Upload
others
View
7
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ECE 342 – Jose Schutt‐Aine 1
Jose E. Schutt-AineElectrical & Computer Engineering
University of [email protected]
ECE 342Electronic Circuits
Lecture 25Frequency Response of CG, CB,SF and EF
2ECE 342 – Jose Schutt‐Aine
Common Gate Amplifier
Substrate is not connected to the sourcemust account for body effect
Drain signal current becomes
D m gs mb bsi g v g v
And since gs bsv v
Body effect is fully accounted for by using m m mbg g g
ECE 342 – Jose Schutt‐Aine 3
i m mb i roi g g v i
m mb ioi o i i L
ro io o L
o
1g g vrv v v i Ri i
r r R1r
with i sv v
Common Gate Amplifier
ECE 342 – Jose Schutt‐Aine 4
i o L
ini m mb o
v r RRi 1 g g r
As o inm mb
1r , Rg g
If L iR , R
o m mb o i iv g g r v v
vo m mb oA 1 g g r
IC - Common Gate Amplifier
ECE 342 – Jose Schutt‐Aine 5
whereo L Lin o m mb o
vo m mb o
r R R1R , A g g rA g g A
Taking ro into account adds a component (RL/Ao) to the input resistance.
vo m mb oA 1 g g r
The open‐circuit voltage gain is:
The voltage gain of the loaded CG amplifier is:
Lv vo
L o vo s
RG AR r A R
IC - Common Gate Amplifier
ECE 342 – Jose Schutt‐Aine 6
x x m mb ov i g g v r v with x sv i R
orout o m mb o s out o vo sR r 1 g g r R R r A R
CG Output Resistance
7ECE 342 – Jose Schutt‐Aine
CG Amplifier as Current Buffer
sis vo
out
RG G 1R
Gis is the short‐circuit current gain
8ECE 342 – Jose Schutt‐Aine
- Include CL to represent capacitance of load‐ Cgd is grounded‐ No Miller effect
High-Frequency Response of CG
ECE 342 – Jose Schutt‐Aine 9
P1
gs sm mb
1f12 C R
g g
P2gd L L
1f2 C C R
• fP2 is usually lower than fp1• fP2 can be dominant• Both fP1 and fP2 are usually much higher than fP in CS case
2 poles:
High-Frequency Response of CG
ECE 342 – Jose Schutt‐Aine 10
Common Base (CB) Amplifier
11ECE 342 – Jose Schutt‐Aine
o Lin
o L
e e
r RR r R1r 1 r
vo m oA 1 g r 'out o m o eR r 1 g r R
'e eR R r e
rr1
CB Amplifier
ECE 342 – Jose Schutt‐Aine 12
High-Frequency Analysis of CB Amplifier
in 3dBx
S E
1r rC R R
1 1
out 3dBL
1C R
The amplifier’s upper cutoff frequency will be the lower of these two poles.
Exact analysis is too tedious approximate
From current gain analysis
ECE 342 – Jose Schutt‐Aine 13
Source Follower
' 1L L o
mb
R R rg
'o m gs Lv g v R
14ECE 342 – Jose Schutt‐Aine
Source Follower
gs i ov v v
'
'1o m L
vi m L
v g RAv g R
1m o
vom mb o
g rAg g r
11
mvo
m mb
gAg g
ECE 342 – Jose Schutt‐Aine 15
Source Follower – Output Resistance
1o o
m mb
R rg g
1/ 1o mR g
ECE 342 – Jose Schutt‐Aine 16
Frequency Response of Source Follower
•Determine location of transmission zeros• Use method of open‐circuit time constants to estimate 3‐dB frequency
ECE 342 – Jose Schutt‐Aine 17
• Three capacitances form a continuous loop• Two transmission zeros
Z mZ
gs
gC
Z Tf f
Determination of Zeros
ECE 342 – Jose Schutt‐Aine 18
Determination of Poles
gs sigR R
'
'1sig L
gdm L
R RR
g R
LC L oR R R
1 1/ 22 LH gd gd gs gs L C
H
f C R C R C R
The source follower has excellent high-frequency response
ECE 342 – Jose Schutt‐Aine 19
Emitter Follower
ECE 342 – Jose Schutt‐Aine 20
Emitter Follower
ECE 342 – Jose Schutt‐Aine 21
Emitter Follower High-Frequency Exact analysis is too tedious approximate
' m L mv
Em L
m E
sC1g R gA ( s ) sC R1 g R 1
1 g R
m E m3dB T
E
1 g R gR C C C
22ECE 342 – Jose Schutt‐Aine
High-Frequency Analysis of Emitter Follower
0m ZVg V s Cr
leads to:(1/ ) 1m
e
g rC C r
1Z
eC r
ECE 342 – Jose Schutt‐Aine 23
' '1sig LR R r R
' '
' '
1
sig L
sig L
e
R RR
R Rr r
1/ 2Hf C R C R
High-Frequency Analysis of Emitter Follower