30
[email protected] .de 1 Development of a NQF for HE from a European perspective TEMPUS-Project 2nd Bitola Workshop Feb. 24-25 2010

[email protected] osnabrueck.de 1 Development of a NQF for HE from a European perspective TEMPUS-Project 2nd Bitola Workshop Feb. 24-25 2010

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

[email protected]

1

Development of a NQF for HE from a European perspective

TEMPUS-Project2nd Bitola Workshop

Feb. 24-25 2010

[email protected] 2

Qualifications frameworks are good for helping make academic processes and judgements transparent, explicit and fair.

[email protected] 3

Learning Outcomes = Qualification

• Qualification is the formal standard, which is defined as being the „end“ of a learning path (credential).

• It depicts those Learning Outcomes which have been achieved on this pathway (formal learning)

• Learning Outcomes are what the student should know and is able to do

4

In outcome-based education the educational outcomes are clearly and unambiguously specified.

These determine the curriculum content and its organisation, the teaching methods and strategies, the courses offered, the assessment process, the educational environment and the curriculum timetable.

They also provide a framework for curriculum evaluation.

(Harden et al., 1999a)

Challenge at Programme level

[email protected] 5

Mode of Study

Resources

Timing

Type of Pro-

gramme

TypeOf

Student

Workload

Structure

Syllabus/Learning

Outcomes

Document-ation

Core Curriculum

Learner centred

MobilityTiming

Objectives

Add-onSubstitute

Complement

Synergy

ECTS Key Features

User´sGuide

QFRProfile QA RecognitionEmployabilityLearning

ChainSocial

Dimension

GradeRating

Assessment

[email protected] 6

How can this be developed?

• Policy level– Challenge: HE institutions ensure that

academic principles and values are respected and the processes correctly implemented

• Institutional level– Promote shared values and attitudes – rather

than simply managerial processes– Balance: national / international external

accountability requirements

[email protected] 7

There is no single way

I did it my way Cassius Clay Melody

[email protected] 8

Shift of Paradigm

New way of thinking

Self-assessment

Learning outcomes

Workload

Bologna- and Copenhagen Processes

[email protected] 9

Change of Paradigm

Learning Chain

Programme Profile Learning Outcomes

Learner´s Profile

Learning Space

Module DefinitionModule Structure

Learning OutcomesAssessment

Learning and Teaching Material

Total Quality Management

-Labour Market -Qualificationsframeworks

-Strategy

General / VocationalEducation and

Training

Communication

[email protected] 10

To be decided:

Profile

[email protected] 11

Profile

Structure

Learning Outcomes

Processes

[email protected] 12

Profile: Levels of Description

• University - Philosophy,

Mission Statement

• Faculty - Bundle of Qualifications

• Study- Profile of Qualification Programme. (Bundle of

Learning Outcomes)

• Module - Learning Outcomes

[email protected] 13

LearningUnit / Module

Learning Programme

OrganisationalLevel

Sectoral Level

National Level

EQF LLL

Qualitativ

ely Relate

d Learnin

g Outc

omes

Quantitativ

ely R

elate

d Cre

dits

Quality assured

Quality assured

EHEAMacedonia

References

[email protected] 14

We need evidence of outcomes!

We promise!Internal / External QA

[email protected] 15

YES,WE CANfind evidence

[email protected] 16

But before…

We have to

Work hard –Play hard

[email protected] 17

HE institutions

Integrated Faculties

LO defined

Governance

More autonomy

StakeholdersStudents, Employers

Society

Flexibility

Concise document

Substitute?

EHEASocial inclusion

Transparency, Mobility, Permeability, Curriculum design,

Role and PurposeSpecific descriptions, levels, cycle descriptors, awards, credits and LO

OverarchingIndependent QA – ECTS based Recognition – Link EQFs

[email protected] 18

Germany – External QA

• Accreditation Board (Foundation):– To contribute to the development in the

quality of teaching and learning in Germany– To cooperate in the realisation of the

European Higher Education Area– takes care that the agencies act in line with

the highest degree of quality, comparability and transparency.

[email protected] 19

Who can perfrom accreditation?

• Agencies which have been accredited by the German Accreditation Board

• Will be re-accredited regularly (after 8 years at the latest)

• Seven agencies exist– 3 general – 4 sector specific

[email protected] 20

What do universities have to do?

They submit• Application to an Accreditation AgencyThey get• Advice• Site VisitDecision made• Accreditation Committee• Reaccreditation…..a circle

[email protected] 21

Accreditation Agencies

• European Standards and Guidelines• European Register• Site visits by Peers

– Professors (according to discipline, at least 1 from traditional universities, 1 from „new“ ones)

– Expert from industry– Student – Agency representative

[email protected] 22

Structure

Processes Outcomes

Quality

Internal QA at German Institutions

[email protected] 23

Internal Quality Assurance

• Evaluation sheets– Based on questionnaires given to students /

staff

• Continuous Feedback

• Evaluate all information

• Consequences?

[email protected] 24

Learning ChainTools at work

Learning OutcomesSubject-related

-KnowledgeDeepening / Widening

Generic-Skills / Competences

Knowledge opening / developingQFR-NQR-HQR-SQR

LearnerCredit Transfer +

AccumulationApplication /CV /

Learning Agreement/TOR / Mobility Pass

Language PassDiploma/Certificate

Supplement

Learning SpaceTeaching and Learning,

ResearchLearning Environment

Information Package / Course Catalogue

Change of Paradigm

Quality Assurance/ -enhancementStandards & Guidelines / Register

Labour Market

Labour Market

[email protected] 25

Learning Chain Design

Learning OutcomesFirst Cycle

Subject-relatedGeneric

180 credits BachelorMQF

Internal Quality Assurance+EnhancementQuality (LO)/Quantity (Credits)/Assessment

External Quality A+E

Profile: Regional-National-International / General-Special / Research-Applied

Study-Programme

BA-level 6BA-level 6-1BA-level 6-2

Knowledge

Capability

Knowledge

Capability

Knowledge

Capability

[email protected] 26

BA-level 6-1Knowledge-Widening

-DeepeningCapabilityAccessing/Opening / Developing

Knowledge widening-present tools to design a strategy and to develop business organisations strategically-interpret alternative tools to make a choice -outline consequences of strategic decisionsKnowledge deepening-apply tools to implement a strategic development successfully-identify and interpret strategic issues in different contexts-realise how strategy development can be seen, how processes can be understood and what the implications are for strategy development-differentiate between strategic management in different contextsCapability – Knowledge accessing / opening / developingInstrumental (methodological) capability-apply techniques of strategic analysis-apply techniques to select adequate strategies-apply techniques to implement strategy Communicative / interpersonal capability-use different viewpoints on strategy to explain observable processes in organisations-explain implications of diffrent scenarios and different strategiesSystemic capability-to demonstrate the impact of national and organisational culture on strategy formulation and implementation-to apply techniques in specific business positions

LO in detail

[email protected] 27

Knowledge widening-present tools to design a strategy and to develop business organisations strategically-interpret alternative tools to make a choice -outline consequences of strategic decisionsKnowledge deepening-apply tools to implement a strategic development successfully-identify and interpret strategic issues in different contexts-realise how strategy development can be seen, how processes can be understood and what the implications are for strategy development-differentiate between strategic management in different contextsCapability – Knowledge accessing / opening / developingInstrumental (methodological) capability-apply techniques of strategic analysis-apply techniques to select adequate strategies-apply techniques to implement strategy Communicative / interpersonal capability-use different viewpoints on strategy to explain observable processes in organisations-explain implications of diffrent scenarios and different strategiesSystemic capability-to demonstrate the impact of national and organisational culture on strategy formulation and implementation-to apply techniques in specific business positions

Forms of Assessment

-Quizzes(„best two“)

-Oral Presentation(Case Study-

Group)-Oral exam (20 min.

Individual)-Case Study („Open BookExam“-Notes)

[email protected] 28

Quality Assurance

- Measures- Qualitative measuring is pursued through the

achievement of the learning outcomes in the time foreseen (performance) (ex-post) – What?

- Qualitative measuring is pursued by grading how the student performed (ranking) (ex-post) – How?

- Quantitative measuring is pursued by allocating the workload expressed in credits (ex-ante) – How much?

- Consequencen of the results measured lead to a formative evaluation, i.e. help to support a continuous quality improvement

[email protected] 29

But changing education and training is a slow process! It may take more than a life-time

More than we can stomach??

[email protected] 30Enjoy your meal – quality assured