Upload
independent
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
0041-3216/2013/020096-10 Trop. Agric. (Trinidad) Vol. 90 No. 2 April 2013 96 © 2013 Trop. Agric. (Trinidad)
Physico - chemical properties of five cultivars of sweet
potato (Ipomea batatas Lam) roots grown
in Sri Lanka
Suraji Senanayake1, Anil Gunaratne
2, K.K.D.S Ranaweera
1,
and Arthur Bamunuarachchi3
1Department of Food Science and Technology, University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Sri Lanka
2Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Sabaragamuwa University of Sri Lanka, Belihuloya, Sri Lanka
3”ON – SITE” Consultancy, Training and Trade Systems, 128/22, Poorwarama Rd, Kirulapone,
Colombo 5, Sri Lanka
The flours and starches obtained from matured roots of five different cultivars of sweet potato (Ipomea batatas
.Lam) roots commonly grown in Sri Lanka (SWP1 – Wariyapola red, SWP3 – Wariyapola white, SWP4 –
Pallepola variety, SWP5 - Malaysian variety and SWP7 – CARI 273) showed significant differences in the
chemical composition and slight variation in functionality. Starch levels in studied cultivars on dry weight basis
were significantly different at P<0.05 and SWP7 contained the highest (64.1±0.1%) while SWP1 contained the
lowest (33.7±1.7%). The protein levels ranged from 1.2 ± 0.1 to 3.0 ± 0.1% and the total fat levels in tubers
varied ranging from 1.1 ± 0.1 to 1.7 ± 0.1%. The crude fibre contents in tubers were found to range from 2.1 ±
0.2 to 13.6 ± 0.3% and SWP7 contained a significantly higher level of fibre (P<0.05) than the other cultivars. The
ash levels ranged from 1.9 ±0.2 to 2.8 ±0.1. The sweet potato contained higher levels of calcium and iron and
high level of magnesium was observed in SWP5. Lowest swelling was observed in the SWP7 cultivar and there
was no significant difference in swelling of the starches obtained from the other cultivars. Scanning electron
microscopic studies showed different shapes such as oval, pentagonal and hexoganal in the native starches of
studied cultivars. Based on the thermal properties, SWP7 starch showed a high energy requirement and thus
gelatinized at a higher temperature. High peak viscosity, high breakdown and high final viscosity were observed
in the SWP4 cultivar and lower values for those parameters were observed in SWP7. The high level of enthalpy
and the low level of peak viscosity in SWP7 were associated with its low level of swelling. The DSC curves of the
melting properties of retrograded amylopectin were similar in all tested cultivars because melting temperature
reflects the quality and the perfection of the crystallites. Results revealed a high nutritional significance and
possible application of sweet potato flour and starch as jelling and/ or thickening agents in food industry.
Keywords: Chemical composition, Ipomea batatas, Swelling power, Mineral elements, Thermal properties
The main sources of starch supply of the
world today are corn, cassava, potato, wheat
and rice (Rosa M. Alves et al. 2002, 476-481).
Sweet potatoes (Ipomea batatas Lam) are an
important staple food of large sections of the
world population in the tropics where both the
tubers and tender shoots are eaten as a vital
source of nutrients. The bulk of production is
now concentrated in Asia, which accounts for
the major production of this crop in
developing countries.
The sweet potato is a tuberous – rooted
perennial plant belonging to the
Convolvulaceae or morning glory family.
This family includes about 45 genera and
1000 species, but only Ipomea batatas is of
economic importance as food (Onwueme
1978, 167-175). In Sri Lanka, fresh tubers of
sweet potatoes are commonly eaten boiled or
as a curry with other food ingredients and in
rural areas leaves are also consumed as a leafy
vegetable. Flour or starch may also be able to
be applied as an important ingredient in
various food systems as a thickener, binder
and a gelling agent depending on the physico
– chemical nature. Corn, potato and cassava
are the most common sources of starch for
such industries (Tester and Karkalas 2002,
381-438). The sweet potato plant consists of
herbaceous prostrate or climbing stems,
branches, petioles with a groove on the upper
surface, leaves spirally arranged on stems and
root (Hahn and Hozyo 1984, 551-567). It
produces one to several tuberous roots at
maturity, generally 4 to 7 (Chandra et al.
1985, 153-156).
Sweet potato has a remarkable ability to
convert solar and soil energies into
Physico-chemical properties of sweet potato; Senanayake et al.
97 Trop. Agric. (Trinidad) Vol. 90 No. 2 April 2013
carbohydrates giving impressive yields under
marginal and stress situations and it requires a
minimum amount of agricultural inputs and
little attention. Adaptability to extreme
environmental conditions, flexibility in crop
management and non-seasonality make sweet
potato a viable crop in many agro ecological
zones excluding high elevations. The high
nutritive quality, the richness of starch and the
physico –chemical properties in sweet potato
flour and starch can be used to increase its
utilization as a food crop and in food
industrial applications in Sri Lanka. The
objectives of this study were to analyze the
physicochemical characterization of the flour
and the starch of locally cultivated sweet
potatoes in order to popularize its utilization
and to evaluate their potential use in various
food industrial applications.
Materials and methods
Raw material
Mature tubers of sweet potatoes namely,
SWP1 (Wariyapola red), SWP 3 (Wariyapola
white), SWP 4 (Pallepola variety), SWP 5
(Malaysian variety) and SWP 7 (CARI 273)
were randomly collected from Dhambulla,
Horana and Gokarella areas in Sri Lanka and
prepared for analysis two to three days after
harvesting.
Separation of different fractions
Flour extraction
The tubers were washed, hand peeled and
trimmed to remove defective parts. Then the
tubers were grated into thin chips (~ 5 mm)
and dried in an air convection oven at 40 °C
for 30 hours up to 14% moisture. The dried
chips were powdered using a laboratory scale
grinder and sifted through a 300 µm sieve.
The flour samples were sealed and packed in
air tight containers for further analysis.
Starch separation
Starch separation was carried out according to
the method described by Takeda et al., 1988
with slight modifications. Fresh tubers were
washed, peeled and diced. Dipped in ice water
containing 100 ppm sodium metabisulphite to
minimize browning wet milled at low speed in
a laboratory scale blender with 1:2 w/v of tap
water for 2 minutes and filtered through a
gauze cloth. Residue was repeatedly wet
milled and filtered thrice and the suspension
was kept overnight to settle starch. The
supernatant was decanted and the settled
residue was further purified with repeated
suspension in tap water (1:2 v/v) followed by
the settling for 3 hours. The purified starch
was dried at 35 °C, sifted through 300 µm
sieve, sealed and packed for analysis.
Physico – chemical characterization
Chemical composition analysis of flour
Moisture, lipid, protein (N x 6.25), ash and
fibre were determined according to AOAC
(1980) methods. Starch content was estimated
by the complete acid hydrolysis method (Kent
Johns and A. J Amore, 1960). Flour sample of
2.5 g was suspended in a mixture of 200 ml of
water and 20 ml of HCl acid. (Sp. Gravity
1.125) The mixture was heated in a flask
provided with a reflux condenser for 2.5
hours. Contents were cooled, and neutralized
with NaOH (5 N). Volume was made to 250
ml and the sugar formed was determined as
dextrose by Lane and Eynon reducing sugar
estimation method. The dextrose multiplied
by 0.9 was taken as starch.
Mineral elements (Ca, Mg, Fe, K and Zn)
were determined by dry the ashing method,
(AOAC 1980). The ash was dissolved in conc.
HCl, filtered and diluted to 50 ml with
distilled water. Prepared solutions were
analysed with standards for elemental analysis
by Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer
(GBC Avanta Ver 1.33).
Physico-chemical properties of sweet potato; Senanayake et al.
Trop. Agric. (Trinidad) Vol. 90 No. 2 April 2013 98
Swelling power (SP)
Swelling power (SP) of the starch was
determined according to the method of
Gunaratne et al. (2010). Flour (100 mg, db)
was weighed directly into a screw – cap test
tube, and 10 ml distilled water was added.
The capped tube were placed on a vortex
mixer for 10 seconds and incubated at 85 °C
water bath for 30 min with frequent mixing.
The tubes were cooled to room temperature in
an iced water bath and centrifuged at 2000 X
g for 30 min and the supernatant removed and
remaining sediment in the tube weighed (Ws).
The supernatant was dried to constant weight
(W1) in a drying oven at 100 °C. The water
swelling power was calculated as follows:
SP = Ws/ [0.1 X (100% - WSI)] (g/g)
Where WSI = W1/ 0.1 X 100%
Morphology of starch
Morphology of the native starch granules was
evaluated by the scanning electron
microscope (HITACHI SU 6600, Japan) by
the procedures suggested by Lares, Perez and
Gonzalez (1997). Starch samples were
completely dried overnight (50 °C) and then
suspended in ethanol to obtain 1% suspension.
One drop of the starch – ethanol suspension
was applied on an aluminium stub and stub
was placed in dryer for 2 hrs. After drying,
stubs were coated with gold – palladium
(60:40), placed in microscope with an
accelerating potential of 15 kV.
Differential scanning calorimetry
Thermograms were obtained using a TA 2920
Modulated DSC Thermal Analyzer
differential scanning calorimeter (DSC)
equipped with a thermal analysis data station
(TA Instruments, Newcastle, DE). Starch (3
mg) was weighed onto the aluminium DSC
pan and distilled water (9 µl) was added with
a micro syringe. Pans were sealed and
allowed to stand for 1 hour at room
temperature. The scanning temperature range
and heating rate were 30 – 140 °C and 10
°C/min, respectively, using an empty pan as
reference.
Retrogradation
After gelatinization in the DSC, pans were
stored at 4°C for 48 hours to initiate
nucleation. Samples were kept at 40°C for 5
days before rescanning in the DSC with the
same heating rate and the temperature range.
Pasting properties
Pasting properties of starches were
determined in duplicate replications using a
Rapid Visco – Analyzer (RVA) model 3D
(Newport Scientific, Warriiewood, Australia).
Flour (3.5 g, 14% moisture basis) was mixed
with distilled water (25 g) in the canister and
loaded using STD2 heating and cooling
profile.
Statistical analysis
MINITAB software package (version 14 for
Windows) was used for data analysis.
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s
HSD test (p< 0.05) was performed for
samples in triplicate.
Results and discussion
Chemical composition
The results indicate that the SWP7 is
generally richer in starch than the other
studied sweet potato cultivars. (Table1). From
the five cultivars, SWP5 contained the lowest
level of starch on a dry weight basis. Moisture
contents of the fresh tubers were in the range
of 65.0±3.4 -74.6%. Protein contents in
studied cultivars were significantly different
at P<0.05 and SWP7 contained a significantly
higher level of protein than the other sweet
potatoes cultivars. There was no significant
difference (P<0.05) in the crude fat contents
of sweet potatoes (Table 1) but fat was
slightly lower in SWP3 cultivar.
Crude fibre levels were comparatively
high in most of the studied varieties of sweet
Physico-chemical properties of sweet potato; Senanayake et al.
99 Trop. Agric. (Trinidad) Vol. 90 No. 2 April 2013
potato cultivars. Literature reveals that the
crude fibre content of sweet potato tuber has
been reported to range from 2.5 to 5% dry
basis and crude fibre in roots had been
regarded as a defect factor of sweet potato
quality (Jones et al. 1980, 797-802). Crude
fibre level of SWP7 was significantly higher
(P<0.05) than the rest of the cultivars and
SWP5 contained a comparatively lower level.
Calcium level ranged between 2.1±0.1 to
5.9±0.1 mg/100 g db and swp5 contained a
significantly high level (P<0.05) than the
other 3 cultivars. Significantly, higher levels
of iron (P<0.05) were observed in swp3 and
swp7 than the other two varieties. A higher
level of Magnesium was in swp5 compared to
other varieties. Considerable levels of
Potassium and zinc were observed in swp1
and the lowest level of potassium was found
in swp5 (Table 2).
Swelling power
The swelling power of the tested starch
samples varied from 5.9 g (SWP7) to 8.8 g
(SWP3) per 1 g of dry starch (Table 3).
Swelling power of SWP7 was comparatively
lower (p< 0.05%) than other sweet potato
cultivars. Swelling power of starch depends
on the starch granular size and the amylose
content in the starch; and the degree of
swelling and solubility rely on the extent of
chemical cross bonding within the granules
(Schoch 1964, 106-109). There was no great
variation in swelling of the studied cultivars
but more variations have been reported in
swelling and solubility of sweet potato starch
of different genotypes (Rasper et al. 1969,
642-646).
Table 1: Chemical composition of flours obtained from sweet potato cultivars
Cultivar Moisture Crude protein* Total fat Crude fibre Total starch
Content (%) (g/100 g db) (g/100 g db) (g/100 g db) (g/100 g db)
SWP1 70.1±0.4b 1.2±0.1e 1.7±0.1a 8.5±0.4b 33.7±1.7e
SWP3 65.8±2.5c 3.0±0.1b 1.1±0.1b 7.3±0.2c 58.6±0.5b
SWP4 74.6±1.9a 2.3±0.1c 1.3±0.2a,b 6.5±0.4d 49.0±0.3c
SWP5 71.0±0.5b 1.7±0.2d 1.5±0.3a,b 2.1±0.2e 43.0±0.6d
SWP7 65.0±3.4c 3.3±0.1a 1.7±0.2a 13.6±0.3a 64.1±1.9a
N* X 6.25, Data represent the mean of three replicates. Values followed by the different superscript in each column are
significantly different at (P<0.05) Table 2: Composition of mineral elements in sweet potato roots (mg/ 100 g dry weight)
Cultivar Calcium Iron Magnesium Potassium Zinc
Swp3 2.1±0.1b 6.2±0.9a 11.0±0.8b 8 05.6±5.7a 2.5±0.3a
Swp4 3.4±0.8b 4.5±0.9b 12.1±0.1b 7 08.5±2.7b 1.9±0.1b
Swp5 5.9±0.1a 4.2±0.1b 15.3±0.1a 526.8±2.3c 1.6±0.1b
Swp7 2.2±0.1b 6.3±0.2a 11.0±0.3b 691.5±5.9b 2.6±0.1a
Data represent the mean of three replicates. Values followed by the different superscript in each column are
significantly different at (P<0.05)
Physico-chemical properties of sweet potato; Senanayake et al.
Trop. Agric. (Trinidad) Vol. 90 No. 2 April 2013 100
Morphological characteristics
The scanning electron micrograph (SEM) of
native sweet potato starches of different
cultivars is shown in the figure 1. The starch
granules consisted of a mixed population of
large, medium and small sizes and various
shapes such as oval, pentagonal and
hexagonal were observed. The average
diameters ranged between 16 and 24 µm in
five types of cultivars
.
SWP1 SWP3 SWP4
SWP 5 SWP 7
Figure 1: Scanning electron micrograph (SEM) of native sweet potato starch of different
cultivars
Table 3. Gelatinization parametersa and swelling power of sweet potato roots
Cultivar To ( °C) Tp ( °C) Tc( °C) ∆H (J/g) Swelling power
at 85 °C (g/g)
SWP1 78.3±1.2 82.0±0.7 94.0±1.1 15.7±0.4 8.0±0.9
SWP3 77.6±0.4 81.9±0.5 94.5±1.4 16.4±0.7 8.8±0.9
SWP4 77.0±0.3 81.8±0.3 94.3±0.9 14.3±0.3 8.7±0.4
SWP5 77.3±0.6 80.5±0.2 92.8±1.5 15.5±0.6 8.1±0.7
SWP7 78.6±0.4 83.6±0.2 95.7±1.8 20.1±0.5 5.9±0.1
aTo= onset temperature, Tp=peak temperature, Tc=conclusion temperature, ∆H=gelatinization enthalpy, values are mean
of triplicate determination ± SD
Gelatinization and retrogradation
properties
The To and Tp values of starches of the sweet
potato samples were in the range of 77.0 °C to
78.6 °C and 80.5 °C to 83.6 °C respectively (
Table 3). The lowest To ( 77.0 °C) and Tp (80.5
°C) values were observed in the starches
obtained from SWP4 and SWP5 respectively.
Highest values for To ,Tp and enthalpy
was observed in SWP7 cultivar.
Gelatinization is a swelling driven process
and swelling power of SWP7 starch was
comparatively lower compare to other
cultivars (Table 3). High gelatinization
Physico-chemical properties of sweet potato; Senanayake et al.
101 Trop. Agric. (Trinidad) Vol. 90 No. 2 April 2013
enthalpy, To andTp is related to the low
swelling capacity of the SWP7 starch (Fig.1).
Literature reveals the requirement of higher
energy for gelatinization for sweet potato than
starches like cassava and Zhang and Oates
(1999) observed that the Tp and To of
different sweet potatoes were 83 - 78 °C and
81 – 75 °C respectively. The enthalpy for
starch gelatinization of studied cultivars was
in the 15.5 – 20.1 J/g.
Figure 2: Gelatinization DSC curves of sweet potato starch (starch water ratio 1:3): curves from
top to bottom are SWP1, SWP3, SWP4, SWP5 and SWP7.
Table 4: Melting properties of retrograded amylopectin of sweet potato starches.
Cultivar To ( °C) Tp ( °C) Tc( °C) Tc - To ( °C) ∆H (J/g)
SWP1 66.5 72.1 80.2 13.7 3.9
SWP3 66.4 72.1 80.1 13.7 5.3
SWP4 66.4 72.2 80.3 13.9 5.4
SWP5 65.9 71.8 79.9 14.0 3.5
SWP7 66.2 71.9 80.0 13.8 5.8
To= onset temperature, Tp=peak temperature, Tc=conclusion temperature,
∆H= melting enthalpy of retrograded Amylopectin
Temperature (°C)
Hea
t F
low
(g/W
)
Physico-chemical properties of sweet potato; Senanayake et al.
Trop. Agric. (Trinidad) Vol. 90 No. 2 April 2013 102
Figure 3: DSC curves obtained from amylopectin retrogradation of sweet potato starches: curves
from top to bottom are SWP1, SWP3, SWP4, SWP5 and SWP7
Table 5: RVA data of different varieties of sweet potato grown in Sri Lanka
Cultivar PV HPV BD CPV SB
Swp1 222± 4.5 131±5.9 91±5.3 180±6.1 49±2.4
Swp3 225±2.1 145±6.1 79±3.6 208±2.8 62±1.8
Swp4 257±4.2 162±3.2 95±4.2 251±3.2 89±5.2
Swp5 248±3.2 129±4.2 118±2.9 178±2.6 48±4.1
Swp7 214±4.1 141±3.1 73±6.3 212±3.2 71±3.2
PV= peak viscosity, HPV=hot paste viscosity, BD=break down, CPV=cold paste viscosity, SB= setback
The melting properties of retrograded
amylopectin showed that quality and the
perfection of the crystallites are similar in all
tested cultivars because melting temperature
reflects the quality and the perfection of the
crystallites. Differences in ΔH suggest that
different cultivars are retrograded to different
extent. ΔH primarily reflects the loss of
double helical order and also is a measure of
the overall crystallinity of the amylopectin.
Takeda et al. (1986, 132-135) reported that
sweet potato amylose retrogrades at the same
rate as the cassava but more slowly than that
of potato amylose. Del Rosario and
Pontiveros (1983, 86-92) found that sweet
potato starch retrogrades more slowly than
cassava, wheat and corn starch.
-3.2
-3.0
-2.8
-2.6
-2.4
He
at
Flo
w (
W/g
)
40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Temperature (°C)Exo Up Universal V2.5H TA Instruments
Temperature (°C)
Hea
t F
low
(g
/W)
Physico-chemical properties of sweet potato; Senanayake et al.
103 Trop. Agric. (Trinidad) Vol. 90 No. 2 April 2013
Pasting properties by RVA
The pasting properties, peak viscosity,
breakdown viscosity, setback and pasting
temperature are shown in the Table 5. Highest
peak viscosity was shown in SWP4 and the
lowest was observed in SWP7 cultivar (Figure
3). The increase in viscosity during the
heating cycle is influenced by the extent of
amylose leaching, granular swelling and the
extent of friction between swollen granules
(L. Jayakody et al. 2007; 148-163). The
higher peak viscosity exhibited by SWP4
could be attributed to its high level of
swelling compare to SWP7 (Table 3). Pasting
properties are dependent on the rigidity of
starch granules, which in turn affect the
granule swelling potential (Sandhya Rani and
Bhattacharya 1989; 127-137) and the amount
of amylose leaching out in the solution
(Morris 1990; 2-6). The higher peak viscosity
exhibited by SWP4 could be attributed to its
high level of swelling compare to SWP7
(Table 3). The highly swollen granules in
SWP4 are more liable to disintegrate at high
temperature under shear, resulting more
granular breakdown. During the cooling
phase, regaining viscosity (cool paste
viscosity) is primarily due to realignment of
amylose chain into a certain order
(retrogradation).
Figure 4: RVA curves of sweet potato starches (S1= SWP1, S3= SWP3, S4= SWP4, S5= SWP5
and S7= Swp7)
0 0
80
160
240
320
20 20
40
60
80
100 100
0 0 5 10 15 20 25 25
Time (Mins)
Vis
cosi
ty (
RV
U) T
emp
eratu
re (°C)
S4
S5
S7
S3
S1
Physico-chemical properties of sweet potato; Senanayake et al.
Trop. Agric. (Trinidad) Vol. 90 No. 2 April 2013 104
Conclusion
Flours obtained from sweet potato cultivars
contained a considerable level of starch as
the main constituent on dry matter basis.
Results revealed the presence of significant
quantities of fibre, protein, considerable
amount of crude fat and ash in the studied
cultivars. Significant levels of calcium and
iron in the studied varieties show the
nutritional importance of sweet potato as an
important starch source. Moreover, the
cultivars which show high swelling, low
gelatinization peak temperatures and high
peak viscosity can be used as thickeners,
binders and gelling agents in various food
industrial applications. Further studies on
apparent amylose content, gel textural
strength and flow behavioral nature of
starch suspensions are required to use these
starch sources as food and industrial
additives in Sri Lanka.
Acknowledgement
The authors thank the Horticultural Crop
Research Institute, Gannoruwa, Sri Lanka for
the support extended and the University of Sri
Jayewardenepura, Sri Lanka for providing the
financial assistance for this study.
References
Alves, Rosa M, Maria Victoria Grossmann,
Cristina Ferrero, Noemi E. Zaritzky,
Miriam N. Martino and Maria Rita
Sierakoski. 2002. “Chemical and
Functional Characterization of Products
Obtained from Yam Tubers.” Starch/
Stärke 54: 476 – 481.
Association of Official Analytical
Chemistry (AOAC). 1980. Official
methods of analysis of AOAC
International, Volume 1.
Chandra, A., and J.F. Thivari. 1985.
“Studies on growth, sink and quality
parameters in sweet potato ( Ipomea
batatas Poir).” Tropical tuber crops
National Symp. (1985), pp 153 -156.
Del Rosario, R. R., and C.R. Pontiveros.
1983. “Retrogradation of some starch
mixtures.” Starch/ Stärke 35: 86 – 92.
Gunaratne A ., A. Bentota. Y.C. Zong, L.
Collado, and H. Corke. 2011.
“Functional, digestibility and antioxidant
properties of brown and polished rice
flour from traditional and new –
improved varieties grown in Sri Lanka.”
Starch/ Stärke 00: 1 – 8.
Gunaratne, A., and R. Hoover. 2002.
“Effect of heat – moisture treatment on
the retrogradation on the
physicochemical properties of tuber and
root starches.” Carbohydrate Polymers
49: 425 – 437.
Hahn, S.K., and Y. Hozyo. 1984. The
Physiology of Tropical Field Crops.
Edited by P. R. Goldsworthy and N.M.
Fisher, 551 – 567. John Wiley and Sons,
Ins., New York, NY.
Jayakody, L., R. Hoover, Q. Liu, and E.
Donner. 2007. “Studies on tuber
starches. II. Molecular structure,
composition and physicochemical
properties of yam Dioscorea sp) starches
grown in Sri Lanka.” Carbohydrate
Polymers 69: 148 - 163.
Jones, A., P.D. Dukes, M.G. Hamilton, and
R.A. Baumgardener. 1980. “Selection for
low fibre content in sweet potato.” Hort.
Science 15: 797 – 802.
Lares, M., E. Perez, and Z. Gonzalez. 1997.
“Some characteristics of Sagu (Canna
edulis Kerr) and Zulu (Maranta spp.)
rhizomes.” Journal of Agriculture Food
Chemistry 45: 2546 – 2549.
Kent Jones, G. W., and A.J Amore. 1960.
Modern Cereal Chemistry. 5th
edition.
Morris, V. J. 1990. “Starch gelation and
retrogradation.” Trends in Food Sci.
Technol. 1: 2 – 6.
Physico-chemical properties of sweet potato; Senanayake et al.
105 Trop. Agric. (Trinidad) Vol. 90 No. 2 April 2013
Onwueme, I.C. 1978. “Section C. Sweet
potato.” In The Tropical Tuber Crops
Yams, Cassava, Sweet potato, Cocoyams,
167 – 175. John Wiley and Sons:
Chichester, UK.
Rasper, V. 1969. “Investigation on starches
from major starch crops grown in Ghana.
II. Swelling and solubility patterns and
amyloelastic susceptibility.” J. Sci. Food
Agric. 20: 642 – 646.
Sandhya Rani, M. R., and K.R.
Bhattacharya. 1989. “Rheology of rice
flour pastes: Effect of variety,
concentration and temperature and time
of cooking.” J. Texture. Stud. 20: 127 –
137.
Schoch, T. J. 1964. “Swelling power and
solubility of granular starches.” In
Methods in Carbohydrate Chemistry, 106
– 109. Vol. 4. Whistler, R. L. Academic
Press, New York.
Swinkles, J. J. M. 1985. “Composition and
properties of commercial native
starches.” Starch/ Stärke 37: 1 – 5.
Szylit, O., M. Durand, L.P. Borgida, H.
Atinkpahoun, F. Prieto, and J. Delort-
Laval. 1978. “Raw and steam- pelleted
cassava, sweet potato and yam
cayenensis as starch sources for
ruminant and chicken diets.” Animal
feed science technology 3: 73.
Takeda, Y., A. Suzuki, and S. Hizukuri.
1988. “Influence of steeping conditions
for kernels on some properties of corn
starch.” Starch/ Stärke 40: 132 – 135.
Tester, R.F., and J. Karkalas. 2002.
“Starch.” In Biopolymers,
Polysaccharides II, Polysaccharides
from eukaryotes, edited by E.J
Vandamme, S. De Baets, and A.
Steinbuchel, Vol. 6, 381 – 438.
Weinheim: Wiley.
Zhang, T., and C.G. Oates. 1999.
“Relationship between α-amylase
degradation and physicochemical
properties of sweet potato starches.”
Food Chem. 65: 157 – 163.
Zobel. H. F. 1988. “Molecules to granules:
a comprehensive starch review.” Starch/
Stärke 40: 44 – 50.