... 76

Table no. 34: Entry Point activity (EPA) (All financial Figures in lakh Rs.) ............................................................................................................ 79

Table no. 35: Details of activities of preparatory phase (All financial Figures in lakh Rs.) ................................................................................... 83

Table no. 36: Activity related to Surface water resources in project area (All financial Figures in lakh Rs.) ....................................................... 85

Table no. 37: Activity related to recharging ground water resources in project area (All financial Figures in lakh Rs.) ..................................... 87

Table no. 38: Activity related to Livelihood by Self Help Group (SHGs) in project area ...................................................................................... 89

Table no. 39: Other activities of watershed work phase- Proposal target ................................................................................................................ 91


Table no. 40: Details of engineering structure in watershed works*.......................................................................................................................... 94

Table no. 41: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works* ........................................................................................ 96

Table no. 42: Details of allied / other activities ............................................................................................................................................................ 97

Table no. 43: Details of activities in the CPR in the project areas ............................................................................................................................. 97

Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution ................................................................................................................................................................. 99

Table no. 45: Capacity Building Plan ........................................................................................................................................................................ 100

Table no.46: Information, education and Communication Activities .................................................................................................................... 100

Table no. 47: Village wise- activity wise budget ........................................................................................................................................................ 101

Table no.48: Budget at a glance .................................................................................................................................................................................. 105

Table no.49: Details of convergence of IWMP with other Schemes ........................................................................................................................ 106

Table no.50: Public-Private Partnership in the IWMP projects .............................................................................................................................. 106

Table no. 51: Employment in Project area ................................................................................................................................................................. 107

Table no. 52: Details of seasonal migration from Project area ................................................................................................................................. 108

Table no. 53: Details of average ground water table depth in the project areas (in meters) ................................................................................. 109

Table no. 54: Status of Drinking water\ ...................................................................................................................................................................... 110

Table no. 55: Details of kharif crop area and Yield in the project areas ................................................................................................................. 111


Table no. 56: Area under horticulture ........................................................................................................................................................................ 112

Table no. 57: Forest/vegetative cover .......................................................................................................................................................................... 115

Table no. 58: Details of livestock in the project areas (for fluids please mention in liters, for solids please mention in kgs. And income in Rs.)…116

Table no. 59: Backward-Forward linkages .............................................................................................................................................................. 116

Table no. 60: Details of Watershed Development Fund (WDF) ............................................................................................................................... 118


CHAPTER -1

PROJECT BACKGROUNG


Project Background

Netramali Project IWMP-11 project is located in Idar Taluka, Sabarkantha District of Gujarat state. The project is a cluster of eight micro watersheds with 5F2D6b2f,

5F2D6b2f, 5F2D6b2d, 5F2D6b2a, 5F2D6b2e, 5F2D6b2b, 5F2D6b1d, 5F2D6b1c, 5F2D6b1g, 5F2D6b2e, 5F2D6b2f as their respective codes. The total project area

of the watershed is about 5013.08 Ha, Which proposed to be treated 5013.08 ha under Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP). The watershed falls

under the government designated flat area. It is located very near to the Taluka place Idar Town in Sabarkantha.

Table no.1: Basic project information

Sr

No.

Name of the

Project

Villages

Gram Panchayats Taluka District Area of the

project

Area proposed

to be treated

Total

project cost

(Rs. In

lakh)

PIA Name Census code

1

IWMP-11

Netramali 00368500 Netramali

Idar

Sab

arkan

tha

1233.50 1157.96 138.96

DW

DU

Sab

arkan

tha

2 Ganeshpura 00368600 Netramali 242.00 227.61 27.31

3 Daramali 00370000 Daramali 456.00 437.25 52.47

4 Hingaraj 00372600 Hingaraj 189.30 179.80 21.58

5 Bhuvel 00370100 Chadasna 204.90 193.02 23.16

6 Chadasna 00371600 Chadasna 196.70 186.40 22.37

7 Nanivadol 00372700 Chadasna 269.70 255.14 30.62

8 Dungari 00371700 Dungari 545.70 524.65 62.96

9 Mangadh 00372800 Mangadh 280.40 264.40 31.73

10 Rudardi 00370200 Rudardi 543.70 523.35 62.80

11 Laloda 00366800 Laloda 851.90 826.42 99.17

Total 5013.8 4776 573.12


Geographical Area of Project


1.3 Project Area of the IWMP-11 Idar Cluster


1.4 Need of Watershed Development Program

Watershed Development Programme is selected on the basis of thirteen parameter namely Poverty Index, Percentage of SC/ST. Actual wages, Percentage of small

and marginal farmer, Ground water status, Moisture Index, Area under rain fed agriculture, Drinking water situation in the area, Percentage of the degraded land,

Productivity potential of the land, Continuity of another watershed that has already development/treated, Cluster approach for plain or for hilly terrain, Based on these

thirteen parameter a composite ranking was been given to Netramali Watershed project as given in table no. 3

The total number of families under BPL is 921, which is 31 per cent of the total households of the village. Hence a score of 5 is allotted. The percentage of

schedule castes in the village is about 30 percent to the total population; hence a score of 5 is allotted. Rained agriculture forms the primary occupation of the village

due to the fact that ground water is saline and hence unfit for usage. More than 60 cent of the farmers are small and marginal by nature and the actual wages earned

by the labour is less than the minimum wages hence a composite rank of 5 and 5 are allotted respectively.

Since the rainfall received is erratic and irregular, the moisture index is low and the area is classified under DDP block. Drinking water is problematic in the

village. The soil is very permeable and production of the land can be significantly enriched with the availability of timely irrigation. Netramali watershed falls in

continuity with other watersheds namely Netramali, Ganeshpura, Daramali, Hingaraj, Bhuvel, Chadasna, Nanivadol, Dungari, Mangadh, Rudardi, Laloda, cluster

approach was followed taking into consideration nine micro-watersheds covering a total area of 5256.32 Ha. All the parameters taken together give a cumulative

score of 84.5 to the watershed (reference Table 2.1 below)

Table no.2: Weight age of the project

Project name Project type Weight age

i ii iii iv v vi vii viii ix x xi xii xiii

IWMP -

11Netramali OTHERS 5 10 5 5 2 10 5 5 5 5 10 15 0


Table No. 2.1 Criteria and weight age for selection of watershed

Sr.

No. Criteria

Maximum

score Ranges & scores

I Poverty index (% of poor to

population) 7.5

Above 80 % (10) 80 to 50 % (7.5) 50 to 20 % (5) Below 20 % (2.5)

Ii % of SC/ ST population 5 More than 40 % (10) 20 to 40 % (5) Less than 20 % (3)

iii Actual wages

0

Actual wages are significantly

lower than minimum wages

(5)

Actual wages are equal to or

higher than minimum wages

(0)

Iv % of small and marginal

farmers 5

More than 80 % (10) 50 to 80 % (5) Less than 50 % (3)

V Ground water status 3 Over exploited (5) Critical (3) Sub critical (2) Safe (0)

Vi Moisture index/

DPAP/ DDP Block 10

-66.7 & below (15)

DDP Block

-33.3 to -66.6 (10)

DPAP Block

0 to -33.2 (0)

Non DPAP/ DDP Block

vii Area under rain-fed agriculture 15

More than 90 % (15) 80 to 90 % (10) 70 to 80% (5) Above 70 %

(Reject)

viii Drinking water 7.5 No source (10) Problematic village (7.5) Partially covered (5) Fully covered (0)

Ix Degraded land 10

High – above 20 % (15) Medium – 10 to 20 % (10) Low- less than 10 % of

TGA (5)

X Productivity potential of the

land

15

Lands with low production &

where productivity can be

significantly enhanced with

reasonable efforts (15)

Lands with moderate

production & where

productivity can be enhanced

with reasonable efforts (10)

Lands with high

production & where

productivity can be

marginally enhanced with

reasonable efforts (5)

Xi Contiguity to another

watershed that has already

been developed/ treated 5

Contiguous to previously

treated watershed &

contiguity within the micro

watersheds in the project (10)

Contiguity within the micro

watersheds in the project but

non contiguous to previously

treated watershed (5)

Neither contiguous to

previously treated

watershed nor contiguity

within the micro

watersheds in the project

xii Cluster approach in the plains

(more than one contiguous

micro-watersheds in the

project)

15

Above 6 micro-watersheds in

cluster (15)

4 to 6 micro watersheds in

cluster (10)


cluster (5)


xiii Cluster approach in the hills

(more than one contiguous

micro-watersheds in the

project)

15

Above 5 micro-watersheds in

cluster (15)


cluster (10)


cluster (5)

Total 113 150 90 41 2.5

Table no.3: Watershed information,

Sr. No. Name of the project No. of watersheds to be

treated Watershed code

Watershed regime/type/order

1 Netramali 1 5F2D6b2f Micro Watershed

2 Ganeshpura 1 5F2D6b2f Micro Watershed

3 Daramali 1 5F2D6b2d Micro Watershed

4 Hingaraj 1 5F2D6b2a Micro Watershed

5 Bhuvel 1 5F2D6b2e Micro Watershed

6 Chadasna 1 5F2D6b2b Micro Watershed

7 Nanivadol 1 5F2D6b1d Micro Watershed

8 Dungari 1 5F2D6b1c Micro Watershed

9 Mangadh 1 5F2D6b1g Micro Watershed

10 Rudardi 1 5F2D6b2e Micro Watershed

11 Laloda 1 5F2D6b2f Micro Watershed


Other projects/scheme running in the Netramali village

(1) Total Sanitation Campaign (TSC): 65 individual toilets are constructed under TSC programmed

(2) Awas Yojana : (Total 38 house has been constructed in the Netramali village under various Awas Yojana (in which under Indira Awas Yojana, Sarday Awas

Yojana.

(3) MGNREGA: Bori bunds, & Pond deepening has been taken-up under NREGA.

(4) Swarnjayanti Gram Swarozgar Yojana (SGSY) – 10 SHG are made Under this Programme

(5) WASMO: - Over Head tank and water supply lines were taken in this Scheme

(6) Irrigation Dept.: 15 Check dams were constructed in this village under this department

Table no. 4: Developmental programmes running in the project area

Si.

No

Name of the

programme/scheme

Sponsoring agency Objectives of the

programme/scheme

Year of

commencement

Villages

covered

Estimated

number of

beneficiaries

Netramali

1 MGNREGA Rural Development Dep. Employment 2009-10 1045

2 Irrigation Govt. of Gujarat Irrigation water 2008-09 20

3 WASMO Govt. of Gujarat Drinking water facility 2009-10 200

4 SGSY Rural Development Dep. Finanicial Inclusion 2008-09 8

5 TSC Rural Development Dep. Toilet 2009-10 9

Ganeshpura



2 Irrigation Rural Development Dep. Livelihood 2008-09 22


4 SGSY Rural Development Dep. Employment 2008-09 7


Daramali






Hingaraj




4 Misson Mangalam Rural Development Dep. Livelihood 2008-09 30


Bhuvel


2 GWSSB Govt. of Gujarat Drinking water facility 2008-09 22



Chadasna




4 SGSY Rural Development Dep. Finanicial Inclusion 2008-09 8


Nanivadol







Dungari






Mangadh




4 Misson Mangalam Rural Development Dep. Livelihood 2008-09 30


Rudardi





Laloda






SR.NO.

Name of the

programme/

scheme

Sponsoring agency Objectives of the

programme/scheme

Year of

commencement Villages covered

Estimated number

of beneficiaries

1 TSC

DRDA SENITATION 2005 11 1500

2 IAY

DRDA HOUSE 1995 9 125

3 MGNREGA

DRDA

BORIBANDH

,POND,ROAD 2005 11 2500

4 SGSY

DRDA HOUSE 1995 9 58

5 WASMO

GOG DRINKING WATER 2003 6 -

6 IRRIGATION Irrig. Dept CHECK DAM 2005 5 35

Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmes in the project area:

Sr.

No

Project

name

Year

started

Name of

villages

No. of

micro

waters

hed

Waters

hed

cod

Area

under

treatment

Funding

source

Nodal

agency PIA

Total

cost

Expenditure

incurred up

to start of

IWMP

%

financial

completion

% physical

completion

1

IWMP-11

Netramali -

Netramali - - - - - - - - - -

2 Ganeshpura - - - - - - - - - -

3 Daramali - - - - - - - - - -

4 Hingaraj - - - - - - - - - -

5 Bhuvel - - - - - - - - - -

6 Chadasna - - - - - - - - - -


7 Nanivadol - - - - - - - - - -

8 Dungari - - - - - - - - - -

9 Mangadh - - - - - - - - - -

10 Rudardi - - - - - - - - - -

11 Laloda - - - - - - - - - -


CHAPTER -2

PROJECT IMPLEMENTING AGENCY


Project Implementing Agency

The Project Implementing Agency (PIA) is being selected by an appropriate mechanism by State Level Nodal Agency (SLNL). PIAs would be responsible for

implementation of watershed project. These PIAs may include relevant line departments, autonomous organizations under State / Central, Governments, Government

Institutes / Research bodies, Intermediate Panchayats, Voluntary Organization (VOs) The PIA of Netramali watershed Project (MWP) is District watershed

development Unit, Sabarkantha.

District Watershed Development Unit, Sabarkantha

The organization and its objectives:

The District Watershed Development Unit (DWDU), Sabarkantha is a district level nodal agency and was established on 1sth April 2008 to oversee for then smooth

implementation of watershed projects in the district. The District Development Officer (DDO) is the chairman of the DWDU. The DWDU have dedicated and

experience staffs comprising one project Manager (deputation from Gujarat Forest Department) a technical expert (on contract basis) and multidisciplinary team of

agriculture expert, community mobilization expert, computer operator, civil engineer, MIS coordinator, system analyst, surveyor, and accountant are recruited. The

DWDU Sabarkantha staffs are sitting with the District Rural Development Agency (DRDA) at Bahumali Building, C-block, Ground Floor, Himatnagar-Sabarkantha.

The objective of the DWDU Sabarkantha are supervising, planning, implementing, documenting and promoting watershed development projects and related

development activities in the district. Moreover, the DWDU Sabarkantha will work as a PIA for some IWMP projects.

Programmes / Projects running in the district

At present 21 IWMP projects have been sanctioned by Government of India for the Sabarkantha district. The Entry Point Activities of first six IWMP projects has

almost completed and work phase work has been started in all the project of the 2009-10 projects. In 2009-10 projects 4 project being PIA were Forest Dept. (IWMP

1, 2, 3&6) and in 2 projects DWDU (IWMP 4&5) were PIA respectively. In 2010-11 we have other six project were sanctioned for district Sabarkantha in which

Forest Dept. as PIA for the 2 projects (IWMP-8 & 9) and DWDU-self is as PIA for the 4 projects (IWMP-7,10,11 & 12). Apart from the running six IWMP projects,

total 135 pre-Hariyali & Hariyali projects (DPAP & IWDP) has been sanctioned and out of that 30 projects are completed and 110 projects are still running in the

district. The DWDU Sabarkantha is also monitoring a central government sponsored scheme on “Artificial Recharge of Groundwater through Dug wells” in the

district.


Table no.6: PIA

Sr No. Name of project Details of PIA

1 IWMP-11 Netramali project

(i) Type of organization District Level Nodal Agency

(ii) Name of organization DWDU, Sabarkantha

(iii) Designation & Address Project Manager, DWDU, Sabarkantha

(iv) Telephone 241666

(v) Fax

(vi) E-mail [email protected]

Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level:

Sr. No. Name Age Sex Designation Qualification Experience Job assigned Monthly

remuneration

1 Shri B.B Patel 54 Male Project Director B.Sc (Physics) 24 years Project Management 560000.00

2 Prashant Dhanula 26 Male Technical Expert MBA in

MArketing 1.6 years Project Management 25000.00

3 Sidharth Singh

Bisen 29 Male Technical Expert

MBA in Rural

Mgmt 2.6 years Project Management 25000.00

4 Malava Bhavsar 21 Male MDT( Eng) Civil Eng. 7 months SMC development 15000.00

5 Sunil Patel 22 MDT (Agri) M.R.S 8 months Agriculture Development 9000.00

6 Hiral Patel 28 Female MDT (CM) B.R.S 8 years Community Mobilization 12000.00

7 Sweety Patel 32 Female MDT (CM) M.S.W 8Years Community Mobilization 12000.00

8 Hidayat Menon 27 Male MDT (MIS) B.E( IT) 3 years Project Data Management 15000.00

9 Nayan Patel 23 Male System Analyst MCA 6 months System Management 8000.00

mailto:[email protected]


10 Deepak Patel 28 Male MDT Account M.Com 5.8 yeas Manage the District

Account 15000.00

11 Disha Prajapati 28 Female Data Entry

Operator PGDCA 1 year Operator 6000.00

12 Bhaveshchand Ravat 25 Male Office Assistant B.A 5 months Office Assistant 3500.00

13 Manhor Sinh 36 Male Peon 10th

Pass 6 years Peon 4500.00

Table No. 7.1 Staff at Cluster Level

Sr. No. Name Age Sex Designation Qualification Experience Job assigned Monthly

remuneration

Patel Jigneshkumar R. 25 Male WDT (Eng.) Diploma Civil

Eng. 2.5 YEARS

Structural

development in

rural

development

12000

Sureskumar R.

Prajapati 36 Male WDT (Agri) B.R.S./M.R.S 13 Years

Agriculture

Development 8000

Bakulaben S Kharadi 36 Female WDT. CM B.R.S./M.R.S 7 Years Community

Mobilization 8000

Sutariya Hiteskumar R 24 Male Surveyor ITI.Serveyer 2 Years

Eng. Structural

verification and

checking

6000

Patel Maneshkumar N 24 Male Accountant B.Com/M.Com/

B.ed 6 Years

Account details

of project 7000


Jetavat Jaypalsih A. 23 Male D.E.O. B.C.A. 1 Years Data entry

operator 5000

SWOT analysis of the DWDU:

Strength

1. Well establishment of PRIs for social audits Independent District Level Nodal Agency (DWDU). With Dedicated competent and experienced personnel.

2. Separate State Level Nodal Agency (Gujarat State Watershed Management Agency) for Planning and fund Dispersion.

3. Use multidisciplinary teams and with more holistic approaches using modern technology like GIS & Remote Sensing (RS).

4. Strong linkages with national and state level Institutions, State Agricultural Universities, North Gujarat University KVKs and NGOs for capacity building and

technical guidance.

5. District level monitoring, coordination & co-operating Committee (DLCCC).

6. Extensive grassroots coverage at district- and village-level with project office in cluster level and village office at village level.

7. Amalgamation of Various technological, academic and social institutions for programme support.

8. Participatory planning involving more grassroots contact. Bottom-up approaches ensures effective grassroots and community participation.

9. Allocation of financial resources to the community hence planning and Implementation by community with a Project Implementation Agency for technical

and Logistical support.

10. Programme is more flexible and is adjusted to changing needs and environmental factors for making a sustainable and measurable outcome

Weakness:

1. Lack of technical knowledge in new Personnel.

2. Permanent Office Building is lacking

3. High staff turnover since there is no permanent staff.


4. Inadequate budgets as majority of area is rain-fed and highly scarce natural resources.

5. Numerous but uncoordinated developmental interventions resulting from secluded and untenable output.

6. Duplication and repetition of projects without measuring output and gap analysis.

7. Community participation suffers due to conflicts, counterproductive thinking and Lack of leadership for effective community mobilisation.

Opportunities:

1. Cooperation between the public and private sectors.

2. Improved collaboration and efficiency through departmental convergence.

3. Greatly improved understanding of community needs through participatory planning and implementation would show greater accountability and impact of work.

4. Small independent decision-making units like village Watershed committee, SHG federation will facilitate quick decision-making and greater flexibility in

programme implementation.

5. Awareness generation among the illiterates through IEC activities by usage of new ICT activities.

6. Usage of new technologies of watershed modeling and GPS for monitoring the watershed activities.

Threats:

1.Lack of Sustainable agriculture development

2.Delay of releasing project fund from the higher authority.

3.The outcome of the project is heavily dependent on monsoon making it vulnerable.

4.Unfavorable socio-economic environment threatens operations and survival of the project.

5.Contribution and cooperation from local peoples were reduced due non timely payments

6.Low and erratic rainfall in the project area.

7.Low literacy rate in the project area


CHAPTER -3

BASIC INFORMATION OF PROJECT AREA


Basic Information of Project Area

Netramali watershed is located in the district of Sabarkantha about 22kms from district head quarters. The project area is characterized by high temperature and

low rainfall. The proposed watershed has a land area of 4054.10 ha will be treated. The Netramali watershed project is characterized by flat with varying slopes and

drainages. The soil and underground water is highly saline which results in acute shortage of drinking water.

Land use pattern:

The net geographical area of Netramali watershed is about 5013.80 ha out of which forest area is nil. About 80.85 % of land is used in agriculture which is completely

rain fed mainly a Kharif & Rabi crop is taken. About 959.90 ha of the total land are classified under wasteland out of which 48.81% is cultivable and rest is

uncultivable 51.18%. Total agricultural lands were classified under watershed area.

Table no. 8: Land use pattern:

Sr. No. Name of villages Geographical Area

of the village Forest Area

Land under

agricultural use

Rain fed

Area

Permanent

pastures

Wasteland

Cultivable Non-

Cultivable

1 Netramali 1233.50 0.00 1009.20 523.40 0.00 98.50 125.80

2 Ganeshpura 242.00 0.00 133.40 84.20 0.00 45.50 63.10

3 Daramali 456.00 0.00 358.20 300.00 0.00 3.00 94.80

4 Hingaraj 189.30 0.00 154.60 94.90 0.00 34.40 0.50

5 Bhuvel 204.90 0.00 193.70 173.60 0.00 4.40 6.80

6 Chadasna 196.70 0.00 166.10 140.90 0.00 12.00 18.60

7 Nanivadol 269.70 0.00 245.30 230.30 0.00 16.60 7.80


8 Dungari 545.70 0.00 446.30 246.30 0.00 78.00 21.40

9 Mangadh 280.40 0.00 230.30 148.30 0.00 2.80 47.30

10 Rudardi 543.70 0.00 435.40 325.40 0.00 56.20 52.10

11 Laloda 851.90 0.00 681.60 16.60 0.00 117.20 53.10

TOTAL 5013.8 5013.80 2283.90 4054.10 2283.90 468.60 491.30

41%

0%

34%

18%

0% 3% 4%

Land Distribution of Six village

Geographical Area

Forest Area

Land under Agricutlture

Rain fed

Permanent Pasture

Cultivable Watesland

Non cultivable

35%

0%

32%

30%

0%

2%

1%

Land Distribution of five Village

Geographical Area

Forest Area

Land under Agricutlture

Rain fed

Permanent Pasture

Cultivable Watesland

Non cultivable


Soil and topography:

Netramali watershed project falls under North West Gujarat agro climatic zone. The soil is mainly maze and cotton. The soil is brown to very dark grayish

brown in surface colour. The depth of soil is moderate to deep about 25 to 75 cm. The predominate texture of soil is loamy sand and silt and clay. The fertility of soil

is very poor with low nitrogen, phosphorus and potash. The topography of the area is moderate ranging from 0-10% slope. The soil is mainly loam and Sandy loam.

The soil is light brown to light or semi dark greyish or black in surface colour. The depth of soil is moderate to deep about 30 to 65 cm. The predominant texture of

soil is loamy, sand, silt and clay. The soil fertility is poor with moderate nitrogen, phosphorus and potash. By large soils are well drained with moderate water holding

capacity. There has a considerable reduce application of farm yard manure and use of the chemical fertilizer which resulting in reduction in moisture retention capacity and

porosity in the soils. Due to low organic carbon, lack of water conservation measures at the field and at the community level has led to the acceleration of environmental

degradation. The increasing dependency on external input has increased the vulnerability of agriculture such that even small stresses and fluctuations in the environment lead

to instability and threatens farming livelihoods. The soil falls in Aridsol and Inseptisols order, topography of the area is flat.

Table no. 9: Soil type and topography:

Sr.

No.

Name of the agro-climatic zone

covers project area Area in ha Names of the villages

Major soil types Topography

a) Type b) Area in ha

1

North Gujarat 4776

Netramali

Moharam Black

1157.96

Flat

2 Ganeshpura 227.61

3 Daramali 437.25

4 Hingaraj 179.80

5 Bhuvel 193.02

6 Chadasna 186.40

7 Nanivadol 255.14

8 Dungari 524.65


9 Mangadh 264.40

10 Rudardi 523.35

11 Laloda 826.42

TOTAL 4776

Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition:

Sr. No. Village Flood (Incidence) Drought (Incidence)

1 Netramali -

Once In 4 Years

2 Ganeshpura -

3 Daramali -

4 Hingaraj -

5 Bhuvel -

6 Chadasna -

7 Nanivadol -

8 Dungari -

9 Mangadh -

10 Rudardi -

11 Laloda -


Table no.3.4 Edaphic Factors

Table 11.1 Soil Erosion

Cause Type of erosion Area affected ha Run off

(mm/year)

Average soil loss

(Tonnes/ha/year) Water erosion

A Sheet 3220 470

35-40 B Rill 1211 500

C Gully 342 755

Total 4773

Table no. 11.2: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress)

Name of the Village Survey Number Soil Ph Type of Salinity

(Inherent/Ingress)

Netramali

-

7.5 to 8.00 Inherent

Ganeshpura 7.5 to 8.00 Inherent

Daramali 7.5 to 8.00 Inherent

Hingaraj 7.5 to 8.00 Inherent

Bhuvel 7.5 to 8.00 Inherent

Chadasna 7.5 to 8.00 Inherent

Nanivadol 7.5 to 8.00 Inherent

Dungari 7.5 to 8.00 Inherent

Mangadh 7.5 to 8.00 Inherent

Rudardi 7.5 to 8.00 Inherent


Laloda 7.5 to 8.00 Inherent

Table no. 11.3: Water logging Conditions

Name of the Village Survey Number Reasons

Netramali

NIL NIL

Ganeshpura

Daramali

Hingaraj

Bhuvel

Chadasna

Nanivadol

Dungari

Mangadh

Rudardi

Laloda


Table no. 12: Climatic conditions:

Name of

project

Average rainfall- last 5 years Average temperature

Year mm Summer Winter

IWMP-10

(Harsol)

Max Min Max Min

2008 587 44 28 35 24

2009 669 43 24 36 25

2010 700 45 27 34 26

2011 689 44 24 34 25

2012 874 44 24 35 27

In Netramali project area having totally depended on the rainfall. In this area rainfall is sufficient in this area and will be good for Kharif and early Rabi crops.

The average rainfall of this area is about 703.5 mm (from past five year data) with a highest intensity of 89 mm (in a day). Area faces continual crop failure that comes on

whenever there is a shortfall in the total quantum of rain. However, even more serious are the gaps in rain even in years when the total rainfall is considered normal. These gaps at

crucial periods in the crop growth cycle can prove fatal for the crop. However, through careful water harvesting, in-situ moisture conservation and a drought-proofing strategy of dry

land agriculture, these gaps can easily be plugged and the crops saved.

Table no. 13: Physiographic and relief

Project name Elevation (MSL) Slope range (%) Major streams

IWMP-11 Netramali 194 0-5 Debhol Stream


Land and Agriculture

The area is completely dependent on rainfall. The rainfall is highly scanty which has resulted in recurrent phenomenon of drought two to three years. The

average rainfall of this area is about 703.6 mm (from past five year data) with a highest intensity of 89 mm (in a day). This uneven distribution is leading to runoff of

soil every year to the streams and rivulets.

Lack of surface water source and high salinity of ground water has decreased sufficient base of irrigation as well as for drinking purpose. The average land

holding is about 3 to 5 Ha. Lack of irrigation source forces the majority of these farmers to ensure their livelihood. This affects directly the demographic profile of the

village. The major crop cultivated by the farmers are Cotton, castor, maze, vegetables and Wheat in the village.. The land conservation measure such as check dams,

land leveling, Farm ponds, earthen bunds and farm bunds in the area will help them to take up a rabi crop. Lack of irrigation source forces the majority of the farmers

to migrate to city area for ensure their livelihood. This affects directly the demographic profile of the village. The major crops cultivated by the farmers are Cotton,

castor, wheat and maize. Sorghum is primarily grown for fodder purpose only. It is grown in alternate year with available irrigation facility. It is also grown without

irrigation in some areas but the yield varies thereafter. Some of the farmers take up rain-fed castor crop if rainfall is good. The land conservation measures such as

earthen bunds and farm bunds in the area will help them to take up a rabi crop of mustard or cumin in the residual moisture

Table no. 14: Land ownership details

Sr no. Village Total owned land

HHS Giving Land On Lease HHs taking land on lease

Gen OBC SC

1 Netramali 122 17 124 161 -

2 Ganeshpura 0 56 11 57 -

3 Daramali 201 23 22 27 -

4 Hingaraj 85 0 0 13 -

5 Bhuvel 56 20 10 18 -

6 Chadasna 65 80 12 55 -

7 Nanivadol 1 52 30 57 -


8 Dungari 82 45 94 48 -

9 Mangadh 154 25 2 74 -

10 Rudardi 237 10 145 22 -

11 Laloda 314 20 25 136 -

Total- 1317 348 475 668

Table no. 15: Agriculture

Sr No. Village Net sown area

One time Two time Three Time

1 Netramali 1009.20 485.80 -

2 Ganeshpura 133.40 49.20 -

3 Daramali 358.20 58.20 -

4 Hingaraj 154.60 59.70 -

5 Bhuvel 193.70 20.10 -

6 Chadasna 166.10 25.20 -

7 Nanivadol 245.30 15 -

8 Dungari 446.30 200 -

9 Mangadh 230.30 82 -


10 Rudardi 435.40 110 -

11 Laloda 681.60 665 -

Total- 4054.1 1770.2 -

Table no. 16: Irrigation

Sr No. Village

Source 1 : Canal Source 2 : Check dam/Pond Source 3: Well

Availability

months Net area Gross area

Availability

months Net area Gross area

Availability

months Net area

Gross

area

1 Netramali 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 485.80 485.80

2 Ganeshpura 0 0 0 0 0 0 8

49.20 49.20

3 Daramali 0 0 0 0 0 0 8

58.20 58.20

4 Hingaraj 0 0 0 0 0 0 8

59.70 59.70

5 Bhuvel 0 0 0 0 0 0 8

20.10 20.10

6 Chadasna 0 0 0 0 0 0 8

25.20 25.20

7 Nanivadol 0 0 0 0 0 0 8

15 15

8 Dungari 0 0 0 0 0 0 8

200 200

9 Mangadh 0 0 0 0 0 0 8

82 82


10 Rudardi 0 0 0 0 0 0 8

110 110

11 Laloda 0 0 0 0 0 0 8

665 665

Total 1770.2 1770.2

Table no. 17: Crop details:

Sr no Village Kharif (Monsoon)

Cotton Maize Paddy

Area

(ha)

Production

(in Kgs)

Productivity

(Kg/ha)

Area

(ha)

Production

(in Kgs)

Productivity

(Kg/ha) Area (ha)

Production

(in Kgs)

Productivity

(Kg/ha)

1 Netramali 836 16720 20 128 1664 13 45 765 17

2 Ganeshpura 55 1210 22 45 630 14 33 594 18

3 Daramali 123 2460 20 178 2136 12 58 986 17

4 Hingaraj 125 2500 20 85 845 13 34 612 18

5 Bhuvel 80 3960 22 85 1105 13 28 476 17

6 Chadasna 83 1660 20 58 754 13 25 425 17

7 Nanivadol 102 2040 20 108 1296 12 35 665 19

8 Dungari 263 5523 21 125 1500 12 58 986 17

9 Mangadh 104 2080 20 98 1372 14 28 504 18

10 Rudardi 202 4242 21 185 2405 13 48 864 18

11 Laloda 394 8668 22 202 2424 12 85 1615 19

Total 2367 51063 228 1297 16131 141 477 8492 195


Sr no Village Rabi (Winter)

Wheat Castor Vegetables

Area

(ha)

Production

(in Kgs)

Productivity

(Kg/ha)

Area

(ha)

Production

(in Kgs)

Productivity

(Kg/ha)

Area

(ha)

Production

(in Kgs)

Productivity

(Kg/ha)

1 Netramali 268 8040 30 220 4400 20 35 1155 33

2 Ganeshpura 46 1380 30 30 630 21 8 272 34

3 Daramali 90 2790 31 185 3700 20 25 825 33

4 Hingaraj 47 1410 30 38 836 22 9 286 32

5 Bhuvel 60 1860 31 90 1890 21 23 759 33

6 Chadasna 45 1395 31 75 1575 21 20 660 33

7 Nanivadol 44 1364 31 58 1160 20 28 952 34

8 Dungari 119 3570 30 102 2040 20 25 850 34

9 Mangadh 60 1920 32 58 1276 22 30 960 32

10 Rudardi 195 6045 31 105 2205 21 25 800 32

11 Laloda 5 155 31 5 105 21 6 186 31

Sr no Village Zaid (Summer)

1 Netramali

-

Area

(ha)

Production

(in Kgs)

Productivity

(Kg/ha)

Area

(ha)

Production

(in Kgs)

Productivity

(Kg/ha)

Area

(ha)

Production

(in Kgs)

Productivity

(Kg/ha)

2 Ganeshpura 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

3 Daramali 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

4 Hingaraj 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

5 Bhuvel 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

6 Chadasna 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

7 Nanivadol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

8 Dungari 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


9 Mangadh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

10 Rudardi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

11 Laloda 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Live Stock:-The village has about 1523 cows and 2702 buffaloes out of which majority are of high breed, there are 2116 bullock and people depends on animal

husbandry for their livelihood. Lack of rain and surface water has reduce the fodder and pasture area for their animal. This leads to very insufficient fodder for

animals and hence affecting in quality as well as quantity of milk given by animals hence this will affect on their livelihoods.

Table no. 18: Livestock

Sr.

No. Village

Buffalo Cow

Milk/ lit/day

(Buffalo+Cow)

Goat Sheep Bullock Hen Others

No Milk/

lit/day No

Milk/

lit/day. No Milk Camel

1 Netramali 510 4335 435 4785 9120 0 0 0 805 0 0

2 Ganeshpura 50 425 40 440 865 12 48 0 21 0 0

3 Daramali 249 2116.5 101 1111 3227.5 1 4 0 59 0 0

4 Hingaraj 180 1530 50 550 2080 0 0 0 56 0 0

5 Bhuvel 117 994.5 57 627 1621.5 73 292 0 0 0 0

6 Chadasna 14 119 171 1881 2000 32 128 0 0 0 0

7 Nanivadol 79 671.5 43 473 1144.5 54 216 0 15 0 1

8 Dungari 299 2541.5 91 1001 3542.5 13 52 0 198 0 0


9 Mangadh 68 578 20 220 798 0 0 0 32 0 0

10 Rudardi 496 4216 299 3289 7505 0 0 0 490 0 0

11 Laloda 640 5440 216 2376 7816 293 1172 0 440 0 0

Total 2702 22967 1523 16753 39720 478 1912 0 2116 0 1

Table no. 19: Drinking water

Sr. No. Village Ground water table (mt) Source of drinking water Availability in months Quality

1 Netramali 24 mt – 150 mt Open Wells, Bore 8 Month Potable

2 Ganeshpura 25 mt – 160 mt Open Wells, Bore 8 Month Potable

3 Daramali 22 mt – 150 mt Open Wells Bore 8 Month Potable

4 Hingaraj 24 mt – 150 mt Open Wells Bore 8 Month Potable

5 Bhuvel 30 mt – 165 mt Open Wells Bore 8 Month Potable

6 Chadasna 24 mt – 162 mt Open Wells Bore 8 Month Potable

7 Nanivadol 26 mt – 165 mt Open Wells Bore 8 Month Potable

8 Dungari 28 mt – 170 mt Open Wells Bore 8 Month Potable

9 Mangadh 25 mt – 150 mt Open Wells Bore 8 Month Potable

10 Rudardi 28 mt – 165 mt Open Wells Bore 8 Month Potable

11 Laloda 30 mt – 185 mt Open Wells Bore 8 Month Potable


Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources

S. No. Names of

project

CPR

Particulars

Total Area (ha)

Area owned/ In possession of Area available for treatment (ha)

Pvt. Persons Govt.

(Specify dep’t.) PRI

Any other

(Pl. Specify)

Pvt.

Person

s

Govt.

(Specify

dep’t.)

PRI Any other

(Pl. Specify)

1 Netramali

Wasteland/ degraded land - 125.80 - - - - - -

Pastures - 65.57 - - - - - -

Village Ponds/ Tanks - 1.55 - - - - - -

Community Buildings - 9.80 - - - - - -

Weekly Markets - - - - - - - -

Permanent markets - - - - - - - -

Temples / Places of

worship - 0.31 - - - - - -

Others (Pl. specify) Road - 8.14 - - - - - -

2 Ganeshpura


Pastures - 10.56 - - - - - -



Others (Pl. specify)Road - 1.92 - - - - - -

3 Daramali


Pastures - 3.60 - - - - - -

Village Ponds/ Tanks - - - - - -

Community Buildings 4.28

- - - - - -

Temples/ Places of

worship - - - - - -


Others (Pl. specify) - - - - - -

4 Hingraj


Pastures - - - - - -

Village Ponds/ Tanks - - - - - -

Community Buildings - - - - - -

Weekly Markets - - - - - -

Permanent markets - - - - - -

Temples/ Places of

worship - - - - - -

Others (Pl. specify) - - -

5 Bhuvel


Pastures - 8.81 - - - - - -



Temples/ Places of

worship - - - - - -

Others (Pl. specify)Road 4.17 - - - - - -

6 Chandasna


Pastures - 4.59 - - - - - -



Others (Pl. specify)road - 0.39 - - - - - -

7 Nani Vadol


Pastures - 2.29 - - - - - -





8 Dungari


Pastures - 8.51 - - - - - -


Community Buildings - 4.7 - - -


9 Mangadh


Pastures - 13.10 - - - - - -



Temples/ Places of worship

- 0.40 - - - - - -

10 Rudardi


Pastures - 36.22 - - - - - -




11 Laloda


Pastures - 8.84 - - - - - -


Community Buildings - - - - - - - -

Temples/ Places of worship - - - - - - - -

Others (Pl. specify) - 18.83


Socio-Economic Profile

Demographic Status: Netramali watershed project mainly covers netramali village which as total 1130 household with a net population (as per base-line survey)

14149 with 7283 males and 3305female. The sex ratio is about 945 females to 1000 males. There are about 486 BPL families. The average family size is of four to

five members. The literacy rate is about 68.74 per cent with male literacy rate of 58.49per cent and a female literacy rate is 41.45 per cent..The major casts in the

village are Patel , suthar , thakor , vankar,chenava , adivasi ,prajapati , goswami ,marwadi, Brahmin, muslim etc. and most of population is involved in Agriculture

and animal husbandry and labor work.

Table no. 21: Demographic information

Sr. No. Village Population SC ST

Total Male Female Total Male Female % Total Male Female %

1 Netramali 2358 1185 1173 651 336 315 27.60 101 48 53 4.28

2 Ganeshpura 705 350 355 287 130 157 40.70 - 0 0 0

3 Daramali 1254 653 601 167 88 79 13.30 16 8 8 1.27

4 Hingaraj 472 253 219 42 21 21 8.9 - 0 0 0

5 Bhuvel 540 273 267 99 50 49 18.3 - 0 0 0

6 Chadasna 965 502 463 203 108 95 21.03 - 0 0 0

7 Nanivadol 668 361 327 166 84 82 24.9 - 0 0 0

8 Dungari 1213 631 582 350 190 160 28.9 5 2 3 0.41

9 Mangadh 1572 786 786 254 118 136 16.15 - 0 0 0


10 Rudardi 2019 1073 946 716 383 333 36.26 - 0 0 0

11 Laloda 2383 1216 1167 370 188 182 15.52 51 24 27 2.14

Total 14149 7283 6886 3305 1696 1609 66.52 173 82 91

Table no. 22: Literacy rate

Sr. No. Village Literacy Literacy %

above age 14

Literacy %

below age 14 Total % Male % Female %

1 Netramali 1579 66.96 911 57.69 668 42.30 13.93 11.97

2 Ganeshpura 443 62.83 251 56.65 192 43.34 24.83 12.42

3 Daramali 1016 81.02 566 55.70 445 43.79 24.12 8.37

4 Hingaraj 380 80.50 221 58.15 159 41.84 27.63 19.74

5 Bhuvel 407 75.37 228 56.01 179 43.98 30.71 49.63

6 Chadasna 641 66.42 403 62.87 238 37.12 31.98 18.72

7 Nanivadol 351 52.54 225 64.10 126 35.89 10.83 9.97

8 Dungari 787 64.88 482 61.24 305 38.75 26.05 38.75

9 Mangadh 1113 70.80 625 56.15 488 43.84 20.22 18.87

10 Rudardi 1270 62.93 794 62.51 476 37.48 25.59 17.32

11 Laloda 1738 72.93 983 56.55 755 43.44 12.08 12.95

Total 9725 68.83 5689 58.87 4031 41.07 22.54 19.88


Migration:- No such migration been seen in the project area people will move from village to the taluka but at the end of the day return to their village so permanent

migration not shown in this area.

Table no.23: Migration Details

Sr. No. Village Total

population

Migration Migration by Months Main

Reason

for

migration

Income

during

migration/

month Total Male Female Up to 3

months 3-6 months

More then

6 months

1 Netramali 2358 0 0 0 0 0 0 - -

2 Ganeshpura 705 0 0 0 0 0 0 - -

3 Daramali 1254 0 0 0 0 0 0 - -

4 Hingaraj 472 0 0 0 0 0 0 - -

5 Bhuvel 540 0 0 0 0 0 0 - -

6 Chadasna 965 0 0 0 0 0 0 - -

7 Nanivadol 668 0 0 0 0 0 0 - -

8 Dungari 1213 0 0 0 0 0 0 - -

9 Mangadh 1572 0 0 0 0 0 0 - -

10 Rudardi 2019 0 0 0 0 0 0 - -

11 Laloda 2383 0 0 0 0 0 0 - -


Table no. 24: Poverty

Sr. No. Village Total Household BPL

% BPL HH Total Land

less HH % of land less HH

0-16 16-20 Total

1 Netramali 531 122 22 144 27.12 0 0

2 Ganeshpura 124 2 9 11 8.87 45 36.29

3 Daramali 273 24 38 62 22.71 25 9.1

4 Hingaraj 98 54 64 118 120.41 14 0

5 Bhuvel 104 20 16 36 34.62 19 18.2

6 Chadasna 212 28 30 58 27.36 98 46

7 Nanivadol 140 23 47 70 50.00 79 56.4

8 Dungari 269 30 19 49 18.22 18 6.69

9 Mangadh 255 48 60 108 42.35 55 21.5

10 Rudardi 414 30 107 137 33.09 25 6.03

11 Laloda 495 98 30 128 25.86 80 36.03

Total 2915 479 442 921 31.60 458 15.71


Table no.25: Village infrastructure

Sr. No. Village

Pucca

road to

the village

(Y/N)

Schools

Colleges

(Number)

Post Office

(Distance)

Banks

(Number)

Distance

from nearest

market yard

Milk

collection

centre

(Number)

Milk

cooperativ

e

(Number)

Other

Cooperati

ves /CBIs

(Numbe)

Any

other

institut

ion

LP UP HS

1 Netramal

i Yes Yes Yes

Yes No Yes Yes 7 KM 0 1 1 No

2 Ganeshp

ura

Yes Yes Yes Yes No 2km 0 9 0 1 - No

3 Daramali Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 0 9 0 1 1 No

4 Hingaraj Yes Yes Yes Yes No 1km 0 10 0 1 - No

5 Bhuvel Yes Yes Yes Yes No 1km 0 9 0 1 - No

6 Chadasn

a

Yes Yes Yes Yes No 2km 0 9 0

1 - No

7 Nanivad

ol

Yes Yes Yes Yes No 2km 0 9 0

1 - No

8 Dungari Yes Yes Yes Yes No 0 0 12 0 1 1 No

9 Mangadh Yes Yes Yes Yes No 1km 0 12 0 1 - No

10 Rudardi Yes Yes Yes Yes No 0 0 10 0 1 1 No

11 Laloda Yes Yes Yes Yes No 0 1 4 0 1 1 No


Table no. 26: Facilities / HH assets

Sr. No. Village HHs with

electricity

HHs with safety

latrines

HHs with phones HHs with vehicle HHs with TV

set

HHs with

cooking

gas

HHs

with

Drinki

ng

water

HHs

with

Fridge Land

line Mobile 2-wheeler 4-wheeler

1 Netramali 535 347 191 400 310 35 412 210 518 215

2 Ganeshpura 124 124 35 125 70 5 120 50 0 55

3 Daramali 273 265 225 250 200 20 273 250 273 250

4 Hingaraj 98 88 40 102 128 28 98 60 98 78

5 Bhuvel 104 99 86 99 58 8 98 85 104 82

6 Chadasna 212 205 95 198 180 15 202 198 212 195

7 Nanivadol 140 140 92 108 18 3 128 110 140 110

8 Dungari 269 228 105 205 180 12 252 235 269 250

9 Mangadh 255 255 38 250 110 28 40 204 255 250

10 Rudardi 414 395 302 410 65 25 98 352 414 400

11 Laloda 495 478 248 490 120 50 430 421 495 402


Livelihood pattern: The villagers earn their livelihood mainly from Agriculture and Animal Husbandry. Some People also earn their livelihood from doing small

business and small trade as this a big village, surrounding village people come here for their necessary things .Labors are involved in agriculture as well as

construction work.

Table no. 27: Income

Sr. No. Village Agriculture Animal husbandry Casual labour Others Total

1 Netramali 14128700 4796500 515000 1993000 21433200

2 Ganeshpura 1599000 360000 452000 449000 2860000

3 Daramali 10890000 1942000 1993000 7257000 22082000

4 Hingaraj 3813000 485000 6639000 1323000 12260000

5 Bhuvel 7597000 943000 522000 1417000 10479000

6 Chadasna 4372000 646000 1946000 2916000 9880000

7 Nanivadol 1290200 680000 1267000 1938000 5175200

8 Dungari 25585200 1507400 42416600 4645000 74154200

9 Mangadh 5759170 247000 9401459 1199000 16606629

10 Rudardi 88719000 4396000 1052620 1676000 1983770

11 Laloda 17496535 3268000 31900 24957000 489115

TOTAL- 181249805 19270900 66236579 49770000 177403114


Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR

Sr no Village Benefit type 1 Benefit type 2 Benefit type 2 Total

income % sells Income % sells Income % sells Income

1 Netramali 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2 Ganeshpura 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

3 Daramali 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

4 Hingaraj 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

5 Bhuvel 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

6 Chadasna 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

7 Nanivadol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

8 Dungari 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

9 Mangadh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

10 Rudardi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

11 Laloda 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution)

Sr

no Village

Total

workforce Agriculture

Animal husbandry

(AH)

Agriculture +

AH

Casual

labour Services Handicraft Others

1 Netramali 1280 523 346 221 158 8 24 -

2 Ganeshpura 389 106 140 72 69 - 2 -

3 Daramali 600 188 250 186 12 5 99 -

4 Hingaraj 276 86 172 12 2 2 2 -

5 Bhuvel 349 115 44 186 4 8 80 -

6 Chadasna 503 210 248 210 10 5 316 -

7 Nanivadol 322 375 464 83 14 8 58 -

8 Dungari 356 433 148 6 0 7 6 -

9 Mangadh 925 172 273 304 3 - 25 -

10 Rudardi 1054 335 401 512 6 15 458 -

11 Laloda 1270 405 324 365 142 10 24 -

TOTAL 7324 2948 2810 2157 420 25 1094 -


3.7 Comparative data of the crop productivity of the area: project area vs. District vs. State vs. Country vs. World

“The term productivity in general means the total output per unit of factor input. For example land productivity means output per hectare of land. Productivity

can be calculated as dividing the total output of a particular crop by the total cultivated area under that crop.”

Data are made available by the Baseline survey, Handbook of Agriculture, ICAR publication 2006 (For Gujarat and India), and Final district plan (DAP) of

Dept. of Agriculture (for Patan). The results indicate that the cluster villages have comparatively lower productivity compared to Gujarat.. The productivity is low not

only because that the land is unproductive or the farmer’s lack the skills to manage their crop but also due lack to of source of irrigation, salty water and scarcity of

rain.

The IWMP-11 village comes under Semi-arid zone. So farmers grow crop according to the rainfall. If they get good rainfall they generally grow high value

crops like mustard, cumin, Bengal gram etc. In case of low rainfall they go for sorghum, and pearl millet. So we can say that monsoon decides cropping patterns of

the villages.

16.86

18.45 18.58

15.23

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

India Gujarat Sabarkantha Idar IWMp-11

qt/

ha

Cotton productivity in qt/ha

Cotton Productivity in qt/ha


3.8 The IWMP-14 project has low productivity because of the following reasons

i) Full dependence on monsoon:

Water is essential input in agriculture. Due to the absence of proper irrigation facility,100% of the total cultivated area depends on the uncertain

monsoon. Therefore, the suceess or failure of the monsoon determines the success or failure of agriculture production.The rainfall is unreliable due to

two factors: untimely and inadequate rainfall.

ii) Low use of fertilizer per unit cropped area:

Farmers do not use sufficient fertilizer due to lack of water, scarcity of fertilizer in market and insufficient money for fertilizer. Many a times they

don’t get fertilizer at the right time.

iii) Traditional farming methods: This also leads to low productivity. There is a lot of ignorance about the use of new farming methods and

technologies such as multiple cropping. They don’t use FYM and other input in a proper way; that is why they don’t get 100% output. So these factors

contribute to low productivity.

iv) Lack of adequate farm machinery: Even today a large number of farmers in some villages use wooden ploughs and bullocks. They don’t have

adequate machinery like seed drill. So, old machineries take more time in tillage practices.

v) Lack of finances for farmers: Most of the farmers are marginal or small farmers in the villages. They do not have enough money to buy good quality

seeds, machinery and other inputs.


vi) Lack of good quality seeds and fertilizers: Good quality seed, fertilizer and pesticide are important factor in agriculture productivity. The use of good

quality leads to higher land productivity. In Netramali Project, there are mainly two limitations in the use of fertilizer. First these fertilizers are most

useful in irrigated condition. But in Netramali Project 100 per cent of land depend on rainfall. Second is mostly farmers use nitrogenous fertilizers

especially urea. This has resulted in disproportionate use of fertilizer depleting the quality of land.

vii) Lack of other facilities such as storage and marketing: 5-10% of agriculture product damage after harvesting due to scarcity of proper storage and

proper market for sale. So they sell it to local traders at the low prices. Farmers mainly face two problems in which first is proper means of

transportation and roads and second problem is farmers don’t have proper storage facilities


Chapter 4

Watershed Activity


Introduction:

The purpose of this study is to provide a comparative analysis of productivity of Netramali village with reference to India. Gujarat, Sabarkantha district. “The

term productivity in general means the total output per unit of factor input, For example land productivity means output per hectare of land. Productivity is an average

and is calculated by dividing the total output of a particular crop by the total cultivated area under the crop.”

Date are made available by Baseline survey (for Netramalivillage), Handbook of Agriculture, ICAR publication 2006 (For Gujarat and India), and Final district

plan (DAP) of Dept. of Agriculture (For Sabarkantha). The result shows that productivity is important not only because we observe a strong positive relationship with

profits but that the results are suggestive of important scale that should be taken to improve the production. These results indicate that Netramalivillage has very low

productivity compared to world. India, Gujarat and Sabarkantha. The productivity is low not because that the land is unproductive or the farmer’s lack the skills to

managing their crop but it is due lack of source of irrigation, salty water and scarcity of rain.

The Netramali village come under arid zone. So farmers grow crop according to the rainfall. If they get good rainfall they generally grow high value crops like

cotton, castor, vegetables etc. In case of low rainfall they go for maze, jowar etc So we can say that monsoon decides cropping patterns of Netramali village.

The productivity of cotton is 629 kg/ha in India, Gujarat produces major cotton of our country with a record productivity of about 787 kg/ha. Sabarkantha

district has very good productivity 724 kg /ha. The Idar Taluka has major productivity of 870 kh/Ha of cotton The Netramali project area has only 466 kg/ha

productivity. It is low compare to Taluka ,district, State,and country India.

The world productivity of castor is 984 kg/ha. In India, it is grown in about 7.3 lakh hectares with a production of 8.0 lakh tonnes and productivity of 1,094

kg/ha. Gujarat alone produces about 80% of the total castor of our country from 50% of the area with a record productivity of about 1838 kg/ha. Sabarkantha district

has very good productivity 1958 kg /ha. The Idar taluka has productivity of 1934 kg/Ha . The Netramaliproject area has comparatively low productivity of 1339

kg/Ha . It is low compare to district, State, India and world.

.


The Netramali project area has low productivity because of the following reasons:

1. 100% cultivated area depends on monsoon: Netramali village is depend on monsoon without monsoon they cannot get any crop because irrigation water is

salty. Water is essential input in agriculture. Due to the absence of proper irrigation facility, 100% of the total cultivated area depends on the uncertain monsoon.

therefore the success of failure of agriculture production. The rains, as a source of irrigation, are unreliable de to work factors;

Untimely rain: The rains are sometimes received when the crops are ready for harvesting. The ready crop may be ruined due to untimely rain

Inadequate rain: There are regions in India which do not get adequate rain and face a difficult situation every year. There are other regions where there are excessive

rains which are harmful for the crops. The dependence on the uncertain rainfall is a factor that contributes to low productivity of land.

2. Less use of fertilizer per unit cropped area: Farmers don't use sufficient fertilizer due to scarcity of fertilizer in market and insufficient money for fertilizer.

Many times they don't get fertilizer at the right time.

3. Traditional farming methods: This is the factor that leads low productivity. There is lot of ignorance about the use of new farming methods and technologies such

as multiple cropping. They don't use FYM and other input in a proper way that is why they don't get 100% output. So these factors contribute low productivity.

4. Lack of finances for farmers: In Netramali most of farmers are marginal and small. Farmers do not have enough resources to purchase these seed.

5. Lack of good quality seeds and fertilizers:Good quality seed, fertilizer and pesticide are important factor in agriculture productivity. The use of good quality

leads to higher land productivity. In Jadar, however, there are two limitations in the use of fertilizer; First these fertilizers are most useful in irrigated condition.

But in Netramali90 per cent of land depend on rainfall. In Netramali mostly farmers use nitrogenous fertilizers especially urea. This has resulted in disproportionate

use of fertilizer depleting the quality of land.


6. Lack of rural credit:

Farmers face so many problems for rural credit and it leads to low agricultural productivity. Farmers need credit mainly for the purchase of various

inputs such as seed, fertilizers and pesticide and for repair of implements. They use long term credit for buying land, and for investment to

improve the quality of land, buying the new implements and improving irrigation facilities.


Watershed Activities

Watershed management as a strategy is been adapted by Government of India especially in the rain fed regions of semi-arid tropics. These regions are

characterized by low and undependable rain, low soil fertility, poor infrastructure development, low literacy and high incidence of migration. The inherit ant low

fertility of crops results in high productivity of crops which have a very low biological efficiency.

Several studies have identified that there is a dire need of a systematic and scientific approach to deal with watershed development. The common guidelines

generate a fresh and flexible framework for the next generation watershed development.

1. Cluster Approach

This envisages a broader vision of Geo-hydrological unit which involves treating a cluster of micro-watershed. The Netramali Project consists of eight

micro-watersheds namely 5F2D6b2f, 5F2D6b2f, 5F2D6b2d, 5F2D6b2a, 5F2D6b2e, 5F2D6b2b, 5F2D6b1d, 5F2D6b1c, 5F2D6b1g, 5F2D6b2e,

5F2D6b2f as their respective codes.

2. Base line Survey

To access the impact of any watershed development programme a detailed baseline survey has to be conducted. This acts a benchmark for any

intervention during and post implementation of any development programme. A detailed baseline survey was been undertaken which involved

household census survey, Bio-physical survey and Village level date collection from Talati-Cum mantri. Household census survey includes a detailed

questionnaire which was been filled by visiting each and every house-hold in the village. This gave in the details of the demographic profile of the

village, the literacy percentage, SC/ST population, number of BPL household,

cattle population, Net consumption rate in the village, average milk production of the cattle’s and various schemes running and their

Bio-physical survey was been undertaken to identify various natural resource available in the village. It included the soil typology,

Well in the area, crop taken in the field, Cropping pattern, fertilizer used and various sources of irrigation in the field.

3. Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA)


The past experience of watershed has given tremendous input to focus on creating accountability of the stakeholder towards the

programme. This has created an emphasis to included all the stakeholder communities and their local and indigenous Technological Knowledge (ITK)

while planning for any activity. Participatory approach provide a new path for planning, implementing, monitoring and post-withdrawal activities with a

complete accountability of the stakeholders. This decrease the efforts of the ground staff i.e WDT members and involves more of villages as

implementers. Various PRA techniques like resource mapping, social mapping, season calendars were used to understand the physical and social

orientation of the village in general and watershed in specific. These tools put the village in ease than the complicated questionnaires. Various tools like

Matrix ranking, venne Diagram were used to identify various local vegetations (apt for afforestation), Fodders crops, various institution and their

significance in the life of the farmers.

4. Use of GIS and remote sensing for planning

Use of various high science tool has been promoted at various stages of watershed development.

a) Prioritization

Geographical Information System (GIS) has been use for prioritization process. Various layer maps were created like Geo-morphological, Soil, BPL,

Population, SC/ST population, Ground water Status, Drinking water situation Slope percent. These were all given proper weight ages according to the

DoLR specification. This helped in prioritization of various watershed areas.

b) Planning

A action plan matrix was been formulated by State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) taking into account various features like the slope percent soil Depth,

Soil Texture, Soil erosion in the area for wasteland, forest land and agricultural land.

Global positioning system (GPS) was used to identify each and every water conservation structures available in the project area. This will be used to

create a map. Contour Map of vertical interval of 1 meter at a scale of 1:8000 was used for identifying various location specific for soil and water

conservation structures.


c) Hydrological modeling

Hydrology modeling technique was been used for locating drainage, stream length, flow direction, sink, Flow accumulation. This model overlaid over

cadastral map hel to calculate the catchment area of each structures like the check dam etc. This has helped to remove the human error which generally

occurring while calculating the catchment area of a check dam.

Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP project

Sr. No. Scientific criteria/ inputs used Whether scientific criteria was

used

1 (A) Panning Yes

Cluster approach Yes

Whether technical bank-topping for the project has been arranges? If yes, mention the name of the institute Yes

Baseline survey Yes

Hydro-geological survey Yes

Contour mapping Yes

Participatory Net Planning (PNP) Yes

Remote Sensing data-especially soil/ crop/run-off over Yes

Ridge to Valley Treatment Yes

Online IT connectivity between Yes

(1) Project and DRDA cell /ZP Yes

(2) DRDA and SLNA Yes

(3) SLNA and DoLR Yes

Availability of GIS Layers Yes

1. Cadastral map Yes

2. Village boundaries Yes

3. Drainage Yes

4. Soil (Soil nutrient status) Yes

5. Land use Yes

6. Ground water status Yes

7. Watershed boundaries Yes

8. Activity Yes


Crop simulation models# No

Integrated coupled analyzer/ near infrared visible spectroscopy/ medium spectroscopy for high speed soil

nutrient analysis

Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)# No

2 Weather Station Yes

(B) Inputs Yes

1. Bio-pesticides Yes

2. Organic manures Yes

3. Vermicompost Yes

4. Bio-fertilizer Yes

5. Water saving devices Yes

6. Mechanized tools/ implements Yes

7. Bio-fencing Yes

8. Nutrient budgeting Yes

9. Automatic water level recorders & sediment samplers No

Any other (please specify) Yes

Institution formation in watershed

Table no.31: Details of PRA Activities conducted in the project area

Sr. Name of the PRA

Activity / FGD Date

Number of

people

present

Lessons learnt / Understanding of the problem/situation

1 Social map 22-11-2011

Netrmali

Provide Information about geographical area

2 Drainage map Make aware about Drainage of villages. Too much of soil erosion in monsoon.

3 Daily activity chart Mostly all men are engaged with farming and labour work and women are engaged with

animals.


4 Seasonal chart Majority of farming work related of cereals & cash crop

1 Social map 20-11-2011

Ganeshpura

Make aware about geographical land. Having two peta para.

2 Drainage map Make aware about Drainage of villages.


animals.

4 Seasonal chart Majority of farming work related of cash crop , Vegetables & fruits.

1 Social map 23-11-2011

Daramali

Provide Information about geographical area that there are three other peta para in revenue

village.



animals.

4 Seasonal chart Majority of farming work related of cereals & cash crop.

1 Social map 24-11-2011

HIngraj



3 Daily activity chart Mostly all women are engaged with animals, and man was engaged with farming and labour

work.


1 Social map 24-11-2011

Bhuvel

Make aware about geographical land that there are three other peta para in revenue village.

2 Drainage map Provide information about Drainage of villages.


animals.



1 Social map 21-11-2011

Chadasana




animals.


1 Social map 21-11-2011

Nanivadol




animals.


1 Social map 23-11-2011

Dungari


village.

2 Drainage map Provide relevant information about Drainage of villages.


animals.


1 Social map 18-11-2011

Mangadha




animals.



1 Social map 19-11-2011

rudardi


village.

2 Drainage map Provide relevant information about Drainage of villages. Too much of soil erosion in

monsoon.


animals.


1 Social map 25-11-2011 Laloda Provide Information about geographical area that there are three other peta para in revenue

village.

2 Drainage map Provide relevant information about Drainage of villages.


animals.



Problem Analysis Tree

Poor Life Style Migration

LOW SOCIO-ECONOMIC

STATUS

Low Income Unemployment Local self Governance not dynamic or inclusive

Low Agricultural

Production

Low Market Price

of the Product

Low Literacy

Status

Less Orientation

for self

employment

Local

Leadership not

sufficiently

developed

Lack of common

interest to support

and strength the

local governance

Poor

Cropping

pattern

Less Fertile Soil

Soil Erosion

Natural Misfortunes Lack of

irrigation

Facilities

Less

availability

of water

Lack of

resource for

irrigation

Lack of

appropriate

market linkage

Lack of co-

operation

between

farmers

Presence of

middle man

Lack of

Entrepreneurial

skill

Lack of

Information

and training

Low

representation of

Weakest in real

term

Lack of Grass

root Peoples

Organisation


Objective Tree

Improvement in life style Less Migration/Comfort Migration

Improvement in socio-economic status

Increase in Individual income Generate the Opportunity of self

employment

e

Presence of dynamic local self governance

Increase in

Agricultural

Productivity

Good Market price

of the product Less Orientation

for self

employment

Well established

Local

Leadership

Increase common

interest to support

and strength the

local governance

Improved

Agricultural

Practices

Wadi

Developmen

t Programme

Availability of

water and resources

for irrigation

Water resource

Management,

watershed

development

Elimination of

Middleman and

Increase the Co-

operation between

farmers

Capacity Building

and Awareness

programme and

formation of PO’s

Capacity

Building and

skill

improvement

programme

Setup

Microenterpr

ise

Facilitate

milk

production

as an income

generating

activity

Increase the

representation of

weakest in real term

Presence of

people’s

Organisation

Training

and

Awareness


1. Watershed Committee (WC)

It is a committee that is constituted by Gram Sabha to implement the watershed project with technical support of WDT in the village This committee

was registered under society Registration Act 1860. The Gram sabha of the village Selects the chairman of the watershed committee with the secretary who

will be a paid functionary. Awatershed committee was formed accordingly in Netramalivillage. Since the watershed has only on village so no separate

watershed sub-committee was formed in the village. Capacity building training to the watershed committee was given by WDT member.

The watershed committee has a pivotal during various processes like the PRA and over planning of various points

Table no. 32: Watershed Committee details

Sl.

No.

Name

s of

WCs

Date of

registration

as a

societydd/m

m/yyyy

Name of Members Designation M/F Gen. OBC SC ST SF MF L

F

Land-

less

UG SHG GP Any

Othe

r

Educatio

nal

Qualifica

tion

Functio

n/S

Assigne

d

1

NE

TR

AM

AL

I

Bhangi Babubhai

Bhikhabhai President

M √ √ √ 7 Pass

2 Vankar Govindbhai

Khemabhai Secretary

M √ √ √ M.A

3 Patel Jayantibhai

Jethabhai

Member M √ √ 7 Pass

4 Kumpavat Dilipsih

Narsih

Member M √ √ S.S.C.

5 Patel Jagrutiben

Harsadbhai

Member F √ √ √ B.A

6 Vankar Vinaben

Manharbhai

Member F √ √ √ S.S.C.

7 Patel Kantibhai

Khemabhai


8 Patel Vasantbhai

Santilal



9 Vankar Rekhaben

Dinesbhai

Member F √ √ √ √ B.A.

10 Prajapti surshkumar

Ramabhai

WDT M √ MRS

11 Dhanula Prashantbhai

d

Nodal

Officer

M √ MBA

Table no. 32: Watershed Committee details

Sl.

No.

Names

of WCs

Date of

registration

as a society

(dd/mm/yy

yy)

Name of Members Designati

on

M/F G

N

OB

C

SC ST SF MF LF Land

-less

Ug SH

G

G

P

Any

Other

Educatio

nal

Qualificat

ion

Functi

on/S

Assign

ed

1

CH

AD

AS

AN

A

Patel Amratbhai Tarsihbhai President

M √ √ B.com

2 Makvana Devusih Bhikhusih Secretary

M √ √ √ S.S.C.

3 Patel Ramilaben Samarbhai Member F √ √ √ √ 7 pass

4 Barot Ajitbhai Maganbhai Member M √ √ √ S.S.C.

5 Patel Hasmukbhai

Ranchodbhai


6 Patel Indiraben Mahendrabhai Member F √ √ √ √ S.S.C.

7 Bhabhi Dasaratbhai Somabhai Member M √ √ S.S.C.

8 Barot Bachubhai Chotalal Member M √ √ √ S.S.C.

9 Makvana Ramsih Punjsih Member M √ √ 5 Pass

10 Prajapti surshkumar Ramabhai WDT M √ MRS

11 Dhanula Prashantbhai d Nodal

Officer

M √ MBA


Sl.

No.

Names

of WCs

Date of

registration

as a society

dd/mm/yyy

y

Name of Members Desig

natio

n

M/

F

GN OBC SC ST SF MF LF Lan

d-

less

Ug SHG GP Any

Other

Educatio

nal

Qualifica

tion

Funct

ion/S

Assig

ned

1

DA

RA

MA

LI

Patel Vinodbhai Murabhai Presid

ent

M √ √ HSC

2 Patel Somabhai Amabhai Secret

ary

M √ √ 7 Pass

3 Patel Mahendrabhai Dahyabhai Memb

er

F √ √ HSC

4 Patel Maganbhai Joytabhai Memb

er

M √ √ B.ed.

5 Prajapati Kantibhai Ramabhai Memb

er

M √ √ √ SSC

6 Vankar Jivabhai Lalabhai Memb

er

F √ √ M.A.

B.ed

7 Patel Gitaben Bhagabhai Memb

er

M √ √ √ 7

8 Patel Manjulaben Haresbhai Memb

er

M√ √ √ 10

9 Prajapati Dhyabhai Nathabhai Memb

er

M √ √ √ 10

10 Patel jigneshkumar Rasikbhai WDT

Engg.

M √ Civil

Engg.


Office

r

M √ MBA


Sl.

No.

Na

mes

of

WC

s

Date of

registration as

a society

(dd/mm/yyyy)

Name of Members Designati

on

M/F GN OB

C

SC ST SF MF LF Land-

less

Ug SH

G

GP Any

Other

Educational

Qualification

Function/S

Assigned

1

NA

NIV

AD

OL

Parmar Jayantibhai

Amrabhai President

M √ √ B.A.

2 Bhabhi

Rajendrakumar

Ganpatbhai

Secretary

M √ √ H.S.C.

3 Barot Gunvatlal

Sivlal

Members M √ √ √ 8 Pass

4 Kachavasa Kishorsih

Mansih

Members M √ √ 10 Pass

5 Bharvad Nanuben

Sedhabhai

Members F √ √ √ 4 Pass

6 Dhakarda Pravinaben

Kahyaji

Members F √ √ 5 Pass

7 Raval Sangitaben

Balabhai

Members F √ √ √ 8 Pass

8 Raval Punjabhai

Ravabhai


9 Parmar Govindbhai

Karabhai



Ramabhai

WDT M √ MRS

11 Dhanula

Prashantbhai d

Nodal

Officer

M √ MBA


Sl.

No.

Nam

es of

WC

s

Date of

registration as

a society

(dd/mm/yyyy)

Name of Members Designat

ion

M/F open OB

C

S

C

ST SF M

F

LF Land

-less

Ug SHG GP Any

Other

Education

al

Qualificati

on

Funct

ion/S

Assig

ned

1

DU

NG

AR

I

Patel Khemabhai Murabhai President

M √ √ √ B.com

2 Vankar Lebabhai Punjabhai Secretary

M √ √ √ C.Ped

3 Patel Isvarbhai Prabhudas Member M √ √ 10 Pass

4 Patel Virsangbhai Jesingbhai Member M √ √ √ 7 Pass

5 Patel Ashokbhai Revabhai Member M √ √ √ 10 Pass

6 Patel Vasantbhai Ganeshbhai Member M √ √ √ M.A.B.ed

7 Patel Kailasben Kesabhai Member F √ √ √ √ B.A.

8 Patel Varsaben Amitbhai Member F √ √ √ √ S.S.C.

9 Chamar Kailasben Dhirajbhai Member F √ √ √ S.S.C.

10 Patel jigneshkumar Rasikbhai WDT

Engg.

M √ Civil Engg.


Officer

M √ MBA


Sl.

No.

Name

s of

WCs

Date of

registration as

a society

(dd/mm/yyyy)

Name of Members

Designatio

n

M/

F

GN

OB

C

S

C

S

T

SF M

F

L

F

Land

-less

Ug SH

G

G

P

Any

Othe

r

Educatio

nal

Qualifica

tion

Functio

n/S

Assigne

d

1

Hin

gar

aj

Patel Ambalal Kalidas President

M √ √ H.S.C.

2 Patel Ramesbhai Pasabhai Secretary

M √ √ B.com

3 Patel Manibhai Dhurabhai Member M √ √ B.A.

4 Patel Kacharabhai Lavjibhai Member M √ √ 8Pass

5 Patel Sundarben Jitubhai Member F √ √ B.A.

6 Patel Manjulaben

Hasmukhbhai

Member F √ √ √ 10 Pass

7 Patel Jignisaben Vijaykumar Member F √ √ √ B.A.

8 Thakrda Kailasben Dinesbhai Member F √ √ 8 Pass

9 Chenva Chehrabhai Maganlal Member M √ √ 1 pass

10 Prajapti surshkumar Ramabhai WDT M √ MRS


Officer

M √ MBA


Sl.

No.

Nam

es of

WCs

Date of

registration as a

society

(dd/mm/yyyy

Name of Members Designation M/F open OBC SC ST SF MF LF Land-

less

Ug SHG GP Any

Othe

r

Educational

Qualification

Function/S

Assigned

1

Bhuvel

Patel Bharatbhai

Kacharabhai President

M √ √ √ B.A.

2 Patel Kamlesbhai

Vithalbhai Secretary

M √ √ √ 12 Pass

3 Patel Sankarbhai

Manibhai

Member M √ √ √ 12 Pass

4 Patel Vithalbhai

Chaganbhai

Member M √ √ √ S.Y.B.com

5 Patel Dinesbhai

Motibhai

Member M √ √ √ S.S.C.

6 Patel Kantibhai

Samarbhai

Member M √ √ S.S.C. B.ed

7 Prajapati Taraben

Asvinbhai

Member F √ √ S.S.C.

8 Mansuri Merajben

Mukesbhai

Member F √ √ √ 7 pass

9 Parmar Vinaben

Kamlesbhai

Member F √ √ √

10 Patel jigneshkumar

Rasikbhai

WDT Engg. M √ Civil Engg.


Officer

M √ MBA


Sl.

No.

Nam

es of

WC

s

Date of

registration as

a society

dd/mm/yyyy

Name of Members

Designati

on

M/F GN OB

C

SC ST SF MF LF Land

-less

Ug SHG GP Any

Oth

er

Education

al

Qualificati

on

Func

tion/

S

Assi

gned

1

Man

gad

ha

Rajpura rasidbhai alibhai President

√ 9 pass

2 Rajpura Abidbhai Usmanbhai Secretary

M √ √ 10 pass

3 Gaji Sahidbhai Sadikbhai Member M √ √ 5 Pass

4 Khanusiya Molmutar

Farukbhai


5 Rajpura Mahmadhanifbhai

Usmanbhai


6 Vankar Narsihbhai Dalabhai Member M √ √ 10 Pass

7 Khanusiya Fanmaben

Hifjurbhai

Member F √ √ 5 Pass

8 Thakarda Asaben Karabhai Member F √ √ 6 Pass

9 Chenva Kariben Dasrathbhai Member F √ √ MRS


Ramabhai

WDT M √ MBA


Officer

M √


Sl.

No

Nam

es of

WC

s

Date of

registration as

a society

dd/mm/yyyy

Name of Members

Designati

on

M/

F

GN ob

c

SC S

T

SF MF LF Land-

less

U

G

SH

G

GP Any

Other

Educa-

tional

qualifi

-cation

Funct

ion/s

assign

1

RU

DA

RD

I

Vankar Kamraben

Ramchandra President

F √ √ Yes H.S.C.

2 Gurjar Pravinkumar

Rameshbhai Secretary

M √ √ B.A.

3 Champavat Narayansh

Puthavisih

Member M √ √ √ S.S.C.

4 Patel Kirtibhai Vithalbhai Member M √ √ √ S.S.C

5 Vankar Dahyabhai Pasabhai Member M √ √ √ S.S.C.

6 Vankar Dahyabhai Pasabhai Member M √ √ √ H.S.C.

7 Chuhan Manjulaben

Rameschandra

Member F √ √ √ H.S.C

8 Dabhi Anjanaben Sailessih Member F √ √ √ 7 Pass

9 Patel Manguben Prabhudas Member F √ √ √ 7 Pass


Ramabhai

WDT M √ MRS


Officer

M √ MBA


Sl.

No.

Nam

es of

WC

s

Date of

registration as

a society

(dd/mm/yyyy

Name of Members Designa

tion

M/

F

GN OB

C

S

C

S

T

S

F

M

F

L

F

Land

-less

U

g

SHG GP Any

Othe

r

Educatio

nal

Qualifica

tion

Function/S

Assigned

1

Gan

eshpura

Gulamhaidar Abdulbhai

Maknusiya Presiden

t

M √ √ 10 pass

2 Nazar Ahmed

Gulamhusen Maknusiya Secretar

y

M √ √ BA

3 Ramjibhai Jivabhai

Chenva

Member M √ √ 10pass

4 Amichandbhai Pasabhai

Chenva

Member M √ √ HSC

5 Bhavnaben Arkhabhai

Chenva

Member M √ √ √ 10 Pass

6 Kamlaben Jaynatibhai

Chenva

Member M √ √ 10 pass

7 Tahirali Sadiqbhai

Vijapura

Member F √ √ √ 7th

Pass

8 Kazimali Sulemanbhai

Momin

Member F √ √ 9th

Pass

9 Abedaben Hasanali

Momin

Member F √ √ √ 7th

Pass

10 Prashantbhai D. Dhnula WDT M √ MBA


Rasikbhai

WDT

Engg.

M √ Civil

Engg.

Patel

jigneshkum

ar

Rasikbhai


Sl. No. Name

s of

WCs

Date of

registration as

a society

dd/mm/yyyy

Name of Members Designat

ion

M/F GN OB

C

S

C

ST SF M

F

L

F

Land

-less

Ug SHG GP Any

Othe

r

Educatio

nal

Qualifica

tion

Functio

n/S

Assigne

d

1

Patel Mohanbhai

Narsabhai President

M √ √ √ H.S.C.

2

LA

LO

DA

Patel Jitubhai Joytabhai Secretary

M √ √ B.com

3 Patel Hasmukbhai

Manjibhai

Member M √ √ B.A.

4 Parmar Ramanbhai

Punjabhai


5 Thakarda Somabhai

Badarbhai

Member M √ √ B.A.

6 Vankar Madhuben

Motibhai

Member F √ √ √ 10 Pass

7 Patel Manjulaben

Devabhai

Member F √ √ B.A.

8 Patel Nirmalaben

Pravinbhai

Member F √ √ 8 Pass

9 Parmar Jayaben Joytabhai Member F √ √ √ 1 pass


Rasikbhai

WDT

Engg.

M √ Civil

Engg.


Officer

M √ MBA


2. Self Help Group

Self Help Group are motivated, Small homogenous group organized together highly successful of credit and thrift activities. Self help group initiative especially for

women help to uplift their livelihood. Generally self help group includes landless and marginal sized farm women, BPL household, SC/ST women.

SHG initiative in Netramali watershed was being organization by having a cause group discussion between various homogenous communities of women

based on their livelihood separately. Each group discussed their basic problems with their facilitators. The major problems identified women based on their

livelihood separately. The major problems identified are:

a) Lack of proper credit facilities due to low intervention of formal financial credit institute

b) Excessive exploitation of weaker section by money lenders

c) Lack of attitude of saving among poor people due to complex and rigid conventional financial institution structures.

d) Lack of small micro-loans without collaterals and high interest rates.

e) Lack of knowledge of credit, Thrift activity and banking.

With a view point of these problems it was planned to organize these women to a into a group consisting of 12 to 20 in each groups and it was also

proposed to have 8 groups.

With a detailed discussion with some of the local NGOs working in the area like SEWA, it was planned to have some capacity building training regarding

SHG activities. It was also proposed to have some livelihood activities which will promote women empowerment this included spice packing, embroidery

activities with forward and backward linkage. This will ultimately lead into better human development in the village.


Table no. 33: SHG detail

S. No. Name of village

Total no. of registered SHGs No. of members No. of SC/ST in each

category

No. of BPL in each

category

With

only

Men

With only

Women

With

both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total

1 NETRAMALI 4 6 - 10

(i) Landless 12 08 20 04 02 06 02 03 05

(ii) SF 08 35 42 03 08 11 02 06 08

(iii) MF 05 05 10 02 01 03 01 01 02

(iv) LF 15 12 27 06 02 08 03 02 05

2 GANESHPURA 2 5 - 7

(i) Landless 02 05 07 01 02 03 01 01 02

(ii) SF 10 25 35 04 08 12 02 02 04

(iii) MF 06 15 21 03 05 07 01 01 02

(iv) LF 02 05 07 01 02 03 01 01 02

3 DARAMALI 2 7 1 10

(i) Landless 10 05 15 02 02 04 01 01 02

(ii) SF 35 04 39 04 04 08 02 01 03

(iii) MF 25 02 27 03 05 07 01 01 02

(iv) LF 05 08 13 01 02 03 01 02 03

4 HINGRAJ 0 4 0 4

(i) Landless 00 5 5 0 3 03 0 01 01

(ii) SF 00 25 25 0 05 05 0 01 01

(iii) MF 00 10 10 0 03 03 0 02 02

(iv) LF 00 0 0 0 07 02 02 04


5 BHUVEL 2 5 - 7

(i) Landless 15 05 20 04 01 05 02 02 04

(ii) SF 35 15 50 02 03 05 01 01 02

(iii) MF 10 08 18 02 02 04 01 01 02

(iv) LF 15 05 20 05 04 09 01 02 03

6 CHADASNA 1 6 2 9

(i) Landless 05 05 10 03 04 07 02 01 03

(ii) SF 40 05 09 02 02 04 01 01 02

(iii) MF 15 04 19 04 01 05 02 01 03

(iv) LF 10 06 16 01 01 02 01 01 02

7 NANI VADOL 2 6 - 8

(i) Landless 05 03 08 02 02 04 01 01 02

(ii) SF 25 07 32 02 04 06 01 02 03

(iii) MF 15 04 19 03 02 05 01 03 04

(iv) LF 15 06 21 04 01 05 01 02 03

8 DUNGARI - 7 3 10

(i) Landless 10 03 13 03 02 05 01 01 02

(ii) SF 40 05 09 03 03 06 01 02 03

(iii) MF 15 03 18 02 01 03 01 01 02

(iv) LF 15 03 18 03 03 06 01 01 02

9 MANGADH - 5 2 7 (i) Landless 05 05 10 02 02 04 01 01 02


(ii) SF 20 17 37 03 02 05 01 01 02

(iii) MF 15 08 23 02 02 04 01 01 02

(iv) LF 20 10 30 03 02 05 01 02 03

10 RUDARDI 3 6 3 12

(i) Landless 09 05 14 04 01 05 01 01 02

(ii) SF 36 15 51 06 01 07 02 01 03

(iii) MF 14 10 24 05 02 07 01 02 03

(iv) LF 14 10 24 01 04 05 01 01 02

11 LALODA 1 8 3 13

(i) Landless 10 03 13 01 02 03 02 01 03

(ii) SF 38 08 46 03 01 04 02 01 03

(iii) MF 35 02 37 03 03 06 01 01 02

(iv) LF 20 05 25 02 01 03 01 02 03


3. User Group:

These are homogeneous groups of person having landholding within the watershed area. They are normally formed to manage and activity or asset on a long

term basis. The user groups collect use charges from their members. Some of the points which were considered while forming a user group in Netramali

are:

1) In case of a check dam, check wall khet talavadi , farm pond all the beneficiaries of the individual check dam were involved as user group members.

2) In case of Fodder bank all the individual beneficiaries of animal husbandry are considered as potential members.

3) Membership was on voluntary and democratic.

4) Focused group discussion was conducted to between the user group to discuss the above conditions and to select potential members.

5) It was advocated that each group to formulate certain internal rules and have a feeling of ownership with community spirit.

Table no. 34: UG detail

Sr. No.

Village Total no. of registered UGs No. of members

No. of SC/ST/ in

each category

No of BPL in each

category

Men Women Both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total

01

Netramali 07 0 03 10

(i) Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0

(ii) SF 20 08 28 04 03 07 01 01 02

(iii) MF 19 06 25 05 05 10 01 00 01

(iv) LF 08 02 10 02 02 04 01 01 02

Total 47 16 63 11 10 21 3 2 5

02

Ganeshpura 03 0 02 05

(i) Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0

(ii) SF 10 4 0 02 01 03 01 01 02

(iii) MF 10 2 0 03 01 04 02 01 03


(iv) LF 7 3 0 02 01 03 01 00 01

TotaL 27 09

36

7 3 10 4 2 6

03

Daramali 08 02 10

(i) Landless 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0

(ii) SF 35 02 37 05 04 09 1 1 2

(iii) MF 25 02 27 02 12 14 0 1 1

(iv) LF 10 01 11 05 01 06 1 1 2

Total 65 05 70 12 17 29 2 3 5

04

Higraj 04 01 05

(i) Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(ii) SF 35 1 36 5 2 7 1 1 2

(iii) MF 10 1 11 2 1 3 1 0 1

(iv) LF 05 1 06 0 0 0 1 1 2

Total 50 3 53 7 3 10 2 2 4

05

Bhuvel 03 02 05

(i) Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(ii) SF 12 0 12 8 2 10 8 0 85

(iii) MF 15 0 15 3 1 4 4 1 5

(iv) LF 5 1 6 1 0 1 4 1 5

Total 32 1 33 12 3 15 16 2 18

06

Chadasana 03 01 04

(i) Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(ii) SF 10 0 10 5 2 7 10 0 10

(iii) MF 4 1 5 1 0 1 6 1 7

(iv) LF 4 1 5 1 1 2 2 1 3


Total 18 2 20 7 3 10 18 2 20

07

Nanivadol 04 02 06

(i) Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(ii) SF 15 3 18 4 2 6 20 8 28

(iii) MF 8 2 10 4 1 5 20 5 25

(iv) LF 5 1 6 2 2 4 5 2 7

Total 28 6 34 10 5 15 45 15 60

08

Dungari 09 03 12

(i) Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(ii) SF 30 6 36 10 2 12 25 4 29

(iii) MF 20 4 24 3 2 5 10 3 13

(iv) LF 10 3 13 2 1 20 5 2 7

Total 60 13 73 15 5 37 40

9

49

09

Mangadha 03 01 04

(i) Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(ii) SF 20 1 21 5 1 6 30 5 35

(iii) MF 5 0 5 1 1 2 20 5 25

(iv) LF 2 1 3 1 1 2 5 4 9

Total 27 2 29 7 3 12 55 14 69

10

Rudradi 04 02 06

(i) Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(ii) SF 10 2 12 6 1 7 25 4 29

(iii) MF 5 1 6 2 1 3 10 3 13

(iv) LF 05 1 6 1 1 2 5 2 7

Total 20 4 24 9 3 12 40 9 49


11

Laloda 08 02 12

(i) Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(ii) SF 30 10 40 7 3 10 10 0 10

(iii) MF 20 8 28 4 3 7 6 1 7

(iv) LF 10 5 15 2 1 3 2 1 3

Total 60 23 83 13 7 20 18 2 20

Entry Point activity (EPA)

EPA activities are taken up under watershed projects to build a rapport with the village community at the beginning of the project; generally, certain important works

which are in urgent demand of the local community are taken up. A group Discussion was conducted with watershed Development Committee regarding the EPA

activity, It was conveyed to the WC that an amount of Rs. 5.80 Lakh was allotted for EPA activity, which was 4 per cent of total allocated budget. The villagers

discussed various activities which they felt is important but after a brief discussion it was conveyed to them that only those activities can be taken, which revive the

common natural resources. It was also taken into priority that there should be an instrument of convergence which will result in sustainability of activities.Physical

activities to be undertaken under IWMP, NetramaliEntry Point Activity (EPA)


Table No.35 Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs.)

Sr.

No. Name of Village

Amount earmarked for EPA

Rs. in Lakhs EPA Planned

Estimated Cost (In

lakhs) Rs.

Expected

Outcomes

1 Netramali 5.56

Causeway 2.0 -

Causeway 2.0 -

Stand post 0.56 -

Ponds Pitching 1.0 -

Total 5.56 -

2 Ganeshpura 1.09 Causeway Structure 1.09 -

3 Daramali 2.10 Protection Wall (No.2) 2.10 -

4 Hingraj 0.86 Old Water Tank Repairing 0.86 -

5 Bhuvel 0.93 Wire Fencing 0.93 -

6 Chadasna 0.89 Well border Repairing, net 0.70 -

Wire Fencing 0.19 -

7 Nani Vadol 1.22 Causeway Structure 1.22 -

8 Dungari 2.52 Smashan Leveling & Horticultures kit,

Benches

2.52 -

9 Mangadh 1.27 Causeway 1.27 -

10 Rudardi 2.51 Well Blasting Whole & Net 2.51 -

11 Laloda 3.97

Underground Tank, 1.0 -

Over Had Water Tank 2.50 -

Stand post With Pipe Line 0.47 -


EPA

Identification

Coues way Structure (Netramali) IWMP-11 Cost- 2.00 S. NO -209/1

GPS No. N- 23 46’ 40.5”, E- 72 59’ 27.6”

Smashan Levaling & Horticultures Kit / Benches (Dungri) IWMP-11

Cost- 2.52, S.No-Gam Tal GPS No. N- 23 44’ 40.6” E- 73 00’ 51.70”|

Well Border Reparing&Net (Chadasana) IWMP-11 Cost-0.70 S.No-33

GPS No. N- 23 44’ 42.3” E- 72 58’ 19.7”

Protection Wall (Daramali) IWMP-11 Cost-2.10 S.No- 148/Gam Tal

GPS No- N – 23 44’ 58.7” E-72 59’ 05.1”


Table no.36: Details of ridge line treatment / land based activities in watershed works*

Sr

No.

Village

name Name of structures

Type of treatment Target

(i) Ridge

area (R)

(ii)

Drainage

line

(D)

(iii)

Land dev.

(L)

(i)

Private

(ii)

Community

(iii)

Others

(pl.

specify)

No. of

units

(No./

cu.m./

rmt)

Estimated cost (Rs. in

lakh) Expected month

& year of

completion

(mm/yyyy) M W O T

1 NETRAMA

LI

Check Dam - D - - C - 2.0 4.80 3.20 - 8.0 2015

Farm bunds - - L P - - 23214 0 13.0 - 13.0 2015

Land Leveling - - L P - - 19643 0 11.0 - 11.0 2015

Protection Wall - D - C - 5 1.80 1.20 - 3.0 2015

Check Wall - D - C - 13 3.90 2.60 - 6.50 2015

Total 10.5 31.0 - 41.5

2 Ganeshpura

Check Dam - D C - 4.0 7.20 4.80 - 12.0 2015

Farm bunds - - L P - - 7142 0 4.0 - 4.0 2015

Protection Wall - - - C - 2 3.0 2.0 - 5.0 2015

- - - Total 10.20 10.80 - 21.0

3 Daramali

Check Dam - D - C - 4 9.60 6.40 - 16.0 2015

Farm bunds - - L P - - 4464 2.5 - 2.5 2015

Land Leveling - - L P - 2678 1.5 - 1.5 2015

Protection Wall - - C - 3 1.08 0.72 - 1.80 2015

- - - Total 10.7 11.01 21.8

4 Hingraj Protection Wall - - L - C 5 1.91 1.27 - 3.18 2015

Stone Pitching - - L - C 1 2.04 1.36 - 3.40 2015

Wire Fencing - - L - C 1 0.28 0.42 0.70 2015

4.23 3.05 7.28

5 Bhuvel

Check Dams - D - C - 1 1.80 1.20 - 3.0 2015

Farm bunds - L P - 1785 0 1.0 - 1.0 2015

Check Wall -- D C - 5 1.50 1.0 - 2.50 2015

- - 0 3.2 - 6.50

- Total 3.3 6.4 13.0

6 Chadasna Farm bunds - L P - 8928 0 5.0 - 5.0 2015

- Total 5.0 5.0


7 Nani Vadol

Check Dam - D C - 3 5.40 3.60 - 9.0 2015

Farm bunds - L P - 3571 0 2.0 - 2.0 2015

Protection Wall - D C - 3 0.90 0.60 - 1.50 2015

Check Wall - D C - 3 1.08 0.72 - 1.80 2015

Land Leveling - L P - 3571 0 2.0 - 2.0 2015

- Total 7.38 8.92 - 16.3

8 Dungri

Earthen Bunding - D C - 1785 0 1.0 - 1.0 2015

Ogan - D C - 1 0.60 0.40 - 1.0 2015

Check Dam De-

silting - D C - 6 0 3.0 - 3.0 2015

Check Dam - D C - 2 4.80 3.20 - 8.0 2015


Land Leveling - L P - 14285 0 8.0 - 8.0 2015

Farm bunds - L P - 16071 0 9.0 - 9.0 2015

Check Wall - D C - 4 1.20 0.80 - 2.0 2015

- Total 7.68 26.12 - 33.8

9 Mangadh

Farm bunds - L P - 7142 0 4.0 - 4.0 2015

Check Wall - D C - 7 2.10 1.4 - 3.50 2015

Land Leveling - L P - 3571 0 2.0 - 2.0 2015


Stone Pitching - - L - C - 1 1.20 0.80 - 2.0 2015

Wire Fencing - - L - C - 1 0.90 0.60 1.50

Total 5.28 9.52 14.8

Check Wall - D - C - 6 1.80 1.20 - 3.0 2015

Check Dam - D - C - 1 2.40 1.60 - 4.0 2015

Farm bunds - - L P - - 14285 0 8.0 - 8.0 2015

Land Leveling - - L P - - 10714 0 6.0 - 6.0 2015

- - - - - Total 4.2 16.8 - 21.0

11 Laloda

Check Wall - D - - C - 20 6.0 4.0 - 10.0 2015

Check Dam - D - - C - 2 4.80 3.20 - 8.0 2015

Farm bunds - - L P - - 3571 0 2.5 - 2.5 2015

Land Leveling - - L P - - 6250 0 3.5 - 3.5 2015


Protection Wall - D - P C - 5 1.80 1.20 - 3.0 2015

- - Total 12.6 14.4 27

Table no.37: Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)

Sr.

No. Village name

Type of

structures

Proposed target

Augmentation/ repair of existing

structures Construction of new structures Total target

No.

Area to be

irrigated

(ha)

Storage

capacity

Estimated

cost No.

Area to be

irrigated

(ha)

Storage

capacity

Estimated

cost

Area to be

irrigated

(ha)

Storage

capacity

Estimated

cost

1 Netramali

Farm pond - - - 26 30 52000 15.60 30 52000 15.60

Pond Deepening 3 50 150000 12.00 - - - 50 150000 12.00

Pond 3 50 160000 12.00 50 160000 12.00

Total 39.60

2 Ganeshpura Well depending - - - - - - - - - - -

3 Daramali Pond - - - - 1 20 50000 4.0 20 50000 4.0

Pond Deepening 3 45 135000 9.0 - - - - 45 135000 9.0

Total 13.0

4 Hingraj Pond Deepening 1 15 150000 4.0 15 150000 4.0

Well Deepening 1 - - 0.50 - - 0.50

Total 4.0

5 Bhavel Pond 1 15 45000 3.0 15 45000 3.0

Pond Deepening 2 35 90000 6.0 - - - - 35 90000 6.0

Total 9.0

6 Chadasna

Farm Pond - - - - 1 4 10000 0.60 4 10000 0.60

Pond - - - - 2 100 200000 8.0 100 20000 8.0

Pond Deepening 2 55 105000 8.0 - - - - 55 105000 8.0

Total 16.60


7 Nani vadol Pond Deepening 2 45 150000 6.0 - - - - 45 150000 6.0

Total 6.0

8 Dungri Farm Pond 1 25 125201 1.25 25 125201 1.25

Pond Deepening 1 23 125689 4.0 23 125689 4.0

9

Total

Mangdha Pond

Deepening 1 12 150000 4.0 - - - - 12 150000 4.0

Total 4.0

10 Rudaradi

Pond - - - - 3 85 600000 12.0 85 600000 12.0

Pond Deepening 1 15 60000 4.0 - - - 15 60000 4.0

RRWHS 1 20 250000 1.0 20 250000 1.0

Total 17.0

11 Laloda Pond 2 25 252500 8.0 25 252500 8.0

Pond Deepening 6 152 560000 24.0 - - - - 152 560000 24.0

Total 32.00

Table no.38: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)

S. No. Name of Villages Type of structures

Proposed target

Augmentation/ repair of existing

recharging structures

Construction of new recharging

structures Total target

No. Area to be

irrigated (ha) Estimated cost No.

Area to be

irrigated (ha) Estimated cost

Area to be

irrigated (ha) Estimated cost

1 Netramali

(i)Open wells - - - - - - - -

(ii)Bore wells - - - - - - - -

(iii)Any others

(Pl. specify) - - - - - - - -

Total for the village - - - - - - - -

Total for the - - - - - - - -


Project

2 Ganeshpura

(i)Open wells - - - - - - - -

(ii)Bore wells - - - - - - - -

(iii)Any others

(Pl. specify) - - - - - - - -


Total for the

Project - - - - - - - -

3 Daramali

(i)Open wells - - - - - - - -

(ii)Bore wells - - - - - - - -

(iii)Any others

(Pl. specify) - - - - - - - -


Total for the

Project

- - - - - - - -

4 Hingraj

(i)Open wells - - - - - - - -

(ii)Bore wells - - - - - - - -

(iii)Any others

(Pl. specify) - - - - - - - -


Total for the

Project - - - - - - - -

5 Bhuvel

(i)Open wells - - - - - - - -

(ii)Bore wells - - - - - - - -

(iii)Any others

(Pl. specify) - - - - - - - -


Total for the

Project - - - - - - - -

6 Chadasna (i)Open wells - - - - - - - -

(ii)Bore wells - - - - - - - -


(iii)Any others

(Pl. specify) - - - - - - - -


Total for the

Project - - - - - - - -

7 Nani Vadol

(i)Open wells - - - - - - - -

(ii)Bore wells - - - - - - - -

(iii)Any others

(Pl. specify) - - - - - - - -


Total for the

Project - - - - - - - -

8

Dungri

(i)Open wells - - - - - - - -

(ii)Bore wells - - - - - - - -

(iii)Any others

(Pl. specify) - - - - - - - -


Total for the

Project - - - - - - - -

9 Mangadh

(i)Open wells - - - - - - - -

(ii)Bore wells - - - - - - - -

(iii)Any others

(Pl. specify) - - - - - - - -


Total for the

Project - - - - - - - -

10 Rudardi

(i)Open wells - - - - - - - -

(ii)Bore wells - - - - - - - -

(iii)Any others

(Pl. specify) - - - - - - - -



Total for the

Project - - - - - - - -

11 Laloda

(i)Open wells

(ii)Bore wells

(iii)Any others

(Pl. specify)

Total for the village

Total for the

Project - - - - - - - -

Table no.39: Details of activities related to livelihood, production system and micro-enterprises

S. No. Name of village Name of activity

Type of land Executing agency Target

(i) Private (ii)

Community

(iii) Others (pl.

specify)

(i) UG

(ii)SHG

(iii) Others (pl. specify)

Estimated

cost

(Rs. in

lakh)

Expected

month & year

of completion

(mm/yyyy)

1 Netramali

Vermi Compost P - - SHG/UG 2.73 2015

Horticulture P - - SHG/UG 2.10 2015

Crop Demonstration P - - UG 1.42 2015

Cattle Camp - Com - UG /SHG 2.0 2015

Kitchen Garden P - - SHG 5.80 2015

Farm Implement (

Tractor) P - - UG 5.0 2015

Animal Nutrient - Com - UG/SHG 3.18 2015

Catering Business - Com - SHG 4.17 2015

TOTAL 26.40

2 Ganeshpura

Kitchen Garden P - - SHG 0.50 2015


Tailoring Machine p - - UG 0.28 2015



Farm Implement P - - UG 1.60 2015



TOTAL- 5.18

3

Daramali





Kitchen Garden P - - UG /SHG 2.50 2015


TOTAL 9.96

4 Hingraj






TOTAL 4.11

5 Bhuvel






TOTAL 4.40

6 Chadasna



Chaff Cutter - Com - UG/SHG 0.25 2015

TOTAL 4.25


7 Nani Vadol





Provision store - Com SHG 1.80 2015

Seed Kit p - - UG/SHG 0.30

TOTAL 5.81

8 Dungri


Tailoring Machine P - - SHG/UG 0.35 2015




Mochi Na Implement P - - UG 0.20 2015

Wheel Cart *(Gadu) P - - UG 0.20 2015

Mandap Decoration p - - UG /SHG 2.0 2015

TOTAL TOTAL 11.96

9 Mangadh






Poultry P - - UG 0.50 2015


TOTAL 6.04

10

Rudardi





Farm Implement (

Tractor) P - - UG 5.0 2015

Seed Kit P - - UG 0.69 2015


TOTAL TOTAL 11.92

11 Laloda







Flour Mill P - - UG/SHG 1.80 2015

Drip Irrigation - Com - SHG 2.36 2015

Tailoring Machine - Com SHG/UG 0.48 2015

Masala processing Unit - Com - SHG 0.87 2015

TOTAL TOTAL 18.85

Table no. 40: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas

S. No. Names of

Villages

Major activities of the SHGs

Name of activity No. of SHGs involved Average annual income from activity per SHG

1 Netramali Vermi Compost 3 4800

Horticulture 7 5000

Crop Demonstration - -

Cattle Camp - -

Kitchen Garden 6 3500

Farm Implement ( Tractor) 1 25000

Animal Nutrient - -

Catering Business 1 8200

2 Ganeshpura Kitchen Garden 1 3900

Animal Nutrient - -

Tailoring Machine 2 2000


Farm Implement 2 2300

Cattle Camp - -

Horticulture 1 2120


3 Daramali Vermi Compost 2 2000

Horticulture 2 1850


Cattle Camp - -


Farm Implement - -

4 Hingraj Vermi Compost - -

Horticulture 2 2200



Cattle Camp - -

5 Bhuvel Vermi Compost 1 2200

Horticulture 2 1900


Cattle Camp - -


6 Chadasna Animal Nutrient - -


Chaff Cutter 2 1350

7 Nani Vadol Animal Nutrient - -


Cattle Camp - -


Provision store 1 3000

Seed Kit 6 3500

8 Dungri Animal Nutrient - -



Cattle Camp - -


Mochi Na Implement 1 1320

Wheel Cart *(Gadu) 1 1000

Mandap Decoration 1 4800


9 Mangadh Vermi Compost 1 3500

Horticulture 2 2840


Cattle Camp - -


Poultry 1 1960

Animal Nutrient - -

Rudardi Animal Nutrient - -


Cattle Camp - -


Farm Implement ( Tractor) 1 26000

Seed Kit 10 3950

Laloda Vermi Compost 2 2582

Horticulture 4 1258


Cattle Camp - -



Flour Mill 1 1960

Drip - -


Masala processing Unit 1 2658

Table no. 41: Linkages developed at village level

Sr.

No. Village Name of activity

Forward/Backward

linkage Linkage with

Outcome

1 Netramali Vermi compost Agro produce market,

Village for agri inputs

Village level individual farmers,

agri input companies Quality input at lower price

2 Ganeshpura Agro center Farmer cooperatives Village Level individual Reduction in food wastage and


farmers, agri input companies increase in income

3 Daramali Vermi Compost Farmer cooperatives Best organic manure to village

Level individual farmers Quality input at lower price

4 Hingaraj Vermi compost GLPC Individual farmer, Fertilizer

cooperative

Increase in income and introduce

organic farming for better soil

health

5 Bhuvel Cattle feed centre Farmer cooperatives Cattle feed companies Quality feed at lower price

6 Chadasna Agro Processing Farmer cooperatives Village Level individual

farmers, agri input companies

Reduction in food wastage and

increase in income

7 Nanivadol Nursery Raising Forest dept. Village Level individual farmers Increase in income and

8 Dungari Cattle feed centre Farmer cooperatives Cattle feed companies Quality feed at lower price

9 Mangadh Fodder bank University for

development Farmers, Dairy owners

10 Rudardi Agro Center Agro produce market,

Village for agri inputs

Village level individual farmers,

agri input companies Quality input at lower price

11 Laloda Vermi Compost Farmer cooperatives Village Level individual

farmers, agri input companies

Reduction in food wastage and

increase in income

Table no.42: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works

S.

No.

Name of

village

Name of

structure/ work

Type of treatment Type of land Executing

agency Target

(i)

Ridge

area

(R)

(ii) Drainage

line

(D)

(iii) Land

dev. (L)

(i)

Private

(ii)

Community

(iii) Others

(pl.

specify)

(i) UG

(ii)SHG

(iii) Others

(pl.

specify)

Area

(ha)

No. of

plants

Estimated

cost

(Rs. in lakh)

Expected

month & year

of completion

(mm/ yyyy)

1 Netramali Afforestation L C UG 1 5000 1.0

2 Ganeshpura Afforestation - - - - - - - - -- - -

3 Daramali Afforestation - - - - - - - - -- - -


4 Hingraj Afforestation - - L - C - - 1 2000 0.30 -

5 Bhuvel Afforestation - - - - - - - - -- - -

6 Chadasna Afforestation - - - - - - - - -- - -

7 Nani Vadol Afforestation - - - - - - - - -- - -

8 Dungri Afforestation - - - - - - - - -- - -

9 Mangadh Afforestation - - L - C - UG 1 2500 0.50 -

10 Rudardi Afforestation - - - - - - - - -- - -

11 Laloda Afforestation - - - - - - - - -- - -

Table no.43: Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas

S. No. Name(s) of the

villages CPR particulars Activity proposed

Target

Target area under the activity

(ha)

Estimated expenditure

(Rs.) Expected no. of beneficiaries

1

Netramali Panchayat Pond Deepening 80 12.0

Pond 95 12.0

Check Wall 5 6.50

Check Dam 50 8.0

Protection Wall 5 3.0

Afforestation 1 1.0

2 Ganeshpura Panchayat Check Dam 75 12.0


3 Daramali Panchayat Pond Deepening 25 9.0

Pond 85 4.0

Check Dam 100 16.0


4 Hingraj Panchayat Protection Wall - 3.18

Stone Pitching - 3.40

Wire Fencing - 0.70


5 Bhuvel Panchayat Pond Deepening 45 6.0

Pond 25 3.0

Check Dam 5 3.0

Check Wall 10 2.50

6 Chadasna Panchayat Pond Deepening 45 8.0

Pond 100 8.0

7 Nani Vadol Panchayat Pond Deepening 25 6.0

Check Dam 32 9.0

Check Wall 5 1.80


8 Dungri Panchayat Pond Deepening 26 4.0

Check De-silting 12 3.0

Check Wall 5 2.0


Earthen Band 5 1.0

Ogan 1.0

Check Dem 56 8.0

9 Mangadh Panchayat Pond Deepening 30 4.0


Check Wall 15 3.50

Stone Pitching 1 2.0

Wire Fencing 1 1.50

10 Rudardi Panchayat Pond Deepening 35 4.0

Check Dam 29 4.0

Check Wall 5 3.0

Pond 68 12.0

RRWHS - 1.0

11 Laloda Panchayat Pond Deepening 105 24.0

Check Dam 69 8.0

Check Wall 15 10.0


Pond 68 8.0


Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution:

S. No. Name of the

Training Institute

Full Address with

contact no.,

website & e-mail

Type of

Institute#

Area(s) of

speciali-

zation$

Accredita-

tion details

Trainings

Reference Year No. of trainings

assigned

No. of trainees to

be trained

1 Sadguru Foundation

Sadguru

Foundation,

Chosala, Dist.

Dahod

NGO Rural

Development

Training

Institute 2011-12 12 143

1

Institute of Rural

Management

(IRMA)

Anand Academic Rural

management Academic 2011-2012 3 100

2

State Institute of

Rural

Development,Gujrat

Ahemedabad GOG

Training in

Rural

Development

Schemes

Training

Institute 2010-2015 3 150

3 ICECD

E-1/14, Sterling

city,Bopal,

Ahemedabad.

(o)+91-79-

3732039

[email protected]

www.icecd.com

Development

centre

Women

Rural &

Tribal areas,

Urban slum,

poor & low-

middle

income

centre of

development

programme

2012-2014 3 108

4 Dantiwada Argil. Dantiwada -

Banaskantha University

Training in

modern and

better

agriculture

practices

Agriculture

University 2010-2015 3 100

5 BISAG BISAG-

GADHINAGAR

Space

application

Remote

Sensing GoG 2010-2015 3 3

7 KVK KVK,

Khedbramha, GoG

Agriculture

Science GoG 2011-2012 8 120


Dist. Sabarkantha

Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan:

S. No. District Project Stakeholders Total no. of

persons

No. of persons to be

trained No. of training programmes Estimated cost

PIA 2 2 6

28.68

WDTs 5 5 16

UGs 257 121 20

SHGs 440 190 19

WCs 130 130 54

834 448 115 28.68

Table no.46: Information, Education and Communication Activities:

Sr. No. Activity Executing agency Estimated expenditure (Rs.) Outcome

(may quantify, wherever possible)

1 Project Information Board PIA-DWDU

To make aware people more about

project, its work and their participation. 2 Wall Slogan PIA-DWDU

3 Pamphlet & Posters PIA-DWDU


Chapter-6

BUDGET


Table no. 47: Budget at a glance for the project

Sl no village name Budget component Cost requirement Rs in lakh

01 Netramali

Administrative costs 10% 13.90

Monitoring 1% 1.39

Evaluation 1% 1.39

Entry Point activity 4% 5.56

Institution and Capacity Building 5% 6.95

Detailed Project Report 1% 1.39

Watershed Development Works 56% 77.82

Livelihood activities for asset less 9% 12.50

Production systems and micro-enterprises 10% 13.90

Consolidation phase 3% 4.16

TOTAL 100% 138.96

2

Ganeshpura


Monitoring 1% 0.27

Evaluation 1% 0.27








TOTAL 100.% 27.31

3 Daramali


Monitoring 1% 0.52

Evaluation 1% 0.52









TOTAL 100% 52.47

4 Hingraj


Monitoring 1% 0.22

Evaluation 1% 0.22








TOTAL 100% 21.58

5 Bhuvel


Monitoring 1% 0.23

Evaluation 1% 0.23








TOTAL 100% 23.016

6 Chadasna


Monitoring 1% 0.22

Evaluation 1% 0.22









TOTAL 100% 22.37

7 Nani Vadol


Monitoring 1% 0.31

Evaluation 1% 0.31








TOTAL 100% 30.62

8 Dungri


Monitoring 1% 0.63

Evaluation 1% 0.63








TOTAL 100% 62.96

9 Mangadh


Monitoring 1% 0.32

Evaluation 1% 0.32









TOTAL 100% 31.73

10 Rudardi


Monitoring 1% 0.63

Evaluation 1% 0.63








TOTAL 100% 62.80

11 Laloda


Monitoring 1% 0.99

Evaluation 1% 0.99








TOTAL 100% 99.17


Table no. 48: Village wise- component wise budget available under IWMP

Sr . no Village Activity

ADMN

MONI/EVL

EPA Institution

and CB

DPR Watershed

development Work

Livelihood for

asset less

Production system and

Microenterprises

Consolidation Total

1 Netramali 16.68 5.56 6.95 1.39 77.82 12.50 13.90 4.16 138.96

2 Ganeshpura 3.27 1.09 1.37 0.27 15.29 2.46 2.73 0.83 27.31

3 Daramali 6.29 2.10 2.63 0.52 29.38 4.72 5.25 1.58 52.47

4 Hingaraj 2.60 0.86 1.08 0.22 12.08 1.94 2.16 0.64 21.58

5 Bhuvel 2.78 0.93 1.16 0.23 12.97 2.08 2.32 0.69 23.16

6 Chadasna 2.68 0.89 1.12 0.22 12.53 2.01 2.24 0.68 22.37

7 Nanivadol 3.68 1.22 1.53 0.31 17.15 2.76 3.06 0.91 30.62

8 Dungari 7.56 2.52 3.15 0.63 35.26 5.66 6.30 1.88 62.96

9 Mangadh 3.81 1.27 1.59 0.32 17.77 2.86 3.17 0.94 31.73

10 Rudardi 7.54 2.51 3.14 0.63 35.17 5.65 6.28 1.88 62.80

11 Laloda 11.09 3.97 4.96 0.99 55.54 8.92 9.92 2.97 99.17

TOTAL 67.98 22.92 28.68 5.73 320.96 51.56 57.33 17.16 573.13

Table no. 49: Village wise gap in funds requirement

Sl .No Village Total cost requirement Total funds available under IWMP Gap in funds requirement

1 Netramali 143.24 138.96 4.28

2 Ganeshpura 33.02 27.31 5.71

3 Daramali 57.89 52.47 5.42

4 Hingaraj 21.58 21.58 0

5 Bhuvel 25.69 23.16 2.53

6 Chadasna 27.40 22.37 5.03

7 Nanivadol 35.77 30.62 5.15

8 Dungari 66.75 62.96 3.79


9 Mangadh 33.26

31.73 1.53

10 Rudardi 65.63 62.80 2.83

11 Laloda 102.63 99.17 3.46

Total 612.86 573.13 39.73

Table no.50: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes

S. No. Village Phase/ Type of

work*

Activity to be

carried out

Fund made available to

IWMP due to

convergence (Rs. in

lakh)

Scheme with

which

convergence took

place

Reference no. of

activity/ task/

structure in DPR

Level at which decision for

convergence was taken

1 Netramali

Work Phase Farm Bund 2.0 MGNREGA Distict

Farm Leveling 2.28 MGNREGA Distict

Distict

2 Ganeshpura

Work Phase Protection Wall 1.71 MGNREGA Distict

Farm pond 4.0 MGNREGA Distict

3

Daramali

Farm Bund 2.0 MGNREGA Distict

Farm Leveling 2.0 MGNREGA Distict

Pond deepening 1.92 MGNREGA Distict

4 Bhuvel Pond deepening 2.53 MGNREGA Distict

5 Chadasana Farm bunds 2.00 MGNREGA Distict

Pond deepening 2.08 MGNREGA Distict

6 Nanivadol Land Leveling 1.0 MGNREGA Distict


Farm bunds 1.0 MGNREGA Distict

Pond deepening 3.15 MGNREGA

7 Dungari Farm bunds 0.79 MGNREGA Distict

Check dam De-

silting 3.0

MGNREGA

8 Mangadha Pond deepening 1.53 MGNREGA Distict

9 Rudardi Land Leveling 1.33 MGNREGA Distict

Farm bunds 1.50 MGNREGA Distict

10 Laloda Pond deepening 2.0 MGNREGA Distict

Land Leveling 1.46 MGNREGA Distict


OUTCOMES


Table no. 52: Employment in Project area:

S.

NO.

Names of

Villages

Wage employment Self employment

No. of man days No. of beneficiaries No. of beneficiaries

SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total

1 Netramali 225 0 1374 25 1624 55 0 235 10 300 25 0 120 25 170

2 Ganeshpura 525 0 1250 32 1807 85 0 355 12 452 30 0 110 20 160

3 Daramali 435 0 1330 35 1800 56 0 280 10 346 25 0 108 22 155

4 Hingaraj 45 0 895 30 970 45 0 300 15 360 22 0 99 25 146

5 Bhuvel 205 0 908 25 1138 82 0 200 20 302 28 0 85 15 128

6 Chadasna 185 0 1008 40 1233 79 0 389 10 478 22 0 98 10 130

7 Nanivadol 205 0 987 25 1217 80 0 390 18 488 25 0 110 20 155

8 Dungari 305 0 982 30 1317 70 0 289 20 379 35 0 158 35 228

9 Mangadh 45 0 990 26 1061 59 0 385 15 459 22 0 128 20 170

10 Rudardi 345 0 1580 45 1970 90 0 400 20 510 35 0 130 22 187

11 Laloda 342 0 1702 35 2079 98 0 399 25 522 28 0 128 21 177


Table no. 53: Seasonal migration from Project area

Sl. No. Names of villages No. of persons migrating No. of days per year of migration

Pre-project Expected post project Pre-project Expected post project

1 Netramali 0 0 0 0

2 Ganeshpura 0 0 0 0

3 Daramali 0 0 0 0

4 Hingaraj 0 0 0 0

5 Bhuvel 0 0 0 0

6 Chadasna 0 0 0 0

7 Nanivadol 0 0 0 0

8 Dungari 0 0 0 0

9 Mangadh 0 0 0 0

10 Rudardi 0 0 0 0

11 Laloda 0 0 0 0


Table no. 54: Average ground water table depth in the project areas (in meters)

S. No. Names of Villages Sources Pre-Project level Expected Increase/decrease

(Post- Project)

1

Netramali Open wells 25 mt,150 mt 20 mt, 140 mt

Bore wells

Others (specify)

2 Ganeshpura Open wells 25 mt,150 mt 20 mt, 140 mt

Bore wells

Others (specify)

3 Daramali Open wells 25 mt,150 mt 20 mt, 140 mt

Bore wells

Others (specify)

4 Hingaraj Open wells 25 mt,150 mt 20 mt, 140 mt

Bore wells

Others (specify)

5 Bhuvel Open wells 25 mt,150 mt 20 mt, 140 mt

Bore wells

Others (specify)

6 Chadasna Open wells 25 mt,150 mt 20 mt, 140 mt

Bore wells

Others (specify)

7 Nanivadol Open wells 25 mt,150 mt 20 mt, 140 mt

Bore wells

Others (specify)

8 Dungari Open wells 25 mt,150 mt 20 mt, 140 mt

Bore wells

Others (specify)

9 Mangadh Open wells 25 mt,150 mt 20 mt, 140 mt

Bore wells

Others (specify)

10 Rudardi Open wells 25 mt,150 mt 20 mt, 140 mt


Bore wells

Others (specify)

11 Laloda Open wells 25 mt,150 mt 20 mt, 140 mt

Bore wells

Others (specify)

Table no. 55: Status of Drinking water

S.

No.

Names of

Villages

Availability of drinking water

(no. of months in a year) Quality of drinking water

Comments

Pre-project Expected Post project Pre-project Expected Post-project

1 Netramali 8 12 POTABLE POTABLE

2 Ganeshpura 8 12 POTABLE POTABLE

3 Daramali 8 12 POTABLE POTABLE

4 Hingaraj 8 12 POTABLE POTABLE

5 Bhuvel 8 12 POTABLE POTABLE

6 Chadasna 8 12 POTABLE POTABLE

7 Nanivadol 8 12 POTABLE POTABLE

8 Dungari 8 12 POTABLE POTABLE

9 Mangadh 8 12 POTABLE POTABLE

10 Rudardi 8 12 POTABLE POTABLE

11 Laloda 8 12 POTABLE POTABLE


Table no. 56 :Crop area and yield in the project area

Sr. No. Name of village Name of crops

Pre-project Expected Post-project

Area

(ha) Average Yield (Qtl) per ha.

Area

(ha)

Average Yield per ha

(qtl)

1

Netramali

Kharif

Cotton 836 20 836 22

Maize 128 13 128 15

Juvar 45 17 45 19

Rabi

Wheat 268 30 268 32

Castor 220 20 220 22

Vegetables 35 33 35 34

2

Ganeshpura

Kharif

Cotton 55 22 55 24

Maize 45 14 45 16

Juvar 33 18 33 20

Rabi

Wheat 46 30 46 32

Castor 30 21 30 23


3

Daramali

Kharif

Cotton 23 20 23 22

Maize 178 12 178 14

Juvar 58 17 58 19

Rabi

Wheat 90 31 90 32

Castor 185 20 185 22


Hingaraj Kharif


4 Cotton 125 20 125 22

Maize 85 13 85 15

Juvar 34 18 34 20

Rabi

Wheat 47 30 47 32

Castor 38 22 38 24


5

Bhuvel

Kharif

Cotton 80 22 80 24

Maize 85 13 85 15

Juvar 28 17 28 19

Rabi

Wheat 60 31 60 33

Castor 90 21 90 23


6

Chadasna

Kharif

Cotton 166 20 166 22

Maize 58 13 58 15

Juvar 25 17 25 19

Rabi

Wheat 45 31 45 33

Castor 75 21 75 23


7

Nanivadol

Kharif 102 102

Cotton 108 20 108 22

Maize 35 12 35 14

Juvar 19 21

Rabi

Wheat 44 31 44 33

Castor 58 20 58 22


Dungari Kharif


8 Cotton 263 21 263 23

Maize 125 12 125 14

Juvar 58 17 58 19

Rabi

Wheat 119 30 119 32

Castor 102 20 102 22


9

Mangadh

Kharif

Cotton 104 20 104 22

Maize 98 14 98 16

Juvar 28 18 28 20

Rabi

Wheat 60 32 60 34

Castor 58 22 58 24


10

Rudardi

Kharif

Cotton 202 21 202 23

Maize 185 13 185 15

Juvar 48 18 48 20

Rabi

Wheat 195 31 195 33

Castor 105 21 105 23


11

Laloda

Kharif

Cotton 394 22 394 24

Maize 202 12 202 14

Juvar 85 19 85 21

Rabi

Wheat 05 31 05 33

Castor 05 21 05 23



Table no. 57: Area under horticulture

S. No. Name of Village Existing area under horticulture (ha) Area under horticulture proposed to be covered through

IWMP

1 Netramali 5 7

2 Ganeshpura 3 6

3 Daramali 4 7

4 Hingaraj 3 5

5 Bhuvel 2 4

6 Chadasna 3 6

7 Nanivadol 3 5

8 Dungari 5 7

9 Mangadh 3 5

10 Rudardi 5 7

11 Laloda 8 10


Table no. 58: Forest/vegetative cover

S. No. Name of Village Existing area under tree cover (ha) Area under tree cover proposed

1 Netramali 8 10

2 Ganeshpura 5 7

3 Daramali 7 9

4 Hingaraj 3 5

5 Bhuvel 5 7

6 Chadasna 6 8

7 Nanivadol 4 6

8 Dungari 6 8

9 Mangadh 5 7

10 Rudardi 8 10

11 Laloda 10 12

Table no. 59: Details of livestock in the project areas (for fluids please mention in liters, for solids please mention in kgs. and income in Rs.)

S.

No.

Name of

Village Type of Animal

Pre-Project Expected Post-project Remarks

No. Yield Income No. Yield Income

1 Netramali

Buffalo 510 3060 122400 555 4050 144000

Cow 435 2175 65250 450 2280 68250

2 Ganeshpura

Buffalo 50 350 14000 65 455 15600

Cow 40 250 7500 58 355 8800

3 Daramali

Buffalo 249 1743 69720 262 1920 70252

Cow 101 525 15750 125 625 16895

4 Hingaraj Buffalo 180 4080 163200 200 4150 183200

Cow 50 200 6000 65 300 8000

5 Bhuvel

Buffalo 117 702 28080 128 825 30000

Cow 57 280 8400 65 325 8600

6 Chadasna

Buffalo 14 84 3360 20 125 3800

Cow 171 875 26250 188 900 28250

7 Nanivadol

Buffalo 79 837 33480 85 898 35628

Cow 43 172 5160 55 199 5230


8 Dungari Buffalo 299 1794 71760 255 1920 79820

Cow 91 455 13650 100 600 16582

9 Mangadh

Buffalo 68 408 16320 75 99 16325

Cow 20 152 4560 30 220 5568

10 Rudardi

Buffalo 496 2976 119040 522 3100 139045

Cow 299 1196 35880 325 1230 36852

11 Laloda Buffalo 640 3840 153600 655 3950 163600

Cow 216 864 25920 216 1000 26292


Table no. 60: Backward-Forward linkages

S. No. Project Type of Marketing Facility Pre-project (no.) During the project

(no.) Post-project (no.)

1 Netramali

Backward linkages - - -

Seed certification - KVK KVK

Seed supply system - - -

Fertilizer supply system - Cooperatives Agro centers

Pesticide supply system - - -

Credit institutions - Banks Banks

Water supply - - -

Extension services - - -

Nurseries - - -

Tools/machinery suppliers - - -

Price Support system - - -

Labour - MGNREGA MGNREGA

Any other (please specify) - - -

Forward linkages - - -

Harvesting/threshing machinery - - -

Storage (including cold storage) - - -

Road network - - -

Transport facilities - - -

Markets / Mandis - - -

Agro and other Industries - - -

Milk and other collection centers - Dairy-11 `Dairy-11

Any other (please specify) - - -


CHAPTER -7

QUALITY AND SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES


7.1 Plans for Monitoring and Evaluation

A Web-based GIS System is being developed for monitoring and evaluating the project in its planning & implementation phases. The system would be

available on a public domain and can be accessed by all the stakeholders of the project. The system shows the entire state of Gujarat and all of those areas selected

over the next 18 years. Filtering allows the user to zoom onto one particular project. Details related to soil type, Land-use classification, inhabitation etc., can be

obtained village-wise. Furthermore, survey-number wise details related to ownership, irrigation source, yield etc., can also be accessed by the users of the system.

This system is being used for pooling up the details obtained from the DPR. In other words, the DPR is made available online in the form of a database which will

help the stakeholders know areas of importance viz., already treated areas/historical works in the area, proposed areas for treatment etc., for further treatment and

planning. The system would also show the satellite imageries of various years from the project inception stage to the project closing stages. This allows the user to

evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment and thereby plan corrective measures for the project area. The system would serve as an aiding tool to the planners and

evaluators for judging the efficacy of the project.

Yet another component of the Web-based GIS system is the Mobile based Monitoring & evaluation System, which will help the ground staff alias WDTs

(Watershed Development Team) to transmit information from the ground level to the central server. Also, any higher-up official in charge of the project can obtain

information regarding the project area on their mobile phone by means of an SMS. The system works in the following manner. The WDT equipped with a GPS

instrument marks the latitude-longitude information of various treatment areas during the DPR. The probable sites are then transferred onto the central server. During

the works phase, any progress in the treatment areas is reported to the server by means of an SMS by the WDT. Similarly, any nodal officer or higher-up official can

view the progress in a project by means of summarized reports generated over frequent periods of time.

7.2 Plans For Project management

The Project management of any watershed programme is very important. It mainly depends upon the community organisation and the village level institutes.

In Nertrmali project, watershed committee and various user group have been formulated for post project operation and maintenance of assets created during project

period. Major emphasis will be on equity and sustainable benefit of the project even after implementation stage. A proper link-up will be built during project period

with various institutes and capacity building organisation. They will act as a major kingpin during post implementation for scaling up the successful experience during

project.


7.3 Watershed Development Fund

The major source of financial assistance after post implementation period is watershed Development Fund. The contribution of it will comes mainly fund the

following:

7.4 User Charges

Various user groups will be formed in village. These user groups will collect user charges according to the designated rules formed during the formation of

user group. These funds will be transferred to the WDF funds as per these formulated rules. The secretary of watershed committee (WC) shall maintain all the

records.


Logical framework Analysis

Narrative Summary Indicators Source of verification Assumptions

Goal: Sustainable Development and

conservation of natural resources with

the help of peoples participation

Increased Agricultural

Production and overall development

increase in contribution of

agricultural income to the

household income.

Objective 1 Increase soil moisture content

1.1 Less Uncertainty in Agricultural

Production

1.2 Farmers take two crops in a

year

1.1 Discussion with Villagers/Farmers

1.2 Soil testing

1.3 Physical verification

Repair and Maintenance

and taking care of

conservation structures

Output Soil moisture content will increase

1.1 Clear growth of vegetation cover

1.2 Certainty in Khariff,Rabi crop

Discussion with Villagers/ Farmers Time to time take care of

structures

Activities 1.1 Farm bunding

1.2 Boulder checks

1.3 Gabions

1.1 40500 rmt

1.2 109 rmt

1.3 9 no


1.2 Records in asset register

1.3 Interferences from GIS maps at

different times

1.4 Measurement Book

1.1 Money spent on right

time

1.2 Proper scientific

methods used

1.3 Workers are ready

1.4 Fields are free from

crops


Objective 2 Increased irrigation potential

2.1 increased irrigated area

2.2 increase in Land value

2.3 More uncultivable lands to be

brought under agriculture and new

plantation

2.1 Revenue records

2.2 Patwari map

2.3 Maps from GIS

2.1 Judicious use of water

2.2 Accessibility to

common and forest lands

increased with removal of

encroachments and

resolution of conflicts

Output Increased irrigation water

2.1 Increased water table in wells

2.2 Increas in flow period of strems




different times

2.4 Promotion of better irrigation

practices like drip irrigation

2.2 Structures full to its

capacity

2.3 Good amount of

rainfall received

Activities 2.1 Nalla/Gully plug

2.2 Irrigation tank

2.3 Farm ponds

2.4 Repair of old Check dams

2.5 Check dams

2.6 Causeway cum check dam

2.1 15 nos

2.2 11 nos

2.3 130 nos

2.4 4 nos

2.5 79 nos

2.6 17




different times

2.1 Good amount of

rainfall

2.2 Size according to

catchment and storage

volume calculation

2.3 No seepage from

structure

Objective 3 To improve Soil Quality

3.1 Agriculture based livelihood

income generation activities

3.2 Promotion of organic farming

Practices

3.1 Physical verification 3.1 Availability of

waste/mulching material

Output Quality of soil improved

3.1 Agriculture production will

increase

3.2 Plantation of fruits and forest

species


3.2 Market Survey

3.3 Soil testing

3.1 Composting material

used and refilled according

to farm requirement

3.2 Use it in right time

Activities 3.1 Composition

3.1 Nos Physical verification 3.1 People ready for

voluntary contribution for


3.2 Application of farm yard manure

3.3 Use of FYM enriched with route

Phosphate and Bio-Fertilizers

Biogas Structure

3.2 Available of cow dung

at right time

3.3 Proper maintenance of

structures

Objective 4 To increase fodder availability

4.1 Increase in the proportion of

households having more security of

fodder

4.2 Reduction in drudgery of fodder

Collection especially women

4.1 Survey(Pre and Post) 4.1 Quality of

management of common

property resources

4.2 Proper distribution of

seedling and take care

Output Increased fodder availability

4.1 Health of live stock improved

4.2 Expected increase in cattle

population

4.3 promotion of dairy development

among communities

4.1 Expenditure on seedling from

register

4.2 List of beneficiaries frome the

register

4.1 Proper seedling

4.2 Proper care and

maintance

Activities 4.1 Pasture land and grassland will be

developed

4.2 On farm bunds selected local

species and fodder crops


4.2 Verification on farm bunds

4.1 WC˜s Reports

4.2 Expenditure Register

4.3 Resolution in WC˜s


4.1 Peoples participating

4.2 Proper variety

selection

4.3 Social fencing

Objective 5 5.1 Peoples participation/women’s

socio-political and economic empower

ment in watershed for income

generation activities

5.1 Women participation enhanced

in decision making of GVCs

Project to be implemented

and managed in a

democratic and

participatory way ensuring

equity

Output 5.1 Maintenance of assets and 5.1 Frequent meetings 5.1 Proper training


5.1 Community Mobilized

5.2 Community Trained

5.3 Better standard of living

records by the villagers themselves. 5.2 Training register

5.3 Increased participation

provided

5.2 No biasness in villages

Activities 5.1 Formation and strengthening of

village institutions like women˜s SHG

groups/WS/UGs and WCs through

awareness programmes

5.2 Formation of fodder banks to

increase fodder security and promote

dung development

5.3 Capacity building of SHG leaders

and accounts

members/farmers/UGs/WCs through

workshop/meetings

5.4 Income generation activities.

5.5 Awareness campaign

5.1 Increased awareness amongst

women about village resources.

5.2 Women participation enhanced

in decision-making of GVCs.

5.3 Farmers adopt organic farming

practices

5.4 Increased household income

5.5 improved access to credit to

livelihood purposes.

5.6 Gender sensitization of UGs and

WCs to increase

Inclusiveness of group decision

making

5.1 Farmable socio-cultural conditions

at the village

5.2 Checking registers of SHGs

5.3 Checking passbook of groups

5.4 Physical verification of income

generation activities

5.5Posters/banners/meeting register

5.1 No influence of any

external agency

5.2 Smooth flow of funds

5.3 Access to appropriate

technology

5.4 Peoples Participation

and positive perception

towards the programme


MAPS


Netramali

.


Bhuvel


Chadasna


Daramali


Ganeshpura


Hingalaj


Laloda


Mangadh


Nani vadol


Ruderdi


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------x--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Documents

Gujarat State Watershed Management Agency Detail …gswma.gujarat.gov.in/pfile/DPR/2010-11/Sabarkantha/IWMP-11... · Detailed Project Report, Netramali (IWMP-11) (8) Project Background