Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2019/5/2 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and ordersfiled on the selected date. The documents are displayedin no particular order. However, all of these documentsare searchable.

To find a specific order, please use the Search/Findfunction within a PDF viewer.

1) Select Edit > Find in the main menu or press Ctrl-f(Command-f or Apple-f on a Mac);

2) Enter the index number, a word, or a phrase in the formfield provided and press Enter or Return.

In most applications, the first appearance of the indexnumber, the word, or the phrase in the document will behighlighted.

Tip: Ctrl-f opens the Find function in most applications,including browsers and PDF viewers.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK APR 3 0 2019

X NYCALI.A.S. Part(Mendez, J.)

PART 13

13IYS SUPREME COURT • CIVILIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATIONX

JAMES R. REYNOLDS and JEAN REYNOLDS,Index No. 113781/02; 106690/02

Plaintiff(s),UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

-against-A.C. and S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING &SUPPLY), et al.

Defendants.X

WHEREFORE, defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION hereby requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to C.P.L.R. Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs’ complaint and cross-claims against defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL

CORPORATION with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it

is,

ORDERED, that, all claims and cross-claims against defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL

CORPORATION be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: //1

/

Joanljasior, Esq.RENZULLI LAW FIRM, LLPOne North Broadway, Ste.1005White Plains, NY 10601Attorneys for DefendantAmerican Optical Corporation

Matthew Tarasoff, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)

SO ORDERED,

F I L E D Hon. Manuel Mendez, J.S.C

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.MAY 0 2 2019

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

APR 3 0 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK PART 13

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILX NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

XWARD A. REYNOLDS and CAROL REYNOLDS

Index No. 190276/11Plaintiff(s),

UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

-against-A.O, SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.

Defendants.X

WHEREFORE, defendant PFIZER INC. hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled action, pursuant to C.P.L.R. Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint and

cross-claims against defendant PFIZER INC.with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants

there is no opposition, it is,

ORDERED, that, all claims and cross-claims against defendant PFIZER INC. be and the

same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: /

Joan Gasior, Esq.RENZULLI LAW FIRM, LLPOne North Broadway, Ste.1005White Plains, NY 10601Attorneys for DefendantPfizer Inc.

U. X .i' —' ^^Patti Burshtyn, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for Plaintiffs)

SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel Mendez, J.S.C

F I L E D MANUEL J. MENDEZJ S C.

MAY 0 2 2019


'SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK rprj p n n r=J p;

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.) APR 3 0 2019

This Document Relates to: PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILIndex No.: 109983/08

JOSEPH SAEVAAND

.NORMA SAEVA UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Company, requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint

and cross-claims against Patterson Pump Company, with prejudice, and after notice to all co-

defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Patterson Pump Company,

are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, Ndw YorkMJ2&L 2019

Jordan C. Fok, Hs|q.Âttorney for|Pl^^ff(Joseph Saeva"aiBELLUCK & Fox, LLP546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, New York 10036(212) 681-1575

Kerâhn M. Cook, Esq.Attorney ior DefendantPatterson Pump CompanyMCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

orma Saeva

SO ORDERED, F IHon. Manuel J. Mendez “raw*

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S .C .

MAY 0 2 2019 454-11499


e si— , r

APR 3 0 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

X NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS UITIGATIONX

WADE M. LEWIS,Index No. 106694/02; 114654/02



Defendants.X





is,



l / a a / UDated:>/

//LPatrick Efnle^TEs)pWEITZ & LTTXENBERCT700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for Plaintiffs)

Joan Gasior, Esq.RENZULLI LAW FIRM, LLPOne North Broadway, Ste.1005White Plains, NY 10601Attorneys for DefendantAmerican Optical Corporation


MAY 0 2 MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C .


NfS SUPREME COURT C1VHX NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)

nae ~r-BT

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATIONX

ALFRED DIFRANCO,Index No. 126681/02; 103527/03


-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.

Defendants.X





is,



Dated: /

//

Patrick Eihlevf^s^.WEITZ & lk700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for Plaintiffs)

Joanijasior, Esq.RENZULLI LAW FIRM, LLPOne North Broadway, Ste.1005White Plains, NY 10601Attorneys for DefendantAmerican Optical Corporation

NBERG

FSO ORDERED, rasateJHB vte'-ssa if AHon. Manuel Mendez, J.S.C

MAY 02 2019MANUEL J. MENDEZ

J.S.C. COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

ff8 . . -• j i— '7 . -

APR 3 0 2019

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

)

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.) PART 13

COURT - CIVILNYS SUPREME

This Document Relates to:Index No.: 104668/05, 116822/00

LUIGI CRISCI UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Simplex Wire & Cable Company, requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,

dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Simplex Wire & Cable Company, with

prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Simplex Wire & Cable

Company, are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New Yark, Ne-W Yor

Jo Matthew Du Sajnffar, Esq.Attorney fcfDefendantSimplex Wire & Cable CompanyMCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

eane,mey for Plaintiff

Luigi CrisciTHE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.515 Madison Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022(212) 980-0404

SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C. F 533-14G

lam

MAY 02 2019COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

NEW YORK

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)

APR 3 0 2019

'^3

This Document Relates to:Index No.: 116819/00

„ PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

PATRICK CURRAN UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER







Dated: NewYork. N Yorkmn

§! J '

Matthew I^S^mpar, Esq.Attorney for DefendantSimplex Wire & Cable CompanyMCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

Johnjpfearie, Esq.ey for Plaintiff

Patrick CurranTHE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.515 Madison Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022(212) 980-0404

A


MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

533-17A*

MAY 0 2 2019




This Document Relates to: APR 3 0 2019Index No.: 112280/00

ff5 SUPREME*COURTPATRICK DALY UNOPPOSED SUMMJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

• CIVIL







Dated: New York, New York

JohnTtearie,At|m-ney for PlaintiffPatrick DalyTHE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.515 Madison Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022(212) 980-0404

Matthew D. Sampdr, Esq.Attorney for DefendantSimplex Wire & Cable CompanyMCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456


F I LMANUEL J. MENDEZj.s.a.

533-10A

MAY 0 2 2019




This Document Relates to:CIVILIndex No.: 104691/05, 116819/00

JAMES F. DOWLING UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER







Dated: New York, Nfew York\ '1

John/Dearie,Atjomey for PlaintiffJames F. DowlingTHE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.515 Madison Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022(212) 980-0404

Matthew D/Sarppar, Esq.Attorney forDefendantSimplex Wire & Cable CompanyMCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456



533-17E

MAY 02 2019




APR 30 2019PART 13NYS SUPREME COURTThis Document Relates to: - CIVILIndex No.: 104659/05, 112281/00

KALLJO LAIDLA UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER







Dated: New.York, b/ew York

Matthew D. âmpar^sq.Attorney forSimplex Wire & Cable CompanyMCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

Attorney for PlaintiffKalljo LaidlaTHE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.515 Madison Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022(212) 980-0404

ant


MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C. 533-15E

FMAY 02 2019



APR 30 2019IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.) PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT CIVILThis Document Relates to:Index No.: 104658/05, 112281/00

LEONARD LESNEFSKY UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER







Dated: New York, New York?

MatthewCp. I^mtpar, Esq.Attorney for DefendantSimplex Wire & Cable CompanyMCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

John0earie, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffLeonard LesnefskyTHE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.515 Madison Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022(212) 980-0404


MANUEL J. MENDEZ C 8 IJ. .S.C

MAY 02 2019


533-15A

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK IAPR 30 2019IN RE: NEW YORK CITY


• CIVILThis Document Relates to:Index No.: 104666/05, 116819/00

THOMAS MOELLER UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER







Dated: New Yo

44

JohnE0earie,Attorney for PlaintiffThomas MoellerTHE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.515 Madison Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022(212) 980-0404

Matthew ID. Sapapar, Esq.Attorney foFDefendantSimplex Wire & Cable CompanyMCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456


MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S.C . 533-17J

FMAY 02 2019

RK'S OFFICECOUNTY CLENEW YORK



APR 3 0 2019NYS SUPREMETCOURT - CIVILThis Document Relates to:

Index No.: 116828/00

PETER MONGELLO UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER







Dated: New Yonk, NeW York

7 Matthew DrSampar, Esq.Attorney for DefendantSimplex Wire & Cable CompanyMCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

John Dearie, Esq.Attorfiey for PlaintiffPeter MongelloTHE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.515 Madison Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022(212) 980-0404



533-18F

MAY 02 2019



ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.) APR 30 2019This Document Relates to:Index No.: 111582/00

NYS suwJSS&r - CIVILMICHAEL PERAGINO UNOPPOSED SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER







Dated: New York, New York

John dearie,Attorney for PlaintiffMichael PeraginoTHE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.515 Madison Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022(212) 980-0404

Matthew p. Sampar, Esq.Attorney'feH3efendantSimplex Wire & Cable CompanyMCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456


F IMANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

R533-7

MAY 0 2 2019




APR 3 0 2019PART 13

COURT - CIVILNY$ SUPREMEThis Document Relates to:

Index No.: 104687/05, 111754/00

FRED RICCIARDI UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER







Dated: New Y</rk, New York

Jo Matthew DJSampar, Esq.Attorney far DefendantSimplex Wife #; Cable CompanyMCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

Aj*6mey for PlaintiffFred RicciardiTHE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.515 Madison Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022(212) 980-0404


MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S .C . 533-13E

MAY 02 2019




APR 30 2019NYS SUPREMTCOURT - CIVILThis Document Relates to:

Index No.: 104657/05, 112281/00

VICTOR RODRIGUEZ UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER







Dated: New York, NeW York

JohrvDearie, Esq.Aôrney for PlaintiffVictor RodriguezTHE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.515 Madison Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022(212) 980-0404

Matthew D. /Sampan; Esq.Attorney foil^DgffendantSimplex Wire & Cable CompanyMCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456


MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S.C.

533-15Hram

h.jja

MAY 02 2019COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK ©IN RE: NEW YORK CITY


ApR 3 0 2019This Document Relates to:

Index No.: 116820/00

JOHN RYBOS UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER







Dated: New York, New York4/ 367ho/ 3 I

John Efeane, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffJohn RybosTHE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.515 Madison Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022(212) 980-0404

Matthew D. Sampar, Esq.Attorney for DefendantSimplex Wire & Cable CompanyMCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456


MANUEL J. MENDEZJ S C .

533-16C

MAY 0 2 Z019



ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.) APR 3 0 2019

PART 1 TSUPREME COURT

This Document Relates to:- CIVILIndex No.: 104693/05, 116820

FRANK STELLA UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER







Dated: New York, New York/V/TT/av?

/Matthew ELAttorney for Defendant

V

Simplex Wire & Cable CompanyMCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

John Dearie, Esq.Attorney For PlaintiffFrank StellaTHE DEARIE LAW FIRM,P.C.515 Madison Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022(212) 980-0404

par, Esq.


MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S .C .

533-16G

AT#*GB &*:

MAY 02 2019




APR 3 0 20 ]$PART 13NYS SUPREME COURTThis Document Relates to: - CIVIL

Index No.: 104656/05, 112281/00

PATRICK WALSH UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER







Dated: New York

John Matthew D/Snmpar, Esq.Attorney for DefendantSimplex Wire & Cable CompanyMCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

Attorney for PlaintiffPatrick WalshTHE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.515 Madison Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022(212) 980-0404


MANUEL J. MENDEZJ . S .C

533-15B[ <«E3tlfSl

MAY 0 2 2019


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK APR 30 2019xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)


X

This Document Relates to: Index No.: 115015/1998

UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

LINDA BIGAJ, as Executrix for the Estate of LEONARDJOSEPH BIGAJ and LINDA BIGAJ, Individually,

X

WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissingthe complaint and cross-claims against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and afternotice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Goodyear CanadaInc. are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

q- 22 .1WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Goodyear Canada Inc.

ByAlexandra E. OberUreksler

(JLS700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

•VR*8*iUsa feta*SO ORDERED: rA33

Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.MAY 02 2019MANUEL J. MENDEZ

J.S.C.COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

NEW YORK


APR 3 0 2019xNEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

IN RE: NYCALJ.A.S. Part 46(Billings, J.)


X

This Document Relates to: Index No.: 107340/2001

UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

MARCIA TRUCKS, as Personal Representative for theEstate of WILLIAM L. TRUCKS SR., and MARCIATRUCKS, Individually,

X

WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. requests summary judgment inthe above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice,

and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Goodyear Canada

Inc. are dismissed with prejudi.ce and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

1177 jnL

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PC.Attorneys for Plaintiff

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Goodyear Canada Inc.

---

By: By:s

^ ^^pmujornFerlman, Esq. Dan Gagliardi, Esq.

137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

JMiaUrn

SO ORDERED: MAY 0 2 2019Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

NEW YORKMANUEL J.MENDEZJ.S.C.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK gg)

APR 3 0 2019IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)

This Document Relates to: '&VILIndex No. 190388/10

KATHLEEN DOYLE, Individually and asAdministratrix of the Estate of JOHN D.DOYLE

UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Flowserve US, Inc., solely as successor to Edward Valves,

Inc. and Edward Vogt Valve Company (improperly sued as Edward Vogt Valve Company,

individually and as successor to Edwards Valves, Inc.) (“ Flowserve US” ), hereby requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section

3212, dismissing plaintiffs Complaint against Flowserve US with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Flowserve US be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

till I L3New Vorkl, New York

Dated:

Kevin M. Berry, Esq. /Wilentz, Goldman & SpitzerAttorneys for Plaintiff110 William Street26th FloorNew York, NY 10038

Brian SorensMcElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLPAttorneys for Defendant Flowserve US, Inc.225 Liberty Street, 36th FloorNew York, New York 10281

SO ORDERED,Honorable Manuel Mendez, J.S.C.

MANUEL J.MENDEZ MAY 0 2 2019


3493815 1



IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION NYS SUWEMECQURT - CIVIL

This Document Relates to:Index No.: 121211/00

JANICE WARD, as Executrix of the Estate ofJEROME WARD UNOPPOSED SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Rockwell Manufacturing Company (hereinafter “ Rockwell” or

“ defendant” ),, requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the Complaint and cross-claims against

Rockwell with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Rockwell are dismissed with prejudice and without costs..

New York, New York7/ / , 2019

Dated:

/Brian Sorensen, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLPAttorneys for Defendant RockwellManufacturing Company225 Liberty Street, 36th FloorNew York, New York 10281

Kevin M. Berry, Esq. /Wilentz, Goldman & SpitzerAttorneys for Plaintiff110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, NY 10038

F i r*** sgraw®**

SO ORDERED, MAY 02 2019Honorable Manuel Mendez, J. S. C.

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORKMANUEL J. MENDEZ

j.s.c

3767350v1

APR 3 0 3019PART 13

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)

XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

XROBERT JOSEPH SHANSTROM, as PersonalRepresentative for the Estate of ROBERT J.SHANSTROM,

Index No. 118531/02; 106695/02


Plaintiff(s),


Defendants.-X





is,



4 l ig> j nDated:/

2 J

\/hJoan taasior, Esq.RENZULLI LAW FIRM, LLPOne North Broadway, Ste.1005White Plains, NY 10601Attorneys for DefendantAmerican Optical Corporation

JJuMi SiebehEsqWEITZ & LUXENBERG700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)

Ix-i - h*r \SO ORDERED, MAY 0 2 2019

MANUEL J. MENDEZUNÊCwyR0KRSK0FFICE

J.S. C.

Hon. Manuel Mendez, J.S.C

APR 3 0 Z019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK


-X NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION— X«•mum•*r**mm >

JAMES R. REYNOLDS and JEAN REYNOLDS,

Plaintiff(s),Index No. 113781/02; 106690/02



Defendants — X





is,


CORPORATION be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs,

Dated: /iZ£

Joan Gasior, Esq.RENZULLI LAW FIRM, LLPOne North Broadway, Ste.1005White Plains, NY 10601Attorneys for DefendantAmerican Optical Corporation

Matthew Tarasoff, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for Plaintiffs)

C lMAY 02 2019

^—COUNTY CLEHIMANUELJ.MENDEZ NEW YORK

* '7*.


- OFFICEJ .S.C.



X PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT • CIVILIN RE NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONX

Index No: 190092/2009This Document Relates to:

UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

JAMES LYNCH and MARY LYNCH

X

WHEREFORE, defendant CUMMINS, INC., requests summary judgment in the above-entitled

action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against CUMMINS, INC. with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no

opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant CUMMINS, INC., are dismissed

with prejudice and without costs.

L!. oxDated: , 2019New York, New York

Charles Ferguson, Esquifre*WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York, 10003Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Johr^S. How^th, /EsquireKefth D. Babula, EsquireWILBRAHAM, LAWLER & BUBA140 Broadway, 46th FloorNew York, New York, 10005Attorneys for Defendant, CUMMINS, INC.

SO ORDERED,MANUEL J. MENDEZ, J.S.C.

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S .C.

MAY 02 2019OFFICE‘CCOUNTY CLERK

NEW YORKv O


APR 2 6 2019IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION PART 13

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:Index No.104431/97109676/99

DANIEL P. POLAK

UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Harsco Industrial f/k/a Patterson Kelley, hereby requests

summary judgment in the above entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules §

3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against defendant, Harsco Industrial f/k/a

Patterson Kelley, with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition,

ORDERED, that all claims and cross claims against defendant Harsco Industrial f/k/a

Patterson Kelley, are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED:

Anna M. DiLbnardoAttorneys for Defendant

) Harsco Industrial f/k/a PattersonKelleyMarshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747

Attorneys for Plaintiff wvWeitz & Luxenberg °^ V700 Broadway - 7th floorNew York, NY 10003 u

SO ORDEREDHon. Manuel J. Mendez J.S.C. MAY 0 2 2019



t SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK APR 2 6 2019

PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:Index No. 121595/98

CHARLES M. WEGENER








oDATED:

Noriel L. Sta. MariaAttorneys for DefendantHarsco industrialMarshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747

AttorneysWeitz & L700 Broadway wtn fioorNew York, NY 10003

nerg

SO ORDEREDHon. Manuel J. Mendez J.S.C. EJWK* &*;?sraa

MANUEL J. MENDEZ MAY 0 2 2019


j c r


PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION


RONALD TENEYCK and EDWINATENEYCK


WHEREFORE, defendant, Harsco Industrial f/k/a Patterson Kelley, hereby requestssummary judgment in the above entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules §3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against defendant, Harsco Industrial f/k/aPatterson Kelley, with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition,



Attorneys for Plaintiff J-fJ. V Andrew M. WarshauerWeitz & Luxenberg IJQL, c l/\ ' '" Attorneys for Defendant700 Broadway - 7th floor ^ J Harsco Industrial f/k/a Patterson

DATED:

./ .Cut!/

KelleyMarshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747

NewYork, NY 10003

SO ORDEREDHon. Manuel J. Mendez J.S.C.


MAY 0 2 2019

OFF-ICE'CCOUNTY CLERKNEW YORK

O



NYS SUPREME COURT •CIVIL


NAZZARO SERINO and CHRISTINA SERINO


WHEREFORE, defendant, Bucyrus International, hereby requests summary judgment inthe above entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing thecomplaint and cross-claims against defendant, Bucyrus International, with prejudice, and afternotice to all co-defendants there is no opposition,

ORDERED, that all claims and cross claims against defendant Bucyrus International, aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED:

Attorneys for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg ^700 Broadway - 7th floorNew York, NY 10003

Anna M. DiLonardoAttorneys for DefendantBucyrus InternationalMarshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747

SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez J.S.C.

MANUEL J. MENDEZJSC.

¥

litres* •V

MAY 0 2 2019

COUNTYNI;EYOBKOFFICE





JOSEPH SAEVA and NORMA SAEVA


WHEREFORE, defendant, Sur-Seal Gasket & Packing, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against defendant, Sur-Seal Gasket & Packing, with

prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition,

ORDERED, that all claims and cross claims against defendant Sur-Seal Gasket &

Packing, are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

X-DATED: «r -/yn

Andrew M. WarshauerAttorneys for DefendantSur-Seal Gasket & PackingMarshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747

Attorneys for PlaintiBelluck & Fox LLP/546 Fifth AveiwyNew York, NY 10036

th Floor

SO ORDERED Si‘'f t

E.., y

Hon. Manuel J. Mendez J.S.C.

MAY 0 2 2019MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C. 3 Of tIK

1 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

APR 2 6 2019PARI i s

NYS SUPREME COURT Civil

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION


ELIZABETH KELLY, as Executrix for the Estate ofDONALD P. KELLY, and ELIZABETH KELLY,Individually, UNOPPOSED SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Lockheed Martin Corp., hereby requests summary judgment

in the above entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing thecomplaint and cross-claims against defendant, Lockheed Martin Corp., with prejudice, and after

notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition,

ORDERED, that all claims and cross claims against defendant Lockheed Martin Corp.,are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED:A

lV \

Colleen M, CroninAttorneys for DefendantLockheed Martin Corp.Marshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747

WeitzBTCuxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

- 7th floor

SO ORDEREDHon. Manuel J. Mendez J.S.C.i

MAY 0 2 2019MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

I

KSCfPiCl.COUNTY CLEINEW YORK


I PART 13I NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVICIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION


JACK SKELLY




3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Harsco Industrial f/k/a Patterson Kelley,

with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon prior notice to all co-defendants, and absent any opposition, all

claims and cross claims against defendant Harsco Industrial f/k/a Patterson Kelley, be and the

same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

iiiMDATED:

MariaNortel L"Attorneys for DefendantHarsco IndustrialMarshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, SuiteMelville, NY 11747

Attorneys for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 Broadway - 7th floorNew York, NYA 10003

has*

MAY 0 2 2019/^X

SO ORDERED COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORKHon. Manuel J. Mendez J.S.C.

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C


PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - U v i:IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION


MYRIAM GALEANO, Individually and as ProposedExecutrix of the Estate of MANUEL GALEANO,deceased UNOPPOSED SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Sur-Seal Gasket & Packing, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against defendant, Sur-Seal Gasket & Packing, with

prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition,

ORDERED, that all claims and cross claims against defendant Sur-Seal Gasket &

Packing, are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED:

Attorneys for Plaintiff/ l jpBelluck & Fox LLP / /546 Fifth Avenue -|4rth jtfoorNew York, NY 10Q3tr

Andrew M. WarshauerAttorneys for DefendantSur-Seal Gasket & PackingMarshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747

/ VSO ORDEREDHon. Manuel J. Mendez J.S.C.


IRE EG¥!c4iwc::




THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:Index No.121985/99105972/00DORA FREEMAN, as Adminstratrix for the Estate of

MARVIN W. FREEMAN and DORA FREEMAN,Individually,


WHEREFORE, defendant, BMCE Inc., hereby requests summary judgment In the above

entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint and

cross-claims against defendant, BMCE Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants

there is no opposition,

ORDERED, that all claims and cross claims against defendant BMCE Inc., are dismissed

Iwith prejudice and without costs.

Q /O1-' / 1°\DATED:

Andrew M.WarshauerAttorneys for DefendantBMCE Inc.Marshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747

AttorneysforPlaintiffWeitz & Luxenherg700 Broadway - 7th floorNew York, NY 10003

F I L E Ttiv -ts-ai

/ \SO ORDEREDHon. Manuel J. Mendez J.S.C. MAY 0 2 2019

MANUEL J. MENDEZ COUNTY CLERKS OFFICENEW YORK





DORA FREEMAN, as Adminstratrix for the Estate ofMARVIN W. FREEMAN and DORA FREEMAN,Individually,




3212/ dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against defendant, Harsco Industrial f/k/a


ORDERED, that all claims and cross claims against defendant Harsco Industrial f/k/aPatterson Kelley, are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

l/oM /hDATED:

XxAttorndya^for PlaintiffWeitz & LUXOTO^QI700 Broadway - 7th floorNew York, NY 10003

Andrew M. WarshauerAttorneys for DefendantHarsco Industrial f/k/a PattersonKelleyMarshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747 i&

rr\SO ORDERED m «2 mHon. Manuel J. Mendez J. S.C.

S OFFICECOUNTYNSf"oRXMANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

RECESSEDSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK APR 2 6 2019 |

PAH UNY5 SUPREME COURT - CIVItIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION


DORA FREEMAN, as Adminstratrix for the Estate ofMARVIN W. FREEMAN and DORA FREEMAN,Individually,



in the' above entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the

complaint and cross-claims against defendant, Lockheed Martin Cprp., with prejudice, and after


ORDERED, that all claims and cross claims against defendant Lockheed Martin Corp.


9i / oai|iftED:

V \

AttomeysforPliwjtifmWeitz & Luxenberg700 Broadway - 7th floorNew York, NY 10003

Andrew M. WarshauerAttorneys for DefendantLockheed Martin Corp.Marshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747

Cm

SO ORDEREDHon, Manuel J, Mendez J.S.C.

MAY 0 ^ 29,9

COUNTY CLERKS OFFICENEW YORK


APR 2 6 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK


NYCALIAS Part 46(Billings, J.)



CARL KENNETH AYLWARD and FRANCES AYLWARD



in the above entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the

complaint and cross-claims against defendant, Lockheed Martin Corp., with prejudice, and after




DATED:

Sam V. ROggeriAttorneys for DefendantLockheed Martin Corp.Marshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747 tr

700 Broadway - 7th floorNew York, NY 10003

fesra*

/'-NSO ORDERED MAY 0 2 MU


Hon. Manuel J. Mendez J.S.C.MANUEL J. MENDEZ

J.S.C.


PA<RT 13NY$ SUPRSNiE COURT - CIVILIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION


ZINA NEWELL, as Executrix for the Estate of JOHNNEWELL, and ZINA NEWELL, Individually



summary Judgment in the above entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules §




Patterson Kelley, are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.DATED:

Noriel L. Sta, MariaAttorneys for DefendantHarsco IndustrialMarshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747

Attorneys for PlaintiffWeltz & Luxenberg700 Broadway - 7th floorNew York, NY 10003

SO ORDEREDHon. Manuel J. Mendez J.S.C,

MAY 02 2019

COUNTY CLERKNEW YORK

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C. OFFICE'Oo


PART ISNYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION


ERIK JENSEN


WHEREFORE, defendant, BMCE Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the above

entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint and

cross-claims against defendant, BMCE Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants

there is no opposition,

ORDERED, that all claims and cross claims against defendant BMCE Inc., are dismissed

with prejudice and without costs.

1~ n-i°iDATED:

•V;Vi

1'

NorielL. Sta. MariaAttorneys for DefendantBMCE Inc.Marshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747

Attorneys for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 Broadway - 7th floorNew York, NY 10003

SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez J.S.C.

MAY 0 2 2019MANUEL j. MENDEZJ.S.C. OIFICE‘CCOUNTY CLERK

NEW YORKO


NYS SUPREME COURT * CIVILSEB3



ERIK JENSEN



in the above entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the

complaint and cross-claims against defendant, Lockheed Martin Corp., with prejudice, and after




£ --7 -|?DATED:

i* 'Vm u*Noriel L. Sta. Maria

Attorneys for DefendantLockheed Martin Corp.Marshall, Dennehey, WarnerColeman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747

Attorneys for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenoe&g700 Broadway - 7th floorNew York, NY 10003

SO ORDEREDHon. Manuel J. Mendez J.S.C.

am


MAY 0 2 2019

HK'F OFFICECOUNTY CLEMEW YORK





CHARLES DIESSO and PHYLLIS DIESSO








s f i r j ^DATED:

Andrew M. WarshauerAttorneys for DefendantHarsco Industrial f/k/a PattersonKelleyMarshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747

Attorneys for Plaintiff lWeitz & Luxenberg ^—700 Broadway - 7th floorNew York, NY 10003Z(l\t 3

SO ORDERED F 1 LHon. Manuel J. Mendez J.S.C.MAY 0 2 2019


M*NU®L J. MENDEZJ.S.C.




THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:Index No.

CHARLES J. PALMISANO and SUSAN PALMISANO 128019/02105936/03

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER


in the above entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing thecomplaint and cross-claims against defendant, Lockheed Martin Corp., with prejudice, and after


ORDERED, that all claims and cross claims against defendant Lockheed Martin Corp.,are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED:

\ /

/

Colleen M. CroninAttorneys for DefendantLockheed Martin Corp.Marshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747

Attorneys for Plaintiff ^ \Weitz & Luxenberg700 Broadway - 7th floorNew York, NY 10003

SO ORDEREDHon, Manuel J. Mendez J.S.C,

F i L •>


1i

0 2 20BMMi

Documents

Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2019/5/2 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders