16
Support for this work was provided by a grant from the California HealthCare Foundation. Kathleen Thiede Call National Network of State and Local Health Surveys APHA San Francisco October 29, 2012 Use of Survey Data for Tracking the Impact of the ACA in States

Call nnslhs 2012_final

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: Call nnslhs 2012_final

Support for this work was provided by a grant from the California HealthCare Foundation.

Kathleen Thiede Call

National Network of State and Local Health Surveys

APHA San Francisco

October 29, 2012

Use of Survey Data for Tracking the

Impact of the ACA in States

Page 2: Call nnslhs 2012_final

Overview

• Monitoring health reform:

1. Health insurance

coverage

2. Affordability and

comprehensiveness of

coverage

3. Access to health care

services

2

Page 3: Call nnslhs 2012_final

Considerations for Selecting Measures

• Measures that reflect major

goals and provisions of the

law

• Outcomes rather than

implementation process

• Relevant/meaningful to

policymakers

3

Page 4: Call nnslhs 2012_final

Considerations for Recommending Data Sources

• Comparability over time

• Ability to do in-depth analysis (e.g.,

by geography, age, income,

race/ethnicity)

• Population coverage – complete

population of interest

• Availability of benchmarks/national

comparisons

• Timeliness of estimates

• Accessibility of data

• Flexibility to adapt to changing

needs

4

Page 5: Call nnslhs 2012_final

Measures come from Varied Data Sources

• Population surveys

• Employer surveys

• Health care provider data

• Health plan data

• State public program data

• Today’s focus: review framework discussing

measures available through population surveys

5

Page 6: Call nnslhs 2012_final

6

State-specific Household Survey Activity

http://www.shadac.org/content/state-survey-research-activity

Page 7: Call nnslhs 2012_final

Priority Measures: Coverage

7

Uninsured Public Coverage Employer Coverage

Distribution of Insurance Coverage

Health Insurance

Exchange

Point in time

Uninsured for a year

or longer

Uninsured at some

point in past year

Reasons for

uninsurance

Exempt from mandate

Participation rate

Churning

Nongroup coverage:

exchange and as % of

market

Employer coverage:

exchange and as %

of market

Employers offering

Employees in firms

that offer

% Eligible

% Enrolled

Families with ESI

offer

All family

members enrolled Paying penalty

Enrollment trend

Employers paying

penalty

Page 8: Call nnslhs 2012_final

Priority Measures: Coverage

8

Uninsured Public Coverage Employer Coverage

Distribution of Insurance Coverage

Health Insurance

Exchange

Point in time

Uninsured for a year

or longer

Uninsured at some

point in past year

Reasons for

uninsurance

Exempt from mandate

Participation rate

Churning

Nongroup coverage:

exchange and as % of

market

Employer coverage:

exchange and as %

of market

Employers offering

Employees in firms

that offer

% Eligible

% Enrolled

Families with ESI

offer

All family

members enrolled Paying penalty

Enrollment trend

Employers paying

penalty

Page 9: Call nnslhs 2012_final

Priority Measures: Coverage

9

Uninsured Public Coverage Employer Coverage

Distribution of Insurance Coverage

Health Insurance

Exchange

Point in time

Uninsured for a year

or longer

Uninsured at some

point in past year

Reasons for

uninsurance

Exempt from mandate

Participation rate

Churning

Nongroup coverage:

exchange and as % of

market

Employer coverage:

exchange and as %

of market

Employers offering

Employees in firms

that offer

% Eligible

% Enrolled

Families with ESI

offer

All family

members enrolled Paying penalty

Enrollment trend

Employers paying

penalty

Page 10: Call nnslhs 2012_final

Priority Measures: Affordability &

Comprehensiveness of Coverage

10

Insurance Premiums

Subsidies

Comprehensiveness Financial Burden

# receiving premium

and cost sharing

subsidies in exchange

Average value of

subsidies

% of families with high

cost burden

“Affordable” premium

as % of income

Employer coverage

Total premium

Employee share

Single

Family

Single

Family

Nongroup coverage

Per enrollee

Enrollment by benefit

level

ESI

Nongroup

Deductibles

ESI: single, family

Nongroup: single,

family

Page 11: Call nnslhs 2012_final

Priority Measures: Affordability &

Comprehensiveness of Coverage

11

Insurance Premiums

Subsidies

Comprehensiveness Financial Burden

# receiving premium

and cost sharing

subsidies in exchange

Average value of

subsidies

% of families with high

cost burden

“Affordable” premium

as % of income

Employer coverage

Total premium

Employee share

Single

Family

Single

Family

Nongroup coverage

Per enrollee

Enrollment by benefit

level

ESI

Nongroup

Deductibles

ESI: single, family

Nongroup: single,

family

Page 12: Call nnslhs 2012_final

Priority Measures: Affordability &

Comprehensiveness of Coverage

12

Insurance Premiums

Subsidies

Comprehensiveness Financial Burden

# receiving premium

and cost sharing

subsidies in exchange

Average value of

subsidies

% of families with high

cost burden

“Affordable” premium

as % of income

Employer coverage

Total premium

Employee share

Single

Family

Single

Family

Nongroup coverage

Per enrollee

Enrollment by benefit

level

ESI

Nongroup

Deductibles

ESI: single, family

Nongroup: single,

family

Page 13: Call nnslhs 2012_final

Priority Measures: Access to Care

13

Individuals System

Use of services Barriers to care

Has usual

source of care

Any doctor visit

in past year

Preventive care

visit in past year

% of physicians

accepting new

patients, by payer Did not get

necessary care

(& reasons)

Not able to get

timely

appointment

Difficulty finding

provider to take

new patients

Difficulty finding

provider that

accepts

insurance type

Ambulatory care

sensitive hospital

admissions

Emergency room

visit rate

Preventable/

avoidable ER visits

Safety net

Volume and type of

services provided

by safety net clinics

Uncompensated

care

Type of place

for usual source

of care

% of physicians

participating in

public programs

County indigent

care volume and

cost

Page 14: Call nnslhs 2012_final

Priority Measures: Access to Care

14

Individuals System

Use of services Barriers to care

Has usual

source of care

Any doctor visit

in past year

Preventive care

visit in past year

% of physicians

accepting new

patients, by payer Did not get

necessary care

(& reasons)

Not able to get

timely

appointment

Difficulty finding

provider to take

new patients

Difficulty finding

provider that

accepts

insurance type

Ambulatory care

sensitive hospital

admissions

Emergency room

visit rate

Preventable/

avoidable ER visits

Safety net

Volume and type of

services provided

by safety net clinics

Uncompensated

care

Type of place

for usual source

of care

% of physicians

participating in

public programs

County indigent

care volume and

cost

Page 15: Call nnslhs 2012_final

Concluding comments

• State-specific surveys provide data in all three

priority areas: coverage, affordability, access

• State-specific survey advantage

– Wide range of policy relevant questions

– Flexibility to alter survey content

– Quick turnaround availability

• State-specific survey have and will continue to

play a role in monitoring health reform

15

Page 16: Call nnslhs 2012_final

Sign up to receive our newsletter and updates at

www.shadac.org

@shadac

Complete copy of the Framework report is available at:

http://www.shadac.org/publications/framework-tracking-impacts-

affordable-care-act-in-california

Kathleen Thiede Call

[email protected]