Analysis Crest Cutoff Wall at Ostrovul Mic - YRC 2013 Presentation

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/13/2019 Analysis Crest Cutoff Wall at Ostrovul Mic - YRC 2013 Presentation

    1/11

  • 8/13/2019 Analysis Crest Cutoff Wall at Ostrovul Mic - YRC 2013 Presentation

    2/11

    Presentation Content

    I. Brief description of the site and of the encountered phenomena

    II. Aim of the analysis

    III. Mathematical models used to analyze the efficiency of the cutoff wall

    IV. Calibration of the mathematical model

    V. 2D vertical and horizontal analysis

    VI. Conclusions

  • 8/13/2019 Analysis Crest Cutoff Wall at Ostrovul Mic - YRC 2013 Presentation

    3/11

    Site description

    Ostrovul Mic hydropower development, first of the Rul Mare Aval scheme, is

    situated at about 20 km from Haegtown.

    The development is composed of a weir dam, a hydroelectric power plant and the

    perimeter dams.

    The main purposes of the development are: the production of electrical energy, the

    regulation of the Raul Mare River and irrigation.

    NRL: 465.00 maSL

    Crest elevation: 468.00 maSL

    Water volume : 5.80 mil mc

    Installed flow : 90 mc/s

    Dikes length : 3.80 km

  • 8/13/2019 Analysis Crest Cutoff Wall at Ostrovul Mic - YRC 2013 Presentation

    4/11

    The encountered phenomena

    Seepage problems since commission (1986)

    Concentrated springs

    Large wet areas

    Piping phenomena

    Seepage flow : 140 l/s

  • 8/13/2019 Analysis Crest Cutoff Wall at Ostrovul Mic - YRC 2013 Presentation

    5/11

    Aim of the study

    To analyze the efficiency of the proposed solution regarding the seepage flow, the

    spring level, the critical gradient and the influence of the proposed length of thecutoff wall.

  • 8/13/2019 Analysis Crest Cutoff Wall at Ostrovul Mic - YRC 2013 Presentation

    6/11

    Mathematical model 2D vertical and horizontal analysis

    Distante (X)

    0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575 600 625

    Distante(Y)

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    110

    120

    130

    140

    150

    160

    170

    4579 finite elements

    4549 modes

    12580 finite elements

    Boundary conditions (for both models):

    Upstream: lake water level equal to the normal retention level (465.00 maSL)

    Downstream: 1 m water level in the downstream channel (449.00 maSL)

    potential spring area on the downstream slope.

  • 8/13/2019 Analysis Crest Cutoff Wall at Ostrovul Mic - YRC 2013 Presentation

    7/11

    Model calibration emergence elevation of the seepage curve

    Main causes the deteriorated slabs on the lower part of the concrete face

    the damaged joint between the concrete face and the cutoff wall

    flexible and

    nondestructive in

    situ measurements

    infrared photography

  • 8/13/2019 Analysis Crest Cutoff Wall at Ostrovul Mic - YRC 2013 Presentation

    8/11

    2D vertical analysis of the crest cutoff wall

    4504

    52

    454

    4 5 6

    458

    460

    462

    46

    4

    Cota lac: 465.00 mdM

    Cota coronament : 466.80 mdM

    Distante orizontale

    0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150

    Co

    te

    425

    430

    435

    440

    445

    450

    455

    460

    465

    470

    475

    480

    Cota lac: 465.00 mdM

    Cota coronament : 466.80 mdM

    Distante orizontale

    0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150

    Cote

    425

    430

    435

    440

    445

    450

    455

    460

    465

    470

    475

    480

    450

    452

    454

    4 5 6 4

    58

    4 6 04

    62

    464

    Cota lac: 465.00 mdM

    Cota coronament : 466.80 mdM

    Distante orizontale

    0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150

    Cote

    425

    430

    435

    440

    445

    450

    455

    460

    465

    470

    475

    480

    1. Perfect execution

    2. Lack of embedding (0,50 m)

    3. Presence of a window (0,50 m)

    flow: 0,037 l/s m spring el.in the channel

    i < icritical

    flow: 0,419 l/s m

    spring el. in the channel

    i < icritical

    flow: 0,494 l/s m

    spring el. 0.50 m above the berm

    i < icritical

  • 8/13/2019 Analysis Crest Cutoff Wall at Ostrovul Mic - YRC 2013 Presentation

    9/11

    2D horizontal analysis of the crest cutoff wall

    Distante (X)

    0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575 600 625

    Dista

    nte(Y)

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    7080

    90

    100

    110

    120

    130

    140

    150

    160

    170

    Distante (X)

    0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575 600 625

    Distante(Y)

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    110

    120130

    140

    150

    160

    170

    Distante (X)

    0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575 600 625

    Distante(Y)

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    110

    120

    130

    140

    150

    160

    170

    1. Perfect execution

    2. Presence of a window

    3. Reduced length (150 m)

  • 8/13/2019 Analysis Crest Cutoff Wall at Ostrovul Mic - YRC 2013 Presentation

    10/11

    Conclusions

    The seepage phenomenon through the dikes of the Ostrovul Mic Lake is a continuous and

    intensity increasing process followed by the fine material picking up. This is the cause ofthe restricted water level operating mode since the commissioning of the development.

    The seepage analysis was based on two 2D finite elements models using Geostudio

    software. The calibration was realized using the emergence rate of the downstream

    parameter depression curve. To determine its value in situ, infrared image technique was

    used. The proposed solution for the sealing of the left side dike crest cutoff wall was

    analyzed in both the situation when the execution was perfect and the situation in which

    some defects may appear in its body. As a result of the mathematical modeling, this

    solution offers a complete seepage control, even if the execution of the cutoff wall is not

    perfect.

  • 8/13/2019 Analysis Crest Cutoff Wall at Ostrovul Mic - YRC 2013 Presentation

    11/11

    Thank you for your attention !