2017 FLEET BAROMETER - Arval LU · Context 10 • The scrappage scheme which was put into place early 2007 in Luxembourg enabled the automobile market to grow in 2007 but also in

1

2017 FLEET BAROMETER

Luxemburg

Table of content

2

I CHARACTERISTICS OF THE FLEET p.13

II FINANCING p.31

III TELEMATICS p.45

IV PERSPECTIVES IN TERMS OF MOBILITY p.50

VI INFORMATION SOURCES p.60

V IMPACT OF FISCAL REFORM ON FLEET POLICY p.57

3

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2002

Creation in

France

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Greece out

of the study

India out of

the study

2017 Brazil and Russia

out of the study

Perimeter of the study

Focus Europe

DATA COLLECTION METHOD

CATI System (Computer Assisted

Telephone Interviewing)

JANUARY

2016

16

FIELDWORK PERIOD TARGET

FEBRUARY

2016

6

QUOTAS

Company size

& sector 10 minutes in average

(without SME focus)

SAMPLE DURATION OF INTERVIEWS

3847 interviews including

3540 through Europe* and

307 out of Europe (Turkey)

4

Fleet managers in

companies of all industries

using at least 1 corporate

vehicle

Methodology

* All along the report, country results are being compared with Europe. Europe results do not include data from Turkey.

5

Companies with 10 to 99 employees

61 interviews

Companies with 100 to 249 / 499 / 999 employees

29 interviews

Companies with 250 / 500 / 1 000 employees and more

29 interviews

More than 100

employees

58 interviews

Companies with less than 10 employees

101 interviews

Sample

1 to 99

employees

162 interviews

Perimeter of the survey: companies owning at least 1 vehicle

6

Less than 10 employees

10 to 99 employees

100 to 249 employees



250 employees and

more

500 employees and

more

1000 employees and

more

FR IT UK NL ES BE CZ DE PL PT CH LU TR

Sample

7

* Fleet size : the size of the fleet has been defined according to the total number of vehicles given in question A5.

Company size

10 – 99 employees


1000 employees and more

Less than 10 employees

Fleet size*

Medium fleet = 10 – 49 vehicles

Large fleet = 50 vehicles and more

Small fleet = 1 – 9 vehicles

Pictograms

8

CONTEXT AND MAIN RESULTS

9

A – CONTEXT

Context

10

• The scrappage scheme which was put into place early 2007 in Luxembourg enabled the automobile

market to grow in 2007 but also in 2008 whilst the GDP started to contract because of the subprime crisis.

• 2009: strong market contraction due to the crisis

• 2010 – 2012: market growth

• 2013: the incentive for purchasing a vehicle with low CO2 emissions restricted to hybrid and electric

vehicles implies a strong market decline (like in 2009) despite a growing GDP (+4.2%). The decline in

sales to households/individuals is partly offset by an increase in sales of company vehicles.

• 2014: Increase of 6.8% in terms of number of personal cars sold that allows the market to reach 2012’s

sales level. Sales level was supported by a high GPD growth rate of 4.7% in 2014

• 2015: The GDP growth rate reaches a lower level compared with the previous year (3.5% in 2015 versus

4.7% in 2014) and PCs sales volumes nosedives by 6.7%. Many different causes could explain this

decrease in sales but the increase in VAT is probably one of the main explicative factor (according to Mr

Ernest Pirsch, President of FEGARLUX). This decrease was limited thanks to the fleet vehicles segment.

• 2016: Come back to an increase market, PC sales increase of 8.8% compared with the previous year.

• OECD foresees for 2017 and 2018 GPD to reach a similar growth rate level as for 2016: +4% (compared

with +3.6% for this year).

• One estimates a 20% share of company vehicles in Luxembourg.

Context

11

Compared evolution of Personal Vehicles sales and real GDP growth rate (OECD) in Luxembourg

-8,0

-6,0

-4,0

-2,0

0,0

2,0

4,0

6,0

8,0

10,0

40000

42000

44000

46000

48000

50000

52000

54000

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

PC sales GDP growth rate (Real - OECD)

Context

12

Compared evolution of LCV sales and real GDP growth rate (OECD) in Luxembourg

-8,0

-6,0

-4,0

-2,0

0,0

2,0

4,0

6,0

8,0

10,0

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

LCV sales GDP growth rate (Real - OECD)

13

CHARACTERISTICS OF THE FLEET

I

14

A – FLEET ASPECT

10 to 99 vehicles

100 to 499 vehicles

500 vehicles and more

15

Total

A5. Can you please tell me the total number of vehicles of less than 3.5 tons in your fleet? Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%

1% 3% 3% 15% 9% 9% 11% 10%

28%

29% 37% 34%

2% 1%

30% 34%

68% 64%

62% 47%

53% 54%

98% 99%

70% 66%

21% 26%

7% 9%

1 to 9 vehicles

Number of vehicles in fleet

Balance

2015

Balance

2013

Balance = Fleet growth will increase – Fleet growth will decrease

Balance

2014

Balance

2017

+17 +13 +15 +11

+11 +10 +9 +5

+17 0 +13 +9

+8 +4 +6 +3

+11 +13 +19 +16

+9 +9 +6 +8

+23 +14 +9 0

+14 +10 +10 +6

+17 +33 +22 +22

+15 +20 +15 +3

16

A8. In the next three years, do you think that the total number of vehicles in your company fleet will? Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%

Total 22%

18%

22%

13%

15%

14%

27%

21%

24%

26%

5%

7%

5%

5%

4%

5%

5%

7%

7%

11%

% which think that the total number of vehicles of their company fleet will…

Fleet growth potential by company size

Increase Decrease

Increase Decrease Balance

2017

17

A8. In the next three years, do you think that the total number of vehicles in your company fleet will? Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%

Total +17 +13 +15 +11

+11 +10 +9 +5

+14 +4 +16 +6

+7 +5 +6 +4

+16 +18 +3 +8

+13 +15 +9 +4

+27 +30 +33 +22

+19 +20 +16 +10

% which think that the total number of vehicles of their company fleet will…

22%

18%

20%

12%

21%

21%

30%

29%

5%

7%

6%

5%

5%

8%

3%

10%

Fleet growth potential by fleet size

Balance

2015

Balance

2013

Balance

2014


18

Total

A25. On average, how long do you keep your vehicles before being sold ? – NEW 2017

Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%

Average in years

4,8 5,0 4,8 4,2 5,9 6,5 5,5 4,7

How long the company keeps its vehicles before

reselling them

19

Total

A25. On average, how long do you keep your vehicles before being sold ? – NEW 2017


Average in years

4,8 5,2 4,1 4,9 4,5 5,9 6,7 6,2 5,4 5,1

How long the company keeps its vehicles before

reselling them

20

A26. Did Volkswagen’s Dieselgate have consequences for your car policy regarding models or CO2 limits ? – NEW 2017


81%

89%

80%

91%

83%

88%

80%

83%

14%

8%

13%

6%

13%

10%

20%

14%

5%

3%

7%

3%

4%

2%

3%

No consequence Yes, few consequences Yes, many consequences

Total

Volkswagen’s Dieselgate consequences

21

A26. Did Volkswagen’s Dieselgate have consequences for your car policy regarding models or CO2 limits ? – NEW 2017


81%

89%

78%

92%

80%

91%

84%

88%

82%

84%

14%

8%

12%

5%

18%

8%

11%

10%

18%

13%

5%

3%

10%

3%

2%

1%

5%

2%

3%

No consequence Yes, few consequences Yes, many consequences

Total

Volkswagen’s Dieselgate consequences

22

B – ENERGY

At least one technology

Hybrid

Plug-in Hybrid

CNG (Compressed Natural Gas)

LPG (Liquefied Petroleum Gas)

Electric Vehicle

Fuel Cell Electric / Hydrogen

Already implemented + considered

% present and future use … E28. Amongst the following technologies, which one do you consider to use? Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%

Total

23

Considered in the next 3 years

Already implemented

Development potential of new energies or

technologies

22%

21%

11%

12%

11%

8%

1%

3%

1%

4%

13%

9%

1%

1%

43%

40%

30%

26%

22%

20%

3%

7%

4%

8%

25%

21%

6%

6%

10%

11%

5%

5%

3%

3%

0%

2%

3%

3%

3%

36%

30%

26%

18%

16%

13%

0%

5%

3%

8%

18%

14%

3%

5%

19%

26%

9%

14%

9%

10%

3%

0%

3%

12%

10%

2%

1%

41%

43%

26%

28%

15%

21%

7%

7%

4%

7%

21%

22%

5%

4%

60%

45%

30%

31%

36%

22%

7%

8%

7%

7%

43%

24%

4%

2%

63%

63%

46%

46%

50%

37%

7%

14%

7%

12%

50%

41%

13%

11%


Hybrid

Plug-in Hybrid



Electric Vehicle

Fuel Cell Electric /

Hydrogen

Already implemented +

considered

% present and future use … E28. Amongst the following technologies, which one do you consider to use? Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%

Total

22%

21%

11%

12%

11%

8%

1%

3%

1%

4%

13%

9%

1%

1%

43%

40%

30%

26%

22%

20%

3%

7%

4%

8%

25%

21%

6%

6%

24

Considered in the next

3 years

Already implemented

10%

8%

6%

3%

2%

2%

0%

1%

0%

3%

4%

2%

37%

29%

27%

17%

16%

13%

0%

4%

5%

8%

17%

12%

2%

5%

13%

17%

4%

8%

4%

5%

3%

0%

3%

9%

5%

2%

1%

43%

35%

28%

21%

24%

17%

7%

6%

2%

6%

22%

16%

9%

6%


technologies

32%

27%

18%

16%

23%

13%

2%

4%

2%

4%

18%

11%

1%

43%

44%

34%

31%

25%

23%

5%

8%

5%

8%

23%

22%

7%

5%

38%

40%

17%

25%

17%

17%

3%

7%

3%

5%

28%

22%

3%

2%

52%

57%

31%

38%

28%

30%

3%

13%

3%

11%

45%

38%

7%

9%

2017

2015

E28. Amongst the following technologies, which one do you consider to use? Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%


Already implemented


Hybrid

Plug-in Hybrid



Electric Vehicle


2017

2015

2017

2015

2017

2015

2017

2015

2017

2015

2017

2015


11%

12%

5%

9%

3%

2%

0%

1%

6%

2%

1%

39%

32%

27%

24%

19%

9%

2%

2%

4%

2%

19%

9%

4%

4%

25

% present and future use …

2017

2015

2017

2015

2017

2015

2017

2015

2017

2015

2017

2015

2017

2015

12%

10%

5%

4%

3%

1%

2%

1%

3%

3%

3%

3%

1%

31%

26%

19%

15%

14%

9%

5%

5%

8%

7%

14%

10%

5%

4%


+


technologies since 2015

2017

2015



Already implemented


Hybrid

Plug-in Hybrid



Electric Vehicle


2017

2015

2017

2015

2017

2015

2017

2015

2017

2015

2017

2015


34%

27%

18%

9%

20%

4%

3%

7%

3%

2%

22%

10%

1%

4%

47%

40%

33%

24%

26%

15%

4%

7%

4%

7%

32%

19%

7%

8%

26


2017

2015

2017

2015

2017

2015

2017

2015

2017

2015

2017

2015

2017

2015

32%

30%

20%

16%

14%

8%

5%

5%

5%

7%

15%

12%

1%

1%

50%

45%

34%

29%

26%

18%

10%

9%

9%

10%

29%

23%

7%

6%


+


technologies since 2015

27


% Already implemented + considered


62% 56% 52% 50% 48% 43% 39% 37% 31% 31% 26% 25% 15%

FR IT UK NL ES BE CZ DE PL PT CH LU


technologies At least one technology

TR

28

47% 46% 37% 30% 30% 30% 26% 21% 16% 15% 14% 13% 4%


technologies Hybrid / Plug-in Hybrid



46% 37% 35% 22% 20% 19% 17% 15% 13% 10%

8% 8% <1%

Hybrid

Plug-in

Hybrid



NL UK LU FR BE CH DE PT ES IT PL CZ

TR

TR

29


technologies CNG / LPG



CNG

LPG


17% 13% 13% 9% 8% 7% 7% 5% 4% 3% 3% 2% 2%

21% 19% 16% 15% 8% 7% 6% 5% 4% 4% 4% 3% 3%



TR

TR

30


technologies Electric / Fuel Cell Electric - Hydrogen



Electric

FCE

Hydrogen


35% 33% 32% 29% 25% 21% 20% 18% 16% 15% 13% 4% 2%

20% 10% 9% 7% 6% 6% 6% 4% 4% 3% 3% 2% 1%



TR

TR

31

FINANCING

II

*Self-purchase = outright purchase + credit (other than car credit) Data have been consolidated: 3 years average for large and very large companies

28%

39%

28%

46%

31%

34%

23%

24%

8%

7%

11%

11%

6%

4%

2%

1%

38%

26%

43%

29%

29%

26%

38%

19%

26%

28%

18%

14%

34%

36%

37%

56%

32

B2. What is the main financing method used to finance your company vehicles today? Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%

Main financing method

Operating leasing Finance leasing Car credit Self purchase*

Total

% of the main financing method used to finance company vehicles…

28%

39%

29%

46%

25%

43%

36%

34%

17%

28%

8%

7%

14%

14%

4%

8%

4%

3%

6%

1%

38%

26%

41%

29%

46%

29%

32%

25%

34%

19%

26%

28%

16%

11%

25%

20%

28%

38%

43%

52%

33


Main financing method


Total



Evolution of the main financing method

34

28% 27% 27% 28% 29%

8% 7% 9%

11% 14%

44% 44% 44% 43% 41%

20% 22%

20% 18%

16%

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017






35

21% 24% 24% 24% 25%

4% 5% 5% 5% 4%

42%

37% 40%

43%

46%

33% 34% 31%

28% 25%

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017






36

36%

33% 33% 35% 36%

0% 2% 3% 3% 4%

36%

30%

33% 32%

32%

28%

35%

31% 30% 28%

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017






37

22% 24% 19% 18% 17%

0% 0% 2% 4% 6%

39%

28% 32% 33% 34%

39%

48% 47% 45% 43%

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017






38

26% 26% 25% 26% 27%

6% 6% 8% 9% 10%

43% 42% 43% 43% 43%

25% 26% 24%

22% 20%

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017





+


39

30% 29% 28% 28% 28%

0% 1% 2% 3% 5%

37%

29% 32% 33%

33%

33%

41% 38%

36% 34%

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017



% of the main financing method used to finance company vehicles… +


40

B8bis. In the next three years, do you intend to develop Operating Leasing in order to finance your corporate fleet ? – NEW 2017 Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%

% of intention to develop Operating leasing in the next three years…

ST YES

Total

Yes probably

Yes certainly

14%

18%

44%

33%

Intention to develop Operating leasing

28%

11%

38%

28%

9%

5%

22%

20%

15%

9%

30%

24%

41

B8bis. In the next three years, do you intend to develop Operating Leasing in order to finance your corporate fleet ? – NEW 2017 Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%

% of intention to develop Operating leasing in the next three years…

ST YES

Total

Yes probably

Yes certainly

Intention to develop Operating leasing

15%

9%

30%

24%

24%

17%

41%

31%

16%

10%

36%

26%

13%

7%

24%

22%

11%

6%

23%

21%

Global fleet growth potential in the next 3 years

according to main financing method

Operating

leasing

Finance

leasing

Car credit

Self purchase*

42

A8. In the next three years, do you think that the total number of vehicles in your company fleet will…


Increase Decrease


Balance

2015

+15 +15 +21 +11

+8 +9 +9 +7

- - - -

+9 +5 +10 +2

+13 +14 +17 +1

+14 +10 +7 +5

+19 +13 +7 +23

+14 +12 +10 +5

19%

14%

37%

14%

20%

20%

25%

23%

4%

6%

5%

7%

6%

6%

9%

*Self-purchase = outright purchase + credit (other than car credit)

Total % which think that the total number of vehicles of their company fleet will…

Small basis

Balance

2017 Balance

2014

Balance

2013

43

LU5. According to you, what are the main added values of Operating Leasing for company vehicles ? Basis : companies using Operating Leasing

Main added value of Operating leasing

% YES

Total

Fixed monthly rental

You have the possibility to renew your vehicles approximately every 3 years

All services included / a full package : All is included in the rental agreement

You only pay for the use of your car

Building a long term relationship with the lessor

At the end of your contract you have the guarantee to pay no extra charge

Release capital into the business

Speed of delivery

Possibility to purchase the vehicle at the end of the contract

Reduce vehicle administration – Purchase

Help you selling your current cars used

75%

64%

63%

59%

57%

53%

49%

39%

39%

39%

20%

74%

54%

42%

57%

51%

54%

47%

27%

51%

35%

10%

Small basis Small basis

44

B25. What is your main motivation for using outright purchase? Basis : companies using Outright purchase

% YES

Full control of your fleet

Car usage longer than duration of a leasing contract

We prefer best specific provider for each service

Total

26%

21%

19%

Don't know : 35% 29%

Small basis Small basis

15%

32%

23%

Purpose for using outright purchase

45

TELEMATICS

III

Use of Telematics

46

E23. Have you implemented Telematics in part of your fleet? Telematics enables data transmission to monitor fuel consumption, driver behaviour, vehicle location...

from vehicles on the move. New precision added for the 2017 questionnaire: Data are transmitted by the mean of an original or an after sales equipment or box

installed in the vehicle. Telematics do not include data transmission by the mean of the users’ smartphones. Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%

Total

15% 10% 16%

26% 20%

12%

25% 37%

% which has implemented telematics in their fleet…

Use of Telematics

47

E23. Have you implemented Telematics in part of your fleet? Telematics enables data transmission to monitor fuel consumption, driver behaviour, vehicle location...

from vehicles on the move. New precision added for the 2017 questionnaire: Data are transmitted by the mean of an original or an after sales equipment or box

installed in the vehicle. Telematics do not include data transmission by the mean of the users’ smartphones. Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%

Total

15% 8% 11%

23% 21% 20% 9%

19% 25%

33%

% which has implemented telematics in their fleet…

48

E23b. And could you tell me who is the supplier of your telematics ? – NEW 2017 Basis : companies which has implemented telematics

Supplier of Telematics

Vehicles bought were already

equipped with Telematics by the

car manufacturer

You asked a car part supplier to

provide you with Telematcis

Vehicles were equipped with

Telematics by your car leaser or

lessor

You asked a Telecom company

for Telematic solution

Other

24%

16%

21%

17%

6%

16%

24%

27%

25%

29%

Who is the supplier of your Teleamatics

21%

15%

14%

23%

30%

14%

18%

16%

30%

31%

14%

19%

19%

28%

27%

Total

Small basis Small basis Small basis

(na) (na) (na)

(na) Results Not Available for Luxemburg – not enough respondents

(na) (na) (na)

(na) (na) (na)

(na) (na) (na)

(na) (na) (na)

Purposes for using Telematics

49

E25. For which reasons do you use Telematics in your company ? – NEW 2017 Basis : companies which has implemented telematics

Improve drivers safety

Improve drivers behaviours

Locate vehicles

Optimize journeys

Reduce fleet costs

Other

55%

52%

54%

50%

83%

68%

67%

54%

53%

55%

15%

14%

Reasons for using Telematics

Total

55%

55%

64%

52%

61%

19%

53%

49%

74%

53%

57%

9%

49%

47%

68%

57%

47%

14%

Small basis Small basis Small basis

(na) (na) (na)

(na) Results Not Available for Luxemburg – not enough respondents

(na) (na) (na)

(na) (na) (na)

(na) (na) (na)

(na) (na) (na)

(na) (na) (na)

50

PERSPECTIVE IN TERMS OF

MOBILITY

IV

17%

17%

62%

11%

15%

67%

5%

34%

55%

51

LU2. Do you consider that having a company car is ... Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%

% YES

A reward for your

employees

A tool to do correctly

their job

Both

13%

22%

61%

Total

Company car consideration

20%

16%

61%

Don't know : 5% 6% 7% 2% 3%

52

Development potential of alternatives

MM9. In the next three years, would you consider using the following alternatives? – NEW 2017 Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%

Car sharing

Ride sharing

Mobility budget or

card

Already using + considered


Total


Already using

17%

18%

23%

23%

17%

16%

20%

23%

26%

28%

20%

23%

40%

32%

27%

35%

27%

23%

47%

42%

30%

43%

31%

33%

19%

23%

31%

29%

18%

20%

19%

27%

35%

33%

20%

27%

8%

10%

18%

17%

14%

12%

11%

14%

20%

21%

17%

17%

ST At least one alternative

(Already using or considered)

45%

45%

34% 50% 68%

34% 54% 66%

53

Development potential of alternatives

MM9. In the next three years, would you consider using the following alternatives? – NEW 2017 Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%

Car sharing

Ride sharing

Mobility budget

or card

Already using + considered


Total

17%

18%

23%

23%

17%

16%

20%

23%

26%

28%

20%

23%


Already using

7%

7%

12%

13%

12%

9%

9%

11%

14%

17%

16%

14%

15%

13%

26%

23%

15%

14%

22%

17%

33%

27%

17%

20%

20%

23%

39%

28%

18%

19%

20%

28%

41%

34%

20%

27%

31%

33%

17%

34%

28%

27%

38%

41%

21%

42%

31%

35%


(Already using or considered)

45%

45%

27%

29%

48% 52% 62%

43% 55% 64%

54

MM10. And would you give up all or part of your company cars for such alternatives ? – NEW 2017 Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%

Yes probably

Yes certainly

Car sharing

Ride sharing

Mobility budget or card

Total

ST YES

% of ready to give up all or part of company cars for alternatives

1%

2%

1%

3%

1%

2%

2%

6%

6%

7%

9%

7%

Part of companies ready to give up all or part of their

company cars for alternative mobility solutions

1%

1%

2%

2%

1%

2%

3%

4%

6%

5%

8%

5%

2%

3%

2%

2%

2%

2%

7%

6%

8%

4%

8%

4%

3%

5%

3%

4%

3%

13%

7%

14%

20%

12%


(Yes certainly or probably)

15%

13%

14% 12% 24%

9% 15% 22%

55

Total

MM10. And would you give up all or part of your company cars for such alternatives ? – NEW 2017 Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%

% of ready to give up all or part of company cars for alternatives

Yes probably

Yes certainly

ST YES

Part of companies ready to give up all or part of their

company cars for alternative mobility solutions

Car sharing

Ride sharing

Mobility budget or card

1%

2%

1%

3%

1%

2%

2%

6%

6%

7%

9%

7%

1%

2%

1%

1%

3%

2%

4%

7%

4%

2%

2%

4%

2%

2%

2%

7%

5%

13%

7%

9%

6%

2%

2%

2%

2%

2%

2%

8%

9%

8%

7%

8%

3%

6%

5%

4%

3%

12%

3%

13%

17%

12%


(Yes certainly or probably)

15%

13%

8%

7%

22% 14% 24%

13% 16% 21%

56

LU3. How do you proceed with your fuel management ? Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%

% YES

Total

Fuel management

66%

20%

14%

17%

Fuel card contract directly managed with an oil company

Paid and reimburse to employees

Included in the leasing contract

Other

77%

17%

34%

13%

81%

14%

9%

8%

54%

24%

10%

23%

57

IMPACT OF FISCAL REFORM ON

FLEET POLICY

V

41%

36%

18%

30%

11%

39%

28%

17%

28%

17%

58

LU6. The new fiscal reform on Benefit in Kind came into force in January 2017. Among the following list, could you tell us what could be the possible

impact of this reform on your fleet policy? Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%

% YES

41%

30%

15%

37%

10%

Total

Impact of the new fiscal reform

on the fleet policy

Establish a CO2 emission

limit in your car policy

Implement more petrol and

hybrid engines vehicles in

your car policy

Open your fleet to a larger

number of employees

Other

Not enough aware of this

reform

52%

38%

17%

34%

3%

37%

21%

11%

50%

8%

59

LU6. The new fiscal reform on Benefit in Kind came into force in January 2017. Among the following list, could you tell us what could be the possible

impact of this reform on your fleet policy? Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%

% YES

Total

41%

30%

15%

37%

10%

Establish a CO2 emission

limit in your car policy

Implement more petrol and

hybrid engines vehicles in

your car policy

Open your fleet to a larger

number of employees

Other

Not enough aware of this

reform

47%

50%

26%

20%

7%

44%

34%

13%

33%

12%

38%

20%

12%

45%

10%

Impact of the new fiscal reform

on the fleet policy

60

INFORMATION SOURCES

VI

61

T13. Which are your main sources of information when you are looking for technical information related to your fleet management (such as safety, specifications of

vehicle model, costs…)? Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%

Part of telematics and other information

sources when looking for technical information

Information from car manufacturers

Websites

Information from long-term lessor /

leasing company

Specialized press

Blogs and consumers' feedbacks

Information from apps

Social Media

61%

59%

58%

54%

46%

29%

29%

28%

21%

15%

12%

10%

11%

17%

Total

Part of main sources of information…

51%

56%

53%

55%

31%

20%

22%

23%

21%

16%

11%

10%

11%

17%

67%

58%

65%

51%

66%

33%

35%

28%

17%

12%

12%

8%

7%

14%

81%

71%

62%

54%

57%

49%

40%

42%

26%

15%

13%

13%

20%

19%

en savoir plus : www.csa.eu - @InstitutCSA 10, rue Godefroy - 92800 Puteaux Tel . : 01.57.00.58.00 - Fax : 01.57.00.58.01

62

Documents

2017 FLEET BAROMETER - Arval LU · Context 10 • The scrappage scheme which was put into place early 2007 in Luxembourg enabled the automobile market to grow in 2007 but also in