DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (DPR)gswma.gujarat.gov.in/pfile/DPR/2009-10/Dahod/IWMP - … · · 2013-04-18district watershed development unit dahod detailed project report (dpr) iwmp-1

DISTRICT WATERSHED DEVELOPMENT UNIT DAHOD

DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (DPR)

IWMP-1 GARBADA (2009-10)

PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION AGENCY

DY. CONSERVATOR OF FOREST, FOREST DIVISION, DEVGADH BARIA

DEPARTMENT OF FOREST, GUJARAT STATE.

District Watershed Development Unit

DAHOD

PIA: Department of Forest, Devgadh Baria Page No: 2

Declaration

Under Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP) 2009-10, the Detailed Project Report (DPR) for the Zari-Bujarg

cluster consisting of six priority villages namely Gulbar, Jambua, Nimach, Gangarada, Simaliya Bujarg and Zari Bujarg had

been prepared based on priority map of district given by BISAG. The total project area proposed to be treated under this

cluster is 3069.84ha with the total project cost 368.38 Lakhs & 96.20 Lakhs as conversion amount.

The DPR is successfully completed with joint efforts of District Watershed Development Unit (DWDU-Dahod) and Project

Implementation Agency (PIA). The PIA nominated from Gujarat State Watershed Management Agency (GSWMA) for IWMP-1

(Zari-Bujarg) is Devgarh Bariya Division, Forest Department.

The DPR is finally submitted to DWDU-Dahod for required corrections/amendments and for further procedures.

Dy. Conservator of Forest

Forest Division, Devgarh Bariya

Garbada-1, District- Dahod


DAHOD


Declaration

Under Integrated Watershed Management Programme 2009-10, the DPR for IWMP-1 (Zari-Bujarg) had been submitted by PIA

to DWDU-Dahod. The DPR is verified and necessary amendments were made to overcome technically limitations and to carry

out effective implementation.

The DPR is made online on website - http://www.ruraldev.gujarat.gov.in/ (Commissionerate of Rural Development Gujarat

State) and hereby put for the approval.

Project Manager


Dahod


DAHOD


Approval Letter

The Detailed Project Report of IWMP-1 (Zari-Bujarg) prepared by DWDU - Dahod & PIA Devgarh Bariya Forest Division,

Gujarat Forest Department) had been designed as per the New Common Guidelines, 2008.

It states briefly the need for implementing the watershed project in Zari-Bujarg cluster and suggests the appropriate so lutions

to overcome the water scarcity through holistic approach. It also put the emphasis on improving livelihood pattern of the rural

section.

I hereby approve the DPR of IWMP-1 (Zari-Bujarg).

Chairman

District Watershed Development Unit, Dahod

&

District Development Officer

Dahod


DAHOD


Contents CHAPTER 1 - PROJECT BACKGROUND .....................................................................................................................................................................................12

1 1- PROJECT BACKGROUND....................................................................................................................................................................................................13

HISTORY – DAHOD...................................................................................................................................................................................................................13

Climate .....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................14

District's Population Information ..............................................................................................................................................................................................15

Project area identity and location .............................................................................................................................................................................................15

Table no.1: Basic project information .......................................................................................................................................................................................16

Area proposed to be treated ......................................................................................................................................................................................................16

Table no. 2: Weightage of the project .......................................................................................................................................................................................18

Table no. 2.1: Criteria and weight-age for selection of watershed.............................................................................................................................................18

Project type: Hilly /Other ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................19

Table no. 3: Watershed information .........................................................................................................................................................................................19

1.3 Other developmental projects/schemes running in the Zaribujarg project ..........................................................................................................................20

Table no.4: Developmental programmes running in the project area .......................................................................................................................................20

Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmes in the project area............................................................................................................................................22

CHAPTER 2 - PROJECT IMPLEMENTING AGENCY ....................................................................................................................................................................24

2.1 Project Implementing Agency.............................................................................................................................................................................................25

2.2 About Gujarat Forest Department as a PIA.........................................................................................................................................................................25

2.2.1 The organization and its objectives ..................................................................................................................................................................................25

2.2.2 Objectives of the Forest Department ..................................................................................................................................................................................26


DAHOD


Table no. 6: PIA ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................27

Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level ....................................................................................................................................................................................................27

2.3 SWOT Analysis of the PIA ...................................................................................................................................................................................................28

Strength: ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................28

Opportunities:...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................28

Threats: ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................28

CHAPTER 3 – BASIC INFORMATION OF THE PROJECT AREA ...................................................................................................................................................29

Figure -2, Field Visit at Garbada Project Area ............................................................................................................................................................................30

3. DPR Process .........................................................................................................................................................................................................................31

3.1 Geography and Geo-hydrology ...........................................................................................................................................................................................31

3.1.1 Land Use Pattern ..............................................................................................................................................................................................................31

Table no. 8: Land use pattern ...................................................................................................................................................................................................31

3.1.2 Soil type and topography ..................................................................................................................................................................................................32

Table no. 9: Soil type and topography ......................................................................................................................................................................................32

Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition ...............................................................................................................................................................................32

Table no. 11.1: Soil Erosion ......................................................................................................................................................................................................33

Table no. 11.3: Water logging Conditions .................................................................................................................................................................................34

Table no. 12: Climatic conditions..............................................................................................................................................................................................35

Table no. 13: Physiographic and relief......................................................................................................................................................................................35

The elevation is hilly and the slop range is from 5 to 11 percent and the major streams of the project area are Pat Nadi.3.1.4 Land and Agriculture ......................35

3.1.4 Land and Agriculture .......................................................................................................................................................................................................36

Table no. 14: Land ownership details .......................................................................................................................................................................................36


DAHOD


Table no. 15: Area Agriculture .................................................................................................................................................................................................37

Table no. 16: Irrigation Facilities..............................................................................................................................................................................................37

Table no. 17: Crop details .........................................................................................................................................................................................................38

Table no. 18: Livestock details of the project IWMP 1...............................................................................................................................................................40

Table no. 19: Drinking water Facilities Prevailing in the project area .......................................................................................................................................40

Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources ..............................................................................................................................................................41

Table no. 21: Demographic information ...................................................................................................................................................................................42

Table no. 22: Literacy rate........................................................................................................................................................................................................42

Table no. 23: Migration details .................................................................................................................................................................................................43

3.2.2 Migration Pattern: ............................................................................................................................................................................................................43

Table no. 24: Poverty ...............................................................................................................................................................................................................43

Table no. 25: Village infrastructure ..........................................................................................................................................................................................44

3.2.3 Infrastructure Facilities: ...................................................................................................................................................................................................44

Table no. 26: Facilities / HH assets ...........................................................................................................................................................................................45

Table no. 27: Income ................................................................................................................................................................................................................45

Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR .................................................................................................................................................................................46

Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution) ...................................................................................................................................................46

3.4 Comparative data of the crop productivity of the area: Project Area v/s District v/s State v/s Country v/s World .............................................................47

3.4.1 Maize Production:.............................................................................................................................................................................................................48

3.4..2 Paddy Production:............................................................................................................................................................................................................48

CHAPTER 4 – WATERSHED ACTIVITIES PLANNED ..................................................................................................................................................................50

Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects..................................................................................................................................51


DAHOD


Table no.31: Details of PRA Activities conducted in the project area........................................................................................................................................53

4.2Object tree analysis .............................................................................................................................................................................................................55

4.2 Institutions At Village Level ................................................................................................................................................................................................56

4.2.1 Watershed Committee (WC) ..............................................................................................................................................................................................56

Table no. 32: Watershed Committee details .............................................................................................................................................................................56

4.2.2 Self Help Group .................................................................................................................................................................................................................62

Table no. 33: SHG detail ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................62

Table no. 34: UG detail .............................................................................................................................................................................................................64

4.3 Physical activities to be undertaken under IWMP – 1 (Zari Bujarg Watershed) ..................................................................................................................65

4.3.1 Entry Point Activity (EPA) .................................................................................................................................................................................................65

Entry Point Activities ...............................................................................................................................................................................................................65

Table no.35: Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs.) ...............................................................................................................................66

Table no.36: Details of Ridge line treatment /land based activities in watershed work ...........................................................................................................68

Table no.37: Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) ......................................................................70

Table no.38: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) .....................................................71

Table no.38: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) .....................................................71

Table no.39: Details of activities related to livelihood, production system and micro- enterprise.............................................................................................72

Table no. 40: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas .................................................................................................74

40.2Vermi compost Unit ............................................................................................................................................................................................................75

40.3 Nursery .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................77

4.4 Vermi Composting unit for Zari Bujarg village ....................................................................................................................................................................78

4.4.1 Introduction .....................................................................................................................................................................................................................78


DAHOD


4.4.2 About the worms...............................................................................................................................................................................................................78

4.4.3 Location ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................78

4.4.4 Use ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................78

4.5 Components of a Commercial Unit ......................................................................................................................................................................................79

4.5.1 Sheds ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................79

4.5.2 Vermi-beds .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................79

4.5.3 Land .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................79

4.5.4 Seed Stock ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................79

4.5.5 Fencing.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................79

4.5.6 Water Supply System ........................................................................................................................................................................................................80

4.5.7 Machinery ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................80

Table no.41: Linkages developed at village level ......................................................................................................................................................................80

Table no.42: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works............................................................................................................81

Table no.43: Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas .............................................................................................................................................83

Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution ...............................................................................................................................................................................84

Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan.........................................................................................................................................................................................85

Table no.46: Information, education and Communication Activities.........................................................................................................................................85

CHAPTER 5 – BUDGET .............................................................................................................................................................................................................86

Table no. 47: Budget at a glance for the project ........................................................................................................................................................................87

Table no. 48: Village wise- component wise budget available under IWMP ..............................................................................................................................87

Table no. 49: Village wise gap in funds requirement ................................................................................................................................................................88

Convergence Opportunities......................................................................................................................................................................................................89


DAHOD


Table no.50: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes ..........................................................................................................................................90

Table no. 51: Public-Private Partnership in the IWMP projects ................................................................................................................................................93

CHAPTER 6 – EXPECTED OUTCOME ........................................................................................................................................................................................94

Table no.52: Environmental Benefits .......................................................................................................................................................................................95

Table no. 53: Status of Drinking water .....................................................................................................................................................................................95

Table no. 54: Details of Kharif crop area and yield in the project areas.....................................................................................................................................96

Table no. 55: Area under horticulture ......................................................................................................................................................................................98

Table no. 56: Details of livestock in the project areas (for fluids please mention in litres, for solids please mention in kgs. and income in Rs.) ........................99

Table no. 57: Employment in Project area .............................................................................................................................................................................. 100

Table no. 58: Details of seasonal migration from Project area ................................................................................................................................................ 100

Table no.59: Per capita Income .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 101

Table no. 60: Backward-Forward linkages ............................................................................................................................................................................. 103

Table no. 61: Logical Framework analysis .............................................................................................................................................................................. 104

CHAPTER 7 – Quality and Sustainability Issues ...................................................................................................................................................................... 108

7 Quality and Sustainability Issues ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 109

7.1 Plans for Monitoring and Evaluation ................................................................................................................................................................................ 109

7.2 Plans for Project management: ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 110

7.3 Watershed Development Fund: ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 110

7.4 User Charges: ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 110

CHAPTER 8 – MAPS................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 111

Existing Structure / Baseline Map of Project Name: Zari Bujarg (Garbada) .............................................................................................................................. 112

Geomoroplogy Map of Project Name: Zari Bujarg (Garbada).................................................................................................................................................. 113


DAHOD


Ground Water Map of Project Name: Zari Bujarg (Garbada) .................................................................................................................................................. 114

Land Use / Land Cover Map of Project Name: Zari Bujarg (Garbada)....................................................................................................................................... 115

River Water Body Map of Project Name: Zari Bujarg (Garbada) .............................................................................................................................................. 116

Slop Map of Project Name: Zari Bujarg (Garbada) ................................................................................................................................................................. 117

Soil Map of Project Name: Zari Bujarg (Garbada)................................................................................................................................................................... 118

Action Plan of Village Name: Gangarda (Zari Bujarg – Garbada) ............................................................................................................................................. 119

Action Plan of Village Name: Gulbar (Zari Bujarg – Garbada) .................................................................................................................................................. 120

Action Plan of Village Name: Jambua (Zari Bujarg – Garbada) ................................................................................................................................................ 121

Action Plan of Village Name: Nimach (Zari Bujarg – Garbada) ................................................................................................................................................ 122

Action Plan of Village Name: Simaliya Bujarg (Zari Bujarg – Garbada) ..................................................................................................................................... 123

Action Plan of Village Name: Zari Bujarg (Zari Bujarg – Garbada) ............................................................................................................................................ 124

Table no. 62: Abbreviations: ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 125


DAHOD


CHAPTER 1 - PROJECT BACKGROUND


DAHOD


1 1- PROJECT BACKGROUND HISTORY – DAHOD

Dahod District, also known as Dohad District, is located in Gujarat state in wastern India. The city of Dahod is the district's administrative

headquarters. The district has an area of 3,642 Kms, and a population of 1, 636, 433 (2001 census), with a population density of 449 persons per KM.

Dahod District was created on 2nd October, 1997, and was formerly part of Panchmahal District. It's territory mostly consists of two former Princely

State, namely Baria (Devgadh) and Sanjeli in addition to Fatepura Taluka of Sunth (Pampur) State, along with the two "eastern mahals" of Dahod and

Jhalod from the former Panchmahals. It was 9.55% urban as of 2001 census.

The district is bounded by Panchmahal District to the west, Vadodara District to the south, Jhabua District and Alirajpur District of Madhya Pradesh

State to the east and southeast respectively, and Banswara District of Rajasthan State to the north and northeast. The population of the district is

mostly rural, and a majority of the district's residents are Tribals, mostly Bhils. Dahod District also has the second larges t population of "Dawoodi

Bohra" sect of Muslims in India.

The District of Dahod is further sub-divided into the following Talukas (Tehsils):-

Dahod

Jhalod

Devgadh Baria

Garbada

Limkheda

Fatepura

Dhanpur

The actual name is "Dohad", which later got transformed into Dahod. The Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb was born in a mosque within the fort of Dahod.

There is a government polytechnic college since 1963 and it was started by Indian Prime Minister Mr. Moraraji Desai and now gover nment degree

engineering college is also there. The degree college is affiliated to Gujarat University.


DAHOD


As far as topography of the district is concerned Jhalod and Dahod are in plains. Normal slope is mainly in north of Jhalod and Fatepura Taluka and

Steep slope is in Devgadh Baria, Dhanpur and Limkheda Taluka.

Geologically the Dahod district is composed of Rocks of Aravalli formation of Delhi systems. At some places Limestone and Basalt are exposed. The

south, southwest and southeast part of Garbada, Dhanpur and Devgadh Baria Taluka comprises of metamorphic rocks like Granite, Phyllite, Schist, and

Quartzite. The west portion of Limkheda Taluka is mainly composed of Quartzite rocks and North, Central and Southwest area covering Dahod &

Jhalod is composed of Basalt and limestone. Rest of the area including Fatepura Taluka is composed of Phyllite and Quartzite rocks.

Geohydrologically, the Rocks of Dahod District have low porosity and permeability. In the district the compactness of rock formation increases with

depth and overall yield in aquifers is low. In Dahod District water found at shallow depth i.e. 40 to 50 mts.

Climate The climate of district is usually hot. This district is considered as rain fed area. The average rain of district is 739 mm. Sometimes rain delays and

district has to face drought. It's very hot during March to June, while from November to February winter prevails in district

No. Year Dahod Garbada Dhanpur Devgadh Baria Limkheda Zalod Fatepura 1 1991 650 650 819 628 819 762 558

2 1992 549 549 742 616 742 742 678

3 1993 724 724 936 857 936 862 703

4 1994 1124 1124 1441 1380 1441 1376 1183

5 1995 441 441 400 570 400 691 814

6 1996 907 907 1207 1029 1207 1297 1925

7 1997 981 981 1250 1024 1250 820 1455

8 1998 715 715 546 795 840 1012 757

9 1999 352 338 330 402 411 633 506

10 2000 271 298 314 414 447 ? 319


DAHOD


District's Population Information Total seven talukas and 696 villages are covered in Dahod district. Total population of district is 16.35 lakh. (2001) Out of which men are 8.24 lakh and

women are 8.11 lakh. Urban population is 1, 56,378.

No. Name of Taluka

No. of Villages

Population (2001)

Literacy Ratio (in percentage)

Geographical Area

Woman Man Total

1 Dahod 86 368511 37.05 61.18 49.22 58190.69

2 Garbada 34 142391 22.91 49.67 36.30 23461.08

3 Dhanpur 90 131855 19.90 44.31 32.20 46638.71

4 D. Daria 87 208197 31.39 67.33 49.46 64480.86

5 Limkheda 152 239293 31.40 63.17 47.29 59718.48

6 Zalod 151 359759 33.43 58.49 46.04 79839.79

7 Fatepura 96 185368 33.39 62.16 47.81 30947.55

Total: 696 1635374 31.70 59.45 45.65 363277.20

Population of scheduled tribes in the newly formed Dahod district is 72 % and scheduled castes are 3 %. Urban population is 8 %, while percentage of

rural population 92%.

Project area identity and location

Zari Bujarg (IWMP - 1) project is situated in Garbada Taluka, of the Dahod District of Gujarat State. The project is a cluster of eleven micro watersheds i.e., 5E2A6d3j, 5E2A6d3k, 5E2A6d3f, 5E2A6d3g, 5E2A6c2e, 5E2A6d3c, 5E2A6c2d, 5E2A6d3h, 5E2A6c2l, 5E2A6c2h, 5E2A6c2k. The total project area of the watershed is about 3069.84 ha is proposed to be treated under Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP).

The livelihood of the people of this area is primarily based on rain fed agriculture, labour work, agriculture labour work, a nd animal husbandry. Mainly the people of this area are migrating to various cities to earn by doing Labour Work, viz. Agricultural Labour Work, Construction and Small Businesses to Rajkot, Valsad, Surat, Ahmedabad, etc. places.


DAHOD


There are no irrigation facilities in the designated watershed area. Watershed may help for fodder development which will be helpful for animal husbandry. Due to less rain fall people had been migrated in various parts of Gujarat. To check the seasonal migration of the people, the main occupation farming is required to be strengthened. Table no.1: Basic project information

Sl No.

Name of the

project

Villages Gram

Panchayats Taluka District

Area of the

project

Area proposed

to be treated

Total project

cost PIA

Name Census code

1

Zari Khurd

Gulbar 180050131730000 Gulbar

Garbada Dahod

302.11 302.11 36.25

Range Forest Dev.

Bariya

2 Jambua 180050131740000 Jambua 575.41 75.41 9.05

3 Nimach 180050131750000 Nimach 522.97 22.97 2.76

4 Gangarda 180050131720000 Gangarda 588.26 588.26 70.59 5 Simaliya Bujarg 180050131700000 Gangarda 878.72 378.72 45.45

6 Zari Bujarg 180050131820000 Zarikhurd 2702.37 1702.37 204.28

Total: 5569.84 3069.84 368.38

Area proposed to be treated

Watershed Development Programme is selected on the basis of thirteen parameters namely (1.) Poverty Index, (2.) Percentage of SC/ST, (3.) Actual Wages, (4.) Percentage of small and marginal farmers, (5.) Ground water status, (6.) Moisture Index, (7.) Area under rain fed agriculture, (8.) Drinking water situation in the area, (9.) Percentage of degraded land, (10.) Productivity p otential of the land, (11.) Continuity of another watershed that has already developed/treated, (12.) Cluster approach for plain (13.) Cluster approach for hilly terrain. Based on these thirteen parameter a composite ranking was been given to Zari Bujarg watershed project as given in Table No. 2.

The total number of families under BPL (Below Poverty Line) is 939, which is 37.98% of the total households of the village. Hence a score of 5 has been given. The percentages of (Schedule Tribes) STs in the village are about 98.50%, SCs are 1.23% and OBCs are Nil. Hence a score of 10 has been given.

Rain fed agriculture forms the primary occupation of the village due to the fact that ground water is either unavailable or too deep to fetch and hence

unfit for usage. In Zari Bujarg project area there are more than 80% farmers are small and marginal hence the score of 10 has been given.


DAHOD


Figure1, Geographic location of Zaribujarg Project

Dahod – District Map Zaribujarg


DAHOD


Table no. 2: Weightage of the project Project name

Project type

Weightage Total

Zari Bujarg Other/Hilly i ii iii iv v vi vii viii Ix x xi xii Xiii

7.5 10 5 10 2 10 15 5 15 10 10 15 15 129.5 Table no. 2.1: Criteria and weight-age for selection of watershed Sr.No

Criteria Maximum Score

Ranges & Scores

1 Poverty index (% of poor to population)

10 Above 80% (10) 80 to 50% (7.5) 50 to 20% (5) Below 20% (2.5)

2 % of SC/ST population 10 More than 40% (10) 20 to 40% (5) Less than 20%(3) -

3 Actual wages 5 Actual wages are significantly lower than minimum wages (5)

Actual wages are equal to or higher than minimum wages (0)

- -

4 % of small and marginal farmers

10 More than 80% (10) 50 to 80% (5) Less than 50% (3) -

5 Ground water status 5 Over exploited (5) Critical (3) Sub critical (2) Safe (0) 6 Moisture index/DPAP/DDP

Block 15

-66.7 & below (15) DDP Block

-33.3 to -66.6 (10) DPAP Block

0 to -33.2 (0) Non DPAP/DDP Block

-

7 Area under rain fed agriculture

15 More than 90% (15) 80 to 90% (10) 70 to 80% (5) Above 70%

(Rejected) 8 Drinking water

10 No source (10) Problematic village

(7.5) Partially covered (5) Fully overfed (0)

9 Degraded land 15

High – above 20% (15) Medium – 10 to 20% (10)

Low – less than 10% of TGA (5)

-

10 Productivity potential of the land 15

Lands with low production & where productivity can be

Lands with moderate production & where productivity can be

Lands with high production & where productivity can be

-


DAHOD


significantly enhanced with reasonable efforts (15)

enhanced with reasonable efforts (10)

marginally enhanced with reasonable efforts (5)

11 Contiguity to another watershed that has already been developed/treated

10

Contiguous to previously treated watershed & contiguity within the micro watersheds in the project (10)

Contiguity within the micro watersheds in the project but non contiguous to previously treated watershed (5)

Neither contiguous to previously treated watershed nor contiguity within the micro watersheds in the project (0)

-

12 Cluster approach in the plains (more than one contiguous micro-watersheds in the project)

15

Above 6 micro-watersheds in cluster (15)

4 to 6 micro-watersheds in cluster (10)


-

13 Cluster approach in the hills (more than one contiguous micro-watersheds in the project)

15

Above 5 micro-watersheds in cluster (15)



-

Total: 150 150 90 41 2.5

Project type: Hilly /Other Table no. 3: Watershed information

Name of the project

No. Of watersheds

to be treated Watershed code

Watershed regime/type/order

Zari Bujarg 11 5E2A6d3j, 5E2A6d3k, 5E2A6d3f, 5E2A6d3g, 5E2A6c2e, 5E2A6d3c,

5E2A6c2d, 5E2A6d3h, 5E2A6c2l, 5E2A6c2h, 5E2A6c2k Mini Watershed


DAHOD


1.3 Other developmental projects/schemes running in the Zaribujarg project Table no.4: Developmental programmes running in the project area

Sl no

Name of the programme/scheme

Sponsoring agency Objectives of the programme/scheme Year of

commencement Villages covered

Estimated number of

beneficiaries

1 NREGS (National Rural Employment Guarantee

Scheme) DRDA / NREGA

The main objective of this scheme is to provide 100 days employment to the local people.

2005-2006 13 1390

2 BRGF (Backward Region Grant

Fund) DRDA

The main objective of this scheme is to fulfill the missing link of the other rural schemes.

2008-2009 13 528

3 IAY (Indira Awas Yojna) DRDA Provides housing facility to BPL beneficiaries is the main objective of this scheme.

2004-2005 13 10

4 Sardar Awas Yojna TASP / Takedari Provides housing facility to BPL beneficiaries.

2003-2004 13 5

5 SGSY (Swarnjayanti Gram

Swarojgar Yojna) DRDA

This scheme gives training, gives facilities to male and female by establishing a small groups like SHG, UG etc. to the local villagers to make them capable to earn by growing their capabilities.

2004-2005 13 1080

6 IGNOAPS (Indira Gandhi National Old Age Pension

Scheme) Jilla Panchayat

In this scheme the government gives pension to the old age peoples/villagers. 2001-2002 13 628

7 Kuwarbai Nu Mameru SWO In this scheme government provides Rs. 5000 to BPL female during her marriage. - 13 430


DAHOD


8 Chiranjivi Yojna SWO This is a health care scheme to save girl child.

2007-2008 13 248

9 Balika Samrudhi Yojna Jilla Panchayat

In this scheme government gives female child the facilities like, bicycle, and scholarship to get well educated.

1997-1998 13 320

10 Vidhva Sahay Yojna Samaj Kalyan

This scheme is mainly for widow women. The facilities provided by this scheme is like, cash pension, etc.

1997-1998 13 282

11 Ambedkar Awas Yojna

To provide shelter or upgrade the existing shelter for people living below poverty line in urban slums.

1989-1990 13 5

12 Sankat Mochan Yojna 1997-1998 13 182

13 Pandit Dindayal Awas Yojna Jilla Panchayat Provides housing facility to BPL beneficiaries.

- - 2

14 Bajpai Bankebal Yojna Provides loan to unemployed educated peoples.

- - 89

15 Tapak Sinchay Sahay Yojna Agriculture Department

In this scheme agricultural department gives irrigation facility to small / marginal farmers.

- - 628


DAHOD


Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmes in the project area

Sl no

Project name

Year started

Name of villages

No. Of micro

watershed

Watershe

d codes

Area under

treatment

Funding

source

Nodal

agency

PIA

Total

cost (La)

Expenditure incurred up to start

of IWMP

% financial

completion

% physical completio

n

1

DPAP

1999-00

Nandawa

7 5E1B7

500

Govt. DRDA Dahod

NGO

30

100.00% 100.00% Batch No-5

Chandela 500 30

Nalwai 500 30

2 DPAP

2000-01

Bhe 3 5E1B7

500 Govt.

DRDA Dahod

NGO

30 100.00% 100.00% Batch

No-6 Patiya 500 30

3

DPAP

2001-02

Gadoi

9 5E1B7

500

Govt. DRDA Dahod

NGO

30

97.92% 97.92% Batch No-7

Gangarda 500 30

Nimach 500 30

Vijagarh 500 30

4

DPAP

2002-03

Zari Bujargh1

5 5E1B7

500

Govt. DRDA Dahod

NGO

30

97.26% 97.26% Batch No-8

Zari Bujargh2

500 30

Boriyala 500 30


DAHOD


5

DPAP

2003-04

Dadur

8 5E2A6

500

Govt. DRDA Dahod

Taluka Panchayat Garbada

30

99.87% 99.87%

Batch No-9

Gangardi

Panchvada 500 30

Sahda Garbada-1 500

30 Vadva 500

Chharchhoda

6

DPAP

2004-05

Garbada-3

3

5E2A6c2g 500

Govt. DRDA Dahod


30

100.00% 100.00% Block No-10

Garbada-2 5E2A6c2g 500 30

Simaliya Buzarg 5E2A6c2e 500 30 Pandedi 5E2A6c1a 500 30

7

DPAP

2005-06

Boriyala-2

4

5E2A6d3l 500

Govt. DRDA Dahod


30

100.00% 100.00%

Block No-11

Jeshawada 5E2A6a3l 500

30 Chharchhoda 5E2A6a3s Nadhelav-1 5E2A6a1d 500 Nadhelav-2 5E2A6a1d 500

8

DPAP

2006-07

Tunkivaju-01312000

4

5E2A6c2m 500

Govt. DRDA Dahod


30

100.00% 100.00%

Block No-12

Nelsur-013010300

5E2A6a3q 465.6

Vajelav-01310200

5E2A6a3m 500 30

Abhlod-01310500

5E2A6c1b 534.4

Total: 16 - 14500 - - - 720 0 99.38% 99.38%


DAHOD


CHAPTER 2 - PROJECT IMPLEMENTING AGENCY


DAHOD


2.1 Project Implementing Agency

The Project Implementing Agency (PIA) is being selected by an appropriate mechanism by State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA). PIAs would be

responsible for implementation of watershed project. The PIA of Zari Khurd watershed project is Deputy Conservator of Forest, Forest Division

Devgadh Baria.

2.2 About Gujarat Forest Department as a PIA 2.2.1 The organization and its objectives

Minister for

Forest &

Environment

Department

Minister of

State for Forest

& Environment

Department

Principal

Secretary

Forest &

Environment

Department

PCCF Gujarat State Forest Department

APCCF D & M

CCF (Territorial Circle)

ACF(District co-ordinator At

PIA level)

RFO (Nodal Officer, IWMP)

DY.C.F (Territorial Division, D.

Bariya (PIA)

RFO Garbada

RFO

Dhanpur

RFO

Limkheda

RFO Zhalod

RFO Dahod

RFO Vasiya dungri

RFO Kanjeta


DAHOD


Gujarat state was constituted as the Union of India on 1st May, 1960 after the bifurcation of the State of Bombay. Gujarat Forest department is

entrusted with the prime responsibility of protection, conservation and development of the forests and wildlife of the state.

The total geographical area of the state is 196024 sq. kms out of which 18961.56 sq. kms (9.67%) is the declared forest area with 7.72% of area as

forest cover. Whereas, the unique features of the state are the climatic and geomorphologic conditions, the largest coastline in the country, the saline

deserts of Rann, grasslands, wetlands. These factors have bestowed the state with the diversity of flora and fauna. The fauna l biodiversity consists of

14% fishes, 18 % reptiles, 37% avifauna and 25% of the mammal population of the country.

2.2.2 Objectives of the Forest Department

Protection, Conservation and development of forests and wild life, the adoption of measures of soil conservation, moisture co nservation and

increasing soil fertility.

The utilization of the forest so as to obtain the maximum yield consistent with their permanent maintenance and the supply of the needs of

the people, agriculture, industry and defence.

To conduct research into silvi culture, utilization and other problems affecting the regeneration and development of the forests.

To achieve the goals of National Forest policy 1988 and to cover the maximum area under forests.

To create awareness among the people about the forests and environment.

To increase active participation of local people in protection & conservation of forest with special emphasis on tribal, poor & women.

2.2.3 Status of Working Plans in Gujarat state

Gujarat state is situated along the western coast of the country with a total geographical area of 1,96,024 sq km having only 9.8% designated forest

lands, divided by the Tropic of Cancer. The forests of Gujarat consist of four major types, namely

(1) Tropical Moist Deciduous,

(2) Tropical Dry Deciduous,

(3) Littoral and Swamp and

(4) Northern Tropical Thorny Forests.


DAHOD


The PIA has experienced staff comprising Watershed Development Team of: Civil Engineer, Agriculture Expert and Community Mobilization and other

staff as Data Entry Operator, Surveyor, Accountant and Messenger. This team has a role of planning, implementing, supervising, documenting and

promoting watershed development projects and related developmental activities in the district as per The New guidelines 2008.

Table no. 6: PIA

Sl. No.

Names of project Details of PIA

1 IWMP – 1

Zari Bujarg

(i) Type of organization District Level Nodal Agency

(ii) Name of organization Devgadh Bariya Range

(iii) Designation & Address District Forest Officer (iv) Telephone 02678-220425 (v) Fax 02678-220425 (vi) E-mail [email protected]

PIA for the IWMP – 1 Garbada Taluka is located at the Range Forest Office Garbada. District Watershed Development Unit, Dahod has allotted 4

WDT’s at PIA level; the details of 4 WDT’s are listed as under:

Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level

Sl. no

Name Age Sex Designation Qualification Experience Job

assigned Monthly

remuneration

1 Chavda Rakesh 25 M W.D.T

Agriculture B.SC Forestry 2.7 Years Field Work 8000/-

2 Patel Jigna 26 F W.D.T C.M B.A, M.S.W 1 Year Field Work 8000/-

3 Shah Ravindra 34 M W.D.T Civil Diploma Civil 4 Years Field Work 8000/-

4 Rafikbhai Mansuri 37 M W.D.T D.E.O Data Entry Operator

11 Years Office Work 5000/-

mailto:[email protected]


DAHOD


2.3 SWOT Analysis of the PIA Strength:

(1) Dedicated and experience staffs and multidisciplinary team. (2) Independent District Level Nodal Agency. (3) Strong linkages with national and state level institutions, agricultural universities, North Gujarat University and NGOs for capacity building and technical

guidance. (4) Scientific planning in watershed projects with the help of BISAG, Gandhinagar. (5) District level monitoring, coordination & cooperation committee.

(6) Well establishment of PRIs for social audits.

Weakness: (1) Insufficient funds for complete watershed projects per hectare (2) No permanent staff (3) No permanent office building (4) No technical equipments facilities

(5) No vehicle or TA is given to surveyor to perform job speedily

Opportunities: (1) Sustainable livelihood generation landless and asset less (2) Improvement of socio-economic status of poor (3) Awareness generation among the illiterates through IEC (Information, Education and Communication) activities by usage of new ICT activities (4) Usage of new technologies of watershed modelling and GPS for monitoring the watershed activities

Threats:

(1) Lack of sustainable agriculture development (2) Delay of releasing project fund from the higher authority (3) Lack of contribution and cooperation from local peoples (4) Low and irregular rainfall in the project area (5) Low literacy rate in the project area (6) Low availability of Water/Canal/Irrigation Sources (7) High migration ratio (8) Low land productivity, erratic and an even distribution of rain.

(9) Undulating , hilly terrain


DAHOD


CHAPTER 3 – BASIC INFORMATION OF THE PROJECT AREA


DAHOD


Figure -2, Field Visit at Garbada Project Area


DAHOD


3. DPR Process

First village visit then village meeting , Transits walk, PRA ( Participatory Rural Appraisal), WDC Formation, Bas e line survey, Net Planning, SHG, UG Formation, DPR

preparation.

3.1 Geography and Geo-hydrology

3.1.1 Land Use Pattern

The net geographical area of the project Zari Bujarg (IWMP – 1) is 5569.84 ha. The total forest area is about 24.12 percent which is under cultivation

under Zari Bujarg project and completely rain fed. The Kharif crop is mainly taken in the project area.

Table no. 8: Land use pattern

S. No.

Names of villages

Geographical Area of the

village

Forest Area

Land under agricultural

use

Rain fed area

Perm-anent

pastures

Wasteland

Cultivable Non-

cultivable 1 Gulbar 302.11 0.00 129.45 2211.92 4.00 4.00 168.66

2 Jambua 575.41 93.34 352.55 242.11 77.00 77.00 52.52

3 Nimach 522.97 292.97 207.60 400.60 4.40 4.40 18.00

4 Gangarda 588.26 0.00 561.87 550.69 15.00 15.00 11.39

5 Simaliya Bujarg 878.72 0.00 519.12 635.92 212.30 212.29 147.30

6 Zari Bujarg 2702.37 957.31 1596.18 258.73 33.00 33.03 115.88

Total: 5569.84 1343.62 3366.77 4299.97 345.70 345.72 513.75

Land in Hector

By the above table it can be concluded that forest area is 24.12 percent, land under agricultural use is 60.45 percent and ra in fed area is 77.20

percent. Most of the area is rain fed area of the total geographical area is rain fed area that is 77.20 percent.


DAHOD


3.1.2 Soil type and topography Zari Bujarg watershed project falls Western/Southern Hills of Gujarat Agro-climatic zone. The soil is mainly Lateride, Calcareous, and Loamy. The soil is

dark brown and black cotton in surface colour. The depth of soil is moderate to deep about 36 to 48 cm. The predominant texture of soil is loamy sand

and silt and clay. The soil fertility is poor with low nitrogen, phosphorus and potash. The topography of the area is hilly with undulating plains and

steep slopes ranging from 0 to 16% slope.

Table no. 9: Soil type and topography

S. No.

Name of the Agro-climatic zone covers

project area

Area in ha

Names of the villages

Major soil types Topography

a)Type b) Area in

ha 1

Southern Hills 3069.84

Gulbar

Clayey, Mixed, Hypothermic

and Lithic Ustochrepts

302.11 Hilly

2 Jambua 75.41 Hilly

3 Nimach 22.97 Hilly

4 Gangarda 588.26 Hilly

5 Simaliya Bujarg 378.72 Hilly

6 Zari Bujarg 1702.37 Hilly

Total: 3069.84 - # Flat, undulating, moderate slope, Steep slope

Major Soil types are Clayey, Mixed, Hypothermic and Lithic Ustochrepts. And topography of the area is hilly. Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition

Sl. no

Village Flood

(Incidence) Drought

(Incidence) 1 Gulbar

Not Affected 3-5 Years

2 Jambua 3 Nimach 4 Gangarda 5 Simaliya Bujarg 6 Zari Bujarg

By the above table it can be conclude that, all the villages (selected) are not affected by flood.


DAHOD


Table no. 11.1: Soil Erosion

Cause Type of erosion

Area affected

(ha) Run off Average soil loss

(Tonnes/ ha/ year)

Water erosion (mm/ year)

a Sheet -

780

12.25

b Rill 10

c Gully 90

d Ravenous -

Sub-Total 100 -

Wind erosion - -

Total 100 780

By the above table, it can be concluded that, 90 percent of the area is affected by Gully Erosion.

Table no. 11.2: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress) Name of the

Village Survey

Number Soil pH

Type of Salinity (Inherent/Ingress)

Gulbar

45/1/4 7.3 0.82 1/1/A 7.2 0.64 64/1 6.6 0.6

43 7.1 0.7

Jambua

21/3 7.2 0.75 69/2/A 7.2 0.85

106 7.2 0.87 73/2 7.1 0.95

Nimach

56 7.2 0.78 27 6.9 0.67

12/7/2001 7.3 0.73 23 7.1 0.62

26/3 7.2 0.72


DAHOD


Simaliya Bujarg

67/2 6.8 0.8

1-Feb 6.9 0.75

75/1 7.1 0.72

147/2 7.2 0.78

Gangarda

161 7.2 0.81

174/5 7.2 0.95

30/4 7.1 1.1

189 7.1 0.98

Zari Bujarg

354/1 7.1 0.9

106 6.7 0.84

211/1 6.5 1.2

506 6.8 0.97

Average: 7.05 0.82

The minimum soil pH of the project area is 6.5 and the maximum soil pH of the project area is 7.3 and the averag e is 7.05. The average salinity of the

project area is 0.82.

Table no. 11.3: Water logging Conditions

Name of the Village Survey

Number Reasons

Gulbar

N/A Undulate condition

Jambua

Nimach

Gangarda

Simaliya Bujarg

Zari Bujarg

The area is not affected by water logging.


DAHOD


Table no. 12: Climatic conditions

Name of project

Average rainfall- last 5 years

Average temperature (Celsius)

Zari Bujarg 1032mm

Summer Winter Max Min Max Min

44 36 34 19

Because of the topology of the project area is hilly the summer is very hot and winter is cool. Average rainfall of the project area since last 5 years is

1032 mm.

Table no. 13: Physiographic and relief

Project name Elevation Slope range (%) Major streams

Zari Bujarg Hilly 5-11 Pat Nadi

The elevation is hi lly and the slop range is from 5 to 11 percent and the major streams of the project area are Pat Nadi.


DAHOD


3.1.4 Land and Agriculture

The area is completely dependent on rainfall. The rainfall is highly lacking in amplitude or quality which has res ulted in recurrent phenomenon of

draught. The average rainfall of this area is about 1032 mm (according to the previous five year data). The rainy days area less than 40, this

mismatched diffusion is directing to runoff of soil every year to the streams and a small streams.

Lack of surface water source and unavailability of ground water has decreased irrigation and drinking water. The average land holding is about 1 ha.

Lack of irrigation source forces the majority of these farmers to migrate to ensure their livelihood. That affects directly the demographic profile of the

village. The major crops cultivated in the area are Maize, Paddy, Soyabean, Wheat, Pigeon Pea, and Gram in the village. If rain is good and proper

irrigation source is available then the farmer can takes rabi crops viz. Wheat, and Gram in good quantity.

The project area has about 1419 cows and 1691 buffaloes out of which majority are local breed; there are 2841 bullock, 3124 Goats, 3226 other

animals. Majority of Tribal community depends on Goat, Cow, and Buffaloes rearing for their livelihood. Lack of rain and surface water has reduced

the fodder and pasture area for their animals. This leads to heavy migration to other parts of the state with their family me mbers and due to this

animal husbandry is poor. The productivity of the milching animals is too low.

Table no. 14: Land ownership details

Sl no

Village Total owned land (ha) HHs giving

land on lease

HHs taking land on

lease Gen OBC SC ST

1 Gulbar 0.00 0.00 3.08 162.91 1 0

2 Jambua 0.00 0.00 0.40 515.54 4 22

3 Nimach 1.60 34.08 13.76 256.52 0 0

4 Gangarda 0.00 13.04 0.00 119.43 0 2

5 Simaliya Bujarg 3.00 9.04 1.68 139.22 3 0

6 Zari Bujarg 0.00 0.00 0.00 241.18 0 1

Total: 4.60 56.16 18.92 1434.8 8 25


DAHOD


Table no. 15: Area Agriculture

Sl no

Village Net sown area

One time

Two times

Three times

1 Gulbar 154.07 29.58 0

2 Jambua 113.72 17.51 0

3 Nimach 93.89 12.21 0

4 Gangarda 104.04 3.92 0

5 Simaliya Bujarg 97.58 9.31 0

6 Zari Bujarg 86.98 19.76 0

Total: 650.28 92.29 0 Table no. 16: Irrigation Facilities

Sl no Village

Source 1 : Canal Source 2 : Check dam / Pond /

Check Wall Source 3 : Well/Bore/River

Availability months

Net area

Gross area

Availability months

Net area

Gross area

Availability months

Net area

Gross area

1 Gulbar 0 0 0 4 10.50 10.50 0 0 0

2 Jambua 0 0 0 5 91.50 91.50 0 0 0

3 Nimach 0 0 0 5 33.00 33.00 0 0 0

4 Gangarda 0 0 0 5 56.50 56.50 0 0 0

5 Simaliya Bujarg 0 0 0 5 77.50 77.50 0 0 0

6 Zari Bujarg 0 0 0 4 74.50 74.50 0 0 0

* Area in Acre


DAHOD


Table no. 17: Crop details

Sl no Village

Kharif (Monsoon)

Maize Paddy Soyabean Pigeon Pea Other

Area Produc

tion

Productivit

y Area

Production

Productivity

Area Produc

tion Produc

tivity Area

Production

Productivity

Area Production

Productiv

ity

1 Gulbar 85 91958 1081 56 46788 839 6 3570 605 0 0 0 0 0 0

2 Jambua 280 254761 911 129 78895 612 22 14955 682 48 19096 400 39 14662 374

3 Nimach 201 206840 1031 79 56200 712 0 50 500 30 16200 545 10 3950 381

4 Gangarda 111 65714 593 39 18945 489 0 0 0 8 4000 516 0 0 0

5 Simaliya Bujarg

100 75060 754 31 21695 707 22 10830 495 0 0 0 1 450 750

6 Zari Bujarg 159 199941 1254 16 11962 729 1429 932559 653 0 0 0 10 4800 490

Total: 776 694333 874 333 222523 672 50 29405 571 85 39296 487 60 23862 501

Sl no Village

Rabi (Winter)

Maize Wheat Gram Pigeon Pea Other

Area Production

Productivit

y Area

Production

Productivity

Area Produc

tion Produc

tivity Area

Production

Productivity

Area Production

Productiv

ity

1 Gulbar 1 250 500 7 6085 836 19 10665 554 1 1900 1357 3 1345 420

2 Jambua 7 2840 410 27 17010 619 83 25885 311 40 10695 269 33 11745 357

3 Nimach 10 10660 1055 3 3630 1156 9 6690 715 2 1000 446 4 1700 438

4 Gangarda 11 5565 499 0 0 0 1 275 324 0 0 0 0 0 0

5 Simaliya Bujarg

7 4430 610 3 2650 779 19 6040 321 1 340 405 0 100 833

6 Zari Bujarg 0 0 0 15 10215 690 15 8680 574 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 36 23745 615 41 29375 711 132 49555 445 44 13935 619 40 14890 512


DAHOD


Sl no Village

Zaid (Summer)

Maize Wheat Gram Pigeon Pea Other

Area Production

Productivity

Area Production

Productivity

Area Production

Productivity

Area Production

Productivity

Area Production

Productivity

1 Gulbar - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

2 Jambua - - - - - - 0.20 80 400 0.40 80 200 2 750 347

3 Nimach - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 210 525

4 Gangarda - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

5 Simaliya Bujarg

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

6 Zari Bujarg - - - 0 100 227 0.20 50 250 - - - - - -

Total: 0 0 - 0 100 227 0.40 130 325 0.40 80 200 3 960 436

Maize, Paddy, Soyaben, Pigeon Pea, Wheat, Gram, Adad, Groundnut, and etc. are the crops in Garbada Taluka (Zari Bujarg Watershed). Crop details

are well illustrated in Table No. 17 (Kharif, Rabi, and Zaid). Crops area production and productivity are seasonal. In Kharif (Monsoon) season the

production of the crop is good compared to those of other two seasons. In Garbada Taluka the 776 ha has been used to produce 694333 KG of Maize

with the productivity of 874 KG/Ha, 333 ha to produce 222523 KG of Paddy (Rice) with the productivity of 672 KG/Ha, 50 ha to produce 29405 KG of

Soyabean with the productivity of 571 KG/Ha, 85 ha to produce 39296 KG of Pigeon Pea with the productivity of 487 KG/Ha, while other crops in 60 ha

to produce 23862 KG with the productivity of 501 KG/Ha. On the other ha nd if we talk about the Rabi (Winter) season there are Wheat, Gram, and

Pigeon Pea as the main crops. The 132 ha has been used to produce 49555 KG of Gram with the productivity of 445 KG/ha, 41 ha to produce 29375 KG

of Wheat with the productivity of 711 KG/Ha, 44 ha to produce 13935 KG of Pigeon Pea with the productivity of 619 KG/Ha, 36 ha to produce 23745

KG of Maize with the productivity of 614 KG/Ha and 40 ha to produce 14890 KG of other crops with the productivity of 512 KG/Ha. In Zaid ( summer)

season some farmers produces crops like Wheat and Gram only due to the scarcity of water. In Zaid (Summer) season the production of the crops are

the 0.40 ha to produce 130 KG of Gram (Gram) with the productivity of 325 KG/Ha, 0.40 ha to produce 80 KG of Pigeon Pea (Pulses) with the

productivity of 200 KG/Ha and . The Large Farmers with the irrigation facilities like Private Bore, or Private Well can be able to take the crops.


DAHOD


Table no. 18: Livestock details of the project IWMP 1

Sl no

Village Buffalo Cow Total Milk

(Buffalo & Cow)

Goat Sheep Bullock Hen Others

No Milk No Milk No Milk

1 Gulbar 183 5490 143 4287 9777 406 7308 5 434 - 188

2 Jambua 408 11240 394 10820 22060 1461 23298 8 849 - 1001

3 Nimach 263 7890 249 7470 15360 4 72 1036 562 - 438

4 Gangarda 194 5820 136 4080 9900 677 12186 44 353 - 235

5 Simaliya Bujarg 67 2010 65 1950 3960 252 4536 1 139 - 114

6 Zari Bujarg 576 15490 432 11285 26775 324 7686 3 504 - 153

Total: 1691 47940 1419 39892 87832 3124 55086 1097 2841 0 2129

3.2. Socio – Economic Profile

3.2.1 Demographic Status:

Zari Bujarg watershed project mainly covers Gulbar, Jambua, Nimach, Gangarda, Simaliya Bujarg and Zari Bujarg villages which comprises of 2472

households with a population of 24592 including 12321 males and 12281 female. The sex ratio is about 997 female to 1000 male. There are about 939

BPL families. The female literacy rate as low as 26.27 per cent.

Table no. 19: Drinking water Facilities Prevailing in the project area

Sl no

Village Ground water

table (mt) Source of drinking

water Availability in months

Quality

1 Gulbar 45-50

Open Well, Private Well, Hand-pump

6-8 Poor

2 Jambua 30-35 8-12 Average

3 Nimach 30-35 8-12 Average

4 Gangarda 30-35 8-12 Average

5 Simaliya Bujarg 30-35 8-12 Average

6 Zari Bujarg 35-40 8-12 Average


DAHOD


Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources

S. No.

Names of

project CPR Particulars

Total Area (ha) Area owned/ In possession of

Area available for treatment (ha)

Pvt. persons

Govt. (specify deptt.)

PRI Public

Property Pvt.

persons

Govt. (specify deptt.)

PRI Public

Property

1 Zari

Bujarg

Wasteland/ degraded land - 513.75 - - - 513.75 - -

Pastures - 345.70 - - - 345.70 - -

Orchards - - - - - - - -

Village Woodlot - 224.10 - - - 224.10 - -

Forest - 1343.62 - - - 1343.62 - -

Village Ponds/ Tanks - 27.00 - - - - - -

Community Buildings - - - - - - - -

Weekly Markets

Permanent markets 3.00 - - - - - - -

Temples/ Places of worship - - - 2.00 - - -

Others (Pl. specify) 610.67 - - - 1273.30 - - -

Total/Average: 613.67 2454.17 0.00 2.00 1273.30 2427.17 0.00 0.00


DAHOD


Table no. 21: Demographic information

Sl no

Village Population SC ST OBC

Total Male Female Total Male Female % Total Male Female % Total Male Female %

1 Gulbar 3045 1528 1527 0 0 0 0 3045 1370 1675 100.00 0 0 0 0

2 Jambua 2342 1180 1162 99 45 54 4.23 2196 988 1208 93.77 0 0 0 0

3 Nimach 1943 958 985 0 0 0 0 1938 872 1066 99.74 0 0 0 0

4 Gangarda 3615 1810 1805 86 39 47 2.38 3525 1586 1939 97.51 0 0 0 0

5 Simaliya Bujarg 4090 2006 2084 0 0 0 0 4090 1841 2250 100.00 0 0 0 0

6 Zari Bujarg 9557 4839 4718 117 53 64 1.22 9431 4244 5187 98.68 0 0 0 0

Total: 24592 12321 12281 302 136 166 7.83 24225 10901 13324 589.70 0 0 0 0

Table no. 22: Literacy rate

Sl no

Village Literacy Literacy %

above age 14 Literacy %

below age 14 Total % Male % Female %

1 Gulbar 3045 18.10 1528 27.80 1527 8.60 30.00 70.00

2 Jambua 2342 35.20 1180 48.30 1162 22.40 20.00 80.00

3 Nimach 1943 26.60 958 40.30 985 13.30 25.00 75.00

4 Gangarda 3615 26.30 1810 38.10 1805 14.10 23.50 76.50

5 Simaliya Bujarg 4090 25.50 2006 37.60 2084 13.60 22.30 77.70

6 Zari Bujarg 9557 25.90 4839 38.20 4718 12.90 18.89 81.11

Total: 24592 26.27 12321 38.38 12281 14.15 23.28 76.72


DAHOD


Table no. 23: Migration details

Sl no

Village Total population

Migration Migration by months Main reason for

migration

Income during

migration / month

Total Male Female Up to 3 months

3-6 months

More than 6 months

1 Gulbar 3045 2059 1348 1215 343 246 321 Low rainfall, Shortage of irrigation source

development, Scarcity of water, low potential of land,

Low rainfall, Degraded & Undulating Terrain, Less

education level.

3690000

2 Jambua 2342 1557 1023 732 435 450 987 8641100

3 Nimach 1943 1077 708 485 132 359 698 8577000

4 Gangarda 3615 2365 1547 1395 567 543 179 2655050

5 Simaliya Bujarg 4090 3197 2154 2142 676 130 561 2260000

6 Zari Bujarg 9557 7687 4990 5381 796 329 699 3780000

Total: 24592 17942 11770 11349 2949 2057 3445 - 29603150 3.2.2 Migration Pattern: Migration is during summer season to various parts of the state like Ahmedabad, Surat, Vadodara, Dahej and Saurashtra as dail y wages agricultural labors and construction workers. Lack of fodder availability and grazing land for smaller ruminant also forces these farmers to migrate to other places.

Table no. 24: Poverty

Sl no

Village Total

Household

BPL % of

BPL HH

Total Land less HH

% of land less

HH 0-16 17-20 Total

1 Gulbar 419 96 63 159 37.95 44 10.5 2 Jambua 378 87 57 144 38.10 75 19.84 3 Nimach 239 55 36 91 38.08 48 20.08 4 Gangarda 502 115 75 190 37.85 62 12.35 5 Simaliya Bujarg 394 91 59 150 38.07 49 12.44 6 Zari Bujarg 540 124 81 205 37.96 53 9.81

Total: 2472 568 371 939 38.00 331 85.02


DAHOD


Table no. 25: Village infrastructure

Sl no

Village

Pucca road to

the village (Y/N)

Schools

Colleges (Number)

Post Office

(Distance)

Banks (Number)

Distance from

nearest market

yard

Milk collection

centre (Number)

Milk cooperative (Number)

Other cooperatives

/ CBIs (Number)

Any other institution LP UP HS

1 Gulbar Y Y Y Y N N N 2 K.M 1 N N 1

2 Jambua Y Y Y Y N N N 17 K.M 1 N N 2

3 Nimach Y Y N N N Y N 15 K.M 1 N N 3

4 Gangarda Y Y N N N N N 10 K.M N N N 2

5 Simaliya Bujarg

Y Y N N N N N 10 K.M N N N 2

6 Zari Bujarg Y Y Y Y N Y N 10 K.M 1 1 N 6

3.2.3 Infrastructure Facilities:

Zari Bujarg watershed is well connected with Garbada Taluka with Kaccha and Pucca roads. The village has electricity connecti ng under Jyothigram

Yojana of Gujarat Government. Nearly 71.63 per cent of households in the village have their personal electric meters. Since ground water is very

deeply and mostly unavailable so electricity is not used for agricultural purpose. Zari Khurd watershed has ten villages viz. Gulbar, Jambua, Nimach,

Gangarda, Simaliya Bujarg and Zari Bujarg having the facilities like Lower Primary School, Under Primary School and High Primary School, Post Office,

Milk Collection Centre, Milk Cooperative, and other institutions (Anganwadi, Panchayat etc.).


DAHOD


Table no. 26: Facilities / HH assets

Sl no

Village HHs with electricity

HHs with safety

latrines

HHs with phones

HHs with vehicle

HHs with TV set

HHs with cooking

gas

HHs with Drinking

water

HHs with fridge

Other Land line

Mobile 2-

wheeler 4-

wheeler

1 Gulbar 411 1 - 23 9 0 3 - - - 163

2 Jambua 365 109 - 282 42 7 31 - - - 98

3 Nimach 239 22 - 82 2 - 3 - - - 49

4 Gangarda 471 18 - 183 41 3 17 - - 2 105

5 Simaliya Bujarg 390 2 - 94 19 - 13 - - - 52

6 Zari Bujarg 439 6 - 115 14 1 - - - - 70

Total: 2315 158 0 779 127 11 67 0 0 2 537

Table no. 27: Income

Sl no

Village Agriculture Animal

husbandry Casual labour

Others Total

1 Gulbar 863980 112800 5829200 1154500 7960480

2 Jambua 1344800 8700 4412100 1226300 6991900

3 Nimach 1957000 722020 2256200 866700 5801920

4 Gangarda 2511135 67540 2565280 1628950 6772905

5 Simaliya Bujarg 2553630 6000 3422800 1390100 7372530

6 Zari Bujarg 1732321 12900 4863700 1485500 8094421

Total: 10962866 929960 23349280 7752050 42994156


DAHOD


Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR

Sl no

Village Grass Fuel Wood for Building Total

Income % sells Income % sells Income % sells Income

1 Gulbar - - - - - - -

2 Jambua - - - - - - -

3 Nimach - - - - - - -

4 Gangarda - - - - - - -

5 Simaliya Bujarg

6 Zari Bujarg - - - - - - -

Here in this area the people of village are not selling the Grass, Fuel and Wood. They use these items for their own consumption.

3.3 Livelihood Pattern:

The villagers earn their livelihood from animal husbandry and agriculture and during lean s easons they go as daily wages labourers at hilly fields of

villages. Another noticeable occupation of the people is to create bucket, supdu, etc. from the community and land or forest.

Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution)

Sl no

Village Total

workforce Agriculture

Animal husbandry

(AH)

Agriculture + AH

Casual labour

Services Handicraft Others

1 Gulbar 419 397 49 47 396 6 0 378

2 Jambua 378 342 275 7 275 22 0 222

3 Nimach 239 226 33 33 238 2 0 224

4 Gangarda 502 484 34 32 443 5 0 46

5 Simaliya Bujarg 395 335 4 4 376 15 0 71

6 Zari Bujarg 546 438 4 3 486 0 0 372

Total: 2479 2222 399 126 2214 50 0 1313


DAHOD


3.4 Comparative data of the crop productivity of the area: Project Area v/s District v/s State v/s Country v/s World

The purpose of this study is to provide a comparative analysis of productivity of Gamdi watershed villages with reference to World, I ndia, Gujarat,

Dahod district. "The term productivity in general means the total output per unit of factor input. For example land productivity means output per

hector of land. Productivity is an average and is calculated by dividing the total output of a particular crop by the total c ultivated area under that crop"

Data area made available by

the Baseline survey. The

results show that

productivity is important not

only because we observe a

strong positive relationship

with profits but that the

results are suggestive of

important scale that should

be taken to improve the

production. This result

indicates that Gamdi

watershed villages have a

very low productivity

compared to World, India,

Gujarat and Dahod. The productivity is low not because of the land is unproductive or the farmer's lack of skills to managing their crop but it is due to

the lack of irrigation sources availability and scarcity of water.


DAHOD


3.4.1 Maize Production:

Maize is widely cultivated throughout the world, and a greater weightage of maize is produced each year than any other grain. The United States

produces almost half of the world's harvest (~42.5%); other top producing countries include China, Brazil, Mexico, Argentina, India and France. The

Maize was planted worldwide, with a yield of 4970.9 kilogram/hectare. In India, it is grown in about 7.59 Million Hectors with a production of 14.71

Million Tonnes and productivity of 1938 KG/Hector. Gujarat alone produces about 57.76 % of the total Maize of our country from 57.44 % of the area

with a record productivity of about 1100 KG/Hector. Dahod district has very good productivity 1430 KG/Hector. The Gulbar, Jambua, Nimach,

GAngarda, Simaliya Bujarg and Zari Bujarg have the productivity of 1080.59, 910.61, 1030.70, 592.98, 753.61, and 1253.70 KG/Ha respectively.

3.4..2 Paddy Production:

Second largest producer of white rice. Rice is India's

preeminent crop, and is the staple food of the people of the

eastern and southern parts of the India. The world

production of Rice is about 4090 KG/Ha, Indian production

of Rice is about 2101 KG/Ha, Gujarat production of Rice is

1959 KG/Ha, and the Dahod district production of rice is

about 1421 KG/Ha. Rice is the second most important grain

in Zari Bujarg watershed villages and the production per

hector of Gulbar, Jambua, Nimach, Gangarda, Simaliya

Bujarg and Zari Bujarg is about 839.40, 612.25, 712.11,

488.78, 707.14, and 729.39 KG/Ha respectively.


DAHOD


3.4.3. Soybean Production:

The Soybean is a species of legume native to East Asia. The

plant is classed as an oilseed rather than a pulse. It is an

annual plant that has been used in China for 5,000 years to

primarily add nitrogen into the soil as part of crop

rotation. Fat-free (defatted) soybean meal is a primary,

low-cost, source of protein for animal feeds and most

prepackaged meals; soy vegetable oil is another valuable

product of processing the soybean crop. Soybean products

such as TVP (Textured Vegetable Protein), for example

important ingredients in many meat and dairy analogues.

Soybeans can produce at least twice as much protein per

acre than any other major vegetable or grain crop, 5 to 10

times more protein per acre than land set aside for grazing

animals to make milk, and up to 15 times more protein per

acre than land set aside for meat production.

Soyabean Production Chart


DAHOD


CHAPTER 4 – WATERSHED ACTIVITIES PLANNED


DAHOD


4 watershed Activities

Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects

S. No.

Scientific criteria/ inputs used

Whether scientific criteria

was used

Planning

Cluster approach Yes

Whether technical back-stopping for the project has been arranged? If yes, mention the name of the Institute

Baseline survey Yes

Hydro-geological survey Yes

Contour mapping Yes

Participatory Net Planning (PNP) Yes

Remote sensing data-especially soil/ crop/ run-off cover Yes

Ridge to Valley treatment Yes

Online IT connectivity between Yes

(1) Project and DRDA cell/ZP

(2) DRDA and SLNA

(3) SLNA and DoLR

Availability of GIS layers

1. Cadastral map Yes


DAHOD


2. Village boundaries Yes

3. Drainage Yes

4. Soil (Soil nutrient status) Yes

5. Land use Yes

6. Ground water status Yes

7. Watershed boundaries Yes

8. Activity Yes

Crop simulation models# No

Integrated coupled analyzer/ near infrared visible spectroscopy/ medium spectroscopy for high speed soil nutrient analysis

Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)#

Weather Station

(A) Inputs

1. Bio-pesticides Yes

2. Organic manures Yes

3. Vermicompost Yes

4. Bio-fertilizer Yes

5. Water saving devices Yes

6. Mechanized tools/ implements Yes

7. Bio-fencing Yes

8. Nutrient budgeting Yes

9. Automatic water level recorders & sediment samplers No

Any other (please specify)

#NDVI - Ratio of the differences of the response of vegetation in the near infrared & red regions of the electromagnetic spectrum


DAHOD


Table no.31: Details of PRA Activities conducted in the project area

Sr. No. Name of the

PRA Activity / FGD

Date Number of

people present Lessons learnt

Understanding of the problem

situation

1 Gulbar 10-06-10 43 Mostly people are illiterate , Uneducated

/they believe in old technique

for farming

Yes

After giving fully information of the project and give some examples,

then they are ready to join us

2 Jambua 11-06-10 60

3 Nimach 14-06-10 25

4 Gangarda 09-06-10 51

5 Simaliya bujarg 08-06-10 42

6 Zari bujarg 15-06-10 78


DAHOD


4.1 Problem tree analysis


DAHOD


4.2Object tree analysis


DAHOD


4.2 Institutions At Village Level

4.2.1 Watershed Committee (WC)

It is a committee that is constituted by Gram Sabha to implement the watershed project with technical support of WDTs in the village. This committee

is registered under society Registration Act 1860. The Gram Sabha of the village selects the cha irman of the watershed committee with the secretary

who will be a paid functionary. A watershed committee was formed accordingly in Zari Bujarg watershed project villages.

Table no. 32: Watershed Committee details

Sl. No.

Names of WCs

Date of Registration as a Society (dd/mm/

yyyy)

Designation M/F SC ST SF MF LF Land-less

UG SHG GP Any

other Educational qualification

Function/s assigned#

1

Jalstrav Vikas

Mandal, Gulbar

F/1751/Dahod

President M 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 BA -

Secretary M 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 BA -

Member M 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 5th -

Member M 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 5th -

Member M 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 8th -

Member M 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 - -

Member M 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 10th -

Member F 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 - -

Member M 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3rd -

Member M 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 3rd -

Member F 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4th -

Member M 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2nd -

Member M 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 - -

Forester F 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12th -


DAHOD


Sl. No.

Names of WCs


yyyy)

Designation M/F OBC ST SF MF LF Land-less

UG SHG GP Any



2

Jalstrav Vikas

Mandal, Jambua

F/1750/Dahod

President M 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 8th -

Secretary M 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4th -

Member F 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 - -

Member F 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4th -

Member M 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 - -

Member M 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 5th -

Member M 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 - -

Member M 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 10th -

Member M 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 12th -

Member F 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 12th -

Forester M 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12th -

Member F 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4th -


DAHOD


Sl. No.

Names of WCs


yyyy)

Designation M/F OBC ST SF MF LF Land-less

UG SHG GP Any



3 Nimach F/1558/Dahod

President M 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 7th -

Secretary M 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 7th -

Member M 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 7th -

Member M 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 8th -

Member M 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 5th -

Member M 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 8th -

Member M 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5th -

Member M 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 7th -

Member M 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 10th -

Member M 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 5th -

Member M 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 - -

Member M 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 12th -

Forester M 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 BA -

Member F 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 8th -

Member F 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 - -

Member F 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4th -

Member F 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 - -

Forester M 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12th -


DAHOD


Sl. No.

Names of WCs


yyyy)


UG SHG GP Any



4

Jalstrav Vikas Samiti

Gangarda

Under Process

President M 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 7th -

Secretary M 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 10th -

Member M 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 4th -

Member F 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 - -

Member M 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2nd -

Member M 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 - -

Member M 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 7th -

Member M 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 - -

Member F 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 - -

Member M 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 5th -

Member M 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 - -

Member M 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10th -

Forester M 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12th -


DAHOD


Sl. No.

Names of WCs


yyyy)


UG SHG GP Any



5

Jalstrav Vikas

Samiti, Simaliya Bujarg

Under Process

President M 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 12th -

Member M 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 5th -

Member M 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 5th -

Member M 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 8th -

Member M 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 8th -

Member M 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 5th -

Member M 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 - -

Member F 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 12th -

Member M 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 12th -

Member F 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 12th -

Member F 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 8th -

Member M 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 10th -

Member M 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10th -


DAHOD


Sl. No.

Names of WCs


yyyy)


UG SHG GP Any



6

Jalstrav Vikas

Mandal, Zari

Bujar

32468

President M 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 12th -

Member M 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 5th -

Member M 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 5th -

Member M 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 8th -

Member M 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 8th -

Member M 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 5th -

Member M 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 - -

Member F 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 12th -

Member M 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 12th -

Member F 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 12th -

Member F 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 8th -

Member M 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 10th -

Member M 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10th -

# Only the letter assigned, as below, needs to be typed, except for `J’, where the type may be specifically mentioned.

A. PNP and PRA B. Planning

C. Maintenance of Accounts D. Signing of cheques and making payments

E. Supervision of construction activities F. Cost Estimation

G. Verification & Measurement H. Record of labour employed

I. Social Audit J. Any other (please specify).


DAHOD


4.2.2 Self Help Group

Self Help Groups are motivated, small homogenous groups organized together through credit and thrift activities. Self Help Group initiatives especially

for women help uplift their livelihood. Generally Self Help Groups include landless and poor women.

Before formation of the SHGs, during PRA activities, Focused Group Discussions (FGDs) were held with the women, which came up with the following

observations:

(a) Lack of proper credit facilities due to low intervention of formal financial credit ins titution.

(b) Excessive exploitation of weaker section by money lenders.

(c) Lack of attitude for saving among poor people.

(d) Lack of knowledge on credit and thrift activity and banking.

With a detailed discussion with some of the local NGOs working in the area like Sadguru, Prakruti, Grisarv, GSRDC Vadodara, and Utthan Limkheda, it

was planned to have some capacity building training regarding SHG activities. It was also proposed to have some livelihood ac tivities which will

promote women empowerment.

Table no. 33: SHG detail

S. No. Village Name

Total no. of UGs No. of members No. of SC/ST in each

category No. of BPL in each

category

Men Women Both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total

1 Gulbar 0 7 0 5

(i)Landless 0 14 14 0 14 14 0 14 14

(ii) SF 0 30 30 0 30 30 0 30 30

(iii) MF 0 33 33 0 33 33 0 33 33

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2 Jambua 0 5 0 5

(i)Landless 0 13 13 0 13 13 0 13 13

(ii) SF 0 20 20 0 20 20 0 20 20

(iii) MF 0 22 22 0 22 22 0 22 22

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


DAHOD


3 Nimach 0 2 0 2

(i)Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(ii) SF 0 11 11 0 11 11 0 11

(iii) MF 0 11 11 0 11 11 0 11

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

4 Gangarda 0 4 0 4

(i)Landless 0 11 11 0 11 11 0 11

(ii) SF 0 33 33 0 33 33 0 33

(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

5 Simaliya Bujarg

0 5 0 6

(i)Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(ii) SF 0 44 44 0 44 44 0 44

(iii) MF 0 22 22 0 22 22 0 22

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

6 Zhari

Bujarg 0 7 0 7

(i)Landless 0 11 11 0 11 11 0 11

(ii) SF 0 44 44 0 44 44 0 44

(iii) MF 0 22 22 0 22 22 0 22

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 0 30 0 29 0 0 341 341 0 341 341 0 341

4.2.3 User Group:

User Groups are normally formed to manage an activity or asset created under the programme on a long term basis. The user group collect user

charges from their members, oversee the works and manage the benefits.

It was decided that each group would formulate certain internal rules and have feeling of ownership with community spirit.


DAHOD


Table no. 34: UG detail

S. No.

Village Name

Total no. of UGs No. of members No. of SC/ST in each

category No. of BPL in each

category Men Women Both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total

1 Gulbar 0 0 3

(i)Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (ii) SF 10 6 12 10 6 12 5 3 8 (iii) MF 9 8 16 9 8 16 2 1 3 (iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2 Jambua 0 0 1 0


3 Nimach 0 0 0 51


4 Gangarda 0 0 0 51


5 Simaliya Bujarg

0 0 0 51


6 Zhari

Bujarg 0 0 0 51


Total: 0 0 4 204 0 118 80 160 118 80 160 33 19 52


DAHOD


4.3 Physical activities to be undertaken under IWMP – 1 (Zari Bujarg Watershed)

4.3.1 Entry Point Activity (EPA)

EPA activities are certain important works which are in urgent demand of the local community. This helps in establishment of credibility of Watershed

Development Team (WDT). It also acts as a rapport building activity of the village community. A group discussion was conducted with Watershed

Development Committee (WDC) regarding EPA activity; it was conveyed to the amount of Rs. 14.74 Lack was allotted for EPA acti vity, which was a 4

per cent of total allocated budget. The villagers discussed various activities which they felt is important but after a brief discussion it was conveyed to

them that only those activities can taken, which revive the common natural resources. It was also taken into priority that there should be an

instrument of convergence which will result in sustainability of activities.

Entry Point Activities


DAHOD


Table no.35: Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs.)

1 Gulbar 145013

Filtered Drinking Water Facilities in school 0 0

Grassland/Gauchar Development 10000 1

Roof water harvesting 35000 1

Cattle Camp 27013

Books for school library 3000 1

Computer Training for Youth 70000 20

Total 145013

2 Jambua 36197


Grassland/Gauchar Development 8197 0.82

Cattle Camp 10000 1


Total 36197

3 Nimach 11026 Cattle Camp 11026 1

Total 11026

4 Gangarda 282365


Animal Water Trough 86100 6

Cattle Camp 10000 1

Computer Training for Youth(1person=3500) 85165 24

Recharge of well 38100 3

Roof water harvesting 35000 1


Grassland/Gauchar Development 10000 1

Total 282365


DAHOD


5 Simaliya Buzarg

181786

Grassland/Gauchar Development (1 ha = Rs. 10000/-) 20000 2 Recharge of well 63500 5

Filtered Drinking Water Facilities in school 15000 1 Cattle Camp 10000 1


Computer Training for Youth(1person=3500) 70000 20 Total 181786

6 Zharibujzarg 817138

Grassland/Gauchar Development (1 ha = Rs. 10000/-) 40000 4 Books for school library 3000 1

Roof water harvesting 35000 1 Animal Water Trough 172200 12

Cattle Camp 59438

Recharge of well 317500 25 Filtered Drinking Water Facilities in school 15000 1

Computer Training for Youth(1person=3500) 175000 50

Total 817138

Grand Total 1433525

A This activity will be very helpful for stop the soil erosion, stop the farm bund damaging, and will grow the moisture level of the soil, and will rise the water table too.

B The ground water level'll rise. C This activity will be helpful to provide drinking water to Animals and Birds.

D We've planned to give Reverse Osmosis plant in School and/or in Anganwadi for drinkable water to children & teacher.

E Rooftop Water Harvesting is especially used to save the raining water and use it in proper way. We've planned to give such facility to School & Anganwadi initially.

F Grassland/Gauchar Development is one of the important activity for Entry Point. Which will be more beneficial for the local peoples to use waste/grassland/gauchar land.

G We've planned to give books for school and/or library for the local people to gather knowledge.

K High quality seed will be provided to the village people in this activity.

L We've planned to give computer basic course training to the village people accoroding to village literacy rate criteria.

M Animal chekup will be done by professional veterinary surgeon.


DAHOD


Table no.36: Details of Ridge line treatment /land based activities in watershed work

S. No.

Village name

Name of structures

Type of treatment Type of land Executing

agency Target

(i) Ridge area (R)

(ii) Drain

age line (D)

(iii) Land dev. (L)

(i) Private

(P)

(ii) Commu

-nity (c )

(iii) Forest

(F)

(i) UG (ii)SHG (iii) Others (pl. specify)

No. of units (No./ cu.m./ rmt)

Estimated cost (Rs. in lakh)

Expected month & year

of completion (mm/yyyy) M W O T

1 Gulbar

Stone Bund R R L P - F UG 983 5.19 Dec-14

Nala plug - D L P - - UG 1 0.79 Dec-14

Farm bund - - L P - - UG 6769 3.25 Dec-14

Field Water Outlets

- - L P - - UG 238 5.27 Dec-14

Plantation - D - P - F UG/SHG 20000 1.00 Dec-14

Check Wall UG 4 8.00 Dec-14

Total: 23.50 Dec-14

2 Jambua

Stone bund R - L P - F UG 417 2.20 Dec-14



Plantation R - L - - UG/SHG 20000 1.00 Dec-14

Total: 6.01 Dec-14

3

Nimach

Field Water Outlets

- - L P - - UG 25 0.55 Dec-14



Total:

2.27 Dec-14


DAHOD


4 Gangarda


Nala plug - D L P - F UG 5 3.93 Dec-14

Gully plug - D L - - F UG 335 3.56 Dec-14

Field Water Outlets - D L P - F UG 553 12.25 Dec-14


Check Wall - D - P - F UG 8 16.00 Dec-14


Total:

45.53 Dec-14

5 Simaliya Bujarg


Farm bund L P UG 3440 1.65 Dec-14


Check Wall D F UG 6 12.00 Dec-14



Total:

27.16 Dec-14

6 Zari

Bujarg






Plantation R - L - - UG/SHG 20000 4 Dec-14

Total:

132.49 Dec-14

Grand Total: 236.96 Dec-14

(M – Materials, W- wages, O- others, T – Total)


DAHOD


Table no.37: Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)

Sl no

Village Name

Type of structures

Proposed target

Augmentation/ repair of existing structures

Construction of new structures Total target

No

Area to be

irrigated (ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost No

Area to be

irrigated (ha)

Storage capacity

(Lakh Ltr)

Estimated

cost

Area to be

irrigated (ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost

1 Gulbar (i) Nala Plug - - - - 1 0.0948 - 0.79 1 0 0.79

(ii) Check Wall - - - - 4 0.96 444.44 8 4 444.44 8

2 Jambua (i) Nala Plug - - - - 2 0.1884 - 1.57 2 0 1.57

3 Gangarda (i) Nala Plug - - - - 5 0.4716 - 3.93 5 0 3.93

(ii) Check Wall - - - - 8 1.92 888.88 16 8 888.88 16

4 Simaliya Bujarg

(ii) Check Wall - - - - 6 1.44 666.66 12 6 666.66 12

6 Zaribujarg (i) Nala Plug - - - - 6 0.5664 - 4.72 6 0 4.72

(ii) Check Wall - - - - 17 4.08 1888.87 34 17 1888.8

7 34

Total/Average: 0 0 0 0 26 5.0748 1999.98 42.29 26 1999.98 42.29


DAHOD


Table no.38: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)

S. No.

Name of Villages

Type of structures

Proposed target

Augmentation/ repair of existing recharging structures

Construction of new recharging structures

Total target

No. Area to be

irrigated (ha) Estimated

cost No. Area to be


cost Area to be


cost

1 Gulbar

(i)Open wells - - - - - - - -

(ii)Bore wells - - - - - - - -

Total for the village: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2 Jambua

(i)Open wells - - - - - - - -

(ii)Bore wells - - - - - - - -


3 Nimach

(i)Open wells - - - - - - - -

(ii)Bore wells - - - - - - - -


4 Gangarda

(i)Open wells - - - - - - - -

(ii)Bore wells - - - - - - - -


5 Simaliya Bujarg

(i)Open wells - - - - - - - -

(ii)Bore wells - - - - - - - -


6 Zari

Bujarg

(i)Open wells - - - - - - - -

(ii)Bore wells - - - - - - - -


Total for the project: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


DAHOD


Table no.39: Details of activities related to livelihood, production system and micro- enterprise

S. No.

Name of village

Name of activity

Type of land Executing

agency Target

(i) Private

(ii) Community

(iii) Others

(pl. specify)

(i) UG (ii)SHG (iii) Farmer


Expected month & year of completion

(mm/yyyy)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

1 Gulbar

Demonstration Plot P C - UG,SHG 1.02 Dec-14

Kitchen Gardening P C - UG, SHG 0.296 Dec-14

Drip Irrigation P C - UG, SHG 0.6 Dec-14

Floriculture - - - SHG 0.12 Dec-14

Horticulture Plant P C - UG, SHG 2.095 Dec-14

Nursery P C - UG, SHG, Farmer 4.95 Dec-14

Vermi Compost P C - UG, SHG 7.2

Total: 16.281 Dec-14

2 Jambua

Demonstration Plot P C - UG, SHG 1.02 Dec-14

Vegetable Kitchen Gardening P C - UG, SHG 0.37 Dec-14


Floriculture & Vegetation - - - SHG 0.15 Dec-14

Vermi Compost P C - UG, SHG 1.8 Dec-14

Total: 5.23 Dec-14

3 Nimach Horticulture Plant P C - UG, SHG 0.6

Total: 0.6 Dec-14


DAHOD


4 Gangarda

Demonstration Plot P C - UG,SHG 1.28 Dec-14

Floriculture Demo P C - UG, SHG 0.425 Dec-14


Kitchen Gardening - - - SHG 0.37 Dec-14


Nursery P C - UG, SHG 6.60 Dec-14

Vermi Compost P C - UG, SHG, Farmer 15 Dec-14

Total: 27.38 Dec-14

5 Simaliya Bujarg

Crop Demonstration P C - UG,SHG 6.00 Dec-14

Vegetable Kitchen Gardening P C - UG, SHG 0.37 Dec-14


Bamboo or Wooden Work - - - SHG 0.43 Dec-14

Floriculture Demo P C - UG, SHG 1.70 Dec-14

Drip Irrigation P C - UG, SHG 1.97


Total: 18.24 Dec-14

6 Zari Bujarg

Gram Vatika P C - UG,SHG 1.4 Dec-14

Plantation/Grass on Farm Bund P C - UG, SHG 20 Dec-14


Floriculture & Vegetation - - - SHG 0.42 Dec-14


Vegetable Kitchen Gardening P C - UG, SHG, Farmer 2.59 Dec-14

Crop Demonstration Plot P C - UG,SHG 2.55 Dec-14


Bamboo or Wooden Work P C - SHG 1 Dec-14


Total: 60.96 Dec-14



DAHOD


Table no. 40: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas

S. No.

Names of Villages

Major activities of the SHGs

Name of activity No. of SHGs

involved

Average annual income from

activity per SHG (Rs.)

1 Gulbar

Vermi Compost

3

25500

Kitchen Gardening 40200

Floriculture Demo 45000

2 Jambua

Floriculture

4

391500


Vermi Compost 25500

4 Gangarda

Vermi Compost

3

25500

Nursery 50000


5 Simaliya Bujarg

Nursery

4

50000

Vermi Compost 25500


Floriculture 391500

6 Zari Bujarg

Bamboo or Wooden Work

4

30000

Vermi Compost 25500


Floriculture 391500

Total: 14 1678000


DAHOD


40.2Vermi compost Unit 2 Vermi (Ascenia Fatida) =

1 Construction Of compost pit cost = (3*1.5)= qty 2 bed

= Rate- 1300.00

Total Amount-2600

2 Vermi (Ascenia Fatida) = 9 kg

Rate=300

Amu= 2700

0.23


DAHOD


3 Green Net (90%) Qty 30 Smt

Rate = 50/smt

= 1500

4 Iron Pipe = 60 Ft

Rate =20/Feet

Amu= 1200.00

5 Organic Fertilizer 3000 kg+ Tree Leaf

Qty = 3000 Kg

Rate = 500

Amo= 1500

Lab our Exp Rate = 500

1 to 6 Total Coast 10,000

Outcome And Profit Details Of Vermicompost Unit

1 Vermicompost (1 st Qut ) = 4 ton =Rs. 1500, Total Amount = 6000/-

2 Vermicompost (2 st Qut ) = 5 ton = Rs. 1500, Total Amount = 7500/-



5 verms 3000/-

Coast of Row material and Others = Rs. 10000

Net Yearly Income = Rs. 21500


DAHOD


40.3 Nursery Sr. No Particulars Qty Rate Amount

1 Pavdo (Saddle) 2 100 200 2 Tikkam (Getti) 2 200 400 3 Tagara () 5 80 400 4 Kodadi 3 50 150 5 Water Jug 5 225 1125 6 Polythene 10000 1.5 15000 7 Misc - - 1000

Total: 18275 1 Land Development - - 1000 2 Cultivation - - 800 3 Soil Expenses - - 800 4 Compost - - 1000 5 Chemical Fertilizer - - 1200

6 Polythene Filling Expenses

- - 2000

7 Seed Expenditure - - 2000 8 Irrigation Expenses - - 1500 9 Maintenance Expenses - - 1500

10 Live Hedge Fencing Expenses

- - 2000

11 Seeds treatment - - 500 12 Seed care - - 300

Total: 14600 G Total: 32875

Say: 33000


DAHOD


4.4 Vermi Composting unit for Zari Bujarg village 4.4.1 Introduction

The process of composting crop residues using earthworms comprise spreading the agricultural wastes and cow dung in layers as 1.5 m wide and 0.9

m high beds of required length. Earthworms are introduced in between the layers @ 350 worms per m3 of bed volume. The beds are maintained at

about 40 – 50% moisture content and a temperature of 20 – 30 oC by sprinkling water over the beds. The earthworms being voracious eaters consume

the biodegradable matter and give out a part of the matter as excreta or vermi-castings. The vermi-casting containing nutrients are rich manure for

the plants.

4.4.2 About the worms

Eisenia fetida, Eudrilus eugeniae, and Perionyx excavatius are some of the species for rearing to convert organic wastes into manure. The worms feed

on any biodegradable matter ranging from coir waste to kitchen garbage and vermin composting units are ideally suited to loca tions / units with

generation of considerable quantities of organic wastes. One earthworm reaching reproductive age of about si x week lays one egg capsule (containing

7 embryos) every 7 – 10 days. Three to seven worms emerge out of each capsule. Thus, the multiplication of worms under optimum growth conditions

is very fast. The worms live for about 2 years. Fully grown worms could be separated and dried in an oven to make ‘worm meal’ which a rich source of

protein (70%) is for use in animal feed.

4.4.3 Location

Zari Khurd watershed villages have lots of animals so it can become good vermi compost centre as well as good source of li velihood. Vermi Compost is

very suitable for fruit, flower and vegetable as well as cereal crops. It increases quality and quantity of product in per unit area.

4.4.4 Use

Put lack irrigation arid desert so chemical is not advisable so to increate nutritive value of soil and available farmyard manure vermi compost has more

nutrient compare to other manures and fertilizer so by the use of vermi compost we can reduce use of chemical fertilizer. Ver mi compost not only

supply nutrient but also improve quantity of hormones for plant growth, improves the soil structure leading to increase in water and nutrient holding

capacities of soil.


DAHOD


4.5 Components of a Commercial Unit

4.5.1 Sheds

Zari Bujarg watershed villages have high temperature in summer so we need a shed structure for vermi compost unit. We can make it by the use of

concrete pillars because this will act as a source of income for those in the village who produce pillars. It will prevent we tting of beds due to rain on a

windy day.

While designing the sheds adequate room has to be left around the beds for easy movement of the labour attending to the filling and harvesting the

beds.

4.5.2 Vermi-beds

Scientific bed size is 75 cm – 90 cm thick depending on the provision of filter for drainage of excess water. The whole bed area should be above the

ground. The bed should have a uniform height over the entire width to the extent possible to avoid low production owing to low bed volumes. The

proper bed width should not be more than 1.5 m to allow easy access to the centre of the bed.

4.5.3 Land

About 135 square meter of land will be required to set up a vermi compost production unit in Zari Khurd watershed villages. I t should have at least 2

to 3 sheds each of about 180 – 200 sq feet. It should have a good watering arrangement and other equipments as required because moisture is very

essential for vermi compost production. We can take land from Gram Panchayat and it can be taken on lease of at least 10 – 15 years.

4.5.4 Seed Stock

This is very important thing because worms multiply at the rate of 350 worms per m3 of bed space over a period of 6 month to a year.

4.5.5 Fencing

The entire area has to be fenced to prevent the animals and other unwanted elements. These could be estimated based on the length of the periphery

of the farm.


DAHOD


4.5.6 Water Supply System

We have to maintain always 50% moisture content, there is need to plan for a water source, lifting mechanism and a system of conveying and

applying the water to the vermi-beds. Drippers with round the clock flow arrangement would be quite handy for continuous supply and saving on

water. Such a water supply / application system requiring considerable initial investment, however, reduces the operational costs on hand watering

and proves economical in the long run. The cost of these items depends on the capacity of the unit and the type of water supply chosen.

4.5.7 Machinery

Farm machinery and implements are required for cutting the raw material in small pieces, conveying shredded raw material to the vermi-sheds,

loading, unloading, collection of compost, loosening of beds for aeration, shifting of the compost. Costs of providing necessary i mplements and the

machinery have to be included in the project cost.

Table no.41: Linkages developed at village level

Sr. No. Village Name of activity Forward/Backward

linkage Linkage with Outcome

1 Gulbar Demonstration Plot Hybrid certified and new technique

KVK/Agro centre

Hybride or certified seed /learninig about

new farming technique 2 Jambua Demonstration Plot Hybrid certified and

new technique

KVK/Agro centre

3 Nimach

4 Gangarda Floriculture demo/demonstration plot

Hybrid certified and new technique

KVK/Agro centre

Hybride or certified seed /learninig about

new farming technique 5 Simaliya Bujarg Demonstration Plot Hybrid certified and

new technique

KVK/Agro centre

6 Zaribujarg Demonstration Plot Hybrid certified and new technique

KVK/Agro centre


DAHOD


Table no.42: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works

S. No.

Village name

Name of structures

Type of treatment Type of land Executing

agency Target

(i) Ridge area (R)

(ii) Drainage

line (D)

(iii) Land dev. (L)

(i) Private

(P)

(ii) Commu-

nity (c )

(iii) Forest

(F)

(i) UG (ii)SHG (iii) Others (pl. specify)

No. of units (No./ cu.m./ rmt)


Expected month & year of completion

(mm/yyyy) M W O T

1 Gulbar

Stone Bund R R L P - F UG 983 5.19 Dec-14



Field Water Outlets

- - L P - - UG 238 5.27 Dec-14

Plantation - D - P - F UG/SHG 20000 1.00 Dec-14

Check Wall UG 4 8.00 Dec-14

Total:

23.50 Dec-14

2 Jambua





Total:

6.01 Dec-14

3 Nimach

Field Water Outlets

- - L P - - UG 25 0.55 Dec-14



Total:

2.27 Dec-14


DAHOD


4 Gangarda




Field Water Outlets

- D L P - F UG 553 12.25 Dec-14

Farm bunding - - L P - - UG 3350 1.61 Dec-14

Check Wall - D - P - F UG 8 16.00 Dec-14


Total:

45.53 Dec-14

5 Simaliya Bujarg



Field Water Outlets

- D L P - F UG 232 4.92 Dec-14




Total:

27.16 Dec-14

6 Zari

Bujarg



Field Water Outlets

- D L P - F UG 2230 47.28 Dec-14



Plantation R - L - - UG/SHG 20000 4 Dec-14

Total: 132.49 Dec-14



DAHOD


Table no.43: Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas

S. No.

Name(s) of the villages

Activity proposed

Target

Target area under the activity (ha)

Estimated expenditure (Rs. in Lakh)

Expected no. of

beneficiaries

1 Gulbar Plantation 2.35 1.00

3045 Horticulture Plant 41.90 2.10

Floriculture 3.20 0.12

Total for village: 47.45 3.22 3045

2 Jambua Plantation 2 1.00


Floriculture 3.20 0.15 Total for village: 43 3.04 2342

3 Nimach Plantation 0.50 0.50


Total for village: 12.45 1.10 1943

4 Gangarda Plantation 20.54 1.00

3615 Floriculture Demo 9.2 0.43

Horticulture Plant 50.2 2.51 Total for village: 79.94 3.935 3615

5 Simaliya Bujarg

Plantation 20.54 1.00 4090 Floriculture Demo 100.00 0.43

Horticulture Plant 39.4 1.97 Total for village: 159.94 3.395 4090

6 Zari Bujarg

Plantation 0.5 4

9557 Plantation/Grass on Farm Bund 100 20

Horticulture Plant 54 2.7

Floriculture 3.8 0.42 Total for village: 158.3 27.12 9557

Total for project: 342.78 14.6825 24592


DAHOD


Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution

S. No.

Name of the Training Institute

Full Address with contact no., website & e-mail

Type of Institute#

Area(s) of specializatio

n

Accredita-tion details

Trainings

Reference Year No. of

trainings assigned

No. of trainees to be

trained

1

N.M Sadguru Water And

Development Foundation

Post Box – 71, Dahod – 389151, Gujarat, PH No – 0091-2673-238601, FAX-0091-2673-238604, Email

Address: [email protected]

Autonomous Body

Capacity Building, Training

Programme Under

Watershed Development Programme

NGO 2011-12 7 183

2 Krushi Vigyan

Kendra (KVK)

Anand Agricultural University, Dahod – 389151, PH No –

02673-245659

Research Institute

Capacity Building / Training

Programme

University 2011-12 7 183

# Central govt. Dept./ State govt. Dept./ Autonomous Body/ Research Institutes/ Universities/ Others (pl. specify)

$ Capacity Building/ Agriculture/ Horticulture/ Animal Husbandry/ Pisciculture/ Remote Sensing/ Water conservation/ Ground water/ Forestry/ livelihoods/

entrepreneurship development/ others (pl. specify)


DAHOD


Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan

S. No. State Project Stakeholders Total no. of

persons No. of persons to be

trained No. of training programmes

Estimated cost

1 Gujarat

PIA 5 5 3 30000 WDTs 5 5 6 60000

UGs 544 144 9 90000 SHGs 183 183 9 90000 WCs 58 58 5 50000 GPs 11 11 3 30000

Community 200 200 7 70000

Table no.46: Information, education and Communication Activities

S. No. Activity Executing agency Estimated expenditure (Rs.) Outcome

(may quantify, wherever possible) 1 Information Gathering DWDU - Dahod 0.2

Awareness regarding watershed projects to the village peoples.

2 Street Plays DWDU - Dahod 0.85

3 Video Shows DWDU - Dahod 1.15

4 Pamphlets & Posters DWDU - Dahod 0.6

5 Banners & Hoardings DWDU - Dahod 1.1

6 Education DWDU - Dahod 10.9


DAHOD


CHAPTER 5 – BUDGET


DAHOD


Table no. 47: Budget at a glance for the project

Sl no

Budget component

Cost requirement

% of Budget

Amount

1 Administrative costs 10 36.84

2 Monitoring 1 3.68

3 Evaluation 1 3.68

4 Entry Point activity 4 14.74

5 Institution and Capacity Building 5 18.42

6 Detailed Project Report 1 3.68

7 Watershed Development Works 50 184.19

8 Livelihood activities for asset less 10 36.84

9 Production systems and micro-enterprises 13 47.89

10 Consolidation phase 5 18.42

Total: 100 368.38

Table no. 48: Village wise- component wise budget available under IWMP

Sl no

Village

Activity

EPA Institution

and CB DPR

Watershed development

Work

Livelihood for asset

less

Production system and Microenterprises

Consolidation Total

1 Gulbar 1.45 1.81 0.36 18.13 3.63 4.71 1.81 31.90

2 Jambua 0.36 0.45 0.09 4.52 0.90 1.18 0.45 7.96

3 Nimach 0.11 0.14 0.03 1.38 0.28 0.36 0.14 2.43

4 Gangarda 2.82 3.53 0.71 35.30 7.06 9.18 3.53 62.12

5 Simaliya Bujarg

1.82 2.27 0.45 22.72 4.54 5.91 2.27 39.99

6 Zaribujarg 8.17 10.21 2.04 102.14 20.43 26.56 10.21 179.77

Total: 14.74 18.42 3.68 184.19 36.84 47.89 18.42 324.18


DAHOD


Table no. 49: Village wise gap in funds requirement

Sl No

Village Total cost

requirement

Total funds available

under IWMP

Gap in funds requirement

1 Gulbar 39.78 26.46 13.32

2 Jambua 11.24 6.66 4.58

3 Nimach 2.87 1.99 0.88

4 Gangarda 72.91 51.57 21.34

5 Simaliya Bujarg 45.40 33.60 11.80

6 Zaribujarg 193.45 149.17 44.28

Total: 365.65 269.45 96.20


DAHOD


Convergence Opportunities

Micro Irrigation

AGWR, AIBP

Horticulture and

Bamboo Making

NRM Related

Irrigation

Rural Development

Forest

Agriculture

Tribal Development

RKVY, BRGF

State Finance

Commission

MPLAD

Others

NREGS

TASP

Sakhi Mandal, SGSY

(Self Employment)

Social Capital

Related

IWMP

INTEGRATED

PLANNING


DAHOD


Table no.50: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes

S. No.

Village Activity to be carried out

Fund made available to IWMP due to

convergence (Rs. in lakh)

Scheme with which convergence took

place

Reference no. of activity/ task/

structure in DPR

Level at which decision for convergence was

taken

1 Gulbar

Stone Bund 1.20

MGNREGA

Table No.36

Due to insufficient Grant available in IWMP project to cover all the activities

Nala plug 0.24 Table No.36

Farm bund 0.98 Table No.36

Field Water Outlets 0.74 Table No.36 Plantation 0.20 Table No.36

Check Wall 2.02 Agriculture Department Table No.42 Demonstration Plot 0.68 MGNREGA Table No.42 Horticulture Plant 0.80 MGNREGA Table No.42

Nursery 2.30 Agriculture Department Table No.42 Vermi Compost 4.16 Horticult. fDepartment Table No.42

Total: 13.32

2 Jambua

Stone bund 0.39

MGNREGA

Table No.36




Plantation 0.30 Agriculture Department Table No.42

Demonstration Plot 0.60 MGNREGA Table No.42

Vegetable Kitchen Gardening 0.11 Agriculture Department

Table No.42

Horticulture Plant 0.70 Table No.42

Vermi Compost 1.63 Horticulture Department Table No.42

Total: 4.58


DAHOD


3 Nimach

Field Water Outlets 0.21 MGNREGA

Table No.36 Due to insufficient Grant available in IWMP project to cover all the activities



Total: 0.88

4 Gangarda

Stone bund 1.78

MGNREGA

Table No.36



Gully plug 0.57 Table No.36

Field Water Outlets 2.27 Table No.36

Farm bunding 0.31 Table No.36

Check Wall 4.00 Table No.36


Demonstration Plot 0.95 MGNREGA Table No.42

Horticulture Plant 1.00 MGNREGA Table No.42

Nursery 2.50 Agriculture Department Table No.36

Vermi Compost 6.68 Horticulture Department Table No.42

Total: 21.34


DAHOD


5 Simaliya Bujarg

Stone bund 0.48

MGNREGA

Table No.36





Gully plug 0.27 Table No.36

Plantation 0.20 Table No.42

Vermi Compost 2.50

Agriculture Department

Table No.42

Vegetable Kitchen Gardening 0.07 Table No.42

Drip Irrigation 0.25 Table No.42

Demonstration Plot 0.34 MGNREGA

Table No.42

Horticulture Plant 0.90 Table No.36

Nursery 3.30 Horticulture Department Table No.42

Total: 11.80

6 Zari

Bujarg

Stone bund 6.99

MGNREGA

Table No.36





Plantation 0.92 Table No.36

Plantation/Grass on Farm Bund 5.89 Table No.42

Horticulture Plant 0.62 Agriculture Department Table No.42

Crop Demonstration Plot 0.59 Horticulture Department Table No.42

Nursery 2.28 MGNREGA

Table No.42

Bamboo or Wooden Work 1.00 Table No.42

Vermi Compost 4.28 Agriculture Department Table No.42

Total: 44.28 - - -

Grant Total: 96.20 - - -


DAHOD


Table no. 51: Public-Private Partnership in the IWMP projects

S. No.

Name of Private Sector

Partner Agency

Type of agreement signed Financial contribution Partnership

Interventions Expected Outcomes

Comments a) MoU b)Contract

c) Any other (pl. specify)

IWMP Private sector


DAHOD


CHAPTER 6 – EXPECTED OUTCOME


DAHOD


Table no.52: Environmental Benefits

Sr. No.

Village

Soil loss (cmt) Water storage

(Cmt) Ground water table (mt) Tree cover

Pre-project

Expected post-

project

Pre-project

Expected post-

project

Open well: pre-

project

Open well: post-

project

Bore well: pre-

project

Bore well: post-

project

Area in Ha.: pre-

project

Area in Ha.:

post-project

Tree count:

pre-project

Tree count: post-

project

1 Gulbar 15 8.95 1 2.5 10 8.5 55 44 0 0.00 0 2

2 Jambua 18 10 1 3.5 12 10.5 49 43 93.34 5.03 0 2

3 Nimach 20 10.5 1 2.0 11 9.0 47 35 292.97 15.79 0 1

4 Gangarda 15 9 1 1.5 11 9.5 55 46 0 0.00 5 21

5 Simaliya Bujarg 18 9 1 2.5 12 10.0 55 47 0 0.00 4 21

6 Zari Bujarg 20 11.6 1 3.5 11 9.5 45 36 957.31 51.60 0 1

Total: 106.00 59.05 6.00 15.50 66.50 57.00 306.00 251.00 1343.62 72.42 9 46

Table no. 53: Status of Drinking water

S. No.

Names of Villages

Availability of drinking water (no. of months in a year) Quality of drinking water

Comments

Pre-project Expected Post project Pre-project Expected

Post-project

1 Gulbar

6-9 10-12 Average,

Poor Good

Availability will increase up to 3 to 4 months and quality will

become good

2 Jambua

3 Nimach

4 Simaliya Bujarg

5 Zari Bujarg

6 Gangarda


DAHOD


Table no. 54: Details of Kharif crop area and yield in the project areas

Sr no Name of village

Season Name of

crops

Pre-project Expected Post-project Area Average

Yield (Qtl) per ha.

Area Average Yield

per ha (qtl) (ha) (ha)

1 Gulbar

Kharif Maize 85.1 919.58 127.65 1379.37 (Monsoon) Paddy 55.74 467.88 83.61 701.82 Soyabean 5.9 35.7 8.85 53.55

Rabi (Winter)

Maize 0.5 2.5 0.75 3.75 Wheat (Wheat) 7.28 60.85 10.92 91.28 Gram (Gram) 19.26 106.65 28.89 159.98 Pigeon Pea 1.4 19 2.1 28.5 Other 3.2 13.45 4.8 20.18

Village Total: 178.4 203.2 267.57 304.8

2 Jambua

Kharif Maize 279.77 2547.61 419.655 3821.42 (Monsoon) Paddy 128.86 788.95 193.29 1183.43 Soyabean 21.92 149.55 32.88 224.33 Pigeon Pea 47.74 190.96 71.61 286.44 Other 39.23 146.62 58.845 219.93

Rabi (Winter)

Maize 6.92 28.4 10.38 42.6 Wheat (Wheat) 27.48 170.1 41.22 255.15 Gram (Gram) 83.28 258.85 124.92 388.28 Pigeon Pea 39.7 106.95 59.55 160.43 Other 32.94 117.45 49.41 176.18

Zaid (Summer)

Gram (Gram) 0.2 0.8 0.3 1.2 Pigeon Pea 0.4 0.8 0.6 1.2 Other 2.16 7.5 3.24 11.25

Village total 708.4 375.59 1062.66 563.38


DAHOD


3 Nimach

Kharif Maize 200.68 2068.4 301.02 3102.6

(Monsoon) Paddy 78.92 562 118.38 843 Soyabean 0.1 0.5 0.15 0.75 Pigeon Pea 29.74 162 44.61 243 Other 10.38 39.5 15.57 59.25

Rabi (Winter)

Maize 10.1 106.6 15.15 159.9 Wheat (Wheat) 3.14 36.3 4.71 54.45

Gram (Gram) 9.36 66.9 14.04 100.35 Pigeon Pea 2.24 10 3.36 15 Other 3.88 17 5.82 25.5

Zaid (Summer)

Other 0.4 2.1 0.6 3.15

Village total 348.9 279.21 523.41 418.81

4 Simaliya Bujarg

Kharif Maize 99.6 750.6 149.4 1125.9

(Monsoon) Paddy 30.68 216.95 46.02 325.43 Soyabean 21.88 108.3 32.82 - Other 0.6 4.5 0.9 -

Rabi (Winter)

Maize 7.26 44.3 10.89 66.45 Wheat (Wheat) 3.4 26.5 5.1 -

Gram (Gram) 18.84 60.4 28.26 90.6 Pigeon Pea 0.84 3.4 1.26 - Other 0.12 1 0.18 -

Village total 183.2 135.11 274.83 402.09


DAHOD


5 Zari

Bujarg

Kharif Maize 159.48 1999.41 239.2215 2999.12

(Monsoon) Paddy 16.4 119.62 24.6 179.43 Soyabean 1429.1 9325.59 2143.65 13988.39 Other 9.8 48 14.7 72

Rabi (Winter)

Wheat (Wheat) 14.8 102.15 22.2 153.23

Gram (Gram) 15.116 86.8 22.674 130.2

Village total 1645 1946.93 2467.05 2920.39

6 Gangarda

Kharif Maize 110.82 657.14 166.23 985.71

(Monsoon) Paddy 38.76 189.45 58.14 284.18 Pigeon Pea 7.75 40 11.625 60

Rabi (Winter)

Maize 11.15 55.65 16.725 83.48

Gram (Gram) 0.85 2.75 1.275 4.13

Village total 169.3 189 253.995 283.5

Project total 3064 2940.03 4595.52 4609.48 Table no. 55: Area under horticulture

S. No.

Name of Village

crop Existing area under

horticulture (ha)

Area under horticulture proposed to be covered through

IWMP (ha)

1 Gulbar

Mango, Guava, Pomogranate, Chiku, Aamla

4.05 41.9

2 Jambua 7.71 37.8

3 Nimach 7.01 11.95

4 Gangarda 7.88 50.2

5 Simaliya Bujarg 11.77 39.4

6 Zari Bujarg 36.21 54

Total: 74.63 235.25


DAHOD


Table no. 56: Details of livestock in the project areas (for fluids please mention in litres, for solids please mention in kgs. and income in Rs.)

S. No.

Name of Village

Type of Animal Pre-Project Expected Post-project

Remarks No. Yield Income No. Yield Income

1 Gulbar

Milch-animals 732 17085

410040

1025 23919

574056

Draught Purpose animals 434 - 608 -

Animals for other purpose 193 - 270 -

2 Jambua


1088592

3168 63501

1524028.8



3 Nimach


370368

722 21605

518515.2



4 Gangarda


530064

1410 30920

742089.6



5 Simaliya Bujarg


203904

538 11894

285465.6



5 Zari Bujarg


827064

1865 48245

1157889.6



Total: 10309 108457 2602968 14432.6 151839.8 3644155.2


DAHOD


Table no. 57: Employment in Project area

S. No.

Names of Villages

Wage employment Self employment

No. of mandays No. of beneficiaries No. of beneficiaries

SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total

1 Gulbar 0 10962 0 6577 10962 0 3045 0 1827 3045 0 3045 0 1827 3045

2 Jambua 356 7906 169 5059 8431 99 2196 47 1405 2342 99 2196 47 1405 2342

3 Nimach 0 6977 18 4197 6995 0 1938 5 1166 1943 0 1938 5 1166 1943

4 Simaliya Bujarg 0 14724 0 8834 14724 0 4090 0 2454 4090 0 4090 0 2454 4090

5 Zari Bujarg 421 33952 32 20643 34405 117 9431 9 5734 9557 117 9431 9 5734 9557

6 Gangarda 310 12690 14 7808 13014 86 3525 4 2169 3615 86 3525 4 2169 3615

Total: 1087 87210 233 53118 88531 302 24225 65 14755 24592 302 24225 65 14755 24592

Table no. 58: Details of seasonal migration from Project area

Sl. No.

Names of villages

No. of persons migrating

No. of days per year of migration

Pre-project

Expected post project

Pre-project Expected

post project

1 Gulbar 300 250

120 90

2 Jambua 300 225

3 Nimach 225 175

4 Simaliya Bujarg 450 350

5 Zari Bujarg 750 600

6 Gangarda 350 300

Total: 2375 1900 120 90


DAHOD


Table no.59: Per capita Income Sr. No.

Village Source of Income Pre-project Expected post

project

1 Gulbar

Agriculture 864 1014 Forestry 0 0 Animal Husbandry

112 312

Casual Labour 582 582 Services 6 0 Handicraft 0 0 Business 0 0 Others 115 115

2 Jambua

Agriculture 134 284 Forestry 93.34 0 Animal Husbandry

87 287


3 Nimach

Agriculture 195 345 Forestry 292.97 250 Animal Husbandry

722 922



DAHOD


4 Gangarda

Agriculture 251 401

Forestry 0 0

Animal Husbandry

67 267

Casual Labour 256 256

Services 5 0

Handicraft 0 0

Business 0 0

Others 162 162

5 Simaliya Bujarg

Agriculture 255 405

Forestry 0 0

Animal Husbandry

60 260


Services 15 0

Handicraft 0 0

Business 0 0

Others 139 139

6 Zari

Bujarg

Agriculture 173 323

Forestry 957.31 375

Animal Husbandry

129 329


Services 0 0

Handicraft 0 0

Business 0 0

Others 148 148


DAHOD


Table no. 60: Backward-Forward linkages

Sr. No.

Project Type of Marketing Facility Pre-project (no.) During the project

(no.) Post-project (no.)

1

Zari Bujarg

Backward linkages - - -

2 Seed certification - - -

3 Seed supply system Local Verity - Hybrid

4 Fertilizer supply system Urea, DAP - Bio Fertilizer, Vermi Compost

5 Pesticide supply system -

6 Credit institutions Money Lander - Bank, SHG

7 Water supply Rainy - Irrigation

8 Extension services - KVK KVK

9 Nurseries 30 - 37

10 Tools/machinery suppliers - - -

11 Price Support system - - -

12 Labour - - Employment Training

14 Forward linkages - - -

15 Harvesting/threshing machinery Nothing - Irrigation Facilities

16 Storage (including cold storage) - - -

17 Road network - - -

18 Transport facilities - - -

19 Markets / Mandis - - -

20 Agro and other Industries - - -

21 Milk and other collection centres - - -

22 Labour - - -

23 Vermi compost 250 - 405


DAHOD


Table no. 61: Logical Framework analysis

Project Structure Expected Result Performance Variable

Indicator Means of Verification

Risk/ Assumptions

GOAL: IMPACT:

To conserve the soil and moisture and enhance the

income of the people of the project area through

watershed activities

* The income of families will increased

* Purchasing power of villagers.

* Impact assessment study

Natural Disaster (Drought) &

Political Intervention

* Living standard will improve

* Saving and annual expenditure of households

* Evaluation report

* Increase in ground water table

* Household assets * Comparison between baseline survey and evaluation report

* Farmers will get Irrigation during off seasons too.

* Migration * Physical observation

* Cropping pattern * Physical Verification and FGD with farmers

OBJECTIVE - 1 OUTCOMES:

To minimize the degradation of land and to conserve the natural resources of the project

area.

* Agricultural income will increase

* Net area under agriculture will increases


Maintenance of the structure after the project completion

* Total agricultural production will increase

* Export of agricultural products.

* Evaluation report

* Soil moisture content will increase

* Presence of vegetation cover in the project area

* Discussion with Villagers / Farmers


DAHOD


OBJECTIVE - 2 OUTCOMES:

To increase the per capita income of BPL and

marginal farmers through various livelihood

activities.

* Reduction in migration of families from the project area.

* Number of people migrating for employment opportunity


* Availability of employment within the project area.

* Number of people engaged in livelihood activities.

* Physical verification/ Photographs

* Unemployment will reduce.

* Number of people involved in self employment activities.

* FGDs and PRA.

OBJECTIVE-3: OUTCOMES:

To strengthen the local institution

* Presence of strong and dynamic local governance

* Number of meetings initiated by the local leaders.


Interest of the people

* People participation and representation will increase.

* Number of people's organization present at grass root level.

* Evaluation report, FGD, Observations

Activity for Objective - 1 OUTPUTS:

1. Soil and moisture conservation works.

* Completion of soil and moisture conservation works.

* Number of watershed, physical structure presents in the project area.

* Physical verification

* Diversified farming. * Discussion with Villagers / Farmers

2. Use of advance water conservation techniques

* Optimum utilization of available water

* Number of households having drip irrigation system of their houses

* Physical verification and PRA


DAHOD


3. Modern agricultural techniques for enhancing of agricultural productivity through crop demonstration plot

* Change in the cultivation pattern and adoption of new techniques in agriculture to utilize the maximum potential of the land.

* Number of people migrating for employment opportunities.

* Observations

Activity for Objective - 2 OUTPUTS:

1. Promotion of livelihood activities like dairy unit, vermicompost, nursery raising, fodder production and garment stitching.

* People will set-up their micro-enterprise on demand based activities.

* Number of people showing their interest to set-up micro enterprise.

* Observations Natural Disaster (Drought)

2. Capacity building activities for improvement entrepreneurial skill.

* Improved knowledge and enhancement of skills for self development

* Number of small enterprise set-up


Activity for Objective-3: OUTPUTS:

1. Organize training and awareness programme for Village institutions

* Quality of local leaders will improve and use of more democratic method of decision making.

* Number of case resolved within the locality.

* Observations and FGD.

2. Capacity building workshops and exposure visits of User Group and Watershed Committee

* Local leaders will take interest to understand the programmes and schemes and utilize for the benefit of the village.

* Number of schemes utilize for the benefit of the villages.

* FGDs and PRA


DAHOD


3. Formation of people organization at the grass root level.

* There will be proper management of available resources by the people's organization.

* Watershed activities is implementing smoothly without any hindrance

* There will be proper implementation of the projects

* Participation of deprived section will increase

* Number of deprived/ poor people participated in the meeting of Gram Sabha

* Representation of local people will increase

* Representation of local people will increase


DAHOD


CHAPTER 7 – Quality and Sustainability Issues


DAHOD


7 Quality and Sustainability Issues 7.1 Plans for Monitoring and Evaluation A Web-based GIS System is being developed for monitoring and evaluating the project in its planning & implementation phases. The system would be

available on a public domain and can be accessed by all the stakeholders of the project. The system shows the entire state of Gujarat and all of those

areas selected over the next 10 years. Filtering allows the user to zoom onto one particular project. Details related to soil type, Land-use classification,

inhabitation etc., can be obtained village-wise. Furthermore, survey-number wise details related to ownership, irrigation source, yield etc., can also be

accessed by the users of the system. This system is being used for pooling up the details obtained from the DPR. In other words, the DPR is made

available online in the form of a database which will help the stakeholders know areas of importance viz., already treated areas/historical works in

the area, proposed areas for treatment etc., for further treatment and planning. The system would also show the satellite imageries of various years

from the project inception stage to the project closing stages. This allows the user to evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment and thereby plan

corrective measures for the project area. The system would serve as an aiding tool to the planners and Evaluators for judging the efficacy of the

project.

Yet another component of the Web-based GIS system is the Mobile based Monitoring & Evaluation System, which will help the ground staff alias

WDTs (Watershed Development Team) to transmit information from the ground level to the central server. Also , any higher-up official in charge of

the project can obtain information regarding the project area on their mobile phone by means of an SMS. The system works in t he following manner.

The WDT equipped with a GPS instrument marks the latitude-longitude information of various treatment areas during the DPR. The probable sites

are then transferred onto the central server. During the works phase, any progress in the treatment areas is reported to the server by means of an

SMS by the WDT. Similarly, any nodal officer or higher-up official can view the progress in a project by means of summarized reports generated over

frequent periods of time.


DAHOD


7.2 Plans for Project management:

The Project management of any watershed programme is very important. It mainly depends upon the community organization and the village

level institutes. In Zaribujarg project, watershed committee, various user groups and SHGs have been formulated for post proj ect operation and

maintenance of assets created during project period. Major emphasis will be on equity and sustainable benefit of the project even after

implementation stage. A proper link-up will be built during project period with various institutes and capacity building organization. They will act as

a major kingpin during post implementation for scaling up the successful experience during project.

7.3 Watershed Development Fund:

The major source of financial assistance after post implementation period is watershed Development Fund.

7.4 User Charges:

Various user groups will be formed in village. These user groups will collect user charges according to the designated rules formed during the fo rmation of

user group. These funds will be transferred to the WDF funds as per these formulated rules.


DAHOD


CHAPTER 8 – MAPS


DAHOD


Existing Structure / Baseline Map of Project Name: Zari Bujarg (Garbada)


DAHOD


Geomoroplogy Map of Project Name: Zari Bujarg (Garbada)


DAHOD


Ground Water Map of Project Name: Zari Bujarg (Garbada)


DAHOD


Land Use / Land Cover Map of Project Name: Zari Bujarg (Garbada)


DAHOD


River Water Body Map of Project Name: Zari Bujarg (Garbada)


DAHOD


Slop Map of Project Name: Zari Bujarg (Garbada)


DAHOD


Soil Map of Project Name: Zari Bujarg (Garbada)


DAHOD


Action Plan of Village Name: Gangarda (Zari Bujarg – Garbada)


DAHOD


Action Plan of Village Name: Gulbar (Zari Bujarg – Garbada)


DAHOD


Action Plan of Village Name: Jambua (Zari Bujarg – Garbada)


DAHOD


Action Plan of Village Name: Nimach (Zari Bujarg – Garbada)


DAHOD


Action Plan of Village Name: Simaliya Bujarg (Zari Bujarg – Garbada)


DAHOD


Action Plan of Village Name: Zari Bujarg (Zari Bujarg – Garbada)


DAHOD


Table no. 62: Abbreviations:

Sr. No

Short Form

Full Form

Sr. No

Short Form

Full Form

1 IWMP Integrated Watershed Management

Programme 14 PDAY Pandit Dindayal Awas Yojna

2 PIA Project Implementation Agency

15 SWOT Strength Weakness Opportunities and thread

3 SC Schedule Caste

16 BSY Balika Samrudhi Yojna

4 ST Schedule Tribe

17 VSY Vidhva Sahay Yojna

5 DPAP Drought Prone Areas Programme

18 AAY Ambedkar Awas Yojna

6 DDP Desert Development Programme

19 SMY Sankat Mochan Yojna

7 MGNREGS Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment

Guarantee Scheme 20 IGNOAPS

Indira Gandhi National Old Age Pension Scheme

8 NREGS National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme

21 BBY Bajpai Bankebal Yojna

9 DRDA District Rural Development Agency

22 TSSY Tapak Sinchay Sahay Yojna

10 BRGF Backward Rural Guarantee Fund

23 BPL Below Poverty Line

11 IAY Indira Awas Yojna

24 APL Above Poverty Line

12 TSP Total Sanitation Programme

25 NGO Non Governmental Organization

13 SGSY Swarnjayanti Gram Swarojgar Yojna

26 OBC Other Backward Class

Documents

DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (DPR)gswma.gujarat.gov.in/pfile/DPR/2009-10/Dahod/IWMP - … · · 2013-04-18district watershed development unit dahod detailed project report (dpr) iwmp-1