15
Department of Orthodontics Journal club on Downs WB Analysis of the dento-facial profile . Angle orthod 1956;26:191 Presented by- Dr. Pratik Yadav PG 1 st Year

Downs analysis

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Downs analysis

Department of Orthodontics

Journal club on

Downs WB Analysis of the dento-facial profile . Angle orthod 1956;26:191

Presented by- Dr. Pratik Yadav

PG 1st Year

Page 2: Downs analysis

Analysis

• Skeletal and dental relationships are measured by reference to a landmark or plane drawn on the lateral cephalogram.

• These can be either ‘ hand traced’ or more commonly now digitised using specialized cephalometric software (e.g. QuickCeph (Mac), Dolphin Imaging (Windows)

Page 3: Downs analysis

• The first published comprehensive analysis was by Downs in 1948

• It is one of the most frequently used cephalometric analysis.

• Downs analysis consists of– Ten parameters of which five are skeletal five are dental

William Downs

Down’s Analysis

Page 4: Downs analysis

• These ten variables were obtained from comparison and correlation of 20 Caucasian patients,10 males and 10 females, having clinically excellent occlusion and were untreated by orthodontics means

• Patients age is 12-17 years

Page 5: Downs analysis

Reference Plane

• ACCORDING TO DOWN “Balance of face is determined by position of

mandible”.• In order to find this balance DOWNS use

FRANKFURT HORIZONTAL PLANE as a reference plane i.e. line from anatomic porion to orbitale.

• Downs elected to use this plane as a reference base from which he determine the degree of retrognathism, orthognathism, or prognathism

Page 6: Downs analysis

Skeletal Parameters

Facial angle;• it is the inside inferior angle formed by

intersection of nasion-pogonion plane andF.H. plane.

• average value; 87.8’ ( 82 –95’)Significance;• indication of antero- posterior positioning of

mandible in relation to upper face .Interpretation• increased in skeletal class III with prominent

chin• decreased in skeletal class II

Page 7: Downs analysis

Angle of Connvexity

• Nasion-point A to point A-pogonion.

• Average value; 0⁰(-8.5 to 10⁰)Significance;• A positive angle suggest a

prominent maxillary denture base in relation to mandible.

• Negative angle is indicative of prognathic profile

Page 8: Downs analysis

Mandibular plane angle

• Intersection of mandibular plane with F.H Plane.

• Average value; 21.9⁰ ( 17 to 28⁰)• Mandibular plane according to

DOWNS is “tangent to gonial angle and lowest point of symphsis

• High MP angle occur in both retrusive & protrusive face and are

suggestive of unfavourable hyperdivergent face

Page 9: Downs analysis

Y-Axis• Sella gnathion to F.H. plane.• Average value; 59⁰ ( 53 to 66⁰)Interpretation• Increased in class II facial patterns.

and also Indicates vertical growth pattern of mandible

• Decreased in class III facial patterns and also indicate horizontal patterns of mandible growth

Page 10: Downs analysis

A-B plane angle

• point A–point B to nasion–pogonion.• Average value; -4.6⁰ (-9 to 0⁰)Significance;• indicative of maxillo mandibular

relationship in relation to facial plane.• Negative since point B is positioned

behind point A.• Positive in class III malocclusion or

class I malocclusion with mandible prominence

Page 11: Downs analysis

Dental parameters

Cant of occlusal plane; • OCCLUSAL PLANE TO F.H. Plane• Average value; 9.3⁰ ( 1.5 to 14⁰)• Gives a measure of slope of

occlusal plane relative to F.H. Plane .

• Increase in class II facial paterns• Decreases in long rami

Page 12: Downs analysis

Inter incisal angle; (135.4±5.8)

Angle between long axes of upper and lower incisors.

• Average value: 135.4⁰ ( 130 to 150.5⁰)

• decreased in class I bimaxillary protrusion & class II division 1

• Increases in class II division 2

Page 13: Downs analysis

Incisor occlusal plane angle;• This is the inside inferior angle formed by

the intersection between the long axis of lover central incisor and the occlusal plane and is read as a plus or minus deviation from a right angle

• Average value: 14.5⁰ ( 3.5 to 20⁰)• An increase in this angle is suggestive of

increased lower incisor proclinationIncisor mandibular plane angle:• This angel is formed by intersection of the

long axis of the lower incisor and the mandibular plane.

• Average value: 1.4⁰(-8.2 to 7⁰)• An increase in this angle is suggestive of

increased lower incisor proclination

Page 14: Downs analysis

Upper incisor to A-pog line (2.7+-1.8)

• This is a linear measurement between the incisal edge of the maxillary central incisor and the line joining point A to pogonion.

• This distance is on an average 2.7 mm(range-1 to 5mm)

• The measurement is more in patients presenting with upper incisor proclination

Page 15: Downs analysis

Cephalomtric polygon• Because of the difficulty of

developing a suitable mental picture of a sizable table of figures varhirs & Adams developd a polygon that express the reading graphically

• By reversing the maximum and minimum limits , it was possible to indicate class II on the left side & class III on the right