Vadodara IWMP (Naswadi 2P) - Gujaratgswma.gujarat.gov.in/.../DPR/2009-10/vadodara/Vad_IWMP_7.pdfnatural resources, and livestock‐buffalo, cow, goat, poultry bird on a small scale

Gujarat State Watershed Management Agency District watershed Development Unit Vadodara IWMP7 (Naswadi 2P)

Detail Project Report

Contents Project Background .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 9

Table no.1: Basic project information ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 9

1.2 Need of Watershed Development Programme ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 11

Table no. 2.1 Criteria and weightage for selection of watershed .............................................................................................................................................................. 12

Table no.3: Watershed information ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 13

1.3 Other developmental projects/schemes running in the Naswadi‐1G village ............................................................................................................................... 13

Table no. 4: Developmental programmes running in the project area: ................................................................................................................................................. 14

Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmes in the project area ......................................................................................................................................................... 15

2.1. Project Implementing Agency ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 17

The organization and its objectives: ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 17

Programmes/projects of DWDU, Vadodara: ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 17

SWOT Analysis of the DWDU: ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 18

Table no. 6: PIA: .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 19

Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level: ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 20

Geography and Geohydrology .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 22

Land use pattern: ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 22

Table no. 8: Land use pattern: .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 22

Soil and topography: ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 22

Table no. 9: Soil type and topography: ................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 23

Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition: ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 23

Table no. 11: Soil Erosion ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 23

Table no. 11.2: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress) ............................................................................................................................................................................ 24

Table no.12: Climatic conditions ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 25

Table no. 13: Physiography and relief .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 26

Land and Agriculture: ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 26

Table no. 14: Land ownership details ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 27

Table no. 15: Agriculture ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 27

Table no. 16: Irrigation ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 28

Table no. 17: Crop details: ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 28

Livestock: .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 29

Table no. 18: Livestock ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 29

Table no. 19 : Drinking water ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 30

Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources: ................................................................................................................................................................................. 30

Socio‐Economic Profile ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 34

Demographic Status: .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 35

Table no. 21: Demographic information .............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 35

Table no. 22: Literacy rate ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 35

Migration Pattern: ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 36

Table no. 24: Poverty ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 37

Infrastructure facilities: .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 37

Table no. 25: Village infrastructure ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 38

Table no. 26: Facilities / HH assets ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 38

Livelihood pattern: ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 39

Table no. 27: Per capita Income .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 39

Dependence on Common Property Resource ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 40

Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 40

Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution) ................................................................................................................................................................... 41

Comparative data of the crop productivity of the area: project area vs. District vs. State vs. Country vs. World: ............................................................... 41

Watershed Activities ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 48

Scientific Planning: ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 48

Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects ............................................................................................................................................ 51

Institution building: ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 52

Table no. 31: Watershed Committee details ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 53

ii )Self Help Group ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 64

Table no. 32: SHG details ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 65

User Group: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 68

Table no. 33: UG detail ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 68

4.3.1 Entry Point activity (EPA) ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 70

Table no.34: Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs.) ........................................................................................................................................ 70

Watershed Development Works: ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 72

Ridge Area Treatment Plans: ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 72

Table no.35: Details of activities of preparatory phase (All financial figures in lakhs) ................................................................................................................. 73

Table no.36: Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) ......................................... 74

Table no. 38: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas ................................................................................................ 77

Table no. 39.1 Soil and water conservation activities of watershed works phase – Proposed Target .................................................................................... 79

Table no.40: Details of engineering structures in watershed works* .................................................................................................................................................... 81

Table no.41.1: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works ........................................................................................................... 89

Production System –I ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 100

Production System‐II .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 102

Production System‐III: ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 107

Production System‐IV ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 109

Production System – V ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 112

Production System: VI ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 115

Production System VII : ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 117

4.4. Capacity Building: ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 119

Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution: .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 120

Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan: ................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 120

Table no.46: Information, education and Communication Activities: ................................................................................................................................................. 121

Budgeting ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 124

Table no. 47: Budget at a glance ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 124

Table no. 48: Village component wise budget available under IWMP ................................................................................................................................................ 125

Table no. 49: Village wise gap in funds requirement .................................................................................................................................................................................. 125

Table no.50: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes ..................................................................................................................................................... 126

Expected Outcomes ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 129

Table no. 52: Employment in Project area ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 129

Table no. 53: Details of seasonal migration from Project area ............................................................................................................................................................... 130

Table no. 54: Details of average ground water table depth in the project areas (in meters) .................................................................................................... 131

Table no. 55: Status of Drinking water .............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 132

Table no. 56: Details of crop area and yield in the project area ............................................................................................................................................................. 132

Horticulture ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 136

Table no. 57: Area under horticulture ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 136

Vegetative cover .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 137

Table no. 58: Forest/vegetative cover .............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 137

Livestock ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 137

Table no. 59: Details of livestock in the project areas (for fluids please mention in litres, for solids please mention in kgs. and income in Rs.) ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 138

Table no. 60: Backward‐Forward linkages ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 140

7.2.1 Adopting Environment friendly conservation measures ....................................................................................................................................... 149

7.2.2 Participation of local community in development and management ................................................................................................................ 150

MAPS .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 152

CHAPTER 1

PROJECT BACKGROUND

Project Background

Naswadi villages of (IWMP‐6) are located in Naswadi Taluka (22°02'26.51"N 73°43'39.42"E,) Vadodara District of Gujarat state. IWMP‐6

consists of 9 villages and a area around 2892.90 ha is taken into the project as per the priority for treatment. 9 villages fall under 4 gram

panchayats. All the villages are separated by a distance of 20‐40 kms from Naswadi taluka. Four main watershed committes are constituted

for these 9 villages. Separated sub‐watershed committee are formulated at village level. This project is expected to cover 6 micro

watersheds with codes 5D2B2d2e, 5D2B2d2f, 5D2B2d2b, 5D2B2d3b, 5D2B2d2c , 5D2B2d2d, .The total project area proposed to be treated

under Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP).

The nearest towns are Gadhboriyad and Kawant which are approximately about 25‐45 Km from almost all the villages, further taluka place

Nawadi itself which is about 20‐40 kms and these towns are well connected by pucca tar road by local transportation facilities. The project

area fall in the footstool of hilly mountains with rocky strata with dense to moderate vegetation and trees a fine example of arid land. The

project area falls among the 6 micro watersheds. Nayaka, Rathwa, Bariya, Bhil, Dungarabhil, and Tadvi communities are the major

inhabitants of the project area. The livelihood of these people is primarily based on rainfed agriculture, wage labour, depends on local based

natural resources, and livestock‐buffalo, cow, goat, poultry bird on a small scale.

The watershed falls under the government designated tribal area. The water level is almost 200‐250 feet deep further, structure of the soil

is very shallow with undulated topography with the hilly surrounding. Considerably a slope of more than 25‐30 can be seen. Dense forests

and lack of road facilities can be seen this area.

Table no.1: Basic project information

S.N. Name of the project

Villages Gram Panchayats Taluka District Area of

the project

Area proposed to be treated

Total project cost

PIA Name Census code

1

Naswadi‐2P ( IWMP‐7 )

Sankal 190070143660000 Sankal

Naswadi Vadodara

301.1 301.1 36.13

Forest Division (Normal)

2 Khokhara(la) 190070143890000 288.3 288.3 34.6 3 Gheswadi 190070143670000 31.66 31.66 3.79 4 Nardha 190070143640000 Katkuva 181.1 181.1 21.73 5 Pisayata (D) 190070143520000

Tarol

342.9 342.9 41.15 6 Ranbor 190070143790000 270.9 270.9 32.5 7 Budhajuldhani 190070143800000 414.7 414.7 49.76 8 Reliya Amba 190070143510000 131.1 131.1 15.73 9 Hariyabar 190070143530000 Lavakoi 278.5 278.5 33.42

1.2 Need of Watershed Development Programme

Watershed Development Programme is prioritised on the basis of thirteen parameters namely Poverty Index, Percentage of SC/ST, Actual

wages, Percentage of small and marginal farmers, Ground water status, Moisture Index, Area under rainfed agriculture, Drinking water situation

in the area, Percentage of the degraded land, Productivity potential of the land, Continuity of another watershed that has already

developed/treated, Cluster approach for plain or for hilly terrain. Based on these thirteen parameters a composite ranking was given to

Naswadi 1P (IWMP6) Watershed project as given in table no. 2.

The total number of families under BPL is 411, which is equal to 66 per cent of the total households of the project. Hence a score of 5 is allotted.

The percentage of schedule tribe in the project is 100% percent to the total population; hence a score of 10 was allotted. Rainfed agriculture

forms the primary occupation of the village majority of the persons. More than 80 per cent of the farmers are small and marginal by nature and

the average land holdings of farmers in around 2 ha and the actual wages earned by the labour is less than the minimum wages hence a

composite rank of 10, 10 and 5 are allotted respectively.

Since the waste land is maximum in the project area and due to the low moisture index the area is classified under DPAP block. Drinking water

is a major problem in this project area. In a broader view the soil of this region is suitable for agriculture crops and cash crops but due to lack of

water harvesting structures and irrigation water agriculture itself has become a constraint and the productivity potential has considerable gone

low. The soil is very shallow and hence rate of infiltration is more however production of the land can be significantly enriched with the help of

better management practices and availability of timely irrigation and use of organic and inorganic fertilizer. Naswadi watershed falls under

second priority and it is an individual cluster. Cluster approach was followed taking into consideration 8 micro‐watersheds covering a total area

of 2892.90 Ha.

All the parameters taken together and a cumulative score of 90.5 is given to the watershed (reference Table 2.1 below).

Table no. 2: Weightage of the project

Project Name

Project type Weightage

Iwmp 6 Arid Land

i ii iii iv v vi vii viii ix x xi xii xiii7.5 10 5 10 3 10 10 5 10 10 5 5 NA

Table no. 2.1 Criteria and weightage for selection of watershed

S. No. Criteria Maximum

score Ranges & scores

i Poverty index (% of poor to population)

10 Above 80 % (10) 80 to 50 % (7.5) 50 to 20 % (5) Below 20 % (2.5)

ii % of SC/ ST population 10 More than 40 % (10) 20 to 40 % (5) Less than 20 % (3)iii Actual wages 5 Actual wages are

significantly lower than minimum wages (5)

Actual wages are equal to or higher than minimum wages (0)

iv % of small and marginal farmers

10 More than 80 % (10) 50 to 80 % (5) Less than 50 % (3)

v Ground water status 5 Over exploited (5) Critical (3) Sub critical (2) Safe (0)vi Moisture index/

DPAP/ DDP Block 15 ‐66.7 & below (15)

DDP Block ‐33.3 to ‐66.6 (10)DPAP Block

0 to ‐33.2 (0)Non DPAP/ DDP Block

vii Area under rain‐fed agriculture

15 More than 90 % (15) 80 to 90 % (10) 70 to 80% (5) Above 70 % (Reject)

viii Drinking water 10 No source (10) Problematic village (7.5)

Partially covered (5) Fully covered (0)

ix Degraded land 15 High – above 20 % (15) Medium – 10 to 20 % (10)

Low‐ less than 10 % of TGA (5)

x Productivity potential of the land

15 Lands with low production & where productivity can be significantly enhanced with reasonable efforts (15)

Lands with moderate production & where productivity can be enhanced with reasonable efforts (10)

Lands with high production & where productivity can be marginally enhanced with reasonable efforts (5)

xi Contiguity to another watershed that has already been developed/ treated

10 Contiguous to previously treated watershed & contiguity within the microwatersheds in the project (10)

Contiguity within the microwatersheds in the project but non contiguous to previously treated watershed (5)

Neither contiguous to previously treated watershed nor contiguity within the microwatersheds in the project (0)

xii Cluster approach in the plains (more than one contiguous micro‐watersheds in the project)

15 Above 6 micro‐watersheds in cluster (15)

4 to 6 microwatersheds in cluster (10)


xiii Cluster approach in the hills (more than one contiguous micro‐watersheds in the project)

15 Above 5 micro‐watersheds in cluster (15)



Total 150 150 90 41 2.5

Table no.3: Watershed information

Name of the project No. of watersheds to be treated Watershed code Watershed regime/type/order

Naswadi‐2P( IWMP‐7) 6 5D2B2d2e, 5D2B2d2f, 5D2B2d2b, 5D2B2d3b, 5D2B2d2c , 5D2B2d2d,

Micro Watershed

1.3 Other developmental projects/schemes running in the Naswadi‐1G village

This village is very back ward in various issues and falls under tribal area, still some of the villages fails to draw the limelight of schemes and developmental projects. Although NREGS (National Rural Employment Scheme) and Indira Awas Yojana (IAY), Sardar Awas Yojana, SGSY, Sakhi Mandal .

i. NREGS: Construction of Wells, kutcha Road constructions works, pond depending, check walls, bori bunds and other labour intensive

activity has been taken‐up under NREGA. Construction of boundary trenching, boundary walls, nursery and terrace ponds on hill tops is

also taken up through forest department.

ii. Indira Awas Yojana: Total houses constructed in this project are 65 and all the villages of this project have Indra Awas Yojana.

iii. Sardar Awas : 31 houses were built under this shemes and work is still in progess in some of the villages.

iv. SGSY: Total 3664 number of persons are under this scheme and most of the groups are currently active and some of the groups are

under grading process.

v. Sakhi Mandal: Sakhi Mandal schemes comprise of 8 groups which are sustainable from long time.

Table no. 4: Developmental programmes running in the project area:

S no Name of the programme/scheme

Sponsoring agency Objectives of the programme/scheme

Year of commencement

Villages covered

Estimated number of beneficiaries

1 NREGS Rural Development Dept. Employment 2009 9 3664 Person 2 IAY Rural Development Dept. Housing 2005 9 325 Person

3 SGSY Rural Developmnet Dept. Women Welfare 2005 9 1012 Person 4 Sakhi Mandal Rural Development Dept. Women Welfare 2006 3 8 Group 5 Sadar Awas Yojana District Panchayat Housing 2003 9 31 House hold 6 WASMO GWSSB Water , Soil & Drainage Mang. 2006 4 4 Villagers 7 JBIC phase No.II Forest Deprtment Forest & Envoirmental Devlopment 2008 4 4 Villagers 8 FDA Forest Deprtment Forest & Envoirmental Devlopment 2005 1 1 Villagers

9 UTAC, Anamiea. Asha, VCS Dipak Foundation Trust Helth Devlpment 2004 9 3664 Person

Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmes in the project area

S.N. Project name

Year started

Name of villages

No. Of micro

watershed

Watershed codes

Area under

treatment

Funding source

Nodal agency

PIA Total cost

Expenditure incurred up to start of IWMP

% financial completion

% physical completion

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

CHAPTER – 2

PROJECT IMPLEMENTING AGENCY

2.1. Project Implementing Agency

The Project Implementing Agencies (PIA) is selected by an appropriate mechanism by Gujarat State Watershed Management Agency (GSWMA),

the State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) for Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP) in Gujarat. The PIAs are responsible for

implementation of watershed project. In district Vadodara Forest Department is being selected as the Project Implementing Agency. The main

office of PIA is located in Chottaudepur taluka place. Deputy conservator of Forest is bestowed the responsibity for all the projects, henceforth

he is the PIA of all projects . There are 7 projects in different taluka of Vadodara and each project is assigned to a Nodal officer (Range forest

officer). Four different offices are setup in 4 different talukas for smooth functioning and overseasing of project work.

About District Watershed Development Unit (DWDU), Vadodara

The organization and its objectives:

The District Watershed Development Unit (DWDU), Vadodara is a district level nodal agency and was established on 12 May 2009 in a separate

office to oversee the smooth implementation of watershed projects in the district. The District Development Officer (DDO) is the chairman of the

DWDU. The DWDU has dedicated and experienced staff comprising one Project Manager (deputation from Gujarat Forest Department), a

Technical expert and a multidisciplinary team of agriculture expert, community mobilization expert and Data Entry Operator, civil engineer, MIS

coordinator, system analyst, surveyor, and accountant. The objectives of the DWDU, Vadodara are supervising, planning, implementing,

documenting and promoting watershed development projects and related developmental activities in the district as per guidelines.

Programmes/projects of DWDU, Vadodara:

At present 7 IWMP projects have been sanctioned by Government of India for Vadodara district. The entry point activities of all the seven IWMP

projects have been identified by the respective PIAs in the district. Vadodara Forest Division is PIA for 7 projects (IWMP‐1, 2, 3, 4,5, 6 & 7).

Apart from the 7 IWMP projects, DWDU Vadodara is involved in a total of 303 pre‐Hariyali & Hariyali projects (DDP & IWDP); 93 projects are

completed and 210 projects are still running in the district and are expected to complete within two years of time. The DWDU, Vadodara is also

monitoring a central government sponsored scheme on “Artificial Recharge of Groundwater through Dugwells” in the district.

SWOT Analysis of the DWDU:

Strength:

(1) Dedicated and experienced staff and a multidisciplinary team.

(2) Independent District Level Nodal Agency.

(3) Strong linkages with national and state level institutions, agricultural universities and training institutes for capacity building and technical

guidance.

(4) Scientific planning in watershed projects with the help of BISAG, Gandhinagar,

(5) District level advisory committee for monitoring, coordination & Co‐operation.

(6) Prior acquaintance of nodal officers with the villagers of selected project area, hence ease in implementation of project.

Weakness:

(1) No permanent office building at project level.

(2) Most of the project area is hilly and distance of project area from DWDU is almost 2‐3 hours.

(3) Project area inhabitants mainly composed of schedule tribe class hence, ignorance about developmental projects.

Opportunities:

(1) A number of different other development schemes of the government are running; so, there can be horizontal integration and convergence

of programmes.

(2) Better financial provision under IWMP better quality of work can be expected

(3) Usage of new ICT tools like GIS, GPS and MIS integration of the project with the State Level Data Cell for online monitoring and evaluation.

(4) Reputed training centres for capacity building at all level of stakeholders viz, , district, block and village level to ensure the proper

implementation of the project

Threats:

(1) Rainfall being very scarce and unreliable in the project area, the activities planned to be taken up may yield limited impact.

(2) Options in production system are limited due to the lack of sufficient natural resources and due to limited resource base.

(3) Irregularities in fund flow can derail the smooth functioning.

(4) Lack of awareness of the watershed programme and its objectives.

(5) Low literacy rate in the project area.

Table no. 6: PIA:

Sl. No. Names of project Details of PIA

1 IWMP 6 Naswadi 1 G

(i) Type of organization DCF, Chhotaudepur Forest Division (Normal) (ii) Name of organization District PIA (IWMP) (iii) Designation of the Nodal officer Range Forest Officer (iv) Address Range Forest Office, NAswadi (v) Telephone 02661‐272400 (vi) Fax 02661‐272222 (P.P)

(vii) E‐mail [email protected]

Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level:

S.no Name Age Sex Designation Qualification Experience Job assigned Monthly

remuneration 1 Mr B.V.matroja 52 Male R.F.O GFS 22 year Nodel officer 300002 Mr D.V.Bariya 27 Male W.D.T.Agri. B.R.S. 3 year WDT (Agri) 80003 Mr.Silpaben.C.Patel 29 Female W.D.T women M.R.S. 3 year WDT (Women) 8000

4 Mr. C.M. Champaneriya 23 Male D.E.O F.Y.B.A 3 year Data entry opretor 5000

5 S.P.Rathod 23 Male Mesanger 12th 6 month M.S 3000

CHAPTER – 3

BASIC INFORMATION OF THE PROJECT AREA

Geography and Geohydrology

Land use pattern:

The net geographical area of Naswadi watershed is about 2892.90 ha out of which 80% is forest area. The forest area is nearly covers

half of the village land. Forest areas in this region are dense to moderate. Most of the villages in this area are surrounded by hilly and rocky

mountains. About 50% of land is under agriculture which is completely rain‐fed; mainly a Kharif crop is taken. About 10% of the total land is

classified under wasteland of which 16 percent is cultivable and rest is uncultivable and hilly. The watershed consist mostly consist of Mahuda

trees, custard apple, bamboo, acacia Arabica, ficus and plam tress. Teak plantation can be seen here extensively and some bordering villages of

project area are under submergence

Table no. 8: Land use pattern:

S. No.

Names of villages Geographical Area of the village

Forest Area Land under agricultural

use

Rainfed area Permanent pastures

Wasteland

Cultivable Noncultivable

1 Budha juladhani 414.7 390.90 23.80 23.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 Gheswadi 124.69 64.10 43.00 43.00 0.00 0.00 17.60 3 Hariyabar 278.5 226.3 48.10 48.10 0.00 1.80 2.30 4 Khokhara (L) 288.3 253.6 77.90 34.30 0.00 0.00 0.30 5 Nardha 181.1 93.1 67.00 67.00 0.00 3.30 17.70 6 Pisayata(D) 342.9 247 91.20 91.20 0.00 4.70 0.00 7 Ranbor 270.9 216.6 45.40 45.40 0.00 8.90 0.00 8 ReliyaAmba 131.1 69.80 55.20 55.20 0.00 0.00 131.10 9 Sankal 301.1 240.7 60.40 59.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 2333.29 1802.1 512 467.4 0.0 18.7 169

Soil and topography:

Naswadi watershed project falls under Middle Gujarat Agro Climatic Zone. The soil is mainly sandy loam to loamy. The soil is reddish brown to

greyish black and deep black in soils in some areas. The depth of soil is shallow to moderate about 25 to 110 cm. The predominant texture of

soil is silty clay and moderately coarse texture to fine texture in some villages. The soil fertility is very poor with low nitrogen, phosphorus and

potash. Status of organic carbon is very poor and depleting in this region due to lack of sufficient organic resources and also largely due to the

ignorance of the farmers. Due to the low moisture index of this region organic fertilizer efficiency is not noteworthy. The topography of the

area is moderate ranging from 0‐30% slope with undulating topography and hills surround the most of the project area.

Table no. 9: Soil type and topography:

S. No. Name of the Agro‐climatic zone covers project area Area in ha

Names of the Project

Major soil typesTopography a)Type b) Area in ha

1 Middle Gujarat Agro climatic zone 2240.26 Naswadi 2P

(IWMP 7)

Sandy Loam Black soils with rocky

strata 2240.26 Flat to steep slope

Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition:

Sr. No. Project Flood (Incidence) Drought (Incidence)

1 Naswadi 1 G( IWMP.6 ) Nil Once in 4 Years

Table no. 11: Soil Erosion

Cause Type of erosion Area affected (ha) Run off Average soil loss (Tonnes/ ha/ year) (mm/ year)

Water erosion

a Sheet 581.39 20‐30%

b Rill 658.99

SubNATotal 2131.11 Wind erosion 377.42 NA

Total 2508.54

Table no. 11.2: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress)

Name of the Village Survey Number Soil pH

Type of Salinity

(Inherent/Ingress) Budha juladhani 8, 15, 19/1 7.2 Gheswadi 4, 10/1, 17, 27/2 7.3 Hariyabar 15/1, 34/2, 45/3 7.6 Khokhara (L) 9/1, 20/1, 23, 29 7.2 Nardha 19, 32, 46/1 7.7 Pisayata(D) 5/1, 18, 31, 44, 7.4 Ranbor 2/1, 23, 29/1, 34 7.3 ReliyaAmba 12/2, 37, 65/1, 71/3 7.5 Sankal 7, 24, 32/2, 35/2 7.4

Table no.12: Climatic conditions

Sl. No. Year

Rainfall (in mm)

Temperature (˚C) Highest intensity of Rainfall

(mm in a day) Max. Min.

1 2004 1101 42.1 12.4 2442 2005 1189 42.5 13.1 1863 2006 1826 42.7 13.4 1774 2007 1186 42.4 12.9 1905 2008 1002 43.3 13.8 1886 2009 1255 44.1 14.5 212

The project area has a optimum to good rainfall over the years however due to various reasons like, changing weather parameters and global climate the details of the rainfall from 2004‐2009 has considerably decreased with increasing rate. Hence rainfall sanctity is growing problem in this area and also due to the low water holding capacity, high infiltration, less land scrub, degrading forests, lack of moisture conservation structure and undulated topography leads to drainage of water. The top fertile soils accounts for major loss. The average rainfall of this area is about 1259.8 mm (from past six year data) with a highest intensity of 244 mm within span of a day. This uneven distribution of rainfall is leading to surface runoff of soil causing ravine and gully erosion as per the details given in table no 11. The rainfall of this area has considerable gone down from the past two consecutive years and there is decresing trend in rainfall with increasing trend in temperature from past 6 years data.

Table no. 13: Physiography and relief

Project Name Elevation Slope range (%) Major streams

Naswadi 2P ( IWMP.7 ) 72.54 m 30 to 35 %

NA

Land and Agriculture:

When Neil Armstrong saw the Earth from the Moon, it appeared blue! This is because water covers more than two‐thirds of the Earth's surface. But fresh water represents less than 0.5% of the total water on Earth. The rest is either in the form of seawater or locked up in icecaps or the soil, which is why one often hears of water scarcity in many areas. Groundwater interacts with surface water by supplying streamflow and maintaining wetlands in times of low precipitation. On average about 40 percent of the river flow nationwide depends on groundwater Over‐pumping of aquifers can lead to lowered stream and lake levels, and to dessication of wetlands. Surface water sources and limited ground water table makes farming a difficult task and scarcity of drinking water in this area is among the major problems in almost all the villages of Naswadi IWMP‐7project area. The average land holding is about 0.5 ha ranging from 0.5 to 5 ha. Although the condition of soil is good crop failure is common problem due to insufficient and untimely rains hence, agriculture become a risky occupation. Crops are taken in only kharif season area. The major crops cultivated by the farmers are Maize, cotton, paddy and pulses like Redgram and black gram in this area. 80% of the total agriculture is rainfed and based monsoon of that particular year. Rabi season only 20% of the land is under cultivation in places where the irrigation sources are available. Modern agriculture practise are prevalent in these areas, use of fertilizers and agricultural pesticides for better crop production for increased yields.

Table no. 14: Land ownership details

S.N. Village Total owned land Gen OBC SC ST

1 Budha juladhani 23.75 2 Gheswadi 40.01 3 Hariyabar 45.05 4 Khokhara (L) 41.79 5 Nardha 34.16 6 Pisayata(D) 55.25 7 Ranbor 45.35 8 ReliyaAmba 58.46 9 Sankal 34.25 Total 378.07

Table no. 15: Agriculture

S.N. Village Net sown area

One time Two times Three times

1 Budha juladhani 23.75 ‐ ‐ 2 Gheswadi 40.01 ‐ ‐ 3 Hariyabar 45.05 ‐ ‐ 4 Khokhara (L) 41.79 ‐ ‐ 5 Nardha 34.16 ‐ ‐ 6 Pisayata(D) 55.25 ‐ ‐ 7 Ranbor 45.35 ‐ ‐ 8 ReliyaAmba 58.46 ‐ ‐ 9 Sankal 34.25 ‐ ‐

Table no. 16: Irrigation

S.N. Village Source 1 : Canal Source 2 : Check dam / Pond Source 3 : Well Availability months

Net area Gross area

Availability months

Net area Gross area

Availability months

Net area

Gross area

1 Budha juladhani ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 414.7 2 Month 3.15 414.7 2 Gheswadi ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 Month 2.75 31.66 2 Month 0.75 31.66 3 Hariyabar ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 Month 5.15 278.5 2 Month 2.95 278.5 4 Khokhara (L) ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 Month 1.9 288.3 2 month 1.55 288.3 5 Nardha ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 month 2.15 181.1 2 Month 2.8 181.1 6 Pisayata(D) ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 Month 3.1 342.9 2 Month 1.4 342.9 7 Ranbor ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 Month 0.85 270.9 2 Month 2.1 270.9 8 ReliyaAmba ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 Month 0.8 131.1 2 Month 4.5 131.1 9 Sankal ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 Month 4.65 301.1 2 Month 5.25 301.1

Table no. 17: Crop details:

S.N. Village Kharif (Monsoon) Maize Paddy Tur

Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity

1 Budha juladhani 23.75 30750 1295 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2 Gheswadi 40.01 52654 1316 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 3 Hariyabar 16.54 19564 1183 ‐ ‐ ‐ 25.05 19632 784 4 Khokhara (L) 30.5 33560 1100 ‐ ‐ ‐ 11.29 8560 758 5 Nardha 25 34625 1385 ‐ ‐ ‐ 5 3962 792 6 Pisayata(D) 35 44659 1276 ‐ ‐ ‐ 15 9265 618 7 Ranbor 15 17652 1177 15 16892 1126 10 7652 765 8 ReliyaAmba 25 24635 985 13 11329 871 12 7936 661 9 Sankal 12 9563 797 ‐ ‐ ‐ 18 9364 520

S.N. Village Kharif (Monsoon) Rabi Cotton Black Gram Crop

Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity

1 Budha juladhani ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

NIL

2 Gheswadi ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 3 Hariyabar 3.46 1693 489 ‐ ‐ ‐ 4 Khokhara (L) ‐ - ‐ ‐ ‐ 5 Nardha 4.16 3645 876 ‐ ‐ ‐ 6 Pisayata(D) ‐ - 5.25 3462 2167 Ranbor ‐ - 5.35 2638 201 8 ReliyaAmba ‐ - 8.46 5368 125 9 Sankal 4.25 3562 838 ‐ ‐ ‐

Livestock:

The village have 448 cows, 169 buffaloes, 927 bullocks, 844 goats and no sheeps. Livestock is owned by all almost all the farmer for drought and agriculture purposes. Partly some people in the community depend on goat rearing for their livelihood. Cows and buffaloes are of local breed. Mehsani buffalo and Gir cow are common in this area and the survival and production parameters are suitable to this region and climatic condition. Hence there is wider scope for improvement of dairy in this cluster of villages of Naswadi IWMP‐7. Lack of rain and surface water has reduced the fodder and pasture availability for their animals. Milk production is very low however this can be improved by fodder production in the wasteland in these areas. Although green fodder is only available in kharif season, excess fodder can be dried and stored for use in off season.

Table no. 18: Livestock

S.N. Village Buffalo Cow Total Milk (Buffalo+Cow)

Goat Sheep Bullock Hen Others

No milk No Milk No Milk

1 Budha juladhani 40 19200 115 60375 79575 272 16320 ‐ 162 7 ‐ 2 Gheswadi 11 5280 42 22050 27330 85 5100 ‐ 102 ‐ ‐ 3 Hariyabar 17 8160 41 21525 29685 108 6480 ‐ 77 ‐ ‐ 4 Khokhara (L) 39 18720 52 27300 46020 69 4140 ‐ 95 ‐ ‐ 5 Nardha 14 6720 35 18375 25095 42 2520 ‐ 106 ‐ ‐

6 Pisayata(D) 6 2880 47 24675 27555 11 660 ‐ 127 ‐ ‐ 7 Ranbor 3 1440 8 4200 5640 44 2640 ‐ 48 ‐ ‐ 8 ReliyaAmba 18 8640 49 25725 34365 58 3480 ‐ 80 ‐ ‐ 9 Sankal 21 10080 59 30975 41055 155 9300 ‐ 130 ‐ ‐ Total 169 81120 448 235200 316320 844 50640 927

Table no. 19 : Drinking water

S.no Village Ground water table

(Feet) Source of drinking water

Availability in months

Quality

1 Budha juladhani 96 Open well & River 8 Minor saline 2 Gheswadi 114 Open well & Handpaump 10 Portable

3 Hariyabar 102 Handpump 9 Minor saline

4 Khokhara (L) 111 Open well & river 7 Portable

5 Nardha 75 Handpaump 10 Portable

6 Pisayata(D) 102 Open well & River & handpump 10 Minor saline

7 Ranbor 90 Handpump 8 Portable

8 ReliyaAmba 75 Open well & Hand pump 10 Minor saline 9 Sankal 87 Open well & Handpump 9 Portable

Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources:

S. No.

Names of project Village

CPR Total Area (ha) Area available for treatment (ha)

Particulars

Area owned/ In possession of

Pvt. persons

Govt.(specify deptt.) PRI

Any other (Pl.

Specify)

Pvt. persons

Govt.(specify deptt.) PRI

Any other (Pl. Specify)

1 IWMP‐7 (Naswadi‐2P) Budhajaldhuni

Waste/Degraded land

Pastures Orchards

Village Woodlot

Forest 390.8 390.8 Village Ponds/ Tanks Community Buildings Weekly Markets

Permanent markets Temples/ Places of

worship

Others (Pl. specify)

2 Gheswadi

Waste/Degraded land Pastures 0.9 0.9 Orchards Village Woodlot Forest 64.1 64.1 Village Ponds/ Tanks Community Buildings Weekly Markets Permanent markets Temples/ Places of worship Others (Pl. specify)

3 Hariyabar

Waste/Degraded land 2.9 2.01 2.9 2.01 Pastures Orchards Village Woodlot Forest 226.3 226.3 Village Ponds/ Tanks Community Buildings Weekly Markets Permanent markets

Temples/ Places of worship Others (Pl. specify)

4 Khokhara

Waste/Degraded land Pastures Orchards Village Woodlot Forest 253.6 253.6 Village Ponds/ Tanks Community Buildings Weekly Markets Permanent markets Temples/ Places of worship Others (Pl. specify)

5 Naradha

Waste/Degraded land 4.44 4.44 Pastures Orchards Village Woodlot Forest 93.1 93.1 Village Ponds/ Tanks Community Buildings Weekly Markets Permanent markets Temples/ Places of worship Others (Pl. specify)

6

IWMP‐7

Pisayata

Waste/Degraded land Pastures Orchards Village Woodlot Forest 247 247 Village Ponds/ Tanks Community Buildings Weekly Markets Permanent markets Temples/ Places of worship Others (Pl. specify)

7 Ranbor


8 Reliyaamba

Waste/Degraded land 1.59 1.59 Pastures Orchards Village Woodlot Forest 69.7 69.7

Village Ponds/ Tanks Community Buildings Weekly Markets Permanent markets Temples/ Places of worship Others (Pl. specify)

9 Sakal (P)


Socio‐Economic Profile

Demographic Status:

Naswadi watershed project has a total of 618 households with a population of 3664 (as per baseline survey) out of which 1893 are male and

1771 female .The sex ratio is 935 female to 1000 male. There are 411 BPL families. The average family size is 5‐6. The literacy rate is very low

i.e. 4.5 per cent; male literacy rate is 62.3 per cent (of total male population) and female literacy rate is 37.7 per cent (of total female

population. The major castes in the village are rathwa, bariya, koli and all are Schedule tribe. Majority of population is involved in agriculture

and animal husbandry. Very low rate of literacy can be seen in this area which draws a major concern. The primary reason behind this can be

linked to migration, which is clearly mention in the sub‐section table no 23.

Table no. 21: Demographic information

S.N. Village Population SC STTotal Male Female Total Male Female % Total Male Female %

1 Budha juladhani 310 160 150 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 310 160 150 1002 Gheswadi 432 217 215 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 432 217 215 1003 Hariyabar 354 187 167 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 354 187 167 100 4 Khokhara (L) 285 149 136 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 285 149 136 100 5 Nardha 454 254 200 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 454 254 200 100 6 Pisayata(D) 743 364 379 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 743 364 379 100 7 Ranbor 336 186 150 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 336 186 150 100 8 ReliyaAmba 315 158 157 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 315 158 157 100 9 Sankal 435 218 217 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 435 218 217 100 Total 3664 1893 1771 3664 1893 1771

Table no. 22: Literacy rate

S.N. Village Literacy

Total % Male % Female %

1 Budha juladhani 19 6.13 11 57.89 8 42.11 2 Gheswadi 8 1.85 5 62.5 3 37.5 3 Hariyabar 16 4.52 10 62.5 6 37.5 4 Khokhara (L) 3 1.05 2 66.67 1 33.33 5 Nardha 18 3.96 12 66.67 6 33.33 6 Pisayata(D) 4 0.54 3 75 1 25 7 Ranbor 25 7.44 15 60 10 40 8 ReliyaAmba 34 10.79 21 61.76 13 38.24 9 Sankal 21 4.83 11 52.38 10 47.62

Migration Pattern:

As discussed previously people migrate during rabi and summer season to different parts of the state like Surat, Ahmedabad, Vadodara city, bhuj, Ankelshwar and Suarashtra as daily wagers, agricultural labours and construction workers. As soon as kharif season ends most of people tend to migrated to different places in search of employment. People with little irrigation souces and livestock stay in the village, futher during drought season 80% of the villagers choose to migrate which leaves these villages almost empty. Regularly they migrate to same places and work as agriculture labour and wage labour. A special transportation is arranged from naswadi taluka place to different places and suprisingly it’s hard to find place in transporting vechiles as they are packed with people. Migrating parents will take their children along with them, this leads to discontuning of their education, and hence the literacy rate is directly linked to migration.

Table no. 23: Migration details

S.N. Village Total population

Migration Migration by months Main reason for migration

Income during migration / month

Total Male Female Up to 3 months

3‐6 months

More than 6 months

1 Budha juladhani 310 62 41 21 ‐ 6‐Mar ‐ Farm Labour 62502 Gheswadi 432 49 25 24 ‐ 6‐Mar ‐ Farm Labour 7000 3 Hariyabar 354 115 67 48 ‐ 6‐Mar ‐ Farm Labour 5900 4 Khokhara (L) 285 48 34 14 ‐ 6‐Mar ‐ Farm Labour 6400 5 Nardha 454 76 48 28 ‐ 6‐Mar ‐ Farm Labour 5600 6 Pisayata(D) 743 72 46 26 ‐ 6‐Mar ‐ Farm Labour 5300 7 Ranbor 336 36 21 15 ‐ 6‐Mar ‐ Farm Labour 6600 8 ReliyaAmba 315 52 31 21 ‐ 6‐Mar ‐ Farm Labour 7000 9 Sankal 435 116 68 48 ‐ 6‐Mar ‐ Farm Labour 6400

Table no. 24: Poverty

S.N. Village Total Household

BPL % of BPL HH Total Land less

HH % of land less

HH 0‐16 17‐20 Total

1 Budha juladhani 64 21 28 49 76.56 11 17.19 2 Gheswadi 63 12 12 24 38.1 3 4.76 3 Hariyabar 64 17 23 40 62.5 15 23.44 4 Khokhara (L) 47 9 13 22 46.81 2 4.26 5 Nardha 90 19 38 57 63.33 17 18.89 6 Pisayata(D) 70 24 31 55 78.57 5 7.14 7 Ranbor 52 16 19 35 67.31 2 3.85 8 ReliyaAmba 88 20 48 68 77.27 11 12.5 9 Sankal 80 28 33 61 76.25 17 21.25 Total 618 166 245 411 83

Infrastructure facilities:

The irony of this cluster is most of them does not have proper “roads and transportation facilities” are limited; especially in rain season it is very hard to access this areas. Except for two mostly all the villages has electricity connectivity under Jyotigram Yojana of the State Government.

Nearly 66 per cent of households in the village have their electricity connections. Most of the villages in this cluster have only primary schools. For middle and higher secondary education, the students have to go to a market place boriyad or Naswadi a mini town which is about 25‐35 kilometres away on an average from the almost all the villages this particular cluster. However, most of the youngster travel this distance on daily basis to obtain a better education facilities. Most of these do not have any primary health care centre for which villagers have to go to boriyad or Naswadi taluka place which is 20 and 25 Kms respectively. Some of the villages come under a Group Panchayat with Panchayat as mentioned in Table no 1 of basic project information. None of the villages have the post‐office facility this show the need for improvement in these project areas.

Table no. 25: Village infrastructure

S.N. Village

Pucca road to the village (Y/N)

Schools Colleges (Number)

Post Office (Distance)

Banks (Numbe

r)

Distance from nearest

market yard

Milk collection centre

(Number)

Milk cooperative (Number)

Other cooperatives

/ CBIs (Number)

Any other institution LP UP HS

1 Budha juladhani N Y ‐ ‐ ‐ 4 k.m ‐ 40 k.m ‐ ‐ 0 ‐ 2 Gheswadi N Y ‐ ‐ ‐ 3 k.m ‐ 35 k.m ‐ ‐ 0 ‐ 3 Hariyabar Y Y ‐ ‐ ‐ 3 k.m ‐ 24 k.m ‐ ‐ 1 ‐ 4 Khokhara (L) N Y ‐ ‐ ‐ 10 k.m ‐ 38 k.m ‐ ‐ 0 ‐ 5 Nardha Y Y ‐ ‐ ‐ 3 k.m ‐ 25k.m ‐ ‐ 1 ‐ 6 Pisayata(D) Y Y ‐ ‐ ‐ 2 k.m ‐ 28 k.m ‐ ‐ 0 ‐ 7 Ranbor N Y ‐ ‐ ‐ 5 k.m ‐ 35 k.m ‐ ‐ 1 ‐ 8 ReliyaAmba Y Y ‐ ‐ ‐ 5 k.m ‐ 30 k.m ‐ ‐ 0 ‐ 9 Sankal N Y ‐ ‐ ‐ 8 k.m ‐ 40 k.m ‐ ‐ 2 ‐

Table no. 26: Facilities / HH assets

S.N. Village HHs with electricity

HHs with safety latrines

HHs with phones HHs with vehicle HHs with TV set

HHs with cooking gas

HHs with Drinking water

HHs with fridge Land

line Mobile 2‐wheeler 4‐wheeler

1 Budha juladhani 0 ‐ 1 8 6 ‐ 0 ‐ ‐ ‐ 2 Gheswadi 55 ‐ 1 12 9 1 2 ‐ ‐ ‐ 3 Hariyabar 53 ‐ 5 8 12 ‐ 5 ‐ ‐ ‐ 4 Khokhara (L) 0 ‐ ‐ 9 3 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 5 Nardha 75 ‐ 8 12 15 ‐ 5 ‐ ‐ ‐ 6 Pisayata(D) 60 ‐ 2 18 12 ‐ 5 1 ‐ ‐ 7 Ranbor 45 ‐ 3 5 8 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 8 ReliyaAmba 70 ‐ 3 5 12 ‐ ‐ ‐ 5 ‐ 9 Sankal 55 ‐ 1 12 11 ‐ 2 ‐ ‐ ‐

Livelihood pattern:

The villagers earn their livelihood from agriculture and animal husbandry, during lean seasons they migrate as daily wage labourers to Surat and surastra and as agriculture labour in other parts of the state. Very few people in this project area are involved in self‐employment and services. Dependence on common property resources can also be seen here as source of income. This area is abundant with local palm trees, in off‐season women tend to sell the extract from these trees locally known as nira a semi alcoholic natural drink consumed by the localities to sustain from the heat waves of summer. This is also one of the subsidiary income sources for the villager especially in summer season.

Table no. 27: Per capita Income

S.no Village Agriculture Animal husbandry Casual labour Others Total

1 Budha juladhani 1516 65 1410 0 2991 2 Gheswadi 1310 72 139 0 1521 3 Hariyabar 1250 85 1160 0 2495 4 Khokhara (L) 1335 193 1396 0 2924 5 Nardha 1480 156 1140 26 2802 6 Pisayata(D) 959 219 12 13 1203 7 Ranbor 1290 34 1530 0 2854

8 ReliyaAmba 1460 560 750 251 3021 9 Sankal 1428 172 901 23 2524

Dependence on Common Property Resource

The vast majority of the villagers of this region depend on Common property resources. Most of them continue to live a virtually hand‐to‐mouth existence. Based upon the rainfall data of past few years the rainfall of this area is increasingly decreasing due to which agriculture is become a major constraint. Availability of little moisture is also insufficient for the development of pasture lands this trend seems to continue year by year making the natural resources in this depleting at a faster rate.One of the prominent features of all these villages in this cluster is dependence on common property resources. Forest has trees which have yield economical value and have good market in the local market yard. It ranges from leafs, flowers, medicinal seeds and many more. Two main products are mahuda flowers and mahuda seeds. First is Mahuda flowers when fermented releases great amounts of alcohol hence, flowers are sold in the near markets which are exported to different states. Secondly seed cotyledons of mahuda have a good amount of fatty acids which turns into oil after it is allowed from oil extraction process. Every family in village depends on common property resources for food fodder and fuel.

Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR

S.no Village Leaf of khakhar Mahuva Leaf of Timru

Total income % sells Income % sells Income % sells Income

1 Budha juladhani 15 5000 12 3000 ‐ ‐ 8000 2 Gheswadi 12 3000 15 5000 ‐ ‐ 8000 3 Hariyabar 15 5000 15 5000 ‐ ‐ 10000 4 Khokhara (L) 15 5000 15 5000 ‐ ‐ 10000 5 Nardha 15 5000 12 3000 ‐ ‐ 8000 6 Pisayata(D) 15 5000 12 3000 ‐ ‐ 8000 7 Ranbor 12 3000 15 5000 10 2000 10000 8 ReliyaAmba 12 3000 15 5000 ‐ ‐ 8000 9 Sankal 15 5000 12 3000 ‐ ‐ 8000

Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution)

S.no Village Total workforce Agriculture

Animal husbandry

(AH)

Agriculture + AH Casual labour Services Handicraft Others

1 Budha juladhani 307 191 11 160 95 ‐ ‐ 20 2 Gheswadi 193 116 27 95 55 4 ‐ 15 3 Hariyabar 228 110 15 98 75 ‐ ‐ 28 4 Khokhara (L) 167 95 21 79 60 ‐ ‐ 10 5 Nardha 369 165 17 146 161 2 ‐ 24 6 Pisayata(D) 655 350 15 289 279 ‐ ‐ 21 7 Ranbor 163 104 29 86 35 ‐ 5 19 8 ReliyaAmba 188 127 31 115 35 ‐ ‐ 15 9 Sankal 393 145 37 109 115 3 ‐ 13

The majority of the citizens of this region depend on Common property resources. Most of them continue to live a virtually hand‐to‐mouth existence. Based upon the rainfall data of past few years the rainfall of this area decreasing due to which agriculture is become a major constraint. Availability of little moisture is also insufficient for the development of pasture lands this trend seems to continue year by year making the natural resources in this depleting at a faster rate. Drinking water is also scarce in this region and most of the well water table is going deeper day by day. One of the prominent features of all these villages in this cluster is dependence on common property resources.

Comparative data of the crop productivity of the area: project area vs. District

vs. State vs. Country vs. World:

“The term productivity in general means the total output per unit of factor input. For example land productivity means output per hectare of

land. Productivity is an average and is calculated by dividing the total output of a particular crop by the total cultivated area under that crop.”

In order to asses the status of agricultural crops of the project area it is very crucial to have data of that particular geography and its agriculture

profile to make a comparative analysis. Hence different sources of data like Baseline survey (for Naswadi village), Handbook of Agriculture,

ICAR publication 2006(For Gujarat and India), and Final district plan (DAP) of Dept. of Agriculture (Vadodara) on production and productivity

are obtained. Based upon the production and productivity data the gap can be understood in comparision with project villages, taluka place,

district, state, country and world. The projections on the graphs is relative comparision of productivity of different places this is in order to

understand the gaps in the productivity and to find the plausible solution for increasing the potential to an extend possible.

Crop Details of Project area:

Crop 1: Maize

One of the most important feature of this taluka in terms of agriculture is, the productivity of maize is higest in Naswadi taluka in comparsion to entire state and stand first in term of productivity. Maize is one of the major cereals crops grown in this project area and taluka place of Naswadi. Mazie staple food crop in this region and 9 villages of project area are designated as tribal villages and their majority of people depend upon mazie as food crop. Fig.1 Comparative data of project, Block, District, State and country of Maize and Redgram

The world productivity of Maize is 2024 kg/ha. In India, it is grown in about 6290 lakh hectares with a production of 10303 lakh tonnes and productivity of 2024 kg/ha. Gujarat is one of the lowest producing state in India with a 1481 kg/ha productivity, Vadodara district productivity being 1100. Naswadi block has very good productivity of 3500 kg/ha. The productivity of the project area is less in comparsion to the district. Hence, with proper solution the gaps can be minimized through modern agriculture practises.

Crop 2: Redgram:

Pigeonpea is grown on an area of about 3.25 million hectares with the production of 2.23 million tonnes in the country.The world productivity of red is 780 kg/ha, India productivity 685 kg/ha. It is second most important crop after chickpea among different pulse crops in the country. Intresting Gujarat state have maximum productivity of with 989 kg/ha and one of the noteworthy facts is Naswadi has twice the productivity of redgram and even the project area productivity is higher than the world. However their is a gap between project area and Naswadi, this can be minimized by modern agricultural practices.

Figure 2 . Comparative data of project, Block, District, State and country of Paddy and Cotton

Figure 2, Compartative Productivity of Paddy and Cotton,Naswadi1G:

Crop 3: Paddy In India, rice accounts for 22 per cent of the total cropped area under cereals.The most significant achievement of the post independent

era is the transformation from chronic deficit to self‐sufficiency. The per capita net availability of rice (provisional) has increased from

about 150 g in 1950 to 225 g in 1990, in spite of growing population.The rice area has shrunk from 2.52 million hectares in 1960 to

about 2.20 million hectares in 1998‐99, but the production has increased from 3.5 million tonnes to about 8.2 million tonnes in 1998‐99

and ranked first in national productivity with 2278 kg/ha. World is kg/ha 3033, Gujarat 1699 kg/ha, district Vadodara 1125 kg/ha,

Naswadi 1200 kg/ha and project area is 419 kg/ha respectively. We can see the gap in the productivity of project area. This is mainly due

to the lack of irrigation facilities and traditional varities. The differenc can be elimated by different innovative techniques of crop

demonstration to create awareness of fertilizer use, pesticides and different tillage practices for increasing productivity of paddy.

Crop 4: Cotton Cotton often referred as "White gold" has been in cultivation in India for more than five thousand years. He cotton required for the

purpose of manufacturing yarn is cultivated in about 9 million hectares of land in India and thus India ranks first in the world. In India,

cotton is grown over an area of about 9 million hectares and provides livelihood for over 4 million farming families. The productivity of

cotton is very low in India but still it stands first in production of cotton after china and USA. The productivity of cotton is very low in the

project area in comparision to the Naswadi block. Hence this difference can be improved agricultural practices to an extend. Productivity

details of project area of cotton is 698 kg/ha, 950 kg/ha, 534 kg/ha, 774 kg/ha, 488 kg/ha, 690 kg/ha in comparision to taluka, district,

state, country and world respectively.

The productivity of Project area is low due to following reasons:

i) Full dependence on monsoon:

Project villages village is dependent on monsoon. Water is essential input in agriculture. Due to the absence of proper irrigation

facility,100% of the total cultivated area depends on the uncertain monsoon. Therefore, the suceess or failure of the monsoon

determines the success or failure of agriculture production.The rainfall is unreliable due to two factors: untimely and inadequate.

ii) Low use of fertilizer per unit cropped area:

Farmers do not use sufficient fertilizer due to lack of water, scarcity of fertilizer in market and insufficient money for fertilizer. Many a times they don’t get fertilizer at the right time.

iii) Traditional farming methods:

This also leads to low productivity. There is a lot of ignorance about the use of new farming methods and technologies such as multiple cropping. They don’t use FYM and other input in a proper way; that is why they don’t get 100% output. So these factors contribute to low productivity.

iv) Lack of adequate farm machinery:

Even today a large number of farmers in Naswadi project use wooden ploughs and bullocks. They don’t have adequate machinery like

seed drill. So, old machineries take more time in tillage practices.

v) Lack of finances for farmers:

In Naswadi most of the farmers are marginal and small. They do not have enough money to buy good quality seeds, machinery and other

inputs.

vi) Lack of good quality seeds and fertilizers:

Good quality seed, fertilizer and pesticide are important factor in agriculture productivity. The use of good quality leads to higher land

productivity. In project, however, there are two limitations in the use of fertilizer. First these fertilizers are most useful in irrigated

condition. But in project 100 per cent of land depend on rainfall. In Naswadi mostly farmers use nitrogenous fertilizers especially urea.

This has resulted in disproportionate use of fertilizer depleting the quality of land.

vii) Lack of other facilities such as storage and marketing:

5‐10% of agriculture product damage after harvesting due to scarcity of proper storage and proper market for sale. So he sells to local

traders at the low prices. Farmers mainly face proper means of transportation and roads. And second problem is farmers don’t have

proper storage facilities.

CHAPTER – 4

WATERSHED ACTIVITIES

Watershed Activities

Watershed management as a strategy has been adopted by Government of India especially in the rain‐fed regions of semi‐arid tropics. These

regions are characterized by low and undependable rain, low soil fertility, poor infrastructure development, low literacy and high incidence of

migration. Several studies have identified that there is a dire need of a systematic and scientific approach to deal with watershed development.

The common guidelines generate a fresh and flexible framework for the next generation watershed development.

Scientific Planning:

i) Cluster Approach

This envisages a broader vision of Geo‐hydrological unit which involves treating a cluster of micro‐watershed. The Naswadi IWMP‐7Project consists of eight micro‐ watersheds namely 5D1B2c2c, 5D1B2c2d, 5D1B2d2b, 5D1B2d2a, 5D1B2c2b, 5D1B2b2f, 5D1B2c2a, 5D1B2d3a, 5D1B2c2c. as their respective codes. Further Naswadi IWMP‐7 watershed project is in continuation with other watershed projects namely Lunaja, Muthai, Ambakuth, Ghata, Chetapur, Kundal Projects which is taken as IWMP‐3 as third priority area this gives an element of continuation of the programme and suits with features of cluster approach as holistic development.

ii) Base line Survey

To access the impact of any watershed development programme a detailed baseline survey has to be conducted. This acts a benchmark for any intervention during and post implementation of any development programme. A detailed baseline survey was undertaken which involved household census survey, Biophysical survey and Village level data collection from Talati –cum mantri. Household census survey includes a detailed questionnaire which was been filled by visiting each and every household in the village. This gave in the details of the demographic profile of the village, the literacy percentage, SC/ST population, number of BPL household, cattle population, net consumption rate in the village, average milk production of the cattle and various schemes running and their benefits. Bio‐physical survey was undertaken to identify various natural resources available in the village. It included the soil typology, well in the area, crop taken in the field, Cropping pattern, fertilizer used and various sources of irrigation in the field.

iii) Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA)

The past experience of watershed has given tremendous input to focus on creating accountability of the stakeholders towards the

programme. This has created an emphasis to include all the stakeholder communities and their local and indigenous Technological

Knowledge (ITK) while planning for any activity. Participatory approach provides a new path for planning, implementing, monitoring

and post‐ withdrawal activities with a complete accountability of the stakeholders. Various PRA techniques like resource mapping, social

mapping, and season calendars were used to understand the physical and social orientation of the village in general and watershed in

specific. These tools put the villagers in ease than the complicated questionnaires. Various tools like Matrix ranking, Venn Diagram were

used to identify various local vegetations (apt for afforestation) , Fodders crops , various institution and their significance in the life of

the farmers.

Focus Group Discussion with women:

Community mobilization expert has carried out the FGD with women in order to understand various issues related to their day to day

life. PRA tools such as time line, daily activity chart, details of SHG’s, details of common property resources, seasonal health problems,

girl child education, problems of agriculture and seasonal charts were discussed. In this discussion women were encouraged to speak

about their problem. The women who drew these charts described the differences between the rainy and dry season patterns. In the dry

season, it took longer to get water from the well and collecting firewood to stockpile for the rainy season. When the rains come, things

are much busier and the women's days are much longer because of all the work to be done in the fields.

iv) Use of GIS and Remote sensing for planning

Use of various high science tools has been promoted at various stages of watershed development.

a) Prioritization

Geographical Information System(GIS) has been used for prioritization process. Various layer maps were created like Geo‐

morphological, Soil, BPL Population, SC/ST population, Ground water Status, Drinking water situation Slope percent. These were all

given proper weightage according to the DoLR specification. This helped in prioritization of various watershed areas.

b) Planning

A action plan matrix was formulated by State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) taking into account various features like the slope percent, soil

Depth, Soil Texture, Soil erosion in the area for wasteland, forest land and agricultural land. Contour Map of vertical interval of 1 meter at

a scale of 1:8000 was used for identifying various locations for soil and water conservation structures. Land parcel number of those

particular villages is provided in order to understand the drainage, slope and stream in that area. Selection of site can be marked on the

maps with help of survey number of that village map.

c) Hydrological modelling

Hydrology modelling technique was used for locating drainage, stream length, flow direction, sink, Flow accumulation. This model

overlaid over cadastral map to calculate the catchment area of each structures like the check dam etc. This has helped to remove the

human error which generally occurs while calculating the catchment area of a check dam.

Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects

S. No. Scientific criteria/ inputs used Whether scientific criteria was

used

(A) Planning Cluster approach YesWhether technical back‐stopping for the project has been arranged? If yes, mention the name of the Institute

Baseline survey YesHydro‐geological survey YesContour mapping YesParticipatory Net Planning (PNP) YesRemote sensing data‐especially soil/ crop/ run‐off coverRidge to Valley treatment Online IT connectivity between (1) Project and DRDA cell/ZP Yes (2) DRDA and SLNA Yes (3) SLNA and DoLR Yes Availability of GIS layers 1. Cadastral map Yes2. Village boundaries Yes3. Drainage Yes4. Soil (Soil nutrient status) Yes5. Land use Yes6. Ground water status Yes7. Watershed boundaries Yes8. Activity Yes

Crop simulation models# NoIntegrated coupled analyzer/ near infrared visible spectroscopy/ medium spectroscopy for No

high speed soil nutrient analysisNormalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)# NoWeather Station

(B) Inputs No1. Bio‐pesticides No2. Organic manures Yes3. Vermicompost Yes4. Bio‐fertilizer No5. Water saving devices Yes6. Mechanized tools/ implements Yes7. Bio‐fencing Yes8. Nutrient budgeting No9. Automatic water level recorders & sediment samplers NoAny other (please specify)

Institution building:

The watershed development project has great potential and scope to empower socially disadvantage sections of the community. Considering the needs and priorities of these sections, special activities can be designed to reduce their drudgery. The can be involved in a skills up gradation programme. People's organizations hold the key in ensuring the right integration between sustainable development and social equity. Such organizations must have representations from representations from socially backward communities and women with separate special interest groups. Within group interactions across group interactions and representation in village level institutions provide a platform for the disadvantaged groups to become a part of mainstream development. It is also important to ensure that these groups obtain equal opportunities to access the resources developed at the community level.

i) Watershed Committee (WC)

It is a committee that is constituted by Gram Sabha to implement the watershed project with technical support of WDT in the village. This committee is registered under society Registration Act 1860. The Gram Sabha of the village selects the chairman of the watershed committee with the secretary who will be a paid functionary. A watershed Committee was formed accordingly in all the villages of IWMP‐7Naswadi 1G project area. The IWMP‐7Naswadi is a cluster of 10 villages with 7 Gram panchayats. Hence 7 main Watershed Committees and 3 sub‐watershed committees are formed at village keeping all parameter of watershed committee keeping the gender sensitive issues intact. Watershed committee member are briefed about the project objectives and a workshop is also conducted a in this regard at every village.

The watershed committee has a pivotal role to play during and after the project implementation period.

Table no. 31: Watershed Committee details

Main Committee: Tarol Groups Gram Panchayat Main Watershed Committee

Sr. No.

Names of WCs

Date of Registration as a Society

Name Designatio

n

M/F

SC

ST

SF MF

LF

Landless UG

SHG GP

Any other

Educational/Qualificati

on

Function/s

assigned#

1

Tarol Groups Gram

Panchayat Main Watershed

Committee

31‐07‐2010

Tadvi Shankarbhai Chimanbhai President M 1 1 1 Std‐4

2 Dungarabhil Revjibhai Vairagibhai

Wise‐President M 1 1 1 Std‐5

3 Patel Prabhudasbhai Laljibhai (RFO) Member M 1 1 1 P.G

4 Dungarabhil Rameshbhai Bhangiyabhai Member M 1 1 1 Uneducated

5 Dungarabhil Sevlabhai Daliyabhai Member M 1 1 1 Std‐6

6 Dungarabhil Gangaben Hooljibhai Member F 1 1 Std‐9

7 Dungarabhil Lelkiben Vesiyabhai Member F 1 1 1 Std‐4

8 Dungarabhil Kalidasbhai Puniyabhai Member M 1 1 1 Std‐8

9 Dungarbhil Kanubhai Member M 1 1 Uneducated

Majiyabhai 10 Patel Shilpaben C. Member F 1 MRS

Sub Committee: Pisayata Sub Watershed Committee

Sr. No.

Names of WCs

Date of Registration as a Society Name

Designation

M/F

SC

ST

SF

MF

LF

Landless

UG

SHG

GP

Any other

Educational/Qualification

Function/s

assigned#

1

Pisayata Sub Watershed

Committee

NIL

Dungarabhil Laliyabhai Masalabhai

President M 1 1 1 Std ‐12

2 Dungarabhil Kalidasbhai Movasiyabhai

Wise‐Presiden

t M 1 1 1 Std‐3

3 Dungarabhil Kanubhai Simjibhai Member M 1 1 1 Uneducated

4 Dungarabhil Dalsing Mathurbhai Member M 1 1 1 Uneducated

5 Dungarabhil Rumaliyabhai Jetibhai Member M 1 1 Std‐3

6 Dungarabhil Laliben Mukabhai Member F 1 1 Std‐3

7 Dungarabhil Savitaben Naykabhai Member F 1 1 1 Uneducated

8 Dungarabhil Syadabhai Dunkhiyabhai Member M 1 1 1 Uneducated

9 Patel Shilpaben C. Member F 1 1 1 MRS 10

Patel Prabhudasbhai Laljibhai (RFO) Member M 1 1 1 M. Sc. (Chemistry)

Sub Committee: Ranbor Sub Watershed Committee

Sr. No.

Names of WCs


Designation

M/F

SC

ST

SF

MF

LF

Landless

UG

SHG

GP

Any other


Function/s

assigned#

1

Ranbor Sub

Watershed

Committee

NIL

Dungarabhil Dharakiyabhai Aatiyabhai

President M 1 1 1 Uneducated

2 Dungarabhil Kemabhai Baliyabhai

Wise‐Presiden

t M 1 1 1 Uneducated

3 Dungarabhil Gisiyabhai Naykabhai Member M 1 1 1 Uneducated

4 Dungarabhil Khusha bhai Maniyabhai Member M 1 1 1 Uneducated

5 Dungarabhil Ravishbhai Chhotabhai Member M 1 1 1 Uneducated

6 Dungarabhil Kevjibhai Harjibhai Member M 1 1 1 Uneducated

7 Dungarabhil Kantbhai Nanjibhai Member M 1 1 1 Uneducated

8 Dungarabhil Sukataben Soriyabhai Member F 1 1 1 Uneducated

9 Dungarabhil Gadiyabhai Nuriyabhai Member M 1 1 1 Uneducated

10 Dungarabhil Ramanbhai Sakudiyabhai Member M 1 Uneducated

11 Patel Shilpaben C. Member F 1 1 1 MRS

12 Patel Prabhudasbhai Laljibhai (RFO) Member M 1 M. Sc. (Chemistry)

Sub Committee: Budhajaldhuni Sub Watershed Committee

Sr. No.

Names of WCs


Designation

M/F

SC

ST

SF

MF

LF

Landless

UG

SHG

GP

Any other


Function/s

assigned#

1

Budhajaldhuni Sub

Watershed

Committee

NIL

Dungarabhil Bhuriyabhai Bhungiyabhai

President M 1 1 1 Std‐3

2 Dungarabhil Hutambhai Dadlabhai

Wise‐Presiden


3 Dungarabhil Dharmabhai Biljibhai Member M 1 1 1 Uneducated

4 Dungarabhil Ganiyabhai Temariyabhai Member M 1 1 1 Uneducated

5 Dungarabhil Nevjibhai Seniyabhai Member M 1 1 Uneducated

6 Dungarabhil Naginbhai Kantibhai Member M 1 1 1

Std‐3

7 Dungarabhil Jaliben Nankiyabhai Member F 1 1 1 Uneducated

8 Dungarabhil Ranguben Ishiyabhai Member F 1 1 Uneducated


10 Patel Prabhudasbhai Laljibhai (RFO) Member M 1 1 1 M. Sc. (Chemistry)

Sub Committee: Reliyaamba Sub Watershed Committee

Sr. No.

Names of WCs


Designation

M/F

SC

ST

SF

MF

LF

Landless

UG

SHG

GP

Any other


Function/s

assigned#

1 Reliyaam

ba NIL Tadvi Ramanbhai Bhayajibhai President M 1 1 1 Std‐10

2 Sub

Watershed

Committee

Bhil Khushalbhai Mangabhai

Wise‐President M 1 1 1 Uneducated

3 Bhil Mangiben Vitthalbhai Member F 1 1 1 Std‐2

4 Bariya Karsanbhai Mangabhai Member M 1 1 1 STd‐7

5

Dungarabhil Chandubhai Pidiyabhai Member M 1 1

Std‐2

6

Dungarabhil Raisingbhai Samnabhai Member M 1 1 1

Std‐4

7 Dungarabhil Dhanjibhai Mansibhai Member M 1 1 1

Std‐2

8

Dungarabhil Gamaanbhai Ukedbhai Member M 1 1 1

Std‐4


10 Patel Prabhudasbhai Laljibhai (RFO) Member M 1 1 1 M. Sc. (Chemistry)

Main Committee: Sankal(P) Groups Gram Panchayat Main Watershed Committee

Sr. No.

Names of WCs


Designation

M/F

SC

ST

SF

MF

LF

Landless

UG

SHG

GP

Any other


Function/s

assigned#

1 Sankal(

P) Groups Gram Panchayat Main

31‐07‐2010

Dungarabhil Chimanbhai Luliyabhai President M 1 1 1 Uneducated

2 Dungarabhil Kamleshbhai Harjibhai


3 Patel Prabhudasbhai Laljibhai(RFO) Member M 1 1 1 M. Sc. (Chemistry)

4 Dungarabhil Maavsingbhai Member M 1 1 1 Uneducated

Watershed

Committee

Retabhai

5 Dungarabhil Sajiyabhai Gamiyabhai Member M 1 1 1 Std‐10

6 Dungarabhil Vershaben Ramabhai Member F 1 1 1 Std‐8

7 Dungarabhil Gooljibhai Teliyabhai Member M 1 1 Uneducated

8 Dungarabhil Jasiben Maavsingbhai Member F 1 1 1 Uneducated

9 Dungarabhil Aarsinhbhai Panchiyabhai Member M 1 1 1 Uneducated

10 Dungarabhil Isiyabhai Simjibhai Member M 1 1 1 Uneducated

11 Patel Shilpaben C. Member F 1 MRS Sub Committee: Sankal(P) Sub Watershed Committee

Sr. No.

Names of WCs


Designation

M/F

SC

ST

SF

MF

LF

Landless

UG

SHG

GP

Any other


Function/s

assigned#

1

Sankal(P) Sub Watershed

Committee

NIL

Dungarabhil Naarsingbhai Garadiyabhai


2 Dungarabhil Kantibhai Verjubhai

Wise‐Presiden

t M 1 1 1 Std‐4

3 Dungarabhil Jashiben Maavsibhai Member F 1 1 1 Std‐3

4 Dungarabhil Dadubhai Movasiyabhai Member M 1 1 1 Std‐4

5 Dungarabhil Gagadiyabhai Jethabhai Member M 1 1 Uneducated

6 Dungarabhil Govindbhai Kajibhai Member M 1 1 1 Uneducated

7 Dungarabhil Savdiben Poolsingbhai Member F 1 1 1 Uneducated

8 Dungarabhil Paarsingbhai Bodabhai Member M 1 1 Uneducated


Patel Prabhudasbhai Laljibhai(RFO) Member M 1 1 1 M. Sc. (Chemistry)

Sub Committee: Khokhara(L) Sub Watershed Committee

Sr. No.

Names of WCs


Designation

M/F

SC

ST

SF

MF

LF

Landless

UG

SHG

GP

Any other


Function/s

assigned#

1

Khokhara(L) Sub

Watershed

Committee

NIL

Dungarabhil Samsherbhai Kakadiyabhai

President M 1 1 1 Uneducated

2 Dungarabhil Dadniyabhai Gamiyabhai


3 Dungarabhil Kalasiyabhai Mangliyabhai Member M 1 1 1 Uneducated

4 Dungarabhil Maangiben Bijiyabhai Member F 1 1 1 Uneducated

5 Dugarabhil Diliyabhai Mungliyabhai Member M 1 1 Uneducated

6 Dungarabhil Seemaben Buliyabhai Member F 1 1 1 Uneducated

7 Dungarabhil Rameshbhai Shaydabhai Member M 1 1 1 Uneducated

8 Dungarabhil Kalasiyabhai Mangliyabhai Member M 1 1 Uneducated



Sub Committee: Gheswadi Sub Watershed Committee

Sr. No.

Names of WCs


Designation

M/F

SC

ST

SF

MF

LF

Landless

UG

SHG

GP

Any other


Function/s

assigned#

1

Gheswadi Sub Watershed

Committee

NIL

Dungarabhil Govindbhai Pangliyabhai


2 Dungarabhil Madhubhai Vechanbhai

Wise‐Presiden


3 Dungarabhil Mamtaben Lalubhai Member F 1 1 1 Std‐7

4 Dungarabhai Aarsinhbhai Teliyabhai Member M 1 1 1 Uneducated

5 Dungarabhai Kantibhai Saliyabhai Member M 1 1 Uneducated

6 Dungarabhai Saliyabhai Kadiyabhai Member M 1 1 1 Std‐3

7 Dungarabhil Nanabhai Aadiyabhai Member M 1 1 1 Uneducated

8 Dungarabhil Mansingbhai Khatariyabhai Member M 1 1 1 Uneducated



Main Committee: Katkuva Groups Gram Panchayat Main Watershed Committee

Sr. No.

Names of WCs


Designation

M/F

SC

ST

SF

MF

LF

Landless

UG

SHG

GP

Any other


Function/s

assigned#

1 Katkuva 09‐07‐ Rathva Omprakashbhai Presiden M 1 1 1 Std.‐ 12

Groups Gram

Panchayat Main Watersh

ed Committ

ee

2010 Ambubhai t

2 Tadvi Somabhai Kadubhai

Wise‐Presiden

t M 1 1 1 Std.‐ 12


4 Rathva Dinubhai Chittabhai Member M 1 1 1 Std.‐ 3

5 Tadvi Savitaben Karsanbhai Member F 1 1 1 Uneducated

6 Rathva Manubhai Narsinhbhai Member M 1 1 1 Std.‐ 10

7 Rathva Sureshbhai Vechanbhai Member M 1 1 Std.‐ 10

8 Tadvi Savitaben Vaanjibhai Member F 1 1 1 Std.‐ 10

9 Rathva Mahesbhai Bhagubhai Member M 1 1 1 Std.‐ 10

10

Rathva Jentibhai Naranbhai Member M 1 1 1 Std.‐ 8

11 Bariya Dineshbhai V. Member M 1 BRS Sub Committee: Nardha Sub Watershed Committee

Sr. No.

Names of WCs


Designation

M/F

SC

ST

SF

MF

LF

Landless

UG

SHG

GP

Any other


Function/s

assigned#

1 Nardha Sub

Watershed

Committ NIL

Tadvi Vaanjibhai Karsanbhai President M 1 1 1 Std‐12

2 Tadvi Damanbhai Naykabhai

Wise‐President M 1 1 1 Uneducated

3 Tadvi Narsinhbhai Member M 1 1 1 Std‐6

ee Karsanbhai

4 Tadvi Kanubhai Lavghanbhai Member M 1 1 1

Std‐6

5 Tadvi Kapilaben Versanbhai Member F 1 1

Uneducated

6 Tadvi Versanbhai Karsanbhai Member M 1 1

Uneducated

7 Tadvi Rameshbhai Kesiyabhai Member M 1 1 1 Std‐12

8 Tadvi Premilaben HImmatbhai Member F 1 1 1 Uneducated

9 Bariya Dineshbhai V. Member M 1 1 1 BRS


Main Committee: Lavakoi Groups Gram Panchayat Main Watershed Committee

Sr. No.

Names of WCs


Designation

M/F

SC

ST

SF

MF

LF

Landless

UG

SHG

GP

Any other


Function/s

assigned#

1 Lavakoi Groups Gram

Panchayat Main Watersh

ed Committ

ee 31‐07‐2010

Rathva Kishanbhai Bhaijibhai President M 1 1 1 Std.‐ 7

2 Bhil Vittalbhai Versanbhai

Wise‐President M 1 1 1 Std.‐ 8


4 Rathva Ambaben Raisingbhai Member F 1 1 1 Uneducated

5 Rathva Sukhrambhai Vechlabhai Member M 1 1 1 Std.‐ 10

6 Bhil Bharatbhai Sanabhai Member M 1 1 Std.‐ 3

7 Bhil Dholiben Ishwarbhai Member F 1 1 1 Uneducated

8 Rathva Jasvantbhai Chandarbhai Member M 1 1 1 Std.‐ 10

9 Bhil Arjunbhai Mohanbhai Member M 1 1 1 Std.‐ 6

10 Patel Shilpaben C. Member F 1 MRS

Sub Committee: Hariyabar Sub Watershed Committee

Sr. No.

Names of WCs


Designation

M/F

SC

ST

SF

MF

LF

Landless

UG

SHG

GP

Any other


Function/s

assigned#

1

Hariyabar Sub

Watershed

Committee

NIL

Bhil Prabhatbhai Vanjibhai President F 1 1 1 Std‐8

2 Bhil Prakashbhai Arjunbhai

Wise‐President F 1 1 1 Std‐10

3 Bhil Haridasbhai Kanjibhai Member M 1 1 1 Std‐5

4 Bhil Ukedbhai Chhipabhai Member M 1 1 1 Uneducated

5 Bhil Isverbhai Revabhai Member M 1 1 1 Std‐6

6 Bhil Ramsingbhai Punabhai Member M 1 1 1

Std‐4

7 Bhil Ramanbhai Naykabhai Member M 1 1

Uneducated

8 Bhil Bhimabhai Revabhai Member M 1 1 1

Uneducated

9 Bhil Ramdas Chariyabhai Member F 1 Uneducated

10 Bhil Kashirambhai Member M 1 1 Uneducated

kanjibhai 11 Patel Shilpaben C. Member F 1 MRS

12 Patel Prabhudasbhai Laljibhai(RFO) Member M 1 M. Sc. (Chemistry)

Details of Main Watershed Committee Registration:

District: Vadodara Taluka: Naswadi

Sr. No. Name Of Institute Registration

Date AD 1860, Registration Summittee, Section 21

AD 1950, Mumbai Public Trust, Under Section 29

(Registration No. Of Public Trust)

1 Tarol Groups Gram Panchayat Main Watershed Committee 31/7/2010 Gujarat/2893/Vadodara F/2576/Vadodara

2 Sankal(P) Groups Gram Panchayat Main Watershed Committee 31/7/2010 Gujarat/2895/Vadodara F/2578/Vadodara

3 Katkuva Groups Gram Panchayat Main Watershed Committee 09/7/2010 Gujarat/2896/Vadodara F/2579/Vadodara

4 Lavakoi Groups Gram Panchayat Main Watershed Committee 31/7/2010 Gujarat/2892/Vadodara F/2575/Vadodara

ii )Self Help Group

Self Help Groups are motivated, small homogenous groups organized together through credit and thrift activities. Self help group initiative especially for women help uplift their livelihood. Generally self help groups include landless and poor women. Men can also be member in SHG if it serves the common objective of the group.

Before formation of the SHGs, during PRA activities, Focussed Group Discussions (FGDs) were held with the women, which came up with the

following observations:

a) Lack of proper credit facilities due to low intervention of formal financial credit institution.

b) Schemes like Sakhi mandal and SGSY are already operation at the village level but not to full extend.

c) Excessive exploitation of weaker section by money lenders

d) Lack of attitude for saving among poor people

e) Lack of knowledge on credit and thrift activity and banking.

After a discussion through PRA and other foucus groupd discussion with villagers and local authorities of taluka panchayat and other

developmental department, it was known that lack of awareness to villagers regarding such facilities and also due to the lengthy procedure

of financial institutions has also become a major constraint.

Table no. 32: SHG details Name of Village S. No. Total no. of registered SHGs No. of members

No. of ST in each category

No. of BPL in each category

With only Men

With only

Women

With both

Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total

Budhjuldhani 1 2 1 2 55

(i) Landless 11 11 22 11 11 22 3 4 7

(ii) SF 11 0 11 11 0 11 5 0 5 (iii) MF 5 6 11 5 6 11 0 0 0 (iv) LF 5 6 11 5 6 11 0 0 0

Total 32 23 55 32 23 55 8 4 12

Ghesvadi 2 2 1 2 55

(i) Landless 11 11 22 11 11 22 1 2 3

(ii) SF 11 0 11 11 0 11 4 0 4 (iii) MF 5 6 11 5 6 11 0 0 0 (iv) LF 5 6 11 5 6 11 0 0 0

Total 32 23 55 32 23 55 5 2 7

Hariyabar 3 2 2 1 55

(i) Landless 11 11 22 11 11 22 3 5 8

(ii) SF 11 11 22 11 11 22 3 2 5 (iii) MF 5 6 11 5 6 11 1 0 1 (iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 27 28 55 27 28 55 7 7 14

Khokhara (la) 4 2 2 1 55

(i) Landless 11 11 22 11 11 22 2 4 6

(ii) SF 11 11 22 11 11 22 3 1 4 (iii) MF 5 6 11 5 6 11 0 0 0 (iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 27 28 55 27 28 55 5 5 10

Nardha 5 2 1 2 55 (i) Landless 11 11 22 11 11 22 3 3 6

(ii) SF 11 0 11 11 11 22 3 2 5 (iii) MF 5 6 11 5 6 11 0 0 0 (iv) LF 5 6 11 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 32 23 55 27 28 55 6 5 11

Pisayata 6 2 1 2 55

(i) Landless 11 11 22 11 11 22 2 0 2

(ii) SF 11 0 11 11 11 22 4 1 5 (iii) MF 5 6 11 5 6 11 0 0 0 (iv) LF 5 6 11 5 6 11 0 0 0

Total 32 23 55 27 28 55 6 1 7

Ranbor 7 2 2 1 55

(i) Landless 11 11 22 11 11 22 4 1 5

(ii) SF 11 11 22 11 11 22 1 2 3 (iii) MF 5 6 11 5 6 11 0 0 0 (iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 27 28 55 27 28 55 5 3 8

Reliya Amba 8 2 2 1 55

(i) Landless 11 11 22 11 11 22 4 3 7

(ii) SF 11 11 22 11 11 22 3 1 4 (iii) MF 5 6 11 5 6 11 0 0 0 (iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 27 28 55 27 28 55 7 4 11

9 2 2 1 55

(i) Landless 11 11 22 11 11 22 1 3 4

Sankal (ii) SF 11 11 22 5 6 11 2 1 3 (iii) MF 5 6 11 5 6 11 0 0 0 (iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 27 28 55 27 28 55 3 4 7

User Group:

User Groups are normally formed to manage an activity or asset created under the programme on a long term basis. The user group collect

user charges from their members, oversee the works and manage the benefits.

It was decided that each group would formulate certain internal rules and have a feeling of ownership with community spirit.

Table no. 33: UG detail

S. No. Village Total no. of UGs No. of members No. of SC/ST in each

category No. of BPL in each

category Men Women Both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total

1 Budhajuldhani 24 1 25

(i)Landless (ii) SF 18 1 19 18 1 19 10 1 11 (iii) MF 5 0 5 5 0 5 3 0 3 (iv) LF 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0

Total 24 1 25 24 1 25 13 1 14

2 Geshvadi 6 1 ‐ 7

(i)Landless (ii) SF (iii) MF 5 1 6 5 1 6 2 0 2 (iv) LF 1 0 1 1 0 1 ‐ ‐ ‐

Total 5 1 6 7 2 9

3 Hariyabar 9 6 ‐ 15

(i)Landless (ii) SF 4 5 9 4 5 9 1 2 3 (iii) MF 5 ‐ 5 5 ‐ 5 2 ‐ 2 (iv) LF 1 ‐ 1 1 ‐ 1 ‐ ‐ ‐

Total 10 5 15 10 5 15 3 2 5

4 Khokhara (la) 14 7 ‐ 21 (i)Landless (ii) SF 9 4 13 9 4 13 3 1 4 (iii) MF 6 2 8 6 2 8 1 ‐ 1

(iv) LF Total 15 6 21 15 6 21 4 1 5

5 Nardha 16 1 17

(i)Landless (ii) SF 9 1 10 9 1 10 3 1 4 (iii) MF 7 0 7 7 0 7 4 0 4 (iv) LF

Total 16 1 17 16 1 17 7 1 8

6 Pisayata (D) 21 2 23


Total 21 2 23 21 2 23 7 0 7

7 Ranbor 17 4 21


Total 17 4 21 17 4 21 4 1 5

8 Reliya Amba 21 1 22

(i)Landless (ii) SF 17 ‐ 17 17 ‐ 17 4 ‐ 4 (iii) MF 4 1 5 4 1 5 1 ‐ 1 (iv) LF

Total 21 1 22 21 1 22 5 ‐ 5

9 Sankal 16 5 21

(i)Landless (ii) SF 7 ‐ 7 7 ‐ 7 3 ‐ 3 (iii) MF 6 2 8 6 2 8 1 ‐ 1 (iv) LF 3 3 6 3 3 6 ‐ 1 1

Total 16 5 21 16 5 21 4 1 5

4.3.1 Entry Point activity (EPA)

EPA activities are taken up under watershed projects to build a rapport with the village community to make them to feel the presence at the

beginning of the project; generally, certain important works which are in urgent demand of the local community are taken up. A group

Discussion was conducted with watershed Development Committee regarding the EPA activity, It was conveyed to the WC that a particular

amount was allotted for EPA activity for each of their villages, which was 4 per cent of total allocated budget. The villagers discussed various

activities which they felt is important but after a brief discussion it was conveyed to them that only those activities can be taken, which revive

the common natural resources. It was also taken into priority that there should be an instrument of convergence which will result in

sustainability of activities.

Table no.34: Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs.)

S.No Names of Villages Amount

earmarked (Rs. Lakhs)

Entry Point Activities planned No of Units Estimated cost (Rs. in Lakhs)

1 Sankal 1.445

Renovation of wells with recharge structure 1 0.2322 H.p Motor with PVC pipes 1 0.232New Handpump with recharge structure 2 0.981 Total 4 1.445

2 Khokhara(la) 1.383

Single phase motor with PVC Pipes 1 0.366New Handpump with recharge structure 2 1.017Total 3 1.383

3 Gheswadi 0.151 Repair of handpump with recharge stucture 1 0.151Total 1 0.151

4 Hariyabar 1.336

water though 250 ft p.v.c pipe 1 0.553Handpump reparing 1 0.153Renovation of well 1 0.630

Total 3 1.336

5 Nardha 0.869

Repair of handpump with recharge stucture 2 0.304New hand pump with recharge structure 1 0.565Total 3 0.869

6 Pisayata (D) 1.645

Renovation of well with recharge structure 2 H.P Motor and pipe 1 0.590

Repair of handpump with recharge stucture 1 0.100New hand pump with recharge structure 1 0.555Construction of water trough for dairy animals 1 0.400Total 4 1.645

7 Ranbor 1.300

2HP Motor for pumping of drinking water 1 0.400New Hand pump 1 0.500Animal water Trough 1 0.400Total 3 1.300

8 Budha juldhani 1.990

Repair of community well with recharge structure 2 0.500New hand pump with recharge structure 2 1.1402 HP motor for pumping the water from well 1 0.350 Total 5 1.990

9 Reliya Amba 0.629

Repair of well with recharge structure 1 0.224Animal water Trough 1 0.405Total 2 0.629

Grand Total 10.748 28 10.748

Watershed Development Works:

Watershed work phase is the core component of the project. Creating permanent structures as required the slope, geology and topography starting from ridge to valley to conserve rain water at point of its incidence with ground. Trapping the water resources at right place at right time can great increase the effectiveness of this project. The objective being reclamation of natural resources and creating sustainability to assets created under this project. A multi‐tier ridge to valley sequence approach should be approached towards implementation of watershed development projects. A net budget of 50 percent is allotted for this work. Ridge Area Treatment Plans:

It is very important to treat the ridge as this is where the major water resources originate. This involves mainly hilly and forest region in Naswadi IWMP‐7watershed. For the ridge area treatment of Naswadi IWMP‐7watersheds following structure are been Proposed after interaction between the watershed committee, Range Forest Officer (RFO) and other field staff of forest and MDT and WDT engineer.

a. Graded Bunding b. Gully Plung

a. Graded Bunding:

“Graded bunds or graded terraces or channel terraces are the bunds or terraces laid along a pre‐determined longitudinal grade very near the contour but not exactly along contour”.

Suitability: The graded bunds, commonly used are comparable to the narrow base terraces. They are used for the safe, disposal of excess runoff high rainfall areas and rigious where the [Clay] soil is relatively impervious. Farming operations are not done on bunds or bund channels.

Function:

1. These terraces act primarily as drainage channel to regulate and conduct runoff at non erosive velocity. 2. To make the runoff water to trickle rather than to rush out.

b. Gully Plunge:

The portion where the stream begins, the structure is construted with arraging loose boulder perpendicular to the flow of water is called gully plunge. Benefits: A. Prevents soil erosion of land and reduces the flow of water and further prevents the formation of new strems. B. Very useful in moisture conservation and reduces the scroucing and delsilation of the streams. Land Development The second tier treatment is the slope treatment. This is generally done on agricultural land or waste land. This generally includes water conservation or surface water storage structures. This being highly labour intensive, will involve more of manual labour; so, funds from National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (NREGS) can be taken.Following structures are been proposed in these areas

Field Bunds:

Bunding, also called a bund wall, is the area within a structure designed to prevent inundation or breaches of various types. Feild bunding is one of the important structures which check the runoff of water from the field level. Often field are left without proper bunding, water freely flows out of the field and scope for percolation is almost negligible. Hence field bunding plays a important role in conservation of moisture at field level. As the multi‐tier approach ridge to valley, drainage line treatment and land development field bund fall in the third agenda.

Table no.35: Details of activities of preparatory phase (All financial figures in lakhs)

Name Of the Village

Institution & Capacity Building 5% DPR 1%

Institution 0.5%

Capacity 3.0% IEC 1.5% Base Line Survey 0.50%

HydroGeological

Survey 0.25%

Technical Support Agencies

Printing Of DPR & Mapping Of Project Area

0.25%

Estimated Cost (Rs. In Lakh)

Sankalp(P) 18066 108396 54198 18066 9033 ‐ 9033 216792 Khokhra (lavakoi) 17298 103788 51894 17298 8649 ‐ 8649 207576

Gheswadi 1900 11398 5699 1900 950 ‐ 950 22795 Nardha 10866 65196 32598 10866 5433 ‐ 5433 130392

Pisayata (Digneol) 20574 123444 61722 20574 10287 ‐ 10287 246888

Ranbor 16254 97524 48762 16254 8127 ‐ 8127 195048 Budha Jaldhuni 24882 149292 74646 24882 12441 ‐ 12441 298584Reliya Amba 7866 47196 23598 7866 3933 ‐ 3933 94392 Hariyabar 16710 100260 50130 16710 8355 ‐ 8355 200520 Total 134416 806494 403247 134416 67208 67208 1612988

Table no.36: Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)

Sr. No.

Village name

Type of structures

Proposed target

Remarks

Augmentation/ repair of existing structures

Construction of new structures Total target

No.

Area to be

irrigated (ha)

Storage

capacity

Estimated cost

No. Area to be

irrigated (ha)

Storage capacit

y

Estimated cost

Area to be

irrigated (ha)

Storage capacit

y

Estimated cost

1 Sankal (P)

(a) Check wall 4 4 120 6 4 120 6 MGNREGA

(b) well 4 41 5.4 41 0 5.4 MGNREGA

Checkdam 2 9.8 7500 6 9.8 7500 6

Checkwall 5 28.5 15200 5.59 28.5 15200 5.59

Total 0 0 0 0 15 83.3 22820 22.99 83.3 22820 22.99

2 Khokhra (L)

(iv)checkwall 3 17 1200 4.5 17 1200 4.5 MGNREGA

(b) well 2 27 1.8 27 0 1.8 MGNREGA

Checkdam 4 15.2 17500 11.2 15.2 17500 11.2Checkwall 4 31.4 13600 3.02 31.4 13600 3.02

Total 0 0 0 0 13 90.6 32300 20.52 90.6 32300 20.52

3 Gheswadi

(a) Check wall 3 2.3 150 4.5 2.3 150 4.5 MGNREGA

(b) well 2 20 1.8 20 0 1.8 MGNREGA

Checkwall 3 6.8 3500 1.89 6.8 3500 1.89

Total 0 0 0 0 8 29.1 3650 8.19 29.1 3650 8.19

4 Nhardha

(a) Check wall 2 2 2.4 2 0 2.4 MGNREGA

(b) well 2 5 1.8 5 0 1.8 MGNREGA

Checkdam 4 13.5 15280 7 13.5 15280 7

Checkwall 2 4.8 4650 1.47 4.8 4650 1.47

Total 0 0 0 0 10 25.3 19930 12.67 25.3 19930 12.67

5 Pisayata (D)

(a) Check wall 2 2.3 150 2.4 2.3 150 2.4 MGNREGA

(b) well 2 20 1.8 20 0 1.8 MGNREGA

Checkdam 4 48 22500 11.2 48 22500 11.2Checkwall 3 15 2800 3.64 15 2800 3.64

Total 0 0 0 0 11 85.3 25450 19.04 85.3 25450 19.04

6 Ranbor

(a) Check wall 4 6 150 6 6 150 6 MGNREGA

(b) well 2 14 1.8 14 0 1.8 MGNREGA

Checkdam 4 15.3 16100 8.4 15.3 16100 8.4

Checkwall 4 10.8 9550 3.14 10.8 9550 3.14

Total 0 0 0 0 14 46.1 25800 19.34 46.1 25800 19.34

7 Budha Jaldhuni

(a) Check wall 3 2 4.5 2 0 4.5 MGNREGA

(b) well 1 5 0.9 5 0 0.9 MGNREGA

Checkdam 5 31.25 22500 14 31.25 22500 14

Checkwall 3 18.5 5800 2.7 18.5 5800 2.7Total 0 0 0 0 12 56.75 28300 22.1 56.75 28300 22.1

8 Relia amba

(a) Check wall 2 6 120 3.5 6 120 3.5 MGNREGA

(b) well 1 41 0.9 41 0 0.9 MGNREGA

Checkdam 2 9.5 12500 4.8 9.5 12500 4.8Checkwall 2 3.8 3200 1.6 3.8 3200 1.6

Total 0 0 0 0 7 60.3 15820 10.8 60.3 15820 10.8

9 Hariyabar

(a) Check wall 2 6 120 3.5 6 120 3.5 MGNREGA

(b) well 1 41 0.9 41 0 0.9 MGNREGA

Checkdam 2 22.2 11500 5 22.2 11500 5

Checkwall 7 17.5 6680 6.75 17.5 6680 6.75Total 0 0 0 0 12 86.7 18300 16.15 86.7 18300 16.15

Total 0 135.65 135.65

Table no 36.1 Technical Details of Earthen Bund:

Particulars Value Units Structure Length 680 mt. Structure Height 1 mt.Upstream Slope 02:01 ‐Downstream Slope 01:01 ‐ Bund Top Width 1 mt.Structure Base Width 4 mt.Structure Cross Section 2.5 sqm

Table no. 36.2 Technical Details of Farm Pond

Particulars Value Unit Pond Length 10 mt. Pond Width 10 mt. Pond Depth 2.5 mt.Side Slope 02:01

Table no . 36. 3 Technical Details of Feild/Farm Bund

Particulars Value Units

Bund Length Per Ha. 400 mt.Proposed Area(area of farm) 1 Ha.Total Bund Length For Proposed Area 400 mt.Top Width 0.5 mt.Side Slope 01:01 Height 0.5 mt.Base Width 1.5 mt.Cross‐Section of Farm bund 0.5 SqM.

Table no. 38: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas S. N. Names of Village Major activities of the SHGs

Name of activity No. of SHGs involved Average annual income from activity per SHG (in Rs. Approx)

1

Sankal(P)

Cattle Feed Store 1 204000 Nursery Raising Forestry Plant 1 198000

Vermicompost Unit 1 429000

2

Khokhara (Lavakoi)


Cattle Feed Store 1 204000

3 Gheswadi Vermicompost Unit 1 216000

4

Nardha



5

Pisayata

Nursery Raising for Forestry Plants 1 216000 Vermicompost Unit 1 69400 Flour‐cum‐Rice Mill 1 216000


6

Ranbor


Cattle Feed Store 1 150000 7

Budha Jaldhuni

Nursery Raising for Forestry Plants 1 69400 Vermicompost Unit 1 180000 Flour‐cum‐Rice Mill 1 339800 Cattle Feed Store 1 150000

Paper plates making 1 384000 8 Reliya aamba Vermi compost Unit 1 429000 9

Hariyabaar

Nursery Raising for Forestry Plants 1 384000 Vermicompost Unit 1 72140


Table no. 39.1 Soil and water conservation activities of watershed works phase – Proposed Target

S. N.

Name of villages

Graded bunding(R)

Gully pluge(R)

Field bunds(L)

Masonary check wall(D)

Masonary check dam(D)

Contour Bunding

Afforestation Live Fencing Total Estimated cost (Rs. In lakhs) (in

Rmt) (in lakh)

(in Cmt)

(in lakh)

(in Rmt)

(in lakh)

No.of units

(in lakh)

No.of units

(in lakh)

(in Cmt)

(in lakh)

(in ha)

(in lakh)

(in Rmt) (in lakh)

1 Sankal(P) 500 2.25 1890 1.96 0 0 5 5.59 2 6 1800 1.2 4.21 0.799 1332.5 0.267 18.066

2 Khokhara (Lavakoi)

500 2.25 1000 1.03 0 0 3 2.265 4 11.2 2.18 0.415 691.25 0.138 17.298

3 Gheswadi 0 0 2 1.26 2.52 0.479 798.75 0.16 1.899

4 Nardha 980 0.98 0 0 2 1.47 4 7 830 0.55 3.42 0.65 1082.5 0.217 10.867

5 Pisayata 800 3.6 1000 1.06 0 0 3 3.64 4 11.2 4.24 0.806 1342.5 0.269 20.575

6 Ranbor 500 2.25 900 0.9 0 0 4 3.14 4 8.4 1250 0.81 2.98 0.566 942.5 0.189 16.255

7 Budha Jaldhuni

500 2.25 1500 1.68 0 0 6 5.4 5 14 6.13 1.164 1940 0.388 24.882

8 Reliya Amba

600 0.6 0 0 2 1.6 2 4.8 3.42 0.65 1082.5 0.217 7.867

9 Hariyabaar 500 2.25 2000 2 0 0 7 6.75 2 5 2.8 0.533 887.5 0.178 16.711

Table no 39.2 Agriculture and Aforestation related activites of watershed works phase – Proposed Target

S. N. Name of villages

Nursary Raising of forestry plans

Crop Demonstration

plot

Fodder /Pasture Development

Horticulture plot Vegetable nursery in net house

Alloevera cultivation

Total Estimated cost (Rs. In lakhs)

in ha (in lakh)

No. (in lakh) Ha (in lakh)

In ha (in lakh) no. (in lakh) in ha (in lakh)

1 Sankal(P) 0.07 1.50 8 1.000 3 0.21 3.60 1.125 2 1.20 5.04


0 0 8 1.000 4 0.28 3.20 1.000 2 1.20 3.48

3 Gheswadi 0 0 1 0.125 1 0.07 0.40 0.125 0 0.00 0.32

4 Nardha 0 0 6 0.750 4 0.28 2.40 0.750 1 0.60 2.38

5 Pisayata 0.07 1.50 7 0.875 3 0.21 3.60 1.125 2 1.20 0.8 0.75 5.66

6 Ranbor 0 0.00 8 1.000 2 0.14 2.80 0.875 2 1.20 0.4 0.375 3.59

7 Budha Jaldhuni

0.07 1.50 12 1.500 7 0.49 5.20 1.625 2 1.20 1.2 1.125 7.44

8 Reliya Amba 0 0 5 0.625 2 0.14 2.40 0.750 0 0.00 1.52

9 Hariyabaar 0.07 1.50 5 0.63 3 0.21 2.80 0.875 2 1.20 0.4 0.375 4.79

Table no.40: Details of engineering structures in watershed works*

S. N.

Village name

Name of structures

Type of treatment Type of land Executing agency

Target

(i) Ridge area (R)

(ii) Drainage line(D)

(iii) Land dev. (L)

(i)Pri‐vate

(ii) Communit

y

(iii) Others (pl.

specify)

(i) UG(ii)SHG(iii) Others (pl. specify)

No. of units (No./ cu.m./ rmt)

Estimated cost (Rs. in lakh) Expected month & year of

completion (mm/yyyy

)

M W O T

1 Sakal (P) ContourBunding

R C

WC/WDT 1800 cmt

0.72 0.48 1.2 2013

Graded Bunding R C

WC/WDT 500 Rmt 0.9 1.35 2.25 2013

Gully plug R C

WC/WDT 1890

Cmt 1.176 0.784 1.96 2013

Checkdam D P WC/WDT 2 3.6 2.4 6 2013

Checkwall D P WC/WDT 5 3.354 2.236 5.59 2013Total 9.75 7.25 17.00

2 Khokhra (L) Graded Bunding

R C

WC/WDT 500 Rmt 0.9 1.35 2.25 2013

Gully plug R C

WC/WDT 1000cm

t 0.412 0.618 1.03 2013

Checkdam D P C WC/WDT 4 6.72 4.48 11.2 2013

Checkwall D P WC/WDT 3 1.359 0.906 2.265 2013Total

9.391 7.35

4 16.745

3 Gheswadi Checkwall D P C

Watershed Committee

WDT

2 0.756 0.504 1.26 2013

Total

1.134 0.756

1.26 2013

4 Nhardha ContourBunding

R C

WC/WDT 830 cmt 0.33 0.22 0.55 2013

Gully plug R P WC/WDT 980 cmt 0.588 0.392 0.98 2013


Checkwall D P C WC/WDT 2 0.882 0.588 1.47 2013Total

6.000 4.00

0 10.000

5 Pisayata (D) Gully plug

P C

WC/WDT 1000 Cmt

0.636 0.424 1.06 2013

Graded Bunding R C

WC/WDT 800 Rmt 2.16 1.44 3.6 2013


Checkwall D P C WC/WDT 3 2.184 1.456 3.64 2013Total 11.7 7.8 19.5

6 Ranbor ContourBunding

R C

WC/WDT 1250 cmt

0.486 0.324 0.81 2013

Graded Bunding R C

WC/WDT 500 Rmt 0.9 1.35 2.25 2013

Gully plug R C WC/WDT 900 cmt 0.54 0.36 0.9 2013


Checkwall D P C WC/WDT 4 1.884 1.256 3.14 2013Total 8.85 6.65 15.5

7 Budha Jaldhuni Graded Bunding

R C

WC/WDT 500 Rmt 0.9 1.35 2.25 2013

Gully plug R C

WC/WDT 1500

cmt 1.008 0.672 1.68 2013


Checkwall D P WC/WDT 6 6.576 4.384 5.4 2013Total

12.06

6 8.794

23.330

8 Reliya Amba

Gully plug R C WC/WDT 600 cmt 0.24 0.36 0.6 2013

Checkdam D P WC/WDT 2 2.88 1.92 4.8 2013

Checkwall D P C WC/WDT 2 0.96 0.64 1.6 2013Total 4.08 2.92 7

9 Hariyabar Gully plug

R C

WC/WDT 2000 cmt

1.2 0.8 2 2013

Graded Bunding R C

WC/WDT 500 Rmt 0.9 1.35 2.25 2013

Checkdam D P WC/WDT 2 3 2 5 2013

Checkwall D P C WC/WDT 7 4.05 2.7 6.75 2013Total 9.15 6.85 16

Total 126.33

5

Table no 40.1. Details of activies proposed and their Survey no/ Reference/ GPS coordiantes Table no 40.2.Techincal Specification Graded Bunding

Particulars Value Units Top width of bund 1 mt. Bottom width of Bund 1 mt.Depth above ground level 1 mt.Depth of Foundation 0.2 mt. Cross section of bund 1 sq. m Proposed Area 750 ha. Table no 40.3.Techincal Specification Field Bund

Particulars Value Units Bund Length Per Ha. 400 mt.Proposed Area(area of farm) 1 Ha.

Total Bund Length For Proposed Area 400 mt.Top Width 0.5 mt.Side Slope 01:01 Height 0.5 mt.Base Width 1.5 mt.Cross‐Section of Farm bund 0.5 SqM. Table 40.4.Techincal specification Masonary Checkwall S.no Particular No. Length Width H/D/T Quantity Unit Rate Amount 1 Excavation Body wall 1 16 1.5 1 24 Key wall 2 2 0.6 1 2.4 26.4 Cmt. 55.64 1468.896 2 C. C. In Foundation and Plinth (B) 1 16 1.5 0.3 7.2 (K) 2 2 0.6 0.3 0.72 7.92 Cmt. 1586.5 12565.08

3 UCR Masonary in Foundation and Plinth (B)

1 16 1.5 0.7 16.8

(K) 2 2 0.6 0.7 1.68

Super Structure (B) 1 16 1.5+0.60/2 1 16.8

(K) 2 2 0.6 1 2.4 37.68 Cmt. 1509.9 56893.03

4 Coping for CC (1:2:4) (B) 1 16 0.6 0.1 0.96

(K) 2 2 0.6 0.1 0.24 1.2 Cmt. 2363.7 2836.44

5 Cement Pointing (B) 1 16 1 16

(K) 2 2 0.6 2.4 18.4 Sq. mt. 41.3 784.7 Total 74548.15

Add 2% W.C.

1490.96

76039.11 Say 76000/

40.4.1.Corss –Section of Check wall with its side wall Dimensions:

Table no 40.5.Techincal Specification Masonary Checkdam S.no Particular No. Length Width H/D/T Quantity Unit Rate Amount 1 Excavation Mt. Mt. Mt. Main Body 1 17 1.5 0.9 22.95 Side Wall 2 6.5 0.6 0.45 3.51 Bucket 1 17 5 0.45 38.25 Key Wall 1 4 0.6 0.45 1.08 1 2 0.6 0.45 0.54 66.33 Cmt. 68.4 4536.972 2 Excavation in Soft rock Main Body 1 17 1.5 0.3 7.65 Side Wall 2 6.5 0.6 0.3 2.34 Bucket 1 17 4 0.25 17 Key Wall 1 4 0.6 0.15 0.36 1 2 0.6 0.15 0.18 27.53 Cmt. 177.2 4878.316 3 Filling the Foundation Main Body 1 17 1.5 0.15 3.825 Side Wall 2 6.5 0.6 0.15 1.17 Bucket 1 17 5 0.15 12.75 Key Wall 1 4 0.6 0.15 0.36 1 2 0.6 0.15 0.18 18.29 Cmt. 1403.4 25661.17 4 UCR Masonary in (1) Foundatlion Main Body 1 17 1.5 0.55 14.025 Side Wall 2 6.5 0.6 0.55 4.29 Bucket 1 17 5 0.3 25.5 Key Wall 1 4 0.6 0.6 1.44 1 2 0.6 0.6 0.72 45.98 46.00 Cmt. 1516 69736

(2) Superstructure Main Body 1 17 1.05 1.4 24.99 Side Wall 2 2 0.6 0.6 1.44 2 5 0.6 1.05 6.3 Key Wall 2 4 0.6 0.6 2.88 2 2 0.6 0.6 1.44 Toe Wall 1 17 0.6 0.6 6.12 43.17 44 Cmt. 1516 66704 5 Coping Top of the main bodywall 1 17 0.6 0.1 1.02 Toe Wall 1 17 0.6 0.1 1.02 Bucket flooring 1 17 4 0.1 6.8 8.84 9 Cmt. 1934.4 17409.6 6 Plaster in (1:3) Main Body 1 17 1.25 21.25 Body wall slop 1 17 1.74 29.58 50.83 51 Sq. mt. 70.2 3580.2 7 Cement Pointing (1:3) Side wall 4 4 1.05 16.8 Key Wall 1 4 0.6 2.4 1 2 0.6 1.2 20.4 21 Sq. mt. 40.5 850.5 8 Name Plate (30cm * 30cm) 1 1 No. 434.9 434.9 Total 193791.7

3% Conti.

5813.75

199605.4 199600/

Table no.41.1: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works

S. N. Name of village

Name of structure/ work

Type of treatment Type of land Executing agency

Target

(i) Ridge area (R)

(ii) Drainage line

(iii) Land dev. (L)

(i) Private

(ii) Community

(iii) Others (pl.

specify)

(i) UG,SHG,WC (Pl.specify

Area (ha)

No. of plants/ Rmt.

Estimated cost in lakhs

Expected month & year of

completion (mm/ yyyy)

1 Sankal (P) Afforestation R L F WC 4.21 2737 0.799 June 2013

Live Fencing L C F WC 1332.5 0.267 June 2013

Fodder/pasture development

L C F WC 3.00 0.21 June 2013

Nursery raising of forestry planrs

L C SHG 0.07 50000 1.50 June 2013

Crop Demonstration plot L P UG 3.20 1.00 June 2013

Horticulture plants P C F UG 3.60 1.125 June 2013

Alloevera Cultivation L P UG June 2013

Total 14.08 54069 4.90 2 Khokhara

(Lavakoi) Afforestation R L F WC 2.18 1417 0.415 June 2013



L C F WC 4.00 0.28 June 2013


L C SHG June 2013




Total 12.58 2108.25 2.833 3 Gheswadi

Afforestation R L F WC 2.52 1638 0.479 June 2013



L C F WC 1.00 0.07 June 2013


L C SHG June 2013




Total 4.32 2436.75 0.959 4 Naradha




L C F WC 4.00 0.28 June 2013


L C SHG June 2013




Total 12.22 3305.5 2.647 5 Pisayata




L C F WC 3.00 0.21 June 2013


L C SHG 0.07 50000 1.50 June 2013



Alloevera Cultivation L P UG 0.80 0.75 June 2013

Total 14.51 54098.7 5.325 6 Ranbor




L C F WC 2.00 0.14 June 2013


L C SHG June 2013




Total 11.38 2879.50 3.15 7 Budhajaldhuni


Live Fencing L C F WC 1940 0.388 June 2013


L C F WC 7.00 0.49 June 2013


L C SHG 0.07 50000 1.50 June 2013




Total 24.4 55924.5 7.792 8 Reliya Amba




L C F WC 2.00 0.14 June 2013


L C SHG June 2013




Total 9.82 3305.5 2.382 9 Hariyabar




L C F WC 3.00 0.21 June 2013


L C SHG 0.07 50000 1.50 June 2013




Total 11.07 52707.5 4.296

Table no .41.1 Technical Details of Aforestation Activities/Plantation/Grass seeding:

Particulars Value Unit Crop Name Plant To Plant Spacing 3 mt Row To Row Spacing 3 mt Pit Length 1.5 ft Pit Width 1.5 ft Pit Depth 1.5 ft No. of Plants 1111 Plantation Area 1 1 Ha No. of Plants Per Ha. 1111 1 Ha Gap Filling 20% 225

Table No. 41.1.1 Cost Estimation For Afforestation Activity (For 1000 Plants)

Sr. No.

Description No. Length Width (m.)

Depth (m.)

Unit Quantity Rate Amount

1 Digging of pits for plants in ordinary murum 1000 1.5 ft 1.5 ft 1.5 ft 1000 2.00 2000

2 Plants sampling for plantation In Govt. pasture area, sampling not less than 30cm. Height

1000 2 2000

3 Transportation of plants from nursery to camp site up to 5km 1000 1000 1 1000 4 Loding and unloding plants 1000 1000

5 Rehandling of plants from camp site up to actual planting site upto 200m.

1000 500

6 Cost of fertiliser & insecticides incl. application 1200 7 Weeding and Hoeing two times (Twice in year) 1000 1000 3 3000

Table no.42: Details of allied / other activities

S. N.

Name of village

Name of activity

Type of land Executing agency Target

(i) Private

(ii) Community

(iii) Others (pl.

specify)

(i) UG

Estimated cost (Rs. in lakh)

Expected month & year of

completion (mm/yyyy)

(ii)SHG (iii) Others (pl.

specify)

1 Sankal(P)

A. Production Systems 1. AgriHorticulture Raising of Vegetable Seedlings in Net‐House P UG 1.20 2013 Crop Demonstration (Acre) P UG 1.00 2013 Horticulture Plot (Acre) P UG 1.125 2013 Drip Irrigation Plot for Cotton/Tur (Vigha) P UG 0.38 2013 Drip Irrigation Plot for Vegetable (Vigha) P UG 0.26 2013 2. Dairy Development Cattle Camp P UG 0.60 2013 Fodder Plot (Ha) P C UG 0.21 2013 B. Micro Enterprise for Assestless Nursery Raising for Forestry Plants P SHG 1.50 2013

Vermicompost Unit P SHG 1.50 2013 Cattle Feed Store P SHG 0.50 2013 Total 8.725


A. Production Systems 1. AgriHorticulture Raising of Vegetable Seedlings in Net‐House P UG 1.20 2013 Crop Demonstration (Acre) P UG 1.00 2013 Horticulture Plot (Acre) P UG 1.00 2013 Drip Irrigation Plot for Cotton/Tur (Vigha) P UG 0.38 2013 2. Dairy Development Fodder Plot (Ha) P C UG 0.28 2013 Cattle Camp P UG 0.60 2013 B. Micro Enterprise for Assestless Vermicompost Unit P UG 2.50 2013 Cattle Feed Store P UG 0.50 2013 Farm Implements P UG 0.45 2013 Total 7.910

3 Gheswadi

A. Production Systems 1. AgriHorticulture Crop Demonstration (Acre) P UG 0.125 2013 Horticulture Plot (Acre) P UG 0.125 2013 2. Dairy Development Cattle Camp P UG 0.20 2013 Fodder Plot (1/2 Ha) P C UG 0.035 2013 B. Micro Enterprise for Assestless Vermicompost Unit P UG 0.375 2013 Total 0.86

4 Nardha A. Production Systems 1. AgriHorticulture

Crop Demonstration (Acre) P UG 0.75 2013 Raising of Vegetable Seedlings in Net‐House P UG 0.60 2013 Horticulture Plot (Acre) P UG 0.75 2013 Drip Irrigation Plot for Cotton/Tur (Vigha) P UG 0.38 2013 2. Dairy Development Fodder Plot (Ha) P C UG 0.28 2013 Cattle Camp P UG 0.60 2013 B. Micro Enterprise for Assestless Vermicompost Unit P UG 1.00 2013 Farm Implements P UG 0.60 2013 Cattle Feed Store P UG 0.50 2013 Total 4.960

5 Pisayata

A. Production Systems 1. AgriHorticulture Raising of Vegetable Seedlings in Net‐House P UG 1.20 2013 Crop Demonstration (Acre) P UG 0.875 2013 Horticulture Plot (Acre) P UG 1.125 2013 Drip Irrigation Plot for Cotton/Tur (Vigha) P UG 0.38 2013 Drip Irrigation Plot for Vegetable (Vigha) P UG 0.26 2013 Alloe Vera Cultivation (Acre) P UG 0.75 2013 2. Dairy Development Cattle Camp P UG 0.60 2013 Fodder Plot (Ha) P C UG 0.21 2013 B. Micro Enterprise for Assestless Nursery Raising for Forestry Plants P SHG 1.50 2013 Vermicompost Unit P SHG 1.25 2013 Flour‐cum‐Rice Mill P SHG 0.75 2013 Cattle Feed Store P SHG 0.50 2013 Total 9.40

6 Ranbor

A. Production Systems 1. AgriHorticulture Raising of Vegetable Seedlings in Net‐House P UG 1.20 2013 Crop Demonstration (Acre) P UG 1.00 2013 Horticulture Plot (Acre) P UG 0.875 2013 Drip Irrigation Plot for Vegetable (Vigha) P UG 0.26 2013 Alloe Vera Cultivation (Acre) P UG 0.375 2013 2. Dairy Development Cattle Camp P UG 0.60 2013 Fodder Plot (Ha) P C UG 0.14 2013 B. Micro Enterprise for Assestless Vermicompost Unit P UG 1.875 2013 Cattle Feed Store P UG 0.50 2013Farm Implements P UG 0.60 2013 Total 7.425

7

Budha Jaldhuni

A. Production Systems 1. AgriHorticulture Raising of Vegetable Seedlings in Net‐House P UG 1.20 2013 Crop Demonstration (Acre) P UG 1.50 2013 Horticulture Plot (Acre) P UG 1.625 2013 Drip Irrigation Plot for Cotton/Tur (Vigha) P UG 0.38 2013 Drip Irrigation Plot for Vegetable (Vigha) P UG 0.26 2013 Alloe Vera Cultivation (Acre) P UG 1.125 2013 2. Dairy Development Cattle Camp P UG 0.60 2013 Fodder Plot (Ha) P C UG 0.49 2013 B. Micro Enterprise for Assestless Nursery Raising for Forestry Plants P SHG 1.50 2013 Vermicompost Unit P SHG 1.50 2013

Flour‐cum‐Rice Mill SHG 0.75 2013 Cattle Feed Store SHG 0.50 2013 Farm Implements UG 0.60 2013 Total 11.430

8 Reliya aamba

A. Production Systems 1. AgriHorticulture Crop Demonstration (Acre) P UG 0.625 2013 Horticulture Plot (Acre) P UG 0.750 2013 Drip Irrigation Plot for Cotton/Tur (Vigha) P UG 0.19 2013 2. Dairy Development Cattle Camp P UG 0.40 2013 Fodder Plot (Ha) P C UG 0.14 2013 B. Micro Enterprise for Assestless Vermicompost Unit P SHG 1.50 2013 Total 3.605

9 Hariyabaar

A. Production Systems 1. AgriHorticulture Raising of Vegetable Seedlings in Net‐House P UG 1.20 2013 Crop Demonstration (Acre) P UG 0.625 2013 Horticulture Plot (Acre) P UG 0.875 2013 Drip Irrigation Plot for Cotton/Tur (Vigha) P UG 0.19 2013 Drip Irrigation Plot for Vegetable (Vigha) P UG 0.26 2013 Alloe Vera Cultivation (Acre) P UG 0.375 2013 2. Dairy Development Cattle Camp P UG 0.60 2013 Fodder Plot (Ha) P C UG 0.21 2013 B. Micro Enterprise for Assestless Nursery Raising for Forestry Plants P SHG 1.50 2013 Vermicompost Unit P SHG 1.125 2013

Cattle Feed Store P SHG 0.50 2013 Farm Implements P UG 0.21 2013 Total 7.670 2013

Production System –I

Vermicompost Unit:

Wastes are nothing but misplaced resources. A large volume of organic matter is generated from agricultural activities, in dairy farms and

animal wastes which are usually dumped in corners where it putrefies, usually emanating foul smell. This valuable resource can be utilised by

properly composting it into a value‐added end product called manure. The chief objective is to compost organic wastes not for the disposal of

solid organic wastes but also to produce superior quality manure to feed our “nutrient/organic matter hungry” soils.

Organic wastes can be broken down and fragmented rapidly by earthworms within short period of time. Vermicompost considerable enhances

the soil fertility of and N,P,K are totally available to the plants. The water holding capacity of the soil is increased and also help in binding the

soil particles together. It should be realized that vermicomposting can be a useful cottage industry for the underprivileged and the economically

weak as it can provide them with a supplementary income. If every village can formulate a cooperative society or SHG’s of unemployed

youth/women group, it could be a wise venture for them to produce vermicompost and sell it back to the village or firm at a recommended

price. The youth will not only earn money, but also aid society by providing excellent quality organic manure for sustainable agro‐practices. This

is one of the simplest process where 5 mt.(length) * 1.5 mt (width) beds with 0.5 depth are made on the ground and in the backyard and is

filled by 3 month old manure and worms are introduced @ 1/2 kg/ sq.ft. These worms voraciously feed on the manure turning it to granulated

compost with 45 day period of time. Hence yearly 8 cycles can be taken within 1 year of time. The proposed model is ideally suitably for the

individual beneficiary.

Components of Vermicompost Unit:

About Worm Species: NonBorrowing

Eisenia fetida, Eudrilus eugeniae is the scientific name of the worms commonly found in Indian soil. They are non‐ borrowing and surface feeders

and go maximum up to a depth of 1‐ 1.5 mts. Feeds on decomposing organic matter and well decomposed manure. They are voracious feeders

and survive in most of the stressed conditions.

Shade Net/ Green Net:

A net with 90% shade with steel pipes of 72 running ft for supporting the shade net is recommended and suitable for the construction of a ideal

vermicompost unit. The main purpose of shade net is to minimize the sunlight to maximum possible extend and allow only that amount which is

essential for keeping worm alive and maintaining a warmer vicinity.

Tools and Implements:

Some tools and implements are required a crowbar, spade, rose can for watering and sieve for sieving the vermicompost for separating the

compost without injury to the earth worms when the compost is ready for packing and storing.

VermiComposting Beds:

Customized beds were prepared based upon areas requirement and availability of the manure and raw material. The dimension of bed for this

specific area are as follows 5mt length *1.5 width * 0.5 mt depth. These types of beds are feasible and require less space and are good

example of the small scale commercial unit for a individual beneficiary at village level

Land and worms requirement:

Area of 502 meter is need to cover two bed of above mentioned dimensions. The beds are made up of bricks at sides and bottom to maintain the

proper structure and depth to ensure viable structure for long period of time. Worms are introduced @ 250 worms for meter 2. This the

optimum population for this bed of this dimension to ensure proper multiplication of worms and composting in desired period of time..

Proposed Model of 2 bed Dimension (5mt *1.5mt*0.5mt):

A. Intial Investment for Vermicompost Unit:

S.no Particulars Units Unit Price Amount

1 Vermiculture (Eisenia fetida) 15 kg Rs. 300/kg 4500

2 Shade net/ Green net of 90 % shade 54 sq.mt Rs. 30/mt 1620

3 Steel pipes galvanized for supporting the shed 100 ft Rs. 25/sq.ft 2500

4 Fencing 18 mts Rs. 50/mt 900

5 Labour charges of installation of shed and shade net ‐ ‐ 500

6 Labour charges for preparation of vermin‐beds ‐ ‐ 400

7 Expenditure for the transport of material ‐ ‐ 400

8 Expenditure of bricks for construction of vermi‐beds 200 Rs 3.00 600

9 Spade and basket ‐ ‐ 200

10 Nuts bolts and other accessories for fixing the shed ‐ ‐ 300

11 Rose can for water the vermin‐beds ‐ ‐ 250

12 Sieve with wooden frame ‐ ‐ 250

Total 12420

B. Returns from Vermicompost Unit:

1. One cycle production per cycle(45 days) is 650 kg * Rs. 3/kg = Rs.1950 8 cycles/Year 15600

2. Sale of worms 1 kg /cycle * 8 cycle Rs. 50/kg 400

3. Gross profit 16000

4. Net profit ( Gross profit 16000 –12420 vermicompost Unit cost) 3580

Break Even Point= Total Fixed Cost (or, Investment) / Unit Margin =12420/ Production System‐II

Introduction:

Rural economy is mainly based upon the agriculture, agriculture growth on the other hand is decelerated at macro level with un‐ profitable

remuneration, crop failure with adverse climatic condition coupled with falling real prices of farm products, and contributing population from

agriculture to nonagricultural sector. Added to these problems is the problem of depleting and degrading natural base for farming,

threatening the very livelihood security of a majority of subsistence farmers. The farming industry is getting un‐remunerative, the failures of

identifying right growth priorities within farming sector, have culminated in farmer’s distress. At this juncture horticultural crops are new

hope in providing economic security and further growth.

The production and consumption of horticultural products could play a key role in providing nutrition and health security to the people and

especially on the income of farmers. Further, given the high degree of agricultural development segmentation with a small percentage of

commercial farmers and a great majority of subsistence farmers, horticultural development could provide an opportunity to bring the

subsistence and bypass farmers into the development orbit; if the appropriate technologies are identified and implemented. Horticultural

crops can augment employment‐income generation to ensure livelihood security of the subsistence farmers without further depleting and

degrading the natural resource base for achieving livelihood security and increased economic growth,

Production Details of Fruit Crops: Table1 S.no Name of Fruit Crop Plants

per acre Specing Production details every years (plants / kg)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 Kesar Mango 40 10 X 10 MT. ‐ ‐ ‐ 5 15 15 25 40 60 95Rajapuri Mango 40 10 X 10 MT. ‐ ‐ ‐ 15 20 25 35 60 80 120Langdo Mango 40 10 X 10 MT. ‐ ‐ ‐ 7 15 30 35 45 75 100

2 Sapota (Kalipati) 40 10 X 10 MT. ‐ ‐ ‐ 20 35 45 75 100 120 1403 Guava 110 6 x 6 MT. ‐ ‐ 10 25 45 80 110 125 135 1504 Custard Apple (Balanagari) 80 5 X 5 MT. ‐ ‐ ‐ 5 7 11 13 15 18 205 Ber (Gola / Umaran) 110 6 X 6 MT. ‐ 2 8 35 55 75 100 125 150 1756 Kagadi Lemon 110 6 X 6 MT. ‐ ‐ 10 20 35 45 60 85 120 150

Details of Expenditure for Mango plantation:

Table2

Sr No Particulars Expenditure in. Rs.

1 40 pits of 3 x 3 x 5 fect 500

2 Grafted mango plants (40) / 70 Rs. Plants 2800

3 Transportation 1200

4 Thorry fencing 800

5 Fertilizer / Insecticides in pits (40) 1500

6 Plantation & after care expenditure 2200

7 Irrigation to plants 3500

Total 12500

Production Parameters:

Kesar variety of mango yields 15kg per plant of 5 years of times and keeps on increasing as growth proceeds.

Particulars

Year Increase in

production in Qtl In Rs.

A Initial Investment Rs. 12,000

B Production /year(15kg/40 Plants) 6

C Gross income/ Year for 600kg @( Rs.3500/100kg) 6*3500 21000

D

Net Income/ Year* (CA) 5th Year 9000

Net Income/ Year* 6th Year =(20*40) 8*3500 28000

Net Income/ Year* 7th Year=(25*40) 10*3850 38500




Sr. No. Cost Head Unit Unit cost Total

I Fixed Cost

a Digging of pits (3*3*5 ft) 40 Rs. 12.50 Rs. 500

b Granfted Mango Plants 40 Rs. 70 Rs. 2,800

c Transportation cost 40 Rs. 30.00 Rs. 1,200.00

d Throny Fencing Rs. 800.00

e Fertilizer/ Insecticides in pits Rs. 1,500.00

f Plantation & after care expenditure 40 Rs. 55.00 Rs. 2,200.00

g Irrigation to plants Rs. 3,500.00

Total: Fixed Cost Rs. 12,500

II Variable Cost (One production cycle) a Labour 2000b Fertilizer/ Insecticides in pits 2000c Transportation cost 1000d Packing 500e Miscellaneous 2500 Total Variable Cost 8000

Sr. No. Heads Unit Amount / Quantity

1 Total Variable Cost (TVC) Rs. 8000

2 Total Production (Q) Kgs 1000

3 Average Variable Cost : AVC= (TVC/Q) 8000/1000 8

4 Average Revenue (AR=Price) 1 kg 38.5

5 Total Revenue: Total Market Value of the produce (P*Q) 38.5*1000 38500

6 Unit Margin (P‐AVC) 38.5‐8 30.5

7 Net profit per cycle (TR‐TVC) 38500‐8000 30500

Break Even Point = Fixed cost (or, Investment) / Unit Margin

= 12500/30.5=409.5

Benefit cost ratio (BCR) = Net Benefit/Net cost

= 30500/8000

= 3.8 ((should be greater than 1)

Production System‐III:

Raising of Poultry Birds Poultry is one of the fastest growing segments of the agricultural sector in India today. While the production of agricultural crops has been rising at a rate of 1.5 to 2 percent per annum, that of eggs and broilers has been rising at a rate of 8 to 10 percent per annum. As a result, India is now the world's fifth largest egg producer and the eighteenth largest producer of broilers. Driving this expansion are a combination of factors ‐ growth in per capita income, a growing urban population and falling real poultry prices. The poultry sector in India has undergone a paradigm shift in structure and operation. A significant feature of India's poultry industry has been its transformation from a mere backyard activity into a major commercial activity in just about four decades. This transformation has involved sizeable investments in breeding, hatching, rearing and processing. Farmers in India have moved from rearing non‐descript birds to today rearing hybrids such as is Hyaline, lt is Shaver, ll and in Babcock, lt which ensure faster growth, good livability, excellent feed conversion and high profits to the rearers. The industry has grown largely due to the initiative of private enterprise, minimal government intervention, and considerable indigenous poultry genetics capabilities, and considerable support from the complementary veterinary health, poultry feed, poultry equipment, and poultry processing sectors. India is one of the few countries in the world that has put into place a sustained Specific Pathogen Free (SPF) egg production project. Why the term “Home Based Business Opportunity” is the most used term on the Internet today. Because today most people doesn’t want to work for other people anymore, and wanted to have their own home based business instead. Sr. No. Cost Head Unit Unit cost Total I Fixed Cost

a Construction of poultry shed (10mt*10mt) 1 13000 13000b Feeder 2 350 700c Drinker 2 200 400e Sub feeders 2 200 400 Total Fixed Cost 14500

1.8 kg body weight * 2.0 F.C.R. (Feed convertion ratio) 3.6 kg feed require for 1.8 kg body wright at 40 42 day period * 15 Rs feed. Cost 55/ Rs Total Feed Cost Benefit cost ratio (BCR) = Net Benefit/Net cost = 14000/10600 = 1.3 ((should be greater than 1)

II Variable Cost (One production cycle) a Purchase of birds 100 25 2500b Feed purchase 100 55 5500c Transportation during procurement 700 700d Transportation during selling 1000 1000e Vaccination & Medication (Twice in cycle) 400 400f Electricity charges 500 500 Total Variable Cost 10600


1 Total Variable Cost (TVC) Rs 10600 2 Total Production (Q) Kgs 140 3 Average Variable Cost : AVC= (TVC/Q) 68.5 4 Average Revenue (AR=Price) 1 kg 100 5 Total Revenue: Total Market Value of the produce (P*Q) (100*140) 140006 Unit Margin (P‐AVC) (100‐68.5) 31.5 7 Net profit per cycle (TR‐TVC) (14000‐10600) 3400

Production System‐IV

Introduction: Jetpurpavi villages of (IWMP‐1) are located in jetpurpavi Taluka Vadodara District of Gujarat state. IWMP‐1 consists of 10 villages and a area around 4353.8 ha is taken into the project as per the priority for treatment. These clusters of village consist of forest area from thin to thick cover. 98% of the population in this area is tribal and hence agriculture, animal husbandry and other allied activities are still carried in very traditional manner. There is huge gap between average and actual yield in this area. Hence, Natural resources based livelihood activities are planned by including modern techniques for enhancing productivity this areas. Selected Activity: Dairy Improvement (Jetpupavi‐1) Livelihood improvement through dairying seems to be a promising option in this area as the livestock population is in optimum number for generating good income and forming potential sub‐sector in these villages. Check list:

1. There is huge number of livestock population in this cluster of villages however; the average productivity potential is very low as per the details given in table 1. Hence after a close study it was decided that by suitable intervention and required support, productivity can be maximized in this area, thereby increasing the average income of the stake holder.

Table: 1

S.No Livestock (Cow, buffalo, etc) No. of cattle No. of productive cattle Milk productivity (liters/cattle/day) 1 Buffalo 2360 486 3.5 2 Cow 2230 545 2.5 3 Bullock 2408 275 ‐ 4 Goat 2476 20 0.5 5 Sheep ‐ 3 0 6 Hen 1706 ‐ ‐

i. Increasing the productivity:

Due to continuous inbreeding the progeny produced is of same indigenous breed which leads to low milk productivity. However, to counter act this issues a tie‐up with local NGO(JK Trust) and District Milk Union working towards dairy development which provides

services such as “Artificial insemination” and animal health care are being linked up to villages of watershed for replacement of indigenous breeds. With the time, improved breeds will ensure the higher productivity of milk in the project area.

ii. Reduce Cost of Production: Cost of production is mainly increased due to fodder and concentrates which are partially available from forest area and farmers own field which is insufficient for entire year. To reduce the cost of production, concentrates along with fodder plots are provided to users group for growing of fodder in their own field which will be sufficient for whole year.

iii. Price realization will be improved by setting up milk collection cum milk grading centre for remuneration as per the fat percentage of milk. Grading centre equipment – 1Computer, 1 Dot‐ Matrix printer, Centrifugal machine for fat testing.

iv. Reducing production Risk: Continuous support for breeding from NGO (JK trust) and District Milk Union/Govt bodies for Artificial Insemination will ensure improved breeds. Feeding risk is being covered by providing fodder plots and concentrates to the user groups ensuring fodder security. Health risk is covered by regular animal health camps‐ de‐worming and preventive health care is provided. Production risk is minimized by above intervention and marketing risk is minimized by linking to District milk collection center. In all the cases agreements are being made between the primary producers and procuring agency.

V. Peoples Institutions Primary level co‐operatives/ Users groups are formed at village level for carrying these activities in collective manner.

Vi. Capacity building requirements Training of farmer/Individual creating awareness regarding preventive health care and animal management through various institutes like KVK, Animal husbandry department and sadguru foundation.

Vii Credit Linkage: Credit linkages with Bank and Gujarat State Tribal Development Corporation through TASP.

Viii Convergence with other programmes: Convergence with District Milk Union, JK trust Program, Animal husbandry department for required technical support and Agriculture department for latest fodder varieties.

S.N. Fodder Name Variety Seed Rate (Kg/Ha.) Torduction (Qtl/Ha.)

1 Jowar S‐1049(Sundhiya), C‐10.2(Chasatiyo), GFS‐

3/4/5 For Improved 60 & For

Hybrid 30 350‐400

2 Maize Africal Tall, Ganga Safed‐2, Ganga‐5, Vikram Farm Sameri, GM‐1/2/3

60 In Monsoon 300‐400, In Winter & Summer 400‐500

3 Gajraj Grass NB‐21, CO‐1, APBN‐1 27777, 12345, 10000 Cuttings

First Year: 1500‐2000, Second Year: 1500, Third Year: 1000

4 Anjan/Dhaman Grass

IGFRI‐1, Pusailo Anjan, Co‐1 2 to 3 In Gauchar 150‐200, In case of Irrigated 400‐500

IX Natural Resource Requirement:

Particulars Private Panchayat Government

Land Private

Water Private

Biomass Private Forest

X. Total Beneficiaries under dairy development program.

Sr No. Village Marginal and small Farmer

Total %of marginal

Farmers Fodder Plots Health Camps

1 Amabazati 3 75 78 11.6

2 Bhindol 8 75 83 7.2

3 Bandli 5 75 80 13.1

4 Bortha 2 75 77 5.5

5 Degla 2 80 82 17.8

6 Naniamrol 10 75 85 13.8

7 Karsan 20 75 95 4.8

8 Rajpur(k) 10 90 100 8.5

9 Saloj 15 75 90 6.9

10 Zab(Sajva) 15 75 90 7.4

Total 90 770 860 9.7

On an average 9.7 % marginal and small farmers will be covered of the total cluster.

*Note: Beneficiaries % is calculated against total demographic population of each village.

Production System – V

Project title:

Cultivation of alovera plants in 1 acre of land as part of production system in selected villages. This idea is mainly borrowed from Van Bandhu

Kalyan Yojana of Chief Minister’s Ten Point Programme.

Objectives: The major objective of the above project is as under.

1. To identify the lands of Tribal/B.P.L Farmer.

2. To prepare a site map of individual plots.

3. To generate and interest among the local population to cultivate herbs of medicinal important in those fileds.

4. To extend necessary technical‐know how for growing medicinal herbs in a cost effective manners.

5. To find out the suitable buyers for the produce and act as a liaison body between the seller and the buyer, protecting interest of the

seller.

Criteria for Crop demonstration in production systems:

a. Owned land minimum 1 acre.

b. Irrigation facility in summer

c. Farmer should be progressive and willingness to adapt new technology.

d. Self motivated and interested in the field activity.

Methodology

Each of the individual plots will be assigned a particular WDT agriculture member agro climatic condition of each plot will be recorded and

necessary measures will be taken to maintain the optimum level of soil condition suitable for the growth of the herbs. Technical assistance

from the expert will be taken to choose the plant species to be grown inn a particular field depending upon the agro climatic condition of

that particular field. Arrangement for the supply of seeds/saplings etc will be made and all effort will be made to keep the herbs free from

infection. After harvest herbs will be sold at the prevailing market price and hers benefits will be passed on to cultivators. The most

important aspect of this project will be that for the growth of the plants no chemical fertilizer will be used rather plants will be grown under

the strict principle of “ORGANIC FARMING” so as maintain the best quality of the crude drugs.

NOTE: This project is purely based on backward and forward linkages for procurement of raw material till selling and all other technical

guidance will be provided through the Navjeevan Trust. This trust is having M.O.U with Nutan Ayurvedic Research Center for purchase all

Aloe Vera plants cultivated by trust in Gujarat.

(A) COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS: For one acre of land one type of crop with probable variation of 10 % when The crop is changed.

S.no Particulars for one year of cultivation Cost in Rs. 1 Preparation of Land (Ploughing, weeding composting etc.) 100002 Seeds/sapling of alovara plants and related. 175003 Misc 10004 Water 15005 Consultation Fee 25006 Transportation Expenses 50007 Total (Per acre per crop) 37500

(B) PROFIT : (Calculated for one crop per acre) S.no Particulars In Rs.

1 5000 baby plants planted in a acre of land will produce about 20,000 sapling. Each sapling will be sell @ Rs. 1 so the net profit from the sell sapling will be

20000

2 Fully mature plants will be purchased @ Rs. 1/kg. Estimated biomass of Aloe Vera in a acre of land will be 15 kg ( individual wt) X 5000

75000

3 Gross profit 95000 4 Net profit (AB) 57500

*Note: Good treatment can give one plant weight up to 35 to 40 kgs.

Production System: VI

Mahua (doli) processing centre:

Madhuca longifolia, commonly known as mahwa or mahua, is an Indian tropical tree found largely in the central and north Indian plains and

forests. It is a fast‐growing tree that grows to approximately 20 meters in height, possesses evergreen or semi‐evergreen foliage, and belongs to

the family Sapotaceae. It is cultivated in warm and humid regions for its oleaginous seeds (producing between 20 and 200 kg of seeds annually

per tree, depending on maturity), flowers and wood. The fat (solid at ambient temperature) is used for the care of the skin, to manufacture soap

or detergents, and as a vegetable butter. It can also be used as a fuel oil. The seed cakes obtained after extraction of oil constitute very good

fertilizer. It is considered holy by many tribal communities because of its usefulness.

Sr. No. Cost Head Unit Unit cost Total

I Fixed Cost

a Mahuda oil extraction machine 1 60,000 60,000

b Machine motor 1 25,000 25,000

c Three phase light connection 25,000

Total: Fixed Cost 1,10,000

II Variable Cost (One production cycle)

a Light bill 4 month 10000

b Oil expenditure 4 month 2500

c Miscellaneous 2,500

Total Variable Cost 15,000


1 Total Variable Cost (TVC) 4 month 15,000

2 Total Production (Q) 4 month 40,000 Kg

3 Average Variable Cost : AVC= (TVC/Q) 2.6 rs/kg

4 Average Revenue (AR=Price) 5 Rs./Kg

5 Total Revenue: Total Market Value of the produce (P*Q) Rs 20,0000

6 Unit Margin (P‐AVC) 2.4

7 Net profit per cycle (TR‐TVC) 185000

• Break Even Point= 45833.3Total Fixed Cost (or, Investment) / Unit Margin

• Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR)= Net Benefit / Net Cost = 185000/125000= 1.4

– should be greater than 1

Production System VII :

Net House Famring: Net Houses cultivation has been experiencing accelerated growth in recent years. Because of the substantial financial investment involved in the building and maintenance of Net Houses’, they are largely used for high added value crops. Net Houses development is particularly suited to the small family farm where there are constraints on available land and water. An average of 300 tons of tomatoes is grown per hectare per season, four times that harvested in open fields. In addition, plastic Net Houses structures have recently come into use for housing livestock, mainly chicken and fish.Net houses are mainly used for growing flowers, vegetables, ornamental plants and spices. Recently experiments have been conducted to investigate the feasibility of Net Houses‐grown fruit trees such as nectarines, peaches, loquats, grapes and bananas for commercial purposes, mainly for export. In our project villages there is vast potential for growing horticulture and floriculture crops which have high commercial value and profit margins are equally with short term returns on investments. A model of capsicum farming in net house is designed in small area to reap the benefits to the best from improvised farming techniques.

S.no Cost Head Unit Unit Quanity Unit cost Total

I Fixed Cost i Civil Works Excavation for net‐house coloumn (1:2:4) ordinary Cement

Concrere of curing etc. Size: 9''*9''*1'‐6'' No. 17 225.00 3825.00

ii STRUCTURE WORK 0 G.I.ISI ''B'' CLASS PIPE 32 mm Rmt. 102 225.00 22950.00 G.I.ISI ''B'' CLASS PIPE 25 mm Rmt. 54 168.00 9072.00 G.I.ISI ''B'' CLASS PIPE 20 mm Rmt. 30 118.00 3540.00 90 % Shade Agro net Sq. Mt. 300 32.00 9600.00 Ropes Rmt. 200 2.50 500.00iii Fitting Charges L/S 1 6849.3 6849.30 Misting System for net house without Ele. motor Nos. ‐ ‐ 0 Plumbing Materials for connecting motor to irrigation system Nos. ‐ ‐ 0iv Taxes @ 5% L/S 1 2816.82 2816.82

Total 59153.12

II Variable Cost (One production cycle)

Units Unit cost Total

a Seedlings 400.No 5 2000

b Land preparation 108.Sqmt 200c Feritlizer & Pesticide 2000d Packing Material 500e Transportation 2500 Total Variable Cost 7200


1 Total Variable Cost (TVC) 7200 2 Total Production (Q) kgs 1080 3 Average Variable Cost : AVC= (TVC/Q) 6.6

4 Average Revenue (AR=Price) 25

5 Total Revenue: Total Market Value of the produce (P*Q)

27000

6 Unit Margin (P‐AVC) 18.4 7 Net profit per cycle (TR‐TVC) 19800

Break Even Point= Total Fixed Cost (or, Investment) / Unit Margin =59153/18.4=3214.8 Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR)= Net Benefit / Net Cost = 19800/7200= 2.75

4.4. Capacity Building:

Capacity Building is the process of assisting the group or individuals to identify and address issues and gain the insights, knowledge and experience needed to solve problems and implement change.

There is a realization in the development sector that there is a need to appraise the success of development interventions by going beyond the conventional development targets and measures of success (e.g. in the form of commodities, goods and services) to take into account improvements to human potential. Capacity building of stakeholders is also increasingly viewed as an important factor in developmental projects that involve participation of stakeholders at all levels for effective implementation of projects.

Scope of capacity building at ProjectVillage(Naswadi 1G)

• Alternative Land Use Plan • Scientific technique of Soil and Moisture conservation • Improved and Scientific agriculture practices • Fodder development and Management • Afforestation • Organic Farming • Meteorological Information • Dairy Development and Management • Income Generation Activities

o Stiching Machines o Making leaf plates o Flour Mills o Centering material o Tent House o Vermicomposting

Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution:

S.No Organisation Training Modules

1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Vadodara Training in modern and scientific agriculture practices

2 Anand agriculture University, Training in modern and better agriculture practices

3 Sadguru Foundation, Dahod Community Mobilization, Geology and Engg structures details

4 BAIF foundation vadodara SMC works, Livelihood activities and Animal Husbandry development Programmes, SHG and federation level training and accounting

5 ITI Jambugoda, Microenterprise development activities6 District industrial center, Mechanical training and support training to stakeholders

7 Forest research center, vadodara Afforestation and Vermicomposting and agro forestry

8 SPIPA, Ahmedabad Participatory approach and Engineering aspects in watershed

9 BISAG Space application and Different maps preparation

Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan:

S. No. Project Name Project

Stakeholders Total no. of persons

No. of persons to be trained

No. of training programmes Estimated cost(in lakh)

1 Naswadi‐1 G

PIA 5 5 4

*(3% of total capacity building fund)

WDTs 6 6 12 UGs 495 36 8 SHGs 124 14 8 WCs 70 20 8

Table no.46: Information, education and Communication Activities:

S. No. Particulars Number/Year Cost per unit Executing agency

Estimated expenditure (Rs.) Outcomes

1 Street play 20 4500 PIA and DWDU, Vadodara 90000

Awareness for the importance of

watershed project

2 Campaigning for community mobilisation 4 2500 PIA and DWDU, Vadodara 10000

3 Pamphlets and posters 20000 3 PIA and DWDU, Vadodara 60000

4 Banners, Hoardings 20 600 PIA and DWDU, Vadodara 12000

5 Wall Painting at 3 community places 20 2500 PIA and DWDU, Vadodara 50000

CHAPTER – 5

BUDGETING

Budgeting

The first step in budgeting is dividing the cost of the project into various component s as detailed in the common guidelines and done

accordingly in table no. 47. It helps us in further identifying activities under different components and allocate appropriate funds.

Table no. 47: Budget at a glance

Budget Component Cost requirement( Rs. in lakhs)

Net Project Cost ‐Administrative Costs 26.9 ‐Monitoring 2.7 ‐Evaluation 2.7 Preparatory phase: 0.0 ‐Entry point activities 10.8 ‐Institution and capacity building 13.4 ‐Detailed Project Report (DPR) 2.7 Watershed Works Phase: 0.0 ‐Watershed Development works, 134.4 ‐Livelihood activities for the asset less persons, 26.9 ‐Production system and micro enterprises 34.9 Consolidation Phase 13.4 Total 268.8

Table no. 48: Village component wise budget available under IWMP

S.No Village

Activity

EPA Institution and CB DPR

Watershed development

Work

Livelihood for asset less

Production system and

Microenterprises Consolidation Total

1 Budha juladhani 199056 248820 49764 1488200 497640 646932 248820 3379232

2 Gheswadi 15196 18996 3799 189960 37992 49389 18996 334328

3 Hariyabar 133680 167100 33420 1671000 334200 434460 167100 2940960

4 Khokhara (L) 138384 172980 34596 1729800 345960 449748 172980 3044448

5 Nardha 86928 108660 21732 1086600 217320 282516 108660 1912416

6 Pisayata(D) 164592 205740 41148 2057400 411480 534924 205740 3621024

7 Ranbor 130032 162540 32508 1625400 325080 422604 162540 2860704

8 ReliyaAmba 62928 78660 15732 786600 157320 204516 78660 1384416

9 Sankal 144528 180660 36132 1806600 361320 469716 180660 3179616

Total 1075324 1344156 268831 12441560 2688312 3494805 1344156 22657144

Table no. 49: Village wise gap in funds requirement

S. No Village Total cost requirement Total funds available under IWMP Gap in funds requirement

1 Sankalp(P) 51.032 36.132 14.9 2 Khokhra (lavakoi) 44.396 34.596 9.8 3 Gheswadi 13.5992 3.7992 9.8 4 Nardha 29.432 21.732 7.7 5 Pisayata (Digneol) 48.848 41.148 7.7 6 Ranbor 43.808 32.508 11.3 7 Budha Jaldhuni 58.664 49.764 8.9 8 Reliya Amba 27.232 15.732 11.5 9 Hariyabar 41.32 33.42 7.9

Total 358.3312 268.8312 89.5

Table no.50: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes

S. No. Village Activity to be carried out

Fund made available to IWMP due to convergence

(Rs. in lakh)

Scheme with which convergence took place

Reference no. of activity/ task/ structure in DPR

Level at which decision for

convergence was taken

1 Sankal (P)

Checkwall 6 MGNREGA, Panchayat Project Level Wells 5.4 MGNREGA, Panchayat Project Level Drinking water 3.5 Mechnical Department District Level Total 14.9

2 Khokhra (L)

Check wall 4.5 MGNREGA, Panchayat Project Level well 1.8 MGNREGA, Panchayat Project Level Drinking water 3.5 Mechnical Department District Level Total 9.8

3 Hariyabar

Checkwall 3.5 MGNREGA, Panchayat Project Level well 0.9 MGNREGA, Panchayat Project Level Drinking water 3.5 Mechnical Department District Level Total 7.9

4 Gheswadi


5 Nardha


6 Pisayata (D) Checkwall 2.4 MGNREGA, Panchayat Project Level well 1.8 MGNREGA, Panchayat Project Level

Drinking water 3.5 Mechnical Department District Level Total 7.7

7 Ranbor

Checkwall 6 MGNREGA, Panchayat Project Level well 1.8 MGNREGA, Panchayat Project Level Drinking water 3.5 Mechnical Department District Level Total 11.3

8 Budha Jaldhuni


9 Relia amba

Checkwall 4.5 MGNREGA, Panchayat Project Level Well 3.5 MGNREGA, Panchayat Project Level Drinking water 3.5 Mechnical Department District Level Total 11.5

CHAPTER 6

EXPECTED OUTCOMES

Expected Outcomes

Employment

One of the prominent features of watershed program is to create self sustainace to stake holder in terms of livelihood and increase in

employment opprutunities is one of the benchmark that can unravel the effect of watershed. Watershed creates employment oppurtunites

during the work phase for labour intensive activities like construction of gully plug, earthen dam, field bund, check dam, check wall and through

the assest created under watershed program have a direct impact on agiculuture and natural resource development. Livelihood for self

employed, wage lobour and income generating activities where there is a ample scope for employment. As the net employement increases the

percapita income of agriculture, animal husbandry and other allied activites are also sure to increase.

Table no. 52: Employment in Project area

S. No. Names of the villages

Wage employment Self employment No. of mandays No. of beneficiaries No. of beneficiaries

SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total

1 Budha Jaldhuni 0 3175 0 1535 4710 0 304 0 147 451 0 106 0 51 157 2 Gheswadi 0 3906 0 1942 5848 0 374 0 186 560 0 130 0 65 195 3 Hariyabar 0 2924 0 1431 4355 0 280 0 137 417 0 98 0 47 145 4 Khokhra(Lavakoi) 0 1922 0 992 2914 0 184 0 95 279 0 64 0 33 97 5 Narda 0 3938 0 1880 5818 0 377 0 180 557 0 131 0 63 194 6 Pisayata (Digneol) 0 776 0 3959 4735 0 743 0 379 1122 0 260 0 91 351 7 Ranbor 0 3509 0 1859 5368 0 336 0 178 514 0 117 0 40 157 8 Reliya Amba 0 137 0 1431 1568 0 281 0 137 418 0 98 0 34 132 9 Sankal 0 1431 0 8523 9954 0 543 0 273 816 0 190 0 66 256

Migration

Main reason for migration is in search of employment oppurtunities for generating income for oneself and family. These clusters of villages have employment oppurtunities only during kharif season and which leaves them unemployed for both rabi and summer season.

Implementation of watershed activities in these villages will open new avenues for employment in both kharif and Rabi seasons. Water stored

in the water harvesting structures will be utilized in the offseason for agriculture purpose and also new technologies like drip irrigation, crop

demonstration, animal camps, and farmers meeting for improved crop production practices will alter the farming pattern and create huge

employment oppurtunites in the rural areas. Water stored through the structures will give opportunity for cultivation of farm lands which were

left barren past years. Hence the overall impact is there will be decrease in the rate of migration.

Table no. 53: Details of seasonal migration from Project area

S. NO. Names of villages

No. of persons migrating No. of days per year of migration

Pre‐project Expected post project Pre‐project Expected post project 1 Budha juladhani 62 50 03‐Jun 02‐Apr 2 Gheswadi 49 39 03‐Jun 02‐Apr 3 Hariyabar 115 92 03‐Jun 02‐Apr 4 Khokhara (L) 48 38 03‐Jun 02‐Apr 5 Nardha 76 61 03‐Jun 02‐Apr 6 Pisayata(D) 72 58 03‐Jun 02‐Apr 7 Ranbor 36 29 03‐Jun 02‐Apr 8 ReliyaAmba 52 42 03‐Jun 02‐Apr 9 Sankal 116 93 03‐Jun 02‐Apr

Ground water table:

The ground water table of this cluster of villages is appromately 15mt and futher goes down in summer and drought seasons. The single biggest

source of groundwater depletion and lowering of the water table is over‐pumping and unchecked ground water utilization. Due to growing

population the demand for water for daily acitivies and agriculute has increased. This posses a major pressure on the water table. The water

travels slowly through layers of soil and rock before finally reaching the water table. Several water harvesting structure are created like

percolation tanks, roof water harvesting structures, bore well and dug well recharge for recharge of ground water. Hence a strong effort is taken

to maintain a balance between usage and recharging of the ground water.

Table no. 54: Details of average ground water table depth in the project areas (in meters)

S. N. Names of Villages Sources Pre‐Project level Expected Increase/decrease

(Post‐ Project) 1 Budha juldhani Open wells 96 77 2 Gheswadi Open wells 114 91 3 Hariyabar Open wells 102 82 4 Khokhra (la) Open wells 111 89 5 Nardha Open wells 75 60 6 Pisayata Open wells 102 82 7 Ranbor Open wells 90 72 8 Reliya Amba Open wells 75 60 9 Sankal Open wells 87 70

Drinking water

Drinking water is major problem in these villages. People depend upon hand pump and open well for drinking water and travel at 50 ft distance

on average to fetch the water. There is no much problem of inherent or ingress salanity in this area. Drinking water is only available for 8

months and only few well in this village are live. The demand for drinking water changes from season to season gets worse in summer. However

through intregration of watershed program with other schemes like WASSMO and Mechnical wing for water supply department Vadodara, has

been done under the convergence. Drinkin water problem is likely to slove by this initiative.

Table no. 55: Status of Drinking water

S. No. Names of Villages Availability of drinking water

Quality of drinking water

Comments

(no. of months in a year)

Pre‐project Expected Post project

Pre‐project Expected Post‐project 1 Budha juladhani 8 12 Minor saline Portable 2 Gheswadi 10 12 Portable Portable 3 Hariyabar 9 12 Minor saline Portable 4 Khokhara (L) 7 12 Portable Portable 5 Nardha 10 12 Portable Portable 6 Pisayata(D) 10 12 Minor saline Portable 7 Ranbor 8 12 Portable Portable 8 ReliyaAmba 10 12 Minor saline Portable 9 Sankal 9 12 Portable Portable

Crops

Table no. 56: Details of crop area and yield in the project area

Agriculture is being one the most important component and main occupation of the people living in these rural areas. Crop production and agiculture itself is constraint due to lack of irrigation facilities and total dependence of rain has limited the scope for agriculture. Only kharif season crops are taken in one year. However structures created under watershed opens avenue to take up cropping in Rabi season by utilizing the water stored through check dam, check wall, farm ponds. Feilds bunds are also created to check the run‐off and to promote percolation of rain water.

Name of village Name of crops Pre‐project Expected Post‐project

Area(ha) Average Yield (Qtl) per

ha. Area(ha) Average Yield per ha

(qtl)

Budha juldhani

Kharif –Maize 23.75 12.95 23.75 15.54 Paddy ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Tur ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Cotton ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Black gram ‐ ‐ ‐ Rabi‐ maize ‐ ‐ 4.75 15.54 Zaid ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

Village total 23.75 12.95 28.5 31.08

Gheswadi

Kharif –Maize 40.01 13.16 40.01 15.79 Paddy ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Tur ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Cotton ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Black gram ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Rabi‐maize ‐ ‐ 8.02 15.79 Zaid ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

Village total 40.01 13.16 48.03 31.58

Hariyabar

Kharif –Maize 16.54 11.83 16.54 14.19 Paddy ‐ ‐ 0 0 Tur 25.05 7.84 25.05 9.4 Cotton 3.46 4.89 3.46 5.86 Black gram ‐ ‐ 0 0 Rabi‐Maize ‐ ‐ 3.31 14.19

Zaid ‐ ‐ Village total 45.05 24.56 48.36 43.64

Khokhra (la)

Kharif –Maize 30.5 11 30.5 13.2 Paddy ‐ ‐ 0 Tur 11.29 7.58 11.29 9.09 Cotton Black gram Rabi–Maize 6.1 13.2 Zaid

Village total 41.79 18.58 47.89 35.49

Nardha

Kharif –Maize 25 13.85 25 16.62 Paddy ‐ ‐ 0 Tur 5 7.92 5 9.5 Cotton 4.16 8.76 4.16 10.51 Black gram Rabi‐Maize 5 16.62 Zaid

Village total 34.16 30.53 39.16 53.25

Pisayarta (D)

Kharif –Maize 35 12.76 35 15.3 Paddy Tur 15 6.18 15 7.41 Cotton Black gram 5.25 2.16 5.25 2.59 Rabi‐Maize 7 15.3 Zaid

Village total 55.25 21.1 62.25 40.6

Ranbor

Kharif –Maize 15 11.77 15 13.5 Paddy 15 11.26 15 14.25 Tur 10 7.65 10 9.18 Cotton Black gram 5.35 2.01 5.35 2.41 Rabi‐Maize 3 13.5 Zaid

Village total 45.35 32.69 48.35 52.84

Reliya Amba

Kharif –Maize 25 9.85 25 12.5 Paddy 13 8.71 13 10.5 Tur 12 6.61 12 7.93 Cotton Black gram 8.46 1.25 8.46 1.5 Rabi‐Maize 5 12.5 Zaid

Village total 58.46 26.42 58.46 44.93

Sankal

Kharif –Maize 12 7.97 12 10.5 Paddy Tur 18 5.2 18 6.24 Cotton 4.25 8.38 4.25 10.05 Black gram Rabi‐Maize 2.4 10.5 Zaid

Village total 34.25 21.55 34.25 37.29

*Note the present data is taken based upon base‐line survey. The above yield is increased by certain percentage keeping in view the assumption that after the intervention of watershed production and net area under agriculture will increase. Although the actual condition is subject to change based upon rainfall and climatic condition of that current year.

Horticulture

Table no. 57: Area under horticulture

S. No. Name of Village Existing area under horticulture (ha) Area under horticulture proposed to be covered through IWMP

1 Budha juladhani 0 6.08 2 Gheswadi 0 0 3 Hariyabar 0 6.56 4 Khokhara (L) 0 3.2 5 Nardha 0 3.04 6 Pisayata(D) 0 5.76 7 Ranbor 0 5.12 8 ReliyaAmba 0 4.8 9 Sankal 0 5.6

Vegetative cover

Table no. 58: Forest/vegetative cover

S. No Name of Village Existing area under tree cover (ha) Area under tree cover proposed

1 Budha juladhani 391 401 2 Gheswadi 64 69 3 Hariyabar 226 233 4 Khokhara (L) 254 266 5 Nardha 93 97 6 Pisayata(D) 247 262 7 Ranbor 217 229 8 ReliyaAmba 70 81 9 Sankal 241 257

Livestock

The village has quite a good of livestock population. These include cows, bullocks, buffaloes, goats, sheep and camels. The interventions like

provision of good quality cows and buffaloes, the establishment of a fodder bank and other such related activities would spur up the dairy

development in the village. It is expected that the post project period would see a substantial increase in livestock population and yield from

them.

Table no. 59: Details of livestock in the project areas (for fluids please mention in litres, for solids please mention in kgs. and income in Rs.)

Name of Village Type of Animal

Pre‐Project Expected Post‐project Remarks No. Yield Income No. Yield Income

Budhajuldhani

Milch‐animals Cow(per animal/day) 115 1.75 35 138 2.5 50 Buffalo(per animal/day) 40 2.5 70 48 3 84 Draught Purpose animals 162 230 Goat (Meat: Rs/kg) 272 25 130 240 13‐16 180

Gheswadi


Hariyabar


Khokhara(la)


Nardha Milch‐animals Cow(per animal/day) 35 1.5 30 42 2 40 Buffalo(per animal/day) 14 2 56 17 3 84

Draught Purpose animals 106 126 Goat (Meat: Rs/kg) 42 25 130 35 13‐15 180

Pisayata(D)


Ranbor


Reliya Amba


Sankal


Linkages

The direct livelihood activities need good forward and backward support. Without such support system the activities may fail to deliver the

desired results. These linkages would involve credit, machinery, input supply, marketing, etc.

Table no. 60: BackwardForward linkages

S. No. Project Type of Marketing Facility Pre‐project (no.) During the project (no.) Post‐project (no.)

1 Naswadi‐1G

Backward linkages Seed certification Seed supply system 1 1Fertilizer supply system Pesticide supply systemCredit institutions ‐ Bank‐1 Bank‐2

Water supply Mechanical Department/Wassmo

Mechanical Department/Wassmo

Extension services Nurseries Tools/machinery suppliers ‐Price Support system Labour Any other (Baby corn) Contract Farming Buy back system Forward linkages Harvesting/threshing machinery Vermicompost Buy back systemRoad network Transport facilities

Markets / Mandis Collective marketing system

Collective marketing system

Agro and other Industries 1Milk and other collection centres 0 5 Labour Any other (please specify) Fodder bank‐1 6

Logical Framework Analysis

PROJECT STRUCTURE EXPECTED RESULT PERFORMANCE VARIABLE

INDICATOR MEANS OF

VERIFICATION RISK/ ASSUMPTIONS GOAL: IMPACT: To conserve the soil and moisture and enhance the income of the people of the project area through watershed activities

* The income of families will increased

*Purchase power of villagers will increase

* Impact assessment study

* Living standard will improve

* Annual expenditure and saving of households.

* Evaluation report Natural disaster (Drought)

*

* Household assests * Compare between baseline survey and evaluation report Political Intervention

Increase of ground water table

* Number of people migrating for employment opportunity

* Physical observation

* Irrigation during off‐season

* Cropping pattern * Physical Varification and FGD with farmers

OBJECTIVE1: OUTCOMES: To minimize the degradation of land and to conserve the natural resources of the project and area.

* Agriculture income will increase

*Net area under agriculture will increases.


* Total agriculture production will increase

* Evaluation report

Soil moisture content will increase

* Presence of vegetation cover in the project area.

* Discussion with Villagers/Farmers

Maintenance of the Structure after the project completion

* Percentage of farmers cultivating the crops in Rabi.

* Trend analysis of crop cultivation

Activity for Objective1: Outputs: 1. Soil and moisture conservation works

* Completion of soil moisture works.

* Number of watershed physical structure presents in the project area

* Physical verification

*Diversified farming * Discussion with Villagers/Farmers

2. Use of advance water conservation techniques.

* Optimum utilization of available available water

* Number of households having drip irrigation system of their houses

* Physical verification

3. Modern agriculture techniques for enhancing of agriculture productivity through crop demonstration plot.

*Change in the cultivation pattern and adoption of new techniques in agriculture to realize the maximum potential of the land


* Observations

OBJECTIVE2: OUTCOMES To increase the per capita income of BPL and marginal farmer through various livelihood activities.

* Reduction of migrating families from the project area.



* Availbility of employment within the project area.

* Number of people engaged in poultry farming and other livelihood activities.

* Physical verification/ Photographs

* Unemployment will decrease

* Number of people involved in self employment activities

* FGDs and PRA

Activity for Objective2: Outputs:

1. Promotion of livelihood activities like dairy unit,vermicompost, nursery raising, fodder production, garment stiching and flour mill.

* People will set‐up their micro‐enterprise on demand based activties.

* Number of people showing their interest to set‐up micro industry

* Observations

2. Capacity building activities for improvement entrepreneurial skill.

* Improved knowledge and enhancement of skills for self development

* Number of small enterprise set‐up


OBJECTIVE3: OUTCOMES: To strengthen the local institution

* Presence of strong and dynamic local governance

* Number of meetings initiated by the local leaders.


* Interest of the People.

* People participation and representation will increase

* Number of peoples’ organization present in the grass root level

* Evaluation report, FGD, Observations

Activity for Objective3: Outputs: 1. Organise training and awareness programme for Village institutions

* Quality of local leaders will improve and use of more democratic method of decision making.

* Number of case resolved within the locality.

* Observations

2.Capacity building workshops and exposure visits User Group and Watershed Committee

* Local leaders will take interest to understand the programmes and schemes and utilize for the benefit of the village.

* Number of schemes utilize for the benefit of the villages.

* FGDs and PRA

3. Formation of peoples organization in the grass root level

* There will be proper management of available resources by the people's organisation

* Activities of the watershed is implementing smoothly without any hindrance

* There will be proper implementation of the projects

* Participation of deprived section will increase

* Number of deprived/ poor people participated in the meeting of Gram Sabha

* Representation of local people will increase

* Number of participants represent in the project meeting.

CHAPTER 7

QUALITY AND SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES

Introduction: Chapter‐7 deals with the plan in which the activities of watershed IWMP‐5 Project of Vadodara maintain the quality and

renders the project sustainable. In details the chapter describes that the proper and regular monitoring and evaluation of the project can

trimming down the improper implementation of activities so that the quality can be controlled at the right time. The chapter extends with the

appropriate post‐project techniques for project sustainability and research and documentation for maintaining the records, locate the loop falls

in implementing and follow up the project with a new and suitable adaptation for the area development.

7.1 Plans for Monitoring and Evaluation:

To control the activities at the stage of implementing proper plans has formed for monitoring and Evaluation. Project monitoring is one

of the important components in watershed development programmes. The broad objectives of a watershed project demand good monitoring

framework. A monitoring framework is suggested which within the capacity of watershed development teams and watershed committees. No

great deal of training, human resources or instruments are expected to be employed. The monitoring should actually assist the project team to

provide a guideline for improvement in the activities and output the project. Selection of an appropriate measure for the given area and

ensuring the quality of project measures to be given great attention at the time of monitoring.

Three Ties of Monitoring: Three tiers of monitoring are planned –

1. First Tire (Monitoring of activities): This is carried out by the head of local PO’s along with part time workers to monitor the

implementation of all activities as per the action plan. The monitoring also aims at ensuring that the quality of work is as per the

guidelines prescribed for each activity.

2. Second Tire (Monitoring of outputs): To check the outputs of the activities, project coordinators along with the part time workers

monitors as per the logical frame work. The indicators are selected considering the broad objectives of the project. One can adopt or

modify these as per requirement at the time of implementation. The output level indicators needs to be devised by the project team

based on the outcome level indicators on. Outputs need to be monitored frequently, may be once in a quarter/ six months.

3. Third Tire (Monitoring of Outcomes): Project reviewing committee along with the project co‐ordinator will monitor the overall

outcomes of the objectives as per the log frame. The outcomes level monitoring may start in the second year and continue on an annual

basis. Most of the information can be available from the sets of output level indicators. Participatory methods should be used at the time

of monitoring the activities.

The methods of collecting samples data for the monitoring activities should be clearly documented in the monitoring report. The detail of

the monitoring system is presented in the table as under.

Table no 60. Details of Monitoring system proposed for the project IWMP5

Tiers of Monitoring

Basis of monitoring

Frequency of monitoring Orientation of the

Indicator Monitoring by

First tier Immediate result

basis Regular Monthly Monitoring Activity oriented Local People organizations

Second Tier Monitoring of

Outputs Regular monitoring

(Quarterly, half yearly and Objective oriented

Internal project team (WDT, PIA, MDT,

Experts and PM)

annually )

Third Tier Monitoring of

Outcomes

Annually but monitoring

start from second year

onwards?

Goal Oriented

1. Specified monitoring team formed by

DWDU,

2. External Monitoring team by GSWMA

Apart from the above mentioned monitoring system, there are a Web‐based GIS System is being developed for monitoring and evaluating

the project in its planning & implementation phases. The system would be available on a public domain and can be accessed by all the

stakeholders of the project. The system shows the entire state of Gujarat and all of those areas selected over the next 18 years. Filtering allows

the user to zoom onto one particular project. Details related to soil type, Land‐use classification, inhabitation etc., can be obtained village‐wise.

Furthermore, survey‐number wise details related to ownership, irrigation source, yield etc., can also be accessed by the users of the system.

This system is being used for pooling up the details obtained from the DPR. In other words, the DPR is made available online in the form of a

database which will help the stakeholders know areas of importance viz., already treated areas/historical works in the area, proposed areas for

treatment etc., for further treatment and planning. The system would also show the satellite imageries of various years from the project

inception stage to the project closing stages. This allows the user to evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment and thereby plan corrective

measures for the project area. The system would serve as an aiding tool to the planners and evaluators for judging the efficacy of the project.

Yet another component of the Web‐based GIS system is the Mobile based Monitoring & Evaluation System, which will help the ground

staff alias WDTs (Watershed Development Team) to transmit information from the ground level to the central server. Also, any higher‐up

official in charge of the project can obtain information regarding the project area on their mobile phone by means of an SMS. The system works

in the following manner. The WDT equipped with a GPS instrument marks the latitude‐longitude information of various treatment areas during

the DPR. The probable sites are then transferred onto the central server. During the works phase, any progress in the treatment areas is

reported to the server by means of an SMS by the WDT. Similarly, any nodal officer or higher‐up official can view the progress in a project by

means of summarized reports generated over frequent periods of time.

Evaluation: The project will be evaluated by the external agency after the project completion to see the impact of the project in the area. The

external agency should use the monitoring tool specified in the DPR of the project and should consider the assumptions and risk mentioned in

the DPR because these are the factors which may be an obstacle in the implementation of the project. The agency will be decided by the State

Nodal Agency (GSWMA) at the time of the evaluation. The evaluation will be evaluate that the goal is achieved or not after the implementation of

the project.

7.2 Plans for PostProject Management/Sustainability Approach:

Watershed development project can be rendered sustainable through an appropriate combination of environmental balance, community

participation and institutionalization of process. So the detail plans for the post project management are described as under:

7.2.1 Adopting Environment friendly conservation measures

The measures taken up will be long lasting. Along with engineering measures, efforts will also be made to establish forest cover in the upper catchment areas and on the slopes. The downstream area will have prolonged stream flows. The stream banks should also be vegetated

to create a buffer between land and water bodies. Such vegetation helps in stabilizing streams, enhancing recharge and improving the riparian habitat.

An including species of trees and grasses will be selected for developing a vegetative cover at the time of implementation of IWMP‐5 project of Vadodara. The diversity of vegetative measures is the key to sustainability. Combination of shallow and deep‐rooted plants, fast and slow growing plants, productive and medical plants and herbs will be encouraged. The vegetation created will ultimately help to recharge the rainwater, use the soil moisture optimally and provide direct and indirect benefits to the community and environment as a whole.

Land use pattern will go hand in hand with carrying capacity of the watershed. Optimum use of water and increased use of organic

fertilizers is the key to conserve the precious land source. Water overuse and excessive fertilization leads to permanent damage of lands and

groundwater.

It is important to maintain soil quality through crop management. Crop diversity and crop rotation helps in improving the micro flora

and fauna present in the soil and maintaining the healthy symbiotic subsystems relationship.

7.2.2 Participation of local community in development and management

During the planning phase the local people’s participation were involved and it is planned that the involvement during implementation

and post project maintenance will enhance the impact of project and maintain the structures. However, participation without empowerment

does not help in achieving sustainable development. So People will be made aware of different concepts and options for their livelihood and

natural resource management. Local wisdom is important in understanding rural dynamics that includes the interface between human

behaviour and its economic / ecological implications. The interests of a community will be created and maintained by adopting the measures in

such a manner that they provide immediate, medium term and long term benefits to the community.

7.2.3 Institutionalization for post project management

A dynamic institutional arrangement is necessary for project management, facilitation of benefit sharing and maintenance of the

resources. This usually includes small user groups for different resources / assets as well as village level organizations. In‐built system and

mechanisms will be developed for qualitative growth and dynamisms of the organizations. The community organizations should be linked to

other Government and Non Government institutes of interest. The potential people’s organizations were formed in the project area include

Watershed level Organization and Users Groups.

Watershed level Committee

Watershed level organization is established right from the beginning of the project. The overall planning, coordination, management and

maintenance are possible through this representative body. This clearly implies representation from different sections of the community –

landholders and landless, upper reach and lower reach, men and women, lower and upper castes, Gram Panchayat and other existing political or

non political organizations.

User Groups

The other categories of institutions are formed of various groups with common areas of interest in the project area named user groups.

These include, depending upon necessity, Self Help Groups of women and men, User Groups for common assets, Natural Clubs, etc. The

capacities of different groups will be developed time to time for effective functioning of these groups. A mechanism will be developed to ensure

continuity, both in learning, functioning and actions that from responsibilities of such groups during the implementation project activities.

MAPS

Documents

Vadodara IWMP (Naswadi 2P) - Gujaratgswma.gujarat.gov.in/.../DPR/2009-10/vadodara/Vad_IWMP_7.pdfnatural resources, and livestock‐buffalo, cow, goat, poultry bird on a small scale