Upload
rudolph-sherman
View
219
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
After the InfoSoc Directive… the Long March to ‘harmonisation’
Barbara StrattonSenior Copyright Adviser
CILIP: Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals
Secretary, LACA: the Libraries and Archives Copyright Alliance, UK
EBLIDA-CEG seminar, Vilnius 26th October 2006
Meet the Commissioners DG Internal Market and Services
Meet the CommissionersDG Information Society and Media
DG Internal Market and Services
MARKT.D Knowledge-based economy Director Jacqueline Minor Adviser Luis Gonzalez Vaque
Markt.D.1 Copyright and Knowledge-based Economy Head of Unit Tilman Lueder Policy Officers Mr D. Baervoets
Mr L. MajerMs J. JugMr Leonardo Cervera NavasMs V. GuennelonMs D. Muffat-jeandetMs Julie SamnaddaMr J. Van Der VeerMs Barbara Norcross-Amilhat
http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/internal_market/index_en.htm
DG Internal Market and Services
D.1 Copyright and Knowledge-based Economy
Tilman Lueder, Head of Unit
Copyright at the crossroads?
Tilman Lueder said last year13th Annual Conference on IP Law & Policy, Fordham University, New York, April 2005
“the department is taking the knowledge economy as its principle focus and aiming to make services, including services supplied across EU borders, the main driver for economic growth and future prosperity.”
“All of our initiatives will be subjected to a rigorous cost/benefit analysis…all Commission proposals will face an Impact Assessment (“IA”) weighing the cost to business before they are sent to the EU Parliament and the Council of ministers for approval. No initiative that fails this screening test will fly: The gains must exceed the cost of compliance. Our aim is to increase the efficiency of commercial exploitation of copyright - not to introduce yet another layer of red tape.”
Copyright at the crossroads?
Tilman also said…Single Market News 37, May 2005 http://europa.eu.int/comm/internal_market/smn/smn37/docs/special-feature_en.pdf
“In the past we have been concerned with substantive aspects of copyright, such as the scope of these rights, the introduction of related rights and the length of protection. We’ve done much to harmonise these rules across Europe but we have found that this has not brought about efficiency gains in how copyright is commercially exploited.”“Harmonisation at the rule-making level cannot overcome the fact that copyright is still administered on a national basis – and this has precluded in some cases the economies of scale usually associated with the internal market.""We also need to foster legitimate online business models and aim to avoid traditional copyright remuneration models, such as levies on blank cassettes, CDs or even computer disks becoming an obstacle to the 'take-up' of legitimate digital remuneration models."
DG Markt D work programme
Agenda is to recast copyright to make it ‘fit’ for the online environment http://europa.eu.int/comm/internal_market/copyright/docs/levy_reform/roadmap_82_83_en.pdf
Is seeking to take an evidence-based approach to the evaluation of the Acquis and specific Directives.
DG Markt D work programmeCollective Rights Management
2004 Consultation attracted 80 responses The problem perceived by the Commission -
Rights managed by national collecting societies could lead to content being subject to clearance 25 times.
National collecting societies a 19th century model inappropriate for internet age.
No cross-border online licences available. Librarians told the Commission to address the issues of lack of
transparency, poor management, and failures in royalty distribution
Commission Recommendation on Collective Cross-border Management of Copyright and Related Rights for Legitimate Online Music Services 18.10.2005 Allows rightholders the option of authorising one single collecting
society to license and monitor all the different uses made of their works across the entire EU.
How are users going to know where to clear online music rights?
DG Markt D work programme Review of Database Directive 1996
November 2004: ECJ judgments on racing fixtures cases Scope of sui generis protection does not include creation of the
underlying data Sui generis = “substantial investment”
October 2005: Creative Economy Conference, London – Commission indicates withdrawal of the Directive is a serious
option – “Shock! Horror!” from rightholders.
December 2005: Commission’s 1st Evaluation of the Directive. Consultation closed 31st March 2006. First evidence-based, rather than faith-based evaluation of an IPR.
Report acknowledges that granting increased rights to db makers had not achieved the policy aims of increasing EU competitiveness against the US. US db industry dominant without the protection.
Four Options: withdraw Directive, repeal sui generis right, amend sui generis right, do nothing.
DG Markt D work programme Review of Database Directive 1996
Libraries are producers of non-original dbs protected only by sui generis right
Problems because of different traditions regarding ‘originality’ UK & Ireland - ‘sweat of the brow’; rest of Europe - ‘intellectual
creativity’
Currently EU ‘originality’ test for dbs is only ‘intellectual creativity’
Impact if Directive withdrawn In UK & Ireland all dbs would revert to copyright protection as
compilations, but
In rest of Europe there would be no protection for non-original dbs
Cross-border collaborative projects could be affected – e.g.. European Digital Library – harmonisation needed
DG Markt D work programme Review of Database Directive 1996
Library lobby For amendment of sui generis right to address its
complexitiesTo amend the the renewable 15 year term of protection
to eliminate perpetual protection.Risk of differing opinions along national lines re
withdrawal of the Directive or repeal of sui generis right
Stakeholder consultation revealed a general lack of enthusiasm for the Directive’s withdrawal Result = no action by the Commission
DG Markt D work programme Review of Acquis Communautaire 1
10+ years of the copyright Acquis = 11 Directives A fast moving technical environment …time to assess…codification
of Community law October 2004: Consultation on the Acquis Communautaire in
copyright & related rights - 139 responses Update the legislative framework in the field of copyright and related
rights - increase its consistency and simplify the provisions 7 December 2005: EC tender for a study into the Acquis
Study on the Acquis to include Reform of copyright levies on equipment & media used for private
copying (NB no levy system in UK & Ireland). Due late 2006 Review of the Term Directive 1993
In particular, term for sound recordings - in the face of industry pressure to extend the term for sound recordings and performances in them.
DG Internal Market is to provide an impact assessment at the end 2006.
Review of ownership of co-written and musical works
DG Markt D work programme Review of Acquis Communautaire 2
Review of the Information Society Directive 2001/29/EC also intended
Originally was to look only at the Directive’s implementation.
Now to be an evaluation review to establish whether or not has it achieved its policy objectives. This is an important change.
Review will includeThe contribution of copyright to knowledge economy
The role of consumers
Difficulties that arise for all the stakeholders
The Member States’ transposition of the exceptions & limitations into national legislation
A look at technical protection measures (TPMs)
DG Markt D work programme Current infringement proceedings
PLR (Public Lending Right)Spain, Ireland, Portugal, Italy, Luxembourg being taken
before the ECJ by the Commission for “incorrect application of the public lending right”
Basically these countries had exempted public libraries from PLR. Ireland is in the (slow) process of compliance by introducing a PLR scheme for public libraries.
InfoSoc Directive implementationFrance, Finland, Spain and the Czech Republic for
“non-implementation”…although the French have been in the process for some time and have now implemented in 2006 amid much controversy
DG Justice & Home AffairsIPRED 2
Amended Proposal for a Directive … on Criminal Measures Aimed at Ensuring the Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights (COM(2006) 168 final 2005/0127 (COD) 26.4.2006) http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/com/2006/com2006_0168en01.pdf Article 1 “…These measures shall apply to intellectual property rights provided for in Community legislation and/or national legislation in the Member States.” Article 3 “Member States shall ensure that all intentional infringements of an intellectual property right on a commercial scale, and attempting, aiding or abetting and inciting such infringements, are treated as criminal offences.
Scope of criminal sanctions for infringement extended beyond that of TRIPS Art. 61 to all IPRs covered by Community law
No financial benefit or profit required – ‘commercial scale’ is much wider and easier to achieve e.g. rightholders claim individual P2P file sharing is on a ‘commercial scale’ .
Could librarians risk accusation of aiding and abetting? Unlikely if unintentional, but Member States might take different approaches.
DG Information Societyi2010 Digital Libraries 1
European Digital Library (EDL) Flagship project within Commission’s i2010 strategy to boost digital
economy Aims at making Europe's diverse cultural and scientific heritage
(books, films, maps, photographs, music, etc.) easier and more interesting to use online for work, leisure and/or study.
Builds on Europe's rich heritage combining multicultural and multilingual environments with technological advances and new business models.
EDL High Level Group established February 2006 Brings together major stakeholders from industry and cultural
institutions. Includes a number of national librarians and archivists.
First tasks are to tackle the barriers posed by copyright and encourage public-private collaboration for digitisation.
DG Information Societyi2010 Digital Libraries 2
Commission Recommendation to Member States (24/08/06) Digitisation of content – large-scale, plus using already digitised
content Online accessibility
By seeking concrete solutions on copyright issues, e.g. mechanisms to deal with "orphan" works and works that are out of print.
Digital Preservation Establish national strategies and plans for the long-term preservation of,
and access to, digital material. Adapt legislation, where necessary
To allow multiple copying and migration for preservation purposesTo facilitate web-preservation and deposit of digital material for
preservation purposes.
http://europa.eu.int/information_society/activities/digital_libraries/index_en.htm
Audiovisual & Media Policies Content Online 1
Public Consultation on Content Online (Closed 13/10/06)On ‘ways to stimulate the growth of a true EU single
market for online cross-border delivery of digital content, such as films, music and games’.
Addressed broader issues such as intellectual property rights management in the digital age.
The creation of an open and competitive single market for online content is one of the key aims of the i2010 Initiative.
http://ec.europa.eu/comm/avpolicy/other_actions/content_online/index_en.htm#consultation#consultation
Audiovisual & Media Policies Content Online 2
EBLIDA Response to Content Online
‘Bottom line’ wasAll the available exceptions to copyright should be made
to operate in all Member States
The absolute legal protection afforded to technological protection measures should be mitigated so that they do not necessarily obstruct the limited copying permitted by law through the exceptions
It should be established clearly in law that any contractual term purporting to nullify a statutory exception is void.
EBLIDA Responses/Policy Positions 2003-2005
On Digital Rights Management Systems, February 2003 On the Proposal for a Directive….on measures and procedures to
ensure the enforcement of intellectual property rights (05.12.2003) (aka IPRED 1)
On the Directive 2004/48/EC …on the enforcement of intellectual property right 29.04.2004 (aka IPRED 1)
on the infringement procedures over Public Lending Right, March 2004 (see also Report from the Commission…on the public lending right in
the European Union (16.09.2002)) DG Internal Market’s consultation…on the Management of Copyright and
Related Rights in the Internal Market, June 2004 DG Internal Market’s consultation on the Final Report of the High Level
Group on Digital Rights Management (March-July 2004), September 2004
EBLIDA Responses/Policy Positions 2003-2005
DG Internal Market’s Staff Working Paper…Review of the EC Legal Framework in the Field of Copyright and Related Rights (19.07.2004), October 2004
The Commission Working Party 29 Working Document 104 on Data Protection Issues Related to Intellectual Property Rights, March 2005
DG Internal Market’s Staff Working Document Study on a Community Initiative on the Cross-border Collective Management of Copyright, July 2005 (this output from the 2004 consultation on the Management of Copyright was entirely about online music)
Resulted in the Commission Recommendation on Collective Cross-border Management of Copyright and Related Rights for Legitimate Online Music Services 18.10.2005
EBLIDA Responses/Policy Positions 2006
To DG Information Society’s “Questions for Online Consultation”, annex to the Communication from the Commission i2010 Digital Libraries, January 2006
To DG Internal Market’s Working Paper on a First Evaluation of Directive 96/9/EC on the Legal Protection of Databases, March 2006
On DG Research’s Study on the economic and technical evolution of the scientific publication market in Europe, May 2006
To the Commission's White Paper on a Communication Policy, May 2006
To the DG Internal Market’s Stakeholder Consultation on Copyright Levies in a Converging World, July 2006
On Chapters 1 & 2 of the Commission's Green Paper on the European Transparency Initiative, August 2006
To the Commission's (Audiovisual & Media Policies) Public Consultation on Content Online in the Single Market October 2006
Advocacy and lobbying 1
The Review of the Acquis and the European Digital Library present great opportunities for us to influence for change The EC will experience first hand from the Digital Library project the
full range of the problems libraries and archives have been coping with in copyright and licensing and the digital environment – from TPMs to orphan works.
DG Internal Market and Services is advising DG Information Society on the Digital Libraries project.
Will the InfoSoc ‘freaks’ win out against the Internal Market ‘ayatollahs’?
At the same time there are pressures to rebalance copyright and guarantee Access to Knowledge within the WIPO Development Agenda process
WIPO SCCR and PCDA meeting pages www.wipo.int
A2K list archives http://lists.essential.org/pipermail/a2k/
Advocacy and lobbying 2
Libraries and archives Should seek recognition by everyone as ‘trusted
intermediaries’ in the digital environment We need to marshall evidence to support our case - faith
is not enoughNeed to lobby effectively at home through associations,
alliances and coalitions of like-minded civil society organisations e.g. libraries, archives, consumers, associations for blind people, dyslexics and others with learning difficulties
And lobby in Europe as members of EBLIDA Otherwise
Copyright ‘fit’ for the online environment will not benefit civil society, nor the creative and knowledge economies
Information sources for Library & User Copyright Advocacy 1
Adelphi Charter http://www.adelphicharter.org/ American Library Association OITC http://www.ala.org/ala/washoff/
WOissues/copyrightb/copyright.htm
Australian Digital Alliance http://www.digital.org.au/
Australian Libraries Copyright Committee http://www.digital.org.au/alcc/
Australian Library and Information Association http://alia.org.au/advocacy/copyright/
BEUC (European Consumer Organisation) - Consumers Digital Rights page http://www.consumersdigitalrights.org/cms/index_en.php
Center for the Study of the Public Domain, Duke University Law School http://www.law.duke.edu/cspd/ - James Boyle Home Page http://james-boyle.com/
CPTech (Consumer Project on Technology) http://www.cptech.org/ - Access to Knowledge page www.cptech.org/a2k
Information sources for Library & User Copyright Advocacy 2
DG Internal Market and Services Copyright and Neighbouring Rights http://europa.eu.int/comm/internal_market/copyright/index_en.htm
DG Information Society i2010 Digital Libraries initiative http://europa.eu.int/information_society/activities/digital_libraries/index_en.htm
EBLIDA www.eblida.org EBLIDA Response/position papers and linked Commission papers at http://www.eblida.org/position/index.htm
EFF (Electronic Frontier Foundation) www.eff.org eIFL: Electronic Information for Libraries
http://www.eifl.net/services/services_ip.html European Digital Rights - EDRI-gram Newsletter www.edri.org Intellectual Property Watch www.ip-watch.org (independent news service
reporting on international IP policy) IP Justice www.ipjustice.org Libraries & Archives Copyright Alliance, UK www.cilip.org.uk/laca Open Rights Group, UK http://www.openrightsgroup.org/