13084844 Tender Evaluation Template Form (Autosaved)

7/27/2019 13084844 Tender Evaluation Template Form (Autosaved)

1/16

APUC LTD - Tender Evaluation Template

Procurement title: Project X Members of Tender Board: Board member

Project technical & quality weighting (%): 60

Project rice weighting (%): 40 !"erall #uality Threshold (otional): 60

#$'T *!+, Tenderer 1

,-amle Technical & #uality *riteria core (out of .)

Functionality 0 30 Yes 4.8 "#.#

Methodology 0 30 Yes 3. ""."

Future "e#elo$ments 0 20 Yes 3.0 $".%

%raining 0 ! Yes 4.0 ).%

&'ter sales assistance and su$$ort 0 ! Yes 4.0 ).%

(ecurity 1 ! Yes 3.4 *.)

)ase o' use * aesthetic characteristics 3 ! Yes 4.6 ).(

#uality Totals (M$T ,#$ /00) /00 1230+s overall ,uality threshold reached Yes

P+'*, *!+,

Tender price whole life costs/ Tenderer $ price 0 +430,000.00

Price score mean price 0/ +426,666.60 1% points Tenderer $ price score 0 49.2

!7,+ *!+,

Pro!ect ,uality weighting 2 ,uality score 60 - .0 / 47.4ro ec pr ce we g ng 2 pr ce score - . / .

!"erall score 67.1

3rder of tenders ran4ing/ 1

Comments

5igned 6y mem6ers of the Tender 7oard 8888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888

for file copy / 8888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888

8888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888

8888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888

Use template to also record 6id evaluation clarification 9 PT: results

'ndi"idual#uality

Threshold(otional)

*riteria8eight

(must total/00)

#uality Thresholdreached9

8eightedcore


2/16

;$

;"

;*

;)

;1

;(

;'

;#

;&

;$%

;$$

;$"

;$*

;$)

;$1

;$(;$'


3/16

,-amle Technical & #uality *riteriaFunctionality

Tenderers must desci6e what reports are availa6le$?*T'!?'T

=3/3/3/ +eorts

T,*@?'*?A#$'T*+'T,+'

*ontractors to inform what reorts they can ro"ide from themaster list3 They also need to confirm if they can slit into?ational ectoral and regional reorts3 Must also include abcanalysis3 They need to confirm that they can ro"ide granular le"elof detail from their reorts ie3 getting bacC to raw data3 +eorts

must be userfriendly redefined and requiring little or noconfiguration3 +eorts should be e-ortable to ,-cel andoweroint3 They will score ; marCs for all of the abo"e3 8e willscore 5 marCs for the ro"ision of e-tra reorting caabilitiesincluding the ro"ison of user defined reorts3 The award of ane-tra oint (. marCs) will be gi"en to e-cetional additionalreorts3


11/16

4.300%

50300%

6 .300% /63.0% 03000%

Technical uality *riteriao"erallPercentage

ectionPercentage core

ctualcore*omany >or'nut

Percentage core*omany >or'nut

Percentage core*omany

!"erallercentage scorefor eachquestionof tender



12/16

0300% /63.0% 03000% 0300% /63.0% 03000%









13/16

E2ample of a 7id Cost Evaluation

=hen the total cost of each 6id has 6een esta6lished these costs should 6e converted to a score out

5ince the lower the cost the 6etter the lowest cost should 6e awarded a score of $%%.

All other 6ids should 6e scored using the formulaF

7idGs 5core 0 $%% 2 lowest total cost > 6id cost/

E2ampleF

Three 6ids are received. The total cost for each isF

7id A H$"%%%%

7id 7 H$")%%%

7id C H$)"%%%

The cost score for each 6id isF

7id A 0 $%% 2 $"%>$"% 0 $%%

7id 7 0 $%% 2 $"%>$") 0 &(.#

7id C 0 $%% 2 $"%>$)" 0 #).1


14/16

of $%%.


15/16

,"aluation *riterion Matri-

*omany *omany B *omany * *oma

Price Price 5core Price 5core Price 5core Price

core H$#'1%%.%% 5/3/;/5 H"$)*'&.%% 6.3.654 H$(''%%.%% .634612 H$$&*"1.%%

ted score )% ?/ /435.64 /03602= 6/30./6

Iormula for Price 5core

Jean Price - 7id Price

2$%% /K1%Jean Price

Jean Price H$'"""(.%%

7ased on Daily Costs

5core 0


16/16

y A

5core

=031/4

;636=45

Documents

13084844 Tender Evaluation Template Form (Autosaved)