View
343
Download
5
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
PG Diploma In International Business and Operation - Pursuing
IGNOU, Delhi
Grade C Mediator Certification In Dispute Management
Indian Institute of Arbitration and Mediation
M.TECH, MIEMCEPT , AHMEDABAD
B.TECH. CIVILBVP, PUNE
DIPLOMA, Network SecurityBVP, PUNE
JYOTPREET KAUR
PORTFOLIO
PROFESSIONAL WORK
Development of standalone container handling facility with Quay length of 330m extension and reclamation of a 27 ha area for container stacking yards along with electrical services and utility buildings towards north at JNPT.
: PROJECT DURATION: Oct 2013 – July 2016
Aim : To Increase container terminal handling Capacity by 800,000 TEU/YearObjective : Construction of :-1. A wharf 330m long constructed as a straight line extension to the existing NSICT wharf2. Capital dredging to -13.5m CD initially and -16.5m CD ultimately for a 70m wide berth pocket to the 330m wharf
(dredging will be procured by JNPT)3. Extension of a guide bund by approximately 160m4. One approach bridge connecting the wharf to the guide bund and one approach bridge connecting the guide bund to
the reclamation/ yard area5. Small craft finger jetty of not less than 50m long berthing face6. Reclaimed backup area of approximately 27ha on a part brownfield/ greenfield site, with container stacking yard
comprising heavy duty mass concrete block pavement, reinforced concrete eRTGCs way beams and turning plates, ground slot markings, buildings, high mast lighting, associated utilities and services infrastructure.
Existing JNPT facilities at North end of Port
Proposed NSIGT Quay & Yard at North end of
Port
Site Location
Proposed NSIGT Quay & Yard at North end of Port
Layout of 330m NSIGT Wharf Extension
Role & Responsibility•Reviewing and approving contractor’s work program submissions.
•Overseeing actual project progress versus the planned work milestones.•Coordinating all disciplinary engineering activities including construction and effective management of discipline design personnel, within the assigned project team.•Implement the work schedule and monitor progress of the work for timely execution of the project through daily/weekly/monthly/ reports with respect to review of the overall project.•Monitoring, adjusting and updating the cost plan and cash flows accordingly and the consolidation of these results in weekly reports.•Reviewing in conjunction with the Resident Engineer any potential changes, and in turn measuring where possible future saving or additional costs can be identified.•Site based knowledge of the full project life cycle, with working on a project from beginning to completion.•Reviewing Contractors Claim (Instruction Variation and Extension of time)•Documentation from commencement of project to project Closeout.
Existing JNPT facilities at North end of Port Proposed NSIGT Quay & Yard at North end of Port
Development of standalone container handling facility with Quay length of 330m extension and reclamation of a 27 ha area for container stacking yards along with electrical services and utility buildings towards north at JNPT.
: PROJECT DURATION: Oct 2013 – July 2016 Main Quay
Construction of a quay extension, contiguous to and in line with the existing NSICT quay, to achieve a new
berth with a 330 m extension to the existing crane track. The quay extension, was designed to
accommodate Ultra Large Container Carriers, and will have an ultimate alongside depth of – 16.5m CD.
The structure comprises a reinforced concrete deck (part precast and part cast in situ) supported on bored,
cast in situ reinforced concrete piles.
Provision and installation of mooring equipment, fenders, ladders and other safety equipment, other quay
furniture, facilities for unloading, erecting, use and maintenance of rail-mounted ship-to-shore gantry cranes,
navigation aids, and water bunkering facilities.
South Approach Bridge
Construction of an approx. 115m long South Approach bridge comprising a reinforced concrete deck (part
precast and part cast in situ) supported on bored, cast in situ reinforced concrete piles.
North Approach Bridge
Approximate 160m extension to existing access roadway from the northern end of the protection bund to
provide access to the quay.
Finger Jetty
Construction of a 50 × 25m finger jetty with a fixed deck elevation.
Access Road
Modifications to existing drainage system to allow discharge flows to outfall through the access roads.
Services and Utilities
Ancillary works and services tied in to existing services, including surface water drainage, power supply and
distribution, communication ductwork, potable water supply system, firefighting system, lighting and road
markings
New fencing to provide a secure boundary
Internal roadways and connections to the existing road system
High mast lighting
Potable water and fire fighting facilities
Pinning station on the approach roads (existing access roadway extension and southern approach bridge,
respectively).
Buildings
Sub-station housing transformers and switchgear for power supply to quay cranes on the 330m long quay;
Security Cabin on the Finger Jetty.
Extension of Existing BerthsProgramme
Programme of Development of NS(I)GT Yard of 27 Ha for DP World Port limited in JNPT
Development of standalone container handling facility with Quay length of 330m extension and reclamation of a 27 ha area for container stacking yards along with electrical services and utility buildings towards north at JNPT.
: PROJECT DURATION: Oct 2013 – July 2016 Construction Planning - Programme
Factors to consider During Planning of NS(I)GT Project.1. Clearly documented project
milestones and deliverables.2. A valid and realistic timescale. 3. Allows accurate cost estimates to
be produced. 4. Details resource requirements. 5. Acts as an early warning system,
providing visibility of task slippage.
6. Keeps the project team focused and aware of progress
Documentation
Development of standalone container handling facility with Quay length of 330m extension and reclamation of a 27 ha area for container stacking yards along with electrical services and utility buildings towards north at JNPT.
: PROJECT DURATION: Oct 2013 – July 2016
Development of standalone container handling facility with Quay length of 330m extension and reclamation of a 27 ha area for container stacking yards along with electrical services and utility buildings towards north at JNPT.
: PROJECT DURATION: Oct 2013 – July 2016
Mangrove Cleaning and Geotechnical Investigation
Area Demarcation
Layout of band Drain
Bathymetric Survey
Survey - Chainage
DescriptionQuantity
(nos)Area (Sq.m)
Total Scope of PVD 193000 241250
Development of standalone container handling facility with Quay length of 330m extension and reclamation of a 27 ha area for container stacking yards along with electrical services and utility buildings towards north at JNPT.
: PROJECT DURATION: Oct 2013 – July 2016
Ground Improvement for Edge Protection Yard Grid with Instrumentation Location
Drainage Network Plan Layout
Development of standalone container handling facility with Quay length of 330m extension and reclamation of a 27 ha area for container stacking yards along with electrical services and utility buildings towards north at JNPT.
: PROJECT DURATION: Oct 2013 – July 2016
Quay and Yard Pavement Paver Block Design
S.NOAREA
DESCRIPTIONTOTAL AREA
(SQ.M)
L B RTG TRACK
(no)
DEDCUTION OF AREA FOR RTGC
TRACK (sqm)
DEDCUTION OF AREA FOR
BUILDINGS (sqm)
TENTATIVE DEDCUTION OF
AREA FOR OTHER SERVICES
PROVISIONS (sqm)
DEDUCTION OF AREA FOR NON
PAVEMENT AREA (sqm)
TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (sqm)
NUMBER OF PAVEMENT
BLOCKS PER SQ.M OF AREA (no)
TOTAL REQUIRED (no)
m m
1 Area 1 52594 193.80 1.50 12 3488 4025 1315 5800 37966 38.96568 1479361
2 Area 2 55937 193.80 1.50 14 4070 0 1398 5800 44669 38.96568 1740549
3 Area 3 52323193.80 1.50 12
3876 0 1308 0 47139 38.96568 1836788129.31 1.50 2
4 Area 4 22313 193.80 1.50 0 0 0 558 0 21755 38.96568 847705
5 Area 5 45879193.80 1.50 10
3430 0 1147 0 41302 38.96568 1609348174.45 1.50 2
6 Area 6 16400 193.80 1.50 0 0 0 410 0 15990 38.96568 623061
52 14865 4025 6136 11600 208820 8136813TOTAL ROUNDED
OFF 8140000
TOTAL INCLUDING 3 % WASTAGES 8384200
1 2 3
4 5 6
7 8
Development of standalone container handling facility with Quay length of 330m extension and reclamation of a 27 ha area for container stacking yards along with electrical services and utility buildings towards north at JNPT.
: PROJECT DURATION: Oct 2013 – July 2016
Pavement Composition for 330m Quay
Pavement Compositionfor Yard – Type 1
1 2 3
4 5 6
7
Pavement Compositionfor Yard – Type 2
PORTFOLIO
Journal Paper Published
Journal Paper : Arbitration and Conciliation in India Published in IJLSR Journal (October 2015)ABSTRACT: The mediation and conciliation are considered as “The best “Alternative Dispute Resolution Method and India should aspire to become a hub of neutral arbitration, most people in the country have immense faith in this alternative form of dispute resolution. The development of mediation in India holds enormous promise. In particular, the neutralizing communication skills and powerful bargaining strategies of facilitated negotiation can strengthen the system’s capacity to bring justice to the society. Despite the demonstrable value of these techniques, however, several large obstacles block the path to mediation in India. Exposure to thesefacilitated negotiation processes, though spreading rapidly, remains limited.
CONCLUSION : India has in place a modern, an efficient Arbitration Act. There have been some decisions which are not in tune with the letter or spirit of the Act. Hopefully, these wouldbe addressed by the judiciary in the near future and continuing popularity of arbitrations would be served by a truly efficient ADR mechanism.
India Dispute Resolution Statistics : August 2015Abraham Lincoln advocated settlement through conciliation and mediation. Imay also refer to a famous statement by John F. Kennedy, former US President– he said:
“Let us not negotiate with fear but let us not fear to negotiate.”
SHALE GAS – A GAME CHANGER FOR INDIA? (Paper published in conference preceding – ICEI-2014, international conference on energy and infrastructure , January 11,2014 AT PDPU)ABSTRACT: Shale gas is a type of natural gas, extracted from a Shale rocks. Shale reserves are widely spread across the world and are in abundance. Shale gas can be included among the main source of energy in the coming decades. Since the discovery of Shale gas in US, the whole economy of US has changed. From the major importer of fossil fuel, it has become an exporter. It has made US energy secured. Shale gas is a big revolution in the energy sector of US.This paper starts with giving the changed energy scenario of US after the discovery of Shale gas in US. And it builds on by discussing the impacts of Shale gas in India in terms of its merits and demerits, if it enters the India’s Energy Sector. It also sees the viability of Shale reserves in India by mapping the eco-sensitive zones in the reserves. The literatures and technical papers available on the subject were studied and further analyzed to assess the impacts of Shale in India.
CONCLUSION : From the first glance, Shale gas might look like a problem solver for India to be energy secured by providing clean energy and by reducing dependence on non-renewable sources like coal and oil. However due to its advanced extraction technology and its negative impacts on environment has left Shale gas development hampered in India. But still India's increasing energy demand, increasing imports and political uncertainty in the Middle East leads India to think on exploration of Shale gas.
ECO SENSITIVE ZONES IN THE SHALE RESERVES OF INDIA
PORTFOLIO
ACADEMIC WORK
FEASIBILITY STUDY ON CONSTRUCTION OF FISHING HARBOR AT MANAKUDI IN KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT UNDER PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP MODE
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA) FOR THE THANGASSERY PORT,KERALA
Economic development and the growth of maritime transport
Impact on surrounding environment
Objectives : To analyze the project based on the components and identify activities that can have considerable effect on the local environment - be it positive or negative. Environment Examination and Environment Risk Assessment Using 3 Tools
1. Interaction Matrices
2. Networks
3. Checklists
Aim : To explore the benefits of “green highways” in Gujarat , what is the need and how it is possible .
Sl. No Type of Road
Length (in km)
1National highways 3245
2 State highways 19761
3Major District roads 30019
4Other Districtroads 1746
A green highway is a roadway constructed per a relatively new concept for roadway design that integrates transportation functionality and ecological
sustainability. An environmental approach is used throughout the planning, design, and the construction. The result is a highway that will benefit transportation, the ecosystem, urban growth, public health and surrounding communities. Source(website) : census of India , gpcb.gov.India ,ministry of health and environment
Symptom
Signs and
Abnormal
clinical
Findings NEC
(R00-R99)
23.3%
Diseases of
the Circulatory
System (I00-
I99) 18.6%
Certain
Infectious and
Parasitic
diseases (A00-
B99) 14.7%
Diseases of
the
Respiratory
System (J00-
J98) 10.6%
Injury,
Poisoning and
Certain Other
Consequence
s of External
Cause (S00-
T98) 7.1%
Certain
Condition
Originating in
the perinatal
period (P00-
P96) 5.9%
Other Groups
19.8%
Death by Six Major Category and Age Group
CATEGORY XVIII CATEGORY IX CATEGORY I
CATEGORY X CATEGORY XVI CATEGORY XIX
By Jyotpreet kaur MIEM Code-1212
Conclusion : AQI at secondary roads show that “Ambient Air Quality” is unhealthy in comparison to other two types of roads and age group of 45-70age is mostly prone to respiratory disorders
Recommendation : Green highways (Green Corridors)As water sources and type of soil (coarse sandy or fine sandy loam) of Gujarat support it
Infrastructure Planning “To analyze and design Infrastructure Layout of Town Planning
Schemes by understanding its Natural, Physical and Infrastructure Environment.”
Objectives of study:
1. Understanding the Development Plans
2. Understanding of TP Scheme and its legal
framework.
3. Preparation of base map
4. Concept planning and reconstitution of plots
5. Infrastructure planning and design
6. Infrastructure costing
Methodology
1. Perspective Study of Walled City v/s Prahlad Nagar
2. Perception Study of various Gamthals
3. Exercise to calculate Population of TPS
4. Baseline Situation Analysis
5. Formulation of Conceptual Development
6. Land Suitability Analysis
7. Preparation of Master Plan
8. TP Mechanism
9. Infrastructure Engineering and Designing
10. Infrastructure Costing
GUJARATAHMEDABAD
Exercise to calculate Population of TPSDescription Area
(ha)
Actu
al %
Max.
Per. %
Area of TPS
84
81.5 100
%
Final Plots 51.1 62.6
5 %
Roads 9.8 12.0
7 %
15%
N.H. & C. C. 5.4 6.66
%
5%
Garden 2.2 2.82
%
5 %
S & E.W.S.H 2.8 3.49
%
10 %
Sale for
Residential
6.2 7.70
%
15 %
Sale for
Commercial
3.7 4.62
%
37.3
5 %
TYPE
AREA
sq.m
%
AREA
% as per
UDPFI
norms
distribu
tion
Sale for Residential 23276.5 9 35 to 40 27 (+ve)
Sale for Commercial 9846.2 4 4 to 5 2 (+ve)
Socially and Economically
Weaker Section 10199.5 4
Garden and Playground 13371.8 5 20 to 25 19 (+ve)
N.H.C.C 9126.1 3 14 to 16 11 (+ve)
OPEN PLOT 154146.8 59
ROAD AREA 41425.6 16
TOTAL AREA OF T.P.SCHEME (sq.m)261392.76
TOTAL POPULATION 7267
POPULATION DENSITY (presons/hactare) 279.5
HathijanVatva
Contd. Infrastructure Planning
Infrastructure Design
Ganesh tekra nachppra
WATER SUPPLY
BUILT Vs OPEN
Location in Vatva
Parameter Specification
Existing 50%
Providing 50%
Area coverage 2450SqM
Pipeline length 340M
Diameter 150mm
ESR Capacity 60KL
Supply Duration 24 x 7
Material Ductile iron
Time Analysis Steady State
Pressure (max , min )
10.4M , 7.3M
Parameter Specification
Type of Soil Coarse sandy
Type of System Gravity
Minimum velocity 0.3 mps
Maximum velocity 1.82 mps
Minimum slope 0.006
Maximum slope 0.087
Material PVC
Manning coefficient 0.013
Diameter 150mm
Depth of manhole(max , min)
1.9 m , 1.6 m
No. of manhole 22
COSTING OF SEWERAGE NETWORK
SEWERAGE NETWORK
Parameter Specifications
No of house hold
300
Service Proposed
Door to Door
Per Capita 250gm/capita/day
Capacity of one Cart
7.119kg
No . Of trip 24 per day
No . Of carts 9
No . Of Container
1 with capacity of 360 kg
Particular Quantity Rate Cost (Rs)
Push Cart 9 4305 38745
Dumper Placer Container 1 75470 75470
TOTAL 114215
Cost/HH 381
COSTING OF SWM FACILITY
ROAD PAVING
COSTING OF CONDUITS
Diameter
Total Length(m) Unit Cost (Rs) Cost (Rs)
100mm
62.9M 150 15623
150mm
101 200 20200
TOATL 45770
COSTING OF MANHOLE
Total Cost (₹) 371568
TOTAL COST OF MANHOLES & CONDUITS
No. Of HH 300
Total cost (₹) 208669
Cost Per HH (₹) 696
Infrastructure Service Cost
Cost per HH
Water Supply
2,16,268 721
Sewerage 2,08,669 696
Solid Waste Management
1,14,215 381
Street Lights
2,60,000 867
Roads 2,50,750 836
Total Cost10,49,902 3,500
Transportation : “Preparing Detailed project report for urban transport infrastructure for the
city of Vadodara “.
Objectives
To develop schematic land use—
transport scenarios as planning inputs
to urban transport infrastructure design
process.
To design the public transport
infrastructure in accordance with LUT
scenarios.
To design the roads and NMT
infrastructure in accordance with LUT
scenarios.
To estimate block costs and evaluate
financing options for the DPR.
Methodology TRANSPORTATION HISTORY
ModeTRL,
1985
CIRT,
1996
RITES,
2006
Walk 40.1 % 36.81 % 20.65 %
Cycle 15.1 % 17.41 % 18.65 %
Auto
rickshaw 5.8 % 7.15 % 13.72 %
two
wheeler 11.6 % 23.62 % 36.45 %
Bus 25.8 % 8.68 % 5.61 %
Cars /
others
NA %
6.33 % 4.93 %
Source: CMP of Vadodara city
1890, M.G Road
2013, M.G Road
Existing Off Street &
On Street Parking
WALKABILITY INDEX
9588
80
95 9892
1725
8
100
73
0
20
40
60
80
100
120walk score
0.90.82 0.85 0.86
0.4
0.63
0.77
0.52
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
WALKABILITY INDEX NO.
Existing Vehicular
Pollution Load
12 18 24 30 36 40
42 3958 58 62 56
58 6142 42 38 44
ROW
ROW SHARE WITH BRTS
12 18 24 30 36 40
42 39 3858 50 45
58 61 6242 50 55
ROW
ROW SHARE WITHOUT BRTS
12 18 24 30 36 40
92 89 93 94 95 95
8 11 7 6 5 5
ROW
EXISTING ROW SHARE
Transportation lab conti .NMT PERCENTAGE SHARE
ROAD
WIDTH(M)
TYPICAL ROA
D SHARE (%)
NMT SHARE(%)
PROBLEMS WITH NMT
BAUTYPICAL
ROAD SHARE (%)
BAUNMT SHARE
(%)
CEGTYPICAL
ROAD SHARE (%)
CEGNMT SHARE
(%)
Without
BRTS
WithBRTS
Withou
t BRT
S
WithBRTS
Without
BRTS
WithBRTS
Withou
t BRT
S
With
BRTS
12 92 8 No pedestrian crossing
42 42 58 58 42 42 58 58
18 89 11 Pedestriantrack used by hawkers
39 39 61 61 39 39 61 61
24 93.4 6.6 No lane marking,nodefined pedestrian structure
38 58 62 42 38 58 62 42
30 94 6 No lane marking,nodefined pedestrian structure
58 58 42 42 58 58 42 42
36 95.5 5.5 Pedestriantrack used by hawkers
50 62 50 38 50 62 50 38
40 95 5 No proper & define pedestrian tracks are present
45 56 55 44 45 56 55 44
C
O
S
T
I
N
G
SrNo.
ROW length Cost per Km
Totalcost (Crore)
1 12 92 0.48Cr 44.16
2 18 133 0.92Cr 122.36
3 24 77 1.032Cr 79.464
4 30 65 1.249Cr 81.185
5 36 12 1.394Cr 16.728
6 40 57 1.414Cr 80.598
Total 424.50
Sr. No. ROW
length Total cost
CYCLE TRACK ALONG VISHMITRI RIVER
4M 1.7KM 0.34Cr
PROPOSED HAWKING STREET
24M
1KM 0.94Cr
Special Projects
Vishwamitri River Cycle Track
Stretch Length : 1.7 km Cost : 34.12Lakh
Railway junction
REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT 1.City Overview
2.Location Attractiveness Index
3.Project Description and Location
4.Demographic Analysis
5.Market Analysis
6.Context Study
7.Site Analysis
8.Entitlements Research
9.Project Design
10.Financial Feasibility
Location Attractiveness Index
Location and connectivity
LAND HOLDING PATTERN AND AREA STATEMENT RESIDENTIAL TYPOLOGY
BUILDING HEIGHT
POPULATION DENSITY
SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE36.54 36.11 35.89
31.01
22.56
29.74 29.48 29.3526.18
20.61
2BHK 3BHK 4BHK 5BHK 7BHK
IRR(%)3YR IRR(%)5YR
Residential scheme
COMPLETION TIME (YEAR)
AREA(Sq M)
No . Of Flats
IRR
2BHK 3 120 300 36.54
5 120 300 29.74
3BHK 3 240 150 36.11
5 240 150 29.48
4BHK 3 300 120 35.89
5 300 120 29.53
5BHK 3 375 90 31.01
5 375 90 26.18
7BHK 3 500 60 22.56
5 500 60 20.61
Demand and Model Assumptions
Percent of Capacity built and sold at
finish 100%
Years to build out 5
Cost escalation, Annual Rate, this financail model 10%
Price escalation, Annual Rate, this financail model 25%
Social Infra and Ameneities Rs '000 7110000
Start Construction on Social Inf and
Amenitities (Year) 2
Fees and Overheas: Annual (INR) 30000
FINANCIAL EVALUATION
Recommended