Innovation in Distance Learning? I Can't Define It, But I Know It When I See It!

Innovation in Distance Learning? I Can’t Define It, But I Know It When I See It!

Fredric M. LittoBrazilian Association of Distance Education

Gdansk, Poland13 June 2009

“I Know It When I See It!”

• 1964 – United States Supreme Court• Justice Potter Stewart• Jacobellis v. Ohio, regarding possible obscenity

in The Lovers• “I can’t define it, but I know it when I see it!”• Became one of the most famous phrases in the

history of the Supreme Court• The user attempts to categorize an observable

fact or event, although the category is subjective or lacks clearly defined parameters

My Personal Interest in Innovation

• Post-Doctoral YearStanford, 1987-88

• New ideas in Cognition/Learning & ICTs

• Upon return to Brazil,a new research laboratory at University of São Paulo 1988— .

• The School of the Future

My Personal Interest in Innovation

• Prohibited from creating distance education through courses (the University only starts DE in 2009!)

• The laboratory did the next best: activities to support the DE of others:– Virtual library– Learning objects– Virtual learning

communities

Group of Learning in Science and Technology with Internet Support

http://darwin.futuro.usp.br

http://darwin.futuro.usp.br/aves/

http://darwin.futuro.usp.br/dalia/

http://darwin.futuro.usp.br/dandelions/

http://darwin.futuro.usp.br/ecologia/

http://darwin.futuro.usp.br/finlay/

http://darwin.futuro.usp.br/frogs/

http://darwin.futuro.usp.br/frutas/

http://darwin.futuro.usp.br/plantas/

http://darwin.futuro.usp.br/sky/

REPOSITORY OF REUSABLE LEARNING OBJECTS

Virtual Science Lab Group

http://www.labvirt.futuro.usp.br

SIMULATIONS

Absorption of Colors

Force (Animation)

Conservation of Energy

Ions

Area of the Circle

Electric Power

Force (Simulation)

2000 – 2009

PARTICIPATING STATES

• 483 public schools• 29,941 participants • 23,365 students• 6,091 teachers• 682 community members

Sistema Solar

Trair i - CE

The Virtual Library of the Portuguese-Speaking Student

http://www.bibvirt.futuro.usp.br

The Price of Innovation

• Central Administration never gave support; merely tolerated the lab

• Self-sustaining—all funding external

• In years 2003-2006, US$ 2 million entered annually

• Supported staff of 75 researchers

The Price of Innovation

• Since we brought in our own funds, we had independence in choosing and running our own projects

• So which is more crucial-– freedom to invent, or– sacrifice freedom and be

part of the regular university budget?

• The lab is currently “coasting along....”

The Study

• The opinions of some of DE’s most experienced leaders

• A sort of pre-Delphi survey

• E-mails of request sent to 70 friends around the world

• 33 responded (49.1%)

• From 1 to 3 pages

The Study

• Today’s report is a preliminary summary of the results

• I plan to submit the final paper, with further details, to the EURODL-European Journal of Open, Distance & E-Learning

The Questions

• Oslo Manual – Guidelines for Collecting & Interpreting Innovation Data. 3rd ed. Paris: OECD, 2005

• Products• Processes• Marketing• Organization

The Questions

1. What are your choices for the most significant innovations in DE 1988-2008?Cite no more than 10 examples.

2. What do you believe were the real or possible factors affecting the high or low number of innovations?

3. What is the single most important challenge that confronts DE over the next decade?

The Restrictions

1. Please refrain from citing innovations initiated by yourself or by the institution for which you worked, or are working at the present time.

3. Although there was no restriction as to the citation of specific brands, institutional names or trademarks, so few were in fact mentioned that these were not included in the conclusions

The Kind Respondents

• Europe: Ulrich BernathDomingo GallegoBrenda GurleyHelmut HoyerFrançois MarchessouBrian SayerDavid Sewart


• Africa: Narand BaijnathBakary Diallo

• Asia & ME: Mahmood H. ButtZhang DemingToufic HouriPranee Sungkatavat


• Europe: Andras SzucsAntonio Moreira TeixeiraMathy Van Buel

• Oceania: Lalita RajasinghamJim Taylor


• North America: Susan AldridgeNicholas AllenTony BatesJohn DanielKay KohlGary MillerTakashi Utsumi


• South America: Gilda Helena CamposAndrea FilatroMarcos FormigaEdith LitwinCarlos LongoJaime Ricardo Valenzuela

Question 1 - Products

Greatest number of citations:• Web 1.0, 2.0 & 3.0• Internet 1 & 2• Open Educational Resources• Learning Management Systems• Social Networking• Mobile Learning


Remainder (in no special order):

Use of ITPDAsMicrocomputersMiniaturizationHypertextVoice over InternetSound over Internet

MultimediaVirtual ClassroomsVirtual UniversitiesVirtual Learning

CommunitiesImmersive Learning

EnvironmentsNetworked LearningBlended Learning


Fibre-based highwaysSatellite systemsProduction/Construction

of Teaching Resources

Asynchronous Learning Environments

Worked-based productsTransactional DistanceWi-fi

Online Videoconferencing

Digital LibrariesRemote & Virtual LabsLearning ObjectseBooksOpen Source SoftwareMega-universitiesMeta-universitiesSearch Engines

Question 1 - Processes

• Innovations in the psychology of learning• Paradigm shift from teacher-centered to student

centered approaches• No-classroom teaching (self-study)• Opportunity to operate globally• Opportunity for non-traditional sources to start

their own educational programs• Interactivity• Complete disappearance of the element of

distance in learning – “any time and any place”


• Shift from “artesenal” education to an “industrialized” education

• Shift from radio & tv to internet & multimedia• Shift from textbooks to multimedia• Shift from printed material and postal

delivery plus tutoring (by correspondence or F2F) to online (materials, delivery, return—all in one) “Unthinkable before the mid-1990s!”

• Mobility/portability of the process—people, content, and tools

Question 1 - Processes• Learning processes:

– Virtual learning environments (wikis, blogs, etc.)– Collaborative learning strategies & communities– Collaborative writing tools– Customization around individualization, around

individual abilities, learning styles, and cultural traditions

• Administrative processes:– More student/customer focused (CRM)– “Unbundling” of individual processes in value

chain and outsourcing to private providers– Using e-business processes to streamline “our

medieval ways of working”


• “Disambiguation” of intellectual property– in wikis, web publications, student

assignments, recycling– represents a loss of ownership, of QA and of

control– but gives greater democratic access to

content

• Web 3.0– assembling ideas and information into bodies

of knowledge by mapping data semantically– semantic searches based on word meanings

Question 1 - Marketing

• DE earlier seen as a palliative or supplementary educational solution for those with little prior learning experience, now with the status of privileged adults involved in the job market


• Investing in the development of brands• Paying attention to rankings• Using ICT for student recruitment, especially

non-traditional students• Using agents (and paying a fee per student)• Market now expects more flexibility,

interaction, and immediacy from the learning process

• Greater outreach for less cost and effort


• The public expects recognition by the market of DE degree and courses

• Philanthropic foundations which served as catalysts for improvement and growth of online DE


• A skeptical view: Promises of instant change and fast skills acquisition made in the late 1990s (start of Web courses) have proved deceitful, counterproductive, and ill-founded. They never attracted a sufficient number of students and led to abysmal failures and loss of public money. “Politicians announce a revolutionary scheme, inexperienced and timid civil servants hurriedly draw up a tender…


• and award it to the lowest (not necessarily the most competent bidder. Political pressure causes the specification to change, so costs spiral and disillusion grows” (The Economist, February 16, 2008, referring to “e-administration,” and could be applied to e-learning in the last decade.

Question 1 - Organization

• Entry of for-profit degree-granting organizations

• New players (publishers, TV producers, world library of digital resources)

• Multiple collaborative authorship of content


• Inter-institutional sharing of educational programs and resources

• Automation, at a distance, of the processes:enrollments, learner resources, exams, tutoring, notification of grades, data mining

• Greater emphasis on professional management processes and practices

• Greater emphasis on evidence-based practice and analytics


• “Organization seems to be better in traditional DE institutions—efficient, smooth-running; but still awaiting the ideal template for Web-based organizations”

• “Most institutions have organizational processes and values about learners which still await modernization”

• “There’s little real innovation in the world of DE – institutions are ossifying and becoming risk-averse”

Question 2 – Causes & Innovation

• Evolution of the technological environment + changes in the kinds of learning appropriate for the 21st century

• Industrial era required 25% of all high school graduates to get higher degrees

• Information era: 80%

Question 2 – Causes and Innovation

• Pressures of competition• Greater access to ICT• Need to implement a QA system• Increased government support• Government demanding more for its money• Growing confidence of DE faculties to show

the results of academic activities• Growth of teleworking, telecommuting

Question 2 – Causes and Innovation

• Public no longer automatically regards universities as a public good

• Needs and demands from individuals (increase income), employers and society (better trained employees)

• Possibilities for updating knowledge and skills parallel to work

• Greater market/business orientation• “Push/Pull of student demand”• Possibility of DE professionals in developing

countries to be on a par with the latest strategies

Question 3 – Greatest Challenge

• Language barriers blocking access to data and information – no common language, cultural differences; automatic translation unreliable

• Transactional distance – its manifestation in the digital world


• How to make the best use of ICT and digital media to reach out to non-traditional targets in large-scale operations. “DE is no longer unique – other forms of teaching & learning can also reach out to anybody, any time (when they see it as in their interests)”

• Achieving due recognition and governmental support in some countries


• Getting academics appropriately skilled in the technology (both technically & pedagogically). “Academics are not keeping up.”

• Bring under control the NIH Factor (Not Invented Here). This will reduce the “reinvention” from scratch of materials, reduce the number of course writers and course editors. But academic course writers have the power in most institutions.


• How to counter the challenge of the process of “devaluation of knowledge” (versus skills, the short-term, utilitarian approach to learning)

• “How not to be dissolved in the superficial e-learning approach?”

• Attitudes of aging academics versus the reactions of future generations of the digital natives. There may be a reaction against innovations for some time.

Question 3 – Greatest Challenge’

• “How best to educate ‘visionary would-be decision-makers’ among the young to pave the way for global DE? Those in power now don’t have the mind set for rapid globalization of learning”

• “How to avoid a ‘silo mentality’ – seeing DE as something different & exotic, and not something just to help people learn.”


• How to overcome thinking of ourselves as the DE community – “we need to move on beyond the frontiers of the past to the next frontier.”

• How to change the customary reactive position of educational professionals when confronted with technological innovations, with a more active attitude in regard to methodological efficiency.


• How to be aware of “innovations” which suggest that henceforth it will be possible to study less or to study less deeply.

• How to avoid the tendency that when we evaluate, we modify the strategy we originally used to develop the themes, concepts and problems...and we return to traditional educational values & practices.

• How to increase the usage of resources – transformation from “building” to “use”


• “How to balance the cost of innovation against the value of adoption (the impact of ICT on institutional productivity).”

• How to overcome the lack of professionals prepared to deal with complexity, and with learners lacking basic study skills


• From where can we expect to come the leadership and management of DE in the future? “Achieving this will alleviate the other challenges”

• “How to avoid institutional stagnation? When the institution becomes the slave of its initial methods and procedures, it ignores technical developments.”


• “How to avoid institutional inertia – the lack of effective leadership to promote proactive organizational development”

• “How to overcome the fact that as DE institutions become large, they get self-satisfied and neglect the students....or become too large to be managed effectively...one has the feeling that no one is really in charge.”


• “Educational institutions have a stranglehold on recognition & accreditation of learning, even though they exist in a world in which the means of learning outside the institution have proliferated. Learning is now democratized. The best situation would be just a few global and respected institutions which could transform themselves to support & recognize this, instead of investing in protectionism & marketing their wares to an already-converted congregation.”


• “How to prepare new business models in an environment in which OERs are issued by renowned institutions & distributed without cost – no remuneration of authors, production teams, investors -- micro-accesses, or micro-payments?”


• ““The conflict of size, quality and benefit will become accute”

• With student numbers falling in the developed world, how to invent ways of being fully open & flexible while maintaining institutional quality.


• “International Regulation & Accreditation of DE Provision & Providers will have to be developed:– growth of numbers of degrees will require

certification of quality—developed, approved, implemented & controlled”

• “Local government regulations may become a barrier to distributed learning (students take courses in different institutions & get a diploma from one).Will government validate?


• “How to avoid failures caused by managers who do not know the various educational alternatives in DE and believe that the only motive an institution thinks it has for adopting DE is the reduction of costs. This leads to embryonic innovations which may have worked well in laboratory situations, but involve risks when applied at a larger scale.”


• “We still have a long way to go to develop pedagogic processes & instructional design which go beyond traditional values of F2F models.”

By Way of a Conclusion

• There is considerable variation, in the identification by leaders in the profession, as to what constitutes innovation

• Those areas most frequently cited tend to be more the result of DE taking advantage of technological breakthroughs, rather than advances in learning themselves

• The challenges of the next decade, as identified, are a fruitful source of suggestion for those interested in innovating

Thanks for your attention

Entertainment & Humor

Innovation in Distance Learning? I Can't Define It, But I Know It When I See It!