22
Chapter 2 Chapter 2 Research Methods in Research Methods in Organizational Organizational Psychology Psychology SOP6669 SOP6669 Dr. Steve Dr. Steve

Chapter 2 Research Methods in Organizational Psychology SOP6669 Dr. Steve

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Chapter 2Chapter 2

Research Methods inResearch Methods in Organizational Psychology Organizational Psychology

SOP6669SOP6669

Dr. SteveDr. Steve

Methods:Methods: ExperimentExperiment / Quasi-Experiment / Quasi-Experiment Questionnaire/SurveyQuestionnaire/Survey Naturalistic ObservationNaturalistic Observation Case StudyCase Study Meta-AnalysisMeta-Analysis

Research MethodsResearch Methods

Research MethodsResearch MethodsExperimentExperiment

Study conducted in a contrived environmentStudy conducted in a contrived environment BenefitsBenefits::

Provides more safety Provides more safety Cause and effect relationshipsCause and effect relationships

• Manipulate I.V. (e.g., leadership sManipulate I.V. (e.g., leadership style)tyle)• MMeasure D.V. (e.g., task performance)easure D.V. (e.g., task performance)• Control extraneous variables (e.g., experience)Control extraneous variables (e.g., experience)

DisadvantagesDisadvantages:: Time consumingTime consuming

Quasi-Experiment – not rQuasi-Experiment – not randomized or unable to andomized or unable to manipulate IV (e.g., gender)manipulate IV (e.g., gender)

Self-report to obtain data on attitudes/behaviors Self-report to obtain data on attitudes/behaviors conducted by phone, mail, interviews, electronicallyconducted by phone, mail, interviews, electronically

BenefitsBenefits:: Can collect a large quantity of dataCan collect a large quantity of data

DisadvantagesDisadvantages:: Accuracy of reportingAccuracy of reporting Representativeness of sampleRepresentativeness of sample Return rateReturn rate

Research MethodsResearch MethodsQuestionnaire/SurveyQuestionnaire/Survey

Observe overt behaviors over timeObserve overt behaviors over time Systematic sampling at various timesSystematic sampling at various times Representative sampleRepresentative sample

BenefitsBenefits:: Use to generate hypothesesUse to generate hypotheses

DisadvantagesDisadvantages:: Experimenter biasExperimenter bias ObtrusivenessObtrusiveness Frequency of behavior occurringFrequency of behavior occurring

Research MethodsResearch MethodsNaturalistic ObservationNaturalistic Observation

In depth view of past events using interviews and In depth view of past events using interviews and archival records archival records

BenefitsBenefits:: Detailed account of why particular event occurredDetailed account of why particular event occurred

Disadvantages:Disadvantages: Little generalizabilityLittle generalizability

Research MethodsResearch MethodsCase StudyCase Study

Meta-analysisMeta-analysis – statistical procedure that – statistical procedure that combines the results of many independent combines the results of many independent research findings on a single topicresearch findings on a single topic

Used to estimate true relationshipUsed to estimate true relationship Measures effect size of findingsMeasures effect size of findings Uses archival dataUses archival data

Data AnalysisData AnalysisMeta-analysisMeta-analysis

Descriptive vs. Inferential StatisticsDescriptive vs. Inferential Statistics Descriptive stats merely describe dataDescriptive stats merely describe data

FrequencyFrequency Central tendencyCentral tendency VariabilityVariability

Inferential stats used to test hypothesesInferential stats used to test hypotheses T-TestT-Test Analysis of varianceAnalysis of variance CorrelationCorrelation RegressionRegression Non-parametricsNon-parametrics

Research StepsResearch StepsStatistical AnalysisStatistical Analysis

Data AnalysisData AnalysisCentral TendencyCentral Tendency

1. Mean – average: X = ∑X / NMean = 72 / 8 = 9

2. Median – middle score (when placed in order)- use when outliers exaggerate the meanMedian = 8.5

3. Mode – most often occurring scoreMode = 6

_example scores = 5, 6, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 17

* In a normal distribution, Mean = Median = Mode

RangeRange - distance between highest and lowest - distance between highest and lowest score score (Range = High score – Low score)(Range = High score – Low score) Range = 17 – 5 = 12Range = 17 – 5 = 12

Standard DeviationStandard Deviation – average distance from the – average distance from the meanmean S= S= Σ(x – x)Σ(x – x)22 / / n – 1n – 1

Data AnalysisData AnalysisVariabilityVariability

S = (5-9) 2 + (6-9) 2 + (6-9) 2 + (8-9) 2 + (9-9) 2 + (10-9) 2 + (11-9) 2 + (17-9) 2 / 7S = 3.85

02468

101214161820

Fre

quen

cy65-74

75-84

85-94

95-104

105-114

115-124

125-134

135-144

145-154

155-164

IQ Scores

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Fre

quen

cy

250-259

260-269

270-279

280-289

290-299

300-309

310-319

320-329

330-339

340-349

Weight (lbs) of NFL Lineman

02468

101214161820

Fre

quen

cy

65-66

67-68

69-70

71-72

73-74

75-76

77-78

79-80

81-82

82-83

84-85

Professional Golf Scores

Positively Skewed Distribution Negatively Skewed Distribution

Normal orBell-shapedDistribution

Data AnalysisSkewed Frequency Distributions

Correlation ( r )Correlation ( r ) – Degree of relationship – Degree of relationship between two variablesbetween two variables Used for predictionUsed for prediction Cannot be used to infer causationCannot be used to infer causation Range from –1 to +1Range from –1 to +1 Negative r – as one variable increases the other Negative r – as one variable increases the other

decreasesdecreases Positive r – as one variable increases so does the Positive r – as one variable increases so does the

otherother Zero r – no relationship between the two variablesZero r – no relationship between the two variables

Data AnalysisData AnalysisCorrelationCorrelation

rr AA BB CC

AA 1.01.0

BB .40.40 1.01.0

CC .20.20 .09.09 1.01.0

Data AnalysisData AnalysisCorrelationCorrelation

Positive Correlation Negative Correlation

0

5

10

15

20

60 80 100 120

Yea

rs o

f P

ract

ice

Golf Scores

**

*

*

**

***

**

* *

**

*

*

**

***

**

***

*

*

**

***

**

**

*

*

**

***

**

*

**

*

*

**

***

**

*

**

*

*

**

***

**

*

*

*

**

*

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600

Col

lege

GP

A

GRE Scores

**

* *

*

***

** *

**

*

*

* *

*

***

** *

**

*

* *

*

***

** *

**

* *

*

***

** *

**

*

* *

*

***

** *

**

*

* *

*

***

** *

**

*

*

***

*

**

**

**

*****

*

*

**

**

**

*****

***

**

**

*****

**

**

**

*****

*

**

**

**

*****

*

**

**

**

*****

*

*

***

*

IQ scores of identical twins: r = +.86IQ scores of identical twins: r = +.86 Phases of the moon & # acts of violence: r = .00Phases of the moon & # acts of violence: r = .00 Economic conditions & # lynchings: r = -.43Economic conditions & # lynchings: r = -.43 Amount of ice cream sold & # drownings: r = +.60Amount of ice cream sold & # drownings: r = +.60 Price of rum in Cuba & priests salaries in New Price of rum in Cuba & priests salaries in New

England: r = +.38England: r = +.38 Number of cigarettes smoked per day & incidence Number of cigarettes smoked per day & incidence

of lung cancer: r = ???of lung cancer: r = ???

Correlation ExamplesCorrelation Examples

Regression Variables (used for prediction)Regression Variables (used for prediction)

YYii = = ßß00 + + ßß11XXi1i1 + + ßß22XXi2i2 (Y = a + b1X1) (Y = a + b1X1) Predictor Variable (X) – measure used to predict Predictor Variable (X) – measure used to predict

an outcome (similar to independent variable)an outcome (similar to independent variable) Example: selection test scores, years of experience, Example: selection test scores, years of experience,

education leveleducation level Criterion Variable (Y) – outcome to be predictedCriterion Variable (Y) – outcome to be predicted

Example: work performance, turnover, sales, Example: work performance, turnover, sales, absenteeism, promotion, etc.absenteeism, promotion, etc.

Example: Example: AFOQT scores as predictors of pilot AFOQT scores as predictors of pilot training performancetraining performance

Statistical MethodsStatistical MethodsRegressionRegression

Statistical Pitfalls:Statistical Pitfalls:BiasBias

Representative SamplingRepresentative Sampling Selecting a sample that parallels the populationSelecting a sample that parallels the population Might use covariates to account for differencesMight use covariates to account for differences

Statistical AssumptionsStatistical Assumptions ANOVA assumes a normal distribution and ANOVA assumes a normal distribution and

independenceindependence• LLack of normality is only minor problem, but may ack of normality is only minor problem, but may

want to identify distribution shape and whywant to identify distribution shape and why• Observations may not be independent, may need to Observations may not be independent, may need to

aggregate (e.g., class instead of student)aggregate (e.g., class instead of student)

Statistical Pitfalls:Statistical Pitfalls:Errors in MethodologyErrors in Methodology

Statistical Power – probabStatistical Power – probability of detecting a true ility of detecting a true difference of a particular sizedifference of a particular size Type I error – falsely reject null hypothesis when a true Type I error – falsely reject null hypothesis when a true

difference does not exidifference does not existst Type II error – fail to reject null hypothesis when a true Type II error – fail to reject null hypothesis when a true

difference does existdifference does exist Power affected byPower affected by

• Sample sizeSample size• Effect size (e.g., Cohen’s D)Effect size (e.g., Cohen’s D)• Type I error rate selected (alpha)Type I error rate selected (alpha)• Variability of sample Variability of sample

(F ratio = var between group / var within group)(F ratio = var between group / var within group)

Statistical Pitfalls:Statistical Pitfalls:Errors in MethodologyErrors in Methodology

Multiple Comparisons – if you compare enough Multiple Comparisons – if you compare enough variables, will find a relationship by chance alonevariables, will find a relationship by chance alone Bonferroni correction – family-wise adjustment Bonferroni correction – family-wise adjustment

(alpha = .05 / #comparisons)(alpha = .05 / #comparisons) ReplicateReplicate Cross-validate (holdout sample)Cross-validate (holdout sample)

Measurement Errors Measurement Errors ReliabilityReliability: Consistency of Measure: Consistency of Measure ValidityValidity: Measures what it was designed to measure: Measures what it was designed to measure

Statistical Pitfalls:Statistical Pitfalls:Problems with InterpretationProblems with Interpretation

Confusion over significanceConfusion over significance P value does not reflect effect size – could P value does not reflect effect size – could

have a small effect, but a lot of powerhave a small effect, but a lot of power Precision vs. AccuracyPrecision vs. Accuracy

More decimals not necessarily more accurateMore decimals not necessarily more accurate CausalityCausality

Correlations are not causal, but ANOVA may Correlations are not causal, but ANOVA may not be eithernot be either

Statistical Pitfalls:Statistical Pitfalls:Problems with InterpretationProblems with Interpretation

GraphsGraphs May not provide accurate portrayal of dataMay not provide accurate portrayal of data

81

81.5

82

82.5

83

83.5

84

Group A Group B

Score

0

20

40

60

80

100

Group A Group B

Score

Always think critically about the research you readAlways think critically about the research you read Who were the participants in the study?Who were the participants in the study? How strong of a relationship was found?How strong of a relationship was found? Was it causal or correlational?Was it causal or correlational? Was it a field study or laboratory study?Was it a field study or laboratory study? How was data collected and analyzed?How was data collected and analyzed? Do you agree with the conclusions based on the Do you agree with the conclusions based on the

analyses provided?analyses provided?

ResearchResearchCritical ThinkingCritical Thinking

Ethical Principles of ResearchEthical Principles of Research

Privacy:Privacy: Participants have the right to limit the amount of information they Participants have the right to limit the amount of information they

reveal about themselves. If they decide to withdraw from the reveal about themselves. If they decide to withdraw from the experiment at any time, they have the right to do soexperiment at any time, they have the right to do so

Confidentiality:Confidentiality: Participants have the right to decide to whom they reveal Participants have the right to decide to whom they reveal

confidential information. By ensuring confidentiality, researchers confidential information. By ensuring confidentiality, researchers may be able to obtain more honest responsesmay be able to obtain more honest responses

Protection from Deception:Protection from Deception: Deception can only be used if the value of the research must Deception can only be used if the value of the research must

outweigh the harm imposed on participants and the outweigh the harm imposed on participants and the phenomenon cannot be measured any other wayphenomenon cannot be measured any other way