1
Post-IT: Putting Postmodern Perspectives to Use in Instructional Technology—A Response to Solomon’s “Toward a Post-Modern Agenda in Instructional Technology” Rick Voithofer Alan Foley Following the publication of David Solomon’s winning Young Scholar paper, “Toward a Post-modern Agenda in Instructional Technology,” in issue 48(4) of ETR&D, several readers inquired asking for more concrete information on the meaning of postmodernism and its implications for practice and research in instructional technology. One reader in particular, Rick Voithofer from Ohio State University, asked if he could submit a reaction to Solomon’s paper. I agreed to examine a draft, on which I provided feedback and encouragement to continue. I then invited David Solomon to provide a brief rejoinder. The products of these efforts follow. Steven Ross Research Editor In this paper, we respond to David Solomon’s construction of postmodernism and his model of a postmodern agenda for Instruc- tional Technology (IT), “Toward a Post-Modern Agenda in Instructional Technology” (2000), by offering an example of how postmodern perspectives can be used in IT research and development. As Solomon and the extant literature indi- cate, the term “postmodern” is problematic and confusing. While it is beyond the scope of this response to address the contingency of the term, we do offer a definition that fits within our own research. Simply put, postmodern theories frame research, learning, and instructional design as processes that exist in a world of rapid technical innovation and increasingly unclear and quickly shifting social and cultural boun- daries, where objectivity and efficiency are less easy to generalize across multiple settings. Postmodern theories hold that particular groups (i.e., efficiency-minded, scientific) have histori- cally controlled not only access to knowledge, but also the standards by which knowledge is considered valuable or legitimate. As a result, postmodern perspectives question the authority of traditional science, as well as any authorita- tive canon (or agenda) whether it is in art, science, philosophy, or instructional design, in favor of approaches that are more reflective, situated and responsive. Instead of looking for generalizable and universal approaches, postmodern perspectives tend toward ap- proaches that are applicable to specific situa- tions and are based on the conditions of those ETR&D, Vol. 50, No. 1, 2002, pp. 5–14 ISSN 1042–1629 5

Editor's note

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Post-IT: Putting Postmodern Perspectives to Usein Instructional Technology—A Response toSolomon’s “Toward a Post-Modern Agenda inInstructional Technology”

Rick VoithoferAlan Foley

Following the publication of David Solomon’swinning Young Scholar paper, “Toward aPost-modern Agenda in InstructionalTechnology,” in issue 48(4) of ETR&D,several readers inquired asking for moreconcrete information on the meaning ofpostmodernism and its implications forpractice and research in instructionaltechnology. One reader in particular, RickVoithofer from Ohio State University, asked ifhe could submit a reaction to Solomon’s paper.I agreed to examine a draft, on which Iprovided feedback and encouragement tocontinue. I then invited David Solomon toprovide a brief rejoinder. The products of theseefforts follow.

Steven RossResearch Editor

In this paper, we respond to DavidSolomon’s construction of postmodernism andhis model of a postmodern agenda for Instruc-tional Technology (IT), “Toward a Post-ModernAgenda in Instructional Technology” (2000), byoffering an example of how postmodernperspectives can be used in IT research anddevelopment.

As Solomon and the extant literature indi-cate, the term “postmodern” is problematic andconfusing. While it is beyond the scope of thisresponse to address the contingency of the term,we do offer a definition that fits within our ownresearch. Simply put, postmodern theoriesframe research, learning, and instructionaldesign as processes that exist in a world of rapidtechnical innovation and increasingly unclearand quickly shifting social and cultural boun-daries, where objectivity and efficiency are lesseasy to generalize across multiple settings.Postmodern theories hold that particular groups(i.e., efficiency-minded, scientific) have histori-cally controlled not only access to knowledge,but also the standards by which knowledge isconsidered valuable or legitimate. As a result,postmodern perspectives question the authorityof traditional science, as well as any authorita-tive canon (or agenda) whether it is in art,science, philosophy, or instructional design, infavor of approaches that are more reflective,situated and responsive. Instead of looking forgeneralizable and universal approaches,postmodern perspectives tend toward ap-proaches that are applicable to specific situa-tions and are based on the conditions of those

ETR&D, Vol. 50, No. 1, 2002, pp. 5–14 ISSN 1042–1629 5

AAH GRAPHICS, INC. / (540) 933-6210 / FAX 933-6523 / 03-04-2002 / 17:27