JPK Portfolio

PG Diploma In International Business and Operation - Pursuing

IGNOU, Delhi

Grade C Mediator Certification In Dispute Management

Indian Institute of Arbitration and Mediation

M.TECH, MIEMCEPT , AHMEDABAD

B.TECH. CIVILBVP, PUNE

DIPLOMA, Network SecurityBVP, PUNE

JYOTPREET KAUR

PORTFOLIO

PROFESSIONAL WORK

Development of standalone container handling facility with Quay length of 330m extension and reclamation of a 27 ha area for container stacking yards along with electrical services and utility buildings towards north at JNPT.

: PROJECT DURATION: Oct 2013 – July 2016

Aim : To Increase container terminal handling Capacity by 800,000 TEU/YearObjective : Construction of :-1. A wharf 330m long constructed as a straight line extension to the existing NSICT wharf2. Capital dredging to -13.5m CD initially and -16.5m CD ultimately for a 70m wide berth pocket to the 330m wharf

(dredging will be procured by JNPT)3. Extension of a guide bund by approximately 160m4. One approach bridge connecting the wharf to the guide bund and one approach bridge connecting the guide bund to

the reclamation/ yard area5. Small craft finger jetty of not less than 50m long berthing face6. Reclaimed backup area of approximately 27ha on a part brownfield/ greenfield site, with container stacking yard

comprising heavy duty mass concrete block pavement, reinforced concrete eRTGCs way beams and turning plates, ground slot markings, buildings, high mast lighting, associated utilities and services infrastructure.

Existing JNPT facilities at North end of Port

Proposed NSIGT Quay & Yard at North end of

Port

Site Location

Proposed NSIGT Quay & Yard at North end of Port

Layout of 330m NSIGT Wharf Extension

Role & Responsibility•Reviewing and approving contractor’s work program submissions.

•Overseeing actual project progress versus the planned work milestones.•Coordinating all disciplinary engineering activities including construction and effective management of discipline design personnel, within the assigned project team.•Implement the work schedule and monitor progress of the work for timely execution of the project through daily/weekly/monthly/ reports with respect to review of the overall project.•Monitoring, adjusting and updating the cost plan and cash flows accordingly and the consolidation of these results in weekly reports.•Reviewing in conjunction with the Resident Engineer any potential changes, and in turn measuring where possible future saving or additional costs can be identified.•Site based knowledge of the full project life cycle, with working on a project from beginning to completion.•Reviewing Contractors Claim (Instruction Variation and Extension of time)•Documentation from commencement of project to project Closeout.

Existing JNPT facilities at North end of Port Proposed NSIGT Quay & Yard at North end of Port


: PROJECT DURATION: Oct 2013 – July 2016 Main Quay

Construction of a quay extension, contiguous to and in line with the existing NSICT quay, to achieve a new

berth with a 330 m extension to the existing crane track. The quay extension, was designed to

accommodate Ultra Large Container Carriers, and will have an ultimate alongside depth of – 16.5m CD.

The structure comprises a reinforced concrete deck (part precast and part cast in situ) supported on bored,

cast in situ reinforced concrete piles.

Provision and installation of mooring equipment, fenders, ladders and other safety equipment, other quay

furniture, facilities for unloading, erecting, use and maintenance of rail-mounted ship-to-shore gantry cranes,

navigation aids, and water bunkering facilities.

South Approach Bridge

Construction of an approx. 115m long South Approach bridge comprising a reinforced concrete deck (part

precast and part cast in situ) supported on bored, cast in situ reinforced concrete piles.

North Approach Bridge

Approximate 160m extension to existing access roadway from the northern end of the protection bund to

provide access to the quay.

Finger Jetty

Construction of a 50 × 25m finger jetty with a fixed deck elevation.

Access Road

Modifications to existing drainage system to allow discharge flows to outfall through the access roads.

Services and Utilities

Ancillary works and services tied in to existing services, including surface water drainage, power supply and

distribution, communication ductwork, potable water supply system, firefighting system, lighting and road

markings

New fencing to provide a secure boundary

Internal roadways and connections to the existing road system

High mast lighting

Potable water and fire fighting facilities

Pinning station on the approach roads (existing access roadway extension and southern approach bridge,

respectively).

Buildings

Sub-station housing transformers and switchgear for power supply to quay cranes on the 330m long quay;

Security Cabin on the Finger Jetty.

Extension of Existing BerthsProgramme

Programme of Development of NS(I)GT Yard of 27 Ha for DP World Port limited in JNPT


: PROJECT DURATION: Oct 2013 – July 2016 Construction Planning - Programme

Factors to consider During Planning of NS(I)GT Project.1. Clearly documented project

milestones and deliverables.2. A valid and realistic timescale. 3. Allows accurate cost estimates to

be produced. 4. Details resource requirements. 5. Acts as an early warning system,

providing visibility of task slippage.

6. Keeps the project team focused and aware of progress

Documentation





Mangrove Cleaning and Geotechnical Investigation

Area Demarcation

Layout of band Drain

Bathymetric Survey

Survey - Chainage

DescriptionQuantity

(nos)Area (Sq.m)

Total Scope of PVD 193000 241250



Ground Improvement for Edge Protection Yard Grid with Instrumentation Location

Drainage Network Plan Layout



Quay and Yard Pavement Paver Block Design

S.NOAREA

DESCRIPTIONTOTAL AREA

(SQ.M)

L B RTG TRACK

(no)

DEDCUTION OF AREA FOR RTGC

TRACK (sqm)

DEDCUTION OF AREA FOR

BUILDINGS (sqm)

TENTATIVE DEDCUTION OF

AREA FOR OTHER SERVICES

PROVISIONS (sqm)

DEDUCTION OF AREA FOR NON

PAVEMENT AREA (sqm)

TOTAL PAVEMENT AREA (sqm)

NUMBER OF PAVEMENT

BLOCKS PER SQ.M OF AREA (no)

TOTAL REQUIRED (no)

m m

1 Area 1 52594 193.80 1.50 12 3488 4025 1315 5800 37966 38.96568 1479361

2 Area 2 55937 193.80 1.50 14 4070 0 1398 5800 44669 38.96568 1740549

3 Area 3 52323193.80 1.50 12

3876 0 1308 0 47139 38.96568 1836788129.31 1.50 2

4 Area 4 22313 193.80 1.50 0 0 0 558 0 21755 38.96568 847705

5 Area 5 45879193.80 1.50 10

3430 0 1147 0 41302 38.96568 1609348174.45 1.50 2

6 Area 6 16400 193.80 1.50 0 0 0 410 0 15990 38.96568 623061

52 14865 4025 6136 11600 208820 8136813TOTAL ROUNDED

OFF 8140000

TOTAL INCLUDING 3 % WASTAGES 8384200

1 2 3

4 5 6

7 8



Pavement Composition for 330m Quay

Pavement Compositionfor Yard – Type 1

1 2 3

4 5 6

7

Pavement Compositionfor Yard – Type 2

PORTFOLIO

Journal Paper Published

Journal Paper : Arbitration and Conciliation in India Published in IJLSR Journal (October 2015)ABSTRACT: The mediation and conciliation are considered as “The best “Alternative Dispute Resolution Method and India should aspire to become a hub of neutral arbitration, most people in the country have immense faith in this alternative form of dispute resolution. The development of mediation in India holds enormous promise. In particular, the neutralizing communication skills and powerful bargaining strategies of facilitated negotiation can strengthen the system’s capacity to bring justice to the society. Despite the demonstrable value of these techniques, however, several large obstacles block the path to mediation in India. Exposure to thesefacilitated negotiation processes, though spreading rapidly, remains limited.

CONCLUSION : India has in place a modern, an efficient Arbitration Act. There have been some decisions which are not in tune with the letter or spirit of the Act. Hopefully, these wouldbe addressed by the judiciary in the near future and continuing popularity of arbitrations would be served by a truly efficient ADR mechanism.

India Dispute Resolution Statistics : August 2015Abraham Lincoln advocated settlement through conciliation and mediation. Imay also refer to a famous statement by John F. Kennedy, former US President– he said:

“Let us not negotiate with fear but let us not fear to negotiate.”

SHALE GAS – A GAME CHANGER FOR INDIA? (Paper published in conference preceding – ICEI-2014, international conference on energy and infrastructure , January 11,2014 AT PDPU)ABSTRACT: Shale gas is a type of natural gas, extracted from a Shale rocks. Shale reserves are widely spread across the world and are in abundance. Shale gas can be included among the main source of energy in the coming decades. Since the discovery of Shale gas in US, the whole economy of US has changed. From the major importer of fossil fuel, it has become an exporter. It has made US energy secured. Shale gas is a big revolution in the energy sector of US.This paper starts with giving the changed energy scenario of US after the discovery of Shale gas in US. And it builds on by discussing the impacts of Shale gas in India in terms of its merits and demerits, if it enters the India’s Energy Sector. It also sees the viability of Shale reserves in India by mapping the eco-sensitive zones in the reserves. The literatures and technical papers available on the subject were studied and further analyzed to assess the impacts of Shale in India.

CONCLUSION : From the first glance, Shale gas might look like a problem solver for India to be energy secured by providing clean energy and by reducing dependence on non-renewable sources like coal and oil. However due to its advanced extraction technology and its negative impacts on environment has left Shale gas development hampered in India. But still India's increasing energy demand, increasing imports and political uncertainty in the Middle East leads India to think on exploration of Shale gas.

ECO SENSITIVE ZONES IN THE SHALE RESERVES OF INDIA

PORTFOLIO

ACADEMIC WORK

FEASIBILITY STUDY ON CONSTRUCTION OF FISHING HARBOR AT MANAKUDI IN KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT UNDER PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP MODE

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA) FOR THE THANGASSERY PORT,KERALA

Economic development and the growth of maritime transport

Impact on surrounding environment

Objectives : To analyze the project based on the components and identify activities that can have considerable effect on the local environment - be it positive or negative. Environment Examination and Environment Risk Assessment Using 3 Tools

1. Interaction Matrices

2. Networks

3. Checklists

Aim : To explore the benefits of “green highways” in Gujarat , what is the need and how it is possible .

Sl. No Type of Road

Length (in km)

1National highways 3245

2 State highways 19761

3Major District roads 30019

4Other Districtroads 1746

A green highway is a roadway constructed per a relatively new concept for roadway design that integrates transportation functionality and ecological

sustainability. An environmental approach is used throughout the planning, design, and the construction. The result is a highway that will benefit transportation, the ecosystem, urban growth, public health and surrounding communities. Source(website) : census of India , gpcb.gov.India ,ministry of health and environment

Symptom

Signs and

Abnormal

clinical

Findings NEC

(R00-R99)

23.3%

Diseases of

the Circulatory

System (I00-

I99) 18.6%

Certain

Infectious and

Parasitic

diseases (A00-

B99) 14.7%

Diseases of

the

Respiratory

System (J00-

J98) 10.6%

Injury,

Poisoning and

Certain Other

Consequence

s of External

Cause (S00-

T98) 7.1%

Certain

Condition

Originating in

the perinatal

period (P00-

P96) 5.9%

Other Groups

19.8%

Death by Six Major Category and Age Group

CATEGORY XVIII CATEGORY IX CATEGORY I

CATEGORY X CATEGORY XVI CATEGORY XIX

By Jyotpreet kaur MIEM Code-1212

Conclusion : AQI at secondary roads show that “Ambient Air Quality” is unhealthy in comparison to other two types of roads and age group of 45-70age is mostly prone to respiratory disorders

Recommendation : Green highways (Green Corridors)As water sources and type of soil (coarse sandy or fine sandy loam) of Gujarat support it

Infrastructure Planning “To analyze and design Infrastructure Layout of Town Planning

Schemes by understanding its Natural, Physical and Infrastructure Environment.”

Objectives of study:

1. Understanding the Development Plans

2. Understanding of TP Scheme and its legal

framework.

3. Preparation of base map

4. Concept planning and reconstitution of plots

5. Infrastructure planning and design

6. Infrastructure costing

Methodology

1. Perspective Study of Walled City v/s Prahlad Nagar

2. Perception Study of various Gamthals

3. Exercise to calculate Population of TPS

4. Baseline Situation Analysis

5. Formulation of Conceptual Development

6. Land Suitability Analysis

7. Preparation of Master Plan

8. TP Mechanism

9. Infrastructure Engineering and Designing

10. Infrastructure Costing

GUJARATAHMEDABAD

Exercise to calculate Population of TPSDescription Area

(ha)

Actu

al %

Max.

Per. %

Area of TPS

84

81.5 100

%

Final Plots 51.1 62.6

5 %

Roads 9.8 12.0

7 %

15%

N.H. & C. C. 5.4 6.66

%

5%

Garden 2.2 2.82

%

5 %

S & E.W.S.H 2.8 3.49

%

10 %

Sale for

Residential

6.2 7.70

%

15 %

Sale for

Commercial

3.7 4.62

%

37.3

5 %

TYPE

AREA

sq.m

%

AREA

% as per

UDPFI

norms

distribu

tion

Sale for Residential 23276.5 9 35 to 40 27 (+ve)

Sale for Commercial 9846.2 4 4 to 5 2 (+ve)

Socially and Economically

Weaker Section 10199.5 4

Garden and Playground 13371.8 5 20 to 25 19 (+ve)

N.H.C.C 9126.1 3 14 to 16 11 (+ve)

OPEN PLOT 154146.8 59

ROAD AREA 41425.6 16

TOTAL AREA OF T.P.SCHEME (sq.m)261392.76

TOTAL POPULATION 7267

POPULATION DENSITY (presons/hactare) 279.5

HathijanVatva

Contd. Infrastructure Planning

Infrastructure Design

Ganesh tekra nachppra

WATER SUPPLY

BUILT Vs OPEN

Location in Vatva

Parameter Specification

Existing 50%

Providing 50%

Area coverage 2450SqM

Pipeline length 340M

Diameter 150mm

ESR Capacity 60KL

Supply Duration 24 x 7

Material Ductile iron

Time Analysis Steady State

Pressure (max , min )

10.4M , 7.3M

Parameter Specification

Type of Soil Coarse sandy

Type of System Gravity

Minimum velocity 0.3 mps

Maximum velocity 1.82 mps

Minimum slope 0.006

Maximum slope 0.087

Material PVC

Manning coefficient 0.013

Diameter 150mm

Depth of manhole(max , min)

1.9 m , 1.6 m

No. of manhole 22

COSTING OF SEWERAGE NETWORK

SEWERAGE NETWORK

Parameter Specifications

No of house hold

300

Service Proposed

Door to Door

Per Capita 250gm/capita/day

Capacity of one Cart

7.119kg

No . Of trip 24 per day

No . Of carts 9

No . Of Container

1 with capacity of 360 kg

Particular Quantity Rate Cost (Rs)

Push Cart 9 4305 38745

Dumper Placer Container 1 75470 75470

TOTAL 114215

Cost/HH 381

COSTING OF SWM FACILITY

ROAD PAVING

COSTING OF CONDUITS

Diameter

Total Length(m) Unit Cost (Rs) Cost (Rs)

100mm

62.9M 150 15623

150mm

101 200 20200

TOATL 45770

COSTING OF MANHOLE

Total Cost (₹) 371568

TOTAL COST OF MANHOLES & CONDUITS

No. Of HH 300

Total cost (₹) 208669

Cost Per HH (₹) 696

Infrastructure Service Cost

Cost per HH

Water Supply

2,16,268 721

Sewerage 2,08,669 696

Solid Waste Management

1,14,215 381

Street Lights

2,60,000 867

Roads 2,50,750 836

Total Cost10,49,902 3,500

Transportation : “Preparing Detailed project report for urban transport infrastructure for the

city of Vadodara “.

Objectives

To develop schematic land use—

transport scenarios as planning inputs

to urban transport infrastructure design

process.

To design the public transport

infrastructure in accordance with LUT

scenarios.

To design the roads and NMT

infrastructure in accordance with LUT

scenarios.

To estimate block costs and evaluate

financing options for the DPR.

Methodology TRANSPORTATION HISTORY

ModeTRL,

1985

CIRT,

1996

RITES,

2006

Walk 40.1 % 36.81 % 20.65 %

Cycle 15.1 % 17.41 % 18.65 %

Auto

rickshaw 5.8 % 7.15 % 13.72 %

two

wheeler 11.6 % 23.62 % 36.45 %

Bus 25.8 % 8.68 % 5.61 %

Cars /

others

NA %

6.33 % 4.93 %

Source: CMP of Vadodara city

1890, M.G Road

2013, M.G Road

Existing Off Street &

On Street Parking

WALKABILITY INDEX

9588

80

95 9892

1725

8

100

73

0

20

40

60

80

100

120walk score

0.90.82 0.85 0.86

0.4

0.63

0.77

0.52

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

WALKABILITY INDEX NO.

Existing Vehicular

Pollution Load

12 18 24 30 36 40

42 3958 58 62 56

58 6142 42 38 44

ROW

ROW SHARE WITH BRTS

12 18 24 30 36 40

42 39 3858 50 45

58 61 6242 50 55

ROW

ROW SHARE WITHOUT BRTS

12 18 24 30 36 40

92 89 93 94 95 95

8 11 7 6 5 5

ROW

EXISTING ROW SHARE

Transportation lab conti .NMT PERCENTAGE SHARE

ROAD

WIDTH(M)

TYPICAL ROA

D SHARE (%)

NMT SHARE(%)

PROBLEMS WITH NMT

BAUTYPICAL

ROAD SHARE (%)

BAUNMT SHARE

(%)

CEGTYPICAL

ROAD SHARE (%)

CEGNMT SHARE

(%)

Without

BRTS

WithBRTS

Withou

t BRT

S

WithBRTS

Without

BRTS

WithBRTS

Withou

t BRT

S

With

BRTS

12 92 8 No pedestrian crossing

42 42 58 58 42 42 58 58

18 89 11 Pedestriantrack used by hawkers

39 39 61 61 39 39 61 61

24 93.4 6.6 No lane marking,nodefined pedestrian structure

38 58 62 42 38 58 62 42

30 94 6 No lane marking,nodefined pedestrian structure

58 58 42 42 58 58 42 42

36 95.5 5.5 Pedestriantrack used by hawkers

50 62 50 38 50 62 50 38

40 95 5 No proper & define pedestrian tracks are present

45 56 55 44 45 56 55 44

C

O

S

T

I

N

G

SrNo.

ROW length Cost per Km

Totalcost (Crore)

1 12 92 0.48Cr 44.16

2 18 133 0.92Cr 122.36

3 24 77 1.032Cr 79.464

4 30 65 1.249Cr 81.185

5 36 12 1.394Cr 16.728

6 40 57 1.414Cr 80.598

Total 424.50

Sr. No. ROW

length Total cost

CYCLE TRACK ALONG VISHMITRI RIVER

4M 1.7KM 0.34Cr

PROPOSED HAWKING STREET

24M

1KM 0.94Cr

Special Projects

Vishwamitri River Cycle Track

Stretch Length : 1.7 km Cost : 34.12Lakh

Railway junction

REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT 1.City Overview

2.Location Attractiveness Index

3.Project Description and Location

4.Demographic Analysis

5.Market Analysis

6.Context Study

7.Site Analysis

8.Entitlements Research

9.Project Design

10.Financial Feasibility

Location Attractiveness Index

Location and connectivity

LAND HOLDING PATTERN AND AREA STATEMENT RESIDENTIAL TYPOLOGY

BUILDING HEIGHT

POPULATION DENSITY

SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE36.54 36.11 35.89

31.01

22.56

29.74 29.48 29.3526.18

20.61

2BHK 3BHK 4BHK 5BHK 7BHK

IRR(%)3YR IRR(%)5YR

Residential scheme

COMPLETION TIME (YEAR)

AREA(Sq M)

No . Of Flats

IRR

2BHK 3 120 300 36.54

5 120 300 29.74

3BHK 3 240 150 36.11

5 240 150 29.48

4BHK 3 300 120 35.89

5 300 120 29.53

5BHK 3 375 90 31.01

5 375 90 26.18

7BHK 3 500 60 22.56

5 500 60 20.61

Demand and Model Assumptions

Percent of Capacity built and sold at

finish 100%

Years to build out 5

Cost escalation, Annual Rate, this financail model 10%

Price escalation, Annual Rate, this financail model 25%

Social Infra and Ameneities Rs '000 7110000

Start Construction on Social Inf and

Amenitities (Year) 2

Fees and Overheas: Annual (INR) 30000

FINANCIAL EVALUATION

Documents

JPK Portfolio