30
1 An Overview of Medical Device Regulations in the U.S. ISCT North America Regional Meeting September 8, 2013 Yong Fan, MD FDA/CBER/OCTGT/DCGT Phone: 301-827-6038 Email: [email protected]

An Overview of Medical Device Regulations in the U.S. · • Class II = 510(k) ... • Abbreviated –relies on special controls, guidance documents, ... HDE vs. PMA • Both are

  • Upload
    vuliem

  • View
    213

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

1

An Overview of Medical Device

Regulations in the U.S.

ISCT North America Regional Meeting

September 8, 2013

Yong Fan, MD

FDA/CBER/OCTGT/DCGT

Phone: 301-827-6038

Email: [email protected]

What will we cover?

• Device definition

• Device regulatory history

• Device classifications

• Device regulatory pathways

• Examples of devices that are regulated by

OCTGT

2

What is a Device?

• An instrument, apparatus, implement, machine,

contrivance, implant, in vitro reagent, or other

similar or related article… which is intended for

use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment,

or prevention of disease;

or

• Is intended to affect the structure or any function

of the body of man or other animals

AND

3

What is a Device (continued)

• Does not achieve its primary intended

purposes through chemical action within or

on the body of man and is not dependent

on being metabolized to achieve its

primary intended purposes.

21 U.S.C. § 201(h)

4

Medical Device Regulatory History

• Medical Device Amendments are signed into law

on May 28,1976

– FDA begins regulating and classifying medical

devices

– Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)

• Initial classification of over 1700 generic device types legally

on the market

• Regulations describe the device type as it existed prior to

May 28, 1976

• Product Codes Are Created

5

Device Regulation Is Risk Based

Section 513(a)(2) of the FD&C Act requires FDA to

determine safety and effectiveness of a device by

weighing any probable benefit to health from the

use of the device against any probable risk of

injury or illness from the use.

6

Device Classification

• Three Regulatory Classes

• Level of control, based on risk, necessary to

provide reasonable assurance of safety and

effectiveness of a device type:

– Class I – General Controls

– Class II – General Controls & Special Controls

– Class III – General Controls & Premarket Approval

Application (PMA)

7

Description of Classes-Class I 513(a)(1)(A) & 21 CFR 860.3(c)(1)

• Devices for which general controls are sufficient

to provide reasonable assurance of safety and

effectiveness.

OR

• It is unclear if general controls alone are

sufficient to provide reasonable assurance of

safety and effectiveness but the device is not

life-supporting, life-sustaining, or of substantial

importance in preventing impairment of human

health

8

General Controls

• Establishment registration and product listing

• Prohibition against misbranding and

adulteration

• Premarket notification requirements

• Good manufacturing practice

• Records and reports

• Repair, replacement, refund

9

Description of Classes-Class II

513(a)(1)(B) & 21 CFR 860.3(c)(2)

• Devices which cannot be classified into Class I because

general controls by themselves are insufficient to provide

reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness,

BUT

• For which there is sufficient information to establish

performance standards or special controls, to provide

such assurance.

10

Special Controls (usually device-specific)

• Performance standards

– National or international consensus standards recognized by

rulemaking

– Voluntary standards

• Guidance documents

• Special labeling requirements

• Postmarket surveillance

• Patient registries

• Other actions (the agency decides are necessary to provide

reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness)

11

Description of Classes-Class III

Sec 513(a)(1)(C) & 21 CFR 860.3(c)(3)

• Devices for which insufficient information exists to determine that

general and special controls are sufficient to provide reasonable

assurance of safety and effectiveness;

AND

• Such devices:

– Are life sustaining or life supporting;

– Are of substantial importance in preventing impairment of human

health; or

– Present potential unreasonable risk of illness or injury.

• Premarket approval (PMA or HDE) is required by definition

12

Device Regulatory Pathways

• Exemption from premarket review

• Premarket Notification-510(k)

• Humanitarian Device Exemption-HDE

• Premarket Approval-PMA

• Biologic License Application (BLA)

13

Device Regulatory Pathway

(Determined by the device regulatory class)

• Class I = exempt from premarket review unless 510(k) is

required by regulation

• Class II = 510(k) required unless exempt from 510(k)

requirements by regulation

• Class III = PMA required (applicant must demonstrate

safety and effectiveness of its device without relying on a

grandfathered/predicate device)

14

Premarket notification-510(k) (Section 510(k) of FD&C Act, 21 CFR 807 Subpart E)

• Mostly class II medical devices

• Most common path to market devices

• FDA reviews to determine Substantial Equivalence (SE)

• Compare a new device to a predicate device

– Pre-amendment device (legally marketed before

5/28/76)

– Cleared by FDA (determined to be SE to a legally

marketed device)

15

510(k) Types

• Traditional

• Special –limited modifications to one’s

own cleared device

• Abbreviated –relies on special controls,

guidance documents, and recognized

standards

• De Novo-allows reclassification of novel

class III (no predicate) to a class II device 16

How does FDA determine SE

• Indications for use/intended use

• Technical characteristics

The subject device should either have the same

Indications for use/intended use and technical

characteristics, or the differences (in these two

elements above) do not raise new type of safety

or effectiveness questions (if different)

17

18

Premarket Approval (PMA)

• Class III-General and special controls insufficient

to assure safety and effectiveness

• Generally supported by clinical study under IDE

to show safety and effectiveness

• Submission can be traditional or modular

• FDA has 180 days to approve or disapprove

19

Humanitarian Use Device (HUD) Section 520(m) of the FD&C Act and 21 CFR 814

subpart H

“… to encourage the discovery and use of devices

intended to benefit patients in treatment and

diagnosis of diseases or conditions that affect fewer

than 4,000 individuals in the United States.” [yearly]

20

Humanitarian Device Exemption (HDE)

Provide incentive for development of devices

intended for treatment or diagnosis, in small

patient populations where otherwise a

device manufacturer’s R&D costs could

exceed market returns

21

HDE vs. PMA

• Both are marketing approvals

• Both subject to post-market Medical

Device Reporting (MDR) requirements

• Approval thresholds differ:

– PMA: safety and effectiveness

– HDE: safety and probable benefit

22

Biologic License Application (BLA)

• Some medical devices such as blood and

HCT/P donor screening testing devices

are approved under the BLA pathway

• Generally supported by clinical study using

healthy donors as subjects under IND

23

Examples of devices reviewed by

OCTGT (1)-Cell Selection Device

• Using antibodies conjugated to beads or similar

concept to select or deplete cells: Isolex and

CliniMACS

• Class III medical devices

• Require PMA or HDE

24

Examples of devices reviewed by OCTGT

(2)-Cell Processing Device

• Apheresis device for mononuclear cell or

hematopoietic stem cell collection

• Cord blood processing devices

• Certain storage containers such as

freezing bags for HCT/Ps

• Mostly class II, require 510(k) 25

Examples of devices reviewed by

OCTGT (3)-Combination Products

• Scaffolds seeded with cells

• Cell delivery devices

• Regulatory pathways (PMA or BLA) depend on

the primary mode of action

• Sponsor may contact OCTGT or CBER

Jurisdiction officer, or submit a Request for

Designation (RFD) to the Office of Combination

Products (OCP)

26

Examples of devices reviewed by OCTGT

(4)-Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) Device

• Produce PRP from a small sample of blood or mixture of blood and

bone marrow (autologous)

• The device output is PRP

• Intended to be used to mix with bone graft materials to enhance

bone graft handling properties in orthopedic practices; not intended

for direct patient application such as injection or implant without prior

mixing with the bone graft materials.

• PRP devices using a mixture of blood and bone marrow are cleared

with limitations: They can only be marketed as PRP device with the

same intended use (mixing with bone graft materials)

27

Thank you!

Questions?

28

OCTGT Contact Information

• Regulatory Questions:

Contact the Regulatory Management Staff in OCTGT at

[email protected]

or [email protected]

or by calling (301) 827-6536

• OCTGT Learn Webinar Series:

http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/NewsEvents/

ucm232821.htm

29

Public Access to CBER

• CBER website:

http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/default.htm

Phone: 1-800-835-4709 or 301-827-1800

• Consumer Affairs Branch (CAB)

Email: [email protected]

Phone: 301-827-3821

• Manufacturers Assistance and Technical Training Branch (MATTB)

Email: [email protected]

Phone: 301-827-4081

• Follow us on Twitter

https://www.twitter.com/fdacber

30