33
Digital Assessments in Flipped Classrooms Workshop George Szanto Docent Marketing Management [email protected] @hippity7 Fontys Toetsconferencie 2014

Digital Assessments in Flipped Classrooms Workshop George Szanto Docent Marketing Management [email protected] @hippity7 Fontys Toetsconferencie 2014

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Digital Assessments in Flipped Classrooms Workshop

George SzantoDocent Marketing [email protected] @hippity7Fontys Toetsconferencie 2014

2Voettekst

• 14:55 – 15:05 Introduction of workshop participants

• 15:05 – 15:20 Introduction to my flipped classroom; case & dilemmas

• 15:20 – 15:30 work on dilemmas in pairs

• 15:30 – 15:50 discuss answers to dilemmas as group

• 15:50 – 16:10 Review of George’s efforts & dilemmas: quantitative & qualitative testing

• 16:10 – 16:15 Wrap-up , Q & A.

Agenda

3Voettekst

• Name• Institute or Fontys Service• Classes/Subjects that you teach• Yes/No Digital testing experience• Yes/No Flipped class teaching experience

BRIEF Participant Introductions

Why Flip My Class Motivations of George

International Exchange Students

Student Complaints

Poor Quality Group Work

Fighting, Disputes in Groups

Limited Resources

History of IBMS Sem. 6 eMarketing Strategy class 2011 - 2014

Classical Teaching Flipped Classroom Teaching

 

Fall 2011

Spring 2011

Fall 2012

Spring 2013

Fall 2013

Spring 2014

Fall 2014

Live Lectures 4 4 4 2  

Recorded Lectures       6 26 26 27

Live Workshops 1 2 2 5 5 6 6

Group Presentation in Class 1          

Individual Presentation in Class or Video Recording    

 Indiv

20%Indiv

%30%  Indiv In pairs50% 

In pairs60%

Extra Group Assignment (20%) 20%  20%  20%  20%   

Main Group Assignment Report (80%) 80%  80%         

Sit down individual final exam (50 - 80%)     60%  50%  80%    5/6 Individual Open Book/Notes In Class

Quizzes 40 % 40 %

Online discussion board / class participation         20%  10% Peer Grading 

11

IBMSEM.ORG Flipped Classroom

Assessments

14

10 – 14 Minute Executive Level Emarketing Stratety Pitch

15

Introducing the digital testing dilemmas for this workshop

1. BYOD or Fontys Computers?

2. Wifi/Computer Network down – now what?

3. Asynchronous testing & cheating

4. Participation in formative quizzes < 20%

5. Archiving test results for accreditation

6. Technical issues for a few students/quiz

7. Online quizzes – full use of Internet/open resources or not?

8. How to handle students with learning disabilities ?

9. Summative quizzes do not help raise final score of project – now what?

10. Can student take summative quiz outside of workshop?

16

Digital Testing Dilemmas

• For the next 5 minutes, please work in pairs discussing solution(s) to your assigned dilemma

17

Your Solutions to Dilemmas 1-5

18

Your Solutions to Dilemmas 6-10

19Voettekst

• Do digital quizzes improve the performance and quality of the final eMarketing Strategy Plan submitted by students in a flipped classroom?

• What kind of positive and negative feedback is given about the digital quizzes by students who have taken the class?

Key Questions of my Research

Voettekst 20

Dependent & Independent Variables

Final Projec

t Grade

Quiz Scores

Quantity Quality Videos

In-class participatio

n

Student Motivation

Past student

knowledge

# of hrs. studied outside class

Assigned Case

Results Final Exam Spring 2013 (no formative quizzes) N=48

1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 7 7.5 8 8.5 9 9.5 100

2

4

6

8

10

12

Histogram of Grades Using 2 Grading Methods Spring 2013

5.5 Linear Cutoff

Average Grading (Ave - 3/4 One Std. Dev.)

GRADE (Average Grade = 46; Std = 12 )

Num

ber o

f Stu

dent

s

Spring 2013Linear = 23 failures

Average = 11 Failures

22

Results Fall 2013 (where 70% of final grade is from the exam; +formative quizzes)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 1100

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Final Exam Scores - Fall 2013 (N=30)

partial creditNo partial credit

Exam Score in Points

Num

ber

of

Stu

dents

No partial credit 24 fail

With partial credit 4 fail

Fall 2013 Poor correlation between formative quiz results and final exam score (but N is small!)

Fall 2013 How about students who take few formative quizzes?

Student Expectations – baseline survey before class starts (N= 24)

Fall 2013 Other Independent Variables – Videos Watched (no correlation, N is small)

Independent Variable – class participation (No correlation, N is small)

Fall 2013 Independent Variable – past GPA full time students (poor correlation, N is small)

Spring & Fall 2014 Summative Quizzes

40.00 50.00 60.00 70.00 80.00 90.00 100.000

2

4

6

8

10

12

f(x) = NaN x + NaNR² = 0 Video Pitch Final Grade vs Quiz Grades (N=67)

Total Quiz Grades (5 or 6 quizzes; maximum total score 100 pts)

Fina

l Vid

eo P

itch

Gra

de

30Voettekst

• Digital summative quizzes don’t seem to help produce quality video pitches

• Student feedback:– Positive, force students to keep up in class– Test deeper understanding of theoretical

concepts• Considering reducing time limits; and

introducing harder questions.

Conclusions

Thank You – Q & A

33