A

Program InformationProgram Information (IR Office)

Program Judgment Exemplary (3) Meets Expectations (2) Below Expectations (1)

Narrative

Program Name: Drafting and Design CIP Code: 151301 Program Coordinator: Richard Herring Program Prefix: DDTDivision: Creative & Therapeutic Technologies Division Chair: Melanie Hacker

B

Award InformationAward Information (Division Secretary) (College Catalog)

Program Judgment Exemplary (3) Meets Expectations (2) Below Expectations (1)

Trenholm State Community College Page 1 / 57

Narrative

AATCERSTC

Award Title Credit Hours Semester Contact Hours

Award 1 AAT Drafting and Design 70 1,568Award 2 CER Drafting & Design Technology 49 1,040Award 3 STC Drafting & Design Technology 28 736

C

Enrollment InformationEnrollment Information – Unduplicated Headcount/Fall Semester of Review Year (IR/ITOffices) (RGTES)

Program Judgment Exemplary (3) Meets Expectations (2) Below Expectations (1)

Narrative

Total Enrollment STC CERT ATT

FA2014 24

Trenholm State Community College Page 2 / 57

Fall Semester Enrollment Trends (Unduplicated) (IR/IT Offices) Fall 2014 Fall 2013 Fall 2012 Fall 2011

New Students 7 9 4 3Program Enrollment 24 26 23 20Program Graduates 0 1 2 3

Credit Hours Produced 233.00 258.00 239.00 208.00Exit Students 1 3 2 4Student FTE 17 17 17 14

Fall Semester Review Year Enrollment Demographics (IR/IT Offices)

Gender/Status Total Male Female Full­Time Part­TimeHeadcount 24 20 4 13 11 Program % 100% 83% 17% 54% 46%

Race White Black Hispanic NativeAmerican Asian Multi­race Unknown Other

Headcount 12 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 Program % 50% 50% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

<18 18­19 20­21 22­24 25­29 30­34 35­39 40­49 50­64 65+

0 3 8 3 5 2 1 0 2 0

(SHUHC)

D

Program Performance TrendsProgram Performance Trends (IR/IT Offices) (COE Report)

Program Judgment Exemplary (3) Meets Expectations (2) Below Expectations (1)

Narrative

Trenholm State Community College Page 3 / 57

Award 2011 2012 2013Completion Rate CER N/A N/A 64.00 AAT 75.00 60.00 64.00Placement Rate CER N/A N/A 89.00 AAT 100 100 89.00Licensure Rate CER N/A N/A N/A AAT N/A N/A N/ARetention Rate 33.33% 33.33% 50%Fall FTE Students 14 17 17

2011 2012 2013Fall FTE Faculty 1 1 1Fall Student/TeacherRatio 14 to 1 17 to 1 17 to 1

Fall Total Credit Hours 208.00 239.00 258.00 Fall Credit Hours/FTE Faculty 208 239 258

Completions (IPEDS)

SU10­SPR11 SU11­SPR12 SU12­SPR13STC ­ 0CER ­ 0AAT ­ 3

STC ­ 1AAT ­ 8 AAT ­ 4

E

Program Satisfaction TrendsE. Program Satisfaction Trends (IR Office/Program Coordinator)

Program Judgment Exemplary (3) Meets Expectations (2) Below Expectations (1)

Trenholm State Community College Page 4 / 57

Narrative

2009­10 2010­11 2011­12 2012­13 2013­14

EmployerSatisfaction

Excellent­0%

Very Good­100%

Very Good100%

No dataavailable

Excellent100% Excellent 100%

Student Satisfaction(ACT StudentOpinion)What is your overallimpressionof the quality ofeducation at this 2­year college?

Excellent­20%

Good­56%Average­

24%

Excellent­29.4%Good­35.3%

Average­29.4%Blank­5.9%

Excellent­7.7%

Good­38.5%Average­38.5%Below

Average­7.7%

Blank­7.7%

Excellent­42%

Good­25%Average­25%

BelowAverage­0%

VeryInadequate­

8%

Survey notadministered

Alumni Satisfaction

Excellent­0%

Very Good­0%

Good­100%

Excellent­0%VeryGood­100%

No dataavailable

No dataavailable

Excellent­42%Very Good­58%

Completer SatisfactionOverall, I am satisfiedwith theeducation received atTrenholm

No dataavailable Yes­100%

Yes­85.7%No­14.3% Yes­100% Yes­100%

AdvisoryCommittee Satisfaction

Excellent­0%

Good­50%Fair­50%

Excellent­30%

Good­60%Fair­10%Poor­0%

Excellent­33.3%

Good­66.7%

Excellent­33.3%

Good­66.7%

Excellent33.3%

Good 66.7%

Program coordinators should describe how they plan to address the issuesexpressed in surveys, if necessary. Program Rectification:Not Necessary

Sources

2009 employer survey

2013 Advisory Survey

Trenholm State Community College Page 5 / 57

2014 employer satisfaction

employer survey 2010

F

Program Cost/Investment TrendsF. Program Cost/Investment Trends (Business Office/Program Coordinators)

Program Judgment Exemplary (3) Meets Expectations (2) Below Expectations (1)

Narrative

2009­10 2010­11 2011­12 2012­13 2013­14

Instructional Cost*82,280.03 90,805.55 76,569.78 77,518.85 78,450.40

EquipmentMaintenance/Replacement

16,100.00 28,560.00

New Equipment (not replacement of non­repairable equipment)

6,905.01

*Includes salary, benefits and other expenses.

Equipment Description. List equipment either replaced or purchased. (ProgramCoordinators)

Trenholm State Community College Page 6 / 57

Description 2009­10

2010­11 2011­12 2012­

13 2013­14

Equipment

Replacement NA NA NA NA NA

New Equipment (not replacement of non­repairable equipment)

U­Print 3­D Printer14,900.00

$6865.3209/26/2014 PL32723 5878.897690.47 CDW­G 09/26/2014 PL41443 986.437690.47 CDW­G The DDT department purchased 25Wacom INTUOS tablets

NOTE: If equipment was donated by another source, you must note it here.

G

Program Opportunities/Industry TrendsProgram Opportunities/Industry Trends

Program Judgment Exemplary (3) Meets Expectations (2) Below Expectations (1)

Narrative

Trenholm State Community College Page 7 / 57

Hourly Wage Rates (IE Office/Department of Industrial Relations Labor Market Info­http://www2.labor.alabama.gov/OES/Wage/wagesbyalpha.aspx)

Occupational Code

Occupational Title

Avg.EstimatedEmployment

Entry Level Hourly Wage

EntryAnnual Salary

Avg. Hourly Salary

Avg. Annual Salary

Experienced Hourly Wage

173011 ArchitecturalCivil Drafters 90 $23.39 $48,660 $15.37 $31,978 $27.41

173013 MechanicalDrafters 30 $21.75 $45,238 $18.02 $37,467 $23.62

Hourly Wage Rates (IE Office/United States Department of LaborInfo­ http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_al.htm#31­0000)

OccupationCode

OccupationTitle Level Employment

EmploymentRSE

Employmentper 1,000Jobs

Locationquotient

Medianhourly Wage

17­1022 Surveyors Detail 670 8.3% 0.365 1.17 $22.60

17­3012

ElectricalandElectronicsDrafters

Detail 480 24.5% 0.258 1.15 $28.46

17­3019 Drafters, AllOther Detail 290 16.1% 0.159 1.42 $23.00

Occupational Employment Projections (IE Office/ALDIR Labor Market Information ­ http://www2.labor.alabama.gov/Projections/Occupational/Proj2020/Statewide/Architecture.aspx

Trenholm State Community College Page 8 / 57

ProjectedEmployment

2020Growth Rate Total Annual

Openings Growth Replacement

Occupational Title State

Local (Region7)

State Local (Region7) State

Local (Region7)

State Local (Region7) State (Region7)

ArchitecturalDrafters 1,490 90 0.07 1.18 30 5 0 0 30

MechanicalDrafters 1,010 100 1.50 1.06 30 5 15 0 15

Industry Partner Job Opening Projections (Program Coordinator)Industry 12­18 Months 2­5 Years 10 Years Caywood & Mills 3 12 20

Anticipated Industry Trends That Will Affect Changes in Curriculum and/orEquipment (Program Coordinator) Description of Anticipated Change Timeframe in Which Changes Will Be Needed 3D Printing 1­5 Years 3D Scanning 1­5 Years Market trends seem to indicate the future will demand the home printing of products whichwould indicate that the need in training of 3D modeling should increase. Technology is developing that will allow the scanning of objects to create a precise 3D modelof objects which will then be recreated by the 3D printer for business and home use. This willcreate the need to purchase the technology and train the students to be proficient in theimplementation of it.

Trenholm State Community College Page 9 / 57

H

Program Goals and ObjectivesProgram Goals and Objectives

Program Judgment Exemplary (3) Meets Expectations (2) Below Expectations (1)

Narrative

Program Performance Results

College WidePrevious year (IR Office)

Program Previous Year (IR Office)

ObjectiveNext Year (ProgramFaculty)

Enrollment PercentChange(Previous Fall Term 2013to Fall Term 2014)

­1.48% FA2014 ­ 24FA2013 ­ 26

­7%

FA2014­24FA2015­27

Completion Rate 76% CER ­ 64%AAT ­ 64% AAT 90%

Placement Rate 90% CER ­ 89%AAT ­ 89% AAT 90%

Licensure Passage Rate 83% N/A NA Retention Rate 50% 50% 60% Student/Teacher Ratio 13:1 17:1 20:1 Credit Hours/FTE Faculty 192 258 % of Programs AchievingViability Criteria

2011­12 through 2013­14

52% DDT Program does not meetviability standard 100%

Program Viability Data* 3­Year Average SU11­SPR12 SU12­SPR13 SU13­SPR14 DDT 5.6 4 8 5

Trenholm State Community College Page 10 / 57

*Based on ACHE Criteria for Program Viability: Program must have a minimum average of 7.5graduates during a three­year period, with the viability being calculated for each award levelseparately. Only long certificates and associate degrees are used in the calculations. Source:IPEDS Completions

Program EnhancementGoals

Goal Statement (Program Faculty)

Curriculum Revisions

During this review period there has been only minorcirriculum revisions. All pre­requisites have been taken offthe DDT courses in order to facilitate intro students and alsoto allow more flexibility in course selection for students.

Accreditation/Certification

The DDT Program Coordinator received InstructorCertification Training Program for completing NCCERStandardized Craft Training program 12/12/2014. DDTprogram instructor has received Moodle training toincorporate on­line hybrid cirriculum course change tofacilitate needs of students.

Professional Development DDT Program coordinator was certified by the NCCER toincorporate skills training in the program. SolidWorks presentation Summer semester 2013 Holiday Inn

EquipmentAdditions/Upgrades 3­D Printer was added to the program.

Co­Op EducationOpportunities Non Applicable

Sources

solid works presentation

solid works presentation2

I

Trenholm State Community College Page 11 / 57

Uniqueness of program (Program Faculty)Note any factors that serve to make this program unique and possibly worthy of continuationeven though it may have low enrollment and or high program costs. Unique programs arethose with special characteristics, special populations, a special market niche, including, butnot limited to, singular program type in a geographical area or section of the state, highpassing rates of graduates on licensure examinations, high placement of graduates in theworld of work, high student GPA performance upon transfer to four­year institutions, uniqueinstructional methodology employed, special qualities in faculty personnel, special studentspopulation, local, state or national emphasis, public relations value, and other factors.

Program Judgment Exemplary (3) Meets Expectations (2) Below Expectations (1)

Narrative 1. The program is the only postsecondary program for Drafting andDesign in Montgomery County and the surrounding counties.

2. The DDT Program has a 100% placement rate for graduates withinthe first 3 semesters of graduation.

3. DDT is a viable trade for people who are confined to a wheelchair.4. The employment projections indicate that demand for draftingpersonnel will continue to grow nationwide and the River Region.

5. The total annual openings in all specialties of drafting have increasedin the last 5 years.

J.A

Schedule A. Instructional Performance/Student LearningBased upon the Program Review, comment on this program's strengths andchallenges utilizing the headings listed below. If appropriate, list any suggestedplan of action you have that will address strengths or challenges. (See attachedSchedules A, B, C, D, E, and F). Program Coordinators are required to complete allschedules and provide appropriate documentation to support these performancemeasures.

Schedule A. Instructional Performance/Student Learning

Trenholm State Community College Page 12 / 57

Performance Indicators:Student Progress (pre­ & post­test differences, percent continuing to next course,percent receiving passing grade, percent withdrawal/drop)Learner­Centered Teaching (use of variety of teaching methods multi­mediapresentation, web delivery techniques [such as email, listerve, and discussion groups],web­based research projects, group projects, peer­assisted learning, use of learningstyle assessments, and independent research assignments)Instructor Credentials (percent of faculty meeting SACS standards, percent of facultymeeting Postsecondary standards, number of years of industry­related experience)Student Satisfaction (classroom engagement, adherence to syllabus, regular feedbackon student performance, supportive of student needs)Adherence to Policy (class starts on time, no­show reports completed on time, pro­active intervention occurs on regular basis, office hours maintained, deadlines regularlymet)

Program Judgment Exemplary (3) Meets Expectations (2) Below Expectations (1)

Narrative STRENGTHS :Program strengths would include the latest releases of CAD software utilizingmulti­media tutorials and feedback. Small class sizes allow one on one instruction in the labsetting.

Student Progress­ Comparison study of high performing graduating students andlow performing or withdrawn students shows an intervention programs such as First Alertrecently developed at Trenholm Tech would close the gap between these two groups.

Narrative Award 2011 2012 2013

Completion Rate CER N/A N/A 64.00

AAT 75.00 60.00 64.00

Placement Rate CER N/A N/A 89.00

AAT 100 100 89.00

Licensure Rate CER N/A N/A N/A

AAT N/A N/A N/A

Retention Rate 33.33% 33.33% 50%

Fall FTE Students 14 17 17

Learner­Centered Teaching – All of the textextbooks and workbooks are from G_WPublisher and are ADDA certified, online tutorials, peer­assisted learning involving advancedstudents assisting beginning students on CAD drawings, technical writing projects.Orientationclasses cover learning style assessments. Each class includes a web based research project,group project and peer­assisted learning .Trenholm State Community College Page 13 / 57

Instructor Credentials –100% DDT faculty meet SACS standards. 100% faculty meet postsecondary standards. Program director/instructor has 25 years industry­related experience.DPE RequirementsDraftingandDesignDepartment

CIP CourseTitle

CoursePrefix

Course DPE Level InstructorRequirements

Degree In­Field QualifyingFields

Work Course Type

Draftingand DesignTechnology

15.1301 ALL DDT ALL B Bachelor'sDegree

*Option(a)Option(b)

DraftingandDesign

Three yearssuccessfulfull­timeexperienceas apractitionerin theoccupational,technical, orvocationalfield

UndergraduateNon­Transferable

DPE RequirementsDraftingandDesignDepartment

CIP CourseTitle

CoursePrefix

Course DPE Level InstructorRequirements

Degree In­Field QualifyingFields

Work Course Type

Draftingand DesignTechnology

15.1301 ALL DDT ALL B Bachelor'sDegree

*Option(a)Option(b)

DraftingandDesign

Three yearssuccessfulfull­timeexperienceas apractitionerin theoccupational,technical, orvocationalfield

UndergraduateNon­Transferable

Student Satisfaction­student satisfaction surveys of both alumni and completersshow 100% satisfaction with instruction and the program's ability to prepare themfor the work world.

Trenholm State Community College Page 14 / 57

2009­10 2010­11 2011­12 2012­13 2013­14

EmployerSatisfaction

Excellent­0%VeryGood­100%

No dataavailable

No dataavailable

No dataavailable

Survey notadministered

StudentSatisfaction(ACT StudentOpinion)What is your overallimpressionof the quality ofeducation at this2­year college?

Excellent­20%

Good­56%Average­

24%

Excellent­29.4%Good­35.3%

Average­29.4%Blank­5.9%

Excellent­7.7%

Good­38.5%Average­38.5%Below

Average­7.7%

Blank­7.7%

Excellent­42%

Good­25%Average­

25%Below

Average­0%Very

Inadequate­8%

Survey notadministered

Alumni Satisfaction

Excellent­0%Very

Good­0%Good­100%

Excellent­0%VeryGood­100%

No dataavailable

No dataavailable

Excellent­42%Very Good­58%

CompleterSatisfactionOverall, I amsatisfied with theeducation received atTrenholm

No dataavailable Yes­100% Yes­85.7%

No­14.3% Yes­100% Yes­100%

AdvisoryCommitteeSatisfaction

Excellent­0%

Good­50%Fair­50%

Excellent­30%

Good­60%Fair­10%Poor­0%

Excellent­33.3%

Good­66.7%

Excellent­33.3%

Good­66.7%

Survey notadministered

Adherence to Policy – Office hours are posted on office door. DDT website offers feedbackopportunities for students to communicate their needs or concerns. All areas listed on syllabusare covered in the semester with emphasis on problem areas. Drawings are graded with arubrics and are returned to students in cycles for student feedback. Flexible open lab timesand implementation of a due date listing helps students learn time management skills neededto thrive in the job market. Students are assisted by instructor during open lab on anindividual and group basis.

CHALLENGES: DDT uses software and hardware that is continuously and rapidly changing. Our biggestchallenge is constantly changing our program to reflect the world in which the entry leveldrafter will compete.

SUGGESTED PLAN OF ACTION:

Trenholm State Community College Page 15 / 57

Software updates must be continuously changed as well as new technology purchased as thejob market dictates. The instructor's skill and proficiency must be maintained and updatedwith seminars and training to promote the newest skills taught to the student. NCCER Training programs are planned to be implemented, along with Moodle on­line coursesto help facilitate the needs of the student.

Sources

2013 Seminar of Structural Engineer Freddy Daughtry

2014 student survey

DDT 104 FA14 SYL

DDT 128 FA 14 Due dates

Seminar of American Builders engineer Jerry Gaston July 17,2014

Seminar of Structural Engineer Mr. Danny Raines ­ July 14 2011

SkillsUSA Trenholm Instructor Script

Student grades1

Student grades2

Student grades3

Student Rubric for CAD

J.B

Schedule B. Curriculum and Course(s) of StudyBased upon the Program Review, comment on this program's strengths andchallenges utilizing the headings listed below. If appropriate, list any suggestedplan of action you have that will address strengths or challenges. (See attachedSchedules A, B, C, D, E, and F). Program Coordinators are required to complete allschedules and provide appropriate documentation to support these performancemeasures.

Schedule B. Curriculum and Course(s) of Study

Trenholm State Community College Page 16 / 57

Performance Indicators:Program Enrollment LevelsEnrollment Growth Rate (new student enrollment)Program Advisory Committee Recommendations (attach minutes for current academic year)Industry Surveys (expected trends in curriculum needs)Trade Journal Articles (forecasts of future industry needs)Labor Market Data: Employment Projections (expected curriculum needs)Employer Satisfaction Survey (relevance of program competency emphases)Alumni Satisfaction Survey (relevance of courses and topics covered)

Program Judgment Exemplary (3) Meets Expectations (2) Below Expectations (1)

Narrative STRENGTHS:DDT course outline is based on industry needs. The plan of study also incorporates 4 coursesthat are agreed upon with all DDT depts. statewide. Courses such as recently adopted MEP(mechanical, Electrical, plumbing) are being implemented to satisfy specialized industry needsin our area. According to the Advisory Committee minutes and conversations with localindustry leaders, the DDT program is applicable and needed to train students for entry leveldrafting positions in the River Region.

Program Enrollment LevelsSee Enrollment Information (C)Enrollment Growth Rate:The DDT dept. has seen a new student growth rate due to word ofmouth, industry needs and recruitment.

Fall 2014 Fall 2013 Fall 2012 Fall 2011

New Students 7 9 4 3

Program Enrollment 24 26 23 20

Program Graduates 0 1 2 3

Credit Hours Produced 233.00 258.00 239.00 208.00

Exit Students 1 3 2 4

Student FTE 17 17 17 14

Program Advisory Committee Recommendations:The DDT advisory committee recommendation to the course of study is as follows: Incorporate Google Sketch Up Add Revit to Arch DDT 132 class Add SolidWorks in the machine drafting class

Trenholm State Community College Page 17 / 57

Industry Surveys: Recent phone calls from architectural firms and AES industries indicatesthat there is a new trend in building construction.The nationwide research and development for scientific and industry uses of the 3d printingtechnology indicate a continued upward growth in the need for drafters with 3d printing skillstaught in 2 of our DDT courses.Trade Journal Articles:Popular Science magazine consistently publish articles on 3d printing trends.

BREAKTHROUGH

WHO Local Motors, Phoenix

FIELD Automotive Manufacturing

ACHIEVEMENT Designing the first 3D­printed car.

Jay Rogers has the keys to a 3D­printed car—in fact, the first­ever 3D­ printed car. It's a humblemachine, an overgrown go­kart built around a 3D­ printed tub. The 48­volt electric drivetrain isbolted to an aluminum subframe in back, and the seats are printed into the tub and covered withscraps of padding. The contraption looks like a misbegotten extraterrestrial rover, but Rogers,cofounder and CEO of small­batch car company Local Motors, thinks the prototype represents arevolutionary kind of transportation: simple, light, inexpensive, and highly personalized. "There are25,000 parts in a normal production car," Rogers says. Local's first production 3D­printed car, asporty two­seater named Strati, will use, by his count, about 64.

Trenholm State Community College Page 18 / 57

Labor Market Data: http://job­outlook.careerplanner.com/Drafters.cfm

Employer Satisfaction Survey: Narrative 2009­10 2010­11 2011­12 2012­13 2013­14

EmployerSatisfaction

Excellent­0%VeryGood­100%

No dataavailable

No dataavailable

No dataavailable

Survey notadministered

StudentSatisfaction(ACT StudentOpinion)What is your overallimpressionof the quality ofeducation at this2­year college?

Excellent­20%

Good­56%Average­

24%

Excellent­29.4%Good­35.3%

Average­29.4%Blank­5.9%

Excellent­7.7%

Good­38.5%Average­38.5%Below

Average­7.7%

Blank­7.7%

Excellent­42%

Good­25%Average­

25%Below

Average­0%Very

Inadequate­8%

Survey notadministered

Alumni Satisfaction

Excellent­0%Very

Good­0%Good­100%

Excellent­0%VeryGood­100%

No dataavailable

No dataavailable

Excellent­42%Very Good­58%

CompleterSatisfactionOverall, I amsatisfied with theeducation received atTrenholm

No dataavailable Yes­100% Yes­85.7%

No­14.3% Yes­100% Yes­100%

AdvisoryCommitteeSatisfaction

Excellent­0%

Good­50%Fair­50%

Excellent­30%

Good­60%Fair­10%Poor­0%

Excellent­33.3%

Good­66.7%

Excellent­33.3%

Good­66.7%

Survey notadministere

Trenholm State Community College Page 19 / 57

Alumni Satisfaction Survey: See chart above.

CHALLENGES: The biggest challenge is attracting a caliber of student who can learn the higher critical thinking skillsand math concepts necessary for the broadened role of the new drafter/designer and who is willing todevelop a strong work ethic demanded by today's employers. SUGGESTED PLAN OF ACTION: The DDT department has encouraged an "problem­solvingattitude" in course work and stress critical thinking skills at high­school and public events.

Sources

2011 Compendium of Surveys

2012 Compendium of Surveys

2013 Advisory Committee Survey

2013 Compendium of Surveys

2014 Alumni Satisfaction Survey

2014 Completer Exit Survey

DDT Fall 2014­1 Advisory Meeting Minutes

DDT Fall 2014­2 Advisory Meeting Minutes

http://job­outlook.careerplanner.com/Drafters.cfm

J.C

Schedule C. Facilities, Equipment, and ResourcesBased upon the Program Review, comment on this program's strengths andchallenges utilizing the headings listed below. If appropriate, list any suggestedplan of action you have that will address strengths or challenges. (See attachedSchedules A, B, C, D, E, and F). Program Coordinators are required to complete allschedules and provide appropriate documentation to support these performancemeasures.

Schedule C. Facilities, Equipment, and Resources

Performance Indicators:Adequacy of Space (determined by Program Advisory Committee, Space Utilization Report,

Trenholm State Community College Page 20 / 57

and Student Satisfaction Survey) Environment Conducive to Learning (Student Satisfaction Survey, Completer Exit Survey,Graduate Satisfaction Survey) Adequacy of Resources (Student Satisfaction Survey, Completer Exit Survey, GraduateSatisfaction Survey, Student/Teacher Ratio, Credit Hours/FTE Instructor) Operation of Equipment (Student Satisfaction Survey, Completer Exit Survey, GraduateSatisfaction Survey) Relevance of Equipment (Program Advisory Committee, Alumni Satisfaction Survey)

Program Judgment Exemplary (3) Meets Expectations (2) Below Expectations (1)

Narrative STRENGTHS: The Drafting and Design department has always been equipped with the latesttechnical software such as Inventor, SolidWorks, Revit and recently been upgraded eachstudent computer that can run these high­tech programs.

Adequacy of Space: A recent move to Trenholm State Library towers has provided amplespace for the expanding program and student needs.

Environment Conducive to Learning: The Drafting and Design student is provided with newfacilities with a break room and access to lab computers and library research materials.

Trenholm State Community College Page 21 / 57

2009­10 2010­11 2011­12 2012­13 2013­14

EmployerSatisfaction

Excellent­0%VeryGood­100%

No dataavailable

No dataavailable

No dataavailable

Survey notadministered

StudentSatisfaction(ACT StudentOpinion)What is your overallimpressionof the quality ofeducation at this2­year college?

Excellent­20%

Good­56%Average­

24%

Excellent­29.4%Good­35.3%

Average­29.4%Blank­5.9%

Excellent­7.7%

Good­38.5%Average­38.5%Below

Average­7.7%

Blank­7.7%

Excellent­42%

Good­25%Average­

25%Below

Average­0%Very

Inadequate­8%

Survey notadministered

Alumni Satisfaction

Excellent­0%Very

Good­0%Good­100%

Excellent­0%VeryGood­100%

No dataavailable

No dataavailable

Excellent­42%Very Good­58%

CompleterSatisfactionOverall, I amsatisfied with theeducation received atTrenholm

No dataavailable Yes­100% Yes­85.7%

No­14.3% Yes­100% Yes­100%

AdvisoryCommitteeSatisfaction

Excellent­0%

Good­50%Fair­50%

Excellent­30%

Good­60%Fair­10%Poor­0%

Excellent­33.3%

Good­66.7%

Excellent­33.3%

Good­66.7%

Survey notadministered

Trenholm State Community College Page 22 / 57

Adequacy of Resources: The Drafting Design program has been relocated to the LibraryTowers which has provided the student with a host of research capabilities.

Program Performance

Results

College WidePrevious year(IR Office)

Program Previous Year(IR Office)

ObjectiveNext Year(ProgramFaculty)

Enrollment PercentChange(Previous Fall Term 2013to Fall Term 2014)

­1.48%FA2014 ­ 24FA2013 ­ 26

­7%

Completion Rate 76% CER ­ 64%AAT ­ 64%

Placement Rate 90% CER ­ 89%AAT ­ 89%

Licensure Passage Rate 83% N/A

Retention Rate 50% 50%

Student/Teacher Ratio 13:1 17:1

Credit Hours/FTE Faculty 192 258

% of Programs AchievingViability Criteria

2011­12 through 2013­14

52% DDT Program does notmeet viability standard

Operation of Equipment: There are a certain number of computer problems that are to beexpected in a program that relies so heavily on computers and software programs, howeverthe IT department is located in the LT and are quick to respond on technical issues. Relevance of Equipment: In 2014, the DDT department purchased a U­Print 3­D printer andtablets from recommendations of the Advisory Committee.

CHALLENGES: The DDT department utilizes constant input from the advisory committee andindustry leaders in trying to "stay ahead of the curve" with software updates.This challenge has been met by seminars conducted by company owners,professional architects and engineers. See attached seminars.

SUGGESTED PLAN OF ACTION:The DDT department emphasizes a continual professionaldialog with industry and local businesses. Plans for the allocation of funds for a 3­D scannerhave been proposed by the Advisory Committee.

Sources

Trenholm State Community College Page 23 / 57

2009­10 Compendium of Surveys

2011 Compendium of Surveys

2012 Compendium of Surveys

2013 Compendium of Surveys

2014 Alumni Satisfaction Survey

2014 Completer Exit Survey

Advisory Committees Survey

DDT Advisory council members 2012

J.D

Schedule D. Quality of Student ExperienceBased upon the Program Review, comment on this program's strengths andchallenges utilizing the headings listed below. If appropriate, list any suggestedplan of action you have that will address strengths or challenges. (See attachedSchedules A, B, C, D, E, and F). Program Coordinators are required to complete allschedules and provide appropriate documentation to support these performancemeasures.

Schedule D. Quality of Student ExperiencePerformance Indicators:

Student Satisfaction (Overall level of satisfaction, specific high and low points)Completer Satisfaction (Overall level of satisfaction, specific high and low points)Alumni Satisfaction (Overall level of satisfaction, specific high and low points)Student Advising Experience (problems encountered, student satisfaction)Student Development and Student Services (instructor interventions, referralsmade, appointments kept)Assessment and Placement Policies Followed (number of exceptions allowed)

Program Judgment Exemplary (3) Meets Expectations (2) Below Expectations (1)

Narrative STRENGTHS:DDT has the latest versions of programs, computers and printers so the student cantransition to the workplace workplace easily. The lab has been remodeled and updated toprovide the students with Smartboard screens, new computers, desks, chairs to enhance theTrenholm State Community College Page 24 / 57

learning experience.

Student Satisfaction The student satisfaction for school year 2013­2014 showed a good­excellent rate of satisfaction. The previous years were a period of building for the DDTdepartment. This indicates the direction in which the program is headed has been effective.

Completer Satisfaction: The surveys from 2009­2014 the DDT department showed a 100%satisfaction rate. This indicates the effort to prepare students for the work­world has beeneffective.

Alumni Satisfaction: There were no excellent ratings except in the school year 2013­2014.This trend seems to indicate that the program has grown, correcting the previous trend of lowstudent enrollment.

Student Advising Experience: This is an ongoing challenge because of the difficulty ofthe Millennial student to attend school on a full time schedule and balance the economic andfamily responsibilities.

Student Development and Student Services: June 3, 2013 Student Government AssociationRe: Recommendation of ___________in the 2013 SGA Elections I am happy to write a letter of recommendation for_______in support for her candidacy in theSGA at Trenholm State Technical College. Ms.______ is a hard working student and displays apositive attitude toward her work. I know she would be a good candidate for the office she isseeking. Sincerely, Richard Herring IDDrafting and Design DepartmentTrenholm State Technical CollegeMontgomery, AL 36116 Assessment and Placement Policies Followed: The Drafting and Design Departmentunder the auspices of the student handbook offers credit by examination to those studentswho have professional experience in the applicable course.

CHALLENGES: The Millennial student faces both challenges of a single parent household andTrenholm State Community College Page 25 / 57

the economic realities of the current economy. These make it difficult to take a full load andgraduate in a timely manner.

SUGGESTED PLAN OF ACTION:The DDT program is developing hybrid online coursesto accommodate the needs of the Millennial student's schedule.

Sources

2009­10 Compendium of Surveys

2014 Completer Exit Survey

Credit by examination Sample

Disciplinary

Work study job description for DDT

Work Study Student

J.E

Schedule E. Institutional SupportBased upon the Program Review, comment on this program's strengths andchallenges utilizing the headings listed below. If appropriate, list any suggestedplan of action you have that will address strengths or challenges. (See attachedSchedules A, B, C, D, E, and F). Program Coordinators are required to complete allschedules and provide appropriate documentation to support these performancemeasures.

SCHEDULE E: Institutional Support

Program Judgment Exemplary (3) Meets Expectations (2) Below Expectations (1)

Narrative STRENGTHS:Trenholm State Technical college has been very good at updating software and computers ona cyclic basis. The DDT Department is ahead of the curve on teaching and suppliying thestudents with the latest BIM software such as ; Revit Architecture, SolidWorks. Inventor.

Trenholm State Community College Page 26 / 57

CHALLENGES: Keeping on the technological curve is both challenging and exciting. New technology demandsprofessional development and training. Alloting time for seminars such as AUGI is going torequire the addition of adjunct faculity. Recruiting from River Region will require aggressivemarketing to both high school and adult population.

SUGGESTED PLAN OF ACTION:An increase marketing of the college as a whole and the program in particular in thecommunity and the industries locally would increase awareness of availability of well trainedworkers. In this environment of career change there are more potential adults students to bereached. Radio, tv and internet ads could be rotated to feature each program individually aswell as using the high school’s internal televised announcement system.The program would benefit from secretarial staff support enabling the instructor to devotemore attention to actual teaching.Professional development seminars could address issues primary to the actual day to daychallenges faced in the classroom and balancing the demands for both teaching andmaintaining a program effectively.The college as a whole could benefit by a greater collaboration between programs which areinterdependent in the real work world. For instance, DDT department could incorporate acollaborative project with the Machine Tools or Graphic Design Dept, thereby benefiting thestudents by creating a real world environment.

Advisory council meetings would have increased participation by industry leaders if modernmultimedia means of virtual meetings were ( i.e. Gotomeeting.com) available for use by thedepartments.

Sources

Dan Morris 2012

DDT tri­fold brochure

Outreach­Recruiting 2010­2011

Recruitment letter for Homeschoolers

Revit Training funding request

Trenholm State's Brochure

J.F

Schedule F. Overall Quality of ProgramBased upon the Program Review, comment on this program's strengths and challengesutilizing the headings listed below. If appropriate, list any suggested plan of action youhave that will address strengths or challenges. (See attached Schedules A, B, C, D, E, andF). Program Coordinators are required to complete all schedules and provide appropriateTrenholm State Community College Page 27 / 57

F). Program Coordinators are required to complete all schedules and provide appropriatedocumentation to support these performance measures.

Schedule F: Overall Program Quality

Performance Indicators:Employer Satisfaction (overall level of satisfaction)Alumni Satisfaction (overall level of satisfaction)Completer Satisfaction (overall level of satisfaction)Student Satisfaction (overall level of satisfaction)Completion Rate (versus prior years, versus institutional average)Enrollment Level/Growth Rate (versus prior years, versus institutional average, program coordinators should explain increase and/or decrease in enrollments)Retention Rate (versus prior years, versus institutional average)Attrition Rate (versus prior years, versus institutional average)Placement Rate (versus prior years, versus institutional average)Licensure/Certification Rate (versus prior years, versus institutional average)Advisory Committee Satisfaction (versus prior years, versus institutional average)

Program Judgment Exemplary (3) Meets Expectations (2) Below Expectations (1)

Narrative STRENGTHS: DDT has the latest software editions available. It is the only Drafting program in the RiverRegion. The students learn a specialized skill sets that are needed by diverse professions ie.Architects, Engineering and Industry. The lab has been updated with new computers,Smartscreens, printers, desks and chairs and LED displays.

Employer Satisfaction:For the period surveyed, employers expressed 100% satisfaction. This indicates that thechanges made in curriculum and hardware have prepared the student for the needs of theemployers in our area.

Alumni Satisfaction:For the reported period satisfaction was good­excellent. This indicatesthat the students needs are being met. Completer Satisfaction:The satisfaction rate was 85.7%­100% for the period surveyed. Theprogram has succeeded in the preparation of the student for entry level positions. Student Satisfaction: The chart below indicates that the majority of those surveyed ratedthe DDT department average­Excellent in satisfactions. This indicates that there is room forimprovement in that the goal is for the program to be excellent in the instruction andpreparation of the student for the work­world. However, a trend is noted that the excellentratings improve year after year showing that the efforts to improve are noticeable to theemployers and students.

Trenholm State Community College Page 28 / 57

2009­10 2010­11 2011­12 2012­13 2013­14

EmployerSatisfaction

Excellent­0%VeryGood­100%

No dataavailable

No dataavailable

No dataavailable

Survey notadministered

StudentSatisfaction(ACT StudentOpinion)What is your overallimpressionof the quality ofeducation at this2­year college?

Excellent­20%

Good­56%Average­

24%

Excellent­29.4%Good­35.3%

Average­29.4%Blank­5.9%

Excellent­7.7%

Good­38.5%Average­38.5%Below

Average­7.7%

Blank­7.7%

Excellent­42%

Good­25%Average­

25%Below

Average­0%Very

Inadequate­8%

Survey notadministered

Alumni Satisfaction

Excellent­0%Very

Good­0%Good­100%

Excellent­0%VeryGood­100%

No dataavailable

No dataavailable

Excellent­42%Very Good­58%

CompleterSatisfactionOverall, I amsatisfied with theeducation received atTrenholm

No dataavailable Yes­100% Yes­85.7%

No­14.3% Yes­100% Yes­100%

AdvisoryCommitteeSatisfaction

Excellent­0%

Good­50%Fair­50%

Excellent­30%

Good­60%Fair­10%Poor­0%

Excellent­33.3%

Good­66.7%

Excellent­33.3%

Good­66.7%

Survey notadministered

Completion Rate:Narrative

Trenholm State Community College Page 29 / 57

Award 2011 2012 2013

Completion Rate CER N/A N/A 64.00

AAT 75.00 60.00 64.00

Placement Rate CER N/A N/A 89.00

AAT 100 100 89.00

Licensure Rate CER N/A N/A N/A

AAT N/A N/A N/A

Retention Rate 33.33% 33.33% 50%

Fall FTE Students 14 17 17

Enrollment Level/Growth Rate:Fall Semester Enrollment Trends (Unduplicated) (IR/IT Offices)

Fall 2014 Fall 2013 Fall 2012 Fall 2011

New Students 7 9 4 3

Program Enrollment 24 26 23 20

Program Graduates 0 1 2 3

Credit Hours Produced 233.00 258.00 239.00 208.00

Exit Students 1 3 2 4

Student FTE 17 17 17 14

Retention Rate: Attrition Rate:

Placement Rate: DDT placement rate indicates that students are finding entry level jobs inthe community.

Narrative

Trenholm State Community College Page 30 / 57

Program Performance

Results

College WidePrevious year(IR Office)

Program Previous Year(IR Office)

ObjectiveNext Year(ProgramFaculty)

Enrollment PercentChange(Previous Fall Term 2013to Fall Term 2014)

­1.48%FA2014 ­ 24FA2013 ­ 26

­7%

Completion Rate 76% CER ­ 64%AAT ­ 64%

Placement Rate 90% CER ­ 89%AAT ­ 89%

Licensure Passage Rate 83% N/A

Retention Rate 50% 50%

Student/Teacher Ratio 13:1 17:1

Credit Hours/FTE Faculty 192 258

% of Programs AchievingViability Criteria

2011­12 through 2013­14

52% DDT Program does notmeet viability standard

Licensure/Certification Rate:NA Advisory Committee Satisfaction: The surveys completed by members of the AdvisoryCommittee indicate a rising level of satisfaction with the DDT program. Several major changesto the program were made on the suggestion of the Advisory committee resulting directly tothe increase of satisfaction.

CHALLENGES: Most of the surveys that are listed above indicate that overall satisfaction ofthe program is above average. The challenges for the program are advertising and promotionof the uniqueness of the program in the River Region. Such funding has been reduced due tobudgeting reductions throughout the college. Some students have stated that they didn'tknow that Trenholm had a drafting department. The need for professional draftsmen with BIMtraining has been established. Workshops with software vendors have emphasized the ever­present need for software updates. Many businesses are not aware of the latest advances intechnical software that could increase their profits. Advertising will help promote the need andawareness of the program. SUGGESTED PLAN OF ACTION: Advertise locally both TV and Radio along with social mediasuch as DDT website. Continue to implement changes as suggested by advisory board. Asnew technology develops, the DDT program will incorporate curriculum and hardware to meetthe challenges. Encourage the leadership at Trenholm to improve communication andawareness of local employers and potential students of the latest advancement in technicalTrenholm State Community College Page 31 / 57

awareness of local employers and potential students of the latest advancement in technicalsoftware which could increase their competivity and profit. Exploration of the concept ofpartnering with universities in the area may open up new avenues of enrollment in ourprogram.

Sources

2009­10 Compendium of Surveys

2011 Compendium of Surveys

2012 Compendium of Surveys

2013 Advisory Committee Survey

2013 Compendium of Surveys

2014 Alumni Satisfaction Survey

2014 Completer Exit Survey

2014 Library Satisfaction Survey

Full Time Part Time Retention Rates Fall 2012 to Fall 2013

K.1

Program AttachmentsIn addition to completion of the INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM REVIEW EXECUTIVESUMMARY: 1. Include the following as program attachments:

a. Program description and course descriptions (copy from current college catalog)

b. Degree plan/Program(s) of Study

c. Syllabi of courses with embedded speech and computer skills development (may not beapplicable to all programs) Associate Degree only!

d. Submit four additional syllabi. (If appropriate, two from 100 level courses and two from 200level courses). (One year) certificate programs are to submit two syllabi. Specializedemphasis course submit one. All syllabi must indicate requirements for students to utilizecollege learning resources.

Trenholm State Community College Page 32 / 57

Program Judgment Exemplary (3) Meets Expectations (2) Below Expectations (1)

Narrative

Sources

2010­12 Drafting Course Sch.

DDT 111 FA14 Syllabus

DDT 124 FA14 Syllabus

DDT 127 SU14 Syllabus

DDT 128 FA14 Syllabus

DDT 131 SU15 Syllabus

DDT 150 SU14 Syllabus

DDT 233 SU14 Syllabus

DDT118 SP14 Syllabus

Plan of Study

Program Information

K.2

Student Learning OutcomesIn addition to completion of the INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM REVIEW EXECUTIVESUMMARY:

List student learning outcomes for the program: (“When the student completes the programhe/she will be able to...”)

Program Judgment Exemplary (3) Meets Expectations (2) Below Expectations (1)

Narrative When the student completes the program he/she will be able to: 1) Develop CAD operational skills 2) Synthesize drafting skills Trenholm State Community College Page 33 / 57

2) Synthesize drafting skills 3) Develop comprehensive and analytical skills

Sources

rubric

Student will develop visualization skills and product design methodology

Student will pass the CAD exam in DDT 127

Students will be able to demonstrate visual skills through orthographic testing.

Students will be able to pass CAD Certification exam

Students will be able to print 3­D objects.

K.3

Graduate Student SurveysIn addition to completion of the INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM REVIEW EXECUTIVESUMMARY:

Discuss results of graduate student surveys and indicate how you have modified yourcurriculum for program improvement based on the surveys. Attach copies of surveys andresults.

Program Judgment Exemplary (3) Meets Expectations (2) Below Expectations (1)

Narrative Following the student after graduation has proven difficult, although most DDT students areworking in a related field before they graduate. All job listings are posted though most of theprofessional positions want experience. There are cases of some companies that require theAssociate Degree before they will consider hiring the student. The results of industry satisfaction compilied from surveys are very good and do not dictate achange in the direction of the program.

Sources

2014 Alumni Satisfaction SurveyTrenholm State Community College Page 34 / 57

2014 Alumni Satisfaction Survey

2014 Completer Exit Survey

Copy of COE Report 2010­2011 (rev.1 Final)

Copy of DDT 2014 COE Final update

positive completers

SU 11 ­ SP 12 COE DDT REPORT

K.4

Employer SurveysIn addition to completion of the INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM REVIEW EXECUTIVESUMMARY:

Discuss results of employer surveys and the level of satisfaction among business and industryclients with Trenholm­trained employees.

Program Judgment Exemplary (3) Meets Expectations (2) Below Expectations (1)

Narrative

As the chart below indicates, the employer satisfaction with the instructional program hasbeen very good. This indicates the program is effective in preparing the student for theworkforce.

Trenholm State Community College Page 35 / 57

2009­10 2010­11 2011­12 2012­13 2013­14

EmployerSatisfaction

Excellent­0%VeryGood­100%

Very Good100%

No dataavailable

No dataavailable Excellent 100%

StudentSatisfaction(ACT StudentOpinion)What is your overallimpressionof the quality ofeducation at this2­year college?

Excellent­20%

Good­56%Average­

24%

Excellent­29.4%Good­35.3%

Average­29.4%Blank­5.9%

Excellent­7.7%

Good­38.5%Average­38.5%Below

Average­7.7%

Blank­7.7%

Excellent­42%

Good­25%Average­

25%Below

Average­0%Very

Inadequate­8%

Survey notadministered

Alumni Satisfaction

Excellent­0%Very

Good­0%Good­100%

Excellent­0%VeryGood­100%

No dataavailable

No dataavailable

Excellent­42%Very Good­58%

CompleterSatisfactionOverall, I amsatisfied with theeducation received atTrenholm

No dataavailable Yes­100% Yes­85.7%

No­14.3% Yes­100% Yes­100%

AdvisoryCommitteeSatisfaction

Excellent­0%

Good­50%Fair­50%

Excellent­30%

Good­60%Fair­10%Poor­0%

Excellent­33.3%

Good­66.7%

Excellent­33.3%

Good­66.7%

Survey notadministered

Sources

2009 employer survey

2014 Alumni Satisfaction Survey

2014 employer satisfaction

Business and Industry Questionairre

employer survey 2010

Trenholm State Community College Page 36 / 57

K.5

Program Advisory CommitteeIn addition to completion of the INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM REVIEW EXECUTIVESUMMARY:

Discuss changes/improvements you have made in your program/curriculum as a result ofProgram Advisory Committee recommendations and feedback. Attach copies of meetingminutes.

Program Judgment Exemplary (3) Meets Expectations (2) Below Expectations (1)

Narrative Funding for a 3D Scanner will help prepare students for the ever changing market and increasetheir employability. The 3D printer was purchased upon the recommendation of the AdvisoryCommittee. The addition of computer tablets with Google SketchUp Pro was also from anAdvisory Committee recommendation.

Sources

Advisory brochure

DDT 2010­1 advisory meeting

DDT 2010­2 advisory meeting

DDT 2011­1 advisory meeting

DDT 2011­2 Advisory Meeting Minutes

DDT Advisory council members 2012

DDT FALL 2011 Advisory Meeting Minutes

DDT Fall 2012­1 Advisory Meeting Minutes

DDT Fall 2013­1 Advisory Meeting Minutes

DDT Fall 2014­1 Advisory Meeting Minutes

DDT Fall 2014­2 Advisory Meeting Minutes

Su10 Advisory Meeting Agenda and Minutes

Trenholm State Community College Page 37 / 57

K.6

Outcome AssessmentIn addition to completion of the INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM REVIEW EXECUTIVESUMMARY:

Discuss changes/improvements you have made in your program/curriculum as a result ofoutcome assessment as documented through institutional effectiveness. Attach copies of theprogram’s outcome assessment information located in the institutional effectivenessdocuments.

Program Judgment Exemplary (3) Meets Expectations (2) Below Expectations (1)

Narrative The retention rates provided by institutional research indicate that students are not preparedfor the math and critical path thinking that is essential in Drafting and Design. The Collegehas instituted remedial courses to equip students for these challenges. However. theMillennial student demonstrates a entitlement attitude which is probable cause for earlywithdrawal. This challenge is not a result of program/curriculum deficiencies but moreover tocultural factors.No recommendations for change is warranted.

Sources

Full Time Part Time Retention Rates Fall 2012 to Fall 2013

Outreach­Recruiting 2010­2011

Risk Assessment Survey (3)

K.7

Previous Program ReviewIn addition to completion of the INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM REVIEW EXECUTIVESUMMARY:

Discuss progress and changes made based on recommendations from the last programreview.

Trenholm State Community College Page 38 / 57

Program Judgment Exemplary (3) Meets Expectations (2) Below Expectations (1)

Narrative

Program EnhancementGoals

Goal Statement (Program Faculty)

Curriculum Revisions The curriculum will be updated yearly inaccordance to the latest trends in industryand versions available from publishers. Agraphics software program to developbrochures and logos for industry outreach willbe included in the next year’s budget.

Accreditation/Certification The Department will seek to establish astudent chapter of the American Drafting andDesign Association. The program willencourage all graduates to take the ADDAcertification test upon completion of theprogram. The program will seek certificationby the ADDA.

Professional Development Instructor will attend all professionaldevelopment workshops and annual seminarsregarding software updates. He will attendconferences as allowed by budget restraints.He will seek certification in his field ofexperience.

EquipmentAdditions/Upgrades

DDT dept will seek funding within theAlabama College System to purchase a 3Dprinter and to upgrade the computers toaccommodate the increased power requiredby the latest software releases. We willincrease the number of stations to adjust tothe increased program enrollment.

Co­Op EducationOpportunities

The DDT department will utilize all co­opopportunities available to students.

In comparrison to the 2010 review, the improvements were as follows:

The department was not furnished with a graphics program for brochures and with it'slimited budget has not been able to purchase marketing brochures, ect. The DDT Department has not pursued the ADDA certification but has replaced theaccredidation with NCCER Standardized Craft Training Program which fulfills SACSaccredidation requirement. The instructor has attended ACCS seminars, SolidWorks demonstrations and severalprofessional development activities throughout the five year period. The DDT Department has purchased a 3D printer. Trenholm State Community College Page 39 / 57

The DDT Department has purchased a 3D printer. Some businesses have indicated they would enter into a co­op enterprise withgraduating students. However no present agreement has been formalized.

Sources

Drafting and Design Flyer9

NCCER certification

NCCER certification2

Program review 2010 ver 2

Revit Training funding request

K.8

Other DocumentationIn addition to completion of the INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM REVIEW EXECUTIVESUMMARY:

Discuss and or/attach other supporting documentation (memos, letters of support, etc.)related to the program.

Program Judgment Exemplary (3) Meets Expectations (2) Below Expectations (1)

Narrative

Sources

DDT Programatic student outcomes listing

Drafting Room Policies

SkillsUSA Trenholm Instructor Script

The following list represents the list of common drafting titles

Trenholm State Community College Page 40 / 57

Checklist

Checklist Instructions: Check “Yes” if the data is complete and “No” if the data isincomplete. Missing or incomplete items should be addressed with the program coordinator,who will then be given opportunity to complete the data before the summary portion of thisform is completed.

Trenholm State Community College Page 41 / 57

YES NO PROGRAMREVIEW ITEM COMMENTS

X A. ProgramInformation

X B. AwardInformation

X C. EnrollmentInformation

X C. EnrollmentTrends

X C. EnrollmentDemographics

X D. ProgramPerformance Trends

X x E. ProgramSatisfaction Trends

*Employer Satisfaction Survey was administered for 2013­14. Look under Surveys on the IR webpage to find thestatistics for DDT. On the program review, this informationwas marked as Survey not Administered. *For future reference, be consistent with the administering ofall surveys. *Advisory Committee Survey was administered for 2013.Look under Surveys on the IR webpage to find statistics forDDT Advisory Committee Satisfaction. On the programreview, this information was marked as Survey notAdministered. Post Review:Program Coordinator did not correct this sectioncompletely

X F. ProgramCost/InvestmentTrends

X G. ProgramOpportunities – Hourly Wage Rates

X G. OccupationalEmploymentProjections

X G. Industry PartnerJob OpeningProjections

*Missing/Incomplete: Industry Partner Job OpeningProjections Post Review:Program Coordinator Corrected this section

X G. AnticipatedIndustry Trends

*Missing/Incomplete: Description of Anticipated ChangeThat Will Affect Changes In Curriculum and/or Equipment Post Review:Program Coordinator corrected this section

Trenholm State Community College Page 42 / 57

Program Coordinator corrected this section

X H. Program Goalsand Objectives

x I. Uniqueness ofprogram

Checklist Instructions: Check “Yes” if the data is complete and “No” if the data isincomplete. Missing or incomplete items should be addressed with the program coordinator,who will then be given opportunity to complete the data before the summary portion of thisform is completed.

Trenholm State Community College Page 43 / 57

YES NO PROGRAM REVIEWITEM COMMENTS

X

J. Schedule A –InstructionalPerformance/StudentLearning

*Missing: Writing the Narrative Under Strengths *Review information that was copied and pasted underinstructor credentials. Delete information that does notpertain to the DDT Program (MAT instructor info) *Suggestion: Instead of attaching a chard underStudent Satisfaction, analyze the data obtained fromthe students in the surveys by administering it in aparagraph form. *Attachments Missing: Attach Student SatisfactionSurveys for the reporting program review period.(Look under Surveys on the IR webpage to find thisstatistics for DDT) Post Review:Program Coordinator somewhat corrected thissection

x J. Schedule B –Curriculum and Course(s)of Study

x J. Schedule C – Facilities,Equipment, and Resources

X J. Schedule D – Quality ofStudent Experience

*Remove any students' names, AND/OR student IDnumbers, social security numbers from any writtenparts of the narrative or within the attacheddocuments.*Missing: Writing the Narrative Under Strengths Post Review:Program Coordinator did correct this section

x J. Schedule E –Institutional Support

x J. Schedule F – OverallQuality of Program

Missing:Narrative for strengths (missing) Narrative for Employer Satisfaction (expand andanalyze the writing) Narrative for Alumni Satisfaction (expand and analyzethe writing)Narrative for Completer Satisfaction (expand andanalyze the writing) Narrative for the Student Satisfaction (missing, only achart is provided, no writing that discusses thesatisfaction of students)Narrative for Placement Rate (missing) Narrative for Advisory Satisfaction (missing)

Suggestion: Expand the narrative for the SuggestedPlan of Action

Trenholm State Community College Page 44 / 57

Post Review:Program Coordinator did somewhat correct thissection

x x K. Overall ProgramSummary andRecommendations

SEE SUGGESTIONS BELOW

x Attachments – Programdescription and coursedescriptions

x Attachments – Degreeplans

x

Attachments – Syllabi ofcourses with embeddedspeech and

computer skills

DDT128 Syllabi is attached twice (remove one) Post Review:Program Coordinator did correct this section

x Attachments – Fouradditional syllabi

x Attachment – Studentoutcomes for program

Review the SLO's for the reporting review period inwriting form under the Narrative section. Only a copiedattachment(s) is provided in this section without awritten narrative. Post Review:Program Coordinator did complete this section

x Attachment – Discussionof results of graduatesurveys

*Remove any students' names from the attachedPositive Completer document. Post Review:Program Coordinator did complete this section

x Attachment – Discussionof results of employersurveys

*Missing Attachments: 2009­2014 EmployerSatisfaction Surveys *Missing the written Narrative regarding the levels ofemployer satisfaction Post Review:Program Coordinator did not complete thissection

x

Attachment – Discussionof changes/improvementsmade to program

based on AdvisoryCommitteerecommendations

Attachment – Discussionof changes/improvementsmade

Trenholm State Community College Page 45 / 57

x made

to program as a result ofassessment

x

Attachment ­­ Discussionof progress/changes madeas a result of

last program review

x Attachments – Othersupporting documentationrelated to program

Program Coordinator to revise discrepancies noted by the Program ReviewEvaluators

within 30 days from notification.

Date Notified:

Summary

Summary Instructions: Based upon the information in the Comprehensive Program Review,comment on the following areas concerning the program.

STRENGTHS OF THE PROGRAM:

CHALLENGES OF THE PROGRAM:

RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT:

OVERALL PROGRAM RECOMMENDATION:(Place an "X" next to your recommendation)

Trenholm State Community College Page 46 / 57

(Place an "X" next to your recommendation)

Continued for the next five­year cycle with the expectation of increasing enrollments.

Continued for the next five­year cycle with the expectation of maintaining currentenrollments.

Continued for the next five­year cycle with the expectation of decreasing enrollments. Closely monitored and considered for phase­out during the next five­year cycle.

Program Terminated Immediately (If this item is checked, a rationale should beincluded)

COMMENDATIONS (Complete this section if the subcommittee found that this program is oneof the Trenholm Tech's exceptional programs.):

On­Site Peer Visit Checklist

Name & Title of Evaluator: Melanie Hacker, Spencer Arington, Instructor / MichaelBarnette, Instructor / Heath Flowers, Instructor

Date of Visit: 5/28/2015

ITEM YES NO NOTAPPLICABLE

1. All instructional supplies and equipment meet appropriateand required safety standards. X

2. Safety signs are appropriately placed and visible bystudents and employees. X

3. Emergency Exit signs are appropriately placed and visibleby students and employees. X

4. Material Safety Data Sheets are completed and available forreview. X

5. Fire extinguisher is available and has undergone therequired preventative maintenance checks. X

6. Shop, classroom, and/or lab are clean and free of debris. X 7. First aid supplies are readily available. X

8. Preventative maintenance services are provided to ensurecontinued operation of the facility. X

9. Access to library services is readily available to students. X 10. Access to student services is readily available to students. X

11. Custodial services are available to provide routine care andmaintenance to facility. X

Trenholm State Community College Page 47 / 57

Identify any needed preventative maintenance, equipment needs, etc.:

Evaluator Rubric

Date of Review: Summer/Fall 2015 Evaluator Committee: Melanie Hacker, Spencer Arington, Instructor / MichaelBarnette, Instructor / Heath Flowers, Instructor

Trenholm State Community College Page 48 / 57

CATEGORY EXEMPLARY (3) MEETS EXPECTATIONS(2)

BELOWEXPECTATIONS

(1)SCORE

ProgramSatisfactionTrends

Well­written plan toaddress deficienciesidentified by programsatisfaction trends isprovided. If nodeficiencies exist, a planis provided to maintainexemplary status.

An adequate response todeficient programsatisfaction trends isprovided.

Section partiallyor not completed 1

ProgramCost /InvestmentTrends

Program Coordinatorthoroughly describedequipment replaced orpurchased, if applicable.

Program Coordinatorcompleted this section, ifapplicable.

Section partiallyor not completed 2

ProgramOpportunities/ IndustryTrends

Program Coordinatorprovided sufficient datato indicate the jobopenings in the followingcategories: 12­18months, 2­5 years, 10years based onoccupationalemployment dataprovided and input fromindustry partners.

Program Coordinatorpartially completed thissection; however, anexplanation was given asto why this data wasmissing

Section partiallyor not completed 2

ProgramGoals andObjectives

Program Coordinatorindicated objectivesfor the next yearbased on the dataprovided. Program Coordinatoralso indicatedstrategies on howthey plan to achievethe next yearobjectives, whichshowed percentageincreases. Program Coordinatorprovided well­writtenand obtainableprogramenhancement goals.

Program Coordinatorpartially completed thissection; however, anexplanation was given asto why this data wasmissing

Section partiallyor not completed 2

CATEGORY EXEMPLARY (3) MEETS EXPECTATIONS(2)

BELOWEXPECTATIONS

(1)SCORE

Program Coordinatorprovided a well­writtenTrenholm State Community College Page 49 / 57

Uniquenessof Program

provided a well­writtendescription of theprogram, specificallydescribing theuniqueness of theprogram.

Program coordinatorindicated at least twounique characteristics ofthe program.

Section partiallyor not completed 2

InstructionalPerformance/ StudentLearning

Program Coordinatorprovided a well­written response toall 5 performanceindicators andcompleted theStrengths,Challenges, andSuggestion Plan ofAction sections. Substantialdocumentation wasprovided to supportresponses.

Program Coordinatorresponded to at least 3of the 5 performanceindicators and completedthe Strengths,Challenges, andSuggestion Plan of Actionsections.

Documentation wasprovided to supportresponses.

ProgramCoordinatorresponded toless than 2 ofthe performanceindicators.

2

CurriculumandCourse(s) ofStudy

Program Coordinatorprovided a well­written and detailedresponse to all 8performanceindicators andcompleted theStrengths,Challenges, andSuggestion Plan ofAction sections. Program Coordinatorprovided substantialdocumentation tosupport responses.

Program Coordinatorresponded to at least4 of the 8performanceindicators andcompleted theStrengths,Challenges, andSuggestion Plan ofAction sections. Program Coordinatorprovideddocumentation.

ProgramCoordinatorresponded toless than 2 ofthe performanceindicators.

2

Program Coordinator

Trenholm State Community College Page 50 / 57

Facilities,EquipmentandResources

Program Coordinatorprovided a well­writtenresponse to all 5performance indicatorsand completed theStrengths, Challenges,and Suggestion Plan ofAction sections.

Substantialdocumentation wasprovided to supportresponses.

Program Coordinatorresponded to at least3 of the 5performanceindicators andcompleted theStrengths,Challenges, andSuggestion Plan ofAction sections. Program Coordinatorprovideddocumentation.

ProgramCoordinatorresponded toless than 2 ofthe performanceindicators.

2

CATEGORY EXEMPLARY (3) MEETS EXPECTATIONS(2)

BELOWEXPECTATIONS

(1)SCORE

Quality ofStudentExperience

Program Coordinatorprovided a well­written response toall 6 performanceindicators andcompleted theStrengths,Challenges, andSuggestion Plan ofAction sections. Substantialdocumentation wasprovided to supportresponses.

Program Coordinatorresponded to at least3 of the 6performanceindicators andcompleted theStrengths,Challenges, andSuggestion Plan ofAction sections. Program Coordinatorprovideddocumentation

ProgramCoordinatorresponded toless than 2 ofthe performanceindicators.

2

InstitutionalSupport

Program Coordinatorprovided a well­writtenand detailed response toinstitutional supportprovided by the College.All three categories,Strengths, Challenges,and Suggested Plan ofAction, were thoroughlydescribed.

Program Coordinatorprovided responses to allcategories of Strengths,Challenges andSuggested Plan of Actionfor this section.

Section partiallyor not completed 2

Program Coordinator

Trenholm State Community College Page 51 / 57

OverallQuality ofProgram

Program Coordinatorprovided a well­written response toall 11 performanceindicators andcompleted theStrengths,Challenges, andSuggestion Plan ofAction sections. Substantialdocumentation wasprovided to supportresponses.

Program Coordinatorresponded to at least 5of the 11 performanceindicators and completedthe Strengths,Challenges, andSuggestion Plan of Actionsections.

Program Coordinatorprovideddocumentation.

Section partiallyor not completed 2

ProgramReviewAttachments

Program coordinatorattached the following:

Program descriptionand coursedescriptions; DegreePlan/Program ofStudy Syllabi ofcourses withembedded speechand computer skillsdevelopment (AATonly); 4 additional syllabi(two each from 100and 200 levels ­must contain use ofcollege library); and Student LearningOutcomes. ­Syllabisubmitted followcollege guidelinesand are student­friendly. Responses areprovided for items 3­8 and are well­written and detailed.If data is missing,program coordinatordescribes a plan toensure data iscollected in thefuture. Documentation isattached.

Program coordinatorattached the following:

Program descriptionand coursedescriptions; DegreePlan/Program ofStudy; Syllabi of courseswith embeddedspeech and computerskills development(AAT only); 4 additional syllabi(two each from 100and 200 levels ­ mustcontain use of collegelibrary); and Student LearningOutcomes. Items 3­8 arecompleted with theappropriatedocumentationattached.

Section partiallyor not completed 3

Trenholm State Community College Page 52 / 57

OverallQuality ofInformationProvided in ProgramReview

Program Coordinatorcompleted all sectionsof the program reviewand responded to eachsection thoroughly withappropriatedocumentation.

Program Coordinatorcompleted 10 of the 12major categories of theprogram review andattached appropriatedocumentation

Responses inprogram revieware poorlywritten.Documentationis limited.5 or more of“MeetsExpectationsindicators” arenot met.

2

DDT Program Review Rubric

Please complete the rubric below. Name of Dean: Lee AmmonsDate of Review: July 29, 2016

Trenholm State Community College Page 53 / 57

CATEGORY Compliant Non­Compliant

NotApplicable

Has the program clearly articulated its programmission, program goals and student learningoutcomes?

Yes

Is the current curriculum content and designappropriate to enable students to develop theskills and attain the outcomes needed forgraduates of this program?

Yes

Does the program have adequate facilities,equipment, resources, staff and support services? Yes

Has the program been successful in its studentrecruitment, retention, placement, andcompletion/graduation goals?

Yes

Are faculty competencies/credentials appropriatefor the discipline and degree? Yes

Is faculty adequately supported and engaged inongoing professional development necessary forstaying current in their field and continuouslyupdating their courses and curriculum?

Yes

Does the program assessment plan clearlyarticulate student learning outcomes, assessmenttools, procedures for gathering evidence ofstudent learning?

Yes

How are the assessment results used to improvethe program and in strategic planning? Yes

The Dean of Instruction will be meeting with DivisionDirector and Program Coordinator to discuss andimplement ways to improve areas identified in thisprogram review, such as recruiting, retention,professional development, etc. A comprehensive plan ofaction will be taken to improve on these key areas, aswell as others identified from this session.

Dean's Narrative

NOTE: The narrative should include recommendations and commendations on thePROGRAM, STUDENTS, FACULTY, and ASSESSMENT AND PLANNING. Given the existing strengths and challenges of the program, recommendationsTrenholm State Community College Page 54 / 57

Given the existing strengths and challenges of the program, recommendationsshould be made to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the program. How could the curriculum of this program be improved over the next five years? Inorder to expand the Drafting & Design curriculum, the instructor should seek professionaldevelopment opportunities on a continuous basis that will afford him with anticipated futuretrends in the Drafting industry. Additionally, the program review revealed a deficiency withthe DDT instructor holding Advisory Council meetings and administering Employer Surveys in aconsistent manner. Industry partnerships are essential to Trenholm State students obtainingemployment and/or internships prior to graduation; as well as, instructors keeping abreast ofindustry trends. With that in mind, the DDT instructor should better utilize this resourceavailable to him. Moreover, the program coordinator and instructor(s) should work withAlabama Community College System Office and the programs Advisory Committee to meetthe needs/demands of local business and industry. What actions would be required to accomplish the improvement given current levelof resources (faculty, staff, facilities, equipment, etc.)The resources available throughout the college are sufficient to accomplish the recommendedimprovements ­ recruitment, retention, increase graduation rates, professionaldevelopment/training, etc. Provide recommendations and commendations regarding program improvement anddevelopment.The Dean of Instruction will meet with the DDT Program Coordinator and Division Director todiscuss areas of concern identified in the program review to devise a plan of action forimprovement. The areas of focus will be on recruitment, retention, professional development,timely administration of surveys and reports (e.g., Employer Satisfaction Surveys, AlumniSatisfaction Surveys, Advisory Committee Surveys, etc). Additionally, a major concern is in terms of the 3­year average of program graduates. TheDrafting & Design program had a 3­year average of 5.6, which is below Alabama CommissionHigher Education (ACHE) 7.5 standard. As a result, the program coordinator will need tocreate a plan of study that creates a pathway to completion in a more sufficient timeframe. Discuss the overall health of the program? Overall, the DDT program is a healthy and steady. However, based on the caliber of programand opportunities for growth, the need to make these adjustments are vital to sustaining thisprogram. Comment on any program specific concerns (i.e., professional accreditationconcerns).Increase in enrollment, retaining students through completion, industry outreach, professionaldevelopment; and, responsiveness to deadlines. Please make any comments regarding aspects of this program not covered in thisreview which you think should be described. Trenholm State Community College Page 55 / 57

Provide general recommendations and commendations.The instructor will work with Alabama Community College System Office to updatethe current curriculum so it will be more up to date.

President's Cabinet Action

President's Cabinet ActionSelect One Conclusions and Recommendations

President's Cabinet recommends that the College continue theprogram for the next five yearsPresident's Cabinet recommends that the College discontinue theprogram based on poor performance

President's Cabinet Recommendations

RECOMMENDATIONS 1.

2015 Drafting Program Review

2015 Drafting Program Review Richard Herring, ProgramCoordinator

President's Cabinet Action SelectOne Conclusions and Recommendations

X President's Cabinet recommends that the College continue the programfor the next five years

President's Cabinet recommends that the College discontinue theprogram based on poor performance

President’s Cabinet Recommendations ACTION PLAN 1. Develop a written plan to increase program viability

2. Ensure advisory committee is comprised of industry and other engagedpartners

3. Consider hiring adjunct instructor with CATIA experience 4. Increase enrollment and retain students through completion 5. Program Coordinator must be more responsive to meeting deadlines 6. Increase industry outreach and faculty professional development

Trenholm State Community College Page 56 / 57

Judgment Exemplary (3) Meets Expectations (2) Below Expectations (1)

Narrative

Trenholm State Community College Page 57 / 57