Transcript
Page 1: The actin cortex: a bridge between cell shape and function

1

Theactincortex:abridgebetweencellshapeandfunctionKevinJ.Chalut1,EwaK.Paluch2,31WellcomeTrust/MedicalResearchCouncilStemCellInstitute,UniversityofCambridge,UnitedKingdom;2MRC-LMCB,UniversityCollegeLondon,London,UnitedKingdom;3InstituteforthePhysicsofLivingSystems,UniversityCollegeLondon,London,UnitedKingdom.Correspondence:[email protected]@ucl.ac.ukPrecisecontrolofcellmorphogenesisisakeytohealthycellphysiology,andcellshape

deregulationisattheheartofmanypathologicaldisorders.Changesincellshapestrongly

correlatewith,ifnotcause,processessuchascellmigration,tissuehomeostasis,epithelial-

amoeboid-mesenchymaltransitionsandcellulardifferentiation(Figure1).Infact,early

embryologistsdefinedmanycellfatechangesbasedoncellmorphology,andusedcell

shapeasaprimaryidentifierofdifferentnascenttissues.Here,wediscussthecontrolofcell

shapeandmechanics,andtheemergingrelationshipbetweenshape,biochemicalsignaling

andcellularfunction,highlightingremaininggapsinourunderstandingandpotential

directionsoffutureinvestigations.

Cellshapeisdefinedbycellularmechanicalpropertiesandbythecell’sphysicalinteractions

withitsenvironment.Mostcelldeformationsaredrivenbychangesinthephysical

propertiesofthecellsurface,whicharedominatedbythemechanicsofthecellularcortex.

Thecortexisathinnetworkofactinthatliesunderandistetheredtotheplasma

membraneinmostanimalcells.Corticalactinfilamentsareorganizedinameshworkcross-

linkedbyspecificproteinsandbymyosinmotors,whichgeneratecontractilestressesinthe

network(Clarketal.,2014).Thesestressesgiverisetocorticaltension,whichdetermines

globalcellsurfacemechanics.Gradientsincorticaltensionresultincorticalflowsand

cellularcontractions,suchasthosedrivingcleavagefurrowingression,cellbodyretraction

duringcellmigrationandepithelialcontractionsunderlyingtissueconstrictionevents

(LevayerandLecuit,2012).

Overthepastdecade,anincreasingnumberofbiologicalandbiophysicalinvestigations

havefocusedontheactincortex.Cortexcompositionhasbeencharacterizedbymass

Page 2: The actin cortex: a bridge between cell shape and function

2

spectrometryusingisolatedcellularblebstocollectsufficientamountsofcorticalmaterial

(Bovellanetal.,2014).Corticalactinnucleatorsandvariousregulatorsofcortical

contractilityhavebeenidentified(Bovellanetal.,2014;Luoetal.,2013),andtoolsare

availabletomeasurephysicalcharacteristics,suchascorticaltensionandthickness

(reviewedin(Clarketal.,2014)).Themechanicsofcorticalcontractionsandflowsinmany

morphogeneticeventshavebeendissected,includingC.eleganszygotepolarization(Mayer

etal.,2010),mouseembryocompaction(Maitreetal.,2015)andepithelialconstrictionsin

theDrosophilaembryo(LevayerandLecuit,2012).However,mostpaststudieshave

focusedonthecortexinitself.Incontrast,muchlessisknownabouthowthecortexis

dynamicallyregulatedbyspecificsignalingpathways,howitinturntriggersbiochemical

signalingevents,andhowcorticalprocessesareintegratedwithinthecelltodrive

morphogenesis.

Manymorphogeneticprocessesappeartobedrivenbytransitionsbetweenacorticalanda

stressfiberdominatedorganizationofintracellularactinnetworks.Stressfibersarequasi

one-dimensionalbundlesofactinfilamentsusuallyconnectingtwoadhesionpoints,

whereasinthecortex,actinformsaroughlyisotropicmeshworkundertheplasma

membrane(Figure2).Whilethemolecularregulationofboththecortexandstressfibers

arereasonablywellunderstood,howtransitionsbetweenthesetwotypesofnetworksare

controlledremainselusive.Forexample,duringdevelopmentaltransitionssuchasexitfrom

naïvepluripotencyorduringepithelialtomesenchymaltransitions(EMT),actinreorganizes

fromamostlycorticalarrangementintostressfibersandlamellipodia(Figure1).Howthis

reorganization,whichdrivescellspreading,isregulatedbythesignalingpathwaysdriving

cellstatechangessuchascelldifferentiationisnotunderstood.

Transitionsinactinnetworkorganizationarealsoassociatedwithchangesinthewaythe

cellinteractswiththeenvironment.Stressfibersareusuallyconnectedtoandpromotethe

formationofintegrin-basedfocaladhesions(LivneandGeiger,2016),whereascorticalactin

isoftenassociatedwithcadherin-basedcell-celladhesions(Engletal.,2014).Interestingly,

cell-cellcontactformationisconcomitantwithcorticalclearinginthecontactzone(Maitre

etal.,2012)whileactindynamicsandtensioninturninfluencecadherinrecruitment(Engl

etal.,2014).Thus,thecell’sinteractionswithneighborsandmatrixarecontrolledviaa

Page 3: The actin cortex: a bridge between cell shape and function

3

subtlecross-talkbetweenactinorganization,contractility,dynamicsandcontactswith

integrinsand/orcadherins.Onefuturechallengewillbetofullyunderstandthiscross-talk,

andhowitismodulatedduringcellularshapechangesassociatedwithdevelopmentalfate

transitions.Extendingthealreadybroadlibrariesofactinbindingproteinsandidentifying

connectionstoadhesionsmayprovideonepathtowardsthisgoal.Theseextensionscanin

turninstructgain-andloss-of-functionstudiestoshedlightonthechangestocellshapeand

fatethataccompanydevelopmentalprocesses.

Anotherkeyyetpoorlyunderstoodaspectoftheactincytoskeletonfunctionin

developmentisitsroleincellularsignaling.Indeed,actinnetworksnotonlycontrolcell

shape,theyalsoareacenterofbothmechanicalandbiochemicalsignaling.Forexample,

focaladhesionmaturationisdrivenbytensioninstressfibers,whichupregulatesfocal

adhesionkinaseandSrcfamilykinasebasedsignaling.Thesekinasesareupstream

mediatorsofmitogenactivatedproteinkinase(MAPK)signaling,whichisessentialfora

multitudeofcellularprocessesincludingdifferentiation.Moreover,thereisfeedbackfrom

MAPKsignalingtotheactincytoskeleton:actinorganizationandcontractilityisregulatedby

interactionsbetweenErkandRhoGTPases(Vialetal.,2003).Thoughlessstudied,similar

interactionsarepossiblebetweencadherin-basedadhesionsandWntsignaling,both

canonicalandnon-canonical(HeubergerandBirchmeier,2010).Itislikelythatthe

connectionbetweenactinnetworksandcellularadhesionsdrivesmanyotherbiochemical

signalingfeedbackloops,raisingthetantalizingpossibilitythatactinorganizationandcell

shapearemorethanpassivedownstreamplayersincellulartransformationssuchas

differentiation.

Thepossibilitythatactinactivelyregulatescellfunctionisbuttressedbythefactthatthere

areatleasttwootherconnectionsbetweenactinorganizationandsignaling.First,actin

dynamicsitselfcaninfluencegeneexpression.Changesinactinorganizationarelikelyto

modifytheintracellularfilamentous(F)tomonomeric(G)actinratiobothinthecytoplasm

and,becauseactinisactivelyshuttledintoandoutofthenucleus,inthenucleus.Increasing

levelsofG-actininthenucleusaffectstranscription,bothduetointeractionswithallthree

typesofRNApolymeraseandalsobecauseitisinvolvedinthenuclearexportofmyocardin-

relatedtranscriptionfactors(MRTFs).Forexample,iflessG-actinisavailableinthenucleus

Page 4: The actin cortex: a bridge between cell shape and function

4

(perhapsbecauseofincreasedlevelsofpolymerizedactininthecell)thenMRTFfamily

membersinturnactivatetheserumresponsefactor(SRF)pathway.SRFactivates

immediateearlygenessuchasc-fos(PosernandTreisman,2006),whichplaymajorrolesin

cellulartransformationssuchasdifferentiationandoncogenesis.Second,thecortexis

physicallyconnectedtothenucleusviacytoplasmicstructuralcomponents,andstressesat

thecellsurfacecantranslatetostrainonthenucleus(Pagliaraetal.,2014).Increasedstress

intheactincytoskeletoncanactthroughtheLINCcomplexonthenuclearmembraneand

thenuclearlaminstofurthertunebiochemicalsignaling.Forexample,increased

cytoskeletalstresscanstabilizelaminA/CwhichactivatesSRFandtheretinoicacid

pathways,andfurthermoreactsasamediatorofMAPKsignaling(Swiftetal.,2013)and

activationofimmediateearlygenes.Thereisalsonewevidencethatstressthroughthe

actincytoskeletoncanactdirectlythroughemerins(alsonuclearmembraneproteins)to

facilitatepolycomb-mediatedgenesilencingatthenuclearenvelope(Leetal.,2016).

Itistemptingtogiveintodespairwhenconsideringthemyriadofwaysinwhichtheactin

cytoskeletonaffectssignalingandviceversa.However,itappearsthatthenexusofactin-

regulatedsignalingandshapemaybeactinnetworkorganization.Thus,tofullyunderstand

therelationshipbetweencellshapeandcellfunction,wemustfirstunderstandthe

transitionsbetweendifferenttypesofactinnetworks.Then,cytoskeletalinvestigations

mustbefullyintegratedwithstudiesofsignalingpathwaysthatdrivecellstatechanges.

Truecomprehensionoftheinterplaybetweenactinnetworktransitionsandcellstate

transitionswillrequireaninterdisciplinarypushinvolvingbiophysicists,molecularandcell

biologistsstudyingthecytoskeleton,developmentalbiologistsandstemcellbiologists.

Acknowledgements:

KJCacknowledgessupportfromtheRoyalSociety,MedicalResearchCouncilUKand

WellcomeTrust(forcorefundingtotheCambridgeStemCellInstitute).EKPacknowledges

supportfromtheMedicalResearchCouncilUK(corefundingtotheLMCB).WethankCéline

LabouesseandMurielleSerresforprovidingtheimagesforthefigures.

Page 5: The actin cortex: a bridge between cell shape and function

5

Figure1:Embryonicstemcellsinanaïvephaseofpluripotency(A)andafterexitfromnaïve

pluripotency(B).Duringthistime,actin(incyan)transitionsfromcorticalactintostress

fibersasthecellsspread.Nucleiarelabeledinred.

Page 6: The actin cortex: a bridge between cell shape and function

6

Figure2:Differenttypesofactinnetworksininterphase(A)andmitotic(B)HeLacells

stainedwithDAPItodetectDNA(red)andphalloidintomarkF-actin(cyan).Interphasecells

arespreadandactinisprimarilyorganizedinstressfibers.Mitoticcellsareroundedand

actinispredominantlycortical.

A B

Page 7: The actin cortex: a bridge between cell shape and function

7

References:Bovellan,M.,Romeo,Y.,Biro,M.,Boden,A.,Chugh,P.,Yonis,A.,Vaghela,M.,Fritzsche,M.,Moulding,D.,Thorogate,R.,etal.(2014).Cellularcontrolofcorticalactinnucleation.CurrBiol24,1628-1635.Clark,A.G.,Wartlick,O.,Salbreux,G.,andPaluch,E.K.(2014).Stressesatthecellsurfaceduringanimalcellmorphogenesis.Currentbiology:CB24,R484-494.Engl,W.,Arasi,B.,Yap,L.L.,Thiery,J.P.,andViasnoff,V.(2014).ActindynamicsmodulatemechanosensitiveimmobilizationofE-cadherinatadherensjunctions.NatCellBiol16,587-594.Heuberger,J.,andBirchmeier,W.(2010).Interplayofcadherin-mediatedcelladhesionandcanonicalWntsignaling.ColdSpringHarbPerspectBiol2,a002915.Le,H.Q.,Ghatak,S.,Yeung,C.Y.,Tellkamp,F.,Gunschmann,C.,Dieterich,C.,Yeroslaviz,A.,Habermann,B.,Pombo,A.,Niessen,C.M.,etal.(2016).MechanicalregulationoftranscriptioncontrolsPolycomb-mediatedgenesilencingduringlineagecommitment.NatCellBiol18,864-875.Levayer,R.,andLecuit,T.(2012).Biomechanicalregulationofcontractility:spatialcontrolanddynamics.TrendsCellBiol22,61-81.Livne,A.,andGeiger,B.(2016).Theinnerworkingsofstressfibers-fromcontractilemachinerytofocaladhesionsandback.JCellSci129,1293-1304.Luo,T.,Mohan,K.,Iglesias,P.A.,andRobinson,D.N.(2013).Molecularmechanismsofcellularmechanosensing.NatMater12,1064-1071.Maitre,J.L.,Berthoumieux,H.,Krens,S.F.,Salbreux,G.,Julicher,F.,Paluch,E.,andHeisenberg,C.P.(2012).Adhesionfunctionsincellsortingbymechanicallycouplingthecorticesofadheringcells.Science338,253-256.Maitre,J.L.,Niwayama,R.,Turlier,H.,Nedelec,F.,andHiiragi,T.(2015).Pulsatilecell-autonomouscontractilitydrivescompactioninthemouseembryo.NatCellBiol17,849-855.Mayer,M.,Depken,M.,Bois,J.S.,Julicher,F.,andGrill,S.W.(2010).Anisotropiesincorticaltensionrevealthephysicalbasisofpolarizingcorticalflows.Nature467,617-621.Pagliara,S.,Franze,K.,McClain,C.R.,Wylde,G.W.,Fisher,C.L.,Franklin,R.J.,Kabla,A.J.,Keyser,U.F.,andChalut,K.J.(2014).Auxeticnucleiinembryonicstemcellsexitingpluripotency.Naturematerials13,638-644.Posern,G.,andTreisman,R.(2006).Actin'together:serumresponsefactor,itscofactorsandthelinktosignaltransduction.TrendsCellBiol16,588-596.Swift,J.,Ivanovska,I.L.,Buxboim,A.,Harada,T.,Dingal,P.C.,Pinter,J.,Pajerowski,J.D.,Spinler,K.R.,Shin,J.W.,Tewari,M.,etal.(2013).Nuclearlamin-Ascaleswithtissuestiffnessandenhancesmatrix-directeddifferentiation.Science341,1240104.Vial,E.,Sahai,E.,andMarshall,C.J.(2003).ERK-MAPKsignalingcoordinatelyregulatesactivityofRac1andRhoAfortumorcellmotility.CancerCell4,67-79.


Recommended