31
The 6 cities’ forests Robert HOSTNIK Slovenia Forest Service The comparative analysis of urban forests’ potentials of six largest cities in Slovenia EMoNFUr LIFE+ project workshop, Ljubljana, May 15 th , 2012

Hostnik presentation e mo-nfur ljubljana 2012

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Hostnik presentation e mo-nfur ljubljana 2012

The 6 cities’ forests

Robert HOSTNIK

Slovenia Forest Service

The comparative analysis of urban forests’ potentials of six largest cities in Slovenia

EMoNFUr LIFE+ project workshop, Ljubljana, May 15th, 2012

Page 2: Hostnik presentation e mo-nfur ljubljana 2012

Landscape Diversity

Page 3: Hostnik presentation e mo-nfur ljubljana 2012

Forest Cover

58,5 % of total area

Page 4: Hostnik presentation e mo-nfur ljubljana 2012

Urban Forest Areas

Page 5: Hostnik presentation e mo-nfur ljubljana 2012

Urban Forest Areas

Ljubljana

Kranj

Celje

Velenje

Maribor

Novo mesto

Page 6: Hostnik presentation e mo-nfur ljubljana 2012

Comparitive analysis

• Urban forests of 6 selected cities

• Urban forests vs. forests on local

and regional level

URBAN

PERI-URBAN

LOCAL

REGIONAL

• Data of regular forestry inventory

• Forest stand as basic unit

~ 400 ha of forest area

~ 1.600 ha of forest area

~ 8.100 ha of forest area

~ 89.000 ha of forest area

Page 7: Hostnik presentation e mo-nfur ljubljana 2012

Research topics

• Urban forest cover

• Urban forest ecosystemsNaturalnessStructure of development phasesTree species diversityGrowing stock and structureStand’s potentials

• Urban forest functions10 social functions4 environmental functions3 productive functions

• Ownershipstructurecharacteristics of private forests

• Legal aspects

Page 8: Hostnik presentation e mo-nfur ljubljana 2012

Defining research area

CORINE Land Cover (CLC 2006)

Urban level

• min. 90 % of densely populated area

• inclusion of traditional urban forests

Peri-urban level

• 2 kilometres circle around urban area

(1/2 hour walking distance)

Page 9: Hostnik presentation e mo-nfur ljubljana 2012
Page 10: Hostnik presentation e mo-nfur ljubljana 2012

Forest Cover

Page 11: Hostnik presentation e mo-nfur ljubljana 2012

15 %

42 %

49 %

63 %

31 %

42 %

49 %

71 %

10 %

29 %49 %

67 %

13 %

29 %

43 %

49 %

14 %

24 %

42 %

42 %

15 %

22 %

25 %

58 %

Novo mesto

Velenje

Kranj

Celje

Maribor

Ljubljana

Urban level Peri-urban level Local level Regional level

Country’s average

58,5%

Forest cover (in %)

Page 12: Hostnik presentation e mo-nfur ljubljana 2012

Naturalness

Page 13: Hostnik presentation e mo-nfur ljubljana 2012

4 categories:• Preserved forests (70%+ site original tree species)

• Changed forests (30 – 69%)

• Strongly changed forests (10 – 29%)

• Altered forests (less than 10 %)

Naturalness – the comparison between current and

potentially natural tree species compositionon particular forest site.

Page 14: Hostnik presentation e mo-nfur ljubljana 2012

Share of preserved forest stands (in %)

57

63

75

55

16

33

15

35

77

8279

66

18

43

28

35

6

29

2119

24 25

54

70

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

%

Ljubljana Maribor Celje Kranj Velenje Novo mesto

Urban level Peri-urban level Local level Regional level

Page 15: Hostnik presentation e mo-nfur ljubljana 2012

Forest Development

Phases

Page 16: Hostnik presentation e mo-nfur ljubljana 2012

Share of older forest development phases (in %)

72 72

68

61

43

51 51

62

7471

6466

89

71

7672

8689

83

70

78

62

57

52

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

%

Ljubljana Maribor Celje Kranj Velenje Novo mesto

Urban level Peri-urban level Local level Regional level

Page 17: Hostnik presentation e mo-nfur ljubljana 2012

Growing Stock

Page 18: Hostnik presentation e mo-nfur ljubljana 2012

Growing stock (in m3/ha)

304

266 269 283

303

323

256281 288 265

286

314

399

379369

290 273 278

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

m3/ha

Ljubljana Maribor Celje Kranj Velenje Novo mesto

Urban level Peri-urban level Local level

Country’s

average276

m3/ha

Page 19: Hostnik presentation e mo-nfur ljubljana 2012

Big Trees

Page 20: Hostnik presentation e mo-nfur ljubljana 2012

Share of trees with diameter over 50 cm (in % of growing stock)

22

21

20

18

1920

9 10

12

23

18

1717

15

16

15 14

13

0

5

10

15

20

25

%

Ljubljana Maribor Celje Kranj Velenje Novo mesto

Urban level Peri-urban level Local level

Page 21: Hostnik presentation e mo-nfur ljubljana 2012

Tree Species

Diversity

Page 22: Hostnik presentation e mo-nfur ljubljana 2012

Number of tree species in urban forests

34

15

4

36

14

5

38

16

5

37

18

3

30

14

2

29

10

4

Ljubljana Maribor Celje Kranj Velenje Novo mesto

All Minority tree species Introduced tree species

Page 23: Hostnik presentation e mo-nfur ljubljana 2012

Recreation

Page 24: Hostnik presentation e mo-nfur ljubljana 2012

Share of forest areas with recreational function (in %)

90

72

85

10

68

37

15

6

95

64

24

11

8994

59

29

98

67

33

23

31

24

913

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

%

Ljubljana Maribor Celje Kranj Velenje Novo mesto

Urban level Peri-urban level Local level Regional level

Page 25: Hostnik presentation e mo-nfur ljubljana 2012

Wood Production

Page 26: Hostnik presentation e mo-nfur ljubljana 2012

Share of forests with importantwood production function (in %)

0 0

57

93

0 0

99 99

5 4

9496

0 0

98 9698

84

67

83

0 0

99 98

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

%

Ljubljana Maribor Celje Kranj Velenje Novo mesto

Urban level Peri-urban level Local level Regional level

Page 27: Hostnik presentation e mo-nfur ljubljana 2012

Ownership

Page 28: Hostnik presentation e mo-nfur ljubljana 2012

Share of public forests (in %)

37

18

1212

47

41

16

24

54

16

12

16

30

10

3

11

26

13

8

3

35

18

12

25

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

%

Ljubljana Maribor Celje Kranj Velenje Novo mesto

Urban level Peri-urban level Local level Regional level

Page 29: Hostnik presentation e mo-nfur ljubljana 2012

Conclusions

Urban forests vs. forests on local & regional level

Differences betwen cities.

Differences:- forest cover- forest functions- ownership

- legal aspects

Similarities:- forest ecosystems’ characteristics

Page 30: Hostnik presentation e mo-nfur ljubljana 2012

Thank you for your attention.

[email protected]

Page 31: Hostnik presentation e mo-nfur ljubljana 2012

The 6 cities’ forests

Robert HOSTNIK

Slovenia Forest Service

The comparative analysis of urban forests’ potentials of six largest cities in Slovenia

EMoNFUr LIFE+ project workshop, Ljubljana, May 15th, 2012