IWMP-3 Idar Detail Project Report - Gujaratgswma.gujarat.gov.in/pfile/DPR/2009-10/Sabarkantha/IWMP_3_Jadar_I… · IWMP-3 Idar District Watershed Development Unit, Sabarkanth (3)

IWMP-3 Idar

District Watershed Development Unit, Sabarkanth

(1)

Detail Project Report IWMP-3(Idar)

Project Implementing Agency

DWDU

Sabarkantha-Himatnagar

IWMP-3 Idar


(2)

TABLE OF CONTENT

CHAPTER – 1 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 5

PROJECT BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5

Project Background ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 6

Table no.1: Basic project information ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 6

Table no.2: Weight age of the project ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 7

Table no.3: Watershed information ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 8

Table no. 4: Developmental programmes running in the project area: ............................................................................................................................................. 10

Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmes in the project area: ................................................................................................................................................... 10

CHAPTER – 2 ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 12

PROJECT IMPLEMENTING AGENCY ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 12

Project Implementing Agency ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 12

Table no.6: PIA: ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 15

Table no. 7: Staff at PIA Level: ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 15

CHAPTER – 3 ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 17

BASIC INFORMATION OF PROJECT AREA ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 17

Basic Information of Project Area ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 18

Table no. 8: Land use pattern: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 19

Table no. 9: Soil type and topography: .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 20

Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition: ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 20

Table no. 11: Edaphic Factors ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 21

Table no. 12: Climatic conditions: .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 23

Table no. 13: Physiographic and relief .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 24

Table no. 14: Land ownership details ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 24

Table no. 15: Agriculture ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 25

Table no. 16: Irrigation ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 25

Table no. 17: Crop details: ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 26

Table no. 18: Livestock ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 28

Table no. 19: Drinking water ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 29

Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources ..................................................................................................................................................................... 29

IWMP-3 Idar


(3)

Table no. 21: Demographic information ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 33

Table no. 22: Literacy rate ................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 34

Table no.23: Migration Details .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 35

Table no. 24: Poverty ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 36

Table no.25: Village infrastructure .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 36

Table no. 26: Facilities / HH assets ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 37

Table no. 27: Income ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 38

Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 39

Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution) ........................................................................................................................................................... 40

CHAPTER – 4 ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 46

WATERSHED ACTIVITIES .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 46

Watershed Activities .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 47

Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP-3 projects. .................................................................................................................................. 52

Table no. 31: Watershed committee details ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 57

Table no.32: SHG detail .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 64

Table no. 33: UG detail ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 67

Table No. 34 Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs.) .................................................................................................................................. 72

Table no.35: Details of activities of preparatory phase (All financial figures in lakh Rs.) ................................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined.

Table no.36: Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) ........................................................................... 74

Table no.37: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) .......................................................... 87

Table no. 38: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas .................................................................................................... 91

Table no. 39: Other activities of watershed works phase – Proposed target ...................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

Table no.40: Details of engineering structures in watershed works* ................................................................................................................................................ 74

Table no.41: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works:- .............................................................................................................. 102

Table no.42: Details of allied / other activities ................................................................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

Table no.43: Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas.................................................................................................................................................. 106

Table No. 44 Capacity Building Institution ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 107

Table No. 45 Capacity Building Plan: ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 108

Table no.46: Information, education and Communication Activities: ............................................................................................................................................ 110

CHAPTER – 5 ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 111

Budgeting ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 111

Table no. 47: Budget at a glance for the Project ............................................................................................................................................................................. 111

Table no. 48: Village component wise budget available under IWMP ........................................................................................................................................... 116

IWMP-3 Idar


(4)

Table no. 49: Village wise gap in funds requirement ...................................................................................................................................................................... 117

Table No. 50: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes ............................................................................................................................................ 118

Table no. 51: Public-Private Partnership in the IWMP projects ..................................................................................................................................................... 119

CHAPTER – 6 ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 120

EXPECTED OUTCOMES ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 120

Expected Outcome ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 120

Table No. 52: Employment in Project is ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 121

Table no. 53: Details of seasonal migration from Project area ....................................................................................................................................................... 121

Table No. 54: Details of average ground water table depth in the project areas (in meters) .......................................................................................................... 122

Table No. 55: Status of Drinking water ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 124

Table no. 56: Details of crop are and field in the Project areas ....................................................................................................................................................... 125

Table no. 57: Area under horticulture ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 125

Table No. 58: Forest/vegetative cover ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 126

Table no. 59: Details of livestock in the project areas ..................................................................................................................................................................... 126

Table No. 60: Backward-Forward linkages ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 128

CHAPTER – 7 ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 130

QUALITY AND SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 130

Quality and Sustainability Issues ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 131

CHAPTER – 8 ............................................................................................................................................................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined.

MAPS ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

IWMP-3 Idar


(5)

CHAPTER – 1

PROJECT BACKGROUND

IWMP-3 Idar


(6)

Project Background

Jadar Project (IWMP-3) project is located in Idar Taluka, Sabarkantha District of Gujarat state. The project is a cluster of one micro watershed

with 5F2D6d3a, 5F2D6c3j, 5F2D6d3c, 5F2D6c3e, 5F2D6e3j, 5F2D6c3k as their respective codes. The total project area of the watershed is about

5256.32 Ha, Which proposed to be treated under Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP).

The watershed falls under the government designated flat area. It is located very near to the Taluka place Idar Town in Sabarkantha.

Table no.1: Basic project information

Sr

NO.

Name of

the

Project

Villages

Gram

Panchayats Taluka District

Area of

the

project

Area

proposed

to be

treated

Total

project

cost (Rs.

In lakh)

PIA Name Census code

1 IWMP-3 Jadar 0500400371500 Jadar Idar Sabarkantha 5256.32 1063.49 630.7584 DWDU

Sabarkantha

2 IWMP-3 Javanpura 0500400370500 Javanpura Idar Sabarkantha 5256.32 707.22 630.7584 DWDU

Sabarkantha

3 IWMP-3 Jethipura 0500400370300 Jethipura Idar Sabarkantha 5256.32 126.51 630.7584 DWDU

Sabarkantha

4 IWMP-3 Maniyor 0500400367000 Maniyor Idar Sabarkantha 5256.32 1039.59 630.7584 DWDU

Sabarkantha

5 IWMP-3 Sadatpura 0500400365500 Sadatpura Idar Sabarkantha 5256.32 228.08 630.7584 DWDU

Sabarkantha

6 IWMP-3 Sapavada 0500400366900 Sapavada Idar Sabarkantha 5256.32 602.71 630.7584 DWDU

Sabarkantha

7 IWMP-3 Surpur 0500400365400 Surpur Idar Sabarkantha 5256.32 661.56 630.7584 DWDU

IWMP-3 Idar


(7)

Sabarkantha

8 IWMP-3 Virpur 0500400368300 Virpur Idar Sabarkantha 5256.32 827.16 630.7584 DWDU

Sabarkantha

Table no.2: Weight age of the project

Project

name

Project

type Weight age

IWMP

3

Hilly

area &

critical

belong

up

i ii iii Iv V Vi vii viii ix x xi xii xiii

IWMP-

3 Jadar 5 5 5 3 2 15 15 5 5 10 5 15 0

IWMP-

3 Javanpura 2.5 3 5 3 2 15 15 5 5 10 5 15 0

IWMP-

3 Jethipura 2.5 3 5 3 2 15 15 5 5 10 5 15 0

IWMP-

3 Maniyor 5 5 5 3 2 15 15 5 5 10 5 15 0

IWMP-

3 Sadatpura 2.5 3 5 3 2 15 15 5 5 10 5 15 0

IWMP-

3 Sapavada 2.5 3 5 3 2 15 15 5 5 10 5 15 0

IWMP-

3 Surpur 2.5 3 5 3 2 15 15 5 5 10 5 15 0

IWMP- Virpur 5 3 5 3 2 15 15 5 5 10 5 15 0

IWMP-3 Idar


(8)

3

Table no.3: Watershed information

Name of the project No. of watersheds to be treated Watershed code Watershed regime/type/order

IWMP-3 Jadar 1 5F2D6d3a Micro Watershed

IWMP-3 Javanpura 1 5F2D6c3j Micro Watershed

IWMP-3 Jethipura 1 5F2D6d3c Micro Watershed

IWMP-3 Maniyor 1 5F2D6c3e Micro Watershed

IWMP-3 Sadatpura 1 5F2D6e3j Micro Watershed

IWMP-3 Sapavada 1 5F2D6e3j Micro Watershed

IWMP-3 Surpur 1 5F2D6c3k Micro Watershed

IWMP-3 Virpur 1 5F2D6c3e Micro Watershed

Need of Watershed Development Program

Watershed Development Programme is selected on the basis of thirteen parameter namely Poverty Index, Percentage of SC/ST. Actual wages,

Percentage of small and marginal farmer, Ground water status, Moisture Index, Area under rain fed agriculture, Drinking water situation in the area,

Percentage of the degraded land, Productivity potential of the land, Continuity of another watershed that has already development/treated, Cluster

approach for plain or for hilly terrain, Based on these thirteen parameter a composite ranking was been given to Jadar Watershed project as given in

table no. 3

IWMP-3 Idar


(9)

The total number of families under BPL is 846, which is more than 20 per cent of the total households of the village. Hence a score of 5 is

allotted. The percentage of schedule castes in the village is about 30 percent to the total population; hence a score of 5 is allotted. Rain fed agriculture

forms the primary occupation of the village due to the fact that ground water is saline and hence unfit for usage. More than 60 cent of the farmers are

small and marginal by nature and the actual wages earned by the labor is less than the minimum wages hence a composite rank of 5 and 5 are allotted

respectively.

Since the rainfall received is erratic and irregular, the moisture index is low and the area is classified under DDP block. Drinking water is

problematic in the village. The soil is very permeable and production of the land can be significantly enriched with the availability of timely irrigation.

Jadar watershed falls in continuity with other watersheds namely Surpur, Jadar, Jadar, Sadatpura, Virpur, Jadar, Jethipura, and Idar. Cluster approach

was followed taking into consideration nine micro-watersheds covering a total area of 5256.32 Ha.

Area proposed to be treated

Other projects/scheme running in the Jadar village

(1) NREGA: Bori bunds & Pond deepening has been taken-up under NREGA.

(2) Total Sanitation Campaign (TSC): 65 individual toilets are constructed under TSC programmed.

(3) Swarnjayanti Gram Swarozgar Yojana (SGSY) – 10 SHG are made under this Programme

(4) Awas Yojana: (Total 38 house has been constructed in the Jadar village under various Awas Yojana (in which under Indira Awas Yojana,

Sarday Awas Yojana.

(5) GGY: - one community hall has been constructed under this scheme.

IWMP-3 Idar


(10)

(6) Irrigation Dept.: 15 Check dams were constructed in this village under this department

(7) WASMO:- Over Head tank and water supply lines were taken in this Scheme.

Table no. 4: Developmental programmes running in the project area:

Sr No.

Name of the

programme/

scheme

Sponsoring

agency

Objectives of the

programme/scheme

Year of

commencement Villages covered

Estimated

number of

beneficiaries

1 TSC DRDA Toilet 2005 8 65

2 IAY DRDA House 2001 8 38

3 NREGA DRDA Bori Bund, Check

Dam, pond deep. 2005 8 12

4 SGSY DRDA Financial 2004 8 10

5 GGY DRDA Community Hall 2004 8 1

6 Irrigation Dept. GOG Irrigation 2008 8 15

7 WASMO GOG Water Supply OH

tank, line 2009 8 2

Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmes in the project area:

Sr.

No.

Project

name

Year

started

Name

of

villages

No. of

micro

waters

hed

Watershed

codes

Area

under

treatment

Funding

source

Nodal

agency PIA

Total

cost

Expenditure

incurred up

to start of

IWMP

%

financial

completion

%

physical

completion

1 Not any

Project - - - - - - - - - - - -

IWMP-3 Idar


(11)

IWMP-3 Idar


(12)

CHAPTER – 2

PROJECT IMPLEMENTING AGENCY

Project Implementing Agency

The Project Implementing Agency (PIA) is being selected by an appropriate mechanism by State Level Nodal Agency (SLNL). PIAs would responsible

for implementation of watershed project. These PIAs may include relevant line departments, autonomous organizations under State / Central,

IWMP-3 Idar


(13)

Governments, Government Institutes / Research bodies, Intermediate Panchayats; Voluntary Organization (VOs) The PIA of Jadar watershed Project

(MWP) is District watershed development Unit, Sabarkantha.

District Watershed Development Unit, Sabarkantha

The organization and its objectives:

The District Watershed Development Unit (DWDU), Sabarkantha is a district level nodal agency and was established on 13th

May 2008 to oversee for

then smooth implementation of watershed projects in the district. The District Development Officer (DDO) is the chairman of the DWDU. The DWDU

have dedicated and experience staffs comprising one project Manager (deputation from Gujarat Forest Department) a technical expert (on contract

basis) and multidisciplinary team of agriculture expert, community mobilization expert and computer operator are recruited. The remaining staff i.e.

civil engineer. MIS coordinator, system analyst, surveyor, and accountant will be recruited very soon. The DWDU Sabarkantha staff is temporarily

sitting with the District Rural Development Agency (DRDA) at Bahumali Building, C-block, Ground Flore, and Himmatnagar- Sabarkantha. The

objective of the DWDU Sabarkantha are supervising, planning, implementing, documenting and promoting watershed development projects and related

development activities in the district. Moreover, the DWDU Sabarkantha will work as a PIA for some IWMP projects.

Programmes / Projects running in the district

At present six IWMP projects have been sanctioned by Government of India for the Sabarkantha district. The entry point activities of all the six IWMP

projects have identified by the respective PIAs in the district Sabarkantha Forest Division as PIA for the five projects (IWMP-1, 2, 4 & 6) and DWDU-

self is as PIA for the one projects (IWMP-3 & 5)

Apart from the running six IWMP projects, total 135 pre-Hariyali & Hariyali projects (DPAP & IWDP) has been sanctioned and out of that 30 projects

are completed and 110 projects are still running in the district. The DWDU Sabarkantha is also monitoring a central government sponsored scheme on

“Artificial Recharge of Groundwater through Dug wells” in the district.

IWMP-3 Idar


(14)

SWOT analysis of the DWDU:

Strength:

(1) Dedicated and experience staffs and multidisciplinary team

(2) Independent District Level Nodal Agency.

(3) Strong linkages with national and state level institutions, agricultural universities, North Gujarat University and NGOs for capacity building and

technical guidance

(4) Scientific planning in watershed projects with the help of BISAG, Gandhinagar,

(5) District level monitoring, coordination & co-operating Committee.

(6) Well establishment of PRIs for social audits

Weakness:

(1) Insufficient funds for complete watershed projects per hector.

(2) No permanent staff.

(3) No permanent office building.

Opportunities:

(1) Sustainable livelihood generation landless and asset less

(2) Improvement of socio-economics status of poor

(3) Awareness generation among the illiterates through IEC activities by usage of new ICT activities.

(4) Reduction of migration rate.

(5) Usage of new technologies of watershed modeling and GPS for monitoring the watershed activities.

Threats:

IWMP-3 Idar


(15)

(1) Lack of Sustainable agriculture development

(2) Delay of releasing project fund from the higher authority

(3) Lack of contribution and cooperation from local peoples.

(4) Low and erratic rainfall in the project area.

(5) Low literacy rate in the project area.

Table no.6: PIA:

Sr No. Name of project Details of PIA

1 IWMP-3 project

(i) Type of organization District Level Nodal Agency

(ii) Name of organization DWDU, Sabarkantha

(iii) Designation & Address Project Manager, DWDU,

Sabarkantha

(iv) Telephone 241666

(v) Fax

(vi) E-mail [email protected]

Table no. 7: Staff at PIA Level:

mailto:[email protected]

IWMP-3 Idar


(16)

Sr. No. Name Age Sex Designation Qualification Experience Job assigned Monthly

remuneration

1 Patel Jignesh.N 24 Male WDT-Agri BRS & MSW 3.5 6/5/2010 8000

2 Mistry Dipika.p 25 Female WDT-

Accountant M.Com 3 1/4/2010 7000

3 Patel Lata .B 27 Female WDT-Social

Mobilisor MSW 3.5 6/5/2010 8000

IWMP-3 Idar


(17)

CHAPTER – 3

BASIC INFORMATION OF PROJECT AREA

IWMP-3 Idar


(18)

Fig. Village Meeting Photograph

Basic Information of Project Area

Idar block watershed is located in the district of Sabarkantha about 28 Kms. From district head quarters. The project area is characterized by high

temperature and low rainfall. The proposed watershed has a land area of 5256.32 ha will be treated. The Idar block watershed project is characterized by

Flat with varying slopes and drainages. The soil and underground water is highly saline which results in acute shortage of drinking water.

Land use pattern:

IWMP-3 Idar


(19)

The net geographical area of watershed is about 5256.32 ha out of which 0 % is forest area. About 83.63 % of land is used in agriculture which is

completely rain fed mainly a Kharif & Rabi crop is taken.

Table no. 8: Land use pattern:

Sr. No. Name of

villages

Geographical

Area of the

village

Forest Area

Land under

agricultural

use

Rain fed Area Permanent

pastures

Wasteland

Cultivable Non-

Cultivable

1 Jadar 1063.49 0 889.41 1063.49 117.63 0 56.44

2 Javanpura 707.22 0 171.64 707.22 0 1.63 3.85

3 Jethipura 126.51 0 115.08 126.51 0 0 0

4 Maniyor 1039.59 0 905.71 1039.59 39.00 0 18.21

5 Sadatpura 228.08 0 178.91 228.08 13.64 6.43 0

6 Sapavada 602.71 0 544.57 602.71 31.68 8.02 24.21

7 Surpur 661.56 0 658.58 661.56 0 7.80 10.74

8 Virpur 827.16 0 614.49 827.16 0 128.68 0

Soil and topography:

IWMP-3 Idar


(20)

Idar block watershed project falls under North West Gujarat agro climatic zone. The soil is mainly maze and cotton. The soil is brown to very dark

grayish brown in surface color. The depth of soil is moderate to deep about 25 to 75 cm. The predominate texture of soil is loamy sand and silt and clay.

The fertility of sail is very poor with low nitrogen, phosphorus and potash. The order of soil is mainly Aridsol and Inseptisol. The topography of the

area is moderate ranging from 0-10% slope.

Table no. 9: Soil type and topography:

Sr. No.

Name of the agro-

climatic zone

covers project

area

Area in ha Names of the

villages

Major soil types

Topography a) Type b) Area in ha

1 North Gujarat 1063.49 Jadar Murum, Black Cotton , 1063.49 Flat

2 North Gujarat 707.22 Javanpura Mohoram, stony, hilly 707.22 Flat

3 North Gujarat 126.51 Jethipura Murum Black Cotton

Soil 126.51 Flat

4 North Gujarat 1039.59 Maniyor Murum, Black Cotton , 1039.59 Flat

5 North Gujarat 228.08 Sadatpura Mohoram, Black

Cotton , 228.08 Flat

6 North Gujarat 602.71 Sapavada Mohoram, Black


7 North Gujarat 661.56 Surpur Mohoram, stony, hilly 661.56 Flat

8 North Gujarat 827.16 Virpur Mohoram, Black


Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition:

Sr. No. Village Flood (Incidence) Drought (Incidence)

IWMP-3 Idar


(21)

1 Jadar Nil Once in 4 Years

2 Javanpura Nil Once in 4 Years

3 Jethipura Nil Once in 4 Years

4 Maniyor Nil Once in 4 Years

5 Sadatpura Nil Once in 4 Years

6 Sapavada Nil Once in 4 Years

7 Surpur Nil Once in 4 Years

8 Virpur Nil Once in 4 Years

Table no. 11: Edaphic Factors

Table 11.1 Soil Erosion

IWMP-3 Idar


(22)

Cause Type of erosion Area affected ha Run off

(mm/year)

Average soil loss

(Tones/ha/year) Water erosion

A Sheet 317.76 317.76

B Rill 150.56 150.56 10%

C Gully 709.64 709.64 18%

D Ravenous 4078.36 4078.36

Sub-Total 5256.32 5256.32 5256.32

Wind erosion

Total 5256.32 5256.32

Table no. 11.2: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress)

Name of the Village Survey Number Soil pH Type of Salinity

(Inherent/Ingress)

Jadar Almost all the land area 8.9 Inherent.

Javanpura Almost all the land area 8.9 Inherent.

Jethipura Almost all the land area 8.7 Inherent.

Maniyor Almost all the land area 8.7 Inherent.

Sadatpura Almost all the land area 8.9 Inherent.

Sapavada Almost all the land area 8.9 Inherent.

Surpur Almost all the land area 8.9 Inherent.

Virpur Almost all the land area 8.9 Inherent.

Table no. 11.3: Water logging Conditions

Name of the Village Survey Number Reasons

Jadar Some land There is big drainages passes through the land

hence erosion of nearest land

IWMP-3 Idar


(23)

Javanpura Some land There are Two drainages passes through the

land hence erosion of nearest land

Jethipura Some land Due to Some Slope on land

Maniyor Some land There are four drainages passes through the land


Sadatpura Some land There are Two drainages passes through the


Sapavada Some land There are Two drainages passes through the


Surpur Some land There are Two drainages passes through the


Virpur Some land There is one drainages passes through the land


Table no. 12: Climatic conditions:

Name of project

Average rainfall- last 5 years

Mm

Average temperature

Jadar

Summer Winter

Max Min Max Min

1 712 45 32 30 10

2 1478 46 34 32 9

3 698 45.5 32 29 10

4 724 46 33 28 9

5 768 45 31 31 10

6 712 45 30 32 10

IWMP-3 Idar


(24)

Table no. 13: Physiographic and relief

Project name Elevation (MSL) Slope range (%) Major streams

IWMP-3 194m 0-10 % Debhol Stream

Land and Agriculture

The area is completely dependent on rainfall. The rainfall is highly scanty which has resulted in recurrent phenomenon of drought two to three

years. The average rainfall of this area is about 876 mm (from past five year data) with a highest intensity of 89 mm (in a day). This uneven distribution

is leading to runoff of soil every year to the streams and rivulets.

Lack of surface water source and high salinity of ground water has decreased sufficient base of irrigation as well as for drinking purpose. The

average land holding is about 5256.32 ha of which the land holding is ranging from 1 to 3 Ha. Lack of irrigation source forces the majority of these

farmers to ensure their livelihood. This affects directly the demographic profile of the village. The major crops cultivated by the farmers are Cotton,

castor, maze, vegetables and Wheat in the village. The land conservation measure such as check dams, land leveling, Farm ponds, earthen bunds and

farm bunds in the area will help them to take up a Rabi crop.

Table no. 14: Land ownership details

Sr no. Village Total owned land HHs giving

land on lease

HHs taking

land on lease Gen OBC SC ST

1 Jadar 331 50 186 23 0 0

2 Javanpura 19 2 4 0 0 0

3 Jethipura 160 0 10 0 0 0

4 Maniyor 235 110 105 0 0 0

5 Sadatpura 113 5 10 0 0 0

IWMP-3 Idar


(25)

6 Sapavada 364 48 30 0 0 0

7 Surpur 456 65 0 0 0

8 Virpur 315 150 96 0 0 0

Table no. 15: Agriculture

Sr No. Village Net sown area

One time Two time Three Time

1 Jadar 715 336 102

2 Javanpura 171.64 87.00

3 Jethipura 115.08 57.58 -

4 Maniyor 864 624 136

5 Sadatpura 195 98 -

6 Sapavada 544 245 98

7 Surpur 658.58 658.58 -

8 Virpur 605 235 85

Table no. 16: Irrigation

Sr No. Village Source 1 : Canal Source 2 : Check dam/Pond Source 3: Well

Availability Net area Gross area Availability Net area Gross area Availability Net area Gross area

IWMP-3 Idar


(26)

months months months

1 Jadar 0 0 0 4 276 Ha 378 Ha 8 581 Ha 715 Ha

2 Javanpura 0 0 0 4 16 Ha 16 Ha 8 24 Ha 24 Ha

3 Jethipura 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 74 100

4 Maniyor 0 0 0 4 154 Ha 325 Ha 8 521 Ha 638 Ha

5 Sadatpura 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 168 Ha 195 Ha

6 Sapavada 0 0 0 4 126 Ha 245 Ha 184 Ha 278 Ha 354 Ha

7 Surpur 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 612 658

8 Virpur 0 0 0 4 156 Ha 265 Ha 9 278 Ha 380 Ha

Table no. 17: Crop details:

Sr

no Village

Kharif (Monsoon)

Cotton Castor Juwar

Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity

1 Jadar 448 9856 22 314 6594 21 13 247 19

IWMP-3 Idar


(27)

2 Javanpura 58 1160 20 45 990 22 7.50 135 18

3 Jethipura 41 820 20 35 770 22 2 36 18

4 Maniyor 524 11528 22 421 8841 21 12 228 19

5 Sadatpura 98 1960 20 54 1188 22 6 108 18

6 Sapavada 153 3060 20 135 2970 22 27 486 18

7 Surpur 228 4560 20 138 3036 22 32 576 18

8 Virpur 158 3160 20 145 3190 22 47.50 855 18

Sr

no Village Rabi (Winter)

Wheat Bajara Vegetables


1 Jadar 367 11744 32 35 1190 34 5 165 33

2 Javanpura 91 2730 30 38 1406 37 6 210 35

3 Jethipura 72 2160 30 24 888 37 3 105 35

4 Maniyor 437 13984 32 78 2652 34 16 512 32

5 Sadatpura 58 1740 30 30 1110 37 4 140 35

6 Sapavada 233 6990 30 45 1665 37 26 910 35

7 Surpur 274 8220 30 55 2035 37 28 980 35

8 Virpur 191 5730 30 38 1406 37 6 210 35

Sr

no Village Zaid (Summer)

Castor Grass -


1 Jadar 186 2790 15 72 4104 57 0 0 0

2 Javanpura 16 240 15 5 285 57 0 0 0

3 Jethipura 15 270 18 5 200 40 0 0 0

IWMP-3 Idar


(28)

4 Maniyor 156 2340 15 87 4959 57 0 0 0

5 Sadatpura 28 420 15 16 912 57 0 0 0

6 Sapavada 110 1650 15 23 1311 57 0 0 0

7 Surpur 110 1650 15 23 1311 57 0 0 0

8 Virpur 123 1845 15 54 3078 57 0 0 0

Live Stock:-The Idar Project has 8 villages and village’s person depends on animal husbandry for their livelihood. Lack of rain and surface water has

reduce the fodder and pasture area for their animal. This leads to very insufficient fodder for animals and hence affecting in quality as well as quantity

of milk given by animals hence this will affect on their livelihoods.

Table no. 18: Livestock

Sr. No. Village

Buffalo Cow

Total Milk

/Day lit

(Buffalo/Cow)

Goat Sheep Bullock Hen Others

No Milk

/Day lit No

Milk

/Day lit No Milk Camel

1 Jadar 925 9250 245 1960 11210 103 0 155 45 0 12

2 Javanpura 34 340 15 180 520 0 0 0 18 0 0

3 Jethipura 65 650 150 1200 1850 18 0 0 60 0 0

4 Maniyor 345 3450 166 1328 4778 42 0 0 184 0 0

5 Sadatpura 318 3180 115 920 4100 0 0 0 120 0 0

6 Sapavada 335 340 145 180 520 0 0 0 150 0 0

7 Surpur 235 1880 400 4000 5880 100 0 0 60 0 0

IWMP-3 Idar


(29)

8 Virpur 1000 8000 250 2500 10500 200 1000 0 400 0 0

Table no. 19: Drinking water

Sr. No. Village Ground water table

(mt)

Source of drinking

water

Availability in

months Quality

1 Jadar 25m Open well ,Bore Well 12 Good

2 Javanpura 28m Bore Well 12 Good

3 Jethipura 24 mt Bore Well 12 Good

4 Maniyor 26m Open well ,Bore Well 12 Good

5 Sadatpura 28m Bore Well 12 Good

6 Sapavada 28m Bore Well 12 Good

7 Surpur 35 mt Bore Well 12 Good

8 Virpur 28m Bore Well 12 Good

Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources

S.

No.

Names of

project

CPR

Particulars

Total Area (ha)

Area owned/ In possession of Area available for treatment (ha)

Pvt. persons

Govt.

(Specify

dep’t.)

PRI Any other

(Pl. Specify)

Pvt.

persons

Govt.

(Specify

dep’t.)

PRI Any other

(Pl. Specify)

IWMP-3 Idar


(30)

1 Jadar

Wasteland/ degraded land - 117.63 - - - 30 - -

Pastures - 56.44 - - - 6.80 - -

Orchards - - - - - - - -

Village Woodlot - - - - - - - -

Forest - - - - - - - -

Village Ponds/ Tanks - 1.25 - - - - - -

Community Buildings - 1.5 - - - - - -

Weekly Markets - 0.5 - - - - - -

Permanent markets 0.75 - - - - - -

Temples/ Places of worship - 0.25 - - - - - -

Others (Pl. specify) - - - - - - - -

2 Javanpura


Pastures - 1.63 - - - 4 - -

Orchards - - - - - - - -


Forest - - - - - - - -



Weekly Markets 2.00 5.00 - - - - - -

Permanent markets 5.00 4.00 - - - - - -


Residents 225.00 45.00 - - - - - -

3 Jethipura

Wasteland/ degraded land - - - - - - - -

Pastures - - - - - - - -

Orchards - - - - - - - -


IWMP-3 Idar


(31)

Forest - - - - - - - -

Village Ponds/ Tanks - - - - - - - -

Community Buildings - 1 - - - - - -

Weekly Markets - - - - - - - -

Permanent markets - 0.01 - - - - - -



4 Maniyor


Pastures - 39.00 - - - 25 - -

Orchards - - - - - - - -


Forest - - - - - - - -


Community Buildings - 1 - - - - - -


Permanent markets - 0.10 - - - - - -



5 Sadatpura


Pastures - 13.64 - - - 4 - -

Orchards - - - - - - - -


Forest - - - - - - - -




IWMP-3 Idar


(32)




6 Sapavada


Pastures - 31.68 - - - 25 - -

Orchards - - - - - - - -


Forest - - - - - - - -







7 Surpur


Pastures - 7.80 - - - 5 - -

Orchards - - - - - - - -


Forest - - - - - - - -







IWMP-3 Idar


(33)

8 Virpur


Pastures - - - - - - - -

Orchards - - - - - - - -


Forest - - - - - - - -



Weekly Markets - 0.5 - - - - - -




Socio-Economic Profile

Demographic Status: The village wise male, female, SC.ST population was shown in the table below.

The major casts in the villages are Patel , suthar , Thakor , Vankar,Chenava , adivasi ,Prajapati , goswami ,marwadi, Brahmin, Muslim etc. and most of

population is involved in Agriculture and animal husbandry and labor work.

Table no. 21: Demographic information

Sr. No. Village Population SC ST

Total Male Female Total Male Female % Total Male Female %

1 Jadar 4818 2477 2341 921 492 429 19.11 173 91 82 3.59

2 Javanpura 3253 1710 1543 378 202 176 11.60 368 194 174 11.31

IWMP-3 Idar


(34)

3 Jethipura 1145 575 570 258 132 126 22.53 0 0 0 0

4 Maniyor 2198 1132 1066 645 341 304 29.34 0 0 0 0

5 Sadatpura 1281 732 549 336 200 136 26.22 68 38 30 5.31

6 Sapavada 1760 892 868 160 85 75 9.09 73 42 31 4.15

7 Surpur 2525 1315 1210 321 168 153 12.72 0 0 0 0

8 Virpur 2568 1307 1261 428 205 223 16.67 42 22 20 1.63

Table no. 22: Literacy rate

Sr. No. Village Literacy

Literacy %

above age

14

Literacy %

below age

14

Total % Male % Female %

1 Jadar 3094 64.21 1828 73.79 1266 54.08 53.68 77.28

2 Javanpura 2271 69.81 1558 68.60 713 31.39 48 34.16

3 Jethipura 1145 70.48 440 76.52 367 64.38 65.72 84.23

4 Maniyor 1381 62.82 790 69.79 591 55.44 54.73 76.41

5 Sadatpura 857 66.90 485 66.26 372 67.75 62.54 70.32

6 Sapavada 1760 67.50 718 40.79 470 26.70 43.67 78.32

IWMP-3 Idar


(35)

7 Surpur 2525 69.74 954 66.69 547 45.20 58.75 71.52

8 Virpur 1809 70.44 1031 78.88 778 61.70 73.67 78.32

Migration:- There is no migration in this village

Table no.23: Migration Details

Sr. No. Village Total

population

Migration Migration by Months Main

Reason for

migration

Income

during

migration/

month Total Male Female

Up to 3

months 3-6 months

More then

6 months

1 Jadar NA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2 Javanpura NA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

3 Jethipura NA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

4 Maniyor NA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

5 Sadatpura NA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

6 Sapavada NA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

7 Surpur NA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

8 Virpur NA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

IWMP-3 Idar


(36)

Table no. 24: Poverty

Sr. No. Village Total

Household

BPL % BPL HH

Total Land

less HH

% of land less

HH 0-16 16-20 Total

1 Jadar 1130 126 223 349 30.88 363 32.12

2 Javanpura 964 15 30 45 56.09 0 0.00

3 Jethipura 199 28 28 14.07 39 19.59

4 Maniyor 510 154 154 30.19 60 11.76

5 Sadatpura 369 32 32 8.67 145 39.29

6 Sapavada 497 24 24 4.83 65 13.08

7 Surpur 535 12 14 26 4.85 0 0.00

8 Virpur 628 188 188 29.93 76 12.10

Table no.25: Village infrastructure

Sr.

No. Village

Pucca

road

to the

village

(Y/N)

Schools

Colleges

(Number)

Post

Office

(Distance)

Banks

(Number)

Distance

from

nearest

market

yard

Milk

collection

centre

(Number)

Milk

cooperative

(Number)

Other

Cooperatives

/CBIs

(Number)

Any other

institution LP UP HS

1 Jadar Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 Yes 3 1 Yes Yes Yes No

2 Javanpura Yes Yes No No Yes No 3 2Km Yes No No No

3 Jethipura Yes Yes No No No No No 5 km Yes No Yes No

4 Maniyor Yes Yes Yes No No Yes 1 12 km Yes Yes Yes No

5 Sadatpura Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes 5 km Yes Yes Yes No

6 Sapavada Yes Yes No No No Yes No 5 km Yes Yes Yes No

7 Surpur Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No 5 km 1 1 1 No

8 Virpur Yes Yes No No No Yes 1 10 km Yes Yes Yes No

IWMP-3 Idar


(37)

Infrastructure facilities: Idar watershed as well connected with Idar Taluka with Jadar roads. The villages have electricity connecting under

Jyothigram yojana of Gujarat government. Nearly 89 per cent of households in the village have their personal electric meters. Since ground water is

highly saline electricity is not used for agricultural purpose. Jadar village has a primary school, secondary and HS schools with all facilities and a

college for higher studies. The village has its own panchayat, PHC, Police Station, Telephone Exchange and Railway Station.

Table no. 26: Facilities / HH assets

Sr. No. Village HHs with

electricity

HHs with

safety

latrines

HHs with phones HHs with vehicle HHs with

TV set

HHs with

cooking

gas

HHs with

Drinking

water

HHs with

Fridge Land line Mobile 2-wheeler 4-wheeler

1 Jadar 1000 675 291 327 365 112 447 235 Tapwater 276

2 Javanpura 960 0 25 105 72 12 100 55 Tapwater 70

3 Jethipura 195 199 35 68 34 4 37 18 Tap water 32

4 Maniyor 505 336 130 160 162 35 173 27 Tapwater 167

5 Sadatpura 369 367 55 145 35 8 184 24 Tapwater 109

6 Sapavada 485 278 47 136 46 4 173 17 Tapwater 92

7 Surpur 530 535 35 125 125 24 345 45 Tap water 215

8 Virpur 621 378 57 231 76 17 185 19 Tapwater 121

IWMP-3 Idar


(38)

Livelihood pattern: The villagers earn their livelihood mainly from Agriculture and Animal Husbandry. Some People also earn their livelihood from

doing small business and small trade as this a big village, surrounding village people come here for their necessary things .Labors are involved in

agriculture as well as construction work.

Table no. 27: Income

Sr. No. Village Agriculture Animal

husbandry Casual labor Others Total

1 Jadar 3588 7938 1813 4557 17896

2 Javanpura 9516.00 1140.00 1125.00 2100.00 13881.00

3 Jethipura 1466 4157 2161 1789 9573

4 Maniyor 8102 7670 2161 3457 21390

5 Sadatpura 3278 10749 3173 2839 20039

6 Sapavada 3508 7670 2840 2367 16385

IWMP-3 Idar


(39)

7 Surpur 4402 7590 3959 3023 18974

8 Virpur 4809 13901 2647 1958 23315

Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR

Sr no Village Benefit type 1 Benefit type 2

Benefit type

2 Total

income % sells Income % sells Income % sells Income

1 Jadar 0 0 0 0

0 0 0

2 Javanpura 0 0 0 0

0 0 0

3 Jethipura 0 0 0 0

0 0 0

4 Maniyor 0 0 0 0

0 0 0

5 Sadatpura 0 0 0 0

0 0 0

IWMP-3 Idar


(40)

6 Sapavada 0 0 0 0

0 0 0

7 Surpur 0 0 0 0

0 0 0

8 Virpur 0 0 0 0

0 0 0

Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution)

Sr.no. Village Total

workforce Agriculture

Animal

husbandry

(AH)

Agriculture +

AH Casual labor Services Handicraft Others

1 Jadar 338 165 154 68 49 0 0 0

2 Javanpura 2856 70 35 25 350 1673 125 578

3 Jethipura 97 45 40 85 12 0 0 0

4 Maniyor 280 150 143 70 75 0 0 0

5 Sadatpura 168 55 45 20 48 0 0 0

6 Sapavada 275 65 85 28 97 0 0 0

7 Surpur 275 65 85 28 97 0 0 0

8 Virpur 323 72 61 43 147 0 0 0

IWMP-3 Idar


(41)

Comparative date of the crop productivity of the area: project area vs. District vs. State vs. Country :

629787 724

870

466

0

200

400

600

800

1000

Ind

ia

Gu

jara

t

Sab

arka

nth

a

Idar

Blo

ck

Productivity of Cotton in (Kg/ Hactre)

IWMP-3 Idar


(42)

1094

1838 1958 1934

1439

0

500

1000

1500

2000

Ind

ia

Gu

jara

t

Sab

arka

nth

a

Idar

Blo

ck

Productivity of Castor in (Kg/ Hactre)

Introduction:

The purpose of this study is to provide a comparative analysis of productivity of Jadar village with reference to India. Gujarat, Sabarkantha district.

“The term productivity in general means the total output per unit of factor input, For example land productivity means output per hector of land.

Productivity is an average and is calculated by dividing the total output of a particular crop by the total cultivated area under the crop.”

IWMP-3 Idar


(43)

Date are made available by Baseline survey (for Jadar village), Handbook of Agriculture, ICAR publication 2006 (For Gujarat and India), and

Final district plan (DAP) of Dept. of Agriculture (For Sabarkantha). The results show that productivity is important not only because we observe a

strong positive relationship with profits but that the results are suggestive of important scale that should be taken to improve the production. These

results indicate that Jadar village has very low productivity compared to world. India, Gujarat and Sabarkantha. The productivity is low not because that

the land is unproductive or the farmer’s lack the skills to managing their crop but it is due lack of source of irrigation, salty water and scarcity of rain.

The Jadar village comes under arid zone. So farmers grow crop according to the rainfall. If they get good rainfall they generally grow high value

crops like cotton, castor, vegetables etc. In case of low rainfall they go for maze, jowar etc so we can say that monsoon decides cropping patterns of

Jadar village.

The productivity of cotton is 629 kg/ha in India, Gujarat produces major cotton of our country with a record productivity of about 787

kg/ha.Sabarkantha district has very good productivity 724 kg /ha. The Idar Taluka has major productivity of 870 kgHa of cotton .The Jadar project area

has only 466 kg/ha productivity. It is low compare to Taluka, district, State, and country India.

The world productivity of castor is 984 kg/ha. In India, it is grown in about 7.3 lakh hectares with a production of 8.0 lakh tones and productivity

of 1,094 kg/ha. Gujarat alone produces about 80% of the total castor of our country from 50% of the area with a record productivity of about 1838

kg/ha. Sabarkantha district has very good productivity 1958 kg /ha. The Idar Taluka has productivity of 1934 kg/Ha. The Jadar project area has

comparatively low productivity of 1339 kg/Ha. It is low compare to district, State, India and world.

.

IWMP-3 Idar


(44)

The Jadar project area has low productivity because of the following reasons:

1. 100% cultivated area depends on monsoon:

Jadar village is depend on monsoon without monsoon they cannot get any crop because irrigation water is salty. Water is essential input in

agriculture. Due to the absence of proper irrigation facility, 100% of the total cultivated area depends on the uncertain monsoon. Therefore the success

of failure of agriculture production. The rains, as a source of irrigation, are unreliable de to work factors;

* Untimely rain: The rains are sometimes received when the crops are ready for harvesting. The ready crop may be ruined due to untimely

Rain

* Inadequate rain: There are regions in India which do not get adequate rain and face a difficult situation every year. There are other

regions where there are excessive rains which are harmful for the crops. The dependence on the uncertain rainfall is a factor that

contributes to low productivity of land.

2. Less use of fertilizer per unit cropped area:

Farmers don't use sufficient fertilizer due to scarcity of fertilizer in market and insufficient money for fertilizer. Many times they don't get

fertilizer at the right time.

IWMP-3 Idar


(45)

3. Traditional farming methods:

This is the factor that leads low productivity. There is lot of ignorance about the use of new farming methods and technologies such as multiple

cropping. They don't use FYM and other input in a proper way that is why they don't get 100% output. So these factors contribute low

productivity.

4. Lack of finances for farmers:

In Jadar most of farmers are marginal and small. Farmers do not have enough resources to purchase these seed.

5. Lack of good quality seeds and fertilizers:

Good quality seed, fertilizer and pesticide are important factor in agriculture productivity. The use of good quality leads to higher land

productivity. In Jadar, however, there are two limitations in the use of fertilizer, First these fertilizers are most useful in irrigated condition.

But in Jadar 90 per cent of land depend on rainfall. In Jadar mostly farmers use nitrogenous fertilizers especially urea. This has resulted in

disproportionate use of fertilizer depleting the quality of land.

6. Lack of rural credit:

Farmers face so many problems for rural credit and it leads to low agricultural productivity. Farmers need credit mainly for the purchase of various

inputs such as seed, fertilizers and pesticide and for repair of implements. They use long term credit for buying land, and for investment to

improve the quality of land, buying the new implements and improving irrigation facilities.

IWMP-3 Idar


(46)

CHAPTER – 4

WATERSHED ACTIVITIES

IWMP-3 Idar


(47)

Watershed Activities

Watershed management as a strategy is been adapted by Government of India especially in the rain fed regions of semi-arid tropics. These regions

are characterized by low and undependable rain, low soil fertility, poor infrastructure development, low literacy and high incidence of migration. The

inherit ant low fertility of crops results in high productivity of crops which have a very low biological efficiency.

Several studies have identified that there is a dire need of a systematic and scientific approach to deal with watershed development. The common

guidelines generate a fresh and flexible framework for the next generation watershed development.

1. Cluster Approach

This envisages a broader vision of Geo-hydrological unit which involves treating a cluster of micro-watershed. The Jadar Project

consists of one micro-watershed namely 5F2D6d3a as their respective codes.

2. Base line Survey

To access the impact of any watershed development programme a detailed baseline survey has to be conducted. This acts a

benchmark for any intervention during and post implementation of any development programme. A detailed baseline survey was been

undertaken which involved household census survey, Bio-physical survey and Village level date collection from Talati-Cum mantri.

Household census survey includes a detailed questionnaire which was been filled by visiting each and every house-hold in the village.

This gave in the details of the demographic profile of the village, the literacy percentage, SC/ST population, number of BPL household,

IWMP-3 Idar


(48)

cattle population, Net consumption rate in the village, average milk production of the cattle’s and various schemes running and their

Bio-physical survey was been undertaken to identify various natural resource available in the village. It included the soil typology,

Well in the area, crop taken in the field, Cropping pattern, fertilizer used and various sources of irrigation in the field.

Fig. Base Line Survey at Project Area

IWMP-3 Idar


(49)

3. Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA)

The past experience of watershed has given tremendous input to focus on creating accountability of the stakeholder towards the

programme. This has created an emphasis to include all the stakeholder communities and their local and indigenous Technological

Knowledge (ITK) while planning for any activity. Participatory approach provides a new path for planning, implementing, monitoring and

post-withdrawal activities with a complete accountability of the stakeholders. These decreases the efforts of the ground staff i.e. WDT

members and involve more of villages as implementers. Various PRA techniques like resource mapping, social mapping, and season

calendars were used to understand the physical and social orientation of the village in general and watershed in specific. These tools put the

village in ease than the complicated questionnaires. Various tools like Matrix ranking, venue Diagram were used to identify various local

vegetations (apt for a forestation), Fodders crops, various institutions and their significance in the life of the farmers.

IWMP-3 Idar


(50)

Fig. PRA in Project Area

IWMP-3 Idar


(51)

4. Use of GIS and remote sensing for planning

Use of various high science tools has been promoted at various stages of watershed development.

a) Prioritization

Geographical Information System (GIS) has been use for prioritization process. Various layer maps were created like Geo-morphological,

Soil, BPL, Population, SC/ST population, Ground water Status, Drinking water situation Slope percent. These were all given proper weight

ages according to the DoLR specification. This helped in prioritization of various watershed areas.

b) Planning

A action plan matrix was been formulated by State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) taking into account various features like the slope

percent soil Depth, Soil Texture, Soil erosion in the area for wasteland, forest land and agricultural land.

Global positioning system (GPS) was used to identify each and every water conservation structures available in the project area. This will

be used to create a map. Contour Map of vertical interval of 1 meter at a scale of 1:8000 was used for identifying various location specific

for soil and water conservation structures.

c) Hydrological modeling

Hydrology modeling technique was been used for locating drainage, stream length, flow direction, sink, Flow accumulation. This model

overlaid over cadastral map hell to calculate the catchment area of each structures like the check dam etc. This has helped to remove the

human error which generally occurring while calculating the catchment area of a check dam.

IWMP-3 Idar


(52)

Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP-3 projects.

Sr. No. Scientific criteria/ inputs used Whether scientific criteria was used

1 (A) Panning

Cluster approach Yes

Whether technical bank-topping for the project has been arranges? If yes, mention the name of the

institute No

Baseline survey Yes

Hydro-geological survey Yes

Contour mapping Yes

Participatory Net Planning (PNP) Yes

Remote Sensing data-especially soil/ crop/ run-off over Yes

Ridge to Valley Treatment Yes

Online IT connectivity between

(1) Project and DRDA cell /ZP Yes

(2) DRDA and SLNA Yes

(3) SLNA and DoLR Yes

Availability of GIS Layers

1. Cadastral map Yes

2. Village boundaries Yes

3. Drainage Yes

4. Soil (Soil nutrient status) Yes

5. Land use Yes

6. Ground water status Yes

7. Watershed boundaries Yes

8. Activity Yes

Crop simulation models#

Integrated coupled analyzer/ near infrared visible spectroscopy/ medium spectroscopy for high

speed soil nutrient analysis

Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)#

IWMP-3 Idar


(53)

Weather Station

(B) Inputs

1. Bio-pesticides No

2. Organic manures Yes

3. Vermicompost No

4. Bio-fertilizer No

5. Water saving devices No

6. Mechanized tools/ implements No

7. Bio-fencing No

8. Nutrient budgeting No

9. Automatic water level recorders & sediment samplers No

Any other (please specify)

Institution formation in watershed

1. Watershed Committee (WC)

It is a committee that is constituted by Gram Sabha to implement the watershed project with technical support of WDT in the village this

committee was registered under society Registration Act 1860. The Gram sabha of the village selects the chairman of the watershed

committee with the secretary who will be a paid functionary. A watershed committee was formed accordingly in Jadar village. Since the

watershed has only on village so no separate watershed sub-committee was formed in the village. Capacity building training to the watershed

committee was given by WDT member.

The watershed committee has a pivotal during various processes like the PRA and over planning of various points.

IWMP-3 Idar


(54)

Table no.31: Details of PRA Activities conducted in the project area

Sr.

No.

Name of the PRA

Activity / FGD Date

Number of people

present Lessons learnt / Understanding of the problem/situation

1 Natural Resource

Mapping 12-05-2010 328

Hilly area. So, no water conservation is there. Soil runoff & loss is very high.

Hatmati river having no permanent water. Stonny area so ground water level is very

low.

2 Daily activity chart 12-05-2010 328

Mostly women are enguaged with animal husbandry and men are enguaged with

farming activity. In summer they having only one crop, so they are enguaged with

labour work

3 Transect Walk 15-05-2010 87 Forest area. Baval, Mahuda, Neem etc. are main trees in that area. Land degradation

is very high.

4 Social Mapping 12-05-2010 328 Villages are divided in Faliya wise. And also connected with pucca road.

5 Seasonal Chart 12-05-2010 328 Aleast two time farmers are farming their farm. Wheat, Maize and cotton are major

crops.

IWMP-3 Idar


(55)

IWMP-3 Idar


(56)

IWMP-3 Idar


(57)

Table no. 32: Watershed committee details

Sr.

No.

Name of

WCs

Date of

Registration as

a Society

(dd/mm/yyyy)

Name of Mamber Designation M/

F SC ST SF

M

F LF

Land

- less UG

SH

G GP Age

Educational

Qualificatio

n

Function’

s

assigned

1

Jadar

com

mit

tee

30/4/2010

Harshidaben J. Oja President F YE

S Yes Yes 43 M.A

P.V.Suthar Secretary M Yes 34 12p

Patel Ambalal G. MEMBER M YE

S Yes 35 12p

Patel Nirajanben B MEMBER M YE

S 45 B.A

Bhoi Purnimaben MEMBER F YES 45 7P

Patel Ushaben

Sanjaybhai MEMBER F

YE

S Yes 35 10P

Modi Bhaveshbhai MEMBER M YE

S

YE

S 48 B.COM

P.M.Patel MEMBER M YE

S Yes 43 B.A

B.R .Patel MEMBER M YE

S

YE

S

YE

S YES 44 12PASS

Dhanula Prashantbhai

D.

.

Nodal M YE

S 26 M.B.A

Parmar

Dharmendrabhai A. W.D.T M

YE

S 32 M.S.W

IWMP-3 Idar


(58)

2 Virpur Patel Bhikabhai S President M YE

S 65 10 Pass

Patel Karsanbhai Secretary M 60 B.Com

Patel Ambalal K MEMBER M YE

S

YE

S 65 B.Sc

Patel Kanubhai M MEMBER M YE

S

YE

S 45 10 Pass

Patel Shantaben A MEMBER F 60 7 Pass

Chavada Prafullaben H MEMBER F YE

S 40 4 Pass

Parmar Dayabhai MEMBER M YE

S 40 10 Pass

Prajapati Pravinbhai MEMBER M 35 10 Pass

Patel Nilishkumar MEMBER M YE

S

YE

S YES 42 12 Pass

Danula Prashantbhai D.

. Nodel M

YE

S 26 M.B.A

Chauhan Jaiminiben G. W.D.T F YE

S 28 D.E.C

3 Maniyor Patel Vinodbhai p. President M YE

S 45 B.A

Thakarda Kantibhai K. Secretary M YE

S 53 5pass

Patel Davabhai MEMBER M YE

S 62 B.A

Patel Govindbhai D. MEMBER M YE

S 51 B.Com

Patel Kalpanaben B. MEMBER F YE

S 30 12pass

Patel Ishavarbhai B MEMBER M 55 10pass

Parmar Hasumatiben MEMBER F YE YE 36 B.R.S

IWMP-3 Idar


(59)

N. S S

Maheshbhai MEMBER M YE

S 45 B.A

Patel Bhikabhai M. MEMBER M YE

S 64 B.A


. Nodel M

YE

S 26 M.B.A


S 28 D.E.C

4 Surpur K.P.Masi President M YE

S 61 9pass

Gulamheidar

Sharifbhai Mansiya Secretary M

YE

S 50 10pass

Abbasbhai Yussufbhai

Surpura MEMBER M

YE

S 62 9pass

Shabbirali Nurali

Khanusiya MEMBER M

YE

S 40 9pass

Habidaben Akbarbhai

Surpura MEMBER F

YE

S 36 10pass

Chauhan Ashaben A. MEMBER F YE

S

YE

S 35 8pass

Khanusiya Shabirali

Yusufbhai MEMBER M 47 12pass

Surpura Abbasbhai I. MEMBER M 56 10pass

Bhambhi Alkhabhai

Ramabhai MEMBER M

YE

S

YE

S 62 9pass


. Nodel M

YE

S 26 M.B.A

Parmar


YE

S 32 M.S.W

IWMP-3 Idar


(60)

4 Jethipur

a

Aglodiya Kasmbhai

Isubbhai President M

YE

S 45 10PASS

RevasiyaGulamimahm

ad Kirbhai Secretary M

YE

S

48 12pass

Kharodiya Tahirali

Kamdabhai MEMBER M

YE

S 48 12PPass

Vijapura Husanbhai

Suleman MEMBER M

YE

S 50 7pass

Surapura Ismailbhai

Yusufbhai MEMBER M

YE

S 40 B.A

Vijapura Hasitaben

Bakarali MEMBER F

YE

S 30 12PASS

Vijapura Hasitaben

Alirzakbhai MEMBER F

YE

S 55 4PASS

Chenva Minakshiben

Amrutbhai MEMBER F

YE

S 30 P.T.C

Chenva Ramilaben

Rajendrabhai MEMBER F

YE

S YES 35 10PASS


. Nodel M 26 M.B.A

Chauhan Jaiminiben G. W.D.T F 28 D.E.C

5 Maniyor Patel Vinodbhai p. President M YE

S 45 B.A

Thakarda Kantibhai K. Secretary M YE

S 53 5pass

Patel Davabhai MEMBER M YE

S 62 B.A

Patel Govindbhai D. MEMBER M YE

S 51 B.Com

Patel Kalpanaben B. MEMBER F YE 30 12pass

IWMP-3 Idar


(61)

S

Patel Ishavarbhai B MEMBER M 55 10pass

Parmar Hasumatiben

N. MEMBER F

YE

S

YE

S 36 B.R.S

Maheshbhai MEMBER M YE

S 45 B.A

Patel Bhikabhai M. MEMBER M YE

S 64 B.A


. Nodel M

YE

S 26 M.B.A


S 28 D.E.C

6 Javanpu

ra

PATEL VITHALBHAI

B. President M

YE

S

YE

S 45 5PASS

PARMARSHILESHB

HAI K. Secretary M

YE

S

YES

35 F.Y.B.A

J.B.PATEL MEMBER M YE

S

YE

S 67 T.Y.B.A

C.K.RAVAL MEMBER M

SUTARIYA

UPENDRAKUMAR S. MEMBER M YES 40 B.A

JOSHI MAMATABEN

S. MEMBER F

YE

S

YE

S 38 10PASS

THAKARDA

MADHUBEN D. MEMBER F YES 42 5PASS

THAKARDA

AMRUTBHAI A. MEMBER M

YE

S YES 50 8PASS

VANKAR

KHANABHAI L. MEMBER M

YE

S YES 65 10PASS

PATEL LALITABEN

N. MEMBER F

YE

S

IWMP-3 Idar


(62)

DANULA

PRASHANTBHAI D.

Nodel

M

YE

S 26 M.B.A

PARMAR

DHRMENDRABHAI

A.

W.D.T M YE

S 32 M.S.W

7. Sadatpur

a

Patel Jethabhai

Jivabhai President M

YE

S 72 10pass

Patel Vinodbhai

Kacharabhai Secretary M

YE

S 45 P.t.C

Patel Kiritbhai

Chinabhai MEMBER M

YE

S 43 10pass

Patel Giradharbhai

Kodarbhai MEMBER M YES 50 10pass

Vankar Ranchodbhai

Dhanabhai MEMBER M

YE

S

YE

S 46 B.ed

Vankar Rajanben

Rameshbhai MEMBER F

YE

S YES 32 B.A

Patel Mayaben P. MEMBER F YE

S 40 10PASS

Patel Chetanaben M. MEMBER F YE

S 55 10PASS

Suthar Vithalbhai K. MEMBER M YES 32 B.A


. Nodel M

YE

S 26 M.B.A


S 28 D.E.C

8. Sapavad

a J.B.PATEL President M

YE

S 69 B.A

C.K.PATEL Secretary M YE

S

IWMP-3 Idar


(63)

Patel Rameshbhai J. MEMBER M YE

S 45 B.A

Vankar Kailasben S. MEMBER F YES 50 10pass

Patel Dayabhai j. MEMBER M YE

S 58 10pass

Barot Harshadbhai J MEMBER M YES 45 12pass

Thakarda Dhuliben B. MEMBER F YE

S 52 5pass

Vankar Haribhai M. MEMBER M YE

S 35 8pass

Patel Bhikhabhai G. MEMBER M YES 58 10pass


. Nodel M

YE

S 26 M.B.A

Parmar


YE

S 32 M.S.W

2. Self Help Group

Self Help Group are motivated, Small homogenous group organized together highly successful of credit and thrift activities. Self help group initiative

especially for women help to uplift their livelihood. Generally self help group includes landless and marginal sized farm women, BPL household,

SC/ST women.

SHG initiative in Jadar watershed was being organization by having a cause group discussion between various homogenous communities

of women based on their livelihood separately. Each group discussed their basic problems with their. Facilitators. The major problems identified women

based on their livelihood separately. Each group discussed their basic problems with their. Facilitators. The major problems identified are:

a) Lack of proper credit facilities due to low intervention of formal financial credit instititutes.

IWMP-3 Idar


(64)

b) Excessive exploitation of weaker section by money lenders

c) Lack of attitude of saving among poor people due to complex and rigid conventional financial institution structures.

d) Lack of small micro-loans without collaterals and high interest rates.

e) Lack of knowledge of credit, Thrift activity and banking.

With a view point of these problems it was planned to organize these women to a into a group consisting of 12 to 20 in each groups and it

was also proposed to have 8 groups.

With a detailed discussion with some of the local NGOs working in the area like SEWA, it was planned to have some capacity building

training regarding SHG activities. It was also proposed to have some livelihood activities which will promote women empowerment this

included spice packing, embroidery activities with forward and backward linkage. This will ultimately lead into better human development in

the village.

Table no.33: SHG detail

Sr.

No.

Total no. of registered SHGs No. of members No. of SC/ST/ in each

category

No of BPL in each

category

With only

Men

With

only

Women

With

Both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total

1 Jadar

(i)

Landless 20 102 122 2 18 20 18 75 93

(ii) SF 18 43 61 4 6 10 14 36 50

IWMP-3 Idar


(65)

(iii) MF 12 39 51 10 20 30

(iv) LF 12 6 18 4 3 7

Total 4 13 4 21 62 190 252 20 47 67 32 111 163

2 Javanpura

(i)

Landless 10 40 50 5 25 30 6 10 16

(ii) SF 15 35 50 12 24 36 8 27 35

(iii) MF 17 33 50

(iv) LF 5 5 10

Total 2 8 4 14 47 113 160 17 49 66 14 37 51

3 Jethipura

(i)

Landless 4 9 13 2 4 6 2 5 7

(ii) SF 3 12 15 2 5 7 1 4 5

(iii) MF 3 3 6 1 2 3

(iv) LF 1 1 2

Total 1 2 3 11 25 36 16 12

4 Maniyor

(i)

Landless 16 100 116 8 35 43 8 50 58

(ii) SF 16 38 54 8 14 22 4 16 20

(iii) MF 16 34 50 10 17 27

(iv) LF 14 6 20 4 2 6

Total 4 12 4 20 62 178 240 30 68 98 12 66 78

5 Sadatpura

(i)

Landless 6 10 16 2 6 8 4 3 7

(ii) SF 4 20 24 2 4 6 4 12 16

IWMP-3 Idar


(66)

(iii) MF 3 10 13 1 5 6

(iv) LF 3 4 7 1 1 2

Total 1 3 1 5 16 44 60 6 16 22 8 15 23

6 Sapavada

(i)

Landless 15 22 37 8 20 28 3 8 11

(ii) SF 12 38 50 9 28 37 3 10 13

(iii) MF 13 34 47 11 15 26

(iv) LF 8 6 14 1 2 3

Total 3 6 3 12 48 100 148 29 65 94 6 18 24

7 Surpur

(i)

Landless 7 8 15 5 5 10 2 3 5

(ii) SF 25 25 50 15 15 30 8 7 15

(iii) MF 15 35 50 12 18 30

(iv) LF 7 8 15 2 3 5

Total 3 6 3 12 54 76 130 10 40 75 10 10 20

8 Virpur

(i)

Landless 15 45 60 5 10 15 10 35 45

(ii) SF 15 43 58 5 8 13 10 35 45

(iii) MF 15 34 49 11 22 33

(iv) LF 10 15 25 4 5 9

Total 3 10 3 16 55 137 192 25 45 70 20 70 90

3. User Group:

IWMP-3 Idar


(67)

These are homogeneous groups of person having landholding within the watershed area. They are normally formed to manage and activity or asset

on a long term basis. The user group collects use charges from their members. Some of the points which were considered while forming a user

group in Jadar are:

1) In case of a check dam, check wall khet talavadi, farm pond all the beneficiaries of the individual check dam were involved as user group

members.

2) In case of Fodder bank all the individual beneficiaries of animal husbandry are considered as potential members.

3) Membership was on voluntary and democratic.

4) Focused group discussion was conducted to between the user group to discuss the above conditions and to select potential members.

5) It was advocated that each group to formulate certain internal rules and have a feeling of ownership with community spirit.

Table no. 34: UG detail

Sr.

No.

Total no. of registered UGs No. of members No. of SC/ST/ in each

category

No of BPL in each

category

Men Women Both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total

1 Jadar

(i) Landless 15 5 20 5 2 7 5 2 7

(ii) SF 85 12 97 27 4 31 28 4 32

(iii) MF 68 10 78 21 3 24 0

(iv) LF 25 5 30 8 2 10 0

Total 4 2 1 7 193 32 225 61 11 72 33 6 39

2 Javanpura

(i) Landless 5 5 2 2 2 2

(ii) SF 46 5 51 28 3 31 12 2 14

(iii) MF 37 5 42 12 2 14

(iv) LF 10 2 12 2 1 3

Total 4 2 1 7 93 17 110 42 8 50 12 4 16

IWMP-3 Idar


(68)

3 Jethipura

(i) Landless 5 5 10 3 2 5 2 2 4

(ii) SF 21 8 29 12 3 15 8 2 10

(iii) MF 15 12 27 5 5 10

(iv) LF 5 2 7

Total 4 2 1 7 46 27 73 20 10 30 8 4 14

4 Maniyor

(i) Landless 15 5 20 9 2 11 5 2 7

(ii) SF 75 10 85 35 5 40 10 2 12

(iii) MF 65 8 73 25 3 28

(iv) LF 25 7 32 5 5

Total 4 2 1 7 180 30 210 74 10 84 15 4 19

5 Sadatpura

(i) Landless 1 3 4 1 2 3 2 2

(ii) SF 25 5 30 16 2 18 4 2 6

(iii) MF 15 2 17 7 1 8 2 2

(iv) LF 5 1 6

Total 4 2 1 7 46 11 57 24 5 29 6 4 10

6 Sapavada

(i) Landless 5 5 2 2 2 2

(ii) SF 46 5 51 28 3 31 12 2 14

(iii) MF 37 5 42 12 2 14

(iv) LF 10 2 12 2 1 3

Total 4 2 1 7 93 17 110 42 8 50 12 4 16

7 Surpur

(i) Landless 5 5 2 2 2 2

(ii) SF 42 8 50 25 5 30 8 2 10

(iii) MF 58 12 70 14 4 18

(iv) LF 15 15

Total 4 2 1 7 24 9 140 39 11 50 8 4 12

8 Maniyor

(i) Landless 7 7 5 5 4 4

(ii) SF 66 10 76 42 5 47 15 3 18

(iii) MF 54 5 59 32 2 34 0

(iv) LF 35 5 40 12 1 13 0

IWMP-3 Idar


(69)

Total 4 2 1 7 155 20 175 86 8 94 15 3 18

Table no.34.1: The following types of groups were planned to be formed in Jadar watershed

Sr. No. Name of User Group Major Task

1 Animal Husbandry Group Bringing of new AH technology

2 Horticultural Group Management of horticultural farming and maintenance

3 Khet talavadi Group Equitable sharing of resources

4 Farm bund and Earthernbund Group Equitable sharing of resources Assuring of proper work

5 Nursery Group Maintenance of nursery plot

6 Fodder Bank Group Ensure fodder security in village

Development of community land for fodder development

Timely supply of enriched fodder at a affordable price

7 Check Dam Group Equitable sharing of resources Assuring of proper work

Entry Point activity (EPA)

EPA activities are taken up under watershed projects to build a rapport with the village community at the beginning of the project; generally, certain

important works which are in urgent demand of the local community are taken up. A group Discussion was conducted with watershed Development

Committee regarding the EPA activity, It was conveyed to the WC that an amount of Rs. 5.80 Lakh was allotted for EPA activity, which was 4 per cent

of total allocated budget. The villagers discussed various activities which they felt is important but after a brief discussion it was conveyed to them that

only those activities can be taken, which revive the common natural resources. It was also taken into priority that there should be an instrument of

convergence which will result in sustainability of activities.

Physical activities to be undertaken under IWMP, Jadar Entry Point Activity (EPA)

IWMP-3 Idar


(70)

IWMP-3 Idar


(71)

Fig. Side Selection for Entry Point Activity

IWMP-3 Idar


(72)

Table No. 35. Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs.)

Sr.

No. Name of Village

Amount earmarked for EPA

Rs. in Lakhs

EPA Planned Estimated Cost (In

lakh) Rs.

Expected

Outcomes

1 Jadar 5.10

Bore Holes in village Pond 1.50 Rising water Table

RO Water System in Schools

(2)

0.90 For Safe Drinking

water

Community Roof Rain Water

Harvesting structure in school

1.50 Rain water Storage

Protection Wall 1.20 To Protect land

from major erosion

2 Javanpura 3.39

Ladies General Bathroom 2.00 Gen Community

Work

RO Water filter System 0.50 For drinking water

Rain Water Harvesting 0.89 Rain water storage

3 Jethipura 0.61 Rain Water Harvesting 0.61 Rain water Storage

Total 0.61

4 Maniyor 5.03


RO water System 0.90 Safe water for

Drinking

Rain Water Harvesting 1.50 Rain water Storage

Library 0.60

Public Bath block 1.03 For village women

5 Sadatpura 1.10

Well Deepening Community

Well

0.50 Storage more water

Wire fencing around Smashan 0.60 community work

6 Sapavada 2.89 Village Pond repairing 1.00 to stop the

IWMP-3 Idar


(73)

discharge

General Bathrooms 1.00 Community Work

Wire fencing around Smashan 0.89

7 Surpur 3.18



Stone pitching at pond 1.18 to stop erosion

8 Virpur 3.97


RO Plant 0.90 for Drinking Water


Well Repairing 0.57

IWMP-3 Idar


(74)

Table no.36: Details of engineering structures in watershed works*

S.

No.

Village

name

Name of

structures

Type of treatment Type of land Executing

agency Target

(i)

Ridge

area

(R)

(ii)

Drain

age

line

(D)

(iii)

Lan

d

dev.

(L)

(i)

Priva

te

(ii)

Commun

ity

(iii)

Others

(pl.

specify)

(i) UG

(ii)SHG

(iii)

Others

(pl.

specify)

No. of

units

(No./

cu.m./

rmt)

Estimated cost

(Rs. in lakh)

Expected

month &

year of

completion

(mm/yyyy) M W O T

1 Jadar

Check Dams D C UG 2 4.02

Check Walls D P UG 40 4.49

Farm Pond R P UG 13 15.66

Farm Leveling R P UG 115 24.79

Farm Bund R P UG 2824 4.24

Wire Fencing L C SHG 2000 6.26

Total 59.46

2 Javanpura wire fencing P C UG 7000 11

IWMP-3 Idar


(75)

well deepening P UG 6 3.21

R.W.H.S C UG 7 4..73

Draing line

structure for

rain water

R P C UG 7.5

Bore hole in

villages R P UG 12 12

Gram vatika R P UG 1 4

Total 42.44

3 Jethipura

D P UG 10 1.6 Check Walls



IWMP-3 Idar


(76)


Total 18.33

4 Maniyor






Wire Fencing L C SHG 1800 5.63

Total 80.13

5 Sadatpura


Farm Pond P UG 8 6.26

Farm Leveling R P UG 25.5 0.9

Total 10.36

IWMP-3 Idar


(77)

6 Sapavada

Wire fencing p UG 4 4.02


Micro

Irrigation R P UG 15 11.74



Total 36.19

7 Surpur



New Pond C UG 1 5

Total 22.33

8 Virpur




IWMP-3 Idar


(78)



Total 69.86

Table No.36.1:- Check Dams

Check Dam:-

Check dams are low cost dams, which are built across streams to prevent rain water from flowing away into the sea. Check dams serves mainly two

purposes: the first is to provide direct irrigation when rain fails, and the second is to facilitate the recharging of surrounding wells through percolation of

water additionally, check dams provide water for other uses also.

Cost Estimation of Check dam for 12m span

Sr.

No. Description Quantity Unit

Rate

(Rs.)

Amount

(Rs.)

1

Excavation for foundation up to 1.5 M. depth including sorting out

and stacking of useful materials and disposing of excavated stud up to

50M. lead.(b) Hard murum

60.93 Cmt 101.00 6153.93

2

Providing and laying cement concrete 1:4:8 (1cement : 4coarse sand :

8 hand broken stone aggregates 40 mm. nominal size) and curing

complete excluding cost of from work in : In foundation and Plinth

10.79 Cmt 1747.00 18850.13

IWMP-3 Idar


(79)

3

Providing and laying cement concrete 1:3:6 (1cement : 3coarse sand :

6 hand broken stone aggregates 40 mm. nominal size) and curing

complete excluding cost of from work in :

In foundation and Plinth

84.41 Cmt 1972.00 167245.32

4

Providing form work of ordinary timber planking so as to give a

rough finish including centering. Shuttering strutting and propping

etc. Height of propping and centering below supporting floor to

ceiling not ex-exceeding 4M. And removal of the same for in

including reinforced concrete and plain concrete works in: (A)

Foundations, footings Bases of columns etc. and Mass concrete.

95.10 Sqmt 87.00 8273.70

5

Providing and fixing 20cm x 15 cm 2.5cm thick year plate of marble

stone set in cm 1:4 including finishing and engraving letters etc.

complete

1 Nos. 231.00 231.00

Total Amount Rs. 200754.08

Say Rs. 200750.00

Table No.36.2 Check Walls

Check Wall:-

Check walls are low cost stone walls to protect the erosion of soil by water.

Cost Estimation of Check Wall for 10m length

Sr.

No. Description Quantity Unit

Rate

(Rs.)

Amount

(Rs.)

IWMP-3 Idar


(80)

1

Excavation for foundation up to 1.5 M. depth including sorting out and

stacking of useful materials and disposing of excavated stud up to 50M.

lead.(b) Hard murum

6.95 Cmt 101.00 701.95

2

Providing and laying cement concrete 1:4:8 (1cement : 4coarse sand : 8

hand broken stone aggregates 40 mm. nominal size) and curing complete

excluding cost of from work in : In foundation and Plinth

1.12 Cmt 1747.00 1956.64

3

(1) Un coursed rubble masonry with hard stone of approved quality in

foundation and plinth in cement mortar 1: (1cement: 6 course sand)

including leveling up etc. complete.

7.29 Cmt 1596.00 11634.84

4

Providing and laying cement concrete 1:3:6 (1cement : 3coarse sand : 6

hand broken stone aggregates 40 mm. nominal size) and curing complete

excluding cost of from work in :

In foundation and Plinth

0.45 Cmt 1972.00 887.4

5 Pointing on un coursed stone masonry with CM 1:3 ( 1 cement : 3 Sand) (a)

Flush pointing 15.00 Sqmt 41.50 622.50

6 Providing and fixing 20cm x 15 cm 2.5cm thick year plate of marble stone

set in cm 1:4 including finishing and engraving letters etc. complete 1 Nos. 231.00 231.00

Total. Total Amount Rs. 16034.33

Say Rs. 16035.00

Table No.36.3:-

Farm Pond:

There is very little qualitative difference between a pond / tank, which usually serves the population of a village and farm pond, which serves and

individual agriculture field. Farms ponds greatly vary in size depending upon the rainfall. These have only a few meters of length and with and are built

IWMP-3 Idar


(81)

across the flow path of natural drainage channels. Surplus water from one pond spills over to a lower pond. In some cases a series of farm ponds are

built on one single stream. Each pond caters to the irrigation needs of the farm and also augments ground water recharge.

Technical Details of Farm Pond 1

Particulars Value

Pond Length 25.00 Mt.

Pond Width 15.00 Mt.

Pond Depth 2.50 Mt.

Side Slope 1:1

Cost Estimation of Farm pond No.1 (25.0 m x 15.0m)

Sr.

No. Description No L B D Quantity Unit

Rate

(Rs.)

Amount

(Rs.)

1

Excavation for pond up to 3.0 mt. including

sorting out and stacking of useful materials and

disposing off the excavated stuff up to 50mt.

Lead(B) Dense or hard soil

1

Main Pond 1.00 17.50 12.50 2.50 546.87

Slope 0.5 65.00 1.25 1.25 50.78

597.65 Cumt 109.00 65143.85

2 Utilizing the stuff(available earth) in bank

from cutting with all required lead and lift 597.65 Cumt 22.00 13148.30

Grand Total Rs. 78292.15

Say Rs. 78290.00

IWMP-3 Idar


(82)

Table:-36.4 Farm leveling

Farm Leveling:-

Leveling of land in the farm is an important role to recharge the ground water and to reduce the land erosion.

Cost Estimation of Leveling

Sr.


Rate

(Rs.)

Amount

(Rs.)

1

Dressing of soil including sorting out and

stacking of useful materials and disposing

off the excavated stuff

1.00 10.00 10.00 0.10 10.00

10.00 Cumt 46.40 464.00

Total Rs. For 100 Sqmt 464.00

i.e. e for 1.00 Acre area rate comes as (4046.87 x 4.64) Rs. 18777.48

Say Rs. 18780.00

Table no.36.5

Farm Bund:-

Farm bunds are useful to stop the rainwater running from the farm and saving the fertility of land which was running with the rain water. It also reduces

the soil erosion as well as helping in recharge the ground water table.

Cost Estimation of Farm Bund Size (1.5m Bottom x 1.00m Top x 0.75 Height x Slope 3:1)

IWMP-3 Idar


(83)

Sr.


Rate

(Rs.)

Amount

(Rs.)

1 Earthwork for bund including making the

proper slope etc complete with all lead and lift

For 50m length 1 50.00 1.00 1.00 50.00

Side slopes 2 x 0.5 50.00 0.25 0.75 9.38

59.38 Cumt 126.00 7481.88

Total Rs. For 50.00 Rmt 7481.88

i.e. for 1.00 Rmt rate comes as (7481.88 / 50.00) Rs. 149.64

Say Rs. 150.00

Table no.36.6

Wire Fencing:-

To protect the fodder and afforastaion from demolition by animals in gauchar land the periphery of the land covered with the wire fencing .

Cost Estimation of Wire Fencing

Sr no Item Rate Per

1

Providing and fixing 1.20 meter high fencing with 2.0 meter

ling M.S. Angle posts 40 mm. X 40 mm. X 6 mm. And oil

painting 3 coats fixed at 2.5 mt. C/c with five horizontal lines

and two diagonals of galvanized steel barbed wire weighing

9.38 Kg. Per 100 meter, strained and fixed to posts with G.I.

staples, including fixing posts in ground with 0.5m x 0.5m

block in C.C.1:5:10 etc. complete.

313 /- Rmt.

Rate as per Govt. SOR R & B Page No.85 Item

no. 1.22.20

IWMP-3 Idar


(84)

Table no.37: Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)

Sr.

No. Village name Type of structures

Proposed target

Augmentation/ repair of existing

structures Construction of new structures Total target

No.

Area to

be

irrigated

(ha)

Storage

capacity

Estimated

cost No.

Area to be

irrigated

(ha)

Storage

capacity

Estimated

cost

Area to

be

irrigated

(ha)

Storage

capacity

Estimated

cost

S Jadar

Farm Pond 13 28 15.66 28 15.66

Farm Levelling 115 132 24.79 132 24.79

Farm bunds 2824 130 4.24 130 4.24

Total 290 44.69 290 44.69

2 Javanpura

Welldeepning 6 Community 3.21 3.21

Wire fencing 20 15 11 15 11

Gram Vatika 1 4.00 4.00

Total 15 18.21 15 18.21

3 JETHIPURA

Farm Pond 11 15 8.61 15 8.61

Farm Levelling 37 35 6.95 35 6.95

Farm bunds 778 21 1.17 21 1.17

Total 71 16.73 71 16.73

4 Maniyor Farm Pond 25 21 19.57 21 19.57

Farm Levelling 129 145 30.43 145 30.43

Farm bunds 99 210 8.45 210 8.45

Total 376 58.45 376 58.45

5 Sadatpura Farm Pond 8 12 6.26 12 6.26

IWMP-3 Idar


(85)

Farm Levelling 7 12 0.90 12 0.90

Total 24 7.16 24 7.16

6 Sapavada Micro Irrigation 15 19 11.74 19 11.74

Farm Levelling 26 85 9.49 85 9.49

Farm bunds 2125 95 3.19 95 3.19

Total 199 24.42 199 24.42

7 Surpur Farm Pond 17 32 13.31 32 13.31

New Pond 1 25 5.00 25 5.00

Total 57 18.31 57 18.31

8 Virpur Farm Pond 23 30 14.09 30 14.09

Farm Levelling 120 232 40.19 232 40.19

Farm bunds 1978 165 2.97 165 2.97

Total 427 57.25 427 57.25

Table no.38: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)

Sr.

No. Name of Villages Type of structures

Proposed target

Augmentation/ repair of

existing recharging structures

Construction of new recharging

structures Total target

No.

Area to be

irrigated

(ha)

Estimated

cost No.

Area to be

irrigated

(ha)

Estimated

cost

Area to be

irrigated

(ha)

Estimated

cost

1 Jadar (i)Open wells 29 55 16.03 55 16.03

2 Javanpura - - - - - - - - -

3 Jethipura - - - - - - - - -

4 Maniyor - - - - - - - - -

5 Sadatpura Open well 16 22 10.68 - - - 22 10.68

6 Sapavada

IWMP-3 Idar


(86)

7 Surpur Open well 28 45 21.44 - - - 45 21.44

8 Virpur - - - - - - - - -

Well Deepening:-

Wells are deepened to approach the water table. So many wells have no water due to not getting deepness.

Table No. 38.1

Cost Estimation for Well Deepening:-

Sr No Description of Item Rate Per Amount

1

Excavation for well including removing and spreading the excavated stuffs

directed with lead up to 90 M

In hard rock with blasting and

chiselling or by chiselling only for

Finishing up to 27.00m depth

709.00 Cumt

Item as per GOG GWSSB SOR wells & gallery section G Item no 1 , III , (18)

For 1 User well deepened upto 3.00m depth

Well dimensions

Diameter 4.00m

Depth 3.00m

(3.14/2) x (4x4) x

3.00=75.36 Cumt 75.36 x 709 53430.24

Say Rs. 53430.00

IWMP-3 Idar


(87)

Table no.39: Details of activities related to livelihood, production system and micro-enterprises

Sr.

No Village Activity/ Type of work Activity to be Carried out

Type of land Executing

agency Target

(i)

Private

(ii)

Community

(iii)

Others

(pl.

specify)

(i) UG Estimated

cost

(Rs. Lakh)

Expected

month & year

of completion

(mm/yyyy)

(ii)SHG

(iii) Others

(pl. specify)

1 Jadar

Agriculture productivity

enhancement

Crop demonstration (Cotton

with Drip) WC 2.4

Vegetable Farming

1.91

Low cost Green house

WC 0.7

Kitchen Garden

WC 0.25

Horticultural Plantation

WC 4.42

Vermi compost

SHG 4.72

Nursery raising Teak Nursery Raising

SHG 3

Neem Nursery Raising

SHG 2.4

Animal

Husbandry/dairy

development

Animal Nutrient

WC 2.9

Cattle Camp

WC 1.6

Fodder Bank Development

SHG 5

IWMP-3 Idar


(88)

Minor Activities Flour Mill

SHG 2

Total

31.3

2 Javanpura Agriculture productivity

enhancement

Crop demonstration (Onion

with Drip) WC 1.5

Vegetable Farming

WC 0.95


WC 1.3

Kitchen Garden

WC 0.3


WC 1.6

Vermi compost

SHG 4

Agro-processing Pickle Making (Amala)

SHG 0.5

Nursery raising Teak Nursery Raising

SHG 1.8

Nilgiri Nursery Raising

SHG 3

Neem Nursery Raising

SHG 1.8

Animal

Husbandry/dairy

development

Animal Nutrient

WC 1.7

Cattle Camp

WC 1.05

Total

19.5

3 Jethipura Agriculture productivity

enhancement

Crop demonstration

(Wheat) WC 1.12


WC 1


UG 0.75

Vermi compost

SHG 1.76

Animal

Husbandry/dairy

development

Animal Nutrient

WC 0.6

Cattle Camp

WC 1

Total

6.23

4 Maniyor Agriculture productivity Crop demonstration

WC 2.4

IWMP-3 Idar


(89)

enhancement (Maize/Groundnut)

Vegetable Farming

UG 1.75


WC 1.3

Kitchen Garden

WC 0.3


UG 1.35

Vermi compost

SHG 3.78

Agro-processing Oil Extraction Unit

SHG 2.4

Animal

Husbandry/dairy

development

Animal Nutrient

WC 2.54

Cattle Camp

WC 1.95


SHG 5.45

Total

23.22

5 Sadatpura Agriculture productivity

enhancement

Crop demonstration

(Wheat/Pigeon Pea) WC 0.75

Kitchen Garden

WC 0.3


UG 1.51

Vermi Compost

SHG 3.65

Animal

Husbandry/dairy

development

Animal Nutrient

WC 0.6

Cattle Camp

WC 0.5

Total

7.31

6 Sapavada Agriculture productivity

enhancement

Crop demonstration

(Cumin/Castor) WC 1.5

Vegetable Farming

UG 1.59


UG 1.15

Kitchen Garden

WC 0.2


WC 1.09

IWMP-3 Idar


(90)

Vermi compost

SHG 3.oo

Nursery raising Nursery Raising

SHG 3.6

Animal

Husbandry/dairy

development

Animal Nutrient

WC 1.25

Cattle Camp

WC 0.85


SHG 2.4

Total

13.63

7 Surpur Agriculture productivity

enhancement

Crop demonstration (Maize/

Wheat/ Cotton) WC 1.5

Vegetable Farming

UG 1.27

Horticulture

UG 1.29


WC 1

Vermi compost

SHG 3.69

Nursery raising Neem Nursery Raising

SHG 2.4

Amala Nursery Raising

SHG 2.4

Animal

Husbandry/dairy

development

Animal Nutrient

WC 1.5

Cattle Camp

WC 0.9


SHG 2

Total

17.95

8 Virpur Agriculture productivity

enhancement

Crop demonstration

(Onion with Drip) WC 2.25

Vegetable Farming

UG 3.19


UG 1.09


WC 1.5

Kitchen Garden

WC 0.5

Vermi compost

SHG 4.4

IWMP-3 Idar


(91)

Nursery raising Neem Nursery Raising

SHG 3

Nursery Raising

SHG 2.4

Animal

Husbandry/dairy

development

Animal Nutrient

WC 1.5

Cattle Camp

WC 1.05


SHG 2

Total

22.88

Grand Total

142.02

Table no. 40: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas

Sr. No. Names of

Villages

Major activities of the SHGs

Name of activity No. of SHGs involved Average annual income from

activity per SHG

1 Jadar Vermi composting 8 0.08

2 Fodder bank 10 0.19

3 Handicraft 4 0.15

1 Javanpura Vermi composting 7 0.08

2 Handicraft 7 0.25

1 Jethipura Vermi composting 8 0.08

1 Maniyor Vermi composting 8 0.08


3 Handicraft 4 0.15

1 Sadatpura Vermi composting 2 0.08

2 Handicraft 3 0.25

1 Sapavada Vermi composting 6 0.08


3 Handicraft 2 0.25

IWMP-3 Idar


(92)

1 Surpur Vermi composting 6 0.08

3 Handicraft 6 0.25

1 Virpur Vermi composting 8 0.08


3 Handicraft 2 0.15

Production System –

Production System-1: Fodder bank for Jadar watershed

Introduction :

“The fodder bank technology is a farming practice whereby leguminous shrubs and grass species are grown on a farm to provide fodder for livestock

sector.” It provides a wide range of animal products that are rich in high quality proteins and have the potential as good and sustainable sources of

income in many areas. However, local of fodder in terms of quality and quantity, is one of the major constrains towards the low productivity of cattle in

Jadar watershed Project.

The fodder bank ensures fodder availability which in turn reduces the distressed migration of the people resulting in sustainable livelihood opportunities

and enhances natural resource security in the project area.

Objective of a fodder bank

1. Build a local fodder bank and organize the distribution of fodder during drought and scarce situation.

2. Establish and maintain village fodder farm in the community grazing area, and allocate the community land for fodder production, in

association with dairy co-operatives.

IWMP-3 Idar


(93)

3. Control regulates and charge in the community grazing and pastures lands.

4. Undertake the distribution of fodder seeds and slips in the village.

Primary problem of the project

Jadar village comes under totally rain fed agriculture because of this migration percentage is very high. Soil is very suitable for fodder crop mainly

sorghum but due the scarcity of irrigation water only one crop can be taken throughout the year. So fodder bank play an important role to solve this

problem. Majority of farmers own less than 2.5ha of land for food and fodder production but lack of irrigation water has made these lands unproductive.

The concept of fodder bank can overcome the problem of seasonal feed shortage, migration and poor animal performance.

It is the milk animal, which is the worst affected during these periods of drought, due to lack of productivity of sufficient fodder and water. As a result,

the poor and force to let go with their animals in search of fodder and green pastures to other parts of the state. This eventually this leads to colossal loss

of income generating assets, poor demographic profile of village and low education level of their children.

Even in good years, during the harvesting season, the poor tend to sell their crop residue or fodder to earn cash. At such time when supply is higher than

demand, they are not able to sell fodder at remunerative prices. The same fodder is bought back by them, mostly at higher prices during the month of

scarcity.

To meet the critical needs of fodder, especially for the poor families and protect them from inordinately high prices during the summer months, fodder

banks are proposed to be setup at the village level

IWMP-3 Idar


(94)

Feasibility of Fodder Bank:

A detailed survey and Focused Group Discussion was conducted in Jadar watershed area. The number and type of cattle as well as the fodder

production capacity of the village was collect during these surveys. In focused group discussion several factors like the various types of fodder available

locally, the quantity of fodder to be stored in the fodder bank, the size of fodder bank, the amount of finances required to operate a fodder bank etc were

discussed with the farmers, User group and watershed committee. The fodder bank should be sustainable and towards that, the sale price of fodder

should cover operating costs and losses in storage. All these decisions were taken jointly with the member of operating fodder bank.

Primary Mode for A fodder Bank

A. Total Dairy farmers

No. of Cattle to be catered by one fodder bank. No. of adult animals No. of calves

Total

Fodder requirement per day (10kg dry fodder for adult and 4 kg for

calf) 1000 kg (per Day)+500 Kg(per Day)=1500 Kg.

Fodder requirement for 180 days. 2700 quintal

Fodder come from community land 15 hec x 150=2250 quintal

Cost of cultivation for fodder production (See table:2) 70,000 Rs.

Remaining requirement for 120 days.

Total Cost

Avg. Procurement rate in harvesting season, Rs.600 per Qt.

including transportation

Net cost of Fodder Production

(Cost of cultivation + Cost of procurement)

2700-2250=450 quintal

600 x 450=Rs.2,70,000/-

3,40,000 /-

IWMP-3 Idar


(95)

B. Area development for fodder bank land required Approx. 3000 m²

(preferably land will be allotted by Gram Panchayat @ Rs.600 per

month)

Rs. 7200

C. C1 fencing + Weighing machine + Small shed + other tools. Rs. 1 ,50,000/-

D. Total Cost for Fodder bank

(A+B +C) Rs.4,97,200 /-

Cost of cultivation for fodder production

Cost Detail Unit cost

1. Cost of tillage 4.5 hors x 15 hec x 400 Rs. =27000 Rs.

2. Cost for seed 12 kg seed x15 hec x100=18000 Rs.

3. Cost for fertilizer 10,000 Rs.

4. Cost for irrigation 5,000 Rs

5. Depreciation cost of C1.(20%) 10,000 Rs

Total cost for 15 hec Rs. 70,000

Initial investment for fodder bank

Sr No Description Amount in Rs.

1 Total Cost for Fodder Bank ( 1year) 4,97,200 /-

2 Required 2 Labor for fodder bank Management @ 2000 /

month

48,000/-

Total initiative Cost For Fodder Bank 5,45,270 /-

Revenue and return Details.

IWMP-3 Idar


(96)

Sr. No. Return Details Cost (in Rs.)

1 Cost of fodder per Kg. = 3,47,200/270000

1.28 Rs/kg

2 Selling Price of Fodder Rs. 2/kg

3 Gross income by selling Price Rs. 5,40,000

4 Net Profit Rs. 1,92,800

Production of Fodder:

We will produce 2250 quintal fodder from community land of Gram Panchayat and for remaining requirement we can fulfill by two ways first one buy

the fodder at the time of harvesting and second we can take land on lease agreement from some other government as well as private agency.

Technical Support/Assistance:

To ensure proper technical support for fodder bank and smooth functioning of activities the required technical assistance may be taken from Krishi

Vigyan Kendra (KVS), Dept. of Agriculture, Dairy and DWDU.

Advantages:

The importance of a fodder bank can be well understood. The fodder banks will provide much needed relief and self-reliance to poor in the village

especially in drought condition. Specifically, the advantages are:-

* It will reduce migration during drought condition.

* Farmers can purchase and sale of fodder at village level, thus doing away with costs incurred by them to carry out these transactions

at the city market.

* It can reduce in overall market prices of fodder during the lean season.

* Ensure availability of fodder during the lean season at affordable and reasonable prices.

IWMP-3 Idar


(97)

* Reduced distress sale of cattle due to non – availability and / or non-affordability of fodder.

* Higher income for the poor as cattle will have enough fodder even during the lean season

* Increase employment opportunities at the village level associate with the sale, purchase and storage of fodder.

Productive System 2:

Vermi composting unit for Jadar village

Introduction:

The Process of composting crop residues using earthworms comprise spreading the agriculture wastes and cow dung in layers as 1.5 m wide and

0.9 m high beds of required length. Earthworms are introduced in between the layers @ 350 worms per m3 of bed volume. The beds are

maintained at about 450 – 50% moisture content and a temperature of 20 – 30° C by sprinkling water over the beds. The earthworms being

voracious eaters consume the biodegradable matter and give our a part of the matter as excreta or vermin-castings. The vermin-casting containing

nutrients are rich manure for the plants.

About the Worms:-

Eisenia fetid, Edrilus Eugenie, and Perionx excavatius are some of the species for rearing to convert organic wastes into manure. The worms feed

on any biodegradable matter ranging from coir waste to kitchen garbage and Vermi composting units are ideally suited to locations / units with

generation of considerable quantities of organic wastes. One earthworm reaching reproductive age of about six weeks lay one egg capsule

(containing 7 embryos) every 7 – 10 days. Three to seven worms emerge out of each capsule. Thus, the multiplication of worms under optimum

growth conditions is very fast. The farms live for about 2 years. Fully grown worms could be separated and dried in an oven to make ‘worm

meal’ which is rich source of protein (70%) for use in animal feed.

Location:-

IWMP-3 Idar


(98)

Jadar village has lots of animals so it can become good vermin compost centre as well as good source of livelihood. Vermi composting very suitable for

fruit, flower and vegetable as well as creel crops. It increases quality and quantity of production in per unit area.

Use:-

Vermicompost is nothing but the excreta of earthworms, which is rich in humus and nutrients. We can rear earthworms artificially in a brick tank or

near the stem / trunk of trees (specially horticultural trees). By feeding these earthworms with biomass and watching properly the food (bio-mass) of

earthworms, we can produce the required quantities of vermicompost.

Advantages of vermicompost:

01. Vermicompost is rich in all essential plant nutrients.

02. Provides excellent effect on overall plant growth, encourages the growth of new shoots / leaves and improves

the quality and shelf life of the produce.

03. Vermicompost is free flowing, easy to apply, handle and store and does not have bad odor.

04. It improves soil structure, texture, aeration, and water holding capacity and prevents soil erosion.

05. Vermicompost is rich in beneficial micro flora such as a fixers, P- solubilizers, and cellulose decomposing micro-flora

etc in addition to improve soil environment.

06. Vermicompost contains earthworm cocoons and increases the population and activity of earthworm in the soil.

07. It neutralizes the soil protection.

08. It prevents nutrient losses and increases the use efficiency of chemical fertilizers.

09. Vermicompost is free from pathogens, toxic elements, weed seeds etc.

10. Vermicompost minimizes the incidence of pest and diseases.

11. It enhances the decomposition of organic matter in soil.

IWMP-3 Idar


(99)

12. It contains valuable vitamins, enzymes and hormones like auxins, gibberellins etc.

Nutrient content of vermicompost

Nitrogen- 1.5 – 2.5 % Calcium- 0.5 – 1.0 %

Phosphorus- 0.9 – 1.7 % Magnesium- 0.2 – 0.3 %

Potash- 1.5 – 2.4 % Sulphur- 0.4 - 0.5 %

And other micronutrients with vitamins, enzymes and hormones.

Materials for preparation of Vermicompost:

Any types of biodegradable wastes-

1. Crop residues

2. Weed biomass

3. Vegetable waste

4. Leaf litter

5. Hotel refuse

6. Waste from agro-industries

7. Biodegradable portion of urban and rural wastes.

Methods of preparation

The vermicompost can be prepared in concrete tank. The size of the tank should be 10 ft. length or more depending upon the availability of land

and raw materials, breadth 3- 5ft and height 3 ft. Suitable plastic tube / basin structure may also be needed. The floor of the tank should be

connected with stones and pieces of bricks.

IWMP-3 Idar


(100)

The available bio-wastes are to be collected and are to be heaped under sun about 7-10 days and be chopped if necessary.

Sprinkling of cow dung slurry to the heap may be done.

A thin layer of half decomposed cow dung (1-2 inches) is to be placed at the bottom.

Place the chopped weed biomass and partially decomposed cow dung layer wise. (10-20 cm) in the tank / pot up to the depth of 2 ½ ft. The bio

waste and cow dung ratio should be 60: 40 on dry wt. Basis.

Release about 2-3 kg earthworms per ton of biomass or 100 nos. earthworms per one sq. ft. area.

Efficient : species:Eisenia, foetidaAmyanthes, diffrigensEudrillus, engineac

Place wire net / bamboo net over the tank to protect earthworm from birds.

Sprinkling of water should be done to maintain 70-80 % moisture content.

Provision of a shed over the compost is essential to prevent entry of rainwater and direct sunshine.

Sprinkling of water should be stopped when 90 % bio-wastes are decomposed. Maturity could be judged visually by observing the formation of

granular structure of the compost at the surface of the tank.

Harvest the vermicompost by scrapping layer wise from the top of the tank and heap under shed. This will help in separation of earthworms from

the compost. Sieving may also be done to separate the earthworms and cocoons.

Model for A Vermi-compost Unit ( For 1 Cycle)

Area (10 x 1.25 m= 12.50 Sqmt)

Sr.

No. Particulars Quantity

Per

Rate (Rs.) Amount (Rs.)

1 Concrete pillars (3m long) 10 No 100 1000

IWMP-3 Idar


(101)

2 Wooden poles (2.5m long) 9 No 38 342

3 Shade net (80 per cent) for covering the roof 12.5 Sqmt 25 312.5

4 Binding wire for tying 5 Kg 50 250

5 Labor charges for erection of sheds 5 Day 150 750

6 Shovels, spades, crowbars, iron baskets, 1 Lump sump 1300 1300

7 Weighing scale (100 kg capacity) 1 No 1300 1300

8 Cow dung @ 80 kg/m3 0.9 Tone 500 450

9 Worms 3kg per Tone 2.7 Kg 80 216

10 Formation of vermin bed with agro-waste, cow dung

and worms 12.5

Sqft

250 3125

11 Miscellaneous (Power, Water Supervision etc.) 1 Lump sump 500 500

Total cost for 1 Cycle 9545.5

Say Rs. 9546.00

Returns from vermicomposting 8 cycle

Benefits

Total Expense for 1 year

Total Cost For 1 cycle 9546.00

Cost for other 7 cycle ( 7 x ( 8+9+11)) =1166 x 7 8162.00

Total for 8 cycle 17708.00

Total Income in 1 year

1. Sale of vermin compost of 7.20MT @ Rs.3000/- per ton 7.20 x 3000.00 = 21600.00

2. Sale of worms @ 5 kg per ton of compost and Rs. 50 per kg

36 x 100 = 3600.00

2. Total Cost 25200.00

Net benefit = ( Income – expense) 7492.00

Table no. 41: Linkages developed at village level

IWMP-3 Idar


(102)

Sr. No. Village Name of activity Forward/Backward linkage Linkage with Outcome

1 Jadar Crop demonstration Backward Linkages Agriculture Dept. To make people aware about improved

farming techniques. 2 Virpur Drip Irrigation Backward Linkages GGRC

3 Surpur Cattel Camp Backward Linkages AH Dept. To make people aware about animal

health 4 Javanpura Animal Nutrients Backward Linkages AH Dept.

5 Jethipura Nursery Raising Backward Linkages Forest Department To make people self employe

6 Sadatpura VermiCompost Forward Linkages Fodder Bank

7 Sapavada Agril. Implements Backward Linkages Agril. Dept. To make people aware about use of new

tools.

8 Maniyor

Table no.42: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works:-

S.

No. Name of village

Name of

structure/ work

Type of treatment Type of land Executing

agency Target

(i)

Ridge

area

(R)

(ii)

Drainage

line

(D)

(iii)

Land

dev.

(L)

(i)

Private

(ii)

Community

(iii)

Others

(pl.

specify)

(i) UG

(ii)SHG

(iii) Others

(pl. specify)

Area

(ha)

No. of

plants

Estimated

cost

(Rs. in

lakh)

Expected

month &

year of

completion

(mm/ yyyy)

1

Jadar

Afforastaion L C SHG 5 4.86

Fodder L C SHG 15 5.45

Horticulture L P UG 6.80 2.32

Total 12.63

Javanpura


Horticulture L P UG 6 2.17

Nursery L C WC 1 2.00

IWMP-3 Idar


(103)

Total 8.06

Jethipura Horticulture L P UG 3.25 1.06

Total 1.06

Maniyor




Total 11.47

Sadatpura Afforastaion L C SHG 3 2.92


Total 4.43

Sapavada



Horticulture L P UG 3 1.09

Total 10.43

Surpur


Nursery L C SHG 1 1.00


Total 7.95

Virpur

Afforastaion L C SHG 3.5 3.40



Total 10.99

Table No.42.1

Horticulture Farming:-

Importance and Scope of Horticulture

IWMP-3 Idar


(104)

India with diverse soil and climate comprising several agro-ecological regions provides ample opportunity to grow a variety of horticulture crops. These

crops form a significant part of total agricultural produce in the country comprising of fruits, vegetables, root and tuber crops, flowers, ornamental

plants, medicinal and aromatic plants, spices, condiments, plantation crops and mushrooms.

It is estimated that all the horticulture crops put together cover nearly 11-6 million hectares area with an annual production of 91 million tones.

Though these crops occupy hardly 7% of the cropped area they contribute over 18% to the gross agricultural output in the country.

Horticultural crops play a unique role in India’s economy by improving the income of the rural people. Cultivation of these crops is labor intensive

and as such they generate lot of employment opportunities for the rural population. Fruits and vegetables are also rich source of vitamins, minerals,

proteins, and carbohydrates etc. which are essential in human nutrition. Hence, these are referred to as protective foods and assumed great importance as

nutritional security of the people. Thus, cultivation of horticultural crops plays a vital role in the prosperity of a nation and is directly linked with the

health and happiness of the people.

Cost Estimation of Horticultural Farming

Sr.

No. Description

Spacing in

Meter

No of Plants

per Ha Rate per plant

Inputs per

plant

Amount of

plants per Ha

Amount of

Inputs per

Ha

Total

Amount per

Ha

1 Mango Farming 10 x 10 100 150.00 180.00 15000.00 7200.00 22200.00

2 Lemon Farming 6 x 6 277 35.00 65.00 9695.00 18005.00 27700.00

3 Pomegranate ( Dadam) 5 x 5 667 30.00 75.00 20010.00 50025.00 70035.00

Table:-42.2 Afforastaion:

IWMP-3 Idar


(105)

Technical Details of Afforastaion Activities

Particulars Value

Crop Name Nilgiri ( Eucalyptus)

Plant To Plant Spacing 3.00 mt

Row to Row Spacing 2.00 mt

Pit Length 0.30 mt

Pit Width 0.30 mt

Pit Depth 0.30 mt

No. of Plants 2778 Nos.

Plantation Area 1 Ha.

No. of Plants for ha 2778 Nos.

Gap Filling 20 %

Cost Estimation for afforastaion activity per Hactre

Sr.

No. Description No. Unit Quantity Rate Amount

1 Digging of pits for plants in ordinary murum 2778 No 2778.00 10.00 27780.00

2 Plants saplings for plantation in Govt. pasture area, sapling not less then

30 cm. height 2778 Nos.

2778.00 10.00 27780.00

3 Transportation of plants from nursery to camp site up to 5 Km 2778 Nos. 2778.00 1.00 2778.00

4 Loading and unloading of plants 2778 Nos. 2778.00 1.00 2778.00

5 Rehandling of plants from camp site to actual planting site up to 200mt. 2778 Nos. 2778.00 1.00 2778.00

6 Cost of fertilizer & insecticides incl. application 2778 Nos. 2778.00 10.00 27780.00

7 Weeding and Hoeing two times (Twice in Year) 2778 Nos. 2778.00 2.00 5556.00

Total cost per Hactre Rs.

97230.00

IWMP-3 Idar


(106)

Table no.43: Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas

S. No. Name(s) of the

villages CPR particulars Activity proposed

Target

Target area under the activity

(ha) Estimated expenditure (Rs.)

Expected no. of

beneficiaries

1 Jadar - - - - -

2 Javanpura - - - - -

3 Jethipura - - - - -

4 Maniyor - - - - -

5 Sadatpura - - - - -

6 Sapavada - - - - -

7 Surpur - - - - -

8 virpur - - - - -

Capacity Building

Capacity Building is the process of assisting the group of individuals to identify and address issues and gain the insights, knowledge and

experience needed to solve problems and implement change.

There is a realization in the development sector that there is a need to appraise the success of development interventions by going beyond the

conventional development targets and measures of success (e.g. in the form of commodities, goods and service) to take into account improvements to

human potential. Capacity building of stakeholders is also increasingly viewed as an important factor in development projects that involve participation

of stake holders at all levels for effective implantation of projects.

IWMP-3 Idar


(107)

Scope of capacity building at Jadar village

* Income Generation Activities

* Stitching

* Beauty Parlor

* Food Processing

* Fodder development and Management

* Afforastaion

* Gram Vatika

* Crop Information

* Meteorological Information

* Alternative Land Use Plan

* Improved and Scientific agriculture practices

* Information dissemination on Audio/Video

* Dairy Development and Management.

* Rural Craft

Table No. 44 Capacity Building Institution

S.

No.

Name of the

Training Institute

Full Address with

contact no., website &

e-mail

Type of

Institute#

Area(s) of

specializations$

Accreditations

details

Trainings

Reference

Year

No. of

trainings

assigned

No. of

trainees to

be trained

IWMP-3 Idar


(108)

1

Institute of Rural

Management

(IRMA)

Anand Academic Rural

management Academic 2011-2012 3 8

2

State Institute of

Rural

Development,Gujrat

Ahemedabad GOG

Training in

Rural

Development

Schemes

Training

Institute 2010-2015 3 50

3 ICECD

E-1/14, Sterling city,

Bopal, Ahemedabad.

(o)+91-79-3732039

[email protected]

www.icecd.com

Development

centre

Women

Rural & Tribal

areas, Urban

slum, poor &

low-middle

income

centre of

development

programme

2012-2014 3 50

4

Dantiwada Argil.

Dantiwada –

Banaskantha University

Training in

modern and

better

agriculture

practices

Agriculture

University 2010-2015 3 50

5 BISAG BISAG-

GADHINAGAR

Space

application

Remote

Sensing GoG 2010-2015 3 3

Table No. 45 Capacity Building Plan:

Sr.

No.

Village Project Stake

Holders

Total No of

Persons

No of Persons To be

Trained

No of Training Programme

Estimated Cost

In Lakh.

1 Jadar WCs 11 11 1 0.18

SHGs 240 120 1 1.44

mailto:[email protected]

IWMP-3 Idar


(109)

UGs 210 30 1 1.50

Total Cost Rs. 3.12

1 Javanpura WCs 11 11 1 0.18

SHGs 160 50 1 1.00

UGs 110 68 1 0.91

Total Cost Rs. 2.09

1 Jethipura WCs 11 11 1 0.18

SHGs 36 10 1 0.10

UGs 73 10 1 0.20

Total Cost Rs. 0.48

1 Maniyor WCs 11 11 1 0.18

SHGs 240 120 1 1.44

UGs 210 30 1 1.50

Total Cost Rs. 3.12

1 Sadatpura WCs 11 11 1 0.18

SHGs 60 20 1 0.20

UGs 57 6 1 0.24

Total Cost Rs. 0.62

1 Sapavada WCs 11 11 1 0.18

SHGs 160 100 1 1.00

UGs 33 18 1 0.91

Total Cost Rs. 2.09

1 Surpur WCs 11 11 1 0.18

SHGs 120 60 1 0.72

UGs 185 96 2 1.15

Total Cost Rs. 2.05

1 Virpur WCs 11 11 1 0.18

SHGs 192 109 1 1.09

UGs 175 30 1 1.50

IWMP-3 Idar


(110)

Total Cost Rs. 2.77

Table no.46: Information, education and Communication Activities:

S. No. Activity Executing agency Estimated expenditure (Rs.) Outcome

(may quantify, wherever possible)

1 Street plays Bhavai /local drama group 0.20

Awareness for the importance of

watershed project area.

2 Video Shows DWDU. 0.11

3 Pamphlets & posters DWDU 0.35

4 Banners, Holdings DWDU 0.60

IWMP-3 Idar


(111)

CHAPTER – 5

Budgeting

Table no. 47: Budget at a glance for the Project

IWMP-3 Idar


(112)

Sr No Budget Component

% of the Budget Cost Requirement

Jadar

1 Administrative costs 10 12.76

2 Monitoring 1 1.28

3 Evaluation 1 1.28

4 Entry Point activity 4 5.1

5 Institution and Capacity Building 5 6.38

6 Detailed Project Report 1 1.28

7 Watershed Development Works 50 63.81

8 Livelihood activities for asset less 10 12.76

9 Production systems and micro-enterprises 13 16.59

10 Consolidation phase 5 6.38

TOTAL 100 127.62

Javanpura


2 Monitoring 1 0.85

3 Evaluation 1 0.85






IWMP-3 Idar


(113)



TOTAL 100 84.87

Jethipura


2 Monitoring 1 0.15

3 Evaluation 1 0.15








TOTAL 100 15.18

Maniyor


2 Monitoring 1 1.26

3 Evaluation 1 1.26




IWMP-3 Idar


(114)





TOTAL 100 125.76

Sadatpura


2 Monitoring 1 0.27

3 Evaluation 1 0.27








TOTAL 100 27.46

Sapavada


2 Monitoring 1 0.72

3 Evaluation 1 0.72


IWMP-3 Idar


(115)







TOTAL 100 72.32

Surpur


2 Monitoring 1 0.79

3 Evaluation 1 0.79








TOTAL 100 79.38

Virpur


2 Monitoring 1 0.99

IWMP-3 Idar


(116)

3 Evaluation 1 0.99








TOTAL 100 99.26

Table no. 48: Village component wise budget available under IWMP

Sr no

Village Administrative

Monitoring EPA

Institution

and CB DPR

Watershed

development

Livelihood

for asset

Production

system and Consolidation Total

IWMP-3 Idar


(117)

and Evaluation Work less Microenterprises

1 Jadar 15.32 5.10 7.66 1.28 63.81 12.76 16.59 6.38 127.62

2 Javanpura 8.49 3.39 4.24 0.85 42.44 8.49 11.03 4.24 84.87

3 Jethipura 1.82 0.61 0.91 0.15 7.59 1.52 1.97 0.76 15.18

4 Maniyor 15.10 5.03 6.29 1.26 62.88 12.58 16.35 6.29 125.76

5 Sadatpura 3.29 1.10 1.37 0.27 13.73 2.75 3.57 1.37 27.46

6 Sapavada 8.67 2.89 3.62 0.72 36.16 7.23 9.40 3.62 72.32

7 Surpur 7.94 3.18 3.97 0.79 39.69 7.97 10.32 3.97 79.38

8 Virpur 9.93 3.97 4.96 0.99 49.63 9.93 12.91 4.96 99.26

Table no. 49: Village wise gap in funds requirement

Sr

No

Village Total cost requirement Total funds available under IWMP Gap in funds requirement

1 Jadar 144.16 127.62 16.54

2 Javanpura 88.76 84.87 3.89

3

Jethipura 24.36 15.18 9.18

4 Maniyor 149.90 125.76 24.14

5 Sadatpura 37.69 27.46 10.23

6 Sapavada 72.32 72.32 3.89

7 Surpur 88.25 79.38 8.87

IWMP-3 Idar


(118)

Table No. 50: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes

Sr.

No. Village

Activity To be

carried out

Total Amount of

activity ( in

Lakhs)

Fund made

available to

IWMP due to

convergence (Rs.

in lakh)

Scheme with which

convergence took

place

Reference No. of

activity/ task/

structure in DPR

Level at which

decision for

convergence was

taken

1 Jadar

Engineering

Structures

80.35 16.54 NREGA

District Level

2 Javanpura

Engineering

Structures

42.44 42.44

Vegetative cover 8.06 3.89 Forest District Level

3 Jethipura

Engineering

Structures

18.33 9.18 NREGA

District Level

4 Maniyor

Engineering

Structures

87.02 24.14 NREGA

District Level

5 Sadatpura

Engineering

Structures

21.04 7.31 NREGA

District Level


6 Sapavada

Engineering

Structures

36.16 - - - -


8 Virpur 123.89 99.26 24.63

IWMP-3 Idar


(119)

7 Surpur

Engineering

Structures

43.75 4.01 NREGA

District Level


8 Virpur

Engineering

Structures

69.86 23.63 NREGA

District Level

Livelihoods

Activity 13.91 1.00 NREGA District Level

Table no. 51: Public-Private Partnership in the IWMP projects

S.

No.

Name of

Private Sector

Partner Agency

Type of agreement signed Financial contribution

Partnership

Interventions

Expected

Outcomes Comments

a)MoU b)Contract c) Any other

(pl. specify) IWMP Private sector

1 SLNA YES YES - - - -

IWMP-3 Idar


(120)

CHAPTER – 6

EXPECTED OUTCOMES

Expected Outcome

Employment

Employment has always been a problem in the village. The principal occupations of the people are dry land agriculture, animal husbandry and casual

labor work. However, rain fall being very limited and erratic, agriculture suffers, i.e. at best they can take only a single crop, which keeps them partially

IWMP-3 Idar


(121)

engaged for about 4 months. Lack of fodder makes animal husbandry very difficult too. So, animal husbandry does not keep them engaged full time.

Thus the people mainly depend upon casual labor, either in the village itself or outside it.

The project plans for creation of both wage employment and self employment opportunities. Wage employment would be created by engaging people in

watershed physical works like construction of earthen bunds, farm bunds, village pond, plantation, etc. Self employment should be created by providing

the people with case support in the form of direct livelihood activities like agriculture. Animal husbandry and enterprise development.

Table No. 52: Employment in Project is

Sr.

No.

Name of

Village

Wage employment Self employment

No. of man-day No. of beneficiaries No. of beneficiaries

SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Othe

rs Women Total SC ST Others Women Total

1 Jadar 21314 9642 15732 10245 56933 142 64 105 68 379 38 14 18 32 102

2 Javanpura 12619 9614 4807 4995 32035 210 173 106 130 619 34 24 47 21 126

3 Jethipura 4438 0 3593 2259 10290 148 0 120 75 343 12 0 8 16 36

4 Maniyor 23083 0 16488 11095 50666 154 0 110 74 338 33 0 28 42 96

5 Sadatpura 4626 3525 1762 1831 11744 31 24 12 12 79 12 8 6 11 37

6 Sapavada 10717 8165 4083 4242 27207 71 54 27 28 180 28 12 24 32 96

7 Surpur 11555 8804 4402 4574 29335 77 59 29 30 195 21 8 18 14 61

8 Virpur 19433 2776 14344 12088 48641 130 19 96 81 326 28 12 24 32 96

Table no. 53: Details of seasonal migration from Project area

IWMP-3 Idar


(122)

Sl. No. Names of villages No. of persons migrating No. of days per year of migration

1 Jadar Pre-project Expected post project Pre-project Expected post project

0 0 0 0

2 Javanpura 0 0 0 0

3 Jethipura 0 0 0 0

4 Maniyor 0 0 0 0

5 Sadatpura 0 0 0 0

6 Sapavada 0 0 0 0

7 Surpur 0 0 0 0

8 Virpur 0 0 0 0

Ground water table

Rainfall has been scanty but demand of ground water has been increasing all the time. The ground water table thus has depleted over the years.

Presently it stands at 28 mt.

Proper water harvesting structures and percolation tanks would go a long way in increasing water table depth from 28 mt in the pre-project level to 25

mt the post project period.

Table No. 54: Details of average ground water table depth in the project areas (in meters)

Sr. No. Name of Village Sources Pre-project level

Expected

Increase/decrease

(Post-Project)

1 Jadar

Open wells 24m 18m

Bore wells 84m 60m

Other (specify)

IWMP-3 Idar


(123)

2 Javanpura

Open wells 30m 20m

Bore wells 80m 60m

Other (specify)

3 Jethipura

Open wells 24 m 16m

Bore wells 75m 60m

Other (specify)

4 Maniyor

Open wells 26m 18m

Bore wells 85m 60m

Other (specify)

5 Sadatpura

Open wells 28m 20m

Bore wells 85m 60m

Other (specify)

6 Sapavada

Open wells 28m 20m

Bore wells 85m 60m

Other (specify)

7 Surpur

Open wells 30m 20m

Bore wells 80m 60m

Other (specify)

8 Virpur

Open wells 28m 20m

Bore wells 85m 60m

Other (specify)

Drinking water

The village has two dug wells on which they depend for their drinking water. Many an effort at finding sweet water at different other places in the same

village has failed. There is a well in common land; but the water is not as good as the other well. WASMO has constructed a tank to store water brought

through pipeline from well.

IWMP-3 Idar


(124)

As a result of the watershed activities, it is expected that the quantity and quality of drinking water would improve.

Table No. 55: Status of Drinking water

Sr. No. Name of Village

Availability of drinking Water

(no. of months in a year Quality of drinking water

Comments

Pre-project Expected Post

project Pre-project

Expected Pre-

project 1 Jadar 12 12 Saline with high TDS Potable

2 Javanpura 12 12 Saline with high TDS Potable

3 Jethipura 12 12 Saline with high TDS Potable

4 Maniyor 12 12 Saline with high TDS Potable

5 Sadatpura 12 12 Saline with high TDS Potable

6 Sapavada 12 12 Saline with high TDS Potable

7 Surpur 12 12 Saline with high TDS Potable

8 Virpur 12 12 Saline with high TDS Potable

Crops

Agriculture primarily depends upon water; but this is what is lacking in Jadar village. The surface water is scanty due to low rainfall and ground water is

saline, which is unfit for crop production.

All this can change with the integrated land and water management during the watershed project. The farmers can take more than one season of crops.

Different varieties of crops can be taken.

IWMP-3 Idar


(125)

Table no. 56: Details of crop are and field in the Project areas

Name of Project Name of crops

Pre-project Expected Post-Project

Area

(ha)

Average Yield (Qtl)

per ha.

Area

(ha)

Average Yield (Qtl)

per ha.

Jadar Project in Idar

Block

Kharif

Cotton 448 22 525 32

Castor 314 21 350 36

Juwar 13 19 15 25

Vegetable 5 33 7 45

Rabi

Wheat 367 32 525 12

Bajara 35 34 100 5

Vegetable 5 32 30 9

655

Village total 407

Project total

Horticulture

Table no. 57: Area under horticulture

Sr. No. Name of Village Existing area under horticulture (ha) Area under horticulture proposed to be covered

through IWMP ha

1 Jadar 0 6.80

2 Javanpura 0 3.9

3 Jethipura 0 2.75

4 Maniyor 0 5.60

5 Sadatpura 0 4.10

6 Sapavada 0 3.9

IWMP-3 Idar


(126)

7 Surpur 0 3.9

8 Virpur 0 5.70

Vegetative cover

There is negligible area under tree cover. Trees like Neem and Alianthus are seen just here and there, not concentrated in any area.

It is planned that 25 ha land to be covered under new plantation.

Table No. 58: Forest/vegetative cover

Sr. No. Name of Village Exiting area under tree cover (ha) Area under tree cover proposed

1 Jadar 35 95

2 Javanpura 5 15

3 Jethipura 5 12

4 Maniyor 46 90

5 Sadatpura 9 20

6 Sapavada 11 25

7 Surpur 12 25

8 Virpur 27 55

Livestock: - The village has quite a good of livestock population. These include cows, bullocks, buffaloes, goats, sheep and camels. The

interventions like provision of good quality cows and buffaloes, the establishment of a fodder bank and other such related activities would spur up the

dairy development in the village. It is expected that the post project period would see a substantial increase in livestock population and yield from them.

Table no. 59: Details of livestock in the project areas (for fluids please mention in litters, for solids please mention in kgs. and income in Rs.)

Sr. Name of Type of Animal Pre-project Expected Post-project Remarks

IWMP-3 Idar


(127)

No. Village No. Yield Income No. Yield Income

1 Jadar Milk-animal

Cow (per animal/day) 245 1960 29400 300 3000 45000

Buffalo (per animal/day) 925 9250 185000 1000 12000 240000

2 Javanpura Milk-animal

Cow (per animal/day) 30 16500 495000

Buffalo (per animal/day) 30 31500 945000

3 Jethipura Milk-animal



4 Maniyor Milk-animal



5 Sadatpura Milk-animal



6 Sapavada Milk-animal



7 Surpur Milk-animal



8 Virpur Milk-animal



IWMP-3 Idar


(128)

Linkage

The direct livelihood activities need good forward and backward support. Without such support system the activities may fail to deliver the desire

results. These linkages would involve credit, machinery, input supply, and marketing. etc.

Table No. 60: Backward-Forward linkages

Sr. No. Project Type of Marketing Facility Pre-project (no.) During the project (no.) Post-project (no.)

1 Jadar

Backward linkages

Seed certification

Seed supply system 1 1

Fertilizer supply system 1 1

Pesticide supply system 1 1

Credit institutions Bank-1 Bank-1

Water supply

Extension services KVK KVK

Nurseries 1

Tools/Machinery supply

Labor 425 425

Any other (Please specify)

Forward linkages

Harvesting/threshing machinery

Storage (including cold storage)

Road network

Transport facilities

Markets/ Mandis Collective marketing system Collective marketing

system

Agro and other Industries 1 1

IWMP-3 Idar


(129)

Milk and other collection centers 1 1

Labor

Any other (please specify) Vermi Compost Unit- 25 25

Fodder bank Fodder Bank

IWMP-3 Idar


(130)

CHAPTER – 7

QUALITY AND SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES

IWMP-3 Idar


(131)

Quality and Sustainability Issues

Plans for Monitoring and Evaluation

A Web-based GIS System is being developed for monitoring and Jadaruating the project in its planning & implementation phase. The system

would be available on a public domain and can be accessed by all the stakeholders of the project. The system shows the entire state of Gujarat and all of

those areas selected over the next 18 years. Filtering allows the user to zoom onto one particular project. Details related to soil type, and-use

classification, inhabitation etc., can be obtained village-wise. Furthermore, survey-number wise details related to ownership, irrigation source, field etc.,

can also be accessed by the users of the system. This system is being used for pooling up the details obtained from the DPR. In other words, the DPR is

made available online in the from of a database which will help the stakeholders know areas of importance viz., already treated areas/historical works in

the area, proposed areas for treatment etc., for further treatment and planning. The system would also show the satellite imageries of various years from

the project inception stage to the project closing stage. This allows the user to Jadaruate the effectiveness of the treatment and thereby plans corrective

measure for the project area. The system would serve as an aiding tool to the planners and Jadaruators for judging the efficacy of the project.

Yet another component of the web-based GIS system is the Mobile base Monitoring Jadaruation System, which will help the ground staff alias

WDTs (Watershed Development Team) to transmit information from the ground level to the central server. Also, any higher-up official in charge of the

project can obtain information regarding the project area on their mobile phone by means of an SMS. The system works in the following manner. The

WDT equipped with a GPS instrument marks the latitude-longitude information of various treatment areas during the DPR. The probable site is then

transferred onto the central server. During the works phase, any progress in treatment areas in reported to the server by means of the SMS by the WDT.

Similarly, any nodal officer or higher-up official can view the progress in a project by means of summarized reports generated over frequent periods of

time

Plans For Project management:

The Project management of any watershed programme is very important. It mainly depends upon the community organization and the village

level institutes. In Jadar, watershed committee and various user group have been formulated for post project operation and maintenance of assets created

during project period. Major emphasis will be on equity and sustainable benefit of the project even after implementation stage. A proper line-up will be

build during project period with various institutes and capacity building organization. They will act as a major kingpin during post implementation for

IWMP-3 Idar


(132)

Scaling up the successful experience during project.

Watershed Development Fund:

The major source of financial assistance after post implementation period is watershed Development Fund. The contribution of it will comes

mainly fund the following.

User Charges:

Various user groups will be formed in village. These user groups will collect user charges according to the designated rules formed during the

formation of user group. These funds will be transferred to the WDF funds as per these formulated rules. The secretary of watershed committee (WC)

shall maintain the record of the following.

IWMP-3 Idar


(133)

Documents

IWMP-3 Idar Detail Project Report - Gujaratgswma.gujarat.gov.in/pfile/DPR/2009-10/Sabarkantha/IWMP_3_Jadar_I… · IWMP-3 Idar District Watershed Development Unit, Sabarkanth (3)