Upload
melissa-richard
View
217
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
AASA State Leadership ConferenceApril 29, 2011Bruce Hunter
1
Passed Long-Term CR that theoretically cuts $39 billion
The House passed it 260-167 April 14th 59 Republicans voted against HR 1473 108 Democrats voted against it 35 Tea Party caucus members voted for the bill and 21
against. Speaker Boehner was forced to get the support of
Democrats - 81 House Democrats voted for it Senate passed it 81-19 April 14th
Signed by President Obama April 18th
2
Striving Readers Even Start Literacy Through
School Libraries Education Technology
State Grants Arts in Education Reading is
Fundamental LEAP Byrd Honors
Scholarships
Education Technology State Grants
Javits Gifted and Talented Education
Smaller Learning Communities
Teach for America National Writing Project Close-Up Foundation Grants to Gulf States
LEA’s
3
Tech-Prep -$103 million Safe and Drug Free
Schools National Programs -$79 million
Teaching of Traditional American History -$73 million
State CTE grants $31 million
State Assessments -$20 million
GEAR UP -$20 million English language
Acquisition State Grants -$15 million
School Improvement Grants -$10 million
Comprehensive Centers -$5 million
Teacher Quality state Grants -$5 million
ESEA Evaluation -$1 million
4
Obama FY12 budget proposal released Feb 14 (2012-13 school year)
Despite tight economic times, including non-defense discretionary budget freeze, education receives historic increases
Proposal includes massive restructuring in ESEA reauthorization 38 programs consolidated to 11
Policy shift toward competitive grants Despite overall increases: ◦ Title I receives $300 million ◦ IDEA received a $200 million increase, falling to 16.5% instead of the
promised 40%
5
New Authority(change relative to consolidated programs cumulative total)
Consolidated Programs
Effective Teachers and Leaders- $447.7 m
Ready to Teach Teacher Quality State Grants
Teacher and Leader Innovation Fund+ 489.4 m
Advanced Credentialing Teacher Incentive Fund
Teacher and Leader Pathways+ $113.9 m
School Leadership Teach for America Teacher Quality Partnership Teachers for a Competitive Tomorrow Transition to Teaching
Effective Teaching and Learning: STEM+ $25.5 m
Mathematics and Science Partnership
Effective Teaching and Learning: Well Rounded Education+ $20.1 m
Teaching American History Academies for American History and Civics Civic Education Close-Up Fellowships Excellence in Economic Education Foreign Language Assistance Arts in Education
College Pathways and Accelerated Learning- $17.3 m
Advanced Placement High School Graduation Initiative Javits Gifted and Talented Education
Successful, Safe and Healthy StudentsLevel Funded
Alcohol Abuse Reduction Elementary and Secondary School Counseling Foundations for Learning Mental Health integration in Schools Physical Education Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities National Activities
Expanding Educational Options- $37.1 m Charter School Grants Credit Enhancement for Charter School Facilities Parental Information and Resource Centers Smaller Learning Communities Voluntary Public School Choice
6
Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan’s (R-WI) budget
relies on spending cuts to reduce the deficit adopted by a 235-193 vote ◦ all but four Republicans supporting it ◦ all Democrats opposed.
7
• Out of Senate HELP committee by May• Through the Senate by June• To the President by August– Bethany Little, Chief Education staffer, Senate
HELP Committee• 3 small bills; 1st one out in May focused on
increasing funding flexibility – James Bergeron, Chief Education staffer, House
Education and Workforce Committee
8
Standardization Federal mandates dictate State as federal enforcer Diminished Local authority Increased Local
Responsibility Decreased Local authority High stakes testing Focus on Accountability
Federal leadership in Equity, Research & Demonstration
Balance local/state federal authority and responsibility
Federal funds to help build state & local capacity
Low stakes Testing Focus on improving
instruction9
Corporate control model◦ Democrats for Education
Reform◦ Education Trust◦ Fordham Foundation◦ Alliance for Excellent
Education◦ Aspen Group◦ Gates Foundation◦ Broad Foundation◦ Walton foundation
State and Local Leadership Model◦ AASA◦ NSBA◦ NEA◦ AFT◦ CCSSO◦ PTA◦ NAESP◦ NASSP◦ NABSE◦ etc
“Reformers” Educatorsvs.vs.
10
Top Down Command and Control Policy Test based strategy using weak tests High Stakes Testing (Campbell's Law) Reliance on Punishments for Change Assumption of Adequate Human Resources Combination of high stakes testing and punishment
crowds out focus on learning and a broad curriculum
11
Performance pay improves instruction and therefore student outcomes
Test Scores primary tool to evaluate teachers and principals
Charter schools will lead to improved student outcomes
Firing teachers improves student outcomes persistently low scoring schools
Firing principals in every low scoring school is essential to improve student outcomes
12
Reformers hold performance pay based on test scores as a central tenant of improving educational outcomes for low income students
Educators are split on performance pay. Many administrators like the idea of using performance pay to reward excellence and /or staff hard to staff schools. Researchers are skeptical as are both unions.
13
Reformers hold using test scores as the primary tool to evaluate teachers as central to improving student outcomes by improving teaching
Educators are split, many administrators like the idea of student outcomes in evaluation, many teachers and both unions are very opposed
14
Reformers -charter schools are essential for wide scale improvement in student outcomes
Educators -some charter schools work as well as regular public schools - ought to be a local option.
Stanford study found that 17% of charters get significantly better and that 37% get significantly worse results than traditional public schools.
CREDO, Stanford University, June 2009
15
Reformers are largely silent on the issue of better tests, but the really like having a single score for accountability.
Educators, including AASA, would like to move to tests of critical thinking and application of knowledge accompanied by :◦ less costly and intrusive summative testing ◦ reduction of the emphasis on high stakes and◦ Less emphasis on punishments.
16
Two consortia, representing 44 states and DC. Eleven states belong to both, 6 to neither Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium (SBAC) hosts 31 states and
received $160 million Partnership for Assessment of College and Career Readiness (PARCC)
hosts 26 states and received $170 millionSBAC PARCC BOTH NEITHER
AL MI OR AL KY PA AL NJ AK
CO MO PA AR LA RI CO OH MN
CT MT SC AZ MA SC DE OK NE
DE NV SD CA MD TN GA PA TX
GA NH UT CO MS KY SC VA
HI NJ VT DC ND NH WYID NM WA DE NH BOLD = both consortia
IA NC WV FL NJ ORANGE = RTTT winner
KS ND WI GA NY
KY OH IL OH
ME OK IN OK
17
Reformers are largely silent on this issue, but view educators concerns in these areas as just making excuses
Educators fair, accurate and instructionally useful assessment for ELL and special education students is a priority
The 2% rule must either be eliminated or made sensible.
18
o Separating Accountability and Assessment for instructional planning – One test can’t serve two purposes
o Accountability assessments controlled by states with broad federal guidelines - growth (value added if desired) could use sampling, NAEP, PISA
o Instructional assessment controlled by school districts - measuring growth, by multiple methods, that are transparent and provide immediate feedback to teachers and administrators
19
Reformers believe that firing more teachers and principals is an important key to improving outcomes especially for low income students.
Educators are split. Administrators believe that test scores are too blunt of an instrument for accurate evaluation and that adequate replacements are not always available. Teachers think firings based on test scores will not be fair or wise.
20
Reformers like everything about NCLB’s accountability system
Educators don’t like NCLB accountability -want an accountability system that is fair & accurate as well as valid & reliable -100% is impossible if the goal is high scores on challenging tests. Most educators do like disaggregating the results to make problems clearer for policy makers, parents and educators.
21
Reformers want to use competitive grants to force compliance. Administration requested an increase in the proportion of federal dollars for competitive grants.
Educators like formula grants - more predictable for staffing and long term plans.
AASA supports formula grants opposes shift to more competitive grants
22
A priority for the Obama Administration◦ Special education◦ Gender◦ Sexual orientation
Avoiding new administrative burdens◦ Administration and advocates want more data
Cyber bullying – legal issues◦ Free speech◦Off campus
Better PD needed but one size does not fit all Local policy improvement – if we don’t the feds will
23
FY11 CR includes language to reverse current sunset provisions.
Both the House and Senate have the votes to support voucher provisions, and each chamber has introduced a bill to reinstate and expand the DC Opportunity Scholarship Program 4 consecutive government reports document the lack of reliable, valid
academic progress We expect to be fighting vouchers on a regular basis in this
Congress.
24
• The debate between Educators and Reformers in the context of ESEA reauthorization is very contentious.
• The administration has sided almost entirely with the Reformers
• The hill is split between Educators and Reformers.• There are other contentious issues that require time
for consideration, e.g., formula.
25
Thursday’s (3/10/11) meeting included Democratic Sens. Tom Harkin of Iowa and Jeff Bingaman of New Mexico; Republican Sens. Michael B. Enzi of Wyoming and Lamar Alexander of Tennessee; Democratic Reps. George Miller of California and Dale E. Kildee of Michigan; Kline and Republican Rep. Duncan Hunter of California.
“It was a good general meeting, a good kickoff,” said Harkin, chairman of the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee. “We all agreed we’re going to get it done this year, and I think there are some principles we all pretty much agreed on.”
26
"We appreciate the opportunity to discuss with President Obama and our Senate counterparts the challenges facing America’s classrooms. Although we have our different approaches, everyone agrees the current law is broken and in need of repair. The status quo is failing both students and taxpayers; it is time we reconsidered the role of the federal government in our schools. As we work to develop reforms that focus on what’s best for students, parents, teachers, and communities, we are engaging our colleagues on both sides of the aisle and listening to the concerns of state and local education leaders. For the sake of our children's future and the strength of the American workforce, we must take the time necessary to get this right."
27
As for the president’s proposed timeline, last week a bipartisan group of lawmakers from both chambers pledged to rewrite the law this year.
In reacting to the president’s Monday speech, however, Kline cautioned that “arbitrary” timelines could undermine efforts. “We need to take the time to get this right,” he said.
“The president made a great case today for why we need to fix our education law in this country,” said Rep. George Miller, ranking member on the House committee. “The status quo is failing our students and putting our future, our economic stability and our global competitiveness at risk.”
I didn’t realize the Congress alone could fix our education laws.The must have powers not enumerated in the constitution
28
Kline Statement on President Obama's Education Speech
WASHINGTON, D.C. — U.S. House Committee on Education and the Workforce Chairman John Kline (R-MN) released the following statement on President Obama’s education speech at Kenmore Middle School:
“The president's remarks affirm the importance of fixing the nation’s broken education system. As we develop targeted, fiscally responsible reforms, the Committee on Education and the Workforce continues to work with school officials and state and local leaders to learn about the tools they need to prepare students for the future. We need to take the time to get this right – we cannot allow an arbitrary timeline to undermine quality reforms that encourage innovation, flexibility, and parental involvement.”
29
SENATE MISSES GOAL ON EDUCATION REWRITEThe Hill -- April 18, 2011By Ramsey Cox
Despite the intentions of Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee Chairman Tom Harkin (D-Iowa), the Senate began its recess Friday without holding a markup on the overdue reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
Harkin in January set the goal of having a bill “ready for markup by our Easter recess.” Negotiations between key legislators have lagged since then, although Harkin and key House members say they believe they can still pass a bill this year.
But neither the Center on Education Policy (CEP), a public education advocacy group, nor the conservative Heritage Foundation expects success.
30
SENATE MISSES GOAL ON EDUCATION REWRITE –continued
This is the first year Education and the Workforce Committee Chairman John Kline (R-Minn.) has chaired the panel. One reason the House has been delayed is that 12 GOP freshmen joined the committee in January and many had to get up to speed on the issues.
“Chairman Kline has been working very hard to educate his members,” said Education and the Workforce ranking member George Miller (D-Calif.). “It is absolutely critical that we rewrite ESEA this year. Our children can’t afford for us to wait any longer.”
Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-Calif.), the chairman of the Early Childhood, Elementary and Secondary Education subcommittee, said last week “I think it'll be done this year,”. “Not as soon as the Senate or the president would like it to be, but I think it'll be done this year, barring any unforeseen circumstances.”
31
SENATE MISSES GOAL ON EDUCATION REWRITE –continued At the same hearing, Kline hinted he might introduce
the first in a series of education-reform bills — this one on “flexibility” — as soon as next month, meaning the House could beat the Senate in passing part of the reauthorization, since Harkin is still negotiating with his committee’s Republicans.
32
Associate Executive DirectorPolicy advocacy and Communication
American Association of School Administrators(703) 875-0738
33