nycourts.gov this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the selected date. The documents are displayed in no particular order

Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and ordersfiled on the selected date. The documents are displayedin no particular order. However, all of these documentsare searchable.

To find a specific order, please use the Search/Findfunction within a PDF viewer.

1) Select Edit > Find in the main menu or press Ctrl-f(Command-f or Apple-f on a Mac);

2) Enter the index number, a word, or a phrase in the formfield provided and press Enter or Return.

In most applications, the first appearance of the indexnumber, the word, or the phrase in the document will behighlighted.

Tip: Ctrl-f opens the Find function in most applications,including browsers and PDF viewers.

:.; .

t ~.

.,

, .: ..:::.. :." :'~ .. \, " ."",

~:.', ' "

"~a 1 "' ...

"

.,'

:: ':.t',. fI',....

, J...... .

.,.

SUPREME COURT OFTHE STATE OF NEW YORK '.COUNTY OF NEW YORK

'. ' .. ,

-----------------------~----------~-----~------------'----------~~"--xIN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATI0N-------------------~----------"-----------~----------------------~--x '. ' :: ~GENEVIEVE MANNING, Indiyidua1\y, and as. ,Administratrix for the Estate of HENRY M. MANNING::- .. ,,r~ . ~"';. . . :, '...

Index'No.: 190324111~ ~ ..'" .

< ~'.

'Plaintiff(s),-against-

'. NO OPPQSITION 'SUMMARY ruDGMENTMOTION AND 'ORDER

A.a. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al:Hon. Peter H.,Moulton

Defendants.--,---------------------------------------------------------------------x

.~'

WHEREFORE, Defendant BW/IP, Inc., hereby request~' Summary Judgment in the .above-

entitled case, pursuant'to Ci"ii Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint;,.'

against Defendant BWlIP, lnc., with prejudi~e, ,and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all, claims and, cross claims against Defendant,

BW/IP; .Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed wit.h prejudice and without costs to either, party.

/

'.Dated: New York; New York

." ~

mi,E& LUXENB,ERG, P.C.

Attorneys forPlaintiff "700 BroadwayNew York, NY J0003

SdORDERED, ~.,' ,'~'. Hon. Peter H. Moulton ...............

"

J

' .. ;~..

.' ., .:' ,,'

::"',.. ,' >.

::., - ,against -' , I ~~";0i..;ljWl~~r:'[~"'"')J8 ",.---- -- --------------.'-C!~ lJ:~:Y:':~ _L~ ::'-':~.'~: -~..~ ::.::~:_:c~ ~- ~ -- ::~:~;~.~~:;:-,":::,~~ ::mDEX'NO: "'.1;:: ~i r: ;;.~f' -c, .. ,. :: J .':

THIS DOCUMENT R]2LATES; TO: -. '., ";"'".-

~/TMc:CCGpk)3/11115

, ,

,'~. '" .~ - . .

:',:

. ,c'

".. .'',' l'~' ' ....,. .' : . . ::;:. \:.~~~: ,''':'1 ~::~ '" ... :.f.SUPREM~~COq~T~F;~TtIE STATE OF NEW Y.Q,RI>; ... ' .,.COUNTY OF NEW YORK .':'.:"---~~-,","------::_.--:;,,~~~'~---:--~--------------------------------"'~X'JOHN FEEHAN.an4ELIZABETH FEEHAN,.

. - against -

Plmntiff(s),

.NO OP'POSITION. SUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

i' ' ' ....; l~flJf/r'l1-.. Index No.: ...

N'Y:G:AL .y:;~::s. Part '}6' S-b

AC./&~S:. IN;q:,f;,t ..:~.,,:; .. ,'" . ,'.. '

, .':.;:~ . D~f~:ndants.. '------------~.:--------~.-_~L . _~'::~ -: _:~----------- X. -

WHEREFORE, defend,mt FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. hereby requests summary

judgment in the abve-entitleq case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,. :. . . ~. ., '... " . ,

dismissingplaintiffs'.complaint against defendant FBLTON':SOIL:ER WORKS, JNC. with ".

'.' .,< ~

. .j. "~

NO OP~OSITIONSUMMA.RYJUDGMENTMOTION AND OlIDER

PI.airitiff(~),

"

X:IFBW50'7491l;gaVNOVEMBER2014. " ., ; ... :-. . ;.. ,,.: ':': ~". !";1~ ." . ~ '. ...:: '., ;.. Attorney forP~~lf1tlffs . ,., ';'-..

Weitz & Luxenberg700 BroadWay '.New York, NY 10003(2-12) 558-5500,

.;'" .

~" .-"

c: .',

. ,." ..)

"t..',

CLBS8868!kgal/nosjm/rio~einber2014 "

SUPREME,COURT OF'TRE'STATE OF NEW YORK. COUNTY OF NEW YORK.. . .-------------~--~---~--~-----~~---~-~~~~--~----------~-~-~~-~~~--)(:

.. JOHN FEEHAN arid ELIZABETH FEEHAN, .... ,'",,'" " ~> :\';

.., '-"..

Plaintiff(s), "

.-; ,

. NO, OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT~MQTIONAND ORDER

-against- Index No.: 120785/97 .

A.C. &S. IN.. , et aI., NYCAL.' " }.~:S.Part~~b-U

',.... " . Defendant(s), '. . C---------------------~-----------_:.:---_.;.----~----,:.-------:---~-;._.:.)( .

WHEREFORE, d~fend~ts CLEAVER-B.ROOKS, 'INC. hereby reque~t's~ary

judgment in the ~bove-elfti'tled cas~; pw;s1,1ant to C'ivilPfactice Law ~d 'Rules ~ection 3212,". '~.;..' .' . '~ ,

. dismissing plai~tiffsl.coh1pl~ihtagairts!deJehdan,!~"GLEAVER~BRQQKS, INC. with prejudice, ' ': ", ", : .. "." [.' "" J

and therebeing'ri9'oPpo~ition theret~,

ORDERED;:tha't upon' notice to all co.,defendants, ail clmms ap.dcr~ss cla,ims against". . ..' . - - . . ~..

~ '.

'. ~

'.; .

.'

, ~.

S'OORDkRED,:0' ',.. , ..~';frOb, .S}ieff)rKI@i~-Heitler

defendants CLEAVER:.13ItOOK,S, INC. b~:~d the',s~e.arehereby dismissed with prejudice and

Frank Or1:i~; Esq.' >Attomey;for piaintiff '; " Attorneys fqr DefendantWeitz i Luxenberg . .CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.700 Broadway- Barry McTiernan & Moore'New York, NewYotk 100Q3 2 Rector s.treet, 14th Floor .

:New York;New York 10006\... '(212) 313-360'0. .,

, .. .~.

"':" . ".'-, '

"','./' ..' .

.,'.. ;

. ',',,:

Index No.: 190019/11

.,.'NOOPPOSITIO.N' ;,SUMMARY JUDGMENT'

, MPTION AND ORDERPlaintiff(s), .

. . . ~agail}st-

.;"

CLB59286/1.egal/ndSj!J1l~ov~~J~r2or4~ " . ..SUPREM~:COURTO~:tHE.sTATE OFNEWYORI~Wt )6.

-,;;

,.,..

X:IFBW44560IlegtiVNOVEMBER"2014

.. ,

'..NO ,OPPOSITION. " .~: '.-~ . . .

, ;SU~MARY JUDGMENT""MOTION AND ORDER

::' Plaintiff(s),

SUPREivrnCOURT:DF'"THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF N'EW,'YORK ' , ' '"_____~_---~~--2---~------~-~~-------~~~~-------------- ~__)(GEORGE E. MILLER.,

- against ~ Index No.: 100306/02 & 120430101:,:t" i:

';:}l~' NicAL ',';, ",,',':?LA.~:. part ~'(5-t)\' ,b .'. --1-:" .: .

, ,~,', .e,:',. Defendants."';

--------~~-~~~---~----~~:~-~---~-~----------~--------------------J('~

WHEREFORE, defendant FULTONB'OILER WORKS; INC. hereby requests summary. ~ .'" /. . " , .

judgment.in the above:.entitled 'case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,, .' :.. '. "0'

. ,:" ~./,:.tri;""~ ,.'. . .: .' .:: ~ . .:

dismissing plaintiffs',;'c:ompIMnt against qefendant FULTONBOI~ERWORl

. ,,"..... "

.:,..

NO OPPOSITION.SUMMARy JUDGMENT

. MOTION AND ORDER.Plaintiff(s),

CLB593)5I1egal/nq~jn1/november20)4 . . ...

~ '~UPREME eOURT.OF.;TfIE STATE OFNEW Y9RK ,;,'.,COUNTY OF.~NEV{YORK . . " . . '---~-------...~-:--:-:,;,-"'-~~,':'~--7,~-----:::-,;,;,,------------------~.,-_.:.--- X .". ," .ANGELOSCA~qNELLI, .

--.','

-agaillst-

"" .' .....

'Index No.: 114832/98'. 'r-

.. A.C. & S. INC., etal., ., " ~ .

.. ' .'. ' " . ' Defendant(s),.-------~-~..;----:_.;----...;:-:..---.:.---------:..--:..--------~------"'--:-------:X . ,',

'W~EREF()RE,defe~ciaritsCLEAVER:..BRQOKS, INc..:h~ieby request summary. . ' i.;.:;" . -. . ,"

judgment in the: above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rilles S~ction 3212,

dlsriIissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendantsCLEAVER-BROOK'S, INC. with prejudice,

and there being 110 opposition thereto,

O~E~D, that upon no'tice to ~ll,co-:defen~imts, aU claims cill~:cross claims against.

defendants CLBA.VER-BROOKS; INC. be and the saine are hereby dismissed with:prejudice C;Uld. . - . ~ ;. '. ." .

without costs.

: ,~.

"

. " ",.-

II

. --..

..... !

, ." : - .~

~ ,~-; .

'>.:.

"

... " 4 ','

SUPREME, COURT OF THE' STATE OF:NEW.,Y0RK ," COUNTY-OF NEW: YORIP~.',~5b ., ,:' :" .' Defendants. , ,. ....

---;.~--~------_:.:_~---~~-~--~---~----~----_:_~--~--_.:~---_:._----~)(,~.'.,

WHEREFORE~defendantFULTON BOILER W0RJS;S, IN,C. 'hereby r~quests'summary

judgment in.:the above""~~titl~d case, pursuant to CiVil Practice~aw and Rules Section 3212,

di~missing pl~ip.tiffsl corn.plai~fagairistdefendant FU:LTON J?OILER WORKS, INC with~., < ','. .~:-..~~. '. ':; "

prejudIce, aI)cl'there. beingJ;lo qpposition thereto,":, '~'

. ',. '. . . ," '. '. :..: -,":< -,

"'. ;!'~:

.. ",-.,, i

. , '

. :', ,,;. \ /:. . :.~;.~

'",

.~ :'. .! ~ .

SUPREME COURT:6p'THE,STATEOF NEW. YbJu(;'~~~' .COUNTYOP"NEW;Yd'RKi '

d' .,-', 'J; , ,"''', ."

, -.-.

, : .~ f

,I ;,.;, ..- .. "

~. ...r, .' ~" '. _

':" '.' .

;';,'; .!iJ.dexNo.: 110043/00

~laintiff( s);

-against-'

. ~ . ,'\: ,'~... . ;,::

" " ,," :':J " ',. ' '. " ' ", ,CLBS932S/legal/nosjriilnovember2014,' " , ", " '

; ,. ~ .-' " ".',"" J,.~...,.. ',.1' _ ", -", '. _:' _ _ .' - . '._1""_' _.

SUPREME,eOURT

_____:~ ... __~.~_~_~~_- .~~~ __~:; .i- ~~ -~~~----;..~---~--X >~-~~."

EUGENEF: BA.TTENHACK :~d ELEANOR, '< . .'.,,~., .....RATTENBACK, , /: NO OPPOS1TION

SUlYIMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

~;j t", .

A.C. & S. INC.,et aI., ~. ,-;;'.: d ~'N.YCAL.,', .. ' .'" .tA~S.; Part,? SU

"_ :':.'. ' '''." "''', ::~"';;:.'i-: ,"" . '. , ,' ;"-.'''. g.

.. ,." .,' ..... ,befendant(s);:.';.,.:' '"-------------~-~~~-j:~~~--.;..---~::.~-":_-:-~;--~~-~-.~-:.-~~ :.~-~--- ...---~~-~X ';'

,.;

WfIEREF6RE, defendants CLEAVER;.BROOK.$,. INC. hereby request sUl11ary,r'. .: :~. ". ,s ;{., .:1"" .. .

judgment ih:the'abQve~erititlecic~se,'pursuant to,Ci\ril:Prattice'Law and Rules Section 3212,. ~. .,;,,'. . . . . ': .

. .', . !'.' ~ " . "

dismissing plaiiltiffs" compl~in(against: def~~dant~CLEAVER~B'ROOKS;: INC. with prejudice,., , .-.

.,-!':: ,.;.

T''' .'

. .'~ '., :-:~ "

"

r ..;

Plaintiff(s),

CLB55064/leg~nosjmlno~ember2014; . " ,,' ,:,' .; "

, SUPREME,COURT--OFTHESTATE OFNEW YORK~. . ..' >,,'.'. ,': ".: ';~}' " ~. ,,\.,:.:' . .' ' '. ",', ,:

COUNTY OF NEW YORK,: ":k---~------~:.~~-~2=~7-,-~-------,:";';;L~:~-----;.:'_-----------"--~::~:'~--X" ,t,:, ,.~GEORGE oK MILLER, " , ' '

',NO"OPPOSITION ,BUMMARY JUDGMENT'

':MOTION AND ORDER

'.'

l~qexNo.: 100306/02 &.120430101

. '. "

A.c. & S. IN,C.,etal. ;'. e'

...: ~.: .. '

."~"'NYCAL ' "t , ", . . .

',:).A.S:,Part)6 SO' "..-' ..-:' .

, ,,' Defendant(s), " . -, : ~'-------;.----------~:2~~------~~~~;f;~~~-----~-~--------------~~~7)( ..,

, .."l

WHEREFORE, defendants' CLEAVER.~B~90KS,IN:: &ereby request summary

judgment in t1k above-entitled case, pursuantto' Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,, ~ ." . .~ ~ .

dismissing plaintiffs,c,~~plaint,agains'tdef~nd,ant~C,~.FAVER-BR90KS,INC. with prejudice,.. ' , .,~', . " ". ~. . '; ..i. " ."."

and there being no opposition thereto,, '~ . '.,.

'I ',,:i

ORD~RED, tha.fuponnotice to all cp-defendapts, aIJelaiinsand cross elaimsagainst',

"~, t.: .

. ';

'. '\'

"~..

! . .;:.

.':',

NYCALLAS. Part }RfSO

" "NQQPPOSITION'. SUMMARY JUDGMENT .

". ~. .

MOTION AND ORDER

:; ..... :

ShaWne~ 1 Itt, sq. '. .' .'BARRY MCTIERNAN & MOORE LLC. ,- , .J~ito,mes~f~r the D~fe,ndant 'CLEAVERl}ROOKS, INC2 ReetoD,'Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006 .TeI.:(212)313-3600.

,Ou.r Fil~ No..:':CLB56459

.Plaintiffs,

'. >, .:against-,

WHEREFORE, defendant, CLEAVER BROOKS, INC., hereby requests

c.~ .~.~ ..

AERCO INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al.,

. ORDERED, that upon;notiee to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against:... '. .," .

INC., with' prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,. .

summary judgment in"the abo;ve-entitled ca~e,pursl;uir:tt.toCivii Practice Law and Rules. ",;' ',...dr . ~ . '.".: ,:.f

"'-.. "

CLB59332/legal/l)osjrnlnovember2Q14

SUPREMECOURT OF THE 'STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK'

----~---------------~-----------------------~--------------------)(ALBERT MARINO, ,

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

A.c. & S. INC., et al.,

Defendant(s),

--~---~-------------------------~--------------------------------)(

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTioN AND ORDER

" Index No.: 107295/00 &125768/99

NYCALl.A.S. Pt)6'Eo

)

WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request suminary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint'against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,~.

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against. '

defendants CLEAV~R-BI~.oOKS, INC: be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

. t\o/~t~s' , . '

::0tl~' ~_._,__Attorney for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant,Weitz & Luxenberg ELEAVER-BROO:

'.'

v'. Or':,'.

i"". ;-' ! ~. '.,

" """

. ;"

' ....."':.

Plaintiff(s),

CLB59327/h~gaUnosjinino;~mber20 i4 .. c::' ' ,:',:' '"'. SUPREME cOURT OP,'THE STATE OF NEW YORK" :--'COUN'FY OF NEWVORK" ,:' >t

" .:t~:~ ,.----.;----.;.-~~-,~L:.:L-~~---------.:--- ,. __.::xC : ,,' : ,.KARL J.uRsbN ~d:NATALIEJURSON~ ". " ' , '

.', " ;"NO OPPOSITION, SUMMARY JUDGMENT'M~TIONAND'ORDER

'"..:..; . '-against- Index No.: 108082/06

NYCAL, .',:/;,:l.A,S;"p'ariJ6.S-0,

'.'; ":', " :.~ :'~;. ,j' '. .,

",

'-(~

X:cases\FBW42722\legaJ\NOSJM

SUPREME COuRT OF THE STATEOF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

---------------------~-------------------------------------------J(HENRY SHERMAN, . Index No.: 105871101

Plaintiff(s)

-against-

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY. JUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER

A.C & S. INC. et al.

Defendants.-------------------~---------~-----------------------------------J(

NYCALI.A:8. Part '%5"0

WHEREFORE, defendant, FULTON BOILER WORKS, hereby request summai-y

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212;

dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant, FULTON BOILER WORKS , with

prejudice, and there being .no opposition thereto,

Ordered, that uponnqtice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, FULTON BOILER WORKS, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

and without costs.

SOORDERED~========~__ t.jfo J/5HEIR. H8Ff' Klettl Heitlef /

ia Malikzay, Esq.arry, McTiernan & Moore

Attorneys for DefendantFULTON BOILER WORKS2 Rector Street, 14th floorNew York, NY 10006(212) 31'3-3600

WEITZ & LUJ(ENBERGAttorney for the plaintiff700 BroadwayNew Yark, NY 10003

,. . ~ (lo ~

"1,> :

I,:'

.:!;'

"'.:-i::

..... ,..,'; "~ ~',. .,':""

x:cases\'FBW427201l~g~I\NOSJ1"{ , ,'; ," , , . ':' " ' ;

SUPREME ~o1JRrPf:THE. S;r;A.fE OF NEW YORJ

~ ..,.. ~ .. '.. ,"'.. /..';. }

Index No.: 123475/00

'-, .~ ~ .

" ,X:cases\FBW42240\LEGALNOSJM ' " ,:

'SUPEf;ME,cduRr'()F'THf:-STATE OF NEWNQRK .COUNTYO.FNEW;y:QRK,.::, ". :'-". ,. . '.---------------~~----------~-:--------~------------~~~-----~-----J(THOMA;5J.~REABYSR., .,.'.' "" ..

" "'., .."'k.

"~', .

~-., \J

"

"j'

. ..' : ~~;;':~,.~ .',.against-

Plaintif( s)'"''''

,'N.O',QPPOSITIONISUMMARY.JUDGMENT MOTION AND

, ''ORDER .

A.C & S. INC. et al.

Defendants.--------~------------;.----.~;;,-,.-----;;.-----------------------------J( .':. .

;-

, ....,',':

,." .

WHEREFORE, defendant, FULTONBOILER WQRi(S, hereby request summary".' . ,,' .."'.',

" '.~

judgment in theabove~entitledcase,pursuant to Civil Pra~ti:ce ta~(anclRules Sect!on 3212,

dismissingplai~tifrs'bori1plaintagainst defendant, FULTON BOILER WO!UcS, with. . . ~ .' .

. prejudice, and there beingnoopposition thereto, . " . ": '1.

Ordered;! that upon notice to all co-defendants, all clai~saI1d cross claims against.-

defendant, FULTON BOILER JfORKS, be and thes~e:are;h~~eby dismissed with prejudice

and without costs.

",f-

. ,

,. ,

: '.: '.

'. ? .. "'~' .

". ~ ,t. ..'{~ ..... y

"~.. .'.. ~

.:.' ,:'..... ; ....:".

:- "

~'" .. ,~ .-

.;, ::

',.; .. '.t', '"

.' .....

. . ~

.,.

ia Malikzay, ESQ.arry, McTiernan & Moore

. Attomeys forPefeIldan,t :FULTON BOILER WORKS2' Rect~r St;e~t; '1'4th floor~New;Yark, N-Y 10006,(212) 313-3600 .

~... . .'

SO ORDERED, ";,,, ,.. -.:'~, L 10' S;:, ' , . ~~r,Kl@iR Meitle.?- ~II : "

;,."

.'

, ':'" "~ ,.;

.." ~'

" .

.... ' tl'''::-1~'~t.~ '.d ~;..:.l ' .~,~~" .'", '

r', '.' ,: ~".~ ,.

;, .,"', "I

2~~~EO~O~:~~'~STATE OF NEW YORK ..

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

i' ;.

OJ';

.;. ~,,~. .

This Ddcument Relates to: '

IRWIN MORRIS AND SANDRA MORRIS.' ~ '.

'.; "

," \')

,,"

"'.,"

.:;:NY.'t'AL': .' . .

. LA.S. P~rt)6 ,S-dfHcitiei ,J.) t

~: Index No: 190082/2009

~NO OPPOSITION:StJMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

'. ',1'..~~

.'

..'.1. ' .. '

, ~ .f" . .' - '.:'f: . .

WHEREFORE, defendant Beazer East; Inc. i?~orrectly slJed a~' Koppe'rs Company

(Beazer East), hereby requests summary judgment in th':ab~ve~entitled"case,'\pJ~suant to Civil'. Practice Law a,nd RUle~:~ection 321'2; dismissing.plai~tifrs co~~i~int~gainsi,defehd~t ~ennox'Industries Inc. with'pr~j~dic~: ~nd there being no oppositio~ the'r~to" ,:.,:. .

/ .'- . " ,." . ;,'~..~ .',. -. '.:. - .. :. .

ORDERED, that ,upon noticetp, all co-defendants, all cla,ims' ~ihd ~ross claims' against

. defendant Beazer:East be andthe:s~n:e,ar~hereby dismi'~sed withprej'Jdite and withb~t ~os~s.,\ . ' . '. i ! .' .' , .. ~. . : ":':: :',~,

Dated: New YOfk,New'York'. '

/zMc(f '1-

~ .,

SUPREME:COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK'COUNTY OF NEW, YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCAL,

This Document Relates ,to:Index No: 1'12129/01 '

JEAN AM:J3ROSINO NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT~1i~TION AND ORDER

. -',. '

j ..

,WHEREFO~i,defendant Amchem Products, Inc., :hereby ~equests summary judgment : > , ,

in the abov~-entitleO case~pursuant to Civil Practice Law artd' R~les Section 3212, dismissing.- .:.

, ' ,

plaintiff's-complaint against defendant Amchem Products, Inc.,With,prejudice, and there being. ~"

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED,th~fupon notice to ~ll co-defendants,'ail claiIIls"and cross claims against

defendant Amchemp',roclucts,Inc.,be and the same are hereby distilissedwith preJ~dice and" ';".' .:

without costs.'"

.....

:,'"

"

Judith A. Yav.l, Esq.DARGERE'

SUPREME COURT OF TBE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

I/I,

'/

,j,'."

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION '

This Document Relates to:

ALYIN L. BASCOMB AND FRANCESBASCOMB

NYCAL

Index. No: 120394/01

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled 'case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant CertairtTeed Corporation, with prejudice: and there being


ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against, , ,

. .''.defendant CertainTeed Corporation, be and the ,same are hereby dismissed With prejudice and~. . .

without costs. '

_ 21' Ne~1~~~k'.~f)~'~

Frank Ortiz, Esq. 'WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P~C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton

JnAY ..jvU It, ,.avItz,' q. , ' , 'DARGER ERRA' "E Y1\VITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East2ih Street,12th Floor,iNew York, NY 10016 "(212) 452-5300

/'.:', ( ....

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NE~ YORK



NYCAL

Index No: 110942/02

SANDRA J. DUSHARM, AS EXECUTRIX FOR NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYTHE ESTATE OF BRUCE V. DUSHARM, AND JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERSANDRA DUSHARM, INDIVIDUALLY

WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment ~

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant Amchem Products, Inc., with prejudice, and there being


ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Amchem Products, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Frank Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Dated: N wYork

ti~:Judith A. Yavitz,DARGER E TE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLP.Attorneys for Amchem Products, Inc.116 East 27th Street, lih FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED, ~ ----- rIo/ISHon. Peter H. Moulton............... /

"'c'' -'.,'''''. ',,-. '.\' . :.'.-

SUPREMRCOURTOF. THE STATE"OF NEW yoRkCOUNTY OF NE\\fYORK . .

IN RE: NEW YORK. CITYASBEstos,LrtIGATION

NYCAL"

This Document Relates to: .

SANDRAJ. DUSHARM, AS EXECUTRIX FORTHE ESTATE OFBRUCEy. DUSHARM, ANDSANDRA DUSHARM,.INDIVIDUALLY

Index No: 110942/02'.

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT 1\10T'ION AND ORDER

'-. . .

WHEREFORE;; defendant CertainTeed Corporation, herebyrequests summary judgment

in theabove-entitiedcase, pursuant to-Civil Practice Law andRul~s Section 3212, dismissing.

plairitiffs complaint againstdefe~dantCertainTeed Corporation, with 'prejudice, and there being .


,?'

ORDERED,Jhat'uponnotice to all co-defendants, ~llc.1aims and cross claims against

defendant Cert;ainTe.ed'Corporation, be and the same are'hereby disll.lissed with prejudice and

without costs.,

~ ~~r-'H~.-M-0-'U-l-to-n-'.---

. . ~.'

, Judith A. Yavitz~ .DARGER E E YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys' for CertainTeed.Corporation116 East 27th'Street, 12th FloorNew York,NY.fOOl~(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,

t,FrankOrtiz,Esq..WEITZ & LlJXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff' .700 Broadway,New York, NY J0003.(212) 558-5500

{\Yl\rt (}1;}[ew.York'. . . ., ,;2015...... ,...""."...~ .".-. . . - ., - .

.,.~,

~~' ,t\~::."'. .- .~".,.

-. '. )'. ., .. ' -". .

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK


NYCAL

Index No: 110942/02-----------------1This Document Relates to:

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYSANDRA J. DUSHARM, AS EXECUTRIX FOR JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERTHE ESTATE OF BRUCE V. DUSHARM, ANDSANDRA DUSHARM, INDIVIDUALLY

WHEREFORE, defendant Dana Companies, LLC, formerly known as Dana Corporation,

hereby requ;ests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law

and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Dana Corporation,

with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,


defendant Dana Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without)

costs.

frott1r~'JNeWYOrkL ,2015

Hon. Peter H. Moulton

Judith A. Yavitz, E L;DARGER E E YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for Dana Companies, LLC116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,




NYCAL

This Document Relates to: Index No: 110942/02

SANDRA J. DUSHARM~AS EXECUTRIX FORTHE ESTATE OF BRUCE V. DUSHARM, ANDSANDRA DUSHARM, INDIVIDUALLY

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summary


dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,



defendant Uruon Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New Yor~New York

mOll k1. 2015

-~ ~/.L- ""

Hon. Peter H. Moulton

Judith A. Yavitz, EsDARGER E E YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 2ih Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,

Frank qrtiz, Esq..WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.e.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10038(212) 558-5500

"~" . ...". ,

COUNTY OF NEWY0RK' ':. .. :,-.' .......

IN RE: NEWYORK CITY . NYCAL

___A_S.:-.B_E_ST_Q_',S_'~t~iT,-'IG..,....:' _A_T_IO_N.:-...--,-__---t. index No: .1~ ?544/04This Document Relates to:

CATHY G. CRUSE,AS EXECUTIUX FOR THE'ESTATE OF RICIiAR:o:A~GEORGE- '.


'r"'

WHEREFORE,Aefendc;lnt Dana Companies, LLC, fonp.erly known as Dana Corporation,

herebyrequestssummaryju.d~entin the above-entitiedcase,'pursuan,.t to Civil Practice Law

and Rules Sect~on 3212,.dismissi!1gplaintiffscomplaintag~instdefendant Dana Corporation,. . ...' . L: . . . .

with prejudice, andthere.beingno.()pposition thereto," -'.'-:'"

ORDERED~that upon noti6etban co~defendarits~allciai~s'arid cross claims against. . '." . .

defendant Dana'corp~t~tlqn;be and the same are he;eby dismissed with prejudice and without

. '.

...~.: -.:;," .. "

.. :' ..".'

costs. ; '.

J,~ditp..A.Yavirz;E g( .DARGERE.' . E:'YAVITZ&BLAU,LLP

. Atto;rneys fq.l)Dana Companies, LLG '.116 East 27th street, 12thFloor .New Y6rk,NYI0016'(212) 452~5300..~"

',: .'

Frank Ortiz, Esq.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK .COUNTY OF NEW YORK



NYCAL

Index No: 115544/04

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYCATHY G. CRUSE, AS EXECUTRIX FOR THE JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERESTATE OF RICHARD A. GEORGE



plaintiff's complaint against defendantCertainTeed Corporation, with prejudice, and there being



defendant CertainTeed Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Ff\Mh YU'New Yorkra- ,2015


/

Judith A. Yavitz, EDARGER ERRAN YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th Floor .New York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED, & ~L//;v//SROIl:Peter H. Moulton !' I

f\\..EO~~R .'l. \\ 1\\\5

RKSOff\CE

COUN~N~~,(OR~




RAYMOND W. mCKEY AND FRANCESmCKEY

NYCAL

Index No: i'16429/2004




plaintiff's complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation, with prejudice, and there being


ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants; all claims and cross claims against


without costs.

Frank Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Judith A. Yavitz,DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys forCertainTeed Corporation116 East 27thStreet, 12'h FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,

~ -


SUPREME COURT OF THE STAtE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

NYCAL


RAYMOND w. mCKEY AND FRANCESmCKEY

~o OPPOSITION SUMMARYJVDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Dana Companies, LLC, formerly known "as Dana Corporation,

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law

and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant Dana Corporation,



defendant Dana Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

ffieark Y21New YorkI-t.. ,2015

Frank Ortiz, Esq. "WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Judith A. Yavitz, E IDARGER E E YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for Dana Companies, LLC116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED, ~eterH. Moulton ---~iIS

. ',)'. ,'.,

SUPREMECOURT'OF.THE;STATE OF NEWYORK.",' ". ';1.. '.:

COUNTY OFNpW YORK

IN RE: NEWYOR1< CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCAL

This Document Relates ,16: Index No:. 119850(98 .'

RICHARD A. HIDDiE AND SHIRLEYHIDDIE

NOOPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT'MO'TioN AND ORDER

.... ' . ".-'."

wHEREFORE,defendant Amchem Products, Inc., h.ereby requests summary judgment


plaintiffs complaintagainst defendant Amchem Products, 'Inc., with prejudice, and there being


ORDERED'~:thatupon notice to all co-deferidants; all claims and cross claims against. ,',. '"

defendant Amchem~toducts, Inc., be and the same are h{(reby;dismis~ed with prejudice and

without costs.

JudithA. Yavitz, E q.DARGERE~' )"AVITZ&BLAU,LLPAttomeys'for Amthem Products, Inc.116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016.(212) 452-5300.

., ", ',./1A- '.

. .'/"L:-- ~.""'--"-------.', Ron: PeterR. Moulton. . " ',.

SO ORDERED,:.

"

".' ..~

" ;-.'-. ,"!.' ~ ';. ,- ,.-".";;,", .




CELESTINE LIPARI, AS EXECUTRIX FOR THEESTATE OF SALVATORE LIPARI, ANDCELESTINE INDIVIDUALLY

NYCAL

Index No: 113316/03







defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New Yor~, New York

ffiLlCC'..~2J,2015

~tl~Frank Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10038(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

Judith A. Yavitz, E q.DARGER E TE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NYI0016(212) 452-5300 .

" '.'

SUPREME COURT OF'THE STATE OF NEW YORK' "COUNTY OF NEW YORK


NYCAL


"

Index No: 124229/02

SALVATORE )\1ALTA, AS PERSONAL'REPRESENTATIVE-F,OR THE ESTATE OFTHOMAS MALTA AND SALVATOREMALTA, AS THE PERSONAL ,REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OFLOUISEMALTA '

NO OP:rOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

I .~;.

WHEREFORE; defendant Amchem Products, Iiic., hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled caSe, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules' Section 3212, dismissing.',

. ~ ,I

" '

plaintiffs complaint against defendant Amchem Products, Inc., with prejudice, and there being


ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, a11,c~aimsand cross claims against

defendant Amchem Products, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Judith A. YavitzDARGER E E'yAYITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for chern Products, IIlc. '116:East 27

th Stn~et,.1th Flo~r" ~'~New York, NY 10016 ' "V(212) 4.52-5300 '.' ','. \":, , '

',' ':"" '~\ V, 'l'~~~' ~, ,.: ,~ ~~'\~ ,, x\v'V

:,' 'L,l/l;iJ I,' / 5 ~, ~,~.:f.S,~;"', ",/j''/ ' O~~-0~~o~ , '

o ' ,

.;'~ . .

:York~W;t-~"""""....L......>"2015

SO ORDERED;',":",

...... '. ,";:',j" -1. "

',.,,', ",":

" '

(

NYCAL:,,

SUPREME C~:)ljRTOfTHE SlATE OF NEW YORk:'COill;J"TY OF N~~YORK. j , ' "

("IN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS' LITIGATION.' -." '

This DocUIDent Relates to:

SALVATORE MALTA, AS PERSONALREPRESENTATrvE:FO~

, :,'

'l-"

IN RE: NEW yoRk ~ITYASBESTOSLITIGATION

.',--.;""',

'. "-

SUPREME COURT OF':THE STATE OF NEW YORK'-:COUNTYOFl\JEWYORJ( . . ,"

NYCAL

Inde~ No: 124229/02------~~--------___l

This DocUment Relates to:

'.,"

j'

SALV~TOREMAL1:'A, ~.s,PERSONALREPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OFTHOMASMALTA,ANn8ALVATOREMALTA,AS THE:P'ERSONAL .REPRESENTATrVE,FOR THE'ESTATE OFLOUISE MALTA

NO QPPOSITIQNSUMMARYJUDGMEN'TIVlOTION AND ORDER

;'.

t

. ,'..

". "

SUPREME COURT OF THESTATE OF NEW YoRkCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

\ct

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY. ASBESTOS LiTIGATION

,

This Document Rel'ates to:

SALVATORE.MALTA, AS PERSONALREPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OFTHONiA,SMA~'TAANDSALVATOREMALTA,:AS,:THE':PERSONAL

. , . . I .

REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OFLOUISE MALTA

NYCAL

Index No: 124229/02

Nil OPPOSITION SUMMARYiUDGMENT MOTION AND"~oRi>Eii

."-.-';'".'

. , ' ',. .. -".1" ~ \ ' , p., '

. .

SUPREME COURT OF TI:IESTATE OF NEW yoRkCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

; .

IN RE: NEW YORk COlJNTYASBESTOS LITIGAnON

.This. Document Relates-to:

GERALD T. MC CORMICKAND SHIRLEY A.MCCORMICK'

NYCAL

Index No: 105872/02

'No. OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

;


judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules .Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant llniQn Carbide Corporation with prejudice,, .~ .


ORDERED,that ~pon notice to all co-defendarits, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same-areher~by dismissed with prejudice and;

withoutcosts.. "

Dated ~~'3D.NeWY.ork. . . 2015

. . ".. .

Frank Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENIlERG, P.c.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10038,(212) 558'-5500

Jlldi!h A. Yavil; Esq.DARGERE' . NTE YAVITZ& BLAULLPAttorneys fo l::Jni~m Carbide Corporation116 ~ast zih Street, 1zth Flo~ .New York;.N:Y10016 r I L ,~ "0..(212) 452-5300 g;:;: . :._. '.

"'"

SO ORDERED, ~B.Moul:-=-

::APR 2020;5

COUN7Y '...~1/S NE~~6~~OFFICE

\

';. ...,. ..,.' .' ~ - , ...: .~>~ "-

: , '.; . ,,;, ... . .,~".,

. ,'" .....

',-I

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW yoRkCOUNTY OF NEW YORK '

IN RE:NEW YO~CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCAL

Index No: J 05872/62 .-----~-~--------__4


,GERALD T. MC CORMICK AND SHIRLEY A.MCCORMICK


WHEREFORE, defendant Dana Companies, LLC, sued herein as Dana Corporation

hereby requests supunary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law

and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Dana Companies, .....

LLC with prejudice; and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that up




PAUL M. HUTNICK JR.

NYCAL

Index No: 111226/01


WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation, hereby requests summary JIldgment


plaintiffs complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation, with prejudice, and there being




without costs.

illed: New Yttw York0..( l~ ,2015

~ ~-=-/I()J/S"( Hon. Peter H. Mnulton '(' I

Fran}c Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

Judith A. Yavitz, ,sq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016 n(212) 452-5300' G .V

\~V .~ ~t~~

~~~ \ K'(\G~'!-CO 0

~ C\'~~O~'f.GO'0~ ~~~



NYCAL

Index No: 111226/01 "-----------------1This Document Relates to:

PAUL M. HUTNICK JR.NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER


hereby requests summary judgment in'the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law

and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Dana Corporation,



defendant Dana Corp()ration, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

Frank Ortiz, Esq. "WEITZ & LuxENB~RG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED, 4 =- ff//~OILPeter H. Moulton ............... 'I' I j

.' "' ... ~. ~.,' '.. ', ""','-

'. '1. '

..' ;'

. ",' .,'1'

" .', .- :.H'

SUPREME C'uUR~OFTHEStATEOF NEW,;y6Rk':,;:::~~rr::r'COuNTY OFNEW:YORK '.,

.' .:

IN RE: NEWYO~ CJTY . .ASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCAL

This DocumentRelate~,to:. .

DANIELA~ PRzEPIQRA

Index No: 105870/02

NO:QPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporatio,n,herebyrequests summary judgment. . , ~ , . '.

t

. ' '~..~

in the above.;elltit1.edcase, pursuant to Civil Practice'LawandRul~'s Section 3212, dismissing ., '.

plaintiffS' complcilnr'against defendant CertainTeed Corponitlon; with prejudice,.and there being

no opposition thereto;

.', .

ORDERED,that upon notice to all co-defendants; all cHtims-.and cross claims against;. ',. '

defendant CertainTeed G,orporation, be and the same are'her~by'disinissedwith prejudice and

without costs.

m.~~~()1:1.e.WYOrk". . , .. 2015. . ,:" ": .,' " ':' "

." .

'.' .':',

. ;- '.

Judith A. Yavitz,. sDARGERE EYA~TZ&BLAU,LLPAttorneys for CertaihTeed 'Corporation116 East 27th Sti'e'et, lih FloorNew York,NY,lo'Ol(j' .(212)452;.5300'

SO ORDERED, ~Moulton

Frank~tl~WEITZ &:LllxENIJERG, P;C.Attorneys forPlainttff ' .700 BroadwayNew York, NY'r0003.(212) 558-5500 -

.', .'.:..;

. ,:,.". ,'.'

.... ,,1, .. :;'.: . ,;

;',-, :. ',_,..0:..''''-:

." '.:: ,;.:: . .. . ; . ~. :-. '., .' I :';.,: .'. ".', .,'"::1".

SUPRE~E CO~R'T::9~:lHE STATE OF NEWYO~::~:.>:?~':COUNTY OF NEW"YORK ' .... '.:.

, ..'

..'.NYCA1,' " .:" :': .'

. , ,

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGAnON Index No;:) 05870/02

---------,--,----~-----_'_:_i

This Document Relates to: . (

DANIEL A.P.RZEPIORANO OPpbSITiQNSUMMARYJUDGIVI:EN'1~,MoTION'~DORDER

." .

WHEREFORE, defendant Dana Companies, LLC, formerly known as Dana Corporation,'" . '.' .

hereby reqJiests s.ummary judgrrierit in the above-erititledcas, pursuant to Civil Practice Law

and Rules Section 32d, dismissing'plaintiffs co~plaint'agaiIistdt~fendant Dana Corporation,

',:: ,..:' ~ '"

with prejudice, arr4. there b~ing no opposition thereto,

ORDERED; thatrip'on notic~ to ali co-defendants, a~l;claims and cross ~laims against

defendant DanaCorporatic:>Ii~'be: and the same are hereby disfuissed with prejudice and without'. .. ' ~ ( '-

costs. " .~.

ftjoidft,'~,w&0,2' New York" , ';,,",. .,2015.' .

".',

'.~.

','" '\

- 1

'II

Judith A.Yavitz,DARGERE " ,tE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorriey~fof'OanaCompanies, LLC116 East,2ih Sti-eei:'qth FloorNew York, NY 10d16(212) 452~5300,:;

SO ORDERED, ..~~~.MOulIO:=--'

FrankOrtjz, Esq. '. , ,wEITZ:&LUXE.~ERG, P.C.Attorneys for plaintiff:'700 Broadway:' ,,'New York; NY .lOaD3(212) 558-5500

.,.: '

. "~:"

... ,;..-;~

" ~ , '

. '.~:. " ','t:

'. ,.'SUPREME COURTOF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OFNEW YORK

,~, .

'. "


NYCAL'," . .

.....'-'.:.'

This Document Relates'to: .

.ALFRED RAINER

Index No:- 108701100

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT~MOTIONAND QRDER

.' i'"

. :','

'., :


in the above-entitled fase, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and:. Rules Section 3212, dismissing.

plaintiffs complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation, with prejudice, and there being


ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against.. ,',

defendant CertainTeedCorporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs...

~ed:.~.. 'tV.:.y.... fM.......~....eWYOrk~11).l.I..-\Q,*",'.f-lJl :,jn. ,2015

. ,,' '.i}

.' .;.:

, .:: . ~

Judith A. Yavitz, EDARGER ERRAN KYAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for Certairiteed Corporation116 East 2ih Street, 12th Floor .New York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

Frank Ortiz,.E.s.q~ .:'; .WEITZ &L~N~~:RG,P~C.AttOnieys ..for:Pi~inHfr .700 -Broadway':.' ". .New York, NY 100()](212) 558..,5500

.. :.' :ol. '

',;'

.':


IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBEStOS LITIGATION

NYCAL


ALFRED RAINERNO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT 1\10TION AND ORDER


hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law

and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant Dana Corporation,



defendant Dana Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

l1\atctw ~i' New York. .,2015

Judith A. Yavitz, Es .DARGER ERRAN YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys forDana Companies, LLC116 East 27th Street, 12th Floor ~New York, NY 10016 i~(212) 452-5300 V

, 'v. f\~ CJ

, : ..

;' .'", ,~' ... 'I',',' ... ;- ....

....,

SUPREME ~()ln~:l)'(cjgt.HE STATE OF NEW YORK

SUPREME COURT. OF THE STATE OF'NEW"ORKCOUNTYOFN'EWYORK - "--.,,

. ,:. ;~' ... ' ..,':- , ,

, T:.

.

;:.' '~';~'}~::

.....;,.......

. ' .. ,,'".

I ~ ,:

. " ~.: .. " ",:~

,'.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW yoRk '" ,"COUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK. CITY ,ASBESTOS LITIGAnON,

NYCt\L

This Document Relatesto:

RANDIALBERTE,LLI;:AS,EXECUTRIX FOR THEESTATE OF HOWARD ROTHMAN

Index No: i15177/05

NO OPPOSiTION SUMMARYJUDGME~trMoTIONAND ORDER


in the above-entitled c~se, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing.",. \;

plaintiffs complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation; with prejudice, and there being


ORDERED, that upon n0tice to all co:"defen~ants,allc.1ail:ns arid cross claims against

defendant CertainTeed Corporation, be and the same aie:~ereby dism'issed with prejudice and

without costs.

mea exiY. ,.0.2jew YorkL " ,2015"~, -'. . ,I.

Frank Ortiz, Esq.wEITZ & LUXI;NBERG, p.e:Attorneys for Plaintiff700 Broadway .New York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

'. ~. .

Judith:k;Yavitz,DAIiGERE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLP /Attorney~.f6r,CertainTeed Corporation116 East27th Stteet, lzth FloorNew York, NY 10016 - ~(212) 452:"5300 ' . ~v

, ~A> ~ (;~: Vt\

.,': .' .. ~ ~'. .~',.

. . . _" " ~ . ". , ';);~/'r\:: ,,':SUPREMECOyRT,.qF THE STATE OF NEW YORK)COUNTY OF NEW YORK

. ;~ .

INRE: NEW YQRK CITYASBEStOS LITIGAnON

NYCAL.

This Document Relates to: Index No: 11'5177/05

RANDI ALBERJ'ELLI, AS EXECUTRIX FORTHE ESTATE OF;aOWARD.ROTBMAN

NO OP~OSITION SUMMARY.JUDGMENT'MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc:., herepy request~ suminary judgmen~

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to. Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant Amchem Products/Inc., with p!ejudice, and there being


ORDERED, thai upon ~otic~ to all co-defendants,.~ll ciaims and cross claims against':;.

'. .defendant Amchem ProduCts, mc., be and the same are he.t:ebY,dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: m.JJ~~}.~g: York. -...' r. ,r:+.'.', 2015.......~, .

.~."...; Pt.~...... ;..... : .. f>'" ..... ",

, .... :

'"

..: .;

,.'': .

.,.,--~;; ... '

./--:--~ ,

Judith A. Yayitz, .DARGERE"" TE'YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorn~ysfdd~~chemProducts, Inc..116 East27~,Street; 12th Floor .New York,NY' 10016(212) 452-5300'

)Frank Ortiz, Esq..WEITZ &LUXENB~RG,P.e.Attorneys for Plaintiff' 700 BroadwayNew York, NY l.OOOJ:, .

,', ..(212) 558-5500

, , ~ .~. "'.' ..

~,'".,. ,-.

.~ .'-" r ...-~ .' ~", ,:.~.-' .- l'

..,.

SUPREME COUJ~~TOf l'HE-STATROF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEWYORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY.ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates' to: .

MICHAEL CARONE AND ANNA CARONE

. .>

1'fXCAL

IndexNo: 190027/12

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARXJU:nGM'ENT MOTION ANDO~ER'

'" -~ .

.... :,;

WHEREFORE, defendant l,Jnion Carbide CorPoration hereby requests, summary. ..'

judgment in. the aboye.,:entitled' case, pursuant to 'Civil :PracticeLaw and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiff's complaint against 4efendant Union.Carbide Corporation with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto, .ORDERED,- .that upon notice to all co-defendants, 'all Claims and cross claims against

, '.~ ~ ,,;,:';"':-" .. , ,,'.. -_.,. ., ' ..' ' ,

defendant' Uni6ij:(ifbideCorporation'be and the same are' hereby dismissed with prejudice and. .' ",', '

, ~'. . ", \'.,

without costs.'.l'~ .

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.COUNTY OF NEW YORK



NYCAL

Index No: 190369/11

CELESTINE LIPARI, AS EXECUTRIX FOR THEESTATE OF SALVATORE LIPARI, ANDCELESTINE INDIVIDUALLY


WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation. hereby requests summary


dismissing plaintiffs .complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,


ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defend~ts,. alLclaims and cross claims against

defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated:

Prank Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10038(212) 558-5500

Judith A. Yavitz,DARGER E TE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 2ih Street, 12th Floor .New York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300 .

SO ORDERED,

-e-' q ... ,

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.COUNTY OF NEW YORK.

IN RE: NEW YORK. CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION


ROBERT SHANSTROM AND RITA M.SHANSTROM

NYCAL

Index No: 106695/02




plaintiffs complaint against defendant CertainTeed CorporatioIi~ with prejudice, and there being


ORDERED, that upon notiCe to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendantCertainTeed Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New Yor~ New YorkLft~1 ,2015

~~l(OWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Judith A. Yavit sq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED, LCd ---Hon. Peter H. Moulton

-.- ; ...'. .;J ..... '. ;.'., ,

!.;-

SUPREME COl,JRTOFTHE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORk


This Do~ument Relates to:

ROBERT SHANSTROM AND RITA M.SHANSTROM

.NYCAL'.

IrictexNo': 106695/02

. NO. OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

~~J1M~Fhl1Ik0rtiZ;E1q. l.tlAJ'O~~MO~IU 0WEITZ &,LUXENBERG,P~C.Attorneys forPlahitifIs" . .

--100 Broadway .. cNew York,.NY .10038(212) 558-5500 .

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide CQrpor~#bn hereby' requests summary.

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil:Bractice Law and Rules Section 3212,. . . .



ORDERED, that upon 'notice to all co-defendailts,' ail claims and crQss claims against.defendantUn.ion Carbide Corpora~ion be and the s&in~:arehere~y dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs:

Dated: New York, New York .

. '4/1, 2015

J.udith A Yavitz;: .q.]jARG~RERAAtEYA VITZ & BLAU.LLPAttorneys' for UnIon Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th Floor. .'New York, NY 10016 ~. " .

pursuant to Q,iYUJ~ractice Law and Rules Section 32\~'J ,di~rrii~~~irg;.p,Fiiiiti~f~:'- complaint

agai~~t 'def~ll(l~{ ARM:~TRONG INTERNATIONAL,. INC. witp.prejudit~~,}iiidi/there being.,. -..' ".... . , ' ~. . . . \ '. ~

no opposition thereto;' .. . ' . '" ".;'~

ORDERED, th;~';:upon n6tice to all co-defendants,all clai~sand cross ~:i~inrs against. defendant ARMSTRONG .INTERNATIONAL, INC. 'b~ ;p'd the ~ame~re hereby/dismissed

. r

with prejudice and w,ithout cost's. -,'','" ....,.-.

Dated: ' 3/2"lL /,r~ ~ '. llJi"j AltuJJ!J~ '.Patti Burshtyn, Esq, R6bertA. ~,chaefe~;lr13~ ,WEITZ!& ,LUXENBERG P.C. ,,' H:ARRIS 'BEACH PLLC ' .'... .Attorneys fof'Piai~~iff" ,"" Attoii1~ysFor Defendartt' .A .,..700 BroadwaY .. ',(~) .' . j' . . ArrnStfbng Interilatidrialh.V .'.

NewiYiork,,-j'-J'Y:llDOQB;luie;c; ",: ' :""Hi' ~,'" >-;;~'rJ.': '.. :- ~ ":,:'! . lion,'PeterMoulton, J-S-C-::cc,-l" '.---. . ,;).t'~#-

, ..~.

~' ..

'-7'

i'. ,,.,"

c,.~ ,'.

, ;

':..','"

" ..".;""

..~:",

,"

, A;'

'"

., .... :.,,:;- .'

>,'

....,.," :';,.

"

"".

:t,

'. . '."' ...(.'

,',

""....

, + "';

"',-

. ~, "';

r,

,",. .,'.

":" /"I' .....-

.';}i~:.:~I.l~L

" :~

.".'

.' ~ .' .:, ~ I ~.~ _ ~;.':" .~ __ " : _ ~.:._ _._..; ~ ...

,.J,

'f:'

i_ t':

"~\ .~}~.;':\:?~.~l

.g~~: :t;.f:,ljIt.~~j\ -, F~':':" ",G;~lfK1i lr.f;oTl,1)~

,-~,}~;~'"~~ i;2,

,,~.

, ", )-,-

I'""'" ""!

\.

;,'rr,. :." ': ~, : .. .'. : ,: ,-- .. ; ~

,. . :'" " ..

.. .">' "l . " f'.:: 'i,.:/,: .....SUPREME CODRt:OFTHESJ:ATEOF NEW:YORK: .COUNTYOF'NE.W.YORK . ." o' (

'-~-~-~------~-----~-~-~7~---~----~--~-~-----------------~-----~---~- X. ,IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LlTIGAnON' NYCAL

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., eta!.,

....

- against-

.. Plaintiff,.?

NO OPPPSfnON SUMMARY., JUDGMENT MOTION AND

, ORD'ER 'ON BEHALF OF. DEFENDltNT M'UELLER'INDUSTRIES,'INC. .

"

Defendants.~--------~---------~~~~~--------------------------~~-----------~---- x.. .

. t"

.' . ~ .....WHEREFORE,. defendant Muelle: Indu.stries; Inc. hereby requests summary

" .. . .judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CivilPr~ctice Law.and Rules Section 3212,

r

dismissing,plaintiffs',compl~int and ailaIJ:lendments to tl,1~ complaint,against Mueller Industries,

Inc. with,prej~d!ce, and)here b'~lIlg noopposition thereto;' ,'.. .:) . .~ '. : '. ", . .". .

.'. ORDERED, that upon ~otice to 'all co-d'efelld'ants, all claims and Gross claims

against de,fend~t .MueI1erjIi.dustries~ Inc. be, and th~ s~~:.a~~::~er~b.Y disIllissed with prejudice. "'".'

'. I'.

and without costs.

,.j

.... , "~t ~, ."

BY:~~n.AI(MarcD. Crowley," Sq.)!Day Pitney LLP ,. '.Attorneys for DefendantMueiIer Industries, Inc;7 Tiqles .~quare

.N~w:York;:NY 10036::73)-1,

. (212~ 29,7-5800

. By:-----,-----;-:--,--.,.,------'-'--

Patti L.,BUrshtyn, Es'q.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.

Attome.ys for PIa.i~tiff... ..'.~... 700 Brpadway . .', V

New York, NY' 10003.~. :.012) 344,::~,~6J '(c,:;:.~ .'.. '~ '~

'- ; d.:, ;i.::I:i:~:;;l~.' .:''r~~f' o{J:",~, .\.~% i, . of-Cj~

SQ"ORBlf,~D:' ': :, )'..;~ ~..A.,.. :..:FJ~.:~.~O~. -"-;'~.~, -"-:-~._-,--,.=~._""""'.,..--H-'1iS~!.::-~ ....~ onorable,P~terH. Moulton

. ~. 6~.;s

, Dated: New York, New YorkKaa-k or6,'10T5

i

I'

i!

90519607.1

.:..:

..',," ''':\. '. "'. 1",'

' .. , .c.,; ......,.....",,' . t-i.: '. ~ -" , ~

."

.' '; ... SUPREME COURTbF THE 'STATE OF NEW YORK. COUNTY "OF NEW YORK

-----------------~-------~------------~-----------------------------xIN RE NEW YORK CITVASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL----------~------~--~~~~~~~~~-~~-~-----~~~:---~------------------~~-x'BuDDY' o. WERN ~n~ ALICE WERN, Index No.: 190286/2013

" ~

Plaintiffs,

- against-

AO. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et aI.,

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOT~ONANDORDER ON BEHALF OFDEFENDANT MUELtERINDUSTRIES, INC.

Defendants.

-----------------------~--------------------------------------------x

WHEREFORE, defendant Mueller Industries, Inc. hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law.and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint and all amendments to the complaint,against Mueller' industries,'.

Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED,' that upon notice to all co-defendants, all 'claims and cross claims

against defendant Mueller Industries, Inc. be, and the same are, hereby dismissed with prejudi,ce

and without costs.

.. --

BY:~J4dv./Marc D. Crowley, Esq. r

Day Pitney LLP, .Attorneys fqr DefendantMueller Industries, Inc.7 Times SquareNew Y6rk, NY 10036-7311(212) 297-5800

90464897, I

By: I--- _

Ambre B andis, Esq.Weitz & nberg, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 Broadway .New York, NY 10003 '"

(212) 34~~5461 . .,IvV ", ,V '. ~~ ~.~'v~ ,1 JSO ORDERED:.li' . ~~ _00 . ~ . . 4/3 /5

'V; ~~~ ~lePete~'H.M~n r -. S;~O

'. ,~(j#" ~~ ~

cP .

.. ~ ,

I)

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK------------------'--------------------------------------------------------'X Index No. 190413/2014DOMINICK J. CREA and JANIS CREA,

- against-

Plaintiffs,NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO.,ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, INC.,Individually and as successor to TAPPAN andCOPES-VULCAN,et al.

Defendants.------------------------------------------------------------------------X

WHEREFORE, Defendant, ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, INC.,

~.

CkH'A K. MESSEMER, ESQ.Attorneys for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

Individually and as successor to Tappan and Copes-Vulcan (hereinafter

"ELECTROLUX") hereby, requests 'summary jLidgment in the above-entitled

case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing, "

plaintiff's Complaint against Defendant,ELECTROLUX, with prejudice, and there

being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross

claims against defendant, ELECTROLUX, be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: White7

Plains, New York7)rJ5 ,2015

BenjaminD~Hodges Walsh & Messemer LLPAttorneys for DefendantELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, INC.,Individually and as successor to TappanandCopes-,Vulcan55 Church Street, Suite 21~White Plains, NY 1060~ VTel: 914-385-6000 V V

So Ordered: _4~F-::.::~----------------JS.c. 'ilil~ ...~~ 0,

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK-----------~--------~-~---~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--------)(

CHARLES K. ZAMMIT and RAYE ZAMMIT, his wife, Index No.: 190371/14

Plaintiffs,

- against-NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION

Kush Shukla, E~q.vViler.ltz, Goldman:,$t SpitzerAttorneys for Plai'n'tiffs110 William Street, 26th FINew York, New York 10038(212) 267-3091

AIR & UQUIDSYSTEMS CORPORATION,SPIRA)( SARCO, INC., individually and asSuccessor to Sarco Company, Inc., et al.

,Defendants:-

------------------------------------------------------------------------)(WHEREFORE, Defendant, SPIRAX SAReO, INC., individuaily ~nd as

suce~ssor to Sarco Company, Inc., (her~inafter "SPIRAX',SARCO;') herebyrequests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against Defendant,

SPIRAX SARCO, with prejudice, and there being no oPPosition thereto.


claims against defendant, SPIRAX SAReO, be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejUdice and without costs.

Dated: White Plains, New Yorkf.tlwrA pY' , 2015

~:==.=-

CY THIA K. IYlESSEMER, ESQ." . ' ~ \ (I h' /I;: " 'l:>rHqdge... /\J q"S.. ~.l~_sem~. &

'Moroknek LLP "Attorneys for DefendantSPIRAASARCO, INC.55 ChurchStreet,Suite 211WhitePlains, NY 10601 ~Tel: 914-385-6000 ~V

So Ordered: "a::-----::..O... ~, 101'\J.S,C. J 'J:JI';::~~V ~~

'-".;.-.-'.-:.;-.--::.~:"': :1.-.':" ~- . :- .. -- .. ':.: ..,....~:'::: ".': -. ::." .;~.:.:':.:M.. ~'I ,.' _. _ , " -; ...

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK-~---~--------------------- J_~ ----------xJOSEPH L. O'LE.ARY anQ GAIL .o'LEARY, Index No.: 190132114

Plaintiffs,

NO OPPOSITION- against - SUMMARY

JUDGM.ENTMOTION

.~

.., .....,--"""\., ....-.;. ..~...- ) ----------_.__... -' .

CYNTH1A K. MES~Bt ESQ.Hodges Walsh Messemer &M6roknek LLPAttorneys for DefendantELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, INC.,

.. Individually and as Sl.!CCeSSOT to Tappanand Copes-Vulcan55 ChLirch Street. SuIte 211White Plains. NY 10601 "Tel: 914,'385-6000

v:;'" ..... ...M .. -__-_-r I' .;..'O-::~~77.. -.--;O. .J ~ _--;o ~:.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK. ..

---------.------.----~~~~---.-----~------~------------------~-"---c~------>C

JOSEPH L. O'LEARY an.d GAIL O'LEARLY, IndeX' No.: 19.0132/14

Plaintiffs,

- against.-

A.a. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO.,SPIRAX SARCO, INC" Individually.and asSucces~br to Sarco Company, et al.

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION

Defenda'nts.----.-~----------------------------------------- ..."---------c----x

WHEREfORE, Def~ndant. SPIRAX SARGO, INC., Individually and as

successor to Sarco Company (hereinafter USP.lRAX SARCO"} hereby

reque~ts sUlTlmary j~dgmerlt in the above-entitled case, pursuar}t to Civil Practice

Lawand Rules Section 32121 dismissing plaintiffs Complaint against Defendant,

S'P1RAX SAReO. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.


claims against defendant, SPIRAX SARCO, be and the same are hereby. .

dismissed with prejudice and withC?lJt costs.

Oed: White Plains, ..... York

~..".J-~7-' 2015...--'7

.,..".... ,/----"..... ~.+--I--~~-------~ ..~' ...""...... / ~ .

hr' Romanelli, Esq. ....--CYNTHIAK MFSSEMER, ESQ.eitz & Luxenberg, P.C. Hodges Walsh Messemer &

Attomeys for Plaintiffs. . Moroknek LLP700 Broadway Attorneys for DefendantNew York, New York 10003 SPIRAX SARCO, INC., Individually and as(212) 558-5500 successorto Sarco C.ompany L"\.

55 Church Street,. SUite 211 ~~YWhite Plains, NY 10601 VTel: 914-3'85-6000 ,,~

I Li' ~~ {

SUPREME COURT OF-THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK ' ': ..

I~ R~~ N~W'YO-RK C"iTY-ASBESTOS LITIGATION---. . .------------~-----------------------------

BRUCE J.,BARDONE and KATHERINE BARDONE,

::Plaintiffs,.....

-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS. CO., etal.,

. Defendants.

Ii' .

Index No.: 190134/14

NO OPPOSITION;.'sUMMARY, ..

JUDGMENT MOTION

WHEREFORE, defendant Emerson Electric Co. ("Defendant") requests Summary

Judgment in the above entitled case pursuant to Civil Practice Law"and Rules 3212, dismissing.. ~.~

Plaintiffs' Complaint against Defendant with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDE.RED, that l;lpon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against~ : .

Defendant be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New Yot' NY3/tB'15

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.

~~)".: ". ~,"...,=;,_. ~.

B . ,,, - .- I ...' ..y. .' .Patti Burshtyn, Esq.,

700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003T: 212.558.5500Attorneys for Plaintiffs

SO ORDERED:

SIMON-LESSER PC

~ \ Ifi!tWM tJ)By:~~~~JlISiobhainMinarovich, Esq.

355 Lexington Avenue, 10th FloorNew York, New York 10017T: 212.599.5455Attorneys for DefendantEmerson Electric Co.

SUPREME COURT OFTHE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK---------_.~_._--~-------------------~-~.---~~

In Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION.'!- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Index No.: 190134/14BRUCE J. BARDONE andKATHERINE BARDONE,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., etal.,

Defendants.

-----------------------------------------~:.

NO'OPPOSITIONSUMMt\RyJUDGMENT MOTION

WHEREF()RE, .defendant ASCO Services, Inc., incorrectly identified as "ASCO

Services Inc., individually and as successor: in interest to Emerson Electric Co., individually and

as successor to ASCO Valve, Inc." (hereinafter "Defendant"), requests Summary Judgment in

the above entitled case pUrsuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs'

Complaint against Defenqant with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all ~l,!ims and cross-claims against


Dated: New York, NY31:BIJ5 .

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.

~.~-n I'v.~~.~:,.~, ~~

'By: ... ,'

~atti Burshtyn, Esq.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003T: 212.558.5500Attorneys for Plaintiffs

SO ORDERED:"

Hon. Peter H. Moulfon, Js.C:

SIMON-LESSER PC

~'f~~y:~\Siobhain Minarovich, Esq.

355 Lexington Avenue, 10th FloorNew York, New York 10017T: 212.599.5455Attorneys for defendant ASCO Services, Inc.,incorrectly identified as "ASCO Services Inc.,individuhlly and as successor in interest toEmerson.El~c fol indEiuD and assuccessor to Dell> VWve~c.

APR 20,20\5

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE. NEW YORK .

" ." ( '~ -

I . "'-:\._,,:'.:,-. "' ..';,'.

~:

......

SUPREME COURTOF THE STATE OF NEW:YOiuc.:COUNTY OF NEW.'YORK . '.,' " '

-.' ."

~i::~.~,c. ,..~

, 'j"." '

- - - - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - ~ - - - ':"" - -,- -'j - - - - - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - - - -1In Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

LISA.WONG,-as Acihti~fsti~t~i~- [or- the- E;t~t~ -ofFRANKJD. ESPOSITO; ari~.LISA W@NG, Individually, 1Index No.: 190212/2013

Plaintiffs, !NO OPPOSITION

-against- !SUMMARY

.~.~._~~I_~~_~~~_~~_~~~~~~f;;;;__e:_a:_, jJUDGMENT MOTION"b'.

".' ., tV"

WHEREFORE, defendant Emerson Ele~tric Co., individually and incorrectly identifi~d!, .,

herein as "EMERSON ELECTRIC-CO., Individually and d/b/a ASCO, and as Successor to.,j!. '.f"" .,"J

ASCO VALVE" ('~Defendant") r~quests SurnmaryJudgmimt in the above entitled case p~~uant

to Civil Practic'e Law and Rules 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs' Complaint against Defendant ~~h

prejudice, and thert~ being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants:.~ll claims, and cross-clc,tims against


Leonard .' ser, Esq. '- .A .: .355 Leo . n~venu~,I~F~r1,~~." . ~New York, New York~017 ~'\~. '. x\GT: 212.599.5455 ~ :..~oAttorneys for Defendant (;'v

Benjamin arche, Esq.Attorneys or PlaintiffWeitz & luxenberg, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK----------------------------------:---------------------------------------X Index No. 190049/14DEIRDRE A. STOLTE as Administratrix for theEstate of JOHN W. THOMAS,

Plaintiffs,NO OPPOSITION

- against - SUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO.,ElECTROlUX HOME PRODUCTS, INC.,Individually and as successor to TAPPAN andCOPES-VULCAN, et al.

Defendants.------------------------------------------------------------------------X

WHEREFORE, Defendant, ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, INC.,

Individually and as successor to Tappan and Copes-Vulcan (hereinafter

"ELECTROLUX") hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled

case, pursuant to Civil Practice law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiff's Complaint against Defendant, ELECTROLUX, with prejudice, and there



claims against defendant, ELECTROLUX, be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: W~tlfains, New York, ,2015

CYNTHIA K. MESSEMER, ESQ.Hodges Walsh & Messemer llPAttorneys for DefendantElECTROlUX HOME PRODUCTS, INC.,Individually and as successor to Tappanand Copes-Vulcan55 Church Street, Suite 211White Plains, NY. 10601 G nTel: 914-385,6000 \..~ y

SoOrdere~~ERH. MO\J[~. '1/'3/15 i(o \ ~~;L'i>'6 (j~"" . ',' -" C, ~~ o

.... . ..........

.-, "r

~ t I, , ;

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCt)UNTy OF NEW YbRK-------_:~-----~~---------------------------------------------------------)(JdHN'NEGRI, Index No.: 190428/14

Plaintiff,

- against-NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION

ADVANCE AUTO SUPPLY,ELECTROLU)( HOME PRODUCTS, INC.,Individually and as successor to TAPPAN andCOPES-VULCAN, et al.

Defendants.--------------~~~-------------------------------------------------------)(

. WHER'EFORE, Defendant, ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, INC.,. . / . ~

. ~:It :. . .' ,~,

IncUvid.ually} and as successor to Tappan and Copes-Vulcan (hereinafter

"ELECTROLUX") hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled

ca$e, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintitf'sComplaint against Defendant, ELECTROLUX, with prejudice, and there



claims against defendant, ELECTROLUX; be and the same are hereby

dismissed with preju ce and without costs.

Dated: hite lains, New York1>- ,2015

-Jo-r-da-n...C-.-+-o-x,...........~------------- 'T~ER'~- .Belluck & ox, . .Hodges Walsh & Messemer LLPAttorneys f r PI 'ntiff Attorneys for Defendant ,546 Fifth A ~th FI ELECTROLU)( HOME PRODUCTS, INC.,New York, New York 10036" Individually and as successor to Tappan(212) 681-1575 and Copes-Vulcan

55 Church Street, S.~i!e 211 1f"l\WhitePlains, NY 10601 G VTel: 914-385-6000 ~~

So Ordered: //P2-.. ... >J:SC. ~I'IIS ~ \ 'g~",,1l,'ISl~ ~

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK-------------------------~-~~~-~~-~---------------~-~------------x

:,

L " ,

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW.YO~.COUNTY OF NEW;YORK

------~~~-----~:~~--~-~:~~[~~~~r;;:~-~~~~~;~~j-~~7t~:~-~-------~-x .In Re:NEW YORKCITY-'ASBESTOSLITIGATION

. ~_:..;' _\ ";'" ,-. ;~; .. ;' , ,-I' .~'.

-----------------------~~~~~~-~-~-------~-~~--------~------------xJOHN A. W~NTIN,

Index No:: .. 190155/2014Plaintiff,

-against-NO:OPPOSITIONSUMMARY' \JUQG~NtMOTION ANDORDER .

.AERCO INTERNATIONAL, et al.,.~ :.

... "'-9:,,.'.~'

...

i .'~;

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE O.F NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEWYOJ.U( '. :: "0 '. .-:-'------------------~.;~--~-~j~--.,i.;;;~~-:.,.,,;.,f=.~~-~:.~:-:,-.,-------.,~,;,-x ' '" ''In Re: NEWYORK:CI;fYi~SBEST.OSLITIGATION_______.; ~ ~~ ~~ ~_1~ ~ ~------.,---------.,----x

ANNE NOLAN,

, '\ ~ "

. - ~ ,-':: I' .

-.:

-against-

, ,:.,- Plaintiff,In~ex'No.:, 190117/2014

, .

NO ,OPPOSrfION, 'SUMMARYJUriG~ENT MOTION ANDORDER,

AERCO INTERNATIONAL, ,et aI.,, '. } ... ;.. ' " .

. ," nef~ndant(s).---:-----------------------,-;.-~---------7--:.,.:_....:-.::---------'-x"

WHEREFORE, defendant,.VELAN VALVE CORP. hereby'requests summary judgment in

the above-entitledcal)e, pu,:su3J:lt to Civil Practice' Law: and, Rilles Section 321'2, dismissing\" ..

.- - "i.....'.


. ~, t,',

In Re: NEW YORKCITY,ASBESTOS LITIGATION. ''>,,'::.'" .

This Document Relates To: Index ~o.: 190379-14

JAMES J. BELL an~ MARGARET BELL,..Plaintiff,

~~~~~T~~~::=YORDER

-- ----.- ---- ._- - : ~4 __

-against-

A.O~ SMITH WATE~PRODUCTS CO., et al......

'fA:' ..

Defendant(s).

WHEREFORE, defendant,' WEYERHAEUSER COM:pANY' hereby requests summary judgment in

the above-entitled .case, pursuant to Civil Practi~e L~w andRul~s . Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs.'

" '

complaint against deferidant,' WE~RHAEUSER COMPANY, with :prejudice, and there being no

OpposItion thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to ~ll co-defendant~~}ll'dainis and~~oss ~1aims against defendant -,.' .> ~' '

MatthewG.arooerson, Esq.-Fp~PERRYWATKJNSKRUTZ

& TARDY LLP,- .. ' ~ ': ~

Xttomeys' for DefendantwEYERHAEUSER COMPANY328 Newman Springs RoadRed Bank; NJ 07701

(732) 852-4400,' Q.:, ., ~

4/3/15 \~ ," ..G,:'\~~'

~ .-.' ~~~ \eft:,~ ..~9 "

~~~o-f., _ ,~G~-{ ,

o~~ ~;., .(; .',-

SOORDERED,':.,~~~ ~"':i~N'- PETER~+f ,MOliLTotf .'lil~,;;r.;;~';';)!'I2,~~:;:.f;.l.) .. ::.:,._. __~:~.. );;d~S.C!l

. ~. ~:' ~~;.;..

,i;"::', q" ' , /THE S LAW.FIRM, P.C.Attomeysfor plaintiff(s)"245 Park Ave~, 39th FloorNew York, New York 10167(212) 792-4001

--'-'.-.--

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. COUNTY OF NEW YORK

I,

.... ;

This DocumentRelates To:" ..J

ARDESmR oMMANt aI1d ELEANOROMMANI,. .',", . 1 ." .

. Plaintiff,

-against-

AIR & LIQUIQ SYST'EMS CORPORATION, asSuccessor bY'Merger to BUffaio. Pumps, Inc., et aI.,

Defendant(s).

'.I ';, .

Index No.: 190384-14

NO OPPOSITioN SUMlViARY, iuDGMENT:MOTION AND '

ORDER' "

f'

. ;).;

.',.-

WHEREFORE, defendant, WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY, hereby requests summary judgment in

the above-entitled ca~e, pursuant t9 ,Civi~, J:lractice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs.' . .. .... . ~'. '.. !. -~. . .'.... ~... '. .. , .

c~mplaint against defendant, WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY, with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto, '

~t upon noti~e, to ail co-defendants, all claims"aiid' cross claims against defendant, , .

OMPANY,be an~ the same ate hereby,di~missedwith prejudice and without costs.

. , .. ,,- ..J' ;.',

,

\.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALLAS. PartyJ 0(Heitter, J.)

-T-h:-:i-s-D-o-cu-m-en-t:-:R-e--::-Ia-t-es-t-o-:----------; HrMIWIIndex No.: 190374/14

VINCENT A GERlTANOand

SANDRA GERlTANO NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, K & J Oil Burner Supply Company, d/b/a M & M Oil Burner

Supply Company, hereby requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to

Civil Practice Law and Rules 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, K & J

Oil Burner Supply Company, d/b/a M & M Oil Burner Supply Company, with prejudice in this

action, and there being no opposition thereto,


defendant, K & J Oil Burner Supply Company, d/b/a M & M Oil Burner Supply Company, be

and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Chauvron S. Leotaud, Esq.Attorney for DefendantK & J Oil Burner Supply Company, d/b/aM & M Oil Burner Supply CompanyMCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. ~80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 ~i VNew York, New York 10004 V(212) 509-3456 ~V' 1> ~

~, ~~ ~,\(j

~ O~~~ .L''?\" ~,~*-

vvJ 4,0~~~~5-0004

0(I{N0366762}

SO ORDERED, a "':1 Hon. Sl!iett::#!lih' II Ieill&-

Ye---\e~ \\, ~ D\A\\-DnHON. PETE.R H~ MOULJ~~.

oseph W. Belluck, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsVincent A Geritano and Sandra GeritanoBelluck & Fox, LLP546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, New York 10036(212) 681-1575



: NYCAL~ LA.S. Pati,zt) SO: (11 . I r, J.)

-T-h-i-s-D-o-cu-in---'-en-i-R-e--'-Ia-t--'-es-t-o-:.-~----~: \{~u'-\M'

~ lt1dex No.: 190263114,

JEREMIAH P. SULLIVANj NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY: JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case,pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company; Inc., with prejudice in this action,


ORDERED; that upon notice to aU co-defendants, all ,claims and cross claims against

defendant, Courter &. Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismiss~d with prejudice and

without costs.

/IJ j I _______----fI'N='===-------Attorney for Plaintiff(s)Jeremiah P. SullivanWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 Broadway.New York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

Attorney for DefendantCourter & C'ompany, Inc.MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004'(212) 509-3456

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATiON

SUPREM~COUR:r OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

: NYCALi rA.S,p~rt~5"ti .

_--,--_--'-'--_'--_~_____'__ ____'_~: .

. IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ,ASBESTOS 'LITIGATION

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTYOF NEW YORK

: NYCAL:', ' 5'~: LA.S. ,Part.J().--------,-------";-,-------------'~i:(I~,','ill,., "This Document Relates to: Y'V"'"

: Index No.: 190263114,

I' ,JEREMIAH p, SULLIVAN

, NOOPPOSITION SUMMARY>JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in

I . the above entitled case, 'pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 3212, dismiss~ng plaintiffs'. .' . . .

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there

being no opposition thereto,

Attorney for Plaintiff(s)JeremiahP. SullivanWEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

i

ORDERED, that upon notice to all c&-defendants,all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Treadweli Corporation, 'be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New.. YArk, New York02 'V) ',2015.

~'ESq.,Attorney for Defendant,Treadwell ,CorporationMCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New YOrk,' New York 10004

(21'2) 509-:3456 , Q

SO ORDERED, -H6fs~~~;;;--==----c'If'3jJs-G \\..~,~,~ ~H~ I2eh'lIbldu ~ a,,' "V e..,~\ ' \\. ~tu.\~ ~~.~' ',SO

'.,1

SUPREME CO\lRTqFT!ftSTAIE OF:N"EW:YOR,K.< , 'COUNTY OF NEW'YO:RK . , , .... ",'IN RE:, NEW YORK'COUNTY''''::' ,.) NjGAL( ':"',' ,;

A.$I3ES..TO~.LlTf(JA.,TIO.N :.' " :tA$.,P~r:tJ6:S"P:,." .. i'02 l3)u,J.)"',' ,

This DocumentRelates to: .: M\)u.\~.i I~&~ N6. )q90263/lit: "'.:: -< /'.;~',;.:" '

, ~,,; , ' "

':,i,

',"., ., ..,

" ,,. c

'.':"

,. ,.':JEREMiA.HP.':SDLLlVAN: ;", .

: NO OPP@SITIONSUMMARY:JUDGivIENT M:Ol'lON'ANn QlIDER

.;;- ,.' , .',(.:-.-.

'WHEREFO~:, 'deftmdant; Tishman.;.LiquidaiingCorp., her~by' requests summaryt,"

" r.

,'. _: '.. " .""-,. .. ,;.,." ":, . ,: '. lr . .. - " " ~" - , _ '

judgment ih theabo:veptit,ledcase"p:utsuant tb.CivilPracticeLawand)t.u1es 3212, dismissing, . " .., ~".. ' " . - . - ,- ..'. ' -, .. .~ ~

plaintiffs, complaint against defendant, Tisfuna~'Liquicl'~ting G6.fr,::~itk prejudice in this ~kctio)1,': . ". _. .. , . _'.. ',. - -., ',1 :'. :. : .:: ;,'- . c. . "


ORDERBD;::that 'uponp~tice,to all co-defe~'darits, '~q'dai~~'~f-ld cross' Claims against. . ,-' .' -:-. . . ."." '., ,-,:-,,' ' - . ,"" ' .. "

defendant, TisIVnan qquici~tihg'c;::Orp., be and the s'ame~.~rehe~eby dismissed withp~ejudice and, . : "', ::,' " ..- . -, - . ;........ - " '. ;', ~,,": ,

without costs.:'."

... ..

,,'\ .

'-i;,,' ~

pated: New Yi.ork,'N.. e:'W.}~?rk' .,. '?:J L~ .;20J 5 :

I~(, 1";"""I 1- .;..

. ".

~ J '

.. ,.

. ' .,'jr, '

',

I .,

',' ...., "..,;.' < '

(

NYCAL.I;A.S~Part,6"0'~ltler,J{/hfPtipy.;i1,

" /

, ". :} "," ,"/~ ',.-

, "o .: ;," ','?

" r" ,~:,

",- .I , ,

1 ,\r:.." "

" " " , . . ~", '\

, 't \I>. "'"

, '~

\ ', ' ~ .

. " " ", I

SiJPREME.COURTOF"',fI&,STATEOFNEWY:OR&"~:, ,,"'

'",,"',

,", "

, "',( ~ 1"',1

\"/

'JI

, :. ~", .'.. ~ ~

'~',',. '~

,'r

I'" . . ". :('

~'-.; ":;" .' . .. , '-.

" '.;

"

, ."

'1:;' ' 't ~ :.'. .. :.. ~'

. '~;-- "'.'!!' - ~r , :.'.

r:'" ,'i'... ,

I

, "

, 'Inde:t'No,.: 190038-13( . . .

, .' NO OPPOSITION .)~vMMARy ,

.,JUDGMENT MOTION" AND ORDER

Plaintiff(s)~'-..:' \,,',' ....

. ";{ ..'; ;--'. ~agamst.. ,

A.O. SMITHWATERPRQB1JCTSCO., eta)., \. "' 20~ " ", " : " 1'/ ,'Y. :~. ,_ Q.;

. >.

;,I

" ..'"

- .~; ':!', '

i-III

i

II

I- I

, ,I,,

;. }

, ;,

'. - ': ..... '

SUPRE1v1E cOURT OF .THESTATE OF NEW YORK' : 'COUNTYOF NE'W~YORI""~:.:

1'"

"

.. ,,:' ".. "

:r.

~ .

I"

. ~

J: 1

, '.' j,;'.' .-;.,".;.. .

~ j' ;. "."'" " ~, ,;. ,;. :.,..,.. ~ " ";..J.. ,.._ ,~.,...'t..;-.. -,.; (:~:.

. ~. ,

.' ..

'~',' .. t ..

" . , ~ ,;:~

, . ' ... ..:...:... ...:,~,

. ,............................_ ,- " ,., ~ ,_.. - " , : '.. '--,.c., " .

I '~

11214~77V!'1 '.

. . , . ', .,~.~~ . : .... : .... '., ... :: L~' _ " ,.' ._ " ' /_~.~,'- ::','" , " .'

WHEREFORE;'.,def,tFPdantPlleumo'AhexLLC';. s~.:e~Qr::hiintrest to..Abex Corporation,'. ..., ",;~':: ,,' ",'.;',~,,:' '.;;"". ,'. .. ' ' ..'. ~'~.: '>:':';

"'j .

,: .~,

-,',,,1 '~ .~ . ~-

of

LA.S. Part:50:. (M9~t6n,.P.H.)"Index No;:' 10585112007

_." .~".' ,"

. :!~{f . 'NOOPPdSltl0N '.

''''.SUM1\fAR.YJi]DGMENT. ill "MOTION AND'ORDER '

. -~t

, ' .....

;. ~.~ ,-;.~.~:I ~{ ~ -

t ."

, \, (/~. .;.-;: ::,;SUPREME.. C(OURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTy'6F NEW YORK ~. ',- --: ~,~.

.,......... ~::.;

-------------------------------------------------------------------------GLORIA SETTECASE, as Proposed Administratrix for,the Estate 'of ANTHONY SETTECASE, and GLORIASETTECASE, Individually,

Plaintiff(s),

- again~t-

Index No.: 190158/09

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTAND ORDER

Defendants.

DENTSPLY AUSTENAL,DENTSPLY CERAMCO;EMPIRE-ACE INSULATION MFG. CORP.,J.F. JELENKO & GO., INC.,J.F. JELENKO AND COMPANY, INC.,KERR CORPORATION,

d/b/a KERR DENTAL CORPORATION,Individually, and as successor by merger to KERR

MANUFACTURINGCOMPANY, .

NOBILIUM COMPANY DIVISION OFCMP INDUSTRIES LLC,

SYBRON DENTIAL SPECIALTIES, INC.,Individually and as successor to, and .f/k/a SYBRON INTERNATIONAL CORP., and ~as successor to KERR DENTAL CORPORATION, G Vas successor by merger to KERR MANUFACTURING ,_VCOMPANY, \ V f\~~

THE J.M: NEY COMPANY, G "f,~ v ~\V~. WHIP MIX CORPORATION, , ~~. \'?:Jox

~~ ~v'v)~O~

~~-

'.'," "';' . ",.".,

i .. , \.

. ,, , "I . ' .' . -,

!~ . . I~d, 'indiviqua!lyan'(j ,ass~;:ce~'so~ ~oRANSQM"'&'~ANDO~PH,erroheously:'

. s/h/a DENTS[l(V, AUSTENAL' ANb:~ENTSPlY'C~~~~C~ with 'prejUdiCe, and. ,).' l ;' - , /.l_. " . - -. " , , ~ . ,

there being no 'opPQsition hereto.

ORDE'RED/th~t 'upon notice to all co-def~ndants, all claims' and cross-claims",

.->,

-, . ~:L,' ('" i:",:.~P..

....":'

GORDON & SILBER, P~C'"ATTORNEYS AT LAW

- .

MEMBERS OF THE FIRM

, DAWN A. ADELSONARTHUR G: COHENWAYNE E. COUSIN"DAVIDM. DINCEEDWARD M. DON DESSANFORD GOLDCHRISTINA KAOURISANDREW B. KAUFMAN

, , ANDREW T. SHEELEY-JON D. LICHTENSTEINSTEVEN H. MUTZLAURA E: RODGERSMICHAEL P. RYANJOHN F. TOTOL~WRENCES. WASSERMAN'

"ALSO ADMITTED IN NJ

3SS LEXINGTON AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10017-6603TEL.: 212/834-0600'FAX: 21 2/490-003S

WESTCHESTER OFFICESO MAIN STREET, SUITE 1000WHITE PLAINS, NY 10606-1920TEL.:914/682-2097

..

.

, ,

I,

SUPREME, COURT OF\THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK '___'_ ~ _'_ ..'__' ~ _~ :"""7f~..., __ :..: .. ,..,~ .. '-Ol~, &s,z,::(C

"', .''f' :

AERCO INTERNATIONAL,',lNC., et al., .. '.. "\ .. ' ,.'.

. Defendant.- - ~ - - - - - - - - - -.; -, ~ .- -' - - ~ - - - - - .- - - - - - - - -- - .,.x

SUPREME COURT oF-THE STATE OF'NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW'yoRk .- - - - - .,.- - .. ~ >~. - ~ -- L- - - - ';. - - - -- - ~ - - '" - - - ~ ~ xIN RE: NEWYOR1Y",.' , . ,'\ ' .. ','costs.' .'.".. .' .

.';'.,

t ..

.,, '.

. .' , .. .' ~," "" .\'''.

\~ ,

. r' .' .", '\~,,~ ,.' ','. .. '~'~-. i,.~ ; ": '., ,)., .

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., etal.,. . Defendant.

- - -'. - - - ;. -. -': - - - - - .,. . ';',- - - ..: - - - - - ~ ....:..~ -xI " -

'.-' .'

.SUPREME:eouiT;OFrHE

","'- . .'~

c":"...." .~', '

....,,-".-....

- :~ '-'. ..... , j

. )

, ,

, ,\ ,

, Plailltiffts),

,I. "

i~~ex No.: 190421-12

,:,'~OIOPPOSITION'SUMMARy "-. '

,':JvI)GMENTMOTION'r," AND'ORDER '

BELL & GOSSETT COMPANY"et aI., ,, ' "., , " "Defendant.

. ~ :' .~ _ ~. '.1" , ". ".... .,: _: " . : ;;.,.'r: .' ...:racticeL~W_and RulesSection3i12"di~fnissingp,lairiiiff's complaint agairistl)~fep(jant ~~h prejudice, andtherebeingnooppositioD,the.rd:tci.',: ( .. - " . "

, "ORDERtP~;ha~:~p~~ ri~tice to all co~defendaiits, all claims and cross claimsagainit D~felldi;ri~;~bi.:~~l:tHej~ameare hereby dismi~sid withprejudice and without .,. . ',' , . .... ,," _,'.. ',' .. ,, .. ~.,,:.l': ..:'-. r. .' . ~', .'_. \.

. costs. '" .:

;' .:

..' '

. 1..

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.,

I

r,

I!i

'I.!

I

INooPPosmONSUMMARY,JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

NYcAL .'~'.' ~.A.S~ Part~~ .' \'. ~ (lIeideFj oJ.) ()itdk-f.:A::i? )

Index No.: 190281/2012i

. Plaintiff(s),

". ,"

'.'?, .. ~~amst-'

'. \ .

. SUPREl\ffi COURT OFTHE' STAtE OFNEWYORK . ".COUNTY OF "i'rnw:YORK {:.,"'. :. c

iNRE::NEWt~~ ~i~~-~~;~~~O~ LI~iG~~i~;.t ..,. ,. -,. ,. ,. ., ,;" ~ .;.. ~ ~~/ -- '" ,. ,. .'".:. -. - - ,. - ,.,. ,. ~ _',. .. x .

. This DocumentReIatesT~\$

" ..',.

Documents

nycourts.gov this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the selected date. The documents are displayed in no particular order